$sulo - 4.files.edl.io · * 683(5,17(1'(17&200(176 '(3$570(1783'$7(6...
TRANSCRIPT
Tuesday, April 28, 2020Regular Meeting
Closed Session 5:15 p.m. Open Session: 6:30 p.m. - Via Zoom MeetingMembers of the public can participate by calling #1-314-649-0957 Meeting ID#949-8155-5433Phone In Meeting Password: 972870Please see the message at the bottom of the agenda for more information about meetingparticipation.
A. OPEN SESSION/CALL TO ORDER (5:15 P.M.)
B. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
1. Persons wishing to address the governing board on any closed session item may do so at this time. Speakers arerequested to state their name and to address comments to the Board of Trustees. The Board is governed by theBrown Act and may briefly respond to public comments but take no action except on items scheduled on theagenda. A maximum of 10 minutes total is set aside for public comment on closed session items.
C. CLOSED SESSION
1. Copy of Personnel: Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release/Resignation (Government Code: 54957).
2. Personnel: Public Employee Employment/Appointments (Government Code: 54957).
3. Conference with Labor Negotiators (Government Code: 54957.6). Agency Designated Representatives:Superintendent, Employee Organization(s): GVTA & CSEA.
4. Public Employee Informal Performance Evaluation, Unrepresented Employee: Superintendent
D. RECONVENE from Closed Session (6:30 P.M.)
1. Reconvene from Closed Session and report any action taken.
E. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
F. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
1. Approve the Agenda
G. SUPERINTENDENT COMMENTS/DEPARTMENT UPDATES
1. Superintendent & MOT/Facilities Report [Wallace]
2. Educational Services/Technology/Special Education Report [Hatch]
3. Human Resources/Student Services Report [Mann]
4. Business Services/Cafeteria Report [Meneses]
H. RECOGNITIONS
1. Gift(s) to the Golden Valley Unified School District [Wallace]
2. Monetary gift to the SVE PAWS, Technology, Mrs. Goerdt and Mrs. Stemple Trust Accounts from the PG&E YouCause Employee Giving Campaign, $1,675.32.
3. Monetary gift to the LHS Baseball ASB from the Fresno Men's Baseball League, $1,500.00.
4. Monetary gift to the LHS Wrestling ASB from the PG&E Your Cause Employee Giving Campaign, $560.00.
5. Monetary gift to the LHS Golf Tournament from Diane & Will Jackson, Mark Wilson Construction, Valley SteelConstruction, Oberti Family, Inc., SEMCU Foundation, Inc., Golden Valley Builders, Riverstone Development, LLC.,Farmers Insurance - Jeffrey R. Jackson, and the LHS Wrestling Boosters, $3,300.00.
I. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
1. A maximum of 20 minutes total is set aside for persons wishing to address the Board on any item not on theagenda. If you wish to address the Board on an agenda item, please do so when that item is called. A maximum ofthree (3) minutes may be allowed. Items requiring lengthy discussion may, at the Board’s discretion, be scheduledas a specific agenda item at future meetings. Speakers are requested to state their name and to address commentsto the Board of Trustees. The Board is governed by the Brown Act and legally can only briefly respond to publiccomments but take no action except on items scheduled on the agenda.
J. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS
1. Adopt, Resolution No. 2019-20-17 Regarding Actions In Response to COVID-19. [Wallace]
2. Hold Public Hearing and Adopt Resolution No. 2019-20-11 Developer Fee Study Justification Study. [Meneses]
3. Approve, Stone Creek Elementary Change Order 001_RES-15. [Wallace]
K. CONSENT AGENDA
1. ALL CONSENT AGENDA items are considered to be routine and are acted on by the Board of Trustees in onemotion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless a Board member or citizen so requests, in which event,the item(s) will be considered following the approval of the Consent Agenda. It is understood that theSuperintendent recommends approval of all consent agenda items. Each item on the consent calendar approved bythe Board of Trustees shall be deemed to have been considered in full and adopted as recommended.
2. Approve, Minutes from Regular Meeting, March 24, 2020. [Wallace]
3. Approve, Minutes from Special Board Meeting, March 27, 2020. [Wallace]
4. Approve, Minutes from Special Board Meeting, April 3, 3020. [Wallace]
5. Ratify, Payroll Report, March 2020. [Meneses]
6. Ratify, Purchase Order Report, March 2020. [Meneses]
7. Approve, April 2020 Williams Quarterly Report [Wallace]
8. Approve, SI&A Behavior Alert System for the 2020/21 School Year. [Mann]
9. Approve, AOS Postage Machine Contract Renewal. [Meneses]
10. Approve, Liberty High School CIF Designation for the 2020/2021 School Year. [Wallace]
11. Ratify, Krazan & Associates, Inc., Stone Creek Elementary, Glulam Beam Inspection. [Wallace]
12. Ratify, Stone Creek Change Order Request 002 RES-15, PG&E Transformer. [Wallace]
13. Ratify, Stone Creek Change Order Request 004 RES-15 A-C Electric. [Wallace]
14. Ratify, Stone Creek Change Order Request 002-005 RES-01 Seal Rite Paving. [Wallace]
15. Ratify, Stone Creek Change Order Request 001 RES-11 BMY. [Wallace]
16. Ratify, Stone Creek Change Order 002 RES-11 BMY. [Wallace]
17. Approve, gift(s) to the Golden Valley Unified School District. [Meneses]
L. BOARD/SUPERINTENDENT COMMENTS/CONCERNS
1. The purpose of this agenda item is to alert the public of future District business.
M. ADVANCE PLANNING
1. Advance Planning
N. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
1. The Board may adjourn back into Closed Session if necessary.
O. RECONVENE FROM CLOSED SESSION
1. The Board will reconvene from Closed Session and report any action taken if applicable.
P. ADJOURNMENT
1. The Board will adjourn the meeting.
Q. MEETING PARTICIPATION
1. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ARE WELCOME TO PARTICIPATE IN ALL OF OUR MEETINGS. YOUR PARTICIPATION ISENCOURAGED AND APPRECIATED. Based on COVID-19 concerns and suspension of Brown Act provisions by theCalifornia Governor, public participation will be allowed telephonically or electronically only. If you wish to speak onan item on the Agenda, please either call the public call-in phone number above, or e-mail your comments inadvance to: [email protected]. Comments received by e-mail will be read during the public comment period orduring the relevant agenda item. Public comment related to agenda items will be allowed when the item is called.Public comments regarding an item not on the agenda will be allowed during the Public Comments section of theAgenda. The Board is governed by the Brown Act and may briefly respond to public comments but take no actionexcept on items scheduled on the agenda. A maximum of 20 minutes total is set aside for persons wishing toaddress the Board. A maximum of three (3) minutes per speaker may be allowed. Speakers are requested to statetheir name and to address comments to the Board of Trustees. Items requiring lengthy discussion may, at theBoard’s discretion, be scheduled as a specific agenda item at future meetings. In compliance with the Americanswith Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to access the meeting via telephonic or electronic means or tootherwise participate in this meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, please contact the Superintendent’s Officeat (559) 645-3570, extension 7510. Notification by noon on the Friday preceding the board meeting, or at least 48hours prior to the meeting, will enable the Governing Board to make reasonable arrangements to ensureaccessibility to the meeting. Any writings or documents that are public records and are provided to a majority of theGoverning Board regarding an open session agenda item, including board backup material for open session agendaitems, will be made available for public inspection on the District’s website. The District welcomes Spanish and otherlanguage speakers to participate in Board meetings. Anyone planning to participate and needing an interpretershould call (559) 645-3570, extension 7510, by noon on the Friday preceding the board meeting, or at least 48hours in advance of the meeting, so arrangements can be made for an interpreter. . El Distrito da la bienvenida a laspersonas quienes hablan espanol a las juntas de la Mesa Directiva. Si planea asistir y necesita interpretacion llameal (559) 645-3570, extension 7510, el viernes antes de la junta y antes del medio dia, o a lo menos 48 horas antesde la junta, para poder hacer los arreglos para la interpretacion. If you have any questions on school district issues,please submit them in writing via e-mail to: [email protected]. The appropriate staff member will contact you toanswer your questions and provide you with information.
Agenda Item Details
Public Content
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Meeting Apr 28, 2020 - Regular Meeting
Category J. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS
Subject 1. Adopt, Resolution No. 2019-20-17 Regarding Actions In Response to COVID-19.[Wallace]
Access Public
Type Action
Background: The Board adopted Resolution 2019-20-15 which closed school buildings through May 1, 2020. Current Considerations: Resolution 2019-20-17 provides the Board an opportunity to extend the closure of schoolbuildings to a future date. Education will continue in Golden Valley through distance learning and other instructionalstrategies.
Resolution 2019-20-17 Second Resolution re Extension of Temporary Closure of Schools.pdf (121 KB)
1
RESOLUTION NO. 2019-20-17
BEFORE THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE
GOLDEN VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
MADERA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION EXTENDING SCHOOL CLOSURES
THROUGH 2019-2020 SCHOOL YEAR
WHEREAS, on March 27, 2020, the Governing Board (“Board”) of the Golden Valley
Unified School District (“District”) adopted Resolution No. 2019-20-15 “Regarding Extension of
School Closures and Delegating Authority to Superintendent to Take Necessary Actions in
Response to COVID-19”;
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2019-20-15 extended the temporary closing of schools and
on-site educational programs of the District through May 1, 2020;
WHEREAS, on March 31, 2020, the California State Superintendent of Public
Instruction issued correspondence to California School Superintendents throughout the State of
California which states, in part:
“Due to the current safety concerns and need for ongoing social distancing it currently
appears that our students will not be able to return to school campuses before the end of
the school year. This is in no way to suggest that school is over for the year, but rather
we should put all efforts into strengthening our delivery of education through distance
learning.”
WHEREAS, on April 2, 2020, the Madera County Superintendent of Schools issued
correspondence to the School Superintendents of Madera County which states, in part:
“It is in everyone’s best interest to offer students an education that is provided through
distance learning and other instructional strategies. Learning and instructional
programming will continue, just not in the manner that has been our tradition on our
school campuses, but with the students and teachers in two different locations”
WHEREAS, the Governing Board shares the concerns expressed by the California State
Superintendent of Public Instruction and the Madera County Superintendent of Schools
regarding the health of our State and community, and the importance of continuing distance
learning during the school closures.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Governing Board as follows:
1. The terms and delegation of authority set forth in Resolution No. 2019-20-17 are hereby
incorporated into this Resolution in their entirety, except as modified herein.
2. The Board extends the temporary closing of schools and on-site educational programs of
the District through _________________.
2
3. The Board authorizes the District’s Superintendent to resume schools and on-site
educational programs before ________________ if the Superintendent, after consulting
with federal, state, and local authorities, determines that schools and on-site educational
programs may resume.
4. The Board continues its authorization for the District Superintendent to take all
appropriate actions to address the threat of and respond to COVID-19, including but not
limited to, supporting educational opportunities for District students to the extent feasible
as well as other matters set forth in Governor Newsom’s various Executive Orders issued
in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including any amendments thereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the following vote of the Governing Board of the Golden
Valley Unified School District, County of Madera, State of California on April 28, 2020, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Maria Knobloch, President
Governing Board
Golden Valley Unified School District
Madera County, California
I, the undersigned, is the Clerk of the Governing Board of the Golden Valley Unified School
District, County of Madera, State of California, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true
copy of the resolution adopted by said Board at a regular meeting thereof, at the time and by the
vote therein stated, which original resolution is on file in the office of said Board.
Andrew Wheeler, Clerk
Governing Board
Golden Valley Unified School District
Madera County, California
Agenda Item Details
Public Content
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Meeting Apr 28, 2020 - Regular Meeting
Category J. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS
Subject 2. Hold Public Hearing and Adopt Resolution No. 2019-20-11 Developer Fee StudyJustification Study. [Meneses]
Access Public
Type Action
Background: The Developer Fee Study Agreement with Odell Planning & Research was approved by the Board onDecember 16, 2019. The Public Notice was posted in the Madera Tribune on April 11, 2020 and April 18, 2020. Adraft of the report was made available for public review on April 17, 2020. Current Considerations: Upon approval of the March 2020 Report and a 60 day period required by law, GVUSD wouldincrease its Level 1 fees to $4.08 per square foot for residential development and a maximum of $.066 per squarefoot for commercial/industrial development. A representative of Odell Planning & Research will join the meeting for the Public Hearing and adoption of the feestudy. Financial Impact: The cost of the public hearing notice in the Madera Tribune was $125.00 and was paid from theDeveloper Fee Fund (Fund 25).
GVUSD Fee Study Resolution 2020.pdf (129 KB)
GVUSD Fee Study 2020 (Final 4.13.20).pdf (1,215 KB)
1
RESOLUTION #2019-20-11
BEFORE THE GOVERNING BOARD
OF THE GOLDEN VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
MADERA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF THE )
DEVELOPMENT FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDY AND )
AN INCREASE IN LEVEL ONE DEVELOPMENT FEES )
WHEREAS, Education Code section 17620 authorizes school districts to
impose certain fees to finance the construction and reconstruction of school facilities;
and
WHEREAS, the District’s Level One development fees are currently $3.79 per
square foot of assessable residential construction, and $0.61 per square foot for
chargeable covered and enclosed new commercial and industrial construction; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority of Government Code section 65995,
subdivision (b)(3), the State Allocation Board has increased the allowable Level One
fee on residential development to $4.08 per square foot of assessable residential
construction as defined by Government Code section 65995, subdivision (b)(1), and
has raised the allowable commercial and industrial fee to $0.66 per square foot of
chargeable covered and enclosed new commercial and industrial construction as
defined by Government Code section 65995, subdivision (b)(2).
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board makes the following
findings:
1. The purpose of the District’s development fees is to provide adequate
school facilities for the students of the District who will be generated by residential and
new commercial and industrial development in the District.
2. The fees are to be used to finance the construction and reconstruction of
school facilities, temporary housing, administrative or legal expenses related to the
District’s developer fee program, and other purposes consistent with law. The facilities
to be constructed are identified in the report entitled Development Fee Justification
Study presented to the Governing Board at its regular meeting of April 28, 2020.
2
3. There is a reasonable relationship between the need for school facilities
and the type of development on which the fees are imposed because residential and
commercial and industrial development generates additional students that cannot be
housed without additional facilities.
4. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees and the types
of development projects on which the fees are imposed in that residential, commercial
and industrial development will generate students for the District, these students cannot
be housed by the District without additional facilities, and the fees will be used to fund
these facilities.
5. There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fees and the
cost of the facilities attributable to the developments on which the fee is imposed in
that the square footage of these types of developments has a direct relationship to the
number of students generated, and thus to the facilities which the District must add to
accommodate these students.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Golden Valley Unified School District
conducted a noticed public hearing at a regular meeting of its Governing Board on
April 28, 2020, at which time the report entitled Development Fee Justification Study
was presented to the Board and hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that since the District’s justifiable fee is greater
than the maximum allowable, the Level One fee on assessable residential construction
shall be increased from $3.79 per square foot to $4.08 per square foot as provided by
Education Code sections 17620 et seq., and Government Code sections 65995, et seq.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that since the Development Fee Justification
Study justified less than $0.66 per square foot for the warehouse category of new
commercial and industrial construction, its fee on chargeable covered and enclosed
new commercial and industrial construction for warehouses shall either correspond to
the amount justified on Table C-1 of the Development Fee Justification Study, or at the
discretion of the District, the fee for commercial and industrial development shall be
calculated on an individual basis using the characteristics of the development and the
methodology of Section C of the Development Fee Justification Study, but shall not
exceed the $0.66 per square foot maximum.
3
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the increase in fees shall take effect sixty
(60) days from the date of this Resolution; on June 27, 2020; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, except as expressly provided by
applicable law, nothing herein shall be interpreted to prevent the District from taking
any other action including, but not limited to, accepting dedications of land,
establishing community facilities districts pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community
Facilities Act of 1982, Government Code section 53311, et seq., entering into
agreements for additional mitigation beyond statutory developer fees, seeking voter
approval of tax exempt bonds or pursuing any other measure which the Governing
Board determines to be necessary to obtain and provide school facilities which meet
the needs of the District, its students, and the community; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the District has established a separate fund
in which all fees collected pursuant to this Resolution, along with any interest income
earned therein, shall be deposited in order to avoid any commingling of the fees with
other revenues and funds of the District, except for temporary investments, and that the
District is hereby further authorized to make expenditures or to incur obligations solely
for the purposes for which the fees are collected, which the Governing Board hereby
designates to be those purposes permitted by any applicable law; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the District will review the above-
mentioned facilities fee fund every fiscal year; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, if the District has unexpended or
uncommitted fees within five (5) years of collection, the District will make required
findings or refund the fees; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the fee imposed pursuant to this Resolution
is not subject to the restriction contained in subdivision (a) of Government Code section
66007, and that no building permit shall be issued for any development absent
certification of compliance by the development project with the fee imposed pursuant
to this Resolution; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Superintendent or his designee give
notice to all cities and counties with jurisdiction over the territory of the District of this
Board’s action by serving a copy of this Resolution, the supporting documentation and
4
a map indicating the areas subject to the fee on each agency and requesting that no
building permits, or for manufactured homes and mobile homes, certificates of
occupancy, be issued on or after the date which is sixty (60) days after the date of this
Resolution on June 27, 2020, without certification from the District that the fees
specified herein have been paid.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted by the Governing Board of
the Golden Valley Unified School District of Madera County, California, at a regular
meeting of said Board duly held on the 28th day of April, 2020, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
President
Governing Board
Golden Valley Unified School District
Madera County, California
CERTIFIED AS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY:
Clerk
Governing Board
Golden Valley Unified School District
Madera County, California
DEVELOPMENT FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDY
Prepared for
Golden Valley Unified School District 37479 Avenue 12
Madera, California 93636
(559) 645-3570
Prepared by
ODELL Planning&Research, Inc. 49346 Road 426, Suite 2
Oakhurst, California 93644
(559) 472-7167
www.odellplanning.com
March 2020
Odell Planning & Research, Inc. i Golden Valley Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTIONS PAGE
A INTRODUCTION AND FINDINGS A-1
B RESIDENTIAL FEE JUSTIFICATION
Introduction B-1
Step 1: Project Number of New Residential Units B-1
Step 2: Project Number of Students Generated by New Unmitigated
Residential Units B-4
Step 3: Determine Available Facilities Capacity for New Development
Students B-6
Step 4: Determine Number of Unhoused Students Generated by Unmitigated
New Development B-7
Step 5: Calculate Cost of School Facilities for Unhoused Students from
Unmitigated New Development B-8
Step 6: Review Available Funding B-9
Step 7: Estimate Square Footage of Projected Residential Development B-10
Step 8: Calculate Level 1 Fee B-10
C COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL FEE JUSTIFICATION
Introduction C-1
Step 1: Determine Square Footage Per Employee C-1
Step 2: Determine Number of Students Per Employee C-1
Step 3: Calculate Student Generation Rate Per 1,000 Square Feet C-1
Step 4: Determine School Facilities Cost Per Student C-3
Step 5: Calculate Cost Per Square Foot C-3
Step 6: Calculate Residential Offset C-3
Step 7: Determine Net Cost Per Square Foot (Justifiable Fee) C-3
APPENDICES
1 School Facilities Capacity
2 Fee Study Intended Use and Limitations
3 Sources Consulted
Odell Planning & Research, Inc. A-1 Golden Valley Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study
SECTION A
INTRODUCTION AND FINDINGS
INTRODUCTION
School districts are authorized to collect fees on new residential and commercial/industrial
development in accordance with Education Code Section 17620 and Government Code Section
65995. The traditional development fees (referred to as “Level 1” fees) were increased by the
State Allocation Board on January 22, 2020, to $4.08 per square foot for residential development
and $0.66 per square foot for commercial/industrial development. The law provides for the
Level 1 fee caps to be adjusted by the State Allocation Board every two years at its January
meeting. The next adjustment will take place in January 2022.
This study is organized into four sections:
• Section A sets forth the purpose of the study and the findings necessary to charge
development fees;
• Section B determines the justifiable residential development fee; and
• Section C determines the justifiable commercial/industrial development fees by category
of development.
FINDINGS
This study presents the information and analysis necessary to demonstrate that the Golden Valley
Unified School District is justified in collecting school facilities fees for new residential and
commercial/industrial development in accordance with Education Code Section 17620 and
Government Code Sections 65995 and 66001. As required by law, this study demonstrates the
following:
a. New residential and commercial/industrial development relates directly to the need for
school facilities in the District.
• Based upon past development activity and reasonable future projections, approximately
1,120 unmitigated residential units are projected to be developed within the District
during the next ten years, including 700 urban single family residential units, 300 urban
multiple family units and 120 rural single family units (see Section B, Step 1).1
• Students will be generated by new residential and commercial/industrial development.
Residential development in the rural residential areas of the District generates an average
1 At the time of report preparation, the U.S. and the world were in the midst of the coronavirus (COVID-
19) pandemic. This pandemic will have a substantial impact on the economy for an unknown duration and
it is unclear at this time how much of an effect it will have on housing construction activity.
Odell Planning & Research, Inc. A-2 Golden Valley Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study
of 0.459 grades TK-12 students per single family unit. Residential development in the
planned urban areas of the District will likely generate an average of 0.607 TK-12
students per single family unit and 0.175 TK-12 students per multiple family unit (see
Section B, Step 2). Commercial and industrial development generates between 0.029 and
0.198 students per 1,000 square feet, depending on the category of development (see
Section C, Table C-1).
• New unmitigated development is expected to generate approximately 533 additional
students in the District during the next ten years, including 320 students in grades TK-6,
79 students in grades 7-8, and 134 students in grades 9-12.
b. The District needs additional school facilities to accommodate students from new
development.
• During the next ten years, the District will need additional school facilities for
approximately 320 grades TK-6 students from unmitigated new development. Students in
grades 7-8 and 9-12 generated by unmitigated new development can be accommodated in
existing facilities (see Section B, Steps 3 and 4).
c. The amount of fees charged is reasonably related to the amount of need attributable to
new development projects.
• The residential fee per square foot justified by this report to fully fund the cost of
providing school facilities to students from unmitigated new development is $6.64 per
square foot (see Section B, Step 8).
• Government Code Section 65995(b) allows the District to charge a residential fee of up to
$4.08 per square foot.2 This fee falls short of funding the full cost of providing school
facilities to students from new development.
• A fee on commercial and industrial development may be charged as a supplement to the
residential fee if the residential fee does not cover the cost of providing school facilities
to students from new development. The justifiable fees for commercial and industrial
development by category are presented in Table C-1, which shows that after subtracting
the residential offset, the net justifiable fee for all categories of commercial/industrial
development, except warehouses, is greater than the maximum statutory fee of $0.66 per
square foot. Therefore, for all categories of commercial/industrial development, except
warehouses, the District may charge the maximum $0.66 per square foot fee. For
warehouses, the District may charge $0.53 cents per square foot.
2A fee can be charged on residential additions of greater than 500 square feet. Although definitive student generation
information on residential additions is not available, an addition of more than 500 square feet maybe reasonably
expected to increase the potential for the unit to accommodate a larger number of persons, including school-age
children.
Odell Planning & Research, Inc. B-1 Golden Valley Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study
SECTION B
RESIDENTIAL FEE JUSTIFICATION
INTRODUCTION
This section presents a step-by-step calculation of the Level 1 residential development fee as
authorized by Education Code Section 17620 and Government Code Section 65995. The
maximum Level 1 residential fee that can currently be charged under Section 65995(b) was
increased by the State Allocation Board in January 2020 to $4.08 per square foot. The next
adjustment to the Level 1 fee will be in January of 2022.
STEP 1: PROJECT NUMBER OF NEW RESIDENTIAL UNITS
The first step in the analysis is to project the number of residential units to be constructed in the
District during the next ten years. This can be estimated by evaluating recent development
activity and current proposals in the District, reviewing local agency land use plans and making
reasonable assumption about future activity.
The number of residential units constructed in the District during the past five years (by calendar
year) is shown on Table B-1.
TABLE B-1 Golden Valley Unified School District
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 2015-2019
Calendar Year Rural Residential Units* Urban Units*
2015 10 0
2016 16 15
2017 26 172
2018 23 193
2019 27 285
Total 102 665
5 Year Average 20 133 Source: GVUSD Developer Fee Records
*All units are single family units
Table B-1 reflects the changing nature of residential development in the District over the past five
years. Until the last two months of 2016, all of the single family building permits were for rural
residential units on scattered parcels in Madera Ranchos and Bonadelle Ranchos. In November
2016, the first permits were issued for single family units in the Riverstone development, and
these are shown as urban units. All of the urban units receiving permits in 2016, 2017, 2018, and
2019 are in the Riverstone development.
Although the District is primarily agricultural and rural residential in nature, substantial areas
within the eastern portion of the District are planned for large-scale urban development, including
Odell Planning & Research, Inc. B-2 Golden Valley Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study
Riverstone, Gunner Ranch West, Liberty Groves, the southern portion of Tesoro Viejo the Rio
Mesa Area Plan, and the Southeast Madera County Area Plan.
