target material tests with the electron beam at the ... filetarget material tests with the electron...

29
Target material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick, Sabine Riemann, Andriy Ushakov POSIPOL2016 Orsay, France, September 14–16, 2016

Upload: others

Post on 19-Sep-2019

15 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Target material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz

Felix Dietrich Alexandr Ignatenko Gudrid Moortgat-Pick Sabine Riemann Andriy

Ushakov

POSIPOL2016

Orsay France September 14ndash16 2016

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 2

Overview

gt Introduction Motivation

gt Mainz Microtron (MAMI)

gt Material for the tests

gt Simulations results

gt Material after the tests

gt Summary

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 3

Introduction Motivation

bull Encouraging results for Ti and Ti alloys for KEKB No tests to long-term

cyclic load

bull Idea to expose to high cyclic load the material for the ILC components

bull Tests using injector of MAMI

bull Ti alloy for the positron conversion target ndash high cyclic load

bull What target thickness is better

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 4

Mainz Microtron

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 5

Mainz Microtron

The Mainz Microtron (MAMI) is an accelerator for

electron beams run by the Institute for Nuclear

Physics of the University of Mainz used for hadron

physics experiments

cw e- beams gt 20 microA (polarized) or up to 100 microA

(unpolarized)

In our tests

14 MeV e- 10 microA average beam current Gaussian beam 200 microm

rms radius

Pulse

1frep

RF = 245 GHz

50 microA

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 6

Collaborators in Mainz

Kurt Aulenbacher

Philipp Heil

Valery Tioukine

+ Marco Dehn et al (operators of MAMI)

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 7

Material for the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 8

Assembly with the targets

Front view to the

target assembly

Side view to the target

assembly

1

2

3

Material of targets

Grade 5 Ti ndash Ti6Al4V

Target 1 2 3

Thickness 1 mm 1 mm 2 mm

Surface Rough Rough Smooth

Fixation Not fixed Fixed Fixed

Cooling Radiation Radiation +

contact to

the holder

Radiation

Diagnostics temperature and current

measurement for target 1

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 9

Targets

Targets 1 amp 2

Rough surface produced by erosion process from a

thicker bar

Target 3

ldquoSmoothrdquo surface milled

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 10

Program

Target Hit

point

Regime Beam time Load

cycles

Years of

ILC

operation

1 1 100 Hz 2 ms 10 μA

average

18 h 28 min 682∙106 246

1 2 67 Hz 3 ms 10 μA

average

5h 4 min 124∙106 045

2 1 67 Hz 3 ms 10 μA

average

5h 4 min 124∙106 045

3 1 100 Hz 2 ms 10 μA

average

14 h 22 min

517∙106 187

1

2

1 year of ILC operation 5000 h 5 Hz each point is irradiated every 65 s

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 11

Simulations results

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 12

GEANT4 and FLUKA simulations targets 1 amp 2

EDD (G4) for 1 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4 and FLUKA

(A Ushakov)

GEANT41002 physics list FTFP_BERT

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 13

Simulation target 3

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

EDD (G4) for 2 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 14

ANSYS simulation target 1

Max average T = 691 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 700 degC) = 82 degC

Max T in target 1 691 + 82 degC

Target 1

Thickness 1 mm

Surface Rough

Fixation Not fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect low thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics etc

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

Distribution of the average temperature (ε=05)

Real temperature measurement in

rarr ε ≳ 05

Here and later

Ambient T = 22 degC

Ti6Al4V properties according to

KC Mills 2002 Recommended Values of Thermophysical Properties

For Selected Commercial Alloys p 217 as referenced by J Yang

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 15

ANSYS simulation target 3

Target 3

Thickness 2 mm

Surface Smooth

Fixation Fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics and

fixation screws

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

ε = 05

Max average T = 787 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 760 degC) = 88 degC

Max T in target 3 787 + 88 degC

Although if ε = 01

Max average T = 1105 degC

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 16

Material after the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 17

Targets after testbeam

Holder with targets entrance

side

Holder with targets exit side

Irradiation spots

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 18

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Surface investigation with 3D laser scan microscope VK-X100X200 series

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 19

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 20

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 2: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 2

Overview

gt Introduction Motivation

gt Mainz Microtron (MAMI)

gt Material for the tests

gt Simulations results

gt Material after the tests

gt Summary

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 3

Introduction Motivation

bull Encouraging results for Ti and Ti alloys for KEKB No tests to long-term

cyclic load

bull Idea to expose to high cyclic load the material for the ILC components

bull Tests using injector of MAMI

bull Ti alloy for the positron conversion target ndash high cyclic load

bull What target thickness is better

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 4

Mainz Microtron

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 5

Mainz Microtron

The Mainz Microtron (MAMI) is an accelerator for

electron beams run by the Institute for Nuclear

Physics of the University of Mainz used for hadron

physics experiments

cw e- beams gt 20 microA (polarized) or up to 100 microA

(unpolarized)

