syntax: recursion, conjunction, and constituency

Syntax:Recursion,

Conjunction, andConstituency

SupplementaryReadings

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion, Conjunction, and

Constituency

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Supplementary Readings

The following readings have been posted to the Moodlecourse site:

I Language Files: Chapter 5 (pp. 204-215, 216-220)I Language Instinct: Chapter 4 (pp. 74-99)

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

An Interesting Property of our PS RulesOur Current PS Rules:S → { NP , CP } VPNP → (D) (A*) N (CP) (PP*)VP → V (NP) { (NP) (CP) } (PP*)PP → P (NP)CP → C S

An Interesting Feature of These Rules:As we saw last time, these rules allow sentences to containother sentences.

I A sentence must have a VP in it.

I A VP can have a CP in it.

I A CP must have an S in it.

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

An Interesting Feature of These Rules:As we saw last time, these rules allow sentences to containother sentences.

N V CP

Dave thinks C S

that he is cool

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Another Interesting Feature of These Rules:These rules also allow noun phrases to contain other nounphrases.

I An NP can contain an (optional) PP.

I A PP can contain an (optional) NP.

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Another Interesting Feature of These Rules:These rules also allow noun phrases to contain other nounphrases.

D N PP

the man P NP

with a telescope

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

RecursionOur Current PS Rules:S → { NP , CP } VPNP → (D) (A*) N (CP) (PP*)VP → V (NP) { (NP) (CP) } (PP*)PP → P (NP)CP → C S

Vocabulary:Recursion is when an expression of some type containsanother expression of that same type

I Sentences containing other sentences

I Dave thinks that he is coolI Dave wonders if he is coolI That he is not cool surprises Dave.

I Noun Phrases (NPs) containing other NPs

I The man with a telescopeI The rock near the treeI Some dogs outside this house

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

The Consequences of RecursionQuestion:So what? What’s so neat about ‘recursion’?

Answer, Part 1:Once recursion gets started, it never has to stop.

I Once the rules allow a sentence inside a sentence...(Dave thinks that he is cool)

I ...then they also allow a sentence in a sentence in a sentence...(Mary said that Dave thinks that he is cool)

I ...and a sentence in a sentence in a sentence in a sentence...(John wonders if Mary said that Dave thinks that he is cool)

I ...and so on, and so on....

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

The Consequences of RecursionQuestion:But what’s so great about that?

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Answer, Part 2:Thanks to this, there are literally an infinite number of possibleEnglish sentences.

I After all, suppose there were only finitely many possible Englishsentences.

I Then, there’d necessarily be a longest English sentence, S.

I But, we could always make a longer sentence by embedding S:(Dave thinks that S)

I Therefore, there is no ‘longest possible’ English sentence(Just like there is no ‘biggest number’)

I Therefore, the number of possible English sentences is infinite!

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

The Consequences of Recursion

The Main Importance of Recursion:Recursion seems to make human language fundamentallydifferent from other kinds of animal communication.

I Other organisms have complex ‘languages’ (bees, dolphins)

I But none of them have been found to exhibit recursion (so far)

I So recursion may be part of what makes human language sospecial...

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

ConjunctionThe Conjunction‘Meta-Rule’

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Conjunction of Noun PhrasesOur Current PS Rules:S → { NP , CP } VPNP → (D) (A*) N (CP) (PP*)VP → V (NP) { (NP) (CP) } (PP*)PP → P (NP)CP → C S

Problem:Our rules won’t let us make sentences like the following:

I Bill and Dave danced.

I The dog chased the young cat and the ugly boy.

I Dave walked past the school and the church.

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

The Pattern:Wherever English allows one NP, it also allows two NPs joinedby ‘and’.

Temporary Solution:Let’s introduce the following, additional rule for NPs:

NP → NP and NP(An NP can be formed from two other NPs joined by ‘and’).

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

The Pattern:Wherever English allows one NP, it also allows two NPs joinedby ‘and’.

Temporary Solution:Let’s introduce the following, additional rule for NPs:

NP → NP and NP(An NP can be formed from two other NPs joined by ‘and’).

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Conjunction of Noun PhrasesOur Updated PS Rules:S → { NP , CP } VPNP → (D) (A*) N (CP) (PP*)NP → NP and NPVP → V (NP) { (NP) (CP) } (PP*)PP → P (NP)CP → C S

We can now form those sentences that we couldn’t before:

NP and NP V

N N danced

Bill Dave

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Conjunction of Noun PhrasesOur Updated PS Rules:S → { NP , CP } VPNP → (D) (A*) N (CP) (PP*)NP → NP and NPVP → V (NP) { (NP) (CP) } (PP*)PP → P (NP)CP → C S

N V PP

Dave walked P NP

past NP and NP

the school the church

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Conjunction of Verb PhrasesOur Updated PS Rules:S → { NP , CP } VPNP → (D) (A*) N (CP) (PP*)NP → NP and NPVP → V (NP) { (NP) (CP) } (PP*)PP → P (NP)CP → C S

Problem:These rules still won’t let us make sentences like the following:

I Dave dances and smokes cigars.

