subha project pdf
TRANSCRIPT
A STUDY ON EMPLOYEE ATTITUDE TOWARDS
TRAINING PROGRAMS –with special reference to Thiruvalluvaar
Textiles Pvt Ltd, Rasipuram
PROJECT REPORT
Submitted by
S.SUBHA
Register No: 098001131043
in partial fulfillment for the award of the degree
of
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
In
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES
ADITHYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
COIMBATORE - 641 107
JUNE 2011
1
BONAFIDE2
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
ADITHYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
COIMBATORE -641 107
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES
PROJECT WORK
JUNE 2011
This is to certify that the project entitled
A STUDY ON EMPLOYEE ATTITUDE TOWARDS TRAINING
PROGRAMS –with special reference to Thiruvalluvaar Textiles Pvt
Ltd, Rasipuram
is the bonafide record of project work done by
S.SUBHA
Register No: 098001131043
of MBA during the year 2010-2011.
______________________________ _________________________
Project Guide Head of the Department
Submitted for the Project Viva-Voce examination held on___________________
3
____________________ ____________________
Internal Examiner External Examiner
4
CERTIFICATE
5
6
DECLARATION
DECLARATION
I affirm that the project work titled “A STUDY ON EMPLOYEE ATTITUDE TOWARDS
TRAINING PROGRAM – with special reference to Thiruvalluvaar Textiles Pvt Ltd,
Rasipuram” being submitted in partial fulfillment for the award of MBA is the original work
carried out by me. It has not formed the part of any other project work submitted for award of
any degree or diploma, either in this or any other University.
(Signature of the candidate)
S.SUBHA
Reg No: 098001131043
I certify that the declaration made above by the candidate is true
(Signature of the guide)
Mrs. K.VIDYA KALA
Head of the department
7
8
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I express my sincere thanks and gratitude to Mr. C.Sugumaran BE, Chairman, Adithya
Institute of Technology for his support in all our endeavors.
I extent my heartfelt thanks to the Dr. N.Kathiravan, M.E.,Ph.D., Principal Adithya
Institute of Technology, for his effective guidance and contribution in terms of professional
expertise and academic knowledge.
I express a deep sense of gratitude and sincere thanks to Mrs.K.Vidyakala,
MBA, M.Phil, Head of the Department and my project guide for her continuous infallible
guidance, motivation and support during my project period.
I sincerely thank my department staff members for their valuable guidance and
suggestions which enabled me to complete this project.
9
I am grateful to Mr. R.DURAISAMY, M.D, THIRUVALLUVAAR TEXTILES PVT
LTD, RASIPURAM, for granting me permission to undergo this project in the organization and
staff members and workers of Thiruvalluvaar Textiles Pvt Ltd, for providing me all the
information and co-operation in carrying out the research successfully.
I would like to express my sincere thanks for my father Mr.K.SUBBARAYAN, my
mother Mrs.R.INDIRANI and friends for their unbounded support to make this project a reality.
I praise the lord for his grace and favor that led me through the greener pastures during
my project work and finish this in a successful way.
S.SUBHA
10
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter No DESCRIPTION PAGE NO
CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES i
LIST OF GRAPHS v
ABSTRACT vi
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 INTRODUCTION ABOUT THE TEXTILE INDUSTRY
1.2 INTRODUCTION ABOUT THIRUVALLUVAAR TEXTILES
1.3 INTRODUCTION ABOUT THE EMPLOYEE ATTITUDE
TOWARDS TRAINING PROGRAMS
1.4 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
1.5 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
1
3
4
13
14
11
1.6 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY 15
2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 16
3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 RESEARCH DESIGN
3.2 POPULATION
3.3 SAMPLE SIZE
3.4 SAMPLING METHOD
3.5 DATA COLLECTION METHOD AND INSTRUMENT
3.6 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
18
18
18
18
18
19
4 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
4.1 PERCENTAGE METHOD
4.2 CHI-SQUARE METHOD
20
25
5 FINDINGS 71
6 SUGGESTIONS 75
6 CONCLUSION 76
APPENDIX
BIBLIOGRAPHY
12
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF TABLES
Table No Description Page No
1.1 GROWTH RATE OF TEXTILE SECTOR IN INDIA 2
PERSONAL PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS
4.1.1.1 GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS 20
4.1.2.1 AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS 21
4.1.3.1 EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS 22