In our tests

14 MeV e- 10 microA average beam current Gaussian beam 200 microm

rms radius

Pulse

1frep

RF = 245 GHz

50 microA

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 6

Collaborators in Mainz

Kurt Aulenbacher

Philipp Heil

Valery Tioukine

+ Marco Dehn et al (operators of MAMI)

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 7

Material for the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 8

Assembly with the targets

Front view to the

target assembly

Side view to the target

assembly

1

2

3

Material of targets

Grade 5 Ti ndash Ti6Al4V

Target 1 2 3

Thickness 1 mm 1 mm 2 mm

Surface Rough Rough Smooth

Fixation Not fixed Fixed Fixed

Cooling Radiation Radiation +

contact to

the holder

Radiation

Diagnostics temperature and current

measurement for target 1

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 9

Targets

Targets 1 amp 2

Rough surface produced by erosion process from a

thicker bar

Target 3

ldquoSmoothrdquo surface milled

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 10

Program

Target Hit

point

Regime Beam time Load

cycles

Years of

ILC

operation

1 1 100 Hz 2 ms 10 μA

average

18 h 28 min 682∙106 246

1 2 67 Hz 3 ms 10 μA

average

5h 4 min 124∙106 045

2 1 67 Hz 3 ms 10 μA

average

5h 4 min 124∙106 045

3 1 100 Hz 2 ms 10 μA

average

14 h 22 min

517∙106 187

1

2

1 year of ILC operation 5000 h 5 Hz each point is irradiated every 65 s

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 11

Simulations results

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 12

GEANT4 and FLUKA simulations targets 1 amp 2

EDD (G4) for 1 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4 and FLUKA

(A Ushakov)

GEANT41002 physics list FTFP_BERT

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 13

Simulation target 3

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

EDD (G4) for 2 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 14

ANSYS simulation target 1

Max average T = 691 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 700 degC) = 82 degC

Max T in target 1 691 + 82 degC

Target 1

Thickness 1 mm

Surface Rough

Fixation Not fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect low thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics etc

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

Distribution of the average temperature (ε=05)

Real temperature measurement in

rarr ε ≳ 05

Here and later

Ambient T = 22 degC

Ti6Al4V properties according to

KC Mills 2002 Recommended Values of Thermophysical Properties

For Selected Commercial Alloys p 217 as referenced by J Yang

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 15

ANSYS simulation target 3

Target 3

Thickness 2 mm

Surface Smooth

Fixation Fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics and

fixation screws

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

ε = 05

Max average T = 787 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 760 degC) = 88 degC

Max T in target 3 787 + 88 degC

Although if ε = 01

Max average T = 1105 degC

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 16

Material after the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 17

Targets after testbeam

Holder with targets entrance

side

Holder with targets exit side

Irradiation spots

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 18

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Surface investigation with 3D laser scan microscope VK-X100X200 series

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 19

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 20

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 3: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 3

Introduction Motivation

bull Encouraging results for Ti and Ti alloys for KEKB No tests to long-term

cyclic load

bull Idea to expose to high cyclic load the material for the ILC components

bull Tests using injector of MAMI

bull Ti alloy for the positron conversion target ndash high cyclic load

bull What target thickness is better

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 4

Mainz Microtron

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 5

Mainz Microtron

The Mainz Microtron (MAMI) is an accelerator for

electron beams run by the Institute for Nuclear

Physics of the University of Mainz used for hadron

physics experiments

cw e- beams gt 20 microA (polarized) or up to 100 microA

(unpolarized)

In our tests

14 MeV e- 10 microA average beam current Gaussian beam 200 microm

rms radius

Pulse

1frep

RF = 245 GHz

50 microA

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 6

Collaborators in Mainz

Kurt Aulenbacher

Philipp Heil

Valery Tioukine

+ Marco Dehn et al (operators of MAMI)

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 7

Material for the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 8

Assembly with the targets

Front view to the

target assembly

Side view to the target

assembly

1

2

3

Material of targets

Grade 5 Ti ndash Ti6Al4V

Target 1 2 3

Thickness 1 mm 1 mm 2 mm

Surface Rough Rough Smooth

Fixation Not fixed Fixed Fixed

Cooling Radiation Radiation +

contact to

the holder

Radiation

Diagnostics temperature and current

measurement for target 1

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 9

Targets

Targets 1 amp 2

Rough surface produced by erosion process from a

thicker bar

Target 3

ldquoSmoothrdquo surface milled

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 10

Program

Target Hit

point

Regime Beam time Load

cycles

Years of

ILC

operation

1 1 100 Hz 2 ms 10 μA

average

18 h 28 min 682∙106 246

1 2 67 Hz 3 ms 10 μA

average

5h 4 min 124∙106 045

2 1 67 Hz 3 ms 10 μA

average

5h 4 min 124∙106 045

3 1 100 Hz 2 ms 10 μA

average

14 h 22 min

517∙106 187

1

2

1 year of ILC operation 5000 h 5 Hz each point is irradiated every 65 s

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 11

Simulations results

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 12

GEANT4 and FLUKA simulations targets 1 amp 2

EDD (G4) for 1 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4 and FLUKA

(A Ushakov)

