supreme ^ourt of ohio clerk of court 19e^ a statute uses the word shall it will be construed as...
TRANSCRIPT
yr.^ Yr ^ „w ^ 2
^^^^^^(̂,^-A^^-0
THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
STATE OF OHIO ex rel.,ROBERT A. SNEAD
Relator, Case No.
'v"s. A0
JUDGE RICHARD P. FERENC et al,,:
Respondent.
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION
ROBEP,.T A. SNEAD #425-370Maci WA°146-L1851 STATE ROUTE 56P.O. BOX 740LONDON, OHIO 43140
RELATOR IN PRO SE
JUDGE RICHARD P. FERENC270 MAIN STREETBATAVIA, OHIO 45103
VINCENT & D. FARIS (0001153)CLERMONT COUNTY PROSECUTOR76 S. RIVERSIDE DR. 3RD FLR.BATAVIA, OHIO 45103
(513)-732-7313
":, 3 u:s ^ ^^ ^^'
rS,:csi 3v'^i^,^4 r
/^,,..N, .^,^^.i's'
;'rs'/'y;%."`"^f;fi^"S'S4's% ins" i^i'+
s u {3P, f^.,WE G 0 u 3 3 L r/, ^ry'^^d.'' i £ y 0
19E^ ^^ ^^^^
CLERK OF COURTSUPREME ^OURT OF OHIO
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY:
1.) On February 25th, 2002, the Relator entered guilty pleas in this case
(Case No. 2001-CR-0010, Clermont County Court of Common Pleas) to 2 counts
of Kidnapping (one with sexual motivation), 1 count of Aggra^ated Burglary,
1 count of Felonious assault of a peace officer and 2 misdemeanor assaults.
All counts stemmed from a single continuous incident on the night of January
1st, 2001. The Relator was sentenced to Maximum and Consecutive terms for an
aggregate sentence of 21 years and was erroneously adjudicated as a sexual
predator. The Relator has attempted numerous times to have the illegal
sentence corrected, however none have been successful. On May 15th, 2013, the
Relator filed a motion to correct a void sentence stating that his sentence
is void do to A.) Non-compliance with tnandatory Statutes, thus rendering the
entire p-roceedi.ngs void and illegal (see numerous citati.ons contained herein),
B.) The Court's failure to comply with Crim. R. 11(C)(2)(a) accepting a plea
of guilty while there was a contemporaneous objection as to his actual
innocence to the felonious assault of a peace officer and, C.) That the sente-
nce is unlawful, illegal, unauthorized by law and in direct conflict with
established law, rendering it a nullity and void in its entirety.
II. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION:
2.) This is an action for writ of mandamus and prohibition to, A.) compel
Judge Richard P. Ferenc, or any presiding Judge of the Clermont County Court
of Common Pleas, to immediately issue a lawful sentence in the Relator's case,
as the Law required the day he was sentenced, B.) to prohibit the same from
acting outside of the parameters set forth in the included memorandum in
support. C.) To prohibit the Clermont County Prosecutor from acting in any
manner inconsistent with the established law as cited in the memorandum in
support.
-1-
3.) The Respondents have a specially joined duty upon them to act within the
Ohio Constitution and by the Ohio Revised Code §S 2931.03, 2929.11, 2929.12,
2929.13, 2929.14, 2929.19, 2929.41, 2941.25 ar-d; Wt not ]irdte3 to 2950.09.
4.) The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked on the basis of Article IV,
Section 3 of the Ohio Constitution, Additionally, this Court has held that a
sentence that is void may be attacked and thus corrected at any time; State ex
rel. Cruzado v. Zaleski, 111 Ohio St.3d 353, 856 N.E.2d 263 (2006)• State v.
Fischer_, 128 Ohio St.3d 92, 942 N.E.2d 332 (2010).
5.) The Relator has been deprived of adequate remedy at law.
6.) The facts demonstrating that the Relator is entitled to the relief requested
are, in brief, as follows (they are fully articulated in the included memorandum
in support):
A. )'I`he trial court failed to perforni its duty and accepted a gtiu.lty`plea, is.xler
contemporaneous objections of actual innocence.
B.) The trial court failed to comply with controlling precedents at the
time of sentencing. Precedents that govern the imposition of near maxinlum,
maximum and consecutive sentences.
C.) The trial court failed to comply with mandatory staiutes governing the
imposition of near maximum, maximum, consecutive and concurrent sentences, and
the imposition of a sexual predator adjudication. Including Ohio Revised Code
H 2929.11, 2929.12, 2929.13, 2929.14, '2929.19, 2929.41, 2941.25 and, but not
limited to § 2950.09. All of these sections of code use the word shall. When
a statute uses the word shall it will be construed as mandatory. Mhen a statute
is mandatory, non-compliance will render the proceedings to which it relates
illegal and void State ex rel. Jones v. Farrar, 246 Ohio St, 467, 471-72
^1946); In Re Dav-is, 84 Ohio St.3d 520, 522; Fraternal Order of Police V. Cit
of Cleveland, 749 N.E.2d 840 (2001).
-2-
D.) The Judge in this case, at the request of the Prosecutor, disregarded the
Iaw. As no Judge has the authority to disregard the law, a sentence that clearlv
does so is void, Colegrove V. Burns, 175 Ohio St. 437, 438 (1964). If an act is
unlawful it is not erroneous or voidable, but is wholly unauthorized and void,
State ex rel. Kudrick v. Meredith, 24 Ohio N.P. (N.S.) 120, 124 (1922).
E.) Uhen all of the Relator's sentencing and plea arguments, and the
controlling statutes, precedents and guidelines are lawfully and properly applied
the Relator's sentencing is not within the applicable statutory range. Thus it
does not contain the actual applicable statutorily mandated term and is void,
State v. Beasley, 14 Ohio St. 74 (1984).
F.) The ignored statutory mandates were lawfully put into place by the Ohio
Legislature to constrain the power of the judiciary. Specifically, to prevent
a sentence such as the one in the case at bar, Oregon v. Ice, 129 S.Ct. 711
(2009).
WF31,,REPORE: The Relator prays that:
A.) A pererriptory writ of mandamus issue immediately requiring the Respondents
perform the duty upon the, or;
B.) An alternative writ of mandamus issue iiumediately requiring that the
Respondents show cause why they should not be ordered and compelled and
C.) A writ of prohibition issue for both Respondents with the writ of
mandamus prohibiting the Respondents from:
1.) Issuance of a new sentence that is not compliant with the
controlling precedents, statutes and guidel.ines as they were at the
time of the Relator's sentencing and as they articulated in both the
motion to correct a void sentence, the sentencing memorandum, this
petition and its accompanying memorandtun.
2.) Any retaliations or vindictive actions in conjunction with the
Relator's subsequent proceedings. and;
-3-
D.) Any and all forms of relief deemed appropriate by this Court and;
E.) F'or all costs to be paid by the Respondents.