Riverstone, with a potential for 6,578 total residential units, is the only large project that has
constructed residential units, and 698 units have received building permits through February 5,
2020. In 2007, the District entered into an agreement with the developer of Riverstone (formerly
Gateway Village) to provide school facilities mitigation for the students the development would
generate. In May 2017, the original agreement was replaced by a new agreement between the
District and the Riverstone developer. The 2017 agreement specifies the terms for formation of a
Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Riverstone development with an annual tax
assessment of $0.38 per square foot on each single family unit, with all proceeds going to the
District for school facilities. In addition, the 2017 agreement requires a per square foot fee at the
time of building permit issuance, and this fee is not subject to the terms of Level 1 developer fees.
The CFD annual tax and the upfront fee constitute full mitigation for school facility impacts of
new residential units, and therefore the Riverstone development is not a factor in this study for
justifying the Level 1 fee. Data from the Riverstone units, however, will be used for other aspects
of this study.
The Tesoro Viejo project is the first development within the Rio Mesa Area Plan with an
approved EIR and final subdivision map. Tesoro Viejo consists of seven villages, but only the
area south of Avenue 14 in the southern-most village of Southern Gateway is within the District.
The initial phase of housing construction is currently taking place, and the Chawanakee Unified
School District, which serves most of the development area, has constructed at TK-8 school
which is currently serving students. The portion of Southern Gateway within the District is
expected to yield approximately 500 dwelling units at full build-out. The build-out timeframe for
Tesoro Viejo is expected to last approximately 15 years, and since the southern portion is planned
to be the last area to be developed it is unlikely that any of this area will be developed during the
next ten years. The remaining portion of the Rio Mesa Area Plan within the District is still
conceptual at this time, with no formal applications having been filed, but is expected to yield
approximately 6,000 dwelling units.
A draft specific plan has been prepared for Gunner Ranch West (2,840 residential units), and the
EIR was approved by the Madera County Board of Supervisors in July 2014 with some water
supply issues still to be resolved. As of the time of this report preparation, many of the water
supply issues have been resolved with Madera County. No tentative map approval has been
granted for residential development, and the project apparently is in a state of suspension. Based
on the traffic study prepared for the project, of the 2,840 dwelling units proposed for the Gunner
Ranch West project, 1,645 would be single family units and 1,195 would be multiple family units
(townhomes, duplexes, triplexes and apartments). The Gunner Ranch West project is planned for
a twenty-year build-out to completion. The project is planned for five phases, with housing and
commercial uses planned in each phase. The actual residential construction schedule will be in
part dictated by market demand for housing. Since no tentative tract map has been approved for
Gunner Ranch West, actual housing construction will not start for at least three years as
infrastructure would need to be developed once a tentative tract map is approved. This report
assumes that about 25 percent of the units (approximately 400 single family and 300 multiple
Odell Planning & Research, Inc. B-3 Golden Valley Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study
family units) will be constructed during the next ten years. The 2017 agreement between the
District and the Riverstone developer requires that the District attempt to negotiate similar
agreements with future developments, and if such an agreement was reached with the Gunner
Ranch West developer, the development would be fully mitigated for school facilities impacts.
In addition, a number of other projects have been proposed for land within the District. These
projects are within an area referred to as the Southeast Madera County Area Plan and include San
Joaquin River Ranch (21,954 units, 3,795 acres); Tatham (9,040 units, 1,250 acres); Liberty
Groves (7,012 units, 1,320 acres); Shaw (997 units, 215 acres); and Morgan (700 units, 149
acres).
Recently, a mostly commercial project with a limited number of residential units has been
proposed on the east side of Highway 41 north of Avenue 12. In addition, Madera County
recently approved an agreement for the construction of a road connecting Avenue 12, east of
Highway 41, to the Tesoro Viejo development. Community Medical Centers has acquired the
property on the northeast corner of Avenue 12 and Highway 41 for a future medical facility. The
development, road, and future medical facility may spur further development of the Rio Mesa
Plan area.
A Notice of Preparation for an EIR for the Liberty Groves development has been issued, but a
Draft EIR has yet to be completed and circulated for comment. The developer has agreed to
reimburse the District for the cost of preparing a mitigation agreement for the project. It is
probable that the school facility impacts of the development will be subject to a mitigation
agreement, so no units from Liberty Groves will be used in this study to justify school impact
fees.
Although there is a very large potential for development activity in the District, the actual number
of units to be constructed is difficult to predict given the unknowns relating to the housing
market, the uncertainties of the project approval process, infrastructure logistics, and whether
mitigation agreements will be adopted. The three projects for which the most development
activity is anticipated during the next ten years are Riverstone, Tesoro Viejo, and Gunner Ranch
West. As previously noted, Riverstone has a mitigation agreement, so it will not be used in this
report to justify developer fees. Units within the GVUSD portion of Tesoro Viejo probably will
not be developed during the next ten years. There is a large potential for development in the Rio
Mesa Area Plan within the District between Tesoro Viejo and the San Joaquin River
(approximately 6,000 units), and it is likely that some development within this area would occur
within the next ten years and/or within the other potential development areas within the District.
For purposes of this report, it is assumed that 25 percent of the Gunner Ranch West units (400
single family and 300 multiple family) will be constructed during the next ten years. It also
assumes that approximately five percent of the unit potential in the Rio Mesa Area east of State
Route 41 and north of the San Joaquin River (about 300 units) will be constructed. Thus, the sum
of the potential urban units within the large developments to be used in this report would be 700
singe family units and 300 multiple family units.
Odell Planning & Research, Inc. B-4 Golden Valley Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study
During the next ten years, it is also assumed that incremental housing construction will continue
to occur in the existing rural residential areas of the District. As indicated by Table B-1, 102 rural
single family residential units have been constructed in the District during the past five years or
an average of about 20 per year. The number of vacant rural residential lots within the existing
Madera Ranchos and Bonadelle Ranchos areas is estimated to be approximately 320.
Furthermore, since some of the lots may have building constraints, it is estimated that the
potential number of units that could be constructed is 240. It is probable that only a portion of the
potential units will be constructed, and for this study it is assumed that no more than 120 of the
remaining buildable lots will have homes built on them during the next ten years. This reflects the
probability that some lots, although buildable, may not be considered desirable to build upon
Based on the previous paragraphs, Table B-2 indicates that approximately 1,120 unmitigated
residential units are projected to be constructed in the District during the next ten years, including
700 urban single-family units, 300 urban multiple family units, and 120 single family units on
rural residential lots. The reader is cautioned, however, that the actual number of units
constructed could be less or more than the number project due to unpredictable economic and
housing market conditions, the uncertainties involved in the project approval process, and
infrastructure logistics for the large development projects.1
TABLE B-2 Golden Valley Unified School District
PROJECTED RESIDENTIAL UNITS (UNMITIGATED) (Ten-Year Period)
Suburban Single Family Units
Suburban Multiple Family Units
Rural Single Family Units
Total Units
700 300 120 1,120
Source: Odell Planning & Research, Inc., 2020
STEP 2: PROJECT NUMBER OF STUDENTS GENERATEDBY
NEW UNMITIGATEDRESIDENTIAL UNITS
The number of students generated by unmitigated residential units constructed during the next ten
years is projected by multiplying the student generation rates for residential development in the
District by the number of units projected in Step 1. The student generation rates used for
projected residential units in the District are shown in Table B-3. The basis for using these
generation rates is described in the following paragraphs.
The residential development that has occurred in the District prior to 2016 has occurred in rural
residential areas. The student generation rate for the rural residential was determined by matching
1At the time of report preparation, the U.S. and the world were in the midst of the coronavirus (COVID-19)
pandemic. This pandemic will have a substantial impact on the economy for an unknown duration and it is
unclear at this time how much of an effect it will have on housing construction activity.
Odell Planning & Research, Inc. B-5 Golden Valley Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study
a sample of 61 units receiving building permits between 2014 and 2018 with the student address
list. The grade level student generation rates are based the ratio of students in the match set for
each grade grouping to the 61 units.
As development continues to occur within the planned large projects within the District, it will be
more urban in nature (on smaller lots and higher density) than existing residential development in
the District. The generation rates of these new units will more closely approximate residential
units in nearby urban areas. Since there is no history of urban residential units in the District
except for the Riverstone development which is not a factor in this study (see discussion on page
B-3), the student generation rates for residential units in the adjacent Clovis Unified School
District are used in this report as being more representative of the urban singe family and multiple
family residential units anticipated to be developed in the District during the next ten years.
(Note: Once sufficient urban development takes place to determine District-specific generation
rates, these will be used in future fee studies.)
TABLE B-3 Golden Valley Unified School District
STUDENT GENERATION RATES
Grade Level
Urban Single Family Units
Urban Multiple Family Units
Rural Single Family Units
Elementary (TK-6) 0.374 0.090 0.262
Intermediate School (7-8) 0.089 0.030 0.066
High School (9-12) 0.144 0.055 0.131
Total (TK-12) 0.607 0.175 0.459
Source: Clovis Unified School District, 2020; GVUSD Developer Fee Records 2014-2018; Odell Planning &
Research, Inc., 2020.
Table B-4 shows the projected number of students generated by unmitigated residential units
constructed during the next ten years. As indicated by Table B-4, approximately 533 students in
grades TK-12 are projected to be generated by residential units constructed during the next ten
years, including 320 in grades TK-6, 79 in grades 7-8, and 134 in grades 9-12.
(This space intentionally left blank)
Odell Planning & Research, Inc. B-6 Golden Valley Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study
TABLE B-4 Golden Valley Unified School District
STUDENTS GENERATED BY UNMITIGATED RESIDENTIAL UNITS (Ten-Year Period)
Grade Level Number of Units Student
Generation Rate New Development
Students
Urban Single Family Units
TK-6 700 0.374 262
7-8 700 0.089 62
9-12 700 0.144 101
Urban Multiple Family Units
TK-6 300 0.090 27
7-8 300 0.030 9
9-12 300 0.055 17
Rural Single Family Units
TK-6 120 0.262 31
7-8 120 0.066 8
9-12 120 0.131 16
Total Students
TK-6 320
7-8 79
9-12 134
K-12 533 Source: Odell Planning & Research, Inc., 2020
STEP 3: DETERMINE AVAILABLE FACILITIES CAPACITY FOR NEW
DEVELOPMENT STUDENTS
To determine whether there is any excess capacity to house new development students, Table B-5
compares the District’s enrollment in each grade grouping to the District’s school building
capacity. (Note: the enrollment numbers in Table B-5 do not include Valley Teen Ranch
Community Day School and students receiving instruction at Valley Children’s Hospital, as these
students do not require traditional school facilities.) The school building capacity shown in Table
B-5 is based on the information in Appendix 1, and the grade level capacities are inclusive of
SDC students who will not be treated separately in this study.
As shown by Table B-5, no existing capacity is available for students in grades TK-6. In fact, the
District needs adequate capacity for 361 students in grades TK-6. Capacity is available for 382
students in grades 7-8, and 454 students in grades 9-12.
Odell Planning & Research, Inc. B-7 Golden Valley Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study
TABLE B-5 Golden Valley Unified School District
AVAILABLE FACILITIES CAPACITY FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT STUDENTS
Grade Level Existing Facilities
Capacity 2019-20 Enrollment
Available Capacity (or Capacity Needed)
TK-6 690 1,051 (361)
7-8 720 338 382
9-12 1,080 626 454
Source: GVUSD, 2020; Odell Planning & Research, Inc.,2020
Although Table B-5 represents existing conditions for facilities capacities and District enrollment,
it must be noted that the District has two projects that will impact the above capacity numbers in
the future.
The first elementary school in the Riverstone development (Stone Creek Elementary) is currently
under construction and will open for the 2021-22 school year, accommodating 651 TK-6
students. Stone Creek Elementary will house students from the Riverstone development, which is
not a part of the fee justification, thus Stone Creek Elementary is not available to house any of the
TK-6 students identified in Table B-4.
The District plans to begin construction on the Liberty High School Engineering Agri-science and
Farming (LEAF) building in late 2020 with an expected opening for the 2022-23 school year. The
LEAF project will add 12 teaching stations that will accommodate 432 students using the District
loading standard for grades 9-12. Because there is already sufficient capacity to accommodate the
projected unhoused grades 9-12 in Table B-4, the LEAF project is not a factor in this study.
STEP 4: DETERMINE NUMBER OF UNHOUSED STUDENTS GENERATED BY
UNMITIGATED NEW DEVELOPMENT
The number of unhoused students from unmitigated new development is determined in Table B-6
by subtracting any available capacity in Table B-5 from the number of students generated by
unmitigated new development. As shown in Table B-6, the District will have the 320 unhoused
grades TK-6 students from projected new development.
All projected unmitigated new development students in grades 7-8 and grades 9-12 can be
accommodated in existing facilities, although it is important to note that mitigated students from
the Riverstone development will also occupy capacity in existing 7-8 and 9-12 facilities.
Odell Planning & Research, Inc. B-8 Golden Valley Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study
TABLE B-6 Golden Valley Unified School District
UNHOUSED STUDENTS GENERATED BY NEWDEVELOPMENT
Grade Level New Development
Students Available Capacity Unhoused Students
TK-6 320 0 320
7-8 79 382 None
9-12 134 454 None
Source: Odell Planning & Research, Inc., 2020
STEP 5: CALCULATE SCHOOL FACILITIES COST FOR UNHOUSED STUDENTS
FROM UNMITIGATED NEW DEVELOPMENT
School facilities costs are broken down into three categories: building construction, site
acquisition, and site development. Since new development will only result in unhoused students
in grades TK-6, only TK-6 values will be used in this study for facilities costs for future students
from unmitigated new development.
Although not a part of the Level 1 fee justification, the construction cost of Stone Creek
Elementary in the Riverstone development provides a basis for an estimate of the per student cost
to construct a TK-6 school. The total bid award for construction of Stone Creek is $27,303,817,
and for a student capacity of 651 TK-6 students this equates to $41,941 per student, which
subsequently is the amount used in Table B-7. (Note: In addition to the actual construction bid
amounts, there are other associated costs such as tests and inspections and probable of change
orders that will increase the actual total cost to construct Stone Creek Elementary.) The total
construction cost to house the 320 projected grades TK-6 students from new development is
estimated to be $13,421,120.
The site acquisition cost for a TK-6 school can also be estimated from the recent agreement to
purchase the Stone Creek Elementary site from the Riverstone developer for $3 million. For a
651-student capacity school this equates to $4,608 per student, and from this amount the
estimated total cost to provide a site for the 320 unhoused TK-6 students is $1,474,560.
Because the construction bid amounts for Stone Creek Elementary are inclusive of site
development work, a separate computation of site development cost is not necessary. Table B-7
summarizes the facilities cost for the projected 320 unhoused TK-6 students, and the total cost is
$14,895,680.
TABLE B-7 Golden Valley Unified School District
SCHOOL FACILITY COST FOR UNHOUSED NEW DEVELOPMENT STUDENTS
Grade Level Construction and Site
Development Cost Site Acquisition Cost Total Cost
TK-6 $13,421,120 $1,474,560 $14,895,680
Source: Odell Planning & Research, Inc., 2020; GVUSD Bid Summary Sheet, 2020
Odell Planning & Research, Inc. B-9 Golden Valley Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study
STEP 6: REVIEW AVAILABLE FUNDING
The District has reviewed its potential local funding sources for school facilities and has
identified unencumbered fund balances as indicated in Table B-8 that are potentially available to
construct facilities to house students from new development. The fund balances are from March
27, 2020.
TABLE B-8 Golden Valley Unified School District
CAPITAL FACILITY FUND BALANCES
Fund Unencumbered Balance*
Fund 21 (Bond Fund) $0
Fund 25 (Capital Facilities Fund) $1,307,831
Fund 35 (Building Fund) $8,460,439
Fund 40 (Capital Reserve Fund) $17,865
Fund 49 (Capital Reserve) $194,210 Total $9,980,345
Source: GVUSD staff, March 2020.
*Note: The fund balances in Table B-8 are for the 2019-20 fiscal year, and most of the funds are actually obligated by
current or future contracts that go beyond the 2019-20 fiscal year.
In addition to the funds identified in Table B-8, which amount to $9,980,345, the District is in the
process of selling an additional $20 million of Measure S bonds, and those funds are expected to
be available in May 2020. Thus, the maximum potentially available funds will be $29,980,345.
The District has current and future obligations against the funds for the construction of Stone
Creek Elementary and the LEAF building at Liberty High School. The construction and site
acquisition costs for Stone Creek Elementary total $30,303,917. (Note: The total cost for Stone
Creek Elementary will be significantly greater because of related construction costs and the future
cost of furniture and equipment.) The District estimates the total cost for the LEAF project to be
$22 million, but it is 50-percent grant funded, leaving a District estimated cost of $11 million.
Table B-5 indicates that there are 361 TK-6 students currently unhoused in the District. A review
of the student address list indicates that approximately 61 TK-6 students have addresses in the
Riverstone development which is not a part of this fee justification study. Therefore, there is a net
of approximately 300 TK-6 unmitigated students that are currently unhoused. Using the per
student costs in Step 5, the cost to provide facilities for these students is approximately
$13,964,700.
The District cost for the Stone Creek Elementary and the LEAF project total more than $41
million, and combined with the cost to house the existing unhoused from the previous paragraph
indicates a total that substantially exceeds the potentially available amount of $29,980,345.
Therefore, there are no available funds to house the projected unhoused students from new
development.
Odell Planning & Research, Inc. B-10 Golden Valley Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study
STEP 7: ESTIMATE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROJECTED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOOPMENT
The total square footage for unmitigated residential units projected to be constructed in the
District during the next ten years is presented in Table B-9. This was determined by multiplying
the average square footage for each type of residential unit in the District by the number of new
dwelling units projected in Step 1. The urban single family unit size is based on sample of 327
units that received building permits in the Riverstone development from July of 2018 through
January of 2020. The urban multiple family unit size is based on units receiving building permits
in Clovis Unified from 2015 through 2018. The rural single family unit size is based on the 61
units receiving building permits in the District from 2015 through June of 2018. The total
estimated residential square feet to be constructed in the District during the next ten years is
2,241,760.
TABLE B-9
Golden Valley Unified School District PROJECTED UNMITIGATED RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
(Ten-Year Period)
Number/Type of Units Average Square Feet Per Unit Total Square Feet
700 Urban Single Family 2,359 1,651,300
300 Urban Multiple Family 1,085 325,500
120 Rural Single Family 2,208 264,960
Total 2,241,760
Source: Odell Planning & Research, Inc., 2020; GVUSD Developer Fee Records; Clovis Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study/School Facilities Needs Analysis, 2020
STEP 8: CALCULATE LEVEL 1 FEE
The District’s potential Level 1 fee is calculated by dividing the facilities cost for new
development students determined in Step 5, Table B-7, by the projected total square footage of
assessable space of residential units anticipated to be constructed during the next ten years
identified in Table B-9. As indicated in Table B-10, the justified Level 1 fee is $6.64 per square
foot, and this exceeds the maximum allowable fee of $4.08 per square foot. Therefore, the
District is justified in levying the allowable $4.08 per square foot fee.
TABLE B-10 Golden Valley Unified School District
LEVEL 1 FEE CALCULATION
Cost For New Development Students
Projected Residential Square Footage
Cost Per Square Foot
$14,895,680 2,241,760
$6.64
Source: Odell Planning & Research, Inc., 2020
Odell Planning & Research, Inc. B-11 Golden Valley Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study
The development fees collected by the District may be used for construction and/or
reconstruction of school facilities, site acquisition, site development, relocatable classrooms on
existing or future sites and other facilities necessitated by students generated by new development
as provided in the District’s Facilities Master Plan or otherwise determined necessary.
Odell Planning & Research, Inc. C-1 Golden Valley Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study
SECTION C
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL FEE JUSTIFICATION
INTRODUCTION
This section presents a step-by-step explanation of the methodology used to determine the
District’s commercial/industrial development fees, as shown in Table C-1. The maximum
commercial/industrial fee that can be charged pursuant to Education Code Section 17620 and
Government Code Section 65995 is $0.66 per square foot.
STEP 1: DETERMINE SQUARE FOOTAGE PER EMPLOYEE
Commercial and industrial development generates employees, and the children of employees
living in the District will need to be housed in District schools. The number of employees per
1,000 square feet generated by various types of commercial and industrial development is shown
in Table C-1.1
STEP 2: DETERMINE NUMBER OF STUDENTS PER EMPLOYEE
The average number of students per employee was determined by using U.S. Census Bureau 2018
American Community Survey (ACS) data for the Golden Valley Unified School District and
CBEDS enrollment information from the California Department of Education (CDE) DataQuest
website. According to ACS data, there were 4,942 civilian employed persons residing the
District. The CDE website indicates that 2,007 students were enrolled in grades TK-12 in the
District in 2018-19. However, since facilities costs were not generated for grades 7-12 students in
Section B, grades 7-12 students have been excluded from the calculation. There were 1,044
students enrolled in the District in 2018-19, excluding grades 7-12. This calculates to a ratio of
0.211 students per employee. This ratio, however, must be further adjusted by including only the
estimated percentage of employees that would move into the District as a result of employment
opportunities (20.0 percent).2 The discounted student per employee ratio, therefore, is 0.042 (20.0
percent of 0.211).
STEP 3: CALCULATE STUDENT GENERATION RATE PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET
The TK-6 student generation rate per 1,000 square feet of commercial/industrial development in
each category was calculated by multiplying the number of employees per 1,000 square feet by
the number of TK-6 students per employee. (The numbers are presented per 1,000 square feet
rather than per square foot for ease of presentation and data manipulation.)
1 Employee density data from the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Traffic Generators
Manual is used in Table C-1, as allowed by law.
2 Based on 2018 U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey data.
TABLE C-1
Golden Valley Unified School District COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL FEE CALCULATION
Category Employees Per 1,000
Square Feet
Students Per Employee
Students Per 1,000 Square
Feet
Facilities Cost Per Student
Cost Per Square Foot
Residential Offset
Net Cost Per Square Foot
(Justifiable Fee)
Warehouse 0.7 0.042 0.029 $46,549 $1.37 $0.84 $0.53
Lodging 1.11 0.042 0.047 $46,549 $2.17 $1.33 $0.84
Industrial Park 1.68 0.042 0.071 $46,549 $3.28 $2.02 $1.27
Community Shopping Center
1.74 0.042 0.073 $46,549 $3.40 $2.09 $1.31
Corporate Office 2.68 0.042 0.113 $46,549 $5.24 $3.22 $2.02
Neighborhood Shopping Center
2.8 0.042 0.118 $46,549 $5.47 $3.36 $2.11
Bank 2.83 0.042 0.119 $46,549 $5.53 $3.40 $2.13
Scientific Research & Development
3.04 0.042 0.128 $46,549 $5.94 $3.65 $2.29
Business Park 3.73 0.042 0.157 $46,549 $7.29 $4.48 $2.81
Medical Office 4.27 0.042 0.179 $46,549 $8.35 $5.13 $3.22
Commercial Office 4.71 0.042 0.198 $46,549 $9.21 $5.66 $3.55
Note: Distribution of cost per square foot between the residential offset and the net cost per square foot may not sum precisely due to rounding.
Source: SANDAG Traffic Generators Manual, 1990; U.S. Census American Community Survey, 2018; Odell Planning & Research, Inc., 2020
Odell Planning & Research, Inc. C-3 Golden Valley Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study
STEP 4: DETERMINE SCHOOL FACILITIES COST PER STUDENT
The average cost of school facilities per student is $46,549 and was determined by using costs in
Step 5 of Section B.
STEP 5: CALCULATE COST PER SQUARE FOOT
The school facilities cost per square foot for each commercial/industrial category was calculated
by multiplying the student generation rate per 1,000 square feet by the average school facilities
cost per student, and then dividing the product by 1,000.
STEP 6: CALCULATE RESIDENTIAL OFFSET
When employees are generated in the District as a result of new commercial/industrial
development, fees will also be charged on the new residential units occupied by the employees
and students generated by commercial/industrial development. To prevent a commercial or
industrial development from paying for the portion of the impact that will be covered by the
residential fee, this amount has been calculated and deducted from each category. This is referred
to as the “residential offset” and is intended to avoid any possibility of overpayment for the same
student impact. The residential offset amount is calculated by multiplying the following factors
together and dividing the total by 1,000 (to convert from cost per 1,000 square feet to cost per
square foot):
• The student generation rate per 1,000 square feet of commercial/industrial development,
adjusted to exclude grades 7-12 (since no facilities costs were generated for grades 7-12
students in Section B).
• The number of dwelling units constructed for each student (excluding grades 7-12). This is
3.50, which is derived by taking the weighted student generation rate for projected residential
development, excluding grades 7-12 (0.286) and dividing it into one.
• The weighted average square feet per dwelling unit (2,002).
• The maximum residential fee that could be charged by the District ($4.08 per square foot).
STEP 7: DETERMINE NET COST PER SQUARE FOOT (JUSTIFIABLE FEE)
After subtracting the residential offset, the net justifiable fee for all categories of
commercial/industrial development except warehouses in Table C-1 is greater than the maximum
statutory fee of $0.66 per square foot. Therefore, except for warehouses, the District may charge
the maximum $0.66 per square foot fee. For warehouses, the District may charge $0.53 per
square foot.
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 1 Golden Valley Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study
APPENDIX 1
SCHOOL FACILITIES CAPACITY
The capacity of the District’s school facilities is shown in Table 1-1 based on the classroom
count included in District’s Long Range Facility Master Plan and the District’s loading
standards. The number of classrooms is adjusted to exclude (1) pullout classrooms used for
reading and computer labs, resource specialists (RSP) and music, dance and theater programs;
and (2) portable classrooms twenty years or older, which are considered past their useful life
expectancy.