GEANT41002 physics list FTFP_BERT

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 13

Simulation target 3

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

EDD (G4) for 2 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 14

ANSYS simulation target 1

Max average T = 691 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 700 degC) = 82 degC

Max T in target 1 691 + 82 degC

Target 1

Thickness 1 mm

Surface Rough

Fixation Not fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect low thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics etc

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

Distribution of the average temperature (ε=05)

Real temperature measurement in

rarr ε ≳ 05

Here and later

Ambient T = 22 degC

Ti6Al4V properties according to

KC Mills 2002 Recommended Values of Thermophysical Properties

For Selected Commercial Alloys p 217 as referenced by J Yang

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 15

ANSYS simulation target 3

Target 3

Thickness 2 mm

Surface Smooth

Fixation Fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics and

fixation screws

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

ε = 05

Max average T = 787 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 760 degC) = 88 degC

Max T in target 3 787 + 88 degC

Although if ε = 01

Max average T = 1105 degC

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 16

Material after the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 17

Targets after testbeam

Holder with targets entrance

side

Holder with targets exit side

Irradiation spots

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 18

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Surface investigation with 3D laser scan microscope VK-X100X200 series

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 19

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 20

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 4: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 4

Mainz Microtron

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 5

Mainz Microtron

The Mainz Microtron (MAMI) is an accelerator for

electron beams run by the Institute for Nuclear

Physics of the University of Mainz used for hadron

physics experiments

cw e- beams gt 20 microA (polarized) or up to 100 microA

(unpolarized)

In our tests

14 MeV e- 10 microA average beam current Gaussian beam 200 microm

rms radius

Pulse

1frep

RF = 245 GHz

50 microA

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 6

Collaborators in Mainz

Kurt Aulenbacher

Philipp Heil

Valery Tioukine

+ Marco Dehn et al (operators of MAMI)

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 7

Material for the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 8

Assembly with the targets

Front view to the

target assembly

Side view to the target

assembly

1

2

3

Material of targets

Grade 5 Ti ndash Ti6Al4V

Target 1 2 3

Thickness 1 mm 1 mm 2 mm

Surface Rough Rough Smooth

Fixation Not fixed Fixed Fixed

Cooling Radiation Radiation +

contact to

the holder

Radiation

Diagnostics temperature and current

measurement for target 1

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 9

Targets

Targets 1 amp 2

Rough surface produced by erosion process from a

thicker bar

Target 3

ldquoSmoothrdquo surface milled

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 10

Program

Target Hit

point

Regime Beam time Load

cycles

Years of

ILC

operation

1 1 100 Hz 2 ms 10 μA

average

18 h 28 min 682∙106 246

1 2 67 Hz 3 ms 10 μA

average

5h 4 min 124∙106 045

2 1 67 Hz 3 ms 10 μA

average

5h 4 min 124∙106 045

3 1 100 Hz 2 ms 10 μA

average

14 h 22 min

517∙106 187

1

2

1 year of ILC operation 5000 h 5 Hz each point is irradiated every 65 s

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 11

Simulations results

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 12

GEANT4 and FLUKA simulations targets 1 amp 2

EDD (G4) for 1 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4 and FLUKA

(A Ushakov)

GEANT41002 physics list FTFP_BERT

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 13

Simulation target 3

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

EDD (G4) for 2 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 14

ANSYS simulation target 1

Max average T = 691 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 700 degC) = 82 degC

Max T in target 1 691 + 82 degC

Target 1

Thickness 1 mm

Surface Rough

Fixation Not fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect low thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics etc

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

Distribution of the average temperature (ε=05)

Real temperature measurement in

rarr ε ≳ 05

Here and later

Ambient T = 22 degC

Ti6Al4V properties according to

KC Mills 2002 Recommended Values of Thermophysical Properties

For Selected Commercial Alloys p 217 as referenced by J Yang

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 15

ANSYS simulation target 3

Target 3

Thickness 2 mm

Surface Smooth

Fixation Fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics and

fixation screws

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

ε = 05

Max average T = 787 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 760 degC) = 88 degC

