technological convergence between developed and developing ...€¦ · technological convergence...
TRANSCRIPT
Technological Convergence Between Developed and pDeveloping Countries
Francisco de la ChesnayeProgram Manager Global Climate ProgramGlobal Climate Program
2011 International Energy WorkshopSt f d U i J l 6 2011Stanford Univ, July 6, 2011
Research question:
• Is there a pattern of technological diffusion and p gconvergence between middle & low income countries and high income countries similar to the pattern observed within high income countries, particularly inobserved within high income countries, particularly in energy-related technologies?
2© 2011 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
Relationship between cost and climate change stabilizationclimate change stabilization
3© 2011 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.Source: Source: IPCC 2007b, Figure TS.9.
Delayed Participation: Regions Enter the Gl b l C liti TiGlobal Coalition over Time
Annex 1 (minus Russia)
BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China)
Remaining Countries
2012 2030 2050 2070
4© 2011 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
Source: Weyant & de la Chesnaye presentation to the National Academies of Science, International Context for America’s Climate Choices
Annex 1 2020 Carbon Prices
$250
$300
ETSAP-TIAM
650 CO2-e 550 CO2-e 450 CO2-e
$150
$200
2005
U.S
.$) FUND
GTEM
IMAGE
IMAGE-BECS
MERGE Optimistic
$
$100$/tC
O2 (
MERGE Optimistic
MERGE Pessimistic
MESSAGE
MESSAGE-NOBECS
MiniCAM - Base
$0
$50 MiniCAM - Lo Tech
POLES
SGM
WITCHFullN.T.E.
DelayN.T.E.
FullN.T.E.
DelayN.T.E.
FullO.S.
DelayO.S.
FullN.T.E.
DelayN.T.E.
FullO.S.
DelayO.S.N.T.E. N.T.E. N.T.E. N.T.E.O.S. O.S. N.T.E. N.T.E.O.S. O.S.
Scenarios that could not be modeled under
5© 2011 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
be modeled under criteria of study.
Source: Weyant & de la Chesnaye presentation to the National Academies of Science, International Context for America’s Climate Choices
Key Characteristics of Selected Climate Economic ModelsClimate Economic Models
Model Model Type Solution Concept Technology Diffusion
AIM A i P ifi I t t d M d l M lti S t G l R i D i E t li it ti i t d ti fAIM: Asian-Pacific Integrated Model(Kainuma, et al, 2007)
Multi-Sector General Equilibrium
Recursive Dynamic Expert elicitation on introduction of new technologies
GEMINI-E3: General Eq. Model of Int. Interaction for Economy-Energy-Env
(Bernard et al, 2006)
Multi-Sector General Equilibrium
Recursive DynamicInstantaneous
EPPA: Emissions Projection and Policy Analysis Model
(Paltsev, et al, 2005)
Multi-Sector General Equilibrium
Recursive Dynamic Endogenously determined depending on technology costs, including fuels, for
each region
MERGE: Model for Evaluating Regional and Global Effects of GHG Reductions
Aggregate General Equilibrium
Intertemporal Optimization Lagged by one or two decades depending on region income leveland Global Effects of GHG Reductions
Policies(Blanford et al, 2009)
Equilibrium on region income level
IMAGE: Integrated Model to Assess the Global Env
(van Vliet et al, 2009)
Market Equilibrium Recursive DynamicInstantaneous
MESSAGE: Model for Energy Supply Strategy Alternatives and Their General
Env. Impact(Krey and Riahi, 2009)
Market Equilibrium Recursive DynamicInstantaneous
MiniCAM: Mini-Climate Assessment Model
Market Equilibrium Recursive Dynamic Instantaneous
6© 2011 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
Model(Calvin et al, 2009)
Different Rates of Technological Convergence and Technology DiffusionCo e ge ce a d ec o ogy us o
Fossil and Advanced Fossil Plants
5 000
4,000
4,500
5,000
non-OECD Ref
2,500
3,000
3,500 OECD Ref
3 deg non-OECD Con F
3 deg OECD Con F
non-OECD Adv Fossil
1 000
1,500
2,000OECD Ref Adv Fossil
-
500
1,000
1971 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100
7© 2011 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
Approximation of the number of fossil fuel power plants based on historical and projected electricity generation data. Sources: Historical data, IEA, 2009; Projections, Blanford et al, 2009.
