task force meeting 2 june 12, 2012 - yellowknife file• rfp / cannor proposal (city to lead) 3. eco...

40
Task Force Meeting 2 June 12, 2012

Upload: phungdan

Post on 10-Apr-2019

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Task Force Meeting 2 June 12, 2012

AGENDA 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

2. REVIEW OF PROJECT OBJECTIVES (10min) • RFP / CanNor Proposal (City to Lead)

3. ECO HOUSING SUSTAINABILITY FRAMEWORK (40min) • Review Matrix / Confirm Criteria (Task Force Discussion)

4. OPEN HOUSE 1 & 2 (20min)

5. SKILLS & CAPACITY BUILDING OBJECTIVES (20min)

6. PREVIOUS BUSINESS (15min) • Other Opportunities and Partnerships

7. OTHER BUSINESS (15min)

PRIMARY MEETING OBJECTIVES Tonight we need to resolve…

1. Review and Confirm Sustainability Objectives Consultant Framework

2. Determination of Project Mandate / Priorities Confirming Metrics for Success Reconciling competing objectives

3. Confirm Public Open House Strategy

4. Skills Training Objectives

2. REVIEW OF PROJECT OBJECTIVES

Eco Housing Vision “The Yellowknife Eco-house will make downtown living attractive and affordable by providing an opportunity to live, work and play that enhances the well-being of residents, the community and our environment.” - Eco Housing Workshop Report

RECAP: ECO HOUSING

Objectives: 1. Innovation and Demonstration – the City wants to develop a model housing project for the north that will

demonstrate the integration of the SmartGrowth Development Plan and Community Energy Plan. Specifically, the intent is to demonstrate innovation in building design and systems that can be applied by northerners to future housing projects, thereby leading to capacity development, new business opportunities and job creation.

2. Smart Growth Plan – the proposed project will further several specific objectives in the Yellowknife Smart Growth Development Plan including:

• Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design • Downtown revitalization • Economic development • Affordable housing

Expected Results: 1. Technology Demonstration –design concepts, installation, performance and life-cycle cost characteristics including:

• high energy efficiency • passive and active solar • water recycling • green roof system • district heating • while not a technology, a car-share co-op is also planned

2. Direct and Indirect Economic Benefits for the City and Downtown 3. Downtown Revitalization

RECAP: ECO HOUSING CanNor Highlights

3. ECO HOUSING FRAMEWORK Summary of RFP / Eco Housing Workshop Report / Eco Housing Sustainability Framework

3 LEGS

12 THEMES

19 GOALS

34 INDICATORS

Eco Housing Sustainability Framework is organized by …

RECAP: ECO HOUSING

ECO HOUSING

ENVIRONMENTAL

Den

sity

In

crea

se C

ompa

ct De

velop

men

t DE

V-1 –

100u

nits/h

a

DEV-

2 – 70

% 2

-3bd

rm

Ener

gy &

Em

issi

ons

Max

imize

Effic

iency

EE

-1 –

50%

abo

ve M

NECB

Re

duce

Ene

rgy

Dem

and

EE-2

– 31

2 kW

h/m2

Enco

urag

e Lo

cal

Rene

wable

Ene

rgy

EE-3

– dis

trict e

nerg

y

EE-4

– 20

% re

newa

ble so

urce

Re

duce

GHG

Em

ission

s EE

-5 –

Net Z

ero

Tran

spor

tatio

n In

crea

se U

se o

f Al

tern

ative

Tr

ansp

ort M

odes

T-1 –

40%

walk

& cy

cle

T-2 –

acce

ss to

amen

ities

T-3 –

acce

ss to

tran

sit

Nat

ural

Are

as

Prot

ect N

atur

al Ar

eas

NA-1

– re

store

50%

NA-2

– 10

% su

rface

parki

ng?

