tanya katz, jason wasiak, alex padiglione and heather cleland · 11. spebar mj, lindberg rb. fungal...
TRANSCRIPT
1. Ballard J, Edelman L, Saffle J, et al. Positive fungal cultures in burn patients: a multicenter review. J Burn Care Res 2008;29:213-21.
2. Becker WK, Cioffi WG, Jr., McManus AT, et al. Fungal burn wound infection. A 10-year experience. Arch Surg 1991;126:44-8.
3. Capoor MR, Gupta S, Sarabahi S, Mishra A, Tiwari VK, Aggarwal P. Epidemiological and clinico-mycological profile of fungal wound infection from largest burn centre in Asia. Mycoses 2012;55:181-8.
4. Horvath EE, Murray CK, Vaughan GM, et al. Fungal wound infection (not colonization) is independently associated with mortality in burn patients. Ann Surg 2007;245:978-85.
5. Moore EC, Padiglione AA, Wasiak J, Paul E, Cleland H. Candida in burns: risk factors and outcomes. J Burn Care Res 2010;31:257-63.
6. Schofield CM, Murray CK, Horvath EE, et al. Correlation of culture with histopathology in fungal burn wound colonization and infection. Burns 2007;33:341-6.
7. Prasad JK, Feller I, Thomson PD. A ten-year review of Candida sepsis and mortality in burn patients. Surgery 1987;101:213-6.
8. Ha JF, Italiano CM, Heath CH, Shih S, Rea S, Wood FM. Candidemia and invasive candidiasis: a review of the literature for the burns surgeon. Burns 2011;37:181-95.
9. Sarabahi S, Tiwari VK, Arora S, Capoor MR, Pandey A. Changing pattern of fungal infection in burn patients. Burns 2012;38:520-8.
10. Ledgard JP, van Hal S, Greenwood JE. Primary cutaneous zygomycosis in a burns patient: a review. J Burn Care Res 2008;29:286-90.
11. Spebar MJ, Lindberg RB. Fungal infection of the burn wound. Am J Surg 1979;138:879-82.
REFERENCES
10 years of Non-Candidal Mycoses at a State-Wide Burns Service Tanya Katz, Jason Wasiak, Alex Padiglione and Heather Cleland
Victorian Adult Burns Service & The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne VIC
Infection remains the primary cause of morbidity and
mortality in the burns patient population. While candidal
infection in burns patients is well described, there is dearth
of information regarding non-candidal fungal infections in
this setting. Identification of non-candidal fungal infections in
burns patients requires clinical suspicion (especially
consideration of burn injury environment) alongside
microbiological confirmation. Although uncommon, fungal
infections have the potential to cause detrimental outcomes
in burns patients.
The purpose of this study was to review and analyse the
incidence, treatment and outcomes of a cohort of burns
patients with non-candidal fungal infections at our state-
wide Burns Service.
INTRODUCTION
MAIN FINDINGS
Table 1. Baseline demographics and burn injury characteristics of 12 patients reviewed with a non-candidal fungal isolate,
including relevant treatment regimes.
Figure 1. Patients with non-candidal fungal isolates & associated outcomes.
METHODS
Setting : The Victorian Adult Burns Service (VABS) is the
state-wide adult burns service, located at The Alfred
Hospital, which is one of two designated major trauma
services for adults in the state. VABS treats ~250 patients
with acute burn injuries each year.
Data Collection: A retrospective review was performed of all
adult burns patients who developed non-candidal mycoses
over a period of 10 years (between January 2001-June
2011). Data analysed included patient demographics,
organisms cultured, antibiotic susceptibility patterns,
treatment, length of stay and overall mortality. Superficial
non-invasive fungal conditions such as dermatophytoses
were excluded.
OUTCOMES
Pt
Age
Sex
% TBSA
% FTSA
Species
Days to Isolate
Sites
Pathogenic
Co-existing pathogens
Fungal treatment
Survival
1 21 M 78 70 Aspergillus fumigatus
8 Sputum Y C albicans Itraconazole
Y
2 47 M 15 0 Aspergillus fumigatus
11 Sputum N Yeast NIL Y
3 78 F 40 40 Aspergillus fumigatus Scedosporium prolificans
21 Sputum
Sputum
Y P aeruginosa Voriconazole/ Terbinafine
Y
4 31 M 70 15 Aspergillus fumigatus
2 Sputum Y GPC/GNR/GPR Voriconazole
Y
5 57 M 65 40 Mucor ramosissimus Scedosporium prolificans
30 Wound
Sputum
Y S maltophilia K pneumoniae P aeruginosa C albicans
1. Ambisone (Mucor) 2. Voriconazole/Terbinafine (Scedosporium)
N
6 38 M 70 70 Absidia corymbifera
18 Wound Y Yeast E cloacae Enterococcus E coli S maltophilia S Aureus
Ambisone
Y
7 65 M 40 40 Aspergillus fumigatus Col 1+2
7 Sputum Wound
Y P aeruginosa C albicans S maltophilia
1. Voriconazole > Side effect: ARF 2. Ambisone
N
8 42 M 30 20 Mucor spp Penicillium spp
13 Wound Wound
Y A hydrophila K pneumoniae C albicans S maltophilia A baumanii
Ambisone
Y
9 24 M 3 3 Aspergillus fumigatus
14 Wound N Yeast NIL Y
10 36 F 55 6 Fusarium solani
13 Wound Y E cloacae H influenza Yeast S maltophilia
1. Voriconazole > Side effect:
hallucinations
2. Ambisone Isolate recurrence 3. Ambisone
Y
11 63 M 40 40 Aspergillus fumigatus Alternaria spp
3 Sputum Wound
N K pneumoniae E cloacae H Influenza
NIL N
12 49 M 22 4 Fusarium spp 10 Wound N S Aureus P aeruginosa
NIL Y
Secondary review
Treated (n=8)
Not treated (n=4)
Initial management
Total patients with non-candidal fungal isolates (n=12)
Positive Outcome
(n=9)
Death**
(n=3)
Sepsis NOT fungaemia
(n=2)
Full treatment course (n=5)
Treatment ceased* (n=1)
Treatment continued
(n=7)
* Clinically not significant; treatment ceased within 1 week
** No deaths attributable to fungal infection
RESULTS
In conclusion, we emphasize the importance of early burn
wound closure, frequent microbiologic assessment of
burn wounds and aggressive surgical burn wound
excision, together with targeted antifungal agents.
Indications and timing of fungal infection treatment remain
uncertain; frequent review and consultation with infectious
diseases experts is required. Our review illustrates the
low incidence and attributable mortality associated with
non-candidal fungal infections in a modern burns unit.
CONCLUSIONS NON-CANDIDAL FUNGAL INFECTIONS ARE RARE:
Only twelve cases (0.4%) of total 3340 burns patients
MOST COMMON (non-Candidal) FUNGAL SPECIES: Aspergillus (n=7) Fusarium (n=2)
Scedosporium (n=2) Mucor (n=2)
CONCOMINANT INFECTIONS:
Bacterial: 75% (n=9)
Yeast: 67% (n=8)
LOW MORBIDITY
NO ATTRIBUTABLE MORTALITY