sustainable design assessment water sensitive urban … · sustainable design assessment water...
TRANSCRIPT
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
SUSTAINABLE DESIGN ASSESSMENT
WATER SENSITIVE URBAN DESIGN RESPONSE
FOR
MR DAVID THOMAS
16 June 2017
File 1115A
resources
resources
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Sustainable Design Assessment 16 June 2017
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION 3
2. SITE DESCRIPTION 4
3. SUMMARY OF KEY ESD INITIATIVES 5
3.1. Energy Ratings 6
4. SUSTAINABLE DESIGN INITIATIVES AND SYSTEMS 7
5. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 13
6. CONCLUSION 15
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1: STORM RESULTS 16
APPENDIX 2: ENERGY RATING ASSUMPTIONS 18
APPENDIX 3: SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM 21
APPENDIX 4: RAINWATER HARVESTING 23
APPENDIX 5: WSUD MAINTENANCE MANUAL 25
APPENDIX 6: SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN 26
APPENDIX 7: BESS RESULTS 27
File: 1115A 1 ©Ark Resources
336 Burnley Street, Richmond Sustainable Design Assessment 16 June 2017
Issue Date Prepared Approved Status
A 25 May 2017 KK /DC JT DRAFT
B 26 May 2017 KK JT DRAFT
C 16 June 2017 KK JT TP Issue
© Ark Resources 2017
The information contained in this document that has been produced by Ark Resources Pty Ltd is solely for the use of Ark Resources' Client for the purpose for which it has been prepared and Ark Resources undertakes no duty to or accepts any responsibility to any third party who may rely upon this document.
All material contained in this report is subject to Australian copyright law. Copyright in the document is owned by Ark Resources Pty Ltd. No material from this document may, in any form or by any means, be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, without prior written permission from Ark Resources.
Any enquiries regarding the use of this report should be directed to:
ARK RESOURCES PTY LTD ABN 29 086 461 369 Suite 8, 10 Northumberland Street South Melbourne VIC 3205 Australia
P: +61 3 9636 0280 W: arkresources.com.au E: [email protected]
File: 1115A 2 ©Ark Resources
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Sustainable Design Assessment 16 June 2017
1. Introduction Ark Resources has been engaged by Mr David Thomas to provide advice in relation to environmentally sustainable development outcomes from the proposed development at 336 Burnley Street, Richmond.
This Sustainable Design Assessment has been prepared to meet the objectives and Application Requirements of Clause 22.17 (Environmentally Sustainable Development Policy) of the Yarra Planning Scheme. This report demonstrates how the development meets policy objectives of Clause 22.17-2, 22.17-4, and 22.16 (WSUD Policy) of the Planning Scheme.
This report contains a summary of:
• Environmental objectives adopted for the development
• Sustainable design initiatives integrated into the design of the project.
Performance outcomes in this report are based on:
• Discussions and correspondence with:
o Emilie Johnston — Senior Consultant, URBIS
• Architectural plans prepared by Truesource set out below:
Description Drawing No. Revision Date
Cover Page TP000 B 10/05/2017
Existing Site Plan TP011 B 10/05/2017
Proposed Site Plan TP012 B 10/05/2017
Basement & Ground Floor Plans TP100 B 10/05/2017
First Floor & Second Floor Plans TP101 B 10/05/2017
Roof Terrace Plan TP104 B 10/05/2017
Elevations TP200 B 10/05/2017
Colour Elevations TP201 B 10/05/2017
3D Perspective Views TP202 B 10/05/2017
Sections TP300 B 10/05/2017
Shadow Diagrams TP400 B 10/05/2017
File: 1115A 3 ©Ark Resources
F avours of India
¶1
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Sustainable Design Assessment 16 June 2017
2. Site Description The proposed development comprises eight residential units with 21 bedrooms. It is anticipated that approximately 23 people will reside in the development.
The building comprises the following uses.
Level Use
Basement • Car stacker, storage facilities, bin area and rainwater tank
Ground Floor • Garage, storage facilities, bin area, 8 units (11 bedrooms)
Level 1 • Living areas, kitchens, 2 upstand swimming pools and 2 bedrooms
Level 2 • 8 bedrooms
The development is located within the City of Yarra.
The total site area is approximately 770m2 and currently contains a single-storey weatherboard dwelling. The surrounding buildings are a mix of residential and commercial use.
An image of the site and the surrounding locale is provided below.
File: 1115A
4
©Ark Resources
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Sustainable Design Assessment 16 June 2017
3. Summary of Key ESD Initiatives A detailed analysis has been undertaken in order to nominate the ESD initiatives required and confirm the performance outcomes achieved. The results of this analysis are set out in the remainder of this report.
The following key sustainable design initiatives have been incorporated into this project:
• Rainwater harvesting system for toilet flushing and irrigation;
• 2.6 kWp rooftop solar photovoltaic system;
• High-performance glazing and energy efficient building services, appliances and fixtures;
• Environmentally preferable internal finishes.
An assessment of sustainable design outcomes of the proposed development has been undertaken with BESS, STORM and FirstRate benchmarking tools. The information presented in this report demonstrates that:
• The combination of design features and services initiatives meets all the standards of the BESS sustainability assessment tool.
• The rainwater harvesting system is predicted to result in an annual mains water saving of 132kL;
• The development meets the Best Practice standard for stormwater quality.
The results of the performance assessment are summarised below.
BESS
The Built Environment Sustainability Scorecard (BESS) assessment tool for new projects was developed by the Council Alliance for a Sustainable Built Environment (CASBE).
The BESS tool provides an objective performance based analysis of nine key sustainable building design categories at the planning permit stage of the building lifecycle.
BESS is widely regarded as an appropriate sustainability assessment tool for both residential and non-residential development projects. Since its launch, several Victorian councils including Banyule, Bass Coast, Darebin, Dandenong, Hobsons Bay, Kingston, Knox, Manningham, Maroondah, Moonee Valley, Maribyrnong, Moreland, Port Phillip, Stonnington, Whitehorse, Whittlesea, Wyndham and Yarra have adopted BESS.
The BESS tool builds on the NCC energy efficiency measures and provides a framework for assessing building performance outcomes in relation to:
• Management
• Water
• Energy
• Stormwater
• Indoor Environment Quality
• Transport
• Waste
• Urban Ecology
• Innovation
BESS scores for the development are summarised in the following table.
Element Required Score
Project Score
Compliance
Management 0%
50%
Yes
File: 1115A
5
©Ark Resources
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Sustainable Design Assessment
16 June 2017
Element Required Score Project Score Compliance
Water 50% 71% Yes
Energy 50% 52% Yes
Stormwater 100% 100% Yes
Indoor Environment Quality 50% 75% Yes
Transport 0% 0% Yes
Waste 0% 0% Yes
Urban Ecology 0% 0% Yes
Innovation 0% 20% Yes
Project BESS Score 50% 50% Yes
The project meets the standard required for water, energy, stormwater and Indoor Environment Quality. The project also meets the 50% BESS Score required to demonstrate Best Practice.