Wat

er

Mini

mize

Wat

er

Cons

umpt

ion

W-1

– 40

% le

ss po

table

Effe

ctive

ly M

anag

e St

orm

wate

r W

-2 –

onsit

e s.w

.mgm

t

Solid

Was

te

Solid

Was

te

MSW

-1 –

75%

con.

waste

MSW

-2 –

60%

bdg

. was

te

ECONOMIC

Infr

astr

uctu

re

Cost

Effe

ctive

On-

Site

Infra

struc

ture

IN

FRA-

1 – se

rvice

costs

INFR

A-2 –

leve

lized

costs

Empl

oym

ent

Clos

e Pr

oxim

ity to

Jo

bs

EMPL

-2 –

1 FTE

in 80

0m/un

it

EMPL

-3 –

< 1k

m co

mmute

Rev

enue

G

ener

atio

n Ge

nera

te R

even

ues

for t

he C

omm

unity

RE

V-1 –

tax g

ener

ation

REV-

2 – 15

% p

rofit

Hou

sing

Pr

ovide

Affo

rdab

le Ho

using

HA-1

– ten

ure p

rofile

, own

/rent

HA-2

– aff

orda

ble p

ricing

HA-3

– ma

rket:n

on-m

arke

t

Acce

ssibl

e and

Ad

apta

ble H

ousin

g HA

-3 –

20%

univ

ersa

l unit

s

SOCIAL

Qua

lity

of L

ife

Oppo

rtunit

y for

So

cial In

tera

ction

QL

-1 –

comm

on sp

ace

QL-2

- ne

ighbo

urlin

ess

Cont

ribut

e to

Saf

e Co

mm

unity

QL

-3 –

perce

ived s

afety

QL-4

– foo

d pro

ducti

on

Div

ersi

ty

Acco

mm

odat

e a

Dive

rse M

ix of

Re

siden

ts

DIV-

1 - re

siden

t age

DIV-

2 – re

siden

t ethn

icity

DIV-

3 – fa

mily

type

DIV-

4 – re

siden

t inco

me

3 - LEGS

19 - GOALS

34 -INDICATORS

ECO HOUSING

ENVIRONMENTAL

Den

sity

In

crea

se C

ompa

ct De

velop

men

t DE

V-1 –

100u

nits/h

a

DEV-

2 – 70

% 2

-3bd

rm

Ener

gy &

Em

issi

ons

Max

imize

Effic

iency

EE

-1 –

50%

abo

ve M

NECB

Re

duce

Ene

rgy

Dem

and

EE-2

– 31

2 kW

h/m2

Enco

urag

e Lo

cal

Rene

wable

Ene

rgy

EE-3

– dis

trict e

nerg

y

EE-4

– 20

% re

newa

ble so

urce

Re

duce

GHG

Em

ission

s EE

-5 –

Net Z

ero

Tran

spor

tatio

n In

crea

se U

se o

f Al

tern

ative

Tr

ansp

ort M

odes

T-1 –

40%

walk

& cy

cle

T-2 –

acce

ss to

amen

ities

T-3 –

acce

ss to

tran

sit

Nat

ural

Are

as

Prot

ect N

atur

al Ar

eas

NA-1

– re

store

50%

NA-2

– 10

% su

rface

parki

ng?

Wat

er

Mini

mize

Wat

er

Cons

umpt

ion

W-1

– 40

% le

ss po

table

Effe

ctive

ly M

anag

e St

orm

wate

r W

-2 –

onsit

e s.w

.mgm

t

Solid

Was

te

Solid

Was

te

MSW

-1 –

75%

con.

