tablelands vs moa vs turner

8/6/2019 Tablelands vs MOA vs Turner

1/7

WORK SESSION AND ROAD BOARD MEETING12001 Business BoulevardEagle River Town CenterM.O.A. Conference Room -#170

AGENDAMay 23,2011Work Session: 6:30 P.M.1. Foreman's Reports (Financial, Capital, Maintenance/Operations)2. General Discussion and Calendaring:,/ lssues Requiring lmmediate Action,/ lssues to be placed under "Future Agenda ltems"Road Board Meeting: lmmediately Following work session or 7:00 p.M.A. ROLL CALLB. MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETTNGS: Aprit 25,2011C. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (Non-Agenda ltems)D. OLD BUSINESS:1. Onqoinq Project Updates: Breckenridge Dr./Eagle Glenn Subdivision Drainage, MOA/SOA AmenitiesMaintenance Agreements, Old Eagle River Road/Hidden Hills Subdivision Diainage2. Eklutna Bridge3. Yosemite Drive Drainage Study4. Chugiak Disposal Site Plan5. Eagle River Lane Emergency Access6. Asphalt Overlay Program7. Storm Drain Project8. Chugiak & Hiland Storage Facitity9. 2011 C.l.P. Program

10. Rebecca Hill Circle Drainage1 1. 3'd Ave/Cresfuiew Lane Driinage12.Traffic Calming (Driftwood Bay Drive/Meadow Creek Drive)E. NEW BUSINESS:1. Work Session - lmmediate Actions (lf Any)2. Efficiency Metrics3. TablelandsF. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMSG. ADJOURNMENT

INFORMATION PHONE: 343-1510FAXr 694.1540lndividuals with disabilities who need auxiliary aids, services, or specia! modifications to pafticipate should contact the Eagle River StreetMaintenance Dept' by telephone at 343-1510;fax at 694-1540; or email [email protected] to request reasonable accommodations.


2/7


3/7


4/7

Page 3 of6Project ldentifierMay6,2011

Activities and Events contributing to the complaintu

. In 2010, the rock covering that had been lining the ditch and slopes in front of the Cross and Boorheesproperties (and presumable placed by the property owner) was removed by either property owner or both.Mr. Cross indicated that the rock lining the ditch and slope was removed with the intent of replacing thesmall rock material with larger rock. Even with the small rock cover in place, slopes were experiencingmovement and slough, and did not have a stabilizing affect on the slope.. The work within the public right-of-way was in progress without any apparent plan to guide the process andstabilize the slopes; nor was there any apparent guideline/design to re-establish or establish ditch flowline.o Right-of-way enforcement discovered the work in the right-of-way in progress; all rock had been removedexposing earthen slopes. The work was in progress without benefit of a right-of-way permit. According tothe enforcement officer,"On l0-11-10 ROW Enforcement (ROWE) found Wayne Defour I Guaranteed Services Jremoving materialfrom the ditch infront of Jim Cross house on Sambar loop. GuaranteedServices had no permit IAMC 24.30.1A0 I YIOLATION. J so ROWE stopped himfrom workand requested that he obtain a permit before continuing work. He went to NW ffice andappliedfor a permit , but did not return to payfor and pick up the permit.. The area was leftin the state discovered; with Spring melt and thow (Alaska breakup) the impact is nowexacerbated.r The ditch and slope were not prepped for winter and the following spring thadbreakup period. The arearemained unprotected through the winter.r With Spring tharv, snovr rnelt, etc., we are now faced with a iailed slope, and other descriptions above. Theproperty owners and neighbors are upset by the above actions (or inactions).

Recommendations to correct the immediate problem:

. The property owner(s) need to present an approvable plan to re-stabilize the disturbed slope area. Portions ofthe right of way fronting a property are often viewed as an extension of the property's front yard, and theproperly owner wants an appealing presentation/curb appeal for the property. Prior rock placement clearlydid not succeed in stabilizing slopes, and may have contributed to slope failure and standing water (ponding)in the ditch due to the resulting direct or indirect elevation changes (damming affect).. Any design needs to consider drainage patterns, dewatering, and slope stabilization.. The plan needs a municipal right-of-way review and right-of-way permit.. The plan, if it is to include substantial retaining walls, may require preparation by a professional engineer(and geotechnical specialist).. Applicable right-of-way permit fee needs to be paid.r At locations where shallow driveway culverts are the catalyst for resultant "humps'o in the driveway, analternative to culvert installation, such as a curtain or French drain, or a combination of both, may be morefunctional.


5/7

Page 4 of6Project ldentifierMay 6, 201 1

:$[ r#h*'" \i*,'l*',ffi

.$]i .tri\,*",ii\.1:1.1i.. r,i

$ffi1* f " 1 r' $TYlr - p.,.*-

Plrotos fi'om Keefery'Pace Visit 4126120ll


6/7

Page 5 of6Project ldentifierMay 6, 201 1

Below are additional photos provided by a concerned resident.

1i'F


7/7

a^^Page 6 of6Project ldentifierMay 6, 201 1

Distribution:

tablelands vs moa vs turner

Documents