t he j udicial b ranch chapter 7: judicial branch chapter 4: rights and responsibilities of citizens...
TRANSCRIPT
THE JUDICIAL BRANCHChapter 7: Judicial Branch
Chapter 4: Rights and Responsibilities of Citizens
Chapter 16: Citizenship and the Law
BRAINSTORMING
What would a society without laws look like? Would it be very different than our society?
Make a list of laws that you think are unjust?
How do we determine fair punishments?
“EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW”
Our judicial system protects citizens under a set of laws/rules that define everyone’s rights and freedoms
Laws promote the common good, protect you physically and personally, protect your rights, and set limits on behavior
However, questions can arise as to where our rights end and someone else’s rights begin Consider: Freedom to play music v. Neighbor’s right to enjoy peaceful surroundings
QUESTION: Think about the phrase “liberty and justice for all”…how are the two ideas tied together in our system of
government? Explain.
CIVIL V. CRIMINAL LAW
Disputes between people
Judge and/or jury listen to arguments of both sides (facts of the case)
Settles personal issues
Defines crimes Behaviors that are illegal because
society finds it to be harmful
Outlines trial/punishment
Protect society as a whole
Civil Law Criminal Law
QUESTION: WHAT ARE SOME EXAMPLES OF CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LAWS/TRIALS?
SOURCES OF THE LAW
Principles of Laws are set forth in the Constitution
Four principal types of law: Statutory Common Administrative Constitutional
Constitutional Law is the supreme law of the land
STATUTORY LAW
Laws passed by lawmaking bodies are known as statutes Can be passed by Congress, state, or local gov’t
Most criminal laws and many civil laws fall into this category
Usually represent the majority rule, so they can change over time through the adoption of a new law
QUESTION: WHAT ARE SOME EXAMPLES OF STATUTORY LAWS?
COMMON LAW
We cannot have a statute for every type of wrongdoing in our society…just imagine how long that list of laws would be Thus, courts often need to make decisions based off common sense,
traditions, and past decisions…this practice is known as common law
Precedent: Earlier Decision Often, judges will use precedent to help them make decisions in court
cases Over time, the ruling becomes a customary law (common law)
QUESTION: WHAT ARE SOME EXAMPLES OF COMMON LAWS?
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Administrative laws are created by government agencies/commissions and not official legislatures
Many of these laws affect our daily lives, much like statutory laws, since the agencies are overseeing some aspect of our society
QUESTION: WHAT ARE SOME EXAMPLES OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW?
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
SUPREME LAW OF THE UNITED STATES
Based on the Constitution and how the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution Example: 6th Amendment’s Right to “assistance of counsel” for their defense and the
SC interpretation that states must give free legal aid to those unable to afford a lawyer (Gideon v. Wainwright)
QUESTION: WHAT ARE SOME EXAMPLES OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW?
