swordfish (xiphias gladius l.) fisheries using mesopelagic longline in … · l.) fisheries using...
TRANSCRIPT
SCRS/2014/111 Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 71(5): 2073-2078 (2015)
SWORDFISH (XIPHIAS GLADIUS L.) FISHERIES USING MESOPELAGIC
LONGLINE IN THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA BY ITALIAN FISHING FLEET
Francesco Bertolino1, Claudia Camolese1, Marco Dell’Aquila1,
Adriano Mariani1, Massimiliano Valastro1
SUMMARY
The use of the traditional and mesopelagic longline in Italy in 2012 was investigated to evalu-
ate the effect of these gears in the swordfish fisheries. At least 800 longliners were estimated to
have swordfish as the main target. A sample of 352 vessels was selected to collect information
about the use of the gear and 26 vessels were selected to collect data about the sample size,
(LJFL) and other relavant information about water depth of the fishing area, estimated depth of
the longline during the operations, duration of set and hauls operation, total time of fishing,
number of hooks. Nominal CPUE values were obtained from data collected.
RÉSUMÉ
On a étudié l'emploi de la palangre traditionnelle et mésopélagique en Italie en 2012 afin
d'évaluer l'effet de ces engins dans les pêcheries d'espadon. On a estimé qu'environ 800 palan-
griers avaient pour cible principale l'espadon. Un échantillon de 352 navires a été sélectionné
afin de recueillir des informations sur l'emploi de l'engin et 26 navires ont été sélectionnés pour
recueillir des données sur la taille de l'échantillon (LJFL) et d'autres informations pertinentes
sur la profondeur de l'eau dans la zone de pêche, la profondeur estimée de la palangre pendant
les opérations, la durée des opérations et des remontées de l'engin, le temps de pêche total et le
nombre d'hameçons. Les valeurs de la CPUE nominale ont été obtenues à partir des données
rassemblées.
RESUMEN
Se investigó el uso del palangre tradicional y mesopelágico en Italia en 2012 para evaluar el
efecto de estos artes en las pesquerías de pez espada. Se estimó que aproximadamente 800
palangreros se dirigen principalmente al pez espada. Se seleccionó una muestra de 352 buques
para recopilar información acerca del uso del arte y 26 buques para recopilar datos acerca del
tamaño de la muestra (LJFL) y otra información pertinente acerca de la profundidad del agua
en la zona de pesca, la profundidad estimada del palangre durante las operaciones, las
duración de las operaciones de calado y virada, el tiempo total de pesca y el número de
anzuelos. Se obtuvieron valores de CPUE nominal a partir de los datos recopilados.
KEYWORDS
Xiphias gladius, Swordfish fisheries,
Longline, Mediterranean, Tyrrhenian Sea, Size composition
1 Consorzio Unimar, Via Nazionale 243 – 00184 Roma, Italy ([email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]).
2073
1. Introduction
Swordfish is an important resource for the Italian fishery, usually practiced, in the past years, with driftnet and
longlines, beside the harpoon fishery, traditionally carried out in the area of the Strait of Messina.
Since the banning of the gillnet fishery (“spadara”) occurred in 2002 swordfish fishery is actually practiced only
by pelagic longlines. Trying to regain profitability lost with the ban, some fishermen have gradually modified the
traditional surface pelagic longline in a mesopelagic fishing gear, which has proven very efficient and it was
gradually adopted by most of the Italian longline fleet. The development of such a system, while the one hand
has probably reduced the fishing pressure on juveniles, on the other hand has increased the potential impact on
adults, affecting the spawning stock. Many aspects of the fishing gear and the fisheries are not yet fully clear,
especially in terms of their impact on the resource. Funded by the Italian Directorate for Fisheries of the Ministry
of Agricultural and Forestry Policy, a project to examine the phenomenon was undertaken during 2012,
comparing also distribution and methods of the two different fishing gears, the traditional surface longline and
the mesopelagic longline, in order to allow the redaction of management measures.
2. Methods
The project provided for three phases: a survey in the Italian ports in order to assess the presence of the
traditional surface pelagic longline and the new mesopelagic gear, a one year long monitoring of catches in three
representative sample ports, and a sampling campaign on board in the same three ports. A sample of 352 vessels
was selected to collect information about the use of the gear, and a sub-sample of 26 vessels was selected to
collect catch data. The size of the catches (lower jaw - fork length - LJFL) were collected during sampling, as
well as technical data concerning fishing gears and other relevant information:
water depth of the fishing area
estimated depth of the longline during the operations
set and hauls duration
soaking time
number of hooks.
Nominal Commercial Catch per Unit Effort (CPUE) values in terms of Kg/1000 hooks were obtained from data
collected.
3. Results and discussion
The geographical distribution of the swordfish longline fleet is showed in Figure 1. In Italy, not less than 800
“pelagic longliners” are estimated to have swordfish as the main target. The vessels are mainly distributed in
Tyrrhenian Sea, with the bulk of the fleet around Sicilian coasts (both Tyrrhenian and Ionian Sea), Straits of
Messina, Sicilian channel and South Adriatic Sea. Regarding the three investigated areas, Figure 2 shows the
fishing activities of the sampled vessels during one year (2012).
Table 1 shows the use of the two gears in the selected boat sample. Even if the mesopelagic one is by far the
most used the majority of vessels use both gears depending on the sea condition, season and fishing opportunity.
In the Table 2 the main differences between the two fishing gears are reported. Surface longline is easier to
manage and faster in the fishing activity (smaller size and shorter soaking time); it can be used by smaller boats
and much closer to the coast (fishing in the surface layers) and produces its main effort only during night hours.
