technical report on the june 30, 2012 update of the mineral … · 2016-12-06 · technical report...

Technical Report on

the June 30, 2012 Update of the Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves,

La India Gold Project, Municipality of Sahuaripa, Sonora, Mexico

North American Datum 27, UTM (Zone 12): 709,000 metres East, 3,174,000 metres North

PREPARED FOR

Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited

145 King Street East, Suite 400

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

M5C 2Y7

Telephone: / 416.947.1212

Facsimile: / 416.367.4681

BY

Daniel Doucet, ing.

Tim Haldane, P.Eng.

Michel Julien, P.Eng.

August 31, 2012

La India Project Technical Report, 31 August, 2012

ii

Date and Signature Page The data on which the contained Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimate for the La India project is based were current as of the Effective Date, August 31, 2012. The undersigned are all qualified persons and were responsible for preparing or supervising the preparation of parts of this Technical Report, as described in Item 2.

(Signed by) Daniel Doucet

Date: October 12, 2012

Daniel Doucet, ing.

(OIQ #39106); (sealed)

(Signed by) Tim Haldane


Tim Haldane, P.Eng.

(Arizona (Mining) #25048), (sealed)

(Signed by) Michel R. Julien


Michel R. Julien, Eng., P.Eng. (QC, NL, NWT and Nunavut)

(OIQ #42119, PEGNL#03033, NAPEG), (sealed)


iii

Contents DATE AND SIGNATURE PAGE ..................................................................................................... II

SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 1 ITEM 1.1.1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION........................................................................... 1 1.2 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND DEPOSIT TYPE ......................................................................... 1 1.3 EXPLORATION .................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 MINING METHODS .............................................................................................................. 2 1.5 RECOVERY METHODS ........................................................................................................ 3 1.6 MINERAL RESOURCE AND RESERVE ESTIMATES ................................................................. 3 1.7 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS................................................................................. 5 1.8 RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................................... 6

INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 8 ITEM 2.2.1 TERMS OF REFERENCE ....................................................................................................... 8 2.2 SOURCES OF INFORMATION................................................................................................ 9 2.3 QUALIFIED PERSONS .......................................................................................................... 9

RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS ......................................................................... 13 ITEM 3. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ..................................................... 14 ITEM 4.

4.1 AREA AND LOCATION ...................................................................................................... 14 4.2 CLAIMS AND TITLE .......................................................................................................... 15 4.3 SURFACE RIGHTS ............................................................................................................. 19 4.4 ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES ......................................................................................... 21 4.5 PERMITS .......................................................................................................................... 21 4.6 SIGNIFICANT FACTORS AND RISKS................................................................................... 23

ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE ITEM 5.AND PHYSIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................... 24

5.1 PHYSIOGRAPHY AND CLIMATE ........................................................................................ 24 5.2 INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................................................................ 25 5.3 WATER SOURCES ............................................................................................................. 25

HISTORY ...................................................................................................................... 28 ITEM 6.6.1 EXPLORATION BY GRAYD RESOURCE CORP., 2004 THROUGH 2011 ................................ 29 6.2 RESOURCE ESTIMATES, 2008 THROUGH 2010 .................................................................. 30

GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION .......................................... 33 ITEM 7.7.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY ....................................................................................................... 33 7.2 LOCAL AND PROPERTY GEOLOGY ................................................................................... 35 7.3 MINERALIZATION ............................................................................................................ 38

DEPOSIT TYPE ........................................................................................................... 45 ITEM 8. EXPLORATION .......................................................................................................... 47 ITEM 9.

DRILLING .................................................................................................................... 47 ITEM 10.10.1 DIAMOND DRILLING ........................................................................................................ 50


iv

10.2 REVERSE CIRCULATION DRILLING................................................................................... 51 10.3 RECOVERY FACTORS ....................................................................................................... 51

SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY .................................. 53 ITEM 11.11.1 SAMPLING METHOD, NATURE, SPACING, SECURITY AND ON-SITE PREPARATION ........... 53 11.2 SAMPLE PREPARATION AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES ................................................. 54 11.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL PRACTICES ............................................ 57 11.4 OPINION ON ADEQUACY OF SAMPLE PREPARATION, SECURITY AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES .............................................................................................................................. 66 11.5 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................ 67

DATA VERIFICATION .............................................................................................. 69 ITEM 12.12.1 INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF DATABASE AND INDEPENDENT SAMPLING ................... 69 12.2 DIAMOND DRILL HOLE CORE RECOVERY ANALYSIS ....................................................... 71 12.3 RC SAMPLE RECOVERY ANALYSIS .................................................................................. 74 12.4 OPINION ON ADEQUACY OF THE LA INDIA DRILL-HOLE DATABASE ................................ 77

MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING ........................ 78 ITEM 13.13.1 SAMPLE COMPOSITES TESTED ......................................................................................... 78 13.2 SAMPLE PREPARATION .................................................................................................... 78 13.3 ROCK DENSITY ................................................................................................................ 79 13.4 BOND WORK INDEX ......................................................................................................... 79 13.5 HEAD ANALYSES ............................................................................................................. 79 13.6 BOTTLE ROLL LEACH TESTS ............................................................................................ 80 13.7 GRAVITY CONCENTRATION ............................................................................................. 80 13.8 FLOTATION ...................................................................................................................... 80 13.9 AGGLOMERATION AND PERCOLATION TESTS .................................................................. 80 13.10 LABORATORY COLUMN LEACH TESTS FOR GOLD RECOVERY ..................................... 81

MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES ..................................................................... 83 ITEM 14.14.1 DATA ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................. 83 14.2 CORE VERSUS RC DRILL RESULTS .................................................................................. 86 14.3 COMPOSITES .................................................................................................................... 89 14.4 VARIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................. 90 14.5 BULK DENSITY ................................................................................................................ 92 14.6 BLOCK MODELS .............................................................................................................. 92 14.7 GRADE INTERPOLATION ................................................................................................... 93 14.8 CLASSIFICATION .............................................................................................................. 95 14.9 JUNE 30, 2012 RESOURCE ESTIMATE (INCLUSIVE OF RESERVES) .................................... 96 14.10 MODEL VERIFICATION ................................................................................................. 98 14.11 JUNE 30, 2012 RESOURCE ESTIMATE (EXCLUSIVE OF RESERVES) ................................ 99 14.12 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................. 99

MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES ...................................................................... 100 ITEM 15.15.1 OPEN PIT OPTIMIZATION ............................................................................................... 100 15.2 PIT DESIGNS .................................................................................................................. 104


v

15.3 LA INDIA MINERAL RESERVES AS OF JUNE 30, 2012 ..................................................... 104

MINING OPERATIONS ........................................................................................... 107 ITEM 16.16.1 MINING OPERATIONS ..................................................................................................... 107 16.2 MINE PRODUCTION SCHEDULE ...................................................................................... 114 16.3 MINE EQUIPMENT SELECTION AND FLEET REQUIREMENTS ........................................... 115 16.4 MINE PERSONNEL .......................................................................................................... 117 16.5 MINE OPERATING COST SUMMARY ............................................................................... 117

RECOVERY METHODS .......................................................................................... 119 ITEM 17.17.1 PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND DESIGN CRITERIA .............................................................. 119 17.2 PROCESS SERVICES ........................................................................................................ 123

PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................................. 125 ITEM 18.18.1 ACCESS ROAD ............................................................................................................... 125 18.2 CAMP ............................................................................................................................. 125 18.3 CENTRAL OPERATING AREA .......................................................................................... 125 18.4 ORE PROCESSING FACILITIES ......................................................................................... 126 18.5 PAD AND PONDS ............................................................................................................ 127 18.6 SEWAGE AND WASTE..................................................................................................... 127 18.7 SECURITY AND FENCING ................................................................................................ 127 18.8 CONSTRUCTION ............................................................................................................. 127

MARKET STUDIES AND CONTRACTS .............................................................. 129 ITEM 19.19.1 MAJOR CONTRACTS ....................................................................................................... 129

ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING, AND SOCIAL AND ITEM 20.COMMUNITY IMPACTS .............................................................................................................. 130

20.1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND ISSUES ......................................................................... 130 20.2 WASTE DISPOSAL, SITE MONITORING AND WATER NANAGEMENT ............................... 131 20.3 PROJECT PERMITTING..................................................................................................... 136 20.4 POTENTIAL SOCIAL OR COMMUNITY RELATED REQUIREMENTS AND PLANS ................. 136 20.5 MINE CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS ................................................................. 137

CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ESTIMATES ............................................. 142 ITEM 21.21.1 CAPITAL COSTS ............................................................................................................. 142 21.2 OPERATING COSTS ......................................................................................................... 144

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS .......................................................................................... 147 ITEM 22.22.1 ASSUMPTIONS, ECONOMIC CRITERIA, AND INPUTS ........................................................ 147 22.2 CASH FLOW ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE................................................ 148 22.3 TAXES AND ROYALTIES ................................................................................................. 149 22.4 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ................................................................................................. 150

ADJACENT PROPERTIES ...................................................................................... 151 ITEM 23. OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION............................................ 153 ITEM 24. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS.......................................................... 153 ITEM 25.


vi

RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................... 154 ITEM 26. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... 155 ITEM 27.

NOTES TO INVESTORS REGARDING THE USE OF RESOURCES ................................... 160

APPENDICES .................................................................................................................................. 161 APPENDIX 12.1 – CORE SAMPLES NOT USED FOR RESOURCE ESTIMATION ................................ 161 APPENDIX 12.2 – RC SAMPLES NOT USED FOR RESOURCE ESTIMATION .................................... 171 APPENDIX 13.1 – SUMMARY OF TEST WORK PERFORMED BY KCA ........................................... 215 APPENDIX 13.2 – SAMPLE COMPOSITES TESTED ....................................................................... 218 APPENDIX 13.2A – BULK DENSITY DATA FROM KAPPES CASSIDAY AND ASSOCIATES .............. 225 APPENDIX 13.3 – SUMMARY BOTTLE ROLL LEACH TEST RESULTS PERFORMED BY KCA ....... 228 APPENDIX 13.4 – LABORATORY COLUMN LEACH TEST WORK ................................................. 230 APPENDIX 14.1 – SEMI-VARIOGRAMS, MAIN AND NORTH ZONES OF LA INDIA DEPOSIT, GEOLOGICAL DOMAINS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 12, 17, AND 18 ........................................................................................ 238 APPENDIX 14.2 – INTERSECTIONS FROM THE MAIN AND NORTH ZONES OF LA INDIA DEPOSIT USED IN RESOURCE ESTIMATION ............................................................................................................. 266 APPENDIX 17.1 – DESIGN CRITERIA .......................................................................................... 286 APPENDIX 21.1 – GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATION OPERATING COST DETAIL ........................... 298


vii

LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 4.1 – LOCATION MAP ................................................................................................................ 14 FIGURE 4.2 – CONCESSION MAP. CLAIM REFERENCE NUMBERS AS IN TABLE 4.1 ................................... 17 FIGURE 4.3 – SURFACE RIGHTS MAP, RESERVES AND RESOURCES AREA, LA INDIA PROJECT .................. 19 FIGURE 5.1 – LA CHIPRIONA RESERVOIR AND INFILTRATION ZONE- LOCATED ON AEM PROPERTY ..... 26 FIGURE 7.1 – REGIONAL GEOLOGIC MAP, SUMMARIZED FROM SERVICIO GEOLOGICO MEXICANO (2009) .............................................................................................................................................................. 34 FIGURE 7.2 – VOLCANIC STRATIGRAPHIC COLUMN OF THE LA INDIA AREA AS DETERMINED BY T. LONGO .................................................................................................................................................. 36 FIGURE 7.3 – DRILL-HOLE FENCE DIAGRAM THROUGH VIRUELA - LA CRUZ ZONE LOOKING NORTHEAST .............................................................................................................................................................. 37 FIGURE 7.4 – SECTION 706,300E, CIENEGUITA AREA, NORTH ZONE SHOWING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MINERALIZATION TYPE DOMAINS 12, 14 AND 18 LOOKING WEST .......................................................... 40 FIGURE 7.5 – SECTION 3,179,175, CIENEGUITA AREA, NORTH ZONE SHOWING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MINERALIZATION TYPE DOMAINS 11, 12 AND 18 LOOKING NORTH ........................................................ 41 FIGURE 7.6 – SECTION 3,176,600, LA VIRUELA AREA SHOWING TYPICAL MORPHOLOGIES AND SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS OF MAIN ZONE MINERALIZATION TYPE DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3 LOOKING NORTH ........... 43 FIGURE 7.7 – SECTION 3,176,100, LA CRUZ AREA SHOWING TYPICAL MORPHOLOGIES AND SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS OF MAIN ZONE MINERALIZATION TYPE DOMAINS 5 AND 6 LOOKING NORTH ................ 44 FIGURE 7.8 – SECTION 3,176,500N, LA VIRUELA WEST AREA SHOWING MORPHOLOGY OF MAIN ZONE MINERALIZATION TYPE DOMAIN 7 LOOKING NORTH .............................................................................. 44 FIGURE 10.1 – NORTH ZONE: LOCATION MAP OF THE COLLARS OF DIAMOND AND REVERSE CIRCULATION DRILL HOLES USED IN THE JUNE 30, 2012 RESERVE AND RESOURCE ESTIMATE ................ 48 FIGURE 10.2 – MAIN ZONE: LOCATION MAP OF THE COLLARS OF DIAMOND AND REVERSE CIRCULATION DRILL HOLES USED IN THE JUNE 30, 2012 RESERVE AND RESOURCE ESTIMATE ...................................... 49 FIGURE 11.1 – GOLD ASSAYS, CERTIFIED BLANK SAMPLES .................................................................... 58 FIGURE 11.2 – GOLD ASSAYS, CERTIFIED BLANKS AND SAMPLES IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING BLANKS, 2006 THROUGH MAY 23, 2012 DRILL PROGRAMS .................................................................................. 59 FIGURE 11.3 – CHART OF PERCENT DIFFERENCE OF THE STANDARDS IN TABLE 11.3 FROM REFERENCE VALUES, ALS CHEMEX ASSAY RESULTS, AS FUNCTION OF STANDARD REFERENCE VALUE IN PPM GOLD61 FIGURE 11.4 – PERCENTILE PLOT OF ABSOLUTE RELATIVE DIFFERENCES OF FIELD, PREPARATION, AND LAB DUPLICATES.................................................................................................................................... 62 FIGURE 11.5 – PLOT COMPARING REGULAR FIRE ASSAY AND SCREEN FIRE ASSAY ANALYTICAL RESULTS. .............................................................................................................................................................. 64 FIGURE 11.6 – PLOT COMPARING ACME AND ALS CHEMEX FIRE ASSAY ANALYTICAL RESULTS ........... 65 FIGURE 11.7 – PERCENT RELATIVE DIFFERENCE, ACME CHECK ASSAY VS. ALS CHEMEX ASSAY ........ 66 FIGURE 12.1 – FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION, GOLD PPM, BY CORE RECOVERY CLASSIFICATION (>50% VS. <50%) ................................................................................................................................................... 73 FIGURE 12.2 – HISTOGRAM SHOWING RECOVERED RC SAMPLE WEIGHTS ............................................. 75 FIGURE 12.3 – CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY, GOLD ASSAYS, LOW- AND HIGH-RECOVERY RC SAMPLE DATASETS .............................................................................................................................................. 76 FIGURE 14.1 – LOCATION MAP SHOWING MINERALIZED ZONES AND DRILL-HOLE COLLARS .................. 84


viii

FIGURE 14.2 – LOGNORMAL CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY PLOT FOR GOLD IN CORE AND RC DRILL SAMPLES, MAIN A ZONE ....................................................................................................................... 87 FIGURE 14.3 – LOGNORMAL CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY PLOT FOR GOLD IN CORE AND RC DRILL SAMPLES, MAIN B ZONE ........................................................................................................................ 88 FIGURE 14.4 – LOGNORMAL CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY PLOT FOR GOLD IN CORE AND RC DRILL SAMPLES, NORTH ZONE ......................................................................................................................... 88 FIGURE 14.5 – DISTRIBUTION OF THE SAMPLE LENGTH, USED TO DETERMINE THE COMPOSITE LENGTH 89 FIGURE 15.1 – GEOTECHNICAL STRUCTURAL DOMAIN CONSIDERATIONS FOR LA INDIA PITS. NOTE THAT “SOUTH PIT” INDICATES THE MAIN PIT. ............................................................................................... 102 FIGURE 16.1 – BASE CASE OPEN PIT LERCHS-GROSSMANN SHELLS, AREAS FOR VALUE RANKING. ..... 108 FIGURE 16.2 – NORTH ZONE DESIGN PITS USED FOR SCHEDULING, SEQUENCED BY VALUE RANKING FROM HIGHEST RANKING (NP21) TO LOWEST RANKING (NP25) .......................................................... 109 FIGURE 16.3 – MAIN ZONE DESIGN PITS USED FOR SCHEDULING, SEQUENCED BY VALUE RANKING FROM HIGHEST RANKING (MP21) TO LOWEST RANKING (MP25) ................................................................... 110 FIGURE 16.4 – LA INDIA PROJECT ULTIMATE PIT DESIGNS IN THE NORTH ZONE AREA ......................... 111 FIGURE 16.5 – LA INDIA PROJECT ULTIMATE PIT DESIGNS IN THE MAIN ZONE AREA ........................... 112 FIGURE 16.6 – PIT DESIGN SLOPE PARAMETER FOR NORTH AND MAIN PITS ........................................ 113 FIGURE 16.7 – ULTIMATE MINE LAYOUT SHOWING ROADS, DUMPS, THE LEACH PAD AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE. ADR PLANT = ADSORPTION/DESORPTION/REFINING PLANT. ................................ 114 FIGURE 17.1 – SIMPLIFIED PROCESS FLOWSHEET FOR LA INDIA OPERATION ....................................... 120 FIGURE 18.1 – CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE FOR THE LA INDIA MINE PROJECT ...................................... 128 FIGURE 23.1 – ADJACENT EXPLORATION PROPERTIES MAP .................................................................. 152


ix

List of Tables TABLE 1.1 – MINERAL RESOURCE AND RESERVE STATEMENT, LA INDIA OPEN PIT MINE PROJECT AS OF JUNE 30, 2012 ......................................................................................................................................... 5 TABLE 2.1 – RESPONSIBILITIES OF EACH QUALIFIED PERSON ................................................................ 10 TABLE 4.1 – LA INDIA PROJECT MINING CONCESSIONS .......................................................................... 16 TABLE 4.2 – PERMITS REQUIRED FOR LA INDIA MINE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION ........................ 22 TABLE 6.1 – EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES BY GRAYD RESOURCE CORP. ON LA INDIA PROPERTY FROM JANUARY 2004 THROUGH NOVEMBER 20, 2011 .................................................................................... 29 TABLE 6.2 – LA INDIA PROJECT NI43-101-COMPLIANT MINERAL INFERRED RESOURCE ESTIMATE BY GRAYD RESOURCE CORP. AS OF FEBRUARY 2008 INCLUDING ALL MATERIAL TYPES IN ALL AREAS (GRAY AND GIROUX, 2008) ................................................................................................................... 30 TABLE 6.3 – LA INDIA PROJECT NI43-101-COMPLIANT INDICATED RESOURCE ESTIMATE BY GRAYD RESOURCE CORP. AS OF FEBRUARY 2009 INCLUDING OXIDE AND SULPHIDE MATERIAL IN ALL AREAS (GRAY AND GIROUX, 2009) ................................................................................................................... 31 TABLE 6.4 – LA INDIA PROJECT NI43-101-COMPLIANT INFERRED RESOURCE ESTIMATE BY GRAYD RESOURCE CORP. AS OF FEBRUARY 2009 INCLUDING OXIDE AND SULPHIDE MATERIAL IN ALL AREAS (GRAY AND GIROUX, 2009) ................................................................................................................... 31 TABLE 6.5 – LA INDIA PROJECT NI43-101-COMPLIANT MEASURED AND INDICATED RESOURCE ESTIMATE BY GRAYD RESOURCE CORP. AS OF MAY 2010 INCLUDING OXIDE AND SULPHIDE MATERIAL IN ALL AREAS (GRAY AND GIROUX, 2010) ....................................................................................................... 32 TABLE 6.6 – LA INDIA PROJECT NI43-101-COMPLIANT INFERRED RESOURCE ESTIMATE BY GRAYD RESOURCE CORP. AS OF MAY 2010 INCLUDING OXIDE AND SULPHIDE MATERIAL IN ALL AREAS (GRAY AND GIROUX, 2010) .............................................................................................................................. 32 TABLE 11.1 – ELEMENT CONCENTRATIONS ANALYZED AND ANALYTICAL LIMITS. ................................ 57 TABLE 11.2 – STANDARDS SED IN ASSAYS FOR THE LA INDIA QA/QC PROGRAM, 2004 THROUGH MAY 23, 2012 ................................................................................................................................................ 60 TABLE 11.3 – SUMMARY OF ASSAY RESULTS OF CERTIFIED STANDARDS FROM 2004 THROUGH MAY 23, 2012 ...................................................................................................................................................... 61 TABLE 12.1 – GOLD ASSAYS OF INDEPENDENT SAMPLES COLLECTED BY CONSULTANT MATTHEW GRAY .............................................................................................................................................................. 71 TABLE 12.2 – SUMMARY STATISTICS, DRILL CORE RECOVERY .............................................................. 72 TABLE 12.3 – SUMMARY STATISTICS, GOLD ASSAYS, HIGH-RECOVERY (>50%) AND LOW-RECOVERY (<50%) SAMPLE SUBSETS ...................................................................................................................... 73 TABLE 13.1 – BOND WORK INDEX TEST RESULTS ................................................................................. 79 TABLE 13.2 – SUMMARY OF LA INDIA GOLD AND SILVER RECOVERIES BY GEOLOGICAL DOMAIN ......... 81 TABLE 14.1 – SUMMARY OF GOLD IN ASSAYS IN THE MAIN ZONE SORTED BY GEOLOGIC DOMAINS ...... 85 TABLE 14.2 – CAPPING STRATEGY FOR MAIN ZONE .............................................................................. 85 TABLE 14.3 – SUMMARY OF CAPPED GOLD IN ASSAYS IN MAIN ZONE ................................................... 85 TABLE 14.4 – SUMMARY OF GOLD IN ASSAYS AT NORTH ZONE SORTED BY GEOLOGIC DOMAINS .......... 86 TABLE 14.5 – CAPPING STRATEGY FOR NORTH ZONE ........................................................................... 86 TABLE 14.6 – SUMMARY OF CAPPED GOLD IN ASSAYS IN NORTH ZONE ................................................ 86


x

TABLE 14.7 – SUMMARY OF GOLD IN 1.5-M COMPOSITES AT MAIN ZONE SORTED BY GEOLOGIC DOMAINS ............................................................................................................................................... 89 TABLE 14.8 – SUMMARY OF GOLD IN 1.5-M COMPOSITES AT NORTH ZONE SORTED BY GEOLOGIC DOMAINS ............................................................................................................................................... 90 TABLE 14.9 – SUMMARY OF SEMIVARIOGRAM PARAMETERS FOR GOLD ................................................ 90 TABLE 14.10 – SUMMARY OF ROCK DENSITIES; SG = SPECIFIC GRAVITY ............................................... 92 TABLE 14.11 – SUMMARY OF THE GRADE INTERPOLATION (ID2) PER SEARCH PARAMETERS – NORTH ZONE ..................................................................................................................................................... 93 TABLE 14.12 – SUMMARY OF ID2 SEARCH PARAMETERS – MAIN ZONE ................................................ 94 TABLE 14.13 – COMPARISON OF THE JUNE 30, 2012 MEASURED, INDICATED AND INFERRED RESOURCES ESTIMATES (INCLUSIVE OF RESERVES) TO THE DECEMBER 2010 RESOURCE ESTIMATE, MAIN AND NORTH ZONES, INCLUDING OXIDE AND SULPHIDE MATERIAL ............................................................................. 97 TABLE 14.14 – MINERAL RESOURCE COMPILATION, LA INDIA PROJECT, JUNE 30, 2012 (EXCLUSIVE OF RESERVES) ............................................................................................................................................. 99 TABLE 15.1 – LA INDIA PIT SLOPE PARAMETERS UTILIZED FOR PIT OPTIMIZATION .............................. 101 TABLE 15.2 – ECONOMIC PARAMETERS USED FOR PIT OPTIMIZATION .................................................. 103 TABLE 15.3 – PROBABLE RESERVES IN THE NORTH AND MAIN ZONES ................................................ 105 TABLE 15.4 – MINERAL RESOURCE AND RESERVE STATEMENT, LA INDIA OPEN PIT MINE PROJECT AS OF JUNE 30, 2012 ..................................................................................................................................... 106 TABLE 16.1 – FEASIBILITY STUDY PIT DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR NORTH AND MAIN PITS ................... 113 TABLE 16.2 – MINE PRODUCTION SCHEDULING PARAMETERS ............................................................. 115 TABLE 16.3 – LIFE OF MINE PRODUCTION SCHEDULE .......................................................................... 115 TABLE 16.4 – MAJOR MINING EQUIPMENT FLEET REQUIREMENTS ....................................................... 117 TABLE 16.5 – YEARLY MINE OPERATING COSTS .................................................................................. 118 TABLE 17.1 – PROCESS OPERATING COSTS ESTIMATE .......................................................................... 124 TABLE 20.1 – CLOSURE COSTS, HEAP LEACH FACILITIES ..................................................................... 141 TABLE 21.1 – LA INDIA MINE PROJECT CAPITAL EXPENDITURES ESTIMATE ......................................... 143 TABLE 21.2 – PROCESS AND INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES ............................................. 144 TABLE 21.3 – LA INDIA MINE PROJECT ESTIMATED OPERATING COSTS ................................................ 145 TABLE 21.4 – ESTIMATED LA INDIA MINE PERSONNEL OVER THE LIFE OF MINE ................................. 146 TABLE 22.1 – GOLD PRODUCTION FORECAST FOR THE LA INDIA MINE, 2013-2022 ............................. 147 TABLE 22.2 – PRE-TAX CASH FLOWS FOR THE LA INDIA MINE BY YEAR ($ 000) .................................. 148 TABLE 22.3 – LA INDIA INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN (IRR) AND NET PRESENT VALUE (NPV) SENSITIVITY TO CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS AND THE GOLD PRICE ................................................................... 150


1

Summary Item 1.The La India gold-silver project in Sonora, Mexico, is a mine development project 100% controlled by Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited (Agnico-Eagle). Agnico-Eagle is a publicly owned company based in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, whose shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange, and is a “Producing Issuer” according to the rules and definitions provided by the Canadian Securities Administrators.

Agnico-Eagle acquired the La India property in November 2011 as part of the acquisition of Grayd Resource Corporation (Grayd). Grayd had explored the property since 2004 and had prepared a preliminary economic assessment (PEA) of the La India project at the end of 2010 based on a June 2010 NI 43-101-compliant resource estimate.

Infill drilling at the La India project from November 2011 to May 23, 2012 allowed Agnico-Eagle to confirm and expand the mineral resources reported in the December 2010 PEA. On August 31, 2012, Agnico-Eagle staff completed a feasibility study for the construction of a multi-pit mine and heap leach operation on the La India deposit. La India’s first mineral reserves were estimated as of June 30, 2012, based on the results of the feasibility study.

A September 4, 2012 news release announced that Agnico-Eagle’s Board of Directors had approved the development of the La India mine on those initial reserves, based on the results of the economic analysis in the feasibility study. This technical report summarizes the scientific and technical information used to support those reserves. It has been prepared by Agnico-Eagle’s staff and Qualified Persons based in Mexico at the Chihuahua regional office, and in Canada at the regional office at Preissac, Quebec and the Toronto head office.

1.1 Property Description and Location

The La India property in the municipality of Sahuaripa, Sonora State, Mexico, comprises 57,614 hectares in 45 mining concessions; all of these claims are in good legal standing. The property is in the Sierra Madre Mountains of northern Mexico, between the towns of Tarachi and Matarachi, and approximately 210 km east-southeast of the city of Hermosillo. Most basic services are available in Sahuaripa, 15 km to the north. Agnico-Eagle’s Pinos Altos and Creston Mascota mines are 70 km to the southeast.

The topography consists of long ridges separated by steep V-shaped valleys ranging in elevation from 1,200 m to more than 2,000 m above sea level, with areas of low relief suitable for building mine-related infrastructure. The climate is semi-arid, with seasonal temperatures ranging from 35°C to -2°C. The area experiences torrential rainfall from July to September; the driest months are March to May.

1.2 Geological setting and deposit type

The La India project lies within the Sierra Madre Occidental (SMO) province, a 2-km-thick, regionally extensive Eocene to Miocene volcanic field. The volcanic field is comprised of two distinct volcanic sequences—an older andesitic and dacitic series, and a younger pyroclastic-


2

dominated rhyolitic series. Most significant metal occurrences in the SMO are hosted by the Lower Series or the underlying Mesozoic strata.

The La India project lies within the western limits of the SMO in an area dominated by outcrops of Lower Series andesitic to dacitic tuffs that were intruded by granodiorite and diorite stocks and overlain by rhyolitic tuffs, basaltic andesite lavas, and a large pile of late conglomerates. These rocks lie within a northwest-trending zone of Miocene extension.

The mineral occurrences present and being sought are volcanic-hosted, epithermal, high-sulphidation gold-silver deposits, as veins and/or disseminated deposits. The North Zone comprising the Cieneguita, Española, Cochis and La India areas is underlain by andesitic and felsic fragmental volcanic strata. The silicified zones outcrop as prominent ridge-capping units and dip slopes, and are 30 to 60 m thick, with down-dip extent of 300 m or more. The Main Zone target area is comprised of the La Viruela, La Cruz, and Cerro de Oro areas. Locally, auriferous hydrothermal breccias are developed along high-angle faults and they appear to postdate all other alteration and mineralization events. The North and Main zones have been the focus of drill-testing, and host the mineral resource described in this report.

1.3 Exploration

The previous owner, Grayd Resource Corporation, commenced exploration of the La India property in January 2004, and Agnico-Eagle has continued these activities since acquiring the project. Detailed and regional geologic mapping and rock chip sampling has been conducted for approximately one third of the claim block, with activities focused on the La India concessions, the Tarachi concessions, the La Viruela - La Cruz area, and the central portion of the Triple A claim. Other exploration has included airborne electromagnetic and magnetic geophysical surveys, photogrammetric topographic mapping to 2-m contour intervals, terrestrial induced polarization geophysical surveys, diamond core drilling, and reverse circulation drilling. Alteration zones have been rock chip sampled, and representative samples of the alteration zones have been analyzed by short wave infrared spectrography to determine alteration mineral assemblages.

The current mineral resource and reserve estimate used drill sample data from January 2004 to May 23, 2012, which included 189 diamond drill holes (16,647 m) and 631 reverse circulation drill holes (54,470 m) at the North and Main zones of the La India deposit.

1.4 Mining methods

Due to the low-grade and near-surface nature of the La India mineral deposit, open pit mining has been chosen as the most economic method to extract the ore. The August 2012 feasibility study produced by Agnico-Eagle included determining the economic pit limits, detailed pit designs, calculating in pit resources and production scheduling, based on a mineral resource model dated June 30, 2012. Mining, capital and operating cost estimates were estimated for the mine plan based on actual costs from Agnico-Eagle’s Pinos Altos and Mascota mines.

The base case Lerchs-Grossmann (LG) analysis presented in Item 15 generated a number of pit shells in the areas of the North and Main zones. Some of these pit shells are small distinct cones but are in


3

close proximity to each other and could be mined more efficiently when combined together. The grouped LG pits were converted to three designed pits (North, Central and Main) using double benching (two 6-m benches), a 7.6-m-wide berm between every double bench stack and 45° inter-ramp slopes to get a truer estimate of waste rock and stripping ratio. Pit ramps should have a maximum slope of 10% based on industry standards, and a bank face angle of 70° is assumed based on rock types and geologic structures. The combined pits were modified to accommodate 90-tonne off-road trucks. Access roads to the working areas will be single-lane at 9.2 m wide, but active haulage roads will be 30 m wide, which is sufficient for two-way traffic with berms and ditches. This provided the basis for scheduling annual production rates, used to estimate the mine equipment and personnel requirements. It also reflects the sequence of mining the pits in order to allow the construction of the leach pad that will be located just west of the North Zone.

The North pit will have final dimensions of 1,499 m long by approximately 952 m wide and 222 m deep. The Central pit will have final dimensions of 525 m long by 340 m wide and 176 m deep. The Main pit will measure 1,463 m long by 670 m wide and 304 m deep.

No preproduction stripping will be necessary as there is no waste capping the deposits. The overall stripping ratio of waste to ore will be 0.99:1. Feed to the crushing plant and leach pad will total 44.6 million tonnes at a grade of 0.65 g/t gold over the life of the mine, which is projected at eight years.

1.5 Recovery Methods

Significant metallurgical testing has been conducted for La India project since 2007, including representative samples from the different ore zones and varying lithologies. Crushing followed by heap leaching and carbon adsorption was selected as the most favourable method for extracting gold and silver from the La India ore. Higher grade material was tested for gravity concentration of gold and silver, but poor results led to the rejection of this method of extraction.

An agglomeration and percolation test determined that a crush size of 100% -25 mm would be satisfactory, to be achieved by a three-stage crushing plant. It was determined that cement should be added to the crushed rock for pH control and additional stability of the heap.

Sample composites of the various Domains of mineralization were generated for the column and bottle-roll leach tests. The weighted average gold recovery determined from these tests, excluding high-sulphide materials was 85.1%. For the purposes of this technical report, a metallurgical gold recovery of 80% was applied, reflecting a more conservative estimate to be expected from field conditions vs. laboratory results.

The process flowsheet is based on an ore processing rate of 6.0 million dry tonnes per year (17,250 dry tonnes per day).

1.6 Mineral resource and reserve estimates

Subsequent to acquiring the project, Agnico-Eagle produced an internal mineral resource estimate for the La India deposit by updating the previous ore models with new drilling results and using three-year trailing averages for metals prices fixed as of May 1, 2012, at $1,342/ounce for gold and $23.00/ounce for silver. This resource estimate was used in the economic analysis of the project.


4

Following additional drilling through May 23, 2012, Agnico-Eagle completed the current resource and reserve estimate for the oxide and sulphide resources in the Main and North zones of the La India deposit as of June 30, 2012.

The database for the La India project consists of drill-hole data from the North Zone and the Main Zone. Agnico-Eagle’s Technical Services group updated the Main Zone geological model, differentiating six separate mineralized domains and one waste domain. The group also produced a geologic solid model for the North Zone differentiating five separate mineralized domains, some similar to the Main Zone, and a waste unit.

A study comparing core assays to RC assays including holes drilled through 2012, showed roughly parallel grade distributions over all the grade classes, indicating that there appears to be no sampling bias present.

Gold grades were interpolated into blocks containing some percentage of various domains by the inverse distance squared (ID2) method. The final grade for the block was a weighted average of all domains present inside the block. Tonnages were determined for each block based on the volume multiplied by the weighted average specific gravity multiplied by the proportion of the block below surface topography. Each block in the Main and North zones was also compared to the oxidation surface established from drill logs. The proportion of the block above the oxide surface was used to determine the tonnage of oxide material present.

For block models within the Main and North zones, the classification of a resource was “measured” if it was estimated in Pass 1, or “indicated” if estimated in Pass 2, and “inferred” if estimated in Pass 3. After this classification procedure was completed, blocks were examined visually, and isolated pockets of inferred resources were upgraded to indicated resources. Moreover, the measured blocks were included with the indicated resources.

The verification and the validation of the block model were done visually using DataMine software where the solid model was reviewed on screen at every 10 m showing the block model results and the composite values along the holes.

Indicated mineral resources were converted to reserves using a different set of parameters and assumptions. The metals prices and currency exchange rate used to establish the cut-off grade for the reserve were based on three-year trailing averages for the period ending June 30, 2012, of $1,379 per ounce gold, $26.49 per ounce silver and MXP/US$ exchange rate of 13.00. The other economic parameters were 80% metallurgical gold recovery, 5% mining dilution, and 100% mining recovery.

A net smelter return cut-off value of $7.10 per tonne was used with the metallurgical recovery rate to determine an economic cut-off grade of 0.20 g/t gold, which defined the limits of an economic pit (the probable reserves) during the optimization process.

Once the pit optimization was completed, a marginal cut-off grade of 0.15 g/t gold was calculated. Any indicated resource blocks contained within the pit shells and with a grade of 0.15 g/t gold or higher were reclassified as probable reserves.

Table 1.1 shows the reserves as well as the indicated and inferred resources for the North and Main zones of the La India project as of June 30, 2012. The mineral reserve is estimated at 44.6 million tonnes grading 0.65 g/t gold (0.93 million ounces of contained gold), all in the probable category,


5

using a 0.20 g/t gold cut-off grade. All reserves at La India are in oxide material. The indicated mineral resource consists of 27.2 million tonnes grading 0.50 g/t gold (containing 0.44 million ounces of gold), while the inferred resource consists of 103.4 million tonnes grading 0.34 g/t gold (containing 1.14 million ounces of gold). The mineral resources do not include mineral reserves.

Table 1.1 – Mineral resource and reserve statement, La India open pit mine project as of June 30, 2012

Category Tonnes (000s)

Gold grade (g/t)

Contained gold (000 oz)

Mineral Reserves Proven reserves - - - Probable reserves Main Zone (oxide only) 26,820 0.61 528 North Zone (oxide only) 17,819 0.70 403 Total proven & probable reserves 44,639 0.65 930 Mineral resources Measured mineral resource - - - Indicated mineral resource Main Zone 14,879 0.52 249 North Zone 12,364 0.47 186 Total measured and indicated mineral

27,243 0.50 435

Inferred mineral resource Main zone 45,042 0.36 519 North zone 58,367 0.33 625 Total inferred mineral resource 103,409 0.34 1,144

Mineral reserves are reported using a 0.2-g/t in-situ gold cut-off.

1.7 Interpretation and conclusions

The La India project hosts a probable reserve comprising 930,000 ounces of gold contained in 44.64 million tonnes at a grade of 0.65 g/t gold. A metallurgical gold recovery of 80% was assumed, based on third party reviews of the metallurgical test work completed to date. Engineering studies and operating and capital cost estimates were developed to exploit only the oxide mineralization at La India; no sulphide mineral was included in the analysis.

The key results below are based on the time period from construction (year PP) to closure, a $1,379 per ounce gold price, a $26.49 per ounce silver price, a MXP/US$ exchange rate of 13.00, and the capital and operating costs detailed in this report:

• $207-million after-tax net present value at a 5% discount rate

• 31% after-tax internal rate of return

• Total cash cost of $497 per ounce of gold produced net of by-product silver credits

• Initial capital cost of $157.6 million

• Life of Mine capital cost of $183.4 million total


6

The La India project has high potential to be developed into a profitable mine, and the identified probable reserve is economically significant, with an average annual production of 90,000 ounces of gold over an eight-year mine life. The robust nature of the economics and the relatively low sensitivity of the project to unforeseen variances in capital, operating costs and revenues are sufficient for an investment decision to proceed with the construction of the project.

1.8 Recommendations

Work to date has identified probable reserves at La India likely to be of economic significance with good potential to develop a profitable and economically significant mine. The economic potential of the La India project is believed to be sufficiently robust to allow a construction decision and to withstand unforeseen changes in operating costs, mineral resources, metallurgical behaviour, or capital costs while maintaining a positive economic impact for Agnico-Eagle. It is therefore the recommendation of Agnico-Eagle Mexico to approve the project for immediate construction.

Specific recommendations to further reduce project risk include:

• complete an infill drilling program in the Main Zone and update the resource block model, with the goal of upgrading the inferred resources to the measured or indicated resource classifications;

• complete a step-out drill program to increase the resource base to extend the mine life or increase the production throughput;

• develop infiltration galleries for project water supply;

• continue acid rock drainage test work and develop a more detailed waste rock management plan.

Opportunities exist to improve the economic performance of the project and should be investigated, including:

• continue geotechnical analysis of the pit slopes to determine if the pit slopes can be steepened, which would cut costs;

• evaluate the mining and processing of sulphide material. Three column tests of sulphide material were completed in the past test campaigns. These included two of Domain 17 material and one of Domain 5 material. All were done with -25-mm material. The two column tests on Domain 17 material had 40% and 60% recovery, and the Domain 5 test had 70% recovery. The sulphide material immediately underlies the oxide material, and waste-to-ore ratios would be low if the sulphide were mined. Further tests to confirm recoveries and reagent costs are recommended.

• increase resources. It is possible that the mineral resources at La India could be modestly increased by step-out drilling in the Main Zone. There is also a possibility that the resource grade in the Main Zone will increase when the block model is further revised to reflect the sample intervals that are currently classified as "no data" due to low sample recovery.

• mine plans and block models will be updated in mid-February 2013 for inclusion in Agnico-Eagle’s resource and reserves statement as of December 31, 2012.


7

• explore for new resource areas. Exploration for new resource zones continues at La India and the nearby Tarachi discovery. There is potential for finding more economic mineralization within the La India property area, especially down-dip and along-strike from the known deposits. The discovery of a new resource area could significantly change the La India project economics.


8

Introduction Item 2.The La India project in Sonora, Mexico, is a mine development project on a large property 100% controlled by Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited (Agnico-Eagle). Agnico-Eagle is a publicly owned company based in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, whose shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange, and is a “producing issuer" according to the rules and definitions provided by the Canadian Securities Administrators.

2.1 Terms of Reference Agnico-Eagle Mines acquired the La India property in November 2011 as part of the acquisition of Grayd Resource Corporation (Grayd). Grayd had explored the La India property since 2004 and had prepared a preliminary economic assessment (PEA) of the La India project at the end of 2010 (Gray et al., 2010) based on the June 2010 mineral resources (Gray and Giroux, 2010).

Infill drilling at the La India project from November 2011 to May 23, 2012 allowed Agnico-Eagle to confirm and expand the mineral resources reported in the December 2010 PEA. On August 31, 2012, Agnico-Eagle staff completed a feasibility study (Agnico-Eagle, 2012a) for the construction of a multi-pit mine and heap leach operation on the La India gold-silver deposit. La India’s first mineral reserves were estimated as of June 30, 2012, based on the results of the feasibility study.

As of June 30, 2012, the probable reserves at La India project are 44.6 million tonnes grading 0.65 g/t gold (containing 930,000 ounces of gold), the indicated resources are 27.2 million tonnes grading 0.50 g/t gold (containing 436,000 ounces of gold), and the inferred resources are 103.4 million tonnes grading 0.34 g/t gold (containing 1,144,000 ounces of gold). There are no proven reserves. The reserves are exclusive of resources.

A September 4, 2012 news release (Agnico-Eagle, 2012b) announced that Agnico-Eagle’s Board of Directors had approved the development of the La India mine on those initial reserves, based on the results of the feasibility study. This technical report summarizes the scientific and technical information used to support those reserves.

The current feasibility study anticipates total capital costs of $183 million including $25.8 million in sustaining capital expenditures. Operating costs are estimated at $7.10 per tonne. The mine project is expected to produce an average of 90,000 ounces of gold per year over its estimated eight-year mine life, with additional silver credits. An after-tax internal rate of return of approximately 31% is estimated based on the economic analysis. The open pit mine and heap leach will operate at an average of 15,716 tonnes per day, and the processing is expected to achieve 80% metallurgical recovery of gold. The waste to ore stripping ratio is estimated at 0.99:1. Life of mine cash costs are expected to average $497 per ounce of gold.

This technical report has been prepared for Agnico-Eagle by the Company’s staff and Qualified Persons based in Mexico at the Chihuahua regional office, at the regional office at Preissac, Quebec and the Toronto head office. The role and experience of the Qualified Persons is described below.

The report was prepared in compliance with the standards set out in the Canadian Securities Administrators’ National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”), Companion Policy 43-101 CP and Form 43-101F1 and in conformity with generally accepted guidelines of the CIM for “Exploration Best Practices” and “Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practices”. Agnico-


9

Eagle Mines Limited is a “producing issuer” and a long-time “reporting issuer” under the definitions of NI 43-101.

2.2 Sources of Information

A feasibility study for a la India mining and heap leach operation based on the June 2012 mineral reserves and resources was prepared in August 2012 by Agnico-Eagle staff utilizing the Grayd PEA document as its base.

This technical report has been prepared in conjunction with the August 2012 La India mine project feasibility study (Agnico-Eagle, 2012a). Both the technical report and feasibility study are based on several sources, many prepared under the direction of the former owner of the La India property, Grayd Resource Corporation.

Several technical reports including NI 43-101-compliant mineral resource estimates for the La India project were prepared for Grayd including Ebert (2004), Gray (2006), Gray and Giroux (2008), Gray and Giroux (2009), and Gray and Giroux (2010).

In July 2010, Grayd commissioned the preparation of a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) of the La India project, based upon the NI 43-101-compliant resources as of June 2010. The PEA was published on 6 December 2010 (Gray et al., 2010). The PEA utilized mineral resource and cost data current as of December 6, 2010.

In the preparation of this report the authors have relied on the above sources as well as their own observations and independent assay data, supplemented by information obtained through review of both published and unpublished documents and maps. Additional sources of information regarding location and dimensions of mineralized showings, mines, veins, and the mineralized grades, include:

• geologic, geophysical, and assay data collected and published by the Consejo de Recursos Naturales (National Resource Council) and its successor, the Servicio Geologico Mexicano (Mexican Geological Survey), a Mexican Federal agency;

• topographic and physiographic data collected and published by the Instituto Nacional de Estadistica Geografica e Informatica (INEGI), a Mexican Federal Agency;

• geologic, geophysical, and geochemical data contained in private maps and reports prepared by Grayd Resource and/or Newmont Mining;

• assay certificates provided by ALS Chemex Inc.; • metallurgical test data and analysis provided by Kappes, Cassiday and Associates; • acid rock drainage test data and analysis provided by SRK Consulting; • basic engineering design and costs provided by Kappes, Cassiday and Associates; • La India Heap Leach Facility - Basic Engineering Water Balance Evaluation provided by

Golder Associates.

2.3 Qualified Persons The compilation of this technical report represents a collaborative effort by Agnico-Eagle staff and independent consultants under the supervision of three Qualified Persons as defined by Canadian


10

National Instrument 43-101, in conformity with generally accepted CIM “Exploration Best Practices” and “Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practices” guidelines. The three Qualified Persons are Mr. Daniel Doucet, ing. (OIQ #39106), Mr. Tim Haldane, P.Eng. (Arizona (Mining) #25048), and Mr. Michel Julien, Eng., P.Eng. (OIQ#42119, PEGNL#03033, NAPEG). The Qualified Persons are all Agnico-Eagle employees at the regional office in Preissac, Quebec, or the head office in Toronto, Ontario. Each Qualified Person retains the responsibility for their contribution as indicated in Table 2.1. Their qualifications and site visits are summarized in the paragraphs below.

Table 2.1 – Responsibilities of each Qualified Person

Qualified Person Period visited la India project site Responsible for items in this report

Daniel Doucet four visits since August 2011 1 (part), 2 (part), 7-12, 14, 15 (part), 25-27 (part) and appendices for items 12 and 14

Tim Haldane five visits since November 2011 1 (part), 2 (part), 3, 4 (part), 5 (part), 6, 13, 15 (part), 16-19, 21-24 and 25-27 (part) and appendices for items 13, 17 and 21

Michel Julien one visit in August 2012 1 (part), 2 (part), 4 (part), 5 (part), 20 and 25-27 (part)

Mr. Daniel Doucet, ing. (Ordre des Ingeniers du Quebec #39106) is a Qualified Person who has been employed by Agnico-Eagle since April 2006. He is currently the Corporate Director of Reserve Development at the Company’s regional office in Preissac, Quebec, Canada. He is a geological engineer with 29 years of experience working in exploration and economic geology. He wrote and supervised the preparation of items 7 through 12 inclusive and 14, and co-authored certain parts of items 1, 2, 15 and 25 through 27 inclusive and the appendices for items 12 and 14 that pertain to geology, reserves and resources and verification in this report. Since August 2011, he has visited and inspected the La India project site four times for an average of three days per visit, auditing the protocols for core logging and sampling.

Mr. Tim Haldane, P.Eng. (Arizona (Mining) #25048) is a Qualified Person and has been employed by Agnico-Eagle since May 2006. He is currently Senior Vice-President, Latin America at the Company’s Latin American regional office in Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A. He is a metallurgical engineer with 34 years of experience in mine operations and project development. He supervised the preparation of all the mining, metallurgy, infrastructure, capital and operating cost data and economic analysis sections of this report including items 1, 2, 4 (part), 5 (part), 6, 13, 15 (part), 16-19, 21-24 and 25-27 and the appendices for items 13, 17 and 21. Since November 2011, he has visited and inspected the La India project site five times for an average of one day per visit, for the purposes of project evaluation and management review.

Michel R. Julien, P.Eng. (Qc, NFLD, NWT and Nunavut), Ph.D. is a Qualified Person who has been employed by Agnico-Eagle since October 2011. He is currently Corporate Director, Environment. Mr. Julien holds a B.Eng. in mining engineering from École Polytechique de Montréal, a Masters in Geo-Engineering from University of Minnesota and a Ph.D. in Mineral Engineering from École Polytechnique de Montréal. He has over 22 years of experience in the field of mining environmental and geotechnical engineering. Prior joining Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd., Mr. Julien was a Principal at Golder Associates Ltd. and the leader of the mining environmental/geotechnical engineering group in Montréal. Over the years, he has been lead designer and Project Director of many mine waste storage facilities and water management structures


11

around the world, and is therefore very familiar with mining environmental issues. He is also Adjunct Professor (to be approved in the coming month) at University of Toronto and co-gives the course Environmental Management in Mining (MIN430) at University of Toronto. He is Chairman of the Board of the Institute for Mining and Environment (IRME) at Polytechnicque-UQAT. He is the author or co-author of several articles over the years, and has been invited as guest lecturer on several occasions. As the Qualified Person responsible for the environmental and community relations aspects of the La India project in this report, he supervised the preparation for the environment and community relations aspects of this report including items 1 (part), 2 (part), 4 (part), 5 (part), 20 and 25-27 (part). He visited the site on August 1-3, 2012 for a period of three days to review site conditions and to better understand the planned project.

Definitions and Translations

ADR plant - Adsorption/desorption/refining plant ARD - acid rock drainage AIF - Annual Information Form Agnico-Eagle - Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. aka - also known as ASL - Above sea level C - degree Centigrade CIM - Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy, and Petroleum C.P.G. - Certified Professional Geologist by American Institute of Professional Geologists CRM - Consejo de Recursos Minerales (Natural Resources Council) CUS - Cambio de Uso de Suelo (Change of Land Use Permit) DGM - Direccion General de Minas (Central Mining Department) gpt - grams per tonne gph - gallons per hour gpm - gallons per minute g/t - grams per tonne Grayd - Grayd Resource Corporation Grayd Mexico - Resource Grayd de Mexico SA de CV HLF - Heap leaching facility ICAP-OES - (see ítem 13) ID2 - Inverse Distance Squared method of grade interpolation INEGI - Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía y Informática IRR - Internal Rate of Return KCA - Kappes, Cassiday and Associates kg - kilogram km - kilometre kt - kilotonne (tonnes x 1000) ktonne - kilotonne (tonnes x 1000) kw - kilowatt LOM - life of mine M - Million MIA - Manifestacion de Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact Statement) mm - millimetres Mt - million metric tonnes NAD - North American Datum


12

NOM120 - Norma Oficial Mexicana Ecological 1997-120 (Environmental Regulation 120) NPV - Net Present Value NSR - Net Smelter Return oz - Troy Ounce PEA - Preliminary Economic Assessment ppm - parts per million RGM - Resource Geosciences de Mexico SA de CV ROM - Run-of-mine SGM - Servicio Geologico Mexicano (Mexican Geological Survey) SEDAR - System for Electronic Data Analysis and Retrieval SEMARNAT - Secretaria del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (Secretary of the Environment and Natural Resources) SMO - Sierra Madre Occidental tpd - tonnes per day tpy - tonnes per year USD - United States Dollar UTM - Universal Transverse Mercatur


13

Reliance on Other Experts Item 3.The professional opinions expressed in this report are based in part on data and information generated by and obtained from Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd., its subcontractors, previous operators of the project, and public domain sources. The authors of this report have exercised all reasonable care in reviewing the supplied information and believe that the basic information provided is accurate. Data that were not generated by the authors have not been independently verified, except as noted in Item 12 of this report. Where information from unverified sources is relevant to interpretations and discussions of the economic potential of the project, the source of information is explicitly mentioned. Mining concession legal information was obtained from Lic. Joel Gonzalez as assigned by Agnico-Eagle.


14

Property Description and Location Item 4.4.1 Area and Location

The La India property comprises 57,614 hectares of mining concessions and is located in the municipality of Sahuaripa, State of Sonora, Mexico, approximately 210 km east-southeast of the city of Hermosillo, (Figure 4.1).

Figure 4.1 – Location map

The centre of the project area is located at UTM Zone 12, 709,000E 3,174,000N, North American Datum 27, or North Latitude 28o 40’ 41” West Longitude 108o 51’ 40”, North American Datum 27 Mexico. All geographic references in this report utilize North American Datum 27 (NAD27) unless otherwise stated.


15

4.2 Claims and Title Mining and exploration rights in Mexico are controlled by the Federal Government. Prior to 2006, exploration and mining rights were assigned to third parties by the granting of “exploration” and “exploitation” concessions, each with differing validity periods and tax and assessment obligations. Mining law reform in December 2005 simplified the concession regime, and all new concessions are “mining concessions”, which are valid for a 50-year period and are renewable. Upon enactment of the mining law reform, all previously issued “exploration” and “exploitation” concessions automatically converted to “mining concessions” with the effective date of title the same as that of the previously titled “exploration” or “exploitation” concession. The mining concessions are administered by the Direccion General de Minas (DGM), a subsecretariat of the cabinet-level Secretaria de Economia. To maintain concessions in good legal standing, concession holders are obligated to pay semi-annual tax payments and to annually file documentation of exploration or development work at the concession.

The La India project consists of 45 mining concessions covering in aggregate 57,614 hectares. Concessions controlled by Agnico-Eagle are summarized in Table 4.1, and the concessions are shown in Figure 4.2. All of these claims are in good legal standing.


16

Table 4.1 – La India project mining concessions

Reference

Title No. Concession Grant date Expiry date Hectares 1 217353 La India 2-Jul-2002 1-Jul-2052 358 2 217354 La India 1 2-Jul-2002 1-Jul-2052 119 3 218560 Triple A 22-Nov-2002 21-Nov-2052 6,592 4 184078 Soledad 15-Feb-1989 14-Feb-2039 19 5 237125 La Viruela 29-Oct-2010 28-Oct-2060 8 6 237126 Continuacion S.E. de La Viruela 29-Oct-2010 28-Oct-2060 4 7 181940 Tayopita 15-Dec-1987 14-Dec-2037 18 8 201919 Ampliacion Soledad 11-Oct-1995 10-Oct-2045 114 9 187195 La Cruz 13-Jun-1990 12-Jun-2040 65 10 214526 San-Fer 1 2-Oct-2001 1-Oct-2051 72 11 216162 San-Fer 2 12-Apr-2002 11-Apr-2052 25 12 220792 San-Fer 3 7-Oct-2003 6-Oct-2053 51 13 221332 San-Fer 4 Fraccion 1 23-Jan-2004 22-Jan-2054 39 14 221333 San-Fer 4 Fraccion 2 23-Jan-2004 22-Jan-2054 40 15 221334 San-Fer 4 Fraccion 3 23-Jan-2004 22-Jan-2054 16 16 226630 El Pilar 3-Feb-2006 2-Feb-2056 16,521 17 226400 Sta. Cruz Pilar Fraccion 1 13-Jan-2006 12-Jan-2056 340 18 226401 Sta. Cruz Pilar Fraccion 2 13-Jan-2006 12-Jan-2056 217 19 226957 Tarachi 31-Mar-2006 30-Mar-2056 390 20 226956 Tarachi-1 31-Mar-2006 30-Mar-2056 100 21 226958 Tarachi-2 31-Mar-2006 30-Mar-2056 431 22 226959 Tarachi 3 31-Mar-2006 30-Mar-2056 337 23 227051 Tarachi Fracc. 1 18-Apr-2006 17-Apr-2056 92 24 227052 Tarachi Fracc. 2 18-Apr-2006 17-Apr-2056 5 25 227053 Tarachi Fracc. 3 18-Apr-2006 17-Apr-2056 20 26 233357 La Rumorosa 17-Feb-2009 16-Feb-2059 375 27 236441 Roka 2 30-Jun-2010 29-Jun-2060 278 28 227636 La Chivitas 18-Jul-2006 17-Jul-2056 174 29 227631 La Chivitas Fraccion 1 18-Jul-2006 17-Jul-2056 48 30 227632 La Chivitas Fraccion 2 18-Jul-2006 17-Jul-2056 47 31 227633 La Chivitas Fraccion 3 18-Jul-2006 17-Jul-2056 10 32 237850 Tayopa 17-May-2011 16-May-2061 11,524 33 237610 Salto Colorado 20-Apr-2011 19-Apr-2061 400 34 237851 El Otonal 17-May-2011 16-May-2061 14,146 35 237953 La Centella 30-Jun-2011 29-Jun-2061 76 36 238482 Tayopa 2 23-Sep-2011 22-Sep-2061 1,891 37 227113 La Chivitas Fraccion II 9-May-2006 8-May-2056 5 38 199007 San Javier 11-Feb-1994 10-Feb-2044 171 39 227163 La Chivitas 17-May-2006 16-May-2056 89 40 227112 La Chivitas Fraccion I 9-May-2006 8-May-2056 234 41 227176 La Chivitas 17-May-2006 16-May-2056 23 42 227630 El Tarachi 18-Jul-2006 17-Jul-2056 100 43 223235 El Tarachi 17-Nov-2004 16-Nov-2054 100 44 225306 La Texana 16-Aug-2005 15-Aug-2055 300 45 239975 Tayopa 5 16-Mar-2012 15-Mar-2062 1,633 Total Hectares 57,614


17

Figure 4.2 – Concession map. Claim reference numbers as in Table 4.1

The claims are currently controlled by Agnico-Eagle through its wholly-owned subsidiary Resource Grayd de Mexico SA de CV (Grayd Mexico) by means of direct ownership via staking and by executed purchase agreements. A summary of the claim ownership agreements follows:


18

La India and La India 1 Concessions - 100% interest in these two mining claims. A one-time bonus payment of $0.50/oz gold on reserves that are proven and recoverable, as determined by a bankable feasibility study, will be payable to the former owners of the property within nine months from the commencement of production. The former owners will also retain a 1% net smelter royalty (NSR) on the property, half of which may be purchased by Agnico-Eagle for $750,000. Agnico-Eagle plans to purchase the 0.5% royalty prior to operations and therefore has included $750,000 in the economic analysis (item 22) in this report.

Triple A Concession - 100% interest in this mining claim. The property is subject to a 2% NSR. Agnico-Eagle can purchase half of the NSR at any time with a payment of $1,500,000.

La Cruz Concession - 100% interest in this mining claim. The property is subject to an underlying 1% NSR that may be purchased for $250,000. Agnico-Eagle plans to purchase the1% NSR prior to operations and therefore has included $250,000 in the economic analysis (item 22) in this report.

La Viruela Claim Group - 100% interest in this group comprising the contiguous La Viruela, Continuación SE La Viruela, Soledad, Ampliación Soledad, and Tayopita concessions. The property is subject to an underlying 3% NSR that may be purchased for $250,000. Agnico-Eagle plans to purchase the 3% NSR prior to operations and has included $250,000 in the economic analysis in this report.

San Fer Claim Group - 100% interest in this group comprising the contiguous San Fer 1, San Fer 2, San Fer 3, San Fer 4 Fracc.1, San Fer 4 Fracc. 2, and San Fer 4 Fracc. 3 concessions.

Pilar Claim Group - 100% interest in this group comprising the El Pilar, Sta. Cruz Pilar Fracc. 1, and Sta. Cruz Pilar Fracc. 2 concessions,. The property is subject to a 2% NSR of which 1.5% can be purchased for $3 million. These concessions do not host any of the mineral resources or reserves estimated in items 14 and 15 of this technical report.

Tarachi Fraccion Claim Group - 100% interest in this group comprising the Tarachi Fracc. 1, Tarachi Fracc. 2. and Tarachi Fracc. 3 concessions. The property is not subject to any NSR or further obligations.

Tarachi Claim Group - 100% interest in group comprising the Tarachi, Tarachi-1, Tarachi-2 and Tarachi-3 concessions. The property is subject to a 2% NSR of which 1.5% may be purchased by Agnico-Eagle for $1,000,000. These concessions do not host any of the mineral resources or reserves estimated in items 14 and 15 of this technical report.

Chivitas - Tayopa Claim Group - 100% interest in group comprising the La Chivitas, La Chivitas Fracc 1, La Chivitas Fracc 2, La Chivitas Fracc 3, La Chivita Fracc II, and Tayopa concessions. Pursuant to an agreement dated July 13, 2011, Grayd obtained the right to acquire 100% interest in the concessions by making staged payments totaling $754,800 over a five-year period. The property is subject to a 2% NSR of which 1% may be purchased by Agnico-Eagle for $1,000,000. These concessions do not host any of the mineral resources or reserves estimated in items 14 and 15 of this technical report.

San Javier Claim Group - 100 % interest in the group comprising the San Javier, La Chivitas (Title 227163), La Chivitas Fracc 1, La Chivitas (Title 227176), El Tarachi, El Tarachi (Title 223235) and the La Texana (50% ownership) concessions. Pursuant to an agreement dated February 15, 2012,


19

Agnico-Eagle obtained the right to acquire 100% interest in the concessions by making staged payments totaling $1,032,500 and equity shares of Agnico-Eagle worth $930,000 over a five-year period. The property is subject to a 2% NRS that may be purchased by Agnico-Eagle for $2,000,000. These concessions do not host any of the mineral resources or reserves estimated in items 14 and 15 of this technical report.

Salto Colorado Concession - 100% interest in this mining claim. The property is subject to a 2% NSR of which 1% may be purchased at any time by Agnico-Eagle for $1,000,000.

Agnico-Eagle holds 100% interest in the La Rumorosa and Roka 2 concessions which were acquired via concession applications (staking) in a lottery process.

4.3 Surface Rights All of the estimated mineral reserves and resources lie within privately owned or possessed land (Figure 4.3). Agnico-Eagle (under the name of Grayd Mexico) owns the surface rights encompassing the North Zone of the La India deposit and has executed a long-term lease agreement (temporary occupation) for surface rights required to develop and mine the Main Zone of the La India deposit. For lands not owned directly, Agnico-Eagle has executed surface access lease agreements with the property owners or possessors, allowing the company access to conduct exploration work.

Figure 4.3 – Surface rights map, reserves and resources area, La India project


20

4.3.1 Ejido Lands

Ejidos are communal agrarian and/or ranching societies formed as part of the Mexican Government’s post-revolutionary agrarian reform policies. Ejido land is collectively owned by the Ejido members. The collectively owned land may be leased but cannot be purchased by private parties or corporations. Constitutional reforms enacted in the 1990s permit the Ejidos to privatize the collectively owned land such that it may be freely combined, rented, or sold. Over 50% of the surface area of Mexico is assigned to Ejidos, and most major mines in Mexico are developed on Ejido lands where land tenure is secured by the mining companies via special lease arrangements defined by Federal Mining Law as Temporary Occupations, or alternatively, via direct purchase of Ejido lands that have been privatized following Federally prescribed procedures (PROCEDE).

Ejido lands are not required for development of the currently defined La India mineral resource. However, in exploration areas away from the currently defined reserves and resources, the surface rights are owned by the Matarachi Ejido, the Tarachi Eijdo, and various private land owners.

The Puertos and Cebadilla exploration targets lie partly within Ejido Matarachi lands. Agnico-Eagle has conducted exploration on Matarachi Ejido lands under the auspices of a written exploration contract with the community whereby exploration access is granted and the company pays compensation of $5,000 per year. Additional compensation fees for road and drill pad construction are negotiated on a case-by-case basis, commensurate with the value of the land affected.

No work is currently being undertaken on land owned by the Tarachi Eijdo. In the area of the Tarachi deposit drilling, surface access for exploration is covered by separate agreements with private landowners.

Development of subsurface water supplies may require access agreements and easements for wells and related infrastructure located on lands not currently controlled by Agnico-Eagle.

4.3.2 Private Lands

Rancho Bronces y Bajios (also known as La Cieneguita) - The North Zone mineral reserve and resource is entirely contained with this fee simple private property, owned directly by Grayd Mexico.

Rancho La Amargosa - The La India part of the North Zone resource is entirely contained within this private property whose title was assigned to Grayd Mexico by judicial resolution. Agnico-Eagle employees currently occupy the ranch house and ancillary buildings; the company has constructed field camps, offices, and storage buildings on the property.

Rancho El Duraznito - Most of the Main Zone reserve and resource lies within this property. The current possessor of the land is Casimiro Monge Carillo, the son of the deceased registered owner, Casimiro Monge Willem. Agnico-Eagle has conducted exploration on the property under the auspices of a written exploration contract with Casimiro Monge Carillo under which Agnico-Eagle was allowed to conduct surface exploration including road construction and drilling in consideration for annual payments.

In July 2012, Agnico-Eagle secured a long-term lease agreement (30-year temporary occupation) with Casimiro Monge Carillo for the remaining surface rights required to develop and mine the Main Zone deposit. Agnico-Eagle has submitted the formal request to expand the area in the present Land Use Permit in order to continue with the project development of the Main Zone. These subsequent


21

permits are expected to be readily obtained, and are not necessary for the construction phase or for the first several years of operation.

4.4 Environmental Liabilities An environmental audit conducted in 2008 by Hermosillo-based consultants Bufete Minero y Servicios del Noroeste SA de CV reported that no significant environmental liabilities are apparent in the area of interest. Small abandoned mines and waste piles are present but are not generating acid drainage. There are no plant facilities or tailings present within the project area. Since 2008, Bufete Minero has conducted periodic site visits to audit the project’s compliance with Mexican environmental regulation NOM-120 and found the project compliant.

Agnico-Eagle’s purchase of surface rights north and outside the project boundaries includes lands with historic mine workings and waste rock piles, and although Mexcian law does not hold current owners liable for the damages caused by past operators, the company will assess the environmental impacts of the historic workings on company-owned lands and take appropriate remedial action.

4.5 Permits Exploration and mining activities in Mexico are subject to control by the Secretaria del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (Secretary of the Environment and Natural Resources), known by its acronym “SEMARNAT”. The La India project is not included within any specially protected, federally designated ecological zones; therefore, basic exploration activities are regulated under Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-120-ECOL-1997. NOM120 allows for activities including mapping, geochemical sampling, geophysical surveys, mechanized trenching, road-building and drilling. If each particular activity does not exceed a defined threshold for surface disturbance (which varies by activity), and if in aggregate these activities will affect less than 25% of the project surface area, the project operator is required only to inform SEMARNAT in writing of the proposed exploration activities. If after five days SEMARNAT has not formally objected, work may proceed immediately. NOM120 defines the impact mitigation procedures that must be followed for each activity.

Most exploration activities can be permitted utilizing NOM120. Mine construction and operation activities generally require preparation of:

• a Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact Statement), known by its acronym “MIA”, and

• a Cambio de Uso de Suelo (Land Use Change) permit, known by its acronym “CUS”.

Properly prepared MIA and CUS applications and mine operating permits for a project that does not affect federally protected biospheres or ecological reserves can usually be approved in 12 months.

Prior to 2012, exploration work at La India was conducted under the auspices of NOM120. Because the limits for surface disturbance permitted under NOM120 are being approached in the Main Zone, further exploration or development work in the La Viruela-La Cruz area (part of the Main Zone) that creates additional surface disturbance will require a CUS permit. This permit cannot be issued until Agnico-Eagle has a formally registered surface rights agreement with the owner of legal record of the


22

affected land. Agnico-Eagle has secured a long-term lease agreement for the remaining surface rights required and has submitted the formal request to expand the area in the present Land Use Permit in order to continue with project development of the Main Zone. (See the Rancho El Duraznito property discussion in item 4.3.2).

Baseline environmental studies of the La India project were completed in October 2008 by independent environmental permitting consultants. The results of these studies show that project is not located in an area with a special federal environmental protection designation, and no factors have been identified that would be expected to hinder authorization of required Federal and State environmental permits.

Permits that are required for the construction and operation of the La India mine are summarized in Table 4.2. Agnico-Eagle has already obtained the CUS permit and a federally approved MIA permit allowing for construction and operation of mining and processing facilities in the North Zone of the La India deposit. No obstacles to obtaining the remaining permits for the La India project are anticipated provided that Agnico-Eagle obtains required the surface rights, and the design and mitigation criteria meet all applicable standards.

Table 4.2 – Permits required for La India mine construction and operation

Permit Required for: Permitting Agency Status Environmental Impact Statement (Manifiesto de Impacto Ambiental – MIA)

Construction, operation and closure

SEMARNAT Approved for construction and operation occupying 327.134 hectares for North Zone. Document DS-SG-UGA-IA-0291-12. Approval of permit for Main Zone expected in 6 months.

Land Use Change Study (Cambio de Uso de Suelo – CUS)

Construction and operation

SEMARNAT - CONAFOR Approved for 327.134 hectares for North Zone. Document DFS/SGPA/UARRN/044/2012. Approval of permit for Main Zone expected in 6 months.

Risk Analysis Study (Estudio de Riego Ambiental – ERA)


SEMARNAT Approved for construction and operation of mining and processing facilities occupying 327.134 hectares for North Zone. Document DS-SG-UGA-IA-0291-12

Municipal Authorization for Construction

Construction SIUE; Municipality of Sahuaripa

Explosive Handling and Storage Permits


SEDENA, Governor’s Authorization, Municipality of Sahuaripa

Issued once federal permits are approved

Archaeological Release Letter

Construction INAH Approved and issued as document CIS/DIR/263/09 (August 31, 2009)

Water Use Concession Title


CNA Typically requires 3 months to obtain permit after discovering and pump testing or otherwise verifying water source

Water Discharge Permit Operation and maintenance

CNA Typically requires 2 to 5 months to obtain permit

Unique Licence Operation and maintenance

SEMARNAT MIA approval condition requires submission of request for this permit within 6 months of initiation of operations

Accident Prevention Plan

Operation and maintenance

SEMARNAT Submittal of plan required within 6 months of initiation of operations

Quarry or Aggregate Extraction Permit

Construction SIUE Typically requires one month to obtain permit

Non-toxic Waste Disposal Permit

Construction Municipality of Sahuaripa Typically requires one month to obtain permit


23

4.6 Significant Factors and Risks No other significant factors and risks are known that could affect access, title, or the right or ability to develop, operate and close the La India mine.


24

Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Item 5.Infrastructure and Physiography

The property is located approximately 210 km east-southeast of the city of Hermosillo, in the eastern portion of the State of Sonora, Mexico, in close proximity to the neighbouring State of Chihuahua. As described in Item 4, sufficient surface rights have been secured by Agnico-Eagle to develop the mining project.

Access is by road from Hermosillo and requires approximately seven hours of travel time. The first 150 km is via a paved road to the village of Arivechi. The remaining distance (approximately 60 km) is on a gravel and dirt road. The road beyond Arivechi provides access not only to the property but also to Alamos Gold Inc.’s Mulatos gold mine.

The property is located between the towns of Tarachi and Matarachi (Figure 4.1). These towns offer little infrastructure beyond rural telephone service and small federally subsidized grocery stores. Most basic services are available in Sahuaripa, 15 km north of Arivechi on the way to Hermosillo. The population of the district is estimated to be a few thousand with most of the inhabitants involved in small mining operations, ranching, and/or subsistence farming.

An adequate supply of labour for mining operations can be drawn from the region, and technical and professional staff will be recruited from within Mexico as required.

The nearest international airport is located at Hermosillo. Unpaved airstrips for light aircraft exist at Matarachi, Tarachi, and the nearby Mulatos mine, but only the airstrip at the Mulatos mine is currently active.

5.1 Physiography and Climate The property is in the Sierra Madre Mountains of eastern Sonora. The topography consists of long ridges separated by steep V-shaped valleys. Elevations range from 1,200 m to more than 2,000 m above sea level. Areas of low relief in the western portion of the project area provide suitable locations for plant sites, leach pads, waste dumps, and other mine-related infrastructure.

The climate in the area is semi-arid with variable seasonal temperatures ranging from 35oC in the summer and -2oC in the winter, with occasional frost at higher elevations. The area experiences torrential rainfall occurring from July to September; the driest months are March to May. Exploration, construction and mining activities may be conducted year round, although summer rains may cause occasional closings of river and arroyo crossings along the roads from Sahuaripa and Yecora to the project. Since storm events are normally short in duration, interruptions to traffic most often last only a few hours.

Vegetation in the area is varied. Vegetation at higher elevations consists of open pine forests, while oak and cedar forests predominate at lower elevations. Poor soils and inconsistent precipitation limit the viability of farming in the area.


25

5.2 Infrastructure Existing infrastructure in the project area is limited to the original Amargosa ranch house and a few outlying buildings located between the North and Main zones that have served as the exploration camp and core storage facilities for Grayd, as well as currently serving as the temporary camp for Agnico-Eagle’s operations and regional exploration group. The existing ranch facilities are in the same area where the new office, warehouse and truck shop facilities are going to be constructed (Figure 16.7).

The closest line electrical power source is the federally owned and operated electric transmission grid that extends as far as Arivechi, approximately 60 km from the project. Therefore the electricity required for the project will be generated at an onsite power plant as described in Item 18.

5.3 Water Sources Water supply has been identified as one of the key issues to resolve for the successful development of the La India project. Based on average annual precipitation and evaporation, the makeup water requirements at La India have been estimated to be 250,000 m3 per year for process and other site uses (Golder Associates, 2012). In an extremely dry year, the makeup water requirements could increase to 450,000 m3 per year.

Hydrogeological conditions in the La India region are not favourable for prolific aquifers and underground water supplies. Drilling by Agnico-Eagle has yielded modest results; three wells could potentially provide a total of approximately 90,000 m3 per year of supply water from the La India site. These wells have not been operated on a continuous basis, and it is not known if their flow is sustainable because drawdown calculations cannot be performed (no water table).

Seasonal rainfall in the La India area averages more than 1,000 mm per year occurring mainly during the four-month period from June through September. Weather records in the region indicate that even during extremely dry years there have been approximately 500 mm of rainfall in the area. Surface water is therefore occasionally abundant during the heavy rainy season, as evidenced by erosion features and actual experience by Agnico-Eagle at the La India site. According to the consultant, these intense rainfall events and/or extremely wet climate years will require an excess storm water storage pond with a capacity of 576,632 m3 in order to maintain a zero discharge water balance at the heap leach facilities (Golder Associates, 2012). This storm water pond will therefore be an ideal storage pond for makeup water and will be used for that dual purpose, with sufficient volume to sustain operations even in an extremely dry year.

Discussions with technical and legal experts in Mexico have concluded that the legal process required to obtain rights to surface water in this area is lengthy, expensive, and cannot be assured. Conversely the rights to underground water are relatively easy to prove and obtain as long as they do not affect the access to water of the neighbouring ranches and communities. As a result of this and based on discussions with the experts, it has been decided that a hybrid approach would be best for the La India project, using near-surface infiltration galleries constructed in sands and gravels associated with the intermittent-flow stream areas. Several locations for infiltration galleries have been identified nearby by experts from Bufete Minero y Servicios de Ingenieria SA de CV, and the process for obtaining approval for the extraction of water from these areas has been initiated.


26

The most viable location for an infiltration gallery is the La Chipriona reservoir, which is an existing dam with a water supply situated on Agnico-Eagle property approximately 3.5 km north of the proposed process plant, just east of where the access road to the project meets the road to Tarachi and Matarachi (Figure 4.3). This area has been identified for its potential to provide approximately 200,000 m3 per year of water for use at La India. Another potential location for an infiltration gallery has been identified approximately 30 km from La India at the confluence of the Iglesias and Tarachi arroyos, which would likely be a more prolific source of water if needed. An aerial photo of the La Chipriona reservoir is shown below (Figure 5.1).

Figure 5.1 – La Chipriona Reservoir and Infiltration Zone- Located on AEM property

Precedent exists for other mining operations utilizing infiltration galleries in Mexico, including at the El Sauzal mine in Chihuahua and more recently the Palmerejo mine in Chihuahua. The nearest neighbour to La India is the Mulatos mine, which also employs infiltration galleries. Numerous mines are in operation in the Sierra Madre region of Mexico, and it is commonly accepted that near-surface infiltration water is the best available reliable supply for the operation requirements.