waste

MSW

-2 –

60%

bdg

. was

te

ECONOMIC

Infr

astr

uctu

re

Cost

Effe

ctive

On-

Site

Infra

struc

ture

IN

FRA-

1 – se

rvice

costs

INFR

A-2 –

leve

lized

costs

Empl

oym

ent

Clos

e Pr

oxim

ity to

Jo

bs

EMPL

-2 –

1 FTE

in 80

0m/un

it

EMPL

-3 –

< 1k

m co

mmute

Rev

enue

G

ener

atio

n Ge

nera

te R

even

ues

for t

he C

omm

unity

RE

V-1 –

tax g

ener

ation

REV-

2 – 15

% p

rofit

Hou

sing

Pr

ovide

Affo

rdab

le Ho

using

HA-1

– ten

ure p

rofile

, own

/rent

HA-2

– aff

orda

ble p

ricing

HA-3

– ma

rket:n

on-m

arke

t

Acce

ssibl

e and

Ad

apta

ble H

ousin

g HA

-3 –

20%

univ

ersa

l unit

s

SOCIAL

Qua

lity

of L

ife

Oppo

rtunit

y for

So

cial In

tera

ction

QL

-1 –

comm

on sp

ace

QL-2

- ne

ighbo

urlin

ess

Cont

ribut

e to

Saf

e Co

mm

unity

QL

-3 –

perce

ived s

afety

QL-4

– foo

d pro

ducti

on

Div

ersi

ty

Acco

mm

odat

e a

Dive

rse M

ix of

Re

siden

ts

DIV-

1 - re

siden

t age

DIV-

2 – re

siden

t ethn

icity

DIV-

3 – fa

mily

type

DIV-

4 – re

siden

t inco

me

3 - LEGS

12 - THEMES

34 -INDICATORS

ECO HOUSING

ENVIRONMENTAL

Den

sity

In

crea

se C

ompa

ct De

velop

men

t DE

V-1 –

100u

nits/h

a

DEV-

2 – 70

% 2

-3bd

rm

Ener

gy &

Em

issi

ons

Max

imize

Effic

iency

EE

-1 –

50%

abo

ve M

NECB

Re

duce

Ene

rgy

Dem

and

EE-2

– 31

2 kW

h/m2

Enco

urag

e Lo

cal

Rene

wable

Ene

rgy

EE-3

– dis

trict e

nerg

y

EE-4

– 20

% re

newa

ble so

urce

Re

duce

GHG

Em

ission

s EE

-5 –

Net Z

ero

Tran

spor

tatio

n In

crea

se U

se o

f Al

tern

ative

Tr

ansp

ort M

odes

T-1 –

40%

walk

& cy

cle

T-2 –

acce

ss to

amen

ities

T-3 –

acce

ss to

tran

sit

Nat

ural

Are

as

Prot

ect N

atur

al Ar

eas

NA-1

– re

store

50%

NA-2

– 10

% su

rface

parki

ng?

Wat

er

Mini

mize

Wat

er

Cons

umpt

ion

W-1

– 40

% le

ss po

table

Effe

ctive

ly M

anag

e St

orm

wate

r W

-2 –

onsit

e s.w

.mgm

t

Solid

Was

te

Solid

Was

te

MSW

-1 –

75%

con.

