sushma sareen complaint

Upload: jason-felch

Post on 10-Feb-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/22/2019 Sushma Sareen Complaint

    1/6

    -

    -

    . . .

    . :

    C

    RIMUL

    L

    ( Ot

    iRT OF

    Th

    . : C

    nY

    OF NEW YORK

    ~ ; ? V N < 9 ~ ~ X 9 . { _ } ( -

    -

    'I HE Ij J P

    =

    r ; < :

    ou

    NEW y ORK

    .

    _.

    < , /

    j_ ' ' _1 1.< - ' --

    J.

    T }. , J_ , L .

    ~ a g a i m ; t -

    Sushma Sareen (F 60),

    Defendant.

    FELONY

    ADA Matthew Boguanos

    (212) 335-9323

    ?

    ~ ~ ~ / ~

    Special Agent Brent Easter, Shield 3014

    of

    the Department ofl Homeland

    Security, Homeland Security Investigations, states as follows:

    The defendant is charged with:

    PL 165.54

    Criminal Possession of Stolen

    First Degree

    (defendant 1: 4 counts)

    On or

    about November 1, 2011 at about 12:00 P.M., at 1 Hogan tee in the

    County and State

    of

    New York, the defendant knowingly possessed stolen pro erty with a

    value in excess of one million dollars with intent to benefit a person other than owner of

    the property and to impede recovery by an owner thereof.

    The jat al basis

    for

    this

    charge

    is as follows:

    The defendant knowingly possessed stolen property with a value in excess ofJone million

    dollars with intent to benefit a person other

    than

    an owner

    of

    the property

    a n ~

    to impede

    recovery by an owner thereof.

    The offenses were committed under the following circumstances:

    I - I

    Deponent states that since approximately 2007, deponent has been signed to a

    squad responsible for investigating, among other things, money laundering, s uggling and

    importation

    of

    contraband, cultural property crimes, art f r a u d and crimes volving the

    interstate

    sale

    and transportati9n

    of

    stolen art. As a Special Agent, deponen has led

    or

    joined teams

    of

    agents andffficers in the execution

    of

    search and arrest warrant seeking the

    arrest

    of

    individuals and the recovery

    of

    property and evidence associated with illegal

    importations and exportations, and with the interstate and foreign transportatio and

    sale of

    stolen goods.

    D e p o n ~ n t

    has also seized evidence and property during the xecution of

    judicially-authorized warrants.

    Deponent states the following, in part, on personal

    k n o w l e d g ~

    based on

    participation in this investigation and experience as a Special Agent with the Dqpartment

    of

    2D 3NYD77D96

  • 7/22/2019 Sushma Sareen Complaint

    2/6

    -

    CRIMINAL COURT

    OF

    TEE

    .Ci:::y OF {..j fi.\1V YORK

    .,._

    :

    COUNTY OF NE\Y/ YORK

    ...

    ..

    _____ -

    ~

    T H'E

    PDOPLE

    OF THE

    .>T

    /- )

    . i: l h l f ~ . ) T i VORK

    . r_

    .

    . J . . . . . .. , .. . . ..._

    ::.

    :: ;

    .

    -against-

    FELONY

    Sushma Sareen (F 60),.

    ADA

    Matthew Bog

  • 7/22/2019 Sushma Sareen Complaint

    3/6

    CRIMINAL COURT OFTHE CITY OF NE

    '\I'JYORK

    COUNTY OF

    NEW

    YORK

    P:ge : o t 6

    -..

    .:::

    THE PEOPLE

    OF THE

    STATE OF

    ~ J i

    R I ~

    l

    .

    -against-

    Sushma Sareen (F 60),

    FELONY

    ADA Matthew Bogaanos

    Defendant.

    1

    (212) 335-9323

    conversations about illicit cultural propetty. Informant

    1

    met with an employtof rt

    of

    the Past ( informant #2''), known to the Office of the District Attorney, who o ered to sell

    a stolen 12th Century Chola bronze statue known

    as

    the Shiva of Nataraja e $3.5M

    Shiva ) for approximately $3.5 million.

    Deponent states that on or about

    27

    September 2011, informant

    ~ m t

    with

    Kapoor

    at

    the

    Art of

    the Past, at 1242 Madison Avenue, New York, New York. uring this

    meeting, informant #1 was equipped with an audio recording device. A cording to

    informant

    1

    and to deponent's review

    of

    that recording, Kapoor showed, an offered to

    sell to, informant 1 at that meeting the

    3.5M

    Shiva for approximately $3.5

    also showed off a 5 million Shiva of Natarja ( the 5M Shiva ). Both Shivas

    same room but in opposing wall cabinets. In substance and in part, Kapoor indi

    informant 1 that he had been holding both of the items for a few years, and fither stated

    that he expected the items to appreciate by 10 to

    15

    percent per year from their lcurrent fair

    market values

    of

    $3.5 and 5 million.