Please refer to Appendix 1 for details of the STORM results and Appendix 7 for the BESS Report.
3.1. Energy Ratings
FirstRate5 (Version 5.2.5 (3.13)) energy ratings have been undertaken for a representative sample of apartments and are summarised in the table below.
Apartment Star Rating Energy Demand (MJ/m2)
Total Heating Cooling
Unit 1 4.8 158.7 117.0 41.7
Unit 3 7.0 81.8 61.2 20.6
Unit 8 5.7 124.5 98.5 25.9
Estimated Development Average
5.8 121.7 92.2 29.4
The energy ratings set out above indicate that the development will not meet the standard required by the National Construction Code 2016 in relation to residential sustainability for Class 1 dwellings'. Please note that during design development, the design of units 1 and 2 will need to be amended in order to achieve a 6 star energy rating.
Please refer to Appendix 2 for details of energy ratings and building construction assumptions.
1 Units 1 and 2 which have individual garages are NCC class 1 dwellings and must achieve a minimum energy rating of 6 stars.
File: 1115A 6 ©Ark Resources
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Sustainable Design Assessment
16 June 2017
4. Sustainable Design Initiatives and Systems
Issue
Performance Commitments / Description
Comments
Building Management
Metering In addition to individual apartment meters for utilities, the following meters will be installed to provide information to the owners corporation in relation to centralised building systems and common area energy consumption:
• Harvested rainwater supply line
• Gas meter for hot water plant
• Common area lift and lighting meter
• Solar photovoltaic system
The information collected from these meters will be used by the Owner's Corporation manager to assess the function and efficacy of central systems during commissioning and ongoing operation.
Commissioning & Maintenance
All energy and water management systems set out in this report will be commissioned in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
Ongoing maintenance and regular monitoring of building systems will be undertaken by building management staff to ensure effective and efficient ongoing operation of all centralised building systems set out in this report including the rainwater harvesting system.
It is anticipated that the building manager will provide regular reports to the Owner's Corporation members in relation to resource consumption and cost.
Building Users Guide A Building Users Guide will be prepared and will provide details regarding the everyday operation of the building to enable building users to minimise energy and water consumption and optimise internal comfort and amenity.
The building users' guide will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of Credit Man-5 of the Green Star Multi Residential tool, Version 1 2009.
Water
Water Efficiency The following water efficient fittings will be specified to all dwellings:
• WELS 3 star showers (>4.5 but <=9 litres/minute)
• WELS 4 star toilets (4.5/3 litre flush)
• WELS 5 star basin taps (5 litres/minute)
• WELS 4 star dishwashers
Water using fixtures will be specified during design development in accordance with this water efficiency performance standard.
File: 1115A
7
©Ark Resources
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Sustainable Design Assessment
16 June 2017
Issue Performance Commitments / Description Comments
Rainwater Harvesting A rainwater harvesting system will be installed comprising:
• Rainwater harvesting from all roof areas and roof terraces(catchment area of approx. 472m2)
• Treatment of all rainwater with a combination of:
o 100 micron screen filter
o 5 micron cartridge filter
o Ultra Violet disinfection unit
• A total storage volume of 16,000 litres in rainwater tanks
• Re-use of water for toilet flushing
• Re-use of water for irrigation
Rainwater modelling indicates that this system will provide an estimated annual mains water saving of 132kL and a supply reliability of 99% from toilet flushing and irrigation.
Please refer to Appendix 4 for details of predicted harvested rainwater volumes and Appendix 5 for an indicative maintenance program.
Water Efficient Landscaping Where appropriate, water sensitive landscape design will be incorporated into the development by specifying a combination of the following:
• Drought tolerant and/or indigenous plant species that are best suited to local climate
• Automated drip irrigation system
• Re-use of harvested rainwater for irrigation
These initiatives will ensure efficient use of water and also reduce the total potable water used for landscape works.
Energy
Apartment Energy Ratings The development is expected to achieve an energy rating of 5.8 stars.
The development energy rating achieved exceeds the NCC 2016 energy efficiency requirements for Class 2 dwellings.
However, the Class 1 dwellings do not meet the statutory requirements.
Refer to Appendix 2 for details of building fabric assumptions.
Heating & Cooling Space heating and cooling for living areas will be provided by reverse cycle heat pumps with a minimum energy star rating within 1 star of the best available at the time of construction.
Efficient reverse cycle units in conjunction with a thermally efficient building envelope are considered to be an environmentally acceptable method of conditioning apartments.
File: 1115A
8
©Ark Resources
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Sustainable Design Assessment
16 June 2017
Issue
Domestic Hot Water
Performance Commitments / Description Comments
Domestic hot water will be provided by an efficient central gas instantaneous hot water system with a minimum appliance efficiency of 86% and a highly insulated circulating loop to reduce parasitic heat losses.
Energy Efficient Appliances All appliances installed by the applicant will have an energy efficiency rating within 1 star of the best available at the time of construction.
Appliances will be specified during design development in order to meet nominated performance standards.
Lighting Energy efficient lighting systems will be installed throughout the development including:
• LED lighting generally to apartments designed to achieve a maximum lighting power density of 4 Watts/m2 or less.
• LED or Compact fluorescent lights controlled with occupancy sensors and daylight sensors (as appropriate) to corridors and public areas.
• LED or compact fluorescent external lighting.
• An energy efficient car park lighting system comprising T5 fluorescent lamps with most lighting controlled according to motion sensors. The remaining lights will act as a "skeleton" lighting circuit and will be permanently lit.
Note that external lighting for the development will be designed with the objective of preventing light spill to the night sky.
Energy Efficient Building Systems
Energy efficiency will be a key factor considered during the design and specification of all energy using systems and appliances for both the centralised building services and residential apartments.
File: 1115A
9
©Ark Resources
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Sustainable Design Assessment
16 June 2017
Performance Commitments / Description
The following renewable energy system will be installed:
• A 2.6 kW peak solar photovoltaic system providing renewable energy to offset greenhouse emissions arising from common area energy usage of the whole development.
• Embodied ecological impacts of PV array and support racking will be reduced by over 12% through use of 280Wp 60-cell modules with efficiency over 12% greater than standard PV modules.
• Procurement of solar panel modules from best-practice manufacturer with an above average ranking on the Solar Scorecard.
Comments
The system is predicted to result in equivalent avoided greenhouse emissions of approximately 3.9 tonnes CO2, each year.
Refer to Appendix 3 for details of proposed system capacity and panel numbers.
Issue
Onsite Energy Generation
Carpark Ventilation To reduce energy use and greenhouse emissions from the apartment's car park mechanical ventilation system, energy use will be minimised by the use of a variable speed fan motor and appropriate controls including CO monitoring.
These initiatives are consistent with Part J of the National Construction Code 2016
Stormwater Management
Stormwater Quality The development achieves a STORM score of 105% as a result of:
• The rainwater harvesting system described under the 'Water category above
The STORM score attained demonstrates that the development attains the Best Practice Standard for Urban Stormwater.