waste

MSW

-2 –

60%

bdg

. was

te

ECONOMIC

Infr

astr

uctu

re

Cost

Effe

ctive

On-

Site

Infra

struc

ture

IN

FRA-

1 – se

rvice

costs

INFR

A-2 –

leve

lized

costs

Empl

oym

ent

Clos

e Pr

oxim

ity to

Jo

bs

EMPL

-2 –

1 FTE

in 80

0m/un

it

EMPL

-3 –

< 1k

m co

mmute

Rev

enue

G

ener

atio

n Ge

nera

te R

even

ues

for t

he C

omm

unity

RE

V-1 –

tax g

ener

ation

REV-

2 – 15

% p

rofit

Hou

sing

Pr

ovide

Affo

rdab

le Ho

using

HA-1

– ten

ure p

rofile

, own

/rent

HA-2

– aff

orda

ble p

ricing

HA-3

– ma

rket:n

on-m

arke

t

Acce

ssibl

e and

Ad

apta

ble H

ousin

g HA

-3 –

20%

univ

ersa

l unit

s

SOCIAL

Qua

lity

of L

ife

Oppo

rtunit

y for

So

cial In

tera

ction

QL

-1 –

comm

on sp

ace

QL-2

– ne

ighbo

urlin

ess

Cont

ribut

e to

Saf

e Co

mm

unity

QL

-3 –

perce

ived s

afety

Loca

l Foo

d Pr

oduc

tion

QL-4

– loc

al foo

d pro

ducti

on

Div

ersi

ty

Acco

mm

odat

e a

Dive

rse M

ix of

Re

siden

ts

DIV-

1 - re

siden

t age

DIV-

2 – re

siden

t ethn

icity

DIV-

3 – fa

mily

type

DIV-

4 – re

siden

t inco

me

3 - LEGS

12 - THEMES

19 - GOALS

ECO HOUSING

ENVIRONMENTAL

Den

sity

In

crea

se C

ompa

ct De

velop

men

t DE

V-1 –

100u

nits/h

a

DEV-

2 – 70

% 2

-3bd

rm

Ener

gy &

Em

issi

ons

Max

imize

Effic

iency

EE

-1 –

50%

abo

ve M

NECB

Re

duce

Ene

rgy

Dem

and

EE-2

– 31

2 kW

h/m2

Enco

urag

e Lo

cal

Rene

wable

Ene

rgy

EE-3

– dis

trict e

nerg

y

EE-4

– 20

% re

newa

ble so

urce

Re

duce

GHG

Em

ission

s EE

-5 –

Net Z

ero

Tran

spor

tatio

n In

crea

se U

se o

f Al

tern

ative

Tr

ansp

ort M

odes

T-1 –

40%

walk

& cy

cle

T-2 –

acce

ss to

amen

ities

T-3 –

acce

ss to

tran

sit

Nat

ural

Are

as

Prot

ect N

atur

al Ar

eas

NA-1

– re

store

50%

NA-2

– 10

% su

rface

parki

ng?

Wat

er

Mini

mize

Wat

er

Cons

umpt

ion

W-1

– 40

% le

ss po

table

Effe

ctive

ly M

anag

e St

orm

wate

r W

-2 –

onsit

e s.w

.mgm

t

Solid

Was

te

Solid

Was

te

MSW

-1 –

75%

con.