Additional opportunities for water collection at La India could include reuse of the contact water from La India mine waste dumps, which could supply up to 30% of the required water supply during operation. Due to the acid rock drainage tendencies of the waste rock, this impacted water would normally require impoundment and treatment prior to release, but it is expected that a permit could be received to reuse this water for dust control or process water supply rather than treating and discharge. The application for the use of this water will be followed using legal processes. Agnico-Eagle currently successfully manages contact water at the Pinos Altos mine in Mexico in a similar manner.

The engineering water balance evaluation (Golder, 2012) indicates that the watershed and catchment areas above the leach pad at La India will be able to sustain 100% of the project water requirements during normal rainfall years after approximately three years of operation. Some of this water will be diverted during the early years of operation, but it may be possible to recover this diverted water also as part of the mining process, and an application will be made to legally secure that right.


27

It is believed that there are several options available to generate a sufficient water supply to sustain operation at La India, and based on conversations with experts, it is expected that these water sources can be legally obtained prior to the onset of operations.


28

History Item 6.The first gold discovery in the region, as recorded by Spanish colonials, was made in 1673 at Ostimuri. The gold deposit at Mulatos was discovered by the Spaniards in 1806, but it is likely that indigenous peoples exploited the native gold-bearing oxidized zone of the Mulatos deposit prior to the colonial epoch. Small-scale mining has been semi-continuous in the district during the last two centuries (Consejo de Recursos Minerales, 1992). Much of the early mining and all of the small-scale present mining (hand-mining by local artisanal miners) targets oxidized fractures containing fine-grained visible gold. The mineralization described for the mines in this section is not necessarily indicative of the mineralization at the La India, Sonora property.

The most significant mining activity in the region has been from the Mulatos gold deposit, located 6.5 km from the property, which is reported to have produced over 400,000 oz gold prior to 1905 (Southworth,1905). Alamos Gold Inc., a TSX traded public company, now controls the Mulatos deposit and operates a large-scale open pit mine there. The Mulatos mine was commissioned in 2008, and produced 153,000 ounces of gold in 2011 (Alamos Gold Press Release, 9 January 2012, available on SEDAR). The mine reported proven and probable reserves of 65.0 million tonnes grading 1.14 grams/tonne (g/t) gold containing 2.39 million oz gold as of December 31, 2011 (Alamos Gold Mineral Reserve table, at www.alamosgold.com, May 2012). Alamos Gold states that these mineral reserve estimates follow the required disclosure for reserves and resources outlined in NI43-101. The estimates were obtained from sources believed to be reliable but cannot be verified.

Past mining activity on the present La India property included small underground mines and work on prospects throughout the La Cruz and La Viruela areas. Local residents state that the La Cruz - La Viruela property was intermittently mined at a small scale during the early 1920s and 1930s. On the basis of the size of the mine workings, the author estimates no more than 10,000 tonnes of material was extracted from all of the historic workings in the La Viruela -La Cruz area. There has been modern exploration work in this area.

In the late 1980s, New Golden Sceptre Minerals and New Goliath Minerals completed approximately 2,000 m of percussion drilling. In the early 1990s Noranda acquired the rights to La Cruz - La Viruela and completed 2,616 m of reverse circulation drilling. Drill logs and assay results generated by these drill programs are not available, but Jenkins (1994) reported that at least 72 holes were drilled, with at least 32 drill holes located in the La Viruela area and at least 35 at La Cruz. The drill holes at La Viruela ranged from 20 to 126 m in depth, whereas the drill holes at La Cruz ranged from 21 to 102 m depth. Jenkins (1994) summarized drill results indicating that intercepts of >0.3 g/t gold were common, with the most significant reported intercepts at La Viruela being 52 m @ 1.03 g/t and 38 m @ 2.68 g/t gold, whereas at La Cruz, the most significant drill intercepts were 20 m @ 6.15 g/t and 24 m @ 1.17 g/t gold.

In 1993 San Fernando Mining Co. Ltd. acquired the property and conducted further drilling, including 10 diamond drill holes totaling 2,268 m at La Viruela and 11 diamond drill holes at La Cruz totaling 1,292 m (McDougall, 1995). Drill logs and assay results generated by the drill programs are not available, but McDougall (1995) reported that the most significant intercepts generated by San Fernando Mining Company Ltd. were 28 m @ 1.96 g/t gold at La Viruela and 27.5 m @ 2.24 g/t gold at La Cruz.


29

6.1 Exploration by Grayd Resource Corp., 2004 through 2011 Grayd Resource Corp. actively explored the project from 2004 through its wholly-owned Mexican subsidiary, Resource Grayd de Mexico SA de CV (Grayd Mexico), until Grayd was acquired by Agnico-Eagle in November 2011. Work completed by Grayd included geologic mapping, geochemical rock-chip sampling, airborne geophysical surveys, ground geophysical surveys, photogrammetric topographic mapping, diamond drilling, reverse circulation drilling, baseline environmental surveys, and metallurgical testing.

The exploration activities from January 2004 through November 20, 2011 are summarized in Table 6.1; the exploration work from January 2004 through mid-2010 was described in “6 December 2010 Preliminary Economic Assessment, La India Gold Project, Municipio of Sahuaripa, Sonora, Mexico” (Gray et al., 2010) and is summarized in item 6 of this report.

Table 6.1 – Exploration activities by Grayd Resource Corp. on La India property from January 2004 through November 20, 2011

6.1.1 Diamond Drilling

In 2004, Grayd completed 1,224 m of BTW (4.2 cm-diameter) diamond drilling in 11 drill holes within the the northern portion of the La India claim block—three holes at the La Cieneguita target (North Zone), one at La Española (North Zone), and seven at the La India target (North Zone). Drill targets were selected on the basis of rock chip geochemical anomalies and silica-alunite alteration exposed in surface outcrops. All drill holes were inclined at approximately –50 degrees and most were drilled due east in order to test interpreted northeast- and northwest-striking structures and stratigraphic controls of gold distribution. Ten of the eleven drill holes intersected gold mineralization (Gray, 2006).

In 2007 and 2008, Grayd completed 3,948 m of HQ and PQ diamond drilling in 54 holes. Seven of the holes completed within the block model area were used exclusively for metallurgical testing. Geologic information from the holes was used to guide interpretation of lithological and alteration contacts, assays of core samples constrained the resource estimate, and core samples were used for specific gravity determinations.

Exploration Activity Units Amount Reconnaissance Geologic Mapping hectares 20,000 Detailed Geologic Mapping hectares 4,200 Rock Chip Sampling samples 9329 Stream Sediment Sampling samples 58 Soil Sampling samples 1193 Airborne Geophysical Survey line-km 1,300 Photogrammetric Topography 2m CI hectares 4,420 Ground Geophysical Survey-Mag line-km 265 Ground Geophysical Survey-IP line-km 100

Diamond Core Drilling – La India and Tarachi

drillholes 169 metres 20,001

Reverse Circulation Drilling – La India and Tarachi

drillholes 633 metres 65,274


30

In 2009, Grayd completed an additional 2,385 m of diamond drilling in 37 drill holes using a portable hydraulic drill rig and NTW tools.

From January 2010 until the acquisition of the project by Agnico-Eagle in November 2011, Grayd completed an additional 5,329 m of diamond drilling in 45 holes at La India using a portable hydraulic drill rig and NTW tools. Agnico has continued the diamond drilling program and as of May 23, 2012 a total of 215 diamond core holes totaling 18,734 m have been completed by Grayd and Agnico. This information was used for the Resources Update done in June 2012.

6.1.2 Reverse Circulation Drilling

In 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, and through January 22, 2010, Grayd completed 45,334 m of 13.4-cm-diameter reverse circulation drilling in 542 drill holes. Reverse circulation drilling was used both for general exploration and for resource definition drilling. A total of 510 RC drill holes comprising 40,871 m are constrained the 2010 resource model.

Subsequent to the data cutoff date for the 2010 resource estimate until the time of the acquisition of the project by Agnico-Eagle in November 2011, Grayd completed an additional 63 reverse circulation drill holes totaling 7,553 m at La India.

6.2 Resource estimates, 2008 through 2010 In 2007 Grayd commissioned Giroux Consultants Ltd. and Resource Geosciences de Mexico SA de CV (RGM) to provide an independent mineral resource estimate and NI43-101-compliant Technical Report for the La India project. The model was constrained by 229 reverse circulation drill holes totaling 20,632 m and three diamond drill holes totaling 142 m. The first 43-101-compliant mineral resource for the La India project, published in February 2008 (Gray and Giroux, 2008), reported an inferred resource containing 936,000 oz gold (36.8 million tonnes grading 0.79 g/t gold) calculated at a 0.40-g/t cutoff grade (Table 6.2). Of this resource, 708,000 oz gold was contained in oxidized and partly oxidized material.

Table 6.2 – La India project NI43-101-compliant mineral inferred resource estimate by Grayd Resource Corp. as of February 2008 including all material types in all areas (Gray and Giroux, 2008)

Au Cutoff Tonnes > Cutoff Grade > Cutoff (g/t) (tonnes) Au (g/t) Au (grams) Au Ounces 0.10 196,710,000 0.301 59,300,000 1,906,000 0.20 92,440,000 0.482 44,500,000 1,432,000 0.30 55,490,000 0.641 35,600,000 1,143,000 0.40 36,790,000 0.791 29,100,000 936,000 0.50 26,130,000 0.933 24,400,000 783,000 0.60 19,730,000 1.058 20,900,000 671,000 0.70 14,860,000 1.192 17,700,000 569,000 0.80 11,630,000 1.315 15,300,000 492,000 0.90 9,220,000 1.438 13,300,000 426,000 1.00 7,490,000 1.550 11,600,000 373,000


31

After completing an additional 12,130 m of reverse circulation drilling and an additional 2,640 m of diamond drilling, in August 2008 Grayd commissioned Giroux and RGM to create an updated NI-43-101-compliant resource estimate for the project, which was published in February 2009 (Gray and Giroux, 2009). The results were an indicated resource (Table 6.3) containing an estimated 654,000 oz gold (20.3 million tonnes grading 0.86 g/t gold), and an inferred resource Table 6.4) containing an estimated 375,000 oz gold (13.5 million tonnes grading 0.87 g/t gold), both calculated at a 0.40-g/t cutoff grade. Of this indicated resource, 524,000 oz gold is in oxidized material, and 322,000 oz gold in the inferred resource is in oxide material.

Table 6.3 – La India project NI43-101-compliant indicated resource estimate by Grayd Resource Corp. as of February 2009 including oxide and sulphide material in all areas (Gray and Giroux, 2009)

TOTAL ALL ZONES - INDICATED RESOURCE Au Cutoff Tonnes> Cutoff Grade > Cutoff

(g/t) (tonnes) Au (g/t) Au (grams) Au Ounces 0.10 56,390,000 0.496 28,000,000 900,000 0.20 43,370,000 0.600 26,000,000 836,000 0.30 32,210,000 0.722 23,300,000 748,000 0.40 23,750,000 0.856 20,300,000 654,000 0.50 17,160,000 1.013 17,400,000 559,000 0.60 12,680,000 1.179 14,900,000 480,000 0.70 9,890,000 1.329 13,100,000 423,000 0.80 7,950,000 1.470 11,700,000 376,000 0.90 6,720,000 1.585 10,700,000 342,000 1.00 5,780,000 1.689 9,800,000 314,000

Table 6.4 – La India project NI43-101-compliant inferred resource estimate by Grayd Resource Corp. as of February 2009 including oxide and sulphide material in all areas (Gray and Giroux, 2009)

TOTAL ALL ZONES - INFERRED RESOURCE Au Cutoff Tonnes> Cutoff Grade > Cutoff

(g/t) (tonnes) Au (g/t) Au (grams) Au Ounces 0.10 37,240,000 0.456 17,000,000 546,000 0.20 25,660,000 0.596 15,300,000 491,000 0.30 19,480,000 0.706 13,700,000 442,000 0.40 13,490,000 0.866 11,700,000 375,000 0.50 9,410,000 1.051 9,900,000 318,000 0.60 7,620,000 1.171 8,900,000 287,000 0.70 6,350,000 1.275 8,100,000 260,000 0.80 5,390,000 1.368 7,400,000 237,000 0.90 4,650,000 1.450 6,700,000 217,000 1.00 3,930,000 1.542 6,100,000 195,000

From then until January 2010, Grayd completed an additional 11,976 m of reverse circulation drilling in 134 drill holes and an additional 2,444 m of diamond core drilling in 37 drill holes. In January 2010, Grayd commissioned RGM and Giroux to prepare an updated independent mineral resource


32

estimate and a NI43-101-compliant technical report for the La India project, which was published in June 2010 (Gray and Giroux, 2010). The results were a measured and indicated resource (Table 6.5) containing 760,000 oz gold (26.8 million tonnes grading 0.88 g/t gold), and an inferred resource (Table 6.6) containing 506,000 oz gold (19.7 million tonnes grading 0.80 g/t gold), both calculated at a 0.40-g/t cutoff grade. Of the indicated resource, 603,000 oz gold was in oxidized material, and 378,000 oz of gold in the inferred resource was in oxide material.

Table 6.5 – La India project NI43-101-compliant measured and indicated resource estimate by Grayd Resource Corp. as of May 2010 including oxide and sulphide material in all areas (Gray and Giroux, 2010)

TOTAL ALL ZONES – MEASURED PLUS INDICATED RESOURCE Au Cutoff Tonnes> Cutoff Grade > Cutoff

(g/t) (tonnes) Au (g/t) Au (grams) Au Ounces 0.10 61,650,000 0.517 31,900,000 1,024,000 0.20 48,230,000 0.619 29,900,000 960,000 0.30 36,090,000 0.745 26,900,000 864,000 0.40 26,770,000 0.883 23,600,000 760,000 0.50 20,180,000 1.025 20,700,000 665,000 0.60 15,570,000 1.167 18,200,000 584,000 0.70 12,250,000 1.308 16,000,000 515,000 0.80 9,870,000 1.443 14,200,000 458,000 0.90 8,100,000 1.573 12,700,000 410,000 1.00 6,800,000 1.693 11,500,000 370,000

Table 6.6 – La India project NI43-101-compliant inferred resource estimate by Grayd Resource Corp. as of May 2010 including oxide and sulphide material in all areas (Gray and Giroux, 2010)

TOTAL ALL ZONES - INFERRED RESOURCE Au Cutoff Tonnes> Cutoff Grade > Cutoff (g/t) (tonnes) Au (g/t) Au (grams) Au Ounces 0.10 117,170,000 0.303 35,500,000 1,143,000 0.20 62,130,000 0.443 27,500,000 886,000 0.30 34,150,000 0.606 20,700,000 665,000 0.40 19,730,000 0.798 15,700,000 506,000 0.50 13,540,000 0.961 13,000,000 418,000 0.60 9,910,000 1.113 11,000,000 355,000 0.70 7,540,000 1.259 9,500,000 305,000 0.80 5,900,000 1.402 8,300,000 236,000 0.90 4,800,000 1.530 7,300,000 236,000 1.00 4,040,000 1.641 6,600,000 213,000

In July 2010, Grayd commissioned the preparation of a Preliminary Economic Assessment of the La India project, based upon the NI43-101-compliant resources as of June 2010. The PEA was published on December 6, 2010 (Gray et.al., 2010), based on the same resources that were estimated in Gray and Giroux (2010), as shown in Table 6.5 and Table 6.6.


33

Geological Setting and Mineralization Item 7.7.1 Regional Geology

The La India project lies within the Sierra Madre Occidental (SMO) province, a regionally extensive Eocene to Miocene volcanic field, which extends southeast from the United States – Mexico border to central Mexico. The total thickness of the volcanic sequence is approximately 2 km, and it rests upon Mesozoic clastic and calcareous sedimentary rock. The volcanic field is comprised of two distinct volcanic sequences, an older andesitic and dacitic series, and a younger pyroclastic-dominated rhyolitic series. The traditional nomenclature refers to these as the Serie Volcanica Inferior (Lower Series) and Serie Volcanica Superior (Upper Series). The Lower Series is approximately 1 km thick and is dominated by Paleocene and Eocene andesitic lavas and pyroclastic deposits, with interbedded volcaniclastic strata. Silicic volcanic units are present but are a minor component. The volcanic strata of the Lower Series are cut by calc-alkaline intrusives. The Upper Series unconformably overlies the Lower Series with erosional disconformity, and comprises a 1-km-thick sequence dominated by Oligocene and early Miocene dacitic and rhyolitic pyroclastic strata and volcaniclastic strata. Most significant metal occurrences in the SMO are hosted by rocks of the Lower Series or the underlying Mesozoic strata.

The La India project lies within the western limits of the SMO in an area dominated by outcrops of andesitic to dacitic tuffs that were intruded by granodiorite and diorite stocks and overlain by rhyolitic tuffs, basaltic andesite lavas, and a large pile of late conglomerates. These rocks lie within a northwest-trending zone of Miocene extension that disrupted the regional stratigraphy along north-northwest-striking normal faults causing large-scale rotation of blocks with predominantly east-northeast inclinations (Figure 7.1). Incised fluvial canyons have cut the uppermost strata and expose the Lower Series volcanic strata.


34

Figure 7.1 – Regional geologic map, summarized from Servicio Geologico Mexicano (2009)


35

7.2 Local and Property Geology The La India project area is underlain by the Lower Series volcanic sequence comprised of Paleocene andesitic and dacitic volcanic rocks interbedded with epiclastic rocks of similar composition (Figure 7.2 and Figure 7.3). The andesitic volcanic rocks are the oldest Cenozoic rocks at La India and include a lower sequence of lavas, tuffs and epiclastic rocks. Atop the andesite is an upper sequence of biotite-pyroxene trachyandesitic and dacitic flow domes and tuffs. These rocks overlie the lower andesites with erosional disconformity; fine-grained dacitic tuffs interbedded with epiclastic rocks mark the contact. Two 40Ar/39Ar age determinations on plagioclase returned Paleocene ages for the lower andesitic and upper dacitic sequences (62.6 Ma and 55.8 Ma, respectively). Dacite and feldspar porphyries intruded the andesitic and dacitic volcanic rocks at La India (Longo, 2006a; Longo et al., 2010), and a granodiorite intruded andesitic volcanic rocks at the southern limit of the project area (Moore, 2006). Two 40Ar/39Ar ages of plagioclase from the porphyries yielded Eocene ages of 43.3 Ma and 36.9 Ma. Thick (100-500-m) deposits of rhyolitic ignimbrite overlie the older andesite and dacite. These rocks are named the Nopal Ignimbrite, and one 40Ar/39Ar age of biotite yielded an upper Eocene age of 33.9 Ma.

Figure 7.2 – Geologic map encompassing the Cieneguita, La Viruela-La Cruz, and Cerro de Oro areas


36

Figure 7.3 – Volcanic stratigraphic column of the La India area as determined by T. Longo

Upper Series rocks include basaltic andesite lavas and flow breccias that overlie the Nopal ignimbrites with erosional disconformity. One 40Ar/39Ar age from a wholerock sample of lava yielded an Oligocene age of 28.2 Ma. These lavas are both overlain by and interbedded with alluvial conglomerates. Upper Series Oligocene rhyolitic ignimbrites have not been recognized within the concession boundaries. The rocks at La India strike northwest and dip 25 to 30 degrees northeast in the southern portion of the project area (Moore, 2005), and dip 15 to 25 degrees west and southwest in the northern portion of the project area. The La India - La Viruela - La Cruz area comprises one of


37

several high-sulphidation epithermal mineralization centres recognized in the Mulatos district (Staude, 2001).

Silica alteration is both stratiform and discordant. Stratiform layers of silica are localized at the base of the dacitic tuffs within the epiclastic rocks (Figure 7.4). Silicification coincident with zones of higher grade gold mineralization is controlled by high angle faults and fractures. Geological mapping and surface rock chip sampling have identified zones of gold-bearing silica, silica alunite, and argillic alteration from numerous localities within the project area. The most extensive surface outcrops of altered and gold-bearing rock are found at the La India, La Viruela, La Cruz, Cerro de Oro, Espanola, Cieneguita, Espanola, and Cochis areas; these have been the focus of drill testing, and host the mineral resource described in this report. Another zone of outcropping gold mineralization has been identified at the Los Tubos area located 2 km east of the La Cruz area. This area offers potential to host additional resources, but this target has only been partially drill-tested and a resource has not been demonstrated.

Figure 7.4 – Drill-hole fence diagram through Viruela - La Cruz zone looking northeast


38

7.3 Mineralization Numerous epithermal gold occurrences are exposed in small abandoned mines or exploration workings throughout the La India property. Host rocks include hydrothermal breccias, andesite, dacite porphyry, and volcaniclastic strata. Both high-angle structural and low-angle stratigraphic controls are observed. Mineralized zones are characterized by alteration mineral assemblages that include alunite, dickite and/or pyrophyllite, accompanied by intense silica replacement of the host rock, with variable intensities of pyritization and/or hematization. Pyrite occurs both as disseminations and in microveinlets. In oxidized zones, relict hematite-limonite-goethite after pyrite is present. In some occurrences, primary hypogene specularite is associated with auriferous zones. The mineral occurrences for which resources have been estimated, the North and Main Zones, are described herein. Other mineral occurrences are described in Gray (2006).

7.3.1 North Zone comprising Cieneguita, Española, Cochis and La India areas

The North Zone is underlain by andesitic and felsic fragmental volcanic strata. Stratigraphically controlled zones of silica alteration and gold mineralization are restricted to the felsic units and outcrop extensively at the Cieneguita, Española, and Cochis areas. The mineralized strata dip gently to the west, and the silicified zones outcrop as prominent ridge-capping units and dip slopes. The silicified strata are 30 to 60 m thick, with down-dip extent of 300 m or more. The La Cieneguita zone is semi-continuously exposed for over 1,300 m of strike length; erosional or fault-offset remnants of the silicified zone are exposed at the Española and Cochis areas located to the east and southeast, respectively. Oxidation is intense and complete throughout the total thickness of the mineralized zone.

The inactive La India mine workings are developed in argillized porphyritic dacite intrusive that underlies silicified felsic fragmental strata. The silicification appears to be controlled by both stratigraphy and high-angle structures, and may be part of the silicified zone exposed to the north at the La Española and La Cieneguita areas. In contrast to other mineralized zones in the region (where gold is generally restricted to silicified zones), at the inactive La India mine significant gold mineralization occurs in argillized volcanic units. The La India area is also unusual in that thus far, it is the only gold occurrence in the project area that is also associated with disseminated copper mineralization; drilling has demonstrated a gold-copper-molybdenum metal assemblage in mineralized porphyry. Gold and copper mineralization is associated with quartz stockwork veinlets in the dacite with quartz-sericite-tourmaline alteration. Coxcomb textured and drusy quartz veins with molybdenite and pyrite that resemble D-veins in the dacite porphyry are found at depths of 200 to 300 m below surface.

North Zone mineralization type domains have been defined on the basis of alteration mineral assemblages and the form or control of gold occurrence (Smit, 2008). The domain definitions have been reviewed, and the mineralization type domains identified are appropriate for the deposit and valid for resource estimation purposes. The domain descriptions presented by Smit (2008 and personal communication) are summarized as follows:

• Domain 11: Variably silica- and/or clay-altered dacite / dacite tuff. Stratigraphically overlies the silicified dacite of Domain 12 and is probably the less altered equivalent.


39

• Domain 12: Massive silica+alunite-altered dacite tuff. Crosscutting field relationships indicate that the massive silicification preceded the economically important gold deposition events, and this unit is generally not significantly mineralized unless it is crosscut by high-angle structures and fracture zones. Forms tabular continuous sheets that typically form dip slopes and blanket the topographic surface. For purposes of metallurgical testing, this domain was subdivided into Domain 12 comprised of material dominated by silica and Domain 12A comprised of a mixture of silica and alunite. The silica-rich Domain 12 has higher densities and lower average gold recoveries than Domain 12A.

• Domain 14: Silica-clay-altered andesite, forming a stratiform and strata-bound layer lying beneath the lower contact of the dacite unit of Domain 12 or Domain 18. The zone is typically less than 10 m thick and exhibits a rapid gradational contact with increasing depth to unmineralized andesite.

• Domain 17: Mineralized porphyry comprising andesitic-dacitic feldspar porphyry that hosts disseminated, stockwork, and irregular structurally controlled gold mineralization with associated copper and molybdenum, occurring in the vicinity of the inactive La India mine workings. A lack of drill-hole data precluded inclusion of Domain 17 in the 2009 resource model, but subsequent drilling provided enough data to allow its use in the 2010 resource model, which is used as the resource base for the economic evaluation in this report.

• Domain 18: Silicified and clay-altered breccia, controlled by low-angle structural zones, continuous and correlated between drill holes only in the north part of the Cieneguita area. Occurs at the base of Domain 12 and is observed in drill core and underground workings as a zone of brecciated massive silicified dacite and the underlying silica- and clay-altered andesite, containing abundant hematite in fractures.

Additional drilling completed by Agnico-Eagle subsequent to acquiring the project has confirmed the North Zone geologic model created by Grayd. However, Agnico-Eagle has interpreted that higher grade portions of the mineralized domains occur at and parallel to the domain boundaries. Agnico-Eagle is currently modelling these higher grade areas as separate sub-domains, with hard boundaries imposed according to drill-hole assays used for resource estimation.

Figure 7.5 and Figure 7.6 demonstrate the typical morphology of the most significant North Zone ore domains and the spatial relationships between them.


40

Figure 7.5 – Section 706,300E, Cieneguita area, North Zone showing relationships between mineralization type Domains 12, 14 and 18 looking west


41

Figure 7.6 – Section 3,179,175, Cieneguita area, North Zone showing relationships between mineralization type Domains 11, 12 and 18 looking north

7.3.2 Main Zone comprising La Viruela, La Cruz and Cerro de Oro areas

The Main Zone target area is comprised of the La Viruela, La Cruz, and Cerro de Oro areas where gold concentrations are hosted by six distinct mineralization type domains. The domains were defined on the basis of alteration mineral assemblages and the form or control of gold occurrence (Smit, 2008). These domain definitions have been reviewed, and the mineralization type domains identified are appropriate for the deposit and valid for resource estimation purposes. The domain descriptions presented by Smit (2008 and personal communication) are summarized as follows:

• Domain 1: Dacite unit, variably altered to silica, clay and alunite mineral assemblages, in the La Viruela and La Cruz areas. This domain is defined both by lithology and alteration. Alteration is most intense in areas of high-angle structures and is in general most intense in the La Viruela area. Where quartz phenocrysts are preserved, conclusive identification of the dacite is possible, whereas in other cases the unit is defined on the basis of its consistent stratigraphic position overlying the Domain 2 stratiform massive silica unit.

• Domain 2: Massive silica unit, developed primarily in dacitic tuff, but also may be developed in contact zone with andesites and dacites in the La Viruela and La Cruz areas. Forms intense


42

stratiform zones of silica-replaced rock, locally with hydrothermal clays. Field relationships indicate that the massive silicification predated the economically important gold deposition event. For purposes of metallurgical testing, this domain was subdivided into Domain 2 comprised of material dominated by silica, and Domain 2A comprised of a mixture of silica and alunite. The silica-rich Domain 2 has higher densities and lower average gold recoveries than Domain 2A.

• Domain 3: Vuggy silica – silica-alunite unit. Silica-alunite-altered rock, typically developed in fine grained andesite tuffs, often with distinct vuggy silica texture, found in the La Viruela area. Mapping and drill-hole data demonstrate that the distribution of this unit is controlled by high-angle northeast-striking structures and by the lower contact of the Domain 2 massive silica unit. It typically forms an irregular layer developed at the base of Domain 2 in the La Viruela area and narrow high-angle tabular bodies that follow northeast structures. A silica-clay-altered andesite zone is present at La Viruela, occurring in gradational contact with the lower contact of Domain 3, reflecting a decreasing alteration intensity in the andesite tuff. In the La Cruz area, it occurs at the base of the Domain 2 massive silica unit. In the 2009 resource model this material was modeled separately as Domain 4, but subsequent drilling and analysis showed that the silica-clay-altered zone is a gradational zone at the boundary of the other domains, is volumetrically insignificant, and cannot be accurately modeled as a distinct unit. Therefore, Domain 4 is no longer used in the resource model, and the mineralized silica-clay-altered zones at the periphery of Domains 2 and 3 are included within the respective domains.

• Domain 5: Silica-clay-altered andesite with structurally controlled mineralization, found in the Cerro de Oro and La Cruz areas, comprised of silica-clay-altered andesite with irregular quarts veinlets and stockworks that cannot be specifically correlated between drill holes. Occurs stratigraphically lower than Domain 2. Drill-hole data indicate that this alteration style is at least in part centred about an andesitic-dacitic porphyry body. It also occurs peripherally to the silica bodies (Domain 6) in the La Cruz area. Where unoxidized, it contains 3% to 5% disseminated pyrite.

• Domain 6: Silicified bodies, apparently controlled by structural zones that can be correlated between drill holes in the Cerro de Oro and La Cruz areas, including the deep, high-grade La Cruz sulphide zone.

• Domain 7:Mineralized porphyry, comprising andesitic-dacitic feldspar porphyry that hosts disseminated, stockwork, and irregular structurally controlled gold mineralization. A lack of drill-hole data precluded inclusion of Domain 7 in the 2009 resource model, but subsequent drilling provided adequate data to allow its use in the 2010 resource model, which is used as the resource base for the economic evaluation in this report.

Figure 7.7, Figure 7.8 and Figure 7.9 demonstrate the typical morphology of the Main Zone mineralization type domains and the spatial relationships between them as in the June 2012 resource model.

Locally, auriferous hydrothermal breccias are developed along high angle faults and they appear to postdate all other alteration and mineralization events. The silica-alunite alteration zones at La


43

Viruela and La Cruz are continuous for hundreds of metres along strike, but have been offset by northwest-striking high-angle normal faults (Longo, 2006a, 2006b, 2006c). Oxidation extends to depths of greater than 100 m along structural zones and the majority of the drill-tested mineralization is oxide material. Highest grades and continuity of mineralization are found in the La Viruela area, but mineralization of varying tenor and style is continuous between the La Viruela, La Cruz, and Cerro de Oro areas.

Figure 7.7 – Section 3,176,600, La Viruela area showing typical morphologies and spatial relationships of Main Zone mineralization type Domains 1, 2, and 3 looking north


44

Figure 7.8 – Section 3,176,100, La Cruz area showing typical morphologies and spatial relationships of Main Zone mineralization type Domains 5 and 6 looking north

Figure 7.9 – Section 3,176,500N, La Viruela West area showing morphology of Main Zone mineralization type Domain 7 looking north


45

Deposit Type Item 8.The mineral occurrences present and being sought in the Cieneguita and La India areas of the North Zone, as well as the Main Zone of the project area are volcanic-hosted, epithermal, high-sulphidation (HS) gold-silver deposits. Such deposits may be present as veins and/or disseminated deposits. Some of the most intensely studied and described HS deposits include Summitville, Colorado (Stoffregen, 1987; Gray and Coolbaugh, 1994), Goldfield, Nevada (Ransome, 1909; Ashley, 1974; Vikre, 1989), Lepanto, Philippines (Hedenquist et al., 1998) and Julcani, Peru (Petersen et al., 1977; Deen et al., 1994). Based on these studies and others, excellent compilations of general characteristics and genetic and empirical models have been presented by Hayba et al. (1985), Heald et al. (1987), Berger and Henley (1988) and Arribas (1995).

General characteristics of HS deposits include:

• located within plutonic-volcanic arcs; • associated with intermediate calc-alkaline rocks, often in dome complexes; • alteration mineral assemblages indicative of high-temperature acidic hydrothermal fluids,

including an advanced argillic assemblage characterized by one or more of pyrophyllite, alunite, dickite, kaolinite, and diaspore;

• silicification and acid leaching of principal hydrothermal fluid conduits (forming the clichéd “vuggy silica” alteration);

• presence of minerals indicative of high sulphidation states, principally the sulphosalt enargite or its low-temperature polymorph luzonite;

• economically important quantities of gold and/or silver and/or copper; and • alteration zoning typified by a central zone of silica alteration flanked by a zone of advanced

argillic alteration, which in turn is surrounded by illite-dominated argillic alteration.

Genetic models proposed for HS systems call upon shallow emplacement of an oxidized calc-alkaline magma. As the magma crystallizes, a metal- and volatile-rich fluid phase exsolves and, at relatively low confining pressures, will separate into a low-salinity vapour and a hypersaline liquid. The vapour phase ascends and, when absorbed into connate or meteoric waters, forms a high-temperature, sulphate-rich, acidic hydrothermal fluid. As this hydrothermal fluid ascends and cools, acidity progressively increases, resulting in a vertical zonation where advanced argillic assemblages overlie illite-dominated argillic assemblages. Neutralization and cooling of the fluid during lateral fluid flow repeats this zoning pattern, with proximal silicified and leached zones flanked first by advanced argillic alteration, and then by more distal illite-dominated alteration. As the hydrothermal system evolves, younger, more reduced hydrothermal fluids, probably generated by interactions between ascending hypersaline magmatic fluid and meteoric-water-dominated convection cells, then transport and deposit metals (gold-silver-copper) along the same conduits utilized previously. Metals may be sourced directly from the magmatic fluids or leached from country rocks.

Over of 250,000 ounces of gold per year is currently produced from this type of deposit in the Sierre Madre region. Some currently exploited examples are listed below. The mineralization described for the mines in this section is not necessarily indicative of the mineralization at the La India, Sonora property.


46

Mulatos, Sonora

Owned and operated by Alamos Gold Incorporated. Exploits a HS mixed oxide and sulphide orebody by conventional open pit mining and heap leach methods. The mineral reserve at the time of mine construction was stated as 36.4 million tonnes @ 1.64 g/t gold, for total contained gold of 1.9 million ounces (M3 Engineering, 2004). In 2011 the Mulatos mine produced 153,000 ounces of gold (Alamos Gold, 2012a); the remaining proven and probable reserve as of December 31, 2011 was 65.0 million tonnes @ 1.14 g/t gold, containing 2.39 million ounces gold (Alamos Gold, 2012b). The estimates were obtained from sources believed to be reliable but cannot be verified.


47

Exploration Item 9.The previous owner, Grayd Resource Corporation, commenced exploration of the La India property in January 2004 and continued exploration activities up to the date of the acquisition of the project by Agnico-Eagle in November 2011. The exploration work from January 2004 through November 2011 is summarized in Item 6 of this report.

Agnico-Eagle has since continued exploration and development activities at both La India project and the adjoining Tarachi project. Exploration activities by Agnico-Eagle to date have included both regional and detailed geologic mapping of the concessions, rock chip geochemical sampling, diamond core drilling, and reverse circulation drilling.

Drilling Item 10.Drilling campaigns were conducted on the La India project by Grayd Resource Corporation every year from 2004 until its acquisition by Agnico-Eagle in November 2011. Agnico-Eagle has continued drilling at the project up to the effective date of this report (September 4, 2012). Previous operators conducted exploration drilling in the La Cruz and La Viruela areas of the Main Zone, as discussed in Item 6 of this report, but drillhole logs and assay data from that work are not available and do not form part of the project database.

For the purposes of the June 30, 2012 reserve and resource estimate, which is the basis of the economic evaluation discussed in this report, data from 189 diamond drill holes totaling 16,647 m and from 631 reverse circulation drill holes totaling 54,470 m with assay results available as of May 23, 2012 were included in the La India deposit database. The collars of all drill holes used in the June 30, 2012 reserve and resource estimate are located in Figure 10.1 and Figure 10.2. The intersections from the diamond and reserve circulation drill holes in this database are listed in Appendix 14.2. Holes DDH-07-15 through DDH-11-199 as well as RC-06-15 through RC-11-654 were drilled under the supervision of Grayd Resource Corp. Agnico-Eagle supervised the drilling of holes DDH-11-200 through DDH-12-237 and IN-12-238 as well as RC-06-15 through RC-12-721, and INR-12-722 through INF-12-763. Figure 7.4 shows a typical cross section through the Viruela – La Cruz areas of the Main Zone.


48

Figure 10.1 – North Zone: Location map of the collars of diamond and reverse circulation drill holes used in the June 30, 2012 reserve and resource estimate


49

Figure 10.2 – Main Zone: Location map of the collars of diamond and reverse circulation drill holes used in the June 30, 2012 reserve and resource estimate


50

10.1 Diamond Drilling In 2004, Grayd completed 1,224 m of BTW (4.2-cm-diameter) diamond drilling in 11 drill holes. Three of the holes were at the La Cieneguita target, one at La Española, and seven at the La India target, which are all parts of the North Zone. Drill targets were selected on the basis of rock chip geochemical anomalies and silica-alunite alteration exposed in surface outcrops. All drill holes were inclined at approximately –50 degrees and most were drilled due east in order to test interpreted northeast- and northwest-striking structures and stratigraphic controls of gold distribution. Ten of the eleven drill holes intersected gold mineralization, results of which were presented in Gray (2006). The drilling was conducted by Canrock Drilling Services SA de CV. The core logging and sampling was conducted by staff geologists of Resource Geosciences de Mexico SA de CV (RGM), at the project exploration camp on the La Amargosa ranch. The core was split with a diamond disk saw, with one half sent for assay and the other half preserved in the core library, located at the La Amargosa ranch and at the Hermosillo core shack. Core recoveries in mineralized zones averaged greater than 85%.

In 2007 and 2008, Grayd completed 3,948 m of HQ- and PQ-diameter diamond drilling in 54 drill holes. Seven of the drill holes completed within the block model area were used exclusively for metallurgical testing and do not form part of the resource model database. Drilling was conducted by Layne de Mexico SA de CV, a subsidiary of Layne Drilling Inc., and Britton Brothers Drilling, a subsidiary of Boart Longyear. All drill-hole collars were surveyed using differential correction GPS equipment. During drilling, Layne conducted downhole surveys using the Reflex downhole surveying instrument. Data indicate that borehole deviation from the initial azimuth and inclination was minimal, seldom exceeding a few degrees. Diamond core holes drilled by Britton Brothers were not surveyed during drilling, but were later re-entered and gyroscopically surveyed by Silver State Surveys of Oro Valley, Arizona. Core logging and sampling were conducted by consultant geologists of RGM at the La Amargosa ranch. Core was split with a diamond disk saw, with one half sent for assay and the other half preserved in the core library. Geologic information from the core holes was used to guide interpretation of lithological and alteration contacts, assays of core samples constrained the resource estimate, and core samples were used for specific gravity determinations.

In 2009, Grayd completed an additional 2,385 m of diamond core drilling in 37 drill holes. Drilling was conducted by Energold Drilling using a person-portable hydraulic drill rig and NTW tools. After drilling was completed, downhole orientations of diamond core holes were gyroscopically surveyed by Silver State Surveys.

In the period January 2010, after the data cutoff date for the 2010 resource estimate and up until the acquisition of the project by Agnico-Eagle in November 2011, Grayd completed an additional 5,329 m of diamond core drilling in 45 drill holes. Drilling was conducted by Energold Drilling using a person-portable hydraulic drill rig and NTW tools. After drilling was completed, downhole orientations of diamond core holes were gyroscopically surveyed by Silver State Surveys, and/or by downhole Reflex survey instruments supplied by the drill contractor.

After acquiring the project, Agnico-Eagle added a second diamond drill contractor to the project, Toro Drilling, to drill HQ-diameter holes. Agnico-Eagle completed an additional 14 diamond holes totaling 999 m until the data cutoff date of May 23, 2012, utilizing the same logging and sampling procedures previously established for the project. As of May 23, 2012, a total of 215 diamond holes totaling 18,734 m had been completed by Grayd and Agnico-Eagle.


51

10.2 Reverse Circulation Drilling From 2005 through January 22, 2010, Grayd completed 45,334 m of 13.34-cm-diameter reverse circulation drilling in 542 drillholes (Figure 10.1 and Figure 10.2). Drilling was conducted by Layne de Mexico SA de CV. All drill-hole collars were surveyed using differential correction GPS equipment. Silver State Surveys was contracted to conduct downhole gyroscopic surveys of the RC drillholes. Downhole deviation of drillholes generally did not exceed a few degrees relative to the planned azimuths and dips. The downhole survey data was included in the project database and controlled the projection of drill-hole intercepts used in constructing the resource model. Logging of drill cuttings and sampling was conducted by consultant geologists of RGM at the drill site. Samples generated were split by cyclone and by rotary or Jones splitter. One quarter split of the sample was sent for assay and the remainder was stored in a warehouse at the exploration camp. Reverse circulation drilling was used both for general exploration and for resource definition drilling. A total of 510 RC drill holes comprising 40,871 m were located within the resource area and constrained the 2010 resource model.

From January 22, 2010 until the time of its acquisition by Agnico-Eagle in November 2011, Grayd completed an additional 63 reverse circulation drill holes totaling 7,553 m.

Agnico-Eagle has continued drilling at La India. From November 2011 until the data cutoff date for this report, May 23, 2012, Agnico-Eagle completed an additional 41 reverse circulation drill holes totaling 4,263 m utilizing the same drill contractor and same logging and sampling procedures previously established for the project.

From January 2004 until May 23, 2012, a total of 648 reverse circulation drill holes totaling 55,616 m had been completed by Grayd and Agnico-Eagle.

10.3 Recovery Factors The average recovery for diamond drill core samples used in the 2010 resource estimate was 83% for BQ-diameter core and 85% for HQ-diameter core. Faulted and fractured rock formations in the North Zone created difficult drilling conditions and affected core recovery. Average core recovery for drill holes in the Main Zone was 86%, whereas average core recovery for drill holes in the North Zone was 82%. Although no statistical bias of gold assays was noted as a factor of core recovery, it is recommended that 641 assays corresponding to samples taken from the intervals with less than 50% recovery should be stricken from the database used for resource estimation.

Because of the variable nature of the rock types, fragmentation and void spaces, it was not possible to quantify the recovery factors for the reverse circulation samples. Silver State Surveys was contracted by Grayd to collect caliper measurements of borehole diameter on a select number of drill holes. Silver State therefore tested 14 RC drill holes and collected caliper measurements on them, and and re-entered them. Silver State advised Grayd that the borehole walls were stable and smooth and that no formations likely to cause down-hole contamination were present. The borehole diameter at the collar seldom varied by more than 10% from the bit diameter of 13.34 cm, and diameters generally decreased downhole as a factor of bit wear. Diameter decrease of as much as 2.5 cm was observed.


52

The average weight of quarter-split RC samples was 5.9 kg, which corresponds to approximately 50% of the estimated mass of a quarter-split of a 1-m-long, 0.127-m-diameter column without voids and with a specific gravity of 2.5.

Low recovered sample weights were noted in instances where RC drill holes intersected structural zones with open fractures. In these areas a lack of return air circulation caused a significant decrease in return of cuttings to surface. The existence of open, through-going fractures was conclusively indicated when air return was lost during drilling and drill-hole blowout was simultaneously seen at nearby unplugged boreholes. Under these conditions, sample recovery at times dropped to zero. Surface mapping and diamond core drilling provide conclusive evidence that structural zones are typically sites of higher gold concentrations; thus, the zones of low RC sample recovery are often the zones of greatest economic interest. There is no evidence that the low recovery samples are not representative of the intervals being drilled. However, in order to have a higher confidence level in the database used in the June 30, 2012 resource estimate, a minimum sample weight of 7.6 kg (approximately equal to a 20% recovery) was set. A total of 2,804 RC samples classified as underweight (less than 7.6 kg) were eliminated from the database, under the assumption that too much sample was missing to consider these samples representative.


53

Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security Item 11.11.1 Sampling Method, Nature, Spacing, Security and On-site

Preparation The methods used under the Grayd Resource Corporation ownershipship of the La India project (2004-2011) are described in this item. Those methods and systems have been continued since Agnico-Eagle acquired the project in November 2011. The on-site sampling, sample preparation and security continue to be conducted by personnel of the consultant RGM under the supervision of Agnico-Eagle senior managers. This section describes the methods of sampling (both surface rock chip and drilling), the sample preparation and labeling, and security measures taken at the site to ensure the quality of the samples sent to the laboratory for analysis. It also describes the analytical procedures at the laboratory and the results of quality control actions taken to provide confidence in the data.

11.1.1 Surface Rock Chip Sampling

Concurrent with geologic mapping, project geologists collect surface rock chip samples of outcropping zones of altered and mineralized rock. In excess of 9,000 rock chip samples have

been collected and analyzed. The objective of the sampling is to characterize the mineral deposit type(s) and to define zones of gold enrichment within the extensive alteration zones. Samples have been collected from the entire project claim block. Surface sample locations are selected to be representative of the geologic feature being investigated. Continuous channel samples are collected by chipping and collecting rock along a line perpendicular to the orientation of the structure or feature being sampled. The channel samples collected are 1 to 2 m in length. All samples are collected by hand, using hardened steel chisels, picks and geological hammers. Samples are placed in 19-cm x 30-cm cloth drawstring sample bags. Sample weights vary from 1.5 kg to 2.5 kg. Sample spacing is variable, depending on the exposure of the mineralized or altered rock. Samples are numbered in ascending order, using sample numbers and sample tags provided by the analytical laboratory. Sample locations are marked in the field with red spray paint, fluorescent plastic flagging, and aluminum tags. Sample descriptions, location data, and multi-element assay data are captured in digital format for importation into map-generation and interpretation software applications.

Surface sample data have not been used for estimation of the mineral resources.

11.1.2 Diamond Drill Core Sampling

Drill core is continuously sampled from beginning to end of the drill hole. Sample intervals are typically 1 m, and vary from this only when geologic contacts are used to limit a sample interval or poor recoveries force the grouping of sample intervals. The drill core diameter for drilling in 2004 was B thin wall (BTW, 4.2 cm). Drill core diameter for 2007 drilling was HQ (6.35 cm) and PQ (8.5 cm). Drill core diameter for the 2008 drilling was HQ. The core diameter for drilling from 2009 through the data cutoff date (May 23, 2012) has been NTW (5.71 cm) and HQ. Sample intervals are marked on the core by project geologists according to the lithology and the domain model. One half split of the core is collected for analysis and the other half is retained in the core library. Core is split with a diamond disk saw.


54

11.1.3 Reverse Circulation Drill Sampling

Industry standard sampling methods are utilized to collect the reverse circulation drill-hole samples. Centre-return 5¼” (13.34 cm) diameter bits are used. Drilling is conducted dry unless significant water production or hole plugging requires the use of wet drilling methods. While drilling in dry conditions, compressed air is used to force drill cuttings up the drill string for collection. Cuttings are forced into a cyclone and Jones splitter as drilling progresses. When drilling in wet conditions, water and compressed air are injected into the hole to force cuttings up the drill string, and a rotary splitter is employed. Samples are collected from the beginning to the end of the drill hole, at intervals of 1.52 m). Quarter-split sample weights are approximately 5.9 kg. Of a total of 33,358 m of reverse circulation drilling used in the 2010 resource model, 3,078 metres (9.2% of total) was drilled using wet methods.

11.1.4 Drill Sample Interval Parameters

Regular sample intervals of 1.52 m are used for reverse circulation drill holes. With few exceptions, a 1-m sample interval is used for diamond core holes. When geologic contacts between materials likely to be of strikingly different grade are recognized in drill core, sample intervals are adjusted to avoid mixing different mineralization types in a single sample.

11.1.5 Sample Security / Chain of Custody

Geologic descriptions of the sample, including nature of the sample, length of drill core or RC drill sample, lithology, alteration, and mineralization, are captured in geologic field books or on drill log forms. Samples are sealed in cloth bags with drawstring closures. Sample identification tags are placed with each sample in the sample bag, and a matching tag is retained in a sample book. Samples are stored on site in a locked warehouse at the exploration camp. Samples are picked up on site by ALS Chemex for delivery to their Hermosillo preparation facility, or are transported by RGM personnel to Hermosillo, Sonora, where they are delivered directly to ALS Chemex.

11.1.6 Personnel

Surface rock chip samples, drill core samples, and reverse circulation drill cutting samples have been collected by project geologists and technicians employed by RGM or previously by geologists employed by Newmont Mining. Senior managers from Grayd Resource Corporation and, since November 2011, from Agnico-Eagle have supervised but have not been directly involved in drill-hole sample collection or preparation, which is currently conducted by RGM personnel.

11.2 Sample Preparation and Analytical Procedures 11.2.1 Sample Preparation by Laboratory

Preparation work on the rock chip, diamond core and RD drilling samples is performed by ALS Chemex, an independent, ISO9001:2000-certified international provider of analytical services to mining and exploration companies. Sample preparation is conducted at the ALS Chemex facility in Hermosillo, Sonora. Analyses are performed at the ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, British Columbia.


55

Each sample is dried and the entire sample is crushed to more than 70% passing a 2-mm (Tyler 10 mesh) screen. Using a riffle splitter, a split of up to 250 grams is taken and pulverized to more than 85% passing a 75-micron (Tyler 200 mesh) screen.

11.2.2 Analytical Techniques

Gold content is first analyzed utilizing standard fire assay fusion, followed by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS). For those samples that yield assays of more than 10,000 ppb gold (10 g/t gold), the sample is assayed again utilizing standard fire assay fusion, followed by gravimetric analysis. Metallic or screen fire assays are conducted on select samples, as described in Item 16 of this report. The two standard fire assay methods used by the ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver and their detection and upper limits are described below.

11.2.2.1 Fire Assay Method 1 for Gold

Metal: Gold

Sample Decomposition: Fire Assay Fusion

Analytical Method: Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS)

A prepared sample is fused with a mixture of lead oxide, sodium carbonate, borax, silica and other reagents as required, inquarted with 6 mg of gold-free silver and then cupelled to yield a precious metal bead.

The bead is digested for half an hour in dilute nitric acid. Hydrochloric acid is then added and the solution is digested for an additional hour. The digested solution is cooled, diluted to 7.5 ml with demineralized water, homogenized and then analyzed by atomic absorption spectrometry. The gold detection limit is 5 ppb (0.005 g/t) and the upper limit is 10,000 ppb (10 g/t).

11.2.2.2 Fire Assay Method 2 for Gold

Metal: Gold

Sample Decomposition: Fire Assay Fusion

Analytical Method: Gravimetric

A prepared sample is fused with a mixture of lead oxide, sodium carbonate, borax, silica and other reagents in order to produce a lead button. The lead button containing the precious metals is cupelled to remove the lead. The remaining gold and silver bead is parted in dilute nitric acid, annealed and weighed as gold. Silver, if requested, is then determined by the difference in weights. Optionally, blanks with known silver and gold content can be assayed at the same time to determine the correction factor for silver loss in the fusion and cupellation. The gold detection limit is 50 ppb (0.05 g/t) and the upper limit is 1,000 g/t.


56

11.2.2.3 ICP – AES Analysis for Other Elements

All other elements listed below were analyzed utilizing Inductively Coupled Plasma - Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP - AES) methods. The method and the detection and upper limits for each element are described in Table 11.1 below.

Sample Decomposition: Nitric Aqua Regia Digestion

Analytical Method: Inductively Coupled Plasma - Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP - AES)

A prepared sample (0.50 grams) is digested with aqua regia for at least one hour in a hot water bath. After cooling, the resulting solution is diluted to 12.5 ml with demineralized water, mixed and analyzed by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry. The analytical results are corrected for inter-element spectral interferences.


57

Table 11.1 – Element concentrations analyzed and analytical limits.

11.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Practices Throughout the drilling campaigns, Grayd and more recently Agnico-Eagle have implemented a quality assurance and quality control program appropriate for an exploration and resource development program. The methods of sample preparation, analysis and security of samples from La India have been reviewed by external consultant Matthew Gray (Gray, 2012a,b).

Element Symbol Lower Detection Limit

Upper Detection Limit

* Aluminum Al 0.01% 15% Antimony Sb 2 ppm 1% Arsenic As 2 ppm 1% * Barium Ba 10 ppm 1% * Beryllium Be 0.5 ppm 0.01% Bismuth Bi 2 ppm 1% Boron B 10 ppm 10,000 ppm Cadmium Cd 0.5 ppm 0.05% * Calcium Ca 0.01% 15% * Chromium Cr 1 ppm 1% Cobalt Co 1 ppm 1% Copper Cu 1 ppm 1% * Gallium Ga 10 ppm 1% Iron Fe 0.01% 15% * Lanthanum La 10 ppm 1% Lead Pb 2 ppm 1% * Magnesium Mg 0.01% 15% Manganese Mn 5 ppm 1% Mercury Hg 1 ppm 1% Molybdenum Mo 1 ppm 1% Nickel Ni 1 ppm 1% Phosphorus P 10 ppm 1% * Potassium K 0.01% 10% * Scandium Sc 1 ppm 1% Silver Ag 0.2 ppm 0.01% * Sodium Na 0.01% 10% * Strontium Sr 1 ppm 1% Sulphur S 0.01% 10% * Thallium Tl 10 ppm 1% * Titanium Ti 0.01% 10% * Tungsten W 10 ppm 1% Uranium U 10 ppm 1% Vanadium V 1 ppm 1% Zinc Zn 2 ppm 1%

*Elements for which the digestion may be incomplete


58

11.3.1 Assays

11.3.1.1 Blanks

During the 2004 diamond drill program, project geologists inserted blank samples into the sample stream at an interval of one blank sample every 50 samples on regular intervals. Blank material during the 2004 diamond drill program was prepared from manually crushed post-mineral rhyolite that outcrops in the project area. Numerous assays of the rhyolite prior to initiation of the drill program failed to detect gold above the 0.005 ppm assay limit, however these blank samples are not “certified” samples prepared by round robin laboratory testing of a bulk homogenized sample. Detection of gold in these blank samples is not definitive proof of sample preparation or analytical errors, as the possibility that the blank sample itself contains some gold cannot be completely discounted. Nonetheless, these blank samples are an indicator of potential sample preparation and/or analytical errors. Details and the compilation of the blank material are described in Gray et al., 2010 and the QA/QC reports from external consultant Matthew Gray (Gray, 2012a,b).

From 2004 through May 23, 2012, a total of 1,284 certified blanks, equivalent to approximately 2.4% of all drill samples submitted for assay, were inserted into the drill sample stream and 1,181 (Figure 11.1 and Figure 11.2) of these blanks were preceded by a sample containing detectable gold. When blank samples yielded anomalous gold concentrations, the blanks and samples in sequence were re-assayed. If it is assumed that the blank samples truly are “blank” and do not contain gold above the 0.005-ppm detection limit, then these data are consistent with a slight and immaterial amount of contamination during sample preparation. This possible contamination affects less than 6.5% of all samples, is generally less than 0.02 g/t gold, and is notable only for the highest grade samples. The data do not indicate any significant or material problems with the sample preparation or assay procedures.

Figure 11.1 – Gold assays, certified blank samples


59

Figure 11.2 – Gold assays, certified blanks and samples immediately preceding blanks, 2006 through May 23, 2012 drill programs

11.3.1.2 Standards

During the reverse circulation and diamond drilling programs from 2004 through May 23, 2012, standards were inserted into the sample stream approximately every 40 samples. The standards were prepared and certified by CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Canada or Rocklabs Ltd. of New Zealand. The standards were subjected to round robin testing and verification by multiple commercial laboratories. The standards were in the form of pulps and were inserted into the sample stream after the laboratory had completed its sample preparation, thus the standards serve to test the analytical accuracy and precision of the lab, but do not address the issue of contamination during sample preparation. Sixteen different standards of different gold grades were used (Table 11.2). A total of 1,411 standards, equivalent to approximately 2.6% of all drill program samples submitted for assay, were certified reference standards.


60

Table 11.2 – Standards sed in assays for the La India QA/QC program, 2004 through May 23, 2012

Control standard failure was defined by a reported gold content outside of a 2-standard-deviation range of the reference standard expected gold content. The failure of a control standard triggered an investigation into the cause. In cases where the failure was not conclusively shown to be a result of a transcription or labeling error, repeat analysis was performed for samples included in the same work order as the failed control standard. If results from the repeat analyses differed significantly from the original assays, they were used in the database.

A comparison of standard assay results from ALS Chemex to the certified assay means for the standards (Table 11.3 and Figure 11.3) indicates that the assays obtained during the Grayd and Agnico-Eagle drilling programs are reliable, although the ALS Chemex assays show a systematic but immaterial bias related to gold grade range. Details of the results for these standards are presented in Gray et al., 2010.


61

Table 11.3 – Summary of assay results of certified standards from 2004 through May 23, 2012

Figure 11.3 – Chart of percent difference of the standards in Table 11.3 from reference values, ALS Chemex assay results, as function of standard reference value in ppm gold


62

11.3.1.3 Field Duplicates – Rig Splits

Field duplicates collected at the drill rig were inserted into the RC drill sample stream at a ratio of one duplicate every 40 samples in the period 2004 through May 23, 2012. Field duplicates were not collected from diamond drill holes. A total of 901 field duplicates, equivalent to approximately 1.7% of all drill program samples, and 2.4% of all RC drill samples submitted for assay, were inserted into the drill sample stream. Field duplicates consist of a quarter rig split of the RC drilling chips collected from the same half split that yields the sample sent to the lab. Field duplicates were submitted blind to the laboratory, i.e., the lab could not distinguish which samples were field duplicates because a consistent policy on duplicate numeration was not followed. About 88% of the duplicates were submitted as the sample immediately following the original sample, and the remainder were submitted out of sequence with the original sample. To eliminate statistical noise associated with assays at or near the detection limit, for statistical evaluation of the data set, sample pairs with mean gold contents of less than three times the detection limit of 0.005 ppm were excluded. The rig split duplicates showed an insignificant negative bias (~2%) compared to originals and 90% of rig split duplicates had less than 38% absolute relative difference from originals (Figure 11.4). Both relative and absolute values of differences are highest at lower grade ranges. The precision demonstrated by the rig split duplicates is at the higher limits of normal ranges observed for gold deposits. The data indicate the sampling is reliable and adequate for resource estimation purposes, but the suitability of the reverse circulation sampling method should continue to be monitored and verified.

Figure 11.4 – Percentile plot of absolute relative differences of field, preparation, and lab duplicates


63

11.3.1.4 Sample Preparation Duplicates – Coarse Reject

A total of 1,136 sample preparation duplicates, equivalent to approximately 2% of all drill program samples submitted for assay between 2004 and May 23, 2012, were inserted into the sample stream. Preparation duplicates were prepared from a split of course reject material at the prep lab. To eliminate the statistical noise associated with assays at or near the detection limits, for statistical evaluation of the data set, sample pairs with mean gold contents of less than three times the detection limit of 0.005 ppm were excluded. The sample preparation duplicates show less than 2.5% bias compared to originals, and 90% of sample preparation duplicates have less than 19% absolute relative difference from originals (Figure 11.4). Both relative and absolute values of differences are highest at lower grade ranges. The precision demonstrated by the coarse reject duplicates is within normal ranges observed for gold deposits, and the data indicate the sampling is reliable and adequate for resource estimation purposes.

11.3.1.5 Lab Duplicates – Pulps

A total of 2,034 lab duplicates, equivalent to approximately 4% of all drill program sample pulps from 2004 to May 23, 2012, were re-assayed by ALS Chemex. Lab duplicates consist of a repeat analysis of an already prepared and analyzed sample pulp. To eliminate the statistical noise associated with assays at or near the detection limits, for statistical evaluation of the data set, sample pairs with mean gold contents of less than three times the detection limit of 0.005 ppm were excluded. The pulp re-assays show less than a 1% bias compared to the original assay, and 90% of laboratory pulp duplicates have less than 14% absolute relative difference from originals (Figure 11.4). Both relative and absolute values of differences are highest at lower grade ranges. The precision demonstrated by the pulp re-assays is within normal ranges observed for gold deposits, and the data indicate the sampling is reliable and adequate for resource estimation purposes.

11.3.1.6 Comparison of the Precision of Field, Lab, and Assay Duplicates

In order, the field (rig), lab (preparation), and assay (pulp re-assay) duplicates demonstrate progressively greater precision. At the 90th percentile, the absolute percent relative difference for the original-duplicate data sets decreases from 36% to 19% to 14% respectively for the field (rig), lab (prep), and assay duplicates (Figure 11.4). Universally accepted limits for what should be considered adequate precision do not exist, although a widely used rule of thumb is that for field duplicates the relative difference at the 90th percentile should correspond to less than 30%, for lab (prep) duplicates less than 20%, and for assay duplicates less than 10%. Such precision is seldom encountered in epithermal gold deposits, and the ranges of precision observed for the La India project are within normal parameters. The La India data follow the expected sequential increase in precision and exhibit no significant bias between duplicate and original data sets. La India duplicate assay data indicate that sampling and assay procedures do not introduce bias or unacceptable error into the La India assay database, and that the database is reliable and suitable for use in resource estimation.

11.3.1.7 Metallic (Screen) Fire Assays

ALS Chemex conducted metallic or screen fire assays on 176 samples selected from mineralized intervals of varying grades. Metallic or screen fire assays test specifically for the occurrence of gold in the coarse fraction of a sample and the possibility of an inhomogeneous distribution of coarse particulate gold relative to the sample size (a phenomena commonly referred to as “nugget effect”).


64

Coarse reject material from the sample submitted to ALS Chemex for the regular fire assay was used. The material was screened into two size fractions: >100 mesh and <100 mesh. Both fractions were weighed. Multiple analyses of the fine fraction were performed and the entire coarse fraction was fire assayed. Using the gold content determined for each size fraction and their respective weights, a gold content for the entire sample was calculated. This gold content was then compared to the gold assay returned by standard fire assay of the same sample. A comparison of results is shown in Figure 11.5. Results from the two methods are nearly identical. The regression line between the two data sets has a slope of 1.036 and a correlation coefficient of 0.972 and the overall mean and assay distribution for the two data sets are similar, with a 5% difference in mean gold grade between the two sample populations (table embedded in Figure 11.5). The data indicate that heterogeneous distribution of gold or “nugget effect” is not a concern for the drill-hole data set. Because no significant bias is present between the data sets, and the overwhelming majority of assays are standard fire assay, in cases where both standard fire assay and metallics assays are available, the standard fire assays were used in the resource model database.

Figure 11.5 – Plot comparing regular fire assay and screen fire assay analytical results.

11.3.1.8 Check Assays

Subsequent to receipt of assay results from ALS Chemex, pulps were selected and sent to Acme Analytical Laboratories in Vancouver, British Columbia for analyses. The objective of the testing was to verify the results provided by ALS Chemex. Check assay data corresponding to drill holes DDH10-164 through DDH12-272 and RC10-590 through INR12-739 were not available. As of May 23, 2012, a total of 904 pulps, corresponding to 2% of the database, were assayed by Acme, and

0

5

10

15

20

0 5 10 15 20

Au p

pm, m

etal

lics a

ssay

Au ppm, fire assay

Metallics vs. Standard Fire Assay

perfect correlation line


65

correspond to drilling through DDH10-163 and RC10-589. Results from the two labs are nearly identical (Figure 11.6 and Figure 11.7), and the overall means for the two data sets are within 2.4%. (table embedded in Figure 11.6). The data indicate that analytical results provided by ALS Chemex are reliable and suitable for use in resource estimation.

Figure 11.6 – Plot comparing Acme and ALS Chemex fire assay analytical results


66

Figure 11.7 – Percent relative difference, ACME check assay vs. ALS Chemex assay

Check assays from drill holes completed through May 23, 2012 should be added to the database and evaluated; the control sample data from these drill holes indicate that the ALS Chemex data are reliable, and thus the lack of check assay data should not preclude use of the data.

11.3.1.9 Reverse Circulation – Diamond Core Drill hole Twins

In order to analyze for bias caused by drilling methods, 30 reverse circulation – diamond core drill-hole twin sets were created and analyzed. Each set consists of one RC and one diamond drill hole, drilled from the same drill pad at the same orientation. Separation between the two drill holes ranged from 1 m to 8 m. Results are shown graphically in Gray et al. (2010). Most twins yield very similar results; the variations observed between the paired drill-hole sets lie within the range expected for a gold deposit with structural controls on gold distribution. A graphical analysis of the results shows no bias between the drilling methods. A statistical review of the RC and DDH data sets (Gray and Giroux, 2010) similarly found no bias between the RC and DDH data sets.

11.4 Opinion on Adequacy of Sample Preparation, Security and Analytical Procedures

In the opinion of the author, the samples collected from the La India project are of high quality and representative of the mineralized areas being evaluated. Sample preparation, security, and analytical procedures used were adequate to insure the integrity and reliability of the sample database.


67

The methods used under the Grayd Resource Corporation ownership of the La India project have been continued since Agnico-Eagle acquired the project in November 2011. The on-site sampling, sample preparation and security continue to be conducted by personnel of the consultant RGM under the supervision of Agnico-Eagle senior managers. Samples are sealed in cloth bags with drawstring closures. Sample identification tags are placed with each sample in the sample bag, and a matching tag is retained in a sample book. Samples are stored on site in a locked warehouse at the exploration camp. Samples are picked up from the site by ALS Chemex for delivery to its Hermosillo preparation facility, or are transported by RGM personnel to Hermosillo, where they are delivered directly to ALS Chemex.

Surface sample locations are selected to be representative of the geologic feature being investigated. Continuous channel samples are collected by chipping and collecting rock along a line perpendicular to the orientation of the structure or feature being sampled. Industry standard methods and best professional judgment are used in collection of the rock chip samples; however, by their nature, manually collected rock chip samples are of lesser quality than mechanically collected continuous samples (i.e., cored or cut samples). The surface rock chip samples are of sufficient quality and confidence to be used for preliminary assessments of the project’s mineral potential, and serve to indicate areas of mineralization; however surface samples are not used for purposes of resource estimation.

Diamond and reverse circulation drill holes are selected to target specific geological or geophysical features, with orientations selected to intersect the interpreted structural and/or stratigraphic controls of mineralization. Because many drill holes have targeted zones hosting both northwest- and northeast-striking structures, the majority of the drill holes have been drilled due east or due west in order to test both orientations. With the exception of 54 reverse circulation drill sample intervals and 523 core samples of low recovery, drill sample recovery has been adequate to provide representative results for the tested features.

11.5 Recommendations • Continue the QA/QC protocols currently in use at the project. • Remove from the resource estimation database 2,804 RC samples with low recovered sample

weights. This will conservatively affect the resource estimate, resulting in decreased average grade and possibly fewer tonnes.

• Remove from resource estimation database 641 diamond drillhole samples taken from intervals of less than 50% core recovery. This will conservatively affect the resource estimate (result in decreased average grade and possibly fewer tonnes).

• Examine the representativeness of the lower recovery samples, both DDH core and RC chips, via additional twin drill holes and utilization of drilling methods that yield higher recoveries (e.g., PQ core, triple tube).

• Determine the reason for, and appropriateness of, changing a mineralized interval in drill hole RC09-477 as reported in the March 2, 2012 database to a barren interval as reported in the May 23, 2012 database.

• In light of the acceptable but relatively high variability demonstrated by RC field duplicates (90% of duplicate-original pairs yield less than 36% absolute relative difference), be vigilant in QA/QC controls of RC sampling methods and continually monitor QA/QC data to insure that sample quality is acceptable and data reliable.


68

• Update the check assay database and continually evaluate performance and reliability of the main assay lab, ALS Chemex.

Composite the DDH core recovery and assay composites to same down-hole intervals, matching as closely as possible the actual sample interval, in order to better classify DDH core sample assays relative to core recovery.

The sample recovered for first 6 m of most reverse circulation drill holes consists of blown out cuttings captured at the collar during setting of the surface casing, and thus is not a true RC samples. Where drill holes are collared in or near the bedrock surface, the top 6 m of these samples are considered relevant data; 1,207 samples of this type are included in the database, but are tagged as casing samples to allow for a separate treatment should it be deemed necessary. For the purposes of the resource estimates presented in this report, these samples are treated identically to the true RC samples.

Diamond core – reverse circulation twin pairs are available for 30 sets of RC and DDH drill holes drilled at approximately the same location. Variations between the mineralized intervals intersected by the RC and diamond drill holes are within the expected normal range of variability and no bias of gold intercepts related to drilling method has been observed. Statistical comparison of the entire RC drill-hole database to the complete DDH database also indicates no bias between the sample sets, as more fully discussed in Item 14.


69

Data Verification Item 12.The previous owner Grayd Resource Corporation conducted exploration drilling programs at the La India project from 2004 through November 2011 when Grayd was acquired by Agnico-Eagle. No data are available from exploration programs conducted prior to Grayd’s involvement with the project, except historical summaries indicating that approximately 8,200 m of diamond core and reverse circulation drilling was completed at the Main Zone of the La India deposit in the late 1980s and early 1990s (Jenkins, 1994; McDougall, 1995). Historical data are not included in the drill-hole database and are not used for estimating mineral resources at the project.

In diamond drill campaigns carried out from 2004 through May 23, 2012, Grayd and subsequently Agnico-Eagle completed 18,734 m diamond core drilling in 215 drill-holes, and 55,616 m of reverse circulation drilling in 648 drill holes at the Main and North zones of the La India gold project, as described in Item 10 of this report.

Throughout the campaigns, Grayd and Agnico-Eagle followed a quality assurance and quality control program appropriate for an exploration program. The results of the QA/QC program verify that the analytical results of the drill samples are reliable and suitable for resource estimation purposes. Key components of the QA/QC program are: systematic insertion into the sample stream of blank samples and standards; analyses of duplicate samples; confirmatory assays by a second laboratory; independent confirmatory sampling, and use of multiple analytical techniques to confirm validity of results, as described in Item 11 of this report. Approximately 10% of the database was directly verified by D. Doucet during the due diligence with included check assay samples of RC intersections and core drilling. Moreover, the personnel of Agnico-Eagle’s Technical Services group also verified the whole database during the conversion into DHLogger software.

12.1 Independent Verification of Database and Independent Sampling

In May 2012, external consultant Matthew Gray cross-checked the May 23, 2012 project database against the original certified assay sheets and verified that the data were correctly transcribed. At that time, the database contained data through drill holes RC12-696 and DDH12-214. For the QA/QC review of the database used for the June 30, 2012 reserve and resource estimate, a database was provided to Mr. Gray directly by an Agnico-Eagle geologist as a locked Access database file, Exploration Viewer – La India – 23-05-2012.mdb, 397,116Kb, dated May 27, 2012. In order to verify that the data starting with drill holes RC09-546 and DDH09-102 remained unchanged in the current database, all core and RC chip assays through drill holes RC12-696 and DDH12-214 were extracted and compared to the May 23, 2012 data, which was the last dataset that had been verified. Slight variances that exceed rounding errors were noted indicating that modifications had been made to the data previously verified. Data investigation revealed that 62 RC drill-hole assays and two diamond drill core assays had been changed in the May 23, 2012 database compared to the March 2, 2012 database. Different sample certificates are noted for the changed assays, suggesting that sample batches were re-assayed and the results from different assay certificates were incorporated into the database. For most of the samples where changes of assays were noted, they were minor and immaterial and are consistent with the slight changes expected when a sample is re-assayed. However, for drill hole RC09-477, a 27.44-m mineralized interval reported in the March 2, 2012


70

database has been changed to a barren (less than detection limit) interval in the May 23, 2012 database. The validity of this change in the database needs to be verified by examining original sample logs and assay certificates. With the exception of the 62 samples that were corrected, no major variances that exceeded rounding errors were noted, indicating that no other modifications were made to the data that had been previously verified.

For selected mineralized and barren drill-hole intercepts, assay certificates provided directly by ALS Chemex were compared to the locked digital database and no discrepancies were noted. Because Mr. Gray had access to original certificates corresponding to assays received only up to April 25, 2012, it was not possible to verify the latest assay certificates included in the May 23, 2012 database.

At various times during field visits to the project, Mr. Gray collected rock chip samples from outcrop, RC cuttings from the splitter at the drill rig, and drill cutting reject samples from the second split of reverse circulation drill samples stored on site. The samples were delivered by the author to ALS Chemex for assay. The resultant database is too small to allow for meaningful statistical analyses, but the analytical results confirmed the gold mineralization indicated by previous sampling at the project, as reported by Gray (2010).

Drill-hole assay data for drill holes RC-10-547 and later as well as DDH-10-103 and later are contained in 102 assay certificates from ALS Chemex. The author randomly selected 21 of the original assay certificates and compared them to the database. Subsequently, the author reviewed the database and using the criteria of significant mineralized intercepts, selected an additional seven assay certificates for review. All assay certificates were provided directly to the author by ALS Chemex in the form of locked pdf files. Twenty eight assay certificates (27% of all assay certificates) were directly checked against the digital database. No errors were discovered in the database, and it faithfully reflects the certified assay data.

At various times during field visits to the project external consultant Matthew Gray collected rock chip samples from outcrop, RC cuttings from the splitter at the drill rig, and drill cutting reject samples from the second split of RC drill samples stored on site. The samples were delivered by him to ALS Chemex for assay. That resultant database is too small to allow for meaningful statistical analyses, but the analytical results confirmed the gold mineralization indicated by previous sampling at the project, as summarized in Table 12.1.


71

Table 12.1 – Gold assays of independent samples collected by consultant Matthew Gray

12.2 Diamond Drill Hole Core Recovery Analysis Previous resource estimates for the La India project did not use assays derived from core samples with measured recoveries less than 31%, which was a threshold arbitrarily determined as the mean core recovery minus two standard deviations. A statistical analysis of the data by external consultant Gary Giroux (Gray et al., 2010) did not indicate any bias between the high and low recovery sample subsets, but Mr. Giroux did not consider the low recovery samples to be representative and elected to remove them from the database.

An analysis of core recovery for the current project database is summarized in Table 12.2. If the same selection criterion as that used in the 2010 resource estimate is applied, i.e., a threshold of the mean recovery minus 2 times the standard deviation, then core samples from intervals of less than 51.5% recovery would be removed from the database used for resource estimation. The mean less 2 standard deviations criterion previously applied was arbitrary. For this study a simpler but still arbitrary subdivision of core samples was made. Sample subsets were selected using recoveries greater or less than 50% with the objective of looking for grade bias between higher and lower recovery sample sets.

Drillhole or Surface Sample From To Sample ID

Au gpt original

Au gpt independent sample Comment

MAG-1 n/a n/a 682429 0.64 0.89 surface sampleMAG-2 n/a n/a 682159 3.11 5.60 surface sampleRC05-14 350 355 637566 8.64 7.97 La CruzRC05-14 590 595 637632 1.28 1.14 La CruzRC08-278 155 160 388825 41.60 36.90 CieneguitaRC08-283 140 145 429519 22.00 21.20 CieneguitaRC08-301 140 145 472525 0.81 0.95 Cerro de OroRC08-311 165 170 515244 1.77 1.56 La ViruelaRC08-313 240 245 515390 0.92 2.62 La ViruelaRC08-314 180 185 515454 0.71 1.42 La ViruelaRC08-316 140 145 515518 1.02 0.46 La ViruelaRC08-332 30 35 516450 0.17 0.17 Cerro de OroRC08-357 110 115 512556 3.09 3.66 CieneguitaRC08-398 85 90 641011 0.79 0.75 La CruzRC08-417 65 70 641714 0.21 0.23 CieneguitaRC09-497 45 50 497-45-50 0.23 0.24 La ViruelaRC09-498 185 190 498-185-190 1.01 1.08 La ViruelaRC09-499 55 60 499-55-60 0.17 0.17 La ViruelaRC09-501 90 95 501-90-95 0.06 0.07 La ViruelaRC09-505 110 115 505-110 0.36 0.17 La ViruelaRC09-505 120 125 505-120 0.32 0.30 La ViruelaRC09-505 130 135 505-120 0.30 0.29 La ViruelaRC09-505 235 240 505-235 0.53 0.94 La Viruela


72

The best analysis would result from compositing core recoveries and assays to the same down-hole compositing interval, but that information is not available so instead the database was queried for core recoveries greater and less than 50% and individual assays were mapped to intervals for which recovery information was available. A total of 15,602 core assays were paired with recovery data and analyzed.

Table 12.2 – Summary statistics, drill core recovery

Note: five records with nonsensical data, assumed to be result of typographic errors during data capture, stricken from database.

Note: 40 records where recovery was calculated at >100%, assumed to be caused by slight in-box measurement errors, set to 100%.

Core samples for which at least 50% of the sample interval was obtained from intervals with measured core recovery of less than 51.3% were selected from the database and analyzed in comparison to samples collected from intervals with greater than 51.3% recovery. Note that sample intervals are generally every 1 m whereas core recovery intervals correspond to the core barrel length of each core run, up to a maximum of 3.05 m. Thus, many sample intervals partially overlap two core recovery intervals. Manual inspection was used to select the appropriate grouping for the assay samples that overlap two distinct recovery intervals. A total of 641 samples, out of a drill core assay database of 15,602 samples, were selected into the low-recovery data subset.

