taitz v. astrue (colvin) - motion for reconsideration - second motion

Upload: georgetownjd

Post on 14-Apr-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    1/38

    Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603E-Mail : d r ta itz@ya h oo.com, [email protected]

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ' PRO SE $ Case ll-cv-402Plaintiff, $ Hon Judge Lamberth

    $Chief Judge Presidingv.$s

    Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the SSocial Security Administrationo $

    sss

    Respondent $Taitzv Astrue Motion for Reconsideration 10.12.2013

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    2/38

    MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF 10.09.2013 ORDER, AS THEORDER WAS ISSUED IN ERROR

    ARGT]MENTIn June 2013 Plaintiff filed a Motion for Reconsideration under Statute 6082,6.The court made an error of fact and stated that the motion had to be filed within

    a year from the final judgment. The court did not notice that the motion was filedunder both clauses 2 and 6 of Statute 608b. The court considered only 60 82,which is supposed to be filed within I year, however the court did not consider6086 part of the motion, which does not have any time limitation.RULE 60. RELIEF FROM A JUDGMENT OR ORDER(a) ConnncrroNs Bnsno oN CLERTcAL MTsTAKES; OvERsrcsrs ANDOtr,ttsstoNs. The court may corect a clerical mistake or a mistake arising fromoversight or omission whenever one is found in a judgment, order, or other part ofthe record. The court may do so on motion or on its own, with or without notice.But after an appeal has been docketed in the appellate court and while it ispending, such a mistake may be corrected only with the appellate court's leave.(b) GnouNDS FoR REr-rsp FRoM A FrNAL Juocrr,rpNT, ORDER, oR PRocEEDTNG. Onmotion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal representative froma final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons:

    (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect;(2) newly discovered evidencethat, with reasonable diligence, could not have

    been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b);(3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation,or misconduct by an opposingparty;(4) the judgment is void;

    2aitzv Astrue Motion for Reconsideration 10.12.2013

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    3/38

    (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged; it is based on anearlier judgment that has been reversed or vacated; or applying it prospectively isno longer equitable; or(6) ANY OTHER REASON THAT JUSTIFIES RELIEF.

    (c) TrvlNG AND Epp'scr oF THE MorroN.(1) Timing. A motion under Rule 60(b) must be made within a reasonabletime-and for reasons (l), (2), and (3) no more than a year after the entry of thejudgment or order or the date of the proceeding.

    Motion for Reconsideration under 6086 can be filed at any time, there is notime limitation, only 608 1,2, 3 have a year limitation. 6086 Motion forreconsideration can be filed 10 years from the final order or a 100 years after thefinal order, as long as it serves justice, as long as it is "inequitable to permit ajudgment to stand." FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b); Ackerman v. United States, 340 U.S.I93, 202 (1950) (Black, J., dissenting). The case at hand deals with the fact thatBarack Obama is occupying the position of the U.S. President by fraud and usingfabricated IDs as a basis of his identity and basis of his legitimacy for the U.S.Presidency. Extraordinary circumstance justifies FRCP 6086 Ackermann v. United

    States, 340 U.S. 193,71 S.Ct. 209,95 L.Ed. 207 (1950). Usurpation of the U.S.Presidency represents an extraordinary circumstance which justifies granting aMotion for Reconsideration under FRCP 6086. As a matter of fact, this is the mostextraordinary circumstance in the history of this nation. Any time evidencesurfaces, which can assist the court in adjudication of the matter on the merits andin stopping the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency, it has to be considered, as itseryes Justice. Not considering such evidence not only will not serve justice, butwould constitute treason against the United States of America. Plaintiff hopes thatthis court will not commit treason against the United States of America by

    Taitzv Astrue Motion for Reconsideration 10.12.2013

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    4/38

    covering up the usurpation of the position of the U.S. President and Commander inChief by Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barack (Ba.rl,)Soebarkah (Hereinafter "Obama") with the aid of fabricated IDs and, in the case athand, by using a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 ofHarrison(Ha.ty) J. Bounel, born in 1890.

    In Link v. Wabash Railroad Co 370 U.S. 626 (1962)., the plaintiff challengedthe court's 41(b) sua sponte motion. The Court recognized that when a courtexercises its inherent power under Rule 41(b) sua sponte, it may do so withoutinforming the party adversely affected by such a motion and not be in derogationof the due process clause. [T]he availability of a corrective remedy such as isprovided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(bfwhich authorizes thereopening of cases in which final orders have been inadvisedly [sic] entered-renders the lack of prior notice of less consequence. Petitioner never sought toavail himself of the escape hatch provided by Rule 60(b).

    Additionally, some courts have held that Rule 60(b) motions apply in habeascorpus proceedings, liberating the challenging party from the strictures of theAntiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.11 Rule 60(b), therefore,

    has very powerful strategic and substantive implications, albeit in limitedcircumstances.The Motion for Reconsideration at hand revolves around the Connecticut

    Social Security number of Harry Bounel, which was fraudulently used by BarackObama in his tax returns. Obama posted his 2009 tax returns, did not flatten thepDF fi|e and full Social Security number that he is using became easily availableto the whole nation. This number failed both E-Veriff and SSNVS. Plaintiffprovided this court with evidence that the original owner of the SSN xxx-xx-4425,which is currently being use by Obama, was born in 1890. This information camefrom sworn affidavits of licensed investigators Susan Daniels and Neil Sankey.

    Taitzv Astrue Motion for Reconsideration 10.t2.20I3

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    5/38

    This court originally denied the appeal seeking the release of SS-5 , application forthe Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 which was originally issued to theindividual born in 1890 and later fraudulently used by Barack obama.

    In 2013 Taitz received a sworn affidavit of an investigator Albert Hendershot,who authenticated a report by Merlyns information systems, showing that SSNxxx-xx-4425 is listed in Merlyns information systems as one being used byHarrison (Hut l,) J. Bounel and Barack Obama. In 2011 U.S. Census Bureaureleased 1940 census results which showed that there is only one Harry Bounel,who resided in 1940 in Bronx NY and who was 50 years old at a time, whichmeans that he was born in 1890, I23 years ago.Additionally, Taitz provided this court with SSA(Social Securityadministration ) "120 year rule", which states that individuals who were born 120years ago or earlier, are considered to be extremely aged individuals and the SSAis obligated to release their SS-5 even without a death certificate. Since only twoindividuals used this SSN, Obama and Bounel, and SSNVS and E-Verift showthat the number was not issued to Obama, by process of elimination it is clear thatit was issued to Bounel, who was born I23 years ago and SSA wrongfully deniedFOIA request by Taitz for his SS-5, as he is an extremely aged individual and theSS-5 has to be released, consideration of privacy cannot be used.

    Second extraordinary circumstance, which justifies granting this Motion forReconsideration under 6086, over a year after the final judgment, is Fraud,Obstruction of Justice, Perjury and possibly Treason committed by Dawn Wiggins,Deputy Chief FOIA officer for Social Security administration, whose sworntestimony the defense used as a basis for their motion to dismiss. While Taitz didnot have an Affidavit from Albert Hendershot until 2013, did not have the name ofBounel, did not have his age and did not know that SSA was obligated to releasehis SS-5 under the " 120 year ruIe", Wiggins had all of this information in 20ll

    Taitz v Astrue Motion for Reconsideration 10.12.2013

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    6/38

    when the case was filed and when she fraudulently claimed that the SS-5 for xxx-xx-4425 cannot be released due to consideration of privacy . She had in front ofher Bounel's SS-5 for xxx-xx-4425, she knew in 2011 that Bounel was born in1890, she knew of SSA 120 year rule and she knew that she had no right to use theexcuse of privacy in denying the production of SS-5. Wiggins acted with malice, inher zeal to cover up crime committed by Obama, she defrauded this honorablecourt, committed perjury, engaged in obstruction ofjustice and possibly treason.Taitz would like to remind Honorable Judge Lamberth that in and aroundDecember ,1994, he sanctioned White House aide Ira Magaziner, who worked forPresident Clinton and committed fraud in his sworn affidavit submitted to JudgeLamberth and ordered to pay sanctions of nearly $300,000 because of theWhite House and Justice Department's "dishonest" and "reprehensible"conduct in failing to reveal to the court key information about the health-care-reform task force headed by first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton. APPS,et al. v. Clinton, 813 F. Supp. (D.D.C. 1993)U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth said the government should pay$285,864 for the conduct of its lawyers in handling a lawsuit filed bya doctors group while the first lady was working on health-care reformduring President Clinton's first term."lt is clear that the decisions here were made at the highest levels ofgovernment, and the government itself is - and should be - accountable

    6aitz v Astrue Motion for Reconsideration 10.12.2013

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    7/38

    when its officials run amok," ld. Further, Your Honor referred this case toAttorney General Janet Reno seeking a special prosecutor and to EricHolder, who was at a time U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, toseek criminal prosecution. Holder refused to prosecute Magaziner.lronically, now, some 16 years later, we see another U.S. President, hisaides and possibly the same Eric Holder defrauding the nation and courtsnot only in relation to yet another health care reform, but in relation to thevery identity, legitimacy and citizenship of the putative President.Fraud Committed by Wiggins is much more egregious, as she was engaged in a defacto RICO, in a scheme to defraud the court and the nation as a whole and tocover up Obama's use of a stolen Social Security number and his use of fabricatedIDs.