waste

MSW

-2 –

60%

bdg

. was

te

ECONOMIC

Infr

astr

uctu

re

Cost

Effe

ctive

On-

Site

Infra

struc

ture

IN

FRA-

1 – se

rvice

costs

INFR

A-2 –

leve

lized

costs

Empl

oym

ent

Clos

e Pr

oxim

ity to

Jo

bs

EMPL

-2 –

1 FTE

in 80

0m/un

it

EMPL

-3 –

< 1k

m co

mmute

Rev

enue

G

ener

atio

n Ge

nera

te R

even

ues

for t

he C

omm

unity

RE

V-1 –

tax g

ener

ation

REV-

2 – 15

% p

rofit

Hou

sing

Pr

ovide

Affo

rdab

le Ho

using

HA-1

– ten

ure p

rofile

, own

/rent

HA-2

– aff

orda

ble p

ricing

HA-3

– ma

rket:n

on-m

arke

t

Acce

ssibl

e and

Ad

apta

ble H

ousin

g HA

-3 –

20%

univ

ersa

l unit

s

SOCIAL

Qua

lity

of L

ife

Oppo

rtunit

y for

So

cial In

tera

ction

QL

-1 –

comm

on sp

ace

QL-2

– ne

ighbo

urlin

ess

Cont

ribut

e to

Saf

e Co

mm

unity

QL

-3 –

perce

ived s

afety

Loca

l Foo

d Pr

oduc

tion

QL-4

– loc

al foo

d pro

ducti

on

Div

ersi

ty

Acco

mm

odat

e a

Dive

rse M

ix of

Re

siden

ts

DIV-

1 - re

siden

t age

DIV-

2 – re

siden

t ethn

icity

DIV-

3 – fa

mily

type

DIV-

4 – re

siden

t inco

me

3 - LEGS

12 - THEMES

19 - GOALS

34 -INDICATORS

ECO HOUSING

ENVIRONMENTAL

Den

sity

In

crea

se C

ompa

ct De

velop

men

t DE

V-1 –

100u

nits/h

a

DEV-

2 – 70

% 2

-3bd

rm

Ener

gy &

Em

issi

ons

Max

imize

Effic

iency

EE

-1 –

50%

abo

ve M

NECB

Re

duce

Ene

rgy

Dem

and

EE-2

– 31

2 kW

h/m2

Enco

urag

e Lo

cal

Rene

wable

Ene

rgy

EE-3

– dis

trict e

nerg

y

EE-4

– 20

% re

newa

ble so

urce

Re

duce

GHG

Em

ission

s EE

-5 –

Net Z

ero

Tran

spor

tatio

n In

crea

se U

se o

f Al

tern

ative

Tr

ansp

ort M

odes

T-1 –

40%

walk

& cy

cle

T-2 –

acce

ss to

amen

ities

T-3 –

acce

ss to

tran

sit

Nat

ural

Are

as

Prot

ect N

atur

al Ar

eas

NA-1

– re

store

50%

NA-2

– 10

% su

rface

parki

ng?

Wat

er

Mini

mize

Wat

er

Cons

umpt

ion

W-1

– 40

% le

ss po

table

Effe

ctive

ly M

anag

e St

orm

wate

r W

-2 –

onsit

e s.w

.mgm

t

Solid

Was

te

Solid

Was

te

MSW

-1 –

75%

con.

waste

MSW

-2 –

60%

bdg

. was

te

ECONOMIC

Infr

astr

uctu

re

Cost

Effe

ctive

On-

Site

Infra

struc

ture

IN

FRA-

1 – se

rvice

costs

INFR

A-2 –

leve

lized

costs

Empl

oym

ent

Clos

e Pr

oxim

ity to

Jo

bs

EMPL

-2 –

1 FTE

in 80

0m/un

it

EMPL

-3 –

< 1k

m co

mmute

Rev

enue

G

ener

atio

n Ge

nera

te R

even

ues

for t

he C

omm

unity

RE

V-1 –

tax g

ener

ation

REV-

2 – 15

% p

rofit

Hou

sing

Pr

ovide

Affo

rdab

le Ho

using

HA-1

– ten

ure p

rofile

, own

/rent

HA-2

– aff

orda

ble p

ricing

HA-3

– ma

rket:n

on-m

arke

t

Acce

ssibl

e and

Ad

apta

ble H

ousin

g HA

-3 –

20%

univ

ersa

l unit

s

SOCIAL

Qua

lity

of L

ife

Oppo

rtunit

y for

So

cial In

tera

ction

QL

-1 –

comm

on sp

ace

QL-2

– ne

ighbo

urlin

ess

Cont

ribut

e to

Saf

e Co

mm

unity

QL

-3 –

perce

ived s

afety

Loca

l Foo

d Pr

oduc

tion

QL-4

– loc

al foo

d pro

ducti

on

Div

ersi

ty

Acco

mm

odat

e a

Dive

rse M

ix of

Re

siden

ts

DIV-

1 - re

siden

t age

DIV-

2 – re

siden

t ethn

icity

DIV-

3 – fa

mily

type

DIV-

4 – re

siden

t inco

me

3 - LEGS

12 - THEMES

19 - GOALS

34 -INDICATORS

RED: Included in RFP, 19 Goals in RFP and Core Indicators from Eco Housing Workshop Report GREY: from Sustainability Framework, not included in RFP