Respectfully Submitted,;
.^,
AFFIDAVIT OF VERIFICATION Relator In Pro Se
I, Robert A. Snead, do hereby verify that I have read the foregoingpetition and that the matters stated therein are true and correct to the bestof my knowledge and belief. ROBERT A. SNEAD
PSworn to and subscribed in my presence on this Va- day of November, 2013.
q^ a e ^eop7^ UBt, I l^
f^eicar^fe K. EOS}^oodNotary Pub16c-atat® of C3hio
mi ExpirOs
_4_
ROBEl2T A. SNEAD
THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
STATE OF OHIO ex re7L oROBERT A. SNEAD
Relator,
vs.
Case rio.
JUDGE RICHARD P. FERENC et al.,
Respondents.
RELATOR' S AFFIDAVIT INSUPPORT
I, 11a'be:^t A. Snead, d1o ^^er°,-I-,y solemnly swear that the following sta.tefitpr7usare true ac.d: accurate '^o the 'be-st of my knovier^ge and belief_=a
1.) These statements are made frQc':1 illj7 ©LTCI -PersC3nal l;iZlt3lJledgC'a
2.) 1 ain t?he ^ia:l.ator in the <ibove-^entitleci act:i(yri and I am fully c(xnpet-e:ntto malre these s tace!rre-nts a
3.) The Respondents liave in the past failed to follow mandatory ;tatu.tes,controlling precedents aiid. other vail(i Sup.rame Court of O;.:zi..o Drecedeir4s.
4.) The Respondents have iri ^--ie past fa:i.iecl conply wit:ri t1he C;-r^irtqznal Rulesof Procecl ure .
^ o) `'!1@ Respondents have demonstrated api"op''ils7:,ty for cC32ltiilued vio7 aionS
of 'L:tie Crinimal ?Lr7_es of Procedure, Valid 01.ixo si:rprezpe Court precedents andlllandatot-y Statutes.
a,):T have no other course of lega.3^_ renmedy,
7.) All matters stated in the accompanying petition are sworn to as thouglifully stated 'nerein.
Further Affiant saye t'n naugInta
R.(3BFR.T A . SNEAD
Su7orrt to and subscribed in my prese-nce this akg, day of Novei^bec, 2013.
-P-o^ew^ ^: •^ ^a
0 0°,¢ ^ a
9A/1 6aS
THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
STATE OF OHIO ex rel.ROBERT A. SNEAD,
Relator,
vs.Case No.
JUDGE RICHARD P. FERENC et al.,
Respondents.
REI.ATOR ° S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT
ROBERT A. SNEAD #425-370MaCI WA-146-L1851 STATE ROUTE 56P . G . BOX 740LGNDON, OHIO 43140
RELATOR IN PRO SE
JUDGE RICHARD P. FERENC270 MAIN STREETBATAVIA, OH 45103
^
VINCENT D. FARIS (0001153)CLERMONT COUNTY PROSECUTOR76 S.RT1t'ERSIDE DRIVE 3RD FLR.BATAVIA OH 45103(S1S)-7312-7313
RELATOR'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT
I. THE CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO FOLLOW THE LAW:
There can be no allowance for indifference, disobedience, disregard or
otherwise failure to follow mandatory statutes, standing Supreme Court of Ohio
precedents, C-riminal Rules of Procedure, or any inattention to the Law.
When a Statute uses the word "shall" it will be construed as mandatory.
Fh7hen a statute is mandatory, non-compliance will render the proceedings to
GJfiich it relates illegal and void, e.g. see, State ex rel. Jones v. Farrar,
146Oh.io St. 467, 471-72 (1946); In Re Davis, 84 Ohio St.3d 520, 522 (1999);
Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Cleveland, 749 N.E.2d 840 (2001). Such is
the case at hand. The following arguments demonstrate no less than eight (8)
mandatory statutes the Respondents failed to follow, one key Criminal Rule
that was blatantly ignored and a multitude of Supreme Court standing precedents
that were casually discarded in the imposition of near-maximum, maximum, and
consecutive sentences with the sexual predator adjudication.
An act which is contrary to law is therefore unlawful, illegal, unauthorized
by law and in direct conflict with established law. Because no Judge has the
authority to disregard the law, a sentence that clearly does so is void; see,
Colegrove v. Burns, 175 Ohio St. 437, 438 (1964).
Th.e Ohio Legislature "intentionally" put the constraints in these eight
statutes to control the length of sentence the Judiciary may impose, and it
is their rightful place to do so, see e.g. Oregon v. Ice, 129 S.Ct 711 (2009).
When these eight statutes, precedents and criminal rules are enforced, the
Relator's sentence may only be within a range of six (6) to eleven (11) years
not the twenty-one (21) imposed. Additionally, the sexual predator adjudication
could not be more than the.sexually oriented offender adjudication. The
Respondents were aware of these factors yet demonstrated a blatant disregard
-1-
for the laws governing felony sentencing.
There can be but one resolution to the case at bar. This illegal sentence,
judgment and conviction must be deemed void, and the Respondents must start
anew with the disposition of the Relator's case, and be prohibited from any
further disregard for the law. Since the Relator's sentence does not contain
the specific actual applicable statutorily mandated sentence it is void, see,
State v, Beasley 14 Ohio St..74 (1984).
II. THE INDIVIDUAL INFRACTIONS OF LAW:
A.) O.R.C. § 2929.11, states in relevant part "A sentence imposed for a
felony shall be --^^^ consistent with sentences imposed for similar crimes
coirgnitted by similar offenders." The record, see attached sentencing entry,
reflects that this was not performed.
B.) O.R.C. § 2929.12, states in relevant part : at 2929.12(B):
The sentencing court shall consider all of the following that apply regardingthe offender, the offense, or the victim, and any other relevant factors, asindicating that the offender's conduct is more serious than conduct normallyconstituting the offense".O.R.C. § 2929.12(B)(2), further states: "The victim suffered serious physical,psychological, or economic harm as a result of the offense".
At the time of the Relator's sentencing State v. Edmondson, 86 Ohio St.3d 324
(1999), was the controlling precedent for the imposition of near maximum and
maxzmum sentences. It mandated that these terms be reserved for the "worst of
the worst" offenders, and "based on recent changes in Ohio sentencing law
minimum sentences are favored for first time offenders". While the trial court
made a finding of "great or unusual harm" there is no evidence within the
record to substantiate the finding as is requl.red.by Q.R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(e).