TABLE 1-1 Golden Valley Unified School District
EXSTING SCHOOL FACILITIES CAPACITY
Webster TK-6
Sierra View TK-6
Ranchos Middle 7-8
Liberty High 9-12
Permanent Classrooms 17 4 23 35
Pullout Classrooms 0 -1 -3 -4
Other Not Loaded -1 0 0 -1
Net Permanent Classrooms 16 3 20 30
Portable Classrooms 13 23 0 0
Pullout Classrooms -4 -3 0 0
20+ Years Old -5 -17 0 0
Other Not Loaded -2 -1 0 0
Net Portable Classrooms 2 2 0 0
Total Loaded Classrooms 18 5 20 30
District Loading* 30 30 36 36
Total Capacity 540 150 720 1,080
Source: GVUSD Long Range Facility Master Plan, 2016; Odell Planning & Research, Inc., 2020
*For TK-6 the loading standard is the weighted average of 25 for TK-1, 27 for 2-3, and 35 for 4-6
Appendix 2 1 Golden Valley Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study
APPENDIX 2
FEE STUDY INTENDED USE AND LIMITATIONS
This purpose of this appendix is to provide information on the intended use and limitations of the
fee study.
The intent of the fee study is to provide an appropriate level of information in accordance with
state law to show that the District is justified in charging Level 1 fees. The study is not intended
to be an all-encompassing financial analysis that identifies all possible and/or probable costs the
District would incur in providing school facilities required by new development. Furthermore, the
study is not intended to serve as a sole basis or as a limiting factor for any future discussions and
negotiations between developers and the District as to financial resources required for school
facilities necessary to accommodate students generated by new development.
Although a Level 1 fee of $6.64 per residential square foot was justified in this study, the Level 1
fee is currently capped statewide at $4.08 per square foot for residential development. It is
important to note that the Level 1 fee calculations do not include the cost of District-wide non-
classroom support facilities (such as administrative offices, transportation facilities, warehouses,
and central kitchens), interim housing costs, many of the administrative costs internally incurred
by the District in implementing of new school facilities projects or financing costs associated with
the use of short- or long-term financing vehicles that may be necessary to leverage revenues from
school facilities fees.
Furthermore, the Level 1 fee calculation in this study is based on a ten year time frame and
justifies fees solely based on the cost of providing facilities for new development students in
grades TK-6. This is because capacity currently exists in grades 7-8 and 9-12 facilities to
accommodate projected new development students at these grade levels. However, in determining
potential fees for a large development project mitigation agreement or another funding
mechanism, such as a community facilities district, the District should not limit itself to TK-6
costs or to a ten year period, as the build out timeframe for most large development projects is
greater than ten years and will result in facilities needs for students in grades TK-6, 7-8 and 9-12.
In conclusion, this study is not intended to limit, restrict, or constrain any future school facilities
master planning process, the District’s evaluation of the impacts of new residential development
on the District, or the remedies that the District may pursue to seek the required revenues to fund
the cost of school facilities, District-wide support facilities and other costs associated with the
impacts of new development.
Appendix 3 1 Golden Valley Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study
APPENDIX 3
SOURCES CONSULTED
Beintker, Aimee, Executive Secretary, Superintendent’s Office, Golden Valley Unified School
District. Email communications, February and March 2020.
Berg, Mike, Consultant to Golden Valley Unified School Distinct. Email Communications.
March 2020.
Clovis Unified School District. Student Generation Rates. March 2020.
Golden Valley Unified School District. Board Agenda and Supporting Documents. March 24,
2020.
Golden Valley Unified School District. Developer Fee Collection Records. 2015-2020.
Golden Valley Unified School District. Long Range Facility Master Plan. April 26, 2016.
Golden Valley Unified School District. Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration for LEAF
Project at Liberty High School. December 2018.
Golden Valley Unified School District. School Facilities Agreement with Riverstone Developer.
May 1, 2017.
Golden Valley Unified School District. Stone Creek School Bid Results. December 12, 2019.
Golden Valley Unified School District. Student Address List, March 2020.
Golden Valley Unified School District. Student Enrollment Data. February 2020.
Madera, County of, Planning Department. Gunner Ranch West Final Program Environmental
Impact Report. March 2013.
Madera, County of, Planning Department. Gunner Ranch West Draft Specific Plan. June 2013.
Madera, County of, Planning Department. Tesoro Viejo Specific Plan Revised Environmental
Impact Report. June 29, 2012
Madera, County of, Resource Management Agency Planning Department. Notice of Preparation
(NOP) of a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Liberty Groves Area Plan and Specific
Plan. June 15, 2011.
Madera, County of, Resource Management Agency Planning Department. Southeast Madera
Existing Characteristics Analysis, Public Review Draft. April 19, 2010.
Meneses, Lacy, Director of Business Services, Golden Valley Unified School District. Email
Communications. March 2020.
Odell Planning & Research, Inc. Development Fee Justification Study. Prepared for Golden
Valley Unified School District. March 2018.
Appendix 3 2 Golden Valley Unified School District
Development Fee Justification Study
San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). San Diego Traffic Generators Manual.
1990, as amended.
School Facilities Consultants. Classroom Inventory for Golden Valley Unified School District.
December 2015.
State Allocation Board, State of California. Index Adjustment on the Assessment for
Development. January 22, 2020.
U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 2018 (https://data.census.gov/cedsci/).
Accessed March 2020.
Agenda Item Details
Public Content
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Meeting Apr 28, 2020 - Regular Meeting
Category J. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS
Subject 3. Approve, Stone Creek Elementary Change Order 001_RES-15. [Wallace]
Access Public
Type Action
Background: The attached change order, pertaining to changing the scope and specification for clock, bell, and PAsystems, is returning from the March board meeting with responses to member questions. Current Considerations: Jeff Berrios, project architect with SIM/PBK, has included answers to questions raised (seeattached). Administration and consultant Mike Berg are available to answer any additional questions, but otherwiserecommend approval. Financial Impact: The increase to the project budget is $153,729.24. This is anticipated to be partially offset withsavings from replacing projectors and screens with tvs in classrooms.
Stone Creek Change Order No. 2.pdf (403 KB) Q&A SIM-PBK Change Order.pdf (183 KB)
1) What was in the original construction documents for this scope of work prior to the value engineering changes? Only the clock portion of the system was included in the original bid. The speakers were not shown on the drawings. Unfortunately, this was realized within 72 hours of the bid and the bid deadline could not be extended to accommodate an addendum. Accordingly, extra contingency was added to the budget to accommodate this change.
Note that a specification for a complete IP system was included; however, since the speakers were not shown along with the clocks, it is assumed the contractors bid only a wireless analog clock system (which is in the spec for certain circumstances), and not the IP components. Also, note the analog clock system is included as a credit in the proposed change order. 2) What was left in the bid set after value engineering and what aspects of clock, bells, and PA would have been functional had we not proposed to change to the proposed change order? The value engineering did not affect the PA/clock system. If the proposed change order is not accepted, then there will be wireless clocks only and no speakers. 3) What will the proposed change include, and specifically how will the system perform i.e.; VOIP operated bells, PA, phone? The change order would include IP speaker/clocks and common area speakers throughout the campus. The devices will function as bells, all-call paging, and individual paging with talkback, time readout, and messages readout. 4) With VOIP operated systems, what happens when the internet is down? Do bells, PA, clocks still operate? If so, what purpose does internet backbone serve? If not, what is the back up system in case of exigent communication demands? The system operates from a server application on a local computer in the MDF room. When the internet is down, it does not affect campus PA/clock operation. When the internet backbone is up, the time can synchronize plus programming and paging from other district locations can be made.
5) What would the estimated cost of system have been had it been included in the bid set versus a change order? Our original estimate was $105,000 for the PA/clock system to be included with bid. Our estimate did not include bonds, overhead and mark-up, which the contractor would have included at bid day and did include with this change order request. Also it can be challenging to attain accurate estimates on this work, especially right before a bid from manufactures & sub-contractors
MARKWlLgONCONSTRLJCTiON, INC
Change Order Request 001_RES-L5A C Electric
To SIM-PBK Architects7790 N Palm Ave
Fresno, CA 93711Attn. Jeff Berrios
We submit the following cost proposal for review and process:
Scope of Change Furnish and install (49) clock speaker combos, (22) exterior ceiling
mount speakers and (1) Exterior Camera. Credit (1) wireless clock
system, (31) wireless clocks and (1) interior camera,
Reason for Change Bulletin 5
Date 3-3-20ProjectProject Number
Riverstone Elementary School20L9L2
Calendar Day Time Extension 0
SIM. Architects Unified SD
.2- F 4^tt
Date* Payment pending SchoolBoard Approval
Description Total
Low voltage adds and deducts per Bulletin 5 5753,729.24
TOTAL Slsl,729.24
Construction
Date
3/1s/2020
FORM TOR EXTRA WORI(AND/OR DEDUCTIVE WORI(
CoNTMctoR's ASDITIVE DEDUCTIVE
15l6 NrriorarpoR c.o.R. {s) O__1_$.$*$iQ{rf
O: Attaoh ltemizod !l9i(9) lndlcatlng houts, rales, mateylal quan0ty, maieriai cosli, and unlt coslso: lncJtrde lhe cosl for laxes.o: Rsier to ihsbverheau ahd ProlitSchedule@: CarikdCbfs bond hnd llabllity lniruiince pr6mluni, lf ln fact ectual bonde a;nd lnsurancd ara to ba pirrbhased, Total ctstbshall not exceCd 2% of ih'e Nel Tolal (line 16), Refer lo the O&P Schedule.(6) lncludes all direcl and iniJireit coels, ln'cludlng but not. llmlled to, aecelera{lon, cunrula(ive offect of the chango(s). expedltlng
ths. Wqrk, Fnagngtg, qto.
suacoNrnAcroR LABoR rorAl o $45-@ffi-11 gEEK*!-gsuecoNrnacroR MATERTAL TorALo, E-3ktLt5.,..88
SugcoNrRecToR'sOVERHEADAND t t -1 nr l rx,lPRorrrroR suBrorAl#1 (Lti'lE4)@ $ll4-1-tu*i i- i
suBTor L#z (LrNEs 4 & s) o il1.$,3!k&dpi?'"b,'?it
3 SuacolrnAcToREeulFMENTTorALo,
4
b
b
$
1
2
SusroraLlll (rlrues 1, 2 & 3)
,ftl7
${AA/4[&3 ilP&S]
7 coNT^ocro^ LABoRrorALo sJbAfr&!n coNTMcroRMareniRuTorRuo, 6JGLb-,nk
CQHrnncrON EQUIPMENT TOTAL Q,
SUEToTAL,#3 (LiNEs 7, I & 9)
CONTRAoToR.S OVERHEAD AND PRoFIT
\q,\, e,q
FoR:guBTorAl,#3 (L|NE 1Q) p12 CoNTRecroR's OvenHeeo nruo PRoFtr
(fi&
fI
4
c
{)
'10
11
I14
qt', \c
".+(ffi,$T
A,7J'.1Sum onSuarornrc#2 &
FoR sudToTAL#2 (LINE 6J O
susrorel #4 (LtNEg 10, 1 1 & 12)
4-e gbntni. eom.7ran 7 CALIFORNIA C.1O LICENSE 99849
ENGINEERING . CONSTRUCTION . TECHNOLOGY. SERVICEFRESNO OtVtStON
Box2425Fresno, CA 93745-2425
O: (559) 233-2208F: (559) 233-6849
www.a-celectric.com
FOUNDED
Job Name:
Customer Job No:
A-C Job No:
1S45
Ghange ReqUest Proposal
RIVERSTONE ELEMENTARY SCH
FR0938
Dats:
Description:
A-C CRP No:
2t21t20
BULLETIN #5
2.00
To GOLDEN VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL37479 AVENUE 12
MADERA, CA 93638
Attn
Description:
BULLETIN #5. FURNISH AND INSTALL 49 CLOCK SPEAKER COMBOS, 22 EXTERIORCEILING MOUNT SPEAKERS & 1 EXTERIOR CAMEM, CREDIT 1 . WIRELESS CLOCKSYSTEM, 31- WIRELESS CLOCKS & .I INTERIOR CAMERA.
Schedule lmpact: 0 Days
Words:
Figure:
Price Valid Until:
Terms and Conditions:
AMOUNT
One Hundred Fifty-Three Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty-Nine Dollars and Twenty-Four Cenls
$153,729.24
1. This proposal is valid for a period not to exceed (20) calendar days from the date of thls proposal unless olheMise noted.
2. This proposal is contingent upon receiving a signed copy of this Change Request or receiving a mutually acceptable form of subcontract change order.
3. Progress billlng will be based on work completed and materials stored.
4. This proposal excludes acceleration, losses of efficiency, as well as the cumulative impact of ongoing and new changos b€ing directed. We reserve our rights to
pursue reimbursement for these and any other costs that occur beyond the scope of our original contract.
5. Labor rates are based on the work being performed during regular working hours - overtime is not included unless specifically stated in this proposal.
6. Pricing is based on having unrestricted access to the work area.
7. Cutting and patching is excluded unless specifically included in the quote.
A-C Electric Company Accepted by:
Signed
Trevor Devers, Service ManagerSigned
Name and Title2121t20
Name and Title
Date
Print Date: O2l24l2O
Date
Page 1 of 1
n-e gbnro€atnpuy
CUSTOMER JOB # 2OI9I2 A-C JOB # FR0938
CUSTOMER APR/PCO# A-C PCO # 2
Date 2l2ll20
RE: Bulletin #5 - Furnish and install49 clock speal<er conrbos, 22 exteriol speakers, 8 iuterior ceiling mount speakers & I exteliol canlel'a.
Credit 1- wireless clock system, 3l- wireless cloclcs & I interiol caltlera.
TO: Malk Wilson ConstructionCole Beudoslci
JOB: RivelstoueElementary
MATERIALMaterial
4.ztk-i4 e\
77 - luu(TOTALMATERIAL
SUBCONTRACTClock/ Speaker/ Camela System
Sl 13,77
128,Q70.79l.2.
3.
4.
TOTAL SUBCONTRACT $ 128,070.79
LABORST Hours 154.82 l{r's @. $ 85.32 ihr $13.209.24OT Hours Fls @. $ /hrDTHous l{rs@ $ /hrProject Manager - Hrs (4. $ 150.00 /hr
Estimatins Hls@ $ 65.00 /hr
Administration Hrs @. $ 55.00 iluMatelial Runner' Hts @. $ 40.00 /hrSubsistance N/A O:yt @ N/A /aoy
$13'209'24
EXPENSES
Consunable Items 4% oflabor Dollars $528.37
Delivery Truck t{rs @ /lrrMaterial Stofage $24,28
EquipmentRentalA-C OwnedEquipment $362.86
Drawins Updates sheets (d /sheetTOTALE)GENSES $9l s.s0
OVERHEAD, PROFIT, BOND, TAX & SIJBCONTRACTMARK.UPSubtotal of Material and LaborOverhead & PlofitTax
0l$ 163.00
$ e4.oz
Mark on
Total Subcontract DollarsMark Up on Subcontlact
Bond
$ 9ls.s0$ 137.33
79
.54
1$
$
$l 729.24
+h,6u'I
TOTAL COST SUMMARY
ry6q}.
1522.00
o
m a g n eta r, u s,, #.'i.ii$}f'a
Change Order Request 01
1912-05-01 Riverstone Elementarv- Public Address and Clocks Solution
r This COR represent the cost of addig Atlas lP Paging System. lncluding back boxes, CAT6 Cabting, licensing,
programing, and the installation of digital speaker clock cotnbos per Bulletin 5.
. The credlt listed is for the specified Sapling Master Clock and Station Clocks,
o This credit also includes L interior camera that was deleted per Bulletin 5.
Date: February 21,2020
Sub 1
Shipping
Taxes
11 , Material subtolal 2
1
2
3
4
5
0
7
B
s
10
11
13
13
11
12
13
1{
15
16
il
1B
19
20
otv.
4S IPSDM Atlas Wall Mount Speaker Clock
49 IP-FEST-SD Atlas Endosure
22 l6lRESExtedorEnclosure
22 VPl61A-APFVandalProofGrill
22 APF-15T Exlerior Horn
11.76 1 1,760'of CAT6 Oata Cable 1 000' per box
8 SD72W-KIT lnterior Speakers Kil
3 IP-ZCMIRMI( lP Gateway
'l IP Licences
1 Programing
1 As-Builts
-31 SBI-31S-254-4RSapling DigitalClock
-1 SMA-3R0-1000-lSaplingMaslerClock
-1 MV32 MerakiCantera
Equpment Renlal
Rental Sub T
21 Equiprnent Rental + Labor cost lotal + Malerial cost totat
22
23
22
IJ
24
25
Clarifications
1.50
0.35
0.75
0,75
1.50
7.00
2,00
1,00
$96,48
$96,48
$96.48
$96,48
$96.48
$96.48
$96.48
$96.48
$96.48
$96.48 ,
$90.48
$96,48
$96.48
$96.48
$96.48
$96.48
$0.00'l
$0,00
4.00
1.00
0,60
3.50
1.00
'LbrSubtolal I
Travel
Subsistence
Lbr Sub 2
Subconlractor I
Total Cost
0verhead
Profit
Bond
Tolal Price
10%
5lo
0%
1)
2l
3)
Labor determined by NECA Manual of Labor Units 20L7-2018
Same project lnclusiorrs/Exclusions apply
Valid for 30 days from the date issued
4gl9 N. ERAWLEYAvE. I Fnesruo, GA 93vzz I TELI 559.477,4rs2 | EMA|L: [email protected] 1- of 1
/doscription ofwork LaborHRS Laborrate Cost:
l. rlmagnetar.us, inc.
Please contqct if you should you have any questions or comments,
Slncerely,
Jeff Nolan
Frojeet Manager
Pleqse slgn and return approvlhg above change order request.
Slgnature
Piint Namei
43 1E N, ERAWLEYAva. I FREsNtr, AASA',TZZ Irer-: SBg.477.4tSZ I EMAIL: [email protected] 2 of 1
Agenda Item Details
Public Content
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Meeting Apr 28, 2020 - Regular Meeting
Category K. CONSENT AGENDA
Subject 2. Approve, Minutes from Regular Meeting, March 24, 2020. [Wallace]
Access Public
Type Action, Minutes
Minutes View Minutes for Mar 24, 2020 - Regular Meeting (Via Conference Call Only #1-712-8
3.24.2020 Minutes.pdf (70 KB)
Golden Valley Unified School DistrictRegular Meeting (Via Conference Call Only #1-712-832-8330 Access Code #4375521) (Tuesday, March 24, 2020)Generated by Aimee Beintker on Thursday, April 9, 2020 Members presentAndy Wheeler, Brian Freeman, Maria Knobloch, Mona L Diaz, Steven Lewis Meeting called to order at 5:23 PM A. OPEN SESSION/CALL TO ORDER (5:15 P.M.)Information: 1. Governor Gavin Newsom issued an executive order which limits the gathering of no more than ten people, andallows local or state legislative bodies to hold meetings via teleconference and to make meetings accessible electronically. Due tothis order, Golden Valley USD will continue to hold Board meetings via conference call until further notice. B. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMSProcedural: 1. Persons wishing to address the governing board on any closed session item may do so at this time. Speakers arerequested to state their name and to address comments to the Board of Trustees. The Board is governed by the Brown Act andmay briefly respond to public comments but take no action except on items scheduled on the agenda. A maximum of 10 minutestotal is set aside for public comment on closed session items. C. CLOSED SESSIONAction: 1. Personnel: Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release/Resignation (Government Code: 54957).Action: 2. Personnel: Public Employee Employment/Appointments (Government Code: 54957).Action: 3. C.2.a Secondary Math Teacher, RMSInformation: 4. Consideration of Student Expulsion #071920 (Government Code: 48918)Information: 6. Conference with real property negotiator (Government Code: 54956.8) Property: Stone Creek Elementary Schoolsite located within the area commonly known as Riverstone, West of Highway 41 and Avenue 12 Agency Negotiator:Superintendent Negotiating Parties: GVUSD and Valley Development Company LLC Under Negotiation: PropertyInformation: 7. Public Employee Informal Performance Evaluation, Unrepresented Employee: Superintendent D. RECONVENE from Closed Session (6:30 P.M.)Action: 2. Reconvene from Closed Session and report any action taken.The Board reconvened from Closed Session and reported the following action taken: C.2. Personnel: Public Employee Employment/Appointments (Government Code: 54597) C.2.a RMS, Math Teacher, Reed Carbone Motion by Mona Diaz, second by Steven LewisFinal Resolution: Motion CarriesYea: Andy Wheeler, Brian Freeman, Maria Knobloch, Mona L Diaz, Steven Lewis E. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTInformation: 1. If you are a member of the public participating via conference call, I encourage you to mute your phone untilyou have input during the meeting. There will be an opportunity for the public to speak during the meeting both underCommunications from the Public and on any action or information items. F. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE G. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDAAction: 1. Approve the AgendaThe Board moved to approve the Agenda after moving Consent Agenda Item #7 to Discussion and Action Item #4. Motion by Steven Lewis, second by Mona L Diaz.Final Resolution: Motion CarriesYea: Andy Wheeler, Brian Freeman, Maria Knobloch, Mona L Diaz, Steven Lewis
H. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLICInformation: 1. A maximum of 20 minutes total is set aside for persons wishing to address the Board on any item not on theagenda. If you wish to address the Board on an agenda item, please do so when that item is called. A maximum of three (3)minutes may be allowed. Items requiring lengthy discussion may, at the Board’s discretion, be scheduled as a specific agendaitem at future meetings. Speakers are requested to state their name and to address comments to the Board of Trustees. TheBoard is governed by the Brown Act and legally can only briefly respond to public comments but take no action except on itemsscheduled on the agenda. There were no public comments. I. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMSAction: 1. Adopt, Resolution #2019-20-09 Approving Purchase Agreement, Special Limited Obligation Note andRelated Documents for Acquisition of Real Property for the Proposed New School Site. [Wallace]The Board moved to adopt Resolution #2019-20-09 Approving Purchase Agreement, Special Limited Obligation Note and RelatedDocuments for Acquisition of Real Property for the Proposed New School Site.
Motion by Mona L Diaz, second by Andy Wheeler.Final Resolution: Motion CarriesYea: Andy Wheeler, Brian Freeman, Maria Knobloch, Mona L Diaz, Steven Lewis Action: 2. Adopt Resolution #2019-20-12 Authorizing the Borrowing of Funds for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 and theIssuance and Sale of One or More Series of 2020-2021 Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes Therefor andParticipation in the California School Cash Reserve Program and Requesting the Board of Supervisors of the Countyto Issue and Sell Said Series of Notes. [Meneses]The Board moved to adopt Resolution #2019-20-12 Authorizing the Borrowing of Funds for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 and theIssuance and Sale of One or More Series of 2020-2021 Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes Therefor and Participation in theCalifornia School Cash Reserve Program and Requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County to Issue and Sell Said Series ofNotes. Motion by Andy Wheeler, second by Mona L Diaz.Final Resolution: Motion CarriesYea: Andy Wheeler, Brian Freeman, Maria Knobloch, Mona L Diaz, Steven Lewis Action: 3. Approve, Consideration of Student Expulsion #071920 (Government Code: 48918) [Mann]The Board moved to approve the District's recommendation regarding Student Expulsion #071920. Motion by Mona L Diaz, second by Steven Lewis.Final Resolution: Motion CarriesYea: Andy Wheeler, Brian Freeman, Maria Knobloch, Mona L Diaz, Steven Lewis Action: 4. Ratify, Stone Creek Elementary Change Order 001_RES-15. [Wallace]The Board and District staff discussed the Stone Creek change order and requested additional information about the originaldesign and bid package for the clocks and PA system. This item was tabled to a future meeting. J. INFORMATION ITEMSInformation: 1. SI&A Behavior Alert System Overview. [Mann]Mrs. Mann provided the law requiring teacher notification for students placed in their classroom who have committed certaininfractions. Mrs. Mann stated the contract will be for the 2020/2021 school year and will return to the April 28, 2020 meetingfor action. Sean Tovsrud asked if the notifications were for behaviors during school only. Mrs. Mann stated yes, the notification is forbehavior only at school. Information: 2. Public Hearing for Resolution No. 2019-20-11 Developer Fee Study Justification Study. [Wallace]Mr. Wallace stated the Public Hearing for the 2020 Developer Fee Study will be held on April 28, 2020. Information: 3. Update on School Closure. [Wallace]Mr. Wallace provided updates from the county health departments and stated Los Angeles had extended their closure until May1, 2020. The Board and District staff commented on the amazing and creative things GVUSD teachers are doing with studentsto stay connected. Mr. Wallace also stated conversations with school administrators were taking place to plan for a worst-case scenario in theclosure is extended. The discussions include graduation and promotion plans along with student access to internet and devicesfor distance learning. K. CONSENT AGENDAAction: 1. ALL CONSENT AGENDA items are considered to be routine and are acted on by the Board of Trustees in one motion.There will be no separate discussion of items unless a Board member or citizen so requests, in which event, the item(s) will beconsidered following the approval of the Consent Agenda. It is understood that the Superintendent recommends approval of allconsent agenda items. Each item on the consent calendar approved by the Board of Trustees shall be deemed to have beenconsidered in full and adopted as recommended. Action: 2. Approve, Minutes from Regular Meeting, March 10, 2020. [Wallace]Action: 3. Approve, Minutes from Emergency Special Meeting, March 13, 2020. [Wallace]Action: 4. Approve, Minutes from Special Meeting, March 17, 2020. [Wallace]Action: 5. Approve, Student Program Agreement Between Golden Valley USD and Crescent View South, Inc. Public Charter.[Hatch]Action: 6. Ratify, Stone Creek Elementary Change Order CO_01-RES-01. [Wallace] The Board moved to approve the Consent Agenda noting the absence of Item K7. Motion by Brian Freeman, second by Steven Lewis.Final Resolution: Motion CarriesYea: Andy Wheeler, Brian Freeman, Maria Knobloch, Mona L Diaz, Steven Lewis L. BOARD/SUPERINTENDENT COMMENTS/CONCERNSInformation: 1. The purpose of this agenda item is to alert the public of future District business. The Board stated they appreciated the conversation about the closure of school. They also thanked Mr. Wallace, cabinetmembers, administrators, teachers and classified staff for all they are doing for students. The Board asked if pop up tents could be provided to the Food Services workers who are providing meals for the students.