    Due to flagrant effor this court should reconsider and grant the Motion forReconsideration.

    Public concern not only warrants consideration, it dictates an urgent, immediatereconsideration as National Security is at stake and a 16 trillion U.S. economy is atstake.

    Further, this court did not grant requested Judicial Notice, stating that it needsnotarized documents for such judicial notice. However, yet again, due to the factthat Plaintiff is bringing forward a complaint dealing with fraud committed by anindividual sitting in the White House, numerous agencies of the U.S. government

    Taitzv Astrue Motion for Reconsideration 10.12.2013

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    8/38

    are refusing to cooperate, often documents are disappearing or being falsified. Theonly way to obtain a requested certified copy, is for it to be requested by the courtitself.

    As such, Plaintiff is requesting this court to sign attached proposed ordersdirecting following agencies and officials of the U.S. Government to certifuattached documents:

    1. Order/ subpoena to John H. Thompson, Director of the U.S. Census, tofurnish within ten days of receipt of this order, a certified copy of the attached pageof the U.S. Census, Population schedule, SD 24, ED No 3-1199, Sheet No-13B,Enumerated April 76, 1940, State-New York, County- the Bronx, New York City,Ward of the city 7A-D showing Harry Bounel residing in Bronx, NY and being 50years old in 1940.

    2. Order to Denis McDonough, White House Chief of Staff , to provide withinten days from the receipt of this order a certified copy of the electronic computerfile of the attached Form 709, from Barack Obama's 2009 tax return, in the exactform as it was posted on Whitehouse.gov on April 75, 2010 at 11 :lI:29 prior toalteration of the file which was done the same day, April15,2010 at 6:17:52PM

    3. Order to the Commissioner of Social Security Administration to providecertification of 2010 "120 year rule", which was published by the Chief FOIAofficer of the SSA in 2011.4. Order to the Commissioner of Social Security to provide a certified copy ofSSNVS report attached herein, which shows that Social Security number xxx-xx-4425, which was used by Obama in his tax returns and made public by posting onWhiteHouse.gov on April 15, 2010 at 1115:29 AM, was never assigned by theSSA to Barack Obama.

    Taitzv Astrue Motion for Reconsideration 10.12.2013

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    9/38

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ' PRO SE $ Case ll-cv-402Plaintiff, $ Hon Judge Lamberth

    $Chief Judge Presidings.

    Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the $Social Security Administration, S

    Respondent $ Proposed orderPlaintiffs motion for reconsideration filed on June 7,2013 and docketed on

    06.13.2013 as Document#45 is GRANTED

    SignedRoyce C. Lamberth USDC Judge

    Taitzv Astrue Motion for Reconsideration 10.12.2013 I4

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    10/38

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    Dr. ORLY TAITI ESQ, PRO SE $ Case ll-cv-402Plaintiff, $ Hon Judge Lamberth

    $Chief Judge Presidings

    Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the SSocial Security Administrationo $

    Respondent SProposed order

    Commissioner of Social Security Administration is ordered to provide thiscourt within ten days of the receipt of this order with a certified copy of theattached 20ll report of the Chief FOIA officer of the social securityadministration relating to " 120 year rule".

    SignedRoyce C. Lamberth USDC Judge

    v.

    Taitzv Astrue Motion for Reconsideration 10.12.2013 10

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    11/38

    Case 1:11-cv-00402-RCL Document 45 Filed 06/13/L3 Page 18 of 74

    SOCTAL SEC1IRITY ADM INISTRATIONChief F'OIA Officer lleporr frrr 201I

    .$tcD.s l'akcn to Anplv thc I'resumntion of Oncnnessl. l)cscribe lhr: sleJx .youf irgsncy hes laken ro ensurc tbat thc presumpliun ofopcrnrs.\ ir being applicrl to all deci.,riuns invrrlting thc F ()lA,

    l'hc Souial Sccuritv Adntirtistration (SSAI has alua.v-r takcrr pridc irr trur lcvcl rrl'scrr icctr.r thu ;ruhlic. hr tlrat traditi,rrt. rvc eontirrrrc (tr usc thc Itrcsirlcnt's I\lerttorlnrtunr attd lhcr\nontcr (jcncrul's (iuidartce Lrr cniiurc that stalTtlrrrr.rulruttt tlre ag,:lrcy undcrstaud hndinrplcnrcnt tltc pn:sumplion of'opdnrrcss rrhcn thc;- rtrspond to IrOIA requcsts.'lltroughuut tlrc 1'car. t\sc) agcncv comporlcnls, the Oll'icc ol'Disabilit;' Ar.l.f uclrcariuu antlRevi*v nrttl iltc ()tlicu ol'S\'stcuts. rr.t'rs the suhjr'ct of r lrigh rr.rlunr rrl'I'OlA requcsls.Wc initiirrcd trrcctirrgs rrith ,\gcrrcv lr(.)1,\ ctr.rrr.linators in llrcsc ul'tic,:s rr discuss lhelr( )lA ru'qur":;ls :lnd prtaclivcll' sought opponunitic.t t(r pnrrnolc thc open g(r\.cmnrcntdircctivc lo respond ta drcrn.r. Desrrihc horv lhc President'.s FOIA lt{cmorandum enrl thc Attorncy (ir:ncrrl'sF()lA (iuidelincs hnvc becn putrlicir.r:tl throughout l'our agenc]'.Wc hflrc puhlicizcd thc I'rcsidcnt's l;OlA lt{emtrrandrrnr dnd rhc Attonrcl'Gcncral'sl;Olrt (.iuidcIincs through the lollosing rcIiviIics:

    . I hc t'hir'f IrOl.A OII'iccr' issusd & nrernorandum to scrlirrr stall'slating, thc |Ol.dpolic-r tlrat agcncics nrust :rpph' a prcsutnptiott ilt lirr or rll'disclnsrrrc rt hcnrcsJxrrrd.ng trr l l'()lA rcqrtcst.

    . lrf'c tl,,.signr:d an inlbnnation Frckct thut rvc distributcd ttr lltr: ugcncy's FOIAcoordinut,:rni and postcd on our lrttranct rvcbsitl. 'l'hc packut incluilcs severulircrns. ir clutiing cupics ut'thc OI'F.N (iovcrnnrt'nr Act ol'?(Xl?- thc Presitlent'sl-()lA trtenrrrrandurn untl ctrrresSxrrrtling Altorrel' (iencral's F()lA (iuidelincs, andlhe C'hiet'[;(-)1.,\ (Jl'licr:r'-s llcrlloftrnclunr to scnior staffregarding the neu' l'-()lAguidancc and prcsumptive disclosurc Jxrlic1,. The packct also contains rhc li()lArL.slx)ns( rlcarllincs. tht list of SS.{ l;OIA coordinllor.s- and it statcmcnt regardirrgthcir resrt.rnsihilitics lirr tltc lj0l,'\ alurttal re'prr:I'

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    12/38

    Case 1:11-cv-00402-RCL Document 45 Filed 06/1-3113 Page L9 of 74

    \1 h:rl lrrrining h:n been lltrndcrl irnd,/or conductcd on thc nen FOl,.\(iuirlelinrr?I lnlttlit.thr(,llicctrl'l'rrr;rc\ lnJl)rn:ltrrrrrL't{ll'l)rilrtlrc(}ll'ircul thc(icncr.rl('()ullrcl (O(i('i. ulticlt rerrr.'s as SS,,\'s l ( ll;\ r.rllit'r,'. gilvc It(rrcntillirrrs oninrptrrtrr;ntiug thc ner', 1 ( ll.\ u.$r\l(lincs irt ttt \ru ( l( i(- I'rrrltkrycs l rirrrturg

    Scssrrur in \l.urh. tltr'{ ll'l) [Jrrluuirl L'r]nlcrctuc rn,lrrlr- urrtl lhc Annuirl t tLi('Conli.'rcttsc he hl in Sr'rlltulhl-r.