Statistical analysis of the high- and low-recovery sample subsets described above indicates bias between the two data sets, as shown by a comparison of the frequency distribution of gold assays of the high recovery (>50%) and low recovery (<50%) databases. The low recovery dataset yields higher gold assays at every point along the frequency distribution curve (Figure 12.1), and the low recovery data subset yields a mean gold assay of 0.465 g/t, compared to 0.284 g/t for the higher recovery data subset (Table 12.3). This statistically significant difference between gold assays of the two datasets does not of itself indicate that one dataset is less representative or reliable than the other. The highest grade gold mineralized zones at the La India project are typically hosted by structural zones comprised of faulted and fractured rock. These zones would reasonably be expected to yield both lower recoveries and higher gold assays than other zones. Thus the higher grade of the low-recovery data subset might not be an artifact or result of non-representative samples, but to the contrary may suggest that the resource model will be inappropriately biased towards a lower gold


73

grade if the low-recovery samples are not used in resource estimation. The same grade distribution differences were observed for low- and high-recovery RC samples.

Figure 12.1 – Frequency distribution, gold ppm, by core recovery classification (>50% vs. <50%)

Table 12.3 – Summary statistics, gold assays, high-recovery (>50%) and low-recovery (<50%) sample subsets


74

In the absence of observable indications that lower recovery intervals are not representative, any sample selection criterion based on core recovery is arbitrary. A recovery threshold for inclusion in the database cannot be objectively determined, but for the purposes of the current resource modeling exercise, it is recommended that 641 assays corresponding to samples taken from intervals of less than 50% recovery should be stricken from the database used for resource estimation. These samples are listed in Appendix 12.1 of this report. This restriction is arbitrary and conservative in that it selectively removes a higher grade sample population from the dataset comprising 4.1% of the drill core database.

12.3 RC Sample Recovery Analysis Down-hole borehole diameters were not measured, so no accurate estimate of RC sample recovery can be made. However, recovered sample weight can be used as a proxy for relative recovery. If a borehole diameter equal to the bit size, 5.25 inches (13.3 cm), and a specific gravity of 2.5 are assumed, 100% recovery from a 1.00-m sample interval should yield approximately 38 kg of sample. True borehole widths exceed the bit diameter due to the eccentric motion of the bit and some caving of borehole walls. Thus, a 100%-recovered 1-m interval sample should yield at least 38 kg of material. ALS Chemex provided data on the received sample weight of each RC sample. Samples sent to ALS Chemex for assay were 100%, 50%, or 25% splits collected at the drill rig. These data were extracted from the database and used in conjunction with the reported sample interval length to normalize all reported sample recoveries back to kilograms of sample recovered per 1.00-m interval drilled. Results are summarized in Figure 12.2.


75

Figure 12.2 – Histogram showing recovered RC sample weights

Previous resource estimates for the La India project did not use assays derived from RC samples with measured recoveries less than a threshold arbitrarily determined as the mean RC sample weight minus 2.5 times standard deviations. No statistical analysis was made to check for bias between the arbitrarily separated datasets, but the low recovery samples were not considered to be representative and were removed from the database (Gray et al., 2010).

If the same statistical criteria are applied to the current dataset, all RC samples would be considered valid based upon sample weight because the mean less 2.5 times standard deviations yields a negative number.

If a threshold sample weight approximately equal to a 20% recovery is used (7.6 kg), then a total of 2,804 RC samples are classified as underweight. Summary statistics for the underweight and acceptable weight samples show a significant bias between the two datasets, with the low sample weight samples yielding a mean gold assay of 0.432 g/t compared to 0.304 g/t for the acceptable weight samples. The frequency distribution charts of the two datasets show different grade distributions and indicate that the two sample populations are statistically distinct (Figure 12.3).


76

Figure 12.3 – Cumulative frequency, gold assays, low- and high-recovery RC sample datasets

Previous statistical studies of gold grade and RC sample recovery did not indicate significant differences between high- and low-recovery datasets. The reason for the different conclusions reached in this analysis is unknown. The current RC sample weight database differs from the previous not just in the inclusion of new drilling but in the reporting of sample weights for earlier generation RC drill holes. This additional data may be the cause for the differing result obtained in this evaluation. There are no compelling geologic observations to suggest that the lower recovery samples are not representative, and the higher grade bias of the lower recovery samples is geologically reasonable. High-grade mineralized zones, especially in the North Zone, are associated with broken structural zones where sample recovery is typically lower than average. In the absence of observable indications that lower recovery intervals are not representative, any sample selection criteria based on sample recovery is arbitrary. A recovery threshold for inclusion in the database cannot be objectively determined. Previous resource estimates for the deposit have excluded low-recovery samples from use in resource estimation. Therefore, to consistently apply sample selection criteria based on RC sample weight as a proxy for recovery, then the author recommends that 2,804 assays corresponding to samples taken from intervals of less than 7.6 kg/m recovered sample be stricken from the database used for resource estimation. These samples are listed in Appendix 12.2 of this report. This restriction is arbitrary; removal of 2,804 assays comprising 7.6% of the RC sample database will conservatively affect the resource estimate, causing average grade to decrease and possible resulting in fewer estimated tonnes.


77

12.4 Opinion on Adequacy of the La India Drill-hole Database The digital drill-hole database for the La India gold deposit, comprising the Main and North zones, inclusive of assay data available as of May 23, 2012, is reliable. The drill samples adequately represent the material being tested, and the database is suitable for resource estimation purposes. The lowest recovery RC and DDH samples exhibit a positive grade bias compared to higher recovery samples, and although there is no compelling evidence that these samples are not representative, conservative modeling of the deposit would preclude use of the lowest recovery samples.


78

Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing Item 13.Metallurgical tests have been conducted on the La India deposit’s gold-bearing rocks to determine the physical characteristics and investigate the potential for gold and silver recovery using various parameters. Heap leaching and carbon adsorption was selected based on favourable metallurgical tests.

From 2007 until the present, the independent consultant Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (KCA) of Reno, Nevada has conducted the metallurgical studies for the project on behalf of both Grayd Resource Corporation and Agnico-Eagle. Metallurgical test work has included physical testing (rock densities and Bond Work Index testing), head analysis, milled bottle roll leach tests, gravity concentration, agglomeration and percolation, column leaching and environmental work. All sample preparation, assaying and metallurgical studies have been performed utilizing accepted industry standard procedures.

Results from metallurgical test work have been formally reported in reports prepared and issued by KCA (Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2007a, 2007b, 2008; 2009; 2010a; 2010b). Samples selected for testing represented the economically important mineralized domains. To date, a total of 28 column leach tests and 37 bottle roll leach tests have been completed.

A summary of the test work performed by KCA is presented in Appendix 13.1.

Results from metallurgical test work have been described in Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2007a, 2007b, 2008; 2009; 2010a; and 2010b. Samples were selected for testing from the areas considered to be the economically important mineralized domains, defined in Item 7 of this report.

Based on the known locations of drill-hole samples used for column test work, the sample locations used meet acceptable levels of representation.

13.1 Sample Composites Tested Separate core interval samples were used to generate a total of 28 samples for column tests and 37 samples for bottle roll tests from metallurgical composites and reverse circulation and core drill-hole rejects. These samples are representative of the different potential ore zones and varying lithologies known to exist at La India. The column test sample composites and bottle roll test sample composites are presented in Appendix 13.2 The origin and use of the composite samples from 2007 through 2010 are described in 6 December 2010 Preliminary Economic Assessment, La India Gold Project, Municipio of Sahuaripa, Sonora, Mexico (Gray et al., 2010).

13.2 Sample Preparation Upon receipt by KCA, each core interval for metallurgical testing was inventoried, weighed and assigned a sample number. Sample preparation was completed to provide test material variably crushed to 100% -50 mm, -25 mm, -12.5 mm or -9.5 mm for column leach testing. Bottle roll test samples were prepared using 1,000-g portions of material. Material for bottle roll tests was either pulverized to 80% passing 0.075 mm, or used as it was received.


79

13.3 Rock Density Rock density tests were completed on randomly selected pieces of whole HQ and PQ core. The pieces for testing were approximately 5 to 8 cm long and were selected from each core interval received from the La India project. The procedure utilized for rock density determination was based upon ASTM Test Method C914, “Standard Test Method for Rock Density and Volume of Solid Refractories by Wax Immersion”. The results are presented in Appendix 13.2a.

A total of 222 separate core interval samples were used for the rock density measurements. Densities varied from a low of 1.33 g/cm3 to a high of 3.17 g/cm3 depending on the lithology and sample location. These density measurements plus an additional 31 measurements from Domain 17 core and surface rock samples were used in the geological and resource estimation models.

13.4 Bond Work Index Test work was completed on each separate composite by Phillips Enterprises, LLC of Golden, Colorado (Phillips) for rod-mill grindability tests, ball-mill grindability tests and abrasion tests. Table 13.1 summarizes the test results, showing that the rocks tested vary from hard (14 to 20) to very hard (>20) in six of the ten rock types sampled.

Table 13.1 – Bond Work Index test results

KCA Sample

Description Rod Mill Work

Ball Mill Work

Abrasion 38308 Silica structure – La Cruz and Cerro de Oro 16.74 18.6 0.7050

38309 Silica clay – La Cruz 7.24 6.62 0.0080 38310 Dacite – SC/SA - Viruela 8.62 9.55 0.2291 38311 Massive silica – Viruela 15.89 14.45 0.7404 38312 Andesite – SA/SV 10.00 11.65 0.4005 38313 Massive silica - Cieneguita 19.19 25.14 0.7779 41723 Viruela 11.99 14.64 0.3951 41724 Viruela high grade -- 12.33 -- 41725 Cieneguita 16.56 20.32 0.5313 41726 Espanola 16.50 21.32 0.5056

13.5 Head Analyses Head analyses were completed June 2011 on the composite samples. A weighted portion of the head material was crushed to a nominal 1.70 mm. Two 500-gram portions were split out and pulverized individually to -0.106 mm. Each pulverized portion was then assayed utilizing standard fire assay methods for gold and silver.

A portion of one of the 500-gram pulverized portions for each separate composite was assayed semi-quantitatively by means of an ICAP-OES for an additional series of elements and for whole rock analyses. In addition to these semi-quantitative analyses, the samples were assayed by quantitative methods for total carbon, total sulphur (sulphur speciation) and mercury. A cyanide-soluble copper shake test was also conducted on a portion of the pulverized head material from each composite.


80

Head screen analyses with assays by size fraction were completed on portions of head material utilized for each separate column leach test. In general the head screen analyses did not show any significant concentration of gold and silver in fine or coarse fractions of the samples tested.

13.6 Bottle Roll Leach Tests A total of 37 bottle roll leach tests were conducted both on core composites and on some selected rejects intervals from RC and core drilling. A weighted portion of the head material from each core and RC drill interval composite was crushed to a nominal 1.70 mm and a 1,000-gram portion was split out. The 1,000-gram portion was either pulverized or ball milled to -0.106 mm (80% -0.075 mm) and then utilized for a cyanide bottle roll leach test. Bottle roll tests on samples No. 44105, 44106, and 44107 were performed on material as-received (no crushing).

The results of the 37 bottle roll leach tests indicated an average 79.4% gold recovery and 46.8% silver recovery. The results of bottle roll leach tests are presented in Appendix 13.3.

13.7 Gravity Concentration A higher grade sample, the Cieneguita – High-Grade (Domain 18) composite material, was the only sample tested for gravity concentration processing. A 1,000-gram portion of the -1.70-mm crushed material from the composite was milled utilizing a stainless steel ball mill to achieve an expected grind of 80% -0.075 mm. The milled material was then run through a Falcon SB40 Concentrator. Results indicated that 23% of the contained gold and 26% of the contained silver could be concentrated into a portion weighing 26% by weight of the feed material. Due to the poor concentration results, gravity testing was discontinued.

13.8 Flotation Flotation tests were conducted on two sulphide-bearing samples. The rougher flotation tests were completed on 500 grams of material that was ring- and puck-pulverized to 80% -0.106 mm. The flotation tests were completed using a Denver D-1 Flotation machine. The results show that gold and silver recovery in the flotation concentrate can be achieved. However, the grade of gold and silver in the rougher concentrates is not high enough to make this product saleable.

13.9 Agglomeration and Percolation Tests Agglomeration tests were initially completed on selected samples stage-crushed to 100% -12.5 mm and 100% -9.5 mm. Each sample was tested with the addition of 0, 2, 4 and 8 kg of cement per dry tonne of sample.

The percolation tests were conducted in small columns at a range of cement levels with no compressive load applied. The purpose of the percolation tests was to examine the permeability of the


81

material under various agglomeration cement levels on stage-crushed material. Percolation problems were not encountered. Subsequent testing strongly indicated that these crush sizes were finer than actually required. Since the adopted crush size was determined to be 100% -25 mm (see Appendix 13.4), further testing of agglomeration was not done.

Although cement is not required, cement will be added to the crushed ore at La India instead of lime for pH control. Cement was chosen because of the additional stability for the heap (although not necessary) and the similar reagent costs for cement and lime. For pH control, about 1.5 times as much cement is required compared to lime resulting in a cement requirement of 2.5 kg per tonne ore.

13.10 Laboratory Column Leach Tests for Gold Recovery A total of 28 separate column leach tests were completed utilizing material from composites generated from the core material. Column leach tests were conducted on material stage-crushed to 100% -50 mm, 100% -25 mm, 100% -12.5 mm and 100% -9.5 mm. Screen analyses with assays by size fraction were completed on each separate column leach test residue. After screening, each size fraction was weighed and pulverized. The individual pulverized samples were submitted for gold and silver analysis by standard fire assay methods. Column test recovery results were based on carbon assays vs. the calculated head (carbon assays + tail assays). Column leach test work is presented in Appendix 13.4.

The results of the laboratory column leach tests were used to predict the gold and silver recoveries for the various mineralization types known to exist at La India. Table 13.2 presents a summary of gold and silver recoveries by Domain that are used for production estimates in Item 22 of this report.

Table 13.2 – Summary of La India gold and silver recoveries by geological domain

Domain Tonnes Distributed

Contained Au Distributed

Number of Column Tests

Average Au Recovery

Average Ag Recovery

Average Weighted Au Recovery

Domain 1 5% 4% 2 90% 20% 2.2% Domain 2 9% 7% 4 69% 21% 4.9% Domain 2A 7% 7% 2 84% 8% 5.6% Domain 3 7% 13% 5 71% 7% 9.2% Domain 4 No Samples Tested Domain 5 18% 14% 3 89% 18% 12.1% Domain 6 5% 8% 2 80% 41% 6.1% Domains 7-10 No Samples Tested Domain 11 5% 3% No Samples Tested 90%1 2.7% Domain 12 6% 5% 2 65% 7% 3.3% Domain 12A 24% 19% 4 97% 23% 18.7% Domain 13 No Samples Tested Domain 14 3% 4% No Samples Tested 89%1 3.3% Domains 15 -16 No Samples Tested Domain 17 6% 5% 3 95% 19% 4.8% Domain 18 4% 12% 1 94%2 51%2 12.2%

Total 100% 100% 28 85.1% 1 - PEA assumed that Domains 11 and 14 leach similarly to Domains 1 and 5 respectively 2 - Only one column test at crush size of -9.5 mm


82

The gold recovery of 85.1% is the weighted average based on contained gold for each domain with the respective domain’s gold recovery. For this analysis, all of the column test data were interpolated to a crush size of 25 mm. The contained gold by domain was extracted from the 2010 Preliminary Economic Assessment. High-sulphide materials were excluded from the analysis.

An overall project average gold recovery of 80% has been selected for the La India project for all calculations in the economic analysis (Item 22) in for this report. This gold recovery is more conservative than the laboratory test data average of 85.1% referenced above, reflecting a conservative adjustment to accommodate field conditions that will be less controlled than a typical laboratory environment.

Because of the scattered recoveries at different crush sizes, an analysis of the crush size vs. recovery was also conducted (Appendix 13.4). Gold recovery and crush size data for all bottle roll tests and column tests were compiled and plotted on a semi-log graph. From the test data, it was evident that the gold recovery begins to noticeably decrease at crush sizes coarser than 5,000 microns (5 mm), with significant recovery decreases being noticed at sizes coarser than 25,000 microns (25 mm). On this basis, a crush size of 100% -25 mm was selected as the optimum particle size for heap leaching at La India. This crush size is achievable using a three-stage crushing circuit as described in Item 17 of this report.


83

Mineral Resource Estimates Item 14.The June 30, 2012 mineral resource and reserve estimate for the La India deposit, which forms the basis of this technical report, is the latest in a series of NI43-101-compliant mineral resources estimates for the project. The previous estimates are summarized in Item 6 of this report.

In January 2010, La India’s then-owner Grayd Resource Corporation commissioned Giroux Consultants Ltd. to complete an update of the La India project resource. This estimate was an update of the one produced in February 2009 (Gray and Giroux, 2009) based on an additional drilling (Gray and Giroux, 2010). The May 2010 resource estimate was the basis of a preliminary economic assessment of the La India project completed in December 2010 (Gray et al., 2010).

Subsequent to acquiring the project in November 2011, Agnico-Eagle produced an internal mineral resource estimate for the La India deposit by updating the previous ore models with new drilling results and using three-year trailing averages for metals prices fixed as of May 1, 2012, at $1,342/ounce for gold and $23.00/ounces for silver. This resource estimate was used in the economic analysis of the project as described in Item 22 of this report. Following additional drilling through May 23, 2012, Agnico-Eagle completed the current resource and reserve estimate for the oxide and sulphide resources in the Main and North zones of the La India deposit as of June 30, 2012.

For the purposes of the June 30, 2012 resource estimate, the parameters of estimation previously fixed by Giroux Consultants Ltd. were used and/or partially adjusted based on new geological information. The June 15, 2010 technical report (Gray and Giroux, 2010) reviewed the methodology and classification used for the May 2010 resource estimate, and confirmed that the work done in the previous report was reasonable and appropriate and in accordance with the CIM guidelines for the estimation, classification and reporting of resources and reserves that were adopted by CIM Council on November 27, 2010.

This item of the report summarizes the methodology used by the Agnico-Eagle Technical Services group in estimating the mineral resources for the La India project as of June 30, 2012. Agnico-Eagle reports mineral resources exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

There are no known environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, political or other relevant factors that could materially affect the La India mineral resources estimate as of June 30, 2012.

14.1 Data Analysis The database for the La India project consists of drill-hole data from the two different mineralized zones shown in Figure 14.1 -- the North Zone and the Main Zone. These two zones, while similar in lithologies and alteration, are described independently due to their geographical separation.


84

Figure 14.1 – Location map showing mineralized zones and drill-hole collars

14.1.1 Main Zone

The Main Zone consists of the La Viruela, La Cruz, and Cerro de Oro areas. The May 23, 2012 database for this zone consists of 368 RC drill holes with a total length of 36,952 m, and 87 diamond drill holes totaling 7,195 m.

A Main Zone geological model has been updated by Agnico-Eagle’s Technical Services group following the interpretation by Grayd Resource geologists that differentiated six separate mineralized domains, as described in Item 7 of this report, and one waste domain:

D1 = Dacite D2 = Massive silica – silica alunite D3 = Vuggy silica – silica alunite D5 = Silica clay with structures D6 = Silica bodies D7 = Porphyry D0 = Lower waste unit

Assays were back-tagged based on their location relative to these seven domains. Table 14.1 summarizes the assay statistics for each domain. Samples not assayed but within the mineralized domains were assigned a value of 0.001 g/t gold. The assays for these units were evaluated using lognormal cumulative frequency plots, PPlot and CV to determine the capping strategy.


85

Table 14.1 – Summary of gold in assays in the Main Zone sorted by geologic domains

A similar exercise was conducted for gold in the remaining Main Zone domains. The capping strategy is summarized in Table 14.2.

Table 14.2 – Capping strategy for Main Zone

Table 14.3 shows the effects of capping on each of the domains. The mean grade in Domains 1 to 7 was slightly reduced and the coefficient of variation was reduced to far more reasonable levels.

Table 14.3 – Summary of capped gold in assays in Main Zone

14.1.2 North Zone

The database for the North Zone through May 23, 2012 consists of 102 diamond drill holes totaling 9,452 m and a total of 263 RC holes totaling 17,518 m. The North Zone is made up of the Cieneguita, El Cochi, La India and Espanola areas.

A geologic solid model was produced by Agnico-Eagle’s Technical Services group with some similar units to the Main Zone outlined, as described in Item 7 of this report. Domains modeled include:

D11 - Dacite D12 - Massive silica

Domain D1 D2 D3 D5 D6 D7 Waste Number of Samples 3,217 3,549 1,814 4,528 1,061 146 14,147 Mean Grade (g/t Au) 0.25 0.41 1.29 0.43 1.23 0.22 0.08 Standard Deviation 0.93 1.13 5.09 1.40 1.76 0.29 0.20 Minimum Value (g/t Au) 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 Maximum Value (g/t Au) 23.50 35.3 152.00 52.30 14.50 2.16 18.80 Coefficient of Variation 3.74 2.79 3.96 3.27 1.44 1.33 2.42

Domain Strategy Capping Level (g/t Au)

Number of Assays Capped

D1 PPlot, CV, quantiles 5.0 16 D2 PPlot, CV, quantiles 6.0 22 D3 PPlot, CV, quantiles 14.0 15 D5 PPlot, CV, quantiles 5.0 29 D6 PPlot, CV, quantiles Not capped 0 D7 PPlot, CV, quantiles Not capped 0 Waste PPlot, CV, quantiles 2.5 8

Domain D1 D2 D3 D5 D6 D7 Waste Number of Samples 3,217 3,549 1,814 4,528 1,061 146 14,147 Mean Grade (g/t Au) 0.22 0.38 1.12 0.38 1.23 0.22 0.08 Standard Deviation 0.52 0.74 1.94 0.60 1.76 0.29 0.15 Minimum Value (g/t Au) 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 Maximum Value (g/t Au) 5.0 6.0 14.0 5.0 14.50 2.16 2.5 Coefficient of Variation 2.38 1.96 1.73 1.58 1.44 1.33 1.79


86

D14 - Silica clay D17 - Porphyry D18 - Silica breccia D0 - Lower waste unit

The assays were tagged with domain codes; the simple statistics for gold in each domain is presented in Table 14.4. Samples not assayed but within the mineralized domains were assigned a value of 0.0 g/t gold.

Table 14.4 – Summary of gold in assays at North Zone sorted by geologic domains

The distribution of gold within each domain was examined using lognormal cumulative frequency plots. A similar strategy was used in the North Zone domains as was used in the Main Zone domains. The capping levels for each domain in the North Zone are shown in Table 14.5.

Table 14.5 – Capping strategy for North Zone

The effects of capping are presented in Table 14.6.

Table 14.6 – Summary of capped gold in assays in North Zone

14.2 Core versus RC Drill Results Both diamond drill core and reverse circulation drilling methods have been utilized on this project. A study comparing core assays to RC assays was completed in 2009 (Gray and Giroux, 2009). That study is updated below with the 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 drill holes included. To determine if any bias exists between the two drilling methods, the gold grade distributions for each method were compared in several areas that contained both sampling types.

Domain D11 D12 D14 D18 Waste Number of Samples 470 2,117 321 916 15,083 Mean Grade (g/t Au) 0.67 0.65 0.50 1.52 0.11 Standard Deviation 0.96 1.02 0.63 6.58 0.32 Minimum Value (g/t Au) 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 Maximum Value (g/t Au) 8.39 16.30 6.79 128.50 11.35 Coefficient of Variation 1.28 1.57 1.25 4.32 2.92

Domain Strategy Capping Level

Number of D11 PPlot, CV, quantiles Not capped 0

D12 PPlot, CV, quantiles Not capped 0 D14 PPlot, CV, quantiles Not capped 0 D18 PPlot, CV, quantiles 15.0 10 Waste PPlot, CV, quantiles 2.0 83

Domain D11 D12 D14 D18 Waste Number of Samples 470 2,117 321 916 15,083 Mean Grade (g/t Au) 0.67 0.65 0.50 1.19 0.10 Standard Deviation 0.86 1.02 0.63 2.37 0.22 Minimum Value (g/t Au) 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 Maximum Value (g/t Au) 8.39 16.30 6.79 15.00 2.0 Coefficient of Variation 1.28 1.57 1.25 1.99 2.12


87

Main A Zone - 706700 E to 707400 E and 3175850 N to 3176610 N

Main B Zone - 707020 E to 707350 E and 3175510 N to 3175660 N

North Zone - 706200 E to 706900 E and 3178400 N to 3179300 N

Using this graphical method to compare the results of the two styles of drilling demonstrates if a sampling bias exists. Figure 14.2, Figure 14.3 and Figure 14.4 show the gold grades of the results in the three areas. In all three cases the samples from the two types of drilling show roughly parallel grade distributions over all the grade classes. The slight variations are well within reason, and there appears to be no sampling bias present. The results of both RC and diamond drilling are therefore used in this resource estimate.

MAIN A ZONE GOLD CORE VS RC

10 -3

10 -2

10 -1

1

10 1

10 2

AU

(g/t)

Percent

10 -3

10 -2

10 -1

1

101

102

0.1

0.5

1.0510203040506070809095

99.0

99.5

99.9

0.1

0.5

1.0

51020304050607080909599.0

99.5

99.9

10 -3

10 -2

10 -1

1

10 1

10 2

Percent

10 -3

10 -2

10 -1

1

101

102

0.1

0.5

1.0510203040506070809095

99.0

99.5

99.9

0.1

0.5

1.0

51020304050607080909599.0

99.5

99.9

Au in Core Holes

Au in RC Holes

Figure 14.2 – Lognormal cumulative frequency plot for gold in core and RC drill samples, Main A Zone


88

Figure 14.3 – Lognormal cumulative frequency plot for gold in core and RC drill samples, Main B Zone

Figure 14.4 – Lognormal cumulative frequency plot for gold in core and RC drill samples, North Zone

MAIN B ZONE GOLD CORE VS RC

10 -3

10 -2

10 -1

1

10 1

10 2

AU

(g/t)

Percent

10 -3

10 -2

10 -1

1

101

102

0.1

0.5

1.0510203040506070809095

99.0

99.5

99.9

0.1

0.5

1.0

51020304050607080909599.0

99.5

99.9

10 -3

10 -2

10 -1

1

10 1

10 2

Percent

10 -3

10 -2

10 -1

1

101

102

0.1

0.5

1.0510203040506070809095

99.0

99.5

99.9

0.1

0.5

1.0

51020304050607080909599.0

99.5

99.9

Au in Core Holes

Au in RC Holes

0.1

0.5

1.0510203040506070809095

99.0

99.5

99.9

0.1

0.5

1.0

51020304050607080909599.0

99.5

99.9

10 -3

10 -2

10 -1

1

10 1

10 2

AU

(g/t)

Percent

10 -3

10 -2

10 -1

1

101

102

0.1

0.5

1.0510203040506070809095

99.0

99.5

99.9

0.1

0.5

1.0

51020304050607080909599.0

99.5

99.9

Au in Core Holes

Au in RC Holes

NORTH ZONE GOLD CORE VS RC

10 -3

10 -2

10 -1

1

10 1

10 2

Percent

10 -3

10 -2

10 -1

1

101

102


89

14.3 Composites Based on the statistical distribution of sample lengths, uniform lengths of 1.5 m were used for the composites respecting the boundaries of each Domain. The smaller intervals on the boundaries of solids of less than 0.1 m length were combined with adjoining intervals to produce a uniform support of 1.5 ± 0.10 m. Figure 14.5 shows the distribution of the sample length. The statistics for gold in 1.5-m composites for both zones are presented in Table 14.7 and Table 14.8. Assays from core holes with recovery less than 50% and assays from RC holes with sample weights less than 7.5 kg were not used to form composites, and in some cases where these assays were in strings, composites were not formed at all.

Figure 14.5 – Distribution of the sample length, used to determine the composite length

Table 14.7 – Summary of gold in 1.5-m composites at Main Zone sorted by geologic domains

Domain D1 D2 D3 D5 D6 D7 Waste Number of Samples 2,830 3,204 1,520 4,329 987 144 9,794 Mean Grade (g/t Au) 0.22 0.38 1.12 0.37 1.31 0.23 0.10 Standard Deviation 0.50 0.71 1.85 0.57 1.86 0.27 0.14 Minimum Value (g/t Au) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum Value (g/t Au) 5.00 6.00 14.00 5.00 13.63 1.87 2.5 Coefficient of Variation 2.30 1.86 1.66 1.51 1.42 1.20 1.47


90

Table 14.8 – Summary of gold in 1.5-m composites at North Zone sorted by geologic domains

14.4 Variography Based on the studies done by the external consultant Gary Giroux, Agnico-Eagle’s Technical Services group made adjustments to obtain a better match between the Search Ellipsoid and the domain models. The semivariograms made by Mr. Giroux are presented in Appendix 14.1. The search parameters used are presented in Table 14.9.

Domain D11 D12 D14 D18 D0 Number of Samples

385 1828 285 828 12,745 Mean Grade (g/t Au) 0.67 0.64 0.51 1.19 0.10 Standard Deviation 0.78 0.95 0.62 2.28 0.21 Minimum Value (g/t Au) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum Value (g/t Au) 7.65 16.1 6.77 15.00 2.00 Coefficient of Variation 1.18 1.48 1.23 1.91 2.04


91

Table 14.9 – Summary of semivariogram parameters for gold

SEARCH PARAMETERS X Y Z Direction Dip

Domain 1 Pass 1 60 50 30

80 -20 Pass 2 120 100 60 Pass 3 240 200 120 Domain 2 Pass 1 65 45 20

52 -20

Pass 2 130 90 40 Pass 3 260 180 80 Domain 3

Pass 1 40 20 15 30 0 Pass 2 80 40 30

Pass 3 160 80 60 Domain 5

Pass 1 45 40 30 50 -30 Pass 2 90 80 60

Pass 3 180 160 120 Domain 6 Pass 1 40 32 25

45 0 Pass 2 80 64 50 Pass 3 160 128 100 Domain 7 Pass 1 80 50 30

45 0 Pass 2 160 100 60 Pass 3 320 200 120 Domain 11 Pass 1 60 50 30




155

-25

Pass 2 70 50 20 Pass 3 140 100 40 Waste Main Zone Pass 1 60 50 30

80

-20 Pass 2 120 100 60

Pass 3 240 200 120 Waste North Zone Pass 1 60 50 30

130

-25 Pass 2 120 100 60

Pass 3 240 200 120

Notes:Minimum Sample Requirement (min): 4 Maximum Sample Requirement (max): 12 Maximum Samples Per Drill Hole (max key): 3


92

The search parameters were changed by Agnico-Eagle following the geological interpretations and observations but based on the parameters used by Grayd Resource for its December 2010 resource estimate.

14.5 Bulk Density Specific gravity determinations were made by consultant Kappes Cassiday & Associates. Its procedure using wax immersion is documented in Appendix 13.2a. The results are summarized in Table 14.10.

Table 14.10 – Summary of rock densities; Sg = specific gravity

No specific gravity determinations were taken in D18, the silica breccia / silica clay unit within the North Zone. Since the unit is a mixture of silica (brecciated) and clay alteration, a combined specific gravity was used. From D12 (massive silica) Sg = 2.63 and from Domain 14 (silica clay) Sg = 1.97, an average Sg of 2.30 was determined. Since there are areas with brecciation and likely some open spaces close to surface, the Sg for D18 was reduced (5%) to 2.18. Unit D0, the lower waste unit, was assumed to have a Sg of 2.22, similar to dacite.

Within the block model, specific gravity was applied by domain, with blocks containing more than one domain having a weighted average.

The resource estimate as of June 30, 2012 by Agnico-Eagle used the same bulk density factor used previously by Grayd.

14.6 Block Models Two block models with blocks 10 m x 10 m x 6 m high were superimposed upon the two geologic models for the Main and North zones. The model origins are as follows:

MAIN ZONE Lower Left Corner 706125 E Column Size 10 m 138 cols. (No Rotation) 3175295 N Row Size 10 m 151 rows Top of Model 1906 Elev. Level Size 6 m 93 levels

Domain Number of Measurements

Minimum Sg (g/cm3)

Maximum Sg (g/cm3)

Average Sg (g/cm3)

D1 – Dacite 22 1.94 2.57 2.22 D2 – Massive silica - Main Zone 33 2.27 2.69 2.51 D2A – Massive silica (alunite) - Main Zone From D12A 2.33 D3 – Andesite – vuggy silica 59 1.88 3.17 2.28 D5 & D14 – Silica clay 25 1.33 2.42 1.97 D6 – Silica structure 22 2.24 2.57 2.39 D12 – Massive silica - North Zone 16 2.56 2.85 2.63 D12A – Massive silica (alunite) - North Zone 36 1.85 2.57 2.33 D7 & D17 – Porphyry 31 2.15 2.63 2.38


93

NORTH ZONE Lower Left Corner 705595 E Column Size 10 m 211 cols. (No Rotation) 3177215 N Row Size 10 m 243 rows Top of Model 1907 Elev. Level Size 6 m 85 levels

For each model the proportion of each block below the topographic surface was recorded as well as the proportion of each domain present.

14.7 Grade Interpolation 14.7.1 North Zone

Gold grades were interpolated into blocks containing some percentage of domains D11, D12, D14, and D18 by the inverse distance squared (ID2) method. All domains used hard boundaries, so only composites from a particular domain were used to estimate that domain. The list of the holes and the average grade of each intersection are presented in Appendix 14.2. The ID2 exercise was completed in a series of passes with an expanding search ellipse tied to the ranges of the domain’s semivariogram. For Pass 1, a minimum of four composites were required within a search ellipse with dimensions equal to one quarter of the semivariogram range. For blocks not estimated in Pass 1, a second pass using a search ellipse with dimensions equal to half the semivariogram range in each direction was used. A third pass used the full range. In all cases a maximum of three composites were allowed from a single hole. In all cases, if more than 12 composites were found in any given pass, the closest 12 were used. Gold grades inside the waste domains were also interpolated into blocks using the same method. The final grade for the block was a weighted average of all domains present inside the block. The ID2 search parameters and number of blocks estimated during each pass are shown in Table 14.11.

Table 14.11 – Summary of the grade interpolation (ID2) per search parameters – North Zone

Domain Pass Number Estimated Azimuth/Dip Dist. X (m) Dist. Y

(m) Dist. Z (m)

11 All Blocks Estimated

1 3,781 130/-25 60 50 30 2 4,783 130/-25 120 100 60 3 595 130/-25 240 200 120


1 14,234 130/-25 60 50 30 2 11,195 130/-25 120 100 60 3 2,279 130/-25 240 200 120


1 2,518 130/-25 60 50 30 2 1,810 130/-25 120 100 60 3 367 130/-25 240 200 120


1 1,974 155/-25 35 25 10 2 3,416 155/-25 70 50 20 3 422 155/-25 140 100 40


94

14.7.2 Main Zone

Gold grades were interpolated into blocks containing some percentage of domains D1, D2, D3, D5, D6 and D7 using the ID2 method. Each domain was estimated independently using hard boundaries between the domains.

Estimation for gold was attempted in every block that had some proportion of a domain present. The list of the holes and the average grade of each intersection are presented in Appendix 14.2. The estimation procedure was completed in a series of passes with an expanding search ellipse. The dimensions for the search ellipse were tied into the appropriate semivariogram for each domain. A first pass in each domain used a search ellipse with dimensions equal to a quarter of the semivariogram range. A minimum of four composites were necessary to estimate the block. Only composites from the domain being estimated were used. For blocks not estimated in Pass 1, a second pass was made using search ellipse dimensions equal to half the semivariogram range. Again a minimum of four composites were required to estimate the block. A third pass was completed using the full range and twice the semivariogram range, respectively. In all cases, if more than 12 composites were found in any given search, the closest 12 were used. A maximum of three composites were allowed from any single drill hole.

Gold grades inside the waste domains were also interpolated into blocks using the same method. The final grade for the block was a weighted average of all domains present inside the block. The ID2 search parameters and number of blocks estimated during each pass are shown in Table 14.12.

Table 14.12 – Summary of ID2 search parameters – Main Zone

Domain Pass Number Estimated Azimuth/Dip Dist. X

(m) Dist. Y (m)

Dist. Z (m)

D1 100% of Solid Estimated

1 13572 80/-20 60 50 30.0 2 15901 80/-20 120 100 60.0 3 2676 80/-20 240 200 120.0


1 13417 52/-20 65 45 20 2 8203 52/-20 130 90 40 3 3718 52/-20 260 180 80

D3 Low Grade 100% of Solid Estimated

1 5080 030/0 40 20 15 2 3553 030/0 80 40 30 3 1821 030/0 160 80 60


1 16219 50/-30 45 40 30 2 11758 50/-30 90 80 60 3 2305 50/-30 180 160 120


1 3123 45/0 40 32 25 2 1306 45/0 80 64 50 3 54 45/0 160 128 100


1 1321 45/0 80 50 30 2 2624 45/0 160 100 60 3 683 45/0 320 120 120


95

Tonnages were determined for each block based on the block volume (10 m x 10 m x 6 m) multiplied by the weighted average specific gravity for the block multiplied by the proportion of the block below surface topography. Each block in the Main and North zones was also compared to the oxidation surface established from drill logs. The proportion of the block above the oxide surface was used to determine the tonnage of oxide material present.

14.8 Classification 14.8.1 Introduction

In the current feasibility study (Agnico-Eagle, 2012), the mineralization of the La India project is classified as mineral reserves and resources according to the following definition from National Instrument 43-101 and the CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted on November 27, 2010.

The terms measured, indicated and inferred are defined as follows:

A Mineral Resource is a concentration or occurrence of diamonds, natural solid inorganic material, or natural solid fossilized organic material including base and precious metals, coal, and industrial minerals in or on the Earth's crust in such form and quantity and of such a grade or quality that it has reasonable prospects for economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological characteristics and continuity of a Mineral Resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge.

An Inferred Mineral Resource is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade or quality can be estimated on the basis of geological evidence and limited sampling and reasonably assumed, but not verified, geological and grade continuity. The estimate is based on limited information and sampling gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes.

An Indicated Mineral Resource is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics can be estimated with a level of confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough for geological and grade continuity to be reasonably assumed.

A Measured Mineral Resource is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape, and physical characteristics are so well established that they can be estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support production planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough to confirm both geological and grade continuity.


96

14.8.2 Main Zone and North Zone Re-Classification

For block models within the Main and North zones in the June 30, 2012 reserves and resources estimate, the classification of a resource was “indicated” if it was estimated in Pass 1, or “inferred” if estimated in Pass 2.

After this classification procedure was completed, blocks were examined visually, and isolated pockets of inferred resources were upgraded to indicated resources. Those reclassified indicated resources are included inside the planning to define the probable reserves in this model.

14.9 June 30, 2012 Resource Estimate (Inclusive of Reserves) The geologic continuity of the various zones within the La India deposit has been established through diamond drilling, RC drilling and surface mapping. Grade continuity can be quantified by semivariogram analysis and interpolated using the ID2 method.

The results have been tabulated for the portion of blocks within the mineralized domains. This assumes mining could be done to the domain boundaries. Since the D0 unit of waste is a tabular slice at the bottom of the model, it may be possible with good grade control to limit the amount of dilution that including this unit would cause. The results of the June 30, 2012 estimate of mineral resources inclusive of reserves are shown in Table 14.13, using a 0.2 g/t gold cut-off grade. This table compares La India project’s mineral resources as of June 30, 2012 with the resources as of December 2010, divided into zones as well as oxide and sulphide material. As of June 30, 2012, the La India project hosts an indicated resource estimated to contain 1,170,000 ounces of gold in 59.93 million tonnes at a grade of 0.61 g/t gold, calculated at a 0.20-g/t cut-off grade. As well, the project hosts an inferred resource containing 1,333,000 ounces gold in 111.2 million tonnes grading 0.37 g/t gold, calculated at a 0.20-g/t cut-off grade. Note that these numbers take into account the reclassification of inferred to indicated resources. This compilation includes mineral reserves, which are extracted from the mineral resources in Item 15 of this report.


97

Table 14.13 – Comparison of the June 30, 2012 measured, indicated and inferred resources estimates (inclusive of reserves) to the December 2010 resource estimate, Main and North zones, including oxide and sulphide material

Note: A cut-off grade of 0.4 g/t gold was used for the December 2010 resources. A 0.2-g/t gold cut-off grade was used for the June 30, 2012 resources.

14.9.1 Indicated Resources

Globally the indicated resources estimated as of June 30, 2012 show an increase of 54% to 1,170,000 ounces gold in comparison with 760,000 ounces gold estimated in measured and indicated resources in December 2010. The infill drilling program in the Main and the North zones has confirmed the previous indicated resource and has increased the conversion of the inferred to indicated resources. Moreover, drilling done along the deep extension of the ore zones has added sulphide mineralization at depth.

For both the Main and North zones, the material of each block above the oxidation surface is classified as “oxidized”, and the material below is classified as “sulphide”. Of the indicated resources as of June 30, 2012, an estimated 800,000 ounces gold (37.1 million tonnes at a grade of 0.67 g/t gold) is contained in oxidized material, and an estimated 369,000 ounces gold (22.8 million tonnes at a grade of 0.50 g/t gold) is contained in sulphide material.

December 2010 June 30, 2012 (interim)

Category Gold (ounces) Tonnes

Grade (g/t Au)

Gold (ounces) Tonnes

Grade (g/t Au)

Measured resources Main zone (oxide only) 127,000 3,730,000 1.06 North zone Total Measured resources 127,000 3,730,000 1.06 Indicated resources Main zone oxide 252,000 9,110,000 0.86 457,000 22,069,000 0.64 sulphide 96,000 3,000,000 1.00 221,000 12,758,000 0.54 Main zone oxide + sulphide 348,000 12,110,000 0.89 678,000 34,827,000 0.61 North zone oxide 255,000 9,430,000 0.84 343,000 15,078,000 0.71 sulphide 30,000 1,500,000 0.62 149,000 10,021,000 0.46 North zone oxide + sulphide 285,000 10,930,000 0.81 492,000 25,099,000 0.61 Total indicated resources 633,000 23,040,000 0.85 1,170,000 59,926,000 0.61 Total measured & indicated 760,000 26,771,000 0.88 1,170,000 59,926,000 0.61 Inferred resources Main zone oxide 189,000 7,957,000 0.74 284,000 17,761,000 0.50 sulphide 100,000 3,818,000 0.81 343,000 32,694,000 0.33 Main zone oxide + sulphide 288,000 11,776,000 0.76 628,000 50,455,000 0.39 North zone oxide 190,000 6,385,000 0.92 204,000 13,577,000 0.47 sulphide 28,000 1,570,000 0.56 501,000 47,161,000 0.33 North zone oxide + sulphide 218,000 7,955,000 0.85 705,000 60,738,000 0.36 Total Inferred resources 506,000 19,731,000 0.80 1,333,000 111,193,000 0.37


98

The Main Zone shows a global increase of 43% of the contained gold to 678,000 ounces versus 475,000 ounces (in measured and indicated resources). This increase is mainly due to the new parameters used in estimation (such as the lower cut-off grade of 0.2 g/t gold) and the new ore models, as well as the addition of the sulphide mineralization located under the oxide mineralization.

Globally the North Zone shows an increase of 73% of the contained gold to 492,000 ounces in comparison with 285,000 ounces. This gain is mainly due of the new sulphide ore recognized along the deep extension of the ore zone. The gold grade of the North Zone decreased by 25% (0.61 g/t versus 0.81 g/t) due to the lower capping grade used in the June 30, 2012 estimate.

14.9.2 Inferred Resources

Globally the inferred resources estimated as of June 30, 2012 show an increase of 163% contained gold to 1,333,000 ounces in comparison with 506,000 ounces estimated in December 2010. The infill drilling program has validated the previous interpretation and defined a new extension of the ore model that appears to be mainly in sulphide material. This variance is also explained by the lower capping grade and the new model. Of the inferred resource as of June 30, 2012, an estimated 488,000 ounces gold (31.3 million tonnes grading 0.48 g/t gold) is contained in oxidized material, and an estimated 845,000 ounces gold (79.9 million tonnes grading 0.33 g/t gold) is contained in sulphide material.

The Main Zone shows a global increase of 118% of the contained gold to 628,000 ounces versus 288,000 ounces, mainly due to an increase in the tonnage of the sulphide resources. The oxide mineralization returned an increase of 50% of the contained gold ounces, while the sulphide material showed an increase of 243%.

Globally the North Zone shows an increase of 223% of the contained gold to 705,000 ounces in comparison with 218,000 ounces in the December 2010 estimate. The contained gold in the oxide mineralization increased by 14,000 ounces (7%), while the sulphide material increased by 473,000 ounces (1,690%). The increase in sulphide material can be explained by infill drilling along the deep extension of the zone. In the June 2012 estimate, no hard boundary was used to limit the deeper part of the resources.

14.10 Model Verification The verification and the validation of the block model were done visually using Datamine software where the solid model was reviewed on screen at every 10 m showing the block model results and the composite values along the holes. The cross sections and level plans produced were reviewed by several Agnico-Eagle geologists and by the qualified person for mineral resources. The exercise, completed in June 2012, resulted in several changes to the geological three-dimensional models of the North Zone and a few modifications were made to the Main Zone. A similar review of the current model has established confidence in the grade interpolation based on the new modeling parameters and new estimation parameters.


99

14.11 June 30, 2012 Resource Estimate (Exclusive of Reserves) The above compilation of La India resources as of June 30, 2012 is inclusive of mineral reserves. Agnico-Eagle’s policy is to disclose mineral resources exclusive of mineral reserves. Therefore the mineral reserves need to be removed from the resources compilation. The method of extracting mineral reserves from mineral resources is described in Item 15 of this report. The remaining mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, are shown in Table 14.14. (The full mineral resources and mineral reserves statement can be found in Item 15.)

Table 14.14 – Mineral resource compilation, La India project, June 30, 2012 (exclusive of reserves)

Mineral resources are reported using a 0.2-g/t in-situ gold cut-off.

14.12 Discussion

The area covered by the mineral resource model for the La India project is currently over 3 km long located on the North and Main zones inside the oxide ore. Drill-hole spacing for the mineral resource model making up the probable reserve category areas is now around 25 m in open pit areas. The inferred resource in the La India resource model generally has a drill-hole spacing more than 50 m. The mineralized oxide zones in the La India property area and specifically the North and Main zones areas seem to be continuous, so that conversion drilling has usually confirmed the existence of the mineral resource and mineral reserves discovered by earlier, more widely spaced exploration drilling.

Since November 2011, the resource estimation parameters used in the La India mineral resource and reserve model have been reviewed by the Agnico-Eagle team to compare with the current ore control models. During 2012, the area of the North and Main zones was the target of an extensive drilling program, which confirmed the continuity of the zones. Some of the new intercepts in this zone were among the best ever found on the La India property. The best portions of the North and Main zones seem to have a similar 30-degree plunge northward as is also typical of the lenses closer to surface. All features indicate that there are also sulphide ore lenses that continue below the current North and Main zones.

There is significant potential for finding more economic mineralization within the La India property area, especially down-dip and along-strike from the known deposits.

Resource category Gold (ounces)

Tonnage (tonnes)

Grade (g/t Au)

Mineral resources

Measured mineral resource - - -

Indicated mineral resource Main zone 249,000 14,879,000 0.52 North zone 186,000 12,364,000 0.47 Total measured and indicated mineral resource

435,000 27,243,000 0.50

Inferred mineral resource Main zone 519,000 45,042,000 0.36 North zone 625,000 58,367,000 0.33 Total inferred mineral resource 1,144,000 103,409,000 0.34


100

Mineral Reserve Estimates Item 15.In the current feasibility study (Agnico-Eagle, 2012), the mineralization of the La India project is classified as mineral reserves and resources according to the definition from National Instrument 43-101 and the CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted on November 27, 2010. The CIM definition for measured, indicated and inferred resources is given in Item 14 of this report. The CIM definition for proven and probable mineral reserves follows:

Mineral Reserves are sub-divided in order of increasing confidence into Probable Mineral Reserves and Proven Mineral Res erves. A Probable Mineral Reserve has a lower level of confidence than a Proven Mineral Reserve.

A Mineral Reserve is the economically mineable part of a measured or indicated mineral resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study. This study must include adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction can be justified. A mineral reserve includes diluting materials and allows for losses that may occur when the material is mined. A Probable Mineral Reserve is the economically mineable part of an Indicated and, in some circumstances, a Measured Mineral Resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study. A Proven Mineral Reserve is the economically mineable part of a Measured Mineral Resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study.

The CIM reporting standards do not allow an inferred resource to be included in reserve estimates; the inferred resource has not been included in this item.

15.1 Open Pit Optimization Open pit optimization was conducted on the three open pits planned at La India to determine the optimal economic shapes of the pits in three dimensions. The three pits planned are the North and Central pits on the North Zone, and the Main pit on the Main Zone. (See Item 16 of this report for details.)

This task was undertaken using MineSight software, which is based on the Lerchs-Grossmann algorithm. The method works on a block model of the deposit, and progressively constructs lists of related blocks that should, or should not, be mined. The method uses the values of the blocks to define a pit outline that has the highest possible total economic value, subject to the required pit slopes defined as structure arcs in the software. Agnico-Eagle Mexico Engineering staff and Agnico-Eagle Technical Services staff in Canada were responsible for the pit optimization using MineSight software, and used established procedures that have been developed at other Agnico-Eagle mines in Mexico.

This section describes the assumptions, parameters and methods used to calculate the block values.


101

15.1.1 Geotechnical Parameters

The geotechnical parameters for the North and Main zones are presented in Table 15.1. The pit slopes vary by sector, as shown by the topographic contours in Figure 15.1, with inter-ramp angles typically at 45° to 50°. The geotechnical studies were performed by independent consultant The Mine Group Inc. (The Mine Group, 2012).

Table 15.1 – La India pit slope parameters utilized for pit optimization

North Zone Main Zone Bench stacking (@ 6m/bench) (metres) 6x2 = 12 6x2 = 12 Bank face angle (degrees) 70 70 Berm width (metres) 7.6 7.5 Inter-ramp slope (degrees) 45 45


102

Figure 15.1 – Geotechnical structural domain considerations for La India pits. Note that “South pit” indicates the Main pit.


103

15.1.2 Conversion of Mineral Resources into Mineral Reserves

The June 30, 2012, mineral reserves for the La India Project were estimated by converting mineral resources into reserves using the parameters and assumptions presented below. Only the indicated resources were considered for conversion into mineral reserves. Inferred mineral resources were not considered.

The parameters used for pit optimization in determining the June 30, 2012 estimate are presented in Table 15.2. The metals prices and currency exchange rate used to establish the cut-off grade for the reserve were based on three-year trailing averages for the period ending June 30, 2012, of $1,379 per ounce gold, $26.49 per ounce silver and MXP/US$ exchange rate of 13.00. For details about the mining costs, see Item 16; for the processing costs see Item 17; and for the general and administrative costs see Item 21 and Appendix 21.1.

Table 15.2 – Economic parameters used for pit optimization

The mineral reserves were derived from contiguous indicated resource blocks that are located inside the designed open pit shell. The pit includes the blocks that have a grade above the economic cut-off grade (0.20 g/t gold), which is based on the net smelter return (NSR) cut-off value ($7.10/tonne). The calculation of the NSR cut-off value and the economic cut-off grade are described below.

The NSR cut-off value is calculated using the sum of the mining, processing, and Gen & Admin costs listed in Table 15.2.

NSR cut-off value = mining cost/tonne + processing cost/tonne + G&A cost/tonne = $7.10/tonne

This NSR cut-off value is utilized, along with a metallurgical recovery of 80% (see Item 17) to define the limits of economic value of the block during the optimization. The gold price used in this evaluation is $1,379 per ounce, which is converted to $44.34 per gram ($1,379/oz / 31.104 g/oz). The economic cut-off grade is calculated by the formula NSR cut-off value / gold price / metallurgical recovery as follows:

Economic cut-off grade = ($7.10/tonne) / ($44.34/gram gold) / 80% = 0.20 g/t

Gold price $ 1,379/oz Silver price $26.49/oz Exchange rate $1.00 = 13.00 Mexican Peso Metallurgical gold recovery 80% average Mining dilution 5% Mining recovery 100% Mine-site costs Processing cost $3.86/tonne processed Gen & Admin $1.50/tonne ore Mining costs including definition drilling costs $1.74/tonne

Total mine-site costs $7.10/tonne Incremental bench costs Not included, factored into avg. mining cost Economic cut-off grade 0.20 g/t gold Overall slope angle

North Zone: variable (see Fig. 15.2) Main Zone: variable (see Fig. 15.3)


104

The minimum cut-off grade is applied to the in situ NSR value of each block model, before dilution and based on the gold and the silver recovery per ore type. In the open pit, the incremental material that is inside the ore wireframes is added into mineral reserves.

15.2 Pit Designs The pit shells produced with the Lerchs-Grossmann algorithm were used as a guideline for the pit designs.

Mining will take place on 6 m-high benches with a final bench height of 12 m between berms, which vary between 6 m and 9 m wide depending on the sector. Double-lane ramps will be 23 m wide to accommodate 90-tonne-class mining trucks (CAT 777), and single-lane ramps will be 13.8 m wide. Road gradients will be at a maximum of 10%. More detail about the pit designs can be found in Item 16 of this report.

15.3 La India Mineral Reserves as of June 30, 2012 As discussed above, an economic cut-off grade of 0.20 g/t gold was used to develop the optimized pit shells.

Once the pit optimization was completed using the economic cut-off grade, a marginal cut-off grade was calculated for lower grade material contained in the pits. The marginal cut-off grade considers than any individual tonne of rock in the pit will be mined, regardless of its destination to a waste rock stockpile or to the process plant. The marginal cut-off grade is therefore calculated the same way as the economic cut-off grade but subtracting the mining costs from the NSR cut-off value; the calculation is shown as follows:

Marginal cut-off grade = (NSR cut-off value $7.10 - Mining Costs $1.74) / ($44.34/gram gold) / 80% = 0.15 g/t

The marginal cut-off grade of 0.15 g/t gold was applied to the indicated resources (see Item 14) contained within these pit shells. Any indicated resource blocks contained within the pit shells and with a grade of 0.15 g/t gold or higher were classified as probable reserves.

The tonnes and grades reported take into account a mining recovery factor of 100% applied to the gold ounces and 5% due to the impact of the mining dilution. The dilution factor of 5% is an estimate supported by engineering studies set out in the La India feasibility study (August 2012). The metal recovery and operating cost estimates are described in items 17 and 21 of this report. These parameters will be reassessed using the results of future open pit mining operations for the La India mine.

Table 15.3a and Table 15.3b show the probable reserves that were converted from indicated resources within the optimized pit designs for the North Zone and the Main Zone, respectively, broken down by geologic domains.


105

Table 15.3 – Probable reserves in the North and Main zones

Table 15.3a – Probable reserves in the North Zone by domains; oxide material only

Table 15.3b – Probable reserves in the Main Zone by domains; oxide material only

Table 15.4 shows the combined reserves from the North and Main zones. Using the assumptions from Table 15.2 and the positive results of the economic analysis presented in Item 22, the mineral reserves for the La India project, dated June 30, 2012, are estimated at 44.6 million tonnes grading 0.65 g/t gold (0.93 million ounces of contained gold). The mineral reserves are all classified as probable; there are no proven reserves at this time. All reserves at La India are in oxide material. The mineral resources reported in this table are drawn from Table 14.14, and do not include the mineral reserves. Based on the results of the La India project feasibility study (Agnico-Eagle, 2012a), the mineral reserves and resources dated June 30, 2012, are not likely to be materially affected by recent changes to mining, metallurgical, infrastructure, permitting and other relevant factors.

Geologic domain (North

Tonnes Gold grade (g/t) Contained gold 11 509,000 0.89 15,000

12 6,805,000 0.76 166,000 14 521,000 0.58 10,000 18 2,315,000 1.33 99,000 Waste mod (8) 7,669,000 0.46 114,000 Total/average 17,819,000 0.70 403,000

Geologic domain (Main

Tonnes Gold grade (g/t) Contained gold 1 2,598,000 0.45 38,000

2 7,913,000 0.59 150,000 3 3,635,000 1.08 126,000 5 2,203,000 0.94 66,000 6 802,000 0.36 9,000 7 2,167,000 0.30 21,000 Waste mod (8) 7,502,000 0.48 117,000 Total/average 26,820,000 0.61 528,000


106

Table 15.4 – Mineral resource and reserve statement, La India open pit mine project as of June 30, 2012

Mineral reserves are reported using a 0.2-g/t in-situ gold cut-off.

Category Tonnes (000s) Gold grade (g/t) Contained gold (000

oz) Mineral Reserves Proven reserves - - - Probable reserves Main Zone (oxide only) 26,820 0.61 528 North Zone (oxide only) 17,819 0.70 403 Total proven & probable reserves 44,639 0.65 930 Mineral resources Measured mineral resource - - - Indicated mineral resource Main Zone 14,879 0.52 249 North Zone 12,364 0.47 186 Total measured and indicated mineral resource 27,243 0.50 435

Inferred mineral resource Main zone 45,042 0.36 519 North zone 58,367 0.33 625 Total inferred mineral resource 103,409 0.34 1,144


107

Mining Operations Item 16.Due to the low-grade and near-surface nature of the La India mineral deposit, open pit mining has been chosen as the most economic method to extract the ore. The mine planning and engineering work completed so far includes determining the economic pit limits, making detailed pit designs, calculating in-pit resources, and determining production scheduling based on the current reserve model. Mining, capital and operating costs have been estimated for the mine plan based on typical costs for this type and size of operation. These components of the study are described in the following sections.

A NI-43-101-compliant Preliminary Economic Assessment for the La India project was produced for then-owner Grayd Resource Corporation dated December 6, 2010 (Gray et al., 2010). Since then, Agnico-Eagle has produced a feasibility study (Agnico-Eagle, 2012) that included determining the economic pit limits, detailed pit designs, calculating in pit resources and production scheduling, based on the updated resource model dated June 30, 2012 as well as using larger mining equipment. Independent consultant Gustavson Associates has reviewed the new life of mine (LOM) plan.

16.1 Mining Operations The type and size of operation chosen for the La India project are very similar to the Agnico-Eagle’s Pinos Altos and Mascota mines operating approximately 70 kms from the La India site. Mining, capital and operating cost estimates were estimated for the mine plan based on actual costs from these operations.

16.1.1 Mining Areas and Phases

The base case Lerchs-Grossmann (LG) analysis presented in Item 15 generated a number of pit shells in the areas of the North and Main zones. These pit shells were prioritized by net value for purposes of developing a mining sequence for a preliminary mine production schedule. Figure 16.1 illustrates the LG shells and the pit areas used and ranked by net value.


108

Figure 16.1 – Base case open pit Lerchs-Grossmann shells, areas for value ranking.

Some of these pit shells are small distinct cones but are in close proximity to each other and could be mined more efficiently when combined together. From the ranking of the smaller pit areas, in the


109

Main deposit a set of five pits, ranked from highest to lowest value, were designed: MP21, MP22, MP23, MP24 and MP25. Similarly the North deposit pit sequence was defined by five additional sets of pits, ranked from highest to lowest value: NP21, NP22, NP23, NP24, and NP25. Note that the lower value LG pit shells were excluded from the production scheduling as being too small, too distant from larger pits or too marginal in value.

The grouped LG pits were converted to designed pits using double benching and 45o inter-ramp slopes to get a truer estimate of waste rock and stripping ratio. Pit ramps should have a maximum slope of 10% based on industry standards, and a bank face angle of 70o is assumed based on rock types and geologic structures identified during exploration and infill drilling campaigns. Figure 16.2 and Figure 16.3 display the ultimate design pits used for production scheduling, for the North and Main zone areas, respectively.

Figure 16.2 – North Zone design pits used for scheduling, sequenced by value ranking from highest ranking (NP21) to lowest ranking (NP25)


110

Figure 16.3 – Main Zone design pits used for scheduling, sequenced by value ranking From highest ranking (MP21) to lowest ranking (MP25)

The combined pits in Figures 16.2 and 16.3 were modified to accommodate 90-tonne off-road trucks and provided the basis for scheduling annual production rates.

Gustavson utilized DataMine© software to produce year-by-year mine plans to demonstrate the mining sequence and active mining areas for each year. The ultimate pits in the North and Main zones are shown in Figure 16.4 and Figure 16.5, respectively. Once the pit parameters were incorporated into the original topography of the La India mine site, a wireframe was built and then compared with the original topography. That information was then compared with the block model to verify the grade of the pits.


111

Figure 16.4 – La India project ultimate pit designs in the North Zone area


112

Figure 16.5 – La India project ultimate pit designs in the Main Zone area

16.1.2 Detailed Pit Designs

The detailed designs for the pit areas indicated in Figure 16.4 and Figure 16.5 are based on the pit design parameters listed in Table 16.1 and shown in Figure 16.6. The same parameters are used for pits in the North and the Main zones. The North pit will have final dimensions of 1,499 m long by approximately 952 m wide and 222 m deep, and the Central pit will have final dimensions of 525 m long by 340 m wide and 176 m deep, as shown in Figure 16.4. The Main pit will measure 1,463 m long by 670 m wide and 304 m deep as shown in Figure 16.5.


113

Table 16.1 – Feasibility study pit design parameters for North and Main pits

Inter-ramp slope (maximum) Bank face angle Bench stacking (@ 6m / bench) Berm width (every 2nd bench) Road grade (maximum) Road width – Double lane Road width – Single lane

45º

70º

2 (double-benches) 7.6 m 10% 13.8 m 9.2 m

Figure 16.6 – Pit design slope parameter for North and Main pits

The bench height used for the pit designs was based on the block height in the 3D model, which is 6 m. The pits are to be mined using double benching, i.e., two 6-m benches per stack, with a 7.6-m-wide berm between every double bench stack, as shown in Figure 16.6. An overall 45o inter-ramp slope is achieved using the 7.6 m berm width along with a 70o bank face angle. The geotechnical studies were performed by independent consultant The Mine Group Inc. as illustrated in Figure 15.1.

Pit access and haulage roads are designed for 90-tonne off-highway haulage trucks (CAT 777 or comparable). Access roads to the working areas will be single lane at 9.2 m wide, but active haulage roads will be 30 m wide, which is the Caterpillar standard of four truck widths, and sufficient for two-way traffic with berms and ditches.

Berm WidthBench Height

Bench Height

Bank Face Angle

Inter-ramp Slope Angle Berm Width


114

16.1.3 Mine Layout

Figure 16.7 displays the layout of the ultimate design pits used for production scheduling, along with the locations for mine-site infrastructure. These include the mine access road, haulage roads, carbon adsorption plant (ADR), truck shop location, leach pad, and prospective waste rock disposal sites.

Figure 16.7 – Ultimate mine layout showing roads, dumps, the leach pad and other infrastructure. ADR Plant = Adsorption/Desorption/Refining plant.

16.2 Mine Production Schedule The mine production schedule for the La India project was developed from the probable reserves contained within each of the design pit phases.

Table 16.2 summarizes the parameters used to generate the mine production schedule and, subsequently, to estimate mine equipment and personnel requirements.


115

Table 16.2 – Mine production scheduling parameters

Combined annual ore and waste production rate Annual crushing rate maximum

9 to 10 million tonnes 6 million tonnes

Mine operating hours per shift Mine operating shifts per day Mine operating days per week Scheduled mine operating days per year

12 2 7 365

Number of mine crews 3

No preproduction stripping will be necessary as there is no waste capping the deposits. Ore occurs on the surface, or near surface, in sufficient quantities to meet production requirements immediately upon commencement of mining. However, a small portion of the NP25 pit (1,245,481 tonnes of ore plus 1,404,520 tonnes of waste) will be mined during construction in the preproduction period (prior to Year 1).

Feed to the crushing plant and leach pad will total 44.6 million tonnes at a grade of 0.65 g/t gold over the life of the mine, which is projected at eight years. Table 16.3 summarizes the resulting mine production schedule for the La India project. It is based on the mine planning and engineering work that was completed in the feasibility study (Agnico-Eagle, 2012a) utilizing larger mining equipment. It also reflects the sequence of mining the pits in order to allow the construction of the leach pad that will be located just west of the North Zone.

Table 16.3 – Life of Mine production schedule

LOM Ore (tonnes) Gold grade

Contained

Recovered

Waste

Stripping ratio

Total tonnes PP 1,245,481 0.721 28,880 16,173 1,404,520 1.13 2,650,000 Year 1 5,809,000 0.702 131,108 73,420 5,430,000 0.93 11,239,000 Year 2 5,840,000 0.719 135,000 108,000 6,740,000 1.15 12,580,000 Year 3 5,840,000 0.612 114,886 91,909 6,760,000 1.16 12,600,000 Year 4 5,840,000 0.532 99,903 79,922 6,760,000 1.16 12,600,000 Year 5 5,840,000 0.582 109,189 87,351 6,760,001 1.16 12,600,000 Year 6 5,840,000 0.685 128,616 102,893 6,760,000 1.16 12,600,000 Year 7 5,840,000 0.672 126,175 100,940 1,870,000 0.32 7,710,000 Year 8 2,544,563 0.691 56,522 64,416 1,622,301 0.64 4,166,864 Year 9 0 0 0 19,199 0 0 0 TOTAL 44,639,044 0.648 930,277 744,222 44,106,822 0.99 88,745,865

16.3 Mine Equipment Selection and Fleet Requirements For the purposes of equipment selection and cost estimation, open pit mining will be conducted from 6-m benches using the following equipment fleet:

• two 171-mm-diameter down-hole-hammer blast-hole drills • one 89 mm crawler-type percussion drill • two 11.5 m3 front-end loaders • seven 90-tonne off-highway haulage trucks • two 201-kW crawler dozers • one 306-kW crawler dozer


116

• one 221-kW motor grader • one 193-kW motor grader • one 30,000-litre water truck

All major mining equipment will be diesel powered. Mobility is an important consideration in equipment selection where multiple pits will be mined concurrently. Productivity calculations were done in order to determine loader requirements. The mine equipment and personnel requirements are derived from the design parameters presented in Table 16.1 and the work schedule in Table 16.2. Mine road construction and general site preparation will be done using the mining equipment during the mining cycle in the preproduction year; and as Table 16.3 shows, the ore and waste scheduled to be moved during preproduction is low, totaling about 2.6 million tonnes.

Ore will be hauled to the crusher located near the proposed leach pad. The crushed ore will then be transported by conveyors and a stacker onto the leach pad.

Waste rock haulage will be directed to various sites as shown in Figure 16.7, but the location of the dumps may change slightly during further design.

These dump sites were selected for their close proximity to mining areas, and their natural confinement for re-grading and water management considerations. Storm run-off will not require re-routing using additional drainage ditches since the natural drainage is sufficient to handle the flow. Pits and waste rock dumps will be situated on higher ground away from major drainages so that neither pits nor dumps are expected to flood.

Equipment productivities are derived dynamically by the scheduling program using pre-determined cycle times for all haul routes. A loose density of 1.77 t/m3, equating to an average 30% swell, is used in waste dump sizing and unit productivity calculations for loading and hauling equipment.

Blast-hole drill productivities are estimated at nearly 1,450 tonnes per hour using a blast-hole pattern of 4.5 m by 5 m in ore areas and 4 m by 4 m in burden, with 0.8 m of subgrade drilling, and an average powder factor of 0.24 kg per tonne of rock. Effective drill penetration rates of 27 m per hour are assumed. A fleet of two down-hole hammer blast-hole drills is estimated to cover the required production plus down time and scheduling losses, with 1.4 drills operating on average. A crawler-type percussion drill will also be needed for secondary breakage, road construction and short-term backup to the primary blast-hole drills. Two 11.5-m3 front-end loaders will serve as the primary loading units, each working with 90-tonne off-highway haul trucks (having an effective payload of 90 tonnes). The productivity of this loader combination is estimated at over 10,000,000 tonnes per year as shown in Table 16.3.

One-way ore haulage distances range from 1.2 km to 5.0 km, and the one-way waste rock haulage is from 0.6 km to 2.3 km The detailed cycle-time analysis has defined a need for five haul trucks in preproduction and the addition of two more haul trucks in Year 1 for a total of seven haul trucks. The overall haul fleet utilization is expected to be approximately 72%.

Table 16.4 summarizes the major mine equipment requirements for the project and their schedule of acquisition.


117

Table 16.4 – Major mining equipment fleet requirements

16.4 Mine Personnel A rotating, three-crew system will be used to staff mine operations and maintenance labour positions. These crews will work 12-hour shifts, with a work rotation of 14 days on and seven days off. At full operation, the mine personnel requirements, including supervision and technical staff, will total 135 employees.

16.5 Mine Operating Cost Summary Based on the selected equipment and personnel schedule, the yearly per tonne operating cost for the mine is presented in Table 16.5. These costs were calculated using the 2012 unit costs from Agnico-Eagle’s operations at the Pinos Altos and Mascota mines in Mexico, which are very similar to La India. The average life of mining cost is $1.74/tonne of material.

Unit CostUS$

Primary (units): Crawler Drills, 171-mm 1,066 2,132 - - - - - - - - 2,132 Loaders, 12.0-cu-m 2,121 4,242 - - - - - - - - 4,242 Trucks, 100-tonne 1,618 8,090 3,637 - - - - - - - 11,727 Sec. Drills, 89-mm 590 590 - - - - - - - - 590 Dozers, 306-kW 950 950 - - - - - - - - 950 Dozers, 201-kW 616 1,150 697 - - - - - - - 1,847 Graders, 221 and 193-kW 673 1,346 - - - - - - - - 1,346 Water Truck, 30,000-liter 490 490 - - - - - - - - 490

Ancillary (units): Powder Truck,3.5-t 50 50 - - - - - - - - 50 Powder Magazine, (120-t, 5-t) 60 120 - - - - - - - - 120 AN Storage Bin, 60-t 100 200 - - - - - - - - 200 Maintenance truck, 3.5-t 50 50 - - - - - - - - 50 Loaders, 4.0-cu-m 500 500 - - - - - - - - 500 Articulated Trucks, 35-tonne 400 400 - - - - - - - - 400 Crawler Excavator, 2.1-cu-m 300 300 - - - - - - - - 300 Backhoe/Loader, 1.1-cu-m 79 79 - - - - - - - - 79 Fuel/Lube Truck 200 400 - - - - - - - - 400 Shop Forklift 120 120 - - - - - - - - 120 Light Plant 15 60 - - - - - - - - 60 Pickup Truck, 0.5-t, 4-WD 30 210 - - - - - - - - 210 Crew Van 60 120 - - - - - - - - 120 Ambulance 150 150 - - - - - - - - 150 Mobile Radios 1 32 - - - - - - - - 32

Miscellaneous (units): Shop Equipment 50 200 - - - - 50 - - - 250 Mining Software 240 240 - - - - - - - - 240 Water Storage (Dust Sup Sys) 50 150 - - - - 50 - - - 200 Dewatering Pumps & Piping 25 - - 25 - 25 - 25 - 25 100 Radio Com Base Station 50 50 - - - - - - - - 50 Office & Misc Equipment 50 100 - - - - - 50 - - 150

TOTAL 22,442 4,334 25 - 25 100 75 - 25 27,026

MINE EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION SCHEDULE (Capital Costs US$000)

Description TotalPP Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8


118

Table 16.5 – Yearly mine operating costs

Description PP Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8

Supervision 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05Wages 0.18 0.21 0.28 0.27 0.22 0.23 0.22 0.22 0.22Drilling 0.20 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14Blasting 0.32 0.29 0.30 0.29 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.29 0.29Loading 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10Hauling 0.20 0.20 0.27 0.25 0.20 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27Services 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01Roads and Dumps 0.06 0.08 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08Misc. Pit Production 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03Operations Total 1.15 1.10 1.31 1.26 1.10 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19

Supervision 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04Wages 0.08 0.11 0.14 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10Drilling 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04Loaders 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.11 0.09 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.05Trucks 0.16 0.15 0.18 0.15 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.12Dozers 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.05Graders and Water Truck 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03Surface Equipment 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02Misc. Pit Equipment 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02Maintenance Total 0.53 0.57 0.73 0.67 0.54 0.53 0.50 0.50 0.48Total Operating Costs 1.68 1.67 2.04 1.93 1.64 1.72 1.69 1.69 1.67

Operations

Maintenance

Annual Operating and Maintenance Cost per Tonne of Material


119

Recovery Methods Item 17.Significant metallurgical testing has been conducted for La India project since 2007, including representative samples from the different ore zones and varying lithologies, described in Item 13 of this report. Heap leaching followed by carbon adsorption was selected as the most favourable method for extracting gold and silver from the La India ore. Higher grade material was tested for gravity concentration of gold and silver, but poor results led to the rejection of this method of extraction. The flotation tests on sulphide-bearing samples resulted in concentrates too low for a saleable product.

An agglomeration and percolation test determined that a crush size of 100% -25 mm would be satisfactory. It was determined that cement should be added to the crushed rock for pH control and additional stability of the heap.

Sample composites were generated for the column and bottle-roll leach tests. Different geological domains gave varying silver and gold recovery results. An overall project average gold recovery of 80% has been selected for the La India project as explained in Item 13.10.

17.1 Process Description and Design Criteria The process flowsheet was selected based upon results of laboratory test work as detailed in Item 13. The process flowsheet includes a three-stage crushing plant followed by a heap leach operation. Gold will be extracted from the leach solution by an Adsorption/Desorption/Refinery (ADR) carbon plant. The detailed design criteria for the processing system at La India are found in Appendix 17.1.

The process flowsheet is based on an ore processing rate of 6.0 million dry tonnes per year (17,250 dry tonnes per day). A simplified process flowsheet is presented in Figure 17.1.


120

Figure 17.1 – Simplified process flowsheet for La India operation

17.1.1 Primary and Secondary Crushing and Screening

Run-of-mine (ROM) ore will be trucked from the mine to the crushing area. ROM ore will then be stockpiled or direct dumped into a 150-tonne ROM feed bin; stockpiled ore will be fed to the ROM feed bin using a loader. Ore in the ROM feed bin will be reclaimed using an apron feeder that feeds a vibrating grizzly. The oversize material from the vibrating grizzly will be crushed using a primary jaw crusher and will then rejoin the vibrating grizzly undersize material. The primary crushed ore will be stockpiled in a canyon below the primary crushing area.

The crushed ore stockpile will have a live capacity of 18,600 tonnes and a total capacity of 58,000 tonnes. Crushed ore will be reclaimed from the pile by two apron feeders that will load the primary crushed ore onto the primary crushed ore reclaim tunnel conveyor (Conveyor #3).

Conveyor #3 will transport ore to the single-deck secondary crusher vibrating screen. Screen undersize material will bypass the secondary cone crusher and report directly to the screen tower


121

feed conveyor (Conveyor #4). Screen oversize material will feed a secondary cone crusher, which will discharge onto the screen tower feed conveyor.

17.1.2 Tertiary Crushing and Screening

The screen tower feed conveyor will transfer material to the twin-screen tertiary screen tower. Screen undersize material will be dropped directly on the screen tower undersize conveyor, which will feed the crushed ore product stockpile stacker. Screen oversize material will be conveyed to a surge bin, which will feed the three tertiary cone crushers. Product discharged from the tertiary cone crushers will be collected by the recycle conveyor (Conveyor #12) and transported to the screen tower feed conveyor to close the circuit. The final crushed product (sized at 100% ̶25 mm) will be stockpiled and reclaimed from the stockpile using two apron feeders and transferred to the product reclaim tunnel conveyor (Conveyor #16) where it will be belt-agglomerated. A belt sampler will be positioned over Conveyor #16.

The final product crushed ore will be belt-agglomerated using cement for pH control and added stability. Cement will be added at a rate of 2.5 kg/tonne from two 100-tonne cement silos. Conveyor #16 will feed a series of overland conveyors.

The overland conveyor system will consist of four overland conveyors and one transfer grasshopper conveyor that will transport the agglomerated ore to the heap-leach stacking line. The final overland conveyor will feed a series of grasshopper conveyors (maximum of 23 required) that ultimately will feed the radial stacker for heap construction.

17.1.3 Heap Leach Pad

The leach pad design is based on a total capacity of 50 million dry tonnes. The final pad will be approximately 545 m x 1,248 m built in two separate phases. Phase 1 will be approximately 388,585 m2 (545 m x 713 m). Phase 2, built in Year 2, will be 291,575 m2 (545 m x 535 m). The ultimate height will be approximately 113 m (measured vertically from the maximum depth). The leach pad liner system will consist of an 80 mil low density polyethylene (LDPE) geomembrane overlying a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) on prepared subgrade. Compacted clay may be used in some areas in place of GCL. It is anticipated that the ore will be stacked in lifts that are 10 m high. As soon as an area of the pad is stacked with ore, piping and drip emitters will be placed on the ore for distribution of the cyanide leach solution. The size of the area placed under leach will vary depending on the configuration of the stacking plan. Solution draining through the leach pad will be collected in a solution-collection ditch taht will route the solution to the pregnant collection pond. A ditch diversion system will divert the natural runoff from uphill catchment areas around the phased heap leach pad.