4.1.4.1 EXPERIENCE OF THE RESPONDENTS 23
4.1.5.1 CURRENT SALARY OF THE RESPONDENTS 24
PRE-TRAINING ACTIVITIES
13
4.2.1.1 -
4.2.1.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & DETERMINATION
OF EMPLOYEES TRAINING NEEDS
26
4.2.2.1 –
4.2.2.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & TRAINING
METHOD & CONTENT
27
4.2.3.1 –
4.2.3.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & PRE-COURSE
BRIEFING OF EMPLOYEES WITH SUPERIORS
28
4.2.4.1 –
4.2.4.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & OBJECTIVE OF
PERFOMANCE IMPROVEMENT SETUP BY THE SUPERIOR
29
DURING THE TRAINING
4.2.5.1 –
4.2.5.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & OBJECTIVE OF THE
TRAINING PROGRAM
30
4.2.6.1 –
4.2.6.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & TRAINING
IMPARTED RELEVANT TO THE JOB REQUIREMENT
31
PLANNING OF THE TRAINING
4.2.7.1 –
4.2.7.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & DESIGN &
SCHEDULE OF THE TRAINING
32
4.2.8.1 –
4.2.8.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & EMPLOYEES
SELECTION FOR TRAINING BASED ON THEIR
PERFOMANCE
33
4.2.9.1 –
4.2.9.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & JOB
REQUIREMENT & RESPONSIBILITIES
34
4.2.10.1 –
4.2.10.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & REGULATIONS IN
THE TRAINING
35
POST-TRAINING ACTIVITIES
4.2.11.1 –
4.2.11.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & FOLLOW-UP
MEETING WITH THE SUPERIOR
36
4.2.12.1 –
4.2.12.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & OPPORTUNITY TO
APPLY THE SKILLS LEARNT
37
4.2.13.1 –
4.2.13.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & ACQUIRED SKILLS
& KNOWLEDGE
38
4.2.14.1 –
3.2.14.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & TRAINING
FEEDBACK
39
TRAINING ATMOSPHERE
14
4.2.15.1 –
4.2.15.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & CONVENIENCE OF
THE TIMING & VENUE OF TRAINING PROGRAM
40
4.2.16.1 –
4.2.16.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & TRAINING
ATMOSPHERE
41
4.2.17.1 –
4.2.17.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & METHODS USED
TO LEARN TRAINING PROGRAM
42
4.2.18.1 –
4.2.18.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & MATERIAL AND
MODULE OF THE TRAINING COURSE
43
EVALUATION OF TRAINER’S RESPONSE
4.2.19.1 –
4.2.19.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & INTERACTION
WITH INDIVIDUALS
44
4.2.20.1 –
4.2.20.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & TRAINERS
SUPPORT
45
4.2.21.1 –
4.2.21.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & IMPARTIALITY OF
TRAINERS
46
PERCEIVED BENEFITS OF TRAINING
4.2.22.1 –
4.2.22.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & EMPLOYEES
MOTIVATION LEVEL AFTER TRAINING
47
4.2.23.1 –
4.2.23.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & JOB BETTERMENT 48
4.2.24.1 –
4.2.24.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & TRAINING
ENABLES EMPLOYEES TO BE FELT VALUED BY THE
COMPANY
49
4.2.25.1 –
4.2.25.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & TRAINING
ENABLES CAREER PROGRESS
50
4.2.26.1 –
4.2.26.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & TRAINING HELPS
EMPLOYEE TO GROW
51
4.2.27.1 –
4.2.27.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & TRAINING
IMPROVED EMPLOYEES SKILL, KNOWLEDGE &
PERFOMANCE
52
4.2.28.1 –
4.2.28.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & TRAINING
FOSTERED TEAMWORK, PARTICIPATION & CO-
OPERATION
53
15
4.2.29.1 –
4.2.29.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & ATTAINMENT OF
OBJCTIVE OF THE TRAINING
54
4.2.30.1 –
4.2.30.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & IMPROVEMENT IS
CONSIDERED AND RECOGNIZED
55
PERCEIVED IMPACT OF TRAINING
4.2.31.1 –
4.2.31.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & PERCEIVED
IMPACT OF TRAINING ON PAY
56
4.2.32.1 –
4.2.32.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & PERCEIVED
IMPACT OF TRAINING ON PROMOTION
57
4.2.33.1 –
4.2.33.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & PERCEIVED
IMPACT OF TRAINING ON JOB ABILITY
58
4.2.34.1 –
4.2.34.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & PERCEIVED
IMPACT OF TRAINING ON JOB SECURITY
59
4.2.35.1 –
4.2.35.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & PERCEIVED
IMPACT OF TRAINING ON FUTURE EMPLOYMENT
PROSPECTS
60
4.2.36.1 –
4.2.36.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & PERCEIVED
IMPACT OF TRAINING ON JOB SATISFACTION
61
4.2.37.1 –
4.2.37.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & PERCEIVED
IMPACT OF TRAINING ON MOTIVATION
62
TIME MANAGEMENT
4.2.38.1 –
4.2.38.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & OVERALL
DURATION OF THE TRAINING
63
4.2.39.1 –
