technical and technological solutions 11 december 2020 · 2020. 12. 22. · pre-conference...
TRANSCRIPT
Online Pre-Conference
WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE
7 – 11 December 2020
Technical And Technological Solutions11 December 2020
Solutions That Leverage The Resilience Of Water Supply Systems –The Experience of EPALAna Margarida Luís, Conceição Almeida, Francisco Serranito
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
Summary
1. About EPAL2. Integrated Risk Framework3. Smart Technologies As Barriers To Strategic Risks 4. Foresight Analysis5. Conclusions
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
Summary
1. About EPAL2. Integrated Risk Framework3. Smart Technologies As Barriers To Strategic Risks 4. Foresight Analysis5. Conclusions
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
1. About EPAL
EPAL is a profitable company founded in 1868, supplying drinking water to more than ¼ of the Portuguese population (2,9 M inhab). The supply system comprises assets whose value is aprox. 700 M€.
Since 2015 EPAL has been responsible to manage the concession of AdVT, a new water and wastewater company that resulted from merging 4 former companies, serving around 1,0 M inhab.
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
Summary
1. About EPAL2. Integrated Risk Framework3. Smart Technologies As Barriers To Strategic Risks 4. Foresight Analysis5. Conclusions
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
2. Integrated Risk Framework
“Strategic Risk Management in Water Utilities:
Development of a Holistic Approachlinking Risks and Futures”
What are our current and future
vulnerabilities? STRATEGIC RISKS’ ASSESSMENT, IN THE PRESENT
Strategic objectives’ identification
Events/exposures/harms systemic model
“Side by side” risks comparison
STRATEGIC RISKS’ ASSESSMENT, IN THE MID AND LONG-TERM
Mega-trends characterization
Construction of future scenarios
“Side by side” risks (evolution) comparison
2010:
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
3. Subtitle
Text : Calibri, dark grey, size to adjust
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
4. Subtitle
Text : Calibri, dark grey, size to adjust
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
2. Integrated Risk Framework
“Side by side” strategic risks comparison
(in the present)
Strategic objectives’ identification
Events/exposures/harms systemic model
“Side by side” risks comparison
Mega-trends characterization
Construction of future scenarios
“Side by side” risks (evolution) comparison
LIK
ELIH
OO
D
PROFITABILITY
SUSTAINABILITY
RELIABILITY
REPUTATION
QUALITY
QUANTITY
CONSEQUENCE
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
2. Integrated Risk Framework
CROSS-CONSISTENCY
ANALYSIS –
FUTURE SCENARIOS
State of the
economyEnergy prices
Consumption
patterns&environ
mental behaviour
Water quality Water availabilityRegulation and
legislation
Infrastructure
development
Technology
development
GrowthSignificant
increase
Consumption
slight decrease
Significant
improvement
C.Bode reservoir
level>121,5m or
Tagus >+8m
Compliance
driven by EU
Resource
scarcity: min. for
Maintenance and
min. for Capex
Low degree of
automation; no
global vision of
system
StagnationSlight increase or
decrease
Consumption
significant
decrease
Slight
improvement
C.Bode reservoir
level>100m or
+4m<Tagus<+6m
Compliance
driven by National
Law
"Normal":
Increase
Maintenance and
Decrease Capex
Developed
degree of
automation;
global view of
system
FluctuationRemains the
same
Consumption
remains stable
Remains the
same
C.Bode reservoir
level<100m or
-1m<Tagus<+4m
Compliance
driven by self-
regulation
Resource
abundance
:Decrease
Mainten. and
Increase Capex
Best in class.
Import / Develops
and exports own
tech.
Recession FluctuationConsumption
slight increase
Slight
degradation
C.Bode reservoir
level <89m or
Tagus< -2m
Compliance
driven by lobby
groups
Significant
decrease
Consumption
significant
increase
Significant
degradation
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
2. Risk Framework
CROSS-CONSISTENCY
ANALYSIS –
FUTURE SCENARIOS
Reference scenarioAs Portugal has just exited an economic recession, the state of the economy is becoming stagnant. Energy prices register slight positive or negative
fluctuations, and consumption patterns evidence a slight decrease. Both water quality and water availability at source remain at good levels. Water
supplied complies with national standards and economic regulation is becoming gradually stronger. Infrastructure developments return to their “normal”
configuration, i.e., increasing maintenance and reducing capital investment, thus optimizing assets' life without compromising the agreed levels of
service to the clients. The company maintains a developed degree of automation, allowing a global view of the system and its centralized operation.