17.1.4 Solution Storage

Solution storage consists of a barren solution tank, a pregnant solution pond and an excess pond (for use in emergencies). The pregnant solution pond will be sized at approximately 40,093 m3. It will be double-lined and equipped with leak collection and recovery systems. The excess pond will be designed to store rain water to minimize fresh water consumption and also to contain the volume of solution that would be produced from a 100-year / 24-hour storm event. It will be constructed during Phase 1 and will have a 576,632-m3 capacity in order to maintain a zero


122

discharge water balance at the heap leach facilities. In case of an extreme storm event excess solution will be routed to the excess pond and later used to supply make-up water.

17.1.5 Carbon Adsorption

Gold-bearing (“pregnant”) solution will be pumped from the pregnant solution pond to a carbon adsorption circuit. The carbon adsorption circuit will consist of two parallel trains of five cascade-type carbon adsorption columns. Each carbon column will have a capacity of 3.5 tonnes of activated carbon with a nominal solution flow of 555 m3/hour.

Pregnant solution will be pumped to the carbon adsorption feed head tank at the top of each train. The solution flow downward will be countercurrent to the flow of carbon (which is pumped upward); the solution overflow from the final column will discharge onto a carbon safety screen to catch any entrained carbon. The barren solution from the final carbon column will be returned to the barren solution tank, from which it will be either returned to the heap for leaching gold and silver, or used for process or agglomeration solution purposes. Antiscalant will be added at the pump suctions to prevent scaling. Cyanide solution will be added to the barren solution tank as needed.

A magnetic flow meter equipped with a totalizer will measure the solution flow to each set of carbon columns. Pregnant and barren solution samples will continuously be taken using wire samplers. The wire samplers will be located at the feed inlet and discharge of each carbon adsorption train.

Adsorption of gold and silver from the pregnant leach solution will be a continuous process. Once the carbon in the first carbon column is adequately loaded with gold, the loaded carbon will be advanced to the acid wash/desorption circuits. Carbon in each column will then be advanced one column. Carbon in the fifth column will be replaced with either regenerated or fresh carbon. Screw impeller pumps will be used to move the carbon up the train of columns.

17.1.6 Gold Recovery and Refining

The loaded carbon will be advanced to the loaded carbon screen for dewatering and then will be transferred into an acid wash tank. Acid washing is used to remove any scale that accumulates on the surface of the activated carbon by circulating a dilute acid solution through the bed of carbon. The dilute acid will be produced in the acid mix tank and then circulated through the carbon. Concentrated acid will be injected into the recycle stream until the pH is maintained between 1.0 and 2.0. The acid wash cycle will be complete after the pH stabilizes between 1.0 and 2.0 without acid addition for a minimum of one full hour of circulation.

At the conclusion of the acid wash cycle, the acid solution will be drained from the acid wash tank into the acid recovery tank to be reused. The carbon will then be rinsed using a dilute caustic solution to neutralize the residual acid solution. The wash solution will be discharged to the barren solution tank. Washed carbon will be transferred to the carbon strip vessel.

A Zadra pressure elution, hot caustic desorption circuit will be used to strip metal values from the carbon. The elution, or desorption, circuit will be sized to elute (or strip) a 7-tonne batch of carbon into pregnant eluate solution. During the elution cycle, gold and silver values will be continuously extracted by electrowinning from the pregnant eluate solution.


123

After transferring loaded carbon to the strip vessel, a caustic soda strip solution containing sodium hydroxide and sodium cyanide will be pumped through a series of two heat exchangers. The first heat exchanger will use solution exiting the strip vessel during normal operation to preheat solution, and the second will use heated solution from a solution boiler to bring the strip solution up to the stripping temperature of 135oC before entering the bottom of the strip vessel. Gold and silver values will be removed from the carbon in the strip vessel at an operating temperature and pressure of 135oC and 340 kPa. Pregnant eluate solution leaving the top of the strip vessel will flow through the heat-recovery heat exchanger to preheat solution going to the elution vessel and then through the cooling heat exchanger before flowing to the electrowinning area. Electrowinning will be performed using four electrowinning cells.

At the conclusion of the strip cycle, the stripped carbon will be pumped to the stripped carbon dewatering screen. The dewatered carbon will be thermally regenerated in the carbon reactivation kiln to maintain its activity.

Gold and silver will be plated onto stainless steel wool cathodes in the electrowinning cell. The cathodes will be periodically removed from the cell and washed in the cathode wash box to remove the gold-bearing sludge. The gold-bearing sludge will be pumped through the cathode sludge filter press to remove water, and will then be dried and smelted in a tilting crucible fuel-oil-fired smelting furnace to produce gold-silver doré and slag. The doré will be transported to a refiner for further purification. A slag granulation mill is planned for future purchase.

17.2 Process Services 17.2.1 Electrical Power

All electrical power for the La India operations will be supplied by four 1,230-kW diesel generators at the site, with a fifth backup 1,230-kW generator. Total site attached power will be 6.6 MW, while the power demand for the operation is estimated at 4.8 MW.

17.2.2 Laboratory

An assay and metallurgical laboratory facility at the site will be equipped to perform sample preparation and assays by atomic absorption, fire assay, and cyanide-soluble analyses. A metallurgical testwork area for process optimization will also be included.

17.2.3 Requirements for energy, water and process materials

The main energy consumption at the La India operations will be in the processing of ore. The heap leaching, crushing, conveying and ADR plant are estimated to require 1,367 MW of electrical power when working at capacity.

Process water required for the heap leach and the operation of the plant will mostly come from reusing and recycling process water. Additional makeup water may be required at an estimated rate of 12 to 24 litres per second depending on the time of year. Using impacted water from the mine and waste dumps as process makeup water instead of withdrawing clean water from off-site


124

would reduce the volume of impacted water to manage and conserve water in the region, as well as conserving power.

The main process materials that will be required at the operation and their rate of use are listed in Appendix 17.1. They include lime, sodium cyanide (for the heap leaching), antiscalant, caustic soda (NaOH), carbon granules, hydrochloric acid, and fluxes (silica, borax, fluorspar, niter and soda ash).

The process operating costs were developed for all of the different ore types, or Domains. The costs were estimated by specific operating area and include crushing and conveying, leaching, plant, refinery and laboratory including major consumables. The cost of process maintenance and personnel including process supervision is included. A summary of the process operating cost estimate is provided in Table 17.1.

Table 17.1 – Process operating costs estimate

$/tonne Heap leach supervision $ 0.27 Energy consumption $ 0.70 Met lab $ 0.03 Assay lab $ 0.15 Crushing $ 0.57 Ore reclaim and stacking $ 0.42 Heap leach system $ 0.69 Refinery $ 0.08 Carbon adsorption $ 0.11 Carbon stripping $ 0.04 Carbon regeneration $ 0.02 Services $ 0.09 Maintenance supervision $ 0.15 Maintenance wages $ 0.22 Crusher maintenance $ 0.11 Leach pad maintenance $ 0.01 Carbon plant maintenance $ 0.00 Desorption maintenance $ 0.02 Loaders $ 0.03 Tractors $ 0.04 Conveyors $ 0.05 Lab maintenance $ 0.01 Forklift and telehandler $ 0.00 Skid loader $ 0.00 Refinery $ 0.01 Miscellaneous $ 0.03 TOTAL Cost/Tonne $ 3.86

An additional $100,000/year from Year 3 through Year 8 for acid treatment and another $4,023,000 leach pad rinsing costs in Year 9 brings the total average operating cost estimate for processing to $4.01 per tonne of ore placed on the heap leach pad, for 44.6 million tonnes of ore over the mine life (Table 16.3).


125

Project Infrastructure Item 18.As of the date of this report, there is little existing infrastructure at the La India site, but the construction and ordering of long-lead-time equipment will begin almost immediately. The location of the planned infrastructure can be seen on Figure 16.7.

18.1 Access Road The existing 4-km road connecting the La India mine site with the road used by the Mulatos mine for access and transport of all materials will require upgrading to be suitable for large trucks early in the construction phase of the project (Figure 4.3).

18.2 Camp The tent-type construction camp / temporary operations camp will be one of the first items needed in order to house the construction workers for the project. This will eventually be replaced by the permanent operations camp built of more sturdy materials.

The permanent camp will tentatively include 39 trailers for lodging, two laundry modules, a laundry water treatment facility, a sewage treatment system, one refrigerator and one freezer container, two warehouses, and a dining hall with kitchen and recreation equipment. Each lodging trailer will have four rooms each equipped with beds, a refrigerator, bathroom with shower, and desk. Thirty-four of the lodging trailers will be designated as workers’ trailers with two people per room; the remaining five trailers will be designated as management trailers and will accommodate one person per room. There will be an estimated 365 employees working at the mine, with two-thirds of them in camp at any one time.

The permanent camp will be about 800 m west-northwest of the Main Zone sufficiently removed from the operations including the blasting and crushing activities to provide a quiet location.

18.3 Central Operating Area Office space will initially be provided by portable trailers. These will be replaced by a permanent office administration building and warehouse structure located close to the truck shop. There will be offices for management, security and visiting contractors and consultants. Office trailers will continue to be used at the Crushing and ADR plant areas.

The truck shop will be a very simple three-sided building with a metal roof and siding. The truck shop walls along the sides and the back will be constructed using stacked 12-m-long shipping containers for offices and storage similar to the shop at Agnico-Eagle’s Mascota mine. Earthworks for the truck shop area will begin the first month of construction with the truck shop being installed between months 3 and 4. It will be located in the central operating area in close proximity to the administration building.


126

The federally owned and operated electric transmission grid extends as far as the village of Arivechi (approximately 60 km from the project). Therefore, an electrical power generation plant will be installed at the mine site to supply the electrical requirements for the entire operation. The power plant will consist of four 1,230-KW diesel power generation units with a fifth 1,230-kW backup generator. The power plant will be located in the central operating area. Temporary generators will be utilized until this facility is in operation.

A secure 100,000-litre, above-ground diesel fuel storage and dispensing facility will be built in the central operating area near the truck shop. All fuel for operating equipment and vehicles will be stored in this facility. The storage facility will be constructed within a concrete containment designed to hold 110% of the fuel tank capacity. A lubricant and waste oil storage containment area is also included as a separate facility near the truck shop.

A separate, secure 100,000-litre above-ground diesel fuel storage and dispensing facility will be built nearby the power plant to supply the generators. The storage area will be constructed within a concrete containment designed to hold 110% of the fuel tank capacity.

18.4 Ore Processing Facilities The process flowsheet and details of the plant site are described in Item 17. The plant site will consist of a crushing plant and related stockpiles, a heap leach pad and two ponds, a gold recovery plant and a laboratory.

The crushing plant will be one of the critical-path items of the project and will require early procurement of the crushing equipment. The primary crushing platform will be located in difficult terrain: the crushing arrangement and platform design will use the natural topography as much as possible to minimize the required earthworks. This design includes the primary crushed ore stockpile being stacked in a canyon below the primary crushing plant. The crushed ore will be reclaimed from the stockpile and fed into the secondary and tertiary screening and crushing facility before conveying it to the leach pad.

The adsorption/desorption/refining (ADR) plant and equipment will be constructed both on- and off-site. Specialty equipment including the electrowinning cells, smelting furnace, and the elution vessel will be constructed off-site, but most other equipment will be built or assembled on-site. The ADR plant is a long-lead-time item and will be ordered during the first month of construction. An estimated 29 weeks is expected from the time the purchase order is issued to the complete installation of the plant. The ADR plant will be located near the excess solution and pregnant solution ponds.

A laboratory will be constructed adjacent to the administration building capable of assaying 150 rock samples per day. The laboratory will be a pre-engineered steel building with specialty equipment sourced for installation. Included in the lab will be separate areas for sample preparation, fire assay, metallurgical lab, wet lab, atomic absorption room, weighing room, and offices. Installation of the laboratory is scheduled to begin at the end of month 5 and to be complete three months before mining begins.


127

18.5 Pad and Ponds The heap leach pad and associated ponds will require the most extensive construction activities. Golder Associates provided the geotechnical engineering design for the leach pad and solution storage ponds and is continuing with the detailed engineering design for construction of these facilities. Preliminary pad earthworks are scheduled to begin almost immediately. The pregnant pond earthworks are scheduled to begin almost immediately after the completion of the pad earthworks, followed immediately by the excess pond earthworks. The pad will be situated in a gently-sloped valley with bedrock close to the surface. Geotechnical investigations from test pits were conducted by Golder Associates in the area of the pad and ponds, as part of their scope of work and no stability or other geotechnical problems have been identified. Golder also prepared a detailed earthworks volumes estimate for the pad and pond construction (Golder, 2012a).

Insufficient clay has been located to provide for an underliner for the heap leach pad. Limited quantities have been found and will be used as available, but for the purposes of this study, a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) is planned for installation under the low density polyethylene main pad liner. See Item 17 for more details about the design of the leach pad and ponds.

18.6 Sewage and Waste Sewage treatment systems will be constructed for the camps and for the administration / warehouse / lab building complex. An incinerator and dump area for inert waste will be built to handle camp and operational waste. A secure area will be constructed to store hazardous waste until it can be transported off-site for disposal at appropriate facilities.

18.7 Security and Fencing While there are few people currently living in the area around the La India site, a security fence will be placed around the camp and the central operating area. Fencing to keep out animals, especially cattle, will be constructed around the entire operational site.

18.8 Construction From the start of construction in September 2012, it will take approximately 13 months to build the project. A simplified construction schedule is presented in Figure 18.1. Costs for construction are outlined in Item 21 of this report.


128

Figure 18.1 – Construction schedule for the La India mine project


129

Market Studies and Contracts Item 19.Agnico-Eagle produces gold and silver in the form of doré bars requiring further refining. The refined La India gold/silver will be sold on the Spot Market.

19.1 Major Contracts Agnico-Eagle intends to proceed with the construction phase of the project. It has already contracted with Golder Associates for the design of the leach pad, and with Kappes, Cassiday and Associates for EPCM and the ADR plant. Agnico-Eagle is in the process of defining and negotiating the following other major construction contracts:

• Purchase of mining equipment • Explosives magazine • Crushing system • Process ponds • Construction and permanent camp facilities • Electric generation plant and distribution grid • Office, warehouse, and truck shop • Water system

As with all past and current contracts, Agnico-Eagle negotiates within industry norms and its past and current experience at its other mines in Mexico. The company intends to utilize its own personnel and equipment for mining and processing operations at the La India mining operation.


130

Environmental Studies, Permitting, and Social Item 20.and Community Impacts

A key objective is to design and build the La India mining operation in such a way that it does not cause significant adverse effects to the environment or the community during construction, operation, closure and post-closure. An outline of some of the key plans is given in this section, together with the costs for environmental monitoring, management plans, environmental protection measures, closure and reclamation.

20.1 Environmental Studies and Issues

An environmental audit was conducted in 2008 by Hermosillo-based consultants Bufete Minero y Servicios del Noroeste SA de CV who reported that no significant environmental liabilities are apparent. Small abandoned mines and waste rock piles are present but are not generating acid drainage. There are no plant facilities present within the project area, nor are tailings piles present at the project site. Since 2008, Bufete Minero has conducted periodic site visits to audit the project’s compliance with Mexican environmental regulation NOM-120, and found that the project continues to be compliant.

Systematic sampling of surface waters draining the project area was conducted between October 2008 and December 2009 to establish baseline water quality for the project.

SRK Consulting conducted a study in June 2012 to characterize the potential for metal leaching and acid rock drainage (ML/ARD) from waste rock and pit walls that is expected to result from mining the La India deposit. The information from this study was also used for waste and water management planning and assessment of possible project environmental effects.

Potential waste rock and pit wall samples were characterized by acid base accounting tests, trace metal scans (ICP), optical petrography, Rietveld X-ray diffraction, electron microprobe and meteoric water mobility procedure leach tests (both single-pass and sequential passes).

The deposit type at La India has been classified as a volcanic-hosted, epithermal, high-sulphidation gold-silver deposit (see item 7). The deposit is extensively oxidized and is characterized by intense silica replacement, minor to absent carbonates, and sulphur both as primary sulphides (i.e., pyrite) and sulphates (i.e., alunite). The deposit is divided into the North and Main zones, and within each zone are ore domains (defined in item 7). Characterization of waste rock ML/ARD potential is related to these zones and also the deposit in general.

The rock samples at La India have been predominantly classified as potentially acid generating, with a mixture of immediately soluble acidic sulphate minerals and additional potential for long term ARD from sulphides. Arsenic, antimony, cadmium, copper and silver are elevated in the majority of domains and, as a result, metal leaching potential exists. The one rock type exception was the silica massive dacites from the North and Main zones (domains 12 and 2), which because of low sulphur content (< 0.1%), were not classified as potentially acid generating. However, element enrichment was present in two samples and ML potential still exists.


131

Soluble contaminants were also identified in the leachate tests, with acidic pH and sulphate dominating the water chemistry. Leachate from D12 samples were shown to have the least impact on water quality of all the samples tested, although baseline water quality was still exceeded in some instances. Overall, leachate chemistry was generally dependent on the presence of alunite and pyrite as follows:

• Samples with more alunite than pyrite generally exhibited aluminum buffering and leachate pHs close to or greater than 4; and

• Samples with more pyrite than alunite exhibited minimal buffering and leachate pHs were close to or less than 3.

The primary potential air quality issue is dust potentially generated by equipment. Costs for watering the road have been included in this study. An air quality monitoring program will be initiated to monitor air quality around and on the site during operation.

Operational areas will be fenced prior starting operation as much as possible to keep animals out. A No Hunting policy will be enforced during operation amongst workers. Waterfowl are not common in the area. However, if required, a system to keep birds from landing in the operations ponds will be devised.

20.2 Waste Disposal, Site Monitoring and Water Nanagement

20.2.1 Waste Handling

20.2.1.1 Mine Waste Dumps

The waste rock will be hauled to the waste dumps surrounding the different pits and within some of the pits where production has been completed. The placement of waste rock will follow the mine plan presented in Item 16. It is understood that the mine plan will be optimized with time and that the currently envisioned placement strategy to develop waste dumps may evolve during operation as it is often the case for any mine operation. Figure 16.7 displays the layout of the mine site including prospective waste rock disposal sites.

Mine waste dumps will be reclaimed both during and post-mining. Mine roads and waste dumps will be re-sloped, re-contoured, have topsoil added, and be re-seeded. Reclamation that can be completed during production will allow the usage of mine equipment within the operating cost framework, minimizing closure costs.

Post-mining closure costs have been estimated at $15 million, which is included as reclamation in the capital costs (Item 21). Monitoring of slope stabilities will be provided until the slopes are deemed stable.


132

20.2.1.2 Disposal of Other Wastes

Special wastes such as waste oil, glycol coolant, solvent fluids, used oil filters, used batteries, and contaminated fuel, will be handled, stored, transported, and disposed of in accordance with appropriate hazardous waste regulations. A management plan will be developed to clearly determine how specific materials will be disposed.

A site for temporary storage of recyclable materials will be established at the lay-down area. Such items as scrap metal, tires, glass, recyclable plastics and drink containers will be separated, containerized as appropriate, and temporarily stored in the lay-down area until sufficient volumes are available for shipment to a recycling point. Non-recyclable and non-hazardous waste will be buried in an on-site landfill.

Putrescible organic food wastes generated from the camp accommodation facilities will be burned in an on-site incinerator. Ash produced by the incinerator will be buried in the on-site landfill along with other inert non-recyclable materials.

The wastewater disposal systems for the camp and office areas will be engineered, constructed, and maintained under the direction of a qualified professional. Detailed engineering for this facility is currently underway. It is intended that this facility will become operational during the construction period prior to start-up.

A location on the mine site will be designated as an outdoor storage area for items that may still be of use for spare parts, such as spare equipment, equipment parts, vehicles and metal components. Materials remaining in the “boneyard” at the end of mine life will either be shipped off site for salvage value, or disposed of in the landfill if they meet the criteria for disposal at that location.

20.2.2 Site Monitoring and Maintenance

After the completion of reclamation works, it is expected that the site will require regular maintenance for approximately the first three years post-closure or until there are no longer signs of changing conditions. During this period, the site will be inspected every three months. Maintenance activities will be planned immediately following each wet season and each unseasonal major storm event, to verify that the drainage and erosion-control measures are working as planned, and to allow the recently revegetated areas to mature and properly take hold. Maintenance work will consist of light manual labour and light equipment work to re-grade or groom any areas showing signs of distress or erosion.

Once the site stops showing signs of seasonal degradation, the functionality of the facilities can be considered robust and safe, and the geochemical performance matches predictive modeling, then the inspection and maintenance activities can be reduced to annually and eventually to only after unusually high rainfall periods.

The quality of the water draining from the heap will require monitoring and comparison to the predicted chemistry. It is currently planned that a certain number of rinsings will be required to remove any residual cyanide from the Heap Leaching Facility (HLF). If it were found from the water quality that residual issues were remaining, additional rinsing and neutralization of the


133

heap could be envisioned. These additional works, if they were required, would extend the maintenance period.

The ponds associated with the HLF will remain in service as long as needed. Water collected in the ponds will be tested during each inspection, and if the quality does not meet discharge standards then the water will be recirculated to the heap and/or evaporated. The ponds will likely accumulate sediments and precipitates as water accumulates and evaporates. These sediments will require periodic removal and burial within the heap. This may be needed for up to five years following closure, depending upon the effectiveness of the erosion-control measures and re-vegetation.

Maintaining a healthy, robust biological system will improve both the physical and geochemical performance of the closed heap. Thus, the periodic inspections will focus on the health of the vegetated areas. Re-seeding and replacement of some topsoil will be planned annually for approximately the first three years.

20.2.3 Water Management

20.2.3.1 Surface Water Management

Systematic sampling of surface waters draining the project area will be conducted throughout the life of the mine, the reclamation period and post-closure until it has been determined that reclamation has been successful in preventing long-term effects on surface waters.

During operation, water diversion structures will be constructed to prevent surface water from flowing into the pad, mine pits, waste dumps and other operational areas. Surface drainage from disturbed areas that have no potential to produce chemical or metal contamination will be directed into small ponds to allow sediments to settle before the water is discharged to the environment.

20.2.3.1.1 Acid Rock Drainage

Additional studies will be required into ML/ARD in laboratories and on site in the coming years to further assess the actual characteristics of the waste rock and long-term geochemical behaviour of the proposed waste dumps. It is currently expected that the dumps of the Main Zone will serve as large-scale test facilities and will be used to optimize placement techniques in order to minimize long-term impacts. It is presently considered that some of these works will be integrated through some research programs with Mexican universities.

Based on the results of this characterization program, the majority of waste rock at La India will likely require contact water management during operation. Approximately 13% of the samples tested are considered to have low ARD potential based on block modelling total sulphur, although even certain samples with less than 0.1% total sulphur and leached antimony, arsenic and nickel above baseline conditions may still require management.

In terms of a waste management strategy, the level of water treatment may be reduced if segregation of the pyritic andesite domains (e.g. domain D0) is possible, although this would not likely remove the need to treat water that has interacted with waste rock at La India.


134

Despite these early findings, it is not expected that the waste dumps will represent important contaminant sources in the long term. Based on the overall content of sulphides, contaminant leaching should remain low in general for the different domains. Therefore, while ARD and ML issues are recognized as possible, the current understanding is that the waste dumps will not result in significant long-term environmental problems that cannot be properly managed by appropriate planning. With a combination of additional testing (kinetic testing), placement techniques of waste rock to minimize segregation and improved compaction, inclusion of adequate surface water management techniques to minimize infiltration during rainy season and establishment of an adapted cover, the overall long-term impacts of these facilities should be minimal and no long-term treatment should be required. Experience gained at the Main Zone will be applied to the other zones.

20.2.3.1.2 Surface Water Treatment

In view of the possibility of ARD and ML issues with waste rock, the consultant SRK was retained to also provide a scoping level estimate of water treatment for the La India mine. Modeling waste rock dump hydrology in arid or monsoonal climates is complex and for its scoping level evaluation, SRK made simplifying assumptions based on its experience at similar sites.

Rainfall at La India occurs primarily from June to September, with August generally being the wettest month (Gray et al., 2010). Approximately 70% of the annual rainfall occurs during the monsoon season. Evaporation rates are high, and the dumps are not expected to become saturated over time. Most of the precipitation is expected to result in surface runoff. During the wet season some of the precipitation will infiltrate the waste rock and result in delayed runoff that will generally lag precipitation by about a month. Waste rock dumps at other sites in Sonora generally do not become saturated nor do they produce seepage year-round; water that infiltrates into the dump is assumed to seep from the toe of the dump. The delayed flow from the dump will be much less than runoff that occurs during precipitation events.

Golder Associates prepared estimates of runoff from the waste rock dumps on site (Golder, 2012) using the United States Soil Conservation Service Curve Number method. The hydrological analysis assumed that there is no seepage from the dumps. The average annual precipitation is 1,022 mm. The estimated annual average runoff volume from the North Zone dumps and the Main Zone dump were approximately 28,000 m3 and 62,000 m3, respectively.

For design purposes, the runoff from the waste rock dumps is considered to be acidic containing concentrations of iron and aluminum with lesser amounts of copper, zinc, cobalt, cadmium and arsenic. For the purposes of this study, the treatment objective is to return the water to current (pre-mining) water quality in the receiving streams.

The addition of lime is the recommended water treatment method. It is the best available conventional technology for treating acid rock drainage and is a proven and accepted method. Lime will be used to raise the pH of the runoff water in order to precipitate metals as metal hydroxides. The precipitates will settle in a pond, and the treated water will be discharged from the pond. The sludge that accumulated in the ponds will have a very low density and will need to be managed.


135

The estimated total annual runoff volume from the proposed dumps for the La India project is approximately 90,000 m3. For a conceptual-level cost estimate, a water treatment influent rate of 2,700 m3/day has been assumed. The average annual runoff volume could be treated in about 41 days at this treatment rate. This estimate assumes that the treatment system is operated 24 hours per day and includes a 25% time contingency for start-up periods or when non-ideal operations require the water to be retreated. The treatment system would likely be operated intermittently in response to rainfall events as well as during the monsoon season.

The proposed treatment rate can be refined as additional project data become available. The rate at which water needs to be treated is a function of runoff rate from the dumps and the capacity of storm water ponds at the toe of the dumps and surge pond. The size of the surge pond and treatment rate should be optimized as the project becomes better defined.

Runoff from the dumps is assumed to be collected in storm water ponds at the toe of the dumps. These storm water collection ponds will be event ponds and will be sized according to local regulations, corporate environmental standards or best practices (e.g., a one in 100-year event or a one in 25-year, 24-hour event). This water will then be transferred to a surge pond from which influent to the treatment plant will be drawn. Influent will be pumped from the surge pond to the reaction tank.

Hydrated lime (Ca(OH)2) will be stored in a 20-tonne silo. Lime will be delivered to a lime slurry tank by an auger to make up a 20% weight to volume slurry solution. Lime slurry will be mixed with the influent in the reaction tank. The reaction tank will be agitated and aerated with compressed air to facilitate the oxidation and precipitation of dissolved iron.

Water will be discharged from the reaction tank to the settling pond. Flocculant will be added to the water and lime solution prior to discharge to the settling pond.

There will be two parallel lined settling ponds. Solids will settle as a sludge that will need to be periodically removed from the ponds. Silt curtains can be deployed in the ponds perpendicular to flow to enhance settling. Treated water will be discharged from the settling pond to the receiving environment. Treated water will also be used as make-up water for mixing lime slurry and flocculant.

SRK has assumed that lime addition alone will be able to reduce metal and arsenic concentrations to meet the discharge criteria. Bench-scale testing will be needed at later stages of water treatment evaluation to determine if additional treatment such as amending with additional iron to co-precipitate arsenic is needed to meet discharge objectives.

Capital and operating costs for the surface water treatment facilities have been included in the economic analysis of this report.

While the proposed water treatment method is standard practice for mine water treatment, operating the site as a zero discharge facility should also be considered. Zero discharge facilities are a standard operating practice in the southwest United States, northern Chile and southern Peru. Freeport McMoRan copper and gold mines in Arizona (Sierrita, Bagdad, Morenci, Miami, and Tohono) and New Mexico (Chino and Tyrone) retain all impacted storm water and use it as makeup water in their leach circuits. Similarly, the Cerro Verde mine in northern Peru is a zero discharge facility. All of the water that is collected on these sites is returned to processing.


136

Using impacted water as process makeup water instead of withdrawing clean water from off-site will obviously reduce the volume of impacted water to manage, and could conserve water in the region. Impacted waste rock dump runoff intercepted in the storm water collection pond could also be used in processing with or potentially without pre-treatment. Reusing impacted water in processing conserves water and power and is as protective of the environment as water treatment.

20.2.3.2 Groundwater Management

Groundwater effects could potentially come from the heap pad and ponds (if the liners leak). Therefore, monitoring wells will be constructed below the heap leach pad. A systematic sampling program will be developed to ensure any effects the operation has on groundwater are detected and appropriate changes to the operation can be made to negate these effects.

Additional monitoring wells will also be installed around the waste rock dumps and the site in general to monitor groundwater quality. Water sampling will be done according to a pre-defined schedule. All data that will be obtained will be managed through a main database for the site and will be reviewed periodically. The primary intent of these wells is to follow trends in groundwater quality and, if required, allow for some adjustments to the closure plan for the site.

20.3 Project permitting

Prior to 2012, exploration work at La India was conducted under the auspices of NOM120-ECOL-1997. Mine construction and operation generally requires preparation of a Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact Statement, MIA), and a Cambio de Uso de Suelo (Land Use Change, CUS) permit. Further exploration or development work in the Main Zone area will require a CUS permit. Agnico-Eagle recently acquired the surface rights needed for further project development at the Main Zone. The company has already obtained a CUS permit and a federally approved MIA permit allowing for construction and operation of mining and processing facilities in the North Zone of the La India deposit.

Permits required for the construction and operation of a mine as described in this report are summarized in Table 4.2, along with the status of the permit applications. No obstacles to obtaining the remaining permits for the La India project are anticipated provided that Agnico-Eagle obtains necessary surface rights, and design and mitigation criteria meet all applicable standards.

Finally, Agnico-Eagle is knowledgeable of the Mexican regulations in terms of closure and will apply the same approach to La India site that it followed to its other sites in the area.

20.4 Potential Social or Community Related Requirements and

Plans It is Agnico-Eagle’s goal to make a significant and positive difference in the communities in which it operates and in the lives of its employees. This commitment is one of the company’s core values – to treat people and communities with respect.


137

The challenge of building sustainable communities that endure includes providing young people with the training and skills they need to gain employment, encouraging local businesses and expanding economic development opportunities, and protecting the water, land and air.

The company works closely with local stakeholders to help individuals acquire new skills and benefit from the opportunities provided by mining, allowing them to prosper in their own communities. At its Pinos Altos mine 70 kilometres away in Chihuahua, Agnico-Eagle is working closely with the neighbouring communities to develop alternative employment and business opportunities and helping to diversify the local economy. The company provided funding for equipment and a facility to help establish a local clothing manufacturer with the goal of becoming a supplier to the mining industry. Presently 11 people are employed at the local clothing business.

In much the same way, communities around the La India project are being included in the development of the mine, starting by taking into account their primary social and economic concerns and partnering with them in the training and employment of potential employees as well as providing funding for special community needs.

20.5 Mine Closure Requirements and Costs

20.5.1 Reclamation

Reclamation will be undertaken during mining activities where possible, but the majority of work will occur after the completion of mining and final gold recovery. The reclamation land use objective will be to return the land to a natural revegetated habitat. The closure objectives include securing the site, minimizing erosion and controlling fugitive dust. To accomplish these objectives, the following key elements are included in the reclamation plan:

• chemical stabilization of heap leach facilities, accomplished through rinsing and neutralizing the heap;

• physical stabilization, accomplished through slope grooming, and the application of topsoil and revegetation;

• control of surface waters to minimize issues with long-term erosion; and • monitoring effluent chemistry from the pad and water draining the mine waste and pit

areas.

Closure will be accomplished in three stages:

• concurrent: measures implemented during the operating life of the project; • final: measures implemented after cessation of operations; and • post-closure: provides for short-term maintenance and long-term monitoring of the closed

facilities.

The key components of the reclamation plan are given in this section; further detail will be required before construction commences. During operation, the reclamation plan will be revised


138

further. Reclamation will be optimized through ongoing monitoring and research programs that will be established during the first years of operation.

20.5.1.1 Soil Handling

Topsoil harvested during construction will be stockpiled for future use. However, the site is expected to be deficient in organic matter and other soils to support revegetation. Therefore, materials that can easily support vegetation growth will be produced during operations by combining compostable materials with suitable native soils and natural topsoil, and will be stockpiled for future use. This process must start early since green wastes require time to compost before they are suitable to use as soil amendments.

Possible sources for organic matter include:

• chipped wood, bark and brush from site-clearing activities beginning with the initial site clearing and including subsequent phases of expansion of the heap, waste dumps and open pits;

• composted organic fractions from solid wastes (especially food wastes) from the camp and canteen; and

• composted sewage sludge from the on-site disposal systems, ideally composted with the solid waste organic fraction.

Reclamation capital costs include the purchase of a wood chipper and appropriate equipment.

“Land farming” is a commonly used method of soil remediation for hydrocarbon-contaminated soil that relies on natural breakdown of hydrocarbons by microbial action. This is done by spreading a shallow layer of contaminated soil onto a lined "bermed" area referred to as a biocell. In the event of a minor hydrocarbon spill on site, the contaminated soil will be treated using a biocell as authorized in the Hazardous Waste Regulations.

20.5.1.2 Camp, Central Operating Area, Mine Pits and Roads

All camp buildings will be removed upon completion of the operation and the area graded and seeded.

Prior to reclamation, all hazardous material will be removed from the site. All equipment and building in the central operating area, including the office and warehouse, truckshop, ADR plant, generators and fuel-handling facility will be dismantled and removed, and the area graded and seeded.

Water diversion structures around the mine pits will be upgraded if required to ensure long-term operation. Material around the top of pits will be stabilized and fenced off if required. There will be some concurrent reclamation with the partial backfilling of one north pit occurring as mining progresses.

During reclamation, steep slopes on roads will be stabilized and any culverts removed. Drainage bars will be constructed to keep water from flowing down the road bed. Except for the access road, surfaces will be scarified and seeded.


139

Heap Leach Facilities Closure Activities

In the first five years of operation, detailed closure and monitoring plans will be developed considering the as-built facilities and the projected as-stacked heap. These plans will be of sufficient detail to allow the start of concurrent closure activities as well as planning for final closure.

Laboratory and field data will be collected to support geochemical and heap neutralization modeling and to allow accurate prediction of both the neutralization process and effluent chemistry following closure. Laboratory testing will include leach columns and kinetic testing to simulate long-term geochemistry. Drilling for representative samples for column tests is currently being completed and samples will be sent to KCA; SRK will model the results to predict heap water quality at closure. Field testing will include testing either pilot heaps or cells created inside the commercial heap to verify the laboratory data. By year 7, geochemical modeling will be completed to allow predictive modeling of effluent quality from the closed heap.

As the leach pad expands, the lower portions of the surface water diversion systems will be in their final locations, and then they will be upgraded to meet permanent standards for erosion and storm size. This will also apply to the outlet structures and any associated erosion works. These upgrades will begin in about year 5.

Once Phase 2 of the leach pad is constructed (estimated in year 6), portions of the Phase 1 heap slopes will be in their permanent configuration and leaching will have ceased. At this time, final grooming, capping and revegetation of these slopes will be implemented, along with associated surface water and erosion controls.

The plans developed during concurrent closure will require final revisions to accommodate both lessons learned and the final configuration of the heap and roads. This will also include final as-built surveys of the facilities.

The heap rinsing and neutralization process consists primarily of recirculating cleaner water through the heap, and treating the effluent to reduce contained metals and neutralize the pH. Initially the recirculated solutions will be process solutions, diluted by normal rainfall, with pH buffered to normal leaching levels to allow complete extraction of gold, silver and other metals. Mexican (NOM 1998) maximum permissible limits for effluent discharges and solids composition will be used when applicable. Once the concentrations of soluble metals are sufficiently low, the pH will be reduced to below 8.0 and rinsing will continue until the target cyanide levels are achieved. Once the target levels for the controlled constituents (pH, metals and cyanide) are reached, the heap will be allowed to sit idle through at least one wet season and the effluent chemistry monitored to ensure the targets are maintained. If any constituent exceeds the target, then rinsing will be repeated. If the geochemical modeling suggests any potential to produce acidic drainage, then the post-rinse pH will be left elevated to offset this potential.

Industry history has shown that, with very few exceptions, the rinsing stage of a gold heap produces more value in gold than the neutralization stage costs to complete. In fact, most large gold heaps continue operating profitably in the “rinse” mode for years beyond the end of mining, even with sustained low metal prices. Since this gold production is not recognized in the


140

economic forecast for the project, the value is properly credited against closure costs. Thus, the closure cost estimate includes zero net cost for the rinsing/neutralization stage.

In most cases the heap slopes will remain in the as-stacked configuration, with only cleanup of benches and minor regrading to promote proper drainage. In some cases where slope stability has been an issue during operations, some flattening of the slopes may be required as part of final closure. The required final slopes will be determined based on testing and analysis. In general, the slopes of the heap will be angle-of-repose lifts followed by nominally flat benches to create a stable overall slope. Some areas may be graded combining several benches to allow creation of permanent access roads or other features. The lower portions of the entire perimeter of the heap will be graded so that all exposed liner is covered.

The crest of the heap and the benches, as well as any disturbed ground in the vicinity (except roads and diversions to that are to remain) will be covered with topsoil, supplemental nutrients as needed, and seeded. For high-erosion-prone areas some rapid-growing annual species of exotics may be used, but the revegetation plan will emphasize the use of locally harvested native species. Experience has shown that locally harvested seeds have the highest survival rates and are the best suited to local soil and climate factors. Over the heap, non-food species will be preferred to avoid accumulation of any metals in the food chain. The cost estimate includes harvesting and purchasing seed and purchasing fertilizer annually for the first three years; afterwards the maturing vegetation will generate sufficient seed and organic mass to support robust growth.

The solution and emergency ponds and pump stations will remain in place and in service for the first few years to allow management of heap effluents. They will be dismantled after they are no longer necessary.

All equipment will be sold except for the light mobile equipment (truck, backhoe, bulldozer) to remain on-site during the post-closure care and monitoring period.

Roads and diversion works that are to remain in service post-closure will be upgraded to meet the closure design. Generally this will mean that the surfacing will be more robust and that the dimensions of drainage facilities will be enlarged to meet a larger design storm. Culverts will be replaced with surface crossings since culverts are only serviceable for 10-20 years (and are targets for theft).

All fencing around the pad and pond areas will be removed following a transition period of monitoring.

Heap drainage will be tested and, when it meets discharge objectives, it will be discharged to the downstream drainages. Periods when the water cannot be discharged will be provided for in the short term; in these cases, solution will be pumped on top of the heap as irrigation water for the revegetated areas. Costs for this program will principally be pump maintenance and provision of electrical power from the diesel-fueled generating station.

When the geochemistry of the heap effluent supports closing the ponds, they will be decommissioned and closed.


141

20.5.2 Closure Cost Estimates for Heap Leach Facilities

The costs for concurrent closure listed below are included in the normal operating and sustaining capital cost estimates. The final and post-closure costs listed below are included in the $15-million reclamation capital costs in Item 21. All cost estimates assume economies of scale achieved by Agnico-Eagle and do not include contractor overhead, profit, or contingency, nor are other indirect costs included. All activities requiring mobile equipment assume that the operations fleet will still be available and thus the closure activities, or that any equipment to be purchased at closure will be funded by the proceeds of selling used equipment for no net cost. Closure costs for the heap leach facilities are as summarized in Table 20.1.

Table 20.1 – Closure costs, heap leach facilities

Concurrent Closure: Engineering Design (year 5) $120,000 Monitoring Plans (physical, geochemical, biological; yr 5) $35,000 Geochemical modeling (and supporting test work; yr 5) $180,000 Topsoil generation (years 3 to 10) Mobile equipment $20,000 $20,000/year x 8 years $160,000 TOTAL CONCURRENT CLOSURE: $515,000 Final Closure: Engineering Design, Survey, Monitoring Plans (yr 9) $100,000 Heap Rinsing & Neutralization -- 0 -- Slope Grooming, Stabilization, Topsoil & Revegetation Seed & fertilizer, 3 yrs x $10,000/yr (yrs 10-12) $30,000 50 hectares x $15,000/ha (yrs 10-12) $750,000 Ponds & Pump Stations -- 0 -- Physical & Mobile Equipment -- 0 -- Roads, Diversion Works & Erosion Control 5 km x $30,000/km $150,000 TOTAL FINAL CLOSURE: $1,030,000 Post-Closure Monitoring & Care: Physical, geochemical & biological monitoring & maintenance Annually, first 3 years post-closure: $50,000/yr x 3 yrs $150,000 Annually, years 4 to 10 post-closure: 20,000/yr x 7 yrs $140,000 Surplus Water Management Annually, first 3 years post-closure: $50,000/yr x 3 yrs $150,000 TOTAL POST-CLOSURE: $440,000 TOTAL CONCURRENT, FINAL & POST-CLOSURE: $1,985,000


142

Capital and Operating Cost Estimates Item 21.21.1 Capital Costs

The capital cost estimate for the La India mine project covers open pit mine construction and development, heap leach pads and ponds, all surface infrastructure including on-site and off-site facilities, gold recovery plant construction, and all closure costs associated with the project in its entirety. The capital and operating costs presented in this item are a summary of the detailed costs that are presented in the Feasibility Study of the La India Gold Project, Municipality of Sahuaripa, Sonora, Mexico (Agnico-Eagle, 2012a). Operating costs were derived from current and historical data from Agnico-Eagle’s Pinos Altos and Mascota mines.

The estimates use second quarter 2012 US dollars. No inflationary escalation factors have been applied to these cost projections. All cost estimates for this study should be considered basic engineering level in accuracy (i.e., ±15%).

The operating life of the La India project is estimated at eight years with an average ore-stacking rate of 15,716 tonnes per day. No preproduction stripping will be necessary as there is no waste capping the deposits. Ore occurs on the surface, or near surface, in sufficient quantities to meet production requirements immediately upon commencement of mining. However, a small portion of the North pit (1,245,481 tonnes of ore plus 1,404,520 tonnes of waste) will be mined during construction in the preproduction period (prior to Year 1).

In addition, a small amount of ore and waste will be mined from the westernmost part of the North pit to allow the construction of Phase 1 of the leach pad. This ore will be stockpiled until the crusher is commissioned. Initial gold production is expected to begin in late 2013, with commercial gold production beginning in 2014 and final gold production in 2022.

The pre-production capital cost is estimated at $157.6 million, plus a sustaining capital cost of $25.8 million, which includes $4.3 million for additional haul trucks and $7.1 million for the construction of the second phase of the heap leach pad. Total capital costs are therefore estimated to be $183.4 million over the Life of Mine model. Table 21.1 shows the breakdown of the capital expenditures anticipated for the project including sustaining capital.


143

Table 21.1 – La India mine project capital expenditures estimate

Capital Estimate Pre-production Capital $(000s) Environment permit & baseline 1,360 Definition drilling (preproduction) 1,000 Water development and water rights 2,000 KCA capital estimate 114,154 ARD treatment 1,000 Mine equipment 22,442 Owner's costs+ owner's contingency 11,800 Ore and waste removed for leach pad construction 801 Allowance for clearing/grubbing 1,230 Haul road construction 851 Main access road construction 919 Total PP Capital 157,556 Sustaining Capital $(000s) ARD treatment 600 Mine equipment 4,584 Allowance for clearing/grubbing 520 Phase 2 HLP $9.125M (Year 2 through Year 3) 7,125 Other ($1M/year - Year 1 through Year 8) 8,000 Reclamation 15.0 Salvage value (mine equipment only) -10.0 Total Sustaining Capital 25,828 Total Capital 183,384

Item 16 of this report explains the estimated mine equipment costs (Table 16.4).

Item 17 explains the heap leaching and gold recovery methods and Item 18 describes the proposed infrastructure. A summary of the process and infrastructure costs is provided in Table 21.2, as is shown as “KCA capital estimate” in Table 21.1.


144

Table 21.2 – Process and infrastructure capital expenditures

$(000) Site & utilities general 10,600 Power generation 6,500 Plant water distribution 1,500 Mobile equipment 3,000 Air & fuel 800 Laboratory 1,600 Crushing 25,200 Agglomeration 300 Heap leach recovery plant 10,600 Refining 0 Heap leach conveying & stacking 11,700 Heap leach pads & ponds 16,000 Reagents 0 Spare parts 1,600 Contingency direct cost plus indirects 11,800 Plant total indirects 6,500 Initial fills 800 EPCM 5,400 Total 114,200

The truck shop, wash pad, tire shop, fuel and lubricant storage and pumping systems, mine offices and power distribution systems are included in process and infrastructure costs.

The environment and reclamation costs are described in Item 20.

21.2 Operating Costs The total operating costs over La India’s Life of Mine are estimated to be $397 million, as summarized in Table 21.3. With silver credits, this amount is reduced to $370 million. Therefore, the estimated operating cost for mining 44.6 million tonnes of ore over the Life of Mine (net of silver credits) is $8.28/tonne. In addition there will be $2.1 million for royalty payments for part of the North Zone and $4.6 million for definition drilling during operations.


145

Table 21.3 – La India mine project estimated operating costs

$/tonne Total cost $(000s) Mining Open pit mining 1.19 105,608 Mining maintenance 0.55 48,810 Total mining (per tonne mined) 1.74 154,418 - Processing (per tonne stacked) 3.86 179,162 G&A 63,000 Total Operating Cost 396,579

The mine operating cost estimates cover pit operations (i.e., drilling, blasting, loading and hauling); waste dump maintenance; construction of internal haul roads, sumps and safety berms; maintenance of all mine roads and safety berms; operating and maintenance labour; mine department supervision; and other earthworks as may be required for day-to-day mining operations. Total operating costs for mining are estimated to average $1.74 per tonne of material moved, for 88.7 million tonnes of ore and waste over the mine life (Table 16.3).

The process operating costs were developed for all of the different ore types, or Domains. The costs were estimated by specific operating area and include crushing and conveying, leaching, plant, refinery and laboratory including major consumables. The cost of process maintenance and personnel including process supervision is included. A summary of the process operating cost estimate is provided in Table 17.1.

Costs not directly related to the mining of material or the crushing and leaching of ore and the recovery and sales of gold have been grouped under General and Administration (G&A). This includes the cost for housing workers in a camp and costs related to worker health and safety.

Senior management will consist of the General Manager and the Mine, Processing and Administration Superintendents who will report directly to the General Manager. All management costs for mining and processing are included in the mining and processing costs. The costs for the General Manager and Administration Superintendent and related support are in General and Administration costs. Average G&A operating costs are estimated at $8 million per year as detailed in Appendix 21.1.

The total workforce at La India is estimated to be 365 at full production and is summarized in Table 21.4 below.


146

Table 21.4 – Estimated La India mine personnel over the Life of Mine

Q4PP Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8

Mining Mine Operations 65 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77Mine Maintenance 21 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27Mine Supervision & Technical 28 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31

Total Mining Personnel 114 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135ProcessProcess Supervision 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14Metallurgy Laboratory 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Assay Laboratory 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18Crushing 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21Ore Reclamation & Stacking 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9Heap Leach System 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14Refinery 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6Carbon Absortion ADR 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12Maintenance Supervision 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8Maintenance Technicians 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18

Total Processing Personnel 122 122 122 122 122 122 122 122 122G&AGeneral Management 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Security 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Community Relations 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3Finances 19 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21Administration & HR 56 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69Enviromental, Health & Safety 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

Total G&A Personnel 93 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 108

Total Project Personnel: 329 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365

PROJECT PERSONNEL SUMMARY

Description


147

Economic Analysis Item 22.This economic analysis is based on probable reserves of 44.6 million tonnes grading 0.65 g/t gold (930,000 ounces of contained gold) reported for the La India deposit as of June 30, 2012 from a database that includes drilling results through May 23, 2012. Mine plans are based on oxide material only; sulphide material was excluded from the plan.

Mine plans and block models will be updated in mid-February 2013 for inclusion in Agnico-Eagle’s resource and reserves statement as of December 31, 2012.

22.1 Assumptions, Economic Criteria, and Inputs The metal prices and foreign exchange rate used to calculate the reserve estimate are the historic three-year averages (in accordance with SEC Industry Guide 7). For the period ending June 30, 2012, the historic three-year average gold and silver prices per ounce (London PM fix) were $1,379 and $26.49/oz, respectively; the historic three-year exchange rate was US$1.00 = Mx Peso 13.0.

Details of the pit optimization and mine production schedule are given in Item 16. The average leach plant gold recovery is estimated at 80% using various ore types, as indicated by test work described in Item 13 of this report. The rate of gold production is based on leach time estimates. The mine will produce gold and silver in the form of doré bars requiring further refining. It is expected that the contracted refinery will recover 100% of the gold. The refined gold will be sold on the spot market by Agnico-Eagle.

The gold production forecast for the La India mine project is shown in Table 22.1. This includes mining a total of 44.6 million tonnes of ore at an average gold grade of 0.65 g/t as well as 44.1 million tonnes of waste, resulting in a waste to ore ratio of 0.99:1. Pre-production (construction) is estimated at 15 months, with initial startup estimated in October 2013. There will be a buildup of inventory during the first 15 months. There will be a buildup of inventory during the first 15 months of operation.

Table 22.1 – Gold production forecast for the La India mine, 2013-2022

LOM Ore to Pad (000 tonnes)

Gold grade of ore (g/t)

Contained gold (oz) Gold recovered (oz)

PP 1,245 0.72 28,880 16,173 Year 1 5,809 0.70 131,108 73,420 Year 2 5,840 0.72 135,000 108,000 Year 3 5,840 0.61 114,886 91,909 Year 4 5,840 0.53 99,903 79,922 Year 5 5,840 0.58 109,189 87,351 Year 6 5,840 0.69 128,616 102,893 Year 7 5,840 0.67 126,175 100,940 Year 8 2,545 0.69 56,522 64,416 Year 9 0 0 0 19,199 Total 44,639 0.65 930,277 744,222


148

The open pit ore production will average 5.8 million tonnes annually from 2014 through 2020. Gold production is expected to average 90,000 ounces per year. Silver production has been assumed as 1.6 ounces of silver per ounce of gold produced, based on metallurgical testing.

Not all gold will be produced in the year the ore is stacked. Recoverable gold inventory is assumed to stabilize after Year 1, and residual inventory will be recovered in Year 9.

Capital and operating costs are estimated in Item 21 of this report. The pre-production capital cost estimate of $157.6 million and the sustaining capital cost estimate of $25.8 million as well as the estimated operating costs of $8.28/tonne over the life of mine assume mining and financing by the owner. Prices are given in constant second quarter 2012 US dollars with no escalation applied to the operating costs, capital costs or revenue.

22.2 Cash Flow Analysis and Economic Performance Based on the time period from construction through closure, on a stand-alone basis the project is expected to return the pre-tax cash flows presented in Table 22.2. Total revenue and total net cash flow are estimated to be $1,056 million and $471 million, respectively over the life of mine modeled. Note that the project cash flow model is based on starting construction in the fourth quarter of 2012. Mine life is estimated at eight years of production plus Year 9 of residual production and the rinsing of the heaps.

Table 22.2 – Pre-tax cash flows for the La India mine by year ($ 000)

Year Capital Exp Operating Exp Revenue Cash Flow Year -1 35,961

-35,961

PP 121,595 11,593 22,897 -110,291 Year 1 5,934 50,719 103,922 47,269 Year 2 4,525 53,324 153,123 95,274 Year 3 4,625 53,458 130,220 72,137 Year 4 1,279 53,458 113,043 58,306 Year 5 1,211 53,458 123,973 69,304 Year 6 1,153 53,458 146,250 91,639 Year 7 1,077 44,950 143,474 97,447 Year 8 1,025 22,750 91,560 67,785 Year 9 5,000 4,023 27,288 18,265 TOTAL 183,385 401,192 1,055,750 471,173

The average LOM total cash cost comes to $497 per ounce of gold produced net of byproduct silver credits, of which the capital cost would be US$245/oz gold produced.

The net smelter return (NSR) includes doré transportation and refining, and a 0.50% NSR royalty from a portion of the North Zone. The $$1,250,000 cost for purchasing other NSRs as per various agreements is not included in capital costs. Revenue and expenses are recognized at the time of production. Income from the salvage value at the end of the project’s life is estimated at 20% of the value of new mining and crushing equipment, and is expected to partly offset the closure costs.


149

Costs for land purchase, environment permit & baseline, feasibility study, detailed engineering and conversion drilling will be incurred before the start of construction and therefore were not included in determining the net present value and internal rate of return for the project.

The results of an economic analysis on a pre-tax basis indicate an internal rate of return (IRR) of 41% with a net present value (NPV) of $311 million at a discounted rate of 5%. The results on an after-tax basis indicate an internal rate of return of 31% with a net present value of $207 million at a discounted rate of 5%.

In both the pre-tax and the after-tax basis, the cumulative net cash flow becomes positive during Year 3 of operation.

22.3 Taxes and Royalties The principal corporate taxes levied in Mexico include:

• the greater of the regular income tax (“ISR”), and the single rate business tax or flat tax (“IETU”), and

• a value-added tax (“VAT”).

22.3.1 Income Tax and Single Rate Business Tax or Flat Tax

Mexico’s corporate income tax is 30% through December 31, 2012. The rate will be reduced to 29% in 2013 and 28% in 2014 and future years. An income tax rate of 28% has been used in the economic model.

Mexico also has a flat tax that applies to corporations. The flat tax is an alternative tax that does not replace the corporate income tax and is calculated on a cash-flow basis, generally when business receipts are collected and business expenditures, including capital expenditures, are made. A flat tax rate of 17.5% has been used in the economic model.

Corporations are required to calculate both their income tax liability and their flat tax liability for each fiscal year, and pay whichever is higher.

22.3.2 Value-added Tax

Value-added tax is assessed on the sale of goods and services, leasing and imports. The rate is 16% and is imposed on all activities conducted within Mexican territory, 11% in the US/Mexican border region and 0% for all exports, which includes the sale of gold. Value-added tax paid on purchases is refundable as long as the expenses are business related and are deductible for income tax purposes. The economic model assumes a value-added tax rate of 16%, and that all value-added tax paid will be refunded.

22.3.3 Royalties

The only royalty expected at the La India mine during operation is a 0.50% NSR royalty from the portion of the North Zone that overlies the La India concession. The other NSRs are expected to be purchased for an aggregate of $1,250,000 before the start-up of mining, as


150

described in Item 4 of this report. Costs for purchasing NSRs as per various agreements are not included in capital costs.

22.4 Sensitivity Analysis The key economic risks of the La India project were examined by running cash flow sensitivities on:

• capital costs • operating costs • gold price

Sensitivities were calculated for a range of -30% to +30% variations of the base case parameters of capital cost, operating cost, and gold price. All analyses were done with a net present value with a discounted rate of 5%. The sensitivities of IRR and NPV to changes in these three parameters are shown on Table 22.3.

Table 22.3 – La India internal rate of return (IRR) and net present value (NPV) sensitivity to capital and operating costs and the gold price

Pre-Tax IRR sensitivity Change % Capital costs Operating costs Gold price +30% 30% 32% 63% Base Case 41% 41% 41% -30% 59% 50% 16%

Pre-tax NPV 5% sensitivity Change % Capital costs Operating costs Gold price +30% $262 million $228 million $537 million Base Case $311 million $311 million $311 million -30% $361 million $394 million $85 million

The project’s IRR and NPV are most sensitive to variations in the gold price and recovered gold (which have the same impact). This is followed by the operating costs, with the capital cost having the least impact on the economics of the project.

The sensitivity analysis shows that the La India project economics are very robust using the base case parameters, and would remain attractive in any reasonably foreseeable economic conditions or change in the cost estimates given in this technical report.


151

Adjacent Properties Item 23.Numerous historic mine workings and prospects are present in the region that hosts the La India project, but public domain or historic information is available only for the Mulatos mine property owned by Alamos Gold Incorporated. Historic mining of silver ores is reported from the La Chipriona mine, located 1.5 km north of La India’s North Zone, but production data are not available.

The Mulatos mine property is immediately adjacent to, and partly surrounded by, the claims comprising the La India gold project. The Mulatos mine is located 5.8 km southeast of the nearest portion of the Agnico-Eagle claim block (Figure 23.1), and the El Yaqui deposit is located 5.7 km east of the nearest portion of the Agnico-Eagle claim block. In 2011 the Mulatos mine produced 153,000 ounces of gold (Alamos Gold, 2012a); a remaining proven and probable reserve of 65.0 million tonnes grading 1.14 g/t gold (containing 2.39 million ounces of gold) was reported as of December 31, 2011. This reserve includes both the Mulatos mine and the La Yaqui and Cerro Pelon pits (Alamos Gold Mineral Reserve table available at www.alamosgold.com, May 2012).

Alamos Gold has identified and partially drill-tested three exploration targets near the Agnico-Eagle concessions. In an Alamos Gold press release (Alamos Gold, 2004, available on SEDAR), Alamos Gold reported that reverse circulation drilling at Cerro El Realito, located 1,400 m east of La India’s North Zone (Figure 23.1), yielded drill intercepts of as much as 24.4 m grading 5.98 g/t gold. An alteration zone extends to the boundary of the claims controlled by Agnico-Eagle and is contiguous with the La India alteration zone.

In its 2005 annual report (Alamos Gold, 2006, available on SEDAR), Alamos Gold reported summary results of reverse circulation drilling at the El Jaspe prospect. El Jaspe is surrounded on the west, north and east sides by Agnico-Eagle’s Triple A claim, and at its closest point is only 500 m from the Triple A claim boundary (Figure 23.1). Alamos reported that drill holes intersected a blind zone of gold-silver-copper mineralization hosted by pyritized and silicified volcanic rock at El Jaspe. The down-dip extent of the mineralized zone projects toward the Agnico-Eagle claims. Intercepts of 6.1 m grading 2.25 g/t gold, 7.6 m at 1.46 g/t gold, and 13.7 m at 0.85 g/t gold were reported.

In June 2011 Alamos Gold issued a press release (Alamos Gold, 2011, available on SEDAR) of exploration results at the El Carricito target, located adjacent to and south of Agnico-Eagle’s El Pilar concession. Alamos Gold reported exploration drill-hole intercepts of 71.65 m grading 0.52 g/t gold and 48.78 m at 0.31 g/t gold.

The author has not reviewed the data from Alamos Gold and therefore cannot comment on the accuracy of these reported mineralized intercepts. The information for Alamos Gold was obtained from sources believed to be reliable but cannot be verified. The mineralization described for the adjacent properties is not necessarily indicative of the mineralization at the La India property.


152

Figure 23.1 – Adjacent exploration properties map


153

Other Relevant Data and Information Item 24.Agnico-Eagle is not aware of any other relevant data or information about the La India mine project.

Interpretation and Conclusions Item 25.The La India project hosts a probable reserve comprising 930,000 ounces of gold contained in 44.64 million tonnes at a grade of 0.65 g/t gold.

A metallurgical gold recovery of 80% was assumed for the purpose of this evaluation, based on third party reviews of the metallurgical test work completed to date. Engineering studies and operating and capital cost estimates were developed to exploit only the only oxide mineralization at La India; no sulphide mineral was included in the analysis.

Key results are based on the time period from construction (year PP) to closure, a $1,379 per ounce gold price, a $26.49 per ounce silver price, a MXP/US$ exchange rate of 13.00, and the capital and operating costs detailed in this report:

• $207-million after-tax net present value at a 5% discount rate • 31% after-tax internal rate of return • Total cash cost is $497 per ounce of gold produced net of by-product silver credits • Initial capital cost of $157.6 million • Life of Mine capital cost of $183.4 million total

The La India project has high potential to be developed into a profitable mine, and the identified probable reserve is economically significant, with an average annual production of 90,000 ounces of gold over an eight-year mine life. The robust nature of the economics and the relatively low sensitivity of the project to unforeseen variances in capital, operating costs and revenues are sufficient for an investment decision to proceed with the construction of the project.


154

Recommendations Item 26.Work to date has identified probable reserves at La India likely to be of economic significance with good potential to develop a profitable and economically significant mine. The economic potential of the La India project is believed to be sufficiently robust to allow a construction decision and to withstand unforeseen changes in operating costs, mineral resources, metallurgical behaviour, or capital costs while maintaining a positive economic impact for Agnico-Eagle. It is therefore the recommendation of Agnico-Eagle Mexico to approve the project for immediate construction.

Specific recommendations to further reduce project risk include:

• complete an infill drilling program in the Main Zone and update the resource block model, with the goal of upgrading the inferred resources to the measured or indicated resource classifications;

• complete a step-out drill program to increase the resource base to extend the mine life or increase the production throughput;

• develop infiltration galleries for project water supply; • continue ARD test work and develop a more detailed waste rock management plan.

Opportunities exist to improve the economic performance of the project and should be investigated, including:

• continue geotechnical analysis of the pit slopes to determine if the pit slopes can be steepened, which would cut costs;

• evaluation of mining and processing of sulphide material. Three column tests of sulphide material were completed in the past test campaigns. These included two of Domain 17 material and one of Domain 5 material. All were done with -25-mm material. The two column tests on Domain 17 material had 40% and 60% recovery, and the Domain 5 test had 70% recovery. The sulphide material immediately underlies the oxide material, and waste-to-ore ratios would be low if the sulphide were mined. Further tests to confirm recoveries and reagent costs are recommended.

• increase resources. It is likely that the mineral resources at La India could be modestly increased by step-out drilling in the Main Zone. There is also a possibility that the resource grade in the Main Zone will increase when the block model is further revised to reflect the sample intervals that are currently classified as "no data" due to low sample recovery.

• mine plans and block models will be updated in mid-February 2013 for inclusion in Agnico-Eagle’s resource and reserves statement as of December 31, 2012.

• explore for new resource areas. Exploration for new resource zones continues at La India and the nearby Tarachi discovery. There is significant potential for finding more economic mineralization within the La India property area, especially down-dip and along-strike from the known deposits. The discovery of a new resource area could significantly change the La India project economics.


155

References Item 27.Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited, 2012a, Feasibility Study of La India Gold Project, Municipality of Sahuaripa, Sonora,

Mexico. 31 August, 2012. Internal document, 303 pages plus appendices A through E. Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited, 2012b, Press release 4 September, 2012. Published on System for Electronic

Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com. Alamos Gold Incorporated, 2004, Press release dated 29 November 2004. Published on System for Electronic

Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com. Alamos Gold Incorporated, 2005, Quarterly Report, 3rd Quarter 2005. Published on System for Electronic Document

Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com. Alamos Gold Incorporated, 2006, 2005 Annual Report. Published on System for Electronic Document Analysis and

Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com. Alamos Gold Incorporated, 2011, Press release 21 June 2011. Published on System for Electronic Document

Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com. Alamos Gold Incorporated, 2012a, Press release 9 January 2012. Published on System for Electronic Document

Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com. Alamos Gold Incorporated, 2012b, 2011 Year-End Reserve Report. Published on Alamos Gold website,

http://www.alamosgold.com/our-mines-and-projects/mulatos-project/reserves-and-resources as of May 2012.

Albinson, T., Norman, D., Cole, D., an d Chomiak, B., 2001, Controls on formation of low-sulfidation epithermal

deposits in Mexico: Constraints from fluid inclusion and stable isotope data: in New Mines and Mineral Discoveries in Mexico and Central America. Special Publication Number 8 of the Society of Economic Geologists, p. 1-32.

Arribas, A., Jr., 1995, Characteristics of high-sulfidation epithermal deposits and their relation to magmatic fluid.

Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course Series, v. 23, p. 419-454. Ashley, R.P., 1974, Goldfield mining district. Nevada Bureau of Mines Geologic Report 19, p. 49-66. Berger, B.R., and Henley, R.W., 1989, Advances in the understanding of epithermal gold silver deposits with special

reference to the western United States: in The Geology of Gold Deposits: the Perspective in 1988. The Society of Economic Geologists, Economic Geology Monograph 6, edited by W.R. Keays, W.R.H. Ramsey, and D.I. Groves.

Bonham, H.F., Jr., 1988, Models for volcanic-hosted epithermal precious metal deposits: in Bulk minable precious

metal deposits of the western United States. Geological Society of Nevada, Symposium Proceedings, edited by R.W. Schafer, J.J. Cooper, and P.G. Vikre.

Buchanan, L.J., 1981, Precious metal deposits associated with volcanic environments in the southwest: in Relation

of tectonics to ore deposits in the Southern Cordillera. Arizona Geological Society Digest, vol.14, edited by W.R. Dickenson and W.D. Payne.

Consejo de Recursos Minerales, 1992, Monographia geologico-minera del Estado de Sonora. Secretaria de Energia,

Minas e Industria Paraestatal, Subsecretaria de Minas e Industria Basica, Mexico, publication M-8e, 220 p.

http://www.sedar.com/






http://www.alamosgold.com/our-mines-and-projects/mulatos-project/reserves-and-resources


156

Deen, J.A., Rye, R.O., Munoz, J.L., and Drexler, J.W., 1994, The magmatic hydrothermal system at Julcani, Peru: Evidence from fluid inclusions and hydrogen and oxygen isotopes. Economic Geology, v. 89, p. 1924-1938.

Ebert, S.W., 2004, Technical report and exploration recommendations, La India Project, Mulatos District, Sonora.

Report prepared for Grayd Resource Corporation dated 30 March, 2004 for NI43-101 filing, published on System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.

Foley, A., 2006a, La India Hoist EM acquisition report. Private report dated April 2006, prepared for Newmont

Mining Corporation and Grayd Resource Corporation, 6 p. Foley, A., 2006b, La India Pole-Dipole acquisition report. Private report dated April 2006, prepared for Newmont

Mining Corporation and Grayd Resource Corporation, 31 p. Giroux, G.H., 2012, Tarachi – Resource Estimate. Private report prepared by Giroux Consultants Ltd. for Agnico-

Eagle Mines, February 2012, 33 p. Goldcorp, 2006, El Sauzal 2005 reserve statement. Published on Goldcorp website, http://goldcorp.com. Goldcorp, 2008, Goldcorp 2007 Annual Report. Published on Goldcorp website, http://goldcorp.com and available

on System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com. Goldcorp, 2012, 2011 Annual Report. Published on Goldcorp website, http://goldcorp.com and available on System

for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com. Golder Associates, 2012a, Technical memorandum: Take-off Quantities for the La India Leach Pad. Private report

dated 5 May, 2012 prepared for Agnico-Eagle Mines. Golder Associates, 2012b, Technical memorandum: La India Heap Leach Facility – Draft Basic Engineering Water

Balance Evaluation. Private report prepared by Rafael Luna and Michael Grass of Golder Associates dated 14 June, 2012 and 27 June, 2012 prepared for Agnico-Eagle Mines.

Gray, Matthew D., 2006, Summary report of the La India gold project. Technical report prepared for Grayd

Resource Corporation dated 14 July, 2006 for NI43-101 filing, 155 p., published on System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.

Gray, Matthew D., 2012a, Drillhole database QA/QC report, La India Gold Project, Municipio of Sahuaripa, Sonora, Mexico (Amendment of 21 March 2012 report to include discussion on sample recovery and removal from database of low recovery samples). Private report dated 24 April 2012 prepared for Agnico-Eagle Mines.

Gray, Matthew D., 2012b, Drillhole database QA/QC report, La India Gold Project, Municipio of Sahuaripa, Sonora, Mexico, Database date 23 May 2012. Private report dated 19 June 2012 prepared for Agnico-Eagle Mines.

Gray, M.D, and Giroux, G., 2008, February 2008 inferred mineral resource, La India gold project, Municipio of

Sahuaripa, Sonora, Mexico. Technical report prepared for Grayd Resource Corporation dated 22 February, 2008 for NI43-101 filing, 158 p., published on System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.

Gray, M.D, and Giroux, G., 2009, February 2009 inferred mineral resource, La India gold project, Municipio of

Sahuaripa, Sonora, Mexico. Technical report prepared for Grayd Resource Corporation dated 26 March, 2009 for NI43-101 filing, 200 p., published on System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.


http://goldcorp.com/


http://goldcorp.com/






157

Gray, M.D, and Giroux, G., 2010, May 2010 measured, indicated and inferred mineral resource, La India gold project, Municipio of Sahuaripa, Sonora, Mexico. Technical report prepared for Grayd Resource Corporation dated 15 June, 2010 for NI43-101 filing, 237 p., published on System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.

Gray et. al., 2010, 6 December 2010 Preliminary economic assessment, La India gold project, Municipio of

Sahuaripa, Sonora, Mexico. Technical report prepared for Grayd Resource Corporation dated 6 December, 2010 for NI43-101 filing, 374 p., published on System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.

Gray, J.E., and Coolbaugh, M.F., 1994: Geology and geochemistry of Summitville, Colorado: An epithermal acid-

sulfate deposit in a volcanic dome. Economic Geology, v. 89, p. 1906-1923. Hayba, D.O., Bethke, P.M., Heald, P., and Foley, N.K., 1985, Geologic, mineralogic, and geochemical

characteristics of volcanic-hosted epithermal precious metal deposits. Reviews in Economic Geology, v. 2, p. 129-167.

Heald, P., Foley, N.K., and Hayba, D.O., 1987, Comparative anatomy of volcanic-hosted epithermal deposits: Scid-

sulfate and adularia-sericite types. Economic Geology, v. 82, p. 1-26. Hedenquist, J.W., Arribas, A., Jr., and Reynolds, T.J., 1998, Evolution of an intrusion-centered hydrothermal

system: Far Southeast Lepanto porphyry and epithermal Cu-Au deposits, Philippines. Economic Geology, v. 93, p. 373-404.

Jenkins, D.M., 1994, Geological report on La Viruela Project, Sonora State, Mexico. Private report dated 13 April,

1994 prepared for San Fernando Mining Company, 40 p. Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2007a, La India project review: cyanide bottle roll tests. Private report dated 21

May, 2007 prepared by T.E. Albert of Kappes Cassiday and Associates for Grayd Resource Corporation. Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2007b, Flotation Tests – La India Project, KCA Project Code: 285 C/7900. Private

report dated 11 July, 2007 prepared by T.E. Albert of Kappes Cassiday and Associates for Grayd Resource Corporation, 3 p.

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2008, La India project, report of metallurgical testwork, September 2008, KCA

Project Code: 285 C/7900. Private report dated September 2008 prepared for Grayd Resource Resource Corporation, 276 p.

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2009, La India project, report of metallurgical testwork, October 2009, KCA

Project Code: 285 C/7900. Private report dated October 2009 prepared for Grayd Resource Corporation, 194 p.

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2010a, Bottle roll leach test work - La India project, report of metallurgical

testwork, March 2010, KCA Project Code: 285 C/7900. Private report dated March 2010 prepared for Grayd Resource Corporation, 4 p.

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2010b, La India project, report of metallurgical testwork, May 2010, KCA Project

Code: 285 C/7900. Private report dated May 2010 prepared for Grayd Resource Corporation, 57 p. Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2012, La India Project, Basic Engineering Design Report, May 24, 2012. Private

report dated 24 May, 2012 prepared for Agnico-Eagle Mines. Longo, T., 2006a, La India field review report, 27 February 2006. Private report dated 27 February, 2006 prepared

for Newmont Mining Corporation and Grayd Resource Corporation, 43 p.




158

Longo, T., 2006b, La India February 2006 monthly report, 28 February 2006. Private report dated 28 February, 2006 prepared for Newmont Mining Corporation and Grayd Resource Corporation, 6 p.

Longo, T., 2006c, La India progress report, 28 March 2006. Private report dated 28 March, 2006 prepared for

Newmont Mining Corporation and Grayd Resource Corporation, 9 p. Longo, A.A., Paez-Beltran, E., Smit, H., Bourke, F.M., and Prefontaine, M., 2010, Geology of the La India Gold

Deposit, Mulatos District, Sonora, Mexico: in Great Basin Evolution and Metallogeny. Geological Society of Nevada, Symposium Proceedings, Reno/Sparks, Nevada, May 14-22, 2010.

M3 Engineering, 2004, Technical report: The Estrella pit development, Mulatos, Sonora, Mexico. Technical report

prepared for Alamos Gold Corporation dated 14 July, 2007 for NI43-101 filing, 189 p., published on System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), http://www.sedar.com.

McDougall, J.J., 1995, Progress Report #1 on La Viruela Project, Sonora State, Mexico. Private report dated 31

March, 1995 prepared for San Fernando Mining Company Ltd., 50 p. The Mines Group, 2012, Preliminary kinematic pit slope design results. Technical memorandum dated August 6,

2012 prepared by Ken Myers of The Mines Group for Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited, 22 p. Moore, S., 2005, Results and exploration concepts from geologic mapping, La India/La Viruela map areas. Private

report dated 6 December, 2005 prepared for Newmont Mining Corporation and Grayd Resource Corporation, 6 p.

Moore, S., 2006, La India Project, Duraznito South area, results of mapping February 2006. Private report dated 18

March, 2006, prepared for Newmont Mining Corporation and Grayd Resource Corporation, 13 p. Petersen, U., Noble, D.C., Arenas, M.J., and Goodell, P.C., 1977, Geology of the Julcani mining district, Peru.

Economic Geology, v. 72, p. 931-949. Ransome, F.L., 1909, The association of alunite with gold in the Goldfield district. Economic Geology, v. 2, p. 667-

692. Servicio Geologico Mexicano, 2009, Geology and Mineralization Map TECORIPA H12-12 Sonora Chihuahua.

Edited by Servicio Geologico Mexicano, March 2009. Smit, Hans, 2008, La India Project domain determination, November 2008. Private report dated November 2008

prepared for Grayd Resource Corporation, 4 p. Southworth, J.R., 1905, Las minas de Mexico ilustrado, Tomo IX Octubre 1905. Secretaria de Fomento

Colonizacion, Industria y Comercio, Gobierno de Mexico, 260 p. SRK Consulting, 2012a, La India – Characterization of Metal Leaching and Acid Rock Drainage Potential at the La

India Deposit, Sonora, Mexico - Phase III. Private report dated June 2012 prepared by Chris Kennedy of SRK Consulting for Agnico-Eagle Mines.

SRK Consulting, 2012b, La India – Run-off Water Treatment Scoping Assessment. Private report dated 15 June,

2012 prepared by Tom Sharp and Chris Kennedy of SRK Consulting for Agnico-Eagle Mines. Staude, J.M., 2001, Geology, geochemistry, and formation of Au-(Cu) mineralization and advanced argillic

alteration in the Mulatos District, Sonora, Mexico: in New Mines and Mineral Discoveries in Mexico and Central America. Society of Economic Geologists, Special Publication Number 8, p. 199-216.

Stoffregen, R.E., 1987, Genesis of acid-sulfate alteration and Au-Cu-Ag mineralization at Summitville, Colorado.

Economic Geology, v. 82, p. 1575-1591.



159

Vikre, P.G., 1989, Ledge formation at the Sandstorm and Kendall gold mines, Goldfield, Nevada. Economic

Geology, v. 84, p. 2115-2138.


160

Notes to Investors Regarding the Use of Resources Cautionary Note to Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured and Indicated Resources

This Technical Report uses the terms "measured resources" and "indicated resources". We advise investors that while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") does not recognize them. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves.

Cautionary Note to Investors Concerning Estimates of Inferred Resources

This Technical Report also uses the term "inferred resources". We advise investors that while this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the SEC does not recognize it. "Inferred resources" have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.

Cautionary Note To U.S. Investors

The SEC permits U.S. mining companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only those mineral deposits that a company can economically and legally extract or produce. Agnico-Eagle uses certain terms in this Technical Report, such as "measured", "indicated" and "inferred", and "resources", that the SEC guidelines strictly prohibit U.S. registered companies from including in their filings with the SEC. U.S. investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011, which may be obtained from us, or from the SEC's website at: http://sec.gov/edgar.shtml. A "final" or "bankable" feasibility study is required to meet the requirements to designate reserves under Industry Guide 7. This feasibility study was recently completed.

Estimates for the La India project were calculated using historic three-year average metals prices and foreign exchange rates in accordance with the SEC Industry Guide 7. Industry Guide 7 requires the use of prices that reflect current economic conditions at the time of reserve determination, which the Staff of the SEC has interpreted to mean historic three-year average prices. The assumptions used for the mineral reserves estimates reported by Agnico-Eagle on September 4, 2012 were based on three-year average prices for the period ending June 30, 2012 of $1,379 per ounce gold, $26.49 per ounce silver, and a MXP/US$ exchange rate of 13.00.

The Canadian Securities Administrators' National Instrument 43-101 requires mining companies to disclose reserves and resources using the subcategories of "proven" reserves, "probable" reserves, "measured" resources, "indicated" resources and "inferred" resources. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

Investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.