I Tom walked into the house and sat down.

I Mary screamed and said her ankle hurt.

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

The Pattern:Wherever English allows one VP, it also allows two VPs joinedtogether by ‘and’.

Temporary Solution:Let’s introduce the following, additional rule for VPs:

VP → VP and VP(A VP can be formed from two other VPs joined by ‘and’).

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

The Pattern:Wherever English allows one VP, it also allows two VPs joinedtogether by ‘and’.

Temporary Solution:Let’s introduce the following, additional rule for VPs:

VP → VP and VP(A VP can be formed from two other VPs joined by ‘and’).

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Conjunction of Noun PhrasesOur Updated PS Rules:S → { NP , CP } VPNP → (D) (A*) N (CP) (PP*)NP → NP and NPVP → V (NP) { (NP) (CP) } (PP*)VP → VP and VPPP → P (NP)CP → C S

We can now form those sentences that we couldn’t before:S

N VP and VP

Dave V V NP

dances smokes cigars

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Conjunction of Prepositional PhrasesOur Updated PS Rules:S → { NP , CP } VPNP → (D) (A*) N (CP) (PP*)NP → NP and NPVP → V (NP) { (NP) (CP) } (PP*)VP → VP and VPPP → P (NP)CP → C S

Problem:These rules still won’t let us make sentences like the following:

I Dave walked out the door and into the yard.

I People with guns and without licenses will be arrested .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Conjunction of Prepositional PhrasesOur Updated PS Rules:S → { NP , CP } VPNP → (D) (A*) N (CP) (PP*)NP → NP and NPVP → V (NP) { (NP) (CP) } (PP*)VP → VP and VPPP → P (NP)CP → C S

The Pattern:Wherever English allows one PP, it also allows two PPs joinedtogether by ‘and’.

Temporary Solution:Let’s introduce the following, additional rule for PPs:

PP → PP and PP(A PP can be formed from two other PPs joined by ‘and’).

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Conjunction of Prepositional PhrasesOur Updated PS Rules:S → { NP , CP } VPNP → (D) (A*) N (CP) (PP*)NP → NP and NPVP → V (NP) { (NP) (CP) } (PP*)VP → VP and VPPP → P (NP)PP → PP and PPCP → C S S

N V PP

Dave walked PP and PP

P NP P NP

out the door into the yard

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Summary of Our Conjunction RulesOur Updated PS Rules:S → { NP , CP } VPNP → (D) (A*) N (CP) (PP*)NP → NP and NPVP → V (NP) { (NP) (CP) } (PP*)VP → VP and VPPP → P (NP)PP → PP and PPCP → C S

Summary:So far, we’ve added three different rules to our system:

I NP → NP and NP

I VP → VP and VP

I PP → PP and PP

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Problem:These three separate rules are missing an obvious pattern!

I Wherever you can have any category X, you can alsohave ‘X and X’ .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

The Conjunction ‘Meta-Rule’:

X → X and X

(Where X can be any category (N, V, A, D, P, C) or any phrase(S, NP, VP, PP, CP, etc.))

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

The Conjunction ‘Meta-Rule’Our Updated PS Rules:S → { NP , CP } VPNP → (D) (A*) N (CP) (PP*)VP → V (NP) { (NP) (CP) } (PP*)PP → P (NP)CP → C SX → X and X

How to Read Our New Rule:“For any label X, this is a rule of the syntax: X → X and X”

I So, our new ‘meta-rule’ makes all the following PS rules:I NP → NP and NPI VP → VP and VPI PP → PP and PP

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Our ‘meta-rule’ also makes some other PS rules we need:

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Conjunction of Sentences:S → S and S

Davethinks C S

that S and S

he sucks Joe rules

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Conjunction of CPs:CP → CP and CP

Davethinks CP and CP

C S C S

that he sucks that Joe rules

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Conjunction of Ns:N → N and N

some N and N fight

dogs cats

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Conjunction of Vs:V → V and V

N V NP

Dave V and V the carrots

cooked sliced

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Conjunction of Ps:P → P and P

Davewalked P NP

P and P the house

in around

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Vocabulary:If two things are joined together by “and”, they are said to be:

I conjoined

I coordinated

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency TestsConjunction

Degree Expressions (Deg)

Question by Repetition

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Phrases and ‘Constituents’Vocabulary:If a group of words in a sentence form a phrase on their own,they are said to be a constituent.

