supercapacitors enable µpower energy harvesters to power ... ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Supercapacitors Enable µPower Energy Harvesters to Power Wireless Sensors
and do other useful things
(Everything you wanted to know about supercapacitors and were afraid to ask)
1
Sensors Expo June 2019Pierre MarsVP Quality & Applications Engineeringwww.cap-xx.com
Energy Harvesting
The environment has infinite energy, sensors are everywhere, so why have small energy harvesters not taken off as forecast?
2
Some Forecasts Forecast 1, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/energy-
harvesting-market-worth-42-billion-by-2019-global-industry-analysis-size-share-growth-trends-and-forecast-2012---2018-237000391.html
• Energy Harvesters markets at $131.4 million in 2012 are projected to increase to $4.2 billion in 2019. Growth is anticipated to be based on demand for micro power generation that can be used to charge thin film batteries. Systems provide clean energy that is good for the environment. Growth is based on global demand for sensors and wireless sensor networks that permit control of systems.
Forecast 2, https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/global-energy-harvesting-market-2019-industry-analysis-size-share-strategies-and-forecast-to-2023-2019-03-28
• $500M in 2018 and forecast $1030M in 2025• List of key players shows this report also deals with micro power.
3
Hurdles for Small Energy Harvesters
Price (CR2032 coin cell ~US$0.3)
10’s – 100’s µW
Knowledge: • How do I get enough power with EH?• How do I keep size, cost down?• How do I avoid complexity?• Efficiency?
Solution:
Supercapacitors
Case Studies – visit us at booth 942
4
Batteries Low cost
Good energy density
But
Need replacing, proper disposal (high cost)
RoHS, SVHC, REACH (e.g. Mouser would not ship CR2032 to Australia, Element14 warning:
High Internal impedance,
May have complex charging algorithm & capacity estimation
Self discharge / leakage current
5
Hazardous ItemThere maybe additional transit time on this item. Delivery of other items on your order will be unaffected.
especially when cold
Supercapacitors “Infinite cycle life”, physical charge storage
Excellent power density
Wide temperature range, -40C to +85C
Low leakage current [CAP-XX ~1µA/F]
Great round trip efficiency (~99%)
From small thin prismatic form-factors to large cans
Simple to charge: Show me the current
An ideal power buffer
But
Low voltage: may need cells in series → Need cell balancing
Not SMD
6
Supercapacitor: an Ideal Power Buffer
Supercapacitor charged at low average power
Supplies peak power bursts (low ESR)
And/or
Backup power in case of energy loss (high C)
Regulate duty cycle so Avge Pwr Out ≤ Avge Pwr In
7
Tx 1 message/hr,
150mW for 0.6s, avge pwr = 25µW
80% efficiency
→ ~30µW 150mW
Supercapacitor Properties
8
What makes a Supercap “Super”?
9
A supercapacitor is an energy storage device which utilizes high surface area carbon to deliver much higher energy density than conventional capacitors
Electrode:Aluminum foil
Nanoporous carbon:Large surface area > 2000m2/gm
Separator:Semi-permeable membrane
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ve -ve
Separation distance:Solid-liquid interface (nm)
Basic Theory:Capacitance is proportional to
the charge storage area, divided by the charge separation
distance (C α A / d)
As area (A) , andcharge distance (d) capacitance (C)
No dielectric, working voltage determined by electrolyte
Electrolyte:Ions in a solvent
Basic Electrical Model:Electric Double Layer Capacitor (EDLC)
What makes CAP-XX “Super”?