161

Appendices Appendix 12.1 – Core samples not used for Resource estimation

DataSet Hole_IDFrom(m)

To(m)

greater than 50% rec

LabJobNumber SampleID Au_Plot Ag_ppm Cu_ppm As_ppm Mo_ppm Zn_ppmDupe Test

La India DDH-07-12 0.00 6.00 no CH07100405 313001 0.29 0.30 227 99 13 194 okLa India DDH-07-13 0.00 7.00 no CH07100405 313167 0.03 0.10 8 41 54 18 okLa India DDH-07-13 7.00 8.00 no CH07100405 313168 0.02 0.20 5 49 61 8 okLa India DDH-07-13 8.00 9.00 no CH07100405 313169 0.01 0.20 4 45 52 4 okLa India DDH-07-13 75.00 76.00 no CH07100405 313243 0.16 0.10 29 45 57 46 okLa India DDH-07-15 7.00 8.00 no CH07100406 313310 0.08 0.10 39 27 38 5 okLa India DDH-07-16 53.00 54.00 no CH07100403 313434 0.02 0.10 24 37 4 2 okLa India DDH-07-17 53.00 54.00 no CH07100403 313567 3.36 1.60 7 103 2 2 okLa India DDH-07-17 59.00 60.00 no CH07100403 313573 29.80 2.20 10 139 3 2 okLa India DDH-07-19 5.00 6.00 no HE07110408 313709 0.29 0.20 4 86 6 1 okLa India DDH-07-21 26.00 27.00 no HE07115498 313932 0.08 0.40 72 133 5 83 okLa India DDH-07-21 27.00 29.00 no HE07115498 313933 0.08 0.20 140 92 3 125 okLa India DDH-07-21 31.00 32.00 no HE07115498 313936 0.06 0.10 120 106 5 188 okLa India DDH-07-23 6.00 7.20 no HE07115499 372062 0.21 0.60 35 36 27 310 okLa India DDH-07-26 11.00 12.00 no HE07116100 372242 0.13 2.10 6 55 19 2 okLa India DDH-07-27 37.00 38.00 no HE07116101 372346 0.07 1.80 248 27 23 7 okLa India DDH-07-27 51.00 52.00 no HE07116101 372361 0.01 0.50 87 48 7 22 okLa India DDH-07-28 0.00 1.20 no HE07116101 372393 0.14 0.10 25 73 4 19 okLa India DDH-07-28 47.00 48.00 no HE07116101 372443 0.01 8.70 28 30 7 6 okLa India DDH-07-28 50.00 51.00 no HE07116101 372446 0.01 1.10 29 42 3 7 okLa India DDH-07-28 51.00 52.00 no HE07116101 372447 0.00 0.70 28 54 2 15 okLa India DDH-07-28 52.00 53.00 no HE07116101 372448 0.00 0.40 34 22 2 10 okLa India DDH-07-28 67.00 68.00 no HE07116101 372464 0.00 0.30 31 25 2 40 okLa India DDH-07-30 0.00 1.00 no CH07121302 372587 0.07 0.50 21 42 7 6 okLa India DDH-07-37 0.00 1.30 no CH07121304 372777 0.24 2.40 44 1690 19 15 okLa India DDH-07-37 6.00 7.00 no CH07121304 372785 0.11 0.40 2 14 1 2 okLa India DDH-07-37 10.00 11.00 no CH07121304 372789 0.42 0.90 3 24 2 4 okLa India DDH-07-37 21.00 22.00 no CH07121304 372800 0.21 1.40 4 19 3 3 okLa India DDH-07-37 34.00 35.00 no CH07121304 372813 7.20 96.40 323 6300 104 18 okLa India DDH-07-38 0.00 1.00 no CH07121304 372832 0.10 1.60 9 78 2 6 okLa India DDH-07-38 21.00 22.00 no CH07121304 372855 0.05 1.00 3 56 1 1 okLa India DDH-07-38 22.00 23.00 no CH07121304 372856 0.12 3.60 6 68 2 3 okLa India DDH-07-39 32.00 34.00 no CH07121306 388531 0.17 8.70 16 7 3 3 okLa India DDH-08-41 6.09 8.00 no HE08093715 514001 0.31 0.10 57 43 17 8 okLa India DDH-08-41 20.00 22.00 no HE08093715 514014 0.28 0.20 58 39 52 28 okLa India DDH-08-41 22.00 24.00 no HE08093715 514015 0.27 0.10 54 34 41 34 okLa India DDH-08-41 24.00 26.00 no HE08093715 514016 0.10 0.10 100 67 54 45 okLa India DDH-08-41 26.00 28.00 no HE08093715 514017 0.08 0.50 66 34 26 46 okLa India DDH-08-41 28.00 30.00 no HE08093715 514018 0.11 0.10 80 37 19 35 okLa India DDH-08-41 30.00 31.00 no HE08093715 514019 0.17 0.10 141 62 19 26 okLa India DDH-08-41 31.00 32.00 no HE08093715 514020 0.06 0.10 53 55 37 21 okLa India DDH-08-41 32.00 33.00 no HE08093715 514021 0.12 0.10 37 43 27 16 okLa India DDH-08-41 33.00 35.00 no HE08093715 514022 0.17 0.10 25 39 28 16 okLa India DDH-08-41 35.00 38.00 no HE08093715 514023 0.11 0.30 29 38 23 18 okLa India DDH-08-41 38.00 40.00 no HE08093715 514024 0.52 0.10 42 237 53 6 okLa India DDH-08-41 40.00 42.00 no HE08093715 514025 0.93 0.10 67 258 37 6 okLa India DDH-08-41 42.00 45.00 no HE08093715 514027 1.61 0.30 8 39 62 12 okLa India DDH-08-41 45.00 48.00 no HE08093715 514028 0.51 0.20 18 15 32 12 okLa India DDH-08-41 48.00 49.00 no HE08093715 514029 0.09 0.20 64 14 15 14 okLa India DDH-08-41 49.00 50.00 no HE08093715 514030 0.14 0.20 166 27 16 17 okLa India DDH-08-41 54.00 55.00 no HE08093715 514033 0.78 0.30 69 17 15 35 okLa India DDH-08-41 55.00 56.00 no HE08093715 514034 0.40 0.10 34 17 10 25 okLa India DDH-08-41 56.00 57.00 no HE08093715 514035 0.23 0.10 52 22 19 26 okLa India DDH-08-41 70.00 72.00 no HE08093715 514046 0.36 21.40 150 55 64 278 okLa India DDH-08-41 72.00 73.00 no HE08093715 514047 0.22 0.20 150 113 48 399 okLa India DDH-08-41 73.00 74.00 no HE08093715 514048 0.26 0.10 239 150 38 370 okLa India DDH-08-41 74.00 75.00 no HE08093715 514049 0.20 0.10 137 80 20 132 okLa India DDH-08-41 75.00 77.00 no HE08093715 514050 0.23 0.10 70 25 14 58 okLa India DDH-08-41 77.00 79.00 no HE08093715 514051 0.21 0.50 124 33 16 120 okLa India DDH-08-41 79.00 81.38 no HE08093715 514052 0.17 0.20 153 83 13 84 okLa India DDH-08-42 4.57 6.00 no HE08093715 514054 0.36 0.10 154 112 21 17 okLa India DDH-08-42 8.00 9.00 no HE08093715 514057 0.12 0.10 112 96 22 12 okLa India DDH-08-42 9.00 11.00 no HE08093715 514058 0.10 0.20 19 52 17 8 okLa India DDH-08-42 14.00 16.00 no HE08093715 514062 0.87 0.10 48 207 11 16 okLa India DDH-08-42 16.00 18.00 no HE08093715 514063 1.22 0.10 28 198 29 13 ok


162


To(m)



La India DDH-08-42 50.00 52.00 no HE08093715 514097 0.37 0.10 145 102 22 7 okLa India DDH-08-42 52.00 54.00 no HE08093715 514098 0.51 0.10 84 80 24 7 okLa India DDH-08-42 54.00 56.00 no HE08093715 514099 0.38 0.10 232 82 36 17 okLa India DDH-08-42 56.00 58.00 no HE08093715 514100 0.22 0.40 124 60 23 14 okLa India DDH-08-43 4.57 8.00 no HE08093715 514128 0.05 0.20 7 47 62 5 okLa India DDH-08-43 8.00 11.00 no HE08093715 514129 0.02 0.10 6 77 83 6 okLa India DDH-08-43 11.00 14.00 no HE08093715 514130 1.16 0.10 2 52 41 10 okLa India DDH-08-43 14.00 17.00 no HE08093715 514131 0.70 0.10 2 53 39 8 okLa India DDH-08-43 41.00 43.00 no HE08093715 514156 0.21 0.10 84 149 363 71 okLa India DDH-08-43 43.00 45.00 no HE08093715 514157 0.34 0.40 11 134 50 31 okLa India DDH-08-43 45.00 47.00 no HE08093715 514158 0.15 0.10 27 157 23 70 okLa India DDH-08-43 47.00 48.00 no HE08093715 514159 0.13 0.50 18 169 31 88 okLa India DDH-08-43 60.00 62.00 no HE08093715 514174 0.02 0.10 77 377 2 16 okLa India DDH-08-43 62.00 64.00 no HE08093715 514175 0.07 0.10 54 317 4 30 okLa India DDH-08-43 64.00 66.00 no HE08093715 514176 0.02 0.10 44 81 2 40 okLa India DDH-08-43 72.00 74.00 no HE08093715 514183 0.05 0.10 20 48 11 79 okLa India DDH-08-43 74.00 76.00 no HE08093715 514184 0.04 0.10 21 39 3 84 okLa India DDH-08-43 76.00 78.00 no HE08093715 514185 0.05 0.10 15 40 7 137 okLa India DDH-08-43 78.00 80.00 no HE08093715 514186 0.04 0.10 386 38 3 129 okLa India DDH-08-43 80.00 82.00 no HE08093715 514187 0.01 0.10 495 62 1 96 okLa India DDH-08-43 82.00 84.00 no HE08093715 514188 0.08 0.10 273 113 6 111 okLa India DDH-08-43 84.00 87.00 no HE08093715 514189 0.07 0.10 195 104 6 61 okLa India DDH-08-45 8.00 10.00 no HE08093716 514324 0.02 0.20 12 96 0.5 1 okLa India DDH-08-45 10.00 12.00 no HE08093716 514325 0.04 0.20 35 108 0.5 1 okLa India DDH-08-45 26.00 27.00 no HE08093716 514339 0.10 0.10 12 38 2 4 okLa India DDH-08-45 27.00 29.00 no HE08093716 514340 0.03 0.20 4 96 6 3 okLa India DDH-08-45 29.00 30.00 no HE08093716 514341 0.25 0.20 8 73 12 2 okLa India DDH-08-46 0.00 2.13 no HE08093716 514407 0.05 0.20 66 40 2 8 okLa India DDH-08-46 2.13 5.00 no HE08093716 514408 0.05 0.20 22 41 6 2 okLa India DDH-08-46 45.00 46.00 no HE08093717 514451 3.52 0.40 3 43 8 1 okLa India DDH-08-46 48.00 49.00 no HE08093717 514454 0.39 0.40 3 88 7 1 okLa India DDH-08-46 75.00 77.00 no HE08093717 514483 0.22 0.20 33 226 11 1 okLa India DDH-08-47 0.00 2.00 no HE08093717 514488 0.17 0.30 48 181 4 1 okLa India DDH-08-47 2.00 5.18 no HE08093717 514489 0.04 0.40 12 104 5 74 okLa India DDH-08-48 0.00 2.13 no HE08093717 514550 0.17 0.30 11 82 10 1 okLa India DDH-08-48 2.13 5.18 no HE08093717 514551 0.55 0.10 6 68 22 1 okLa India DDH-08-48 14.00 15.00 no HE08093717 514562 0.37 2.40 7 215 3 1 okLa India DDH-08-48 15.00 16.00 no HE08093717 514563 0.13 1.60 4 134 1 1 okLa India DDH-08-48 16.00 17.00 no HE08093717 514564 0.09 1.70 3 52 1 1 okLa India DDH-08-48 17.00 21.00 no HE08093717 514566 0.12 1.30 3 52 1 1 okLa India DDH-08-48 24.00 25.00 no HE08093717 514570 0.21 1.30 4 56 3 4 okLa India DDH-08-48 26.00 27.00 no HE08093717 514572 0.10 0.90 4 186 5 1 okLa India DDH-08-48 27.00 28.00 no HE08093717 514573 0.11 0.70 4 180 4 1 okLa India DDH-08-49 0.00 2.00 no HE08098031 514628 0.12 0.40 5 65 14 3 okLa India DDH-08-49 5.00 12.00 no HE08098031 514632 1.97 1.10 10 17 5 3 okLa India DDH-08-49 23.00 24.00 no HE08098031 514645 0.10 1.40 12 48 3 1 okLa India DDH-08-49 24.00 25.00 no HE08098031 514646 0.16 0.90 4 42 2 1 okLa India DDH-08-49 25.00 26.00 no HE08098031 514647 0.13 0.80 4 77 2 1 okLa India DDH-08-49 26.00 27.00 no HE08098031 514648 0.09 1.40 15 61 2 1 okLa India DDH-08-49 27.00 28.00 no HE08098031 514649 0.09 0.60 3 55 2 1 okLa India DDH-08-49 29.00 32.00 no HE08098031 514651 0.22 1.20 9 90 3 1 okLa India DDH-08-49 35.00 37.00 no HE08098031 514656 0.07 0.80 16 120 3 1 okLa India DDH-08-49 37.00 39.00 no HE08098031 514657 0.05 0.90 5 30 1 2 okLa India DDH-08-49 39.00 40.00 no HE08123794 514658 0.05 1.00 5 8 2 1 okLa India DDH-08-49 40.00 41.00 no HE08098031 514659 0.06 0.80 9 5 1 2 okLa India DDH-08-49 41.00 42.00 no HE08098031 514660 0.05 2.00 5 11 1 4 okLa India DDH-08-49 44.00 46.00 no HE08098031 514663 0.04 1.30 6 31 2 1 okLa India DDH-08-49 46.00 48.00 no HE08123794 514664 0.04 3.20 10 111 4 1 okLa India DDH-08-50 0.00 3.00 no HE08102991 514724 0.03 0.30 4 111 14 8 okLa India DDH-08-51 0.00 3.00 no HE08109086 514815 0.24 0.20 1 47 4 4 okLa India DDH-08-51 3.00 6.00 no HE08109086 514816 0.53 0.10 1 30 6 1 okLa India DDH-08-51 17.00 18.00 no HE08109086 514826 0.18 0.40 0.5 18 3 1 okLa India DDH-08-51 18.00 20.00 no HE08109086 514827 0.10 0.30 1 48 7 1 okLa India DDH-08-52 0.00 3.00 no HE08109086 514892 0.09 0.30 2 53 2 1 okLa India DDH-08-52 23.00 24.00 no HE08109086 514913 0.05 0.40 3 66 9 1 ok


163


To(m)



La India DDH-08-52 24.00 25.00 no HE08109086 514914 0.43 0.50 4 176 18 1 okLa India DDH-08-52 35.00 38.00 no HE08109086 514926 0.03 1.90 4 192 7 1 okLa India DDH-08-52 39.00 40.00 no HE08109086 514928 9.66 1.00 4 110 3 1 okLa India DDH-08-53 0.00 3.00 no HE08109086 514976 0.04 0.10 17 133 6 3 okLa India DDH-08-53 3.00 6.00 no HE08109086 514977 0.07 0.30 6 103 5 5 okLa India DDH-08-53 26.00 28.00 no HE08109086 514998 0.45 2.30 4 87 3 1 okLa India DDH-08-53 28.00 30.00 no HE08109086 514999 0.15 2.00 2 22 1 1 okLa India DDH-08-54 0.00 2.00 no HE08114053 590027 0.05 0.20 14 89 3 128 okLa India DDH-08-55 0.00 3.00 no HE08114053 590095 0.73 6.70 39 25 2 1 okLa India DDH-08-55 3.00 5.00 no HE08114053 590096 0.46 3.40 23 18 2 1 okLa India DDH-08-55 39.00 40.00 no HE08114053 590132 1.09 1.60 15 119 4 1 okLa India DDH-08-55 40.00 41.00 no HE08132951 590133 0.81 0.80 9 49 3 2 okLa India DDH-08-55 41.00 44.00 no HE08114053 590134 1.07 2.40 6 33 2 1 okLa India DDH-08-55 44.00 47.00 no HE08114053 590135 1.56 2.10 6 26 3 1 okLa India DDH-08-55 47.00 49.00 no HE08132951 590136 1.70 2.40 4 13 3 4 okLa India DDH-08-55 49.00 51.00 no HE08114053 590137 3.39 5.40 4 14 2 1 okLa India DDH-08-56 0.00 2.00 no HE08114053 590192 0.08 0.60 90 85 4 37 okLa India DDH-08-56 19.00 20.00 no HE08114053 590212 0.03 0.30 123 34 2 9 okLa India DDH-08-56 20.00 21.00 no HE08114053 590213 0.07 1.60 27 33 2 5 okLa India DDH-08-56 21.00 22.00 no HE08114053 590214 0.04 1.50 44 10 2 93 okLa India DDH-08-56 37.00 38.00 no HE08114053 590230 0.01 0.10 27 33 2 236 okLa India DDH-08-56 38.00 39.00 no HE08114053 590231 0.01 0.10 36 33 1 231 okLa India DDH-08-56 39.00 40.00 no HE08114053 590232 0.03 0.10 31 42 1 603 okLa India DDH-08-57 16.00 17.00 no HE08114054 590262 0.17 0.40 2 4 0.5 1 okLa India DDH-08-57 17.00 18.00 no HE08114054 590263 0.24 1.00 1 4 0.5 1 okLa India DDH-08-57 19.00 20.00 no HE08114054 590265 0.27 0.80 1 5 0.5 1 okLa India DDH-08-57 20.00 21.00 no HE08114054 590266 0.35 0.90 2 6 1 1 okLa India DDH-08-57 21.00 21.45 no HE08114054 590267 0.30 1.30 4 11 1 1 okLa India DDH-08-58 0.00 4.00 no HE08114054 590269 0.04 0.90 7 80 6 19 okLa India DDH-08-58 4.00 5.00 no HE08114054 590270 0.02 0.30 3 12 2 3 okLa India DDH-08-58 8.00 9.00 no HE08114054 590274 0.01 0.60 2 5 1 1 okLa India DDH-08-58 9.00 10.00 no HE08114054 590275 0.01 0.60 2 3 1 1 okLa India DDH-08-58 13.00 14.00 no HE08114054 590279 0.06 0.90 2 5 7 2 okLa India DDH-08-58 32.00 33.00 no HE08114054 590300 0.07 2.80 1 18 17 2 okLa India DDH-08-58 33.00 34.00 no HE08114054 590301 0.12 2.40 1 9 5 2 okLa India DDH-08-58 34.00 35.00 no HE08114054 590302 1.87 59.40 13 97 16 7 okLa India DDH-08-58 35.00 39.00 no HE08114054 590303 0.31 14.30 2 16 8 2 okLa India DDH-08-59 0.00 2.00 no HE08114054 590322 0.16 0.30 13 33 2 7 okLa India DDH-08-59 2.00 3.00 no HE08114054 590323 0.02 0.20 2 7 1 1 okLa India DDH-08-59 3.00 5.00 no HE08114054 590324 0.08 0.40 3 4 1 1 okLa India DDH-08-59 10.00 12.00 no HE08114054 590330 0.10 0.30 2 26 2 1 okLa India DDH-08-59 12.00 13.00 no HE08114054 590331 0.07 0.30 1 19 1 1 okLa India DDH-08-59 62.10 65.00 no HE08114054 590384 0.95 6.50 25 114 9 51 okLa India DDH-08-60 0.00 2.00 no HE08114054 590409 0.17 10.50 40 278 15 7 okLa India DDH-08-60 2.00 3.00 no HE08114054 590410 1.33 61.80 6 269 11 2 okLa India DDH-08-60 3.00 4.15 no HE08114054 590411 0.09 3.80 8 316 13 1 okLa India DDH-08-61 0.00 1.20 no HE08114054 590429 0.42 27.50 134 92 3 69 okLa India DDH-08-61 1.20 3.05 no HE08114054 590430 0.91 1.30 6 8 1 11 okLa India DDH-08-61 3.05 5.00 no HE08114054 590431 0.48 3.30 7 15 1 12 okLa India DDH-08-61 5.00 7.00 no HE08114054 590432 0.57 1.70 4 9 1 4 okLa India DDH-08-61 7.00 8.00 no HE08114054 590433 0.37 1.90 4 7 1 3 okLa India DDH-08-61 8.00 10.00 no HE08114054 590434 0.30 2.10 5 7 1 7 okLa India DDH-08-61 12.00 14.00 no HE08114054 590437 0.60 1.60 2 5 1 1 okLa India DDH-08-61 14.00 15.00 no HE08114054 590438 0.81 2.50 3 16 2 1 okLa India DDH-08-61 15.00 16.00 no HE08114054 590439 0.58 2.30 4 10 2 1 okLa India DDH-08-61 16.00 17.00 no HE08114054 590441 0.28 1.60 3 9 2 2 okLa India DDH-08-61 26.00 27.00 no HE08114054 590449 0.16 3.20 6 9 2 1 okLa India DDH-08-61 27.00 28.00 no HE08114054 590450 0.54 2.70 19 21 4 2 okLa India DDH-08-61 28.00 29.00 no HE08114054 590451 0.30 3.00 6 14 3 2 okLa India DDH-08-61 32.00 34.00 no HE08114054 590456 0.33 5.10 8 20 6 4 okLa India DDH-08-61 34.00 35.00 no HE08114054 590457 0.08 2.60 3 5 3 2 okLa India DDH-08-62 0.00 7.10 no HE08123292 590489 0.14 1.40 4 26 1 3 okLa India DDH-08-62 10.00 13.00 no HE08123292 590493 0.04 2.00 12 16 1 4 okLa India DDH-08-62 13.00 14.00 no HE08123292 590494 0.02 1.80 5 14 1 1 okLa India DDH-08-62 14.00 15.00 no HE08123292 590495 0.20 1.60 11 11 1 3 ok


164


To(m)



La India DDH-08-62 15.00 16.00 no HE08123292 590496 0.19 1.60 11 10 1 3 okLa India DDH-08-62 16.00 19.00 no HE08123292 590498 0.13 1.60 15 10 1 4 okLa India DDH-08-62 19.00 21.00 no HE08123292 590499 0.54 1.30 5 7 2 2 okLa India DDH-08-62 21.00 25.60 no HE08123292 590500 0.68 1.40 10 46 7 10 okLa India DDH-08-62 25.60 27.00 no HE08123292 642502 0.10 0.30 48 249 3 35 okLa India DDH-08-62 27.00 28.00 no HE08123292 642503 0.12 0.20 78 360 16 27 okLa India DDH-08-63 23.00 24.00 no HE08123292 642536 5.87 85.80 17 169 3 4 okLa India DDH-08-63 24.00 25.00 no HE08123292 642537 5.85 -100.00 16 239 6 4 okLa India DDH-08-63 25.00 26.00 no HE08123292 642538 3.61 -100.00 11 227 5 6 okLa India DDH-08-63 26.00 28.00 no HE08123292 642539 3.40 95.40 18 122 5 3 okLa India DDH-08-63 28.00 29.00 no HE08123292 642540 4.18 58.80 18 68 5 2 okLa India DDH-08-64 0.00 1.00 no HE08123291 642572 0.46 3.70 2 72 3 1 okLa India DDH-08-64 1.00 2.00 no HE08123291 642573 0.40 88.70 493 54 3 3 okLa India DDH-08-64 2.00 3.00 no HE08123291 642574 0.09 2.40 10 42 12 11 okLa India DDH-08-64 3.00 4.00 no HE08123291 642575 0.05 0.60 3 38 10 18 okLa India DDH-08-65 0.00 1.00 no HE08123832 642626 0.01 1.20 3 20 1 9 okLa India DDH-08-65 1.00 2.00 no HE08123832 642627 0.03 2.70 9 21 3 10 okLa India DDH-08-65 2.00 3.00 no HE08123832 642628 0.03 2.20 4 23 2 1 okLa India DDH-08-65 3.00 4.00 no HE08123832 642629 0.05 2.60 3 34 3 1 okLa India DDH-08-65 23.00 24.00 no HE08123832 642651 0.13 2.20 1 13 2 1 okLa India DDH-08-65 27.00 29.00 no HE08123832 642655 0.08 1.40 2 40 5 2 okLa India DDH-08-65 29.00 30.00 no HE08123832 642656 0.13 0.90 1 17 4 1 okLa India DDH-09-101 19.80 25.90 no HE09145695 887525 0.01 13.10 21 1 1 1 okLa India DDH-09-101 32.00 35.05 no HE09145695 887532 0.02 1.50 6 10 2 3 okLa India DDH-09-101 35.05 41.15 no HE09145695 887533 0.02 3.40 10 5 2 1 okLa India DDH-09-101 42.70 44.20 no HE09145695 887536 0.08 7.60 37 13 3 1 okLa India DDH-09-101 64.00 65.55 no HE09145695 887558 0.03 -100.00 485 47 43 469 okLa India DDH-09-101 65.55 66.00 no HE09145695 887559 0.02 72.00 143 50 5 502 okLa India DDH-09-102 8.00 9.15 no HE10002751 887574 0.01 0.60 3 2 1 1 okLa India DDH-09-102 39.65 42.00 no HE10002751 887608 0.01 0.40 1 1 1 1 okLa India DDH-09-66 1.00 2.00 no HE09110339 840001 0.28 0.40 3 80 10 2 okLa India DDH-09-66 2.00 3.00 no HE09110339 840002 1.55 0.70 5 59 14 2 okLa India DDH-09-66 4.00 5.00 no HE09110339 840004 0.42 0.20 3 26 9 4 okLa India DDH-09-66 5.00 6.00 no HE09110339 840005 0.08 0.20 2 23 9 2 okLa India DDH-09-66 9.00 10.00 no HE09110339 840009 0.49 1.00 7 66 10 3 okLa India DDH-09-66 10.00 11.05 no HE09110339 840010 1.00 0.80 8 52 7 1 okLa India DDH-09-66 11.05 12.00 no HE09110339 840011 0.18 1.20 9 54 7 2 okLa India DDH-09-66 35.00 36.00 no HE09110339 840037 2.50 0.90 5 181 3 1 okLa India DDH-09-66 36.00 37.00 no HE09110339 840038 0.13 1.40 4 59 1 2 okLa India DDH-09-66 37.00 38.00 no HE09110339 840039 0.11 1.20 6 163 2 1 okLa India DDH-09-66 38.00 39.10 no HE09110339 840040 0.11 1.50 6 114 1 1 okLa India DDH-09-66 39.10 40.00 no HE09110339 840041 0.11 1.30 5 156 2 4 okLa India DDH-09-66 40.00 41.15 no HE09110339 840042 0.08 1.50 3 118 2 2 okLa India DDH-09-66 44.20 45.10 no HE09110339 840043 0.05 3.10 7 11 1 1 okLa India DDH-09-67 18.00 19.00 no HE09112427 840103 0.06 0.10 0.5 64 13 1 okLa India DDH-09-69 13.00 14.00 no HE09121338 840239 1.53 0.80 10 18 4 1 okLa India DDH-09-69 14.00 15.00 no HE09121338 840240 5.32 0.90 9 71 16 2 okLa India DDH-09-71 0.40 1.00 no HE09129841 840374 0.18 1.40 6 34 7 1 okLa India DDH-09-71 6.00 7.00 no HE09129841 840380 1.39 0.80 7 31 4 1 okLa India DDH-09-71 7.00 8.00 no HE09129841 840381 0.38 0.10 31 88 8 1 okLa India DDH-09-71 21.00 22.00 no HE09129841 840398 0.03 1.40 3 62 2 1 okLa India DDH-09-71 22.00 23.00 no HE09129841 840399 0.03 1.50 4 63 2 1 okLa India DDH-09-72 0.00 1.00 no HE09134805 840476 0.31 0.80 4 54 3 1 okLa India DDH-09-75 1.50 2.00 no HE09134807 841005 0.41 2.40 45 116 3 4 okLa India DDH-09-75 2.00 3.00 no HE09134807 841006 0.88 3.10 50 127 3 3 okLa India DDH-09-76 1.00 2.00 no HE09134808 841076 0.34 3.40 37 50 3 8 okLa India DDH-09-77 1.00 1.50 no HE09134808 841133 1.49 1.20 32 217 33 6 okLa India DDH-09-78 1.00 2.00 no HE09134809 841168 0.27 1.20 32 45 10 14 okLa India DDH-09-86 0.00 1.00 no HE09141177 841542 0.03 0.30 2 129 10 1 okLa India DDH-09-86 1.00 2.00 no HE09141177 841543 0.07 0.20 0.5 49 5 1 okLa India DDH-09-86 6.00 7.00 no HE09141177 841549 0.03 0.30 2 91 12 1 okLa India DDH-09-86 7.00 7.60 no HE09141177 841550 0.03 0.30 0.5 66 18 1 okLa India DDH-09-86 7.60 8.00 no HE09141177 841552 0.11 0.70 2 94 21 1 okLa India DDH-09-86 8.00 9.00 no HE09141177 841553 0.12 0.50 0.5 43 4 1 okLa India DDH-09-88 0.00 2.00 no HE09145093 841679 1.40 0.80 3 43 8 3 ok


165


To(m)



La India DDH-09-89 0.00 1.00 no HE09145093 841739 0.10 0.50 18 34 1 1 okLa India DDH-09-89 1.00 2.00 no HE09145093 841740 0.04 0.70 6 14 1 1 okLa India DDH-09-92 7.00 8.00 no HE09145096 841962 0.19 0.10 23 21 65 1 okLa India DDH-09-92 8.00 9.00 no HE09145096 841963 0.15 0.10 8 62 119 1 okLa India DDH-09-93 13.00 15.25 no HE09145098 887030 0.95 1.60 11 68 7 1 okLa India DDH-09-93 15.25 16.75 no HE09145098 887031 0.76 1.80 13 32 2 4 okLa India DDH-09-93 16.75 18.30 no HE09145098 887032 1.06 1.80 15 26 2 1 okLa India DDH-09-93 18.30 19.00 no HE09145098 887033 1.57 1.40 10 43 2 1 okLa India DDH-09-93 19.00 20.00 no HE09145098 887034 1.21 1.10 7 52 2 1 okLa India DDH-09-93 21.00 22.85 no HE09145098 887036 0.51 1.50 8 38 7 1 okLa India DDH-09-93 25.90 27.45 no HE09145098 887037 1.32 3.10 11 52 9 1 okLa India DDH-09-93 27.45 28.95 no HE09145098 887039 1.53 2.30 9 62 9 1 okLa India DDH-09-93 28.95 30.50 no HE09145098 887041 4.01 5.90 8 42 5 1 okLa India DDH-09-93 30.50 32.00 no HE09145098 887042 3.81 4.80 10 55 4 1 okLa India DDH-09-93 33.00 33.55 no HE09145098 887044 3.11 7.20 14 40 3 1 okLa India DDH-09-93 33.55 35.05 no HE09145098 887045 4.81 4.60 8 52 3 1 okLa India DDH-09-93 35.05 36.60 no HE09145098 887046 3.50 6.10 9 43 3 1 okLa India DDH-09-94 5.90 7.00 no HE09145098 887089 0.82 0.60 6 74 20 1 okLa India DDH-09-94 7.00 7.90 no HE09145098 887090 1.73 0.50 11 84 37 5 okLa India DDH-09-94 12.00 13.70 no HE09145098 887096 0.53 7.30 11 26 5 1 okLa India DDH-09-94 13.70 15.25 no HE09145098 887097 0.53 1.70 3 45 3 1 okLa India DDH-09-94 15.25 17.00 no HE09145098 887098 0.32 2.60 6 27 4 1 okLa India DDH-09-95 1.00 2.00 no HE09145098 887150 0.01 0.80 5 9 0.5 3 okLa India DDH-09-95 2.00 3.00 no HE09145098 887151 0.00 0.60 2 9 0.5 1 okLa India DDH-09-96 41.00 42.00 no HE09145098 887266 1.68 77.40 42 15 1 1 okLa India DDH-09-96 42.00 43.00 no HE09145098 887268 0.25 4.10 3 12 0.5 1 okLa India DDH-09-96 46.00 47.25 no HE09145098 887272 0.10 1.30 2 14 1 1 okLa India DDH-09-96 50.30 51.85 no HE09145098 887275 0.79 27.20 70 96 12 17 okLa India DDH-09-96 51.85 54.90 no HE09145098 887276 0.49 21.50 59 39 4 5 okLa India DDH-09-96 54.90 56.40 no HE09145098 887277 0.38 1.60 2 9 1 1 okLa India DDH-09-96 62.00 63.00 no HE09145098 887284 0.22 1.00 2 68 2 1 okLa India DDH-09-96 63.00 64.30 no HE09145098 887285 9.54 1.30 4 154 2 1 okLa India DDH-09-97 9.00 10.65 no HE09145098 887306 0.02 0.80 5 183 2 1 okLa India DDH-09-97 10.65 12.20 no HE09145098 887308 0.02 0.60 3 85 3 1 okLa India DDH-09-97 30.00 31.00 no HE09145098 887330 0.02 0.30 9 518 9 7 okLa India DDH-09-97 53.00 54.00 no HE09145098 887356 0.01 0.10 30 206 1 8 okLa India DDH-09-97 54.00 54.90 no HE09145098 887357 0.00 0.10 4 112 2 4 okLa India DDH-09-98 0.00 1.50 no HE09145695 887359 0.07 1.30 2 9 1 1 okLa India DDH-09-98 1.50 3.05 no HE09145695 887361 0.07 1.10 2 56 4 1 okLa India DDH-09-98 7.00 9.15 no HE09145695 887367 0.12 1.40 2 9 2 1 okLa India DDH-09-98 9.15 10.65 no HE09145695 887368 0.18 1.00 1 3 1 1 okLa India DDH-09-98 14.00 15.25 no HE09145695 887372 0.19 1.60 2 5 1 1 okLa India DDH-09-98 15.25 16.75 no HE09145695 887373 0.17 1.90 2 9 14 2 okLa India DDH-09-98 16.75 18.30 no HE09145695 887374 0.10 2.30 2 49 5 3 okLa India DDH-09-98 18.30 19.80 no HE09145695 887375 0.17 5.20 3 25 4 1 okLa India DDH-09-98 19.80 21.35 no HE09145695 887376 0.06 1.10 1 16 1 1 okLa India DDH-09-98 26.45 30.50 no HE09145695 887381 0.09 2.70 3 72 2 9 okLa India DDH-09-98 30.50 36.60 no HE09145695 887382 0.30 6.80 6 530 4 6 okLa India DDH-09-98 36.60 37.20 no HE09145695 887384 0.06 0.10 37 73 2 168 okLa India DDH-09-98 38.00 39.65 no HE09145695 887386 0.05 0.10 35 50 1 411 okLa India DDH-09-98 39.65 41.15 no HE09145695 887387 0.09 0.10 32 70 1 184 okLa India DDH-09-98 41.15 42.70 no HE09145695 887388 0.05 0.10 30 61 0.5 213 okLa India DDH-09-98 45.00 47.25 no HE09145695 887391 0.68 36.10 60 371 1 73 okLa India DDH-09-99 0.00 1.00 no HE09145695 887398 1.42 4.50 12 327 4 1 okLa India DDH-09-99 1.00 2.00 no HE09145695 887399 0.41 4.80 10 195 3 1 okLa India DDH-09-99 41.00 42.00 no HE09145695 887442 10.95 26.20 4 190 14 1 okLa India DDH-09-99 42.00 43.00 no HE09145695 887443 10.55 56.90 2 122 14 1 okLa India DDH-10-104 0.00 3.05 no HE10008319 887689 0.04 0.80 7 23 14 7 okLa India DDH-10-107 0.00 1.00 no HE10016768 887849 0.01 0.10 36 33 2 1 okLa India DDH-10-107 1.00 2.00 no HE10016768 887850 0.02 0.10 78 66 1 1 okLa India DDH-10-107 44.00 45.00 no HE10016768 887895 0.01 0.30 164 85 3 8 okLa India DDH-10-107 45.00 46.00 no HE10016768 887896 0.01 0.40 60 38 3 3 okLa India DDH-10-108 3.00 4.00 no HE10016768 887917 0.02 0.80 56 26 2 1 okLa India DDH-10-108 4.00 5.00 no HE10016768 887918 0.02 0.10 18 256 7 2 okLa India DDH-10-108 9.00 10.00 no HE10016768 887923 0.02 0.20 11 114 6 1 ok


166


To(m)



La India DDH-10-108 10.00 11.00 no HE10016768 887924 0.01 0.20 10 174 15 2 okLa India DDH-10-108 11.00 12.20 no HE10016768 887925 0.11 0.80 22 49 5 1 okLa India DDH-10-109 0.00 2.00 no HE10020829 887979 0.03 0.30 23 711 68 8 okLa India DDH-10-109 44.20 45.50 no HE10020829 888029 0.29 0.20 1 90 5 1 okLa India DDH-10-109 45.50 46.30 no HE10020829 888030 0.49 0.60 23 35 5 1 okLa India DDH-10-111 22.85 24.70 no HE10021221 888159 0.04 2.10 86 42 4 870 okLa India DDH-10-111 69.00 70.50 no HE10021221 888206 0.02 0.30 50 17 2 74 okLa India DDH-10-111 74.70 76.25 no HE10021221 888210 0.04 0.80 103 45 6 67 okLa India DDH-10-111 77.75 79.50 no HE10021221 888213 0.00 0.10 9 6 0.5 57 okLa India DDH-10-112 1.50 3.00 no HE10026551 888237 0.06 2.10 203 110 14 4 okLa India DDH-10-112 6.00 7.20 no HE10026551 888241 0.04 2.60 155 78 24 10 okLa India DDH-10-112 7.20 8.00 no HE10026551 888243 0.04 2.10 84 56 8 8 okLa India DDH-10-113 70.00 71.00 no HE10026551 888417 0.38 7.80 724 40 5 9 okLa India DDH-10-113 71.00 72.00 no HE10026551 888418 5.42 3.30 2550 96 4 72 okLa India DDH-10-115 0.00 1.50 no HE10026552 888565 0.08 1.40 22 16 5 1 okLa India DDH-10-115 43.80 45.20 no HE10026552 888610 0.09 0.60 486 45 16 1 okLa India DDH-10-115 45.20 46.00 no HE10026552 888611 0.80 19.30 274 575 7 1 okLa India DDH-10-118 0.00 1.60 no HE10028780 888732 0.23 11.30 22 173 25 16 okLa India DDH-10-118 1.60 3.16 no HE10028780 888733 0.11 1.50 44 408 13 35 okLa India DDH-10-118 56.00 57.95 no HE10028780 888790 0.02 1.50 5 4 3 1 okLa India DDH-10-118 61.00 62.50 no HE10028780 888794 0.01 17.60 31 2 1 1 okLa India DDH-10-118 63.50 65.55 no HE10028780 888796 0.33 2.10 10 25 7 1 okLa India DDH-10-118 65.55 66.00 no HE10028780 888798 0.35 4.50 27 51 6 1 okLa India DDH-10-119 0.00 1.50 no HE10028780 888823 0.08 2.60 3 25 0.5 5 okLa India DDH-10-119 19.00 21.35 no HE10028780 888840 0.11 0.60 7 390 30 38 okLa India DDH-10-119 21.35 23.25 no HE10028780 888841 0.10 3.20 19 272 6 42 okLa India DDH-10-119 23.25 25.00 no HE10028780 888842 0.05 0.30 24 443 2 145 okLa India DDH-10-119 38.00 39.00 no HE10028780 888857 0.01 1.30 30 152 0.5 46 okLa India DDH-10-119 39.00 40.00 no HE10028780 888858 0.09 0.90 31 659 0.5 58 okLa India DDH-10-119 50.00 53.00 no HE10028780 888870 0.19 -100.00 1835 107 3 3 okLa India DDH-10-119 56.40 57.95 no HE10028780 888874 0.11 1.80 5 13 1 5 okLa India DDH-10-120 8.90 10.65 no HE10029069 888910 0.05 0.70 3 34 5 1 okLa India DDH-10-120 25.10 28.20 no HE10029069 888922 3.38 -100.00 217 529 15 8 okLa India DDH-10-120 28.20 29.20 no HE10029069 888924 0.22 2.80 12 317 17 8 okLa India DDH-10-120 39.65 41.15 no HE10029069 888935 0.15 0.90 20 121 3 10 okLa India DDH-10-120 41.15 42.70 no HE10029069 888936 0.21 2.60 9 84 5 6 okLa India DDH-10-121 0.00 2.00 no HE10033337 888979 0.03 0.20 2 60 2 1 okLa India DDH-10-130 0.00 4.00 no HE10038479 829306 0.05 0.80 50 73 31 4 okLa India DDH-10-130 20.00 21.00 no HE10038479 829325 0.04 1.10 906 84 1 65 okLa India DDH-10-130 27.00 29.00 no HE10038479 829332 0.04 1.70 778 115 1 61 okLa India DDH-10-130 30.00 31.00 no HE10038479 829334 0.05 2.30 891 103 3 90 okLa India DDH-10-130 31.00 33.00 no HE10038479 829335 0.03 0.80 200 37 0.5 30 okLa India DDH-10-130 33.00 35.00 no HE10038479 829336 0.04 1.00 306 70 1 124 okLa India DDH-10-130 42.00 43.00 no HE10038479 829341 0.05 1.60 126 35 1 1140 okLa India DDH-10-130 47.00 49.00 no HE10038479 829346 0.06 1.00 63 31 1 527 okLa India DDH-10-130 49.00 51.00 no HE10038479 829347 0.08 1.20 117 43 1 96 okLa India DDH-10-130 51.00 52.00 no HE10038479 829348 0.08 0.70 59 22 1 44 okLa India DDH-10-130 53.00 55.00 no HE10038479 829350 0.12 1.50 481 172 2 110 okLa India DDH-10-131 0.00 1.50 no HE10038479 829397 0.42 0.40 34 82 148 5 okLa India DDH-10-131 1.50 4.55 no HE10038479 829398 0.29 0.40 47 42 13 4 okLa India DDH-10-131 38.00 39.65 no HE10038479 829434 0.07 0.40 243 10 24 17 okLa India DDH-10-131 41.00 42.70 no HE10038479 829436 0.09 0.50 383 18 49 14 okLa India DDH-10-131 46.00 47.25 no HE10038479 829441 0.05 0.60 347 33 19 16 okLa India DDH-10-131 50.00 51.85 no HE10038479 829445 0.06 0.90 392 15 11 12 okLa India DDH-10-131 51.85 53.35 no HE10038479 829446 0.10 0.50 461 205 21 14 okLa India DDH-10-131 70.00 71.65 no HE10038479 829465 0.10 0.20 185 17 0.5 215 okLa India DDH-10-132 13.70 14.50 no HE10039120 886508 0.14 0.20 187 216 6 12 okLa India DDH-10-132 14.50 15.25 no HE10039120 886509 0.43 0.70 220 223 20 7 okLa India DDH-10-132 17.20 18.00 no HE10039120 886513 0.15 0.30 376 56 2 14 okLa India DDH-10-132 41.00 42.00 no HE10039120 886538 0.06 0.10 241 13 5 130 okLa India DDH-10-132 42.00 43.00 no HE10039120 886539 0.05 0.10 164 12 4 70 okLa India DDH-10-132 46.00 47.00 no HE10039120 886543 0.07 0.80 181 54 3 146 okLa India DDH-10-132 53.00 54.00 no HE10039120 886550 0.03 5.90 260 62 26 347 okLa India DDH-10-132 54.00 55.00 no HE10039120 886551 0.03 1.50 194 45 13 226 okLa India DDH-10-132 61.00 62.00 no HE10039120 886558 0.10 1.40 200 61 16 193 okLa India DDH-10-132 70.00 71.00 no HE10039120 886568 0.15 0.90 109 54 23 609 ok


167


To(m)



La India DDH-10-132 71.00 72.00 no HE10039120 886569 0.11 1.20 269 89 42 431 okLa India DDH-10-132 79.00 80.00 no HE10039120 886578 0.20 0.10 91 213 1 80 okLa India DDH-10-133 13.00 15.25 no HE10041165 886610 0.04 0.20 65 15 7 282 okLa India DDH-10-133 16.00 18.30 no HE10041165 886612 0.12 0.60 203 41 20 108 okLa India DDH-10-133 41.00 42.70 no HE10041165 886637 0.05 0.20 324 14 7 60 okLa India DDH-10-133 46.00 47.25 no HE10041165 886642 0.03 0.30 153 32 38 82 okLa India DDH-10-133 53.00 55.00 no HE10041165 886649 0.06 0.20 166 8 6 118 okLa India DDH-10-133 61.00 62.00 no HE10041165 886655 0.11 0.10 126 18 62 220 okLa India DDH-10-133 62.00 63.00 no HE10041165 886656 0.21 1.20 725 50 108 769 okLa India DDH-10-133 70.00 71.00 no HE10041165 886664 0.09 0.30 416 10 13 82 okLa India DDH-10-133 71.00 72.00 no HE10041165 886665 0.06 0.20 199 8 22 64 okLa India DDH-10-133 79.00 80.00 no HE10041165 886673 0.05 0.70 138 53 13 129 okLa India DDH-10-133 80.00 81.00 no HE10041165 886674 0.05 0.90 286 104 11 155 okLa India DDH-10-134 81.00 82.35 no HE10041165 886830 0.04 0.10 89 6 1 35 okLa India DDH-10-134 82.35 83.85 no HE10041165 886831 0.03 0.10 100 6 1 38 okLa India DDH-10-134 83.85 86.90 no HE10041165 886832 0.05 0.10 110 5 8 37 okLa India DDH-10-134 88.45 89.95 no HE10041165 886834 0.09 0.10 68 5 1 28 okLa India DDH-10-134 91.50 93.00 no HE10041165 886836 0.05 0.10 38 8 11 9 okLa India DDH-10-135 0.00 1.50 no HE10043553 886847 0.06 0.10 74 73 6 4 okLa India DDH-10-135 79.00 81.00 no HE10043553 886930 0.02 0.80 22 10 9 167 okLa India DDH-10-136 74.00 76.25 no HE10043552 39131 0.06 0.20 66 15 1 30 okLa India DDH-10-136 90.00 92.00 no HE10043552 39146 0.06 0.90 49 15 3 133 okLa India DDH-10-137 0.00 3.05 no HE10048721 39210 0.10 0.10 4 18 2 7 okLa India DDH-10-137 3.05 6.10 no HE10048721 39211 0.04 0.10 12 109 10 3 okLa India DDH-10-137 6.10 9.15 no HE10048721 39212 1.31 0.20 35 49 6 2 okLa India DDH-10-137 9.15 12.20 no HE10048721 39213 0.09 0.10 62 67 8 5 okLa India DDH-10-137 12.20 14.00 no HE10048721 39214 0.10 0.10 60 49 3 7 okLa India DDH-10-137 15.00 16.75 no HE10048721 39216 0.02 0.20 29 76 2 8 okLa India DDH-10-137 18.00 20.00 no HE10048721 39219 0.03 0.10 24 218 2 18 okLa India DDH-10-137 20.00 22.00 no HE10048721 39221 0.01 0.20 21 191 1 24 okLa India DDH-10-137 22.00 24.00 no HE10048721 39222 0.00 0.10 26 72 1 40 okLa India DDH-10-137 32.00 33.00 no HE10048721 39231 0.00 0.50 102 31 13 33 okLa India DDH-10-137 33.00 34.00 no HE10048721 39232 0.03 0.50 103 36 6 46 okLa India DDH-10-137 35.00 36.00 no HE10048721 39234 0.03 0.20 80 29 1 44 okLa India DDH-10-137 36.00 37.00 no HE10048721 39235 0.02 0.40 108 24 1 47 okLa India DDH-10-137 53.00 55.00 no HE10048721 39252 0.01 1.20 65 10 1 105 okLa India DDH-10-137 59.00 60.00 no HE10048721 39258 0.01 0.90 184 12 2 41 okLa India DDH-10-137 60.00 62.00 no HE10048721 39259 0.02 0.80 115 15 1 82 okLa India DDH-10-137 79.60 82.40 no HE10048721 39279 0.06 0.80 88 64 7 1410 okLa India DDH-10-137 91.00 92.00 no HE10048721 39288 0.04 0.20 44 19 0.5 286 okLa India DDH-10-137 92.00 93.00 no HE10048721 39289 0.18 4.40 73 69 1 167 okLa India DDH-10-137 130.00 132.00 no HE10048721 39331 0.01 0.20 12 10 0.5 181 okLa India DDH-10-137 290.00 291.00 no HE10048722 39498 0.04 1.30 21 42 12 44 okLa India DDH-10-137 291.00 292.00 no HE10048722 39499 0.03 0.90 19 22 4 11 okLa India DDH-10-137 292.00 293.00 no HE10048722 39501 0.03 0.90 12 32 5 155 okLa India DDH-10-137 293.00 295.85 no HE10048722 39502 0.02 0.70 11 30 1 20 okLa India DDH-10-138 15.10 16.75 no HE10053327 39519 0.07 2.10 116 9 1 18 okLa India DDH-10-138 20.00 22.85 no HE10053327 39523 0.05 1.10 355 5 0.5 64 okLa India DDH-10-138 22.85 24.00 no HE10053327 39524 0.23 0.60 218 63 3 141 okLa India DDH-10-138 111.00 112.00 no HE10053327 39615 0.13 0.40 101 38 3 214 okLa India DDH-10-138 112.00 116.00 no HE10053327 39616 0.78 0.50 50 19 8 75 okLa India DDH-10-138 190.00 191.00 no HE10053328 39695 0.12 0.30 105 6 103 29 okLa India DDH-10-140 2.00 3.00 no HE10067830 39999 0.02 0.10 92 187 19 6 okLa India DDH-10-140 38.00 39.00 no HE10067831 893035 0.01 0.10 7 12 3 3 okLa India DDH-10-140 39.00 40.00 no HE10067831 893036 0.01 0.10 9 16 28 4 okLa India DDH-10-141 2.75 4.00 no HE10069439 893155 0.04 0.10 8 20 8 2 okLa India DDH-10-143 41.15 42.70 no HE10073951 893472 0.23 0.10 13 145 56 3 okLa India DDH-10-145 0.00 1.00 no HE10073953 893731 0.06 0.40 9 22 16 5 okLa India DDH-10-145 1.00 2.00 no HE10073953 893732 0.04 0.40 7 22 10 5 okLa India DDH-10-146 0.08 1.50 no HE10077550 893898 0.04 0.70 7 32 22 16 okLa India DDH-10-146 1.50 2.00 no HE10077550 893899 0.07 1.10 6 17 9 29 okLa India DDH-10-154 7.00 7.90 no HE10093511 8805 0.08 1.10 49 46 3 2 okLa India DDH-10-154 7.90 9.15 no HE10093511 8806 0.15 1.00 45 29 4 3 okLa India DDH-10-154 14.00 15.60 no HE10093511 8811 0.03 1.10 111 49 3 39 okLa India DDH-10-154 15.60 17.00 no HE10093511 8813 0.04 1.20 192 284 3 82 ok


168


To(m)



La India DDH-10-154 172.30 173.85 no HE10093511 8976 0.03 0.10 31 27 13 180 okLa India DDH-10-155 0.00 1.50 no HE10096719 9414 0.34 0.10 28 46 43 1 okLa India DDH-10-155 71.00 73.00 no HE10096719 9486 0.01 0.10 22 9 7 14 okLa India DDH-10-155 73.00 75.00 no HE10096719 9487 0.01 0.40 22 10 12 18 okLa India DDH-10-155 75.00 77.00 no HE10096719 9488 0.01 0.30 28 12 31 14 okLa India DDH-10-155 77.00 78.00 no HE10096719 9489 0.01 0.30 30 14 1 18 okLa India DDH-10-155 178.00 180.00 no HE10096719 9594 0.03 0.10 31 20 3 216 okLa India DDH-10-155 184.00 185.00 no HE10096719 9601 0.07 0.10 90 27 1 2520 okLa India DDH-10-155 185.00 186.00 no HE10096719 9602 0.04 0.10 66 21 2 186 okLa India DDH-10-156 0.00 1.50 no HE10096719 9604 0.10 1.10 35 43 2 1 okLa India DDH-10-156 43.00 45.00 no HE10096719 9650 0.03 1.00 59 33 4 23 okLa India DDH-10-156 48.00 50.00 no HE10096719 9655 0.04 0.70 90 21 10 17 okLa India DDH-10-156 55.00 57.00 no HE10096719 9661 0.03 0.40 46 32 14 35 okLa India DDH-10-156 57.00 59.00 no HE10096719 9662 0.01 0.60 37 32 12 33 okLa India DDH-10-156 62.50 64.00 no HE10096719 9668 0.02 0.60 47 26 8 22 okLa India DDH-10-156 64.00 66.00 no HE10096719 9669 0.01 0.80 81 83 19 61 okLa India DDH-10-156 66.00 68.00 no HE10096719 9670 0.05 0.60 43 49 13 28 okLa India DDH-10-156 68.00 70.00 no HE10096719 9671 0.01 0.70 35 20 15 30 okLa India DDH-10-156 85.00 87.00 no HE10096719 9688 0.04 2.20 935 215 4 19 okLa India DDH-10-156 87.00 89.00 no HE10096719 9689 0.02 0.40 204 14 5 6 okLa India DDH-10-156 89.00 90.00 no HE10096719 9690 0.02 0.30 309 16 7 7 okLa India DDH-11-200 0.00 3.00 no HE11252316 16973 0.46 0.90 4 207 1 2 okLa India DDH-11-202 0.00 3.00 no HE11256248 17102 0.50 7.60 30 610 5 13 okLa India DDH-11-202 9.00 12.00 no HE11256248 17109 1.41 36.30 29 619 9 12 okLa India DDH-11-202 24.00 27.00 no HE11256248 17121 2.49 52.30 18 168 4 6 okLa India DDH-11-202 30.00 32.00 no HE11256248 17124 2.08 91.50 13 107 2 5 okLa India DDH-11-202 32.00 34.00 no HE11256248 17125 1.98 86.30 13 114 2 5 okLa India DDH-11-202 34.00 37.00 no HE11256248 17126 0.97 85.20 71 175 18 920 okLa India DDH-11-202 37.00 40.00 no HE11256248 17127 0.06 1.30 26 339 1 491 okLa India DDH-11-203 2.80 7.00 no HE11257197 17147 0.05 0.70 10 37 10 17 okLa India DDH-11-203 9.00 12.00 no HE11257197 17149 0.03 0.80 2 15 2 1 okLa India DDH-11-203 12.00 15.00 no HE11257197 17151 0.79 2.00 2 12 1 1 okLa India DDH-11-204 0.00 3.00 no HE11261846 17208 0.14 95.80 454 56 18 53 okLa India DDH-11-205 20.00 24.00 no HE11261847 17297 0.41 8.30 15 254 14 8 okLa India DDH-11-205 24.00 33.00 no HE11261847 17298 0.04 4.00 3 15 2 1 okLa India DDH-11-205 33.00 36.60 no HE11261847 17299 0.02 0.90 2 9 1 1 okLa India DDH-11-206 0.00 4.00 no HE11264800 17302 0.39 6.70 22 354 487 23 okLa India DDH-11-206 4.00 6.10 no HE11264800 17303 0.97 13.00 29 323 147 22 okLa India DDH-11-206 6.10 10.00 no HE11264800 17304 0.41 14.60 10 87 52 8 okLa India DDH-11-207 6.00 8.00 no HE11264801 17330 0.81 1.00 4 7 1 2 okLa India DDH-11-207 8.00 10.00 no HE11264801 17331 0.71 1.20 2 17 5 3 okLa India DDH-11-207 10.00 12.00 no HE11264801 17332 0.56 1.40 3 41 11 9 okLa India DDH-11-207 12.00 15.00 no HE11264801 17333 1.26 2.50 7 154 21 34 okLa India DDH-11-207 15.00 19.00 no HE11264801 17334 3.20 10.70 5 58 5 5 okLa India DDH-11-207 19.00 22.00 no HE11264801 17335 1.64 18.80 5 60 5 16 okLa India DDH-11-207 22.00 24.00 no HE11264801 17336 2.30 19.10 3 35 5 4 okLa India DDH-11-207 33.00 35.00 no HE11264801 17344 0.13 2.20 92 91 1 367 okLa India DDH-11-207 35.00 37.00 no HE11264801 17345 0.08 0.50 36 99 1 62 okLa India DDH-12-208 12.00 14.00 no HE12013920 17370 0.08 4.40 1 18 2 1 okLa India DDH-12-208 14.00 16.00 no HE12013920 17371 0.09 1.80 1 8 1 2 okLa India DDH-12-208 16.00 18.00 no HE12013920 17372 0.23 4.30 13 7 2 12 okLa India DDH-12-208 18.00 20.00 no HE12013920 17373 0.03 2.30 1 4 0.5 1 okLa India DDH-12-208 20.00 21.00 no HE12013920 17374 0.08 4.40 1 3 0.5 1 okLa India DDH-12-209 0.00 2.00 no HE12016528 17637 0.10 1.30 2 15 1 1 okLa India DDH-12-209 2.00 4.00 no HE12016528 17638 0.16 1.80 1 8 0.5 1 okLa India DDH-12-209 15.00 17.00 no HE12016528 17651 0.03 0.70 5 6 0.5 1 okLa India DDH-12-209 17.00 19.00 no HE12016528 17652 0.06 2.10 4 7 0.5 1 okLa India DDH-12-209 19.00 21.00 no HE12016528 17653 0.05 0.80 1 12 0.5 1 okLa India DDH-12-218 96.00 97.60 no HE12045864 860337 0.07 7.20 37 26 1 4 okLa India DDH-12-234 0.00 3.00 no HE12074376 862116 0.06 2.70 8 115 2 5 okLa India DDH-12-234 88.00 90.00 no HE12074376 862205 0.09 20.40 43 20 6 7 okLa India DDH-12-234 90.00 92.00 no HE12074376 862206 0.05 10.00 12 9 5 146 okLa India IN-12-239 9.00 10.50 no GU12085538 163081 0.09 4.00 6.6 33.3 4.79 6 okLa India IN-12-239 10.50 12.00 no GU12085538 163082 0.36 7.00 9.2 187 7.52 4 okLa India IN-12-239 12.00 13.50 no GU12085538 163083 0.13 5.00 231 94.2 18.95 61 ok


169


To(m)



La India IN-12-239 13.50 15.00 no GU12085538 163084 0.09 4.00 243 76.6 18.45 28 okLa India IN-12-239 15.00 16.50 no GU12085538 163085 0.12 25.00 379 93.9 14.1 198 okLa India IN-12-239 16.50 18.00 no GU12085538 163086 0.04 48.00 330 79.9 8.46 83 okLa India IN-12-239 18.00 19.50 no GU12085538 163087 0.01 94.00 401 80.5 6.17 20 okLa India IN-12-239 19.50 21.00 no GU12085538 163088 0.01 48.00 267 87.1 5.88 12 okLa India IN-12-239 21.00 21.50 no GU12085538 163089 0.17 9.00 78.3 270 5.71 96 okLa India IN-12-240 6.00 7.50 no GU12086371 164092 0.10 6.00 1 18.1 1.27 1 okLa India IN-12-240 7.50 9.00 no GU12086371 164093 0.07 7.00 1.4 13.2 1.19 1 okLa India IN-12-241 26.50 28.00 no GU12086373 163180 0.04 3.00 979 49.7 14.4 317 okLa India IN-12-241 28.00 29.50 no GU12086373 163181 0.02 2.00 739 54.7 17.35 20 okLa India IN-12-241 29.50 31.00 no GU12086373 163182 0.07 3.00 211 144.5 14.4 5 okLa India IN-12-242 119.00 120.50 no GU12082204 167293 0.10 6.00 168 23.8 7.96 3370 okLa India IN-12-242 120.50 122.00 no GU12082204 167294 0.06 7.00 254 17.8 6.71 1560 okLa India IN-12-242 125.00 126.50 no GU12082204 167297 0.06 3.00 14.1 14.4 5.39 28 okLa India IN-12-242 126.50 128.00 no GU12082204 167298 0.07 3.00 32.2 20.4 8.09 7 okLa India IN-12-242 128.00 132.00 no GU12082204 167299 0.14 4.00 174.5 27.2 5.2 13 okLa India IN-12-242 133.00 135.00 no GU12082204 167301 0.04 3.00 49.3 20.6 5.7 10 okLa India IN-12-242 135.00 137.30 no GU12082204 167302 0.12 10.00 356 59.9 25.7 27 okLa India IN-12-242 137.30 140.30 no GU12082204 167303 0.08 3.00 91.2 43.1 7.81 8 okLa India IN-12-242 140.30 143.50 no GU12082204 167304 0.15 20.00 279 59.6 9.71 200 okLa India IN-12-243 52.00 53.50 no ZA12088136 164187 0.05 9.00 14.2 27.9 9.07 8 okLa India IN-12-243 53.50 55.00 no ZA12088136 164188 0.03 3.00 24.4 43.2 12.25 14 okLa India IN-12-244 27.00 29.00 no GU12074338 163242 0.01 24.00 119.5 10.9 38.1 25 okLa India IN-12-244 29.00 31.00 no GU12074338 163243 0.00 1.00 4.9 7.6 1.82 1 okLa India IN-12-244 31.00 35.00 no GU12074338 163244 0.01 1.00 5.9 17 3.27 1 okLa India IN-12-244 35.00 38.00 no GU12074338 163245 0.01 4.00 81.2 22.5 4.61 2 okLa India IN-12-244 38.00 41.00 no GU12074338 163246 0.04 79.00 52.7 30.4 4.02 1 okLa India IN-12-244 41.00 43.00 no GU12074338 163247 0.04 1.00 7.8 26.3 3.83 1 okLa India IN-12-246 5.00 8.00 no ZA12090066 167325 0.04 0.50 10.8 65 2.7 221 okLa India IN-12-246 8.00 11.00 no ZA12090066 167326 0.01 0.50 3.2 140 1.88 57 okLa India IN-12-246 11.00 13.00 no ZA12090066 167327 0.01 0.50 3.1 290 2.62 70 okLa India IN-12-246 13.00 14.50 no ZA12090066 167328 0.01 0.50 3.8 362 3.92 92 okLa India IN-12-247 33.00 34.50 no ZA12088132 163319 1.26 9.00 2 60.5 1.63 2 okLa India IN-12-247 34.50 36.00 no ZA12088132 163320 0.09 3.00 4.3 80.3 1.09 2 okLa India IN-12-247 36.00 37.50 no ZA12088132 163321 0.07 3.00 3.4 95.6 1.16 2 okLa India IN-12-248 8.30 10.00 no ZA12090068 167370 0.14 3.00 18.9 59.9 4.67 82 okLa India IN-12-248 10.00 11.50 no ZA12090068 167371 0.20 3.00 22.7 139.5 7.37 111 okLa India IN-12-248 11.50 14.50 no ZA12090068 167372 0.02 2.00 36.8 128 2.61 262 okLa India IN-12-248 14.50 17.30 no ZA12090068 167373 0.13 1.00 5.9 73.2 2.86 138 okLa India IN-12-248 17.30 20.00 no ZA12090068 167374 0.06 0.50 9.5 148 2.87 161 okLa India IN-12-248 26.00 27.50 no ZA12090068 167381 0.01 0.50 7.5 62.4 0.94 1980 okLa India IN-12-248 27.50 29.00 no ZA12090068 167382 0.01 0.50 5.4 122.5 1.25 1040 okLa India IN-12-249 0.00 1.50 no GU12094344 167391 0.03 3.00 4.9 51.2 6.14 10 okLa India IN-12-249 1.50 3.00 no GU12094344 167392 0.11 6.00 9.1 76.5 5.07 11 okLa India IN-12-249 11.30 14.30 no GU12094344 167393 0.04 0.50 26 47.4 2.41 77 okLa India IN-12-249 14.30 17.30 no GU12094344 167394 0.00 0.50 38.3 49.2 3.51 93 okLa India IN-12-249 17.30 21.00 no GU12094344 167395 0.00 0.50 34.9 48.1 1.95 107 okLa India IN-12-249 21.00 24.00 no GU12094344 167396 0.00 1.00 40 47.4 2.81 135 okLa India IN-12-249 24.00 27.00 no GU12094344 167397 0.00 0.50 55.3 65.5 2.36 181 okLa India IN-12-249 29.00 32.50 no GU12094344 167399 0.32 3.00 97.3 361 2.56 1700 okLa India IN-12-250 0.00 3.00 no ZA12090060 164369 0.01 0.50 54.6 24.3 1.06 201 okLa India IN-12-253 24.50 26.00 no GU12094345 163476 0.01 1.00 19.9 65.1 1.97 332 okLa India IN-12-253 26.00 27.50 no GU12094345 163477 0.03 6.00 16.3 97.4 1.43 336 okLa India IN-12-255 0.00 5.30 no ZA12096024 167437 0.05 5.00 5.8 88.1 5.75 10 okLa India IN-12-255 20.00 21.50 no ZA12096024 167450 0.01 1.00 49.4 50.7 1.71 329 okLa India IN-12-255 21.50 23.00 no ZA12096024 167451 0.01 1.00 43 61.4 1.93 257 okLa India IN-12-255 23.00 25.50 no ZA12096024 167452 0.02 1.00 50.2 140.5 2.65 165 okLa India IN-12-255 25.50 29.30 no ZA12096024 167453 0.00 1.00 85.4 155 2.46 212 okLa India IN-12-256 0.00 5.30 no ZA12096023 167456 0.12 6.00 18.7 154.5 14.85 19 okLa India IN-12-256 5.30 11.30 no ZA12096023 167457 0.35 6.00 9.9 112 10.95 13 okLa India IN-12-256 11.30 17.30 no ZA12096023 167458 0.34 6.00 20.3 133.5 9.19 21 okLa India IN-12-256 17.30 20.50 no ZA12096023 167459 0.01 3.00 84.5 49 1.82 128 okLa India IN-12-256 23.30 27.00 no ZA12096023 167462 0.29 1.00 82.4 197.5 6.15 97 okLa India IN-12-257 0.00 3.00 no GU12094349 163491 0.12 29.00 16.2 168.5 2.38 9 okLa India IN-12-257 64.50 66.00 no GU12094520 163552 0.14 12.00 21.7 16.2 3.84 4 ok


170


To(m)



La India IN-12-257 66.00 67.10 no GU12094520 163553 0.62 13.00 27.4 139.5 5.71 4 okLa India IN-12-257 67.10 70.15 no GU12094520 163554 0.28 11.00 34.9 67.7 3.17 10 okLa India IN-12-258 0.00 4.00 no ZA12096025 167466 0.12 9.00 19 222 8.16 27 okLa India IN-12-258 4.00 5.30 no ZA12096025 167467 0.05 0.50 17.1 289 9.91 4 okLa India IN-12-258 5.30 11.00 no ZA12096025 167468 0.16 9.00 16.5 75.6 8.33 36 okLa India IN-12-258 11.00 14.30 no ZA12096025 167469 0.06 5.00 7.8 123 9.54 17 okLa India IN-12-258 14.30 17.30 no ZA12096025 167470 0.28 3.00 5.3 69.1 8.86 7 okLa India IN-12-258 17.30 21.15 no ZA12096025 167471 0.22 5.00 5.5 122 7.47 16 okLa India IN-12-258 21.15 23.30 no ZA12096025 167472 0.18 5.00 4.1 119.5 13.25 10 okLa India IN-12-258 26.30 28.40 no ZA12096025 167476 0.77 17.00 22.3 616 13.65 186 okLa India IN-12-258 28.40 30.00 no ZA12096025 167477 0.36 3.00 14.3 442 1.42 453 okLa India IN-12-259 0.00 1.50 no ZA12096026 164531 0.01 1.00 5.2 523 5.54 16 okLa India IN-12-259 1.50 3.00 no ZA12096026 164532 0.05 0.50 4.9 409 4.76 10 okLa India IN-12-260 0.00 2.00 no ZA12096400 167488 0.01 2.00 16.3 123 1.41 42 okLa India IN-12-260 2.00 4.00 no ZA12096400 167489 0.01 1.00 14.1 132 1.63 88 okLa India IN-12-260 4.00 5.30 no ZA12096400 167490 0.03 1.00 11.5 82.4 11.6 32 okLa India IN-12-260 5.30 6.40 no ZA12096400 167491 0.06 1.00 7.1 173.5 3.14 37 okLa India IN-12-260 6.40 8.30 no ZA12096400 167492 0.10 1.00 15.6 230 4.52 45 okLa India IN-12-261 0.00 3.00 no ZA12098789 167507 0.02 1.00 38.9 188.5 4.89 55 okLa India IN-12-261 3.00 6.00 no ZA12098789 167508 0.00 0.50 66.5 381 3.59 162 okLa India IN-12-261 6.00 8.30 no ZA12098789 167509 0.01 0.50 63.2 293 4.94 132 okLa India IN-12-261 8.30 11.30 no ZA12098789 167510 0.00 0.50 70.5 325 1.83 131 okLa India IN-12-263 26.00 27.60 no ZA12098840 167556 0.00 2.00 31 107 0.53 118 okLa India IN-12-263 27.60 30.00 no ZA12098840 167557 0.01 0.50 27.8 303 6.9 267 okLa India IN-12-265 0.00 3.50 no ZA12098841 167565 0.28 5.00 3.2 32.4 3.02 2 okLa India IN-12-265 3.50 6.00 no ZA12098841 167566 0.39 10.00 8.8 100 2.49 2 okLa India IN-12-265 6.00 8.30 no ZA12098841 167567 0.12 5.00 13.2 309 2.64 10 okLa India IN-12-265 8.30 10.00 no ZA12098841 167568 0.07 1.00 6.9 76.1 3.02 22 okLa India IN-12-265 10.00 11.30 no ZA12098841 167569 0.16 1.00 5.8 180 3.98 23 okLa India IN-12-269 0.00 5.30 no ZA12102739 167623 0.36 2.00 10.3 165 6.63 12 okLa India IN-12-269 5.30 6.00 no ZA12102739 167624 0.02 0.50 11.4 69.7 3.19 86 okLa India IN-12-269 11.30 14.30 no ZA12102739 167630 0.00 0.50 17.1 59.3 1.17 152 okLa India IN-12-269 20.30 23.30 no ZA12102739 167637 0.00 0.50 14.1 20.8 1.1 106 okLa India IN-12-269 23.30 26.30 no ZA12102739 167638 0.00 0.50 37.8 33.8 1.95 236 okLa India IN-12-270 71.50 73.20 no ZA12102804 164881 0.34 7.00 31.8 105 13.25 134 okLa India IN-12-271 0.00 1.80 no HE12099533 167713 1.10 8.00 4.6 248 6.61 7 okLa India IN-12-271 1.80 3.00 no HE12099533 167714 0.41 11.00 7.7 169 5.89 6 okLa India IN-12-271 5.00 7.00 no HE12099533 167717 0.50 17.00 6.2 93.2 6.91 1 okLa India IN-12-271 7.00 13.00 no HE12099533 167718 0.72 18.00 10.1 111 7.19 6 okLa India IN-12-271 13.00 18.00 no HE12099533 167719 0.64 22.00 16.7 368 11.65 191 okLa India IN-12-271 20.00 22.00 no HE12099533 167722 2.22 15.00 114.5 471 8.18 12 okLa India IN-12-271 22.00 23.00 no HE12099533 167723 3.15 27.00 32.2 1025 11 11 okLa India IN-12-271 23.00 24.00 no HE12099533 167724 0.25 0.50 48.8 96.9 2.29 6 okLa India IN-12-271 24.00 25.00 no HE12099533 167725 0.20 1.00 34 99.5 2.29 43 okLa India IN-12-271 25.00 26.00 no HE12099533 167726 0.12 2.00 49.8 118.5 2.08 58 okLa India IN-12-271 26.00 27.00 no HE12099533 167727 0.09 1.00 20.1 48 1.84 88 okLa India IN-12-271 27.00 28.50 no HE12099533 167728 0.23 2.00 51.3 194 2.16 21 okLa India IN-12-271 28.50 30.00 no HE12099533 167729 0.87 3.00 14.9 190 4.69 11 okLa India IN-12-271 30.00 32.00 no HE12099533 167730 0.08 4.00 6.6 96.6 4.3 3 okLa India IN-12-271 32.00 34.00 no HE12099533 167731 0.08 4.00 3.8 105.5 4.38 1 okLa India IN-12-271 34.00 36.00 no HE12099533 167732 0.15 9.00 4.5 108.5 4.97 3 okLa India IN-12-271 36.00 38.00 no HE12099533 167733 0.28 6.00 6.9 117 5.96 21 okLa India IN-12-271 38.00 40.00 no HE12099533 167734 0.23 3.00 8.2 81.4 3.27 11 okLa India IN-12-271 40.00 41.30 no HE12099533 167735 0.14 0.50 3.4 69.6 3.23 19 okLa India IN-12-272 9.00 12.00 no HE12099531 167769 0.33 2.00 8.4 441 4.1 61 ok


171

Appendix 12.2 – RC samples not used for Resource estimation


To(m)

SampleID Sample_Type Recvd Wt Au_PlotNormalization

FactorNormalized

WeightNormalized Wt per meter

by Perc and Interval Length

La India INR-12-735 3.05 4.57 169185 CHIPS-25%JONES 1.80 0.028 4 7.20 4.74La India INR-12-738 0.00 1.52 169303 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.80 0.080 4 11.20 7.37La India RC-05-12 9.14 10.67 637707 CHIPS-JONES 1.72 0.032 4 6.88 4.50La India RC-05-12 172.21 173.74 637817 CHIPS-JONES 1.68 0.063 4 6.72 4.39La India RC-05-12 181.36 182.88 637824 CHIPS-JONES 2.80 0.075 4 11.20 7.37La India RC-05-13 3.05 4.57 637403 CHIPS-JONES 1.96 0.003 4 7.84 5.16La India RC-05-13 126.49 128.02 637487 CHIPS-JONES 2.78 0.316 4 11.12 7.27La India RC-05-13 131.06 132.59 637490 CHIPS-JONES 2.20 0.024 4 8.80 5.75La India RC-05-14 184.40 185.93 637635 CHIPS-JONES 2.24 3.050 4 8.96 5.86La India RC-05-14 187.45 188.98 637637 CHIPS-JONES 2.70 0.265 4 10.80 7.06La India RC-05-14 225.55 227.08 637663 CHIPS-JONES 1.96 0.264 4 7.84 5.12La India RC-05-14 240.79 242.32 637673 CHIPS-JONES 2.46 0.320 4 9.84 6.43La India RC-05-14 243.84 245.36 637675 CHIPS-JONES 2.12 0.113 4 8.48 5.58La India RC-05-14 249.94 251.46 637679 CHIPS-JONES 2.56 0.099 4 10.24 6.74La India RC-06-15 4.57 6.10 668504 CHIPS-JONES 1.74 0.003 4 6.96 4.55La India RC-06-15 24.38 25.91 668517 CHIPS-JONES 2.20 0.124 4 8.80 5.75La India RC-06-15 25.91 27.43 668518 CHIPS-JONES 2.52 2.530 4 10.08 6.63La India RC-06-15 28.96 30.48 668520 CHIPS-JONES 2.14 0.967 4 8.56 5.63La India RC-06-15 45.72 47.24 668531 CHIPS-JONES 1.84 0.049 4 7.36 4.84La India RC-06-15 51.82 53.34 668535 CHIPS-JONES 2.08 1.255 4 8.32 5.47La India RC-06-15 118.87 120.40 668582 CHIPS-JONES 2.58 0.061 4 10.32 6.75La India RC-06-15 181.36 182.88 668624 CHIPS-JONES 2.70 0.029 4 10.80 7.11La India RC-06-15 205.74 207.26 668641 CHIPS-JONES 1.88 0.015 4 7.52 4.95La India RC-06-15 211.84 213.36 668645 CHIPS-JONES 1.62 0.008 4 6.48 4.26La India RC-06-15 217.93 219.46 668649 CHIPS-JONES 1.06 0.005 4 4.24 2.77La India RC-06-15 242.32 243.84 668666 CHIPS-JONES 2.06 0.024 4 8.24 5.42La India RC-06-15 243.84 245.36 668667 CHIPS-JONES 1.78 0.008 4 7.12 4.68La India RC-06-16 3.05 4.57 668685 CHIPS-JONES 1.36 0.060 4 5.44 3.58La India RC-06-16 36.58 38.10 668708 CHIPS-JONES 2.54 0.210 4 10.16 6.68La India RC-06-16 123.44 124.97 668767 CHIPS-JONES 2.60 0.095 4 10.40 6.80La India RC-06-16 141.73 143.26 668779 CHIPS-JONES 1.20 0.283 4 4.80 3.14La India RC-06-16 161.54 163.07 668793 CHIPS-JONES 2.82 0.220 4 11.28 7.37La India RC-06-17 3.05 4.57 668819 CHIPS-JONES 1.06 0.511 4 4.24 2.79La India RC-06-17 6.10 7.62 668821 CHIPS-JONES 1.82 0.375 4 7.28 4.79La India RC-06-17 74.68 76.20 668868 CHIPS-JONES 2.38 0.154 4 9.52 6.26La India RC-06-17 76.20 77.72 668869 CHIPS-JONES 2.08 0.180 4 8.32 5.47La India RC-06-17 77.72 79.25 668870 CHIPS-JONES 1.44 0.197 4 5.76 3.76La India RC-06-17 79.25 80.77 668871 CHIPS-JONES 2.52 0.190 4 10.08 6.63La India RC-06-17 80.77 82.30 668872 CHIPS-JONES 0.09 0.309 4 0.36 0.24La India RC-06-17 91.44 92.96 668879 CHIPS-JONES 2.76 0.281 4 11.04 7.26La India RC-06-17 97.54 99.06 668884 CHIPS-JONES 2.72 0.160 4 10.88 7.16La India RC-06-17 102.11 103.63 668887 CHIPS-JONES 0.09 0.254 4 0.36 0.24La India RC-06-17 105.16 106.68 668889 CHIPS-JONES 0.68 0.258 4 2.72 1.79La India RC-06-17 111.25 112.78 668893 CHIPS-JONES 1.22 0.268 4 4.88 3.19La India RC-06-17 112.78 114.30 668894 CHIPS-JONES 0.26 0.251 4 1.04 0.68La India RC-06-17 114.30 115.82 668895 CHIPS-JONES 2.50 0.498 4 10.00 6.58La India RC-06-17 115.82 117.35 668896 CHIPS-JONES 2.08 0.895 4 8.32 5.44La India RC-06-17 141.73 143.26 668914 CHIPS-JONES 0.20 1.130 4 0.80 0.52La India RC-06-17 143.26 144.78 668915 CHIPS-JONES 1.02 0.810 4 4.08 2.68La India RC-06-17 144.78 146.30 668916 CHIPS-JONES 2.66 0.901 4 10.64 7.00La India RC-06-17 149.35 150.88 668919 CHIPS-JONES 2.90 2.010 4 11.60 7.58La India RC-06-18 3.05 4.57 668933 CHIPS-JONES 1.90 0.006 4 7.60 5.00La India RC-06-18 4.57 6.10 668934 CHIPS-JONES 0.18 0.069 4 0.72 0.47La India RC-06-18 129.54 131.06 669020 CHIPS-JONES 2.00 0.053 4 8.00 5.26La India RC-06-18 132.59 134.11 669022 CHIPS-JONES 2.34 0.010 4 9.36 6.16La India RC-06-18 135.64 137.16 669024 CHIPS-JONES 2.54 0.010 4 10.16 6.68La India RC-06-18 144.78 146.30 669030 CHIPS-JONES 1.96 0.024 4 7.84 5.16La India RC-06-18 153.92 155.45 669036 CHIPS-JONES 2.04 0.017 4 8.16 5.33La India RC-06-19 4.57 6.10 669071 CHIPS-JONES 2.20 0.181 4 8.80 5.75La India RC-06-19 9.14 10.67 669074 CHIPS-JONES 2.62 0.946 4 10.48 6.85La India RC-06-19 33.53 35.05 669091 CHIPS-JONES 0.13 0.318 4 0.52 0.34La India RC-06-19 38.10 39.62 669094 CHIPS-JONES 0.13 0.312 4 0.52 0.34La India RC-06-19 187.45 188.98 669196 CHIPS-JONES 1.72 0.073 4 6.88 4.50La India RC-06-19 190.50 192.02 669198 CHIPS-JONES 2.12 0.083 4 8.48 5.58La India RC-06-19 193.55 195.07 669201 CHIPS-JONES 2.52 0.106 4 10.08 6.63