Scenario 1 - Water scarcity Downscaled climate change scenarios indicate that severe drought periods are expected to occur in the next 40 years. During these periods, that may
extend over one year or more, there may be a fluctuation in the prices of energy, as energy production is also affected by droughts, as well as a
fluctuation in the state of the economy. Consumptions will decrease due to restrictions imposed by EPAL and the regulator. Water quality at sources will
also decrease, due to the reduction in flows in the water bodies, which augments the concentration of pollutants. This decrease of water quality may
become significant if compliance with environmental standards is self regulated and economic regulation is weak. In order to cope with the increased
water treatment operational costs and the costs associated with the implementation of adaptation measures to water scarcity, along with the reduction in
revenue due to a decrease in consumption, tariffs will be gradually increased. EPAL will decrease the regular investment costs, thus increasing
maintenance expenditure, and will maintain a developed degree of automation, since having a global view of the system is shown to be crucial for its
operation in this scenario.
Scenario 2 - Financial resources‘ scarcityIn a prolonged global economic recession context, water quality at sources gets worse, since industries and municipalities cannot afford adequate
treatment of the wastewater they produce and, on the other hand, farmers tend to use non-approved pesticides. EPAL faces a significant decrease in
consumption, which lowers annual revenue. Both capital and operational expenditures are constrained, and part of the installed automation system may
begin to fail. EPAL moves from a preventive attitude in asset management towards a reactive one. Economic regulation is weak, since regulators know
that water utilities have no financial resources either to put measures in place to accomplish the established levels of service or to pay any fines.
Development of new solutions or technology may occur, due to the need to find cheaper ways to operate the water supply system.
Scenario 3 - Strong economic growthSignificant improvement in water quality happens in a context of strong economic growth. Although existing industries in
the watershed increase their activity and new ones arise, they comply with EU water quality legislation and treat all the
wastewater before it is discharged into the rivers or the sewage network. Farmers also use permitted pesticides only,
complying with the Nitrates Directive. Municipalities' wastewater treatment is of secondary or tertiary levels. There
is a slight increase in water consumption. This context of strong economic growth makes way to an increase in Capex,
targeting trunk mains' rehabilitation because of their ageing process, and also enables the company to
adopt or develop new technology, becoming “best in class”. For example, EPAL augments its own power
generation capacity, through the production of solar, wind and micro-hydric energy. As a result of all these
factors, EPAL faces a reduction in Operational Expenditure, due to reduced costs with energy and chemicals,
as well as to an increase in the revenue from the clients.
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
2. Integrated Risk Framework
Evolution of Strategic Risks (in the future)
LIK
EL
IHO
OD
CONSEQUENCE
PROFITABILITY
SUSTAINABILITY
RELIABILITY
REPUTATION
QUALITY
QUANTITY
(reference scenario)
LIK
EL
IHO
OD
CONSEQUENCE
PROFITABILITY
SUSTAINABILITY
RELIABILITY
REPUTATION
QUALITY
QUANTITY
(water scarcity scenario)
Strategic objectives’ identification
Events/exposures/harms systemic model
“Side by side” risks comparison
Mega-trends characterization
Construction of future scenarios
“Side by side” risks (evolution) comparison
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
Summary
1. About EPAL2. Integrated Risk Framework3. Smart Technologies As Barriers To Strategic Risks4. Foresight Analysis5. Conclusions
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
3. Smart Technologies As Barriers To Strategic Risks
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
3. Smart Technologies As Barriers To Strategic Risks
Eg.#1: Asset Management
LISBON DISTRIBUTION NETWORKRENEWAL – PRIORITY AREAS
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
3. Smart Technologies As Barriers To Strategic Risks
Eg.#2: Smart Network Management
Remote
supervision and
operation of all
drinking water
production and
transport
processes
Algorithm that identifies suspension zones
with a low service quality level, based on a
risk matrix criteria.
Customer relation management application
that integrates commercial and technical
information, including mobility functions
Provide customers
with information about
their water
consumption, allowing
them to optimise the
use of water in their
homes or businesses
(warning even
possible bursts)
Support energy management in water supply
and waste water utilities, aiming energy
operational and economic optimisation.
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
3. Smart Technologies As Barriers To Strategic Risks
Eg.#3: Business Continuity
- Definition of contingency plans for drought;
- Contact with security forces, health entities and NGO´s;
- Contacts with various official entities, including the regulator;
- Contacts with municipalities for support;
- Developing campaigns in the media;
- Strengthening the supply ducts, allowing redundancy;
- Preparation of alternative supply channels
Drought Contingency Plans
Emergency Plans
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
Summary
1. About EPAL2. Integrated Risk Framework3. Smart Technologies As Barriers To Strategic Risks 4. Foresight Analysis5. Conclusions
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
4. Foresight Analysis
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
4. Foresight Analysis
Current vulnerability = Low (due to natural conditions + adaptation measures in the past)
Megatrend: Climate change
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
4. Foresight Analysis
Megatrend: Climate change
Future vulnerability = ???