The development therefore meets the WSUD objectives set out in Clause 22.16: Stormwater Management Policy of the Yarra Planning Scheme.
Refer to Appendix 1 for the STORM report, Appendix 5 for an indicative WSUD maintenance program, and Appendix 6 for the preliminary Site Management Plan.
Indoor Environment Quality
Natural Ventilation & Daylight The building has been designed to ensure that all living rooms and bedrooms have access to natural ventilation and daylight.
These features will improve comfort and amenity for residents, and reduce peak energy demand and greenhouse emissions arising from mechanical cooling.
File: 1115A
10
©Ark Resources
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Sustainable Design Assessment
16 June 2017
Issue Performance Commitments / Description Comments
Thermal Comfort Thermal comfort for occupants will be enhanced by the specification of high performance glazing.
Note that the majority of apartments will receive direct sunlight due to the arrangement of apartments within each floor plate.
Solar Access The building form and unit layout has been configured to ensure that the majority of apartments have an east, west or north view and therefore receive direct solar access.
Volatile Organic Compounds All interior paints, adhesives and sealants will be Low VOC type to improve indoor environmental quality for residents.
Low VOC paints, adhesives and sealants will be specified to meet the requirements of Credit IEQ-8 of the Green Star Multi Residential tool Version 1, 2009
Sustainable Transport
Bicycle Facilities Readily accessible bicycle storage facilities have been provided to encourage bicycle use by including:
• Racks for a total of one bike perdwelling located in the basement
Walkability & Public Transport Access
The site attains a Walk Score® of 88 out of 100 which is defined as 'Very Walkable'.
The site has some amenities within a walking distance (<400m) such as cafés, grocery stores, parks and shops.
Additionally, the site is within close proximity of tram routes 70 and 75, and Burnley Railway Station which provides direct rail link services to Melbourne CBD.
The site is also within walking distance of bus routes 605 and 969 that provide public transit services.
The location of the development will facilitate walking and public transport in lieu of private vehicle use.
File: 1115A
11
©Ark Resources
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Sustainable Design Assessment
16 June 2017
Issue Performance Commitments / Description Comments
Waste Management
Construction Waste Minimisation
A target recycling rate of 80% of construction and demolition waste has been adopted for the construction phase of the development to minimise the volume of waste to landfill.
This will be achieved by the development of a comprehensive waste minimisation strategy including:
• Separation of all commercially viable recyclable waste streams
• Training in waste minimisation for all site staff and contractors to form part of site induction training.
• Record keeping of landfill waste and recyclable stream volumes to track performance against the 80% recyclable target.
• Quarterly reporting of volumes and percentages for each waste stream.
A dedicated recycling contractor will be engaged to facilitate separation of commercially viable recyclable waste streams in accordance with the target adopted.
Building Materials
Environmentally Preferable Materials
The following environmentally preferable materials will be specified with the objective of reducing off-site environmental impacts and improving indoor environmental quality for residents:
• All feature timber will be recyded or from accredited sustainably harvested plantation sources (FSC or AFS).
• All interior paints will be low VOC type
Timber products will be specified in accordance with the requirements of Credits Mat-6 of the Green Star Multi Residential tool, Version 1 2009.
File: 1115A
12
©Ark Resources
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Sustainable Design Assessment
16 June 2017
5. Implementation Strategy The ESD initiatives set out in this report will be coordinated by the Project Manager in conjunction with the following project design team members:
• Architect
• Thermal Performance Assessor
• Building Services Consultant
An implementation schedule is set out in the following table.
# Initiative
ESD Initiative Implementation Schedule
Requirement Responsibility Stage
1 Coordination of Initiatives Full implementation. Project Manager All
2 Apartment Energy Ratings Full First Rate Assessments for all dwellings. Thermal Performance Assessor
Design Development
3 Renewable Energy System Specification of nominated Solar Photovoltaic System Building Services Engineer
Design Development
4 Heating & Cooling Specification of units in accordance with nominated MEPS star ratings.
Building Services Engineer
Design Development
5 Energy Efficient Appliances Specification of appliances in accordance with nominated star ratings.
Architect Design Development
6 Lighting Specification of nominated energy efficient lighting types and automated controls.
Building Services Engineer
Design Development
7 Domestic Hot Water Centralised gas hot water system. Building Services Engineer
Design Development
8 Rainwater Harvesting Design and specify rainwater harvesting system including toilet flushing & automated irrigation system.
Building Services Engineer
Design Development
9 Water Efficiency Specify fixtures in accordance with nominated WELS star ratings.
Architect Design Development
File: 1115A
13
©Ark Resources
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Sustainable Design Assessment
16 June 2017
ESD Initiative Implementation Schedule
# Initiative Requirement Responsibility Stage
10 Bicycle Facilities Specify bike racks & hoops. Architect Design Development
11 Construction Waste Minimisation Prepare construction waste minimisation plan. ESD consultant Design Development
12 Environmentally Preferable Materials Specify materials in accordance with nominated schedule. Architect Design Development
13 Metering Specify meters in accordance with nominated schedule. Building Services Engineer
Design Development
File: 1115A 14 ©Ark Resources
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Sustainable Design Assessment 16 June 2017
6. Conclusion This report sets out a range of sustainable design features, which are integrated into the design and specification of the proposed development, in order to improve environmental outcomes during occupation.
In terms of performance outcomes, the development energy rating achieved exceeds the NCC 2016 energy efficiency requirements for Class 2 dwellings. However, the Class 1 dwellings do not achieve the minimum 6 star energy rating required. The design of Units 1 and 2 will need to be amended during detailed design in order to ensure the development complies with the NCC energy efficiency requirements
The combination of design features and services initiatives integrated into the proposed development meets water, energy, stormwater and indoor environment quality standards of the BESS assessment tool developed by CASBE and adopted by several Victorian Local Government Authorities including the City of Yarra.
The proposed development also achieves a Best Practice standard for urban stormwater quality and therefore achieves the objectives set out in Clause 22.16: Stormwater Management (WSUD) Policy of the Yarra Planning Scheme.
Accordingly, the sustainable design outcomes from the proposed development are considered to be adequate for a residential development of this scale.