172


To(m)


FactorNormalized



La India RC-06-19 196.60 198.12 669203 CHIPS-JONES 2.16 0.060 4 8.64 5.68La India RC-06-20 22.86 24.38 669232 CHIPS-JONES 0.10 0.503 4 0.40 0.26La India RC-06-20 68.58 70.10 669264 CHIPS-JONES 0.13 0.248 4 0.52 0.34La India RC-06-20 147.83 149.35 669318 CHIPS-JONES 2.02 0.102 4 8.08 5.32La India RC-06-26 1.52 3.05 670208 CHIPS-JONES 1.54 1.145 4 6.16 4.03La India RC-06-26 6.10 7.62 670211 CHIPS-JONES 2.74 0.725 4 10.96 7.21La India RC-06-29 3.05 4.57 681003 CHIPS-JONES 1.30 0.787 4 5.20 3.42La India RC-06-29 4.57 6.10 681004 CHIPS-JONES 2.64 0.595 4 10.56 6.90La India RC-06-29 6.10 7.62 681005 CHIPS-JONES 2.36 0.414 4 9.44 6.21La India RC-06-29 32.00 33.53 681023 CHIPS-JONES 1.86 0.288 4 7.44 4.86La India RC-06-29 33.53 35.05 681024 CHIPS-JONES 1.66 0.305 4 6.64 4.37La India RC-06-29 35.05 36.58 681025 CHIPS-JONES 1.70 0.092 4 6.80 4.44La India RC-06-29 54.86 56.39 681038 CHIPS-JONES 1.68 0.527 4 6.72 4.39La India RC-06-29 67.06 68.58 681048 CHIPS-JONES 2.22 0.250 4 8.88 5.84La India RC-06-29 71.63 73.15 681051 CHIPS-JONES 2.00 0.186 4 8.00 5.26La India RC-06-29 105.16 106.68 681073 CHIPS-JONES 1.40 0.184 4 5.60 3.68La India RC-06-30 3.05 4.57 681098 CHIPS-JONES 2.40 0.210 4 9.60 6.32La India RC-06-30 4.57 6.10 681099 CHIPS-JONES 1.90 0.123 4 7.60 4.97La India RC-06-30 6.10 7.62 681100 CHIPS-JONES 1.84 0.137 4 7.36 4.84La India RC-06-30 7.62 9.14 681101 CHIPS-JONES 2.06 0.043 4 8.24 5.42La India RC-06-30 9.14 10.67 681102 CHIPS-JONES 2.06 0.071 4 8.24 5.39La India RC-06-30 10.67 12.19 681103 CHIPS-JONES 1.30 0.054 4 5.20 3.42La India RC-06-30 12.19 13.72 681104 CHIPS-JONES 2.64 0.061 4 10.56 6.90La India RC-06-30 15.24 16.76 681106 CHIPS-JONES 1.44 0.049 4 5.76 3.79La India RC-06-30 18.29 19.81 681108 CHIPS-JONES 1.30 0.068 4 5.20 3.42La India RC-06-30 21.34 22.86 681110 CHIPS-JONES 2.48 0.045 4 9.92 6.53La India RC-06-30 25.91 27.43 681113 CHIPS-JONES 2.36 0.076 4 9.44 6.21La India RC-06-30 36.58 38.10 681120 CHIPS-JONES 1.82 0.159 4 7.28 4.79La India RC-06-30 39.62 41.15 681122 CHIPS-JONES 1.66 0.016 4 6.64 4.34La India RC-06-30 42.67 44.20 681124 CHIPS-JONES 2.28 0.038 4 9.12 5.96La India RC-06-30 44.20 45.72 681126 CHIPS-JONES 1.70 0.061 4 6.80 4.47La India RC-06-30 59.44 60.96 681136 CHIPS-JONES 1.48 0.093 4 5.92 3.89La India RC-06-30 60.96 62.48 681137 CHIPS-JONES 2.22 0.263 4 8.88 5.84La India RC-06-30 62.48 64.01 681138 CHIPS-JONES 2.74 0.148 4 10.96 7.16La India RC-06-30 70.10 71.63 681144 CHIPS-JONES 2.72 0.090 4 10.88 7.11La India RC-06-30 71.63 73.15 681145 CHIPS-JONES 2.64 0.153 4 10.56 6.95La India RC-06-30 74.68 76.20 681147 CHIPS-JONES 2.26 0.134 4 9.04 5.95La India RC-06-30 80.77 82.30 681151 CHIPS-JONES 2.62 0.379 4 10.48 6.85La India RC-06-31 3.05 4.57 681165 CHIPS-JONES 1.06 0.125 4 4.24 2.79La India RC-06-31 4.57 6.10 681166 CHIPS-JONES 1.70 0.075 4 6.80 4.44La India RC-06-31 6.10 7.62 681167 CHIPS-JONES 2.70 0.048 4 10.80 7.11La India RC-06-31 10.67 12.19 681170 CHIPS-JONES 2.40 0.024 4 9.60 6.32La India RC-06-31 15.24 16.76 681173 CHIPS-JONES 2.64 0.303 4 10.56 6.95La India RC-06-31 18.29 19.81 681175 CHIPS-JONES 1.78 0.207 4 7.12 4.68La India RC-06-31 28.96 30.48 681183 CHIPS-JONES 1.44 0.787 4 5.76 3.79La India RC-06-31 30.48 32.00 681184 CHIPS-JONES 2.56 0.701 4 10.24 6.74La India RC-06-31 32.00 33.53 681185 CHIPS-JONES 0.46 0.620 4 1.84 1.20La India RC-06-31 33.53 35.05 681186 CHIPS-JONES 1.26 1.510 4 5.04 3.32La India RC-06-31 35.05 36.58 681187 CHIPS-JONES 2.54 0.297 4 10.16 6.64La India RC-06-31 39.62 41.15 681190 CHIPS-JONES 2.86 0.292 4 11.44 7.48La India RC-06-31 41.15 42.67 681192 CHIPS-JONES 2.08 0.200 4 8.32 5.47La India RC-06-31 44.20 45.72 681194 CHIPS-JONES 2.04 0.153 4 8.16 5.37La India RC-06-31 45.72 47.24 681195 CHIPS-JONES 0.78 0.197 4 3.12 2.05La India RC-06-31 48.77 50.29 681197 CHIPS-JONES 1.12 0.227 4 4.48 2.95La India RC-06-31 50.29 51.82 681198 CHIPS-JONES 2.36 0.196 4 9.44 6.17La India RC-06-31 53.34 54.86 681200 CHIPS-JONES 1.96 0.100 4 7.84 5.16La India RC-06-31 54.86 56.39 681201 CHIPS-JONES 1.54 0.093 4 6.16 4.03La India RC-06-31 59.44 60.96 681204 CHIPS-JONES 2.24 3.090 4 8.96 5.89La India RC-06-31 64.01 65.53 681207 CHIPS-JONES 2.24 2.070 4 8.96 5.89La India RC-06-31 74.68 76.20 681214 CHIPS-JONES 2.44 0.186 4 9.76 6.42La India RC-06-32 54.86 56.39 681260 CHIPS-JONES 2.26 0.262 4 9.04 5.91La India RC-06-32 62.48 64.01 681265 CHIPS-JONES 2.84 0.141 4 11.36 7.42La India RC-06-32 64.01 68.58 681266 CHIPS-JONES 3.12 0.257 4 12.48 2.73La India RC-06-32 68.58 70.10 681267 CHIPS-JONES 2.26 0.234 4 9.04 5.95La India RC-06-32 70.10 71.63 681268 CHIPS-JONES 1.82 0.190 4 7.28 4.76


173


To(m)


FactorNormalized





174


To(m)


FactorNormalized





175


To(m)


FactorNormalized





176


To(m)


FactorNormalized





177


To(m)


FactorNormalized





178


To(m)


FactorNormalized





179


To(m)


FactorNormalized





180


To(m)


FactorNormalized





181


To(m)


FactorNormalized





182


To(m)


FactorNormalized





183


To(m)


FactorNormalized





184


To(m)


FactorNormalized





185


To(m)


FactorNormalized





186


To(m)


FactorNormalized





187


To(m)


FactorNormalized





188


To(m)


FactorNormalized





189


To(m)


FactorNormalized





190


To(m)


FactorNormalized





191


To(m)


FactorNormalized





192


To(m)


FactorNormalized





193


To(m)


FactorNormalized





194


To(m)


FactorNormalized





195


To(m)


FactorNormalized





196


To(m)


FactorNormalized



La India RC-08-309 92.96 94.49 515118 CHIPS-JONES 0.13 0.824 4 0.52 0.34La India RC-08-310 3.05 4.57 515141 CHIPS-JONES 1.52 0.262 4 6.08 4.00La India RC-08-310 4.57 6.10 515142 CHIPS-JONES 2.42 0.244 4 9.68 6.33La India RC-08-310 6.10 7.62 515143 CHIPS-JONES 2.76 0.758 4 11.04 7.26La India RC-08-310 9.14 10.67 515145 CHIPS-JONES 2.58 0.649 4 10.32 6.75La India RC-08-310 10.67 12.19 515146 CHIPS-JONES 2.22 1.735 4 8.88 5.84La India RC-08-310 12.19 13.72 515147 CHIPS-JONES 2.50 0.397 4 10.00 6.54La India RC-08-310 18.29 19.81 515151 CHIPS-JONES 2.88 0.144 4 11.52 7.58La India RC-08-310 19.81 21.34 515152 CHIPS-JONES 2.10 0.675 4 8.40 5.49La India RC-08-310 30.48 32.00 515159 CHIPS-JONES 2.02 0.200 4 8.08 5.32La India RC-08-312 59.44 60.96 515318 CHIPS-JONES 0.10 0.587 4 0.40 0.26La India RC-08-313 39.62 41.15 515366 CHIPS-JONES 1.60 0.091 4 6.40 4.18La India RC-08-313 41.15 42.67 515367 CHIPS-JONES 2.12 0.052 4 8.48 5.58La India RC-08-313 71.63 73.15 515389 CHIPS-JONES 1.84 0.152 4 7.36 4.84La India RC-08-313 79.25 80.77 515394 CHIPS-JONES 0.09 0.875 4 0.36 0.24La India RC-08-316 10.67 12.19 515495 CHIPS-JONES 2.64 0.061 4 10.56 6.95La India RC-08-318 13.72 15.24 515623 CHIPS-JONES 2.56 0.008 4 10.24 6.74La India RC-08-318 18.29 19.81 515626 CHIPS-JONES 2.66 0.015 4 10.64 7.00La India RC-08-318 38.10 39.62 515639 CHIPS-JONES 2.34 0.162 4 9.36 6.16La India RC-08-319 53.34 54.86 515726 CHIPS-JONES 2.50 0.003 4 10.00 6.58La India RC-08-319 54.86 56.39 515727 CHIPS-JONES 0.54 0.031 4 2.16 1.41La India RC-08-319 56.39 57.91 515728 CHIPS-JONES 1.32 0.038 4 5.28 3.47La India RC-08-320 10.67 12.19 515737 CHIPS-JONES 2.70 0.245 4 10.80 7.11La India RC-08-320 16.76 18.29 515742 CHIPS-JONES 2.50 0.176 4 10.00 6.54La India RC-08-320 47.24 48.77 515764 CHIPS-JONES 2.42 0.009 4 9.68 6.33La India RC-08-320 53.34 54.86 515769 CHIPS-JONES 2.76 0.094 4 11.04 7.26La India RC-08-320 56.39 57.91 515771 CHIPS-JONES 2.28 0.193 4 9.12 6.00La India RC-08-320 57.91 59.44 515772 CHIPS-JONES 2.88 0.167 4 11.52 7.53La India RC-08-321 6.10 7.62 515799 CHIPS-JONES 1.86 0.042 4 7.44 4.89La India RC-08-321 22.86 24.38 515812 CHIPS-JONES 2.02 0.024 4 8.08 5.32La India RC-08-322 53.34 54.86 515872 CHIPS-JONES 2.74 0.022 4 10.96 7.21La India RC-08-322 64.01 65.53 515879 CHIPS-JONES 2.14 0.044 4 8.56 5.63La India RC-08-322 121.92 123.44 515921 CHIPS-JONES 2.22 0.208 4 8.88 5.84La India RC-08-322 126.49 128.02 515924 CHIPS-JONES 2.32 0.030 4 9.28 6.07La India RC-08-324 19.81 21.34 515991 CHIPS-JONES 2.68 1.290 4 10.72 7.01La India RC-08-325 60.96 62.48 516071 CHIPS-JONES 2.80 0.075 4 11.20 7.37La India RC-08-326 9.14 10.67 516097 CHIPS-JONES 2.74 0.051 4 10.96 7.16La India RC-08-327 22.86 24.38 516159 CHIPS-JONES 2.34 0.154 4 9.36 6.16La India RC-08-329 4.57 6.10 516263 CHIPS-JONES 1.70 0.585 4 6.80 4.44La India RC-08-329 6.10 7.62 516264 CHIPS-JONES 1.34 0.397 4 5.36 3.53La India RC-08-329 9.14 10.67 516265 CHIPS-JONES 0.42 0.393 4 1.68 1.10La India RC-08-329 32.00 33.53 516279 CHIPS-JONES 1.62 1.275 4 6.48 4.24La India RC-08-329 89.92 91.44 516322 CHIPS-JONES 2.66 0.041 4 10.64 7.00La India RC-08-332 60.96 62.48 516487 CHIPS-JONES 2.58 0.037 4 10.32 6.79La India RC-08-333 22.86 24.38 516515 CHIPS-JONES 2.82 0.051 4 11.28 7.42La India RC-08-334 13.72 15.24 516559 CHIPS-JONES 1.44 0.012 4 5.76 3.79La India RC-08-334 36.58 38.10 516576 CHIPS-JONES 0.08 0.365 4 0.32 0.21La India RC-08-335 30.48 32.00 516614 CHIPS-JONES 0.15 0.273 4 0.60 0.39La India RC-08-336 6.10 7.62 516638 CHIPS-JONES 1.12 0.262 4 4.48 2.95La India RC-08-336 7.62 9.14 516639 CHIPS-JONES 2.56 0.361 4 10.24 6.74La India RC-08-336 39.62 41.15 516663 CHIPS-JONES 1.70 0.107 4 6.80 4.44La India RC-08-336 42.67 44.20 516665 CHIPS-JONES 2.58 0.122 4 10.32 6.75La India RC-08-337 3.05 4.57 516675 CHIPS-JONES 2.64 0.147 4 10.56 6.95La India RC-08-337 4.57 6.10 516676 CHIPS-JONES 2.02 0.120 4 8.08 5.28La India RC-08-338 3.05 4.57 516737 CHIPS-JONES 2.80 0.172 4 11.20 7.37La India RC-08-339 3.05 4.57 516778 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.54 0.807 4 10.16 6.68La India RC-08-339 4.57 6.10 516779 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.70 1.100 4 10.80 7.06La India RC-08-339 6.10 7.62 516781 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.52 0.838 4 10.08 6.63La India RC-08-340 24.38 25.91 516827 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.52 0.156 4 10.08 6.59La India RC-08-341 16.76 18.29 516857 CHIPS-25%JONES 0.16 0.302 4 0.64 0.42La India RC-08-341 30.48 32.00 516867 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.64 0.056 4 10.56 6.95La India RC-08-342 3.05 4.57 516895 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.38 0.012 4 9.52 6.26La India RC-08-342 4.57 6.10 516896 CHIPS-100%JONES 1.30 0.008 1 1.30 0.85La India RC-08-342 6.10 7.62 516897 CHIPS-25%JONES 1.04 0.007 4 4.16 2.74La India RC-08-342 7.62 9.14 516898 CHIPS-25%JONES 1.00 0.006 4 4.00 2.63


197


To(m)


FactorNormalized



La India RC-08-342 9.14 10.67 516899 CHIPS-100%JONES 2.52 0.008 1 2.52 1.65La India RC-08-342 10.67 12.19 516901 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.42 0.005 4 9.68 6.37La India RC-08-342 12.19 13.72 516902 CHIPS-100%JONES 0.84 0.005 1 0.84 0.55La India RC-08-342 13.72 15.24 516903 CHIPS-50%JONES 3.94 0.024 2 7.88 5.18La India RC-08-342 18.29 19.81 516906 CHIPS-100%JONES 9.06 0.011 1 9.06 5.96La India RC-08-342 42.67 44.20 516924 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.28 0.005 4 9.12 5.96La India RC-08-342 44.20 45.72 516925 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.34 0.006 4 9.36 6.16La India RC-08-342 50.29 51.82 516929 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.78 0.007 4 11.12 7.27La India RC-08-342 53.34 54.86 516931 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.02 0.007 4 8.08 5.32La India RC-08-342 56.39 57.91 516933 CHIPS-50%JONES 5.36 0.006 2 10.72 7.05La India RC-08-342 60.96 62.48 516936 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.32 0.008 2 8.64 5.68La India RC-08-342 64.01 65.53 516938 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.32 0.013 2 8.64 5.68La India RC-08-342 65.53 67.06 516939 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.54 0.011 2 9.08 5.93La India RC-08-342 67.06 68.58 516941 CHIPS-50%JONES 3.98 0.012 2 7.96 5.24La India RC-08-342 68.58 70.10 516942 CHIPS-50%JONES 2.94 0.012 2 5.88 3.87La India RC-08-342 70.10 71.63 516943 CHIPS-50%JONES 5.40 0.253 2 10.80 7.06La India RC-08-342 71.63 73.15 516945 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.98 0.011 2 9.96 6.55La India RC-08-342 73.15 74.68 516946 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.10 0.018 2 8.20 5.36La India RC-08-342 74.68 76.20 516947 CHIPS-50%JONES 2.72 0.032 2 5.44 3.58La India RC-08-342 76.20 77.72 516948 CHIPS-50%JONES 3.10 0.020 2 6.20 4.08La India RC-08-343 19.81 21.34 517010 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.82 0.005 4 11.28 7.37La India RC-08-343 48.77 50.29 517031 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.30 0.003 4 9.20 6.05La India RC-08-343 94.49 96.01 517065 CHIPS-25%JONES 0.17 1.455 4 0.68 0.45La India RC-08-343 100.58 102.11 517069 CHIPS-25%JONES 0.19 0.698 4 0.76 0.50La India RC-08-344 16.76 18.29 517094 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.52 0.113 4 10.08 6.59La India RC-08-345 3.05 4.57 517122 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.70 0.183 4 10.80 7.11La India RC-08-346 3.05 4.57 517147 CHIPS-25%JONES 0.91 0.458 4 3.64 2.39La India RC-08-346 4.57 6.10 517148 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.64 0.604 4 10.56 6.90La India RC-08-346 6.10 7.62 517149 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.82 0.262 4 11.28 7.42La India RC-08-346 7.62 9.14 517150 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.35 0.334 4 9.40 6.18La India RC-08-346 10.67 12.19 517152 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.61 0.392 4 10.44 6.87La India RC-08-346 19.81 21.34 517159 CHIPS-25%JONES 1.99 0.053 4 7.96 5.20La India RC-08-348 7.62 9.14 517215 CHIPS-25%JONES 1.99 0.079 4 7.96 5.24La India RC-08-348 16.76 18.29 517222 CHIPS-50%JONES 5.28 0.165 2 10.56 6.90La India RC-08-348 25.91 27.43 517229 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.82 0.314 2 9.64 6.34La India RC-08-349 3.05 4.57 517254 CHIPS-25%JONES 0.69 0.170 4 2.76 1.82La India RC-08-349 4.57 6.10 517255 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.71 0.111 4 10.84 7.08La India RC-08-349 10.67 12.19 517259 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.60 0.067 4 10.40 6.84La India RC-08-349 28.96 30.48 517273 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.66 0.238 4 10.64 7.00La India RC-08-350 3.05 4.57 517293 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.22 0.090 4 8.88 5.84La India RC-08-350 9.14 10.67 517297 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.42 0.299 4 9.68 6.33La India RC-08-351 13.72 15.24 517331 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.62 0.021 4 10.48 6.89La India RC-08-353 35.05 36.58 517425 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.89 0.176 4 11.56 7.56La India RC-08-353 36.58 38.10 517426 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.77 0.132 4 11.08 7.29La India RC-08-354 10.67 12.19 517450 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.53 0.369 4 10.12 6.66La India RC-08-354 32.00 33.53 517466 CHIPS-50%JONES 2.71 0.423 2 5.42 3.54La India RC-08-356 28.96 30.48 512530 CHIPS-25%JONES 0.11 0.344 4 0.44 0.29La India RC-08-357 16.76 18.29 512547 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.96 0.355 2 9.92 6.48La India RC-08-357 36.58 38.10 512557 CHIPS-100%JONES 2.74 0.836 1 2.74 1.80La India RC-08-358 7.62 9.14 512564 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.43 0.068 2 8.86 5.83La India RC-08-358 13.72 15.24 512568 CHIPS-100%JONES 1.25 0.115 1 1.25 0.82La India RC-08-358 15.24 16.76 512569 CHIPS-50%JONES 2.77 0.091 2 5.54 3.64La India RC-08-358 16.76 18.29 512570 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.23 0.091 2 8.46 5.53La India RC-08-358 19.81 21.34 512572 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.33 0.065 2 8.66 5.66La India RC-08-358 21.34 22.86 512573 CHIPS-50%JONES 3.83 0.110 2 7.66 5.04La India RC-08-358 22.86 24.38 512574 CHIPS-50%JONES 3.46 0.100 2 6.92 4.55La India RC-08-359 18.29 19.81 512592 CHIPS-100%JONES 1.49 0.086 1 1.49 0.98La India RC-08-359 19.81 21.34 512593 CHIPS-100%JONES 2.46 0.062 1 2.46 1.61La India RC-08-360 7.62 9.14 512599 CHIPS-50%JONES 1.28 0.039 2 2.56 1.68La India RC-08-360 9.14 10.67 512601 CHIPS-50%JONES 5.47 0.056 2 10.94 7.15La India RC-08-360 10.67 12.19 512602 CHIPS-50%JONES 3.82 0.025 2 7.64 5.03La India RC-08-360 12.19 13.72 512603 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.90 0.035 2 9.80 6.41La India RC-08-360 13.72 15.24 512604 CHIPS-100%JONES 3.45 0.023 1 3.45 2.27La India RC-08-360 15.24 16.76 512606 CHIPS-50%JONES 3.43 0.030 2 6.86 4.51La India RC-08-360 16.76 18.29 512607 CHIPS-100%JONES 0.60 0.016 1 0.60 0.39


198


To(m)


FactorNormalized





199


To(m)


FactorNormalized





200


To(m)


FactorNormalized





201


To(m)


FactorNormalized



La India RC-08-414 76.20 77.72 641607 CHIPS-100%JONES 2.78 0.121 1 2.78 1.83La India RC-08-414 99.06 100.58 641623 CHIPS-100%JONES 1.32 0.164 1 1.32 0.87La India RC-08-414 102.11 103.63 641625 CHIPS-100%JONES 2.03 0.114 1 2.03 1.34La India RC-08-415 42.67 44.20 641656 CHIPS-100%JONES 3.12 1.865 1 3.12 2.04La India RC-08-415 47.24 48.77 641659 CHIPS-50%JONES 3.34 0.560 2 6.68 4.37La India RC-08-417 54.86 56.39 641739 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.60 0.003 2 9.20 6.01La India RC-09-420 0.00 1.52 631001 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.40 0.012 2 8.80 5.79La India RC-09-420 1.52 3.05 631002 CHIPS-50%JONES 3.58 0.023 2 7.16 4.68La India RC-09-420 3.05 4.57 631003 CHIPS-100%JONES 0.34 0.010 1 0.34 0.22La India RC-09-420 4.57 6.10 631004 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.84 0.006 2 9.68 6.33La India RC-09-420 6.10 7.62 631005 CHIPS-50%JONES 5.18 0.006 2 10.36 6.82La India RC-09-420 9.14 10.67 631007 CHIPS-50%JONES 1.82 0.026 2 3.64 2.38La India RC-09-420 10.67 12.19 631008 CHIPS-50%JONES 0.90 0.097 2 1.80 1.18La India RC-09-420 12.19 13.72 631009 CHIPS-JONES 0.78 0.100 4 3.12 2.04La India RC-09-420 13.72 15.24 631010 CHIPS-JONES 2.30 0.051 4 9.20 6.05La India RC-09-420 15.24 16.76 631011 CHIPS-JONES 0.70 0.053 4 2.80 1.84La India RC-09-420 44.20 45.72 631032 CHIPS-25%JONES 0.11 0.932 4 0.44 0.29La India RC-09-420 51.82 53.34 631037 CHIPS-25%JONES 0.12 0.216 4 0.48 0.32La India RC-09-421 0.00 1.52 631062 CHIPS-50%JONES 5.50 0.094 2 11.00 7.24La India RC-09-421 1.52 3.05 631063 CHIPS-50%JONES 3.76 0.045 2 7.52 4.92La India RC-09-421 3.05 4.57 631064 CHIPS-50%JONES 2.88 0.081 2 5.76 3.79La India RC-09-421 4.57 6.10 631065 CHIPS-50%JONES 2.08 0.177 2 4.16 2.72La India RC-09-421 6.10 7.62 631067 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.92 0.344 2 9.84 6.47La India RC-09-422 73.15 74.68 631159 CHIPS-25%JONES 0.11 0.369 4 0.44 0.29La India RC-09-422 77.72 79.25 631163 CHIPS-25%JONES 0.11 0.679 4 0.44 0.29La India RC-09-422 79.25 80.77 631164 CHIPS-25%JONES 0.12 0.477 4 0.48 0.32La India RC-09-422 80.77 82.30 631165 CHIPS-25%JONES 0.14 0.322 4 0.56 0.37La India RC-09-422 82.30 83.82 631166 CHIPS-25%JONES 0.12 0.285 4 0.48 0.32La India RC-09-423 4.57 6.10 631174 CHIPS-25%JONES 1.70 0.003 4 6.80 4.44La India RC-09-423 48.77 50.29 631206 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.68 0.003 2 9.36 6.16La India RC-09-423 51.82 53.34 631208 CHIPS-50%JONES 2.60 0.003 2 5.20 3.42La India RC-09-423 53.34 54.86 631209 CHIPS-50%JONES 0.80 0.003 2 1.60 1.05La India RC-09-423 56.39 57.91 631211 CHIPS-50%JONES 3.58 0.003 2 7.16 4.71La India RC-09-423 59.44 60.96 631213 CHIPS-50%JONES 5.68 0.003 2 11.36 7.47La India RC-09-424 4.57 6.10 631221 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.74 0.011 2 9.48 6.20La India RC-09-424 6.10 7.62 631222 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.54 0.010 2 9.08 5.97La India RC-09-424 9.14 10.67 631224 CHIPS-50%JONES 2.20 0.003 2 4.40 2.88La India RC-09-424 10.67 12.19 631225 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.46 0.006 2 8.92 5.87La India RC-09-424 13.72 15.24 631227 CHIPS-50%JONES 3.18 0.018 2 6.36 4.18La India RC-09-424 16.76 18.29 631229 CHIPS-50%JONES 3.86 0.003 2 7.72 5.05La India RC-09-424 18.29 19.81 631230 CHIPS-50%JONES 5.72 0.013 2 11.44 7.53La India RC-09-425 4.57 6.10 631318 CHIPS-50%JONES 5.80 0.010 2 11.60 7.58La India RC-09-425 6.10 7.62 631319 CHIPS-50%JONES 3.16 0.003 2 6.32 4.16La India RC-09-425 7.62 9.14 631321 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.18 0.003 2 8.36 5.50La India RC-09-425 9.14 10.67 631322 CHIPS-50%JONES 3.10 0.003 2 6.20 4.05La India RC-09-425 10.67 12.19 631323 CHIPS-50%JONES 2.02 0.003 2 4.04 2.66La India RC-09-425 18.29 19.81 631324 CHIPS-100%JONES 3.02 0.116 1 3.02 1.99La India RC-09-425 19.81 21.34 631325 CHIPS-100%JONES 3.20 0.039 1 3.20 2.09La India RC-09-425 21.34 22.86 631326 CHIPS-50%JONES 5.42 0.006 2 10.84 7.13La India RC-09-425 22.86 24.38 631327 CHIPS-50%JONES 2.44 0.029 2 4.88 3.21La India RC-09-425 24.38 25.91 631329 CHIPS-50%JONES 5.42 0.212 2 10.84 7.08La India RC-09-425 28.96 30.48 631332 CHIPS-50%JONES 0.14 0.611 2 0.28 0.18La India RC-09-425 30.48 32.00 631333 CHIPS-100%JONES 2.42 0.151 1 2.42 1.59La India RC-09-425 32.00 33.53 631334 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.42 0.048 2 8.84 5.78La India RC-09-425 65.53 67.06 631357 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.36 0.084 2 8.72 5.70La India RC-09-425 86.87 88.39 631372 CHIPS-50%JONES 3.06 0.245 2 6.12 4.03La India RC-09-425 88.39 89.92 631373 CHIPS-50%JONES 5.32 0.228 2 10.64 6.95La India RC-09-425 96.01 97.54 631378 CHIPS-50%JONES 2.90 0.125 2 5.80 3.79La India RC-09-425 120.40 121.92 631395 CHIPS-50%JONES 3.40 0.257 2 6.80 4.47La India RC-09-426 36.58 38.10 631426 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.33 0.172 4 9.32 6.13La India RC-09-426 108.20 109.73 631475 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.59 0.025 4 10.36 6.77La India RC-09-426 114.30 115.82 631479 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.54 0.017 4 10.16 6.68La India RC-09-426 126.49 128.02 631488 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.34 0.003 4 9.36 6.12La India RC-09-426 143.26 144.78 631499 CHIPS-50%JONES 4.27 0.013 2 8.54 5.62La India RC-09-426 144.78 146.30 632001 CHIPS-50%JONES 5.15 0.619 2 10.30 6.78


202


To(m)


FactorNormalized





203


To(m)


FactorNormalized





204


To(m)


FactorNormalized





205


To(m)


FactorNormalized





206


To(m)


FactorNormalized





207


To(m)


FactorNormalized





208


To(m)


FactorNormalized





209


To(m)


FactorNormalized





210


To(m)


FactorNormalized





211


To(m)


FactorNormalized





212


To(m)


FactorNormalized





213


To(m)


FactorNormalized





214


To(m)


FactorNormalized



La India RC-12-712 15.24 16.76 862933 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.71 0.003 4 10.84 7.13La India RC-12-712 16.76 18.29 862934 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.04 0.003 4 8.16 5.33La India RC-12-713 3.05 4.57 862956 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.30 0.008 4 9.20 6.05La India RC-12-713 4.57 6.10 862957 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.81 0.006 4 11.24 7.35La India RC-12-717 0.00 1.52 863207 CHIPS-50%JONES 3.73 0.030 2 7.46 4.91La India RC-12-718 3.05 4.57 863289 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.39 0.166 4 9.56 6.29La India RC-12-719 4.57 6.10 863378 CHIPS-25%JONES 1.87 0.439 4 7.48 4.89La India RC-12-719 53.34 54.86 863413 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.85 0.003 4 11.40 7.50La India RC-12-719 65.53 67.06 863422 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.18 0.003 4 8.72 5.70La India RC-12-719 108.20 109.73 863452 CHIPS-25%JONES 2.74 0.120 4 10.96 7.16


215

Appendix 13.1 – Summary of test work performed by KCA KCA May 2007

• Eight composite samples of mineralized reject from four reverse circulation holes drilled in 2006

• Bottle rolls at 80% minus 0.075 mm for each composite at 96 hr • Flotation tests on two sulfide composites

KCA July 2007

• Two single stage rougher flotation tests on sulfide composites from KCA May 2007 test work

KCA September 2008

• Seven composite samples from 152 bags of HQ and PQ core material. • Rock density tests on randomly selected pieces of whole HQ and PQ core. • Bond work index test work on material crushed to minus 50 mm from each composited,

with the exception of one high grade composite. A 20 kg portion of crushed material for each composite was sent to Phillips Enterprises for rod mill grindability tests, ball mill grindability tests, and abrasion tests.

• Head analyses for gold and silver for each composite with a portion of pulverized head split being assayed for an additional series of elements for a whole rock analysis.

• Bottle roll leach tests for each composite at 80% minus 0.075 mm. • Gravity concentration test on the high grade composite at P80 0.075 mm. • Agglomeration test work on four 2-kilogram portions from each of the composites,

excluding the high grade composite at a crush size of minus 12.5 mm with additions of 0, 2, 4, and 8 kilograms of cement per metric tonne of ore for the four tests, respectively.

• A total of 13 column leach tests conducted on material crushed to 100% minus 50 mm and 12.5 mm for each of the six non-high grade composites; a single column test at 12.5 mm was conducted utilizing the high grade composite.

• Acid base accounting test work was performed on a pulverized portion of the head material from each of the seven composites and a weighted portion of the tailings material from each separate column leach test pulverized to 100% minus 0.106 mm to determine acid generating potential.

KCA 2009

• Four composites from 24 bags of material containing 74 tagged intervals of split HQ core • Rock density tests were completed on a single piece of split HQ core from each tagged

interval • Bond work index test work was completed on a weighted portion of material from each

composite crushed to minus 25 mm; a portion of stage crushed material from each composite was sent to Phillips Enterprises, LLC for rod mill grindability tests, ball mill grindability tests, and abrasion tests

• Head analysis for each composite


216

• Bottle roll tests on each composite at 80% minus 0.075 mm was performed • Agglomeration and percolation tests were performed on three of the four composites at a

crush size of minus 9.5 mm and cement additions of 0, 2, 4, and 6 kilograms of cement per metric tonne of dry ore

• A total of seven separate column tests using material from the four composites with material crushed to minus 25 mm and 9.5mm

• Environmental test work was conducted on three of the column leach tests

KCA March 2010

• Seven separate core composites from two boxes of material consisting of nominal 6.3 mm RC cuttings with mostly fines

• Head analyses were completed on the seven composites • Bottle roll tests on material size 80% passing 0.075 mm was conducted for each

composite

KCA March 2010

• Three samples • Head screen analyses on the three samples • A total of three bottle roll tests were completed on the samples with the material as

received (no crushing)

KCA March 2010

• Two samples from assay rejects • Bottle roll tests on each sample at 80% minus 0.075 mm was performed

KCA May 2010

• Two samples were prepared from 12 bags of ½ split HQ core from Domain 2-LC, Zone LC-2, and Domain 2-VR, Zone D2

• Head analyses were completed on the two samples • Bottle roll tests on material size 80% passing 0.075 mm for 96 hours was conducted on

the two samples • Cyanide shake tests on the two samples were performed • A total of two column tests (one for each sample) were performed at a crush size of 100%

passing 25 mm for a 66 day leach period

KCA June 2010

• One composite of sulfide material from Domain 5 • Head analysis were conducted • One bottle roll at crush size of 80% passing 0.075 mm for a 96 our period was conducted

on the sulfide sample • A cyanide shake test was performed on the sulfide composite • A column test at 100% passing 25 mm for a 64 day period was conducted


217

KCA September 2010

• Three samples (oxide, mixed, and sulfide) from eighteen 5 gallon buckets containing 48 tagged intervals of ½ split NQ core

• Head analyses were completed • A total of three bottle roll tests (one for each composite) at 100% passing 0.106 mm for

96 hr were conducted • Cyanide shake tests were performed for each composite • Three separate column tests using material from the three core composites at 100%

passing 25 mm • Rock density test work on randomly selected pieces of core was performed • Comminution test work was performed

KCA June 2011

• Two samples of reject feed material from 2010 KCA test work • A total of two column tests were performed at crush size of 100% passing 12.5 mm were

conducted

KCA 2011

• Two separate samples from eight boxes of bulk material • Liner puncture test work performed

KCA 2011 Tarachi

• Nine composite samples from 35 samples of crushed reject material from the La India-Tarachi Zone

• Head Analyses conducted • A total of nine bottle rolls tests (one on each composite) at crush size 80% passing 0.075

mm


218

Appendix 13.2 – Sample Composites Tested The column test sample composites are presented in Table 13.2.1 and the bottle roll test sample composites are presented in Table 13.2.2.


219

Table 13.2.1 – Column Test Samples

KCA Sample No. Sample Description Source DDHInterval (meters) Sample type

Calculated Au Head g Au/MT

38310 C Dacite SC/SA ViruelaDDH07-32 DDHO7-25

0-19.3 1-5.9 PQ/HQ 1.12

38310 C Dacite SC/SA ViruelaDDH07-32 DDHO7-25

0-19.3 1-5.9 PQ/HQ 0.97

38311 D Silica Massive Viruela

DDH07-32 DDHO7-25 DDH07-31

19.3-28.0 5.9-34.5 5.9-25.5 PQ/HQ/HQ 0.98

43748 Domain 2-VR, Zone D2

DDH-09-67 DDH-09-68 DDH-09-69 DDH-09-70 DDH-

09-71

21.5-32.0 8.6-29.0 0.0-17.0 2.0-12.0

11.0-18.0 HQ Core 0.71



09-71

21.5-32.0 8.6-29.0 0.0-17.0 2.0-12.0

11.0-18.0 HQ Core 0.72

38311 D Silica Massive Viruela

DDH07-32 DDHO7-25 DDH07-31

19.3-28.0 5.9-34.5 5.9-25.5 PQ/HQ /HQ 1.06

43747 Domain 2-LC, Zone LC-2

DDH-09-82 DDH-09-83 DDH-09-84

DDH-08-46

51.0-60.0 49.0-56.0 25.0-33.0 43.0-51.0 HQ Core 1.04


DDH-09-82 DDH-09-83 DDH-09-84

DDH-08-46

51.0-60.0 49.0-56.0 25.0-33.0 43.0-51.0 HQ Core 1.44

41723 B Viruela


08-53

16-34 34-72 37-55 53-60 24-35 HQ Core 1.55

41724 B Viruela DDH-08-50 HQ Core 13.25

38312 E Andesite SA/SVDDH07-32 DDHO7-25

52.0-78.0 34.5-42.3 PQ/HQ 2.35

41723 A Viruela


08-53

16-34 34-72 37-55 53-60 24-35 HQ Core 1.65

38312 E Andesite SA/SVDDH07-32 DDHO7-25

52.0-78.0 34.5-42.3 PQ/HQ 2.27

38309 B Silica Clay La CruzDDH07-33 DDHO7-34

13-39 7-31.0 HQ Core 0.45

38309 B Silica Clay La CruzDDH07-33 DDHO7-34

13-39 7-31.0 HQ Core 0.51

44108 D5 - Sulfide CompositeDDH-08-41 DDH-08-42

51.0-72.0 61.0-71.0 Core 0.4


220

Table 13.2.1 - Column Test Samples - Continued



38308 ASilica Structure La Cruz and Cerro do Oro

DDH07-36 DDHO7-33

0-35 54.3-60.8 HQ Core 1.77

38308 ASilica Structure La Cruz and Cerro do Oro

DDH07-36 DDHO7-33

0-35 54.3-60.8 HQ Core 1.71

38313 FSilica Massive- Cieneguita DDHO7-40 0.0-34.0 HQ Core 0.40

38313 FSilica Massive- Cieneguita DDHO7-40 0.0-34.0 HQ Core 0.39

41725 B CieneguitaDDH-08-59 DDH-08-60 DDH-08-64

25-66 4.2-19.1

22-42 HQ Core 1.09

41726 B EspanolaDDH-08-61 DDH-

08-6311-41 13-44 HQ Core 1.04

41725 A CieneguitaDDH-08-59 DDH-08-60 DDH-08-64

25-66 4.2-19.1

22-42 HQ Core 1.08

41726 A EspanolaDDH-08-61 DDH-

08-6311-41 13-44 HQ Core 1.16

44725 D17 - Oxide CompositeDDH-10-113 DDH-10-114

0.0-26.0 0.5-42.0 NQ Core 0.85

44726 D17 - Mixed Composite DDH-10-113 26.0-54.0 NQ Core 0.7544727 D17 - Sulfide Composite DDH-10-113 54.0-81.0 NQ Core 0.82

38314 G Cieneguita - High Grade DDHO7-40

34.0-36.5 36.5-39.4 39.4-40.9 HQ Core 9.01


221

Table 13.2.2 – Bottle Roll Test Samples



36372 A 670125-670133 RC-06-25 1.5-15.2 RC 5.0136372 B 670146-670155 RC-06-25 32-45.7 RC 2.8836372 C 715200-715209 RC-06-44 71.6-85.3 RC 5.3536372 D 715223-715232 RC-06-44 105.2-118.9 RC 2.0836372 E 715414-715423 RC-06-47 47.2-61.0 RC 4.2136372 F 715441-715448 RC-06-47 85.3-97.5 RC 9.1736372 G 684282-684290 RC-06-52 6.1-19.8 RC 0.7836372 H 684294-684302 RC-06-52 22.9-36.6 RC 4.40

38308Silica Structure La Cruz and Cerro do Oro

DDH07-36 DDHO7-33

0-35 54.3-60.8 HQ Core 1.74

38309 Silica Clay La CruzDDH07-33 DDHO7-34

13-39 7-31.0 HQ Core 0.44

38310 Dacite SC/SA ViruelaDDH07-32 DDHO7-25

0-19.3 1-5.9 PQ/HQ 1.10

38311 Silica Massive Viruela

DDH07-32 DDHO7-25 DDH07-31

19.3-28.0 5.9-34.5 5.9-25.5 PQ/HQ/HQ 0.93

38312 Andesite SA/SVDDH07-32 DDHO7-25

52.0-78.0 34.5-42.3 PQ/HQ 2.31

38313 Silica Massive- CieneguiDDHO7-40 0.0-34.0 HQ Core 0.41

38314 Cieneguita - High Grade DDHO7-40

34.0-36.5 36.5-39.4 39.4-40.9 HQ Core 8.30

41723

DDH-08-48 DDH-08-50 DDH-08-51 DDH-08-52 DDH-08-53

16.0-34 .0 34.0-72.0 37.0-55.0 53.0-60.0 24.0-35.0 HQ Core 1.57

41724 DDH-08-50 HQ Core 12.85

41725

DDH-08-59 DDH-08-60 DDH-08-64

25.0-66 .0 4.2-19.1 22.0-42.0 HQ Core 0.89

41726DDH-08-61 DDH-08-63

11.0-41.0 13.0-44.0 HQ Core 1.02

43359 LI09-1 RC-09-447

18.3-19.8 22.9-24.4 27.4-29.0 32.0-33.5 36.6-38.1 RC Reject 0.53

43360 LI09-2 RC-09-476

1.5-3.1 6.1-7.6 10.7-12.2 15.2-16.8 19.8-21.63 24.4-25.9 RC Reject 0.93


222

Table 13.2.2 – Bottle Roll Test Samples – Continued



43361 LI09-3 RC-09-476

29.0-30.5 33.5-35.1 38.1-39.6 42.7-44.2 42.7-48.8 47.2-48.8 51.8-53.3 RC Reject 0.81

43362 LI09-4 RC-09-476

56.4-57.9 61.0-62.5 65.5-67.1 74.7-76.2 79.3-80.8 83.8-85.3 RC Reject 0.93

43363 LI09-5 RC-09-477

3.1-4.6 7.6-9.1 12.2-13.7 16.8-18.3 21.3-22.9 25.9-27.4 30.5-32.0 RC Reject 1.16

43364 LI09-6 RC-09-477

35.1-36.6 39.6-41.2 44.2-45.7 47.2-48.8 RC Reject 0.36

43365 LI09-7 RC-09-453

32.0-33.5 35.1-36.6 38.1-39.6 41.2-42.7 44.2-45.7 RC Reject 0.84


DDH-09-82 DDH-09-83 DDH-09-84 DDH-08-46

51.0-60.0 49.0-56.0 25.0-33.0 43.0-51.0 HQ Core 0.93


DDH-09-67 DDH-09-68 DDH-09-69 DDH-09-70 DDH-09-71

21.5-32.0 8.6-29.0 0.0-17.0 2.0-12.0 11.0-18.0 HQ Core 0.74

43792 HE 09140093

841174 741176 841100 841102 841104 Assay Reject 0.62

43793 HE 09140094

841191 941193 941113 841110 Assay Reject 1.46


223

Table 13.2.2 – Bottle Roll Test Samples – Continued

Whole core from 2007 drillholes (HQ and one PQ diameter) was used to generate 8 separate composites for testing. The composites were used for bottle roll leach tests and each composite was used to create -12.5 and a -50mm samples for column leach tests, excepting one composite of D18 that was only column tested at -12.5 mm. (13 column and 7 bottle roll tests total). In addition, the 7 composites were used for a suite of physical and environmental test work.

In 2009, 4 composites were created using half core from 2008 drilling (HQ diameter). These were used for bottle roll leach tests and for column leach testing at -9.5 mm and -25mm, excepting one composite of high grade material that was only tested at -15.5 mm. (7 column and 4 bottle roll tests total). In addition, the 4 composites were used for a suite of physical and environmental test work.

In 2010, six test programs were conducted. In these six test programs the following composites and samples were generated for testing:

• Two composites were created from half core from 2009 HQ diameter drillholes • Seven samples were taken from nominal 6.3 mm RC cuttings • Three samples documented as LI-BR-10-1, LI-BR-10-2, and LI-BR-10-3 • Two samples were taken from assay rejects



44105 LI-BR-10-1 RC-09-476

5.0-10.0 20.0-25.0 35.0-40.0 50.0-55.0 65.0-70.0 80.0-85.0 RC Reject 0.791

44106 LI-BR-10-2 RC-09-476

95.0-100.0 110.0-115.0 125.0-130.0 140.0-145.0 155.0-160.0 170.0-175.0 RC Reject 0.763

44107 LI-BR-10-3 RC-09-477

10.0-15.0 25.0-30.0 40.0-45.0 55.0-60.0 70.0-75.0 85.0-90.0 100.0-105.0 RC Reject 0.877

44108 D5 - Sulfide compositeDDH-08-41 DDH-08-42

51.0-72.0 61.0-71.0 Core 0.33

44725 D17 - Oxide CompositeDDH-10-113 DDH-10-114

0.0-26.0 0.5-42.0 NQ Core 0.91

44726 D17 - Mixed Composite DDH-10-113 26.0-54.0 NQ Core 0.4744727 D17 - Sulfide CompositeDDH-10-113 54.0-81.0 NQ Core 0.8


224

• One composite of sulfide material from Domain 5 • Three samples from half split NQ core were used for bottle roll and column leach tests

Using these samples a total of 18 bottle roll tests and 6 column tests were conducted.

In 2011 two samples of reject feed material from 2010 test work were used to conduct two column tests at a finer crush size of 100% passing 12.5 mm.


225

Appendix 13.2a – Bulk density data from Kappes Cassiday and Associates

Rock Density Test Work

Rock density tests were completed on randomly selected pieces of whole HQ and PQ core. The pieces selected were approximately 5 to 8 cm in length and were selected from each core interval received from the La India Project.

The procedure utilized by KCA for rock density determination is based upon the ASTM Method C914, Standard Test Method for Rock Density and Volume of Solid Refractories by Wax Immersion. A summary of the average rock density for each composite sample is presented in Table 13.2.3.

Table 13.2.3 Summary of Composite Rock Densities

Rock Density Test Procedure

Rock densities were determined utilizing the wax immersion test method. The equipment required for the test method and the general procedure are outlined as follows:

For each refractory to be characterized several representative specimens should be chosen. These specimens may be whole shapes or broken pieces and should exhibit sufficient structural integrity to permit handling. Loose particles and soil should be removed from the specimens prior to testing.

An apparatus used for melting wax is required. A container heated by hot water, preferably thermostatically controlled, is satisfactory. The water should be heated to only slightly above the melting point of the wax to avoid flashing of the wax vapors. Vapors given off by molten wax ignite spontaneously at above 400°F (205°C) and should not be allowed to come in contact with the heating element or open flame. The container should be large enough to permit the dipping of the specimen into the melted wax so that a uniform surface coating of wax is achieved.

Fully refined paraffin wax that has a known constant density, K, that does not change after repeated melting and cooling cycles is required. The paraffin waxes generally used are commercially available and have density values in the range of 0.87 to 0.91 g/cm3. These waxes melt at approximately 135°F (57°C).

KCA Sample Nos. Composite Description

Average Density, g/cm3

38301 A-V A Silica Structure - La Cruz and Cerro de Oro 2.3938302 A-Y B Silica Clay - La Cruz 1.9738303 A-V C Dacite - SC/SA - Viruela 2.22

38304 A-GG D Silica Massive - Viruela 2.5138305 A-DD E Andesite - SA/SV 2.1938306 A-P F Silica Massive - Cieneguita 2.63


226

A balance capable of determining the weights of the specimens to a minimum of four significant Figures is required. Thus, specimens weighing from 100 to 999 g should be weighed to a minimum of one decimal place. Those from 10 to 99 g should be weighed to two decimal places and so on.

The individual test specimen was dried to a constant weight by heating to 105 - 110°C to remove entrapped moisture which would affect the rock density determination. Any loose material or soil was removed from the test specimen.

An initial weight, W, of the test specimen in grams was measured to four significant Figures and the weight recorded.

The test specimen was then coated with wax by dipping the specimen into the container of melted wax. Care was taken not to entrap air bubbles under the wax. If found, these bubbles were pressed out so that the wax conformed exactly to the surface of the specimen. Holes in the wax coating were closed by additional dipping in the melted wax so that the surface was completely sealed.

A wax coated weight, P, of the test specimen in grams to four significant Figures was taken and the weight recorded. The balance was then counterbalanced with a device to suspend the specimen in place while immersed in water, Figure 13.2.1.

Figure 13.2.1 – Counterbalance Device Utilized for Water Immersion Weight

The weight of the wax-coated specimen suspended in water, S, in grams to four significant Figures was determined and the weight recorded. The total volume, V1, of the wax coated test specimen (specimen including the wax coating) was calculated in cubic centimetres as follows;

V1 = P – S

Balance

Rock

Water


227

This assumes that 1 cubic centimetre (cm3) of water weighs 1.0 gram. This is true to within 3 parts per thousand (ppt) for distilled water at room temperature.

The volume of the wax coating on the test specimen, V2, was calculated in cubic centimetres as follows;

V2 = (P – W)/K

Where K = density of the wax, g/cm3.

The volume of the test specimen, V, was then calculated by subtracting the volume of the wax coating from the total volume as calculated in step 11 above.

V = V1 – V2

The rock density, D, of the test specimen in grams per cubic centimetres (g/cm3) was calculated as the quotient of the initial weight divided by the volume of the test specimen, excluding the volume of wax.


228

Appendix 13.3 – Summary Bottle Roll Leach Test Results Performed by KCA

Table 13.3.1 – Bottle Roll Leach Test Results – Gold

KCA Sample No.

KCA Test No. Description

Average Head Assay, gms/Au

MT

Calculated Head, gms/Au MT

Extracted, gms/Au MT

Average Tails, gms/Au MT

Extracted, % Au

Days of Leach

Consumption NaCN, kg/MT

Addition Ca(OH)2, kg/MT

36372 A 36373 A LA06-01 5.50 5.01 4.62 0.40 92% 4 0.31 1.5036372 B 36373 B LA06-02 3.17 2.88 2.76 0.12 96% 4 0.52 1.5036372 C 36373 C LA06-03 5.45 5.35 0.27 5.08 5% 4 1.09 2.0036372 D 36373 D LA06-04 2.16 2.08 0.14 1.94 7% 4 3.00 1.5036372 E 36374 A LA06-05 4.34 4.21 3.85 0.36 92% 4 0.41 2.0036372 F 36374 B LA06-06 9.22 9.17 8.54 0.64 93% 4 0.95 3.0036372 G 36374 C LA06-07 0.81 0.78 0.73 0.05 94% 4 0.94 5.0036372 H 36373 D LA06-08 4.82 4.40 4.19 0.21 95% 4 0.22 1.0038308 38361 A Silica Structure - La Cruz and Cerro de Oro 1.69 1.74 1.38 0.36 79% 4 0.27 1.0038309 38361 B Silica Clay - La Cruz 0.48 0.44 0.39 <0.10 89% 4 1.05 2.5038310 38361 C Dacite - SC/SA - Viruela 1.24 1.10 1.01 0.09 92% 4 0.20 1.0038311 38362 A Silica Massive - Viruela 1.15 0.93 0.80 0.14 85% 4 0.22 1.0038312 38362 B Andesite - SA/SV 2.45 2.31 1.96 0.35 85% 4 0.17 1.0038313 38362 C Silica Massive - Cieneguita 0.40 0.41 0.36 <0.10 88% 4 0.27 1.0038314 38362 D Cieneguita - High Grade 9.00 8.30 7.48 0.82 90% 4 1.07 3.0041723 41901 A Viruela 1.35 1.57 1.44 0.13 92 4 1.15 1.0041724 41901 B Viruela High Grade 12.88 12.85 12.42 0.43 97 4 0.89 1.0041725 41901 C Cieneguita 1.11 0.89 0.83 0.06 94 4 0.33 1.0041726 41901 D Espanola 1.03 1.02 0.97 0.05 95 4 0.51 1.0043359 43367 A LI09-1 0.54 0.53 0.20 0.33 38 4 6.81 10.0043360 43367 B LI09-2 0.92 0.93 0.82 0.11 88 4 1.00 3.0043361 43367 C LI09-3 1.04 0.81 0.64 0.18 78 4 4.17 2.0043362 43368 A LI09-4 1.11 0.93 0.78 0.15 83 4 3.95 3.0043363 43368 B LI09-5 1.26 1.16 1.13 0.03 97 4 0.83 3.0043364 43368 C LI09-6 0.40 0.36 0.31 0.05 86 4 1.69 3.0043365 43368 D LI09-7 0.85 0.84 0.49 0.35 58 4 2.01 6.0043747 43776 A Domain 2-LC, Zone LC-2 0.84 0.93 0.86 0.06 93% 4 1.78 1.5043748 43776 B Domain 2-VR, Zone D2 0.59 0.74 0.69 0.05 93% 4 1.55 1.0043792 44110A HE 09140093 - 0.62 0.42 0.19 69% 4 1.17 2.0043793 HE 09140094 - 1.46 1.06 0.41 72% 4 1.14 1.5044105 44136 A LI-BR-10-1 - 0.791 0.732 0.059 93% 4 0.23 2.5044106 44136 B LI-BR-10-2 - 0.763 0.345 0.418 45% 4 3.15 1.5044107 44136 C LI-BR-10-3 - 0.877 0.765 0.111 87% 4 0.28 2.0044108 44137 A D5 Sulfide Composite 0.41 0.33 0.21 0.11 65% 4 1.72 8.0044725 44734A D17 - Oxide Composite - 0.91 0.85 0.07 93% 4 0.22 3.0044726 44734B D17 - Mixed Composite - 0.47 0.29 0.18 62% 4 3.67 1.5044727 44734C D17 - Sulfide Composite - 0.80 0.61 0.19 77% 4 3.21 2.00


229

Table 13.3.2 – Bottle Roll Leach Test Results – Silver

KCA Sample No.


Average Head Assay, gms/Ag

MT

Calculated Head, gms/Ag MT

Extracted, gms/Ag MT

Average Tails, gms/Ag MT

Extracted, % Ag

Days of Leach



36372 A 36373 A LA06-01 4.8 6.7 5.8 0.8 87% 4 0.31 1.5036372 B 36373 B LA06-02 20.2 18.4 17.5 0.8 95% 4 0.52 1.5036372 C 36373 C LA06-03 18.2 16.7 2.8 13.9 17% 4 1.09 2.0036372 D 36373 D LA06-04 15.1 10.0 3.0 7.1 30% 4 3.00 1.5036372 E 36374 A LA06-05 14.4 11.9 11.1 0.8 93% 4 0.41 2.0036372 F 36374 B LA06-06 2.7 1.2 0.3 0.8 26% 4 0.95 3.0036372 G 36374 C LA06-07 2.7 2.1 1.2 0.8 59% 4 0.94 5.0036372 H 36373 D LA06-08 2.0 4.6 3.7 0.8 81% 4 0.22 1.0038308 38361 A Silica Structure - La Cruz and Cerro de Oro 11.3 9.9 7.8 2.1 78% 4 0.27 1.0038309 38361 B Silica Clay - La Cruz <1.7 2.0 0.4 1.6 21% 4 1.05 2.5038310 38361 C Dacite - SC/SA - Viruela <1.7 1.7 0.8 0.9 49% 4 0.20 1.0038311 38362 A Silica Massive - Viruela 3.9 2.7 1.9 0.9 69% 4 0.22 1.0038312 38362 B Andesite - SA/SV 13.5 7.5 2.7 4.8 36% 4 0.17 1.0038313 38362 C Silica Massive - Cieneguita 5.7 6.0 2.4 3.6 40% 4 0.27 1.0038314 38362 D Cieneguita - High Grade 117.9 105.5 57.2 48.3 54% 4 1.07 3.0041723 41901 A Viruela 16.5 15.6 2.9 12.7 19 4 1.15 1.0041724 41901 B Viruela High Grade 8.0 8.3 1.5 6.9 18 4 0.89 1.0041725 41901 C Cieneguita 17.1 17.9 8.5 9.4 47 4 0.33 1.0041726 41901 D Espanola 23.1 23.5 12.0 11.5 51 4 0.51 1.0043359 43367 A LI09-1 1.4 0.9 0.2 0.7 23 4 6.81 10.0043360 43367 B LI09-2 4.3 2.7 1.3 1.4 49 4 1.00 3.0043361 43367 C LI09-3 3.8 2.6 1.9 0.7 74 4 4.17 2.0043362 43368 A LI09-4 3.4 3.4 2.7 0.7 80 4 3.95 3.0043363 43368 B LI09-5 3.1 3.4 1.1 1.2 48 4 0.83 3.0043364 43368 C LI09-6 1.7 1.2 0.5 0.7 43 4 1.69 3.0043365 43368 D LI09-7 1.2 0.9 0.2 0.7 21 4 2.01 6.0043747 43776 A Domain 2-LC, Zone LC-2 5.7 4.9 0.9 3.9 19% 4 1.78 1.5043748 43776 B Domain 2-VR, Zone D2 5.1 5.8 2.2 3.6 38% 4 1.55 1.0043792 43776 B HE 09140093 - 3.6 0.9 2.7 24% 4 1.17 2.0043793 44110A HE 09140094 - 1.5 1.1 0.4 38% 4 1.14 1.5044105 44136 A LI-BR-10-1 - 3.7 1.1 2.6 30% 4 0.23 2.5044106 44136 B LI-BR-10-2 - 2.9 1.5 1.4 52% 4 3.15 1.5044107 44136 C LI-BR-10-3 - 2.2 0.7 1.5 31% 4 0.28 2.0044108 44137 A D5 Sulfide Composite 1.6 2.8 0.6 2.2 20% 96 1.72 8.0044725 44734A D17 - Oxide Composite - 3.5 1.8 1.7 51% 4 0.22 3.0044726 44734B D17 - Mixed Composite - 2.4 1.0 1.4 42% 4 3.67 1.5044727 44734C D17 - Sulfide Composite - 9.0 7.1 1.9 79% 4 3.21 2.00


230

Appendix 13.4 – Laboratory Column Leach Test Work The results of the laboratory column leach tests were used to establish recoveries for the various ore types known to exist at La India.

Tables 13.4.1 and 13.4.2 present the results of the column leach tests conducted by KCA for gold and silver, respectively. Test numbers refer to KCA test numbers.

Extraction vs. Time curves for gold and silver are shown in Figures 13.4.1 and 13.4.2.

Figures 13.4.3, 13.4.4, 13.4.5, and 13.4.6 show the extraction vs. time for gold and for silver for the Main and North pits, respectively, by domain.

Figure 13.4.7 show the column leach test results by ore domain


231

Table 13.4.1 – Column Leach Test Results - Gold

Table 13.4.2 – Column Leach Test Results – Silver

KCA Sample No.


Average Head Assay, gms/Au

MT

Calculated Head, gms/Au MT

Extracted, gms/Au MT

Average Tails, gms/Au MT

Extracted, % Au

Days of Leach



38308 A 38315 Silica Structure - La Cruz & Cerro de Oro

1.69 1.65 1.25 0.40 76% 126 0.57 1.00

38308 B 38318 Silica Structure - La Cruz & Cerro de Oro

1.69 1.76 1.43 0.33 81% 140 0.88 2.00

38309 A 38321 Silica Clay - La Cruz 0.48 0.47 0.42 <0.10 89% 126 2.43 2.0138309 B 38324 Silica Clay - La Cruz 0.48 0.45 0.45 <0.10 89% 126 2.03 0.0038310 A 38327 Dacite - SC/SA - Viruela 1.24 0.92 0.83 <0.10 90% 126 0.86 2.0038310 B 38330 Dacite - SC/SA - Viruela 1.24 1.08 0.97 0.11 90% 126 1.29 0.0038311 A 38333 Silica Massive - Viruela 1.15 1.10 0.44 0.66 40% 126 0.64 1.0038311 B 38336 Silica Massive - Viruela 1.15 0.84 0.56 0.28 67% 126 0.78 2.0038312 A 38339 Andesite - SA/SV 2.45 2.45 1.20 1.00 49% 126 0.68 1.3338312 B 38342 Andesite - SA/SV 2.45 2.27 1.46 0.81 64% 126 1.03 3.0038313 A 38345 Silica Massive - Cieneguita 0.40 0.40 0.16 0.19 40% 126 0.57 1.0038313 B 38348 Silica Massive - Cieneguita 0.40 0.37 0.22 0.15 60% 140 1.03 2.0038314 A 38351 Cieneguita - High Grade 9.00 8.09 7.54 0.55 93% 126 3.19 3.0041723 A 41902 Viruela -- 1.53 1.20 0.33 78% 91 0.81 2.0141723 B 41905 Viruela 1.35 1.43 1.10 0.33 77% 104 0.77 0.0041724 B 41908 Viruela High Grade 12.88 13.01 12.23 0.78 94% 91 1.60 0.0041725 A 41911 Cieneguita -- 1.04 1.00 0.04 96% 91 0.82 2.0141725 B 41914 Cieneguita 1.11 0.98 0.92 0.06 94% 104 0.92 0.0041726 A 41917 Espanola -- 1.05 1.01 0.04 96% 91 0.88 2.1041726 B 41920 Espanola 1.03 0.96 0.89 0.07 93% 104 0.83 0.0043747A 43768 Domain 2-LC, Zone LC-2 0.84 1.30 1.07 0.23 82% 66 0.67 2.01 43748A 43771 Domain 2-VR, Zone D2 0.59 0.64 0.50 0.14 78% 66 0.76 2.00 44108 44130 D5 Sulfide Composite 0.47 0.35 0.24 0.12 70% 64 2.72 6.14

44725 A 44759 D17-Oxide Composite 0.78 0.78 0.74 0.04 95% 76 1.50 2.02 44726 A 44762 D17-Mixed Composite 0.57 0.66 0.21 0.45 32% 76 2.63 2.03 44727 A 44765 D17-Sulfide Composite 0.94 0.71 0.38 0.33 53% 76 2.31 3.04 43747 B 48514 Domain 2-LC, Zone LC-2 0.841 0.964 0.805 0.159 84% 45 0.63 2.0043748 B 48517 Domain 2-VR, Zone D2 0.591 0.673 0.543 0.130 81% 45 0.43 2.00

KCA Sample No.

KCA Test No.

Description Average Head Assay, gms/Ag MT

Calculated Head, gms/Ag MT

Extracted, gms/Ag MT

Average Tails, gms/Ag MT

Extracted, % Ag

Days of Leach



38308 A 38315 Silica Structure - La Cruz & Cerro de Oro

-- 8.5 2.7 5.8 30% 126 0.57 1.00

38308 B 38318 Silica Structure - La Cruz & Cerro de Oro

-- 9.2 4.2 5.0 44% 140 0.88 2.00

38309 A 38321 Silica Clay - La Cruz -- 1.1 0.1 1.0 9% 126 2.43 2.0138309 B 38324 Silica Clay - La Cruz -- 1.6 0.4 1.2 8% 126 2.03 0.0038310 A 38327 Dacite - SC/SA - Viruela -- 1.4 0.2 1.2 17% 126 0.86 2.0038310 B 38330 Dacite - SC/SA - Viruela -- 1.3 0.2 1.1 24% 126 1.29 0.0038311 A 38333 Silica Massive - Viruela -- 1.9 0.2 1.7 13% 126 0.64 1.0038311 B 38336 Silica Massive - Viruela -- 2.9 0.5 2.4 18% 126 0.78 2.0038312 A 38339 Andesite - SA/SV -- 9.9 1.0 8.9 10% 126 0.68 1.3338312 B 38342 Andesite - SA/SV -- 8.2 1.2 7.0 16% 126 1.03 3.00

38313 A 38345 Silica Massive - Cieneguita -- 5.9 0.3 5.6 5% 126 0.57 1.00

38313 B 38348 Silica Massive - Cieneguita -- 5.2 0.4 4.8 8% 140 1.03 2.00

38314 A 38351 Cieneguita - High Grade -- 110.2 56.4 53.8 52% 126 3.19 3.0041723 A 41902 Viruela -- 14.3 0.2 14.1 2% 91 0.81 2.0141723 B 41905 Viruela 16.5 14.6 0.3 14.3 2% 104 0.77 0.0041724 B 41908 Viruela High Grade 8.0 8.0 0.3 7.6 4% 91 1.60 0.0041725 A 41911 Cieneguita -- 17.8 3.5 14.3 20% 91 0.82 2.0141725 B 41914 Cieneguita 17.1 17.4 4.6 12.8 26% 104 0.92 0.0041726 A 41917 Espanola -- 17.4 4.5 12.9 26% 91 0.88 2.1041726 B 41920 Espanola 23.1 21.3 5.4 15.9 25% 104 0.83 0.0043747A 43768 Domain 2-LC, Zone LC-2 -- 3.8 0.3 3.5 8% 66 0.67 2.01 43748A 43771 Domain 2-VR, Zone D2 -- 5.6 1.8 3.8 32% 66 0.76 2.00 44108 44130 D5 Sulfide Composite -- 1.1 0.5 0.6 45% 64 2.72 6.14

44725 A 44759 D17-Oxide Composite 4.3 5.8 1.1 4.7 19% 76 1.50 2.02 44726 A 44762 D17-Mixed Composite 2.2 2.1 0.4 1.7 18% 76 2.63 2.03 44727 A 44765 D17-Sulfide Composite 6.7 8.8 2.7 6.1 31% 76 2.31 3.04 43747 B 48514 Domain 2-LC, Zone LC-2 3.51 3.31 0.18 3.13 5% 45 0.63 2.0043748 B 48517 Domain 2-VR, Zone D2 2.66 4.38 1.57 2.81 36% 45 0.43 2.00


232

Figure 13.4.1 – Column Leach Test Extraction vs. Time – Gold

Figure 13.4.2 – Column Leach Test Extraction vs. Time – Silver


233

Figure 13.4.3 – Column Leach Test Extraction vs. Time by Domain – Main Pit – Gold

Figure 13.4.4 – Column Leach Test Extraction vs. Time by Domain – Main Pit – Silver


234

Figure 13.4.5 – Column Leach Test Extraction vs. Time by Domain – North Pit – Gold

Figure 13.4.6 – Column Leach Test Extraction vs. Time by Domain – North Pit – Silver

Several column tests were noted to have lower recoveries. A close examination of these tests shows that many of these low recoveries were associated with samples high in sulfides, or


235

samples with a coarser crush. These samples are labeled on the Extraction vs. Time leach curve graphs.

Table 13.4.3 presents the column test results by Domain which were used to determine gold recovery, major reagent consumption, and abrasion index.

Table 13.4.3 – Column Leach Test Results by Ore Domain

Domain KCA Test #% of

Tonnes% of

OuncesParticle Size Au Recovery

Domain Recovery Recovery @ -25mm

NaCN Cons. Kg/MT

Lime Addition (kg/t)

Abrasion Index Ai/g

Domain 1 38330 12.5 90.0% 1.29 0.00 0.2291

Domain 1 38327 50 91.0% 0.86 2.00 0.2291

Domain 1 Avg. 90.5% 1.08 1.00 0.2291

Domain 2 38336 12.5 71.0% 0.78 1.00 0.7408

Domain 2 48517 12.5 82.0% 0.43 2.00 -

Domain 2 43771 25 81.0% 0.76 2 -

Domain 2 38333 50 46.0% 0.64 1.00 0.7408

Domain 2 Avg. 70.0% 0.65 1.50 0.7408

Domain 2A 48514 12.5 85.0% 0.63 2.00 -

Domain 2A 43768 25 84.0% 0.67 2.01 -

Domain 2A Avg. 84.5% 0.65 2.01 -

Domain 3 41905 9.5 79.0% 0.77 0 -

Domain 3 41908 9.5 94.0% 1.60 0 -

Domain 3 38342 12.5 66.0% 1.03 3.00 0.4005

Domain 3 41902 25 80.0% 0.81 2.01 0.3951

Domain 3 38339 50 56.0% 0.68 1.00 0.4005

Domain 3 Avg. 75.0% 0.98 1.20 0.3987

Domain 5 38324 12.5 89.0% 2.03 0.00 0.0080

Domain 5 38321 50 90.0% 2.43 2.26 0.0080

Domain 5 44130 25 70.0% 2.72 6.14 -

Domain 5 Avg. 83.0% 2.39 2.80 0.0080

Domain 6 38318 12.5 81.0% 0.88 2.00 0.7050

Domain 6 38315 50 77.0% 0.53 1.00 0.7050

Domain 6 Avg. 79.0% 0.71 1.50 0.7050

Domain 12 38348 12.5 62.0% 1.03 2.00 0.7779

Domain 12 38345 50 51.0% 0.57 1.00 0.7779

Domain 12 Avg. 56.5% 0.80 1.50 0.7779

Domain 12A 41914 9.5 95.0% 0.92 0 0.5313

Domain 12A 41920 9.5 93.0% 0.83 0 0.5056

Domain 12A 41911 25 96.0% 0.82 2.01 0.5313

Domain 12A 41917 25 97.0% 0.88 2.10 0.5056

Domain 12A Avg. 95.3% 0.86 1.03 0.5185

Domain 17 44759 25 95.0% 1.50 2.02 0.0517

Domain 17 44762 25 40.0% 2.63 2.03 0.0290

Domain 17 44765 25 60.0% 2.31 3.04 0.0175

Domain 17 Avg. 65.0% 2.15 2.36 0.0327

Domain 18 38351 4% 12% 12.5 94.0% 94.0% 3.22 3.03 -

5% 4%90.3%

9% 7%

7% 7%

69.1%

84.0%

7% 13%

18% 14%

70.9%

89.3%

5% 8%

6% 5%

79.7%

64.9%

24% 19%

6% 5%

96.5%

95.0%


236

Test results on the same composites show similar recoveries between -12.5mm and -50mm columns for Domains 1, 5 and 6. Recoveries were higher for Domains 2, 3 and 12 in the -12.5mm columns in comparison to the -50mm columns. Testing at -9.5 mm and -25mm on the same composites showed similar recoveries for Domains 3 and 12A. The recoveries for Domain 2 and Domain 3 at -25mm showed improved recoveries compared to column tests at -12.5mm (These are on different composites). Because of the scattered recoveries at different crush sizes, an analysis of the crush size vs. recovery was conducted. For this review recovery and crush size data for all bottle roll tests and column tests were compiled and plotted on a semi-log graph. Sulfide samples and composites (shown in green), including three column tests and six bottle roll tests were excluded from this analysis. Two additional bottle roll tests were excluded (shown in purple) due to uncharacteristically low recoveries. One of the low recoveries is associated with a high copper content (500-650 ppm in solution), and the other sample lacks a description in the lab report and is believed to be high in sulfides. Two of the sulfide samples that were not included in the analysis had exceptionally low recoveries (5% and 7%). These recoveries are believed to be so low as a result of having exceptionally high sulfide sulphur (5.87% and 4.57%, respectively). A trend line was plotted to show the correlation of the crush size vs. the recovery. The results of the analysis are shown in Figure 13.4.7.

Figure 13.4.7 – Column Leach Test Results by Ore Domain

From the test data the recovery begins to noticeably decrease at crush sizes coarser than 5 mm with significant recovery decreases being noticed at sizes coarser than 25 mm. A crush size of 100% -25mm has been selected as the optimum crush size for this project. In practice, crushing to 100% -25 mm using a tertiary crushing setup is very practical and can be achieved without requiring excessive equipment. Based on the data the expected recovery at a crush size of 100% -25 mm (without field deduct) would be about 78.5%. This recovery is less than the weighted

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

10 100 1000 10000 100000

% R

ecov

ery

Size (microns)

La India P100 Crush Size vs. Recovery No Deduction Lab to Field

Sulfides

Non-SulfideHigh Copper 500 ppm in solution

No Description -

Coarse Crush (50 mm)

Target Crush


237

average recovery from the column test work, but the weighted average recovery takes into account each domain, their average recovery, and the percentage of the overall ore body this represents.