M. ADVANCE PLANNINGInformation: 1. Advance Planning Mr. Wallace stated a Special Meeting will be called if the closure is extended by the county health department, MCSOS or theGovenor's office. N. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSIONInformation: 1. The Board may adjourn back into Closed Session if necessary.N/A O. RECONVENE FROM CLOSED SESSIONAction: 1. The Board will reconvene from Closed Session and report any action taken if applicable.N/A P. ADJOURNMENTAction: 1. The Board will adjourn the meeting.The Board moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:05 p.m. Motion by Steve Lewis, second by Andrew Wheeler.Final Resolution: Motion CarriesYea: Andy Wheeler, Brian Freeman, Maria Knobloch, Mona L Diaz, Steven Lewis
Agenda Item Details
Public Content
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Meeting Apr 28, 2020 - Regular Meeting
Category K. CONSENT AGENDA
Subject 3. Approve, Minutes from Special Board Meeting, March 27, 2020. [Wallace]
Access Public
Type Action, Minutes
Minutes View Minutes for Mar 27, 2020 - Special Meeting: All Board Members will participat
3.27.2020 Minutes.pdf (54 KB)
Golden Valley Unified School District Special Meeting: All Board Members will participate via Zoom Meeting (Friday, March 27, 2020)Generated by Aimee Beintker on Thursday, April 9, 2020 Members presentAndy Wheeler, Brian Freeman, Maria Knobloch, Mona L Diaz, Steven Lewis Meeting called to order at 5:28 PM A. OPEN SESSION/CALL TO ORDER (5:15 P.M.)Governor Gavin Newsom issued an executive order which limits the gathering of no more than ten people, and allows local orstate legislative bodies to hold meetings via teleconference and to make meetings accessible electronically. Due to this order,Golden Valley USD will continue to hold virtual Board meetings until further notice. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDAAction: 1. Approve the AgendaThe Board moved to approve the agenda. Motion by Mona Diaz, second by Steven LewisFinal Resolution: Motion CarriesYea: Andy Wheeler, Brian Freeman, Maria Knobloch, Mona L Diaz, Steven Lewis D. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMSAction: 1. Adopt, Resolution No. 2019-20-15 Regarding Actions In Response to COVID-19. [Wallace] Mr. Wallace provided an update from the county health department and noted the resolution being presented extends the schoolclosure until May 4, 2020. The Board asked what is being looked at to re-open schools. Mr. Wallace read some of the guidelines (see below) from TulareCounty that were forwarded to Madera County Superintendents from Dr. Massetti. Mr. Wallace stated similar guidelines may belooked at for Madera County schools as well.
1. The California State Shelter in Place order has been lifted.2. The number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Tulare County has remained constant for a two week period ordeclined3. The directive to Social Distance has been removed.4. The limit placed on social gatherings has been removed.
The Board commented they like the fact the resolution states schools could reopen sooner if things got better and it wasimportant to ensure the safety of the staff and students. E. ADJOURNMENTAction: 1. The Board will adjourn the meeting. The Board moved to adjourn the meeting at 5:50 p.m. Motion by Steven Lewis, second by Andrew Wheeler.Final Resolution: Motion CarriesYea: Andy Wheeler, Brian Freeman, Maria Knobloch, Mona L Diaz, Steven Lewis
Agenda Item Details
Public Content
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Meeting Apr 28, 2020 - Regular Meeting
Category K. CONSENT AGENDA
Subject 4. Approve, Minutes from Special Board Meeting, April 3, 3020. [Wallace]
Access Public
Type Action, Minutes
Minutes View Minutes for Apr 3, 2020 - Special Meeting: All Board Members will participat
4.3.2020 Minutes.pdf (37 KB)
Golden Valley Unified School DistrictSpecial Meeting: All Board Members will participate via Zoom Meeting (Friday, April 3, 2020)Generated by Aimee Beintker on Friday, April 10, 2020 Members presentAndy Wheeler, Brian Freeman, Maria Knobloch, Mona L Diaz, Steven Lewis Meeting called to order at 5:32 PM A. OPEN SESSION/CALL TO ORDER (5:15 P.M.)Governor Gavin Newsom issued an executive order which limits the gathering of no more than ten people, andallows local or state legislative bodies to hold meetings via teleconference and to make meetings accessibleelectronically. Due to this order, Golden Valley USD will continue to hold virtual Board meetings until further notice. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDAAction: 1. Approve the AgendaThe Board moved to approve the agenda. Motion by Steven Lewis, second by Andrew WheelerFinal Resolution: Motion CarriesYea: Andy Wheeler, Brian Freeman, Maria Knobloch, Mona L Diaz, Steven Lewis D. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS Action: 1. Adopt, Resolution No. 2019-20-16 Regarding Actions In Response to COVID-19. [Wallace]President Knobloch read a statement regarding school closures and stated she felt a meeting was in order to have anopportunity to discuss the issue.Mr. Wallace read a portion of the resolution and also stated he felt it was important for the Board to discuss the option ofextending school closure to the end of the year as many districts surrounding Golden Valley are doing. The Board stated they felt a decision to extend closure to the end of the year was premature at this time since schools buildingswere already closed until May 4, 2020. The Board discussed graduation options with Mr. Piedra and District staff in order toplan for a worse case scenario. They also discussed internet and device access for students who do not currently have them. Comments were made from Jennifer Stemple, Teri Malmstrom and David Hobbs who supposed postponing the decision to extendthe closure of school buildings until a later date. Mr. Wallace thanked everyone for joining the meeting and restated the importance of discussing the issue with the Board inorder to keep rumors to a minimum and keep the community informed. This item did not receive a motion or second and didnot move forward for a vote. Action: 2. Approve, Certificated Growth Position, Elementary Teacher at Webster. [Mann] The Board moved to approve the Certificated Growth Position, Elementary Teacher at Webster. Motion by Mona Diaz, second by Steven LewisFinal Resolution: Motion CarriesYea: Andy Wheeler, Brian Freeman, Maria Knobloch, Mona L Diaz, Steven Lewis E. BOARD/SUPERINTENDENT COMMENTSThe Board thanked Mr. Wallace and Mrs. Knobloch for setting up the meeting for discussion. They also thanked the staff andcommunity for participating in the meeting and for their support during this time. Mr. Hatch gave kudos to James Chance for the great video he posted to the LHS students from the staff. F. ADJOURNMENTAction: 1. The Board will adjourn the meeting.The Board moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:45 p.m. Motion by Mona Diaz, second by Steven LewisFinal Resolution: Motion CarriesYea: Andy Wheeler, Brian Freeman, Maria Knobloch, Mona L Diaz, Steven Lewis
Agenda Item Details
Public Content
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Meeting Apr 28, 2020 - Regular Meeting
Category K. CONSENT AGENDA
Subject 5. Ratify, Payroll Report, March 2020. [Meneses]
Access Public
Type Action
Payroll Payment Order March 31, 2020 (1).pdf (420 KB)
PAYROLL PAYMENT ORDER
TO THE
COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS AND
COUNTY AUDITOR OF MADERA, CALIFORNIA
DISTRICT: GOLDEN VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
PAY DAY: March 31, 2020
BY ORDER OF THE GOVERNING BOARD
The County Superintendent of Schools and Auditor of Madera are here by authorized to
transfer salary in the amount of:
$ 1,106,678.45 General Fund
$ 3,648.45 Adult Education Fund
$ 28,336.64 Cafeteria Fund
$ 1,138,663.54 TOTAL PAYROLL ALL FUNDS
To the Schools Payroll Revolving Fund. 21115 E.C.) They are further authorized to draw salary warrants, less
employee’s authorized voluntary deductions and TSA’s of $413,596.07 to the employees of said school district as
indicated. This payroll order directs that deductions required by law, or authorized by employee, be made from
the total earned salary and deposited to trust funds in the county treasurer, and further directs the proper
disbursement of such trust funds. This payroll order further directs that the employer cost of the health benefits
as authorized by the school board in the amount of $192,977.74 and any other benefits as required by laws be
transferred to the appropriate fund and directs the proper disbursements of such funds.
BOARD of TRUSTEES, CLERK _________________________________________
Examined and Approved
CECELIA A. MASSETTI
COUNTY SUPT. OF SCHOOLS
By: ____________________
COMPLETE IN DUPLICATE/Original-County Office/Copy- District
Agenda Item Details
Public Content
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Meeting Apr 28, 2020 - Regular Meeting
Category K. CONSENT AGENDA
Subject 6. Ratify, Purchase Order Report, March 2020. [Meneses]
Access Public
Type Action
March 2020.pdf (480 KB)
Agenda Item Details
Public Content
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Meeting Apr 28, 2020 - Regular Meeting
Category K. CONSENT AGENDA
Subject 7. Approve, April 2020 Williams Quarterly Report [Wallace]
Access Public
Type Action
Background: In April, July, October and January, the Superintendent of a district has to make its Board aware of anycomplaints regarding the conditions of facilities, insufficiency of textbooks or instructional materials, and teachervacancies or misassignments. This information then must be reported to the County Board of Education. Current Considerations: The report states that Golden Valley Unified School District has received no complaints inthese areas for the past quarter. Financial Impact: There is no financial impact.
WILLIAM FORM 2019-20 ADA COMPLIANT - April 2020.pdf (11 KB)
Quarterly Report on Williams Uniform Complaints [Education Code § 35186(d)]
District: Golden Valley Unified School District Person completing this form: Rodney Wallace Title: Superintendent Quarterly Report Submission Date: April 2020 Date for information to be reported publicly at Governing Board meeting: April 28, 2020
No complaints were filed with any school in the District during the quarter indicated above.
The following chart summarizes the nature and resolution of these complaints.
General Subject Area
Total # of Complaints
# Resolved # Unresolved
Textbooks and Instructional
Materials
0
Teacher Vacancy or Misassignment
0
Facilities Conditions
0
TOTALS 0
Rodney Wallace Print Name of District Superintendent
April 28, 2020 Signature of District Superintendent Date
DocuSign Envelope ID: 20D6A365-95CB-43AD-8013-B8FB16B08C77
Agenda Item Details
Public Content
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Meeting Apr 28, 2020 - Regular Meeting
Category K. CONSENT AGENDA
Subject 8. Approve, SI&A Behavior Alert System for the 2020/21 School Year. [Mann]
Access Public
Type Action
Background: California Ed. Code, section 49079, mandates that teachers be provided a list of their students whohave been suspended or expelled, engaged in, or are reasonably suspected to have engaged in, acts of risky behaviorfrom their previous three school years. (Includes acts described in the subdivisions, except subdivision (h), of Section48900 or in Section 48900.2, 48900.3, 48900.4, or 48900.7). Current Considerations: GVUSD currently has no system in place to compile and notify teachers confidentially aboutstudents that are violent and have been expelled or suspended for those offenses. This information has toinclude three years of student discipline incidents leading to suspensions/expulsions. Behavior Alert compiles this datain conjunction with Aeries and notifies the teachers via email. This allows compliance with the Ed Code requirements. Fiscal Implications: The cost of this system is $4000.00/per year beginning 2020-2021 school year with a one time$1000.00 initial Implementation fee (this includes $500.00 discount from original quote).
Golden Valley BehaviorAlert-ExecSum_09052018.pdf (1,344 KB)
51% of school violence incidents flared in just 10 states last year. California is one of them.
Our district partners have a defensible legal position when it comes to required teacher notifications.
GOLDEN VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT FEBRUARY 5 2020
Source: Educator's School Safety Network Report, Amy Klinger, August 2018
TAKE MEANINGFUL PREVENTATIVE MEASURES
California ranks among the top 10 "states of concern" that accounted for 1,851 threats and episodes of violence out of 3,654 nationwide, according to a recent report by the Educator's School Safety Network.
"We have seen that there are threats and incidents of violence that occur in literally every state," said Amy Klinger, co-author of the report. "So, it’s really incumbent upon every school to take a look at what they need to do."
BEHAVIOR ALERT IS THE SOLUTION
School districts are tasked with the immense challenge of gathering and delivering critical data, spanning back three years, which must be delivered on an ongoing basis to multiple people, in order to support a safe school environment.
It’s the Law California Ed. Code, section 49079, mandates that teachers be provided a list of their students who have been suspended or expelled, engaged in, or are reasonably suspected to have engaged in, acts of risky behavior from their previous three school years. (Includes acts described in the subdivisions, except subdivision (h), of Section 48900 or in Section 48900.2, 48900.3, 48900.4, or 48900.7).
School Safety Plan Requirement In addition, California now requires that districts include a comprehensive process for notifying teachers of risky student behavior in their School Safety Plans.
WHY HAVE US HANDLE YOUR NOTIFICATIONS?
Surprisingly, most districts and school sites do NOT comply. Why?
Unaware of the mandated requirements Behavior Alert is designed by Ed. Code experts and makes it easy to meet the mandated requirements.
SIS cannot comply with the mandate on its own Behavior Alert integrates with your district’s SIS then automates tracking and teacher notifications on a timely and consistent basis.
Difficulty of compiling 3+ years of discipline data as students move Students change grade levels, schools, and districts, making it close to impossible to keep track of the necessary information required to notify teachers—especially for students with multiple teachers.
Ensuring privacy of student information Behavior Alert data is encrypted to deliver notifications securely.
Trouble documenting and reporting notifications Behavior Alert dashboard shows all notification activity at a glance.
OVERVIEW
In the 2011-12 school year, according to the U.S. Department of Education, K-12 public school teachers reported the following startling statistics:
197,400 teachers (5.8%) were physically attacked—hit, kicked, bitten, slapped or shot
338,400 teachers (9.9%) were threatened by students with acts of violence
When it comes to violence in schools, districts are vulnerable to lawsuits from teachers, parents and advocacy groups. Ensuring compliance with Behavior Alert is like giving your school district an insurance policy.
Teacher and student safety
Typically a contractual obligation union within teacher union contracts
Document due diligence
A defensible legal position
REPORTS
Behavior Alert is about informing your teachers and supporting the safety of your classrooms. That is why we are relentless in the pursuit of good data—we’ve designed reports that are relevant, timely, comparative, understandable and actionable. We believe that good data helps drive good decisions.
Teacher Notification Report: Detailed report by teacher of students with incidents
Incident Summary Report: Detailed summary of all incidents by student with filter options
Dashboard Overview: Actionable data at-a-glance
Oversight & data analysis
Administrative and teacher dashboard views
Admin sees individual activity details and trends per school
Flexibility to send email reminders
Current Attention2Attendance partners link directly between the two software programs
Automatic emails are sent directly to teachers
Private and secure notifications
Auto updates from the district’s student information system
Ongoing email notifications throughout the year for newly enrolled students or class roster changes
Teachers stay informed about only their students
Welcome and reminder emails
Student suspension or expulsion notifications
Any potential behavioral threat notifications
Current and prior three-year student disciplinary information, as required
SAFETY ∙ CLIMATE ∙ CONFIDENCE
“The threats and violence that flared in the 2017-18 school year should be a warning to educators around the country,” Klinger said in an interview with USA Today. Districts have a fiduciary responsibility and legal obligation to protect themselves in the case of a lawsuit. “Notification to Teachers” is mandated by law in California; districts must notify teachers of a student’s prior three-year disciplinary history and failure to do so is a misdemeanor.
Behavior Alert makes the notification and tracking process easy. We take away the worry of compliance and the workload of compiling three-years of student disciplinary data. Teacher safety is a priority. The steps you take now will protect your teachers and your district. Now more than ever, districts are entrusting their teacher notifications to Behavior Alert.
BEHAVIOR ALERT PRICING
Golden Valley USD
February 5, 2020
1. SOFTWARE & SERVICE
Easy-to-use
Web-based, proprietary software
Unlimited access to online guides and videos
Dedicated Help Desk available Monday-Friday
Annual Fee Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
$4000 $4000 $4000
2. IMPLEMENTATION
Districtwide implementation
ROBOT installation
District and school site configuration
User account set-up
One-time Flat Fee Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
$ 1,500 --- ---
Annual Total Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
$5500 $4000 $4000
We are compliance experts
Automatic teacher notifications
Three-year student data
Dashboard controls
School Safety Plan compliance verbiage provided
Dedicated implementation team
Secure install of the ROBOT
Data configuration (district suspension codes and education codes)
Data schedules are flexible to fit your district’s needs
Data encryption and security
Easy reporting features
Dedicated Help Desk available Monday–Friday
SI&A’s highest priority
Pupil privacy
Secure equipment housing
Encrypted data
Password protected
Agenda Item Details
Public Content
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Meeting Apr 28, 2020 - Regular Meeting
Category K. CONSENT AGENDA
Subject 9. Approve, AOS Postage Machine Contract Renewal. [Meneses]
Access Public
Type Action
Background: The District currently has a contract with Automated Office Machines for its postage meter. Current Considerations: The proposed contract also includes a built-in maintenance agreement that covers parts,repairs, maintenance and training for staff.The proposed contract will also provide the District with a new postage machine. Financial Impact: The proposed contract will cost about $20 more each month, or $240 annually.The monthly costunder the proposed FP contract is $238 per month for 63 months. The current contract is $218.60 per month for 63months.
Golden Valley SD PostBase Vision A9 (1).pdf (110 KB)
April 22, 2020 Ms. Lacy Meneses Golden Valley School District 37479 Ave 12 Madera CA 93636 Dear Lacy: We appreciate the opportunity to recommend technology solutions for your office. AOS has been serving the Central San Joaquin Valley for more than thirty years and specializes in win/win partnerships that ensure that our clients are working at the highest efficiency and productivity as they manage their documents. Our goal is to develop a long-term business relationship by focusing on your imaging needs, workflow, and technology initiatives. Once you elect to purchase or lease from AOS, you will discover that we are committed to total customer service. From the initial placement to technical support and ongoing consultative service, you can depend on us to do everything possible to earn the right to be your image technology company for many years in the future. If you have any questions or need additional information after reviewing this proposal, please do not hesitate to contact me. My personal extension is 2532. Sincerely, Greg Baca Major Account Manager GB/dp
April 22, 2020
GOLDEN VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
FP PostBase Vision A9
Including:
90 Letters per Minute
Automatic Feeder/Sealer
15 lb Scale
Resets/Rate Guard
250 Cost Accounts
Pass Through Maintenance/Cleaning
Meter
Lease Option for the FP PostBase Vision A9:
63 Month Lease Payment $ 238.00
*Includes all end of lease fees
*Prices and fees in effect for 30 days from date of proposal *No down payment on approved leases *Prices and fees quoted do not include sales tax *Delivery & Installation Based On Model * Network and Desktop Services $125.00 per hour
Agenda Item Details
Public Content
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Meeting Apr 28, 2020 - Regular Meeting
Category K. CONSENT AGENDA
Subject 10. Approve, Liberty High School CIF Designation for the 2020/2021 School Year. [Wallace]
Access Public
Type Action
Background: Liberty High School is submitting the 2020-2021 Designation of CIF Representatives to League. Current Considerations: The attached is a form upon which to record your district and/or school representatives toleagues for the next school year 2020-2021. It is a legal requirement that league representatives be so designated. Fiscal Implications: The cost is possible mileage reimbursement to attend CIF meetings.
Letter to Superintendents and form April 2020.pdf (686 KB)
TO: SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS PRINCIPAL OF PRIVATE SCHOOLS FROM: RON NOCETTI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RE: FORM TO RECORD DISTRICT AND/OR SCHOOL REPRESENTATIVES TO LEAGUES DATE: APRIL 15, 2020 Enclosed is a form upon which to record your district and/or school representatives to leagues for next year, 2020-2021. It is a form sent every year to you in order to obtain the names of league representatives to every league in the state and to make sure that the league representatives are designated by school district or school governing boards. It is a legal requirement that league representatives be so designated. The education code gives the authority for high school athletics to high school governing boards. The code also requires that the boards, after joining CIF, designate their representatives to CIF leagues. This is a necessity! (Ed. Code 33353 (a) (1)) We are asking that, after action by the governing board, you send the names of league representatives to your CIF Section office. Obviously, the presumption behind this code section is that the representatives of boards are the only people who will be voting on issues, at the league and section level, that impact athletics. If a governing board does not take appropriate action to designate representatives or this information is not given to Section offices within the required time frame, CIF is required to suspend voting privileges (CIF Constitution, Article 2, Section 25, p. 18) for the affected schools.
At the State Federated Council level, we will be asking that Sections verify that their representatives are designated in compliance with this Ed. Code section. I hope this gives you a bit of background. Thank you for all you do to help support high school athletics. It is a valuable program in all high schools, and we appreciate the support you give to the program and to CIF. Please return the enclosed form no later than June 28, 2020 directly to your CIF Section Office. Addresses of each section are listed on the back of the form. Please contact us if we can give you further information.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6AE1DE2B-767F-4FA8-8ACC-22A571C33DE5
2020-2021 Designation of CIF Representatives to League
Please complete the form below for each school under your jurisdiction and RETURN TO THE CIF SECTION OFFICE (ADDRESSES ON REVERSE SIDE) no later than June 28, 2020.
School District/Governing Board at its meeting,
appointed the following individual(s) to serve for the 2020-2021 school year as the school's league representative:
PHOTOCOPY THIS FORM TO LIST ADDITIONAL SCHOOL REPRESENTATIVES
NAME OF SCHOOL ______ NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE POSITION ______ ADDRESS CITY ZIP ______ PHONE FAX E-MAIL ______ ***************************************************************************************** NAME OF SCHOOL ______ NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE POSITION ______ ADDRESS CITY ZIP ______ PHONE FAX E-MAIL ______ ***************************************************************************************** NAME OF SCHOOL ______ NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE POSITION ______ ADDRESS CITY ZIP ______ PHONE FAX E-MAIL _____________ ***************************************************************************************** NAME OF SCHOOL ___ NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE POSITION _______ ADDRESS CITY ZIP PHONE FAX E-MAIL If the designated representative is not available for a given league meeting, an alternate designee of the district governing board may be sent in his/her place. NOTE: League representatives from public schools and private schools must be designated representatives of the school’s governing boards in order to be eligible to serve on the section and state governance bodies.
Superintendent's or Principal’s Name ____________ Signature ________________________
Address City Zip
Phone ____________ Fax_______________________________
PLEASE MAIL OR FAX THIS FORM DIRECTLY TO THE CIF SECTION OFFICE.
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CIF SECTION OFFICE ADDRESSES.
(Date) (Name of school district/governing board)
Felipe Piedra Principal12220 Road 36 Madera 93636
Liberty High School
559-645-3500 559-645-4796 [email protected]
Liberty High SchoolMike Nolte Athletic Director
12220 Road 36 Madera 93636559-645-4796559-645-3500 [email protected]
April 28, 2020Golden Valley Unified
37479 Avenue 12
559-645-7144559-645-3570
Madera 93636
Rodney Wallace
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6AE1DE2B-767F-4FA8-8ACC-22A571C33DE5
CIF SECTION OFFICES
CIF CENTRAL SECTION Jim Crichlow, Commissioner P.O. Box 1567 Porterville, CA 93258 Phone: (559) 781-7586 Fax: (559) 781-7033
CIF OAKLAND SECTION Franky Navarro, Commissioner 1000 Broadway, Ste. 150 Oakland, CA 94607 Phone: (510) 879-2846 No fax number
CIF CENTRAL COAST SECTION Duane Morgan, Commissioner 333 Piercy Road San Jose, CA 95138 Phone: (408) 224-2994 Fax: (408) 224-0476
CIF SAC-JOAQUIN SECTION Michael Garrison, Commissioner P.O. Box 289 Lodi, CA 95241 Phone: (209) 334-5900 Fax: (209) 334-0300
CIF LOS ANGELES SECTION Vicky Lagos, Commissioner 10660 White Oak Avenue, Suite 216 Granada Hills, CA 91344 Phone: (818) 767-0800 Fax: (818) 767-0802
CIF SAN DIEGO SECTION Jerry Schniepp, Commissioner 3636 Camino Del Rio North #200 San Diego, CA 92108 Phone: (858) 292-8165 Fax: (858) 292-1375
CIF NORTH COAST SECTION Pat Cruickshank, Commissioner 5 Crow Canyon Court, Suite 209 San Ramon, CA 94583 Phone: (925) 263-2110 Fax: (925) 263-2120
CIF SAN FRANCISCO SECTION Don Collins, Commissioner 555 Portola Drive, Bungalow 2 San Francisco, CA 94131 Phone: (415) 920-5185 Fax: (415) 920-5189
CIF NORTHERN SECTION Elizabeth Kyle, Commissioner 2241 St. George Lane, Suite 2 Chico, CA 95926 Phone: (530) 343-7285 Fax: (530) 343-5619
CIF SOUTHERN SECTION Rob Wigod, Commissioner 10932 Pine Street Los Alamitos, CA 90720 Phone: (562) 493-9500 Fax: (562) 493-6266
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6AE1DE2B-767F-4FA8-8ACC-22A571C33DE5
Agenda Item Details
Public Content
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Meeting Apr 28, 2020 - Regular Meeting
Category K. CONSENT AGENDA
Subject 11. Ratify, Krazan & Associates, Inc., Stone Creek Elementary, Glulam Beam Inspection.[Wallace]
Access Public
Type Action
Background: The attached supplemental Krazan proposal is in addition to their original Construction Testing andInspection proposal and PO. The original proposal covered the DSA required inspections called for at plan approval. Current Considerations: In-plant inspection is included in the original proposal for steel fabrication only. After award,and once construction began, the DSA inspector is also calling for in-plant inspection during the fabrication of gluelambeams. The subject supplemental proposal covers time and expenses for a Krazan inspector to be present in-plantthroughout the gluelam fabrication process. Financial Impact: The glulam beam inspection cost is $14,375.00 ad will be paid from the project budget.