Research question:
• Is there a pattern of technological diffusion and p gconvergence between middle & low income countries and high income countries similar to the pattern observed within high income countries, particularly inobserved within high income countries, particularly in energy-related technologies?
8© 2011 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
Historical Technological Convergence Between Developed and Developing Countriesp p g
9© 2011 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.Source: Comin and Hobijn (2004)
Research task: add technology measures for energy related sectors and developing countriesgy p g
Electricity
KWhr of electricity produced per unit of real GDP per year
KWhr of electricity produced by coal units
KWhr of electricity produced by gas unitsKWhr of electricity produced by gas units
KWhr of electricity produced by biomass‐waste renewable units
KWhr of electricity produced by wind & solar renewable units
Petroleum refining / fuels
Kiloton of Oil Equivalent (KTOE) per unit of real GDP per year
KTOE of petroleum for Transportation
KTOE of petroleum for Oil Refining (excluding transportation uses)
KTOE of petroleum for Chemical and Petrochemical production
10© 2011 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
KTOE of petroleum for Chemical and Petrochemical production
Obtain data for additional Low- & Middle–Income Countries, focusing on the following large CO2 emitting countriescountries
1. China2. Brazil
1. Nigeria2. Venezuela
3. Indonesia4. Russian Federation5 India
3. Turkey4. South Africa 5 Saudi Arabia5. India
6. Mexico7. South Korea 8 I
5. Saudi Arabia 6. Poland 7. Thailand 8 A ti8. Iran
9. Ukraine 8. Argentina
11© 2011 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
Electricity Generation Convergence Between Developed and Developing Countriesp p g
8 0
Electric Power Generation Convergence Rates
7.0
8.0All Elec (KWh/GDP)
Coal Elec (KWh/GDP)
Gas Elec (KWh/GDP)
Bio‐Waste Elec (KWh/GDP)
5.0
6.0 Wind‐Solar Elec (KWh/GDP)
3.0
4.0
1.0
2.0
12© 2011 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.12
0.0
1971 1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007
Electricity Generation Convergence Between Developed and Developing Countriesp p g
3 0
Electric Power Generation Convergence Rates
2.5
3.0All Elec (KWh/GDP)
Coal Elec (KWh/GDP)
Gas Elec (KWh/GDP)
2.0
Bio‐Waste Elec (KWh/GDP)
1.0
1.5
0.5
13© 2011 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.13
0.0
1971 1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007
Petroleum-related Technological Convergence Between Developed and Developing Countriesp p g
3 0
Petroleum Related Convergence Rates
2.5
3.0Transport Oil (KTOE/GDP)
Oil Refining (KTOE/GDP)
Chem/PetroChen (KTOE/GDP)
2.0
1.0
1.5
0.5
14© 2011 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.14
0.0
1971 1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007
Results on Speed of Convergence
Estimates of βs and the speed of convergence, in percent, for selected technologies All Electricity Coal Electricity Gas Electricity Bio‐Waste
ElectricityWind‐Solar Electric
0.71(0 05)
0.43(0 22)
0.85(0 07)
0.83(0 11)
0.56(0 16)(0.05)
34%R‐2 = 0.66
(0.22)86%
R‐2 = 0.67
(0.07)16%
R‐2 = 0.67
(0.11)19%
R‐2 = 0.50
(0.16)57%
R‐2 = 0.18
Transportation Oil
RefineriesOil
Chemical Petrochemical
0.58(0 07)
0.92(0 03)
0.77(0 06)(0.07)
54%R‐2 = 0.37
(0.03)8.4%
R‐2 = 0.90
(0.06)27%
R‐2 = 0.70Standard errors are in parenthesis. Speed of convergence is calculated as ‐ln(β).
15© 2011 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conclusions
• There is an observed pattern of technological convergence between developed and developing countries in the observedbetween developed and developing countries in the observed data, i.e., more detailed assessment of electric generation and petroleum-related technologies.
• For electric generation technologies, convergence is faster g g , gbetween developed and developing countries than that observed between OECD countries.
• This is the same for oil refining, however, transportation and chemical production show very distinct patterns.
• Key insight # 1: Patterns and speed of convergence with a technology group (all electricity) can be very different (gas vs
l)coal). • Key insight # 2: Newer technologies (wind and solar) exhibit
much faster convergence rates than stable technologies.
16© 2011 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
• Take away: Details within technology groups matter; more detail the better for specifying convergence rates.