submission doc.: ieee 11-12/0844r0 slide 1 non-linear multiuser mimo for next generation wlan date:...

19
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0 Slide 1 Non-linear Multiuser MIMO for next generation WLAN Date: 2012-07-13 Authors: Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR N am e A ffiliations A ddress Phone em ail ShoichiK itazawa ATR 2-2-2, H ikaridai, Seika, Kyoto, Japan +81-774- 95-1511 [email protected] SatoshiTsukam oto tsukamoto@ atr.jp SatoshiSonobe [email protected] H iroshiBan [email protected] M asahiro U no [email protected] K iyoshiK obayashi [email protected]

Upload: esther-warren

Post on 23-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Submission

doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0

Shoichi Kitazawa, ATRSlide 1

Non-linear Multiuser MIMO for next generation WLAN

Date: 2012-07-13

Name Affiliations Address Phone email Shoichi Kitazawa ATR 2-2-2, Hikaridai,

Seika, Kyoto, Japan +81-774-95-1511

[email protected]

Satoshi Tsukamoto [email protected]

Satoshi Sonobe [email protected]

Hiroshi Ban [email protected]

Masahiro Uno [email protected]

Kiyoshi Kobayashi [email protected]

Authors:

Submission

doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0

Shoichi Kitazawa, ATRSlide 2

Abstract

• This contribution provides an overview of non-linear MU-MIMO, focusing on the correlated LOS indoor MIMO channel.• Simulation of linear vs. non-linear MU-MIMO

• Experimental results

• Measurements were performed in an indoor LOS environment. Throughput performances of the non-linear MIMO system were superior to linear MIMO.

Submission

doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0

Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR

Introduction

• WLAN data traffic has been growing quite rapidly.• An increasing number of WLAN equipped devices.

• Large data file or high-definition video is transmitted over WLAN.

• WLAN is used for data traffic offload from the cellular network.

• Future WLAN/mobile communication systems will need to provide robust and high-capacity transmission to many users.

• Multiuser MIMO (MU-MIMO) is one of the key technologies to improve both area throughput and user throughput.• TGac include DL MU-MIMO as an optional mode.

• 3GPP LTE and LTE-Advanced adopted MU-MIMO.

Slide 3

Based on linear precoding.

Submission

doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0

Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR

Usage Environment

• Multiple users simultaneously use WLAN at conference room, lobby etc.• High capacity needed.

• In an indoor Correlated LOS MIMO channel.

Slide 4

Non-linear MU-MIMO will be needed.

Submission

doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0

Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR

MU-MIMO in a small sized cell

• Linear precoding/combining• Low computational complexity.

• Weak point Correlated channel condition Spatial channel correlation becomes rather high due to the increase of LOS

probability.

• Non-linear precoding/combining • Higher achievable sum rate than linear MU-MIMO, especially over

spatially-correlated MIMO channels.

• Increased computational complexity compared to linear MU-MIMO.

• Examples of non-linear algorithms:• Iterative soft interference canceller (Turbo-SIC)

• Tomlinson-Harashima precoding (THP)

• Vector perturbation (VP)Slide 5

Submission

doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0

Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR

MMSE and Vector Perturbation

Slide 6

VPMMSE

filtermodulo

MMSE filter

Obtain precoding gain by VP

MMSE

VP

Submission

doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0

Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR

Vector Perturbation

Slide 7

Tx side Rx side

Submission

doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0

Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR

Sampling rate 30.72 Msamples/sFFT size 2048Number of subcarriers 1200Number of antennas 4 (BS), 2 (UE)Number of users 2Direction of UEs from BS (deg.) -2.38, 2.38Modulation coding scheme 16QAM (3/4) , 64QAM (3/4) Channel coding Turbo codeDecoding algorithm SOVA (6 iterations)Array configuration Uniform linear arrayAntenna spacing 1.0 wavelength @ DL carrier frequency (BS)

0.5 wavelength @ DL carrier frequency (UE)Carrier frequency 3.36 GHz (DL)Spatial filtering MMSE with perfect SNR estimationPerturbation vector search QRDM - E (S = 7, M = 7)

シミュレーション諸元Simulation settings

Layout

Slide 8

Submission

doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0

Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR

WINNER II Channel modelTwo scenarios have been selected for the simulation

Slide 9

Submission

doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0

Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR

WINNER II A1 indoor office LOS

• The spectrum efficiency of VP is double that of MMSE at around 24dB SNR and above.

Spectrum efficiency of 16QAM is 12 b/s/Hz.

16QAM

64QAM16QAM

64QAM

Slide 10

Submission

doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0

Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR

WINNER II B3 large indoor hall LOS

• The spectrum efficiency of VP is double that of MMSE at around 21dB SNR and above.

Spectrum efficiency is 12 ~ 18 b/s/Hz

16QAM

64QAM

16QAM

64QAM

Slide 11

Submission

doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0

Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR

Measurement setup

Slide 12

Parameter BS UE

Baseband Precoding Linear:MMSENonlinear:Vector Perturbation

None

Multiplex mode OFDM-SDM(MU-MIMO)

OFDMA(SIMO)

Modulation scheme QPSK, 16QAM, 64QAM

Number of subcarriers 1200

RF Frequency 3.36 GHz 3.26GHz

Bandwidth 20 MHz 20MHz

TX power 4 W Max. 1 W Max.

Antenna Type Monopole antenna , 2.1dBi

Number of elements 4 2

Element spacing 1 l 0.5 l

Height 3.0m 1.8m

• In order to form a 4 × 4 MU-MIMO, 1 BS and 2 UE’s were used.

Submission

doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0

Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR

MCS

Slide 13

MCS Modulation TBS Coding rate

10 4008 0.483

11 4392 0.529

12 4968 0.597

13 5736 0.689

14 6456 0.777

15 7224 0.869

17 7736 0.620

18 7992 0.640

19 9144 0.731

20 9912 0.792

21 10680 0.853

22 11448 0.914

16QAM

64QAM

This MCS based on LTE-Advanced system.

Submission

doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0

Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR

Measurement Equipment

Slide 14

RF Unit

BasebandUnit

Antenna

BS UE

Submission

doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0

Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR

Measurement Environment

Slide 15

18m

LargeWindow

7.2m

Ceiling Height:12m

3.0m

1.8m

Submission

doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0

Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR

Throughput

• Throughput performance of the VP algorithm is superior to that of the MMSE. • 20 to 30% higher throughput

Slide 16

16QAM 64QAM 16QAM 64QAM

UE distance = 1.0m, Pout=3dBm Max.UE distance = 1.5m, Pout=3dBm Max.

30%

20%

Submission

doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0

Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR

Block Error Rate (BLER)

Slide 17

MCS19: 64QAM, R=0.73MCS14: 16QAM, R=0.77

• At the higher MCS, BLER of non-linear MIMO is lower than linear MIMO.

Submission

doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0

Shoichi Kitazawa, ATRSlide 18

Conclusions

• In future WLAN is needed to extend system capacity.

• Proposed non-linear MU-MIMO is one of the key solutions.

• Performances of the non-linear MU-MIMO in indoor LOS environments were better than linear MU-MIMO in our measurements.

This work is supported by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications under a grant entitled "Research and development on nonlinear multiuser MIMO technologies."

Submission

doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0

Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR

Future Work

• We will perform additional measurement campaigns in several environments and other MIMO configurations.• Measurement in auditorium, corridor etc.

• 8 × 8 MIMO configuration.

Slide 19