taaa / spinal cord protection · 1993 extent

86
TAAA / Spinal Cord Protection Hazim J. Safi, MD Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery McGovern Medical School The University of Texas Science Center at Houston Memorial Hermann Heart & Vascular Institute Professor and Chair International Cardiovascular Surgery Mini-Symposium 2018

Upload: others

Post on 27-Jan-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • TAAA / Spinal Cord Protection

    Hazim J. Safi, MD

    Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery

    McGovern Medical School

    The University of Texas Science Center at Houston

    Memorial Hermann Heart & Vascular Institute

    Professor and Chair

    International Cardiovascular Surgery Mini-Symposium 2018

  • January 1984

  • Uni P = 0.0001 Multi P = 0.007 H.R. 1.6

  • 1993

    Extent

  • Classification

    15% 31% 7% 4%

  • Clamp and Go Era

  • All Aneurysm Types

  • Rationale for

    Spinal Cord Protection

  • 1. Distal aortic pressure

    2. Moderate hypothermia

    3. CSF pressure

    Spinal Cord Protection

  • 90° to table

    60° hip rotation

    patient’s back is near edge of table

  • CSF Drainage

  • 1286 TAAA & DTAA Repairs:

    (Jan 1991 – Aug 2006)

    Median age: 67 (8-92)

    64% 36%

  • Variable %

    Smoking 32

    Hypertension 73

    Cerebrovascular Disease 11

    Coronary Artery Disease 27

    Renal Disease 19

    Acute Dissection 4

    Chronic Dissection 25

    Pre-Operative Characteristics

  • Variable

    Intercostal Artery Reattachment 39%

    Pump time 44 min

    Aortic Cross-Clamp Time 46 min

    Adjunct use 74%

    Operative Factors

  • Jan ‘91 –

    Jan ‘95

    Evolution of TAAA Surgery in Quartiles

    Feb ’95 –

    May 98 Jun ’98 –

    Jul ‘01 Aug ‘01 –

    Aug ‘04

  • Neurologic Deficit n %

    Overall 36/1106 3.3

    (-) Adjunct 16/283 5.7

    (+) Adjunct 20/823 2.4

    p=0.008

    Results

  • 35 sec/yr

    p

  • p=0.02

    All Aneurysm Extents

  • TAAA II

    p=0.0001

  • Neurologic Deficit Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis

    Variable OR p

    TAAA Extent II 6.41 0.0001

    Renal Dysfunction 2.28 0.03

    (+) Adjunct 0.26 0.0004

    Aortic Clamp Time 1.01 0.11

  • Neurologic Deficit X-Clamp and Go Era

    No Adjunct

  • Neurologic Deficit Adjunct Era

  • Despite increased aortic cross-clamp times, adjunct has reduced overall risk of neurologic deficit

    Adjunct use has blunted effect of aortic cross-clamp time

    Adjunct may allow surgeon to operate without pressure of time

    Conclusions

  • Median Age: 67 (8 – 85)

    Adjunct 246/300* (82%)

    64% 36%

    *Now 394

  • Classification

  • Classification DTAAA

  • 30-day mortality 8.0% (24/310)

    (In-hospital mortality) 8.7% (26/310)

    Neurological Deficit 2.3% (7/300)

    Overall

    Results

  • *Neurologic Deficit

    Adjunct Group 1.2% (3/238)

    Non-Adjunct 6.4% (4/62)

    * p=0.02

    Results

  • Adjunct Group

    Immediate 0.8% (2)

    Delayed 0.4% (1)

    Non-Adjunct

    Immediate 4.7% (3)

    Delayed 1.6% (1)

    Neurologic Deficit

    Results

  • TAAA

    AAA

    Fistula

    Freedom From Reoperation

  • DAP & CSFD can be performed with acceptable

    morbidity and mortality significantly reducing the

    incidence of neurological deficits during repair of

    DTAA

    Open Repair appears durable

    Classification - prognostic significance

    Results

  • Delayed Neurological

    Complication

  • +CSFD -CSFD

    Immediate 20.1% 21.2%

    Delayed 8.3% 11.5%

    1990

  • Extent II 3.12

  • Results

    75%

    43% 0%

    Delayed

    Improved

  • Cases Controls OR P

    Hemoglobin

  • Results*

    OR 95% CI P

    MAP

  • Correctly Classified

    N GFR / Ab Cr

    N Cr / Ab GFR

  • 1106 TAAA & DTAA Repairs:

    (1991 –2004)

    Median age: 67 (8-92)

    64% 36%

  • 30-Day Mortality

    p = 0.0001

    Patients

    Deaths

  • 27% 18% 10% 5%

    30-Day Mortality

    Patients

    Deaths

  • Conclusion

    Subclinical pre-existing renal disease is

    prevalent in TAAA patients

    GFR versus serum creatinine

    More sensitive index of renal function

    Better predictor of mortality

  • Neuromonitoring

  • Jan 2000 - Jan 2006

    444 SSEP in DTA/TAA repair

    Data collected prospectively &

    reviewed retrospectively

    68 years (20 - 87 years)

    158 (36%) 286 (64%)

    Methods

  • Right & left PTN alternatively stimulated at the ankle to get a sustained waveform

    SSEP Monitoring

    Rate = 4.7 Hz

    Stimulus Duration = 0.05 – 0.7 sec

    Intensity = 0.3 Amp

  • Sensory

  • 10%

    50%

  • SSEP Monitoring

    Group 1

    Normal SSEP

    Group 2

    Transient Change Group 3

    Persistent Change

    SSEP changes classified into three groups

  • Sensitivity for immediate ND: 62.5

    Specificity for immediate ND: 81.2

    NPV of SSEP for immediate ND: 99.2%

    Results

  • Motor

  • Overall ND: 8/233 (3.1%)

    Permanent SSEP Change: 9/233 (3.8%)

    Permanent MEP Change: 11/233 (4.7%)

  • Sensitivity:

    37.5% SSEP

    62.5% MEP

    Specificity and negative predictive value

    >97% for both

  • ‘Any’ Change (Transient and permanent)

    Sensitivity

    Specificity

    False Positive

  • Conclusion

    If there is no change at the end of

    operation, > 97% awakening with no ND

    MEP have not added any additional

    benefit in detecting ND

  • Thank You