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
1980-2009 2010-2039 2040-2069 2070-2099
N m
ine
ral (
ton
/an
o)
A2 N mineral: Rio Zêzere - Castelo de Bode
Clima Clima + sócio-economia
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1980-2009 2010-2039 2040-2069 2070-2099
P t
ota
l (to
n/a
no
)
B2 P total: Rio Zêzere - Castelo de Bode
Clima Clima + sócio-economia
Low to Medium
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
4. Foresight Analysis
Megatrend: Climate change
Flexible Adaptation Plan ?climate change indicatorsA1.4
A1.1
A4.1
A2.1
A6.1
A.Extra
A2.2
B1.1
B2.4
B.Extra
B2.6
C1.1
C3.1
C4.1
C.Extra
D1.2
D1.1
D1.3
E.Extra
E1.1
E4.1
E1.2
F3.1
Longo prazo
EF
Curto prazo Médio prazo
AB
CD
Systems’ interconnections
ProtocolC. Bode
WTP requalification
C. Bode Dam bottom discharge
Water losses reduction
Shared solutions
Intakes’ protection zones
Desalination plant in Lisbon
New spur in Tagus river
Water import via maritime vessels
Reduce pressure at peak hours
Forecast models based on CCindicators – I&D
New wells
Consideration of CC impacts in the design of assets
2004/2005 2005/2006 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Outubro 1 100,0% 0,2 2,8 0,9 0,8 0,8 0,6 0,8 0,5 1,1 0,8
Novembro 2 100,0% 0,6 6,0 0,7 0,5 0,8 1,1 0,9 0,9 1,2 1,4 <1
Dezembro 3 100,0% 1,2 6,5 0,7 0,6 1,4 2,0 1,1 1,4 1,6 1,8 >=1<1,25
Janeiro 4 100,0% 1,7 6,8 0,9 1,3 3,1 3,5 1,4 2,4 3,3 2,4 >=1,25<1,50
Fevereiro 5 100,0% 2,0 7,7 1,0 2,1 4,6 4,4 1,6 3,3 6,5 2,9 >1,50
Março 6 100,0% 2,6 8,0 1,2 2,4 6,5 5,0 1,7 5,3 7,3 3,1
Abril 7 100,0% 2,9 7,9 1,5 2,4 7,0 5,4 1,7 6,6 8,1 3,2
Maio 8 100,0% 3,0 8,1 1,6 2,6 7,7 6,1 1,8 7,1 8,7 3,3
Junho 9 100,0% 3,1 8,3 1,8 2,8 8,0 7,0 2,0 7,6 9,3 3,5
Julho 10 100,0% 3,1 8,5 2,0 3,1 8,2 7,4 2,0 7,8 9,5 3,7
Agosto 11 100,0% 3,2 8,2 2,1 3,2 8,0 7,5 2,0 7,5 9,2 3,7
Setembro 12 100,0% 3,0 7,7 2,1 3,1 7,4 7,0 2,0 7,1 8,7 3,5
Mês (ordinal) do ano
hidrológico
Caudais acumulados ao mês de observação em comparação com o período de referência 2004-2005
CAUDAL AFLUENTE ANUAL CASTELO DO BODE
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
Summary
1. About EPAL2. Integrated Risk Framework3. Smart Technologies As Barriers To Strategic Risks 4. Foresight Analysis5. Conclusions
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
Conclusions
The Strategic Risk Management Approach
i. represents the first approach combining risk and futures;
ii. allows the company to have an integrated view of its strategic risks, with an influence diagram;
iii. shows the role of smart technologies in securing the corporate strategic objectives;
iv. allows the company to anticipate how strategic risks might change in the mid- and long-term and to timely adopt adaptation measures;
v. provides the basis for the utility Master Plan [Chinese Proverb].
PRE-CONFERENCE “WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE”
Conclusions
i. Both the Strategic Risk Management approach and the Adaptaclima project are successful examples of collaboration between industry and research.
ii. The approach followed by EPAL is aligned with the European Commission (EC) first strategic forward-looking report recently adopted, to identify emerging problems and opportunities in order to guide the necessary transitions in a sustainable way and adapted to the specificities of each city, keeping strategic risks at acceptable levels.
iii. We strongly believe this approach can be adopted by other entities with management roles in mega-cities, contributing to leverage their pathway towards resilience.
Online Pre-Conference
WATER, MEGACITIES AND GLOBAL CHANGE
7 – 11 December 2020
Thank you for your attention !
Ana Margarida Luí[email protected]