Jan Talacko Director
File: 1115A 15 ©Ark Resources
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Sustainable Design Assessment 16 June 2017
Appendix 1: STORM Results
-■ Melbourne Os Water STORM Rating Report
TransactionlD: 469049
Municipality: YARRA
Rainfall Station: YARRA
Address: 336 Bumley Street
Richmond
VIC 3121
Assessor: K Karanja
Development Type: Residential - Multiunit
Allotment Site (m2): 770.00
STORM Rating %: 105
Description
Remaining impervious areas (e.g. balconies(
Rainwater catchment areas (All roofs + terraces)
Date Generated:
Impervious Area Treatment Type Treatment Occupants / Treatment % Tank Water (m2) Areallolume Number Of Supply
(m2 or L) Bedrooms Reliability (%)
289.00 None 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
472.00 Rainwater Tank 16.000.00 25 170.00 82.00
23-May-2017 Program Version 1 0 0
File: 1115A 16 ©Ark Resources
1111
1111
111[1
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
11llW
1111
L
lioniminggral rommilin.. v... --- --- mmum --=
111111
golummnra; ibmInm-unn„ ■■■ENI■
336 Burnley Street, Richmond Sustainable Design Assessment 16 June 2017
RAINWATER CATCHMENT AREA
■■■■1111113[■111■ 111•111111111U111•1
EMII■nElEgIN •011IMEIMIIM MININIENIM 11111111111•11•MINI MEMO!. 111111111
File: 1115A 17 ©Ark Resources
336 Burnley Street, Richmond Sustainable Design Assessment
16 June 2017
Appendix 2: Energy Rating Assumptions
BUILDING MATERIALS
Element Description Added R Value
Floor Type Basement — Concrete slab on ground Unit 1 & 2 Ground & level 1 - Suspended concrete slab
Unit 3 - 8 Ground - Suspended concrete slab
Timber to remaining levels
Floor Insulation 50mm Kingspan Kooltherm K10 R 2.5 soffit board:
Underside of concrete floor to ground level units shared with carpark/ramp below.
Underside of concrete floor to unit's 1-2 garage shared with habitable rooms below. Underside of level 1 concrete floor to unit's 1-2 shared with garage below.
R 2.5
R 4.0 bulk insulation to underside of timber floors exposed to external air below.
R 4.0
Wall Insulation Lightweight party walls:
75mm Bulk insulation R1.5 R 1.5
Garage/store/bin walls shared with dwelling:
90mm HD Bulk insulation R 2.5 R 2.5
External Lightweight walls:
90mm HD Bulk insulation R 2.5 R 2.5
Precast concrete apartment walls shared with carpark:
20mm Green foilboard with dual reflective airspace
15mm airspace / 20mm green foilboard / 28mm airspace
R Total R 2.2
Roof Insulation 50mm Kingspan Kooltherm K10 R 2.5 soffit board:
Underside of concrete ceiling/roof sections to unit's 1-2 ground level study/section of entry shared with terrace above
R 2.5
R 4.0 bulk ceiling insulation + R 1.3 anticon 60 to underside of metal roof
Ceiling R 4.0 Roof R 1.3
R 4.0 bulk insulation to underside of ceiling/roof section shared with roof terrace & roof terrace stair above R 4.0
Window Frames Thermally broken aluminium frames to all windows and glazed doors
Sky Lights Nil
External Blinds Nil
File: 1115A
18
©Ark Resources
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Sustainable Design Assessment
16 June 2017
GLAZING
Glazing Type
Thermally Broken
Description Whole of Window
U
Value
SHGC LOCATION Sliding Door
Glazing Capral Futureline SD Clear Double Glazed Low-e
LB Clear 5 / 12 / 5 2.3 0.40 As per elevations
Energy Rating REY-003-18 TB SD
6.38CP Clear / 12 Argon / 6 2.1 0.40 Software
Thermally Broken U SHGC LOCATION
Fixed Glazing
Glazing Capral Futureline 440 series Clear Double Glazed Low-e
LB Clear 5 / 121 5 1.8 0.51 As per elevations
Energy Rating BRD -104-09 TB Fixed
4ET / 12 Argon / 4ET 1.89 0.51 Software
Thermally Broken U SHGC LOCATION
Awning
Glazing Capral Futureline 54W series Clear Double Glazed Low-e
LB Clear 5 / 12 / 5 2.7 0.37 As per elevations
Energy Rating THC-015-10B TB Awning
6ET / 12Argon / 6 2.73 0.37 Software
Thermally Broken U SHGC LOCATION Hinge Door
Glazing Capral Futureline 46D series Clear Double Glazed Low-e
LB Clear 5 / 12 / 5 3.2 0.43 As per elevations
Energy Rating CAP-082-06 Hinge Door
6EA / 10 Argon / 6 3.28 0.44 Software
Thermally Broken U SHGC LOCATION Sliding Window
Glazing Capral Futureline SW Clear Double Glazed Low-e
LB Clear 5 / 12 / 5 2.6 0.33 As per elevations
Energy Rating AWS-037-30 TB SD
6.38CP Gy / 8 Argon / 4 2.63 0.32 Software
NOTES
The energy rating software accredited by the Australian Building Codes Board contains a relatively limited library of window systems. When the glazing systems specified are not available in the software, the protocol requires that the glazing type which most closely matches the specified glazing is selected for the purpose of calculating the energy rating.
File: 1115A
19
©Ark Resources
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Sustainable Design Assessment 16 June 2017
The table above sets out the glazing specifications together with the glazing input for the purposes of calculating the energy rating.
To meet the energy rating specified in this report the whole of window U — Value must be equal or lower than the energy rating software value and the whole of window SHGC — Value must be within +/-5% of the energy rating software value.
GENERAL RATING ASSUMPTIONS
Item Details
Floor Coverings • Tile to bathrooms, laundries and kitchens
• Carpet to bedrooms and all other areas
Window Coverings • Holland blinds to all windows. (Regulation Mode)2
Draught Proofing • Weather strips to all entry & external doors and windows.
• Seal / self-closing to all exhaust fans.
Down lights • Recessed down lights in ceiling /roof space to be sealed type or fitted with fire proof unvented down light covers (external roof areas only) to provide air tightness and contact with insulation
General • All party walls are classed as neighbour walls.
Shading • Overshadowing from adjoining buildings has been incorporated into the energy ratings
Ceiling Calculation • Calculation for loss of ceiling insulation due to down lights, exhaust fans, ceiling speakers etc. have been incorporated into the energy rating where applicable
NOTES
1. Changes to any of the above stated specifications may affect energy performance and invalidate the
energy ratings detailed in this report.
2. Sealing of gaps and cracks: inadequate sealing of gaps and cracks can negatively affect the energy
performance of a dwelling.
NCC 2016 vol.1 Part J3 and vol. 2 Part 3.12.3 requires that seals are to be provided to:
a) chimneys and flues b) roof lights i.e. skylights or windows installed in a roof c) around external doors and windows and d) exhaust fans
2 Holland blinds are assumed as required by VBA Practice Note 55 (Clause 5.2). This assumption is for regulatory purposes only.
