talent management system mike rounds and ola faucher human resource management november 6, 2014 1
TRANSCRIPT
Performance ManagementCurrent State• Paper based, difficult to
manage• Limited ability to match
individual and organizational goals
• Inconsistently executed• System of record for
evaluations in HR has limited visibility to supervisors
Performance Management System
2
• Improves performance feedback
• Ability to align employee talent with University goals
• Allows for consistent delivery and consistent processes
• Increases visibility of employee performance
Performance Management System• The Performance Evaluation contains two sections
• Goals
• Set by the employee and by the supervisor
• Can be cascaded
• Competencies
• The University has identified nine competencies upon which
all employees will be evaluated
3
Performance Management SystemTimeline
5
FeedbackOctober
2015
FeedbackOctober
2015
FeedbackJuly 2015
FeedbackJuly 2015
FeedbackApril 2015
FeedbackApril 2015
Learning ManagementCurrent State
• Schedules/Offerings difficult to find.
• Limited knowledge of the training that is available on campus.
• Multiple (or none) Learning Management Systems.
• Staff must track annual training manually.
Learning Management System
7
• Unifies diverse course offerings in a “one-stop” catalog.
• Training easier to find and self-assign or supervisor to assign. Meets long term development goals
• Single Learning Management System, HR staff can load courses in for departments
• Staff develop a transcript of courses completed.
Scheduled OfferingsCourses can be scheduled through either the specific catalog offering or from the Course Calendar
10
Learning Management
• View work completed over time.
• Learning is recorded automatically when course or group of courses are completed.
11
Learning History