tbi airports in europe - fedea · cardiff airport • ownership • tariffs are not regulated, but...
TRANSCRIPT
TBI Airports in Europe
Bob Bullock, Business Development Director
TBI / Abertis Airports
24 May 2011
UK - Belfast Int.
4.0 M PAXSweden - Stockholm Skavsta
2.5 M PAX
UK - Cardiff
1.4 M PAX
UK - London Luton
8.8 M PAX
USA – Macon 2 Airports
Management Contract
USA – Bob Hope Burbank
4.6 M PAX
USA - Raleigh - Durham
Management Contract
USA - Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta
Terminal E 10.1 M PAX
Geographical Presence
TBI and Abertis Airports Global Presence
80 Million passengers in 2010
29 Airports
8 Countries
Colombia - Aerocali
3.1 M PAX
Colombia - El Dorado Bogotá
2 Runway concessions
Jamaica - Montego Bay
3.3 M PAX
USA - Orlando Sanford Int.
1.1 M PAX
Bolivia 3 Airports
3.7 M PAX
Santiago Chile
10.2 M PAX
GAP Mexico 12 Airports
20.2 M PAX
TBI’s European Presence
• Serving all carrier classes
• Competitive environments
• Regional in nature
• Differing ownership arrangements
BFS
DUB
LTN
STN
LGWBRI
CWL
LHR
ARLNYO
BMAVAS
BHD
• Concession Agreement (1998-2028)
• Tariffs are not regulated, but “influenced”
• The operator takes all risks (traffic
London Luton Airport
development, non-aero revenue, operating
costs, safety of operation, relationship
with community)
• A specific challenge: ensuring long term
plans are consistent with owner’s
requirements
Belfast International Airport
• Ownership (999 years)
• Tariffs are not regulated, but “influenced”
• The operator takes all risks (traffic
development, non-aero revenue, operating
costs, safety of operation, relationship
with community)
• A specific challenge: regional
government’s planning policy
Cardiff Airport
• Ownership
• Tariffs are not regulated, but “influenced”
• The operator takes all risks (traffic
development, non-aero revenue, operating
costs, safety of operation, relationship
with community)
• A specific challenge: incorporating regional
government’s development strategy into
airport plans and operations
Stockholm Skavsta Airport
• Co-Ownership with the local
municipality (Nyköping)
• Tariffs are not regulated, but
“influenced”
• The operator takes all risks (traffic
development, non-aero revenue,
operating costs, safety of operation)
• A specific challenge: more for less
while integrating the co-owner’s
interests
Conclusion
Overall Challenges
• Public vs. private organizational mindsets during transition and operation
• Regulatory uncertainty and evolving requirements
• Increasing air carrier and passenger expectations (more for less, preferably
free) and changing travel patterns
• Developing cost-effective, efficient and environmentally friendly facilities given
new technology and other opportunities
• Minimizing costs while maximizing incomes
• Near term and continuing financial performance requirements
• Maintaining maximum flexibility within fixed boundaries
Private Airport Reality
CommercialOffer
Facility
ServicesManagement
and Team
Policies
Airport
Private Airport Reality
CommercialOffer
Facility
ServicesManagement
and Team
Policies
Airport
Private Airport Reality
CommercialOffer
Facility
ServicesManagement
and Team
Policies
Airport