Very small, very thin form factors
Ultra-low impedance (ESR)
• High power delivery (CAP-XX has world’s highest power density)
Very high capacitance (C)
• Provides the energy needed to keep delivering the power
Easy to charge
• Just need a charge current (from 20uA) & over-voltage protection
Very low leakage current (<1µA)
Unlimited cycle life (physical charge storage, no chemical reactions)
Excellent low temperature performance
Good frequency response
10
High Power & Energy Density
11
1.00E+00
1.00E+01
1.00E+02
1.00E+03
1.00E+04
1.00E+05
1.00E+06
1.00E-02 1.00E-01 1.00E+00 1.00E+01 1.00E+02
Po
we
r D
en
isty
(W
/L)
Energy Density (Wh/L)
Volumetric Power Density vs Energy Density: SupercapacitorsCap-xx
Maxwell Boostcap
Illinois Capacitor - Prismatic
Illinois Capacitor - Radial
Maxfarad
Murata
Nesscap
NEC/Tokin
NEC/Tokin - Prismatic
AVX
Cooper Bussmann / Eaton
Cellergy
Panasonic
Tecate - Prismatic
Tecate - Radial
Nichicon
ELNA - Radial
ELNA - Prismatic
KEMET
Rubycon
Taiyo Yuden
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
No
rmali
sed
ES
R t
o r
oo
m t
em
pera
ture
Temperature (C)
Normalised ESR vs. temperature
H Series
G series
Poly. (H Series)
Poly. (G series)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
No
rmali
sed
DC
cap
acit
an
ce t
o r
oo
m t
em
pera
ture
(%)
Temperature (Celsius)
Normalised DC capacitance vs. temperature
G Series
H series
Supercapacitors operate over a wide temp range
12
13
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 180.0
Le
akag
e C
urr
en
t (u
A)
Time (hrs)
Leakage Current
CAP-XX GZ115 0.15F
CAP-XX GZ115 0.15F
CAP-XX HS230 1.2F 5V
Maxwell PC10 10F
Maxwell PC10 10F
Powerburst 4F
Powerburst 4F
PowerStor 1F
PowerStor 1F
Nesscap 3F
Nesscap 3F
AVX 0.1F 5V
AVX 0.1F 5V
…translates to Low Charge Current
14
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Vo
lta
ge
(v)
Time(hrs)
Low Current Charging Behaviour of GA109
200uA
100uA
50uA
20uA
10uA
10uA theoretical
20uA theoretical
50uA theoretical
Shallow discharge steady state ILEAKAGE
15
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
IL(µ
A)
Time (Hrs)
HW109 Single Cells ILeakage following a shallow dischargeBlue Cells precharged for 100 hours at 2v7, Red Cells had no pre-charging time.
Discharged from 2v7 to 2v0 every hour then recharged through 2k2Ω while monitoring ILeakage
IL No-Chg 1
IL No-Chg 3
IL No-Chg 5
IL No-Chg 7
IL Pre-Chg 1
IL Pre-Chg 3
IL Pre-Chg 5
IL Pre-Chg 7
TheoreticalCharge Current
1.25µA2.8µA
3.7µA
Poor Frequency Response ...
16
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06
Ph
as
e(d
eg
ree
)
Ma
gn
itu
de
(Ω)
Frequency(Hz)
Magnitude
Phase
... But excellent pulse response
17
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4
4.05
4.1
4.15
4.2
4.25
4.3
4.35
4.4
-1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0
Cu
rre
nt(
A)
Vo
ltag
e(V
)
Time(ms)
1.8A 1.1ms pulses supported by GW209, source current limited to 0.5A
Voltage (V)
Source Current (A)
Load Current (A)
What is effective capacitance?