4.2.39.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & TIME GIVEN TO
GET FEEDBACK THE EMPLOYEES
64
EMPLOYEES SUGGESTION TOWARDS TRAINING
4.2.40.1 –
4.2.40.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER &
RECOMMENDATION OF THE TRAINING FOR OTHERS
65
4.2.41.1 –
4.2.41.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & PERFOMANCE OF
THE TRAINING
66
OPINION OF EMPLOYEES FOR FURTHER
IMPROVEMENT
4.2.42.1 – RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & REQUIREMENT OF 67
16
4.2.42.2 CROSS TRAINING
4.2.43.1 –
4.2.43.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & COMPANY
STRATEGY
68
4.2.44.1 –
4.2.44.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & CONSISTENCY OF
TRAINING FORMAT & PROCESS
69
4.2.45.1 –
4.2.45.2
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & NEW HIRE
TRAINING PERIOD
70
17
LIST OF GRAPHS
18
LIST OF GRAPHS
TABLE
NO
DESCRIPTION PAGE
NO
PERSONAL PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS
4.1.1.2 AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS 20
4.1.2.2 EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS 21
4.1.3.2 EXPERIENCE OF THE RESPONDENTS 22
4.1.4.2 CURRENT SALARY OF THE RESPONDENTS 23
4.1.5.2 GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS 24
19
ABSTRACT
The project work entitled “A study on employees’ attitude towards the training
program” with special reference to THIRUVALLUVAR TEXTILES PVT LTD, RASIPURAM,
contains different variables that are concerned with the attitude of the employees towards
training program.
The analysis has been made mainly based on the primary data collected through opinion
survey method. The researcher has taken a sample size of 100 and has used the simple random
sampling method to select the samples from the total population. The study gives the attitude of
employees’ about the training program conducted in THIRUVALLUVAR TEXTILES.
The analysis has been done through percentage analysis and Chi-square test, and the
results of the study reveals that there is no relationship between gender and the training activities,
except determining the training needs of employees. The study has also revealed that most of the
respondents have a positive attitude towards the training activities.
20
CHAPTER – I
21
INTRODUCTIONCHAPTER- 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1. INTRODUCTION ABOUT THE TEXTILE INDUSTRY:
The textile sector in India ranks next to agriculture. Textile is one of India’s oldest industries and
has a formidable presence in the national economy. It accounts for around one-third of gross
export earnings and provides gainful employment to millions of people in India. The textile
industry occupies a unique place, one of the earliest to come into existence in India, it accounts
for 14% of the total industrial production, contributes to nearly 30% of the total exports and is
the second largest employment generator after agriculture. Textile industry provides one of the
most basic needs of people. It maintains sustained growth for improving quality of life. It has a
unique position as self-reliant industry, from the production of raw materials to the delivery of
finished products, with substantial value-addition at each stage of processing.
Indian economy is largely dependent on the textile manufacturing & trade in addition to other
major industries. About 27% of the foreign exchange earnings accounts for export of textiles and
clothing alone. Around 8% of the total excise revenue collection is contributed by the textile
industry. The textile industry accounts for as large as 21% of the total employment generated in
the economy. Around 35 million people are directly employed in the textile manufacturing
activities. Indirect employment including the manpower engaged in agricultural based raw-
material production like cotton & related trade and handling is stated to be around another 60
22
million.
The textiles and clothing sector is the largest employer after agriculture and its importance in
India’s economy is recognized for its contribution to industrial production and export earnings.
The textile industry holds significant status in India. However, the industry was predominantly
unorganized industry even a few years back, but the scenario started changing
after the economic liberalization of Indian economy in 1991. The opening up of economy gave
the much-needed thrust to the Indian textile industry, which has now successfully
become one of the largest in the world. Textile industry provides one of the most fundamental
necessities of the people. It is an independent industry, from the basic requirement of raw
materials to the final products, with huge value-addition at every s t age o f
p roce s s in g .