Illustration: “Dave likes the happy man.”S

N V NP

Dave likes D A N

the happy man

I ‘the happy man’ is a constituent(Those words together on their own form a phrase in thesentence: the NP)

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

N V NP

Dave likes D A N

the happy man

I ‘likes the happy man’ is a constituent(Those words together on their own form a phrase in thesentence: the VP)

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

N V NP

Dave likes D A N

the happy man

I ‘the happy’ is not a constituent(Those words on their own don’t form a phrase in the sentence)

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

N V NP

Dave likes D A N

the happy man

I ‘likes the’ is not a constituent(Those words on their own don’t form a phrase in the sentence)

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Tests for Constituency

Question:

I Suppose I don’t already know the right structure for asentence...

I How can I tell whether some bunch of words isactually a constituent of not?

Answer:There are some tests you can use!

I Linguists call these ‘constituency tests’.I The first involves ‘conjunction’

(joining things with ‘and’)

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Tests for Constituency

Question:

I Suppose I don’t already know the right structure for asentence...

I How can I tell whether some bunch of words isactually a constituent of not?

Answer:There are some tests you can use!

I Linguists call these ‘constituency tests’.I The first involves ‘conjunction’

(joining things with ‘and’)

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Conjunction as Constituency Test

Our ‘Meta-Rule’ for Conjunction: X → X and X

I This rule says that ‘and’ can only go between twophrases of the same type.

I NP → NP and NPI VP → VP and VPI PP → PP and PP

Important Consequence of the ‘Meta-Rule’:I Suppose some words ‘X Y Z’ are a constituent.I Then, they together form a phrase of some type ‘XP’I Then, our conjunction rule would let you join together two

such XPs with ‘and’I So, you should be able to follow ‘X Y Z’ with

I ‘and’, followed byI Another bunch of words ‘A B C’ of the same

categories as ‘X Y Z’

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Important Consequence of the ‘Meta-Rule’:I Suppose some words ‘X Y Z’ are a constituent.

I Then, they together form a phrase of some type ‘XP’I Then, our conjunction rule would let you join together two

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Important Consequence of the ‘Meta-Rule’:I Suppose some words ‘X Y Z’ are a constituent.I Then, they together form a phrase of some type ‘XP’

I Then, our conjunction rule would let you join together twosuch XPs with ‘and’

I So, you should be able to follow ‘X Y Z’ withI ‘and’, followed byI Another bunch of words ‘A B C’ of the same

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

such XPs with ‘and’

I So, you should be able to follow ‘X Y Z’ withI ‘and’, followed byI Another bunch of words ‘A B C’ of the same

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Illlustration: “Dave likes the happy man”I ‘The happy man’ is a constituent (an NP).I And, so we can follow it with ‘and’ plus a sequence of words of

the same categories:(Dave likes the happy man and some angry cat)

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Illlustration: “Dave likes the happy man”

I ‘The happy man’ is a constituent (an NP).I And, so we can follow it with ‘and’ plus a sequence of words of

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Illlustration: “Dave likes the happy man”I ‘The happy man’ is a constituent (an NP).

I And, so we can follow it with ‘and’ plus a sequence of words ofthe same categories:(Dave likes the happy man and some angry cat)

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Illlustration: “Dave likes the happy man”I ‘The happy man’ is a constituent (an NP).I And, so we can follow it with ‘and’ plus a sequence of words of

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Important Consequence of the ‘Meta-Rule’:I Suppose some words ‘X Y Z’ are a constituent.I Then, they together form a phrase of some type ‘XP’I Then our conjunction rule would let you join together two

Illlustration: “Dave likes the happy man”I ‘Likes the happy man’ is a constituent (a VP).

I And, so we can follow it with ‘and’ plus a sequence of words ofthe same categories:(Dave likes the happy man and hates some angry cat)

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Illlustration: “Dave likes the happy man”I ‘Likes the happy man’ is a constituent (a VP).I And, so we can follow it with ‘and’ plus a sequence of words of

the same categories:(Dave likes the happy man and hates some angry cat)

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Illlustration: “Dave likes the happy man”I ‘The happy’ is not a constituent.