    r \\ c crrut]nu!' hr rrr ist irtrJ uprlatc t]ttr in-h()rhc l-(.1[,'1'1'6.",at Ar;t lritirttttgnt'(rgnt,n institrrtrd la{t -\cllrthul lircurcstrrt lltc r'Jriutrs tcclttucll- lcg;rl. ln'l"h.rrrtl:-.rn" tsstrcr inrrrlr cd rn Fr.{*rrirrg I ( ll.\ rc(lucsh- [ hc rrarnrttg. ctt\urs]Iltitl lrtrrl.rrls rrrtdcr.start,.l lhr.t int;roflatter: (rl lltL'sutltlttr'c disckr$tlrr.'.\. rttlr.J Jll(t$'l' tlltl r.lisruss reccnl Jisclrnrrrc isrur'.,irn(l c\iulitrc ttru rrpFlnltrtttics lirr llrdFsritlS1i11111g js.gllrrrrrrr

    e\\'turrtrtirrUctlrrurc$nrtilltllrirrthr(r'tcrrurlrgtiUldnl'tt\rrlrstitlllhcrrlrp$rlunilr hr,irrrdrhl rulsrllc I (,l \ lralnittQ, St;rti'illtr:ttdcJ I (rl.\ lr;ttning \f\tn$)rl'tl t\rsupttrltcd br agcncier ilJtcl rlr$ilri/nlitrrx likc tht'l)c;trrlmcnl (tl'.luslicc. lhc.\nrcrrriilt Srrrlct) ,rl-.,\ecrlss llrrrlr:r:itrnal\. llhl rhc Ilttcrtralt.'tl.ll '\*s.r.iitlitrtt,rlPrirlr.r l)trrtcrsrrrnals- I ltrs trutntrlg ltlcluJcd all lrrJ*cctr rrl I I ll,'\. tttcltt.ling thtrrr'that lircr.sctl r,rr a hasic lit )l A r.ncrvicw. opclt L.r'r\'(illrtrsnl prirre iplcs. prcsunrptircJiscl."urc. ;rnrl prir acr Jrulicr I hc tr:rinlnr: .rl:rt rtrt luJct rttrrltrple ^'h:tttrjr trn"urrrlrrlrt'ps.

    lltrs h6 ]nur {genct crcutcd or modified ruur intcrnul guidanct lo rcfltct lhtp rrsumpl irln of optnness?

    \\ c h:*e tlerrloJrg'd lr ttttlrc r;rtll,itla.rratirc rclltionslrrlr *ith l6cnc-r l-( ll'\cooftlilirtrrrs. I [is inrprrrvcd rct',rtirrnship {rlsurus tlrul the1" h;lvu ttur rllppon \}lrclrconrlre tinr: c\tcnii\-c scilrcttc\ l(, p&r\ irlc thc lnosl crrnlplctr' ;utJ tiltrclr rrJlxtn\r'\Ir..,srhlu. 'l hir ,rppr,ruclr rnr:lu.lss ;r-.rislittg lltc crror(liltalrrrs l\'hcll Olrtirtruttg unr.lrevicg,itrg ittlirrrrtUtitrlt l(r cll-surc llt:tt t[C.r a;rpl-r tftc pl'tJ5tllnpli('lr pl'trpultnuss'

    \f,:r. itrr Jrcrlirrrttttrg mrlrc Pccr rri\'lc\\s und u.rllabnr.rtinp rrillt rrthcrofllcr's itt rrrttagcnc). thi{t u(lrliludlly'provide rrs rtith.locutl'-rllts ilt rcspottsc ttr l;(-ll.'\ rl'quc:il\trr cn:6rt' tlrlrl 1c rcl

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    13/38

    d.

    case 1:l-l--cv-00402-RCL Document 45 Filed 06/13/l_3 page 2o ot 74

    \\jc hit"e rerisilt-tt hrng5ln1liipg dr-'ci.sions regrriJing rhr,- u,ithhrrkling of ccrtuinliequcntlv rcqttt'strtl daLr. lo dctenttinr' il'uur rcctrrrrn:errt]ctl guitlancr.. is stillapplicablt' and rcllccts lhr: prr.'.sun:ptiott olopcnness, lirr irr.slancc. rvc ir.sucrl lrtrrguidancc ftu'disclosing cxrrcnrcl_v agcd irulivitlurls' original social sccurirlApplications (ss--it rrhcn our rEcords do nrr! indicate l ilarc ol'dearh, \\:ctlevelupctJ a ltt'rt policv that cstablisltcs a " l2{J vcar rulc" antl irssunrcs that anindivid:lal is alivc unlcss their hirth datr-' c.,rcr-uds I J(l -vcars or rvc hlve proof ol'the individual's death. l'his nt'w ;xrlic.r'enablrct us hr relcLsy. nroru intirrnralionatrrt ptrlr-'ntiatl5' redr.rceil rcqucsts cn appcal.

    To rvhal estent has you; agenc!' madc rliscrctiona4, relcrLres of othcnvisc crenptinf'ormatiun ?. Wc rct' c\v cvcrv reque$t with thc intcnt to rcleasc a.s nrurh inlbnrration ir.sprrssiLrle- \Ve no llrnger rvithhnld intirmnlitrlr tlrll rvoulil hc cxctrrpl un

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    14/38

    case l-:11-cv-00402-RCL Document 45 Filed 06/13/13 page 2L of 74

    Hnw ducs r'our :tgcncv rcvirn rtrcord.s to dctcrminc whcthcr discrstionan,rcle:tseis a rr p{,-ssihle?r \\''c us pccr rcvies's urtd lcgal rcvicrss. and oicrr crrnsult rt'irh tlrc rnvr.lcr(st trf lhr'

    rr'-cords trr appll lhe prc'sumpl.i{}n r}f uFcntrcss. \\Ic also rcr'ir.-$, rlrrr guirlane c trnrclcasc 'r('liequcntlr rcqucstL{ docuntcltts lu dar*t,tt'n* il'it is ronsisrcnt rr itlr thcpresull)f ti on {}l- ol',crltlcss.

    Dcscribe any othcr initiativcs undcrtakcn bv vnur ngrocy to ensure that thcprtsumptic.n of oprnnesr is bring applied.. S'u {r}fllinuou-slt cttrphirsiz.e to our ljOl,,\ coor:linaltrrs and uthcr agcnc! slatf thciillF)nanc( ol'govcrnrnolt trpcnncss. irrttl thcir rcspr'rnsitrilit]' lo cnsurc that rvc urc

    provitlir:g thc most inl'ornratiotr to thc trrublic. Whr.n ilcccssal},. wc uontluctmccting; arnd confl'relrcc calls rrith thcm. [n particrrlarl_r dillicult cirscs. rr],cconsrrll '.r'ith thc L)e-purtnrcnt trl'.lusticc trr assisit us irr makirrg rir:cision.* onrl i screl ic.tmry rclca-.ir:-s-

    . L)trr nuu.agenrent rr.'0nl rlrccts rc'gulitrl!, t(r rc\'ie$'tltc pnr*urc.ss ul'lhc ohlest cuscs.ln thcsc ntr'clings. .slafl'updalcs our rn;rna1tct's rut tlu','cloping, scurchirrg. arrtlrcviet'ing cascs. and assistancc tlte.\' ncud to nl()vc thc cases 1o closure. \\'s no$hinc a rrrund-lahlc'discussirrn to ussist anah,sls with particularly conrplex citscs-\te usc n tcarlr approach thal includcs input licnr nranagL'ni. senior li()lA nnirl-vst^s,uttd pccrs on lhc h('st w.41,.,i tu :utal_r'zc. rcr'icrv. atttl rcseitrclr rcquc$s.

    r Wr,, rvrrrk ulo.sell n'ith tlrr' ()llice ol'thc ('hief'l tl'crrrttatitur Oflicer lt' hc proarriut'rllrcn disckrsing intbnrration lo llt{: public thrrrugh trur O;rn Gol't-'rnmenlirritiatires. \trjc disclo.sc' :;trrtisticirl inlirrrnation:rhotrt SSA's rvorkloads.prcrcessing ti ntcs. and .,\dministratjvc l ;tw .l udgc cli sposition rates'

    2. Rcpurt thc cstclt to rvhich thc nunrbers of requcsts rvhcrc rccttrds have bt'cnreteased in futl anrl thr: numhrrs of rrqusts wlrcrc rccords havc lren relrgrscd inpnrt he.r thangr:rl from thrrsr numbcrs as rcported in 1'our previous Ycar's Annuall'(llA Repofl.In our ljY 20 lt.t nrrual FOli\ repon. rve rcpoflcd an itcrcosc in thu numroL-rol'l'ullrclcilscs tt.tn.r 36.-144 in l:Y l(ltlt) trr i l.0t)9 iu ljY l(l I t'. I ltu numhcr ol'partial grmlsdcctcascd frorrr.l(l()5 in l''Y 2(l0t) ro l5(17 in I'Y l(ll{l-

    E.