Krazan Glulam Beam Inspection.pdf (299 KB)
& A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .
G E O T E C H N I C A L E N G I N E E R I N G E N V I R O N M E N T A L E N G I N E E R I N G C O N S T R U C T I O N T E S T I N G A N D I N S P E C T I O N S
215 West Dakota Avenue • Clovis, California 93612 • (559) 348-2200 • FAX (559) 348-2201 With Offices Serving the Western United States
March 30, 2020 KA Proposal No. T20161CAF (Revised April 2, 2020)
Golden Valley Unified School District 37479 Avenue 12 Madera, California 93636 Attn: Mr. Mike Berg
Phone: (559) 906-4100 [email protected]
RE: CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES ESTIMATE AND FEE SCHEDULE Riverstone Elementary School-Glulam Beam Inspection SWC Market and Boulder Drive Madera, California
Dear Mr. Berg:
We are submitting this fee estimate for professional construction testing services on the above-referenced project. Our fee schedule and General Conditions below itemizes each area of work with unit cost breakdowns.
***As shown on the following table, the anticipated unit cost for our services for this project:
Scope: Special Testing & Inspections Unit Rates Total
Glulam Beam In-Plant Inspection (Sub-Consultant)
In-Plant Inspections (8Days) $9,600.00
Travel Time/Mileage $1,860.00
Lodging/Meal Per Diem (8 Days) $1,040.00
Krazan Oversight, Administrative, Engineering Review, Final Report $1,875.00
*Based on anticipated production schedule provided by Glulam Manufacture
Estimated Testing and Inspection Total-Not to Exceed $14,375.00
Inclusions, Exclusions and Clarifications
These above prices are good for 30 days from the date of this proposal.
Services will be performed on a “time and materials” basis. Any total estimates provided in this proposal aremerely estimates and are not a guaranteed maximum price.
DocuSign Envelope ID: B52C9FDE-6241-4175-BF7F-EB0FDEB45B48
KA Proposal No. T20161CAF Page No. 2
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Krazan & Associates, Inc. With Offices Serving The Western United States
The above prices DO NOT reflect the changes to Section 1720 (ref. SB1999) of the Labor Code requiringinspectors and Land Surveyors be paid general prevailing wage during all phases of construction. Thisamendment to Section 1720 of the Labor Code (approved 9-28-00) became effective Jan. 2001.
Krazan & Associates charges a four (4.0) hour minimum per site visit portal-to-portal and two (2.0) hourincrements thereafter.
Standard working hours are from 7:00 A.M to 3:30 P.M. Monday through Friday. Any work performedbeyond 8 hours per day and Saturdays will be billed at 1.5 times the hourly rate noted above. Workperformed in excess of 12 hours on any weekday, on Sunday, on Holidays or in excess of 8 hours on Saturdaywill be charged at double the hour rate.
All cancellations without 12 hour notice of cancellation may be subject to 2 hour minimum charges per daycancelled.
This proposal does not include “Inspector of Record” responsibilities, project oversight or constructionmanagement services.
Additional services, as requested, will be billed in accordance with our yearly fee schedule.
Krazan & Associates, Inc. takes great pride in our ability to provide quality service to our client's projects and we anticipate you will be pleased with the selection of our firm. Again, we appreciate the opportunity to provide this estimate and look forward to working with you on this project. If you have any questions and or require any additional information, please contact me at (559) 348-2200. If this estimate is acceptable please sign and return to our office by facsimile.
Respectfully submitted, KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Aaron Atkinson Project Manager Testing & Inspection Division
The following items are included as an Attachment: Attachment A – Contract
DocuSign Envelope ID: B52C9FDE-6241-4175-BF7F-EB0FDEB45B48
COMT 2020.1 Page 1 of 4 __________/__________ T20161CAF Riverstone Elementary School Glulam Beam Inspection Contract.doc.docx
Please initial
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC., hereinafter referred to as “Consultant”, and Golden Valley Unified School District 37479 Avenue 12, Madera, CA 93636 , hereinafter referred to as “Client.” This Agreement between the parties consists of the TERMS AND CONDITIONS (below), the attached PROPOSAL titled “Riverstone Elementary School Glulam Beam Inspection ,” file number T20161CAF, dated April 2, 2020 (“PROPOSAL”), and any exhibits or attachments cited in the PROPOSAL, which are incorporated in full by this reference. This Agreement, executed in Clovis, CA, is effective as of the date this Agreement is countersigned by Krazan & Associates, Inc, or the date on which Consultant initiates services as scheduled by Client, whichever occurs earlier. The parties agree as follows:
1. DEFINITIONS1.1. Contract Documents. Plans, specifications, and agreements between Client and Contractor, including amendments, supplementary instructions, and
change orders. 1.2. Contractor. The contractor or contractors, and including its/their subcontractors of every tier, retained to perform construction Work on the Project for
which Consultant is providing Services under this Agreement. 1.3. Day(s). Calendar day(s) unless otherwise stated. 1.4. Hazardous Materials. The term Hazardous Materials means any toxic substances, chemicals, radioactivity, pollutants or other materials, in whatever
form or state, known or suspected to impair the environment in any way whatsoever. Hazardous Materials include, but are not limited to, those substances defined, designated or listed in any federal, state or local law, regulation or ordinance concerning hazardous wastes, toxic substances or pollution.
1.5. Services. The professional services provided by Consultant as set forth in this Agreement, as included in Consultant’s PROPOSAL and any written Change Order, Task Order or amendment to this Agreement, and Consultant’s professional services as scheduled by Client’s contractor through oral or written communication.
1.6. Work. The labor, materials, equipment and services of the Contractor required to complete the Work described in the Contract Documents. 1.7. Fee Schedule. Consultant’s standard annual fee schedule unless project specific fee schedule is provided. 1.8 Inspection (or Observation). Visual determination of conformance with specific or, on the basis of Consultant’s professional judgment, general
requirements. 1.9 Testing. Measurement, examination, performance of tests, and any other activities to determine the characteristics or performance of materials.
2. SCOPE OF SERVICES2.1. Services Provided, Scheduling. Consultant will provide construction materials testing and inspection services as set forth in the PROPOSAL and any
additional services requested by Client by oral or written request (Scope of Services). Client or their designated agent shall cause all required tests and inspections of the site, materials and work performed by their Contractor to be scheduled no less than one full work day prior to the time when Consultant is to perform their scheduled tests or inspections. No claims for loss, damage or injury shall be brought against Consultant by Client or any third party for tests or inspections not performed due to inadequate scheduling notice provided to the Consultant by Client.
2.2. Changes in Scope. Client may request changes in the scope of services indentified in the PROPOSAL. Such changes, including any additional types of Work to be inspected and/or tested, or any change in Consultant’s compensation or time of performances, which may be requested in writing or orally and which are mutually agreed upon by Consultant and Client, will be incorporated in this Agreement. All Services performed by Consultant on the Project are subject to the terms and limitations of this Agreement. If Services are performed, but the parties do not reach agreement concerning modifications to the PROPOSAL, Services or compensation, then the terms and limitations of this Agreement apply to such Services, except for the payment terms. The parties agree to resolve disputes concerning modifications to scope or compensation pursuant to Section 15, “Disputes.”
2.3. Excluded Services. Consultant’s Services under this Agreement include only those Services specified in the PROPOSAL, and those services subsequently requested by Client and agreed to by Consultant. Client expressly releases any claim against Consultant relating to any additional Services that Consultant recommended or that the project designer or Building Official required, but that Client either did not authorize or instructed Consultant not to perform.
2.4. Authority of Consultant. Consultant will report observations and data to the Client and the General Contractor. Consultant will report any observed work to the Client or Client’s representative, which, in Consultant’s opinion, does not conform with plans, specifications, and codes applicable to the Project. Consultant has no right or responsibility to approve, accept, reject, or stop work of any agent of the Client.
2.5. Variation of Material Characteristics and Conditions. Observations and standardized sampling, inspection and testing procedures employed by Consultant will indicate conditions of materials and construction activities only at the precise location and time where and when Services were performed. Client recognizes that conditions of materials and construction activities at other locations may vary from those measured or observed, and that conditions at one location and time do not necessarily indicate the conditions of apparently identical material(s) at other locations and times. Services of Consultant, even if performed on a continuous basis, should not be interpreted to mean that Consultant is observing, verifying, testing or inspecting all materials on the Project. Consultant is responsible only for those data, interpretations, and recommendations regarding the actual materials and construction activities observed, sampled, inspected or tested, and is not responsible for other parties' interpretations or use of the information developed. Consultant may make certain inferences based upon the information derived from these procedures to formulate professional opinions regarding conditions in other areas.
2.6. Sampling, Inspection & Test Locations. Unless specifically stated otherwise, the Services do not include surveying the Site or precisely identifying sampling, inspection or test locations. Sampling, inspection and test locations will be based on field estimates and information furnished by Client and its representatives. Unless stated otherwise in the report, such locations are approximate. Consultant will take reasonable precautions to limit damage to the Project Site or Work due to the performance of Services, but Client understands that some damage may necessarily occur in the normal course of Services, and this Agreement does not include repair of such damage unless specifically stated in the PROPOSAL.
2.7. Independent Contractor. Consultant will perform Services under this Agreement as an independent contractor. 3. PAYMENTS TO CONSULTANT
3.1. Basic Services. Consultant will perform its services on a time and materials basis unless alternate payment terms are specifically stated in thePROPOSAL.
3.2. Additional Services. Any Services performed under this Agreement, including increased hours or units for those Services expressly identified in the attached PROPOSAL, and any additionally requested inspection and/or testing tasks, will be provided on a time and materials basis at the rates established for the project unless otherwise specifically agreed to in writing by both parties.
3.3. Estimate of Fees. Testing and Inspection services are highly dependent on contractors’ schedules, weather, overlapping of work and many other factors. Client recognizes that changes in scope and schedule, and unforeseen circumstances, Contractor performance and production of the Work can all influence the successful completion of Services within the estimated cost.
The provision of an estimate of fees or a cost estimate is not a guarantee that the Services will be completed for that amount; Consultant’s Services shall continue on a time and materials basis to completion of the Services unless directed otherwise by Client. Furthermore, the provision of a “not to exceed” limitation is not a guarantee that the Services will be completed for that amount; rather, it indicates that Consultant will not incur fees and expenses chargeable to Client in excess of the “not to exceed” limitation amount without notifying Client in writing that the “not-to-exceed” amount has been reached and that Services will continue on a time and materials basis unless directed by Client to discontinue any further Services. Consultant Project Manager charges are above and beyond unit rates quoted.
3.4. Rates. Client will pay Consultant at the rates set forth in the PROPOSAL and Fee Schedule. 3.4.1. Billing Increments. A four (4) hour minimum, portal to portal charge per call, applies to all Consultants services. Services beyond the initial
minimum billing increment will be billed in increments of two (2) hour(s) for the first 8 hours and at increments of one hour thereafter for each day’s Services for each assigned technician.
3.4.2. Billing Rate Premiums. Services initiated between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. will be performed at the standard rates presented in the PROPOSAL and Fee Schedule. Services initiated outside of these hours will be billed at the appropriate rate plus a premium of 12.5 percent. Additionally,
DocuSign Envelope ID: B52C9FDE-6241-4175-BF7F-EB0FDEB45B48
COMT 2020.1 Page 2 of 4 __________/__________ T20161CAF Riverstone Elementary School Glulam Beam Inspection Contract.doc.docx
Please initial
services rendered on Saturdays or in excess of 8 hours on any week day will be billed at time and a-half the hourly rate. Services rendered on Holidays, Sundays, or in excess of 8 hours on a Saturday or in excess of 12 hours on any weekday will be charged at double the hourly rate. Late cancellation may be subject to reasonable charges if personnel cannot be appropriately reassigned.
3.4.3. Changes to Rates. Client and Consultant agree that the rates presented in the PROPOSAL and the Fee Schedule are applicable only through December 31 of the year published, unless stated otherwise in the PROPOSAL, and are subject to periodic review and amendment, as appropriate to reflect Consultant’s then-current fee structure. Unless otherwise provided for in the PROPOSAL, where projects are on-going beyond December 31 of the year the services were initiated, the rates presented in the PROPOSAL and Fee Schedule are subject to an annual cost of living adjustment based on the consumer price index for the geographic area where our services are being provided. Notwithstanding the foregoing, where Prevailing Wage regulations apply Consultant’s labor rates are subject to revision based on determinations made by the governing agency. Where labor rates are increased during the course of the project Consultant’s billing rates presented in the PROPOSAL and the Fee Schedule shall be increased proportionally with respect to any mandated labor and/or benefits rate increases unless otherwise stipulated in the PROPOSAL. In the event that the cost of fuel increases 10 percent or more over the course of the project a fuel surcharge may be imposed to recoup the added costs incurred by Consultant. Consultant will give Client at least 30 days advance notice of any changes. Unless Client objects in writing to the proposed amended fee structure within 30 days of notification, the amended fee structure will be incorporated into this Agreement and will then supersede any prior fee structure. If Client timely objects to the amended fee structure, and Consultant and Client cannot agree upon a new fee structure within 30 days after notice, Consultant may terminate this Agreement and be compensated as set forth under Section 14, “Termination.”
3.4.4. Prevailing Wages. Unless Client specifically informs Consultant in writing that prevailing wage regulations cover the Project and Client provides Consultant with the applicable Determination that includes Client’s Services, and the Scope of Services identifies it as covered by such regulations, Client will reimburse, defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from and against any liability resulting from a subsequent determination that prevailing wage regulations cover the Project, including all costs, fines and attorneys’ fees.
3.5 Expenses. Miscellaneous out-of-pocket charges, such as parking, air fare, car/equipment rental, mailing, shipping, subcontractor charges, etc., will be charged on a cost plus overhead basis. On remote jobs or at fabrication facilities, subsistence, when not furnished, will be an additional charge.
3.6. Payment Timing; Late Charge. Consultant will submit invoices to Client periodically, but no more frequently than every two (2) weeks. All invoices are due and payable upon receipt. Upon Consultant’s approval of Client for 30-day payment terms Client shall pay undisputed portions of each progress invoice within thirty (30) days of the date of the invoice. The invoice amounts shall be presumed to be correct unless Client notifies Consultant in writing. If Client objects to all or any portion of any invoice, Client will so notify Consultant in writing within fourteen (14) calendar days of the invoice date, identify the cause of disagreement, and promptly pay when due that portion of the invoice not in dispute. The parties will immediately make every effort to settle the disputed portion of the invoice. In the absence of written notification described above, the balance as stated on the invoice will be paid. Payment thereafter will first be applied to accrued late payment charges interest on unpaid undisputed charges and then to the unpaid principal amount. Consultant reserves the right to apply payments to Client’s outstanding invoices from oldest to most recent regardless of project or invoice designation on checks received. All amounts unpaid when due will include a late payment charge from the date of the invoice, at the rate of 1-1/2% per month or the highest rate permitted by law on the unpaid balance from the invoice date until the invoice is paid. Consultant reserves the right to require payment in full on any and all invoices on Client’s account regardless of project prior to releasing field notes, laboratory test data, photographs, analyses and/or reports. All undisputed amounts due to Consultant by Client shall be paid in full prior to Consultant’s release of final reports or other required forms of certified or verified reports. If the account becomes delinquent, the Client will reimburse Consultant for all time spent and expenses (including fees of any attorney, collection agency, and/or court costs) incurred in connection with collecting any delinquent amount. Consultant shall not be bound by any provision or agreement conditioning Consultant’s right to payment upon payment by a third party. In the event of a legal action for invoice amounts not paid, attorneys’ fees, court costs, and other related expenses shall be paid to the prevailing party. Client’s failure to pay Consultant when due the failure to pay will constitute a substantial failure of Client to perform under this Agreement and Consultant will have the right to stop all current work and withhold letters, reports, or any verbal consultation until the invoice is paid in full. In the event that Client fails to pay Consultant within sixty (60) days after any invoice is rendered, Client agrees that Consultant will have the right to consider the failure to pay Consultant's invoice as a breach of this Agreement. If the Client requests back-up data or changes to the format of the standard invoice, an administrative fee of $100 per invoice may be charged plus $1 per page of back-up data. 4. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE; DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES
4.1 Professional Standards. Subject to the limitations inherent in the agreed Scope of Services as to the degree of care, the amount of time and expenses to be incurred, and subject to any other limitations contained in this Agreement, Consultant will perform the Services consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other professionals providing similar services in the same locale and under similar circumstances at the time the Services are performed. No other representation and no warranty or guarantee, express or implied, is included or intended by this Agreement or any report, opinion, document, or other instrument of service.
4.2. Level of Service. Consultant offers different levels of construction observation, inspection and materials testing Services to suit the desires and needs of different clients. Although the possibility of error can never be eliminated, more detailed and extensive Services yield more information and reduce the probability of error, but at increased cost. Client must determine the level of Services adequate for its purposes. Client has reviewed the PROPOSAL and has determined that it does not need or want a greater level of Services than that specifically identified in the PROPOSAL.
4.3. No Warranty. Client recognizes the inherent risks connected with site development and construction activities, and understands when signing that those risks are not entirely eliminated through the services of Consultant. Consultant’s tests and observations of the Work are not a guarantee of the quality of Work and do not relieve other parties from their responsibility to perform their Work in accordance with applicable plans, specifications and requirements. Therefore, in signing this Agreement the Client understands that Consultant neither makes nor intends a warranty or guarantee, express or implied, of any type nor does it create a fiduciary responsibility to Client by Consultant. 5. CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCEConsultant is not responsible for Contractor’s means, methods, techniques or sequences during the performance of its Work. Consultant will not supervise or direct Contractor’s Work, or be liable for any failure of Contractor to complete its Work in accordance with the Project’s plans, specifications and applicable codes, laws and regulations. Client understands and agrees that Contractor, not Consultant, has sole responsibility for the safety of persons and property at the Project Site. Consultant shall not be responsible for job site safety or the evaluating and reporting of job conditions concerning health, safety or welfare. 6. CLIENT’S RESPONSIBILITIESIn addition to payment for the Services performed under this Agreement, Client agrees to:
6.1. Access. Grant or obtain free access to the Project Site for all equipment and personnel necessary for Consultant to perform its Services under this Agreement.
6.2. Relevant Information. Supply Consultant with all information and documents relevant to Consultant’s Services. Consultant is entitled to rely upon such information without verifying its accuracy. Client will notify Consultant of any known potential or possible health or safety hazard regarding the materials to be tested, including its intended use, chemical composition, relevant MSDS, manufacturers’ specifications and literature, and any previous test results.
6.3. Project Information. Client agrees to provide Consultant within 5 days after written request, a correct statement of the recorded legal title to the property on which the Project is located and the Client and/or Owner’s interest therein, and the identity and address of any construction lender. 7. CHANGED CONDITIONSIf Consultant discovers conditions or circumstances that it had not contemplated at the commencement of this Agreement (“Changed Conditions”), Consultant will notify Client in writing of the Changed Conditions. Client and Consultant agree that they will then renegotiate in good faith the terms and conditions of this Agreement. If Consultant and Client cannot agree upon amended terms and conditions within 30 days after notice, Consultant may terminate this Agreement and be compensated as set forth in Section 14, “Termination.” 8. ALLOCATION OF RISK
8.1. Limitation of Liability. The total cumulative liability of Consultant, its subconsultants and subcontractors, and all of their respective shareholders,directors, officers, employees and agents (collectively “Consultant Entities”), to Client and its successors and all parties included as additional insured on Consultant’s insurance policies and all of their respective shareholders, directors, officers, employees and agents (collectively “Client Entities”) arising from or relating to Services under this Agreement, including attorney’s fees due under this Agreement, will not exceed the gross compensation received by Consultant
DocuSign Envelope ID: B52C9FDE-6241-4175-BF7F-EB0FDEB45B48
COMT 2020.1 Page 3 of 4 __________/__________ T20161CAF Riverstone Elementary School Glulam Beam Inspection Contract.doc.docx
Please initial
under this Agreement or twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00), whichever is greater; provided, however, that such liability is further limited as described below. This limit is an aggregate limit with respect to all services on the project, whether provided under this, prior or subsequent agreements, unless modified in writing, agreed to and signed by authorized representatives of the parties. This limitation applies to all lawsuits, claims or actions that allege errors or omissions in Consultant’s Services, whether alleged to arise in tort, contract, warranty, or other legal theory. Upon Client’s written request, Consultant and Client may agree to increase the limitation to a greater amount in exchange for a negotiated increase in Consultant’s fee, provided that they amend this Agreement in writing as provided in Section 16. Consultant Entities and Client Entities also agree that the Client Entities will not seek damages in excess of the limitations indirectly through suits with other parties who may join Consultant as a third-party defendant.
8.2. Indemnification. Client will indemnify, defend and hold harmless Consultant, its subconsultants and subcontractors, and all of their respective shareholders, directors, officers, employees and agents (collectively “Consultant Entities”) from and against any and all claims, suits, liabilities, damages, expenses (including without limitation reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of defense) or other losses (collectively “Losses”) except to the extent caused by the sole negligence of Consultant. In addition, except to the extent caused by Consultant’s negligence, Client expressly agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant Entities from and against any and all Losses arising from or related to the existence, disposal, release, discharge, treatment or transportation of Hazardous Materials, or the exposure of any person to Hazardous Materials, or the degradation of the environment due to the presence, discharge, disposal, release of or exposure to Hazardous Material.
8.3. Consequential Damages. Neither Client nor Consultant will be liable to the other for any special, consequential, incidental or penal losses or damages of whatever nature including but not limited to losses, damages or claims related to the unavailability of property or facilities, shutdowns or service interruptions, loss of use, loss of profits, loss of revenue, or loss of inventory, or for use charges, cost of capital, or claims of the other party and/or its customers, which may arise directly or indirectly as a result of the Services provided by Consultant under this Agreement.
8.4. Continuing Agreement. The provisions of this Section 8, “Allocation of Risk,” will survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. If Company provides Services to Client that the parties do not confirm through execution of an amendment to this Agreement, the provisions of this Section 8 will apply to such Services as if the parties had executed an amendment.
8.5. No Personal Liability. Client and Consultant intend that Consultant’s Services will not subject Consultant’s individual employees, officers or directors to any personal liability. Therefore, and notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, Client agrees as its sole and exclusive remedy to direct or assert any claim, demand or suit only against the business entity identified as “Consultant” on the first page of this Agreement. 9. INSURANCE
9.1. Consultant’s Insurance. Consultant carries Statutory Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance; Commercial General LiabilityInsurance for bodily injury and property damage; Automobile Liability Insurance, including liability for all owned, hired and non-owned vehicles; and Professional Liability Insurance. Certificates of insurance can be furnished upon written request but may not be processed unless accompanied by a signed Agreement. Client agrees not to withhold payment to Consultant for Client’s failure to make such a timely request and such requests may not be honored if made after final completion of authorized Services. Additional charges may apply for Waiver of Subrogation and Additional Insured Endorsements. Consultant assumes the risk of damage caused by Consultant’s personnel to Consultant’s supplies and equipment.
9.2. Contractor’s Insurance. Client shall require that all Contractors and subcontractors for the Project name Consultant as an additional insured under their General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance policies. If Client is not the Project owner, Client will require the Project owner to require the owner’s Contractor to purchase and maintain General Liability, Builder’s Risk, Automobile Liability, Workers’ Compensation, and Employer’s Liability insurance with limits no less than as set forth above, and to name Consultant and its subcontractors and subconsultants as additional insureds on the General Liability insurance. Upon request, Client will provide Consultant with certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the existence of the policies required herein. 10. OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCUMENTS
10.1. Use of Documents. Documents prepared by Consultant are solely for use by Client and will not be provided by either party to any other person or entity, other than the project Architect, Structural Engineer, General Contractor and Building Department, without Consultant’s prior written consent.
