teaching math to students who barely speak english yes we can!
TRANSCRIPT
Teaching Math to Students
Who Barely Speak English –
Yes We Can! by
Elmano Costa, Ed. D.
209-667-3638
California State University, Stanislaus
1 University Circle
Turlock, CA 95382
Comprehensible Input
Activate Prior Knowledge (or build it if it does not exist)
Use Concrete Objects/Manipulatives
Do Demonstrations/Provide Visual Clues
Teach Vocabulary
Simplify and Paraphrase Instructional Language (but not content/expectations)
Use Cooperative Learning
Use Graphic Organizers
The Language of Math
What is:
A table? In everyday life? In math?
A row? In a classroom? In math?
An expression? In everyday life? In math?
Homophones: Sum, some?
---------------------------------------------------------------
MATH IS NOT A UNIVERSAL LANGUAGE - IT IS A UNIQUE LANGUAGE.
THE LANGUAGE OF INSTRUCTION CAN BE A BARRIER TO LEARNING THE CONTENT
Stages of English Development
Early Beginning Point to …
Find the …
Put the ___ next to the ___
Give the to ___
Who has the ___?
Do you have a ___?
Who wants the ____?
Beginning Yes/no questions (Is Jimmy the tallest?)
Either/or questions (Is this larger or
smaller?)
One word responses to questions (What
is three times two?)
General questions which encourage lists
(What are all the shapes you see?)
Two word responses
Intermediate Why?
How?
Tell me about … Talk about …
What do you think about …?
Describe …
How would you changes this part of the
answer?
Describe/compare …
How are these different/similar?
Early Advanced What would you recommend/suggest
we do next?
How do you think this problem will be
solved?
What would happen if …?
Which do you think …?
Krashen’s Four Quadrants
Cognitively Undemanding
Context Imbedded Context Reduced
Cognitively Demanding
Cooperative Strategies for EL
Students
WAYS TO GROUP PURPOSE
By primary language To learn new content -
able to use primary
language
Mixed EO and EL of
various languages
To practice English
when content and
vocabulary are known
Sample List of Vocabulary for
Functions Unit Conceptual Specific Process
Function
Pattern
Linearity
Nonlinear function
Rate
Slope
Change
Growth
Input
Output
Nth Term
General Term
Independent Variable
Variable
Expression
Coefficient
Constant
Graph
Perimeter
Area
Axis
Describe
Analyze
Compare
Contrast
Extend
Investigate
Explore
Interpret
Predict
Justify
Explain
Proposition 227 Five Year Report
Our findings suggest that it is not the language of instruction but rather the quality of instruction that matters most (to the achievement of English learners). (emphasis added)
» Robert Linquanti (2006) - co-author
Effects of Proposition 227 on the Education of English Learners, American Institute for Research and WestEd, 2006. www.WestEd.org/Prop227
I hear and I forget
I see and I learn
I do and I understand
- Chinese Proverb
Go teach;
and if you must, use words.
- Francis of Assisi
Gráfico
Tampa Circumfêrencia Diámetro Resultado
da Divisão
1
2
3
4
5
Metaphor for Teaching
Teaching is like walking a child from a
lighted area into a dark cave. You must
move slowly to allow the eyes time to
adjust. You must help the child feel his/her
way, making sure of his/her footing before
proceeding onwards. And you must
encourage the child to overcome his/her
fear of the unknown.
The average teacher explains.
The superior teacher demonstrates.
But the truly great teacher inspires.
- Thoreau
According to Glasser and others
WE LEARN:
10% of what we only read
20% of what we hear
30% of what we see
50% or what we both see and hear
70% of what is discussed with others
80% of what we experience personally
90% of what we teach to others
NCTM’s Principals and Standards
for School Mathematics Content Standards
1. Number and Operations
2. Algebra
3. Geometry
4. Measurement
5. Data Analysis and Probability
Process Standards
6. Problem Solving
7. Reasoning and Proof
8. Communication
9. Connections
10. Representation
California Mathematics
Framework
BALANCED MATHEMATICAL
PROGRAM
• Procedural and Computational Skills
• Conceptual Understanding
• Problem Solving
Principles of Math Instruction
Skills without conceptual understanding
are meaningless
Conceptual understanding without skills
is inefficient
Skills and conceptual understanding
without problem solving is useless.