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    15/38

    case l-:11--cv-00402-RCL Document 45 Filed 06/13/13 page 22 of 74

    \\'e lrclicr e thxl i]ttr con5islsnl ilttcnti(rn kl thc upclruess principlc has cunlributcr1 rcr ourinctcasc in lirll rclcascs. llolrcr'u'f. the rcduclirrrr in priarrill rr*leascs is hardcr todclcrnritrc. I ll'- rcduclirrn in parriul rclL.a.{qs rna,r' he arrrihurcd to rlrc t_r.pc of Ij( )l.ArL-qucsts thut wr' typicalll: rcccivc. lirr inslunce. thc r.ast n.lajorir_v ol'ca-sr.s \\ nr(,cL\s itr5.lA rcquest pcrsonal ittlirnttatitnr rcgartling living individurls. !'he rcqucstc4 rucordsuontain nredical. hcalth. linansial. und other pcrsunal inlirmrution about srrial sccurirl-claintants- antJ ufti:n itsk tirr tlu canrirrgs rccords lirr rrrillions ot-pcoplc. Wt- usuallyrvitlth

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    16/38

    b.

    Case 1:11-cv-00402-RCL Document 45 Filed 06/13/i.3 page 23 of 74

    llcscribc how ,luur irgcncv's Ff)lrl profcssional.r intcract rvith your oyrcn('ioucttment l'elm.(ll'D and thc agcncv'r Otfice oiOpcn (ir.rlrlnrnrenl ((X Xj) n:aintairr un cslrcmuh' closcrr'orking rclarionship on an onguins basis. .,\ccordingl.r- ()PD n'as u kc1, snllaborarorttith ()O(i indcvcltrping lhe agunc)'s (-)pcn ('rolsrurncnl Plan in FY l0l{t. OPI) FOIAual-t'sls !;L'r\'(d rtlt severnl proiccl rvorklinlup; artrJ authrrrcd .rignificiurt seclions ol'ths.plan.As a tttaiu stakclroltlcr in the plan- ()P[) also pluyr:d a ccnlral role irr rctir:rvirrg arrdrefitting r.arirlus dralis rrl'the plirrr. which inclutled a scoretl cr'aluation b-f anittilg^-nclcnt outsid* rs'Vit'$,r:r. l'his cvaluation rcrrJerr-'d tl** highest possiblc scrrrc lorthc sclirrns rclirtcd trr li(')lA. ()ur stirf'l'crtrtrinuerl ro rvr.rrk u ith LXXI (rrr all Lrn-goingba.sis up throryh the plan's puhlication ort.lune 3,1.:{tl0-Additionall_r.. ,:)l'[) senitrr lcadcnhip and I;t)lA anall'sls :*'n c on lhc agenr.v'r Open('ioverrrmcnt Stcering L'rrmnritlcc. l'he Cr:runtiltcc clnl(rs ort a regular bssis r.rn nllrsFcct,.i rrl-()pcn (iorsrunlcnL und pravidcs ongorngovcrsiglrt ol'thc agcrrcv-s L)ttnlnvcrttor-r' und l'lan lbr ltclcasirrg lligh Valuu l):ttir.Drscrihe thc cteps !'$ur rgcncv has laken to assess rvbt'thcr adcqua{c steffing isheittg devoted to rcsyrnding to FOIA rcqutsts.Wc urc continu(lusly looking ilt our cir.s!' procls:;irlg s-ystcnl to ensure thll u'c arcprocc$$ing l:O1.,\ requests in lhe rnost ctl'cctivr,'and cllicicnl nlanncr. and thal rrc hittccrperienccd stull'*-signed trr approprialu rcqur-sts. To cltsttrc lhc uptirttunl tlst'ol'stall'rtillrin our li()1.,\ rrllice- rrye strr-.anrlitted tltc prtrct'durt by rvhiclt rvc.u"si$n lj0l.'\rcquij!'ts to scnior anrrll'sts irnd tn thc anal-r'sts rt'ho ucrualll. proccss tht requc.sts, Sr:nitlranall.sts no\r hatL' the lna.ior rtrlc in thc initial de veltpnretrt afld crrordination of FOIAreqllcsts scnl t(, our c(lrnJxrncrrl-s to olrldrt rcqucsted docunrcnts. \\'c contit]uc toprovir.1,." lrainilr*u [o (]ur ncw analvsts to J)t'cpirrs tltcln trr handle l'()lr\ rt'qucsls. lnadrlitiol. rre rcccrrlll' hircd alr irrrcrn to as-sist lhc in-take l()lA Pnlccs; and rrne lj0l.'\arrullst to pt'(rc=ss reqrrsts. $ith thr.'addilinrtal stirfl-and lhc'crrnlilruous traiuitrg. tvch{vc ,*Lcn abte tr: tcducc uur haeklog lrom 90 in ljY ?0rtt9 to 6ll in FY l0l0-l'his liscal ),ca -. \ve lear.sesscd our proccs$ l-rrr obtrirf rrg requestcd docurrcnls- \l'csrrcssc.I rhur ct.,mlxrnenri must hasc adequate stafling lo rcspond tirrl"ty ltrtl'accurate[vrvlrcn scarching lirr a!-lunc]'nccrtls. \\''c also conductctl trainirrg ;itt t1;11]'ip lrlrrcornponcnt offrccs to cnsurc thc.v arc arrarc of thcir rcsponsibiliries undcr tli"* liOL{.6

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    17/38

    Case 1:l-1-cv-00402-RCL Document 45 Filed 06/l_3/13 page 24 ot 74

    d. Dscrihr anI othcr rl(p\ lrrur ilgcnc.r hlr undertrlr(n to ensurc thlt 1our FOl..t!r \lcm opcnrlcr cflicicntl.r nnd cffcctir dp.\\.'c arc ahvl-vr kxrhing lirr rvu.ts Lu cnhitrlrT lhc cFO ,,\ c;rsc proccssll! \\.slrln. \\ic:rrcci.rrtrrriltcrj trr UlinS trstltrrrrkrg_r tr.' slrllrncs rr1rl g1p4lr1ls1ics. lrr lll07. rrr llrplcnrcrtlcrl ,rncrt lrl.u,rs:r-birsc.l Fl.rthrrrtr. clllcr.t cl ( ll.\. shirlr v.r d(\igncd spccrlic.rll_r ltrrul.inlllc mrtch r-'r1'tltc \rrrfLlkrrl lirr h;rnJlinS I'rir.itc'. ,\rt.md Ff-)l { rcqtrcsts. lrr F\'llll(1. rrr.'te lsarrd lirttt tr;rr,latr-'s l.\r lhr'rvhtcnt rvith ttrt ntorc:rlslcnts intprrlv!:nlcntsschcrjrrlcd lirr rtleast' srxrtt.

    lll. $tenr'lrLr to lncrer* l'roactirr llirclcrruresDescrilrr hrrr lltt'$t(pli t'cur $gnc\ har ltkcn to incrctrr the rmounl of mntcriel lhelis avsihhlt on !'{rur agcnc} rvchsits. inrluding providing ctamplcs of proeclivcrlisclosurcr thll havc ]rt'rn mldc sincc irtu{ncc of thr ntn FOI.{ (iui

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    18/38

    c.

    case 1:11-cv-00402-Rcl Document 45 Filed 06/13/j_3 page 25 ot r4

    (Jile curmplcs of the l-r.pcs uf records your agnry not. po.rts thet used lo hrrt'ailalrlt onl.r' by nrrking a F'(]lA rcqucst for thcm.Exirnrplcs include rhe tbllon'irrg:r Admini*tr.tlivc l-un .lu6lgu tAI-l)disprrsiriun daurr I lcarinE {}tilce l}isposiri'rrs pr-r At.t pcr Da1. Rarc Ranking Rcp.rrr \urnhcr'l'He;rrings I lcld ln-ltcrs.n rrr r.ia vi.lerr-('olrltrencingr llcuring ()llicc Avcrage Pro,ce.,-.sing linre Rankirrg ltcpunr I learing ()lJicc \\'orkload l)urar Nl-. I'S l-A l' ltcJxrrt-1rhc urr:rirgc :ulr(runrs rrt-rilne ir tirkcs tirr r.irrious uppculs trrnl(rr'c lcr rarious lcvcls)r SS.\ Slrtc .{gcncl' \liorkloud Daralvhat s.r'slcm rlo you hatc in place to routincly irlentif.r.' rtcor.ds lhat arcappropriate firr portinglt{ }ur eF()1.4 casL' proccssirrg -svslenr aulrrnuliculll. idenlilics lkqur:ntl1. rcqucstcrJitctns tlrill rr't cr,rttsitfi-'r lirr poslirr* lo otrr l{c'atling RL$ru. Scrrir.rr irrrtlysts ulso llirqli'rclucntll r:qrcstctl rlrrcrrnrcnts arrd scnsitiyr: rcqucsls l'rrr l{cading Ruorncortsidcralir: n.