Max T in target 3 787 + 88 degC

Although if ε = 01

Max average T = 1105 degC

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 16

Material after the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 17

Targets after testbeam

Holder with targets entrance

side

Holder with targets exit side

Irradiation spots

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 18

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Surface investigation with 3D laser scan microscope VK-X100X200 series

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 19

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 20

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 5: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 5

Mainz Microtron

The Mainz Microtron (MAMI) is an accelerator for

electron beams run by the Institute for Nuclear

Physics of the University of Mainz used for hadron

physics experiments

cw e- beams gt 20 microA (polarized) or up to 100 microA

(unpolarized)

In our tests

14 MeV e- 10 microA average beam current Gaussian beam 200 microm

rms radius

Pulse

1frep

RF = 245 GHz

50 microA

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 6

Collaborators in Mainz

Kurt Aulenbacher

Philipp Heil

Valery Tioukine

+ Marco Dehn et al (operators of MAMI)

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 7

Material for the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 8

Assembly with the targets

Front view to the

target assembly

Side view to the target

assembly

1

2

3

Material of targets

Grade 5 Ti ndash Ti6Al4V

Target 1 2 3

Thickness 1 mm 1 mm 2 mm

Surface Rough Rough Smooth

Fixation Not fixed Fixed Fixed

Cooling Radiation Radiation +

contact to

the holder

Radiation

Diagnostics temperature and current

measurement for target 1

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 9

Targets

Targets 1 amp 2

Rough surface produced by erosion process from a

thicker bar

Target 3

ldquoSmoothrdquo surface milled

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 10

Program

Target Hit

point

Regime Beam time Load

cycles

Years of

ILC

operation

1 1 100 Hz 2 ms 10 μA

average

18 h 28 min 682∙106 246

1 2 67 Hz 3 ms 10 μA

average

5h 4 min 124∙106 045

2 1 67 Hz 3 ms 10 μA

average

5h 4 min 124∙106 045

3 1 100 Hz 2 ms 10 μA

average

14 h 22 min

517∙106 187

1

2

1 year of ILC operation 5000 h 5 Hz each point is irradiated every 65 s

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 11

Simulations results

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 12

GEANT4 and FLUKA simulations targets 1 amp 2

EDD (G4) for 1 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4 and FLUKA

(A Ushakov)

GEANT41002 physics list FTFP_BERT

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 13

Simulation target 3

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

EDD (G4) for 2 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 14

ANSYS simulation target 1

Max average T = 691 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 700 degC) = 82 degC

Max T in target 1 691 + 82 degC

Target 1

Thickness 1 mm

Surface Rough

Fixation Not fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect low thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics etc

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

Distribution of the average temperature (ε=05)

Real temperature measurement in

rarr ε ≳ 05

Here and later

Ambient T = 22 degC

Ti6Al4V properties according to

KC Mills 2002 Recommended Values of Thermophysical Properties

For Selected Commercial Alloys p 217 as referenced by J Yang

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 15

ANSYS simulation target 3

Target 3

Thickness 2 mm

Surface Smooth

Fixation Fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics and

fixation screws

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

ε = 05

Max average T = 787 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 760 degC) = 88 degC

Max T in target 3 787 + 88 degC

Although if ε = 01

Max average T = 1105 degC

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 16

Material after the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 17

Targets after testbeam

Holder with targets entrance

side

Holder with targets exit side

Irradiation spots

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 18

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Surface investigation with 3D laser scan microscope VK-X100X200 series

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 19

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 20

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 6: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 6

Collaborators in Mainz

Kurt Aulenbacher

Philipp Heil

Valery Tioukine

+ Marco Dehn et al (operators of MAMI)

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 7

Material for the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 8

Assembly with the targets

Front view to the

target assembly

Side view to the target

assembly

1

2

3

Material of targets

Grade 5 Ti ndash Ti6Al4V

Target 1 2 3

Thickness 1 mm 1 mm 2 mm

Surface Rough Rough Smooth

Fixation Not fixed Fixed Fixed

Cooling Radiation Radiation +

contact to

the holder

Radiation

Diagnostics temperature and current

measurement for target 1

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 9

Targets

Targets 1 amp 2

Rough surface produced by erosion process from a

thicker bar

Target 3

ldquoSmoothrdquo surface milled

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 10

Program

Target Hit

point

Regime Beam time Load

cycles

Years of

ILC

operation

1 1 100 Hz 2 ms 10 μA

average

18 h 28 min 682∙106 246

1 2 67 Hz 3 ms 10 μA

average

5h 4 min 124∙106 045

2 1 67 Hz 3 ms 10 μA

average

5h 4 min 124∙106 045

3 1 100 Hz 2 ms 10 μA

average

14 h 22 min

517∙106 187

1

2

1 year of ILC operation 5000 h 5 Hz each point is irradiated every 65 s

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 11

Simulations results

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 12

GEANT4 and FLUKA simulations targets 1 amp 2

EDD (G4) for 1 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4 and FLUKA

(A Ushakov)

