taking the next step: moving from observation to action pg ... › sites › production › files...

14
Taking the Next Step: Moving from Observation to Action PG&E & The New Breaker SF 6 Leak Study Sven Thesen Senior Environmental Consultant Pacific Gas & Electric Company 415/973-1048 [email protected] 1

Upload: others

Post on 07-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Taking the Next Step: Moving from Observation to Action PG ... › sites › production › files › 2016-02 › ...Eureka Moment • Either “Leak” or Not • If leaking, why

Taking the Next Step: Moving from Observation to Action

PG&E & The New BreakerSF6 Leak Study

Sven Thesen Senior Environmental Consultant Pacific Gas & Electric Company

415/973-1048 [email protected]

1

Page 2: Taking the Next Step: Moving from Observation to Action PG ... › sites › production › files › 2016-02 › ...Eureka Moment • Either “Leak” or Not • If leaking, why

Collected Data

• 537 Breakers installed 1998-2002;• 41 had at least one “leak” alarm; • 78 alarm (repeaters) Living in a new paradigm

2

Page 3: Taking the Next Step: Moving from Observation to Action PG ... › sites › production › files › 2016-02 › ...Eureka Moment • Either “Leak” or Not • If leaking, why

• Less than 8% leak• ~1/3 repeat or new41 Leakers

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

1 2 3 4 5

5 Ti4 Ti3 Ti2 Ti1 Ti

Leaking Transmission Equipment

Number of Times Each Breaker Leaked

Tota

l Num

ber o

f Lea

ks

mers mers mers mers mers

3

Page 4: Taking the Next Step: Moving from Observation to Action PG ... › sites › production › files › 2016-02 › ...Eureka Moment • Either “Leak” or Not • If leaking, why

Function (Leak) Detectors

• All breakers charged MY 1998-02 to ~80 psi at ~68 F SF6,

• Some utilities consider this a density of 100%;

• Alarm (leak determined) triggered by “true” drop of 10 psi or 10% drop by density monitor.

4

Page 5: Taking the Next Step: Moving from Observation to Action PG ... › sites › production › files › 2016-02 › ...Eureka Moment • Either “Leak” or Not • If leaking, why

Density Monitor/ Function Detector

• Measures ambient breaker temperature and pressure;

• Calculates real time pressure or density;• “Adjusts” for pressure and temperature &

compares to full breaker pressure/ density; • Accuracy: ~ + 2 psi, + 2%.

5

Page 6: Taking the Next Step: Moving from Observation to Action PG ... › sites › production › files › 2016-02 › ...Eureka Moment • Either “Leak” or Not • If leaking, why

Eureka Moment

• Either “Leak” or Not • If leaking, why wait so long to alarm?

6

Page 7: Taking the Next Step: Moving from Observation to Action PG ... › sites › production › files › 2016-02 › ...Eureka Moment • Either “Leak” or Not • If leaking, why

Eureka Moment

7

Page 8: Taking the Next Step: Moving from Observation to Action PG ... › sites › production › files › 2016-02 › ...Eureka Moment • Either “Leak” or Not • If leaking, why

10 psi leak?

Use Ideal Gas Law PV = nRT P = pressure V = Volume n = moles R = gas law constant T = temperature

• PV = nRT @ full charge

• Known: P, n, R & T

• Calculate V • Drop P by 10 psi • Hold V & T constant• Calculate new n

8

Page 9: Taking the Next Step: Moving from Observation to Action PG ... › sites › production › files › 2016-02 › ...Eureka Moment • Either “Leak” or Not • If leaking, why

10 psi leak?

• 10 psi drop ≈ 10% SF6 loss

• 5 psi drop ≈ 5% SF6 loss @ 80 psi initial charge & holding T constant

~70 F

9

Page 10: Taking the Next Step: Moving from Observation to Action PG ... › sites › production › files › 2016-02 › ...Eureka Moment • Either “Leak” or Not • If leaking, why

10% Density Leak?

mm

Density = mass/volume V = Breaker Volume (Constant)

f = mass SF6 at full charge t = mass SF6 at time t

% Density at time t = (mt/V)/(mf/V) = mt/mf

10% Density Loss = 10% SF6 loss

10

Page 11: Taking the Next Step: Moving from Observation to Action PG ... › sites › production › files › 2016-02 › ...Eureka Moment • Either “Leak” or Not • If leaking, why

Implications:

Large breaker: 450 pounds SF6

• 10 psi or % set point ≈ 45 lb SF6 loss

• 5 psi or % set point ≈ 23 lb SF6 loss

Why wait to address the leaker?

(especially as it still may be under warranty)

11

Page 12: Taking the Next Step: Moving from Observation to Action PG ... › sites › production › files › 2016-02 › ...Eureka Moment • Either “Leak” or Not • If leaking, why

Implications:

Changing alarm set-point from 10 psi or % to 5 psi or % has the potential to half the breaker leak rate.

12

Page 13: Taking the Next Step: Moving from Observation to Action PG ... › sites › production › files › 2016-02 › ...Eureka Moment • Either “Leak” or Not • If leaking, why

Other Potential Issues:

• Some thermocouples are not positioned properly & may give false readings;

• Temperature unit confusion in setting density monitor;

• Pressure sensor connections may leak SF6;

13

Page 14: Taking the Next Step: Moving from Observation to Action PG ... › sites › production › files › 2016-02 › ...Eureka Moment • Either “Leak” or Not • If leaking, why

Going Forward:

PG&E to change density monitor set point on a few new large breakers.

14