    c, Hrnr rlu vou ulilizc social mrrlis in disssminating informltion?!iS;\ has hcgun to uliliz.c social mctli:r on nun)' popullr sitcs. insluding l;:rccbuok.Trvitter. and \?u'l'ufr- ()ur prcscrtcc on lltc$r-' sitcs allurr s rvidcr disscnrination ofirr!'rtrmation ro thc pthlic. including press rclcases. ilrlirmrulirxrul virlcos tn ()urprograrrs anrl sen'ir:es. urtd licqucnrll'rcqucstcd nralerial such ;rs our m()st grpularhuh_r'rtatucs lisl.We havc also inrplr-'nrcnled idca-sltaring techrtology providetl b,"" ltlcaScatc- [u inlbmrsnd ohtain lcedhacl lmur thc puhlic otl rirrr ()pcn liovcmnrcnt initiatirus- and har.ccontrtrctcd r-ilh ir cloud-ccmputirrg prcvider tn irnplcrnqu a nl('rrc irrteractivc"frequenth askcd qucstions" sectiolr oJ-our rvchsitc. "5SA'-s (.)rrlinr' AnsrvcrsKrtrrn ludgehusr:.'-

    d_

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    19/38

    case 1:11-cv-00402-RCL Document 45 Filed 06/13/j.3 page 26 of 74

    Ilscrihc rn1 orhrr steps t'kcn tu incrr.:rsc prorcti'c disclosures rr v-our irHenc}.\\ie contittuuuslr seuriclt lirr rval's lo trr-' nr(rrrj pr()u'jtivc irr prrrvicling thc ntust acce$s lotlre public:

    rVe lrc in tlrc prr:ccss uf'rt-

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    20/38

    Case 1:11-cv-00402-RCL Document 45 Filed 06/13/1-3 Page 27 oI74

    in paper- lbrnt artrl then scan artd prruc-rs lhenr clcctronically rvitlrin thc eFOIA\\'r"lclll.

    h. To wbel crlrnt have.t'ou incrcascd lhc numher of conrponcnls doirrg su sincuthc filing of ;-our last (lhicf FOIA Officer llcport?

    Nlr\c. lVhst mcthods does )'our agcn!'.r' usc tu rccr.ivc rcqucsts cleclronicallr"l

    ()ur r:F(rlA -svslcnr oll-crs an onlinc sr'n icc r'ia the lnlcmr-'l that allorvs rncrnhursul'thc puh.lic lo lrrukc FOl.{ rcqucsts anrJ Jra.v cirtlinr'- Wc also usc an c-lnailJccr)ilnl t(, rccrjivf l'tll.,\ rctlucstS. iltrd lt'e rL'ceivc la'qttcsts r'ia I;AX.2. Eleclronic tracking of FOIA rquest:

    31. Wh*t proportion of compontnts within your ag,c1rcv rvhich rct(ive F'OtArequcstr havc lhc ctpahility to rcccive lluch re{luests clcclronicall.v-?SSA has u conrrulized FOI;\ pnrccss :tt our hcadquartu'rs in llnltimore- und rvcItirr, e' lltr- capahi I i t1 (o rccci vc re't1 ttcsts c lcctrorri cal l-v,

    b. To rvhal c.rtcnl harc vou incrcescd lbc number of comlxlnenrs doing so sincethc filinq of your lust (lhicf FOIA Officer Report?N/A

    c. lVhrt mcthods tlocs .r-our .rgcnc! uric to track rcqucsls clcctronicllh'lWr.. cilpt.rrc. nr;linrain. unrJ track l'()l'\ rcqttesls tlrrotrgh oul gl:(Jl;\ slslcnr.cFOl.A is:r rvch-bascrl r+,ork n)auilgerncnt lntl?trcl and lnlcrttr.'t systr-'lrl thol rl-c uscIrr contrt'.l. nl:tnagc. uttd Fr(lccss lr0lA retltrr"sts,

    3. Elcttronic proccsr of FOIA requests:u. Wh:tt proportirrn 0f r.ornponents rvithin Iour rgenty tthich rcccivc l''OlAru;ursts havc thc cupubili$ to process fiuch rt(luests electronieellv?

    r\S ans$ered abOvc. $'e havc a cctttrillizcd t-leclronic l:OlA process-l0

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    21/38

    case 1:11-c_v-00402-Rcl Document 45 Filed 06/j-3lj.3 page 28 ot 74

    b. To rvhat ertcnt havc 1'ou intrcasrd thr: numbcr of crrrnponcnts rloing 19 sinccthe filing of vour la.st Chief F-()lA (tfficcr Rcport?liiA

    c- Wlrat rnethods docs yolrr agency ust to prorcss rcqursts electronicelly'lOur ugcncr-uscs tJtc cl'O1..\ sJ'stL'nt to r('ceivc. lriruk. rnanage. and process I;()lArc'qu{sli- Irr addition lo ch'clrunic requcst.\ wc rcccir,e vi:t lhc lntenrct. l.r'c lcc(.itctrthcr rcquesls thrrrrrgh rcgular nrail, conrnrercial nrail serr'iccs. r,ia lax. trr fruluothcr SSA ctttllpKlncn(s in papr:r l-onrr- Wc clcctnrnicall\ scinl und prrrce*r lhesrrcqrcsri rrirhirr thc eF()lA s)'stent.

    {. Electnrnic prcparaliun of your Annuel lI)lA rcprrl:zr. $h'at r1.-pc of teclrmrlogr docs your {grnc}.. use (o prcprrre }-$ur ngtnr}'sAnnual FOIA Rclxtrt, i.e. specify nhelher rhe tcchnalogv is F0lA-spccific or

    a generic dltl-processing svslcm.Wc use el;C)lA, a rrrrrdificd corntncrcial olTthr shell-producl. h' prcparc ouri\rrnuul l;()lA l{cpon. l'lr( clj(}[A system is a rveh-hased svslL'm sJtcciliualll'dcsignccl t{r lrrrrccss rlcctronic arrd lnpcr liOlA requcsts. (]ur el:(-)lr\ systcrlldilpturL's rnosl r.rl-lhs tlatla rr c nccd ttl prcp8te rrur irnfiuul rsporl,

    b. If 1'ou src nr)i rrtislied u'ith vour t'xisting sy.rtenr to prcprrc yuur AnnullFOIA Rrpofl, dcscrihc thc stcps vou have lirkcn lo increasc vour u.re uftchrrolrgr fur nert yr*r,I'hc eFL)l;\ s_v.stcm pnrr ides us u,itlt an cf'fJcient rrtt-clmtristn lo ntanugc- traclt. atrcl

    uonlrolrhc f:C)lA wrrrklond and to prpirc thc Annual FOIA ltcporr as rerluircdh-t LX).|.

    \'- StcDs'l'akcn tu Reduce Brclsloqs itntl lmnrovt'l'imeliness in Rclnundinq toRcoucsttl. tf your egencl has a harklogr rtporl hcre rvhcthcr lhet backlog is dccrt*sing. Thtttreduction should be measurcd in tu'a wa1's. l'irst, report rthtther lhc numbcr ofbnrkl4gcd rcque$tli end lrrckloggcrl adttinlstrrfivc rppcrls thlt remuin ptntlinglt lhc cn{ of the li*cll yeer decrease

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    22/38

    Case 1-:11--ev-00402-RCL Document 45 Filed 06/13/i.3 page 29 ot 74

    Fiscal Ycar 2010 the ten oklerrt ol'those pending rcqucsls lnd apprirls from FiscalYc:rr 2{|09, and if nof. report hon' rnan}' of them lour efienr.r did closc.r\lthough rve ,tat'c n ntinitual backlog. n'r: dccreastt hfh our initial casc buckltrg andour admini.stmtir,r a;rpcul baekkru in l:Y 2UI0 ts lbllotvs:hritinl t'ascs

    FY l{X}g-gtJl-'\'lr)1il 6t{.\dnrinistrati ve Appea I C'asur

    FY 1009-qF\' 20lo-11*'c chrsc'd lhc len nldest pgrding rcquests and appcr.ls litxrr FY l(X)9 in l-l' 2{}l(,.

    2- If therc has not heen a rcduction in thc brcklog at rnea$urerl by cilhcr of thtsrntclrics, describe wh1' thlt hils occurrcd. ln doing lror {n$!r'er the folloruingquestions and then includc anp' other additional explanatiun,N,,A- Durirtg 'Y l()l(1. our backlo-r tluurcas.:tl.

