table of contents - microsoft€¦ · management: the modern way; dave van walleghem, vetoquinol,...
TRANSCRIPT
P
age2
Table of Contents
Who We Are 2
Office Staff 2
Reports 3
Ministry Representative
Chief Executive Office 3 4
Saskatchewan Poultry Extension Service 5
Introduction
General
Broiler Hatching Egg Producers
Chicken Producers
Turkey Producers
Table Egg Producers
Budget Report and Predictions
5 5 7 8 10 11 13
Financial Statements 14
Auditor‟s Report
Balance Sheet
Statement of Operations
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
Statement of Cash Flows
Notes to the Financial Statements
14 15 16 17 18 19
2011 Budget 21
Who We Are
Office Staff
Shelly Popowich,
Poultry Analyst;
Clinton Monchuk,
Chief Executive
Officer;
Gale Kellington,
Admin and
Accounting
Colleen Kohlruss,
Production and
Promotions
Pag
e3
Reports
Ministry Representative Roy White
I am pleased to report that 2010 was a watershed year for
the BHE Board. Two significant advancements took place,
the most recent of which was the election of a new board
of directors.
My congratulations to each member of the new board, your
fellow producers have demonstrated faith in you and I am
confident the BHE Board is in good hands. The Ministry of
Agriculture is also pleased with this initiative and will be
looking forward to the day when producers resume full
responsibility for functions and powers of this board.
The other significant advancement for the BHE Board in 2010
was the adoption of a pricing formula. For a number of
years, producers have been discussing the merits of a
formula driven pricing mechanism, and in August 2010 the
conditions were ideal for implementing such a mechanism
with little affect on farm gate price. I believe the new system will take the “play” out of the
pricing cycle in Saskatchewan in a way that that is predictable, transparent and respects
the interests of both the hatcheries and producers. This policy change was successful
because of the work and support of producers and hatcheries alike and further
demonstrates a growing capacity of this board for self governance.
On the national front, the BHE Board continued its contractual arrangement with the
Canadian Hatching Egg Producers (CHEP) which provides Saskatchewan the opportunity
to participate at the national table. One of the key projects for the CHEP in 2010 was its
progress towards updating the Federal Provincial Agreement (FPA). Amendments need to
be made to the FPA in order to have Saskatchewan recognized as full fledged member of
the CHEP. Some progress was made to finalize wording, but discussions continue. It is
hoped that the CHEP will be able to move this process to the final stage by distributing the
FPA for final endorsement by other signatories later this year. In the mean time,
Saskatchewan is pleased with our reception at the CHEP and we will continue to
participate at the CHEP for intents and purposes as a full member.
The BHE Board could not have achieved this level of success without the hard work
dedication of its entire staff including Clinton Monchuk, Shelly Popowich, Colleen Kohlruss
and Gale Kellington. It is my pleasure once again to thank them for their counsel and
service in 2010.
Sincerely,
Roy White, SBHEPMB
P
age4
Chief Executive Officer Clinton Monchuk
The 2010 year proved to be one of change with the
Saskatchewan Broiler Hatching Egg Producers Marketing
Board (BHE).
The BHE finally has an agreed upon pricing formula that is
both fair and predictable. Using the Alberta cost of
production based price, Saskatchewan has now moved
away from the „status quo‟ pricing model to one that is
more reflective of market indicators. In the future the
Saskatchewan saleable chick price will be an average of
the previous two pricing period prices in Alberta. The
pricing committee that included two producers and both
hatcheries felt that this was a satisfactory method to
proceed with.
On the administrative side no substantive changes
occurred. The province is under producing based on our allocation, however changes
to a larger operator‟s facility in 2010 will likely result in better production in 2011.
Saskatchewan also has all producers fully certified on the food safety program, CHEQTM.
Nationally we continue to be part of the Canadian Hatching Egg Producers (CHEP) via
a contractual agreement. It is anticipated that Saskatchewan will become part of the
Federal Provincial Agreement with CHEP in 2011.
Thank you to all producers for a great 2010 and I look forward to working with the new
producer board in 2011!
Yours truly,
Clinton Monchuk
Pag
e5
Saskatchewan Poultry Extension Service
Introduction
The Saskatchewan Poultry Extension Service is funded by the four Saskatchewan Poultry
Marketing Boards, Lilydale and Prairie Pride Natural Foods. There are two service
personnel: a Poultry Scientist and a Veterinarian. The University of Saskatchewan
provides an office for each and access to university resources. Policies are established
by the Saskatchewan Poultry Council on recommendations by the Research and
Extension Committee. The service is supervised and administered by Drs. S. Gomis and
H.L. Classen of the University of Saskatchewan.