I And so we can’t follow it with ‘and’ plus a sequence of words ofthe same categories.(*Dave likes the happy and some angry man)

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Illlustration: “Dave likes the happy man”I ‘The happy’ is not a constituent.I And so we can’t follow it with ‘and’ plus a sequence of words of

the same categories.(*Dave likes the happy and some angry man)

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Illlustration: “Dave likes the happy man”I ‘Likes the’ is not a constituent.

I And so we can’t follow it with ‘and’ plus a sequence of words ofthe same categories.(*Dave likes the and saw the happy man)

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Illlustration: “Dave likes the happy man”I ‘Likes the’ is not a constituent.I And so we can’t follow it with ‘and’ plus a sequence of words of

the same categories.(*Dave likes the and saw the happy man)

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Applying the Test to a New Case

The Main Consequence:If we’re not sure if some bunch of words forms a constituent,we can use conjunction as a test:

I Take that sequence of words, follow it with ‘and’ plus a sequenceof words of the same categories.

I If it sounds good, it’s a constituent!I If it sounds bad, it’s not a constituent!

Let’s now try this out on a new case!

Degree Expressions:I “The very tall man left.”I The category of ‘very’ is a ‘Degree Expression’ (Deg).I Other Degs include: too, kinda, more, most, least, ...

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Degs and ConstituencyQuestion:In the sentence “The very tall man left”, do the Deg ‘very’and the adjective ‘tall’ form a constituent?

I That is, which of these tree structures is correct?:S

D Deg A N V

The very tall man left

D AP N V

The Deg A man left

very tallOur ‘Conjunction Test’:Take that sequence of words, follow it with ‘and’ plus asequence of words of the same categories.

I If it sounds good, it’s a constituent!

I If it sounds bad, it’s not a constituent!

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

D Deg A N V

D AP N V

The Deg A man left

very tall

Our ‘Conjunction Test’:Take that sequence of words, follow it with ‘and’ plus asequence of words of the same categories.

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

D Deg A N V

D AP N V

The Deg A man left

very tallOur ‘Conjunction Test’:Take that sequence of words, follow it with ‘and’ plus asequence of words of the same categories.

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Degs and ConstituencyOur ‘Conjunction Test’: “The very tall man left.”Take “very tall”, follow it with ‘and’ plus a sequence of words ofthe same category (a Deg and an A).

Result: “very tall” passes the test!I The following sentence sounds totally fine:

“The very tall and kinda handsome man left.”

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

D AP N V

The AP and AP man left

Deg A Deg A

very tall kinda handsome

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Question:In the sentence “The very tall man left”, do the Deg ‘very’and the adjective ‘tall’ form a constituent?

Answer:Yes; ‘very’ and ‘tall’ do form a constituent in this sentence!

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Adjective Phrases

Question:What’s the rule that combines a Deg (‘very’) and an A (‘tall’)into a phrase?

Answer:I We’ll call this type of a phrase an Adjective Phrase (AP)I Since it consists of a Deg and an A, the PS rule would be:

AP → (Deg) A

Our Updated PS Rules:S → { NP , CP } VPNP → (D) (AP*) N (CP) (PP*)VP → V (NP) { (NP) (CP) } (PP*)PP → P (NP)CP → C SAP → (Deg) AX → X and X

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Adjective Phrases

AP → (Deg) A

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Adjective Phrases

AP → (Deg) A

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

I Besides this, linguists have many other ‘tests’ forwhether a bunch of words forms a constituent.

I In this class, we’ll learn just one more...(More are discussed in the reading...)

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Questioning by RepetitionBasic Fact:We can ‘call things into question’ by repeating them in aquizzical fashion:

I Person 1: “Dave is dating a lawyer.”

I Person 2: “A lawyer?!?”

Crucial Fact:In such dialogs, we can only ‘quizzically repeat’ a constituent.

I Person 1: “Dave likes the happy man.”

I Person 2: “Likes the happy man?!?”

I Person 2: “The happy man?!?”

I Person 2: * “the happy?!?”

I Person 2: * “likes the?!?”

The Rationale:If something is not a ‘constituent’, then it’s not a full phrase,and it’s ‘weird’ not to speak in full phrases...

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Questioning by RepetitionCrucial Fact:In dialogs, we can only ‘quizzically repeat’ a constituent.

The Constituency Test:If we’re not sure if some bunch of words forms a constituent,we can use ‘quizzical repetition’ as a test:

I Imagine someone says the sentence, and then try to ‘quizzicallyrepeat’ those words.

I If it sounds natural, then those words form a constituent!I If it doesn’t, they they don’t form a constituent!

Illustration: “Dave walked into the house”

I Our rules predict that ‘walked’ and ‘into the house’ form aconstituent (VP).