    3. lhscribe the stps Jour:rgenc! is lnking lo reduce eny becklogs and tU improvetimclincrs in rtrponding lo rrqursts irnd ldministrativt apperals. ln doing soflnswr thc follorving qucstions snd then slso inclu.lc nny uthcr rlcps bcing tskcn t{)improvc timcliness.

    r. llocs vour agenc!' nrutinell' sct gorl-t lnd monilor thc progress of your FOIAcascload'lYes. Wc cnnduct bi-u'cekl1' nleetings with nranagcmcnl and scnirtr anelllsls to .\cLlnilcstort's and to molrilor our backlog lo irsscs:i lhe -statu:'- ol'rtld cascs- iduntitlthr cau:e lirr urrr tlclal . arrtl lo rcduce this *orkhvarl a-s quickly as p$ssiblc.

    h. llas 1'our f,Bcnc.!' increasetl its !'()14 stafting?Ycs. Wc hircd an additional lirll-tinrr"'analyst and an inltm tu improrc r.rur uvufttlll.()[A pnrccss.

    c. I las 1'our agUcl nrrrde lT impruv0rnents to incrcilse linlelincss?Nq. Hprvcr.(:r. $e q.ill cplrtinuc tp cvaluatc thr-- need lirr sv-stcln itttprovctrrenls-

    L2

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    23/38

    Case 1:l-1--cv-00402-RCL Document 45 Filed 06/l-3113 Page 3O ot 74

    d. llas l our agcncl C'hief l'Olrt Olficer bccn invohcd in ovcrseeing.youragcncy's clprcir.r* to proccss rcr;uc.rts?Yr's. 'l'ltr.- ('hiel'Ff)lA (.lfficcr is instrunrcntal irr pronruting rhc inrJxrrtance ul'l;OlA rtithin (he agcncy. l-[c charnpioncd our nccd lirr additiorral stafl'to inrprrrvctlrt irg*r.cv F(l[,\ proccss. us scll us highligtrtcd thc inrportiurcr: ol-llrc FOIA anil()pett gr'r'cn)mcnl to scrriur slall. I Ic also rncourilgr.'s flnd cnsurcs rhat OPD stall'is ablc tn attcnd apprurpriatc trrinilg-

    Snotlittht un SuctessOut of all thc lttivitir:s undcrtlkel hy lour irgcncJ in this lust ycar to increaselran-rparenrl', drscrilx. hcrc lrne.$ucccss stor..v that you r*ould like to highlight ascmhlcmatic of 1'our cfforts.

    lrr th.: past year. $re have incrcasecl orrr prcscncc on social ntetliu sitcs, such as I'ar;ebool'-{ouTuhc- and Trvilter. Our use ol'lhe.ss* applicaticlns prrcr,ides a ner'r' untl vcrsatilc r.ruth.:llirr conrrnunicuting (lur pnlgrunrs and ne*' initiatilcs, tnd allorved tr.rrr$pitrcnl publicdialogur-- about thenr. ljor instarrcc'. dur postings on F'rccbtx* havc alread,v gcnctatcdIrtrndruds trl'puhlic cr)nlnlcnts. aclirtg irs a r'ultrablc oullcl lirr thosc rvishing to eitlrcrpraise our progranls snd scn'ices. or providc critiques of lrrru' rve nright impnrvc.W!' cotllitl[ tcr r.xplurc nc*' alttl crcnlivc rr.iry's itt *hich to u.tpattd t)ur tlsc ol'lhcscu;'rplications to increa.sc puhlit ir\!ilrcncsis nnd lranspan:nc1'.

    13

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    24/38

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    Dr. ORLY TAITI ESQ, PRO SE $ Case ll-cv-402Plaintiff, $ Hon Judge Lamberth

    $Chief Judge Presidings

    Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the SSocial Security Administrationo $

    Respondent SProposed order

    Commissioner of Social Security Administration is ordered to provide thiscourt within ten days of the receipt of this order with a certified copy of theattached SSNVS report

    SignedRoyce C. Lamberth USDC Judge

    v.

    t1aitz v Astrue Motion for Reconsideration 10.12.2013

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    25/38

    BSO - SSN Verification Results

    (.r \t....' i):',: .,p,,'Lv ril..;iieiii isr:cu I iiy.,:1 i:.; B!iif 5',!.rrriI!.rvlrji;{.ieil l-ogi:rut

    Page 1 of 1

    iirrsinr,,ss S{"xa'icfs iln}inr:lo4t:r;r.i fjS{}lltr:rnlatir..rl: Contacttj:; Kei3bi;.rrciAS\iurr Social Security Number Verification SystemlesNVS)

    SSNVS Helo

    Employeds EIN'Records Submitted. 1Failed: 1Verifed Records: 0Verlfy l'lorq SSNswhat te de. ji.e[ 59lt__fo-i-t-,s*!everilyField Offlce Locator

    ,S-SN Verification Resu ltsThe followrng table dispiays your submrtted resutts. The first column indrcates if the submitted re@rdvertfied. failed or employee is deceased. The firsl five digrts of the SSN will b masked for vefifiedrecords and records with a verrficatron results cod of 2. 3, 4 or 6.

    r Failed - Data does not match Social Security Administration's records- Select What to do ifa-n-S_SN F_qiis !o !s51fo_.for more information.r Deceased - Data matches Social Secunty Adminrslration's records. and our records indicate thatthe person is deceased For more information. piease conlacl our general SSA information lineal l8(n-772-1213 (TDDITTY 1-80G325-0778) or your local Socral Secunty fieH offce. Select.f.i-e I d- Qff

    'E"e__1,-Elg!pI-to f nd I he oftice nea resr y ou.c Verified - Data matches Social Secunty Adminislration's records.

    sstt ii ri.stigssgsggggll xarnci :i _ Middle LastNameDate ofBir0r

    MTTIDDYYYYGenderFiM VerificationResultaame

    x268442s IIBARACX ^o6lra 08041e61 ll M 1

    Have a guestion? Call 100-7724270 Mon. - Fri. 7AM to 7PM Eastern Time to speak with Employer Custorner Servic personnel. ForTDD/TTY call 100-325-028.

    SSN not in file (never issued).

    https://secure.ssa.gov/apps 1 2zlSSN V S/interactiveVerifi cation.do

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    26/38

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE g Case ll-cv-402Plaintiff, $ Hon Judge Lamberth

    $Chief Judge Presiding

    Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the SSocial Security Administrationo $

    Respondent SProposed orderJohn H. Thompson, Director of the U.S. Census Bureau is ordered herein to

    provide within 10 days from receipt ofthis order a cenified copy of the attachedpage of the 1940 U.S. Census: Population schedule, SD 24, ED No 3-1199, SheetNo-13B, Enumerated April 16,7940, State-New York, County- the Bronx, NewYork City, Ward of the city 7A-D showing Harry Bounel residing in Bronx, NYand being 50 years old in 1940.

    SignedRoyce C. Lamberth USDC Judge

    Taitz v Astrue Motion for Reconsideration 10.12.2013 12

    v.

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    27/38

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE $ Case ll-cv-402Plainfiff, $ Hon Judge Lamberth

    $Chief Judge Presidings

    Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the $Social Security Administrationo $

    Respondent $ Proposed orderDenis McDonough, White House Chief of Staff is ordered to provide within

    ten days from the receipt of this order a certified copy of the electronic computerfile of the attached Form 709, fromBarack Obama's 2009 tax return, in the exactform as it was posted on Whitehouse.gov on April 15,2010 at 1 1 :lI.29 prior toalteration of the file which was done the same day, April15,2010 at 6:17:52PM

    SignedRoyce C. Lamberth USDC Judge

    Taitzv Astrue Motion for Reconsideration 10.12.2013

    v.

    13

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    28/38

    t" Original Tax Fosting,pdf PropertiesGeneral FDF Details

    -,1ltue:Audrc,r:SuLrject:Kerl.i'srds:

    Created:I"lsdified:Applicatinn:

    Thursda,r', April 15, Irllr], 11: 15:H Ar"1Thursdat, ,4pril 15, liJ10, 11: 15:tg AI"1

    FDF Frsduteri l"lar OS X lu,5,S Quartl PDFCnntextFaEt ',1ieh r,'ieiT: t'Jo FDF tiersiont 1,3ffi Inft,rnratisn on dris page refferts $re actual rc,ntents offlie .4dnhe FDF file. This pfige ma,i diffur frsm c'herr*# pages af dris propertr sheet frat displa'i irrfurmatisnfrnnr the \"rindg,,t'E file g',istent,

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    29/38

    ,.,- 709DEFilimdt 1t the k'a.rury

    States Gift {and Generation-Skipping Transfer} Tax_ iFrr 1rfts rF de d$hg crlrlds y4& 20O$)) Sae sePrrrtc iflslruclionr. '

    United Fleturn2009

    ooocooo(,trEo.