Program Objectives:
1. Monitor industry performance.
2. Identify and solve industry problems.
3. Investigate individual production problems.
4. Communicate advances in poultry production.
5. Act as a liaison to individuals supplying feed, medication and equipment to the
poultry industry.
Personnel:
Tennille Knezacek, Poultry Scientist, (306) 966-6597
Bob Goodhope, Poultry Veterinarian, (306) 966-7300
General
2010 Saskatchewan Poultry Industry Conference
In 2010, the Saskatchewan Poultry Industry Conference changed venues and altered
the conference length. The Sheraton Cavalier hosted the meeting which was shortened
by scheduling technical sessions normally held on Friday into Thursday‟s Annual General
Meeting agendas. The luncheon and technical presentations arranged by the Poultry
Extension service included: Karen Schwean-Lardner, University of Saskatchewan,
Animal Welfare: Why It Impacts Market Access; Dr. Scott Gillingham, Aviagen, Brooding
for Success; Dr. Susantha Gomis, University of Saskatchewan, Detrimental Effects of
Variant IBD on Broiler Production in Saskatchewan; Terry Albrecht, Aviagen, Breeder
Management: The Modern Way; Dave Van Walleghem, Vetoquinol, Cleaning and
Disinfecting; and Dr. Peter Ferket, North Carolina State University, How to Resolve Leg
Problems in Turkeys. Dr. Ferket‟s seminar for the Saskatchewan Turkey Producers was
unique as it was the first webinar presentation successfully presented at this conference!
The 2009 Saskatchewan Egg Producer of the Year Award was presented at the
conference banquet to Edward Kleinsasser from the Smiley Hutterian Brethren.
Gene Makowsky, an offensive lineman from the Canadian Football League‟s
Saskatchewan Roughriders was the guest speaker. A football toss during the reception,
P
age6
as well as cheerleading prior to and signing autographs after Gene‟s presentation
made for a fun (and green) evening!
Presentations and Newsletters
Poultry extension is available to write technical articles for producer newsletters and
mail-outs, as well as make presentations on topics of interest at producer meetings.
Saskatchewan Poultry Disease Updates were presented at New-Life Feeds Producer
Meetings held in Yorkton and Saskatoon in November.
The 2010 fall meeting for the Saskatchewan Egg Producers was held in Swift Current on
December 1st. Presentations delivered by poultry extension were “Salmonella
Monitoring Update and Control”, “Avian Influenza – Seasonal Flu – Pandemic Flu...” and
“On-farm Survey of Beak Characteristics in White Leghorns as a Result of Hot Blade or
Infra-Red Beak Trimming.”
Articles prepared for the Chicken Farmers of Saskatchewan newsletter included: CFIA
Policy for Monitoring Broilers Arriving at a Processing Plant (February 2010); Notifiable
Avian Influenza First Response Exercise in Saskatchewan (April 2010); Salmonella: Human
and Chicken Interactions (June 2010); Poultry Science Association meeting in Denver,
Colorado (August 2010); Liver Condemnations of Broiler Chickens in Saskatchewan
(October 2010); and Reducing Foot Pad Dermatitis in Your Broiler Flocks (December
2010). Two poultry pointers were written for the Saskatchewan Poultry Producers,
including Newcastle Disease Alert: Diagnosed in Saskatchewan Cormorants (August
2010) and Avian influenza Alert: Low Path AI diagnosed in Manitoba (November 2010).
CanNAISS Program
CanNAISS is the Canadian Notifiable Avian Influenza Surveillance System that has been
developed by CFIA, government and poultry industry representatives to meet current
Notifiable Avian Influenza (NAI) guidelines from the World Organization for Animal
Health (OIE) and new trade regulations of the European Union. This surveillance
program will also assist in preventing, detecting and eliminating the presence of H5 and
H7 subtypes of NAI in Canada's commercial poultry flocks. CFIA covers all costs
associated with sample collection, submission and analysis.
During 2010, Saskatchewan‟s Poultry Extension Service was contracted by CFIA to
collect blood samples from 11 turkey and 7 broiler breeder flocks. No NAI virus was
detected in any of the tested flocks.