238

Appendix 14.1 – Semi-variograms, Main and North zones of La India deposit, geological domains 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 12, 17, and 18


239


240


241


242


243


244


245


246


247


248


249


250


251


252


253


254


255


256


257


258


259


260


261


262


263


264


265


266

Appendix 14.2 – Intersections from the Main and North zones of La India deposit used in resource estimation

X (m) Y (m) Z (m)1 DDH-07-15 3.00 37.00 0.07 34.00 707 334.50 3 176 324.72 1 805.05 1 DDH-07-16 3.00 31.00 0.45 28.00 706 983.87 3 176 562.57 1 846.94 1 DDH-07-17 0.00 20.00 0.70 20.00 706 867.67 3 176 606.38 1 847.78 1 DDH-07-18 0.00 45.00 0.13 45.00 707 005.98 3 176 456.08 1 821.87 1 DDH-07-19 0.00 14.00 0.65 14.00 706 828.18 3 176 515.93 1 824.11 1 DDH-07-20 0.00 57.00 0.07 57.00 707 304.43 3 176 356.55 1 800.97 1 DDH-07-24 0.00 98.00 0.05 98.00 706 558.35 3 176 351.91 1 713.28 1 DDH-07-29 0.00 11.00 0.05 11.00 707 120.79 3 176 425.24 1 831.31 1 DDH-07-30 1.00 5.75 0.40 4.75 706 855.31 3 176 423.03 1 779.39 1 DDH-08-44 1.52 33.00 0.02 31.48 707 241.69 3 176 431.06 1 794.29 1 DDH-08-45 0.00 34.00 0.04 34.00 707 205.72 3 176 528.75 1 820.44 1 DDH-08-46 5.00 35.00 0.10 30.00 707 341.06 3 176 460.08 1 826.51 1 DDH-08-47 5.18 42.00 0.38 36.82 707 004.51 3 176 563.14 1 845.38 1 DDH-08-48 5.18 9.00 1.44 3.82 706 900.42 3 176 553.42 1 833.22 1 DDH-08-49 2.00 5.00 0.57 3.00 706 893.64 3 176 549.58 1 835.58 1 DDH-08-50 3.00 4.00 0.73 1.00 706 954.28 3 176 410.70 1 803.51 1 DDH-08-51 6.00 10.00 0.31 4.00 706 908.94 3 176 460.41 1 808.84 1 DDH-08-52 3.00 20.00 0.12 17.00 706 799.34 3 176 526.34 1 813.00 1 DDH-08-54 22.00 32.00 0.34 10.00 706 817.23 3 176 464.01 1 783.82 1 DDH-09-66 0.00 9.00 0.27 9.00 706 885.13 3 176 574.17 1 842.18 1 DDH-09-67 0.00 21.50 1.94 21.50 706 843.71 3 176 571.67 1 829.46 1 DDH-09-68 0.40 8.60 0.53 8.20 706 893.01 3 176 553.10 1 834.13 1 DDH-09-71 1.00 10.00 0.28 9.00 706 888.98 3 176 520.48 1 818.69 1 DDH-09-72 1.00 23.65 0.22 22.65 706 801.58 3 176 554.32 1 816.14 1 DDH-09-73 0.00 12.20 0.39 12.20 706 844.01 3 176 472.28 1 803.75 1 DDH-09-79 0.00 25.00 0.42 25.00 706 941.71 3 176 577.51 1 849.57 1 DDH-09-80 0.00 30.50 0.15 30.50 707 016.11 3 176 459.18 1 824.96 1 DDH-09-81 1.00 36.45 0.22 35.45 707 037.89 3 176 485.38 1 832.80 1 DDH-09-82 1.40 48.00 0.01 46.60 707 240.57 3 176 417.27 1 787.83 1 DDH-09-83 3.55 22.00 0.04 18.45 707 352.17 3 176 372.21 1 810.02 1 DDH-09-84 0.00 24.00 0.08 24.00 707 276.96 3 176 475.28 1 811.71 1 DDH-09-85 0.00 23.30 0.31 23.30 707 000.26 3 176 489.34 1 833.98 1 DDH-09-86 2.00 6.00 0.13 4.00 706 848.42 3 176 472.21 1 805.32 1 DDH-09-87 0.00 31.60 0.44 31.60 706 804.79 3 176 479.95 1 796.91 1 DDH-09-90 0.00 4.00 0.16 4.00 706 912.66 3 176 413.83 1 793.62 1 DDH-09-91 0.00 15.00 0.43 15.00 706 970.50 3 176 416.29 1 804.25 1 DDH-09-92 0.00 4.00 0.05 4.00 707 361.88 3 176 405.81 1 823.21 1 DDH-09-94 2.50 9.10 0.20 6.60 706 890.04 3 176 555.26 1 833.30 1 RC-06-15 0.00 51.82 0.39 51.82 706 578.20 3 176 350.88 1 740.92 1 RC-06-30 0.00 28.96 0.05 28.96 707 330.30 3 176 287.56 1 796.36 1 RC-06-31 0.00 15.24 0.09 15.24 707 339.24 3 176 279.30 1 799.14 1 RC-06-32 0.00 19.81 0.15 19.81 707 340.73 3 176 320.43 1 811.05 1 RC-06-40 0.00 19.81 6.03 19.81 706 851.21 3 176 567.84 1 831.44 1 RC-06-41 0.00 15.24 0.99 15.24 706 857.31 3 176 568.30 1 836.64 1 RC-06-42 0.00 22.86 0.48 22.86 706 841.29 3 176 568.14 1 832.07 1 RC-06-43 0.00 4.57 0.56 4.57 706 875.01 3 176 607.81 1 853.44 1 RC-06-68 0.00 3.05 0.38 3.05 706 803.24 3 176 619.02 1 824.22 1 RC-06-91 0.00 9.14 0.12 9.14 706 957.42 3 176 415.49 1 803.94 1 RC-06-92 0.00 3.05 0.29 3.05 706 862.57 3 176 420.15 1 782.70 1 RC-07-112 0.00 16.76 1.17 16.76 706 871.18 3 176 398.62 1 777.96 1 RC-07-113 0.00 3.05 0.39 3.05 706 859.32 3 176 422.48 1 781.49 1 RC-07-116 0.00 28.96 0.16 28.96 707 019.90 3 176 453.18 1 829.45 1 RC-07-117 0.00 45.72 0.16 45.72 707 009.56 3 176 452.73 1 828.20 1 RC-07-118 0.00 13.72 0.12 13.72 706 952.30 3 176 521.06 1 839.43 1 RC-07-119 0.00 3.05 0.07 3.05 706 952.84 3 176 418.04 1 805.62 1 RC-07-120 0.00 24.38 0.69 24.38 706 819.11 3 176 512.81 1 821.00 1 RC-07-122 0.00 6.10 0.58 6.10 706 873.09 3 176 506.01 1 811.90 1 RC-07-123 0.00 6.10 0.69 6.10 706 891.18 3 176 551.36 1 835.00 1 RC-07-124 0.00 15.24 0.41 15.24 706 911.78 3 176 601.16 1 851.43 1 RC-07-125 0.00 25.91 1.56 25.91 706 953.66 3 176 579.80 1 849.99 1 RC-07-130 0.00 4.57 0.10 4.57 706 776.82 3 176 343.35 1 734.96 1 RC-07-131 0.00 102.11 0.06 102.11 706 554.17 3 176 353.25 1 717.27 1 RC-07-132 0.00 89.92 0.11 89.92 706 518.51 3 176 417.22 1 733.00

Coordonnate of the IntersectionDomainMain Zone Hole ID FROM

(m)TO(m)

Average gradeAu (g/t)

Core Lenght(m)


267

X (m) Y (m) Z (m)1 RC-07-133 0.00 33.53 0.09 33.53 706 454.96 3 176 474.19 1 743.95 1 RC-07-134 0.00 13.72 0.98 13.72 706 880.76 3 176 608.00 1 850.69 1 RC-07-135 0.00 33.53 0.23 33.53 707 030.31 3 176 454.29 1 830.79 1 RC-07-136 0.00 3.05 0.09 3.05 707 048.98 3 176 554.90 1 867.12 1 RC-07-137 0.00 7.62 0.42 7.62 706 945.63 3 176 476.26 1 825.03 1 RC-07-138 0.00 3.05 0.54 3.05 706 906.85 3 176 515.15 1 824.49 1 RC-07-140 0.00 12.19 0.26 12.19 706 903.25 3 176 459.88 1 810.17 1 RC-07-141 0.00 6.10 0.29 6.10 706 948.05 3 176 412.93 1 804.09 1 RC-07-142 0.00 15.24 0.75 15.24 706 829.05 3 176 514.49 1 822.87 1 RC-07-143 0.00 19.81 2.93 19.81 706 785.87 3 176 540.98 1 807.66 1 RC-07-144 0.00 13.72 0.28 13.72 706 898.53 3 176 460.77 1 810.85 1 RC-07-145 13.72 25.91 0.70 12.19 706 818.25 3 176 463.98 1 789.17 1 RC-07-147 0.00 32.00 0.78 32.00 706 986.93 3 176 560.48 1 853.72 1 RC-07-148 0.00 19.81 0.66 19.81 706 869.53 3 176 604.90 1 847.82 1 RC-07-149 0.00 1.52 0.03 1.52 707 116.58 3 176 425.03 1 836.23 1 RC-07-152 0.00 35.05 0.10 35.05 707 327.30 3 176 473.01 1 829.84 1 RC-07-153 0.00 41.15 0.33 41.15 707 333.01 3 176 452.56 1 832.89 1 RC-07-154 0.00 64.01 0.06 64.01 707 283.78 3 176 379.25 1 792.42 1 RC-07-155 4.57 56.39 0.07 51.82 707 303.00 3 176 356.96 1 796.49 1 RC-07-158 1.52 21.34 0.07 19.82 707 352.71 3 176 373.40 1 813.58 1 RC-07-159 4.57 15.24 0.05 10.67 707 352.10 3 176 377.51 1 810.45 1 RC-07-160 0.00 19.81 0.04 19.81 707 357.03 3 176 374.14 1 812.13 1 RC-07-161 1.52 38.10 0.13 36.58 707 337.68 3 176 323.81 1 807.13 1 RC-07-182 0.00 117.35 0.02 117.35 706 609.26 3 176 263.07 1 695.98 1 RC-07-183 0.00 163.07 0.02 163.07 706 655.02 3 176 191.52 1 683.23 1 RC-07-184 0.00 67.06 0.01 67.06 706 675.31 3 176 238.84 1 710.98 1 RC-07-185 0.00 89.92 0.07 89.92 706 473.87 3 176 343.49 1 718.54 1 RC-07-186 1.52 92.96 0.06 91.44 706 504.44 3 176 344.62 1 700.92 1 RC-07-211 0.00 30.48 0.59 30.48 707 028.90 3 176 519.11 1 849.22 1 RC-07-212 0.00 35.05 0.29 35.05 706 973.88 3 176 558.94 1 850.37 1 RC-07-213 0.00 15.24 0.23 15.24 706 949.00 3 176 521.07 1 835.86 1 RC-07-214 0.00 6.10 0.55 6.10 706 803.28 3 176 619.90 1 822.92 1 RC-07-215 0.00 3.05 1.83 3.05 706 806.08 3 176 622.48 1 824.39 1 RC-07-216 0.00 7.62 0.84 7.62 706 795.88 3 176 584.88 1 814.23 1 RC-07-217 0.00 10.67 0.17 10.67 706 932.08 3 176 476.05 1 823.94 1 RC-07-220 0.00 24.38 0.23 24.38 707 043.51 3 176 556.44 1 852.94 1 RC-07-221 0.00 19.81 0.12 19.81 706 853.86 3 176 365.88 1 759.13 1 RC-07-225 0.00 9.14 0.29 9.14 706 952.54 3 176 410.22 1 803.65 1 RC-07-226 0.00 3.05 0.45 3.05 706 956.09 3 176 577.31 1 861.74 1 RC-07-229 0.00 3.05 0.11 3.05 707 346.18 3 176 380.62 1 820.06 1 RC-07-230 1.52 24.38 0.14 22.86 707 359.10 3 176 505.26 1 834.97 1 RC-07-231 1.52 3.05 0.07 1.53 707 352.67 3 176 512.55 1 842.90 1 RC-07-234 0.00 42.67 0.01 42.67 707 241.57 3 176 415.75 1 786.69 1 RC-07-244 0.00 30.48 0.07 30.48 707 198.78 3 176 530.09 1 819.22 1 RC-07-245 0.00 13.72 0.12 13.72 706 959.03 3 176 449.23 1 811.74 1 RC-07-257 1.52 10.67 0.30 9.15 707 103.99 3 176 630.90 1 827.46 1 RC-07-259 1.52 36.58 0.16 35.06 707 122.48 3 176 631.79 1 819.39 1 RC-07-265 0.00 12.19 0.07 12.19 707 271.93 3 176 541.97 1 827.89 1 RC-07-266 0.00 38.10 0.02 38.10 707 184.06 3 176 536.78 1 819.07 1 RC-07-267 1.52 18.29 0.39 16.77 707 043.31 3 176 425.87 1 814.68 1 RC-07-268 1.52 22.86 0.09 21.34 707 273.66 3 176 478.69 1 816.00 1 RC-07-269 3.05 38.10 0.06 35.05 707 227.97 3 176 437.79 1 790.83 1 RC-08-297 0.00 51.82 0.03 51.82 707 183.50 3 176 492.58 1 811.49 1 RC-08-306 0.00 36.58 0.09 36.58 707 128.40 3 176 574.18 1 842.27 1 RC-08-308 0.00 39.62 0.78 39.62 707 029.95 3 176 552.74 1 852.46 1 RC-08-309 0.00 15.24 0.38 15.24 706 909.85 3 176 599.98 1 851.33 1 RC-08-310 1.52 18.29 0.45 16.77 706 820.56 3 176 518.58 1 823.63 1 RC-08-311 0.00 15.24 0.41 15.24 706 917.88 3 176 600.54 1 853.18 1 RC-08-312 0.00 28.96 0.75 28.96 707 026.07 3 176 515.18 1 846.12 1 RC-08-313 0.00 39.62 0.13 39.62 707 002.69 3 176 457.12 1 821.60 1 RC-08-314 0.00 4.57 0.17 4.57 706 950.77 3 176 410.50 1 802.89 1 RC-08-315 0.00 6.10 0.07 6.10 706 956.68 3 176 410.26 1 801.15 1 RC-08-316 0.00 7.62 0.20 7.62 706 960.53 3 176 409.23 1 803.58

DomainMain Zone Hole ID FROM

(m)TO(m)


Core Lenght(m)

Coordonnate of the Intersection


268

X (m) Y (m) Z (m)1 RC-08-317 0.00 13.72 0.43 13.72 706 847.89 3 176 370.21 1 762.52 1 RC-08-318 0.00 21.34 0.03 21.34 706 866.25 3 176 372.36 1 757.69 1 RC-08-323 0.00 9.14 0.10 9.14 706 780.29 3 176 347.76 1 734.26 1 RC-08-324 0.00 4.57 0.21 4.57 706 774.78 3 176 341.80 1 735.46 1 RC-08-342 0.00 47.24 0.03 47.24 706 501.37 3 176 053.96 1 631.95 1 RC-08-343 0.00 60.96 0.01 60.96 706 322.62 3 176 323.36 1 646.14 1 RC-08-401 0.00 89.92 0.05 89.92 706 417.87 3 176 154.22 1 602.82 1 RC-09-424 0.00 92.96 0.11 92.96 706 650.81 3 176 066.84 1 618.33 1 RC-09-425 0.00 53.34 0.08 53.34 706 682.32 3 176 004.93 1 619.91 1 RC-09-427 0.00 71.63 0.09 71.63 706 427.44 3 176 163.20 1 626.33 1 RC-09-431 0.00 30.48 1.09 30.48 707 059.38 3 176 497.23 1 844.07 1 RC-09-432 0.00 6.10 1.02 6.10 706 882.12 3 176 604.78 1 852.67 1 RC-09-439 0.00 16.76 0.08 16.76 706 968.70 3 176 444.95 1 811.24 1 RC-09-449 0.00 4.57 0.14 4.57 707 077.66 3 176 592.09 1 853.50 1 RC-09-450 0.00 13.72 0.46 13.72 706 909.65 3 176 605.69 1 852.82 1 RC-09-458 0.00 10.67 0.06 10.67 707 274.13 3 176 543.50 1 828.56 1 RC-09-459 0.00 15.24 0.12 15.24 707 268.36 3 176 486.42 1 816.76 1 RC-09-460 0.00 21.34 0.13 21.34 707 275.58 3 176 477.06 1 814.63 1 RC-09-462 0.00 22.86 0.76 22.86 706 867.88 3 176 610.55 1 845.49 1 RC-09-463 0.00 12.19 0.35 12.19 706 829.84 3 176 514.22 1 824.25 1 RC-09-485 0.00 51.82 0.04 51.82 707 188.79 3 176 540.15 1 810.96 1 RC-09-486 1.52 18.29 0.10 16.77 707 294.54 3 176 515.05 1 826.05 1 RC-09-487 0.00 39.62 0.04 39.62 707 274.87 3 176 389.44 1 798.82 1 RC-09-497 0.00 12.19 0.65 12.19 706 936.94 3 176 526.99 1 837.40 1 RC-09-498 0.00 16.76 1.45 16.76 706 839.00 3 176 533.31 1 824.00 1 RC-09-499 0.00 9.14 0.27 9.14 706 936.49 3 176 479.50 1 824.04 1 RC-09-500 0.00 16.76 0.80 16.76 706 926.45 3 176 595.51 1 854.37 1 RC-09-501 0.00 25.91 0.39 25.91 706 965.65 3 176 580.88 1 848.55 1 RC-09-504 0.00 12.19 0.10 12.19 707 096.63 3 176 476.50 1 854.60 1 RC-09-505 0.00 33.53 0.13 33.53 707 129.64 3 176 543.76 1 850.60 1 RC-09-507 0.00 25.91 0.21 25.91 706 991.60 3 176 496.89 1 833.57 1 RC-10-571 0.00 54.86 0.14 54.86 706 333.86 3 176 324.38 1 666.64 1 RC-12-686 3.05 45.72 0.14 42.67 706 349.56 3 176 346.61 1 664.04 1 RC-12-687 4.57 99.06 0.16 94.49 706 542.31 3 176 060.98 1 617.35 1 RC-12-688 3.05 51.82 0.03 48.77 706 508.02 3 176 060.27 1 639.11 1 RC-12-689 3.05 70.10 0.14 67.05 706 496.97 3 176 109.09 1 643.62 1 RC-12-690 3.05 70.10 0.02 67.05 706 477.97 3 176 107.28 1 626.07 1 RC-12-691 4.57 80.77 0.13 76.20 706 374.17 3 176 204.89 1 626.98 1 RC-12-696 6.10 38.10 0.28 32.00 707 222.10 3 176 568.22 1 830.40 1 RC-12-697 4.57 71.63 0.15 67.06 707 204.47 3 176 568.38 1 810.76 1 RC-12-698 6.10 115.82 0.17 109.72 707 188.56 3 176 565.20 1 800.68 2 DDH-07-15 37.00 65.00 0.16 28.00 707 338.41 3 176 320.43 1 768.26 2 DDH-07-16 31.00 38.00 0.05 7.00 706 983.54 3 176 562.52 1 829.45 2 DDH-07-17 20.00 50.00 0.50 30.00 706 851.94 3 176 606.60 1 828.35 2 DDH-07-18 45.00 64.00 0.07 19.00 706 985.25 3 176 458.18 1 797.58 2 DDH-07-19 14.00 50.00 0.30 36.00 706 840.29 3 176 517.48 1 801.44 2 DDH-07-20 57.00 77.00 0.21 20.00 707 303.93 3 176 357.64 1 762.48 2 DDH-07-29 11.00 26.00 0.40 15.00 707 120.78 3 176 425.31 1 818.31 2 DDH-07-30 5.75 22.00 0.71 16.25 706 855.24 3 176 422.98 1 768.89 2 DDH-07-35 0.00 33.00 1.42 33.00 706 852.51 3 176 315.69 1 726.35 2 DDH-08-44 33.00 46.00 0.21 13.00 707 256.37 3 176 432.43 1 777.64 2 DDH-08-45 34.00 68.00 0.13 34.00 707 226.45 3 176 530.06 1 794.80 2 DDH-08-46 35.00 53.00 0.81 18.00 707 354.10 3 176 460.67 1 804.60 2 DDH-08-47 42.00 51.00 0.25 9.00 707 018.86 3 176 563.72 1 827.52 2 DDH-08-48 9.00 26.00 0.22 17.00 706 907.66 3 176 553.85 1 824.41 2 DDH-08-49 12.00 52.00 0.13 40.00 706 874.83 3 176 549.98 1 811.89 2 DDH-08-50 4.00 33.00 0.14 29.00 706 954.05 3 176 410.59 1 788.51 2 DDH-08-51 10.00 37.00 0.10 27.00 706 917.49 3 176 460.82 1 799.06 2 DDH-08-52 20.00 52.00 0.21 32.00 706 813.60 3 176 526.47 1 795.92 2 DDH-08-53 6.00 16.00 0.02 10.00 706 741.82 3 176 452.67 1 793.54 2 DDH-08-54 32.00 44.00 2.56 12.00 706 824.44 3 176 463.97 1 775.52 2 DDH-09-66 12.00 48.75 0.23 36.75 706 870.68 3 176 588.06 1 818.25 2 DDH-09-67 21.50 55.00 0.42 33.50 706 833.85 3 176 582.64 1 811.01

FROM(m)

TO(m)


Core Lenght(m)

DomainMain Zone Hole ID



269

X (m) Y (m) Z (m)2 DDH-09-68 8.60 34.80 0.32 26.20 706 889.18 3 176 557.30 1 817.90 2 DDH-09-69 10.00 17.00 0.79 7.00 706 962.31 3 176 622.44 1 834.33 2 DDH-09-70 6.00 13.00 0.72 7.00 706 972.41 3 176 611.69 1 837.78 2 DDH-09-71 10.00 32.00 0.40 22.00 706 884.03 3 176 526.21 1 805.45 2 DDH-09-72 23.65 55.00 0.39 31.35 706 792.04 3 176 564.60 1 793.07 2 DDH-09-73 12.20 47.00 0.44 34.80 706 835.95 3 176 480.75 1 783.37 2 DDH-09-79 25.00 40.00 0.54 15.00 706 934.80 3 176 584.66 1 832.22 2 DDH-09-80 30.50 34.00 0.11 3.50 707 011.09 3 176 464.36 1 809.57 2 DDH-09-81 36.45 46.00 0.04 9.55 707 032.75 3 176 491.04 1 811.64 2 DDH-09-82 48.00 71.00 0.77 23.00 707 256.26 3 176 401.43 1 761.11 2 DDH-09-83 22.00 62.00 0.18 40.00 707 362.53 3 176 361.49 1 784.89 2 DDH-09-84 24.00 33.00 0.44 9.00 707 280.56 3 176 470.89 1 796.21 2 DDH-09-85 23.30 46.50 0.26 23.20 706 992.39 3 176 498.40 1 814.06 2 DDH-09-86 9.00 43.00 0.46 34.00 706 845.63 3 176 475.21 1 783.71 2 DDH-09-87 31.60 44.00 0.26 12.40 706 799.04 3 176 485.56 1 776.43 2 DDH-09-88 2.00 39.00 0.23 37.00 706 770.79 3 176 588.85 1 789.93 2 DDH-09-89 2.00 29.00 0.16 27.00 706 738.79 3 176 442.40 1 788.41 2 DDH-09-90 4.00 40.60 0.10 36.60 706 903.16 3 176 423.17 1 778.30 2 DDH-09-91 15.00 36.30 0.09 21.30 706 965.69 3 176 420.61 1 787.29 2 DDH-09-92 4.00 44.00 0.27 40.00 707 356.75 3 176 410.68 1 811.13 2 DDH-09-94 9.10 45.00 0.30 35.90 706 883.41 3 176 561.82 1 822.30 2 RC-06-24 1.52 22.86 0.31 21.34 707 197.69 3 175 541.93 1 691.16 2 RC-06-30 28.96 85.34 0.25 56.38 707 307.83 3 176 308.50 1 765.65 2 RC-06-31 16.76 44.20 0.28 27.44 707 338.94 3 176 279.10 1 776.28 2 RC-06-32 19.81 73.15 0.39 53.34 707 361.86 3 176 300.72 1 776.61 2 RC-06-33 0.00 59.44 0.60 59.44 707 351.48 3 176 267.50 1 784.91 2 RC-06-40 19.81 42.67 0.86 22.86 706 851.21 3 176 567.84 1 810.48 2 RC-06-41 15.24 48.77 0.29 33.53 706 874.40 3 176 569.19 1 817.70 2 RC-06-42 22.86 64.01 0.26 41.15 706 823.17 3 176 568.13 1 805.72 2 RC-06-43 4.57 33.53 0.73 28.96 706 875.01 3 176 607.81 1 833.24 2 RC-06-63 0.00 10.67 0.74 10.67 706 872.58 3 176 310.72 1 733.47 2 RC-06-67 0.00 18.29 0.11 18.29 706 737.83 3 176 452.18 1 795.58 2 RC-06-68 4.57 24.38 0.20 19.81 706 803.36 3 176 618.92 1 812.41 2 RC-06-75 0.00 3.05 0.07 3.05 707 224.61 3 175 534.88 1 688.55 2 RC-06-79 0.00 33.53 0.20 33.53 707 179.18 3 175 518.32 1 684.13 2 RC-06-83 0.00 12.19 0.02 12.19 707 222.53 3 175 533.94 1 683.35 2 RC-06-84 0.00 33.53 0.29 33.53 707 167.53 3 175 464.23 1 671.50 2 RC-06-85 0.00 42.67 0.29 42.67 707 161.02 3 175 464.29 1 658.65 2 RC-06-86 0.00 57.91 0.30 57.91 707 165.56 3 175 455.93 1 667.52 2 RC-06-87 1.52 16.76 0.93 15.24 707 135.65 3 175 597.04 1 702.11 2 RC-06-91 9.14 41.15 0.22 32.01 706 967.41 3 176 416.01 1 790.49 2 RC-06-92 4.57 19.81 1.23 15.24 706 869.63 3 176 420.47 1 774.71 2 RC-06-93 0.00 32.00 0.09 32.00 707 139.83 3 176 323.76 1 778.76 2 RC-07-110 6.10 7.62 0.22 1.52 707 094.20 3 175 637.21 1 715.96 2 RC-07-112 16.76 48.77 0.67 32.01 706 871.18 3 176 398.62 1 753.58 2 RC-07-113 4.57 16.76 0.62 12.19 706 859.32 3 176 422.48 1 772.35 2 RC-07-116 28.96 35.05 0.02 6.09 707 020.21 3 176 452.65 1 806.60 2 RC-07-117 45.72 67.06 0.05 21.34 706 981.91 3 176 451.77 1 795.21 2 RC-07-118 13.72 42.67 0.22 28.95 706 968.08 3 176 520.01 1 820.38 2 RC-07-119 4.57 41.15 0.18 36.58 706 952.84 3 176 418.04 1 784.28 2 RC-07-120 24.38 57.91 0.26 33.53 706 819.11 3 176 512.81 1 785.57 2 RC-07-122 6.10 21.34 0.10 15.24 706 873.09 3 176 506.01 1 802.76 2 RC-07-123 6.10 27.43 0.39 21.33 706 891.34 3 176 551.12 1 823.19 2 RC-07-124 15.24 33.53 0.57 18.29 706 911.78 3 176 601.16 1 834.67 2 RC-07-125 25.91 28.96 0.21 3.05 706 953.66 3 176 579.80 1 835.51 2 RC-07-129 0.00 3.05 4.49 3.05 706 876.17 3 176 310.76 1 737.19 2 RC-07-130 4.57 9.14 0.41 4.57 706 776.88 3 176 343.30 1 730.39 2 RC-07-131 102.11 105.16 0.02 3.05 706 553.12 3 176 352.64 1 658.23 2 RC-07-132 89.92 92.96 0.07 3.04 706 517.72 3 176 417.03 1 686.53 2 RC-07-133 33.53 47.24 0.38 13.71 706 455.41 3 176 473.99 1 716.15 2 RC-07-134 13.72 32.00 0.49 18.28 706 891.53 3 176 608.37 1 837.85 2 RC-07-135 33.53 48.77 0.41 15.24 707 048.10 3 176 454.07 1 808.92 2 RC-07-137 7.62 42.67 0.16 35.05 706 959.34 3 176 476.02 1 808.69


(m)TO(m)


Core Lenght(m)



270



(m)TO(m)


Core Lenght(m)



271

X (m) Y (m) Z (m)2 RC-08-311 15.24 33.53 0.73 18.29 706 928.65 3 176 600.54 1 840.34 2 RC-08-312 28.96 53.34 0.13 24.38 707 012.43 3 176 516.25 1 823.23 2 RC-08-313 42.67 59.44 0.08 16.77 706 987.04 3 176 461.87 1 794.98 2 RC-08-314 4.57 45.72 0.13 41.15 706 942.95 3 176 410.50 1 781.41 2 RC-08-315 6.10 10.67 1.89 4.57 706 958.40 3 176 410.30 1 796.10 2 RC-08-316 7.62 39.62 0.18 32.00 706 965.27 3 176 408.49 1 790.73 2 RC-08-318 21.34 50.29 0.42 28.95 706 882.05 3 176 374.23 1 740.24 2 RC-08-319 1.52 13.72 0.62 12.20 706 747.60 3 176 520.95 1 789.58 2 RC-08-323 9.14 16.76 0.81 7.62 706 785.80 3 176 347.40 1 727.95 2 RC-08-324 4.57 24.38 0.38 19.81 706 775.84 3 176 333.81 1 722.53 2 RC-08-325 0.00 4.57 0.38 4.57 707 126.00 3 175 414.68 1 651.07 2 RC-08-326 0.00 39.62 0.25 39.62 707 134.37 3 175 472.09 1 655.48 2 RC-08-327 0.00 42.67 0.26 42.67 707 081.41 3 175 488.29 1 657.44 2 RC-08-328 0.00 51.82 0.15 51.82 707 149.03 3 175 449.62 1 657.80 2 RC-08-329 0.00 41.15 0.35 41.15 707 073.62 3 175 487.26 1 657.70 2 RC-08-330 18.29 25.91 0.22 7.62 707 064.23 3 175 560.39 1 668.04 2 RC-08-331 1.52 51.82 0.16 50.30 707 076.10 3 175 523.41 1 668.87 2 RC-08-342 47.24 134.11 0.07 86.87 706 488.47 3 176 041.06 1 581.82 2 RC-08-343 60.96 76.20 0.15 15.24 706 322.62 3 176 323.36 1 610.32 2 RC-08-401 89.92 103.63 0.52 13.71 706 418.77 3 176 154.30 1 554.82 2 RC-09-421 7.62 15.24 0.13 7.62 706 321.85 3 176 527.59 1 676.36 2 RC-09-424 92.96 121.92 0.20 28.96 706 652.05 3 176 067.50 1 540.24 2 RC-09-427 71.63 102.11 0.73 30.48 706 427.44 3 176 163.20 1 574.89 2 RC-09-431 30.48 38.10 2.19 7.62 707 054.68 3 176 503.15 1 825.75 2 RC-09-432 6.10 28.96 0.85 22.86 706 885.60 3 176 600.83 1 836.35 2 RC-09-439 16.76 38.10 0.07 21.34 706 974.58 3 176 438.75 1 790.45 2 RC-09-449 4.57 9.14 0.05 4.57 707 076.62 3 176 593.10 1 849.17 2 RC-09-450 13.72 30.48 0.51 16.76 706 909.75 3 176 612.78 1 839.33 2 RC-09-458 10.67 28.96 0.24 18.29 707 274.13 3 176 543.50 1 817.51 2 RC-09-459 15.24 45.72 0.29 30.48 707 259.19 3 176 496.38 1 798.34 2 RC-09-460 21.34 32.00 1.28 10.66 707 275.58 3 176 477.06 1 795.96 2 RC-09-462 22.86 42.67 0.56 19.81 706 861.24 3 176 617.04 1 828.86 2 RC-09-463 12.19 59.44 0.43 47.25 706 839.42 3 176 505.16 1 797.62 2 RC-09-485 51.82 83.82 0.16 32.00 707 176.81 3 176 552.56 1 772.79 2 RC-09-486 18.29 36.58 0.20 18.29 707 300.37 3 176 509.20 1 810.59 2 RC-09-487 39.62 57.91 0.73 18.29 707 283.71 3 176 382.65 1 766.80 2 RC-09-497 12.19 30.48 0.18 18.29 706 933.25 3 176 530.68 1 823.08 2 RC-09-498 16.76 50.29 0.31 33.53 706 831.24 3 176 542.59 1 801.96 2 RC-09-499 10.67 32.00 0.12 21.33 706 930.64 3 176 485.56 1 809.54 2 RC-09-500 16.76 36.58 0.64 19.82 706 920.79 3 176 601.62 1 840.70 2 RC-09-501 25.91 39.62 0.21 13.71 706 974.22 3 176 580.88 1 833.27 2 RC-09-502 0.00 25.91 0.14 25.91 706 882.48 3 176 499.64 1 803.97 2 RC-09-503 0.00 19.81 0.04 19.81 706 741.22 3 176 450.54 1 793.50 2 RC-09-505 33.53 77.72 0.40 44.19 707 107.44 3 176 564.85 1 805.55 2 RC-09-507 25.91 48.77 0.20 22.86 707 003.18 3 176 486.57 1 814.76 2 RC-10-570 7.62 9.14 0.02 1.52 706 479.06 3 176 533.32 1 717.57 2 RC-10-571 54.86 76.20 0.50 21.34 706 366.47 3 176 325.24 1 628.87 2 RC-12-686 45.72 64.01 1.07 18.29 706 366.15 3 176 347.42 1 638.50 2 RC-12-687 99.06 146.30 0.51 47.24 706 585.60 3 176 061.46 1 561.30 2 RC-12-688 50.29 123.44 0.20 73.15 706 508.70 3 176 058.20 1 575.53 2 RC-12-689 70.10 129.54 0.20 59.44 706 544.08 3 176 113.35 1 586.39 2 RC-12-690 70.10 114.30 0.19 44.20 706 476.84 3 176 106.79 1 570.47 2 RC-12-691 80.77 105.16 0.04 24.39 706 409.37 3 176 203.01 1 582.02 2 RC-12-696 38.10 60.96 0.18 22.86 707 238.54 3 176 567.43 1 810.40 2 RC-12-697 71.63 105.16 0.05 33.53 707 204.69 3 176 568.52 1 760.47 2 RC-12-698 115.82 137.16 0.02 21.34 707 214.57 3 176 563.17 1 766.62 3 DDH-07-15 65.00 71.00 1.24 6.00 707 340.16 3 176 318.43 1 751.46 3 DDH-07-16 38.00 97.00 0.76 59.00 706 982.86 3 176 562.47 1 797.20 3 DDH-07-17 50.00 80.15 3.18 30.15 706 835.69 3 176 606.80 1 808.33 3 DDH-07-18 64.00 101.00 1.20 37.00 706 967.09 3 176 460.21 1 776.37 3 DDH-07-19 50.00 89.00 1.49 39.00 706 858.03 3 176 519.70 1 768.47 3 DDH-07-30 22.00 25.00 1.55 3.00 706 855.14 3 176 422.94 1 759.26 3 DDH-07-35 33.00 43.00 0.87 10.00 706 839.13 3 176 316.14 1 709.53


(m)TO(m)


Core Lenght(m)



272

X (m) Y (m) Z (m)3 DDH-08-44 46.00 51.00 0.39 5.00 707 262.32 3 176 432.95 1 770.91 3 DDH-08-48 28.00 43.00 0.57 15.00 706 918.44 3 176 554.50 1 811.29 3 DDH-08-49 52.00 95.00 0.87 43.00 706 849.03 3 176 550.43 1 779.07 3 DDH-08-50 33.00 83.00 6.26 50.00 706 953.57 3 176 410.35 1 749.02 3 DDH-08-51 37.00 57.00 1.03 20.00 706 934.61 3 176 461.64 1 779.50 3 DDH-08-52 52.00 62.00 1.41 10.00 706 828.49 3 176 526.69 1 778.07 3 DDH-08-53 16.00 45.00 0.94 29.00 706 753.94 3 176 452.87 1 779.91 3 DDH-09-66 48.75 78.00 0.50 29.25 706 857.65 3 176 600.55 1 796.63 3 DDH-09-67 55.00 68.50 0.73 13.50 706 823.99 3 176 593.44 1 792.61 3 DDH-09-68 34.80 54.00 1.62 19.20 706 884.17 3 176 562.82 1 796.46 3 DDH-09-69 17.00 30.90 0.98 13.90 706 958.84 3 176 626.36 1 825.57 3 DDH-09-70 13.00 69.00 0.43 56.00 706 982.36 3 176 601.10 1 812.63 3 DDH-09-71 32.00 76.00 1.90 44.00 706 873.60 3 176 538.32 1 777.16 3 DDH-09-72 55.00 60.00 2.00 5.00 706 785.61 3 176 571.47 1 777.52 3 DDH-09-73 47.00 52.75 0.24 5.75 706 829.01 3 176 488.05 1 765.78 3 DDH-09-75 4.00 31.00 0.42 27.00 706 893.47 3 176 652.04 1 808.87 3 DDH-09-76 4.00 46.00 0.65 42.00 706 866.20 3 176 653.01 1 800.26 3 DDH-09-77 1.50 18.00 0.91 16.50 706 824.44 3 176 657.39 1 801.57 3 DDH-09-78 2.00 31.00 0.71 29.00 706 812.73 3 176 658.43 1 794.81 3 DDH-09-79 40.00 54.60 0.61 14.60 706 929.65 3 176 589.86 1 819.36 3 DDH-09-80 34.00 62.00 0.34 28.00 707 006.91 3 176 468.69 1 796.65 3 DDH-09-81 46.00 81.00 0.21 35.00 707 026.92 3 176 497.54 1 787.78 3 DDH-09-84 33.00 36.95 0.06 3.95 707 282.03 3 176 469.19 1 790.14 3 DDH-09-85 46.50 61.00 0.03 14.50 706 986.37 3 176 505.47 1 798.68 3 DDH-09-87 44.00 51.00 1.06 7.00 706 796.52 3 176 488.07 1 767.40 3 DDH-09-88 39.00 45.00 0.25 6.00 706 763.76 3 176 597.12 1 771.37 3 DDH-09-89 29.00 33.00 0.86 4.00 706 744.32 3 176 436.06 1 775.40 3 DDH-09-90 40.60 54.00 0.44 13.40 706 891.47 3 176 434.69 1 759.44 3 DDH-09-91 36.30 59.00 0.92 22.70 706 959.95 3 176 425.83 1 766.71 3 DDH-09-94 45.00 53.00 0.94 8.00 706 870.43 3 176 574.65 1 800.76 3 RC-06-31 51.82 77.72 1.32 25.90 707 338.41 3 176 278.78 1 742.00 3 RC-06-32 73.15 102.11 0.29 28.96 707 377.80 3 176 285.85 1 750.64 3 RC-06-33 59.44 73.15 0.59 13.71 707 367.08 3 176 252.94 1 747.96 3 RC-06-35 56.39 67.06 2.95 10.67 707 304.26 3 176 269.38 1 745.85 3 RC-06-40 44.20 88.39 0.91 44.19 706 851.21 3 176 567.84 1 772.00 3 RC-06-41 48.77 68.58 0.76 19.81 706 893.84 3 176 570.12 1 795.75 3 RC-06-42 64.01 74.68 0.68 10.67 706 809.17 3 176 568.04 1 783.92 3 RC-06-43 33.53 47.24 0.35 13.71 706 875.01 3 176 607.81 1 815.34 3 RC-06-63 10.67 21.34 0.47 10.67 706 872.48 3 176 310.83 1 722.80 3 RC-06-66 0.00 7.62 0.14 7.62 706 820.43 3 176 397.83 1 772.18 3 RC-06-67 18.29 35.05 0.78 16.76 706 737.83 3 176 452.18 1 773.49 3 RC-06-68 25.91 33.53 2.16 7.62 706 803.65 3 176 618.77 1 796.41 3 RC-06-91 41.15 65.53 0.78 24.38 706 986.10 3 176 416.87 1 764.53 3 RC-06-92 19.81 25.91 0.22 6.10 706 876.63 3 176 420.71 1 766.66 3 RC-07-113 16.76 21.34 1.11 4.58 706 859.32 3 176 422.48 1 763.96 3 RC-07-114 0.00 10.67 0.28 10.67 706 822.63 3 176 392.50 1 769.96 3 RC-07-116 35.05 41.15 0.14 6.10 707 020.34 3 176 452.56 1 800.50 3 RC-07-117 67.06 97.54 0.77 30.48 706 965.26 3 176 451.18 1 775.37 3 RC-07-118 42.67 64.01 0.95 21.34 706 982.76 3 176 518.98 1 802.39 3 RC-07-119 42.67 64.01 5.99 21.34 706 952.84 3 176 418.04 1 753.80 3 RC-07-120 57.91 67.06 1.12 9.15 706 819.11 3 176 512.81 1 766.90 3 RC-07-121 0.00 19.81 0.43 19.81 706 763.00 3 176 471.00 1 798.38 3 RC-07-122 21.34 38.10 3.33 16.76 706 873.09 3 176 506.01 1 785.61 3 RC-07-123 27.43 42.67 2.10 15.24 706 891.78 3 176 550.56 1 803.02 3 RC-07-124 33.53 51.82 0.77 18.29 706 911.78 3 176 601.16 1 815.24 3 RC-07-125 28.96 57.91 1.22 28.95 706 953.66 3 176 579.80 1 819.51 3 RC-07-130 9.14 18.29 1.87 9.15 706 776.95 3 176 343.18 1 723.53 3 RC-07-133 47.24 50.29 0.45 3.05 706 455.58 3 176 473.90 1 705.48 3 RC-07-134 32.00 56.39 0.65 24.39 706 902.54 3 176 608.76 1 824.71 3 RC-07-135 50.29 51.82 0.12 1.53 707 056.01 3 176 453.95 1 799.15 3 RC-07-137 42.67 60.96 0.06 18.29 706 976.48 3 176 475.72 1 788.26 3 RC-07-138 24.38 28.96 0.89 4.58 706 923.64 3 176 516.30 1 805.81 3 RC-07-139 25.91 30.48 0.48 4.57 706 894.29 3 176 504.99 1 793.71


(m)TO(m)


Core Lenght(m)



273



(m)TO(m)


Core Lenght(m)



274

X (m) Y (m) Z (m)3 RC-09-500 36.58 53.34 0.79 16.76 706 913.54 3 176 609.39 1 823.09 3 RC-09-501 41.15 45.72 0.25 4.57 706 978.50 3 176 580.95 1 825.18 3 RC-09-502 25.91 32.00 0.41 6.09 706 886.53 3 176 495.59 1 788.22 3 RC-09-503 19.81 41.15 2.07 21.34 706 748.50 3 176 443.26 1 775.68 3 RC-09-507 48.77 57.91 1.66 9.14 707 010.78 3 176 479.80 1 802.41 3 RC-10-571 76.20 100.58 1.04 24.38 706 380.82 3 176 325.86 1 611.58 3 RC-12-686 64.01 88.39 0.39 24.38 706 378.64 3 176 348.43 1 621.24 3 RC-12-688 123.44 128.02 0.45 4.58 706 509.22 3 176 056.67 1 532.13 3 RC-12-690 114.30 118.87 0.49 4.57 706 476.26 3 176 106.32 1 546.09 3 RC-12-691 105.16 115.82 0.05 10.66 706 420.14 3 176 202.24 1 568.21 3 RC-12-696 60.96 83.82 0.39 22.86 707 252.82 3 176 566.64 1 792.56 5 DDH-07-12 6.00 155.00 0.26 149.00 707 225.10 3 176 174.08 1 686.06 5 DDH-07-13 9.00 84.65 0.93 75.65 707 269.15 3 176 223.27 1 742.38 5 DDH-07-14 3.00 53.30 0.50 50.30 707 076.34 3 176 200.30 1 721.92 5 DDH-07-21 12.00 67.00 0.50 55.00 707 082.68 3 176 279.60 1 733.93 5 DDH-07-22 6.00 65.00 0.13 59.00 707 216.42 3 175 955.15 1 722.01 5 DDH-07-23 1.65 28.00 0.55 26.35 707 331.36 3 176 004.21 1 719.23 5 DDH-07-26 0.00 70.00 0.60 70.00 706 927.77 3 175 869.83 1 675.73 5 DDH-07-29 82.00 99.20 0.06 17.20 707 120.65 3 176 425.63 1 746.21 5 DDH-08-41 8.00 70.00 0.46 62.00 707 032.39 3 176 037.87 1 667.12 5 DDH-08-42 6.00 84.43 0.53 78.43 707 245.93 3 176 153.30 1 743.78 5 DDH-08-43 17.00 90.53 0.55 73.53 707 305.52 3 176 226.16 1 757.43 5 RC-05-14 0.00 249.94 0.18 249.94 707 174.51 3 176 186.07 1 673.99 5 RC-06-16 1.52 35.05 0.36 33.53 707 251.24 3 175 982.81 1 728.22 5 RC-06-17 0.00 167.64 0.87 167.64 707 160.99 3 176 151.09 1 719.32 5 RC-06-19 0.00 41.15 0.35 41.15 706 993.59 3 175 875.91 1 679.68 5 RC-06-20 0.00 141.73 0.26 141.73 706 933.73 3 175 873.40 1 649.88 5 RC-06-21 0.00 35.05 0.26 35.05 706 974.13 3 175 874.26 1 676.75 5 RC-06-29 0.00 97.54 0.38 97.54 707 246.39 3 176 214.02 1 759.10 5 RC-06-34 0.00 68.58 0.55 68.58 707 305.97 3 176 224.22 1 756.23 5 RC-06-35 0.00 54.86 4.18 54.86 707 305.23 3 176 241.38 1 773.88 5 RC-06-36 0.00 89.92 0.77 89.92 707 279.49 3 176 246.36 1 757.52 5 RC-06-37 1.52 135.64 0.24 134.12 707 201.52 3 176 192.77 1 743.16 5 RC-06-44 0.00 156.97 0.20 156.97 707 215.17 3 176 182.44 1 700.35 5 RC-06-45 0.00 103.63 0.47 103.63 707 244.39 3 176 152.92 1 735.58 5 RC-06-46 0.00 62.48 0.67 62.48 707 270.80 3 176 188.17 1 758.54 5 RC-06-47 33.53 88.39 4.35 54.86 707 266.09 3 176 199.55 1 728.40 5 RC-06-48 0.00 160.02 0.35 160.02 707 162.77 3 176 238.84 1 690.04 5 RC-06-51 0.00 10.67 0.27 10.67 707 374.52 3 175 962.61 1 708.49 5 RC-06-63 38.10 50.29 0.09 12.19 706 872.26 3 176 311.09 1 694.61 5 RC-06-64 0.00 141.73 0.62 141.73 707 147.56 3 176 192.45 1 674.14 5 RC-06-65 1.52 147.83 0.31 146.31 707 103.50 3 176 170.45 1 689.09 5 RC-06-69 0.00 64.01 0.17 64.01 707 217.48 3 175 955.79 1 725.08 5 RC-06-70 1.52 71.63 0.11 70.11 707 184.29 3 175 893.15 1 747.89 5 RC-06-74 0.00 89.92 0.23 89.92 706 898.60 3 175 873.92 1 664.92 5 RC-06-78 0.00 118.87 0.52 118.87 707 116.65 3 176 221.11 1 697.05 5 RC-06-89 0.00 83.82 1.28 83.82 707 270.79 3 176 222.26 1 761.71 5 RC-06-90 0.00 91.44 0.41 91.44 707 043.02 3 176 236.48 1 709.23 5 RC-06-94 0.00 28.96 0.51 28.96 707 332.75 3 176 002.05 1 715.04 5 RC-07-106 1.52 170.69 0.28 169.17 707 084.01 3 176 193.78 1 668.29 5 RC-07-107 1.52 135.64 0.30 134.12 707 166.52 3 176 178.73 1 699.60 5 RC-07-108 1.52 44.20 0.27 42.68 707 240.75 3 176 247.39 1 777.73 5 RC-07-111 4.57 89.92 0.26 85.35 707 246.57 3 176 245.24 1 758.24 5 RC-07-126 0.00 48.77 0.44 48.77 707 213.81 3 176 100.50 1 748.79 5 RC-07-127 0.00 114.30 0.28 114.30 707 142.96 3 176 135.96 1 683.79 5 RC-07-128 0.00 10.67 0.20 10.67 707 281.00 3 175 935.00 1 713.46 5 RC-07-129 4.57 89.92 0.24 85.35 706 905.29 3 176 311.78 1 702.46 5 RC-07-151 0.00 77.72 0.39 77.72 707 061.00 3 176 281.19 1 743.01 5 RC-07-156 36.58 68.58 0.18 32.00 707 281.75 3 176 269.30 1 784.85 5 RC-07-157 27.43 83.82 0.12 56.39 707 255.97 3 176 293.67 1 771.37 5 RC-07-162 0.00 141.73 0.33 141.73 707 251.13 3 176 152.58 1 722.45 5 RC-07-168 0.00 144.78 0.41 144.78 707 087.34 3 176 121.14 1 658.33 5 RC-07-170 0.00 80.77 0.30 80.77 707 049.56 3 176 023.75 1 637.70


(m)TO(m)


Core Lenght(m)


275

X (m) Y (m) Z (m)5 RC-07-171 1.52 65.53 0.19 64.01 706 929.40 3 176 325.87 1 717.10 5 RC-07-172 1.52 60.96 0.22 59.44 706 944.08 3 176 326.55 1 705.74 5 RC-07-173 0.00 33.53 0.41 33.53 706 957.02 3 176 327.34 1 722.74 5 RC-07-174 0.00 10.67 0.11 10.67 706 997.10 3 176 318.13 1 732.30 5 RC-07-175 0.00 70.10 0.45 70.10 707 007.84 3 176 283.32 1 703.03 5 RC-07-176 0.00 12.19 0.12 12.19 706 994.05 3 176 321.21 1 732.01 5 RC-07-209 0.00 169.16 0.29 169.16 707 062.80 3 176 152.10 1 655.74 5 RC-07-233 21.34 85.34 0.20 64.00 707 220.52 3 176 343.80 1 752.02 5 RC-07-235 0.00 65.53 0.15 65.53 707 287.89 3 176 231.46 1 745.01 5 RC-07-236 0.00 28.96 0.27 28.96 706 983.52 3 176 086.05 1 679.68 5 RC-07-237 1.52 59.44 0.47 57.92 707 015.14 3 176 196.98 1 701.78 5 RC-07-239 0.00 65.53 0.18 65.53 707 087.84 3 176 283.50 1 735.51 5 RC-07-240 0.00 25.91 0.19 25.91 707 317.21 3 176 051.52 1 725.61 5 RC-07-241 1.52 12.19 0.36 10.67 707 334.06 3 176 128.39 1 736.72 5 RC-07-242 0.00 22.86 0.24 22.86 707 244.36 3 176 059.99 1 741.74 5 RC-07-243 0.00 108.20 0.29 108.20 707 165.80 3 176 110.78 1 690.44 5 RC-07-246 0.00 25.91 0.16 25.91 706 839.67 3 176 012.26 1 629.48 5 RC-07-271 28.96 71.63 0.38 42.67 707 195.24 3 176 384.72 1 754.71 5 RC-08-298 48.77 79.25 0.02 30.48 707 179.43 3 176 416.77 1 756.44 5 RC-08-299 48.77 65.53 0.17 16.76 707 152.27 3 176 319.49 1 734.30 5 RC-08-300 12.19 82.30 0.15 70.11 707 192.60 3 176 304.89 1 755.17 5 RC-08-302 0.00 59.44 0.34 59.44 707 070.37 3 175 997.90 1 674.51 5 RC-08-303 1.52 59.44 0.26 57.92 707 031.40 3 175 975.68 1 685.31 5 RC-08-333 0.00 42.67 0.24 42.67 707 107.43 3 175 781.04 1 697.05 5 RC-08-334 0.00 39.62 0.27 39.62 707 059.13 3 175 949.08 1 690.61 5 RC-08-335 1.52 42.67 0.20 41.15 707 047.91 3 175 959.85 1 681.77 5 RC-08-336 9.14 54.86 1.36 45.72 707 035.05 3 176 036.15 1 674.81 5 RC-08-337 1.52 76.20 0.31 74.68 706 975.08 3 176 303.93 1 704.47 5 RC-08-338 4.57 21.34 0.17 16.77 706 946.22 3 176 244.50 1 692.72 5 RC-08-339 0.00 19.81 0.53 19.81 706 960.76 3 176 207.89 1 690.41 5 RC-08-340 1.52 50.29 0.18 48.77 707 001.41 3 176 155.29 1 685.11 5 RC-08-396 1.52 96.01 0.32 94.49 707 002.40 3 176 064.49 1 662.58 5 RC-08-397 6.10 48.77 0.36 42.67 706 996.67 3 176 039.95 1 663.60 5 RC-08-398 1.52 77.72 0.36 76.20 707 069.95 3 176 057.31 1 690.05 5 RC-08-399 0.00 74.68 0.16 74.68 707 001.43 3 175 932.32 1 674.09 5 RC-08-400 0.00 59.44 0.32 59.44 707 136.38 3 176 111.57 1 708.67 5 RC-09-451 0.00 77.72 0.13 77.72 706 842.24 3 175 865.96 1 633.80 5 RC-09-452 0.00 53.34 0.18 53.34 706 810.17 3 175 895.31 1 630.46 5 RC-09-453 0.00 56.39 0.16 56.39 706 966.88 3 175 790.08 1 637.35 5 RC-09-454 1.52 33.53 0.20 32.01 706 868.01 3 175 806.48 1 640.55 5 RC-09-457 0.00 39.62 0.29 39.62 706 771.18 3 175 973.66 1 597.21 5 RC-09-461 22.86 92.96 0.18 70.10 707 246.36 3 176 315.78 1 762.68 5 RC-09-488 28.96 62.48 0.32 33.52 707 255.43 3 176 345.81 1 773.36 5 RC-09-489 41.15 50.29 0.05 9.14 707 212.04 3 176 370.16 1 763.61 5 RC-09-490 35.05 56.39 0.24 21.34 707 206.02 3 176 337.29 1 755.36 5 RC-09-492 1.52 59.44 0.45 57.92 707 214.44 3 176 228.42 1 745.73 5 RC-09-493 1.52 70.10 0.67 68.58 707 285.94 3 176 152.24 1 741.11 5 RC-09-494 0.00 71.63 0.33 71.63 707 180.97 3 176 055.79 1 730.01 5 RC-09-495 0.00 51.82 0.66 51.82 707 296.77 3 176 144.63 1 730.78 5 RC-09-508 0.00 64.01 1.93 64.01 707 106.19 3 176 041.51 1 682.60 5 RC-09-509 0.00 12.19 0.28 12.19 706 911.63 3 175 999.92 1 648.76 5 RC-09-510 0.00 54.86 0.26 54.86 706 964.51 3 176 141.54 1 684.87 5 RC-09-511 0.00 48.77 0.30 48.77 706 939.15 3 175 858.26 1 674.44 5 RC-12-692 4.57 42.67 0.39 38.10 706 974.93 3 176 195.22 1 684.11 5 RC-12-693 4.57 185.93 0.41 181.36 707 048.85 3 176 093.64 1 644.09 5 RC-12-694 3.05 131.06 0.53 128.01 707 082.86 3 176 041.98 1 619.54 5 RC-12-695 4.57 74.68 0.30 70.11 707 094.53 3 176 239.84 1 719.87 6 DDH-07-12 75.00 135.00 3.15 60.00 707 224.79 3 176 175.24 1 673.90 6 DDH-07-27 0.00 40.00 1.31 40.00 707 040.50 3 175 642.67 1 678.43 6 DDH-07-28 1.20 35.00 0.32 33.80 707 228.31 3 175 524.35 1 674.90 6 DDH-08-55 5.00 102.80 1.02 97.80 707 331.60 3 175 554.92 1 621.24 6 DDH-09-93 0.40 60.75 1.27 60.35 707 331.77 3 175 561.78 1 628.07 6 RC-05-14 102.11 187.45 2.59 85.34 707 164.13 3 176 185.71 1 661.62


(m)TO(m)


Core Lenght(m)



276

X (m) Y (m) Z (m)6 RC-06-25 0.00 47.24 3.04 47.24 707 042.77 3 175 658.97 1 687.82 6 RC-06-26 3.05 39.62 0.25 36.57 707 076.93 3 175 647.04 1 710.22 6 RC-06-44 70.10 144.78 2.52 74.68 707 212.17 3 176 185.35 1 675.94 6 RC-06-49 0.00 12.19 0.52 12.19 707 360.76 3 175 669.28 1 652.89 6 RC-06-50 3.05 38.10 1.66 35.05 707 354.20 3 175 651.90 1 642.12 6 RC-06-52 0.00 38.10 2.34 38.10 707 232.11 3 175 530.51 1 678.36 6 RC-06-53 0.00 60.96 1.16 60.96 707 026.26 3 175 653.08 1 679.64 6 RC-06-54 0.00 41.15 1.40 41.15 707 037.13 3 175 644.32 1 686.57 6 RC-06-64 0.00 112.78 1.78 112.78 707 096.59 3 175 914.42 1 670.29 6 RC-06-71 0.00 51.82 1.34 51.82 707 048.15 3 175 633.62 1 696.13 6 RC-06-72 0.00 50.29 0.77 50.29 707 032.29 3 175 632.46 1 693.11 6 RC-06-73 0.00 111.25 1.16 111.25 707 332.97 3 175 551.45 1 617.45 6 RC-06-75 4.57 30.48 0.99 25.91 707 233.72 3 175 536.71 1 675.54 6 RC-06-76 0.00 88.39 0.25 88.39 707 331.18 3 175 572.76 1 632.07 6 RC-06-96 0.00 47.24 0.17 47.24 707 309.95 3 175 568.82 1 639.22 6 RC-07-107 86.87 120.40 1.91 33.53 707 180.61 3 176 166.81 1 665.40 6 RC-07-109 1.52 56.39 0.28 54.87 707 069.81 3 175 609.67 1 700.23 6 RC-07-110 0.00 3.05 0.51 3.05 707 091.82 3 175 639.68 1 720.04 6 RC-07-127 64.01 96.01 2.60 32.00 707 143.61 3 176 136.44 1 661.33 6 RC-07-166 0.00 51.82 0.32 51.82 707 003.43 3 175 655.83 1 675.51 6 RC-07-168 94.49 129.54 1.77 35.05 707 087.01 3 176 120.77 1 616.43 6 RC-07-272 1.52 71.63 1.98 70.11 706 944.83 3 175 610.74 1 635.56 6 RC-07-273 0.00 65.53 0.57 65.53 706 944.53 3 175 634.19 1 651.78 6 RC-07-274 0.00 38.10 0.66 38.10 706 984.46 3 175 631.04 1 666.21 6 RC-08-301 0.00 51.82 0.36 51.82 706 965.69 3 175 603.60 1 656.46 6 RC-08-330 0.00 18.29 0.13 18.29 707 064.23 3 175 560.39 1 681.00 6 RC-08-332 0.00 30.48 0.41 30.48 707 021.03 3 175 562.61 1 672.84 6 RC-12-693 131.06 179.83 0.32 48.77 707 073.84 3 176 061.94 1 598.99 6 RC-12-694 106.68 129.54 0.12 22.86 707 082.88 3 176 042.31 1 593.10 7 RC-09-420 7.62 86.87 0.30 79.25 706 334.00 3 176 404.00 1 645.47 7 RC-09-422 0.00 77.72 0.20 77.72 706 355.73 3 176 509.96 1 637.69 7 RC-09-430 0.00 92.96 0.18 92.96 706 363.43 3 176 410.42 1 648.48


(m)TO(m)


Core Lenght(m)


277

X (m) Y (m) Z (m)11420 DDH-10-120 16.50 25.10 1.50 8.60 706 150.76 3 178 989.00 1 671.21 11420 DDH-12-229 8.00 14.00 0.00 6.00 706 126.71 3 179 072.12 1 679.06 11420 INR-12-726 10.64 16.72 0.00 6.08 706 082.00 3 179 055.00 1 659.32 11420 RC-09-440 7.62 13.72 0.48 6.10 706 103.25 3 179 020.07 1 663.31 11420 RC-09-543 6.10 10.67 0.58 4.57 706 159.29 3 179 084.26 1 692.94 11420 RC-11-658 0.00 6.10 0.24 6.10 706 107.35 3 179 008.31 1 673.74 11420 RC-11-662 22.86 32.00 0.24 9.14 706 195.68 3 178 970.30 1 683.62 11500 DDH-11-200 5.00 42.00 0.95 37.00 705 861.95 3 179 305.96 1 587.87 11500 DDH-12-211 0.00 8.00 0.28 8.00 705 838.18 3 179 373.95 1 601.00 11500 DDH-12-212 13.00 54.00 0.78 41.00 705 813.68 3 179 356.37 1 558.27 11500 DDH-12-213 11.00 39.00 0.91 28.00 705 808.41 3 179 258.37 1 554.23 11500 DDH-12-214 0.00 11.00 1.33 11.00 705 875.88 3 179 220.10 1 593.99 11500 DDH-12-215 1.00 11.00 0.93 10.00 705 843.74 3 179 199.55 1 580.97 11500 DDH-12-216 4.00 17.00 0.33 13.00 705 743.74 3 179 207.43 1 564.26 11500 DDH-12-217 9.00 14.00 0.05 5.00 705 779.70 3 179 072.02 1 554.35 11500 DDH-12-218 6.00 34.00 0.51 28.00 705 865.40 3 179 081.55 1 574.76 11500 DDH-12-219 32.00 40.00 0.00 8.00 705 946.51 3 179 016.27 1 575.09 11500 DDH-12-220 32.00 40.00 0.00 8.00 705 927.34 3 178 983.17 1 562.32 11500 DDH-12-222 10.00 15.00 0.15 5.00 706 024.25 3 178 891.16 1 610.39 11500 DDH-12-231 31.00 36.00 0.00 5.00 705 909.55 3 178 863.18 1 554.83 11500 DDH-12-232 20.00 25.00 0.86 5.00 705 880.81 3 178 799.95 1 546.75 11500 DDH-12-233 56.00 61.00 0.61 5.00 705 859.86 3 178 709.72 1 494.97 11500 IN-12-238 23.00 30.00 0.00 7.00 705 718.00 3 179 065.00 1 535.50 11500 IN-12-242 35.00 40.00 0.00 5.00 705 724.00 3 179 009.00 1 518.50 11500 IN-12-243 12.00 17.00 0.00 5.00 706 037.00 3 178 610.00 1 566.50 11500 INR-12-722 16.73 28.89 0.00 12.16 705 874.00 3 179 118.00 1 586.19 11500 INR-12-724 34.96 42.56 0.00 7.60 705 919.00 3 178 958.00 1 554.24 11500 RC-09-441 16.76 21.34 0.35 4.58 706 016.21 3 178 852.03 1 599.20 11500 RC-09-445 0.00 16.76 0.63 16.76 705 933.26 3 179 111.65 1 608.41 11500 RC-09-446 32.00 36.58 0.31 4.58 705 899.63 3 178 929.27 1 544.92 11500 RC-09-447 6.10 38.10 0.38 32.00 705 728.84 3 179 274.54 1 550.54 11500 RC-09-527 22.86 33.53 0.01 10.67 705 972.69 3 179 055.13 1 595.26 11500 RC-09-533 0.00 22.86 0.75 22.86 705 860.88 3 179 149.59 1 579.01 11500 RC-09-534 18.29 28.96 0.31 10.67 705 858.83 3 179 030.15 1 557.48 11500 RC-09-535 42.67 51.82 0.40 9.15 705 823.91 3 178 943.06 1 525.43 11500 RC-10-549 0.00 3.05 0.01 3.05 705 742.41 3 179 138.19 1 561.52 11500 RC-11-665 27.43 36.58 0.00 9.15 705 833.63 3 179 002.44 1 542.93 11500 RC-11-666 36.58 47.24 0.78 10.66 705 809.01 3 178 850.79 1 511.44 11500 RC-11-667 32.00 38.10 0.87 6.10 705 840.13 3 178 602.96 1 507.85 11500 RC-11-670 28.96 35.05 0.00 6.09 705 995.21 3 178 718.64 1 554.79 11500 RC-11-671 9.14 15.24 0.23 6.10 706 008.64 3 178 865.63 1 608.64 11500 RC-11-674 4.57 62.48 0.88 57.91 705 815.44 3 179 308.43 1 549.72 11500 RC-12-719 3.05 9.14 0.22 6.09 705 757.00 3 179 175.03 1 559.65 11509 DDH-11-200 47.00 60.00 0.40 13.00 705 872.05 3 179 306.49 1 559.63 11509 DDH-12-211 28.00 48.00 1.35 20.00 705 852.46 3 179 374.10 1 570.14 11509 DDH-12-212 62.00 72.00 0.90 10.00 705 824.58 3 179 356.74 1 526.60 11509 DDH-12-213 69.00 76.00 3.40 7.00 705 824.91 3 179 258.59 1 509.69 11509 RC-11-674 68.58 74.68 0.40 6.10 705 828.69 3 179 308.90 1 514.00 11509 RC-12-718 24.38 77.72 0.65 53.34 705 812.76 3 179 400.25 1 541.57 12100 RC-08-348 24.38 28.96 0.24 4.58 706 751.85 3 177 795.24 1 675.54 12100 RC-08-349 22.86 27.43 0.42 4.57 706 757.92 3 177 846.96 1 686.09 12110 RC-08-351 6.10 9.14 0.42 3.04 706 897.19 3 177 980.79 1 738.66 12110 RC-08-352 19.81 32.00 0.83 12.19 706 837.73 3 177 910.80 1 708.22 12110 RC-08-353 19.81 25.91 0.25 6.10 706 845.03 3 177 966.59 1 722.93 12120 RC-08-345 4.57 13.72 0.56 9.15 706 651.51 3 177 914.21 1 648.50 12120 RC-08-346 1.52 18.29 3.30 16.77 706 651.98 3 177 940.15 1 653.98 12160 DDH-09-101 56.00 61.00 0.16 5.00 706 082.48 3 178 353.94 1 557.18 12160 DDH-09-102 47.00 53.00 0.40 6.00 706 083.55 3 178 214.31 1 540.59

Coordonnate of the IntersectionDomainNorth Zone Hole ID FROM

(m)TO(m)

Average grade

Au (g/t)

Core Lenght

(m)


278

X (m) Y (m) Z (m)12160 DDH-11-183 35.00 40.00 0.57 5.00 705 969.98 3 178 351.02 1 528.87 12160 DDH-11-184 31.00 35.00 0.17 4.00 705 969.09 3 178 223.04 1 520.45 12160 DDH-11-185 54.00 58.00 0.16 4.00 705 965.90 3 178 307.65 1 509.94 12160 IN-12-244 67.00 73.00 0.00 6.00 706 089.00 3 178 279.00 1 545.00 12183 RC-08-350 4.57 9.14 1.18 4.57 706 717.69 3 178 046.74 1 672.93 12210 IN-12-248 0.00 7.50 0.00 7.50 706 739.00 3 178 436.00 1 665.25 12210 IN-12-249 0.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 706 766.00 3 178 396.00 1 665.50 12210 IN-12-252 1.00 9.00 0.00 8.00 706 795.00 3 178 378.00 1 669.00 12210 IN-12-255 5.30 12.00 0.00 6.70 706 785.00 3 178 358.00 1 665.35 12210 RC-08-292 0.00 12.19 1.20 12.19 706 790.55 3 178 552.66 1 707.10 12210 RC-08-384 6.10 15.24 1.03 9.14 706 754.20 3 178 338.21 1 660.72 12210 RC-08-385 1.52 16.76 1.02 15.24 706 790.51 3 178 432.75 1 673.67 12210 RC-08-386 0.00 24.38 0.40 24.38 706 764.82 3 178 492.11 1 681.85 12210 RC-08-407 1.52 6.10 1.19 4.58 706 854.09 3 178 537.80 1 701.66 12210 RC-12-701 0.00 7.62 0.39 7.62 706 777.62 3 178 477.80 1 686.72 12210 RC-12-702 1.52 12.19 0.75 10.67 706 833.88 3 178 537.94 1 704.76 12225 RC-06-55 0.00 6.10 0.29 6.10 706 918.10 3 178 792.71 1 790.57 12225 RC-06-56 0.00 10.67 0.42 10.67 706 921.30 3 178 788.81 1 788.65 12230 DDH-04-10 9.14 17.00 1.08 7.86 706 840.40 3 178 683.29 1 740.50 12230 DDH-08-63 1.00 7.00 0.17 6.00 706 858.95 3 178 729.69 1 770.71 12230 DDH-11-203 7.00 17.00 0.48 10.00 706 805.55 3 178 732.92 1 743.99 12230 DDH-11-204 7.00 25.00 0.73 18.00 706 844.34 3 178 770.56 1 762.32 12230 RC-08-288 6.10 12.19 0.65 6.09 706 796.32 3 178 786.47 1 746.53 12230 RC-08-395 0.00 7.62 0.71 7.62 706 860.51 3 178 733.06 1 771.16 12230 RC-08-402 13.72 21.34 1.21 7.62 706 848.19 3 178 798.38 1 760.92 12230 RC-08-403 3.05 12.19 0.69 9.14 706 820.14 3 178 853.60 1 772.97 12230 RC-08-404 3.05 18.29 1.28 15.24 706 821.63 3 178 851.02 1 771.25 12233 DDH-04-10 21.00 26.25 0.82 5.25 706 847.18 3 178 683.53 1 732.41 12233 DDH-08-63 15.00 23.00 2.01 8.00 706 866.45 3 178 729.69 1 757.72 12233 DDH-08-63 29.00 33.00 0.92 4.00 706 872.45 3 178 729.69 1 747.32 12233 DDH-11-203 17.00 30.00 1.03 13.00 706 809.55 3 178 733.09 1 733.21 12233 DDH-11-204 28.00 36.00 0.42 8.00 706 849.74 3 178 770.63 1 747.26 12233 RC-08-395 12.19 32.00 1.34 19.81 706 869.65 3 178 733.06 1 755.33 12233 RC-08-402 35.05 41.15 0.51 6.10 706 858.47 3 178 798.38 1 743.10 12233 RC-08-404 28.96 33.53 0.96 4.57 706 832.49 3 178 851.02 1 752.44 12240 DDH-08-61 10.00 12.00 1.06 2.00 706 703.41 3 178 760.59 1 730.45 12240 DDH-08-61 17.00 26.00 0.53 9.00 706 698.16 3 178 760.59 1 721.36 12240 RC-08-289 0.00 19.81 0.53 19.81 706 697.71 3 178 762.79 1 730.43 12240 RC-08-391 3.05 10.67 0.50 7.62 706 693.43 3 178 724.08 1 728.12 12243 DDH-08-61 29.00 41.00 0.35 12.00 706 691.79 3 178 760.59 1 710.32 12243 RC-08-289 21.34 38.10 1.78 16.76 706 688.64 3 178 762.81 1 713.68 12243 RC-08-391 16.76 35.05 0.99 18.29 706 686.92 3 178 724.08 1 710.23 12250 DDH-08-62 7.10 10.00 0.03 2.90 706 738.52 3 178 991.54 1 773.40 12250 RC-06-58 0.00 27.43 1.02 27.43 706 733.89 3 178 995.11 1 768.50 12250 RC-08-284 0.00 12.19 1.11 12.19 706 681.20 3 178 862.77 1 738.91 12250 RC-08-285 1.52 30.48 1.70 28.96 706 689.40 3 178 915.21 1 746.92 12250 RC-08-286 1.52 10.67 0.90 9.15 706 704.39 3 178 944.23 1 762.66 12250 RC-08-393 6.10 19.81 0.35 13.71 706 668.29 3 178 859.33 1 733.60 12250 RC-08-394 3.05 44.20 1.59 41.15 706 684.66 3 178 946.16 1 744.57 12300 DDH-07-39 0.00 9.00 1.05 9.00 706 484.82 3 178 465.93 1 683.46 12300 DDH-08-59 5.00 6.00 0.02 1.00 706 391.54 3 178 510.00 1 664.47 12300 DDH-08-64 4.00 6.00 0.04 2.00 706 466.41 3 178 630.27 1 703.38 12300 RC-06-61 0.00 7.62 0.62 7.62 706 483.44 3 178 544.84 1 699.39 12300 RC-07-100 0.00 9.14 0.75 9.14 706 482.71 3 178 464.58 1 683.13 12300 RC-07-101 0.00 9.14 0.99 9.14 706 488.10 3 178 462.79 1 683.15 12300 RC-07-102 0.00 6.10 0.36 6.10 706 465.40 3 178 631.74 1 704.98 12300 RC-07-203 0.00 3.05 0.25 3.05 706 407.86 3 178 450.52 1 667.24 12300 RC-08-370 0.00 10.67 0.70 10.67 706 481.25 3 178 462.21 1 682.88

DomainNorth Zone Hole ID FROM

(m)TO(m)

Average grade

Au (g/t)

Core Lenght

(m)



279

X (m) Y (m) Z (m)12300 RC-08-371 0.00 12.19 1.07 12.19 706 469.15 3 178 498.42 1 688.22 12300 RC-08-372 1.52 10.67 0.27 9.15 706 456.31 3 178 495.99 1 685.28 12300 RC-08-373 1.52 9.14 0.29 7.62 706 458.95 3 178 545.25 1 694.33 12300 RC-08-374 0.00 6.10 0.34 6.10 706 470.07 3 178 599.97 1 701.60 12300 RC-08-375 1.52 15.24 0.34 13.72 706 446.21 3 178 643.90 1 701.41 12300 RC-08-376 0.00 6.10 0.29 6.10 706 466.56 3 178 600.33 1 701.16 12300 RC-08-377 1.52 12.19 2.06 10.67 706 392.75 3 178 496.19 1 662.51 12300 RC-08-414 3.05 10.67 0.45 7.62 706 454.56 3 178 498.54 1 685.31 12300 RC-08-415 1.52 9.14 0.43 7.62 706 459.07 3 178 546.63 1 694.95 12300 RC-11-683 0.00 13.72 0.25 13.72 706 415.82 3 178 452.16 1 666.73 12300 RC-11-684 0.00 12.19 0.42 12.19 706 488.16 3 178 545.61 1 700.86 12305 DDH-07-39 11.00 32.00 0.55 21.00 706 490.63 3 178 465.93 1 667.49 12305 DDH-08-58 18.00 32.00 0.20 14.00 706 388.49 3 178 510.57 1 643.66 12305 DDH-08-59 25.00 80.00 0.92 55.00 706 425.30 3 178 510.00 1 624.23 12305 DDH-08-64 22.00 45.00 0.77 23.00 706 477.15 3 178 632.00 1 677.04 12305 DDH-11-207 5.00 33.00 1.83 28.00 706 463.47 3 178 678.88 1 699.05 12305 RC-06-61 25.91 53.34 0.96 27.43 706 483.44 3 178 544.84 1 663.58 12305 RC-06-61 59.44 77.72 0.38 18.28 706 483.44 3 178 544.84 1 634.62 12305 RC-07-100 12.19 47.24 0.31 35.05 706 482.39 3 178 464.75 1 654.56 12305 RC-07-101 12.19 28.96 0.52 16.77 706 493.58 3 178 462.53 1 667.71 12305 RC-07-102 22.86 45.72 0.87 22.86 706 476.95 3 178 630.82 1 675.96 12305 RC-07-203 27.43 68.58 0.69 41.15 706 407.86 3 178 450.52 1 617.71 12305 RC-08-370 16.76 25.91 0.34 9.15 706 472.72 3 178 462.05 1 669.35 12305 RC-08-371 39.62 77.72 0.37 38.10 706 500.53 3 178 497.92 1 647.50 12305 RC-08-373 33.53 65.53 0.64 32.00 706 437.99 3 178 545.25 1 658.04 12305 RC-08-374 16.76 24.38 0.33 7.62 706 478.61 3 178 600.93 1 686.34 12305 RC-08-375 25.91 41.15 0.91 15.24 706 435.76 3 178 644.22 1 674.82 12305 RC-08-376 27.43 35.05 1.25 7.62 706 466.31 3 178 600.62 1 672.98 12305 RC-08-376 44.20 50.29 1.91 6.09 706 465.85 3 178 600.73 1 656.98 12305 RC-08-377 25.91 47.24 0.34 21.33 706 392.98 3 178 498.04 1 632.08 12305 RC-08-414 44.20 82.30 0.48 38.10 706 435.02 3 178 498.54 1 631.61 12305 RC-08-415 35.05 65.53 0.47 30.48 706 437.73 3 178 546.63 1 658.00 12305 RC-11-683 22.86 60.96 0.78 38.10 706 436.31 3 178 452.50 1 638.32 12305 RC-11-684 32.00 73.15 0.74 41.15 706 510.60 3 178 547.17 1 660.20 12310 RC-07-103 24.38 32.00 0.77 7.62 706 382.73 3 178 519.41 1 640.54 12310 RC-07-204 1.52 18.29 0.62 16.77 706 402.79 3 178 597.92 1 674.31 12310 RC-08-378 12.19 15.24 0.25 3.05 706 387.16 3 178 543.63 1 657.05 12310 RC-08-416 15.24 21.34 0.47 6.10 706 350.18 3 178 521.15 1 634.47 12310 RC-11-682 10.67 19.81 2.48 9.14 706 344.09 3 178 506.43 1 633.53 12320 DDH-08-60 4.15 19.05 0.50 14.90 706 265.14 3 178 741.89 1 658.82 12320 DDH-11-206 10.00 15.00 0.76 5.00 706 372.84 3 178 737.71 1 706.00 12320 RC-07-104 0.00 12.19 0.61 12.19 706 366.32 3 178 737.92 1 708.37 12320 RC-07-196 3.05 9.14 0.29 6.09 706 256.31 3 178 650.26 1 639.45 12320 RC-07-197 6.10 7.62 0.14 1.52 706 250.51 3 178 494.49 1 629.53 12320 RC-07-198 0.00 7.62 0.47 7.62 706 302.08 3 178 543.77 1 646.79 12320 RC-07-199 6.10 12.19 0.30 6.09 706 306.54 3 178 593.76 1 650.03 12320 RC-07-200 0.00 16.76 0.82 16.76 706 301.73 3 178 696.82 1 665.12 12320 RC-07-201 1.52 7.62 0.39 6.10 706 334.81 3 178 649.26 1 674.59 12320 RC-07-202 0.00 4.57 0.36 4.57 706 301.78 3 178 479.03 1 630.49 12320 RC-07-255 3.05 7.62 0.94 4.57 706 249.24 3 178 698.98 1 648.66 12320 RC-07-256 1.52 32.00 0.56 30.48 706 258.06 3 178 742.01 1 650.93 12320 RC-08-380 7.62 12.19 0.36 4.57 706 256.40 3 178 600.70 1 631.94 12320 RC-08-382 1.52 7.62 0.18 6.10 706 342.56 3 178 604.00 1 668.05 12320 RC-08-383 0.00 4.57 0.32 4.57 706 336.85 3 178 652.53 1 677.06 12320 RC-08-417 0.00 9.14 0.71 9.14 706 333.05 3 178 711.12 1 683.96 12320 RC-08-418 0.00 16.76 0.50 16.76 706 311.57 3 178 743.36 1 678.20 12320 RC-11-681 4.57 13.72 0.65 9.15 706 254.95 3 178 556.40 1 631.15 12320 RC-12-709 10.67 12.19 0.39 1.52 706 252.66 3 178 526.76 1 628.10