File: 1115A 20 ©Ark Resources
Equivalent Solar Hot Water System
Required solar contribution % 47% To be supplied by solar water heaters MJ / day 143
Solar radiation, Melbourne, optimum angle MJ / day / m2 annual ave. 17.2 Evac. Tube
70%
12.0
11.9
1.67 8
1.1 x 2.2
Sustainable Design Assessment 16 June 2017 336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Appendix 3: Solar Photovoltaic system
336 Burnley Street, Richmond Input Calculated
Data Total number of bedrooms 21 Average number of people per bedroom 1.1 Total occupants 23
Photovoltaic System Electricity gas emissions factor, NG [2] kg_CO2-e/kWh 1.19
PV Melbourne energy delivery MWh/y per kWe 1.25 PV capacity required kWe 2.6 Proposed PV module rating Wp 280 Efficiency improvement over traditional 250W module 12.0% Typical dimensions for 60-cell module Width (m) x length (m) 1.0 x 1.6 Number of panels required rounded up 10 Expected electricity produced KWh/day 9.5 Annual expected electricity produced KWh/yr 3.472
Scope 2 and 3
10° tilt, 30° azimuth
Collector Type: Flat Plate Solar water heater efficiency annual average 55%
Delivered energy into water MJ / day / m2 annual ave. 9.5
Solar water heater collector area required m2_aperture area 15.1
Solar water heater area / panel m2_aperture area / panel 1.86 Number of panels required rounded up 9
Typical collector dimensions width (m) x length (m) width =along header direction 1.0 x 2.0
Indicative water storage volume req'd litres 760
Supplementary Heat Input to DHW From supplementary source(s) MJ / day 161 Expected performance effy annual average 75% Energy input to supplementary source(s) MJ / day 215
Annual expected solar energy contribution GJ/y 52.3 Natural gas use reduction from solar GJ/y 69.7
Greenhouse gas emissions factor, NG [1] kg_CO2-e/GJ 55.3
Greenhouse gas emissions reduction tonnes_CO2-e/yr 3.85
Scope 1 and 3
[1] National Greenhouse Accounts (NGA) Factors, August 2016, tables 2 and 38 [2] National Greenhouse Accounts (NGA) Factors, August 2016, table 41 "Latest", "Victoria"
File: 1115A 21 ©Ark Resources
7 Ll i
:now mn — ==•• - so
Itift. IFNI ■ II ■
111§
In•lii• 1•••■ 31111
111.
=7-
I
= — COliel•• = P11104••
G•111U•• = ••••••
••••••
7 E•••••
••■ - ..vs Illes••• *Al MI MIMEO
*II III IMO 101 III ■■M■
EE ■E■ 'MEW
EE Mum ■■M MEM= e•ais• volume mama. ■MME■ ME• MEM
ipmm mg; has 1111 11.1.11■
•E■ MEMO MIME
EE EntIOHM ES 0012MM M MOWN
ME■■EM MIME =
tt MEMMIIM ■••1111■
tl
EN
MEE
Ell MEM. MOMS •••••1131111•1
•••••1I•1
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Sustainable Design Assessment 16 June 2017
INDICATIVE SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM LAYOUT
aKi
File: 1115A
22 ©Ark Resources
Sustainable Design Assessment 16 June 2017 336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Appendix 4: Rainwater Harvesting 336 Burnley Street, Richmond
box 1
Inputs
Property
Version
Jan Feb Mar Apr May
Rain Run off 15 21 13 21 20
(ShortfallySurplus before irrigation
1
Irrigation (t)
Unsatisfied Dement (1)
'997
(ShortfallYSurplus before Irrigation
(3) 16 8 6 4 1 8 9
Irrigation (4) (7) (7) (8) (9) (9) (9) (8) Unsatisfied Dement (13) 8 1 (2) (5) (8) (1) 1
64
(1)2)
(38)
Irrigation Schedule
1/m2 . . . .
PPL 2f• Flush/Person/Day : '5
Litres/Flush
Total Daily usage (litres) '..:40:5;
Recall update pivots,
table and graphs
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Roof area (rn2)
Collection Evaporation
Tank Capacity (litres)
Irrigation Area (rn2)
Toff if Total Rain (nzn)
in the last
• days
box 2
System components (kls per year)
Rein Run off
Overfbw
Toilet
edged° n Unsafe derd
box 3
System components (kls per year) based on 12 years of actual historical daily rainfall 12 years of Averages
(k I) Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec' Total
17 16 21 18 23 23 24 231
Overflow --1------(2.)----(1----ia---(.9.)...---...e.--....-151-----(91-..--1.91--M----121--._._..(a..-.....-5991. Rain Water saved 12 9 10 14 12 11 11 12 10 11 11 11 132
Toilet (11) (1)) (11) (10) (11) 12) (11) (ii) (13) (11) (0) (11) (46)
(1) (1) 3 1 1 0 1 (0) (0) 1 (0) 5
(1) (2) (0) (0) (0) (0) (01 (0) (0) (1) (1) (8)
(2) (3) 3 1 0 0 1 (1) (1) 0 (1) (3)
Actual Years (k I)
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Total
Rain Run off 161 262 274 282 271 178 221 279 265 197 190 188
2,768
Overflow (38) (120) (49) (150) 1149 (50) (87) (143) (139) (72) (53) (53)
(145)
Rain Water saved 123 142 135 132 130 127 134 136 126 125 137 135
1,582
Toilet ' (126)r (126)r (126)_r (46 ' OM F. 126)' (26) r (126)r (46) r (126)r (126)r (27)
(1513)
(0) (2) 10 8
(9) (8) ( /3) (4)
(9 ) (9) 0 (2)
Reliability of supply (daily demand met)- Tank size what ifs
box 4
Tank Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
it 35% 47% 33% 47% 52% 53% 59% 58% 58%
2k 47% 59% 45% 65% 66% 71% 77% 75% 73%
5k 68% 81% 61% 84% 91% 90% 93% 95% 89%
13k 81% 91% 79% 88% 99% 98% 130% 40% 99%
20k 94% 96% 92% 95% 130% 99% 130% 1)0% 40%
50k 95% 99% 94% 1)0% 130% 100% 130% 130% 130%
1)0k 95% 99% 94% 1)0% 130% 100% 130% 130% 1)0%
200k 95% 99% 94% 1)0% 130% 1)0% 1)0% 1)0% 1)0%
Oct Nov Dec Overall
61% 48% 42% 49%
76% 67% 58% 65%
88% 95% 81% 85%
96% 99% 93% 94% 40% 40% 40% 98%
'00% 130% 40% 99%
100% 130% 100% 99%
1)0% 110% 130% 99%
File: 1115A ©Ark Resources 23
336 Burnley Street, Richmond Sustainable Design Assessment 16 June 2017
Graph 2 - Reliability of supply from tank (average across 12 years)
• Toilet & Inigation ar Toilet only
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
100%
98%
96%
94%
92%
90%
88%
86%
84%
82%
No
. day
s to
tal
de
ma
nd m
et
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Overall
Graph 3 -Tank water used (per year) V Tank size Kls per year
180
• Unsalisfied demand •Tenk water used
140
1
1
1 1 1 120
I I I
130
20
1 2 5 10 15 20 25 50 75 100 150 200
Tank size (k1)
Graph 4 - Tank water used v unsatisfied demand by month (kis per month)
14
12
10 rn
a,) • 8
_c • 6 0 E
4
2
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
• Unsetrafied Demand ■Tank water
File: 1115A 24 ©Ark Resources
Pre-storage filter and insect / vermin control
[— Post-storage / filter
Inspection Inspection opening* Optional V
\— ,_ opening *
pump position
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Sustainable Design Assessment 16 June 2017
Appendix 5: WSUD Maintenance Manual Rainwater Harvesting System Maintenance Program
Once installed, a systematic maintenance program will be implemented to ensure the rainwater harvesting system operates as designed and water quality is maintained.