Infra-Red Camera
In conjunction with researchers at the University of Saskatchewan, Poultry Extension has
purchased an infra-red camera for use in research and field applications. Infra-red
thermography is a useful tool because it is non-contact, two-dimensional, and allows
images of fast changing thermal patterns to be captured in real-time. Applications for
poultry producers may include ventilation and equipment assessments. Producers
interested in acquiring thermal images of their barns and/or equipment must schedule
an appointment with Poultry Extension.
Pag
e7
Emergency Response Planning
The Saskatchewan Poultry Industry Emergency Management Team (SPIEMT) producer
manuals are available from the board offices. The manuals include information about
reportable poultry disease symptoms and the procedures to follow if you suspect you
have a reportable disease on your farm.
SPIEMT is comprised of representatives from the Saskatchewan Egg Producers,
Saskatchewan Broiler Hatching Egg Producers, Saskatchewan Turkey Producers,
Chicken Farmers of Saskatchewan, egg graders and processors, hatcheries, poultry
meat processors, U of S poultry extension, feed industry, catching crews and Farm
Animal Council of Saskatchewan (FACS), as well as government partners, including the
Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) and the Saskatchewan Ministry of
Agriculture.
Acknowledgements
Poultry Extension would like to thank the poultry producers and processors who make
themselves, their facilities and their birds available for educational purposes. Students
from the Western College of Veterinary Medicine and the College of Agriculture and
Bioresources at the University of Saskatchewan appreciate the opportunity to learn first-
hand about the Saskatchewan poultry industry. These student-industry interactions are
also an excellent opportunity to promote the poultry industry in this province and to
encourage student interest in poultry-related employment subsequent to graduation.
Strict biosecurity protocols are followed for all on-farm visits. Additionally, a list of
students in attendance is provided to keep the visitor log book at each farm site
current.
Broiler Hatching Egg Producers
Health
Overall flock health was good. Seven producers reported 22 disease incidents. Twenty-
three percent of the cases were bacterial yolk sac infections in chicks. Bacterial
lameness (arthritis/tendinitis) accounted for 18% of diagnostic submissions. There were
no cases of necrotic enteritis or coccidiosis which have been present in previous years.
Lame breeders are not likely to breed or be bred and therefore do not contribute to
quality hatching eggs. Reducing stress to the breeders will minimize lameness in the
flock. A few stressors to consider carefully are moving pullets, adjusting birds to the layer
barn, rooster aggression, nest box competition and feed management, which all
become more critical as hens achieve peak egg production.
The search for a commercial manufacturing company to produce vaccine developed
by Dr. Gomis for inclusion body hepatitis (IBH) continues. IBH outbreaks have caused
significant mortality losses in broiler chicken flocks for the past 8 years. An efficacious
vaccine would prevent transmission of the virus from the egg to the broiler chick.
P
age8
Yearly Number of Reported IBH Outbrreaks
All breeder flocks were blood sampled to monitor vaccination effectiveness for
infectious bursal disease and avian encephalomyelitis to ensure protection of parents
and progeny. The results indicate good vaccination practices in most flocks. All flocks
were blood sampled twice to ensure freedom from Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG)
and Mycoplasma synoviae (MS). All flocks tested negative for MG and MS.
Vaccination auditing, particularly for breast injections, is part of the poultry extension
service that can be requested. A random sample of pullets is examined to ensure the
person(s) administering the vaccine(s) is using the proper technique and applying the
vaccine in the correct area.
Chicken Producers
Health
Overall broiler chicken livability has continued to be good. Fifty producers reported 144
disease incidents. Inclusion body hepatitis (IBH) continued for the sixth year as the most
frequent diagnoses with 24% of submissions. The total yearly outbreaks of IBH reported
are shown in the chart to the right. Numbers of outbreaks continue at the same pace
as 2009. Research into the
epidemiology and preventive
strategies of IBH in
Saskatchewan has isolated the
mortality-causing strains and
developed a vaccine for broiler
parents. The research is
supervised by Dr. Gomis at the
University of Saskatchewan and
partially funded by the
Saskatchewan Chicken Industry
Investment and Development
Fund. The search for a
commercial manufacturer to
produce the vaccine continues.
E. coli bacterial infections were the second most frequent diagnosis at 17%, edging out
yolk sac infection in chicks. Yolk sac infection represented 15% of submissions which is a
decrease in frequency of 17% from 2009 (half the 2007 value). Bacterial lameness
(arthritis) was significantly higher than previous years at 13% of submissions. Necrotic
enteritis (6%) showed a significant increase from previous years. Ascites and necrotic
dermatomyositis continued a decline in incidence beginning last year (2009) and there
were fewer cases of coccidiosis.