10.1.1. Use by Client. Client has the right to reuse the Documents for purposes reasonably connected with the Project for which the Services are provided, including without limitation design and licensing requirements of the Project.
10.1.2. Use by Consultant. Consultant retains the right of ownership with respect to any patentable concepts or copyrightable materials arising from its Services and the right to use the Documents for any purpose.
10.2. Electronic Media. Consultant may agree at Client’s request to provide Documents and information in an electronic format as a courtesy. However, the paper original issued by Consultant will remain the final documentation of the Services.
10.3. Unauthorized Reuse. No party other than Client may rely, and Client will not represent to any other party that it may rely on Documents without Consultant’s express prior written consent and receipt of additional compensation. Client will defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from and against any claim, action or proceeding brought by any party claiming to rely upon information or opinions contained in Documents provided to such person or entity, published, disclosed or referred to without Consultant’s prior written consent. 11. SAMPLES
Consultant will dispose of all samples collected during the construction phase of the project immediately upon completion of testing. Upon request received prior to the initiation of testing, Consultant will deliver samples to the Client or will store them for an agreed delivery or storage charge. All samples shall remain the property of the Client and, in the absence of evidence of contamination, Consultant shall dispose of samples for the Client. Client shall be responsible for and promptly pay for the removal and lawful disposal of all contaminated samples and hazardous materials and other hazardous substances, unless otherwise agreed in writing. 12. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTS
During the term of this Agreement and following its expiration or termination for any reason, neither party may assign this Agreement or any right or claim under it, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the other party, except for an assignment of proceeds for financing purposes. Any assignment that fails to comply with this paragraph will be void and of no effect. Consultant may subcontract for the services of others without obtaining Client’s consent if Consultant deems it necessary or desirable for others to perform certain Services. 13. SUSPENSION AND DELAYS
13.1. Procedures. Client may, at any time by 10 days written notice suspend performance of all or any part of the Services by Consultant. Consultant may terminate this Agreement if Client suspends Consultant’s Services for more than 60 days and Client will pay Consultant as set forth under Section 14, “Termination.” If Client suspends Consultant’s Services, or if Client or others delay Consultant’s Services, Client and Consultant agree to equitably adjust: (1) the time for completion of the Services; and (2) Consultant’s compensation in accordance with Consultant’s then current Fee Schedule for the additional labor, equipment, and other charges associated with maintaining its workforce for Client’s benefit during the delay or suspension, or charges incurred by Consultant for demobilization and subsequent remobilization.
13.2. Liability. Consultant is not liable to Client for any failure to perform or delay in performance due to circumstances beyond Consultant’s control, including but not limited to pollution, contamination, or release of hazardous substances, strikes, lockouts, riots, wars, fires, flood, explosion, “acts of God,” adverse weather conditions, acts of government, labor disputes, delays in transportation or inability to obtain material and equipment in the open market. 14. TERMINATION
14.1. Termination for Convenience. Consultant and Client may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 30 days written notice delivered or mailed to the other party.
14.2. Termination for Cause. In the event of material breach of this Agreement, the non-breaching party may terminate this Agreement if the breaching party fails to cure the breach within 5 days following delivery of the non-breaching party’s written notice of the breach to the breaching party. The termination notice must state the basis for the termination. The Agreement may not be terminated for cause if the breaching party cures the breach within the 5-day period.
14.3. Payment on Termination. Following termination other than for Consultant’s material breach of this Agreement, Client will pay Consultant for Services performed prior to the termination notice date, and for any necessary Services and expenses incurred in connection with the termination of the Project, including but not limited to, the costs of completing analysis, records and reports necessary to document job status at the time of termination and costs associated with termination of subcontractor contracts in accordance with Consultant’s then current Fee Schedule.
DocuSign Envelope ID: B52C9FDE-6241-4175-BF7F-EB0FDEB45B48
COMT 2020.1 Page 4 of 4 __________/__________ T20161CAF Riverstone Elementary School Glulam Beam Inspection Contract.doc.docx Please initial
15. DISPUTES 15.1. Mediation. All disputes between Consultant and Client, except those involving Client’s failure to pay undisputed invoices as provided herein and
excluding Consultant’s perfection of any mechanic’s lien, are subject to mediation. Either party may demand mediation by serving a written notice stating the essential nature of the dispute, amount of time or money claimed, and requiring that the matter be mediated within 45 days of service of notice. The mediation shall be administered by the American Arbitration Association or by such other person or organization as the parties may agree upon, in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association.
15.2. Precondition to Other Action. No action or suit, except those involving Client’s failure to pay undisputed invoices as provided herein and excluding Consultant’s perfection of any mechanic’s lien, may be commenced unless the mediation did not occur within 45 days after service of notice; or the mediation occurred but did not resolve the dispute; or a statute of limitation would elapse if suit was not filed prior to 45 days after service of notice. If the matter is referred to arbitration, the arbitration shall be conducted in Fresno County, California. The arbitrator shall be appointed within 60 days of the arbitrators’ receipt of a written request to arbitrate the dispute. The arbitrator shall be authorized to provide all recognizable remedies available in law or equity for any cause of action that is the basis of the arbitration (to the extent such remedy is not otherwise precluded under this Agreement), provided that (i) the arbitrator shall not have the authority to award punitive damages, and (ii) each party shall bear its own costs and attorney’s fees related to the arbitration.
15.3. Choice of Law; Venue. This Agreement will be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the state of California. Except for actions, such as for enforcement of mechanic's liens, which are required by statute to be brought in a specific venue, or unless the parties agree otherwise, any mediation or other legal proceeding will occur in Fresno County, California. Client waives the right to have the suit brought, or tried in, or removed to, any other county or judicial jurisdiction. The prevailing party will be entitled to recovery of all reasonable costs incurred, including court costs, reasonable attorney's fees, and other claim related direct expenses.
15.4. Statutes of Limitations. Any applicable statute of limitations will be deemed to commence running on the earlier of the date of substantial completion of Consultant’s Services under this Agreement or the date on which claimant knew, or should have known, of facts giving rise to its claims. 16. MISCELLANEOUS
16.1. Integration and Severability. This Agreement reflects the entire agreement of the parties with respect to its terms and conditions, and supersedes all prior agreements, whether written or oral. If any portion of this Agreement is void or voidable, such portion will be deemed stricken and the Agreement reformed to as closely approximate the stricken portions as the law allows. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the enforceability of the remaining provisions will not be impaired.
16.2. Modification of This Agreement. This Agreement may not be modified or altered, except by a written agreement signed by authorized representatives of both parties and referring specifically to this Agreement.
16.3. Notices. Any and all notices, requests, instructions, or other communications given by either party to the other must be in writing and either hand delivered to the recipient or delivered by first-class mail with return receipt (postage prepaid) or express mail (billed to sender) at the addresses given in this Agreement.
16.4. Headings. The headings used in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not a part of this Agreement. 16.5. Waiver. The waiver of any term, conditions or breach of this Agreement will not operate as a subsequent waiver of the same term, condition, or breach.
One or more waivers of any term, condition or covenant by either party shall not be construed as a waiver of any other term, condition or covenant. 16.6. Survival. These terms and conditions survive the completion of the Services and/or the termination of this Agreement, whether for cause or for
convenience. 16.7. Warranty Of Authority To Sign, Personal Guarantee. The person signing this contract warrants that he/she has authority to sign on the behalf of the
Client for whose benefit Consultant’s services are rendered. If such person does not have such authority, he/she agrees that he/she is personally liable for obligations under this Agreement and all breaches of this contract and that in any action against him/her for breach of such warranty, reasonable attorney’s fees shall be included in any judgment rendered. Further, if Client fails to perform and is in breach of this Agreement the person signing this Agreement agrees that he/she is personally liable for obligations under this Agreement and all breaches of this contract and that in any action against him/her for breach of such warranty, reasonable attorney’s fees shall be included in any judgment rendered.
16.8. Precedence. These Terms and Conditions take precedence over any inconsistent or contradictory provisions contained in any other agreement term, proposal, purchase order, requisition, notice to proceed, or other document regarding Consultant’s Services.
16.9. Incorporation of Provisions Required By Law. Each provision and clause required by law to be inserted in this Agreement is included herein, and the Agreement should be read and enforced as though each were set forth in its entirety herein. 17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement between the parties consists of these Terms, the PROPOSAL by the Consultant, and any exhibits or attachments noted in the PROPOSAL. Together, these elements will constitute the entire Agreement superseding any and all prior negotiations, correspondence, or agreements either written or oral. The Parties have read the foregoing, understand completely the terms, and willingly enter into this Agreement. This Agreement was developed to be fair and reasonable to both parties. The terms of this Agreement will prevail over any different or additional terms in Client’s purchase order or other forms provided by Client to Consultant as part of the authorization process unless agreed in writing by Consultant. The parties acknowledge that there has been an opportunity to negotiate the terms and conditions of this Agreement and agree to be bound accordingly. Consultant’s acceptance of this Agreement is pending credit review and a retainer fee may be required.
Client: GOLDEN VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Consultant: KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Signature Date Signature Date
Name (Please Print) Name (Please Print)
Title Title
DocuSign Envelope ID: B52C9FDE-6241-4175-BF7F-EB0FDEB45B48
4/3/2020
Rodney Wallace
Superintendent
Agenda Item Details
Public Content
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Meeting Apr 28, 2020 - Regular Meeting
Category K. CONSENT AGENDA
Subject 12. Ratify, Stone Creek Change Order Request 002 RES-15, PG&E Transformer. [Wallace]
Access Public
Type Action
Background: Change Order Request 002 RES-15 is due to a change in direction from PG&E drawing PM#35130386. Current Considerations: The change order is for relocating the PG&E Transformer from inside the mechanical yard tothe street and extending the secondary trenching, conduit, sand shade. Financial Impact: The change order is $25,523.82 and will be paid from the project budget.
Change Order 002 RES-15.pdf (424 KB)
MARKW|I.sONC0fiS]-Rl JCTi0l'1, ll'r( .
Change Order Request 002 RES-15A-C Electric
Date 3-12-20ProjectProject Number
Riverstone Elementary School20L9LZ
lo: SIM-PBK Architects7790 N Palm AveFresno, CA 93711
Attn. Jeff Berrios
We submit the following cost proposal for review and process:
Scope of Change Relocate PG&E transformer from inside the mechanical yard to thestreet, extend secondary trenching, conduit, sand shade & backfill per
the PG&E drawing PM#35130386.
Reason for Change pG&E
Calendar Day Time Extension 0
SIM.PBK en Unified SD
3- A7- )niDDate
* Payment pending SchoalBoard Approval
Description Total
Relocate transformer $ zs,szl.gz
s
$
s
5
$
s
TOTAT $ 25,523.82
Construction
Date
3/26/2020
Form for EXTRA WORK and/or DEDUCTIVE WORK
Subcontractor Work Additive
I Subcontractor Labor Total $4.050.00
2 Subcontlactor Material Total
3 Subcoutractor Equipment Total
4 Subtotal #1 ( Lines 1,2&3) $4.050.00
- Subcontractor's Overhead & Profit for Subrotal #l' (Line 4)
6 Subtotal #2 (Lines 4 & 5) $4.050.00
Deductive
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Contractor's Work
7 Contractol Labor Total
8 Contractor's Material Total
9 Contractor Equiprnent Total
l0 Sub Total #3 (Lines (7,8,9)
. . Contractor Overhead and Profit (For Subtotal #3lt" (line 10)
l2 Contractors Overhead and Profit for Subtotal #2
l3 Subtotal #4 (lines 10, 11, 12)
Additive Deductive
$10.957.22
$7.609.61
$s41.00
$19.107.83
$ r .91 0.78
$202.50
$2t,22t.t|
$0.00
$0,00
$0.00
14 Sum of Subtotals #2 and#4 $25,271.11 $0.0015 Contractor's Bond
16 Net Total for COR$2s2.7r
$25.523.82
$0.00
$0.00
ft-v ul&zJo vurwu/
TO: Mark Wilson ConstructionCole Bendoski
JOB: Riverstone Elementaty
CUSTOMER TOB # 2OI9I2CUSTOMER MR/PCO #
A-C JOB # FRO938
A-C PCO # 3
Date 3ll1120
RE Relocate PG&E Transformer from inside the mechanical yard to the street. Exteud secondaly trenching, conduit, sand shade & backfillper the approved PG&E drawing PM#35130386 issued 3/4/2020. Excavate treuch to a depth of 8' & iuclude benching to accommodate
storm drain.
MATERIALMaterial $6,534.24TOTAL MATERIAL s6,534.24
SUBCONTRACTExcavation labor 4,0s0.00l.
2.
3.
4.
TOTAL SUBCONTRACT $ 4,050.00
LABORST Hours 128.43 Hrs @ $ 85.32 ihr $10,957.22
OT Hours Hrs @ $ AuDT Hours Hrs@ $ /luProiect Manager Hrs@ $ 150.00 iluDrawing Updating / Detailiug Hrs@ $ 75.00 /lrEstimating Hrs (@ $ 65.00 AuAdrninistration Hrs@ $ 55.00 /luMaterial Runner Hrs@ $ 40.00 /hrSubsistance N/A Days @ N/A /dayTOTAL LABOR COST $10,9s7.22
EXPENSESConsumable Items 4% of Labor Dollars $43 8.29
Delivery Tmck Hrs @ /hrMaterial Storage $ 130.68
Equipment Rental $240.00
A-C Or,vned Equipurent $30 r.00Drawing Updates sheets (@ /sheet
TOTAL EXPENSES $ r ,109.97
OVERHEAD, PROFIT, BOND, TAX & SUBCONTRACT MARK-UPSubtotal of Material and Labor $19 107.83
Overhead & Profit 10% $ 1,910.78
Tax 7.75% $ 506.40
Expcnses $ l,109.97Mark Up on Expenses 10.00% $ 111.00
Total Subcontract Dollars
Mark Up on Subcontract
Bond5% $ 202.50
$ 4,050.00
TOTAL COST SUMMARY
1o/o 252.00
$ 25,523.1I
Standard Material Estimate Sheet
Project: RiverstoneElementary
4-e Sbhio enqaa+
Estimator:Bid#: FR0938
z56o S. EASTAVEFRESNO, CALIFORNIA 9gT 06
Bid Date March 6,2020
Material LaborDESCRIPTION Qtv
Unit Price Per Amount Unit Per Amount6,534 128.43Totals from Page 1
TOTAL MATERIAL 6,534 TOTAL LABOR 128.43
I
4-e gb)rio eanfa&lz56o S. EASTAVB
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 937 o6
Standard Material Estimate Sheet
Project: Riverstone ElementaryBid # FR0938
Estimator: Bid Date March 6,2020
DESCRIPTION QtvMaterial Labor
Unit Price Per Amount Unit Per AmountPVC GLUE 4 10.53 E 42.11 0.75 E 3.004" PVC -1 10 220.O0 c -242.00 4.00 C 4.404'PVC 90 -2 9.25 E -18.51 120.00 c -2.40
4'PVC COUPLING -2 2.11 E 4.21 60.00 c -1.20
4" BELL END -2 4.75 E -9.50 0.50 E -1.00
4" CONDUIT PLUG -2 4.00 E -8.00 0.05 E -0.10
BACKHOE SPOTTEFY COMPACTION LABOR 120 36.00 c 43.20
5" PVC 650 590.00 c 3,835.00 5.75 c 37.38
5" PVC 90 36" RADIUS 10 108.91 E 1,089.10 1.25 E 12.50
5'PVC COUPLING 10 15.72 E 157.20 1.00 E 10.00
5" PVC 90 60'RADIUS 5 135.21 E 676.05 1.50 E 7.50
5" 30 ELBOW 60" RADIUS 5 48.54 E 242.70 1.50 E 7.50
5" PVC BELL ENDS 10 13.32 E 133.20 0.25 E 2.50
MULE TAPE 5OO' ROLL 2 55.55 E 111.10 2.00 E 4.00
12"x 12" SAND ENCASEMENT -110 2.00 E -220.00 8.00 c -8.80
36'X 24' SAND ENCASEMENT 125 6.00 E 750.00 15.00 c 18.75
TOTAL MATERIAL 6,534 TOTAL LABOR 128.43
Agenda Item Details
Public Content
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Meeting Apr 28, 2020 - Regular Meeting
Category K. CONSENT AGENDA
Subject 13. Ratify, Stone Creek Change Order Request 004 RES-15 A-C Electric. [Wallace]
Access Public
Type Action
Change order request 004 RES-15 from A-C Electric is a credit for the deduction of two dedicated hand dryer circuitsin Building C Rooms 301 and 303 which were not required for the spaces. The credit for the change order is $1,410.82.
Change Order 004 RES-15 A-C Electric.pdf (779 KB)
Change Order Request 004_RES-15A-C Electric
Date 4-14-20Project Riverstone Elementary SchoolProject Number 201912
To:
Scope of Change
Reason for Change
Total
$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
TOTAL $
Calendar Day Time Extension 0
We submit the following cost proposal for review and process:
Deduct (2) Hand Dryer Circuits
Description
Deduct (2) dedicated hand dryer circuits in Building C Rooms 301 and 303.
SIM-PBK Architects7790 N Palm AveFresno, CA 93711Attn. Jeff Berrios
Bulletin 18
(1,410.82)
(1,410.82)
Mark Wilson Construction SIM-PBK Architects Golden Valley Unified SD
Date Date Date*Payment pending SchoolBoard Approval
Cole Bendoski
4/15/20 4/16/20
DocuSign Envelope ID: 657151D5-1C17-4AFA-B439-FC8432A134C8
4/20/2020
A-C Electric Company CALIFORNIA C-10 LICENSE 99849
ENGINEERING - CONSTRUCTION - TECHNOLOGY - SERVICE
FOUNDED
1945
FRESNO DIVISION
Box 2425
Fresno, CA 93745-2425
O: (559) 233-2208
F: (559) 233-6849
www.a-celectric.com
Change Request Proposal
Job Name: Date:
A-C Job No:
RIVERSTONE ELEMENTARY SCH
FR0938
Description: BULLETIN 18
A-C CRP No: 5.00
Customer Job No:
To: GOLDEN VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL
37479 AVENUE 12
MADERA, CA 93638
Attn:
4/10/20
BULLETIN 18 - DEDUCT 2 DEDICATED HAND DRYER CIRCUITS IN BUILDING C
ROOMS 301 & 303.
Description:
Schedule Impact:
AMOUNT
Words:
Figure:
Price Valid Until:
Negative One Thousand Four Hundred Eleven Dollars and Eighty-Two Cents
$(1,410.82)
0 Days
Terms and Conditions:
1. This proposal is valid for a period not to exceed (20) calendar days from the date of this proposal unless otherwise noted.
2. This proposal is contingent upon receiving a signed copy of this Change Request or receiving a mutually acceptable form of subcontract change order.
3. Progress billing will be based on work completed and materials stored.
4. This proposal excludes acceleration, losses of efficiency, as well as the cumulative impact of ongoing and new changes being directed. We reserve our rights to
pursue reimbursement for these and any other costs that occur beyond the scope of our original contract.
5. Labor rates are based on the work being performed during regular working hours - overtime is not included unless specifically stated in this proposal.
6. Pricing is based on having unrestricted access to the work area.
7. Cutting and patching is excluded unless specifically included in the quote.
Signed
A-C Electric Company Accepted by:
Signed
Trevor Devers, Service Manager
Name and Title4/10/20
Date
Name and Title
Date
Trevor Devers, Service Manager
Page 1 of 1Print Date: 04/10/20
DocuSign Envelope ID: 657151D5-1C17-4AFA-B439-FC8432A134C8
A-C Electric Company
TO: Mark Wilson Construction CUSTOMER JOB # 201912 A-C JOB # FR0938
Cole Bendoski CUSTOMER APR/PCO # A-C PCO # 5
JOB: Riverstone Elementary Date 4/9/20
RE:
MATERIAL
Material ($760.61)
TOTAL MATERIAL ($760.61)
SUBCONTRACT
1.
2.
3.
4.
TOTAL SUBCONTRACT -$
LABOR
ST Hours -6.78 Hrs @ 85.32$ /hr ($578.26)
OT Hours Hrs @ -$ /hr
DT Hours Hrs @ -$ /hr
Project Manager Hrs @ 150.00$ /hr
Drawing Updating / Detailing Hrs @ 75.00$ /hr
Estimating Hrs @ 65.00$ /hr
Administration Hrs @ 55.00$ /hr
Material Runner Hrs @ 40.00$ /hr
Subsistance N/A Days @ N/A /day
TOTAL LABOR COST ($578.26)
EXPENSES
Consumable Items of Labor Dollars
Delivery Truck Hrs @ /hr
Material Storage
Equipment Rental
A-C Owned Equipment
Drawing Updates sheets @ /sheet
TOTAL EXPENSES
OVERHEAD, PROFIT, BOND, TAX & SUBCONTRACT MARK-UP
Subtotal of Material and Labor (1,397.82)$
Overhead & Profit 10%
Tax 7.75% (58.95)$
Expenses -$
Mark Up on Expenses 10.00% -$
Total Subcontract Dollars -$
Mark Up on Subcontract 5% -$
Bond 1% -13.00
TOTAL COST SUMMARY (1,410.82)$
Bulletin #18- Deduct 2 dedicated hand dryer circuits in Building C rooms 301 & 303.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 657151D5-1C17-4AFA-B439-FC8432A134C8
Project: Riverstone Elementary
Bid # :
Estimator: TJD Bid Date
Unit Price Per Amount Unit Per Amount
-40 70.86 C -28.34 5.00 C -2.00
-4 0.31 E -1.25 15.00 C -0.60
-4 0.33 E -1.33 25.00 C -1.00
-4 0.74 E -2.95 16.00 C -0.64
-2 4.29 E -8.58 0.45 E -0.90
-150 121.06 M -18.16 6.25 M -0.94
-2 0.35 E -0.70
-61 -6.78
12 THHN STRANDED CU
3 - #14-6 EQUIP CONN
Standard Material Estimate Sheet
MaterialQty
April 3, 2020
FR0938
A-C Electric Company2560 S. EAST AVE
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93706
3/4" EMT
3/4 STEEL/COMP CONNECTOR
3/4 STEEL/COMP COUPLING
3/4" EMT STRAP
4 SQ BOX WITH 5/8" EXT RING
LaborDESCRIPTION
TOTAL LABORTOTAL MATERIAL
4/9/2020 PAGE 1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 657151D5-1C17-4AFA-B439-FC8432A134C8
Project: Riverstone Elementary
Bid # :
Estimator: TJD Bid Date
Unit Price Per Amount Unit Per Amount
-61 -6.78
-61 -6.78
LaborQty
Material
April 3, 2020
DESCRIPTION
A-C Electric Company2560 S. EAST AVE
Totals from Page 1
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93706
Standard Material Estimate Sheet
FR0938
TOTAL LABORTOTAL MATERIAL
4/9/2020 PAGE 2
DocuSign Envelope ID: 657151D5-1C17-4AFA-B439-FC8432A134C8
7790 N. PALM AVENUE || FRESNO, CA 93711 || P 559 448 8400 F 559 448 8467 || www.sim-pbk.com
Bulletin No. 18PROJECT: Golden Valley Unified School District –
Riverstone Elementary SchoolDATE: 04/03/2020
DSA APP. NO.: 02-117213LOCATION: South-West Corner, Market Ave. & Boulder Dr.Madera, CA 93636
DSA FILE NO.: 20-50
SIM-PBK NO.: 16-32TO: Mark Wilson Construction5799 E Clinton Ave.Fresno, CA 93727
Incorporate the following modification into the scope of construction for the subject project. Briefly stated, this modification is as follows:
Electrical Credit Bldg C Rooms 301 & 303
DESCRIPTION:
Building C Rooms 301 & 303 (Sheet Ec1.2):Contractor to omit Electrical j-box, circuit, and hand dryer connections in Bldg C Rooms 301 & 303 as Electrical Hand Dryers (HD) are not required in these spaces. Contractor to provide credit for this scope.
ATTACHMENTS:None
ACTION TO BE TAKEN:
Make the described change in the work at no change in the Contract Sum and no change in the Contract Time of Completion. If the contractor determines that this bulletin requires a change in the contract sum and/or contract time, the contractor shall not proceed with this work and shall promptly submit an itemized proposal per the General Conditions.
SUBMITTED BY: Jeff B. SIM-PBK
DocuSign Envelope ID: 657151D5-1C17-4AFA-B439-FC8432A134C8
7790 N. PALM AVENUE || FRESNO, CA 93711 || P 559 448 8400 F 559 448 8467 || www.sim-pbk.com
Bulletin No. 18PROJECT: Golden Valley Unified School District –
Riverstone Elementary SchoolDATE: 04/03/2020
DSA APP. NO.: 02-117213LOCATION: South-West Corner, Market Ave. & Boulder Dr.Madera, CA 93636
DSA FILE NO.: 20-50
SIM-PBK NO.: 16-32TO: Mark Wilson Construction5799 E Clinton Ave.Fresno, CA 93727
Incorporate the following modification into the scope of construction for the subject project. Briefly stated, this modification is as follows:
Electrical Credit Bldg C Rooms 301 & 303
DESCRIPTION:
Building C Rooms 301 & 303 (Sheet Ec1.2):Contractor to omit Electrical j-box, circuit, and hand dryer connections in Bldg C Rooms 301 & 303 as Electrical Hand Dryers (HD) are not required in these spaces. Contractor to provide credit for this scope.