(m)TO(m)

Average grade

Au (g/t)

Core Lenght

(m)



280

X (m) Y (m) Z (m)12330 DDH-07-38 4.00 10.00 2.92 6.00 706 338.96 3 178 905.66 1 724.85 12330 DDH-08-65 31.00 37.35 0.63 6.35 706 266.11 3 178 901.49 1 681.32 12330 DDH-09-96 28.00 41.00 1.95 13.00 706 272.10 3 178 901.53 1 680.96 12330 RC-07-105 6.10 10.67 2.70 4.57 706 338.08 3 178 908.38 1 723.68 12330 RC-07-193 32.00 41.15 3.15 9.15 706 259.30 3 178 903.60 1 673.46 12330 RC-07-195 7.62 12.19 0.29 4.57 706 242.62 3 178 859.23 1 690.29 12330 RC-07-249 1.52 6.10 0.12 4.58 706 269.17 3 178 848.40 1 696.67 12330 RC-07-254 0.00 10.67 0.47 10.67 706 253.48 3 178 820.79 1 683.21 12330 RC-08-278 18.29 24.38 0.33 6.09 706 300.56 3 178 906.12 1 703.37 12330 RC-08-364 24.38 35.05 0.57 10.67 706 202.39 3 178 899.19 1 672.71 12330 RC-08-365 15.24 19.81 0.87 4.57 706 312.39 3 178 903.52 1 708.18 12330 RC-08-367 10.67 24.38 0.44 13.71 706 291.90 3 178 852.03 1 688.96 12330 RC-08-368 6.10 21.34 0.26 15.24 706 235.28 3 178 819.94 1 675.36 12330 RC-08-369 1.52 13.72 0.33 12.20 706 275.60 3 178 811.86 1 685.36 12330 RC-09-512 1.52 4.57 0.16 3.05 706 210.16 3 178 821.77 1 679.71 12330 RC-09-513 4.57 12.19 0.60 7.62 706 249.60 3 178 858.27 1 692.37 12333 DDH-04-07 5.00 14.00 1.91 9.00 706 256.10 3 179 202.21 1 739.49 12333 DDH-04-08 1.57 14.60 0.31 13.03 706 227.04 3 179 176.14 1 718.13 12333 DDH-04-09 0.00 17.11 0.43 17.11 706 261.26 3 179 126.61 1 737.89 12333 DDH-07-37 1.30 20.00 0.42 18.70 706 255.18 3 179 122.38 1 735.16 12333 DDH-09-98 4.75 7.00 0.22 2.25 706 234.18 3 179 083.82 1 729.89 12333 RC-06-59 0.00 16.76 0.56 16.76 706 263.25 3 179 124.89 1 738.35 12333 RC-06-60 0.00 21.34 0.48 21.34 706 256.54 3 179 122.82 1 732.92 12333 RC-07-189 0.00 9.14 0.24 9.14 706 272.00 3 179 220.00 1 742.47 12333 RC-07-191 0.00 4.57 0.24 4.57 706 269.11 3 179 047.07 1 739.17 12333 RC-07-252 4.57 9.14 0.18 4.57 706 277.32 3 179 073.06 1 740.36 12333 RC-08-279 4.57 9.14 0.21 4.57 706 281.83 3 179 086.32 1 739.91 12333 RC-08-280 9.14 13.72 0.45 4.58 706 228.67 3 179 084.84 1 722.98 12333 RC-08-281 9.14 19.81 0.38 10.67 706 245.09 3 179 046.64 1 723.13 12333 RC-08-354 1.52 13.72 0.50 12.20 706 219.91 3 179 175.39 1 714.95 12333 RC-08-355 0.00 12.19 1.21 12.19 706 256.46 3 179 204.45 1 740.77 12333 RC-08-356 6.10 13.72 0.75 7.62 706 298.44 3 179 082.13 1 745.58 12333 RC-08-357 1.52 19.81 0.50 18.29 706 249.36 3 179 116.81 1 735.54 12333 RC-08-361 9.14 16.76 0.17 7.62 706 250.97 3 179 046.55 1 724.42 12333 RC-08-411 1.52 4.57 0.24 3.05 706 253.09 3 179 116.91 1 742.29 12333 RC-08-412 0.00 19.81 0.27 19.81 706 249.05 3 179 120.48 1 738.83 12333 RC-08-413 3.05 7.62 0.19 4.57 706 236.23 3 179 082.61 1 729.99 12333 RC-09-515 0.00 1.52 0.13 1.52 706 198.40 3 179 049.88 1 716.13 12333 RC-09-540 0.00 10.67 1.80 10.67 706 220.68 3 179 208.27 1 719.93 12423 DDH-10-118 66.00 71.10 0.62 5.10 706 119.78 3 178 919.81 1 591.42 12423 DDH-10-119 63.00 67.00 0.30 4.00 706 166.26 3 178 927.31 1 615.91 12423 DDH-10-120 69.00 73.90 0.73 4.90 706 167.93 3 178 990.10 1 623.57 12423 DDH-12-230 66.00 73.00 1.88 7.00 706 123.15 3 178 885.83 1 585.47 12423 RC-09-525 47.24 59.44 0.69 12.20 706 136.27 3 178 861.65 1 595.69 12423 RC-11-662 76.20 79.25 0.33 3.05 706 215.28 3 178 970.87 1 636.90 12423 RC-11-685 76.20 80.77 0.12 4.57 706 126.77 3 178 951.35 1 592.42 12435 DDH-12-221 92.00 99.00 0.18 7.00 706 021.96 3 179 031.84 1 541.78 12435 DDH-12-225 82.00 111.00 0.26 29.00 706 033.23 3 178 988.02 1 549.77 12435 RC-11-672 103.63 108.20 0.77 4.57 706 073.14 3 178 960.95 1 538.44 12440 DDH-12-225 62.45 68.00 0.11 5.55 706 033.23 3 178 988.02 1 579.05 12440 DDH-12-226 4.00 39.00 0.32 35.00 705 986.18 3 179 131.48 1 621.86 12440 DDH-12-227 0.00 14.00 0.27 14.00 706 040.07 3 179 212.06 1 662.83 12440 RC-09-438 1.52 15.24 0.27 13.72 706 051.46 3 179 068.70 1 648.86 12440 RC-09-464 0.00 6.10 0.23 6.10 706 045.73 3 179 233.58 1 667.26 12440 RC-09-526 0.00 15.24 0.30 15.24 706 022.87 3 179 159.23 1 643.09 12440 RC-11-672 67.06 71.63 0.20 4.57 706 059.98 3 178 959.63 1 572.53 12440 RC-11-675 22.86 28.96 0.10 6.10 706 010.08 3 179 102.86 1 622.75 12440 RC-11-676 1.52 6.10 0.31 4.58 706 079.38 3 179 100.01 1 670.13

Hole IDDomainNorth Zone

FROM(m)

TO(m)

Average grade

Au (g/t)

Core Lenght

(m)



281

X (m) Y (m) Z (m)12440 RC-11-677 7.62 18.29 0.38 10.67 706 077.87 3 179 153.84 1 666.43 12443 DDH-12-226 41.00 65.00 0.50 24.00 705 999.48 3 179 130.65 1 593.32 12443 DDH-12-227 34.00 39.00 0.06 5.00 706 052.46 3 179 211.92 1 636.05 12443 INR-12-725 36.48 44.08 0.00 7.60 706 082.00 3 179 120.00 1 640.72 12443 RC-09-438 47.24 51.82 0.22 4.58 706 072.04 3 179 068.70 1 613.23 12443 RC-09-464 28.96 35.05 0.35 6.09 706 044.69 3 179 233.42 1 638.33 12443 RC-09-526 35.05 42.67 1.26 7.62 706 034.02 3 179 160.26 1 613.93 12443 RC-11-675 57.91 62.48 0.38 4.57 706 021.19 3 179 103.10 1 590.32 12443 RC-11-676 32.00 36.58 0.16 4.58 706 089.07 3 179 100.28 1 641.23 12450 RC-09-437 0.00 9.14 0.52 9.14 706 065.71 3 179 325.94 1 684.35 12450 RC-09-521 4.57 19.81 1.46 15.24 706 103.34 3 179 305.26 1 686.37 12450 RC-09-522 1.52 6.10 0.77 4.58 706 061.95 3 179 277.61 1 678.57 12460 DDH-11-201 2.00 18.00 0.39 16.00 705 901.86 3 179 310.91 1 615.12 12460 INR-12-723 9.12 22.80 0.00 13.68 705 964.00 3 179 282.00 1 626.04 12460 RC-09-442 4.57 9.14 0.23 4.57 705 943.82 3 179 347.05 1 630.71 12460 RC-09-443 0.00 16.76 0.83 16.76 705 970.31 3 179 254.99 1 618.78 12460 RC-09-444 1.52 27.43 0.53 25.91 705 936.12 3 179 177.52 1 606.41 12460 RC-09-528 0.00 19.81 0.82 19.81 705 912.68 3 179 253.73 1 597.25 12460 RC-09-529 1.52 9.14 0.80 7.62 705 914.59 3 179 353.83 1 626.05 12460 RC-09-532 0.00 10.67 0.37 10.67 705 988.54 3 179 318.01 1 641.96 12460 RC-11-656 1.52 30.48 0.58 28.96 705 921.58 3 179 203.65 1 606.62 12460 RC-11-657 0.00 24.38 1.22 24.38 705 975.76 3 179 207.06 1 614.33 12465 DDH-11-201 25.00 40.00 0.64 15.00 705 909.70 3 179 311.44 1 594.04 12465 DDH-12-210 0.00 11.00 0.26 11.00 705 901.72 3 179 401.51 1 626.28 12465 DDH-12-235 2.00 15.00 0.30 13.00 705 884.06 3 179 442.07 1 612.07 12465 INR-12-723 28.88 38.00 0.00 9.12 705 964.00 3 179 282.00 1 608.56 12465 RC-09-442 18.29 24.38 0.33 6.09 705 943.82 3 179 347.05 1 616.23 12465 RC-09-443 21.34 27.43 0.67 6.09 705 970.50 3 179 255.07 1 602.78 12465 RC-09-444 33.53 42.67 0.72 9.14 705 947.69 3 179 176.31 1 585.85 12465 RC-09-528 25.91 30.48 0.73 4.57 705 919.33 3 179 253.94 1 580.21 12465 RC-09-529 15.24 30.48 0.57 15.24 705 921.02 3 179 354.35 1 609.75 12465 RC-09-530 0.00 4.57 0.35 4.57 705 965.25 3 179 416.23 1 640.45 12465 RC-09-531 1.52 6.10 0.22 4.58 705 985.16 3 179 379.87 1 647.15 12465 RC-09-532 10.67 19.81 0.56 9.14 705 992.00 3 179 318.23 1 632.69 12465 RC-11-656 36.58 41.15 0.22 4.57 705 931.13 3 179 204.02 1 579.28 12465 RC-11-657 27.43 42.67 0.51 15.24 705 983.81 3 179 207.14 1 593.34 12503 DDH-12-213 51.00 56.00 0.21 5.00 705 818.33 3 179 258.50 1 527.51 12503 DDH-12-214 16.40 45.00 0.29 28.60 705 886.27 3 179 220.35 1 571.04 12503 DDH-12-215 16.00 70.00 0.70 54.00 705 859.13 3 179 199.63 1 547.33 12503 DDH-12-216 24.00 35.00 0.27 11.00 705 750.32 3 179 207.53 1 546.44 12503 DDH-12-217 44.00 56.00 0.23 12.00 705 797.07 3 179 072.11 1 518.04 12503 DDH-12-218 70.00 79.00 0.07 9.00 705 888.10 3 179 081.90 1 525.22 12503 DDH-12-219 91.00 98.00 0.09 7.00 705 980.06 3 179 016.27 1 527.17 12503 DDH-12-220 90.00 94.00 0.18 4.00 705 950.43 3 178 984.29 1 511.31 12503 DDH-12-222 66.00 70.00 0.15 4.00 706 047.58 3 178 891.66 1 560.03 12503 DDH-12-231 58.00 62.00 0.32 4.00 705 920.94 3 178 863.51 1 530.90 12503 DDH-12-232 46.00 50.00 0.08 4.00 705 891.78 3 178 800.05 1 523.73 12503 DDH-12-233 73.00 78.00 0.27 5.00 705 865.51 3 178 709.76 1 478.94 12503 DDH-12-234 58.00 61.00 0.22 3.00 705 821.76 3 179 145.64 1 514.37 12503 IN-12-238 75.00 86.00 0.00 11.00 705 718.00 3 179 065.00 1 481.50 12503 IN-12-242 82.00 88.00 0.00 6.00 705 724.00 3 179 009.00 1 471.00 12503 IN-12-243 56.00 61.00 0.00 5.00 706 037.00 3 178 610.00 1 522.50 12503 INR-12-722 85.48 94.66 0.00 9.18 705 874.00 3 179 118.00 1 518.93 12503 INR-12-724 77.65 83.73 0.00 6.08 705 919.00 3 178 958.00 1 512.31 12503 RC-09-441 53.34 57.91 0.19 4.57 706 031.24 3 178 850.79 1 565.88 12503 RC-09-445 80.77 92.96 0.70 12.19 705 935.50 3 179 112.00 1 529.96 12503 RC-09-446 73.15 77.72 0.35 4.57 705 899.32 3 178 931.22 1 503.82 12503 RC-09-447 60.96 65.53 0.08 4.57 705 730.98 3 179 274.92 1 509.46


(m)TO(m)

Average grade

Au (g/t)

Core Lenght

(m)



282

X (m) Y (m) Z (m)12503 RC-09-448 48.77 53.34 0.22 4.57 706 021.83 3 178 572.23 1 510.05 12503 RC-09-533 59.44 64.01 0.19 4.57 705 879.72 3 179 149.75 1 532.37 12503 RC-09-534 70.10 82.30 0.32 12.20 705 878.08 3 179 030.77 1 508.56 12503 RC-09-535 74.68 80.77 0.42 6.09 705 838.58 3 178 943.96 1 498.73 12503 RC-11-665 77.72 83.82 0.10 6.10 705 853.13 3 179 003.91 1 498.27 12503 RC-11-666 65.53 70.10 0.30 4.57 705 819.35 3 178 851.67 1 487.70 12503 RC-11-667 71.63 76.20 0.03 4.57 705 854.70 3 178 602.94 1 471.82 12503 RC-11-670 62.48 68.58 0.15 6.10 706 006.34 3 178 718.45 1 523.17 12503 RC-11-671 71.63 76.20 0.12 4.57 706 010.22 3 178 887.54 1 550.96 12503 RC-12-719 41.15 50.29 0.02 9.14 705 771.13 3 179 175.07 1 522.22 12503 RC-12-720 86.87 91.44 0.00 4.57 705 745.18 3 178 929.34 1 470.22 12506 DDH-12-217 107.40 112.00 0.14 4.60 705 821.56 3 179 072.01 1 465.52 12506 DDH-12-218 101.77 115.00 0.25 13.23 705 902.18 3 179 082.25 1 494.40 12506 DDH-12-219 100.65 106.00 1.39 5.35 705 985.12 3 179 016.27 1 519.94 12506 DDH-12-219 107.00 123.00 0.42 16.00 705 991.82 3 179 016.27 1 510.38 12506 DDH-12-220 107.00 112.00 0.34 5.00 705 957.52 3 178 984.73 1 495.32 12506 DDH-12-221 111.00 126.00 0.31 15.00 706 031.95 3 179 032.22 1 521.07 12506 DDH-12-231 119.00 132.00 0.34 13.00 705 948.60 3 178 864.32 1 471.53 12506 DDH-12-232 99.00 107.00 0.41 8.00 705 914.91 3 178 800.85 1 473.84 12506 DDH-12-233 86.00 103.00 0.31 17.00 705 872.41 3 178 709.81 1 459.11 12506 DDH-12-234 85.00 88.00 1.18 3.00 705 833.37 3 179 145.38 1 489.99 12506 IN-12-238 115.00 119.00 0.00 4.00 705 718.00 3 179 065.00 1 445.00 12506 IN-12-242 104.00 110.00 0.00 6.00 705 724.00 3 179 009.00 1 449.00 12506 IN-12-243 101.00 107.00 0.00 6.00 706 037.00 3 178 610.00 1 477.00 12506 INR-12-724 108.18 114.26 0.00 6.08 705 919.00 3 178 958.00 1 481.78 12506 RC-09-441 94.49 117.35 0.44 22.86 706 051.94 3 178 849.77 1 520.05 12506 RC-09-446 105.16 109.73 0.20 4.57 705 898.95 3 178 932.74 1 471.85 12506 RC-09-448 91.44 99.06 0.60 7.62 706 024.95 3 178 573.02 1 465.97 12506 RC-09-533 94.49 100.58 0.27 6.09 705 892.75 3 179 149.62 1 499.02 12506 RC-09-534 111.25 114.30 0.16 3.05 705 891.48 3 179 031.19 1 474.53 12506 RC-09-535 112.78 117.35 0.34 4.57 705 856.53 3 178 945.09 1 466.01 12506 RC-11-665 99.06 105.16 0.28 6.10 705 862.03 3 179 004.80 1 478.90 12506 RC-11-666 112.78 118.87 0.40 6.09 705 840.19 3 178 853.38 1 444.50 12506 RC-11-667 106.68 111.25 0.37 4.57 705 868.49 3 178 603.27 1 439.60 12506 RC-11-670 97.54 103.63 0.43 6.09 706 017.88 3 178 717.62 1 490.08 12506 RC-12-720 115.82 121.92 0.02 6.10 705 755.54 3 178 931.17 1 442.43 12509 DDH-12-217 130.00 131.15 0.00 1.15 705 830.32 3 179 071.99 1 446.57 12509 DDH-12-219 136.00 144.00 0.48 8.00 706 006.16 3 179 016.27 1 489.90 12509 DDH-12-219 145.00 172.00 0.47 27.00 706 016.77 3 179 016.27 1 474.74 12509 DDH-12-220 124.00 141.00 0.49 17.00 705 966.82 3 178 985.34 1 474.29 12509 DDH-12-234 127.00 140.30 0.00 13.30 705 849.21 3 179 149.35 1 446.61 12509 RC-12-719 132.59 146.30 0.43 13.71 705 802.76 3 179 176.26 1 434.00 12512 INR-12-724 1.52 9.12 0.00 7.60 705 919.00 3 178 958.00 1 587.68 12512 RC-09-446 0.00 3.05 0.01 3.05 705 900.00 3 178 928.04 1 577.66 12512 RC-09-535 0.00 9.14 0.87 9.14 705 802.75 3 178 941.95 1 562.47 12512 RC-11-666 4.57 28.96 0.37 24.39 705 799.52 3 178 850.32 1 534.72 14150 RC-08-295 30.48 42.67 0.62 12.19 706 327.47 3 178 095.01 1 609.18 14150 RC-08-296 22.86 28.96 0.11 6.10 706 362.49 3 178 181.01 1 636.09 14186 RC-08-347 44.20 53.34 0.30 9.14 706 775.83 3 178 064.07 1 666.49 14186 RC-08-350 27.43 39.62 0.37 12.19 706 711.15 3 178 054.48 1 648.26 14200 RC-08-387 1.52 6.10 0.38 4.58 706 901.12 3 178 438.81 1 681.52 14200 RC-08-388 3.05 4.57 0.29 1.52 706 891.70 3 178 401.92 1 682.48 14220 RC-06-55 15.24 32.00 0.46 16.76 706 907.82 3 178 792.35 1 772.75 14220 RC-06-56 10.67 22.86 0.40 12.19 706 921.53 3 178 782.26 1 779.29 14220 RC-06-57 10.67 15.24 0.35 4.57 706 889.52 3 178 872.85 1 781.20 14220 RC-08-406 0.00 10.67 0.29 10.67 706 911.90 3 178 905.43 1 788.14 14236 DDH-04-10 42.60 49.80 0.33 7.20 706 861.68 3 178 684.04 1 715.12 14236 DDH-08-63 37.00 53.00 0.29 16.00 706 879.45 3 178 729.69 1 735.20


(m)TO(m)

Average grade

Au (g/t)

Core Lenght

(m)



283

X (m) Y (m) Z (m)14236 DDH-11-203 31.00 35.00 0.53 4.00 706 812.86 3 178 733.25 1 724.31 14236 DDH-11-204 40.00 62.00 0.36 22.00 706 856.04 3 178 770.80 1 729.33 14236 RC-08-395 33.53 47.24 0.31 13.71 706 878.03 3 178 733.06 1 740.80 14236 RC-08-402 47.24 57.91 0.44 10.67 706 865.71 3 178 798.38 1 730.57 14236 RC-08-404 35.05 42.67 0.49 7.62 706 836.30 3 178 851.02 1 745.85 14246 DDH-08-61 50.00 59.00 0.33 9.00 706 681.66 3 178 760.59 1 692.78 14246 RC-08-289 51.82 65.53 0.39 13.71 706 675.61 3 178 763.14 1 687.83 14246 RC-08-291 6.10 32.00 0.70 25.90 706 724.16 3 178 694.23 1 716.52 14246 RC-08-390 0.00 24.38 0.74 24.38 706 707.46 3 178 667.57 1 719.24 14246 RC-08-391 42.67 59.44 0.40 16.77 706 677.80 3 178 724.08 1 685.16 14260 RC-08-290 27.43 36.58 0.65 9.15 706 755.65 3 178 694.00 1 701.57 14260 RC-08-392 0.00 7.62 0.65 7.62 706 822.58 3 178 653.26 1 733.00 14260 RC-12-706 9.14 22.86 0.58 13.72 706 771.06 3 178 667.80 1 717.68 14325 DDH-11-206 22.00 26.00 0.00 4.00 706 378.56 3 178 737.94 1 696.02 14325 RC-07-104 21.34 27.43 0.88 6.09 706 366.80 3 178 738.11 1 688.94 14325 RC-07-196 41.15 45.72 0.75 4.57 706 269.08 3 178 650.71 1 604.36 14325 RC-07-197 35.05 39.62 0.29 4.57 706 260.92 3 178 494.86 1 600.90 14325 RC-07-198 25.91 33.53 0.39 7.62 706 310.94 3 178 544.07 1 622.44 14325 RC-07-199 27.43 33.53 0.55 6.10 706 313.70 3 178 594.01 1 630.34 14325 RC-07-200 25.91 30.48 1.32 4.57 706 308.76 3 178 697.07 1 645.79 14325 RC-07-201 19.81 30.48 1.32 10.67 706 334.38 3 178 649.36 1 654.02 14325 RC-07-202 18.29 21.34 2.07 3.05 706 307.77 3 178 479.24 1 614.02 14325 RC-07-202 22.86 24.38 2.03 1.52 706 309.07 3 178 479.28 1 610.44 14325 RC-07-255 27.43 33.53 0.87 6.10 706 249.91 3 178 698.44 1 623.53 14325 RC-07-256 41.15 47.24 0.39 6.09 706 258.60 3 178 742.77 1 623.51 14325 RC-08-380 32.00 35.05 0.10 3.05 706 256.40 3 178 600.70 1 608.32 14325 RC-08-382 19.81 24.38 0.25 4.57 706 348.56 3 178 604.00 1 651.58 14325 RC-08-383 19.81 25.91 0.33 6.10 706 350.29 3 178 652.22 1 661.48 14325 RC-08-417 18.29 22.86 0.16 4.57 706 341.05 3 178 711.12 1 670.10 14325 RC-08-418 24.38 28.96 0.34 4.58 706 320.72 3 178 743.36 1 662.36 14325 RC-11-681 24.38 28.96 0.18 4.58 706 261.08 3 178 556.22 1 614.73 14400 DDH-12-208 22.00 36.00 0.38 14.00 706 111.40 3 178 794.89 1 599.47 14400 DDH-12-237 37.00 42.00 0.08 5.00 706 099.08 3 178 761.33 1 590.98 14400 IN-12-239 10.50 15.00 0.00 4.50 706 182.00 3 178 719.00 1 621.25 14400 IN-12-240 34.00 39.00 0.00 5.00 706 114.00 3 178 649.00 1 570.60 14400 IN-12-251 24.00 33.00 0.00 9.00 706 132.00 3 178 766.00 1 604.50 14400 RC-09-517 22.86 27.43 0.26 4.57 706 181.09 3 178 694.67 1 613.84 14400 RC-09-518 16.76 21.34 0.39 4.58 706 184.76 3 178 785.76 1 639.48 14400 RC-11-668 6.10 18.29 1.32 12.19 706 089.61 3 178 527.20 1 561.93 14400 RC-11-669 44.20 48.77 0.19 4.57 706 087.88 3 178 706.07 1 554.16 14400 RC-11-673 15.24 19.81 0.23 4.57 706 177.40 3 178 555.33 1 594.25 14455 RC-09-437 21.34 27.43 0.01 6.09 706 075.80 3 179 325.04 1 667.32 14455 RC-09-521 22.86 27.43 0.32 4.57 706 103.34 3 179 305.26 1 673.42 14455 RC-09-522 10.67 18.29 0.40 7.62 706 065.65 3 179 277.73 1 668.56 18336 DDH-04-07 21.40 46.00 0.34 24.60 706 271.65 3 179 202.76 1 720.95 18336 DDH-04-08 25.35 32.10 1.15 6.75 706 237.35 3 179 176.50 1 700.25 18336 DDH-04-09 20.00 27.88 2.34 7.88 706 270.72 3 179 129.50 1 726.10 18336 DDH-07-37 22.00 34.00 1.39 12.00 706 254.81 3 179 122.28 1 716.74 18336 DDH-07-37 35.00 43.00 5.50 8.00 706 254.52 3 179 122.28 1 705.74 18336 DDH-07-38 24.00 53.00 0.25 29.00 706 348.22 3 178 906.28 1 694.75 18336 DDH-09-95 51.00 56.00 0.22 5.00 706 296.47 3 178 954.16 1 675.02 18336 DDH-09-96 47.25 65.00 1.40 17.75 706 286.20 3 178 901.35 1 663.80 18336 DDH-09-97 40.00 47.40 5.57 7.40 706 239.06 3 178 999.21 1 684.02 18336 DDH-09-98 37.20 51.85 1.17 14.65 706 258.41 3 179 083.82 1 701.01 18336 RC-06-59 18.29 33.53 2.06 15.24 706 273.70 3 179 127.83 1 724.58 18336 RC-06-60 21.34 42.67 0.68 21.33 706 255.96 3 179 122.75 1 713.50 18336 RC-07-105 24.38 50.29 0.74 25.91 706 348.23 3 178 908.73 1 695.76 18336 RC-07-189 12.19 24.38 0.41 12.19 706 272.00 3 179 220.00 1 728.00


(m)TO(m)

Average grade

Au (g/t)

Core Lenght

(m)



284

X (m) Y (m) Z (m)18336 RC-07-190 15.24 35.05 0.90 19.81 706 314.60 3 179 003.30 1 716.50 18336 RC-07-192 39.62 45.72 30.14 6.10 706 271.19 3 179 000.02 1 688.74 18336 RC-07-193 39.62 57.91 0.71 18.29 706 263.47 3 178 903.74 1 662.01 18336 RC-07-194 54.86 59.44 0.37 4.58 706 299.76 3 178 948.54 1 672.34 18336 RC-07-195 25.91 32.00 1.79 6.09 706 242.62 3 178 859.23 1 670.85 18336 RC-07-250 42.67 50.29 33.65 7.62 706 261.95 3 178 958.19 1 672.84 18336 RC-07-252 16.76 35.05 0.62 18.29 706 283.61 3 179 072.81 1 722.39 18336 RC-07-253 7.62 21.34 2.53 13.72 706 361.52 3 178 948.02 1 723.22 18336 RC-07-254 28.96 39.62 0.42 10.66 706 263.16 3 178 821.12 1 655.93 18336 RC-08-276 19.81 25.91 0.25 6.10 706 336.71 3 178 988.99 1 719.10 18336 RC-08-277 22.86 41.15 0.73 18.29 706 338.02 3 178 947.09 1 704.60 18336 RC-08-278 44.20 68.58 6.10 24.38 706 300.56 3 178 906.12 1 667.93 18336 RC-08-279 15.24 33.53 2.62 18.29 706 281.83 3 179 086.32 1 721.23 18336 RC-08-280 30.48 39.62 0.36 9.14 706 228.67 3 179 084.84 1 699.36 18336 RC-08-281 36.58 48.77 2.71 12.19 706 245.09 3 179 046.64 1 694.17 18336 RC-08-282 35.05 41.15 1.38 6.10 706 266.71 3 179 029.08 1 699.32 18336 RC-08-283 41.15 51.82 4.75 10.67 706 238.98 3 178 946.63 1 665.94 18336 RC-08-294 38.10 44.20 1.93 6.10 706 234.60 3 178 998.79 1 685.63 18336 RC-08-354 21.34 41.15 0.84 19.81 706 219.77 3 179 175.14 1 692.47 18336 RC-08-355 18.29 24.38 0.28 6.09 706 256.46 3 179 204.45 1 725.53 18336 RC-08-356 25.91 28.96 1.08 3.05 706 298.44 3 179 082.13 1 728.06 18336 RC-08-356 30.48 32.00 0.17 1.52 706 298.44 3 179 082.13 1 724.25 18336 RC-08-357 30.48 35.05 1.40 4.57 706 237.49 3 179 118.03 1 717.85 18336 RC-08-358 25.91 32.00 0.59 6.09 706 299.23 3 179 053.14 1 719.76 18336 RC-08-361 36.58 41.15 0.75 4.57 706 261.50 3 179 050.04 1 701.85 18336 RC-08-362 39.62 41.15 0.01 1.53 706 237.14 3 178 997.24 1 689.07 18336 RC-08-362 42.67 47.24 0.93 4.57 706 235.39 3 178 997.30 1 684.85 18336 RC-08-364 35.05 45.72 0.29 10.67 706 202.39 3 178 899.19 1 662.04 18336 RC-08-365 36.58 38.10 2.19 1.52 706 320.40 3 178 903.39 1 690.06 18336 RC-08-365 39.62 65.53 0.45 25.91 706 326.38 3 178 903.43 1 676.05 18336 RC-08-367 35.05 39.62 0.15 4.57 706 291.90 3 178 852.03 1 669.15 18336 RC-08-368 36.58 41.15 0.38 4.57 706 222.29 3 178 821.47 1 653.88 18336 RC-08-369 27.43 41.15 1.92 13.72 706 284.37 3 178 812.41 1 658.17 18336 RC-08-412 24.38 65.53 0.76 41.15 706 232.79 3 179 120.48 1 703.95 18336 RC-09-512 22.86 27.43 0.07 4.57 706 210.65 3 178 821.80 1 657.61 18336 RC-09-513 27.43 32.00 1.38 4.57 706 258.07 3 178 858.56 1 672.79 18336 RC-09-514 33.53 48.77 0.72 15.24 706 203.72 3 178 937.58 1 665.35 18336 RC-09-515 21.34 22.86 0.09 1.52 706 206.22 3 179 049.87 1 696.28 18336 RC-09-516 19.81 21.34 4.42 1.53 706 198.54 3 179 010.80 1 695.05 18336 RC-09-540 10.67 35.05 0.75 24.38 706 220.70 3 179 208.36 1 702.40 18336 RC-11-660 38.10 44.20 1.69 6.10 706 313.47 3 178 978.48 1 697.73 18336 RC-11-661 45.72 50.29 1.19 4.57 706 270.54 3 178 970.07 1 677.87 18426 DDH-09-100 24.00 35.50 0.70 11.50 706 161.91 3 179 343.89 1 712.28 18426 DDH-09-99 7.00 50.00 0.61 43.00 706 198.96 3 179 321.52 1 724.26 18426 DDH-10-118 47.75 52.10 0.27 4.35 706 113.20 3 178 920.13 1 608.84 18426 DDH-10-119 46.50 50.00 0.18 3.50 706 160.79 3 178 927.61 1 631.74 18426 DDH-10-120 53.00 57.95 1.18 4.95 706 162.55 3 178 989.76 1 638.61 18426 DDH-11-202 3.00 30.00 1.87 27.00 706 198.56 3 179 206.13 1 700.91 18426 DDH-12-229 45.00 75.00 0.38 30.00 706 147.09 3 179 072.32 1 634.50 18426 DDH-12-230 44.00 53.00 0.79 9.00 706 114.66 3 178 886.23 1 604.67 18426 DDH-12-236 31.00 65.00 0.90 34.00 706 186.20 3 179 124.52 1 672.92 18426 RC-08-354 41.15 44.20 0.15 3.05 706 219.79 3 179 174.92 1 681.80 18426 RC-09-436 6.10 47.24 0.40 41.14 706 169.59 3 179 143.90 1 675.13 18426 RC-09-515 39.62 44.20 0.46 4.58 706 213.48 3 179 049.85 1 677.85 18426 RC-09-516 50.29 56.39 0.40 6.10 706 210.97 3 179 010.45 1 664.74 18426 RC-09-519 0.00 33.53 0.64 33.53 706 219.67 3 179 149.79 1 704.72 18426 RC-09-520 6.10 44.20 1.80 38.10 706 163.95 3 179 287.55 1 693.47 18426 RC-09-523 7.62 53.34 1.81 45.72 706 175.33 3 179 188.19 1 672.27


(m)TO(m)

Average grade

Au (g/t)

Core Lenght

(m)



285

X (m) Y (m) Z (m)18426 RC-09-524 3.05 50.29 0.30 47.24 706 114.69 3 179 157.04 1 665.85 18426 RC-09-525 25.91 38.10 0.45 12.19 706 128.57 3 178 861.71 1 615.58 18426 RC-09-537 18.29 50.29 0.25 32.00 706 127.42 3 179 255.05 1 660.51 18426 RC-09-538 0.00 54.86 1.51 54.86 706 158.04 3 179 224.47 1 671.27 18426 RC-09-539 10.67 24.38 1.21 13.71 706 122.42 3 179 387.37 1 688.27 18426 RC-09-541 1.52 35.05 2.03 33.53 706 184.39 3 179 250.86 1 687.95 18426 RC-09-542 0.00 21.34 0.50 21.34 706 219.35 3 179 271.73 1 717.41 18426 RC-09-543 36.58 57.91 0.60 21.33 706 173.17 3 179 084.42 1 656.65 18426 RC-11-658 53.34 59.44 0.32 6.10 706 126.34 3 179 008.48 1 624.30 18426 RC-11-662 57.91 60.96 0.12 3.05 706 208.20 3 178 970.66 1 653.76 18426 RC-11-663 0.00 33.53 3.54 33.53 706 194.68 3 179 281.47 1 703.77 18426 RC-11-664 4.57 48.77 1.17 44.20 706 140.21 3 179 188.57 1 666.39 18426 RC-11-685 50.29 54.86 0.35 4.57 706 117.69 3 178 951.20 1 616.68 18446 DDH-12-227 46.00 50.00 0.25 4.00 706 057.25 3 179 211.86 1 625.60 18446 RC-09-464 42.67 47.24 3.62 4.57 706 044.08 3 179 233.22 1 625.39


(m)TO(m)

Average grade

Au (g/t)

Core Lenght

(m)



286

Appendix 17.1 – Design Criteria

General Site Conditions Location Country Mexico Coordinates 28 53’ N 108 53’ W Near to 15.5 km Northwest of Mulatos Mine Nearest Major City Hermosillo State Sonora Elevation 1,550masl Meteorology Climate Sub Alpine Sierra Madre Average Minimum, C° -2 Average Maximum C° 35 Rainfall Average Annual, mm 1012.5 Wet Season (July-August) Wettest Month, mm 296 Dry Season (November-June) Driest Month, mm 9.5 Maximum 24 hr Event, mm 180 Max Snowfall Event, mm Evaporation Annual Pan, mm 1,431.7 Prevailing Wind Direction East-Southeast General Seismic Zone TBD Power Incoming Genset Distribution 4160 v Medium Voltage 4160 v Low Voltage 480 V, 60 Hz Control Voltage 220/110 V Water Source Groundwater Well(s) ? Water Quality ??? Fuel Diesel/Gasoline Mining General Base Case Mineable Reserve 50,000,000mt Production Schedule 365 d Production Rate 6.296 MTPA/ 17,250mtpd Life of Mine, Years 8 Average Grade Au/Ag 0.7 /4.5 g/t Ore types Dacite, Andesite, Massive Silica Flooded Breccia, some

clays Strip Ratio 0.54:1 In Situ Bulk Density 1.97-2.63 g/cm3

Moisture content, wt% 3.5 Crushing General Production Schedule 365 d System Utilization 87% System Availability 86% Overall System Availability 75% Production Rate Design 958mt/hr Conveyor Design Conveyor Speed (2 m/s Max) ROM Ore Bulk Density 1.6 t/m3 TBC ROM Size -600 mm


287

Final Crushed Ore Product Size P100 -25mm Crushed Ore Product Bulk Density 1.40 No. of Crushing Stages 3 Ball Mill W.I. (kWh/st) Low 6.62 High 25.14 Average 14.91 Abrasion Index, Ai Low 0.01 High 0.78 Average 0.41 Dust Suppression System Type Water Spray Primary Crushing ROM Stockpile Capacity ~50,000 t ROM Feed Bin Steel Structure Bin Feed Method Direct Truck-Dump and Loader Haul Truck Size CAT 777 Oversize Protection Grizzly Rock Breaker At Jaw Crusher Station Apron Feeder 48”x30’ Vibrating Grizzly Feeder Yes 5’x8’ Primary Crusher Type Jaw Crusher Size JC5460 Cross-Belt magnet Yes Metal Detector Yes Crushed Ore Stockpile Live Capacity 18,600 Confirmed Total Capacity 58,000 Confirmed Angle of Repose 37 degrees Angle of Drawdown 65 degrees Reclaim Tunnel Modular – Steel TBC Reclaim Feeders 2 ea. Apron Feeders Secondary Crushing Screen Vibrating Single Deck No. of Screens 1 Size Simplicity 6’x16’ or Equiv. Scalping Screen Opening 75 mm Secondary Crushing Type MVP 550 S/C No. of Secondary Crushers 1 Tertiary Crushing Screen Vibrating Double Deck No. of Screens 2 Size Simplicity 8’x24’ or Equiv. Scalping Screen Opening

Secondary Crusher Type MVP 450X S/MF or Equiv. No. of Tertiary Crushers 3 Crushed Ore Stockpile Live Capacity 590 Total Capacity 6,520 Angle of Repose 37o

Angle of Drawdown 65o

Reclaim Tunnel Modular-Steel Reclaim Feeders 2 ea. Apron Feeders


288

Crushed Ore Bulk Density 1.40 t/m3

Agglomeration Type Cement / Belt Agglomeration CementAddition Rate kg/t 2.5 Rate Control Belt Scale Cement Addition tonnes/day 43 Truck Delivery Size, tonnes 25 Daily Consumption, Trucks 2 Storage Capacity, Days 4 Storage Capacity, tonnes 200 (2 ea. 100 tonne Silos) Agglomeration Solution Barren Solution Agglomeration Solution Addition Nominal m3/hr 100 Agglomeration Solution Addition Design m3/hr 125 Conveying and Stacking Stacking Rate 17,250 mtpd Type Overlands, Portable Field Conveyors, HIC, Radial

Stacker Design Belt Capacity 958 TPH Design Capacity Motor (20% over Crushing Design)

1,150 TPH

Width 42” Stacker Length, m 42.7 Lift Height 10 m TBC Number of Lifts 11 TBC Setback Between Lifts 10 m TBC Angle of Repose 37o

Stacking Width ~80 m Surface Preparation After Stacking D8 Crushed Ore Stacked Density 1.40 Leach Pad Type Multiple Lift, Single Use Construction TwoPhases Clay Permeability, cm/seg. 1x106

Liner System Single 1.5 mm LLDPE on GCL overlain with 0.6 m of 19 mm minus drain cover fill at base area- draincoil only on slopes

Heap Operation Ore Feed Rate 17,250tpd Leaching Cycle 90 d Leaching Schedule 365 d Active Leach Area 110,880 m2 Solution Application Method Drip Tube and Sprinkler Solution Application Rate 10 L/h/m2

Gold Recovery, average LOM 80% Silver Recovery, average LOM 19% Average Gold Leached, kg/day / oz/day 9.66 / 310 Average Silver Leached, kg/day / oz/day 14.75 / 474 Average Pregnant Solution Grade @ 10 L/hr/m2 (Au/ Ag )

0.36 / 0.55 g/tsoln. (0.92 ppm total)

Pump Availability, % 98 Barren SolnNaCN Grade, ppm 200 Wet Season Ore Absorption % 3 Dry Season Ore Absorption % 7 Annual Drip Tube Evaporation Rate % 2 Annual Sprinkler Evaporation Rate % 6 24-hr Drain Down Avg., L/t 20.33


289

Solution Storage General Storage Type Pregnant solution Barren solution Event solution

Pond Tank Pond

Leak Detection / Collection Yes Pregnant Pond Liner Double liner 60 mil HDPE over geonet over 60 mil HDPE

over GCL or 0.3 m clay Volume 41,093 m3 confirmed

Pond Depth (m) 10 TBC Pond side slopes 2.5 H to 1V Pregnant Pond Pump Type Submersible - Slide Mount/skid Number of Pumps Installed/ operating/standby

2/2/0 + warehouse spare

Nominal / Design Flow Rate m3/hr 1150 / 1380 Total Dynamic Head m TBD Agglomeration Pump Type Horizontal at Barren Tank Number of Pumps Installed/ operating/standby

2/1/1

Nominal / Design Flow Rate m3/hr 100/125 Total Dynamic Head m TBD Barren Solution Tank Capacity (minutes at nominal barren flow) 30 Operating freeboard, metres 1 H:D, m 9:9 Barren Heap Leach Pumps Type Horizontal Split Case Double Suction Number of Pumps Installed/ operating/standby

3/2/1 TBC

VFD Yes Nominal/ Design Flow Rate m3/hr 1150 / 1380 Main Header Pipeline Size 16” Total Dynamic Head m TBD Process Solution Pump Process Uses Carbon boost, tank fill elution, etc. Type Horizontal Centrifugal Number of Pumps 1 + warehouse spare Nominal/Design Flow Rate, m3/hr 100/125 TBC Excess Solution Pond Liner Double liner 60 mil HDPE over geonet over 60 mil HDPE

over GCL or 0.3 m clay Volume Sizing 576,632 m3 confirmed

Pond Depth (m) 10 TBC Pond side slopes 2.5 H to 1V Event Pond Pump Type Submersible Pump on Slide Number of Pumps 1


290

Design Flow Rate, m3/hr 400 m3/hr TBC Heap Leach Recovery Circuit General Recovery Plant Type ADR Operating Schedule 365 d Operating Availability 98% Adsorption Section Flowrate Pregnant From Heap Average / Design m3/hr 1110/ 1332 Pregnant Solution Feed Grade to Adsorption 0.36 Au / 0.55 Ag g/tsoln. (0.92 ppm total) Adsorbtion Efficiency 95% Average Gold on Carbon, kg/day / oz/day 9.2 / 295 Average Silver on Carbon, kg/day / oz/day 14.0 / 450 Carbon Loading, g Au+Ag per tonne carbon 5,000 Specific Adsorption Flowrate,m3/hr/m2 (gpm/ft2) 61 (25) Carbon Adsorption Columns Type Cascade Number of Trains 2 Number of Columns/Train 5 Design Flow Rate per Train, m3/hr 621 max

Column Diameter, m 3.3 TBC Column Height, m 3.3 TBC Carbon Depth, m 0.83 dead, 2.1 exp max TBC Step-down between Columns, m 0.4 TBC Tonnes Carbon per Column 3.5 Column Material of Construction steel Distribution Plates & Bubble Caps Yes Inter-column Flow Control Method Dart Valve Carbon Advance Pump Type Screw Number of Pumps 1 Carbon Transfer Time, minutes 30-45

Carbon Advance Rate to Acid Wash Tank 7 tonne batch every 48 hrs TBC Carbon Safety Screen Type Stationary Quantity 2 ea. (1 each train) Screen Retention Size, Mesh 65 Solution Samplers Type Wire Quantity 2 Carbon Columns Area Sump Pump Pump Type Vertical Sump Design Flow Rate, m3/hr 15 TBC Acid Wash Section Type Hydrochloric Acid Number of Acid Wash Columns 1 Carbon Capacity per Column tonnes 7 Acid Wash Column Material of Construction Carbon Steel Tank with FRP or Rubber Liner System Acid Wash Concentration HCL % 3


291

Wash Schedule Every Elution Cycle Washes per Week / vessel 3-4 Acid Wash Time, hrs 4 to 6 Acid Storage Qty NA Volume (working), m3 Drums or Tote Bins Acid Mix Tank Qty 1 Volume (working), m3 TBD Material of Construction Carbon Steel Tank with FRP or Rubber Liner System Acid Wash Pump Pump Type Magnetic drive, seal-less Design Flow Rate, m3/hr TBD Quantity, installed / operating / standby 2 / 1 / 1 Acid Transfer Pump Pump Type Barrel Pump Design Flow Rate, m3/hr 1.5 TBC Acid Area Sump Pump Pump Type Vertical sump Design Flow Rate, m3/hr 10 Neutralization Type Caustic soda rinse Caustic Concentration, % by weight 25 Caustic Addition Point To acid mix tank (spent solution after raw water rinse).

Caustic neutralization solution to be circulated using the acid wash pump

Design Solution Flow Rate, m3/hr TBD End Neutralization pH 7 to 8 Carbon Advance Pump Type Screw (Hydrostal or similar) Number of Pumps 1 Carbon Transfer Time, minutes 30 – 45 Elution Section Type Pressure Zadra Number of Elution Columns 1 Carbon Capacity per Elution Column (tonnes) 7 Elution Column Material of Construction Stainless Steel Elution Column Insulation 50 mm (minimum) R-14 waterproof w/ stainless steel

cladding Design Eluate Solution Flow Rate, m3/hr 28 Elution Temperature, °C (max) 135/150 Elution Design Pressure 690 kPa Elutions per Week 5-6 Elution Time, hrs 12-16 Eluant Storage Tank Type Closed-top, vented Quantity 1 Volume (working), m3 28 TBC


292

Material of Construction

Carbon Steel

Tank Insulation 50 mm (minimum) R-14 waterproof w/ stainless steel cladding

Working Temperature, °C 95 Eluant Pump Pump Type Horizontal Centrifugal Quantity op/standby 1/1 Design Flow Rate, m3/hr 28 Operating Temp., °C 95 Elution Drain Pump Pump Type Horizontal Centrifugal Design Flow Rate, m3/hr 20 Stripped Carbon Transfer Pump Screw Pump or recessed impeller Number of Pumps 1 Carbon Transfer Time, minutes 30-45 Elution Area Sump Pump Pump Type Vertical Sump Design Flow Rate, m3/hr 10 Eluant Solution Heater Type Hot Water Boiler Quantity 1 Service Diesel Eluant Solution Samplers Type Wire Quantity 2 Electrowinning Section Electrowinning Cells Type Fiberglass or Polypropylene Number of Cells 2 Solution Flow Rate m3/hr 28 (14 ea.) Solution Temp., °C 85 Au + Ag Recovery(per pass thrucell) +/- 70% Type of Steel Wool Stainless Rectifiers Type Thyristor (SCR) Qty 1 Operating Voltage 0-6 VDC Electrowinning Cell Exhaust Fan Qty 1 Fan Type reclined Barren Eluant Return Pump Qty 1 Pump Type Horizontal Centrifugal Design Flow Rate, m3/hr/pump 28 Operating Temp., °C 85 Electrowinning Area Sump Pump


293

Pump Type Vertical Sump Design Flow Rate, m3/hr 10 Refinery Section Smelting Furnace Type Fuel Oil Fired, Crucible Metal Production, kg Au+Ag/wk

168

Fuel Diesel Melts per Month 7-8 Pour Method System Manual with Cascade Mold Bag House Dust Collector Yes Drying Oven, size, m3 TBD Flux Mixer Type No- Manual mix Slag Crusher / System No - Future Carbon Regeneration Section Carbon Regeneration Kiln Dewatering Screen Type Stationary Screen Material Stainless Steel Carbon Regeneration Kiln Type Horizontal Rotary w/ feed hopper and pre-drier, indirect

diesel-fired Percent of Carbon Regenerated per Cycle 33%approx Throughput Rate, kg/hr / kg/day 50 / 1,200 Feed Hopper Capacity, tonnes (m3) 7 Retention Time at Temp.(min) 10 Carbon Moisture, % to Kiln 20 Regeneration Kiln Off-Gas Scrubber Type No Carbon Quench Tank Type Cylindrical, cone bottom 45° Storage capacity, t Carbon 7 TBC Carbon Handling Carbon Transfer Pump Type Screw (Hydrostal or similar) Number of Pumps 1 Carbon Transfer Time, minutes 30-45 Carbon Sizing Screen Type Vibrating Screen Material Stainless Steel Mesh Size 20 Carbon Storage Tank Type Cylindrical, cone bottom 45° Storage capacity, t Carbon 7 New Carbon Attritioning Tank Type Cylindrical, cone bottom 45° Capacity, t Carbon 1


294

Agitated?, yes/no Yes Carbon Attritioning Agitator Type Top mount/Fixed speed Batch Size, t Carbon 1 Carbon Fines Tank Type Cylindrical, cone bottom 45° Tank volume req’d, m3 24 TBC Carbon Fines Filter Press Type Recessed Plate Volume Sufficient for 1 week of fines collection on average Carbon Fines Filter Press Feed Pump Pump Type Horizontal Centrifugal Design Flow Rate, m3/hr 15 TBC Carbon Handling Area Sump Pump Shared with Carbon Columns Area Reagents and Consumables Lime Cement Addition , kg/t 2.5 Addition Point Dry fed onto conveyor Addition Method Screw feeder from silo onto belt, controlled by

weightometer Consumption, kg per day, nominal 43,125 Bulk density, kg/m3 0.88 Truck size, t 25 TBC Selected silo size, truckloads

4

Selected silo size, t (m3) 2 ea.100 Total silo capacity, days 4-5 Sodium Cyanide (Heap Leach) Specific Gravity 1.60 Bulk Density, t/m3 0.75 to 0.90 Consumption, kg/t 0.41 Consumption, kg/d,nominal 7,072 Form Briquette Container configuration Solid, in bulk bags Container size, kg 1000 kg Boxes Reagent storage capacity, days 70 t dry storage (double stack), 10 days Cyanide Mix Tank Mix capacity, t NaCN 7 Tank volume req’d, m3 25 (working) Agitated?, yes/no yes Cyanide Transfer Pump Pump Type Horizontal Centrifugal, seal-less Design Flow Rate, m3/hr 20 Quantity, installed / operating / standby 2 / 1 / 1 Cyanide Storage Tank Tank Capacity, days 1.5 (max) Tank volume req’d, m3 37 Cyanide Metering Pumps- Barren


295

Locations CN area to Barren Tank Pump Metering Variable Speed Yes Nominal flow, L/min TBD Design flow, L/min TBD Quantity, installed / operating / standby 2/1/1 Cyanide Metering Pumps- Strip Circuit Locations CN area to Eluate Storage Tank Pump Metering Variable Speed Yes Nominal flow, m3/hr 0.5 Design flow, m3/hr 1 Quantity, installed / operating / standby 1/1/ 0 Cyanide Area Sump Pump Pump Type Vertical Sump Design Flow Rate, m3/hr 10 Antiscalant (as required) Type TBD Form Liquid Container 1 m3 Tote Bins Average Addition Rate 6 ppm Addition Points Barren and pregnant pump suctions Specific Gravity, solution 1.0 Consumption total, kg/t nominal 0.019 TBC Consumption total, kg/d nominal 327 TBC Reagent Storage Capacity, days 30 (10 tote bins) Antiscalant Metering Pumps Type Diaphragm Variable Speed Yes Addition Method Individual pumps for each addition point Nominal flow, mL/min Design flow, mL/min Antiscalant dosing range , ppm 0 to 20 Quantity, installed / operating / standby 2 / 2 /0 Caustic Soda (NaOH Consumption, kg/d (nominal)

60.4 (total)

Form Pearls or Flakes Container configuration Bags Reagent Storage Capacity, days 50 Caustic Mix/Storage Tank Configuration Cylindrical, flat bottom covered tank Mix capacity, kgNaOH TBD Mix Concentration, % by weight TBD Tank Capacity, days TBD Tank volume required, m3 (working) TBD Agitated?, yes/no Yes, during mixing Caustic Mix Tank Agitator Type Single axial flow impeller Caustic Transfer/Metering Pumps Pump Type Horizontal centrifugal or peristaltic


296

Design Flow Rate, m3/hr Varies depending on addition point Variable Speed y/n Yes Solution s.g. 1.22 Addition Points Cyanide Mixing, Eluant Storage Tank and Acid Wash Quantity, installed / operating / standby 1 / 1 / 0 Carbon Type Coconut Shell Size, Makeup 6 x 12 mesh Consumption, kg/t/strip 30 Consumption, kg/d, nominal 105(average) TBC Container configuration Bulk bags Container size, kg 500 Hydrochloric Acid Delivered Concentration, % by weight 28 to 35 Consumption, L/day, nominal TBD Delivery Container Configuration 1 m3 Tote bins or bulk Acid Wash Conc., % by weight 3 to 5 Reagent Storage Capacity, days TBD Fluxes Flux ratio, kg flux/kg Au+Ag 1.5 : 1 Flux mix, % 100 Silica 25 Borax 40 Fluorspar 0 Niter 20 Soda Ash 15 Flux reagents requirements, kg/d, nominal Silica 9 Borax 14.4 Fluorspar 0.0 Niter 7.2 Soda Ash 5.4 Total 36 Container Size, kg 25 or 50 kg bags Storage Capacity, days 60 Raw Water Source Water Well Consumption, Nominal / Design m3/h Well Pump Pump Type Nominal/ Design Flow Rate, m3/hr 100 (provisional max heap only requirement), approx

150 for site Quantity, installed / operating / standby 1 Pit Dewatering Pump (Mine Area) Pump Type Design Flow Rate,m3/hr Quantity, installed / operating / standby

Potable Water Source Water Treatment Consumption, m3/h


297

Potable Water Treatment Pump N/A Pump Type N/A Design Flow Rate, m3/hr N/A Quantity, installed / operating / standby N/A Potable Water Treatment System N/A Type N/A Design Flow Rate, m3/hr N/A Potable Water Tank N/A Tank Volume, m3 N/A Material of Construction N/A Potable Water Distribution Pump N/A Pump Type N/A Design Flow Rate, m3/hr N/A Quantity, installed / operating / standby N/A Air Crushing Plant Air Compressor Quantity 1 Design flow, actual m3/h 175 Design discharge pressure, kPa 700

Type ADR Instrument Air Compressor Quantity 1 Design flow, actual m3/h 15 Design discharge pressure, kPa 620 Instrument Air Dryer Design Flow, m3/hr 15 Design Discharge Pressure, kPa

620

Carbon Press, Sludge Press and Cyanide ISO Blow-Down Compressor

Compressor Type Reciprocating Design Flow, m3/hr 125 Design Discharge

518 Blow Down Time, hr 1-4 Fuels Fuel Delivery Pump Specific Gravity of Fuel Oil 0.9 Nominal / Design flow, L/h 116/166 Fuel Oil Day Tanks Number of Tanks 1 Tank Working Volume, m3 50 Sanitary System Type Sewage Treatment Plant


298

Appendix 21.1 – General and administration operating cost detail

General and Administrat ion 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2023

37901 - Human Resourc es6010 - Labor - Regular 13,318 13,318 13,318 13,318 13,318 13,318 13,318 13,318 5,041

6125 - Consultants - General 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 1,363

6210 - General Materials 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 227

6245 - Uniform and Pers. equipment 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 341

8010 - Salary - Regular 192,550 192,550 192,550 192,550 192,550 192,550 192,550 192,550 72,880

8027 - Shares Incentive Plan - - - - - - - - -

8120 - Office Supplies 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 1,136

8195 - Travelling 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 1,325

8246 - Other external services 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 1,817

8301 - Fuel / Gasolina 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 227

8405 - Recreational Activities 47,340 47,340 47,340 47,340 47,340 47,340 47,340 47,340 17,918

8410 - Social Club Activities 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 6,813

8430 - Recruiting, Relocation Expense 15,750 15,750 15,750 15,750 15,750 15,750 15,750 15,750 5,961

8435 - Official Papers, publications 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 1,703

8445 - Promotional Items 38,750 38,750 38,750 38,750 38,750 38,750 38,750 38,750 14,667

8470 - Occupational Hygiene - - - - - - - - -

8475 - Clinical Appraisals 21,500 21,500 21,500 21,500 21,500 21,500 21,500 21,500 8,138

8480 - Doctors & Consultants 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 4,542

8510 - Employees Training 4,399 4,399 4,399 4,399 4,399 4,399 4,399 4,399 1,665

Transfer Salary to Mascota

Transfer Salary to Exloracion

Total 37901 - Human Resources 385,107 385,107 385,107 385,107 385,107 385,107 385,107 385,107 145,763

37903 - Community Relations

6010 - Labor - Regular - - - - - - - - -

6016 - Taxes 22,868 22,868 22,868 22,868 22,868 22,868 22,868 22,868 8,655

6110 - Labor contractor 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 2,725

6210 - General Materials 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 1,590

6245 - Uniforms and personal equipment 915 915 915 915 915 915 915 915 346

8010 - Salary 183,547 183,547 183,547 183,547 183,547 183,547 183,547 183,547 69,473

8035 - Memberships - Miscellaneous 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 2,271

8056 - Commnication expenses 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 189

8100 - Municipality taxes 9,158 9,158 9,158 9,158 9,158 9,158 9,158 9,158 3,466

8120 - Office supplies 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 568

8195 - Travelling 12,100 12,100 12,100 12,100 12,100 12,100 12,100 12,100 4,580

8212 - Misc. Travel, visit, Corporate - - - - - - - - -

8220 - Consulting 48,935 48,935 48,935 48,935 48,935 48,935 48,935 48,935 18,522

8240 - Legal 7,600 7,600 7,600 7,600 7,600 7,600 7,600 7,600 2,877

8275 - Transport freight 10,650 10,650 10,650 10,650 10,650 10,650 10,650 10,650 4,031

8301 - Fuel / Gasolina 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 5,450

8304 - car repair and maintenance 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,600 3,634

8402 - Community Support 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000 18,168

8415 - Sponsoring 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 568

8510 - Training 3,406 3,406 3,406 3,406 3,406 3,406 3,406 3,406 1,289

8610.- Software 884 884 884 884 884 884 884 884 334

8616 - Computer suplies 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 681

8705 - Permits - - - - - - - - -

Transfer Exploraciomes salary

Transfer Mascota salary

Total 37903 - Community Relations 394,762 394,762 394,762 394,762 394,762 394,762 394,762 394,762 149,418

37905 - Operation Camp6010 - Labor - Regular 1,271,746 1,271,746 1,271,746 1,271,746 1,271,746 1,271,746 1,271,746 1,271,746 481,356

6110 - Labor - Contractors 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 4,542

6117 - Equipment Repairs 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 9,084


6245 - Uniform and Pers. equipment 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 1,136

6250 - Electricity (distribution) - - - - - - - - -

6426 - Water supply (rigths) 27,840 27,840 27,840 27,840 27,840 27,840 27,840 27,840 10,537

8010 - Salary - Regular 83,661 83,661 83,661 83,661 83,661 83,661 83,661 83,661 31,666

8210 - Meals & Entertainment 984,000 984,000 984,000 984,000 984,000 984,000 984,000 984,000 372,444

8301 - CarFuel 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 4,542

8304 - Car Repair & Mtce 11,700 11,700 11,700 11,700 11,700 11,700 11,700 11,700 4,428


Transfer to Exploracion

Trabsfer to Construccion - Proyecto del Tiro?

Total 37905 - Operation Camp 2,467,990 2,467,990 2,467,990 2,467,990 2,467,990 2,467,990 2,467,990 2,467,990 934,134


299


37907 - Camp Offic es6210 - General Materials 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 1,136

6245 - Personal Protection Equip. - - - - - - - - -

6275 - Transport Freight 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700 2,157

6525 - Spare Parts & Others - - - - - - - - -

8056 - Communications Expense - - - - - - - - -

8107 - Office Maintenance 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 2,725

8120 - Office Supplies 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 1,136

8122 - Utilities, Gas and Electricity 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 11,355

8301 - Fuel / Gasolina 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 227

7904 - general transfer Gas LP y Servicios a Taller (15,575) (15,575) (15,575) (15,575) (15,575) (15,575) (15,575) (15,575) (5,895)

Total 37907 - Camp Offices 33,925 33,925 33,925 33,925 33,925 33,925 33,925 33,925 12,841

37910 - Hermosillo Offic e

6010 - Labor - Regular 63,587 63,587 63,587 63,587 63,587 63,587 63,587 63,587 24,068

8001 - Salary - - - - - - - - -

8005 - Salary - Management 647,881 647,881 647,881 647,881 647,881 647,881 647,881 647,881 245,223

8010 - Salary - Regular 118,652 118,652 118,652 118,652 118,652 118,652 118,652 118,652 44,910

8040 - Office Rent 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 15,897

8056 - Communications Expense 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 6,813

8060 - Postage & Courier Expenses 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 1,136

8085 - Professional Memberships - - - - - - - - -

8107 - Office - Maintenance 7,800 7,800 7,800 7,800 7,800 7,800 7,800 7,800 2,952

8120 - Office Supplies 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 2,271

8122 - Utilities, Gas and Electricity 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 1,817

8140 - Miscellaneous Expenses - - - - - - - - -

8195 - Travelling 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 6,813

8210 - Meals & Entertainment 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 1,136

8212 - Misc. Travel, visit, Corporate 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 9,084

8240 - Legal 24,600 24,600 24,600 24,600 24,600 24,600 24,600 24,600 9,311

8301 - Carfuel 2,280 2,280 2,280 2,280 2,280 2,280 2,280 2,280 863

8304 - Car Repair & Mtce 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 1,363


Total 37910 - Hermosillo Office 996,800 996,800 996,800 996,800 996,800 996,800 996,800 996,800 377,289

37912 - Sec urity Guards6010 - Labor - Regular - - - - - - - - -


6210 - General Materials 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 908

6245 - Uniform and Pers. equipment 1,650 1,650 1,650 1,650 1,650 1,650 1,650 1,650 625

8010 - Salary - Regular 113,369 113,369 113,369 113,369 113,369 113,369 113,369 113,369 42,910

8058 - Office Equip Repairs & Mtce 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 681

8210 - Meals & Entertainment - - - - - - - - -

8234 - Service Charges 298,554 298,554 298,554 298,554 298,554 298,554 298,554 298,554 113,003

8301 - Fuel 3,900 3,900 3,900 3,900 3,900 3,900 3,900 3,900 1,476

8304 - Car Repair & Mtce 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,600 3,634


Transfer to Mascota 22%

Transfer to Exploracion 10%

Transfer to Construccion and projects 3%

Total 37912 - Security Guards 446,116 446,116 446,116 446,116 446,116 446,116 446,116 446,116 168,855


300


37913 - Health Safety

6010 - Labor-Regular - - - - - - - - -


6245 - Uniform and Pers. equipment 9,357 9,357 9,357 9,357 9,357 9,357 9,357 9,357 3,542

6272 - Vehicule Maintenance 12,483 12,483 12,483 12,483 12,483 12,483 12,483 12,483 4,725

7904 - General Transfer - - - - - - - - -

8010 - Salary-Regular 371,440 371,440 371,440 371,440 371,440 371,440 371,440 371,440 140,590

8050 - Stationery & Supplies 1,277 1,277 1,277 1,277 1,277 1,277 1,277 1,277 483

8057 - Office Equipment 638 638 638 638 638 638 638 638 242

8059 - Other Equipment 22,212 22,212 22,212 22,212 22,212 22,212 22,212 22,212 8,407

8120 - Office Supplies 3,574 3,574 3,574 3,574 3,574 3,574 3,574 3,574 1,353

8140 - Miscellaneous Expenses 6,383 6,383 6,383 6,383 6,383 6,383 6,383 6,383 2,416

8195 - Travelling 8,181 8,181 8,181 8,181 8,181 8,181 8,181 8,181 3,096

8220 - Consulting 6,809 6,809 6,809 6,809 6,809 6,809 6,809 6,809 2,577

8301 - Fuel / Gasolina 7,989 7,989 7,989 7,989 7,989 7,989 7,989 7,989 3,024

8460 - Personnal Protection Equip. 2,764 2,764 2,764 2,764 2,764 2,764 2,764 2,764 1,046

8465 - Security Awards 3,830 3,830 3,830 3,830 3,830 3,830 3,830 3,830 1,450

8480 - Doctors & Consultants 1,532 1,532 1,532 1,532 1,532 1,532 1,532 1,532 580

8490 - Clinical Material 71,957 71,957 71,957 71,957 71,957 71,957 71,957 71,957 27,236


8512 - Training / Materiel 5,106 5,106 5,106 5,106 5,106 5,106 5,106 5,106 1,933

8520 - Air ambulance Expenses 1,021 1,021 1,021 1,021 1,021 1,021 1,021 1,021 387

8605 - Computers 1,277 1,277 1,277 1,277 1,277 1,277 1,277 1,277 483

8750 - Hazardous Waste management 4,596 4,596 4,596 4,596 4,596 4,596 4,596 4,596 1,739

7904 - General Transfer to proces (recarga extintores)

7904 - General Transfer to UG (recarga extintores)

7904 - General Transfer to OP (recarga extintores)

7904 - General Transfer to Camp (recarga extintores)

Total 37913 - Health Safety 565,616 565,616 565,616 565,616 565,616 565,616 565,616 565,616 214,086

37915 - Vehic ule Transportation6010 - Labor - Regular 84,783 84,783 84,783 84,783 84,783 84,783 84,783 84,783 32,090




6268 - Aircraft Rental 96,240 96,240 96,240 96,240 96,240 96,240 96,240 96,240 36,427

8010 - Salary - Regular 37,262 37,262 37,262 37,262 37,262 37,262 37,262 37,262 14,104

8070 - License & taxes 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 1,136

8120 - Office Supplies 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 227

8195 - Travelling 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 227

8301 - Carfuel 51,000 51,000 51,000 51,000 51,000 51,000 51,000 51,000 19,304

8302 - Car insurance/ tax 28,079 28,079 28,079 28,079 28,079 28,079 28,079 28,079 10,628

8304 - Car Repair & Mtce 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 11,355

8510 - Employees Training 2,266 2,266 2,266 2,266 2,266 2,266 2,266 2,266 858

Transfer to Mascota

Total 37915 - Vehicule Transportation 401,485 401,485 401,485 401,485 401,485 401,485 401,485 401,485 151,962

37917 - Expats Housing8522 - Expat Fees 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 11,355

6010 - Labor - Regular 10,285 10,285 10,285 10,285 10,285 10,285 10,285 10,285 3,893

Total 37917 - Expats Housing 40,285 40,285 40,285 40,285 40,285 40,285 40,285 40,285 15,248


301


37920 - W arehouse

6010 - Labor - Regular 127,175 127,175 127,175 127,175 127,175 127,175 127,175 127,175 48,136

6210 - General Materials 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 454

6220 - Tools 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 227


6275 - Transport Freight - - - - - - - - -


8010 - Salary - Regular 141,494 141,494 141,494 141,494 141,494 141,494 141,494 141,494 53,555

8057 - Office Equipment 1,360 1,360 1,360 1,360 1,360 1,360 1,360 1,360 515

8120 - Office Supplies 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 681

8140 - Miscellaneous Expenses 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 227

8195 - Travelling 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 227

8301 - Carfuel 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 1,136

8304 - Car Repair & Mtce 5,400 5,400 5,400 5,400 5,400 5,400 5,400 5,400 2,044


Total 37920 - Warehouse 292,662 292,662 292,662 292,662 292,662 292,662 292,662 292,662 110,773

37921 - Purc hasing6010 - Labor - Regular - - - - - - - - -


6245 - Uniform and Pers. equipment 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 341

6275 - transport freigth 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 3,407


8010 - Salary - Regular 197,030 197,030 197,030 197,030 197,030 197,030 197,030 197,030 74,576

8057 - Office Equipment 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 227

8061 - Customs fees 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 4,542

8120 - Office Supplies 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 454

8140 - Miscellaneous Expenses 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 227

8195 - Travelling 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 908

8220 - Consulting 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 795

8276 - Inbound Freight 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 2,271

8301 - Carfuel 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 227

8460 - Personnal Protection Equip. 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 227


8605-Computers - 500 - - - - - - 500

Transfer to Mascota 18%

Total 37920 - Purchasing 238,922 239,422 238,922 238,922 238,922 238,922 238,922 238,922 90,932

37930 - Tec hnic al Serv ic es

6010 - Labor - Regular 169,566 169,566 169,566 169,566 169,566 169,566 169,566 169,566 64,181


6245 - Personal Protection Equip. 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 2,914

8010 - Salary - Regular 484,809 484,809 484,809 484,809 484,809 484,809 484,809 484,809 183,500

8058 - Office Equip Repairs & Mtce 11,550 11,550 11,550 11,550 11,550 11,550 11,550 11,550 4,372

8059 - Other Equipment 11,100 11,100 11,100 11,100 11,100 11,100 11,100 11,100 4,201

8076 - Software Support 44,667 44,667 44,667 44,667 44,667 44,667 44,667 44,667 16,906

8120 - Office supplies 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 1,136

8195 - Travelling 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 984

8200 - Hotel and Lodging 5,310 5,310 5,310 5,310 5,310 5,310 5,310 5,310 2,010

8205 - Aifare 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 2,271

8210 - Meals and Entertainment 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 1,703

8212 - Misc, Travel Visit Corporate 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 3,596

8220 - Consulting 35,500 35,500 35,500 35,500 35,500 35,500 35,500 35,500 13,437

8275 - Freigth / Transportation 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 662

8301 - Fuel / Gasolina 6,900 6,900 6,900 6,900 6,900 6,900 6,900 6,900 2,612

8304 - Car Maintenance 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,600 3,634


8512 - Training / Material 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 227

8610 - Software 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 1,893

8615 - Computers Supplies 7,030 7,030 7,030 7,030 7,030 7,030 7,030 7,030 2,661

Total 37930 - Technical Services 877,427 877,427 877,427 877,427 877,427 877,427 877,427 877,427 332,106


302


37950 - IT6010 - Labor - Regular - - - - - - - - -

6210 - General Materials - - - - - - - - -

6218 - Mobile Radios & Parts 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 2,271


8010 - Salary - Regular 83,661 83,661 83,661 83,661 83,661 83,661 83,661 83,661 31,666

8054 - Equipment Rentals - - - - - - - - -

8056 - Communications Expense 175,980 175,980 175,980 175,980 175,980 175,980 175,980 175,980 66,608

8058 - Office Equip Repairs & Mtce 29,500 29,500 29,500 29,500 29,500 29,500 29,500 29,500 11,166

8079 - Consumables 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 2,725

8081 - Faxes/ photocopiers/ printers 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 2,271

8082 - Network Costs 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 10,220

8120 - Office Supplies 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 379

8140 - Miscellaneous Expenses 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 1,817

8195 - Travelling 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 4,164

8220 - Consulting - - - - - - - - -

8234 - Service Charges 14,860 14,860 14,860 14,860 14,860 14,860 14,860 14,860 5,625

8304 - Car Repair & Mtce 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 1,260 477

8460 - Personnal Protection Equip. - - - - - - - - -


8605 - Computers 23,100 23,100 23,100 23,100 23,100 23,100 23,100 23,100 8,743

8615 - Computers Supplies 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 568

8620 - Service Contract 58,606 58,606 58,606 58,606 58,606 58,606 58,606 58,606 22,182

8607 - Server Hardware Costs 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 2,271

8610 - Software Purchases 44,889 44,889 44,889 44,889 44,889 44,889 44,889 44,889 16,991

Total 37950 - IT 507,293 507,293 507,293 507,293 507,293 507,293 507,293 507,293 192,010

37960 - Env iro nme nt6010 - Labor 73,455 73,455 73,455 73,455 73,455 73,455 73,455 73,455 27,803

6110 - Labor contractor 22,054 22,054 22,054 22,054 22,054 22,054 22,054 22,054 8,347

6245 - Uniforms and safety equipment 2,995 2,995 2,995 2,995 2,995 2,995 2,995 2,995 1,133

8010 - Salary 51,588 51,588 51,588 51,588 51,588 51,588 51,588 51,588 19,526

8056 - Commnication expenses 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 284

8120 - office supplies 2,765 2,765 2,765 2,765 2,765 2,765 2,765 2,765 1,047

8175 - Misc expenses 16,243 16,243 16,243 16,243 16,243 16,243 16,243 16,243 6,148

8195 - Travelling 24,787 24,787 24,787 24,787 24,787 24,787 24,787 24,787 9,382

8220 - Consulting 115,320 115,320 115,320 115,320 115,320 115,320 115,320 115,320 43,649

8240 - Legal 1,787 1,787 1,787 1,787 1,787 1,787 1,787 1,787 676

8301 - Combustible 9,420 9,420 9,420 9,420 9,420 9,420 9,420 9,420 3,565

8304 - Car repair and maintenance 6,612 6,612 6,612 6,612 6,612 6,612 6,612 6,612 2,503

8510 - Training 4,472 4,472 4,472 4,472 4,472 4,472 4,472 4,472 1,693

8610 - Software 884 884 884 884 884 884 884 884 334

8616 - Computer suppliers 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 871

xxxx - Heavy equipment maintenance 14,255 14,255 14,255 14,255 14,255 14,255 14,255 14,255 5,396

8705 - Permits 1,201 1,201 1,201 1,201 1,201 1,201 1,201 1,201 455

8720 - Revegetation 23,968 23,968 23,968 23,968 23,968 23,968 23,968 23,968 9,072

8735 - Environmental audits - - - - - - - - -

8750 - Hazardous Waste management - - - - - - - - -

8748 - Sign posting 792 792 792 792 792 792 792 792 300

8954 - Equipment rental 17,903 17,903 17,903 17,903 17,903 17,903 17,903 17,903 6,776

Transfers ARO (45,031) (45,031) (45,031) (45,031) (45,031) (45,031) (45,031) (45,031) (17,044)

Total 37960 - Environment 348,519 348,519 348,519 348,519 348,519 348,519 348,519 348,519 131,915

Total Administration 7,996,910 7,997,410 7,996,910 7,996,910 7,996,910 7,996,910 7,996,910 7,996,910 3,027,331

technical report on the june 30, 2012 update of the mineral … · 2016-12-06 · technical report...

Documents