GEANT41002 physics list FTFP_BERT

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 13

Simulation target 3

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

EDD (G4) for 2 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 14

ANSYS simulation target 1

Max average T = 691 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 700 degC) = 82 degC

Max T in target 1 691 + 82 degC

Target 1

Thickness 1 mm

Surface Rough

Fixation Not fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect low thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics etc

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

Distribution of the average temperature (ε=05)

Real temperature measurement in

rarr ε ≳ 05

Here and later

Ambient T = 22 degC

Ti6Al4V properties according to

KC Mills 2002 Recommended Values of Thermophysical Properties

For Selected Commercial Alloys p 217 as referenced by J Yang

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 15

ANSYS simulation target 3

Target 3

Thickness 2 mm

Surface Smooth

Fixation Fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics and

fixation screws

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

ε = 05

Max average T = 787 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 760 degC) = 88 degC

Max T in target 3 787 + 88 degC

Although if ε = 01

Max average T = 1105 degC

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 16

Material after the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 17

Targets after testbeam

Holder with targets entrance

side

Holder with targets exit side

Irradiation spots

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 18

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Surface investigation with 3D laser scan microscope VK-X100X200 series

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 19

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 20

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 7: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 7

Material for the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 8

Assembly with the targets

Front view to the

target assembly

Side view to the target

assembly

1

2

3

Material of targets

Grade 5 Ti ndash Ti6Al4V

Target 1 2 3

Thickness 1 mm 1 mm 2 mm

Surface Rough Rough Smooth

Fixation Not fixed Fixed Fixed

Cooling Radiation Radiation +

contact to

the holder

Radiation

Diagnostics temperature and current

measurement for target 1

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 9

Targets

Targets 1 amp 2

Rough surface produced by erosion process from a

thicker bar

Target 3

ldquoSmoothrdquo surface milled

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 10

Program

Target Hit

point

Regime Beam time Load

cycles

Years of

ILC

operation

1 1 100 Hz 2 ms 10 μA

average

18 h 28 min 682∙106 246

1 2 67 Hz 3 ms 10 μA

average

5h 4 min 124∙106 045

2 1 67 Hz 3 ms 10 μA

average

5h 4 min 124∙106 045

3 1 100 Hz 2 ms 10 μA

average

14 h 22 min

517∙106 187

1

2

1 year of ILC operation 5000 h 5 Hz each point is irradiated every 65 s

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 11

Simulations results

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 12

GEANT4 and FLUKA simulations targets 1 amp 2

EDD (G4) for 1 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4 and FLUKA

(A Ushakov)

GEANT41002 physics list FTFP_BERT

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 13

Simulation target 3

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

EDD (G4) for 2 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 14

ANSYS simulation target 1

Max average T = 691 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 700 degC) = 82 degC

Max T in target 1 691 + 82 degC

Target 1

Thickness 1 mm

Surface Rough

Fixation Not fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect low thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics etc

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

Distribution of the average temperature (ε=05)

Real temperature measurement in

rarr ε ≳ 05

Here and later

Ambient T = 22 degC

Ti6Al4V properties according to

KC Mills 2002 Recommended Values of Thermophysical Properties

For Selected Commercial Alloys p 217 as referenced by J Yang

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 15

ANSYS simulation target 3

Target 3

Thickness 2 mm

Surface Smooth

Fixation Fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics and

fixation screws

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

ε = 05

Max average T = 787 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 760 degC) = 88 degC

Max T in target 3 787 + 88 degC

Although if ε = 01

Max average T = 1105 degC

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 16

Material after the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 17

Targets after testbeam

Holder with targets entrance

side

Holder with targets exit side

Irradiation spots

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 18

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Surface investigation with 3D laser scan microscope VK-X100X200 series

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 19

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 20

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 8: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 8

Assembly with the targets

Front view to the

target assembly

Side view to the target

assembly

1

2

3

Material of targets

Grade 5 Ti ndash Ti6Al4V

Target 1 2 3

Thickness 1 mm 1 mm 2 mm

Surface Rough Rough Smooth

Fixation Not fixed Fixed Fixed

Cooling Radiation Radiation +

contact to

the holder

Radiation

Diagnostics temperature and current

measurement for target 1

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 9

Targets

Targets 1 amp 2

Rough surface produced by erosion process from a

thicker bar

Target 3

ldquoSmoothrdquo surface milled

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 10

Program

Target Hit

point

Regime Beam time Load

cycles

Years of

ILC

operation

1 1 100 Hz 2 ms 10 μA

average

18 h 28 min 682∙106 246

1 2 67 Hz 3 ms 10 μA

average

5h 4 min 124∙106 045

2 1 67 Hz 3 ms 10 μA

average

5h 4 min 124∙106 045

3 1 100 Hz 2 ms 10 μA

average

14 h 22 min

517∙106 187

1

2

1 year of ILC operation 5000 h 5 Hz each point is irradiated every 65 s

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 11

Simulations results

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 12

GEANT4 and FLUKA simulations targets 1 amp 2

EDD (G4) for 1 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4 and FLUKA

(A Ushakov)