C.) O.R.C. § 2929.14(B), states in releavant part, "the court shall imposethe shortest prison term authorized" and again at O.R.C. § 2929.14(C)"the court may impose the longest prison term only upon offenders whocommitted the worst forln of the offense". And again at O.R.C. § 2929.12(E)(4),"The court may require the offender to serve the prison terms conseaitivelyif the court finds and if the court also finds any of the following:
-2-
O.R.C. § 2929.14(E)(4)(b): further states in relevant part "the harm caused bytwo or more of the multiple offenses was so great or unusual that no singleprison term adequately reflects the seriousness of the offender's conduct".
l,lhile the trial court made this finding, it failed to support it with reasons,
facts or evidence as was required by O.R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(c) and State v.
Jones, 93 Ohio St.3d 391 (2001).
While this court did make a possibly intervening decsion in State v.
Porterfield, 106 Ohio St.3d 5, 2005-Ohio=3095, there are still two points
that bear consideration: 1.) In Porterfield supra, the court was relieved of
the onus of fitxiirgs only because Porterfield made them and the court reiterated
them on the record and, 2.) The statute is mandatory and thus the only Judicial
by-pass to it would be unconstitutionality of the statute and this was upheld
by the principals in Oregon v. Ice supra, as the Legislations right.to put
constraints upon the judiciary. The fact remains that the Relator made no
such. stipulations as in Porterfield supra.
D.)-O.R.C. § 2929.19, states in relevant part: at § 2929.19(A)(1) "the courtshall inform the offender -'-'-°^ of the finding of the court", and again at§ 2929.19(B)(2) "The court shall impose a sentence and shall make a findingthat gives its reasons for selecting the sentence> imposed in any af.thefollowing circumstances".
(c) "If it imposes consecutive sentences under § 2929.14 of the revised code,its reasons for imposing the consecutive sentences".
(e) :--its reasons for imposing the maximum prison term".
These reasons were never permitted to be merely uttered, they also must have
been supported by facts and evidence. No such reasons were ever brought forth
as none exist, as such the statute was mandatory and violated.
E.) O.R.C. § 2929.41(A), states in relevant part "Except as provided in%-' section 2929.14 a prison term shall be served concurrently with anyother prison term".
This section of the statute was very clear, if you cannot comply with section
2929..14, which the court did not and could not, the sentences must be run
concurrently, not consecutively.
-3-
F.) O.R.C. § 2941.25 (allied offenses), states in relevant part at 2941.25(A),
Y'Mhere the same conduct by the Defendant can be construed to constitute two ormore allied offenses of similar import, the indictment or information may containcounts for all such offenses, but the defendant may be convicted of only one".
While this section of the revised code certainly does not contain the word shall,
this court has ruled that the court has a"znandatory duty" to merge th.e counts,
see State v. Underwood, 2010-Ohio-1. Both statutes that use the word shall and
thisc3ecisi.on are mandatory. Failure to comply with the statute renders the
decision and proceedings illegal and void. The same must hold for any mandatory
duty.
G.) O.R.C. § 2929.19(B)(3)(e), was again mandatory in the notification of
post release control, with a defina.te mandatory term of five (5) years, the
consequences of violation of post release control, and the notification was
required to be in person, see State v. Jordan, 104 Ohio St.3d 21 (2004).
H.) O.R.C. § 2050.09, states in relevant part at § 2950.09(]3)(4) thecourt shall specif_y that the determination was made pursuant to division (B)of this section". And again at § 2950.09(E)(1) the Judge who is to imposesentence on the offender shall determi.ne, prior to sentencing, whether theoffender previously has been convicted of a,-' sexually oriented offense andis a habitual sex offender". And again at § 2950.09(E)(2) the Judge shallspecify in the offender's sentence that the offender is not a habitual sexoffender".
The Judge was under a mandatory duty to A.) state that the determination was
made pursuant to division (B) of this section, and to B.) make the habitual
sex offender determination. Neither were complied with.
I.) Criminal Rule 11(C)(2)(a) statesin relevant part, "(2) '-,-' shall not accepta plea of guilty without first addressing the defendant personally anddoing all of the following" at (a) "Determining that the defendant is makingthe plea voluntarily, with understanding of the maximum penalty involved".
The court failed to comply with this mandatory rule in two ways, A.) It
accepted the plea with a contemporaneous objection as to actual innocence of
the felonious assault of a peace officer and, B.) The court failed to state
the "actual applicable mandatory statutory sentence" when all, of the mandatory
-4-
statutory c:onstra-hits are given their due weight and precedence.
I I I. CONCLtTS ION :
There can be but one conclusion, the Relator`s sentence, judgment and
conviction must be deemed void, and the proceedings declared illegal as they
did not comport with mandatory statutes, criminal rules and precedents of the
Supreme Court of Ohio, State ex re1.. Jones, In Re Davis, & Fraternal Order of
Police supra.
This Court has held that a void sentence is subject to and may be corrected
at any time by the trial court see, State v. Fischer, 128 Ohio St.3d.92, 942
N.E.2d 332 (2010); State ex r_el. Cruzado v. Zaleski, 111 Ohio St.3d 353, 856
N.E.2d 263 (2006).
The Relator has a "vested right" to the lawful sentence as it was prescribed
by law the day he was sentenced see, Peerless Elec. v. Bowers, 164 Ohio St.
209, 210 (1955). The Relator requests this court grant all relief as sought in
the petition for manadmus and prohibition.
Respectfully Submitted,
_5_
ROBERT A. SNEAD
Relator In Pro Se
l!_ _^ D
COURT OF COMMON PLEASCLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO
20 13 APR 18 AM 10: 15STATE OF 9FilO CASE NO. 2D^1-CR-00'I ^
F-i)l^flfii-^. ri YfIi `t^3 ^ei3^;.:I^^f'LEi,K Or Ct;MMON I'LCA3 C:Os.ifsT
t,^ [.R,M0HPI4iftj'1?fp1H Judge Richard P. Ferenc
1ls.
ROBERT A. SNEAD, NUNC PRO TUNCJUDGMENT ENTRY
Defendant. . OF SENTENCE
On the 4t" day of March, 2002 defendant's sentencing hearing was held
pursuant to R.C. 2929.19. Defense attorney R. Scott Croswell and Assistant
Prosecuting Attorney Daniel J. Breyer and Maura Teague were present as was
defendant who was afforded all rights pursuant to Crim.R. 32. The Court has
considered the record, oral statements, any victim impact statement and
presentence report prepared, as well as the principles and purposes of
sentencing under R.C. 2929.11 and has balanced the seriousness and recidivism
factors under R.C. 2929.12.
The Court finds that defendant, pursuant to his pleas of guilty entered on
February 25, .2002, was thereby found guilty by the Court and thus convicted of:
Ct.#1: Aggravated Bur lg ary with a three year gun specification, in violation of
Section 2911.11(A)(1) of the OhioRevised Code, a felony of the first degree;
Ct:#4: Kidnapping with sexual motivation specification in violation of Section
2905.01(A)(2), a fefony of the first degree; Ct.#5: Kidnapping in violation of
Section 2945.01(A)(2), a felony of the first degree- Cts.#19 and #11: Assault in
violation of Section 2903.13, misdemeanors of the first degree and Ct #12:
Felonious Assault on a Police Officer in violation of Section 2903.11(A)(2), a
felony of the first degree.