Growth Trend of Textile Sector in India:
Role of textile industry in India GDP has been quite beneficial in the economic life of the
country. The worldwide trade of textiles and clothing has boosted up the GDP of India largely as
this sector has brought in a huge amount of revenue in the country. In the past one year, there has
been a massive upsurge in the textile industry of India. At present, Indian textile industry
holds 3.5 to 4 percent share in the total textile production across the globe and 3 percent
share in the export production of clothing. The growth in textile production touched
USD 22.1 billion during 2007-08.USA is known to be the largest purchaser of Indian textiles.
Table: 1.1 GROWTH RATE OF TEXTILE INDUSTRY IN INDIA
YEAR GROWTH RATE OF TEXTILES (%)
2003-04 -1.1
2004-05 9.3
2005-06 8.2
2006-07 10.9
2007-08 5.8
2008-09 -1.2
23
2009-10 (April-November) 5.8
India Spinning Industry has gone from strength to strength since a very long time now as it was
the hub of cotton manufacturing. Cotton is not only consumed to the highest extent in India but it
has also become one of the most profitable textiles in the export industry.
Spinning in India can be classified into 2 categories: medium and long staple. But there was a
shortfall in the 'extra-long' category that continued for many years.
1.2. INTRODUCTION ABOUT THIRUVALLUVAR TEXTILES PRIVATE LIMITED:
Thiruvalluvar Textile Private Limited (TTPL) was incorporated as a private limited company on
8 Dec'93. The company was promoted by Mr. R.Duraisamy. The company set up a spinning unit
to manufacture cotton yarn by open-end spinning methods and also by ring spinning with an
installed capacity of 1008 rotors and 3120 spindles. The unit is located at Senthamangalam,
Namakkal District-Tamilnadu. With a focus on the future, the mill grew steadily over the next
decade producing world-class yarn, accumulating reserves and expanding its customer base to
cover almost all parts of the World. Thiruvalluvar Textile (India) Pvt Ltd is formed by well
qualified, professional and experienced directors on board who have a massive exposure and
experience in the textile industry. The management team is supported by an experienced &
technically qualified team. Led by a team of promoters with more than twenty years of
experience in the textile arena, they have been successful in fulfilling all the major requirements
of their clients for quality yarn in the shortest possible time. Customer satisfaction, consistency
in quality and timely delivery had always been on the highest priorities of Thiruvalluvar Textiles.
The company has installed the latest textile machineries including blow room, carding machines,
draw frames, simplex frames and ring frames. In 1996-97 the installed capacity was increased by
6016 spindles to 18992 spindles. Modernization programme was availed by the company to the
tune of Rs. 34.00 lakh under the Technology Up-gradation Fund Scheme. During 2008-2009 the
company had gone for expansion of Spindles to the extent of 4752 spindles.
24
Products:
Manufacturers and Exporters of Cotton Yarn, viscose yarn, cotton / viscose blended yarn, open
ended yarns and wider width gray fabrics.
1.3. EMPLOYEE ATTITUDE TOWARDS TRAINING PROGRAM:
Role of HRD in Textile Industry:
The advent of technological advancement in industrial set-ups has altered the working conditions
and requirements on the part of employees and employers. In addition, the changes in
government policies have also been taken place since the last decade. Different work patterns
like night shift, part time work, overtime, etc, are being experienced. The situation is same in
textile sector also. Now a day the recruitment of the workforce has become a specialized field.
The main motive is skill development as technical jobs are becoming more complex and demand
more skill that is professional. At managerial and marketing level, skills and knowledge demand
have increased in importance. Therefore, before imparting training with respect to textile or
garment industry the training program should be so designed that it covers the skills that will be
required in long term and short-term basis. Many countries of the world have understood the
importance of human resource development, thus encourages the business organizations to take
active part in designing and execution. The changing face of business organizations in national
and international markets demands a new breed of skills that are non-technical in nature.
Generally, when some new skills are to be taught to upgrade the ongoing work profile, on the job
training and special course classes could be arranged to upgrade the employee's skills and
knowledge.
25
Present status of human resource in textile sector:
The advent of HR practices in textile sector was rather slow in comparison to other industrial
sectors. However, due to globalization there is increase in competition as a result development of
human resource has become essential. However, an organized HR practice is being adopted
mostly by the mill sector. In last decade we have seen not so good performance by textile sector,
this was because of lack of HRD department in many mills. However, the scenario has changed
as HRD departments have taken up their role in textile sectors. Various training programmes
pertaining to training of workforce, textile related topics have helped in enhancing the overall
performance of the textile companies. In order to get increased productivity from workforce it is
essential to have a well-framed HRD system in the organization. If the principles of HRD are
adopted it could result in decrease in non-attendance by 20% and increase in productivity by
30%. Therefore, to cope up with the market competition HRD is very essential element for the
textile industry. HRD department is responsible for developing the feeling of motivation in the
employees; this motivation in other words is the commitment of the employees towards the job
and the organization. When the work of HRD has done effectively it would result into co-
operation among team members, demolition of centralized system of decision-making, creates
homely environment, feeling of ownership and positive working atmosphere.