SUMMARY

ENVIRONMENTAL

Den

sity

In

crea

se C

ompa

ct De

velop

men

t DE

V-1 –

100u

nits/h

a

DEV-

2 – 70

% 2

-3bd

rm

Ener

gy &

Em

issi

ons

Max

imize

Effic

iency

EE

-1 –

50%

abo

ve M

NECB

Re

duce

Ene

rgy

Dem

and

EE-2

– 31

2 kW

h/m2

Enco

urag

e Lo

cal

Rene

wable

Ene

rgy

EE-3

– dis

trict e

nerg

y

EE-4

– 20

% re

newa

ble so

urce

Re

duce

GHG

Em

ission

s EE

-5 –

Net Z

ero

Tran

spor

tatio

n In

crea

se U

se o

f Al

tern

ative

Tr

ansp

ort M

odes

T-1 –

40%

walk

& cy

cle

T-2 –

acce

ss to

amen

ities

T-3 –

acce

ss to

tran

sit

Nat

ural

Are

as

Prot

ect N

atur

al Ar

eas

NA-1

– re

store

50%

NA-2

– 10

% su

rface

parki

ng?

Wat

er

Mini

mize

Wat

er

Cons

umpt

ion

W-1

– 40

% le

ss po

table

Effe

ctive

ly M

anag

e St

orm

wate

r W

-2 –

onsit

e s.w

.mgm

t

Solid

Was

te

Solid

Was

te

MSW

-1 –

75%

con.

waste

MSW

-2 –

60%

bdg

. was

te

ECONOMIC

Infr

astr

uctu

re

Cost

Effe

ctive

On-

Site

Infra

struc

ture

IN

FRA-

1 – se

rvice

costs

INFR

A-2 –

leve

lized

costs

Empl

oym

ent

Clos

e Pr

oxim

ity to

Jo

bs

EMPL

-2 –

1 FTE

in 80

0m/un

it

EMPL

-3 –

< 1k

m co

mmute

Rev

enue

G

ener

atio

n Ge

nera

te R

even

ues

for t

he C

omm

unity

RE

V-1 –

tax g

ener

ation

REV-

2 – 15

% p

rofit

Hou

sing

Pr

ovide

Affo

rdab

le Ho

using

HA-1

– ten

ure p

rofile

, own

/rent

HA-2

– aff

orda

ble p

ricing

HA-3

– ma

rket:n

on-m

arke

t

Acce

ssibl

e and

Ad

apta

ble H

ousin

g HA

-3 –

20%

univ

ersa

l unit

s

SOCIAL

Qua

lity

of L

ife

Oppo

rtunit

y for

So

cial In

tera

ction

QL

-1 –

comm

on sp

ace

QL-2

– ne

ighbo

urlin

ess

Cont

ribut

e to

Saf

e Co

mm

unity

QL

-3 –

perce

ived s

afety

Loca

l Foo

d Pr

oduc

tion

QL-4

– loc

al foo

d pro

ducti

on

Div

ersi

ty

Acco

mm

odat

e a

Dive

rse M

ix of

Re

siden

ts

DIV-

1 - re

siden

t age

DIV-

2 – re

siden

t ethn

icity

DIV-

3 – fa

mily

type

DIV-

4 – re

siden

t inco

me

3 - LEGS

12 - THEMES

19 - GOALS

34 -INDICATORS

SUMMARY

ENVIRONMENTAL

Den

sity

In

crea

se C

ompa

ct De

velop

men

t DE

V-1 –

100u

nits/h

a

DEV-

2 – 70

% 2

-3bd

rm

Ener

gy &

Em

issi

ons

Max

imize

Effic

iency

EE

-1 –

50%

abo

ve M

NECB

Re

duce

Ene

rgy

Dem

and

EE-2

– 31

2 kW

h/m2

Enco

urag

e Lo

cal

Rene

wable

Ene

rgy

EE-3

– dis

trict e

nerg

y

EE-4

– 20

% re

newa

ble so

urce

Re

duce

GHG

Em

ission

s EE

-5 –

Net Z

ero

Tran

spor

tatio

n In

crea

se U

se o

f Al

tern

ative

Tr

ansp

ort M

odes

T-1 –

40%

walk

& cy

cle

T-2 –

acce

ss to

amen

ities

T-3 –

acce

ss to

tran

sit

Nat

ural

Are

as

Prot

ect N

atur

al Ar

eas

NA-1

– re

store

50%

site

NA-2

– 10

% su

rface

parki

ng?