GEANT41002 physics list FTFP_BERT

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 13

Simulation target 3

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

EDD (G4) for 2 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 14

ANSYS simulation target 1

Max average T = 691 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 700 degC) = 82 degC

Max T in target 1 691 + 82 degC

Target 1

Thickness 1 mm

Surface Rough

Fixation Not fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect low thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics etc

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

Distribution of the average temperature (ε=05)

Real temperature measurement in

rarr ε ≳ 05

Here and later

Ambient T = 22 degC

Ti6Al4V properties according to

KC Mills 2002 Recommended Values of Thermophysical Properties

For Selected Commercial Alloys p 217 as referenced by J Yang

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 15

ANSYS simulation target 3

Target 3

Thickness 2 mm

Surface Smooth

Fixation Fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics and

fixation screws

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

ε = 05

Max average T = 787 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 760 degC) = 88 degC

Max T in target 3 787 + 88 degC

Although if ε = 01

Max average T = 1105 degC

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 16

Material after the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 17

Targets after testbeam

Holder with targets entrance

side

Holder with targets exit side

Irradiation spots

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 18

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Surface investigation with 3D laser scan microscope VK-X100X200 series

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 19

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 20

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 9: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 9

Targets

Targets 1 amp 2

Rough surface produced by erosion process from a

thicker bar

Target 3

ldquoSmoothrdquo surface milled

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 10

Program

Target Hit

point

Regime Beam time Load

cycles

Years of

ILC

operation

1 1 100 Hz 2 ms 10 μA

average

18 h 28 min 682∙106 246

1 2 67 Hz 3 ms 10 μA

average

5h 4 min 124∙106 045

2 1 67 Hz 3 ms 10 μA

average

5h 4 min 124∙106 045

3 1 100 Hz 2 ms 10 μA

average

14 h 22 min

517∙106 187

1

2

1 year of ILC operation 5000 h 5 Hz each point is irradiated every 65 s

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 11

Simulations results

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 12

GEANT4 and FLUKA simulations targets 1 amp 2

EDD (G4) for 1 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4 and FLUKA

(A Ushakov)

GEANT41002 physics list FTFP_BERT

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 13

Simulation target 3

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

EDD (G4) for 2 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 14

ANSYS simulation target 1

Max average T = 691 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 700 degC) = 82 degC

Max T in target 1 691 + 82 degC

Target 1

Thickness 1 mm

Surface Rough

Fixation Not fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect low thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics etc

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

Distribution of the average temperature (ε=05)

Real temperature measurement in

rarr ε ≳ 05

Here and later

Ambient T = 22 degC

Ti6Al4V properties according to

KC Mills 2002 Recommended Values of Thermophysical Properties

For Selected Commercial Alloys p 217 as referenced by J Yang

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 15

ANSYS simulation target 3

Target 3

Thickness 2 mm

Surface Smooth

Fixation Fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics and

fixation screws

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

ε = 05

Max average T = 787 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 760 degC) = 88 degC

Max T in target 3 787 + 88 degC

Although if ε = 01

Max average T = 1105 degC

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 16

Material after the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 17

Targets after testbeam

Holder with targets entrance

side

Holder with targets exit side

Irradiation spots

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 18

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Surface investigation with 3D laser scan microscope VK-X100X200 series

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 19

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 20

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 10: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 10

Program

Target Hit

point

Regime Beam time Load

cycles

Years of

ILC

operation

1 1 100 Hz 2 ms 10 μA

average

18 h 28 min 682∙106 246

1 2 67 Hz 3 ms 10 μA

average

5h 4 min 124∙106 045

2 1 67 Hz 3 ms 10 μA

average

5h 4 min 124∙106 045

3 1 100 Hz 2 ms 10 μA

average

14 h 22 min

517∙106 187

1

2

1 year of ILC operation 5000 h 5 Hz each point is irradiated every 65 s

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 11

Simulations results

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 12

GEANT4 and FLUKA simulations targets 1 amp 2

EDD (G4) for 1 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4 and FLUKA

(A Ushakov)

GEANT41002 physics list FTFP_BERT

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 13

Simulation target 3

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

EDD (G4) for 2 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 14

ANSYS simulation target 1

Max average T = 691 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 700 degC) = 82 degC

