tech581 analyze presentation fall 2008 date: 11/11/08 team members: xxxxx xxxxx sound removed

17
TECH581 Analyze Presentation Fall 2008 Date: 11/11/08 Team Members: xxxxx xxxxx Sound Remove d

Upload: donald-wade

Post on 31-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

TECH581 Analyze Presentation Fall 2008

Date: 11/11/08Team Members: xxxxxxxxxx

Sound Removed

Brief Review of Project Charter

Information Technology Department of major Insurance Company attempting to collect metrics on business requirements changes throughout application project lifecycle.

If collected, measure is taken at the end of the project, amounting to 8 hours of work for a project manager.

Tracking and recording the changes throughout the lifecycle of a project and the associated process that can be implemented across the organization can be a significant improvement to a maximum of 1 hour total for each project.

The process of requirements counts/metrics can be used to further analyze and estimate future projects.

Goal: To understand current processes for requirements metrics gathering to identify and eliminate non value add steps. Identify value added steps performed inefficiently and implement improvements.

CTQ Tree(s)

Requirements need to be

counted at each stage gate of

project lifecycle

Tool being used for requirements

tracking.

Size of project

Enterprise Project Office(EPO)

CTQ

KPOVs

KPIVs

Customers

Project Management

Office(PMO)

Quality and Process

Improvement (QPI)

Executive Management

Time that PM spends on collecting

requirements counts needs to be as minimal

as possible.

PM Experience

Requirements need to be

counted at each stage gate of

project lifecycle

Tool being used for requirements

tracking.

Size of project

Enterprise Project Office(EPO)

CTQ

KPOVs

KPIVs

Customers

Project Management

Office(PMO)

Quality and Process

Improvement (QPI)

Executive Management

Time that PM spends on collecting

requirements counts needs to be as minimal

as possible.

PM Experience

Awareness of Relative

Priority to Collect Requirements

Counts

Requirements Complexity

Data Collection Summarized

Random sample of historical projects. PMs estimated time it took to measure requirements changes over time

Random sample of new projects that were initiated soon before and/or after start of class project.

Stratified by tool used for requirements collection and tier (size in forecasted dollars).

Data Collection Chart – Historical Data

Process Observation Worksheet - Historical Information

Completed Project Number

Tool for Collecting Requirements Counts Project Tier (size)

Estimated Time to collect Requirements Change Counts by phase at end of project

1 ClearQuest 1 82 ClearQuest 1 63 Excel 2 84 Word 2 95 ClearQuest 3 76 Excel 3 87 Word 4 88 ClearQuest 4 7

7.625Estimate average hours to count requirements changes over time at the end of the project

Pivot Tables - Historical DataData by stratification factors

Tool for Collecting Requirements Counts (All) Project Tier (size) (All)

Average of Estimated Time to collect Requirements Change Counts by phase at end of project

Average of Estimated Time to collect Requirements Change Counts by phase at end of project

Project Tier (size) Total Tool for Collecting Requirements Counts Total1 7 ClearQuest 72 8.5 Excel 83 7.5 Word 8.54 7.5 Grand Total 7.625

Grand Total 7.625

Historically, Tier 2 projects took longer to count

requirements changes at the end of the project

lifecycle.

Historically, requirements kept in MS Word took longer to count changes at

the end of the project lifecycle.

Data Collection – Current and Ongoing Projects

Process Observation Worksheet

In Process Project Number

Tool for Collecting Requirements Counts Tier

Requirements Complexity(# of requirement types)L (1-2), M (3-5), H (6-10)

PM Experience(Job Grade)

Awareness of Relative Priority(Y/N) Baseline

Initiation SG

Design Readiness SG

Construction SG

Production Readiness SG

Project Closeout Total

1 ClearQuest 1 10 (H) 18 Y 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.05 0.2 0.25 1.12 ClearQuest 1 8 (H) 17 N 0.25 0.2 0.2 0.025 0.2 0.2 1.0753 Word 2 8 (H) 17 Y 0.5 0.25 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.5 1.954 ClearQuest 2 4 (M) 17 N 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.15 0.1 0.1 0.955 Word 3 2 (L) 17 Y 0.2 0.2 0.15 0.15 0.25 0.1 1.056 Excel 3 3 (M) 17 N 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.15 0.2 0.2 0.956 Excel 4 1 (L) 17 N 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.01 0.05 0.1 0.768 Word 4 1 (L) 17 N 0.1 0.1 0.25 0.02 0.3 0.2 0.97

1.10

Time To collect (in Hours) Requirements Count at Point In Time - Baseline and Stage Gates

Counting requirements changes during the project lifecycle

averages to 1.10 hours of time to collect.

Fishbone Diagram

Takes too long to gather/report requirements

metrics (~ 7.6 hrs)

Man Method Machine

Material Environment

Not knowledgeable ofrequirements processes

Not aware of priority of reporting metrics

Requirements reporting process is not documented Tool not intuitive

Tool does not support ease of counting requirements

Fear of retribution

Large number of requirements

Must manually count requirements for each

requirement type

Chart by Project Size

Average By Project Tier

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

1 2 3 4

Tier (Size)

Avg

Ho

urs

Tier 2 included a project with Word as the requirements tool.

Chart by Requirements Complexity

Average Hours by Requirements Complexity

0.000.200.400.600.801.001.201.401.60

H L M

Complexity

Avg

Hour

s

Chart by PM Experience (Grade)

Average Hours by PM Experience (Grade)

1.00

1.02

1.04

1.06

1.08

1.10

1.12

17 18

PM Grade

Avg

Hour

s

Chart by PM Awareness

Average Hours by Awareness

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

N Y

Awareness of Priority?

Avg

Hou

rs

Chart by Awareness and Tool

Avg Hours by Awareness and Tool

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

N Y N N Y

ClearQuest Excel Word

Awareness/Tool

Avg

Hou

rs

Tier 4 and low complexity

Higher complexity

and size (tier)

Chart by Requirement Tracking Tool

Average Hours by Requirement Tool

0.000.200.400.60

0.801.001.201.40

ClearQuest Excel Word

Requirements Tool

Avg

Hour

s

Chart by Tool and Project Size

Average Hours by Tool and Project Size

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

ClearQuest ClearQuest Word Excel Word Excel Word

1 2 3 4

Tier/Tool

Avg

Ho

urs

Conclusions

Total hours to count requirements changes over the project lifecycle at the end of the project averages 7.6 hours based on historical information.

Average hours to count requirement changes over the lifecycle of the project during the project lifecycle averages 1.1 hours based on sample of projects studied.

Conclusions based on sample of projects studied:

Requirements took longer to count when using MS Word as the requirements tracking tool.

Projects with high complexity requirements took longer to count.

No correlation found between awareness of the priority of the task and the effort to report requirements counts.

No correlation found between PM experience (grade) and the effort to report requirements counts.