THE ROLE OF COURTS
Cases can be people v. people; people v. government; government v. government
In a criminal case, it is society v. individual Society represented by attorney for government (often the District Attorney)
In civil dispute, both sides have options of having an attorney or representing themselves
THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM
THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM
U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
Set up by Congress
Federal District Courts Lowest level of US federal courts Trial courts for original jurisdiction (no appeals in district courts) Only federal court in which jury trials are held 94 Total in United States (each state has at least 1)
3 District Courts in PA
DISTRICT JUDGES
Federal District Judges are appointed by the President and get approved by Senate Can only be removed via impeachment by Congress
Trial judges that oversee civil and criminal trials Apply the law to the facts of the case Can be with or without juries Decides punishment in criminal cases
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Losing party in district court has right to appeal US Court of Appeals reviews decision by lower courts (Appellate Jurisdiction)
12 Judicial Circuits PA in judicial circuit 3, along with New Jersey & Delaware
Each court of appeals will have anywhere from 6 to 28 judges Longest serving member under 65 years of age is the senior judge
U.S. COURTS OF APPEALS: THE CURRENT MAP
12
PROCESS OF COURT OF APPEALS
Losing party appeals
Panel of at least 3 judges examines records of district court and hears arguments from both sides
Do not decide guilt, but rather if the trial was fair and law was properly interpreted
Majority vote for decision
May be sent back to new trial in district court (remand) or uphold the court’s decisions This may get appealed again to the Supreme Court
THE SUPREME COURT
Highest court of the United States Consists of nine justices, appointed for life Chief Justice is the principal judge on the case
Today: John Roberts Reviews cases that have been tried in lower federal
courts and in state courts most of the time 3 Exceptions for SC original jurisdiction
1. Diplomats from other countries2. Cases between states3. State v. Federal Gov’t cases
QUALIFICATIONS
No Special Requirements
Appointed by President, approval by Senate
Removal by resignation, death, or impeachment only
JUDICIAL REVIEW
Power where the Supreme Court can decide whether or not a law is in agreement with the Constitution
How did they get this power? John Marshall in the case of Marbury v. Madison
Marbury named justice of peace by John Adams Jefferson tells Sec of State Madison to deny appointment Marbury claims Judiciary Act of 1789 gives court power to order Madison
to fulfill appointment Marshall says it was not granted by Constitution—declares act of Congress
unconstitutional
PICK & CHOOSE YOUR CASE…
Over 7,000 cases are filed each year to the SC Court takes cases that deal with important constitutional or national questions Minimum of four justices must vote to hear a particular case If refused, lower court decision will remain in effect Remand: return a case to the lower court for a new trial
HEARING A CASE… ….RULING ON A CASE
Supreme Court hears cases by oral arguments Each side given equal time Justices will then read written
arguments and consider arguments said in court
Eventually, they will take a vote and a simple majority wins
After all of this, the Court will share the opinion Reasoning used to come to that
decision
Court’s Opinion (Majority Opinion) Written by senior member in majority or
Chief Justice (could assign to someone else if they choose)
Details reasoning for decision
Concurring Opinion Agrees with decision, but not the reasoning
behind it
Dissenting Opinion Explains why the justices in the majority
opinion are wrong Has zero effect on law, but is important if
case gets review later
CHECKS AND BALANCES REVISITED
Executive Branch Appoints Federal Judges
Legislative Branch Senate confirmation Rewriting of “unconstitutional” laws Amend the Constitution
QUESTIONS
Do you think we should set qualifications for Supreme Court Justices? Why or why not?
Should Supreme Court Justices be appointed for life? Why or why not?
When deciding cases, how should the Constitution be interpreted? Should it be word-for-word as written or interpreted for meaning (including modern times)
HOW THE COURT CHANGES OVER TIME
Civil Rights and Segregation
Scott v. Sandford (1857) Slaves were not US citizens (they were
property), thus they cannot sue
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) “Separate but equal” doctrine
Brown v. Board of Education (1954) Segregated schools were not equal—reversed
Plessy ruling
TOUGH DECISIONS TO MAKE
Many schools passed laws requiring children to salute the American flag in schools each day. Many organizations supported this patriotic measure, while many others opposed. One such group was the Jehovah’s Witnesses who believe that biblical prohibition of worshipping images forbids them from saluting the flag. With schools requiring the salute, a parent of two Jehovah’s Witnesses challenged the law in court.
How should the court rule? Explain.
TOUGH DECISIONS TO MAKE
While gathering evidence for the prosecution of a suspect, the FBI bugs a telephone booth by attaching a microphone and tape recorder to the outside of the booth knowing the suspect will use a private number instead of his own for illicit activities. The FBI did not have a warrant and the information obtained in the search is to be used in courts. The defendant argues this constitutes an illegal search since it is a public telephone and violates his right to privacy.
How should the court rule? Explain.