Max T in target 1 691 + 82 degC

Target 1

Thickness 1 mm

Surface Rough

Fixation Not fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect low thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics etc

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

Distribution of the average temperature (ε=05)

Real temperature measurement in

rarr ε ≳ 05

Here and later

Ambient T = 22 degC

Ti6Al4V properties according to

KC Mills 2002 Recommended Values of Thermophysical Properties

For Selected Commercial Alloys p 217 as referenced by J Yang

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 15

ANSYS simulation target 3

Target 3

Thickness 2 mm

Surface Smooth

Fixation Fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics and

fixation screws

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

ε = 05

Max average T = 787 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 760 degC) = 88 degC

Max T in target 3 787 + 88 degC

Although if ε = 01

Max average T = 1105 degC

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 16

Material after the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 17

Targets after testbeam

Holder with targets entrance

side

Holder with targets exit side

Irradiation spots

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 18

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Surface investigation with 3D laser scan microscope VK-X100X200 series

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 19

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 20

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 11: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 11

Simulations results

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 12

GEANT4 and FLUKA simulations targets 1 amp 2

EDD (G4) for 1 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4 and FLUKA

(A Ushakov)

GEANT41002 physics list FTFP_BERT

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 13

Simulation target 3

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

EDD (G4) for 2 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 14

ANSYS simulation target 1

Max average T = 691 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 700 degC) = 82 degC

Max T in target 1 691 + 82 degC

Target 1

Thickness 1 mm

Surface Rough

Fixation Not fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect low thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics etc

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

Distribution of the average temperature (ε=05)

Real temperature measurement in

rarr ε ≳ 05

Here and later

Ambient T = 22 degC

Ti6Al4V properties according to

KC Mills 2002 Recommended Values of Thermophysical Properties

For Selected Commercial Alloys p 217 as referenced by J Yang

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 15

ANSYS simulation target 3

Target 3

Thickness 2 mm

Surface Smooth

Fixation Fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics and

fixation screws

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

ε = 05

Max average T = 787 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 760 degC) = 88 degC

Max T in target 3 787 + 88 degC

Although if ε = 01

Max average T = 1105 degC

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 16

Material after the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 17

Targets after testbeam

Holder with targets entrance

side

Holder with targets exit side

Irradiation spots

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 18

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Surface investigation with 3D laser scan microscope VK-X100X200 series

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 19

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 20

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 12: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 12

GEANT4 and FLUKA simulations targets 1 amp 2

EDD (G4) for 1 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4 and FLUKA

(A Ushakov)

GEANT41002 physics list FTFP_BERT

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 13

Simulation target 3

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

EDD (G4) for 2 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 14

ANSYS simulation target 1

Max average T = 691 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 700 degC) = 82 degC

Max T in target 1 691 + 82 degC

Target 1

Thickness 1 mm

Surface Rough

Fixation Not fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect low thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics etc

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

Distribution of the average temperature (ε=05)

Real temperature measurement in

rarr ε ≳ 05

Here and later

Ambient T = 22 degC

Ti6Al4V properties according to

KC Mills 2002 Recommended Values of Thermophysical Properties

For Selected Commercial Alloys p 217 as referenced by J Yang

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 15

ANSYS simulation target 3

Target 3

Thickness 2 mm

Surface Smooth

Fixation Fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics and

fixation screws

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

ε = 05

Max average T = 787 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 760 degC) = 88 degC

Max T in target 3 787 + 88 degC

Although if ε = 01

Max average T = 1105 degC

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 16

Material after the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 17

Targets after testbeam

Holder with targets entrance

side

Holder with targets exit side

Irradiation spots

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 18

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Surface investigation with 3D laser scan microscope VK-X100X200 series

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 19

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 20

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 13: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 13

Simulation target 3

PEDD = 474 GeV(e- cm3) = 437 10-5 J(gbunch) (FLUKA)

Number e- per bunch = 255105

Number of bunches per pulse = 49106 (2 ms) or 735106 (3 ms)

EDD (G4) for 2 mm target

EDD vs depth along the beam axis for

1 mm target G4

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 14

ANSYS simulation target 1

Max average T = 691 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 700 degC) = 82 degC

Max T in target 1 691 + 82 degC

Target 1

Thickness 1 mm

Surface Rough

Fixation Not fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect low thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics etc

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

Distribution of the average temperature (ε=05)

Real temperature measurement in

rarr ε ≳ 05

Here and later

Ambient T = 22 degC

Ti6Al4V properties according to

KC Mills 2002 Recommended Values of Thermophysical Properties

For Selected Commercial Alloys p 217 as referenced by J Yang

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 15

ANSYS simulation target 3

Target 3

Thickness 2 mm

Surface Smooth

Fixation Fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics and

fixation screws

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

ε = 05

Max average T = 787 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 760 degC) = 88 degC