CREDE Five Standards Teachers and Students Working Together
– Use instructional group activities in which students and teacher work together to create a product or idea
Developing Language and Literacy Skills across all Curriculum
– Apply literacy strategies and develop language competence in all subject areas
Connecting Lessons to Students' Lives
– Contextualize teaching and curriculum in students' existing experiences in home, community, and school
Engaging Students with Challenging Lessons
– Maintain challenging standards for student performance; design activities to advance understanding to more complex levels
Emphasizing Dialogue over Lectures
– Instruct through teacher-student dialogue, especially academic, goal-directed, small-group conversations (known as instructional conversations), rather than lecture
Characteristics of Effective
Instruction for EL Students Hands-on, meaningful learning tasks drawn from the
core curriculum
Prior Knowledge - frequent, systematic use
Plentiful, systematic student-student interaction and cooperation
Structured opportunities for students to use their primary language as a means of facilitating their learning and promoting positive self-esteem
Integration of language arts (listening, speaking, reading, writing)
Adapted from University of California, Equals, Lawrence Hall of Science
Characteristics of Effective
Instruction for EL Students (Cont) Rich variety of authentic and meaningful language
experiences
Frequent use of contextualization rather than simplification to facilitate student comprehension
Frequent and systematic opportunities for students to negotiate meaning
Variety of multimedia, multisensory learning experiences
Integration of multicultural perspectives throughout the core curriculum
Focus on authentic assessment (more than traditional paper-pencil assessment)
Adapted from University of California, Equals, Lawrence Hall of Science
Academic Challenge in High
Poverty Classrooms Observed 140 classrooms in mathematics, reading, writing
Compared skills oriented and meaning-oriented classrooms
Students exposed to instruction emphasizing meaning are likely to demonstrate a greater grasp of advanced skills at the end of the school year (6-7 NCEs better on test of mathematical understanding
Amount of time spent on instruction, attention to discrete basic skills, the teachers general proficiency at managing instruction and background characteristics of the teacher did not alter the findings on type of instruction and achievement
Meaning-centered instruction did not impede mastery of basic skills, and may eve facilitate it (children in classrooms focusing on meaning performed 6.1 NCEs better on measures of computational ability than students being taught skills only)
Results held for very low achieving students as well as the higher achieving students in high poverty schools.
From Knapp, M. S., Shields, P. M. & Turnbull, B. J. (1995).
Lesson Planning for EL Students Into (Planning Phase)
Through (Teaching Phase)
Beyond (Extending Phase)
Find out what
students already know
Plan experiences to
build the link - prior
knowledge to lesson
objective
Identify key
vocabulary
Identify ways to
make the lesson
comprehensible
Incorporate ELD
objective (content
based ELD)
C 1992 C Williams, F. Sanchez, R.
Walqui
Adapted by E. Costa (2002)
Connection to prior
learning (review)
Sequenced lesson delivery
Build on incremental steps
Comprehensible input -
manipulatives,
demonstration, etc.
Scaffolding
Students reconstruct the
information
Students interact with the
language (vocabulary)
Students reinforce their
learning by working in native
language cooperative
groups
Debriefing of
learning
Teacher
facilitates in getting
students to think
about their
learning
Self-evaluation
by the students
Teacher
assesses student
learning to use in
planning new
instruction
(feedback loop)
Swings in Mathematical
Instructional Practices
1900-1935 Focus on basics
1935-1938 Meaningful mathematics
1958-1970 Discovery learning
1970-1980s Back to basics
1990s Meaningful mathematics
and discovery learning
Current Back to basics
Stages of English Development
and Mathematical Questioning
Early Beginning Point to É. Find the É Put the ___ next to the ___ Give the ____ to ___. Who has the ____? Do you have a ____ Who wants the ___? Who has the ___?
Beginning Yes/no questions (Is Jimmy the tallest?) Either/or questions (Is this larger or smaller?) One word responses to questions (What is three times two?) General questions which encourage lists (What are all the shapes you see?) Two word responses
Intermediate Why? How? Tell me aboutÉ Talk aboutÉ What do you think aboutÉ ? Describe É How would you change this part of the answer? Describe/compareÉ. How are these different/similar?
Early Advanced What would you recommend/suggest we do to next?? How do you think this problem will be solved? What would happen if É? Which do you thinkÉ .?
Lesson Planning for EL Students
Academic Objective: To be able to _________________________________
Into (Planning Phase)
Through (Teaching Phase)
Beyond (Extending Phase)
Teacher builds on prior knowledge
Find out what students already know
Connect prior knowledge to the lesson
Plan experiences to build the link
Identify key vocabulary
Identify ways to make lesson comprehensible
Incorporate ELD objective (content based ELD)
Copyright 1992 C. Williams, F. Sanchez, A. Walqui Adapted for math by E. Costa (2002)
Sequenced lesson delivery
Connect to prior learning
Build on incremental steps
Attention to comprehensible input Ğ manipulatives, demonstration, etc.
Scaffolding Students
reconstruct the information
Students interact with the language (vocabulary)
Through peers student reinforce instruction by conversing in their native language
Students create, plan, research, and project
Teacher facilitates in getting students to think about their learning
Self evaluation by students
Debriefing of learning
Teacher assesses student learning to use in planning new activities/lessons (feedback loop)
Bloom’s Taxonomy of
Cognitive Thinking
EVALUATION Uses given criteria to judge; appraises alternatives
SYNTHESIS Puts ideas together in a new way; asks: ÒWhy not do something in another
way?Ó
ANALYSIS Identifies overall patterns; recognizes relationships
APPLICATION Distinguishes between where can and cannot be used; tells where
information has been or could be used; applies information to specific situations
COMPREHENSION Predicts effects and consequences; interprets facts; explains in own words
KNOWLEDGE Can repeat and remember (facts, knowledge, definitions, rules, trends)
Bloom’s Taxonomy of
Cognitive Thinking EVALUATION
Uses given criteria to judge; appraises alternatives
SYNTHESIS Puts ideas together in a new way; asks. “Why not do something in another way?”
ANALYSIS Identifies overall patterns; recognizes relationships
APPLICATION Distinguishes between where can and cannot be used; tells where information has been or could
be used; applies information to specific situations
COMPREHENSION Predicts effects and consequences; interprets facts; explains in own words
KNOWLEDGE Can repeat and remember (facts, knowledge, definitions, rules, trends)