Salmonella
Salmonella is generally not a disease problem in chicks over 7 days of age but is a
significant cause of food poisoning in people. There were a few cases of protracted
mortality in chicks past one week of age due to salmonella. All poultry submissions
including broilers which request bacterial culture at the Prairie Diagnostic Services
laboratory are also monitored for salmonella. It is important to realize that these samples
Pag
e9
are from chickens with bacterial infections and do not reflect the actual prevalence of
salmonella in Saskatchewan broiler chicken flocks. The 2003-2010 yearly isolation rate
average was 22% of samples submitted for culture; however, in 2009 it was 31% and
2010 – 33% continuing higher than previous years. Results are reported to
processors/hatcheries in addition to the flock manager. Producers are reminded to
take precautions when handling their chickens, such as wearing gloves and washing
hands, to prevent possible infection of themselves or others, especially young children
and the elderly.
Economic Impact of Infectious Bursal Disease on SK Broiler Production
Dr. Susantha Gomis identified “variant” Infectious Bursal Disease (IBD) viruses in 36% of
Saskatchewan broiler farms. Because Canadian IBD vaccines generally contain non-
variant strains, control of IBD in these Saskatchewan broiler barns has been
compromised. Significant production losses due to lower meat production per square
meter of barn floor area, poorer feed conversion ratio and higher morality were
recorded from farms infected with IBD virus.
Data sheets indicating IBD status and average production data of each broiler
production unit, compared to average production data from all Saskatchewan broiler
producers, were mailed to farm owners at the end of December 2010.
An effective IBD prevention and control program must include an effective broiler
breeder parent vaccination program, proper clean-up and disinfection between flocks
and control of traffic on broiler farms, and if necessary, an effective broiler vaccination
program.
Dr. Gomis has ongoing research to evaluate the commercially available vaccine‟s
ability to confer protective immunity against variant IBD viruses previously isolated from
Saskatchewan broiler barns.
Liver Condemnations of Broiler Chickens in Saskatchewan
A study was conducted by Dr. Gomis, with assistance from a graduate student,
research technicians, and Poultry Extension, to identify causes of condemnations
associated with liver conditions and to determine if these lesions result from a primary or
secondary disease (such as IBD). Sixteen Saskatchewan broiler farms (44 barns total)
participated. Total condemnations from these farms ranged from 0.35 to 4.32% with an
average of 1.40%, and condemnations due to liver conditions ranged from 0.05 to
1.60% with an average of 0.37%. Over a 12 month period, 264 livers from condemned
carcasses were examined from these 16 premises. Blood and bursa samples from 20
randomly selected birds were collected from 13/16 farms.
The livers had lesions that would indicate an acute bacterial infection; however no
causative agents such as viral inclusion bodies (i.e. inclusion body hepatitis), bacteria,
fungi and parasites were observed. Thirty-five (13%) of the liver samples were cultured
for bacteria and 8 of those samples had no bacterial growth. The remaining liver
samples had small amounts of bacterial growth with no consistent pattern. No
Campylobacter or Salmonella species were isolated from any of the samples. No viruses
were isolated from 17 liver samples sent to Guelph.
P
age1
0
Decreased bursal weight:body weight ratios, along with high bursal atrophy scores
(determined by looking at bursa samples under a microscope) were found in flocks with
increased condemnations for liver conditions. These are the two major indicators of IBD
infection. In this study, bursal atrophy, low bursal weight:body weight ratio and high IBD
titres were correlated with both higher total condemnations and condemnations due
to liver lesions.
This study showed that liver lesions are probably not caused by a primary bacterial
pathogen, and are likely associated with immunosuppression due to an IBD challenge.
Additional research is necessary to gain a better understanding of the development of
liver conditions in broilers so this emerging disease in the Saskatchewan broiler industry
can be controlled. In the meantime, producers experiencing high levels of liver
condemnations should ensure they effectively clean and disinfect their chicken barns
to minimize the numbers of immunosuppressive viruses present when chicks are placed.
Turkey Producers
Health
Eight turkey producers reported 16 disease incidents. The most frequent diagnosis was
E. coli bacterial infections other than yolk sac infections (63% of submissions), and its
prevalence has remained relatively high for the last three years. E. coli infections are
usually secondary to a primary stressor such as moving to the grower barn, chilling,
overheating, or hemorrhagic enteritis (HE) immunosuppression. Identifying the primary
stressor is the challenge to achieving control of infection in subsequent flocks.
