tax update for insurance companies€¦ · insurers be impacted? insurance ... reform readiness ....
TRANSCRIPT
Tax Update for Insurance Companies IASA Central States Conference - 2017
2
Tax Reform ReadinessTable of Contents
Topic Slide Number
Outlook of Tax Reform 3
Overview of Tax Reform Proposals 8
Tax Reform Readiness 14
Immediate Tax Reform Planning Considerations 17
Contact Information 20
3
Outlook of Tax Reform Proposals
4
Tax Outlook Is Uncertain
Impossible to predict possibility of tax reform in 2017Many legislative priorities in addition to tax reform
Unclear if any tax legislation would be retroactive
to January 1, 2017
Substance of any tax reform is uncertain
Details of current proposals
need to be more fully developed
Could require bipartisan support
5
Election Results
Republican Donald J. Trump elected to serve as 45th President of the United States
Republican majority in House of Representatives241 Republican194 Democrat
Republican majority in Senate52 Republican46 Democrat2 Independent
6
Important Aspects of Legislative Procedure
All tax legislation must originate in the House
60 votes in Senate are necessary to prevent filibuster
Budget reconciliation bills have procedural protections that facilitate passage
7
Federal Budget Process
Congressional Budget & Impoundment Control Act of 1974
Framework for congressional budget process
Starts with President’s budget request
Congressional budget resolution
Authorization & appropriation
8
Overview of Tax Reform Proposals
9
Evaluation of Proposed Tax Rates and Ongoing Proposals Domestic Income Tax Reform Overview
Corporate Tax Rate Reform
Headline Rate
35% Current Tax Rate
25% Camp II Proposal
20% House GOP Proposal
15% President Trump
Proposal
Base
• Repeal Corporate AMT• Full Expensing of Capital Investments• Retain R&D Credit• Retain LIFO
• Interest Expense Limitation• Repeal Most Business Expenses (President
Trump)• Repeal IRC 199
Taxpayer Unfavorable/Favorable Proposals
10
Domestic Reform ProposalsProvision Current Law President Trump House GOP Blueprint Camp II
Top Corporate Rate 35% 15% 20% 25%
Research Credit
Generally allows either a 20%credit for qualifying researchexpenses in excess of a baseamount, or a 14% alternative
simplified credit
Retain research credit, but repeal most other business tax
expenditures
Retain credit; Ways and MeansCommittee will “evaluateoptions” to make it “more
effective and efficient”
Research credit (alternative simplified credit) would be
permanent
IRC §199 Deduction andOther Business Deductions
Up to 9% deduction under IRC §199 for certain income
attributable to domestic production activities
Repeal most business tax expenditures except for the
research creditRepeal IRC §199
Repeal of IRC §199 phased out over two years (6% in year one, 3% in year two); repeal of percentage
depletion
Capital Cost Recovery
Taxpayers generally recovercosts under the Modified
Accelerated Cost RecoverySystem (MACRS)
Firms engaged in US manufacturing may elect todeduct the full cost of theircapital investments in year
one; option revocable withinfirst 36 months*
Full expensing in year one ofall assets, tangible and
intangible, other than land
Depreciation would be computed using straight-line method with
longer recovery periods (similar to ADS)
Net Operating Loss (NOL)** Available for 2-year carryback and 20-year carryforward
No Change Specified*
NOLs carried forward indefinitely, annual future
deduction is limited to 90% of net taxable income. NOL
carrybacks will no longer be permitted
NOL would only be permitted to offset 90% of the corporation’s
taxable income in the carryback or carryforward year
Interest Expense Generally deductible
Businesses that elect full expensing in year one will lose
their ability to deduct netinterest expense
Interest expense deductibleagainst interest income, butno current deduction for net
interest expense; net interest expense may be
carried forward indefinitely
Modifies IRC §163(j) with new thin cap rules; limit for adjusted taxable income reduced from 50% to 40%
* Previously in Trump’s proposal, but not included in the most recent guiding principles
** Please note that HR 2181 – Insurance Company Tax Modernization and Parity Act of 2017 will amend the IRC of 1986 and would repeal limitations related to consolidated returns and non life insurance companies.
11
CAMP Proposal – Property & CasualtyP&C Insurance-Specific Provisions
• Modifications include replacing the fixed 15% reduction in the reserve deduction for P&C companies with a special formula.
• Tax exempt income of the company multiplied by a percentage equal to ratio of the tax exempt assets of the company to allthe assets of the company
Modifications to Proration rules for P&C companies
Discounting Rules for P&C insurance companies
• a. Require P&C insurance companies to use higher interest rate for IRC 846 purposes.‒ i. Use corporate bond yield curve to discount unpaid losses
‒ ii. 5 year limitation for special rule extending loss payment patterns for certain lines of business
• b. Repeal IRC 846(e) election to use company specific historical loss payment patterns.