18
Effective capacitance is a time domain representation of freq response that can be used for a quick estimate of pulse response
Effective Capacitance (GW209)
19
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Pe
rce
nta
ge o
f D
C c
apac
itan
ce(%
)
Pulse Width (s)
Efficient Charge / Discharge Cycle
20
• Losses = I2R x duration during charge, discharge
• Energy in/out = 2 x ½ C (V2MAX – V2
MIN)
• Efficiency = Energy in/out = Energy in/out_____ Energy in/out + Losses Energy in/out + i2.ESR.t
=
12𝐶(𝑉2
2 − 𝑉12
12𝐶 𝑉2
2 − 𝑉12 + 𝑖2. 𝐸𝑆𝑅. 𝐶
𝑉2 − 𝑉1𝑖
=𝑉2 + 𝑉1
𝑉2 + 𝑉1 + 2. 𝑖. 𝐸𝑆𝑅
• Ex 1: GPRS 2A disch from 3.8V to 3.2V, ESR = 50mΩ, = 97.2%
• Ex 2: Charge @ 50mA from 3.2V to 3.8V, = 99.9%
For i = constant
Cell Voltage Balancing
Supercapacitors are low voltage devices
Modules containing 2 or more supercapacitors in series are needed to achieve higher operating voltages
Multi-cell modules need voltage balancing to ensure that slight differences in leakage current do not cause voltage imbalances between the cells
Without adequate voltage balancing, one cell may go over-voltage, leading to accelerated ageing & premature failure
Balancing can be: Passive (simple, but costly in terms of energy lost), or Active (to achieve the minimum possible leakage current)
21
No balancing
22
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.3
2.5
2.7
2.9
3.1
3.3
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Te
rmin
al V
olt
ag
e (
V)
Mid
Po
int
Vo
ltag
e (
V)
Time (hrs)
HA202 supercapacitors at 5V with no balancing
Teminal VoltageMid Point Voltage
With balancing
23
1.7
1.75
1.8
1.85
1.9
1.95
2
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Mid
po
int
Vo
ltag
e(V
)
Time (Hrs)
GS206 @ 3.6V with balancing, midpoint voltages
68KΩ Resistive BalancingActive Balancing
Active Balancing with an Op Amp
24
Low current rail-rail op amp, ~500nA
Can source or sink current, 4.7mA
Supplies or sinks the difference in leakage current between the 2 cells to maintain balance
Total current, supercapacitor leakage + balancing circuit ~2µA
Low cost op amp
Or Use a Single Cell
If your circuit can run at 2.7V (prismatic) or 3V (cylindrical) or less, use a single cell
• Simpler (no balancing required)• Cheaper• Thinner
If source > 2.7V (or 3V) use a low power buck, e.g. TPS62743 (Iq 360nA), or LDO TPS78227 (Iq 500nA)
Depends on energy / power required
It’s a cost / size trade-off
3V prismatic cell coming !!
25
Sizing the Supercapacitor
Energy balance approach often used:Avg Load Power x Time = E = ½ C(Vinit
2 – Vfinal2),
C = 2E/(Vinit2 – Vfinal
2)
But this implicitly assumes ESR = 0!
This may lead to undersizing the supercapacitor.
For constant current pulse of duration T: Vdrop = ILOAD x [ESR + T/Ceff(T)]
For constant power it will be worse as ILOAD increases as Vsupercap decreases to keep V x I = const. See CAP-XX website for tools that solve this problem
26
Equation for Constant Power
27
ESR
C
VSUPERCAP
VLOAD
ILOAD
PLOAD
ESR
PESRVVI
PIVESRI
IESRIVP
IVP
ESRIVV
SUPERCAPSUPERCAP
LOAD
LOADLOADSUPERCAPLOAD
LOADLOADSUPERCAPLOAD
LOADLOADLOAD
LOADSUPERCAPLOAD
2
4
0
)(
2
2
If load current is very small, ILOAD x ESR << VSUPERCAP so use energy balance approach. Otherwise, use a spreadsheet to solve the above & simulate V & I over time, or use SPICE
𝑉𝑆𝑈𝑃𝐸𝑅𝐶𝐴𝑃 𝑡 + 𝑑𝑡 = 𝑉𝑆𝑈𝑃𝐸𝑅𝐶𝐴𝑃 𝑡 −𝐼𝐿𝑂𝐴𝐷 𝑡 . 𝑑𝑡
𝐶
Iterate:
Constant Power Example
28
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Load P
ow
er
(W)
Superc
apacitor
Voltage (
V),
Load C
urr
ent(
A)
Time (secs)
HS130: 2.4F, 25mΩ supercapacitor module suppyling 1W for 4s
Voltage
Current
Pwr Chk
https://www.cap-xx.com/resources/design-aids/
Supercapacitor Ageing Supercapacitors will slowly lose C and increase ESR over time.