Pursuant to Crim.R. 48(A), the State requested leave of court to dismiss
Ct.#2 - Aggravated Burglary, Ct.#3 - Aggravated Robbery, and Cts.#6, 7, 8 & 9
- Kidnapping - of the indictment. These charges are hereby dismissed and the
prosecution on these charges shall terminate accordingly.
-5-
THE COURT HEREBY FINDS that the Defendant is a sexual predator
subject to the reporting requirements of Section 2950 et sea. of the Ohio Revised
Code.
THE DEFENDANT IS HEREBY NOTIFIED that failure to register with the
appropriate local entity as a sexual predator is a separate criminal offense.
The Court finds pursuant to R.C. 2929.14(B) that the shortest prison term
possible will demean the seriousness of the offense AND will not adequately
protect the public and therefore imposes a greater term.
The Court finds that defendant has committed the worst form of the
offense AND THEREFORE imposes the maximum sentence for these offenses.
It is hereby ORDERED that defendant serve a term of ten (10) years as to
Ct.#1, plus three (3) years on the gun specification, ten (10) years as to Ct.#12,
to be served concurrent to Ct:#1, eight (8) years as to Ct.#4, and eight (8) vears-
as to Ct.#5, to be served concurrent to Ct.#4 but consecutive to Cts:#1 & 12, and
Cts.#1 Q& 11; six (6) months on each count, to be served concurrent, for a total
stated prison term of twenty one (21) years,
The sentences are ordered to be served consecutively to one another
being necessary to fulfili the purposes of R.C. 2929.11, and not disproportionate
to the seriousness of the offender's conduct or the danger the offender poses
and the Court FURTHER FINDS the harm caused was great or unusual.
Defendant has been given notice under R.C. 2929.19(B)(3) and of
appellate rights under R.C. 2953.08,
The Court has further notified the Defendant that post release control is
mandatory in this case up to a maximum of five years, as well as the
consequences for violating conditions of post release control imposed by the
Parole Board under Revised Code section 2967.28. The Defendant is ordered to
serve as part of this sentence any term of post release control imposed by the
Parole Board, and any prison term for violation of that post release control.
Defendant is ORDERED conveyed to the custody of the Ohio Department
of Rehabilitation and Corrections. Credit for jail time served is submitted under
-6-
separate entry. Defendant is ordered to pay court costs and any fees permitted
pursuant to R.C. 2929.18(A)(4).
Bond, if any shall be released.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that this Nunc Pro Tune Entry is being filed
pursuant to the holding in, State v. Lester, 130 Ohio Sf.3d 303, 2011-Ohio-5204,
958 N.E.2d 142, and this Court's personal review of the records in this case,
including, but not limited to the Defendant's written plea of guilty journalized on
February 25, 2002.
^ ,.
Richard P. Ferenc, Judge
TO THE CLERK:
Piease serve a copy of this Entry upon Judith Brant, Assistant Prosecuting
Attorney, 76 South Riverside Drive, Second Floor, Batavia, OH 45103, R. Scott
Croswell, 1208 Sycamore Street, Cincinnati, OH 45202, and Robert A. Snead,
#425-370, MaC( WA-146-L, P. O. Box 740, London, OH 43140, all by regular
U.S. Mail.
Richard P. Ferenc, Judge
-7-
THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
vs.
STATE OF OHIO ex rel.ROBERT A. SNEAD,
Relator,. Case No.
JUDGE RICHARD P. FERENC et al.,
Respondents.
RELATOR`S AFFIDAVIT OFPREVIOUS CIVIL FILINGS
I, Robert A. Snead, do hereby solemnly swear that the following statementis true and accurate to the best of iklyr 'inowlcdge an(7 belief:
1.) Ihav^ fi1ed: the following civil actions within the last 5yca.rsr
2s) (hi or abovi;. February 17th, 2011, I. filed a Federal Ha:teas Corpus p°t.:i.ti.orlagainst the t:7arden of MaCI. Case Na4 1:11-ovµ127, and its subsequenc appeal,Case No o^^^41? 7. Both were deniedd due to lack of Jbrisdi; tion,
3.) On or about August 18th, 2011, :f: filed suit a^ainsfiw the ODRC in the courtof claims for 7.r gc:ries Zreceivedp Case ?tio. 2011-"10410, and its su'uscqu4nwAppeal, Case iiov 13API-02,,,157. [<lhi1.e we proved 1.iabilaty, bcth courts felcwe had not sufficiently proved acon^pensable level of injury.
4.) On or about September 28th, 2012, 1: filed a Federal 42 tI, S4 i>§ 1983action agai.nst Gary c< Mo?Zr, Stuart Hudson, John DesMarais, Gary Croft, Robert,,olch, Mona Parks, Dr. Andrew Eddy, DC. TC7s'..r','.e3, iltlrti,es Layne czf'C,. Root, RallphVilson, Karen fi i ariforwh, Jai,drea Parrish, Officer D. Mc ronis;al and MarcS'canleyr for denial of med%.wal care and first Amwndrraent viola'eicns of :r_ecalia-t:'Lo21s for use of the gr1eva12;:('_ p"°.L3ti.G7s. P#snntly we are in active di`^^cCJv°ry.Case No. 2 : 12 -cv-739v
5.) On or about MaFf 25th, 2012, SfiJ.ed: a medical Malpractice cc>:mp' aint a.11Drr DaV! d Chc'̂ Y lG^s We7 l i'"1y k ^^ e ^''d a'"i (^^. ^ ^ 3 :.nty C'L'^ L ^CrR^1 LCsi^i^alC a,^ , ^^z'sa^G ,̂. ^''-dfJ ^^^tl!°,/^..J.^.t7.."t.^f.5`s ; `^o3.._..;.^34.i.,l.i.^J .E,K;,<.1.^ws:.:!,. '.,:;Z. ..3.1^3 ('^ ..,^^.!"', i_`, l.. .. t... :wli r^, ^_J1..^
.^....d:^, as, ^' .._ ^ ., .i.E %^
:e County court 3a'"':w"d ju ii<,?7 t1oi The ^. .̀.^C7u: e of Claims ta:?`"aE'. No.is 201 3000?,2 tMeis wa,., dismissed without pre j? dik,e due to my inability toGctTii3lyT with C1SP oR,.E0(D)(2),
_0
DEC 0 4 2013CIERK OF COURT
SUPREMECOURTOFONIO
6.) On or about April 10€.h, 2013, 1 filed ior writs of McaX)dazl?us and prohibitionin the Tuelfth Distrint Court of Appeals against Judge Richard P. FererAc 7.k;an attempt to r_ ecea.ve a proper fznal appeal.ai:ale order, Case t°^o. C^ 201J-Q4-t^31. gthe subser^enc appeal if before ehis court; case rEoa 2013-1084e Jud.^e Ferencelztered a nunc; pro turic entry correcting the deficiencies ,anci the 12th diw-m1 ssed the petition as thus being moot.