ATTACHMENTS:None
ACTION TO BE TAKEN:
Make the described change in the work at no change in the Contract Sum and no change in the Contract Time of Completion. If the contractor determines that this bulletin requires a change in the contract sum and/or contract time, the contractor shall not proceed with this work and shall promptly submit an itemized proposal per the General Conditions.
SUBMITTED BY: Jeff B. SIM-PBK
DocuSign Envelope ID: 657151D5-1C17-4AFA-B439-FC8432A134C8
Agenda Item Details
Public Content
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Meeting Apr 28, 2020 - Regular Meeting
Category K. CONSENT AGENDA
Subject 14. Ratify, Stone Creek Change Order Request 002-005 RES-01 Seal Rite Paving. [Wallace]
Access Public
Type Action
The four attached Change Order requests are presented for ratification. They are component parts for the gradingdesign error and will be reimbursed by Precision Engineering, via SIM/PBK, through fee reduction. The compilationrectifies drainage issues on the ball fields and northwest corner of the site, and pays for estimating and equipmentrental while the contractor was waiting for redirection from the engineer. The four change orders total $62,500.24 and will be reimbursed by Precision Engineering via SIM-PBK fee reduction.
Seal Rite Change Orders.pdf (854 KB)
DocuSign Envelope lD: 30BEA24D-66F5-4DBB-9E2B-E1 D8ACEC25FC
hl?A&K WILS*lii4r\r:i' , i!! rna:/,4i lLi,,,,t ,,i !. . : r i-ti, : :r.,:, i, l: \r.
Change Order Request 002_RE5-0LSeal Rite Paving
Tor 5lM-PBK Architects7790 N Palm Ave
Fresno, CA 93711
Attn. Jeff Berrios
We submit the following cost proposal for review and process:
Scope ofChange Review and analyze grade changes,
Reason for Change Bulletin 1.1 revisions.
Date 2-L9-20ProjectProject Number
Riverstone Elementary School201912
Calendar Day Time Extension 0
1,Vr G.*r^ir-k'-Mark Wilson Construction SIM-PBK Architects Golden Vallev Unified SD
4/16/2026
Date* Payntent pending SchoolBoard Approval
Description Total(25) Hours of analysis of grades 52,375,00
TOTAL s2,375.00
Date
2roDate
41612420
DocuSign Envelope lD: 30BEA24D-66F5-4D88-9E28-E1 DBACEC25FC
4237 West Swill Avenue - l--rcsno, CA93722Phone: 559-222-7325 - Fax: 559-325-0760
csBL #80s58s-A
Change Order No. 7
Felrruary 18,2420
Golden Valley Unified School District37479 Avenue 12
Madera CA93636Plrone: 559-645-3570
Constriction Management Company:
Mark Wilson Construction
5799 E. Clinton Ave - Fresno Ca93'127
Attn: Golden Valley U.S.D and Mark Wilson Construction: Kasey Earls
Re: Review and analyze the grade fbr the third time
Analysis of the grades fbr 25 hours x $95 hours :$2,375.00
'fotal Cost: ____--s. $ 2,375.00
ACCEPTED BY: SUBIVIITTED I}Y:
SEAL RITE PAVING & GR.\DING
i K,r
E
Change Order SummaryRiverstone Elementary SchoolChange Order No. 6
Trade: Paving
Sub's Name: Seal Rite Paving and Gradlng
Rro1""t,
Date:2118/2A2A
oooCa6fmloo!
Sco of Work Descri
td-1t"9.!1.9.:y.?19
)tJl.o/ bl
Total Cost
s2,1 64.8(
.............111i.,1:)l/o. 1(
C.
s5E8.0t
s0.00
JU
p(!O@m
l!5oo)-n(r
oCD@(omN)@m
cl@
omoN(n'Tlos0.0(
s1 76
$0
Foreman Rate $0.00 ol ?o $731 .12 s0.00Rate $0.00 90.20 164.80 0 s0.00
Labor Rate $0 68.39 $547.12 0 c.n nn
Foreman Truck Rate $0 $0.00 Foreman TruckExcavator $0 815FCat Roller $0 $0.00 623E 0 s171 .26
Water truck $0 $0.00 670CH I $73.51 JCOO
Cat 613C $0 $0.00 truck d s66.2s 5530Tractor 5U $0.00 0 S5O,87 s0Bobcat $0 $0.00 s33.40 s0
Lorv Bed 50 $0.00 $150.00 s0Trucki ng $0 0 $1 10.00 s0
0 $4 1 .84 $0Du Fee s0 (n nn
Porter sawrJrc,l,r'riiio"
$0 50 00
s0 $0 00Du itt 1 s0 s0.00
1"4 a te ria l ls 1 $0.00 SO $0.00$o.oo s0$0.00 $0.00
32 I $2,347
$352.1 4 s868.6C
s5,659.24
Equipment
Totai
$2,699.74
Rate# Hrs.
56.0
Eq. Type
Labor
Total
$3,443.04
$516.46
$3.9sS.s0
Raie
250
Labor Hours
40.0
Units
per Manhour
$o
$0
Materials
$0.00
Cost P€r Unil
15.00%
QtvUnil
Subtotals
--r-------I
r o/^
'----------------f ----Sutx:ontractors OH & P
Item DescriptionScope of Work Description
Totai CO No.
Seal Rite PavingSrgnature
2t18t2024
Date
2t18t2020INSPECTORSignature Date
DocuSign Envelope lD: 29OEAEFF-ABDF-4428-A8 17 -4967 1 68D 4544
II{AfrKWILS#rur\i\\:a i::! i.' !,,'1:: !1r..'i.ir:':.\ j I', -'.,,,1' . r,lt..
Change Order Request 003_RES-01Seal Rite Paving
Dare 2-19-20ProjectProject Number
Riverstone Elementa ry School2A19L2
Gkk-
To: SIM-PBK Architects7790 N Palm Ave
Fresno, CA 9371.1
Attn. Jeff Berrios
We submit the following cost proposal for review and process:
Scope of Change Grading the swale per revised grades in Bulletin 1.1
Reason for Change Bulletin 1.1 revisions.
Mark Wilson Construction Architects
2
Calendar Day Time Extension 0
Golden Valley Unified SD
4/L0/2020
Date
" Payment pending SchoolBoard Approval
Description Total
Grading the Swale s6,6s9.24
TOTAT $6,6s9.24
Date
'I'O ?.4Date
4/91202A
DocuSign Envelope lD: 290EAEFF-A8DF-4428-A817 -4967 168D4544
Lhcmg<r- o.rJz^,r * kFORftI FOR EXTRA WORI( ANO/qBIDEDUCTIVE WORI(
each if moro DITIVE
S ADDITIVE OEDUCTIVE
S BOND
NEr TorAL roR C.O.R. {5J
(D: Atlach itenrized li$l(s) lndicaling hours, rales, ms(erial quanlity. nraterial cosls, and uoit costsO: include llre cost for la:(ec.Ot: Refer to lhe Overhead anil Profil ScheduleC'J: Conlradcfs bond and liaijility insurance pienrium, if in facl actual bonrJs and insuranco ar€ to bo purchased. -l
ot3l coslsshEll nct exc€ed 2l'" of the Nel Tolat {lino 16). Refer to lhe oap schedute.(3) lncludes all direcl and indirecl cosis, including but not limited lo, acceleraiicn. cunlutalivg eltect oi ll.ie change(s), expeditinglh€ Work, Fragnets, etc.
15't6
$
1SuecorrrRrrcrotl LABoR ToTAL O
SUecoNInacToR MATEfl IAI ToTALo,
SuacoMrnacToR EeulpMEr.tr Tor^to,
$
1- 'i
J
4
5
I s
Suaroul{11 (LtNEs J,2 & 3)
SUBCOI'I]RACTOR,S OVERIJEAD AIIOPRoFTT FoR suBTorAL /11 (uNE 4) @
SuBrorAL #? (LtfrEs 4 & 5) r,
s
tJ $
B
ct
10
1',l-
12
IJ
CoIIInRcron,s OVERH€AO ANo PRoFITFOn suEToTAL #3 (L|NE ',10) O
Cc,urRacton's OvERt'iEAo At'tD PRoFlrFoR su6rorAl #2 (UilE 6) o
SUBToTAL#4 (LNE$ 10, 11& 12)
s 2,%\s 4-'l__._$AfreW-
s 3Av",3-
$3#33 qr-
COTTTRACTON EAUIPMEIVT TO"TAL Q,
a-{s-,1.! 54 'a3 .
SUr'r oF SUBT0T,ILS #2 & li414
q
$
s
s
$
t
SuErorAL #3 (Lh{Es 7, B & 9)
Colrrtu\cr0R LAB0R To'rAL O
CorurmcroR MnrEarel Tornl 0,
Change Order SurnmaryRiverstone Elementary SchoolChange Order No. 6
Trade: Pavino
Sub's N ame: Seal Rite Paving and Grading
Project: Riverstone Elementary School
Da tei 2/1812024
oooCa(6=mfooEoINoOm
m-Tl-Tl
@o-Tl
N@
@__t
@o!O)ooo5.tr
e of Work Descriptionthe swale revised
$6,
Total
$0.0c
14
,347
Rate# Hrs
0.00
0.00
56.0
Equipment
Eq. Type
623E 0.00 $171 .26
$13 i8.006 tcrTruck
0.00
670CH
truck
$3,443.04
Total
1 64.80$2
$731.'12
$547.1 2
00
$o.oo
$516.46
Rate
250.0
Labor
Labor Hours
24.00i 90.20
68.398.00
Units
per Manhour
40.0
Total
s0.00
$0.00$0.00
$0.00
Cost Per Unit
$0
$0.
srl.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
s0.00
Unitl oty
15.00%
Malerials
Item DescriptionScope of Work Description
$0.00 8.00
$0
s0
s0.00
Cct Scraper 61 3C
:$0
mp Fee :lsnaMale
..lgy.Psg.......Iiysi:ils.....
. lee.l.999i.qYs.s.y.
... ..?yrc5-"..9.....Porler saw
'r"iioliDiiiciii
Labor R.ate
lor Ratc
Bobcat
Cat Roller
V(ater truck
Traclor
$0.00
$0
Foreman Rate
Foreman lruck Rate
i;;;;"6;
SubtotalsSui:conlractors OH & P
Total CO No
Total Cost
s0.00; $0.00
$0.00
0.00 $0 s0.00:8.00
s547.1
5 tlo. tb 5 r/o. i
5l U3J .Jtl s1,c53.3r
s0 0i
s588.0r
Jf,JU UJ
io.o;s0 0c
s0.0a
s0.0c
sc.0c
s731 .1
s0.
8.00 D/J.f, I
8.00 botJ./5 s530.00
0.00 $s0.871
$33.40
s0$o
2l't8t2020
Date
2t18t2020
Seal Rite PavingSignature
INSPECTORSignature Dale
DocuSign Envelope lD: F7CA6526-A7A l -4BAE-8848-6CB8CCD642DC
&sAftr{vfrls*rui'i::.,::
' i':: i:, :,4.:ii. ;l.iil
Change Order Request 004_RE5-01Seal Rite Paving
Dare 2-20-20ProjectProject Number
Riverstone Elementary 5chool201912
SIM-PBK Architects7790 N Palm Ave
Fresno, CA 93711
Attn. Jeff Berrios
We submit the following cost proposal for review and process:
Scope of Change Grade change on the north and west parking lot site.
Reason for Change Bulletin 1.1- revisions
SIM-PBK Arclritects
4fi712420
Calendar Day Time Extension
'15.000
0
See SIM-PBK Cover letter.
"dsfted4/1712020
SD4/22/2020
Date* Paymenl pendirtg 5cltoo/Board Approval
TotalDescription
$-2F,75+56Grade change at North & West Parking Lots
$15,000
-Ttf,?il'GsTOTAL
Mark son Construction
Date
L\n c"*.1,* Orsl*-€'.{r eYF0Rr,l Fgn EXTI3A WORt(3r'rn1on DEDU CTIVE WABj!
rt each if
1 $uecoilTRAcroR LAB0R T0TAL O
2 $uoconrRAcToRi,rr\rERtALTOTAto,
3 SueconrnAcToR EeutpritEr'rrTornL€r, $
$
DTD
DFDUCTIVE
4
5
Sueror^Llll (L|NE$ J, Z & g)
Strgcor'rtRrtcToR's OvEn|.1 eno ailnPR0TIT FIf,R SUSToTAL I,.1 (LINE 4) cI
SUBT0TAL #? (LtltEs 4 & 5) s
Cor,lTnr\cron EeulpMei'lr To'rAL 0,
suBr0]'AL #3 (UNES 7, $ & 9)
Co lt't nncTclR's OvEnilEAD At'lD pfi oFllFoR suBrorAl #3 (LtftE 1 0) O
Contmcton's OrreRne.qg Rl'lo Pnorrtron susrornr. #2 (L[,iE 6) (i)
SuBrorAL lr4 (uN:s !0, I 1 !q 12)
Su}r oi" SueloraLs #2 & #4
E totbXS 6:t-
,}:e#3s3
$
:$
s
e
si
$
'l
ah
s
It
7
B
o
10
i?
'12
13
croR's WoRt( ADDITIVE
bCourRi\cr0R LAgoR To'rAL (}
Cor,rTRqcron fvlA'r€RtAL TorAL O, $_..--
5l
5 &s, r .t-r, L.J'
't4
CollTR,{cToR's 0ilDillET Tor^L FoR C.O.R. (S) $
rD: Atisch iterrized lisl(sl indicalklg luurst ratest nlterie I quanlily, mJterial ccsls, and urril ccstsfr: lnckide the cosl fcr lfr<es-O: liefer lo lhe O,rerheod and Profit Scheduta{): Contractcfsbondandliabililyinsurancepremium,iiinfact ocluai botrdsentlinsurancaarstlrDeDurihased. Tolal cosl6shcll no[ e:(ceed 2t! ol lhf; ltet Tolsl {linB t6). R{rier to the Ofip Schsrjutc.{5} ktclud':s all direct anrJ indirect cosi5. inaluCing bul not l;mit*cJ lo, acf,clcr!lion, clJnlulaliv; eliecl ol lhe changnlt). erpctlilirrglhc Uiork, Fragnals. elc
J516
Change Order $ummaryRiverstone Elementary SchoolChange Order No.
Scope of Work Descri ption:
BTrade: Paving
Sub's Name:
Project:
Dale:
Seal R;te Paving anC
Htverstone Elemeniary
2r1UZO20
Grading
9tg:1: q.lelg.:.1.1.!I9.t91,-',..?lg..y9L!.p. qf!,19 19i site
Scope of Work Description
trorenran Rate
. .. . !lP:f9ier.n9l9.s0.00
s0.00
$0.00
$0.
50
s0.00
l-abor f?ate
Forernali Truch R:rle
Excavalor
. 'i-?1.8.91!-u-r . .
Water iruck
613CCat
T rsciot
8c'bcet
Lcw 6eC
-.;i;;,;i;a;i;'s tir & ;, -------
o o.
Seal Rite PavingSignalure
Total CostTotalRate
s{jSO,CIO
s1 10.0c
# Hrs
0.ri0
0.0c
Cr
50.00
s41.84SO,
s0
171
s65
i.o+bU.Utr i
36
.80
.35t
)i
.21oq
$:1.1 i0.S124.0C
tb
0.0
?OU.U
EquipmentEq. Type
truck
oz-tE
Blade 670Cil
Toial
11,/ tz.JZ
$0.00s0.00
$0.00$o_oo
s0.00
$1,765.85
Rate
91.39
LaborLabor H0{-irs
OO.UU
24.4O
JtJi_b/
t.Jo$124.00
5U
sc
s22.82Tnrck
6E.39
2,1.00
24.00
Units
per Manhour
s0.0c
Cost Per Unitl Toral
l-*---50r-0
50.u0
s0.0c
Unitl Oty
15.000/0
MaterialsItem Description
I
2t18!2020
Date
2]18t202AiNSPECTORSignature
riilMr{il{ coR# 0#4-RH$-0'1
PROJECT: Golden Valley Unified School District -Riverstone Elementary School
South-West Corner, Market Ave. & Boulder DrMadera, CA 93636
DATE
DSAAPP. NO
DSA FILE NO.
SIM-PBK NO.:
4t'l7na20
02-117213
20-50
16-32
LOCATION
TO: Mark Wilson Construction5799 E Clinton Ave.
c493727
Ghange Order Request COR 004-RES-01: Additional costs for North half of campus re -grading
Architects/Engineers Response:
After review and discussion with Seal Rite Pavino on 411712020. we all aoree to a cost of $15,000 for this COR. Weare recommending this cost be accepted by the district.
ACTION TO BE TAKEN:Architect / Engineer Reviewed
Jeff Berrios
7790 N. PALM AVENUE ll FRESNO, CA 93711 ll P 559 448 8400 F 559 448 8467 ll www.sim-pbk.com
DocuSign Envelope lD: DB85F31B-F6A4-4699-840C-A35FF8E0AB12
MARKwlLSONi.,iJ;'.1) Iii.Jl, IIU!\. iF;1.,.
Change Order Request 005_RES-O1Seal Rite Paving
Dale 3-24-20ProiectProject Number
Riverstone Elementary School201912
To: SIM-PBK Architects7790 N Palm Ave
Fresno, CA 93711Attn, Jeff Berrios
We submit the following cost proposal for review and process:
Scope of Change Equipment Standby Cost.
Reason for Change Wait time when Bulletin 1 was being finalized
Calendar Day Time Extension
See SIM-PBK cover letter Cated 4-17-2A20
0
CobQurrbl,'
Mark Wilson Construction
3t24t20 4-17 24204/22/2020
Date* Payment pending SchoolBoard Approval
/') /-Docusigned bY:(A I at ,r,,,Y lw
SIM-PBK Architects =6lBb15'PJfr6V
unitieo so
TotalDescri ption-54e-,e?#gEquipment Standby Cost
s38.466 -
TOTAL -$49;s7648
Date Date
\I I(*
u
4237 Wesr Swift Avenue - Fresno, CA93722Phone: 559-222-7325 - Fax: 559-325-0760
CSBL #805585-A
Equipment Standby Cost as of 211912020(Chanee Order No.9)
February 20,2020
Golden Valley Unified School District37479 Avenue 12
Madera CA93636Phone: 559-645-3570
Constriction Management Company:
Mark Wilson Construction5799 E. Clinton Ave - Fresno Ca 93727
Attn: Golden Valley U.S.D and Mark Wilson Construction: Kasey Earls
Re: Equipment Daily Rate
Rate Dav Amount01. Foreman truck 176.16
02. Compactor 1,053.36 5 $ 5,266.80
03. Scraper 1,370.08 5 $ 6,850.40
04. Blade (2) 711.36 l0 $ 7,113.60
530.00 5 $ 2,650.0005. Water truck
06. Excavator 3,154.16 8 $25,233.2807. Tractor 291.20 5 $ 1,456.00
08. Bobcatw/sweeper 292.08 5 $ 1.406.40
Total=:::: :>$49,976.49
NOTB: IF THB DECISION TO PROCEED WITH WORK IS MADE BY TODAY 212012020,
THE EQUIPMENT WILL BE OFF THE STANDY TIME, OTHERWISE IT WILL RESUMEAGAIN TOMORROW ON ALL OF THE EQUIPMENT EXCEPT THE EXCAVATOR.
SUBMITTED BY:ACCEPTED BY:
SBAL RITE PAVING & GRADING
rrltffirqfi coR# fi*s-RH$-O'!
TO
PROJECT:
LOCATION
ACTION TO BE TAKENArchitect / Engineer Reviewed
Golden Valley Unified School District -Riverstone Elementary School
South-West Corner, Market Ave. & Boulder DrMadera, CA 93636
Mark Wilson Construction5799 E Clinton Ave.Fresno, CA93727
DATE
DSA APP. NO.
DSA FILE NO.:
SIM-PBK NO.:
t+t i Muzv
02-117213
20-50
16-32
Change Order Request COR 005-RES-01: Equipment Standby costs
Architects/Engineers Response:
After review and discussion with Seal Rite Paving on 411712020, we all agree to a cost of $38,466 for this COR. Weare recommending this cost be accepted by the district.
-: "^BY: , Jeff ernos
7790N.PALMAVENUE ll FRESNO,CA93711 ll P5594488400 F5594488467 Il www.sim-pbk.com
Agenda Item Details
Public Content
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Meeting Apr 28, 2020 - Regular Meeting
Category K. CONSENT AGENDA
Subject 15. Ratify, Stone Creek Change Order Request 001 RES-11 BMY. [Wallace]
Access Public
Type Action
This is a district requested change to a different window frame system as part of value engineering. This changegives more natural light into the classrooms and less costly frame unit per door. DSA required a deferred approval onthis change. The cost to run the calculations at the different locations is $3,213.00 and will be paid from the project budget.
Change Order 001 RES-11.pdf (970 KB)
Change Order Request 001 RES-11BMY
Date 3-25-20Project Riverstone Elementary SchoolProject Number 201912
To:
Scope of Change
Reason for Change
Total
3,213.00$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
TOTAL 3,213.00$
Calendar Day Time Extension 0
We submit the following cost proposal for review and process:
Structural calculations for HM Windows
Description
Added cost to provide structural calculations for Hollow Metal Windows with vertical mullions over 10'.
SIM-PBK Architects7790 N Palm AveFresno, CA 93711Attn. Jeff Berrios
Bulletin #02
Mark Wilson Construction SIM-PBK Architects Golden Valley Unified SD
Date Date Date*Payment pending SchoolBoard Approval
Cole Bendoski
3/25/20 4/7/2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5AC4E067-8BC5-464E-9CF3-FAB1010D23E9
4/24/2020
BMY Construction Group, Inc.5485 East Olive AvenueFresno, California 93727-2541Phone: (559) 243-4200Fax: null
Project: 19021 - Riverstone Elem School Bid Package 11 GeneralSpecialties
760 Market AvenueMadera, California 93636
Prime Contract Potential Change Order #001: Bulletin 02: Window Type 9Structural Calcs
TO: Golden Valley Unified School District37479 Ave 12Madera, California 93636
FROM: BMY Construction Group, Inc.5485 E. Olive AveFresno, California 93727
PCO NUMBER/REVISION: 001 / 0 CONTRACT: 19021 - Riverstone Elem School Bid Package11 General Specialties Prime Contract
REQUEST RECEIVED FROM: CREATED BY: Drew Atkins (BMY Construction Group,Inc.)
STATUS: Pending - In Review CREATED DATE: 3/25/2020
REFERENCE: PRIME CONTRACTCHANGE ORDER:
None
FIELD CHANGE: No
LOCATION: ACCOUNTINGMETHOD:
Amount Based
SCHEDULE IMPACT: PAID IN FULL: No
TOTAL AMOUNT: $3,213.00
POTENTIAL CHANGE ORDER TITLE: Bulletin 02: Window Type 9 Structural Calcs CHANGE REASON: Design Development POTENTIAL CHANGE ORDER DESCRIPTION: (The Contract Is Changed As Follows)CE #001 - Bulletin 02: Window Type 9 Structural CalcsPer Bulletin 02, Addendum 1, "Drawing AD1-A05 – Windows with Vertical & Mullions over 10’-0” will require Deferred Approval." Please see theattached cost associated with structural calculations for Window Type 9. ATTACHMENTS:Riverstone PCO 001 - Window Calcs.pdf Xerox Scan_03062020112420.pdf
Jeff Berrios (SIM-PBK) Golden Valley Unified School District BMY Construction Group, Inc.7790 N. Palm Ave 37479 Ave 12 5485 E. Olive AveFresno, California 93711 Madera, California 93636 Fresno, California 93727 ProcoreArchitectSignHere ProcoreArchitectSignedDate ProcoreOwnerSignHere ProcoreOwnerSignedDate ProcoreGeneralContractorSignHere ProcoreGeneralContractorSignedDate
SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE BMY Construction Group, Inc. page 1 of 1 Printed On: 3/25/2020 01:34 PM
PCO #001DocuSign Envelope ID: 5AC4E067-8BC5-464E-9CF3-FAB1010D23E9
BMY CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC.
BMY JOB NO. 18015#19021 DATE: 3/25/20
PCO
SUBCONTRACTOR WORK ADDITIVE DEDUCTIVE
1 SUBCONTRACTOR LABOR TOTAL - -
2 SUBCONTRACTOR MATERIAL TOTAL 2,608.70 -
3 SUBCONTRACTOR EQUIPMENT TOTAL - -
4 SUBTOTAL #1 2,608.70 -
5 OVERHEAD & PROFIT @ 20% <$2500, 15% >=$2500 391.30 -
6 TOTAL ON SUBCONTRACTOR WORK (SUBTOTAL #2) 3,000.00
CONTRACTOR WORK ADDITIVE DEDUCTIVE
7 CONTRACTOR LABOR - -
8 CONTRACTOR MATERIAL - -
9 CONTRACTOR EQUIPMENT - -
10 SUBTOTAL #3 - -
11 CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD & PROFIT FOR SUBTOTAL #3
@ 15% <$2500, 10% >=$2500 - -
12 CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD & PROFIT FOR SUBTOTAL #2
@ 10% <$2500, 5% >=$2500150.00 -
13 TOTAL ON CONTRACTOR WORK (SUBTOTAL #4) 150.00
14 SUM OF SUBTOTALS #2 & #4 3,150.00
CONTRACTOR'S BOND 63.00
NET TOTAL 3,213.00
Notes:
001
DESCRIPTION: Added cost to provide structural calculations for Hollow Metal Windows with vertical and mullions over 10'-0"
per Bulletin #02.