The rate of C loss, ESR rise is a function(V,T)
CAP-XX has placed a range of parts at different voltage-temp combinations for ~1yr to determine ageing rates as functions of V, T.
29
y = 2.2831E+00e-3.3817E-06x
R² = 9.6769E-01
y = 2.2028E+00e-7.5813E-06x
R² = 9.8497E-01
y = 2.0922E+00e-1.8428E-05x
R² = 9.7950E-01
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000
C(F
)
Time (Hrs)
GS130N 1.8V C
50C50C Median
23C23C Median
C loss rate is at 0.3376% per thousand hours from the previous value, at 23°C 1.8V
C loss rate is at 0.7553% per thousand hours from the previous value, at 50°C 1.8V
70C70C Median
C loss rate is at 1.98% per thousand hours from the previous value, at 70°C 1.8V
y = 2.9019E-05x + 1.0947E+01
y = 4.9123E-04x + 1.2169E+01
y = 2.0099E-04x + 1.0231E+01
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
ESR
(m
Ω)
Time(Hrs)
GS130N 1.8V ESR
70CMedian 70C
ESR increases at 0.4912mΩ every 1000 hourOr 4.036% increase from initial ESR per thousand hours, at 70°C 1.8V
50CMedian 50C
23CMedian 23C
ESR increases at 0.029mΩ every 1000 hourOr 0.265% increase from initial ESR per thousand hours, at 23°C 1.8V
ESR increases at 0.2010mΩ every 1000 hourOr 1.83% increase from initial ESR per thousand hours, at 50°C 1.8V
Life Estimates Life is not a fixed end date. It is when the supercapacitor has
lost C, increased ESR so it no longer supports your load.
You can increase life by starting with a higher C, lower ESR supercapacitor
You should have a typical V-T operating profile:• Using the corner case (e.g. 5V, 70) is lazy and won’t
work
Common Arrhenius assumptions:• Ageing rate halves for every 10C decrease and every
0.2V decrease• Only applicable if reactions stay the same – they don’t!
CAP-XX has regressed eqns for Closs, ESRrise with V, T.
30
Temperature Voltage % Time
-40°C 5 0%
-30°C 5 0%
-20°C 5 5%
-10°C 5 5%
0°C 5 10%
+10°C 4.8 20%
+20°C 4.8 20%
+30°C 4.8 10%
+40°C 4.6 10%
+50°C 4.6 10%
+60°C 4.5 5%
+70°C 4.2 5%
100%
Arrhenius Ridiculous
Claim: 0.77yrs @ 5V, 85C
At 3.6V, using assumption of life doubling for every 0.2V reduction, life increased by 2(5V-3.6V)/0.2V = 27= 128
Life at 3.6V, 85C = 0.75 x 128 = 99yrs
Reducing temperature to 25C increases life by a factor of 2(85-25)/10 = 26 = 64
Life at 3.6V, 25C = 99 x 64yrs = 6308yrs!
31
Size for Ageing
Use real estimates of Closs, ESRrise
Determine min C / max ESR that will support your application
• I.ESR Vdrop
• Constant power or constant current
• Ceff for short PW
Estimate a realistic V-T operating profile
Apply C loss / ESR rise factor over required life to EOL C, ESR to determine initial C, ESR.