7.) During July of 2013, 1 filed a complaint with the Court of Claims ofCh3.o, Case tlo. 2013-AD-0250 against the CDRC for being given amedirationthat I was known to ne allergic to. This is still being investigated.
80 4:1aVe filed no other civil actions within tb
Further Affiant sayeth naught.
Sworn to and sut^sur +be^: in my presence this .. ^ day of November , 2013.
,,I,
NQBLTGtAOCNe K. Eastrwood
PuhiBOM cf oh#o
.2
R®BERT A. SNEAD
THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
STATE OF OHIO ex rel.ROBERT A. SNEAD,
Relator,
vs.
JUDGE RICHARD P. FERENC et al.,
Case No.
Relator's Affidavit ofPersonal Property
Respondents.
I, Rtiberi A. Snead, do hereby solemnly si,rear that ti1e fol1:^.uvaing stat^^ent4-s true and accurate to the best of my 'Kcao-wled.ge and belief:
1.) Ici.irrer?t-ly have less 4han $25.00 -in my Inmate Trust Account.
2.) T currently possess the .ioll.w:lng itexrzso- A,.) A13'$ zenith 'T"V' B.) anArv'c? MP3 Player, C.) A GE sUDe:r 3 radio, D:j a JP4 player, F.) aMasseyfan, and. F.) A S:ainte:,. 'Ey^e-vrrwter.
3.) 1 ha`re no oclicr assets 9accounts or possessions.
Further Affiant sayeth naugnt.
ROBERT A. SNEAD
Sworn to and sdoscrib^c1 in my presence fi?^^ s /) /) day oi 'Navenber520:1_3 m
e
BLICMelanie K. Etasiwood
z^ ^ F Notary Pablie-State of Ohio^ m y ^os^ ssioll x 6r^&
♦ d ,q
y^ ^^pg ti~ smunsav.^ r^ ^ ^ ^,Y
THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
STATE OF OHIO, ex rel.ROBERT A. SNEAD,
Relator,
vs.
JUDGE RICHARD F. FERENC et a.I. , :
Case No.
Respondent.
R.ELAIUR' S AFFIDAVIT OFINDIGFN9CY
I, s:obert A. Snead, do beraby solemnly swear the following st;atoinents aretrue and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief:
1.) Iam indigent, and as such Tart unable to pay the filing fees and costsassociated with the above-entitled case, I am indigent for Cie foliowir,,,reasons:
2.) 1 am currently incarcerated and as such I am without the financial meanswith which to pay nhe filing fees and costs associated with the abovc-entitledcase.
3.) I receive $18.00 per month from my Institutional assignment, and T^?ay$4.50 of this to child support.
4.) Thave less than the filing fee in my trust account at the :Cnstit^tion
F[7TiW; 1^FFTM,7 SAY.P'T?-I NAt) x'fffi :
ROBERT A. SNEAD
Sworn to and subscribed in my presence this ^ day of November, 2013.
/`^,^^^^^^V*_. PUSLIC
^
CLERK OF COURTSUPRCMF, CQ'^^ ^^ 0..^...,,.^.,r..^. ^_ ^l^^
h1e9onie K. EpstwoodNctary Rubl6c-S8ate of Ohio
MY 0 mi's ion Expirer,
-- ^^
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHA.BILITATIONAND COR-RECTION
SECTION I - TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER PRIOR TO THIS FORM BEING PRESENTEDTO TI-IE INMATE FOR COMPLETION OF SECTION TI - AFFZDAVIT OF INDIGENCY.
CASHIER AT THE MADISON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONCERTIFY TIMT THE FOLLOWING IS A TRUE AND ACCURATE REFLECTION OF THE STATUS OF THEACCOUNT MAINTAINED AT THIS INSTITUTION FOR THE BENEFIT OF:
Robert Snead r425-370
INMATE NAME AND NUMBER
ACCOUNT BALANCE AS OF t°"1 3 ^
TOTAL STATE PAY CREDITED FOR THE PRECEEDING SIX MONTHS:
AVERAGE MONTHLY STATE PAY FOR THE PRECEEDING SIX MONTHS
TOTAL FUNDS RECEIVED FROM ALL SOURCES, EXCLUDING STATE PAY,FOR THE PRECEEDING SIX MONTHS:
TURE OF CASHIER
NOV22 2013 ,̂bAFFIDAVIT OFINDIGENCY
MaCl CASMIER'S OFFICE
^ 103.00IS3^^
^ -7 o^^ 0
DA:TE
SECTION II - TO BE COMPLETED BY INMATE AFTER CASI-HER'S STATEMENT IS COMPLETED.
BEING FIRST DULY SWORN, SAYS THAT HE/SHE DOES NOT HAVESUFFICIENT FUNDS TO PAY THE FILING FEES AND OTHER COSTS OF PROSECUTING THIS ACTION JNTHE; COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR COUNTY, OHIO AND SUBMITS THECASHIERS STATEMENT (SECTION I) IN SUPPORT OF SAID ALLEGATION OF INDEGENCY.
