taxes and the election 2012 15 october 2012 len burman syracuse university

37
TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Upload: magdalen-allen

Post on 15-Jan-2016

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

TAXES AND THEELECTION 201215 October 2012

Len Burman

Syracuse University

Page 2: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Policy Context

• Expiration of Bush Tax Cuts and Temporary Stimulus Measures (The fiscal cliff)

• Weak economy • Tax revenues at lowest level since Truman Administration

• Tax code is complex, unfair, and inefficient• Corporate tax rates high and base is porous• Rising economic inequality• Existential threat created by the “lucky duckies”

Page 3: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

The Bush-Obama Tax Cuts• Rates cut:

• top rate from 39.6% to 35%; new 10% bracket• Repealed PEP and Pease

• Marriage penalty relief• $1,000 child credit/larger dependent credit• Estate tax repeal in 2010• 15% rate on capital gains/dividends• Higher IRA/pension limits• Saver’s credit• Education incentives• AMT patches

Page 4: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

+Stimulus Tax Cuts• American Opportunity Tax Credit• Larger EITC for 3+ kids• Payroll tax cut• Temporary business tax breaks• [R&E credit and other “extenders”]

Page 5: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

It all turns back into a pumpkin at the end of 2012

Page 6: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University
Page 7: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Historical Outlays and Receipts

Page 8: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Deficit Projections, 2010-21, in $billions

Baseline Obama Budget

Including Effect of Budget Proposals

Page 9: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Ratio of Workers to Retirees

9

Page 10: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Primary Spending as % of GDP, with and without Excess Health Costs, 2062-2080

10

Page 11: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Combined Federal, State, and Local Corporate Tax Rate in OECD Countries, 2011

11

Page 12: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University
Page 13: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

What is the AMT?

13

Page 14: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Value and Number of Tax Expenditures

Page 15: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

10 Largest Tax Expenditures, FY2013 In Billions of Dollars

Page 16: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Inequality is Growing:Income Shares of Top 1% and Top 0.1%, 1913-2010

16

Page 17: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University
Page 18: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Taxes and the Safety Net• And the existential threat to our democracy created by the

“lucky duckies”

18

Page 19: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Tax Credits Have Become an Important Part of the Social Safety Net

19

Program Amount in 2009, $Billions

Medicaid 392

SSI 47

TANF 29

SNAP 55

Housing 41

EITC 49

CTC 44

Source: Jim Ziliak, “Recent Developments in Antipoverty Policies in the United States,” IRP 1395-11, 2011; and Budget of the United States, Analytical Perspectives, FY2011.

Note: Tax credits include effect on both outlays and receipts.

Page 20: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Real Federal Spending on EITC, CTC and Welfare: 1975-2009

Page 21: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Effect of Various Components on Poverty Rate For Kids and All Households, in Percent, 2010

Note: Poverty rate is the “supplemental poverty measure.”

Page 22: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

22

Page 23: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Mitt Romney and the “47Percent”

“There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what…These are people who pay no income tax.”

-- Mitt Romney, May 17, 2012, Boca Raton, FL

Page 24: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

WSJ: “Lucky Duckies”“Who are these lucky duckies? They are the beneficiaries of tax policies that have expanded the personal exemption and standard deduction and targeted certain voter groups by introducing a welter of tax credits for things like child care and education. When these escape hatches are figured against income, the result is either a zero liability or a liability that represents a tiny percentage of income. The 1986 tax reform, for example, with its giant increase in the personal exemption and standard deduction, took six to seven million people off the tax rolls.

“This complicated system of progressivity and targeted rewards is creating a nation of two different tax-paying classes: those who pay a lot and those who pay very little. And as fewer and fewer people are responsible for paying more and more of all taxes, the constituency for tax cutting, much less for tax reform, is eroding. Workers who pay little or no taxes can hardly be expected to care about tax relief for everybody else. They are also that much more detached from recognizing the costs of government.”

Source: “The Non-Taxpaying Class” (editorial), Wall Street Journal, November 20, 2002.

Page 25: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Who are the Lucky Duckies?Households who don’t pay income tax, 2011

Page 26: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Some Statistics About Households that Pay Neither Income Nor Payroll Tax• More than half are elderly• Over one-third are nonelderly with income under $20,000• Only about 1 in 20 is nonelderly with income over $20,000

Source: Tax Policy Center

Page 27: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Income and Payroll Tax as Percent of Incomeby Income Group, 2011

Page 28: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Percentage of Taxpayers Who Pay More Payroll Tax than Income Tax, by Income Group, 2011

Note: Chart shows statistics for tax units that pay at least some income or payroll tax. Thus, it excludes most elderly households. Payroll tax includes only employee share.

Page 29: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Solution• More tax cuts?• Especially for the rich?• Or… the “Buffett Rule?”• And new AMT for multinationals?• Welcome to campaign 2012!

Page 30: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

President Obama’s Tax Plan

• Extend most Bush tax cuts• Top two rates revert to 36% and 39.6%• Restore PEP and Pease• Gains and dividends taxed at 20%• Limit the value of itemized deductions to 28%• Index the AMT• Tax carried interest• Buffett Rule

Page 31: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Obama (continued)• Extend AOTC• Extend and increase CDCTC• Extend EITC increase for 3+ kids• Restore Estate and gift tax to 2009 levels

Page 32: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Obama (continued)• Reduce the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 28%

• 25% for Manufacturing

• Eliminate tax loopholes and subsidies• Establish a new minimum tax on foreign earnings• Expand, simplify, and make permanent the R & E Tax

Credit• Allow small businesses to expense up to $1 million in

investments• Double the deduction for start-up costs

Page 33: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Mitt Romney’s Tax Plan• Make permanent the 2001-03 tax cuts• Cut all individual income tax rates 20%

• 35% becomes 28%; 10% becomes 8%

• Repeal the estate tax and the AMT• Keep gift tax with a max rate of 35%• Eliminate investment income taxation for low- and middle-

income taxpayers• Allow the 2009 stimulus act tax provisions to expire • Pay for by eliminating tax expenditures and economic

growth

Page 34: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University

Romney (continued)• Reduce top corporate income tax rate from 35% to 25%

• Make the research and experimentation credit permanent

• Extend expensing of capital expenditures for one year

• Grant a “tax holiday” for repatriation of corporate profits of foreign subsidiaries

• Implement a territorial system

Page 35: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University
Page 36: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University
Page 37: TAXES AND THE ELECTION 2012 15 October 2012 Len Burman Syracuse University