Wat

er

Mini

mize

Wat

er

Cons

umpt

ion

W-1

– 40

% le

ss po

table

Effe

ctive

ly M

anag

e St

orm

wate

r W

-2 –

onsit

e s.w

.mgm

t

Solid

Was

te

Solid

Was

te

MSW

-1 –

75%

con.

waste

MSW

-2 –

60%

bdg

. was

te

ECONOMIC

Infr

astr

uctu

re

Cost

Effe

ctive

On-

Site

Infra

struc

ture

IN

FRA-

1 – se

rvice

costs

INFR

A-2 –

leve

lized

costs

Empl

oym

ent

Clos

e Pr

oxim

ity to

Jo

bs

EMPL

-2 –

1 FTE

in 80

0m/un

it

EMPL

-3 –

< 1k

m co

mmute

Rev

enue

G

ener

atio

n Ge

nera

te R

even

ues

for t

he C

omm

unity

RE

V-1 –

tax g

ener

ation

REV-

2 – 15

% p

rofit

Hou

sing

Pr

ovide

Affo

rdab

le Ho

using

HA-1

– ten

ure p

rofile

, own

/rent

HA-2

– aff

orda

ble p

ricing

HA-3

– ma

rket:n

on-m

arke

t

Acce

ssibl

e and

Ad

apta

ble H

ousin

g HA

-3 –

20%

univ

ersa

l unit

s

SOCIAL

Qua

lity

of L

ife

Oppo

rtunit

y for

So

cial In

tera

ction

QL

-1 –

comm

on sp

ace

QL-2

– ne

ighbo

urlin

ess

Cont

ribut

e to

Saf

e Co

mm

unity

QL

-3 –

perce

ived s

afety

Loca

l Foo

d Pr

oduc

tion

QL-4

– loc

al foo

d pro

ducti

on

Div

ersi

ty

Acco

mm

odat

e a

Dive

rse M

ix of

Re

siden

ts

DIV-

1 - re

siden

t age

DIV-

2 – re

siden

t ethn

icity

DIV-

3 – fa

mily

type

DIV-

4 – re

siden

t inco

me

3 - LEGS

12 - THEMES

19 - GOALS

34 -INDICATORS

Achievable

To Strive For/Aim to Exceed

Beyond Control

Presents Challenge

Not Applicable

Included in RFP’s Core Indicator

SUSTAINABILITY FRAMEWORK Terms of Reference

ENVIRONMENTAL

SUSTAINABILITY FRAMEWORK Terms of Reference

ENVIRONMENTAL

SUSTAINABILITY FRAMEWORK Terms of Reference

ECONOMIC

SUSTAINABILITY FRAMEWORK Terms of Reference

SOCIAL

Sustainability and Innovation

Skills and Capacity Building

Affordability

RECONCILING COMPETING OBJECTIVES

For example: •Enhanced Technology Demonstration versus Affordable High Performance ‘low tech’ •Flagship Precedent versus Marketable Revitalization Precedent •Intensive on-site Skills Development versus Affordable Prefabrication/select Skills Development

4. OPEN HOUSE 1 & 2

PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT Public Open House 1: What is Eco-Housing?

Objectives: • Community sustainability knowledge enhancement • Present Task Force Goals, Themes and Indicators Content/Material: • Visual Presentation (PowerPoint) GUY / BSN • Display Panels on Eco-Housing, the principles and objectives GUY/ BSN summarize T.F. Goals • Display Panels on Environmental, Economic and Social aspects. GUY / BSN • Why Eco-Housing for Yellowknife? City / GUY / BSN • SmartGrowth and Downtown Revitalization Display Panels City Agenda: • Introduction CITY • Relation to City’s SmartGrowth and Downtown Revitalization objectives? CITY • Overview of Eco Housing Principles GUY / BSN • What are the community benefits? (skills dev., research, monitoring, SmartGrowth, revitalization, reduced infrastructure costs, compact dev. etc.) GUY / BSN • Research/Technology/Design precedents will be presented GUY / BSN • The project may be presented at a highly conceptual emphasizing on demonstrating how options are being considered and selected related to sustainable design and context specific criteria. GUY / BSN