Litter eating resulting in gizzard and intestinal impaction increased from previous years.
Turkey poults have poor adaptive behaviour. Changes to their environment such as
removal of feed trays and moving to another barn with different feed equipment
requires extra attention to make it as easy as possible for the poults to adjust and find
the feed. If they fail to find the feed they will substitute the litter for feed and if this
behaviour continues the litter plugs the intestinal tract and poult mortality increases.
There were no flock diagnoses of round heart or necrotic enteritis.
Salmonella
Salmonella is generally not a disease problem in poults over one week of age but is a
significant cause of food poisoning in people. All poultry submissions including turkeys
which request bacterial culture at the Prairie Diagnostic Services laboratory are also
monitored for salmonella. It is important to realize that these samples are from turkeys
with bacterial infections and do not reflect the actual prevalence of salmonella in
Saskatchewan turkey flocks. The 2010 isolation rate was 33% of samples submitted for
culture, which is similar to the 2003-2010 yearly isolation rate average of 14%. Producers
are reminded to take precautions when handling their turkeys, such as wearing gloves
and washing hands, to prevent possible infection of themselves or others, especially
young children and the elderly.
Pag
e11
Turkey Research at the U of S Poultry Centre
After dispersing the flock of bronze Ridley turkeys maintained at the University of
Saskatchewan since 1981, the Poultry Centre renovated the turkey housing area for
commercial turkey research. In 2010, a breed comparison and toe-trimming study were
completed. Poultry Extension looks forward to collaborating on future studies with
researchers from the U of S and commercial turkey producers in the province.
Table Egg Producers
Health
Layer and pullet flocks were healthy with 32 disease incidents reported. The most
frequent diagnoses were caged layer fatigue and yolk peritonitis. Marek‟s disease was
diagnosed for the third year in a row following three years without a case. There was a
single flock diagnosed with avian leucosis, surprisingly, since breeding stock has been
free of the avian leucosis virus for decades.
Caged layer fatigue is caused by inadequate calcium reserves in the medullary bone
of laying hens. This calcium reserve is responsible for the eggshell. If the layer has
insufficient reserve it takes what it needs from its own bones which results in thinning of
the bones, fractures of the ribs and ultimately inability to breathe. Ensuring adequate
medullary bone starts with the proper nutrition and feeding of the pullet before lay and
during lay. Dr. Bregendahl, nutritionist and director of technical services at Hyline
International (US), recommends diet changes during pullet growout should be based
on body weight rather than age.
The correct nutrition of laying hens. (Pages 12-14, Accessed February 1, 2011)
http://www.poultryinternational-digital.com/poultryinternational/201102_1#pg1
Production problems associated with infectious bronchitis (IB) continues to be reported
and investigated. Each production facility needs to determine the best vaccination
program as the risks are different for single age versus multi-age premises, whether
growing pullets or not. The effectiveness of the vaccination program can be monitored
by blood testing a small sample of birds from the flock a few weeks following the IB
vaccination(s). Contact the poultry veterinarian to help determine whether IB is the
cause of egg production problems and review IB vaccination programs.
NIR Technology
Near Infrared (NIR) is a region of the light spectrum where most organic compounds
have defined reflectance properties which are determined by the molecules and
bonds that make up the compound. NIR technology allows the characteristics of a
compound to be quantified based on the way it reflects light in the NIR spectrum. Feed
parameters that can be analyzed with NIR equipment include: moisture, protein, fat,
fibre, starch and ash; and prediction equations can be established to estimate amino
acid content, such as lysine and methionine, from protein measurements.
Unfortunately, minerals such as calcium, phosphorous and sodium are inorganic
compounds so the accuracy and reliability of these measurements using NIR
technology is questionable.
P
age1
2
The InfraXact™ NIR machine purchased by the Saskatchewan Egg Producers Growth
Fund will help Saskatchewan layer producers improve the accuracy of milling rations
and feeding laying hens by optimizing the use of feed ingredients and providing more
consistent complete feeds.
In 2010, 52% of Saskatchewan Egg Producers (33/63) submitted one or more samples for
NIR analysis. A total of 103 submissions were made with 17 producers making one
submission and 16 producers submitting samples more than one time. Two hundred
seventy individual samples were analyzed, including 196 layer rations (72.6%), 41
ingredient samples (15.2%), 27 pullet rations (10.0%) and 6 other samples (2.2%). All egg
producers are encouraged to submit ingredient and feed samples on a regular basis.