The scope of the maintenance program will include inspection and rectification of issues associated with:
• Roof gutters and downpipes
• First flush screens and filtration devices
• Pumps
• Distribution pipework and reticulation systems
• Overflow systems
Inspections of the system and any maintenance works required will be undertaken on a quarterly basis.
The rainwater harvesting system will be installed in accordance with the guidelines set out in the Rainwater Design & Installation Handbook published by the National Water Commission'. A schematic diagram of the rainwater tank installation is provided below.
FSL Finished surface level
(1) Pump
Reflux valve
Rainwater pipework
Stormwater drainage pipework
* Inspection opening must be lockable. If watertight, it can be flush with FSL. If not watertight, min. 150 mm above FSL.
V 240 V required
Overflow siphon
FSL
Secondary pre-storage
filter Floating pump intake
/—Pipe 0 min. to AS 3500
Stormwater overflow to approved stormwater discharge point with back flow prevention device (reflux valve)
Excavation area
Backfill Calmed
inlet Aerobic zone
---- Anaerobic zone
Submersible pump V
\— Bedding for tank, refer to tank manufacturer
3 Rainwater Design & Installation Handbook, National Water Commission, 2008
File: 1115A 25 ©Ark Resources
336 Burnley Street, Richmond Sustainable Design Assessment 16 June 2017
Appendix 6: Site Management Plan During construction phase, the key pollutants at risk of entering the stormwater system include:
• Sediments (soil, sand, gravel and concrete washings); and
• Litter, debris etc.
These pollutants are as a result of several factors such as dirt from construction vehicles, stockpiles close to surface runoff flow paths, surface runoff from disturbed areas during earthmoving and construction works. It is therefore important to have measure that either prevent or minimise the pollutant loads entering stormwater system during construction.
In order to mitigate the impacts of the above pollutants on the stormwater system, the following stormwater management strategies will be implemented during the construction phase:
• Installation of onsite erosion and sediment control measures. All installed control measures shall be regularly inspected & maintained to ensure their effectiveness. Such measures may include (but not limited to):
o Silt fences
o sediment traps
o hay bales
o geotextile fabrics
• Where possible, litter bins with a lid will be used in order to prevent litter from getting blown away and potentially entering stormwater drains.
Additionally, the following work practices shall be adopted in order to reduce stormwater pollution:
• Site induction by the head contractor/ builder to make personnel aware of stormwater management measures in place
• Employ suitable measures to reduce mud being carried off-site into the roadways such as installing a rumble grid/ gravel/ crushed-rock driveway (or equivalent measure) to provide clean access for delivery vehicles, removing mud from vehicle tyres with a shovel etc.
• Safe handling and storage of chemicals, paints, oils and other elements that could wash off site to prevent them from entering stormwater drains.
• Where practicable, stockpiles will be covered, located within the site's fence and away from the lowest point of the site where surface runoff will drain to. This initiative will minimise erosion.
Accordingly, the measures presented above are considered appropriate for the proposed development at this stage of the project. The measures will reduce the pollutants entering stormwater system from the site during construction works thereby protecting waterways.
Furthermore, the initiatives are consistent with the Application Requirements set out in clause 22.16 of the City of Yarra Planning Scheme.
File: 1115A 26 ©Ark Resources
336 Burnley Street, Richmond
Sustainable Design Assessment 16 June 2017
Appendix 7: BESS Results
This BESS report outlines the sustainable design commitments of the proposed development at 336 Burnley St Richmond VIC 3121. The BESS report and accompanying documents and evidence are submitted in response to the requirement for a Sustainable Design Assessment or Sustainability Management Plan at Yarra City Council.
Note that where a Sustainability Management Plan is required, the BESS report must be accompanied by a report that further demonstrates the development's potential to achieve the relevant environmental performance outcomes and documents the means by which the performance outcomes can be achieved.
336 Bumley St, Richmond 3121 Richmond Project number
Site area: 770 m2 • Building Floor Area: 1092 m2 • Date of Assessment: 25 May 2017 Version: V3, 1 5.0-B146 -Applicant: [email protected],au
8143 Draft
http://bess.net .au/projects/8143
Your BESS score is
+50%
% of Total Category Score Pass
2 % Managernentb0
6 % Water ✓
14 % Energy
13 % Storrnwater ✓
111111111111611=IM
12% 1E0
0 % Transport G
0 % Waste 0
Urban 0%
Ecology
1 % Innovation 20
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% .313% '..Y:)% 100%
50% i 70% i Best Practice Excellence
The full BESS Report is appended in the following pages.
File: 1115A 27 ©Ark Resources
5/25/2017 BESS - 336 Burnley St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia
BESS Report vart' ca bess M A &V sbe Uneer AILJn:e , FavaLLublellial nrierrownt
This BESS report outlines the sustainable design commitments of the proposed development at 336 Burnley St
Richmond VIC 3121. The BESS report and accompanying documents and evidence are submitted in response to the
requirement for a Sustainable Design Assessment or Sustainability Management Plan at Yarra City Council.
Note that where a Sustainability Management Plan is required, the BESS report must be accompanied by a report
that further demonstrates the development's potential to achieve the relevant environmental performance outcomes
and documents the means by which the performance outcomes can be achieved.
336 Burnley St, Richmond 3121 Richmond Project number
Site area: 770 m2 • Building Floor Area: 1092 m2 -
Date of Assessment: 25 May 2017 • Version: V3, 1.5.0-B146 •
Applicant: [email protected]
Your BESS score is
+50% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
50% + 70% +
Best Practice Excellence
8143 Draft
http://bess.net.au/projects/8143
% of Total Category Score Pass
2 % Management50 %
6 % Water 71 % ✓
14 % Energy 52 % ✓
13 %
12%
Stormwater
IEQ
100 ✓
75% ✓
0 % Transport 0 % 100%
0% Waste 0%
0% Urban
0% Ecology
1 % Innovation 20 %
20%
10% 1 0%
■ 1
5/25/2017 BESS - 336 Burnley St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia
Building Composition Dwellings Type
Townhouse
Townhouse
Townhouse
NameQuantityArea
APT 170 2
A m2
APT 4 m
1482
APT 2
80 m2
Townhouse
How did this Development Perform in each Environmental Category?
Maximum Available • Your Building
40
30%
Management Water Energy Stormwater IEQ Transport Waste Urban Ecology Innovation
Sustainable design commitments by category
5/25/2017 BESS - 336 Burnley St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia
The sustainable design commitments for this project are listed below. These are to be incorporated into the design
documentation and subsequently implemented.
Management
50% - contributing 2% to overall score
Credit Disabled Scoped out Score
Management 2.2 Thermal Performance Modelling - Multi-Dwelling Residential 100 %
Management 4.1 Building Users Guide 100 %
Management 2.2 Thermal Performance Modelling - Multi-Dwelling Residential 100%
Score Contribution This credit contributes 33% towards this section's score.