TOUGH DECISIONS TO MAKE
The Amish community often consists of close-knit families where religion is a keystone to their daily lives and their culture differs greatly from “traditional American” culture. One part of the difference is that the Amish only believe in educating their children until 8th grade and exclusively in Amish schools. Many states, such as Pennsylvania, require students to attend high school until at least 16 years old. The Amish population believes public high schools may threaten the beliefs of their youth, so they openly keep them out of school in violation of the law. Can the Amish legally opt to not have their youth be educated past 8th grade?
How should the courts rule? Explain.
TOUGH DECISIONS TO MAKE
A student gives this speech to the student body to nominate his friend for class officer:
I know a man who is firm - he's firm in his pants, he's firm in his shirt, his character is firm - but most [of] all, his belief in you the students of Bethel, is firm. Jeff Kuhlman is a man who takes his point and pounds it in. If necessary, he'll take an issue and nail it to the wall. He doesn't attack things in spurts - he drives hard, pushing and pushing until finally - he succeeds. Jeff is a man who will go to the very end - even the climax, for each and every one of you. So please vote for Jeff Kuhlman, as he'll never come [long pause] between us and the best our school can be. He is firm enough to give it everything.
The school suspends the student and bars him from speaking at graduation and other school functions. Is this a violation of his rights?
How should the courts rule? Explain.
TOUGH DECISIONS TO MAKE
A group decides to picket a funeral of a deceased soldier killed in military service. They say that “God kills American Soldiers because of America’s tolerance of homosexuality”. They picket on public property, maintaining a distance away from the cemetery, but close enough to be seen by those going to and from the service. They wave signs such as “Thank God for Dead Soldiers”, “Thank God for 9/11”, “God Hates the United States”, “You’re Going to Hell”, and others that speak negatively of the current state of the nation.
How should the court rule? Explain.
CONSTITUTIONAL ROOTS
By 1790, all 13 original states ratified the Constitution
Many people did not believe the Constitution did enough to protect individuals
Many different views on whether individual rights should have been included
SHOULD INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS BE INCLUDED IN THE CONSTITUTION?
Thomas Jefferson “Bill of Rights is what people are entitled to…and what no just
government should refuse.”
Alexander Hamilton No laws needed to stop the government from doing things the
Constitution gives it no power to do
OTHER ARGUMENTS
States already have own bill of rights to protect individual liberties Counterargument: Many states (such as NY) did not have a bill of
rights
Would states oppose the Constitution without the Bill of Rights?
Madison’s solution: 10 amendments that focused on individual rights
DO YOU THINK THE BILL OF RIGHTS WAS A NECESSARY ADDITION TO THE CONSTITUTION? WHY/WHY NOT?
THE BILL OF RIGHTS
1: The Five Freedoms
2: Right to Bear Arms; State Militia
3: Quartering of Troops
4: Search and Seizure
5: Due Process of Law; Self-Incrimination; Eminent Domain
6: Person’s Trial Rights
7: Trial by jury in money/property trials
8: Bail and Cruel/Unusual Punishment
9: Personal Rights not explicitly stated
10: Rights not given to Federal Gov’t belong to states and people
OTHER MAJOR AMENDMENTS NOT YET DISCUSSED
13: Abolition of Slavery
14: Equal Protection/Full Citizenship
15: Voting Rights in Regards to Race
17: Direct Election of Senators
19: Voting Rights in Regards to Gender
23: Voting Rights to District of Columbia
24: Abolition of Poll Taxes
26: Voting Age Lowered to Age 18
CITIZENSHIP & YOUR RIGHTS
Civic Duty: No choice in the matter
Following Laws
Paying Taxes
Going to School
Selective Service
Going to Court
Jury Duty
Civic Responsibility: Not required, just do it
Voting
Being active in community
Paying attention to issues
Taking part in government
Protecting others’ rights
CRIME IN THE UNITED STATES
Felonies v. Misdemeanors
Crime Against: Persons Property Victimless White-Collar Organized
CAUSES OF CRIMES?
Start with why we think crimes are committed…discuss
Theories about why crimes are committed.
FIGHTING CRIME
Role of the Police
Role of the Courts
Types of Punishments