32
Supercapacitor ChargingA supercapacitor charging circuit must:
1. behave gracefully into a short circuit since a discharged supercapacitor will look like a short, or the in-rush current will have to be limited
2. be able to charge from 0V
3. provide over voltage protection for the supercapacitor
4. prevent the supercapacitor from discharging into the source when VSOURCE < VSUPERCAP
and
5. should be designed for maximum efficiency
33
SMALL SOLAR CELL REPORTING OVER A WIDE
CAMPUS AREA
LoRa Case Study
34
Small Solar Cells
Power output for solar cells is typically defined at 50,000 lux (bright sunlight) or 100,000 lux (1kW/m2)
If used indoors, light levels are MUCH lower:Typically between 300 lux (minimum for easy reading) & 500 lux (well it office) AND with different spectrum (LED/CCFL)
Select & characterise your solar cell for the conditions in which it will be used!
35
Indoor use: LED/CCFL spectrum, typically 200 – 400 lux. Silicon cells will not do well!
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Po
we
r (u
W)
Cu
rre
nt
(uA
)
Voltage (V)
Epishine EH18-15 solar cells
V-I @ 500 lux
V-I @ 50 lux
V-I @ 500 lux with Halogen
P-V @ 500 lux
P-V @ 50 lux
P-V @ 500 lux with Halogen
Characterise your Solar Cell
36
Epishine: Organic solar cell, lower cost and more responsive to indoor LED / CCFL. 250µW @ 500 lux LED spectrum, 29mm x60mm, 14.4µW/cm2. Voc, Vpp approx. constant
Solar cell
6 digit DVM
RSENSE
DVMSimple cct to characterise solar cell
10Ω
Vpeak_pwr = 2.7V @ 500 lux
Vpeak_pwr = 2.4V @ 50 lux
What is the best charging circuit?
It depends: Direct charging or use a Power Management IC?
Direct Charging• Simple, low cost
• Sufficient light when application needs to run, e.g. working hrs in a
supermarket, office, factory; in daylight
Energy Harvesting PMIC• Boost with Max Peak Power Tracking
• Will still charge when light low, Vsolar < Vmin for application to work
• May include cell balancing
• May include duty cycle regulation
37
Simplest Solar Charging Circuit
38
Single cell supercapacitor. No balancing. Starts charging from 0V
Vsolar – Vdiode ≥ Vload_min when the application needs to run
Vsolar_oc ≤ Vscap_rated at the maximum light level in the application (2.7V in this case) [Vdiode 0 as supercap fully charged]
D1 prevents the supercapacitor from discharging back into the solar cell when light levels fall
BAT46 chosen for D1 due to low VF. VF at currents < 10A, <0.1V
BAT46
Direct Charging Solar Charging Circuit
39
Single cell supercapacitor. No balancing. Starts charging from 0V
Vsolar – Vdiode ≥ Vload_min when the application needs to run
Shunt regulator limits Vload ≤ Vscap_rated.
Low current
No losses when Vsolar < Vscap_rated
D1 prevents the supercapacitor from discharging back into the solar cell when light levels fall
BAT46 chosen for D1 due to low VF. VF at currents < 10A, <0.1V
BAT46
Shunt Regulator
Direct Charge or use EH PMIC?
40
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00
Cu
rre
nt
(uA
)
Su
perc
ap
ac
ito
r vo
ltag
e
Time (hrs)
Comparison of Boost PMIC (AEM10941) and direct charging with indoor solar cell at 400 lux
APPEB1012: Charge with AEM10941
APPEB1011: Direct charge
Direct Charge Current
Direct charge supercapacitor is 0.262F
Capacitor charged with AEM10941 is 0.263F
If Voc > Vtargetat all light levels when app must run then direct charging is a good option.
Epishine Vocnot dropping significantly at lower light levels is suitable for direct charging.