I HEREBY REPRESENT THAT TIIE INFORMATION SET FORTH IN THE CASHIER'S STATEMENTCONCERNING MY FI?VA_NCIAL CONDITION IS TRUE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNONVLEDGEAlsTl1 riTf' ie-•r+
/
f ^ ^'2 ^ ^^ 2, c;'INMATENAME AND NUMBER-
TO ME IN MY PRESENCE THIS C^6 DAY OF ^ 20¢_^
tuleianie K. EastwoodtVatary PubQic-S@aIe of
lon E
NOTARY PUBLIC
11/22/2013 Madison Correctionallnstitution
Inmate Demand Statement
Inmate Name: SNEAD, ROBERT A Number: A425370
Lock Location: MaCI, W,A,;,146L
Date Range: 04/01/2013 Through 11/23/2013
Beginning Account Balances: Ending Account Balances:
Saving Debt Payable Saving Debt PayableFederal Filing FE $0.00 ($177.54) $0.00 Federal Filing Fee R $0.00 $0.00 $0.00Inmate's Person $6.93 $0.00 $0.00 Inmate's Personal Ai $24.36 $0.00 $0<00Begin Totals $6.93 ($177.54) $0.00 End Totals $24.36 $0.00 $0.00
Transaction Transaction Saving Debt PayabieDate / Inst. Amount Description Comment Balance Balance Balance04/01/2013 $5.00 Reservation to SFF- Odrc Pos Exemption $6.93 ($177.54) $0.00
FFF HoldMaCI
04/01/2013 $0.00 $10.00 Reservation to Pos Odrc Pos ExemptionExemption
MaCI
04/05/2013 $18.00 State Pay State Pay
MaCI
04/05/2013 ($3.60) SFF-FFF Hold #1 - Automated FFF-RBTransfer
MaCI
04/05/2013 $3.60 Federal Filing Fee Remaining #1 - Automated FFF-RBBalance Transfer
MaCI
04/05/2013 ($2.52) Postage Charges (USPS)
MaCI
04/08/2013 ($3.60) Payment to PRISONER April Payment 2013ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
MaCI
04/08/2013 ($4.50) Payment to CHILD Anril Payment 2013
MaCI
04/09/2013
MaCI
04/17/2013
MaCI
04/17/2013
MaCI
SUPPORT PAYMENTCENTRAL
($13.54) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 221424
$198.50 JPay MoneyOrders
($39.70) SFF-FFF Hold
Page: 1/9 A425370 SNEAD, ROBERTA
$6>93 ($177.54) $0.00
$24.93 ($177.54) $0.00
$21.33 ($177.54) $0.00
$21.33 ($173.94) $3.60
$18.81 ($173.94)
$18.81 ($173.94)
$14.31 ($173.94)
$3.60
$0.00
$0.00
$0.77 ($173.94) $0.00
25105542/SNEAD, LUCY $199.27 ($173.94) $0.00
#1 - Automated FFF-RB $159.57 ($173.94) $0.00Transfer
RECEIVED
NOV 2 2 2013 Q3)MaCi 11/22/2013
maCi CASH4ER`S OFF6CE
04/1712013
MaCi
04f23/2013
MaCI
04/24/2013
MaCI
04/24/2013
MaCi
04/24/2013
MaCI
04/26/2013
MaCI
04/29/2013
MaCI
04/29/2013
MaCI
04/30/2013
MaCI
05/01/2013
MaCi
05/01/2013
MaCI
05/01/2013
MaCI
05/03/2013
MaCi
05/03/2013
MaCI
05/03/2013
MaCI
05/06/2013
MaCI
05/06/2013
MaCI
05l06/2013
$39.70 Federal Filing Fee Remaining #1 - Automated FFF-RBBalance Transfer
($47.42) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 222815
($1.92) Postage Charges (USPS)
($0.92) Postage Charges (USPS)
($2.52) Postage Charges (USPS)
($0.30) Copy Charges
($1.32) Postage Charges (USPS)
($2.31) Postage Charges (USPS)
($33.81) Commissary Sale
$159.57 ($134.24) $39.70
$112.15 ($134.24) $39.70
$110.23 ($134.24) $39.70
$109.31 ($134.24) $39.70
$106.79 ($134.24) $39.70
6 month demand statement $106.49 ($134.24) $39.70
Ticket Number 223205
$5.00 Reservation to SFF- Odrc Pos ExemptionFFF Hold
($10.00) Inmate's Personal Account POS Exemption Transfer
$10.00 Pos Exemption
$18.00 State Pay
POS Exemption Transfer
State Pay
$105.17 ($134.24) $39.70
$102.86 ($134.24) $39.70
$69.05 ($134.24) $39.70
$69.05 ($134.24) $39.70
$59.05 ($134.24) $39.70
$69.05 ($134.24) $39.70
$87.05 ($134.24) $39.70
($3.60) SFF-FFF Hold #1 - Automated FFF-RB $83.45 ($134.24) $39.70Transfer
$3.60 Federal Filing Fee Remaining #1 - Automated FFF-RB $83.45 ($130.64) $43.30Balance Transfer
($43.30) Payment to PRISONER MAY 2013 PYMT $83.45 ($130.64)ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
($4.50) Payment to Ohio Child MAY 2013 PYMT $78.95 ($130.64)Support Payment Central
$4.50 Reversed Payment to Ohio Reversed Task No. $83.45 ($130.64)Child Support Payment 35007630Central RECEIVED
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Page: 2/9 A425370 SNEAD, ROBERTA Ki0w 0 9 ?n)l MaCI 11/22/2013^
MaC8 CASHIER'S OFFICE
MaCI
05/0612013 ($4.50) Payment to CHILD MAY 2013 PYMT $78.95 ($130.64) $0.00SUPPORT PAYMENTCENTRAL
MaCi
05/06/2013 ($5.80) Postage Charges (USPS) $73.15 ($130.64) $0.00
MaCI
05/06/2013 ($1.52) Postage Charges (USPS) $71.63 ($130.64) $0.00
MaCI
05/0712013 ($26.23) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 223895 $45.40 ($130.64) $0.00
MaCI
05/10/2013 ($0.45) Copy Charges library $44.95 ($130.64) $0.00
MaCI
05/10/2013 ($2.52) Postage Charges (USPS) $42.43 ($130.64) $0.00
MaCI
05/10/2013 ($5.80) Postage Charges (USPS) $36.63 ($130.64) $0.00
MaC!
05/10/2013 ($5.80) Postage Charges (USPS) $30.83 ($130.64) $0.00
MaCi
05/17/2013 ($0.50) JPay Media Credits Automated JPay Media $30.33 ($130.64) $0.00Credits
MaCi
05/21/2013 ($17.50) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 225183 $12.83 ($130.64) $0.00
MaCI
05/22/2013 ($1.20) Copy Charges LIBRARY $11,63 ($130.64) $0.00
MaCI
05123/2013 ($5.80) Postage Charges (USPS) $5.83 ($130.64) $0.00
MaCI
05/23/2013 ($2.12) Postage Charges (USPS) $3.71 ($130.64) $0.00
MaCI
06/01/2013 $5.00 Reservation to SFF- Odrc Pos Exemption $3.71 ($130.64) $0.00FFF Hold
MaCI
06/01/2013 $0.00 $10.00 Reservation to Pos Odrc Pos Exemption $3.71 ($130.64) $0.00Exemption
MaCI
06/03/2013 ($0,35) Copy Charges library $3.36 ($130.64) $0.00
MaCI
06/04/2013 ($3.09) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 226031 $0.27 ($130.64) $0.00
MaCI
06/05/2013 $4.00 Industrial Arts Commission craft payRECEIVED $4,27 ($130.64) $0,00
Page: 3/9 A425370 SNEAD, ROBERTA NOV 2 2 2013 MaCt 11/22/2013
MaCI CASHIER'S OFFICE
MaCi
06/07/2013
MaCI
06f07/2013
MaCI
06/07/2013
MaCI
06/07/2013
MaC!