*

*

T-1 – 40% walk & cycle

T-2 – access to amenities

T-3 – access to transit

EMPL-2 – 1 FTE in 800m/unit

EMPL-3 – < 1km commute

T-1 – 40% walk & cycle

T-2 – access to amenities

T-3 – access to transit

EMPL-2 – 1 FTE in 800m/unit

EMPL-3 – < 1km commute

PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT Public Open House 2: Realizing Eco-Housing Principles

Objectives: • Knowledge and capacity building • Understanding of Process and decision making

Content/Material (To Be Determined) Proposed Focus (Agenda To Be Determined) • Focus on reviewing the project progress to date. • Project presented with emphasis on demonstrating how options were considered and selected related to sustainable design criteria and benchmarks established by the Task Force • Sharing project lessons, information, data, modeling and life-cycle assessment results • Enabling the public to understand more clearly why certain features are selected in the project, as well as understand community benefits and economic spin-offs.

Preliminary

5. SKILLS & CAPACITY BUILDING

SKILLS & CAPACITY BUILDING SUMMARY

1. Public Open House: raise knowledge and understanding of sustainable housing, SmartGrowth practices in Yellowknife and Eco Housing Goals 2. Baseline Surveys: survey of local contractor and development community 3. Design Skills: 1 or 2 invited for internship with local design firm 4. Municipal Skills: a) possible internship, b) how can this project prepare City officials for future high performance multi-unit buildings and meeting efficiency bylaws 5. Development Skills: assist with sales and marketing training 6. Construction Skills & Training: a) utilization of local labour requirements, b) apprenticing and skills development as part of tender process 7. Inspection Skills & Quality Control: a) Holmes Inspection Training, b) Quality Control/Construction Documentation training

… applied by northerners to future housing projects, thereby leading to capacity development, new business opportunities and job creation. (CanNor Objective)

8. Construction and Development Industry Public Meeting/Open House a) presentation of lessons learned, life-cycle cost analysis overview, performance modeling, present Eco Housing Goals and SmartGrowth principles, b) possible expansion into conference format if support exists 9. Facility Tour: Education Public Tour Day – 3 Tours 10. Eco-Housing Report: Publicly available report at conclusion focused on lessons learned and how to implement future projects 11. Project Monitoring: a) 2 year period for monitoring: using recorded and available energy use data, compiled and compared to understand actual performance, payback and fine tune building systems, b) looking for partner for 3rd party involvement & verification 12. Post Occupancy Survey: conducted amongst residents to understand what it is like living there, what worked and didn’t, what has been most beneficial, etc

SKILLS & CAPACITY BUILDING SUMMARY

SKILLS & CAPACITY BUILDING

Establishing a Baseline: • Developer Survey • Contractor Survey

EXAMPLE: Developer Survey

This is to ensure 1 response per company.

please

EXAMPLE: Developer Survey

the capability of the local building trades with respect to the following:

EXAMPLE: Developer Survey

EXAMPLE: Developer Survey

What are the top ways to deliver more sustainable housing in Yellowknife?

6. PREVIOUS BUSINESS

HOW ELSE CAN WE MAXIMIZE PROJECT VALUE WHILE MULTIPLYING PROJECT BENEFITS?

WHAT OTHER OPPORTUNITIES EXIST?

a. Skills Canada, CMHC, Arctic Energy Alliance, NWT Housing Corp. etc. (what agencies could be involved and in what capacities?) b. Private sector suppliers/partnerships

Sustainability and Innovation

Skills and Capacity Building

Affordability

CONFIRMING METRICS FOR SUCCESS

TBD

7. OTHER BUSINESS