• Deferral of tax deductions for reinsurance premiums paid to foreign based affiliates of domestic insurers until the actualinsured event occurs.
• In addition, ceding commissions received and recovered reinsurance will be excluded from income in situations where thepremium deduction has been disallowed.
Reinsurance-Specific ProvisionsNeal Reinsurance Bill
Prevention of arbitrage of deductible interest expense and tax-exempt interest income• Modifications to rules under IRC 265.
‒ i. C corporations, including insurance companies, would be required to calculate the amount of interest disallowed under IRC265 based on single method
‒ ii. Disallows interest deduction based on the percentage of the taxpayer’s assets comprised of tax–exempt obligations
‒ iii. Repeal special rule for qualified small issuer tax exempt obligations
12
Health Insurance-Specific Provisions
• Eliminates net interest expense for businesses
• Eliminate Corporate AMT - Treatment of AMT credits accumulated not specified
• Repeal PPACA and all related business taxes enacted as part of that legislation, including:‒ The 2.3% excise tax on covered medical devices, which was suspended for 2016 and 2017 (after originally
becoming effective in 2013) and is now scheduled to take effect again in 2018, and ‒ The so-called “Cadillac” tax on high-cost employer-provided health plans, which, after being delayed for two
years, is currently set to take effect in 2020.
• Repeal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”) and the business taxes enacted as part of that legislation.
• Transition into a territorial system of taxation
Trump Administration Tax Proposal
House GOP Proposal
• Special Treatment of BCBS: Repeal special rules for Blue Cross Blue Shield and certain other health organizations.
‒ i.e., the 25 percent deduction, the exception from the application of the 20 percent unearned premium haircut, and treatment as stock insurance companies
• Repeal of exemption from tax for certain insurance companies and co-op health insurance issuers
• Repeal of credit for employee health insurance expenses of small employers
CAMP Proposal
13
Global Insurance Company Considerations
Inbound – Do foreign parented insurance companies lose some of their competitive advantage over US parented entities?
• If a territorial tax regime is enacted, would one of the provisions defer the deduction of outbound premium similar to the Neal Bill?
• If a cash-flow border adjustable tax is adopted, how does it apply to outbound reinsurance contracts?
• Could the impact of US tax reform on entities domiciled in low tax jurisdictions drive certain re-domestication to the US?
• Will we see an uptick in M&A activity in the industry as the value of certain offshore entities is impacted?
• How will the changes to taxation of foreign insurers doing business in the US (FDAP, ECI, FET, withholding taxes, etc.) impact operating models, structuring, and intercompany cash flows?
• Will the benefit of risk distribution to the overall insurance marketplace be diminished if outbound reinsurance is not tax-advantaged? Will diversifying risk cost more and drive insurance prices higher?
Outbound – How will US parented entities react to potentially beneficial tax reform?
• Will the benefit of a lower US tax rate and the shift to a territorial system offset the loss of certain tax credits, deductions, and the cost of a one-time deemed repatriation of accumulated earnings?
• How will insurers plan for a one time deemed repatriation? Will companies take advantage of existing repatriation opportunities (e.g. repatriating PTI, triggering basis collector structures)?
• What will happen to existing foreign tax credit carryforwards?
• Will declining US corporate tax rates cause outbound insurers to evaluate global reinsurance arrangements?
• How will cash-flow the border-adjustable tax impact operating models, structuring, and intercompany cash flows?
• How will US owned, offshore captive insurers be impacted?
Insurance Industry
Landscape
14
Reform Readiness
15
With the possibility of tax reform on the horizon,companies will need to accurately analyze andassess the potential impact of the anticipated taxproposals.
Establish aplan forcommunicating ona regular basiswith keystakeholders inthis process
Prioritize thoseprovisions that aremost important tothe company andimplementaccordingly
Identify those taxexpenditures thatprovide importanttax benefits to thecompany
Measure the impactof provisions thatbroaden the tax baseand provideterritorial exemptions
Uncertainty around taxreform may lead to inaction,however, there is ...
Therefore, US companiesmay wish to consider ...
* President Trump, House GOP and Camp proposals
As tax reform proposals undoubtedly evolve throughout 2017, it will be important to have an agile approach to analyzing the tax effects of new proposals on business operations.
