sweet validation of cereal samples – lc-ms/ms analysis
DESCRIPTION
SweEt validation of Cereal samples – LC-MS/MS analysis. Anne Kruse Lykkeberg; Gitte Andersen & Mette Erecius Poulsen; Nordic Pesticide Workshop, 2013, Porvoo / Borgå. Agenda. Short summary of the Method Non-linear standard curves Validation. SweEtSample Clean up. LC- method. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
SweEt validation of Cereal samples – LC-MS/MS analysisAnne Kruse Lykkeberg; Gitte Andersen & Mette Erecius Poulsen; Nordic Pesticide Workshop, 2013, Porvoo/Borgå
National Food Institute. Technical University of Denmark
AgendaShort summary of the MethodNon-linear standard curvesValidation
National Food Institute. Technical University of Denmark
SweEtSample Clean up
Weigh
• 5 ± 0,05 g grinded dry sample (1 mm sieves)• Add 10 ± 1,0 ml H2O• And 10 ± 0,05 ml ethyl acetat med 1 % acetic acid
Mix
• Vortex mix for 30 sec • Add 10 ± 0,5 g Na2SO4• Shake for 10 sec
Extract• Ultra sonication for 30 min• Centrifuge 3 min at 3000 rpm (1500 g)
Filtrate• Filtrate the supernatant into a 0.45 µm filter vial (polypropylene)
National Food Institute. Technical University of Denmark
LC-method• Analytical column: Genesis C18, 100x3 mm, 4 µm
• Solvent A: 10/90 metanol/10 mM ammonium formate, pH 4• Solvent B: Methanol
National Food Institute. Technical University of Denmark
Pyrimethanil – linear regression0.01 0.02 0.1
Recovery 78 94 232
National Food Institute. Technical University of Denmark
Pyrimethanil – quadratic regression0.01 0.02 0.1
Recovery 115 143 125
National Food Institute. Technical University of Denmark
Pyrimethanil – cubic regression0.01 0.02 0.1
Recovery 111 107 104
National Food Institute. Technical University of Denmark
Metribuzin – linear regressionCompound name: MetribuzinCorrelation coefficient: r = 0.993562, r^2 = 0.987166Calibration curve: 10.1201 * x + -0.00464258Response type: Internal Std ( Ref 1 ), Area * ( IS Conc. / IS Area )Curve type: Linear, Origin: Include, Weighting: 1/x, Axis trans: None
Conc0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00
Res
pons
e
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
Conc
Res
idua
l
-10.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
National Food Institute. Technical University of Denmark
Injection volumen - chromatograms Fenhexamid
min18.00 19.00
%
0
100
F8:MRM of 8 channels,ES+302>55.5
3.445e+003Fenhexamid17.72630
284419.92
19.3519.24
18.3518.89
min
%
0
100
F8:MRM of 8 channels,ES+302 > 97.3
2.901e+003Fenhexamid17.72618
2590
19.8919.70
18.4618.35 19.46
min18.00 19.00
%
0
100
F8:MRM of 8 channels,ES+302>55.5
4.873e+003Fenhexamid17.71727
3828
19.32
19.16
18.08 18.62
19.67
min
%
0
100
F8:MRM of 8 channels,ES+302 > 97.3
5.789e+003Fenhexamid17.71820
5283
19.3219.1118.38
19.62
5 µl2 µl
min18.00 19.00
%
-2
98
F8:MRM of 8 channels,ES+302>55.5
2.488e+006Fenhexamid17.67
3181782527076
min
%
-2
98
F8:MRM of 8 channels,ES+302 > 97.3
4.727e+006Fenhexamid17.67
5749984798504
min18.00 19.00
%
-2
98
F8:MRM of 8 channels,ES+302>55.5
1.091e+006Fenhexamid17.70
1353291106886
min
%
-3
97
F8:MRM of 8 channels,ES+302 > 97.3
1.720e+006Fenhexamid17.70
2094541750672
0.001 mg/kg
1.00 mg/kg
National Food Institute. Technical University of Denmark
Injection volumen - standard curvesEpoconazol
Compound name: EpoxiconazoleCoefficient of Determination: R^2 = 0.999832 Calibration curve: 139.264 * x̂ 2 + 89.2489 * x + 0.04741Response type: Internal Std ( Ref 1 ), Area * ( IS Conc. / IS Area )Curve type: 2nd Order, Origin: Include, Weighting: 1/x, Axis trans: None
Conc0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Res
pons
e
0
50
100
150
200
Conc
Res
idua
l
0.0
10.0
20.0
5 µl2 µl