PMIC has ~80% - 90% efficiency
LoRa Setup Supply voltage range, 3.3V – 1.8V
Use Epishine solar cell to directly charge a HA102 supercapacitor to 2.7V, using CAP-XX eval board APPEB1011, see www.cap-xx.com
Supercapacitor can support multiple transmissions
Regulate duty cycle so Vscap does not discharge below 2.4V
41
LoRa Module RFM9xDirect charging circuit
HA102, 240mF, 60mΩ single cell, 2.7V supercapacitor
Solar cell
CAP-XX controller PCB
Sizing the Supercapacitor: LoRa Transmission
42
-0.01
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
2.4
2.45
2.5
2.55
2.6
2.65
2.7
2.75
2.8
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10
Lo
ad
Cu
rre
nt
(A)
Su
pe
rca
pa
cit
or
Vo
lta
ge
(V
)
Time (secs)
Sizing the Supercapacitor: discharge while tranmsitting
Vcap
Icap
Avge current = 10mA for 5.2sPeak Current = 62mA. PW 60ms
Set voltage range 2.7V - 2.4V
1st approx (ignore ESR)
C ≥ 10mA x 5.16s / 0.3V≥ 172mF
Select HA102, 240mF, 60mΩESR
dV = 10mA x 5.16s/0.24F + 0.062*0.06 = 0.22V
2.67V
2.42V
Supercapacitor Direct Charging Circuit
43
• AN1007 Charging a Supercapacitor from a Solar Cell Energy Harvester
• APPEB1011 Direct Solar Cell Charging• APPEB1012 Solar cell charging with PMICVisit www.cap-xx.com , register,
look at Design Services.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0:00:00 0:00:30 0:01:00 0:01:30 0:02:00 0:02:30 0:03:00 0:03:30 0:04:00 0:04:30 0:05:00 0:05:29 0:05:59
Su
perc
ap
ac
ito
r vo
ltag
e(V
)
Elapsed Time
LoRa demo Duty Cycle Regulation at 500lux
Supercapacitor charged, load connected
Transmission burst, supercapacitor discharging
Supercapacitor discharged to lower voltagethreshold, disconnect load.
Load disconnected, solar cell charging supercapacitor
Solar cell selected with direct charging of a CAP-XXX HA102 240mF single cell supercapaciror supports 4 transmission bursts lasting 5.2s every 2 mins
Operation
44
Duty cycle managed by µController, turn load on when supercap
reaches upper threshold, turn load off when supercap reaches
lower threshold.
Lower threshold set above brown out voltage – clean reset.
Interval between transmit bursts depends on light level, brighter
light → shorter interval
See the demo, visit us at booth 942
SMALL SOLAR CELL SUPPORTING CELLULAR IoT
NB IoT/LTE CAT M1 Case Study
45
NB IoT / LTE CAT M1 Setup Report messages from the Arduino µC managing a Ublox IoT module
Supply voltage range, 4.5V – 3.3V
Use GaAs solar cell to charge 2.5F supercapacitor to 4.5V with a PMIC using CAP-XX eval board APPEB1012, see www.cap-xx.com
46
Ublox IoT module
Charging circuit with PMIC
2 x 5F, 2.5V supercapacitor cells in series
Solar cell
CAP-XX controller PCB
Characterise your solar cell
47
Lightricity: GaAs solar cell, most efficient in indoor LED / CCFL light. 687µW @ 500 lux LED spectrum, 48mm x41mm, 34.9µW/cm2.
4s2p configuration, Voc < Vtarget, use a boost to charge the supercap
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Po
we
r (u
W)
Cu
rre
nt
(uA
)
Voltage (V)
Lightricity 4S2P Solar Module
V-I @ 50 lux
V-I @ 200 lux
V-I @ 300 lux
V-I @ 500 lux
P-V @ 50 lux
P-V @ 200 lux
P-V @ 300 lux
P-V @ 500 lux
Selecting Your Charging IC
48
Attribute AEM10941 Comment
Min cold start
voltage
380mV The lower the better.
Cold start
charge
Rapid. Boost charges
22µF (typ) cap.
How the IC boosts the input voltage during cold start to reach the internal voltage
required to run as a boost.
Cold start
power
3µW The lower the better, but must be < power available from the solar cell at min light
levels at which the unit must charge.