I Our ‘repetition test’ for constituency confirms this.I Person 1: Dave walked into the house.I Person 2: Walked into the house?!?

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Sentences With Multiple VerbsOur Current PS Rules:S → { NP , CP } VPNP → (D) (AP*) N (CP) (PP*)VP → V (NP) { (NP) (CP) } (PP*)PP → P (NP)CP → C SAP → (Deg) AX → X and X

Problem:I Our PS rules only let a single sentence have a single V:I However, sentences can seem to have more than one V:

I Dave has bought a car.I Dave did buy a car.I Dave is buying a car.I Dave will buy a car.

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Auxiliary VerbsThe Challenge:Fix our rules so that sentences with multiple Vs are possible:

I Dave has bought a car.

I Dave did buy a car.

I Dave is buying a car.

I Dave will buy a car.

Key Observation:I In these kinds of Ss, the first V isn’t just any old verb of English.I Rather, it can only be one of very limited group:

(has, did, is, will, can, must, should, ...)

VocabularyAuxiliary Verb (Aux) =a V that can directly precede another V in an English sentence(has, did, is, will, can, must, should, ...)

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Key Question:In sentences like those above, does the Aux form a constituentwith the VP?

NP Aux VP

N has bought a car

N Aux VP

Dave has bought a car

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Applying Our Constituency Tests!Key Fact:The sequence ‘Aux VP’ does pass our constituency tests!

1. The Conjunction Test:The sequence ‘Aux VP’ can be followed by ‘and’ plus another‘Aux VP’ sequence:

I Dave has bought a car and will buy a house.

2. The Repetition Test:The sequence ‘Aux VP’ can be ‘quizzically repeated’

I Person 1: ‘Dave will buy a house.”I Person 2: ‘Will buy a house?!?”

Conclusion:The ‘Aux’ does form a constituent with the VP that follows it.

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

The Rule for Auxiliary VerbsConclusion:The ‘Aux’ does form a constituent with the VP that follows it.

N Aux VP

Question:What is the type of phrase that the Aux and the VP make?

Answer:Well, it looks like just another VP!

I It comes together with an NP or CP to make an S

I Wherever you have a ‘plain VP’, you can have ‘Aux VP’

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

N Aux VP

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

N Aux VP

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

N Aux VP

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

N Aux VP

Our Updated PS Rules:S → { NP , CP } VPNP → (D) (AP*) N (CP) (PP*)VP → V (NP) { (NP) (CP) } (PP*)VP → Aux VPPP → P (NP)CP → C SAP → (Deg) AX → X and X

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Recursion in the VPOur Updated PS Rules:S → { NP , CP } VPNP → (D) (AP*) N (CP) (PP*)VP → V (NP) { (NP) (CP) } (PP*)VP → Aux VPPP → P (NP)CP → C SAP → (Deg) AX → X and X

Interesting Consequence:Our new VP rule creates another case of recursion:

I According to the rule, a VP can directly contain another VP

Important Prediction:Because this recursion, our new PS rule lets us have multipleAux’s in a single sentence!

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Recursion in the VPOur Updated PS Rules:S → { NP , CP } VPNP → (D) (AP*) N (CP) (PP*)VP → V (NP) { (NP) (CP) } (PP*)VP → Aux VPPP → P (NP)CP → C SAP → (Deg) AX → X and X

Interesting Consequence:Our new VP rule creates another case of recursion:

I According to the rule, a VP can directly contain another VP

Important Prediction:Because this recursion, our new PS rule lets us have multipleAux’s in a single sentence!

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Recursion in the VPImportant Prediction:Our new PS rule for auxiliaries (VP → Aux VP) lets us havemultiple Aux’s in a single sentence.

N Aux VP

Dave might Aux VP

have Aux VP

been drinking whiskey

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Limits to Recursion in the VPProblematic Prediction:Our PS rule for auxiliaries (VP → Aux VP) wrongly allows usto have an unlimited number of Aux’s in a single sentence.

N Aux VP

Dave mightAux VP

willAux VP

haveAux VP

The Solution?You’ll have to take Linguistics 401 (Introduction to Syntax)

Syntax:Recursion,

Recursion

Conjunction

Constituency Tests

Auxiliary Verbs

. . . . . .

Limits to Recursion in the VPProblematic Prediction:Our PS rule for auxiliaries (VP → Aux VP) wrongly allows usto have an unlimited number of Aux’s in a single sentence.

N Aux VP

Dave mightAux VP

willAux VP

haveAux VP

The Solution?You’ll have to take Linguistics 401 (Introduction to Syntax)

syntax: recursion, conjunction, and constituency

Documents