Mesopelagic longline is often much longer, needs greater depths and distance from the coast. It fishes all the day
long, exploring a huge water column. Usually more than one gear is set during the same fishing trip, therefore a
greater fishing effort can be deployed.
A total of 2070 individuals (LJFL between 81,8 and 235 cm, average length 121,73 cm) were sampled in three
ports. In Figure 3 are reported the size frequency distribution data for catches of surface and mesopelagic gear.
The mesopelagic gear catches on average bigger swordfish but also a wider size range, while surface longline
catches are more limited to medium and small sizes (Table 3).
2074
CPUE values are 141,8 kg in the overall sampling, with partial values of 174,8 kg for mesopelagic and 78,5 kg
for the surface longline. It is a very high yeld, if compared with other values about the same areas (Anon. 2011,
Tserpes et al. 2008, Di Natale et al. 1995, Di Natale and Mangano 2008, Orsi Relini et al. 2008) proving the
very good profitability in particular for the mesopelagic gear (values more than double of the other).
4. Conclusion
Mesopelagic longline is replacing almost completely the surface gear, demonstrating a very good effectiveness
on the whole range of sizes, including the big ones. Until today, even in a negative but fluctuating trend, there
are not signs of dramatic decrease of the catches. Nevertheless the situation has to be taken under strict control,
above all for spawning stock and juveniles. As for the spawning stock it is absolutely necessary not to increase
the effort. As far as juveniles are concerned, the period of two-months closure of fishing activity (October-
November) seems effective, while the problem of catches of juveniles and under-sized bycatch specimens would
be completely solved by extending the prohibition during the same two months to all drifting pelagic longlines
targeting other species such as albacore.
References
Anon. 2011. Report of the 2010 ICCAT Mediterranean Swordfish Stock Assessment Meeting (Madrid, Spain
June 28 to July 2, 2010). Col Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT 66(4): 1405-1470.
Di Natale, A., Mangano, A., Navarra, E., Schimmenti, G., Valastro, M. 1995. Swordfish (Xiphias gladius)
longline fishing in the Tyrrhenian Sea and in the Strait of Sicily: 1992 Report. Col. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT
44(1): 249-254.
Di Natale, A. and Mangano, A. 2008. CPUE series (1985-2006) by gear type in the Tyrrhenian Sea and in the
Strait of Sicily. Col. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 62(4): 1128-1141.
Tserpes G., Peristeraki P., Di Natale A., Mangano A., 2008. Standardization of swordfish (Xiphias gladius) catch
rates from the Greek and Italian Mediterranean longline fisheries. Col. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 62(4): 1074-
1080.
Orsi Relini, L., Palandri, G., Garibaldi, F., Cima, C., Lanteri, L., Relini, M., 2008. A time series of swordfish
longline CPUE in the Northwestern Mediterranean: search for exploitation and/or climatic factors
influencing fish abundance. Col. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT 62(4): 1097-1106.
2075
Table 1. Vessels using swordfish longline observed in different Italian ports.
Administrative
region
Number of
vessels
Surface longline
only
Mesopelagic
longline only
Surface and
mesopelagic longline
N % N % N %
Sicily 167 17 10,2 150 89,8
Sardinia 59 5 8,5 54 91,5
Liguria 29 29 100
Tuscany 18 18 100
Lazio 16 16 100
Calabria 32 5 15,6 27 84,4
Puglia 31 5 16,1 26 83,9
Table 2. Characteristics of the two types of longline.
Gear characteristics Longline
mesopelagic traditional
Operating depth (m): min - max 50 – 800 15 – 60
Gear lenght (Nm) Bigger boats: up to 30 Nm Small boats: 8-12 Nm
Bigger boats: up to 30 Nm
Hooks number per gear up to 1200 up to 1000
Number of gears per fishing trip 2 - 3 1
Time at sea (h): min. - max. 24 - 48 5 - 10
Operating average bathimetry (m) 250 50
Stabilizing mass yes no
Presents of attractive lights no yes
Table 3. Rate distribution of the catches.
LJFL (cm) % longline
mesopelagic traditional
80-85 0,2 4,3
85-90 1,2 9,6
90-95 3,7 10,4
95-100 7,6 11,5
100-105 6,1 13,1
105-110 5,4 9,9
110-115 11,2 9,6
115-120 10,4 10,4
120-125 9,6 8,3
125-130 8,6 4,0
130-135 7,3 3,7
135-140 7,2 2,1
140-145 4,1 1,6
145-150 4,1 0,5
150-155 4,5 0,5
155-160 1,5 0,0
160-165 1,7 0,0
165-170 1,1 0,0
170-175 1,1 0,0
175-180 0,9 0,3
180-185 0,5 0,0
185-190 0,7 0,3
190-195 0,3 0,0
195-200 0,4 0,0
200-205 0,2 0,0
205-210 0,1 0,0
210-215 0,1 0,0
220-225 0,1 0,0
230-235 0,1 0,0
2076
Figure 1. Italian geographic distribution of the fleet using swordfish drifting longline.
Figure 2. Swordfish longline fishing area monitorated.
2077
Figure 3. Size Frequency distribution of catches of two types of pelagic longlines (surface and midwater).
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
80-85
85-90
90-95
95-100
100-105
105-110
110-115
115-120
120-125
125-130
130-135
135-140
140-145
145-150
150-155
155-160
160-165
165-170
170-175
175-180
180-185
185-190
190-195
195-200
200-205
205-210
210-215
220-225
230-235
%
LJFL (cm)
mid-water traditional
2078