Riverstone ES, Bid Package 11PROPOSED ADDITIVE / DEDUCTIVE WORKSHEET
Per Metal Manufacturing (Jerry Guest), overhead was included in cost.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5AC4E067-8BC5-464E-9CF3-FAB1010D23E9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5AC4E067-8BC5-464E-9CF3-FAB1010D23E9
Agenda Item Details
Public Content
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Meeting Apr 28, 2020 - Regular Meeting
Category K. CONSENT AGENDA
Subject 16. Ratify, Stone Creek Change Order 002 RES-11 BMY. [Wallace]
Access Public
Type Action
Stone Creek Elementary Change Order Request 002 RES-11 is for added CL fence, fire lane gate and double maingates. The cost of the change order is $24,380.24 and will be paid from the project budget.
Change Order 002 RES-11 BMY.pdf (1,386 KB)
Change Order Request 002 RES-11BMY
Date 4-15-20Project Riverstone Elementary SchoolProject Number 201912
To:
Scope of Change
Reason for Change
Total
24,380.24$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
TOTAL 24,380.24$
Calendar Day Time Extension 0
We submit the following cost proposal for review and process:
Add fence and gates
Description
Add 6' CL fence, fire lane gate, and double main gates.
SIM-PBK Architects7790 N Palm AveFresno, CA 93711Attn. Jeff Berrios
Bulletin 15
Mark Wilson Construction SIM-PBK Architects Golden Valley Unified SD
Date Date Date*Payment pending SchoolBoard Approval
Cole Bendoski
4/16/20 4/22/2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: 20851689-FE2E-41A8-9317-8445C58DD0C3
4/23/2020
BMY Construction Group, Inc.5485 East Olive AvenueFresno, California 93727-2541Phone: (559) 243-4200Fax: null
Project: 19021 - Riverstone Elem School Bid Package 11 GeneralSpecialties
760 Market AvenueMadera, California 93636
Prime Contract Potential Change Order #003: CE #003 - Bulletin 15 - AddedSite Fencing
TO: Golden Valley Unified School District37479 Ave 12Madera, California 93636
FROM: BMY Construction Group, Inc.5485 E. Olive AveFresno, California 93727
PCO NUMBER/REVISION: 003 / 0 CONTRACT: 19021 - Riverstone Elem School Bid Package11 General Specialties Prime Contract
REQUEST RECEIVED FROM: CREATED BY: Drew Atkins (BMY Construction Group,Inc.)
STATUS: Pending - In Review CREATED DATE: 4/9/2020
REFERENCE: PRIME CONTRACTCHANGE ORDER:
None
FIELD CHANGE: No
LOCATION: ACCOUNTINGMETHOD:
Amount Based
SCHEDULE IMPACT: PAID IN FULL: No
TOTAL AMOUNT: $24,380.24
POTENTIAL CHANGE ORDER TITLE: CE #003 - Bulletin 15 - Added Site Fencing CHANGE REASON: Design Development POTENTIAL CHANGE ORDER DESCRIPTION: (The Contract Is Changed As Follows)CE #003 - Bulletin 15 - Added Site Fencing1. Add 6' CL fence across site as shown clouded on attached drawing B-15-A012. Add a Fire Line Gate with double pad locks at new added fence across the site as shown clouded on attached drawing B-15-A013. Add double man gates at new added fence across site as shown on attached drawing B-15-A014. Add double man gates at southeast and southwest corner of the site as shown clouded on attached drawing B-15-A01 Per clarifying emails from SIM-PBK, provide hardware per detail S-C1.4 and 7-AX1.3 ATTACHMENTS:BMY Riverstone BUL 15 4920.pdf Breakdown PCO 003 Bulletin 15 Added Site Fencing.pdf Bulletin_15 Added Fence Across Site.pdf
Jeff Berrios (SIM-PBK) Golden Valley Unified School District BMY Construction Group, Inc.7790 N. Palm Ave 37479 Ave 12 5485 E. Olive AveFresno, California 93711 Madera, California 93636 Fresno, California 93727 ProcoreArchitectSignHere ProcoreArchitectSignedDate ProcoreOwnerSignHere ProcoreOwnerSignedDate ProcoreGeneralContractorSignHere ProcoreGeneralContractorSignedDate
SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE BMY Construction Group, Inc. page 1 of 1 Printed On: 4/9/2020 02:39 PM
PCO #003
TBD
DocuSign Envelope ID: 20851689-FE2E-41A8-9317-8445C58DD0C3
BMY CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC.
BMY JOB NO. 18015#19021 DATE: 4/14/20
PCO 003
Valley Fence Company ADDITIVE DEDUCTIVE
1 SUBCONTRACTOR LABOR TOTAL 9,810.00 -
2 SUBCONTRACTOR MATERIAL TOTAL 9,985.00 -
3 SUBCONTRACTOR EQUIPMENT TOTAL - -
4 SUBTOTAL #1 19,795.00 -
5 OVERHEAD & PROFIT @ 20% <$2500, 15% >=$2500 2,969.25 -
6 TOTAL ON SUBCONTRACTOR WORK (SUBTOTAL #2) 22,764.00
CONTRACTOR WORK ADDITIVE DEDUCTIVE
7 CONTRACTOR LABOR - -
8 CONTRACTOR MATERIAL - -
9 CONTRACTOR EQUIPMENT - -
10 SUBTOTAL #3 - -
11 CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD & PROFIT FOR SUBTOTAL #3
@ 15% <$2500, 10% >=$2500 - -
12 CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD & PROFIT FOR SUBTOTAL #2
@ 10% <$2500, 5% >=$25001,138.20 -
13 TOTAL ON CONTRACTOR WORK (SUBTOTAL #4) 1,138.20
14 SUM OF SUBTOTALS #2 & #4 23,902.20
CONTRACTOR'S BOND 478.04
NET TOTAL 24,380.24
Notes:
Bulletin 15: Added Site Fencing
DESCRIPTION:
Riverstone ES, Bid Package 11PROPOSED ADDITIVE / DEDUCTIVE WORKSHEET
Additional time to be determined.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 20851689-FE2E-41A8-9317-8445C58DD0C3
Valley Fence Co. 3505 Lind Avenue Clovis, CA 93612
Phone: (559) 294-0451 ▪ Fax: (559) 294-0455 License #: 237348
Fax Transmittal
Date Company Attention Fax Number From Number of Pages (Including Cover Sheet)
DIR: 1000000118
4-9-20
BMY Construction
Drew
Dave Cash
Project : Riverstone Elementary School Subject : Bulletin 15 Installed, Complete $ 22,764.00 Materials $ 9,985.00 Labor $ 9,810.00 ( 109 man hours @ $ 90.00 per ) 15 % O&P $ 2,969.00
DocuSign Envelope ID: 20851689-FE2E-41A8-9317-8445C58DD0C3
7790 N. PALM AVENUE || FRESNO, CA 93711 || P 559 448 8400 F 559 448 8467 || www.sim-pbk.com
Bulletin No. 15
PROJECT: Golden Valley Unified School District – Riverstone Elementary School
DATE: 03/25/2020
LOCATION: South-West Corner, Market Ave. & Boulder Dr. Madera, CA 93636
DSA APP. NO.: 02-117213
DSA FILE NO.: 20-50
TO: Mark Wilson Construction 5799 E Clinton Ave. Fresno, CA 93727
SIM-PBK NO.: 16-32
Incorporate the following modification into the scope of construction for the subject project. Briefly stated, this
modification is as follows: ADDED FENCE ACROSS SITE DESCRIPTION:
1. Add 6’ tall Chain Link fence across site as shown clouded on attached drawing B-15-A01. 2.
ATTACHMENTS: Drawing B-15-A01
ACTION TO BE TAKEN:
Make the described change in the work at no change in the Contract Sum and no change in the Contract Time of
Completion. If the contractor determines that this bulletin requires a change in the contract sum and/or contract
time, the contractor shall not proceed with this work and shall promptly submit an itemized proposal per the General
Conditions.
SUBMITTED BY: Jeff B. SIM-PBK
03/27/2020
ADDED CHAIN LINK FENCE AND GATES
2. Add a Fire Lane Gate with Double Pad Lock as shown clouded on attached drawing B-15-A013. Add Double man gates at new added fence across site as shown clouded on attached drawing B-15-A01.
Add Double man gates at south east and southwest corner of the site as shown clouded on attacheddrawing B-15-A01.
4.
Add a Fire Lane Gate with Double Pad Locks at new added fence across the site asshown clouded on attached drawing B-15-A01.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 20851689-FE2E-41A8-9317-8445C58DD0C3
BUILDING "G"
02.C09
02.C0402.B18
02.B11
02.B01
02.G06
02.G06
02.G13
12.E01
12.E01
07.N03/3 AX1.1
02.K06/13 AX1.1
02.G32
02.G32
BUILDING "H"
20
' - 0
"
10.K09
/11 AX7.1
02.C19 02.C1902.G13
ADD. ALT. #2
ADD. ALT. #3
ADD. ALT. #1ADD. ALT. #1
02.G32
02.C19
02.G13
02.G11
02.G06KEYNOTES XX-XXXX-XX
BUILDING SUMMARY
BUILDING 'A' - MPR BUILDING
ROOF AREA SKYLIGHT AREA
BUILDING 'B' - ADMIN/LIBRARY
BUILDING 'C' - KINDERGARTEN
BUILDING 'D' - CLASSROOM
BUILDING 'E' - CLASSROOM
BUILDING 'G' - CONCESSION
BUILDING 'H' - RESTROOMS
15,954 S.F.
12,852 S.F.
15,382 S.F.
16,062 S.F.
15,904 S.F.
720 S.F.
1,152 S.F.
0 S.F.
0 S.F.
0 S.F.
0 S.F.
0 S.F.
0 S.F.
0 S.F.
AREA REQUIRED FOR SOLAR :
TOTAL ROOF AREA: 78,026 S.F. 0 S.F.
78,026 S.F. X 0.15 = 11,704 S.F.
ZONE 'A'ZONE 'B'
ZONES PROVIDED AREA
6,015 S.F.5,758 S.F.
AREA PROVIDED FOR SOLAR 11,772 S.F.
SOLAR ZONES
20' WIDE MIN.- FIRE LANE
NOTE: REFER TO LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS FOR PLANTED AREAS
SITE HATCHES
FIRE HYDRANT, SPACED PER 2016 CFC, TABLE C102.1, 225'-0" FROM ANY POINT ON STREET TO HYDRANT.
PROPERTY LINE
PAINTED CURBS YELLOW w/ 3" HIGH WHITE LETTERS STATING "LOADING AND UNLOADING PASSENGERS" AT 50' O.C.
PAINTED CURBS RED w/ 3" HIGH WHITE LETTERS STATING "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE" AT 50' O.C.
6'-0" HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE
6'-0" WROUGHT IRON FENCE /11 AX1.4
/7 AX1.3
7 7 9 0 N O R T H P A L M A V E. | F R E S N O , C A L I F O R N I A 9 3 7 1 1P 5 5 9 . 4 4 8 . 8 4 0 0 | F 5 5 9 . 4 4 8 . 8 4 6 7 | w w w . s i m-p b k . c o m
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
REVISIONS
PROJECT NUMBER
SCALE
DATE
PROJECT ARCHITECT
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
LICE
NSED
ARCHIT
ECT
STAT
EOF CALI
FO
RNIA
RENEWAL DATE
3 2 1456789101112131415
3 2 1456789101112131415
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
DAVID
MICHAEL IW
ANAGAC 17199
3-31-21
PROJECT NAME
DSA STAMP LOCATION - KEEP CLEAR - DSA STAMP LOCATION - KEEP CLEAR
PTN#: 75580 APPLICATION#: 02-117213
3/2
3/2
02
0 2
:08
:51 P
MC
:\RE
VIT
\16
32
_RIV
ER
ST
ON
E_A
_V17
_pal
shai
fKT
D2
C.r
vt
ENLARGED SITE PLAN - SOUTH
AS.3DI
Author
Checker
RIVERSTONE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLMADERA, CA, 93636
07.22.2019
1632
GVUSD
SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"
SITE PLAN SOUTH
02.B01 CONCRETE WALK
02.B11 CONCRETE CURB
02.B18 CRACK CONTROL JOINT
02.C04 FDC
02.C09 FIRE HYDRANT
02.C19 POLICE / FIRE DEPT. BY-PASS LOCK (KNOX BOX) LOCATION
02.G06 6'-0" HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE
02.G11 CHAIN LINK MAN GATE
02.G13 CHAIN LINK DOUBLE DOOR MAN GATE
02.G32 FIRE ACCESS GATE
02.K06 SITE ENTRY SIGN
07.N03 EXPANSION JOINT
10.K09 ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICE SIGNAGE
12.E01 BLEACHERS NOT IN SCOPE. NOT APPLICABLE
SOLAR READY BUILDING ANALYSIS
SITE LEGEND
NOTE: FUTURE BLEACHERS, ANNOUNCING SYSTEM WITH ASSISTIVE LISTENING SYSTEM AND SIGNS, TO BE SUBMITTED TO DSA AS A SEPARATE PROJECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AND USE
No. DATE DESCRIPTION
1 10-21-19 ADDENDUM 1
2 Bulletin #15
2
2
2
B-15-A01
PAIR 4'-0" GATES
02.G13
02.G13
2
2
DocuSign Envelope ID: 20851689-FE2E-41A8-9317-8445C58DD0C3
Agenda Item Details
Public Content
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Meeting Apr 28, 2020 - Regular Meeting
Category K. CONSENT AGENDA
Subject 17. Approve, gift(s) to the Golden Valley Unified School District. [Meneses]
Access Public
Type Action
Monetary gift to the SVE PAWS, Technology, Mrs. Goerdt and Mrs. Stemple Trust Accounts from the PG&E YouCause Employee Giving Campaign, $1,675.32.Monetary gift to the LHS Baseball ASB from the Fresno Men's Baseball League, $1,500.00.Monetary gift to the LHS Wrestling ASB from the PG&E Your Cause Employee Giving Campaign, $560.00.Monetary gift to the LHS Golf Tournament from Diane & Will Jackson, Mark Wilson Construction, Valley SteelConstruction, Oberti Family, Inc., SEMCU Foundation, Inc., Golden Valley Builders, Riverstone Development,LLC., Farmers Insurance - Jeffrey R. Jackson, and the LHS Wrestling Boosters, $3,300.00.
Agenda Item Details
Public Content
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Meeting Apr 28, 2020 - Regular Meeting
Category M. ADVANCE PLANNING
Subject 1. Advance Planning
Access Public
Type Information
2019 2020 12 month calendar.docx (20).pdf (117 KB)
Golden Valley Unified School District 2019/2020 - Board 12 Month Calendar
July 23, 2019 (Deadline for Agenda Items 7/16/19 ) - Workshop Superintendent’s Office/
MOT-Facilities
Educational Services/ Special Education/Technology
Human Resources & Student Services
Business Services/ Cafeteria
Elementary School at Riverstone Update Riverstone School Names Revised Board Policies Fresno Mobile Radio (2019) Diamond Alarm Dude Solutions JSWWC Water & Waste B&D Pest Control *And any other MOT contracts
William’s/Valenzuela Quarterly Report Courses of Study Bureau of Education Contract VoIP and Meraki Contracts
Revised Job Descriptions Revised Certificated Management Salary Schedule Adult Ed Consortium Representatives AR 5132 Dress & Grooming
Warrant List/Payroll Report Special Tax Bonds, Series 2019 CFD No. 2017-1 Staff Laptop Replacement (year 3) Quarterly County Investment Report (April-June)
August 13, 2019 (Deadline for Agenda Items 8/6/2019) - Action Superintendent’s Office/
MOT-Facilities
Educational Services/ Special Education/Technology
Human Resources & Student Services
Business Services/ Cafeteria
Final Bus Lease Agreement Conflict of Interest Resolution (even years-Due 2020)
Edgenuity Contract Renewal EDEP Price Increase
New and Revised Job Descriptions Growth Positions
Warrant List/Payroll Report Resolution for Interfund Borrowing
August 27, 2019 (Deadline for Agenda Items 8/20/2019) - Workshop Superintendent’s Office/
MOT-Facilities Educational Services/ Special
Education/Technology Human Resources &
Student Services Business Services/
Cafeteria Department Update Supt Quarterly Informal Evaluation New & Revised Board Policies 6th Grade Camp Field Trip Request
Department Update PBS Corp. Contract Obsolete Textbooks
Department Update 3.5 hr SpEd Para at WES Growth Position
Department Update
September 10, 2019 (Deadline for Agenda Items 9/3/2019) - Action Superintendent’s Office/
MOT-Facilities
Educational Services/ Special Education/Technology
Human Resources & Student Services
Business Services/ Cafeteria
School Dude Contract
Resolution/Public Hearing Sufficiency of Instructional Materials
19/20 Unaudited Actuals Report (action)
Booster Clubs/Parent Clubs & Foundation Renewal LEAF DTSC Public Hearing (info)
Resolution/Public Hearing Sufficiency of Instructional Materials (action)
GANN Resolution (action - 2 originals needed for signature) Warrant List/Payroll Report
September 24, 2019 (Deadline for Agenda Items 9/17/2019) - Action Superintendent’s Office/
MOT-Facilities
Educational Services/ Special Education/Technology
Human Resources & Student Services
Business Services/ Cafeteria
Department Updates LEAF DTSC Public Hearing Resolution Stone Creek State Funding Submission Resolution State Bond Funds Facilities Contracts - CUC and Appraisal GVTA Sunshine Articles (info)
Department Updates (Summer School & ELA Curriculum Update)
Elementary Arts Program Contract
Department Updates Establish a Committee on Assignment Monitoring every other year – due 2019 PIP/STIP Declaration of Need for Qualified Educators
Department Updates
October 8, 2019 (Deadline for Agenda Items 10/1/2019) - Workshop Superintendent’s Office/
MOT-Facilities
Educational Services/ Special Education/Technology
Human Resources & Student Services
Business Services/ Cafeteria
Board Policies
All Sites Presentations (10 minutes each) MOU Kings View and GVUSD
Payroll/Warrant List
Obsolete Equipment
October 22, 2019 (Deadline for Agenda Items 10/15/2018) - Workshop Superintendent’s Office/
MOT-Facilities Educational Services/ Special
Education/Technology Human Resources &
Student Services Business Services/
Cafeteria Department Updates Revised VTR Agreement Board Policies (info) WPTC Booster Application December 2019 Board Meeting Change
Department Updates CAASP Presentation Dashboard Presentation
Technology Update and E-Rate Application (2019) Williams Quarterly Report EZ Care2 Contract Softchoice Corporation Contract
Department Updates Department Updates
November 12, 2019 (Deadline for Agenda Items 11/5/2019) - Action Superintendent’s Office/
MOT-Facilities Educational Services/ Special
Education/Technology Human Resources &
Student Services Business Services/
Cafeteria IOR Proposal Testing Lab Proposal Geosyntec Change Order Board Policies
Fresno ROP Agreement Services Agreement with MCSOS for Medi-Cal
Safety Plans Org Chart Update
Developer Fees Report Public Hearing (2019) (Info) Purchase Order/Payroll Report
December 16, 2019 (Deadline for Agenda Items 12/10/2019) - Action Superintendent’s Office/
MOT-Facilities Educational Services/ Special
Education/Technology Human Resources &
Student Services Business Services/
Cafeteria Annual District Organizational Meeting 2020/2021 School Calendar Developer Fee Study Proposal (2019) Stone Creek Construction Contracts & Krazan Contract Measure S Committee Members Board Policies
WEE Plan (3 yrs. Due 2021)
Cafeteria Growth Position(s) Certificated Job Description
Purchase Order/Payroll Report First Interim (action) Developer Fees Report Public Hearing (Annual and 5 year) 19/20 CFD 2017-1 Report Quarterly Investment Report (July-Sept.)
January 28, 2020 Meeting (Deadline for Agenda Items 1/21/20) - Workshop Superintendent’s Office/
MOT-Facilities Educational Services/ Special
Education/Technology Human Resources &
Student Services Business Services/
Cafeteria Superintendent’s Quarterly Evaluation (tentative) Geosyntec Proposal Board Policies Purchase Agreement Resolution (tentative) Superintendent Contract Limit Authorization for Construction Change ORders
SARC Reports
Speech and Language Pathologist Job Description 1.5 FTE Speech and Language Pathologist
Purchase Order/Payroll Report Audit Report
William’s/Valenzuela Quarterly Report
February 11, 2020 (Deadline for Agenda Items 2/4/20) - Action Superintendent’s Office/
MOT-Facilities
Educational Services/ Special
Education/Technology
Human Resources & Student Services
Business Services/ Cafeteria
Three-Year Math Plan Special Education Bus Lease with Enterprise
Growth Position, Stone Creek Elementary Principal & School Secretary II
Purchase Order/Payroll Report Harris School Solutions (e-trition) Contract Quarterly Investment Report (Oct-Dec) Measure S Bond Issuance Authorization Resolution (info)
February 25, 2020 (Deadline for Agenda Items 2/18/20) - Workshop Superintendent’s Office/
MOT-Facilities Educational Services/
Special Education/Technology
Human Resources & Student Services
Business Services/ Cafeteria
SpEd and Behavior Update CARS Spring Collection
Resolution(s) PKS (info- if needed) Non-Reelects (Closed session-info if needed)
Measure S Bond Issuance Authorization Resolution (action)
March 10, 2020 (Deadline for Agenda Items 3/3/20) - Action Superintendent’s Office/
MOT-Facilities
Educational Services/ Special
Education/Technology
Human Resources & Student Services
Business Services/ Cafeteria
Purchase Agreement Resolution Stone Creek Change Orders (tentative) LHS Wrestling Team Recognition
Dashboard Update Document Tracking Contract E-Rate Services Agreement
Resolution(s) PKS (Open Session-action if needed) Non-Reelects (action if needed) Certificated Growth Positions
Purchase Order/Payroll Report 2nd Interim Budget Report (action)
March 24, 2020 (Deadline for Agenda Items 3/17/20) - Workshop Superintendent’s Office/
MOT-Facilities
Educational Services/ Special
Education/Technology
Human Resources & Student Services
Business Services/ Cafeteria
Stone Creek Change Orders Purchase Agreement Resolution
Summer School MOU Behavior Alert TRANs Resolution
2020 Developer Fee Study (info)
April 28, 2020 (Deadline for Agenda Items 4/21/20) - Action Superintendent’s Office/
MOT-Facilities
Educational Services/ Special
Education/Technology
Human Resources & Student Services
Business Services/ Cafeteria
Public Hearing - Developer Fee Study 2019/2020 School Building Closure Update/Resolution Stone Creek Change Orders Krazan Contract (Inspection) William’s/Valenzuela Quarterly Report
Behavior Alert (action)
Purchase Order/Payroll Report AOS Postage Machine Contract Renewal
May 12, 2020 (Deadline for Agenda Items 5/5/20) - Workshop Superintendent’s Office/
MOT-Facilities
Educational Services/ Special
Education/Technology
Human Resources & Student Services
Business Services/ Cafeteria
Certificated and Classified Recognitions Resolutions WES School Recognition Academic Pentathlon Recognition Diamond Alarm Contract (2019) Enterprise Fleet Update (tentative)
Purchase Order/Payroll Report Cafeteria Presentation
May 26, 2020 (Deadline for Agenda Items 5/19/20) - Action Superintendent’s Office/
MOT-Facilities
Educational Services/ Special
Education/Technology
Human Resources & Student Services
Business Services/ Cafeteria
Superintendent Evaluation/Contract Asst Supts Contracts/Evaluations Tenured/Permanent Employee Recognition RMS Mesa Recognition
Odysseyware Renewal Forecast 5 Contract for Accellus
Review AR 5132 Dress Code
Quarterly Investment Report from County Treasurer EPA Resolution
CIF Representative to League
June 9, 2020 (Deadline for Agenda Items 6/2/20) - Workshop Superintendent’s Office/
MOT-Facilities
Educational Services/ Special
Education/Technology
Human Resources & Student Services
Business Services/ Cafeteria
Technology Update and E-Rate Application (2019) CSEA Sunshine Articles Transportation/IDTs Discussion Developer Fee Study (info)
MCOE Ed Svcs ERS Contract LCAP – Information Title III Consortium
Purchase Order/Payroll Report 2012/2021 Budget (info) CFD Levy Approval for 2020/2021
June 23, 2020 (Deadline for Agenda Items 6/16/20) - Action Superintendent’s Office/
MOT-Facilities Educational Services/ Special
Education/Technology Human Resources &
Student Services Business Services/
Cafeteria Lozano Smith Contract DWK Contract Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost Contract AALRR Contract CSBA/Gamut/Agenda Online Contract
LCAP – Action
Pathways Discussion
Eagle Software Contract MBT Medical Billing Contract SI&A Agreement Contract Follett Software/Destiny Contract School City Contract Proactive K9 Contract Accelus Contract Parentsquare Contract IBoss Contract Edline Contract Cengage
2019/2020 Budget (action)
JSWWC Water and Waste (2019)