    In

    addition to informant

    1

    s observations, Deponent reviewed sever

    containing photographs

    of

    both Shivas; specifically, Art

    of

    the Past's March 2 0 ~ catalogue;

    a publication from Asia Week New York 2009, indicating that Kapoor was exhi iring a 12th

    Century Chola period item that appears to be the $3.5M Shiva; and a publicatio from Asia

    Week New York 2010, containing a picture

    of

    Kapoor with what also appe to be the

    3 .5M Shiva.

    I

    I

    Deponent also reviewed emails from the rt of the Past email ace unt. These

    emails were obtained pursuant to a search warrant issued by the Supreme Co

    of

    New

    York

    City,

    on March 16, 2013. Emails dated around April 23, 2011, \howed an ther gallery

    owner

    in

    New York inquiring abou,t and attempting to sell for commission th $5M Shiva

    possessed by Art

    of

    the Past.}\etween July and October

    of

    2011, yet another

    in

    vidual was

    in email negotiations with Kapoor to purchase the 5M Shiva along with two ther Chola- ,

    Period bronze statues: a $2.5 million statue known as the Uma Parameshvari, the $2.5M

    Uma ) and a 3.5 million statue known as the Uma-Parvat:i. ( the $3.5M Uma' . Deponent

    has learned from Kapoor's business records that were seized pursuant to a

    se

    ch warrant

    and confirmed by Informants

    1-2,

    that both Shivas and both Umas were Jist d

    in

    Art

    of

    the Past catalogues.

  • 7/22/2019 Sushma Sareen Complaint

    4/6

    CRIMINAL COURT OF

    THE

    CGY )F NEW YORK

    COUN1Y OF NEW YORK

    - ~ - - .

    THE PEOPLE Of THE STATE OF NEW

    YORK

    I

    I FELONY

    -against-

    Page 4 of 6

    T..... .:

    Sushma Sareen

    (F

    60),

    ADA Matthew Bogaanos

    Defendant.

    1

    (212)

    335-9323

    Deponent, along with other members

    of

    DHS-HSI, executed

    authorized search warrant on January 5, 2012, at two locations for which

    owner: l)'Art of the Past and

    2)

    units 535, 733, 734, and 736 of Sofia Storage, 16

    Street, New York, New York, 10024.

    judicially

    oor is the

    West 83rd

    Deponent states that according to Art of the Past's own website, u b ~ s h Kappor

    was the owner

    of Art

    of the Past; that according to U.S. Customs records d financial

    records that deponent has reviewed, Subhash Kapoor appears to be the owner o Art of the

    Past

    in

    that he is the signatory for the business; and that according to

    New

    York State

    corporate records, Subhash Kapoor was the principal of Art of the Past.

    According to Informant

    #2, and confirmed by informant

    #3,

    known t ~ t h Office

    of

    the District Attorney and who has been familiar with the business practices of Kapoor

    and

    Art of

    the Past for more than a decade, that defendant Sushma Sareen (Suba h Kapoor's

    sister) currently has the power

    of attorney for Art of the Past and is running e business

    with another individual named Mamta Sager (Subash Kapoor's daughter).

    Deponent states that during the execution of the January 5, 2012, se

    at Art of the Past, a CD with photographs of both Shivas and both Umas (an 10 others),

    the meta-data

    of

    which indicate that the photos were taken on February 26, 2008. Also

    seized pursuant to that warrant were a series of shipping documents for thos 14 statues

    (both Shivas and both

    Um as

    and

    10

    others) showing how each of the statues as illegally

    e x p o ~ e d

    from India to Hong Kong by the subterfuge of including the antiq statues

    in

    otherwise legal shipments of new Indian artistic handicrafts.

    Also recovered during this search were letters addressed

    to

    Aaron

    Fr

    eman from

    Subash Kapoor. The first l ~ t t r was dated November 3, 2011, and instructed Aar n Freeman

    to give back 4 items to Selina (.Mohamad] Bronze Dancers, which are in the 4 closets.

    In

    another letter to Freeman from Kapoor dated November

    6,

    2011, it reads

    4

    cers bronze

    in 4 closets= 2 pairs nataraj conserts

    [sic].

    The deponent has learned from I ottnant

    #2

    that these 4 bronzes are the two Shivas and two Umas that are the subject of thi complaint.

    Deponent is further informed that Aaron Freeman, Subash Kapoor, Sushma areen, and

    Selina Mohamed

    all

    knew

    that the items were stolen. Freeman had the items mo ed to Selina

  • 7/22/2019 Sushma Sareen Complaint

    5/6

    CRIMlNi

    \L COURT OF

    THE CITY

    OF NEW

    YORK

    COUNTY OF

    NEW

    YORK

    THE

    PEOPLE

    OF THE STATE

    OF

    NEW YORK

    -against-

    FELONY

    Sushma Sareen

    (F

    60),

    ADA Matthew

    Bog

  • 7/22/2019 Sushma Sareen Complaint

    6/6

    CRIMINJ\L COURT

    OF THE

    CITY OF

    NEW

    YORK

    COUNTY OF NEW YORK

    THE

    PEOPLE OF THE

    STATE

    OF

    NEW YORK

    -against-

    FELONY

    Sushma Sareen

    F

    60),

    ADA Matthew

    Bog