Cold start
threshold
380mV Voltage at which the IC starts operating as a boost converter, the lower the better
Vin min after
start up
50mV Min i/p voltage for the boost to keep operating once it has started
Quiescent
current
< 1µA Current drawn by the IC while operating as a boost. Vbatt ≥ 2.5VThis is reflected in the
low power efficiency.
Max Peak
Power
Tracking
Samples Vsolar_oc
every 5s to set MPPT
Periodically disconnecting the i/p to sample Voc is the preferred method. MPPT then
set as % of Voc. Can set MPPT at 70%, 75%, 85%, 90% of Voc. Some ICs set this as
a fixed value which only works in constant light.
SCAP Bal. Yes Includes balancing cct for dual cell supercaps
Duty Cycle Ctrl Yes Status bit that reflects if supercap within desired voltage range
Efficiency ~90% at Peak Pwr Pt 90% is excellent efficiency at such low power. Vscap > Vsolar
Hysteric
operation
Yes The boost converter turns off when Vcap reaches its desired voltage and turns on
again when Vcap has discharged to a lower threshold. Saves power.
Max current 100mA From energy harvester to boost converter
Supercapacitor charging cct with PMIC
49
Refer to: AN1007 Charging a Supercapacitor from a Solar Cell Energy HarvesterAN1012 Supercapacitor powered NB IoT LTE CAT-M1User Manual for APPEB1012 Solar cell charging with PMIC
Duty cycle regulation integrated in PMIC
50
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
-2.5 2.5 7.5 12.5 17.5 22.5
Cu
rre
nt
(A)
Vo
lta
ge
(V
)
Time (s)
APPEB1012 AEM10941 Duty Cycle Regulation
Vout
Vscap
STATUS[0]
STATUS[1]
Current
STATUS[0] turns on as Vscap > Vchrdy
STATUS[0] and STATUS[1] go LOW and LDO shuts down
Vscap < Vovdis, STATUS[1] turns on to warn of LDO shutdown in 600ms
STATUS[0] controls connection of load to supercap
Vscap > Vsolar, PMIC starts operating as a boost
Load Power & Energy, Sizing the Scap
51
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Lo
ad
Cu
rre
nt(
A)
Su
perc
ap
ac
ito
r V
olt
ag
e(V
)
Time(s)
LTE CAT-M1 Demo running with a 2.5F dual cell
Supercapacitor Voltage
Load Current
Avge Current = 63mA
Final peak = 180mA
Vdrop = 63mA x 36.6s / C < 4.5V - 3.3V = 1.2V
C > 0.063 x 36.6 / 1.2 = 1.92F
Select 2 x GY12R710020S505R, 5F, 170mΩ cells in series: C = 2.5F, ESR = 340mΩ
Vdrop = 0.063A x 36.6s / 2.5F + 0.18A x 0.34Ω = 0.98V
Vchrdy = 3.67V, Vovdis = 2.8V
Hard cutoff at 2.8V prevents brown out
Regulating the load, Tx interval
At 500 lux, solar cell delivers 687µW
Supercapacitor discharge (excl ESR drop) = 0.92V
Energy loss = ½ x 2.5F x (4.52 – 3.62) = 9.1J
Time to re-charge supercapacitor = 9.1J / 687µW = 13246s = 3.7hrs
Fine if this is suitable for whatever you are monitoring, e.g. a slowly moving variable
Otherwise increase power by: larger solar cell, more light, other energy source, etc.
Large energy requirement for Tx since unit disconnected between transmissions to reduce power, so need to log on to network every time. If you can increase EH power to support unit being always connected to the network, then energy for each transmission greatly reduced.