Compound name: EpoxiconazoleCoefficient of Determination: R^2 = 0.999931 Calibration curve: 228.583 * x̂ 2 + 83.9971 * x + 0.0442506Response type: Internal Std ( Ref 1 ), Area * ( IS Conc. / IS Area )Curve type: 2nd Order, Origin: Include, Weighting: 1/x, Axis trans: None
Conc0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Res
pons
e
0
100
200
300
Conc
Res
idua
l
0.0
10.0
20.0
National Food Institute. Technical University of Denmark
Initial validation – LC-compounds• 28 compounds out of 34 had acceptable recoveries
Recoveries, mg/kg LOQ 0,01 0,02 0,1 3-hydroxy carbofuran 118 117 105 0,006Acephat 95 51 18 0,008Carbaryl 110 102 102 0,003Cyprodinil 113 112 100 0,005Demeton-S-methylsulfon 91 96 95 0,003Desmethyl pirimicarb 100 97 87 0,005Epoxiconazole 105 99 89 0,009Fenhexamid 110 105 104 0,008Flusilazole 107 105 98 0,003Imazalil 104 90 84 0,012Imidacloprid 112 105 98 0,004Isoproturon 114 114 108 0,003Kresoxim-methyl 104 109 90 0,007Linuron 106 102 99 0,003Malaoxon 84 85 85 0,002Methacrifos 106 103 96 0,009Methomyl 169 162 135 0,012
Recoveries, mg/kg LOQ 0,01 0,02 0,1 Metribuzin 112 112 101 0,008Omethoat 0 0 41 0,000Oxydemeton-methyl 57 49 45 0,005Paclobutrazole 98 105 101 0,002Pendimethalin 103 99 89 0,004Pirimicarb 101 109 110 0,002Pirimiphos-methyl 113 110 100 0,005Prothioconazole-desthio 102 102 105 0,006Pyraclostrobin 106 106 96 0,008Pyrimethanil 111 107 104 0,005Spiroxamine 3557 2108 632 0,040Tebufenozide 90 93 87 0,005Thiacloprid 104 105 100 0,004Thiodicarb 10 9 12 0,001Triazophos 91 103 108 0,006Tricyclazole 98 97 96 0,002Triticonazole 106 114 109 0,009
National Food Institute. Technical University of Denmark
Spiroxamin• LogP = 2.89• Low sensitivity LOD = 0.04 ng/ml
– Only i SWEET – not QuEChERS• Recovery is good at the highest level
Compound name: SpiroxamineCoefficient of Determination: R^2 = 0.984179 Calibration curve: 245.305 * x̂ 2 + -3.65684 * x + -0.00631267Response type: Internal Std ( Ref 1 ), Area * ( IS Conc. / IS Area )Curve type: 2nd Order, Origin: Include, Weighting: 1/x, Axis trans: None
Conc0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00
Res
pons
e
0
100
200
Conc
Res
idua
l
-400
-200
0
min16.600 16.800 17.000 17.200 17.400
%
-0
100
F6:MRM of 4 channels,ES+298>100.2
7.590e+003
130402_13 Smooth(SG,1x2) Samstik A cal 3 i hvede
Spiroxamine17.26735
7171
Spiroxamine17.26735
7171
16.69
min
%
0
100
F6:MRM of 4 channels,ES+298 > 144.24.752e+004
130402_13 Smooth(SG,1x2) Samstik A cal 3 i hvede
Spiroxamine17.24503244522
Spiroxamine17.24503244522
National Food Institute. Technical University of Denmark
Compounds with low recoveriesLog P Recovery Structure
Acephate -0.89 18-50%
Omethoate -0.74 17-50%
Oxydemeton-methyl
-0.74 40-60%
Thiodicarb 1.62 0-10%
National Food Institute. Technical University of Denmark
Compound with high recoveriesLog P Recovery
Methomyl 0.093 135-170%
Compound name: MethomylCoefficient of Determination: R^2 = 0.994937 Calibration curve: 1.84593 * x̂ 2 + 7.71071 * x + -0.00275524Response type: Internal Std ( Ref 1 ), Area * ( IS Conc. / IS Area )Curve type: 2nd Order, Origin: Exclude, Weighting: 1/x, Axis trans: None
Conc0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00
Res
pons
e
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
Conc
Res
idua
l
0.0
20.0
National Food Institute. Technical University of Denmark
Conclusions• Samples in ethyl acetate gives non linear standard curves
for many pesticides
• Using Quadratic fit and i few cases Cubic fit gives – Acceptable residuals with random distributions– Acceptable recoveries at three levels
• Compounds with Log P below 0 gives a poor recovery using the SweEt method
National Food Institute. Technical University of Denmark
Thank you for your attention