Salmonella Monitoring Program
The Saskatchewan Egg Producer Board tested all flocks for Salmonella species/serovars
by environmental sampling. The number of flocks testing positive during the 2010
period was 33%; a 17% decrease compared to 2009. In 2010, 19 strains of salmonella
were reported, with S. infantis the most common serotype. S. heidelberg was the
second most common serotype reported and is one of the serovars commonly linked to
food poisoning in humans. Other frequently isolated serovars of Salmonella in
descending order were: kentucky, cubana, rissen, mbandaka, typhimurium, and
braenderup. Salmonella enteritidis was isolated from one production site in 2010.
Twenty-three percent of positive farms had more than one Salmonella serotype isolated
(compared to 21% in 2009 and 31% in 2008) and the most frequent site of isolation was
from the egg belt (43%). Affected flocks were followed up with a letter indicating best
practices for control.
Salmonella screening results are generally available within one week of submission.
Layer farms testing negative in all locations will receive a salmonella screening memo in
the mail from poultry extension within a few weeks. However, if any of the locations
tested on a farm are positive, an additional Poly D test is performed before the samples
are sent to the Reference Laboratory for serotyping. If the Poly D test is negative, the
likelihood of identifying Salmonella enteritidis is negligible.
Serotype results can take up to two months to complete. Due to concerns regarding
delayed notification of positive salmonella screening results, Poultry Extension will be
notifying farm managers when the preliminary positive results are received. Once the
salmonella serotype is identified by the Reference Laboratory, a memo containing this
information will be sent by post.
Pag
e13
Budget Report and Predictions
BALANCE, AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009 $85,026.95
INCOME, SPONSORING AGENCIES $ 218,000.04
EXPENSES
Salaries $ 189,232.22
Vehicle rental and
lease $ 8,035.53
Travel $ 7,271.20
Consumables $ 3,312.92
Telephone/Fax $ 1,615.79
Equipment $ 00.00
TOTAL $ 209,467.66 $ 209,467.66
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2010 $ 93,559.33
BUDGET PREDICTIONS
2011 2012
Salaries $ 198,500.00 $ 198,500.00
Vehicle rental / Travel $ 21,000.00 $ 21,000.00
Telephone $ 1,500.00
$ 1,500.00
Consumables $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
TOTAL $226,000.00 $226,000.00
Pag
e21
2011 Budget
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND SURPLUS
2011 Budget 2010 Budget 2010 Actual
REVENUE
Board Levies (net of CHEP Levies Remitted for 2009) $ 96,880 $ 96,880 $ 96,880
Licenses and Membership $ 150 $ 150 $ 150
Interest $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 350
Miscellaneous income $ - $ - $ -
CHEP Levy $ - $ - $ 73,214
less paid to CHEP $ - $ - $ (70,965)
TOTAL REVENUE $ 99,030 $ 99,030 $ 99,629
EXPENSES*
Amortization $ 130 $ 130 $ 81
Legal $ 500 $ 5,000 $ 755
Audit $ 4,500 $ 3,000 $ 6,016
Bank Charges and Interest $ 850 $ 750 $ 731
Per Diems $ 8,400 $ 1,500 $ 2,500
Directors Travel & Meals $ 6,000 $ 2,500 $ 2,729
Poultry Extension Service (U of S) $ 12,100 $ 14,365 $ 11,118
Insurance $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 2,841
Janitorial/Repairs/Security $ 500 $ 500 $ 511
Meetings $ 2,000 $ 3,000 $ 1,247
CHEQ Program $ 3,000 $ 3,500 $ 5,048
Printing/Postage/Courier/Stationery $ 250 $ 250 $ -
Rent $ 10,000 $ 12,000 $ 10,012
Salaries and benefits $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000
Subscriptions and Memberships $ 150 $ 150 $ 120
Market Initiatives/Strategic Planning $ - $ - $ -
Telephone $ 2,200 $ 2,200 $ 2,075
Utilities $ 800 $ 800 $ 822
Miscellaneous $ - $ - $ -
TOTAL EXPENSES $ 100,380 $ 98,645 $ 91,608
EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENSES $ (1,350) $ 385 $ 8,021
* A 2010 Payee List is available upon request