06/07/2013
$18.00 State Pay State Pay
($4.40) SFF-FFF Hold #1 - Automated FFF-RBTransfer
$4.40 Federal Filing Fee Remaining #1 - Automated FFF-RBBalance Transfer
($4.40) Payment to PRISONER June pymtACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
($5.50) Payment to CHILD June pymtSUPPORT PAYMENTCENTRAL
$22.27 ($130.64) $0.00
$17.87 ($130.64) $0.00
$17.87 ($126.24) $4.40
$17.$7 ($126.24) $0.00
$12.37 ($126.24) $0.00
MaCi
06/11/2013 ($11.33) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 226525 $1.04 ($126.24) $0.00
MaCI
06/24/2013 $198.50 JPay MoneyOrders 26447396/SNEAD, LUCY $199.54 ($126.24) $0.00
MaCI
06/24/2013 ($39.70) SFF-FFF Hold #1 -Automated FFF-RB $159.84 ($126.24) $0.00Transfer
MaCI
06/24/2013 $39.70 Federal Filing Fee Remaining #1 -Automated FFF-RB $159.84 ($86.54) $39.70Balance Transfer
MaC1
06/25/2013 ($33.26) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 227783 $126.58 ($86.54) $39.70
MaCI
06/26/2013 ($0.92) Postage Charges (USPS) $125.66 ($86.54) $39.70
MaCI
06/26/2013 ($1.72) Postage Charges (USPS) $123.94 ($86.54) $39.70
MaCI
06/26/2013 ($1.52) Postage Charges (USPS) $122.42 ($86.54) $39.70
MaCI
06/27/2013 ($25.00) Withdrawal to COURT OF 36494 $97,42 ($86.54) $39.70CLAIMS
MaCI
06/27/2013 ($25.00) Withdrawal to COURT OF 36494 $72.42 ($86.54) $39.70CLAIMS
MaCf
06/27/2013 $25.00 Reversed Withdrawal to Reversed Task No. $97.42 ($86.54) $39.70COURT OF CLAIMS 35651629
MaCi
07/01/2013 $5.00 Reservation to SFF- Odrc Pos Exemption $97.42 ($86.54) $39.70FFF Hold RECEIVED
Page: 4/9 A425370 SNEAD, ROBERTA NOV 2 2 2013 ^5 MaCI 11/22/2013
MaCi CASHIER'S OFFICE
MaCI
07/01/2013
MaCI
07/01/2013
MaCi
07/01/2013
MaC1
07/05/2013
MaCI
07/05/2013
MaCI
07/05/2013
MaCI
07/05/2013
MaCI
07/05/2013
($10.00) Inmate's Personal Account POS Exemption Transfer $87.42 ($86.54) $39.70
$10.00 Pos Exemption POS Exemption Transfer $97.42 ($86.54) $39.70
($25.47) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 228069 $71.95 ($86.54) $39.70
$18.00 State Pay State Pay
($3.60) SFF-FFF Hold #1 - Automated FFF-RBTransfer
$3.60 Federal Filing Fee Remaining #1 - Automated FFF-RBBalance Transfer
($43.30) Payment to PRISONER july paymentACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
($4.50) Payment to CHILD july paymentSUPPORT PA`fMENTCENTRAL
MaCI
07/09/2013 ($29.00) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 228536
MaCI
$89.95 ($86.54) $39.70
$86.35 ($86.54) $39.70
$86.35 ($82.94) $43.30
$86.35 ($82.94) $0.00
$81.85 ($82.94) $0.00
$52.85 ($82.94) $0.00
07/13/2013 $197.00 OffConnect Kiosk Deposit 4594335235124519219/OS $249.85 ($82.94)WALD, DEBORA
MaC!
07/13/2013 ($39.40) SFF-FFF Hold #1 - Automated FFF-RB $210.45 ($82.94)Transfer
MaC1
$0.00
$0.00
07/13/2013 $39.40 Federal Filing Fee Remaining #1 - Automated FFF-RB $210.45 ($43.54) $39.40Balance Transfer
MaCI
07/16/2013 ($81.78) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 229166 $128.67 ($43.54) $39.40
MaC!
07/18/2013 ($1.52) Postage Charges (USPS)
MaCI
07/18/2013 ($2.92) Postage Charges (USPS)
MaCI
07/23/2013 ($22.74) Commissary Sale
MaC1
07/23/2013 ($1.52) Postage Charges (USPS)
MaC1
Page: 5/9 A425370 SNEAD, ROBERTA
$127.15 ($43.54) $39.40
$124.23 ($43.54) $39.40
Ticket Number 229699 $101.49 ($43.54) $39.40
^^^^^^^D
NOV 22 2013
MaCt CASHIERS OFF1CE
$99.97 ($43.54) $39.40
MaCI 11 /22/2013
07/23/2013
MaCi
07/25/2013
MaCI
07/30/2013
MaC1
08/01 /2013
MaCi
08/01/2013
MaCI
08/01/2013
MaCI
08/02/2013
MaCi
08/02/2013
MaC1
08/06/2013
MaCI
08/09/2013
MaCI
08/09/2013
MaCi
08/09/2013
MaCi
08/09/2013
MaCI
08/09/2013
($1.32) Postage Charges (USPS)
($4,00) JPay Media Credits Automated JPay MediaCredits
($52.39) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 230082
$5.00 Reservation to SFF- Odrc Pos ExemptionFFF Hold
$98.65 ($43.54) $39.40
$94.65 ($43.54) $39.40
$42.26 ($43.54) $39.40
$42.26 ($43.54) $39.40
($10.00) Inmate's Personal Account POS Exemption Transfer $32.26 ($43.54) $39.40
$10.00 Pos Exemption
($5.80) Postage Charges (USPS)
($2.12) Postage Charges (USPS)
($11.78) Commissary Sale
$18.00 State Pay
($3.60) SFF-FFF Hold
POS Exemption Transfer $42.26 ($43.54) $39.40
Ticket Number 230449
State Pay
#1 - Automated FFF-RBTransfer
$3.60 Federal Filing Fee Remaining #1 - Automated FFF-RBBalance Transfer
($43.00) Payment to PRISONER August pymtACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
($4.50) Payment to CHILD August pymtSUPPORT PAYMENTCENTRAL
$36.46 ($43.54) $39.40
$34.34 ($43.54) $39.40
$22.56 ($43.54) $39.40
$40.56 ($43.54) $39.40
$36.96 ($43.54) $39.40
$36.96 ($39.94) $43.00
$36.96 ($39.94) $0.00
$32.46 ($39.94) $0.00
MaCI
08/13/2013 ($11.04) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 230988 $21.42 ($39.94) $0.00
MaCi
08/28/2013 ($13.31) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 232319 $8.11 ($39.94) $0.00
MaCI
09/01/2013 $5.00 Reservation to SFF- Odrc Pos Exemption $8.11 ($39.94) $0.00FFF Hold
MaCI
09/01/2013 $0.00 $10.00 Reservation to Pos Odrc Pos EK%'CEIVED$8.11 ($39.94) $0.00
ExemptionPage: 6/9 A425370 SNEAD, ROBERT