Aim To encourage and recognise developments that have used modelling to
inform passive design at the early design stage
Questions
Have preliminary NatHERS ratings been undertaken for all thermally unique dwellings?
Yes
Management 4.1 Building Users Guide 100%
Score Contribution This credit contributes 16% towards this section's score.
Aim To encourage and recognise initiatives that will help building users to use the
building efficiently
Questions
Will a building users guide be produced and issued to occupants?
Yes
Water
71 % - contributing 6% to overall score
Credit Disabled Scoped out Score
Water 1.1 Potable Water Use Reduction (Interior Uses) 50 %
Water 2.1 Rainwater Collection & Reuse (Additional Uses) 100 %
Water 3.1 Water Efficient Landscaping 100 %
Water Approachs
5/25/2017 BESS - 336 Burnley St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia
What approach do you want to use Water?
Project Water Profile Questions
Do you have a reticulated third pipe or an on-site water recycling system?
Are you installing a swimming pool?
Are you installing a rainwater tank?
Water fixtures, fittings and connections
Showerhead
Bath
Kitchen Taps
Use the built in calculation tools
No
Yes
Yes
APT A APT B APT C
3 Star WELS (> 6.03 Star WELS (> 6.03 Star WELS (> 6.0
but <= 7.5) but <= 7.5) but <= 7.5)
Scope out
Scope out
Scope out
> 5 Star WELS
> 5 Star WELS
> 5 Star WELS rating rating
rating
> 5 Star WELS rating
> 4 Star WELS rating
> 4 Star WELS rating
Scope out
Scope out
Yes
No
No
> 5 Star WELS rating
> 4 Star WELS rating
> 4 Star WELS rating
Scope out
Scope out
Yes
No
No
> 5 Star WELS rating
> 4 Star WELS rating
> 4 Star WELS rating
Scope out
Scope out
Yes
No
No
Bathroom Taps
Dishwashers
WC
Urinals
Washing Machine Water Efficiency
Connected to which Tank
Rainwater connected to: Toilets
Rainwater connected to: Laundry (washing machine)
Rainwater connected to: Hot Water System
Rainwater Tanks
What is the total roof area connected to the rainwater tank? Square Metres
Tank Size utres
Irrigation area connected to tank Square Metres
Is connected irrigation area a water efficient garden?
Other external water demand connected to tank? Litres/Day
RVVT 1
472.0
16000.0
9.0
Yes
Water 1.1 Potable Water Use Reduction (Interior Uses)
50%
Score Contribution This credit contributes 57% towards this section's score.
5/25/2017 BESS - 336 Burnley St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia
Water 1.1 Potable water use reduction (interior uses) What is the reduction in total water use due to efficient fixtures, appliances, and rainwater use? To
Aim achieve points in this credit there must be >25% potable water reduction. You are using the built in calculation tools. This credit is calculated from information you have entered above.
Criteria Percentage reduction in potable water use
Questions
Percentage Achieved ? Percentage %
Calculations
Annual Water Consumption (kL) (Reference)
1107
Annual Water Consumption (kL) (Proposed)
847
% Reduction in Potable Water Consumption Percentage %
35 %
Water 2.1 Rainwater Collection & Reuse (Additional Uses) 100%
Score Contribution
Aim
Criteria
Questions
This credit contributes 28% towards this section's score.
What is the additional reduction in potable (mains) water use due to rainwater harvesting? Additional water uses for rainwater include non-potable demands such as irrigation, pools, commercial process uses and taps for washdown. Note: tank water will only be available for additional uses if it not required for internal uses. If the property uses an alternative water source, the alternative water source is deemed to meet 90% of additional non-potable water use requirements. You are using the built in calculation tools. This credit is calculated from information you have entered above in the rainwater tanks section.
What is the additional reduction in potable (mains) water use due to using rainwater or an alternative water source?
Percentage Achieved ? Percentage %
Calculations
Rainwater collection & reuse (additional uses) Percentage %
5/25/2017 BESS - 336 Burnley St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia
100%
Water 3.1 Water Efficient Landscaping 100%
Score Contribution This credit contributes 14% towards this section's score.
Are water efficiency principles used for landscaped areas? This includes low
water use plant selection (e.g. xeriscaping) and specifying water efficient
Aim
irrigation (e.g. drip irrigation with timers and rain sensors). Note: food
producing landscape areas and irrigation areas connected to rainwater or
an alternative water source are excluded from this section.
Questions
Will water efficient landscaping be installed?
Yes
Energy
52% - contributing 14% to overall score
Credit Disabled Scoped out Score
Energy 2.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 100 %
Energy 2.3 Electricity Consumption 100 %
Energy 2.4 Gas Consumption 100 %
Energy 2.5 Wood Consumption N/A
Energy 3.2 Hot Water 100 %
Energy 3.3 External Lighting 100 %
Energy 3.5 Internal Lighting - Residential Single Dwelling 100 %
Energy 4.2 Renewable Energy Systems - Solar 100 %
Dwellings Energy Approachs
What approach do you want to use for Energy? Use the built in calculation tools
Project Energy Profile Questions
Are you installing a solar photovoltaic (PV) system? Yes
Are you installing any other renewable energy system(s)? No
Gas Supply Natural Gas
Dwelling Energy Profiles
APT A
APT B APT C
5/2512017 BESS - 336 Burnley St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia
Below the floor is Ground or Carpark Ground or Carpark Ground or Carpark
Above the ceiling is Outside Outside Outside
Exposed sides 2 2 2
NatHERS Annual Energy Loads - Heat MJ/sqm 117.0 61.2 98.5
NatHERS Annual Energy Loads - Cool MJ/sqm 41.7 20.6 25.9
NatHERS star rating 4.8 7.0 5.7
Solar Photovoltaic systems
D Reverse cycle D Reverse cycle D Reverse cycle space space space
4 Star
4 Star 4 Star
Refrigerative space Refrigerative space Refrigerative space
4 Stars
4 Stars 4 Stars
I Gas I Gas I Gas Instantaneous 5 Instantaneous 5 Instantaneous 5 star star star
A No drying A No drying A No drying facilities facilities facilities
A No clothes drier A No clothes drier A No clothes drier
PV
Type of Heating System
Heating System Efficiency
Type of Cooling System
Cooling System Efficiency
Type of Hot Water System
% Contribution from solar hot water system
Clothes Line
Clothes Drier
System Size (lesser of inverter and panel capacity) kW 2.6
peak
Orientation (which way is the system facing)? North
Inclination (angle from horizontal) Angle (degrees) 10.0
Energy 2.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 100%
Score Contribution This credit contributes 10% towards this section's score.
Aim Reduce the building's greenhouse gas emissions
Criteria Are greenhouse gas emissions >10% below the benchmark
Questions
Criteria Achieved ?
Calculations
Reference Building with Reference Services (BCA only) kg CO2
60674.2
5/25/2017 BESS - 336 Burnley St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia
Proposed Building with Proposed Services (Actual Building) kg CO2
20668.9
% Reduction in GHG Emissions Percentage %
65%
Energy 2.3 Electricity Consumption 100%
Score Contribution This credit contributes 10% towards this section's score.