Navigating the UncertaintyTax Reform Readiness
16
ASC 740 / SSAP 101 Considerations
SSAP 101 Considerations:
• Potential for reduced surplus due to DTA haircut
• Paragraph 11.a. admissibility if NOL carryback rules change
• Risk Based Capital (RBC) calculation
• Transition rules?
Other considerations:
• State tax conformity
• Disclosures
Evaluate the impact on:
• Deferred taxes – unfavorable impact for net DTA position, favorable impact for net DTL position
• Inventory of temporary differences – e.g., DTA for interest could be eliminated
• DTAs for specific tax attributes – foreign tax credits (i.e., future availability), AMT credits
• Valuation allowance implications
‒ Change in net deferred tax position
‒ Future projections of income
• Future effective tax rate (ETR)
‒ Unfavorable impact for proration of TEI, Section 833(b), Section 199, interest or other business expenses
‒ Favorable impact for ACA fee, exempt foreign sales, dividends received and non-passive Subpart F income
17
Immediate Tax Reform Planning Considerations
Convert to Fiscal Year end to Avoid “Transition” Year
18
Tax Reform Proposals Include a Reduction in Corporate Rates Between 10 – 20%
Accounting Method Planning Implemented Prior to Rate Reform May Result in Permanent Rate Reduction for Taxpayers
Current Gross DTA Cash Tax Reduction if Deduct in 2017 at 35% Rate
Cash Tax Reduction if Deduct in 2018 at 25% Rate
Permanent Benefit of Accelerating Deduction into 2017
$100,000,000 $35,000,000 $25,000,000 $10,000,000
Rate Reduction Planning – Permanent Cash Savings
Generally, a taxpayer changing its method ofaccounting for an item of income or expenseonly shifts the recognition of such itemsbetween deferred and current tax expense.The change would typically produce cash taxsavings but rarely creates a permanent taxbenefit.
In taxable years bordering a change infederal corporate tax rates, however,taxpayers can capitalize on a permanent taxsavings opportunity by decreasing current taxexpense as much as possible in years wherea decrease in rates is anticipated.
Tax Reform has provided Companieswith an opportunity to use accountingmethod changes which may result incash tax savings as well as permanentrate savings.
• Unbilled revenue on professional services
• Deferred revenue
• Disputed revenue
• Defer advanced payments
• Prepaid expenditures
• Accruals and reserves review
• Rebate methods• Recurring Item
Exception• Inventory and
UNICAP analysis
• Repair analysis• Dispositions /
Casualty loss• Indirect cost
analysis for self-constructed property
• Bonus depreciation
• I.R.C. § 174 costs
• Ready and available/lag
• Asset reclasses
• I.R.C. §199 enhancement
• Lobbying reviews
• Meals and entertainment
• Tax basis reviews (federal and state)
• Federal Credits and Excise Taxes
• Consider captive insurance co:
o Workers compo Environmental o FAS 106 o Other Risk• Consider
prefunding VEBA:
o Severanceo Trainingo Vacation
Fixed Assets
Deductions & Credits
Revenue Recognition
Captive Insurance & VEBA
Permanent Attribute Planning
Federal Tax Planning
Considerations
19
Expense Acceleration and Revenue DeferralInsurance Specific
Insurance / Health
Premiums: Income inclusion review under Treas. Reg. §1.832-4 that could include Advanced, Multiyear, Fluctuating Risk and Retrospectively Rated contracts
Premiums: Unearned premium of life insurance products issued by Property and Casualty companies taxed under section 807
Premiums: Deficiency Reserves review for convertible features in the contract
Premiums: Deferred and uncollected life premiums review
Premiums: Deferred Acquisition Cost Review
Investments: Impairments – Dispositions / Worthlessness and loss position review
Investments: Separate Account Company Share Percentage, Dividend efficiency review
Reserves: Review of inefficiencies, methodologies, principles based reserving, redundant, disputed claims and previous adjustments
Health Insurer: Administrative Services Contract revenue recognition review and IBNR review
Health Insurer: Health Insurer Fee review of underlying policies feeding into SHCE for exclusions
Health Insurer: Intangible deduction for provider networks, subscriber groups and software
Health Insurer: Pharmacy Rebate revenue accrual review to determine if fixed and determinable
International: Foreign Currency reviews under Sections 985, 987 and 988
International: Subpart F / E&P / FTC / Section 954(i) reviews
Mutual: Policyholder dividend program review
20
Contact Information Convert to Fiscal Year end to Avoid “Transition”
Year
21
Contact Information
Thomas F. Wheeland Partner, BKDSt. Louis [email protected]
Brandy L. ShyDirector, BKD St. Louis314.236.5181 [email protected]