Max T in target 3 787 + 88 degC

Although if ε = 01

Max average T = 1105 degC

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 16

Material after the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 17

Targets after testbeam

Holder with targets entrance

side

Holder with targets exit side

Irradiation spots

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 18

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Surface investigation with 3D laser scan microscope VK-X100X200 series

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 19

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 20

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 14: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 14

ANSYS simulation target 1

Max average T = 691 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 700 degC) = 82 degC

Max T in target 1 691 + 82 degC

Target 1

Thickness 1 mm

Surface Rough

Fixation Not fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect low thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics etc

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

Distribution of the average temperature (ε=05)

Real temperature measurement in

rarr ε ≳ 05

Here and later

Ambient T = 22 degC

Ti6Al4V properties according to

KC Mills 2002 Recommended Values of Thermophysical Properties

For Selected Commercial Alloys p 217 as referenced by J Yang

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 15

ANSYS simulation target 3

Target 3

Thickness 2 mm

Surface Smooth

Fixation Fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics and

fixation screws

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

ε = 05

Max average T = 787 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 760 degC) = 88 degC

Max T in target 3 787 + 88 degC

Although if ε = 01

Max average T = 1105 degC

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 16

Material after the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 17

Targets after testbeam

Holder with targets entrance

side

Holder with targets exit side

Irradiation spots

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 18

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Surface investigation with 3D laser scan microscope VK-X100X200 series

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 19

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 20

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 15: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 15

ANSYS simulation target 3

Target 3

Thickness 2 mm

Surface Smooth

Fixation Fixed

Cooling Radiation

Neglect thermal conductivity to the holder via ceramics and

fixation screws

Consider cooling by radiation from the surface only

ε = 05

Max average T = 787 degC

Max T rise pulse ( 760 degC) = 88 degC

Max T in target 3 787 + 88 degC

Although if ε = 01

Max average T = 1105 degC

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 16

Material after the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 17

Targets after testbeam

Holder with targets entrance

side

Holder with targets exit side

Irradiation spots

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 18

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Surface investigation with 3D laser scan microscope VK-X100X200 series

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 19

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 20

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 16: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 16

Material after the tests

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 17

Targets after testbeam

Holder with targets entrance

side

Holder with targets exit side

Irradiation spots

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 18

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Surface investigation with 3D laser scan microscope VK-X100X200 series

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 19

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 20

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 17: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 17

Targets after testbeam

Holder with targets entrance

side

Holder with targets exit side

Irradiation spots

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 18

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Surface investigation with 3D laser scan microscope VK-X100X200 series

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 19

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 20

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 18: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 18

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Surface investigation with 3D laser scan microscope VK-X100X200 series

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 19

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 20

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 19: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 19

Target 1 entrance side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 20

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 20: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 20

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Color change observed no major changes to the surface

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 21: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 21

Target 1 exit side surface investigation

Before After

Flat surface observed before and after irradiation no major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 22: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 22

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Beam spot clearly seen major changes

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 23: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 23

Target 3 surface investigation entrance side

Before After

Flat surface observed before irradiation

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak and 2 deeps

observed in the beam spot ~ 35 microm from the bottom of the

deep to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 24: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 24

Target 3 entrance side

J Yang et al Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 2215-2222

Surface of a Ti6Al4V plate heated by laser

beam

Surface of target 3

Heated up to 1660 degC

1 mm

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 25: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 25

Target 3 surface investigation exit side

Plastic deformation after irradiation 1 peak observed in the beam spot ~ 25 microm from the

surrounding to the top of the peak

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 26: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 26

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Element analysis for a screw head

Ti

V

Si

Al

C

O

Ti V

Results are normalized by Ti (45 keV)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area

Aluminum concentration is lower in the beam spot area

1

2

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 27: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 27

Target 3 SEM image (Yegor Tamashevich)

Point 1 ndash Beam spot area

Point 2 ndash Un-irradiated area 1

2

Surface outside beam spot Beam spot area

Ablation and condensation process

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 28: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 28

Summary

bull Ti6Al4V targets survived high cyclic load of up to 682∙106 cycles heated to

at least 690 degC

bull No major damage to the material after the tests at the temperature of at least

690 degC

bull Noticeable changes only for the material (plastic deformation surface

change) exposed to the temperatures gt780 degC

bull Next steps

- further tests at 14 MeV

- tests at 35 MeV material for target amp for the dump vacuum window

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention

Page 29: Target material tests with the electron beam at the ... fileTarget material tests with the electron beam at the microtron in Mainz Felix Dietrich, Alexandr Ignatenko, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,

Alexandr Ignatenko | POSIPOL 2016 | September 14 - 16 2016 | Page 29

Thank you for your attention