svc / storwize: cost effective storage planning (bvq use case)

8
Find most economic disk setup with BVQ Bsys2.pptx Michael Pirker [email protected] +49 151 180 25 26 00

Upload: michael-pirker

Post on 29-Jul-2015

152 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SVC / Storwize: cost effective storage planning (BVQ use case)

Find most economic disk setupwith BVQ

Bsys2.pptx

Michael Pirker

[email protected]

+49 151 180 25 26 00

Page 2: SVC / Storwize: cost effective storage planning (BVQ use case)

Page 2

Target for this presentation

• Target

• a mail environment has to be moved from an oversized 10k 300GB storage to a new

storage environment. The new environment shall use 7.2k 1TB drives with Raid 6.

• BVQ is already installed so we can measure IOPS, RW Distribution and caching to do

a most economic sizing

• We analyze the performance of all disks that are involved

• We can proof that 2500 IOPS are what we need

• It is already known that R/W distribution is 55% Read

• The diagram shows a constant read cache hit rate of 90%

• The diagram shows a constant write cache hit rate (overwite in cache) of 15%SVC will put all write data on the cache but 15% of this data will be overwritten before destaging happens. These IOPS will never affect the disk.

• Safety Margins We see a transfer rates which will improve write penalties for raid 6. ánd we use a conservative IO estimation for 7k drives. We do not take in account that the storage system may further improve IO behavior with of own caching

Page 3: SVC / Storwize: cost effective storage planning (BVQ use case)

Page 3

Select Volumes for performance analysis

Make use of the BVQ Accounting Package

� Create a Volume Group of all Volumes that belong to the mail system� Analyze the Volume Group now

Without Accounting Package you can select all volume by search.

Page 4: SVC / Storwize: cost effective storage planning (BVQ use case)

Page 4

Facts measured to support calculation

• Requested

• 40 TB Capacity

• 2500 IOPS

• Facts from Chart (4 work days)

• 55% RW Distribution

• 90% Cache Hit Read

• 15% Cache Hit Write

• Big Transfer size improves “Write Penalty” for Raid 6 (Full Striped Writes)

Cache Hit Read

Cache Hit Write

IOPS RW

Transfer Size RW

Page 5: SVC / Storwize: cost effective storage planning (BVQ use case)

Page 5

Results with Spreadsheet• Target IOPS 2500 IOPS

• RW Distribution: was measured before. Splits IOPS in

R/W

• Cache Hit Read: Reduces read IOPS with measured

Cache Hit Rate

• Cache Hit Write Reduces write IOPS (Overwrite in

Cache ) with measured Cache Hit Rate

• IOPS eff. is sum of read IOPS

and write IOPS

• The number of disks are now calculated with this formula

Result is 48 Disks with 7.2kRPM

Good fit because we need 40TB capacity

Page 6: SVC / Storwize: cost effective storage planning (BVQ use case)

Page 6

What makes this result particularly valuable?

• calculated based on facts

� decreased the number of needed Disks dramatically

• most economic result

• minimum of costly safety margin

Other scenarios without knowledge about facts

We assume Raid 6 and 50% read and 70% cache hit for read

� IOPSeff = 1625 � 72 Disks

We assume Raid 6 and nothing more

� IOPSeff = 2500 � 201 Disks

Page 7: SVC / Storwize: cost effective storage planning (BVQ use case)

Page 7

BVQ in the www

• BVQ Website http://www.bvq-software.com/ (still German will change to English until latest Feb 25. 2013)http://www.bvq-software.de/ (German)http://bvqwiki.sva.de (technical wiki with download – international)

• BVQ Videos on YouTubehttp://www.youtube.com/user/SVAGmbH

• SVA Webseite von SVA GmbH http://www.sva.de/

Internationale Webseiten

• Developer Works Documents and Presentationshttps://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/...

http://tinyurl.com/BVQ-Documents

Page 8: SVC / Storwize: cost effective storage planning (BVQ use case)

Page 8