    I 2 Donor's last namerJl'.ftltA0onoI's tirst flame and middle i,rbaiBARACK H. 3 Donor'sroclrlsccuri$numbor--{*95Ad{tress (number, street, end apariment numbeil15OO PENNSYTVANTA AVENUE,4 NW 5 Legsl resrdence {domicileiItLINOTgCily, state, and ZIP codeWASIIINGTON, DC 2050 0I 7 Cilizeflship {ses instructions)T'NITED SfATES

    28 rf tne cjonor rired during the year, check here ) i i and enter dale of deafi9 rf youextendedth6tirnet0lilelhisFarnrl'09,checknere ) f--]10 Enier lhe ioiai numb8r 0f iionees liste{i ofl Scherlule A Count each oerson only cnce.

    ttgs No

    I 1r Have you (tre donor! previously filed a Fcrm 709 {or TCSA} for any oiher year? ll'No,' sk;p line i ib. ..b if the answer io iine 1 la is Yes," ir-as your address cianged since you last tiled Form 709 (or 709-A)?X Xt2 Giflr by hrs0rod or wilc lo tiird prrillr- D0 you consent to have the grtts (:ncluding generabon-skipping trafisfers) mad by you and byyour sgouse to third oartjes durrng tfte calendar year considered as rnade 0ne-ha[t by each of you? (Soe instrucbons.i (lt the answrr isYes,' the following information must be furnished and your spouse must sign the consent shown below. ll thc enturr lr 'Xo,'sllpli0ei 13-18 and g-o to Schcdulo A.) . . xi3 Nameolconsentinosoouse l'llCHELLE L. OBA$A l!1 SSff tlztttti4-t5 W$e vou married to one arother durin0 the enlire caiendar vear? lsee instuctionsl x18 lf 15 is 'l'to,'check whelirer I I manied I J divorced or I i widowed/deceased, a0d grvs date >17 Will a oifi lax retum l0r lfiis year be tiled by your sp0use? (lf Yes,' mail both retums rn the same onvelcpe.) X18 CorientotSpoute.lconsenttohavethsgifts(andgeneration-skippingtranslsrs)madebymeandbymyspousotothirdpartisdutlnqthecalendat'rear ccnsrdered as made one-halt by ealh ol us. We are bohiware 0tlie hintand several liability for tax creatod by lhe execution otlhis c0nlent

    ocloIo

    xoo.coot!

    I lfiE r.hh. n!_ictifrgrny: thar css) is b*ed d al n|orruth4 ot rFrh Frepdsts 4y k.cwcCgo.?/railN

    iild suteffib. ud to thc bst ol my kncvtlerqBind belief. 't rs

    y'- Tra

    'nt 709 r.:ocg)ottttl*

    SignHere

    1: 15 091-4380330

    Pl cR nc-'IIrLHA Fgrpiicioiurs,PrivecyAct,andPaperwo*ReductlonActl,lotlce,3ocarg! l?olthcceprrtlcinshuctlonttotthisfotm.L

    Fin's lam idlFi#i{*:;)-+J#T!-^ 011LLD 2SO9-.-0 3 0 3o--Blt!{n-, --AARACK H .

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    30/38

    a, Current Tax Posting,pdf FropertiesGeneral FnF Details

    Tide:AuUror:SuLgect:Kef ilErds:

    Created: Thursda',i,.dpril 15, ?B1rl, 11: 15:29 Ahll"lc,dified: Thursdar', April 15, A'llrJ, 6: 17:52 FI"lAppliratic,n:PDF Frsducer: hlac OS X 1'1,5,S Quartz FDFContextFast ireh i,'ie',i': fes PDF ,.ersign: 1,61'ngl Infiormetion on dris page reffects the acfual cc'ntents afT dre Adsbe PDF file. this pge 66'1 diffur fi'sm oil'rer't**. pageE c'f fiii propertr sheit frat display infiormationfrom f're ,+indnii's file srstem,

    OK i cancel i

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    31/38

    Fom 709[]r,[,,rrln]cr:l r I lhl Tt,'rlurylrrtr,.tr,tl Rf Ltl'wr Sr{rrrCO

    United States Gifl (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) TaxrF.r ,rrltg malre.$rrnq c.ttrrl.,ar /".rr :rfr:ll

    ) Soe septreto lnsttucllonr.Return r:l['1H No. l1.lt l'10:'02009

    co'poEb:oc,coot-(no-

    I Donor s ltrst name .]fld rlildrlle 'rlrtralBARACK H. 2 Donor's tast nameOBAI'TA 3 Donor's soclel securig numborArldrass lnunrher. slreet, ind Jparlntent nurttber)

    1 600 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW4 5 t-ega! rcsrdence rdomrcrie)ILLINOISCity, state, :nd ZIP cotJoWASHINGTON,0 DC 20500 7 Citrzenship {see rnstrucl;onsiUNITED STATESII

    10

    It ne ctonor drer| iluring llte'rear, check here > L--- j lnd enter date 0f deathllyouexlendedthetinlat0l|lethisFrlrmi09.checktlero>Eliter tne total nurnber r-rl Jonees rrsled cn Schedule A" Oount each person only once 2

    Yos No

    1 I r tJave yeiu lthe rJ4nor) pruvror.rsly lrlcd ;r Forrrr 709 (or i09-Al tor any other ye'ar? lf 'N0," skip lrne 1 1bb lf ttre .rnswgr to trrre 1 1a is Yrs,'has Tour iddress changed since you last illed Form /09 (or i 09-A'p X XTf-m by h$bsnO or wite to third parlles. Do you consent to havo lhe grfls (rrrclud-ing generallon-skipptng translers) ml! by you ancl byvoui sriouse to thrrd parrics {luring the calendirr year considered as rnade one-hall by each o1you? (See rnslructtons.l (lf th-e.answer is;tes,' ine foliowrng rnfcrrRattgrl rnlrst be f urnrshed and yuur spouse must sign lhe consent shown below. il thc anrwcr lr 't{0,' lkiplines 13-1E and 0b to Schedule A.) X15 Were you marrred t0 one lnolher during the cntre c-a]e!dar year? (see insfi xt6 It 15 is 'ilgJ check whether I I rnarrred L I drvorced or I i itidosed/deceased, and give dale )17 Wrlla otft [u return lor thts be liled by your speuse? (lt aes,' mail bolh returns rn the same e XCon

    Consent ol Spouse. I c0nsdnl l9 have the gfts qand generation-skipprng fansfers) made by rre and by my spouse t0 thrtd parles during the calendar.,,:,rr lnsrdcirtJ ,ts made one-half Oy caph of us. We gre both;rvare ol thejqfnt and several liabrlity lor tar created bv lhe execution ol lhts consent:,;,;,;;;;;i' 7n,*4.-UU Cfu,rt __ o"u > y'- 7:/o

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    32/38

    AFF'IDAVIT

    STAT'E OF i,'LORIDA))S.ScouNTY oF DWAL)

    I, Felicito Papa, am over 18 years old andresidentofT5T9 WaldenRoad, Jacksonville,FL32?44withFLDL #P100-24545-0824. I do not suffer from any mental impairment aad f competently aftest to thefcrilowing under the penalty of perjury:1. I am a professional web developer having graduated with a bachelor's degree in IT from ITTTechnical Instituie in In

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    33/38

    I submitExhibitBl (attachedherewith) Iiorm709 U.S. GiftT?xRetum ofFirstlaily MichelieObaura with her socidf security- number revealed. the foJ{owjng irrftrmation are revialed.:l. Miohelle Obama's SSN 3-50-60-23022. BarackObama's SSN. 0+2-6844253. Preparer's SSN or PIN P00570974EIN 36t700600Phoneno. 3121372-0440

    It is appareutthat the tax preparer for Forrns 709 of Pres. Obama may have forgotfen to look orflatten the covering top layers before posting them on the hternet. I later noticed that a&er April15,2010, thc pdffile postcd atthe White House has beenmodified. The top layers onFresidentObama's Income Tax Return have been locked or flatten and could no longer be dragged out. IIisSSN and his wife's SSN were no longer visible.

    F'UI{THER AI'FIAN I' SAYET II NOT.

    9.

    &I'LICITOPATASLTBSCRIBED TO AND SWORN TO before me on May 23, 2013 -

    fu DL- ?1oo -24s^ S ^ ore-g-fu.Dzlo"lazo

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    34/38

    Fon 709 United States Gift (and Generalion-Skipping TransferlTax Heturn,f t t.{19nade 1.rli,q .tl..r,lrt r',tr .fl(;'Jl) Sce seprrrla instrucllonr. 20090onot r soclll tecurity numbcr{l|IH4-3s5 l-,:gal restdencu i dcrrr c lelI LLINOI S7 Citrzensnrp (see inslructionslUNITED STATES

    CootrbgdqtcIDont(l

    Gitts by husbrnd or wile to thitd ptrllca. J,-r ,Lru c0nsenl to i'ave the qrfh a,nclunin0 qe letutrcrr-':kipprn0 llanstersl made by ycu ard byvour spous tc lhrrc partrus dririn0 tnF cJlenrlal iedr ccns;derert as rrndc,:ne.hall by.ea.ctt ?li?:?_t^S,^?,r'ltllltfj:11-f1:ltg.1n:ljl,,_'t'/rl$.'ihr:lollowrnct,ntcrrralrcrtrnust'::elurnrshedandiour3p'iuse'nuslsr9nlhec0nsufitslou/nhglow. iltitrnrwall!'tlo,'tllplincr t3-18 end go to Schedule A 1t3 llame ol cansenhna sqouse M HELLE I., OBAI'IA'17 )rVrll a qrtt !.1x returt l0r trrr fcar he liled by yout spouse? (ll'Yes,' nrilil both rehjrns rn lhe s.lm8 crlvelope.)

