team 6: “soldier portable uav” david neira tj worden matthew martin joshua mellen ona...
DESCRIPTION
A IR HERCULES. and. adio. ltra. ight. ystem. jected. ontrolled. lectronic. Team 6: “Soldier Portable UAV” David Neira TJ Worden Matthew Martin Joshua Mellen Ona Okonkwo Josiah Shearon. Project Overview. Develop a UAV to compete in the 2011 AIAA Design/Build/Fly Competition - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Team 6: “Soldier Portable UAV”• David Neira• TJ Worden• Matthew Martin• Joshua Mellen• Ona Okonkwo• Josiah Shearon
AIR HERCULES
1
Develop a UAV to compete in the 2011 AIAA Design/Build/Fly Competition◦ Location: Tucson, AZ◦ Date: April 15-17, 2011
Primary requirements:◦ Assembly◦ Hand launched◦ Design Limitations
Power/Electronics Sizing Configuration
Project Overview
2
Mission Profile
Mission 1: Dash to Critical Target• Maximum laps in 4 minutes
Mission 2: Ammo Re-supply• 3 laps with steel bar payload
Mission 3: Medical supply Mission• 3 laps with golf ball payload
3
Overall Scoring Equation
4
RACMMMeReportScorTotalScore 321
Project ManagementFaculty AdvisorsDr. Chiang Shih
Dr. Joe Yeol
Project LeadMatthew Martin (ME)
Materials/FabricationJosiah Shearon (ME)
Electronics/ControlJoshua Mellen (EE)
Onachukwu Okonkwo (EE)
PropulsionDavid Neira (ME)
AerodynamicsTJ Worden (ME)
Materials/FabricationRyan Jantzen
Electronics/ControlRicardo Ascencio
PropulsionMyles BeanJohn Edgar
AerodynamicsEric Sloan
Walker Carr
5
Project Schedule
6
Conceptual Design Phase
7
Specification ValueEmpty Weight < 1.6 lbsPayload to Weight Ratio > 1.5Propulsion Battery Weight < 0.75 lbsMaximum Current Draw 20 ampsMaximum Linear Dimension 22 inAssembly Time < 5 min
• Design Process• Scoring Analysis• Product Specifications• Aircraft Configuration
Propulsion / Control Systems
Aerodynamics
Materials / Fabrication
Subsystem Development
8
Competition Requirement:◦ 20 Amp maximum draw◦ ¾ lb. maximum battery weight◦ Separate propulsion and control system
Research/Analyze Major Components◦ Batteries◦ Motor / ESC◦ Propeller◦ Transmitter / Receiver◦ Servos
Propulsion / Control Systems
9
Propulsion / Control Systems
10
Propulsion / Control Selection
Electrical System Motor
Transmitter Aurora 9 Type Himax HA2025-4200
Receiver Optima 7 Ch Receiver Weight 2.82 oz
Servos 4 Power HD D65 Kv 4200 rpm/v
Motor Controller Castle Creations Phoenix 25A Io 0.75 A
Batteries R 0.75 Ω
Type Receiver Propulsion Power 175 W
Brand KAN 180 Elite 1500 Thrust 2.23 lb
Capacity 180 mAh 1500 mAh Current Draw 15 A
Cell Voltage 1.2 V 1.2 V Gear Ratio 6.6:1
Max Current 20 A 20 A Propeller 12 x 10
Number of Cells 5 10
Pack Voltage 6 V 12 V
Weight 1.48 oz 8.10 oz
11
Wing◦ Airfoil comparisons◦ Wing sizing tradeoffs
Stability ◦ Control surface sizing◦ Empennage sizing
Fuselage ◦ Streamlining
Aerodynamics
12
Aerodynamics
13
Airfoil Selection
Main Wing: Eppler 422
Tail Wing: NACA 0012
Aerodynamics Initial Sizing
Specification Value
Fuselage Volume 46.3 in3
Wing Area 406 in2
Effective Wing Span 44 in
Aspect Ratio 4.55
15
Property Comparison◦ Weight◦ Strength◦ Stiffness
Considered Materials◦ Wood – Balsa, Bass, Plywood◦ Carbon Fiber / Composites◦ High Density Foam◦ Adhesive
Materials & Structures
16
Primary structures◦ Wing spar
Uni-directional 1k CFRP/foam◦ Wing ribs
Balsa wood & aircraft ply◦ Bulkhead
CFRP & balsa ply◦ Upper & lower spine
CFRP◦ Nose & tail fairing
Single ply 1k plain weave CFRP
Materials Selection
17
System Integration Ground Testing
◦ Assembly Time◦ Propulsion and
Controls◦ Structural Integrity
Flight Testing◦ Hand Launch◦ Control Handling◦ Flight Endurance◦ Payload Testing◦ Landing
Performance
Final Design
18
Aircraft Specifications
Overall Aircraft Fuselage
Total Length 29.83 in Length 15.56 in
Total Width 47.98 in Width 5.02 in
Total Height 10.24 in Height 3.08 in
19
M2: Steel Bar Configuration
20
M3: Golf Ball Configuration
21
Payload configurations
Mission 3:Golf Ball Storage
Qty: 16
Mission 2:Steel Bar Storage
22
Electronics Layout
23
System Component Breakdown
24
Assembly Demonstration
25
Suitcase Configuration
Disassembled Aircraft
Competition Risk Assessment Potential Risks
◦ Harsh landing / propeller-ground interference◦ High wind speed◦ Inexperienced pilot
Prototype◦ Novice aircraft designers / builders
Robust 1st design: Over-engineered Multiple flight tests
Final Design ◦ Much lighter, competitive design
Component supply redundancy◦ Recruited professional pilot
26
Video
Flight Demonstration
27
Questions?
28