52
SUPPORTING a WiFi GATEWAY by WIRELESS CHARGING A
SUPERCAPACITOR
53
WiFi Gateway Setup Report light level from the Adafruit to a web page
Supply voltage range, 5V – 3.3V
Use NFC Wireless Charger, see App Notes AN1009 Wireless Charging and AN1014 Supercapacitor Powered Wifi IoT, www.cap-xx.com
54
WiFi moduleWireless charging circuit
2.5F, 5V supercapacitor module
NFC Transmitter 13.56MHz
CAP-XX controller PCB
Charging antenna
Characterising the Charger
55
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Cu
rre
nt(
mA
)/P
ow
er(
mW
)
Voltage(v)
NFC coil V-I plot with custom NFC charger
I
P
Max pwr 94mW
V
I
Charging Circuit
56
Diode Bridge prevents
supercapacitor
discharging back into
the coil
Shunt regulator
protects supercapacitor
from over voltage.
Load Profile, Sizing the Supercapacitor
57
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Cu
rre
nt(
A)
Vo
ltag
e(V
)
Time(s)
WiFi IoT with 2.5F 5.5V module transmission waveform
V
I
Avge I = 73mA
Transmission time varies from 5s to 40s depending on signal strength and time taken to log on to WiFi network.
Average current during transmission = 73mA
Vdrop < 5V = 3.3V = 1.7V
Peak at the end = 88mA
C > 40s x 0.073A / 1.7V = 1.7F.
Select CAP-XX 5.5V 2.5F, 340mΩ module, GY25R51022S255R0.
Vdrop = 0.073A x 40s / 2.5F + 0.088A x 0.34Ω = 1.2V
Charging the supercapacitor
58
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-20 30 80 130 180 230 280
Cu
rre
nt(
A)
Vo
ltag
e(V
)
Time(s)
NFC charging 2.5F Supercapacitor for WiFi IoT
Supercapacitor Voltage
Charging Current
COMING SOONTHIN 3V PRISMATIC CELLS
SAMPLES Q4 2019
We have 3V cylindrical cells now.
Thin prismatic cells are more challenging.
Ideal across CR2032 3V coin cells (no cct reqd) or with a small EH to store more energy or to enable direct charging.
59
3V cells, excellent life: 3V, 70C
60
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
ES
R(m
Ω)
Cap
ac
ita
nc
e (
F)
Elapsed Time (hrs)
Test Cells C & ESR over time at 3V, 70C
Sample 1 C
Sample 2 C
Sample 3 C
Sample 1 ESR
Sample 2 ESR
Sample 3 ESR
~13% Closs, IEC62391 Endurance spec is 30%
1.12 x ESRnit, IEC62391 Endurance spec is 4 x ESRinit
3V Supercapacitor Cell
Target specs:• 3V, -20C to +70C• 500mF• ESR < 200mΩ• IL < 2µA
HA130 size (20mm x 18mm x 1.7mm)• Fits over CR2032 coin cell
Place directly across a 3V coin cell• No extra circuit required
Higher energy for EH apps• 3V→ 2V 50% more energy
61
3V Battery
3V
scap
than 2.7V → 2V
Take Aways
62
Supercapacitors enable µPower energy harvesters to power wireless sensors with high power bursts
Supercapacitors are ideal power buffers• High C (enough energy to do the job)• Low ESR (high power delivery)• Wide temperature range of
operation• Easy to charge (show me the current)• Low leakage current & Excellent
round trip efficiency Supercapacitor Charging
• Into a S/C, from 0V, O/V protection, cannot discharge into the source
Characterise your Energy Harvester
Sizing the supercapacitor• Allow for I.ESR voltage drop• Constant current or constant power?• Ceff for narrow pulse• Easy to charge (show me the current)• Low leakage current & Excellent round
trip efficiency• Ageing (need real data, Arrhenius a
gross approximation) Case studies
LoRa Cellular IoT (LTE CAT M1) WiFi IoT
Visit www.cap-xx.com for App Notes, EVBs. Visit us at booth 942
63
For more information, contact:
Pierre Mars
VP Quality & Applicatons Engineering
or visit us at:www.cap-xx.com