    I Llcrror s l,rqt n.rlte ,lrd r'ldrlle r''!rJlBARACK H. 2 Donor's r.i5l f JrneOBAI,iA1 ArlCress dnrlrll[11, ilte,:t. ,ilrt ,,pirl;Tl.tnt nU|tbet ]1600 PENNSYLVA.I{IA AVENUE, NWI tlrty, state, ,ind ZIF r;odeWASHINGTON, DC 2O5OO8 ll:he dr:nor 'Jied dlrrr,o lhr'.ear, ahe r.k I'ere > i- I ,inrl errter d3te ol ihrath9ll'J0uex10ndcdthettrnetrll,lplhitl.urrttlD9.t|reckl;era>l0 Ftiler lhe :olai numbel ol rlrrnees rr:,led 9!: Schr.jirile A. 0;unt;rc'l p0rson ortry r':rce. )t lr ltJve yr"ru tllp dLr"rlrl prr.''rr:r,slv tile(l ,r Furtrr I09 {ur i'09-A}l0r any ,Jhcr ve,rr? lf ilc,'ship lne l ;tib lt 159 a;tswer t0 lirre i ir is Y,-s,' 1(:rs l0ur .idrlrcss chanQed srnce 'j.iu lasl trlerl Irrm ,'09 icr i09-At?

    15 lvere you trarrigd lo snc :ir0liler dulng the grfre cdlel(lat lelr? {see rnstructrons18 tl l5 is ','lo,'cneck erl'lner rnarried --., drvorced or | ; rrdow'ed,tleccased, and gnre r,ate >

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    35/38

    oMa709 United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return. iFd ..ftts made duhg cabnds y@t 2{D9}) See seprnto lnstructlon!. 'FormBepatrnst ol th Ircerylntflal Revfl@ Sefvico 2009

    or!trbcGooottgr

    1 0onor's first name and middle iniualBARACK H. 2 Donor's last nameOBA$A 3 Donor'rsoelel securitynumbor1 Address {number, street and apartment number)1600 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, Nt{ 5 Legal residonce (domiclle)TI,LTNOISI City, state, and ZIP codeWASHINGTON, DC 20500 7 Citizenship (see insfuctions)UNITED STATESI9

    10

    lf the donor died during the year, check here > I I and enler date of deatil!f you extended the time to file this Form 709, check hers ) tlEnter the total number of donees listed on Schedule A Count each person only once. ) 2

    fEs No

    t h Have you (fie donor) previously filod a Form 709 (or 709-A) for any other year? If 'No,' skip line 1 1b.b lf the answer to line 1 ta is Yes,' has vour address changed since you last filed Form 709 {or 709-A)? Xconsenitohavethegilb(includin0genention-skippingtansfers)ma&byyouandbyv,iirr #ousi to tniid parties durinf fire calendlrr year considered as male oirehall bi each of you? {Soe inslructions.) (lf tho answer isVei.' fne fottowing iriformation mlst be furnished and your spouse musl sign the crinsent shown below- ll thc anrrcr lr 'ilo,'stlg xi1 ssff

    15 Were you manied to one another during the entire calendar year? {see instructions) x10 lf 15 is'No,'chec,k whether I I manied I I divorced or t--ll9qryddeceased, and give date >17 Willasittbxretumlorfrisyaarbeftledbyyourspouso?(ltYes,'rnailbo$$trqqlqlhejgm-grnelgpe'l X16 ComcnioiSpouse. I cgnssnt to have lho gifb iand gsneralion-sklpping transfers) made by me and by rny spousa to $ird partjs durlng the calendaryear considerid as made one-half by ea{h -0t us. Ws tre botyrunre ol tteAinland several liability for bx created by the exec$don 0f lhis c0nsent0nsenty'- 7ro

    odsoo 0.Undtr p4alt ,at pslrry.rrla .odd {accmel 'r.l tilr rehm, if,ctrdlng sy qffipilyktg shedlles md statffit3, sd to the b6t ot nyUi$ dod) lr bd il al iniomtbn ot *hlch pteps* ha 4y knryhdga.o

    LHEIU IIOWET & FINPh@ no.

    iaotD-coo(E>4 of donor Prepnq's SSN s mN

    Flm'snm(slffi{'"'?# >

    sa0 prge1LHA For Disclosurc, P.iv.cy Act, and Paperwork Reductloo Acl Notlco, 12 ol lie seDNrrtc i[shuctlons for this fotm. rom 709 rzoogr

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    36/38

    Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603E-Mail : d r ta itz@va h oo.co m, [email protected]

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE $Plaintiff, S

    $v.Ss

    Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the SSocial Security Administration, S 11-cv-00402

    $$$ Honorable Royce Lamberth

    Respondent $ Chief Justice presiding

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    37/38

    Certificate of serviceI, Lila Dubert, am not aparty to the above captioned case, I am over 18 years

    old and I attest that I served the defendant with attached pleadings by mailing themvia first class mail on 10.11 .2013 the pleadings attached herein by first class mailto the address of the attomey for the defendant:

    US Attorneys' officeAttn Patrick Nemeroff555 Fourth str. NWWashington DC 20530

  • 7/27/2019 Taitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motion

    38/38

    Fgfi1uv*tv gu3tl ql,ln 7877edtxTrockirgNumbet 'rn EPBBExpress4 ExpressPackagesenice :':^T-y1* *J:I:::iroESdicaodrfiatcftEnged Phases.ldcrffillY -''--i&ttw

    -t FedExi: Box r: FedExLJ rube2 Your lntemal Billing RehrcnceFrt 24 ciarrct.s s{ epmars ;Mice3ToEecipient's

    iitud{xpailrar!

    lndirect S- lrirciis.var I address $4 addre$nay.sidedai ds

    - Drv lceI -r oryiie,9,uN ttr5lt CargoAlrcraAddressUEe $is tfe tcrfr H0L0 localsn addtess of

    cftv ._ JlacL 7 Paymemr Seoderr|-.l#H;i#*MxtudM.cd&dft -- _TotalPackages TotalWeight ToalDeclaredValuer-- - -- --rbs S----*--Slo.r.a!,N,r14@dloUSSImu esw-C.Carar'i'fl\.-e Sebrrllo dela{-Bi6-0s sAtllFJio;"jiiii".:"?o"J*-i"1f ? i;c\dtuM,;-j .:dc--,1hdLsryceGldP ! "crqress

    nev D.r. rrl2. Palt!67s2' :2012 f edr. PFiWtD llJ U s A Sfi F

    Biltto:.., -- E8ttfixAceilo.d&rdtc.tdtlo tdd.-] :Recipient - Ttrirde"ny . lCreditCardA

    --0

    Ze I ft/l ffi , o,o ou.,n,n n,'v'\l ' _ fa-.ostr,db-sr$-orqde.e?bseecl-r

    ln.itu.s&drrsnone-s*,ltsddterelc_- FedEx Filst0vernioht | - FedEx 2DayA M'- fa-ostr,db-5r$-o;qCe.e?bseecl se"db's'resFoi'ro'-t$*"staavsrr.e-t*irtsuerie'elc- | - Sdl"'dayoEi,eryNoTata'tbe:iofd/u_:sstSArUn0AYD.eryssdeded I#L,.Ll.,qg'ol?ilillkmn,* I,, 5i{,?1iti,',,,,,,*:r?,r,-, ' tL - \4::,1;::':;;;;:'iii3ffifffiffniT', d/@ - iilsrl**urqor.'.'nElIsEEn tre@[En

    Ceifieryisseiecied;- FedExExpressSaverI frndbldressda/'Sd!day 0lmry N0I ava bbis

    NS0,,** 17) Qn:fr'fu&2+- -- Yes - Yes. Asc!-atu(^cc SfD!e,:Det a.dL,l* SL pq iD(tr.!r. - rcrqrnEl

    5 Packaging'H*ldvdsrffi5o.: -, FedEx Envelope* . ] ;;eorx lar'\/

    ^ -6 SpecialHandlingandDeliverySignature0ptions

    4try : ffitgnmt*0,:lxtg"da d'!erlsrFiL,'3,Ail.c,rd&r,i'e!ssav,- No Sionature Reouired , --,Direct Siqnalurel- l;i;::"i;',rsi:l'l"E;:,-, W'"1lf"il:!T"l:l'X'#;:

    0oes dris shipment contain dangetous good!?'. - oil box rtud bt chccked/m:xs:x --lBEN|8ED f,ffmil*tuLi tpdAFd0'srqnlglg,*g9s

    - Rfcda$ Add.d. CflU kI ltugPrc.4own4ftadIdtrDarnseilh#r