A NOV 2 2 2013 MaCI 11/22/2013
MaCi CASHIERe^ OFFICE
MaCi
09/05/2013
MaCi
09/05/2013
MaCI
09/06/2013
MaCi
09I06/2013
MaCi
09/06/2013
MaCi
09/06/2013
MaCi
09/06/2013
MaCi
09/10/2013
MaCI
09/28/2013
MaCd
09/28/2013
MaCI
09/28/2013
MaCi
10/01/2013
MaCI
10/01/2013
MaCi
10/01/2013
MaCI
10/01/2013
MaCi
10/04/2013
MaCI
10/04/2013
($1.72) Postage Charges (USPS)
($2.32) Postage Charges (USPS)
$18.00 State Pay State Pay
($3.60) SFF-FFF Hold #1 - Automated FFF-RB $18.47 ($39.94)Transfer
$3.60 Federal Filing Fee Remaining #1 - Automated FFF-RB $18.47 ($36.34)Balance Transfer
($3.60) Payment to PRISONER September pymt $18.47 ($36.34)ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
($4.50) Payment to CHILD September pymt $13.97 ($36.34)SUPPORT PAYMENTCENTRAL
($13.58) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 233317 $0.39 ($36.34)
$102.00 OffConnect Kiosk Deposit 4710924432211206450/OS $102.39 ($36.34)WALD, DEBORA
($20.40) SFF-FFF Hold #1 - Automated FFF-RB $81.99 ($36.34)Transfer
$0.00
$3.60
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$20.40 Federal Filing Fee Remaining #1 - Automated FFF-RB $81.99 ($15.94) $20.40Balance Transfer
$5.00 Reservation to SFF- Odrc Pos Exemption $81.99 ($15.94) $20.40FFF Hold
($10.00) Inmate's Personal Account POS Exemption Transfer $71.99 ($15.94) $20.40
$10.00 Pos Exemption
($47.29) Commissary Sale
$1$.00 State Pay
($3.60) SFF-FFF Hold
I Page: 7/9 A425370 SNEAD, ROBERT A
POS Exemption Transfer
Ticket Number 234715
State Pay
$6.39 ($39.94)
$4.07 ($39.94)
$O.qO
$0.00
$22.07 ($39.94) $0.00
$81.99 ($15.94) $20.40
$34.70 ($15.94) $20.40
$52.70 ($15.94) $20.40
#1 -Automal^^^^^^^^ $49.10 ($15.94) $2q.40Transfer
NOV 2 2 2013 `- MaCi 11/22/2013
MaC1 CASHIER'S OFFICE
MaCI
10/0412013 $3,60 Federal Fifing Fee Remaining #1 - Automated FFF-RBBalance Transfer
MaCi
10/04/2013 ($24.00) Payment to PRISONER OCT. PYMTACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
MaCI
10/04/2013 ($4.50) Payment to CHILD OCT. PYMTSUPPORT PAYMENTCENTRAL
MaCI
10/07/2013 ($34.50) Fundraisers - No Specific cccClub
MaCf
10/08/2013 ($9.26) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 235309
MaCI
11/01/2013
MaCI
11/01/2013
MaC1
11 /05/2013
MaCI
11/05/2013
MaCI
11/05/2013
MaCI
11/07/2013
MaC1
11/08/2013
MaCI
11/08/2013
MaCI
$5.00 Reservation to SFF- Odrc Pos ExemptionFFF Hold
$0.00 $10.00 Reservation to Pos Odrc Pos ExemptionExemption
$49.10 ($12.34) $24.00
$49.10 ($12.34)
$44.60 ($12.34)
$10.10 ($12.34)
$0.84 ($12.34)
$0.84 ($12.34)
$0.84 ($12.34)
$198.50 JPay MoneyOrders 29563039/SNEAD, LUCY $199.34 ($12.34)
($12.34) SFF-FFF Hold #1 - Automated FFF-RBTransfer
$12.34 Federal Filing Fee Remaining #1 - Automated FFF-RBBalance Transfer
($30.00) JPay Media Credits Automated JPay MediaCredits
($6.00) JPay Media Credits Automated JPay MediaCredits
$18.00 State Pay State Pay
$187.00 ($12.34)
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$187.00 $0.00 $12.34
$157.00 $0.00 $12.34
$151.00 $0.00 $12.34
$169.00 $0.00 $12.34
11/08/2013 ($12.34) Payment to PRISONER NOV PYMT $169.00ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
MaCI
11/08/2013 ($4.50) Payment to CHILD NOV PYMT $164.50SUPPORT PAYMENTCENTRAL
MaCI
11/091
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
2013 697.00 OffConnect Kosk Depostt 4769245606946824499/OS $261.50 $0.00 $0.00DEBOR^^^^^^^^WALD,
Page> 8/9 A425370 SNEAD, ROBERTA MaCI 11/22/2013
NOV 2 2 2Qi3°^
^^^^ CASHIER'S OFFICE
MaCI
11/10/2013 ($30.00) JPay Media Credits Automated JPay Media $231.50 $0.00 $0.00Credits
MaC1
11/11/2013 ($20.00) JPay Media Credits Automated JPay Media $211.50 $0.00 $0.00Credits
MaCI
11/12/2013 ($10.00) Fundraisers - No Specific CCC-pizza/photos $201.50 $0.00 $0.00Club
MaC1
11/12/2013 ($93.20) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 238282 $108.30 $0.00 $0.00
MaCI
11/1412013 ($39.40) Withdrawal to COURT OF 37748 $68.90 $0.00CLAIMS OF OHIO
MaCI
11/16/2013 ($3.00) JPay Media Credits Automated JPay Media $65.90 $0.00Credits
MaCi
11/19/2013 ($41.24) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 239311 $24.66 $0.00
MaCI
11/22/2013 ($0.30) Copy Charges 6 month demand statement $24.36 $0.00
MaCI
Outstanding Debts:
Start Date Total Debt Paid to DateDescription Case Agency County
10/24/2012 Federal Filing Fee Initial 2:12-cv- PRISONER ($31,36) $31.36Partial 00739 ACCOUNTS
RECEIVABLE10/24/2012 Federal Filing Fee 2:12-cv- PRISONER ($318.64) $318.64
Remaining Balance 00739 ACCOUNTSRECEIVABLE
Totai Outstanding Case Balances $0.00
Outstanding Holds:
Start DateDescription
07/15/2009 Child and SgSupport
Case Agency County Total Debt Paid to Date
701267099 CHILD SUPPORT Clermont $237.94PAYMENTCENTRAL
Total Outstanding Case Hotds $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Owed
$0.00
$0.00
alanceOwed
Outstanding Investments / EPC:
Investment Type J Investment Type Description Invest Company 1 Company Description Balance
RECEIVED
NOV 2 2 '1D 13 ^^
Page: 9/9 A425370 SNEAD, ROBERTA C' C^^^^EKS OFFICE MaC! 1 1 /22020 1 3