Aim Reduce consumption of electricity
Criteria Is the annual electricity consumption >10% below the benchmark
Questions
Criteria Achieved ?
Calculations
Reference kWh
46193.3
Proposed kWh
14088.6
Improvement Percentage %
69 %
Energy 2.4 Gas Consumption 100%
Score Contribution This credit contributes 10% towards this section's score.
Aim Reduce consumption of electricity
Criteria Is the annual gas consumption >10% below the benchmark?
Questions
Criteria Achieved ?
Calculations
Reference m
5/25/2017 BESS - 336 Burnley St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia
111128.2
Proposed MJ
76044.9
Improvement Percentage %
31 %
Energy 2.5 Wood Consumption N/A
This credit was scoped out: No wood heating system present
Aim Reduce consumption of wood
Criteria Is the annual wood consumption >10% below the benchmark?
Energy 3.2 Hot Water 00%
Score Contribution This credit contributes 5% towards this section's score.
Criteria
Questions
Criteria Achieved ?
Does the hot water system use >10% less energy (gas and electricity) than the reference case?
Calculations
Reference MJ
30868.9
Proposed MJ
21177.5
Improvement Percentage %
31 %
Energy 3.3 External Lighting 100%
Score Contribution This credit contributes 5% towards this section's score.
Questions
5/25/2017 BESS - 336 Burnley St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia
Is the external lighting controlled by a motion detector?
Yes
Energy 3.5 Internal Lighting - Residential Single Dwelling 100%
Score Contribution This credit contributes 5% towards this section's score.
Aim Reduce energy consumption associated with internal lighting
Questions
Does the development achieve a maximum illumination power density of 4W/sqm or less?
Yes
Energy 4.2 Renewable Energy Systems - Solar 100%
Score Contribution This credit contributes 5% towards this section's score.
Aim To encourage the installation of on-site renewable energy generation
Criteria
Questions
Criteria Achieved ?
Calculations
Does the solar power system provide 5% of the developments estimated
energy consumption?
Solar Power - Energy Generation per year kWh
3150.8
% of Building's Energy Percentage %
8%
Stormwater
100% - contributing 13% to overall score
Credit Disabled Scoped out Score
Stormwater 1.1 Stormwater Treatment 100 %
Which stormwater modelling are you using? Melbourne Water STORM tool
5/25/2017 BESS - 336 Burnley St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia
Stormwater 1.1 Stormwater Treatment 100%
Score Contribution
Aim
Criteria
This credit contributes 100% towards this section's score.
To achieve best practice stormwater quality objectives through reduction of pollutant load (suspended solids, nitrogen and phosphorus)
Has best practice stormwater management been demonstrated?
Questions
STORM score achieved
105
Flow (MUyear) % Reduction
Total Suspended Solids (kg/year) % Reduction
Total Phosphorus (kg/year) % Reduction
Total Nitrogen (kg/year) % Reduction
Calculations
Min STORM Score
100
IEQ
75% - contributing 12% to overall score
Credit Disabled Scoped out Score
IEQ 3.1 Thermal comfort - Double Glazing 100 %
IEQ 3.3 Thermal Comfort - Orientation 100 %
IEQ 3.1 Thermal comfort - Double Glazing 100%
Score Contribution This credit contributes 50% towards this section's score.
Aim To provide comfortable indoor spaces and reduce energy needed for
heating and cooling
5/25/2017 BESS - 336 Burnley St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia
Questions
Is double glazing (or better) used to all living areas and bedrooms?
Yes
1E0 3.3 Thermal Comfort - Orientation 100%
Score Contribution This credit contributes 25% towards this section's score.
Aim To provide comfortable indoor spaces and reduce energy needed for
heating and cooling
Questions
Are at least 50% of living areas orientated to the north?
Yes
Transport
Waste
Urban Ecology
Innovation
Credit
0% - contributing 0% to overall score
0% - contributing 0% to overall score
0% - contributing 0% to overall score
20% - contributing 1% to overall score
Disabled Scoped out Score
Innovation 1.1 Innovation 20 %
Innovations
Innovation #1 Innovation #2
5/25/2017 BESS - 336 Burnley St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia
• All feature timber specified De-materialisation by will be recycled or from
installing high efficiency solar accredited sustainably panels (>3001N) and
Description
harvested plantation sources procurement from best- (FSC or AFS). • All specified practice manufaturer with an interior paints will be low above average Solar VOC type
Scorecard ranking.
Points Targeted 1 1
Innovation 1.1 Innovation 20%
Score Contribution This credit contributes 100% towards this section's score.
Criteria
Questions
Criteria Achieved ?
What percentage of the Innovation points have been claimed (10 points
maximum)?
Items to be marked on floorplans 316 floorplans & elevation notes complete.
Energy 4.2: Floor plans showing location of photovoltaic panels as described.
Floorplans & elevations - Refer to ARK Resources SMP - Appendix 3
Water 2.1: Location of rainwater tanks as described
Floorplans & elevations - Refer Basement Floor Plans
Water 3.1: Water efficient garden annotated
Stormwater 1.1: Location of any stormwater management systems used in
STORM or MUSIC modelling (e.g. Rainwater tanks, raingarden, buffer strips)
Floorplans & elevations - Refer to basement floor plans
To be printed
To be printed
Incomplete
To be printed
IEQ 3.1: Glazing specification to be annotated Incomplete
IEQ 3.3: North-facing living areas Incomplete
Documents and evidence
5/25/2017 BESS- 336 Burnley St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia
3 / 6 supporting evidence documentation complete.
Management 2.2: Preliminary NatHERS assessments Incomplete
Energy 3.5: Provide a written description of the average lighting power density to To be printed
be installed in the development and specify the lighting type(s) to be used.
Ark Resources SMP - pg. 5
Energy 4.2: Specifications of the solar photovoltaic system(s).
Ark Resources SMP - Refer to Ark Resources SMP - Appendix 3
Stormwater 1.1: STORM report or MUSIC model
Ark Resources SMP - appendix 1
IEQ 3.1: Reference to floor plans or energy modelling showing the glazing
specification (U-value and Solar Heat Gain Coefficient, SHGC)
To be printed
To be printed
Incomplete
IEQ 3.3: Reference to the floor plans showing living areas orientated to the north. Incomplete
The Built Environment Sustainability Scorecard (BESS) has been provided for the purpose of information and
communication. While we make every effort to ensure that material is accurate and up to date (except where denoted
as 'archival'), this material does in no way constitute the provision of professional or specific advice. You should seek
appropriate, independent, professional advice before acting on any of the areas covered by BESS.
The Municipal Association of Victoria (MA\/) and CASBE (Council Alliance for a Sustainable Built Environment) member
councils do not guarantee, and accept no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to, the accuracy,
reliability, currency or completeness of BESS, any material contained on this website or any linked sites.