Trainees’ attitudes may affect the effectiveness of training. Attitudes are likely to be influenced
by participants’ experience of training and in turn affect trainees’ perspectives about the
evaluation of training. As Noe (1986) argues, ‘the attitudes, interests, values, and expectations of
trainees may attenuate or enhance the effectiveness of training’
There may be a link between positive attitude of employees and training effectiveness. Primary
focus is to evaluate the reaction, learning environment, behavior change and the impact of
training perceived by employees. Training is a learning process that involves the acquisition of
knowledge, sharpening of skills, concepts, rules, or changing of attitudes and behaviors to
enhance the performance of employees.
26
Training is about knowing where you stand (no matter how good or bad the current situation
looks) at present, and where you will be after some point of time. Training is about the
acquisition of knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSA) through professional development.
According to Gerard Seijts and Dan Crim (2006), “An employee’s attitude toward the job & the
company had the greatest impact on loyalty and customer service then all other employee factors
combined”.
Training Programmes offered in Textile Industries:
Textile industry continues to be labor-intensive even in the present scenario. Technological
developments have resulted in the automation of many processes in the textile industry. With it
comes the need for operatives’ skills‚ knowledge and ability to operate these
machinery/instruments. It also requires workers to produce results by the practice of better work
habits at the work place and ultimately‚ improve the quality of products and enhance
productivity.
Training programmes for operatives have designed with the objective of:
Imparting skill at the work place
Reduce learning period
Instill good habits of work
Maintain discipline
It is envisaged that an improved work culture, brought about through the training, will bring in
the following direct benefits to the mills:
Improved quality of output
Good housekeeping
Less spoilage of materials
Proper material handling
Less incidence of waste
Higher rates of production
Fewer accidents
27
List of soft skill Training Programs offered in textile Industries:
For Human Resource Department
Interviewing Skills
Advanced Recruitment and Selection Skills.
HR for Non-HR managers
For Administration Department
Vendor Relationship
Supervisory Skills
Finance for non finance
For Finance Department
Effective Book Keeping
Budgeting Skills
Resource Management
For Floor Staff and Supervisors
Attitude Re-engineering
Time Management
Vendor Management
For Managers
Stress Management
Presentation Skills
Leadership Skills
Conflict Management, Team Building & Change Management
For Operators
Attitude Building
Commitment Management
Expressing with Ownership
28
List of Performance & Process oriented Training offered in textile industry:
Quality Appraisal of Woven Fabrics
Testing of Dyes, Chemicals and Textiles
HS Classification of Textiles
Rules of Origin & GSP
Orientation on ISO 9001-2000 QMS
Orientation on ISO 14000 Environmental Management Standards
Social Accountability Standards in Manufacturing
Orientation on ISO 17025 Laboratory Quality Management Systems
Inventory Management and SPC for decentralized units
Project formulation for modernization of textile machinery
Skill development for presentation and communication in Fairs (Visual
Merchandising)
Environmental Compliances and eco labelling
Improved Dyeing techniques for better quality
Skill development for Merchandisers
Fashion/Colour forecast in product development
Apparel Manufacturing
Quality Control in Cotton Ginning
Packaging - A marketing tool
ERP solutions for Garment Industry
Waste minimization
Customer Relationship Management (CRM)
Executive Development Programme
Industrial Engineering, Quality and Production
Advanced Merchandising and Marketing
Advanced Design and Product Development
Applied Apparel Merchandising
Develop Apparel Patterns and Sew Bottoms
Create and Manage Fashion Brand
29
Develop Design Collection
Compute Standard Allowed Minutes
Grade Pattern
Modify CAD Pattern
Interpret Textile Product Knowledge & Provide Advice on Fabric Care for Textile
& Fashion Industry
Conduct Fit Evaluation & Pattern Alteration
Altered Apparel Patterns and Designs through Draping
Altered Cut Order Planning and Marker Layout
Manage Product Safety
Support Apparel Product Development
Draw Digital Images
Analyze Garment Construction
Identify and Analyse Textiles and Process
Perform Fashion Retail Merchandise Buying for Textile and Fashion Industry
Immerse and Prepare to Work in the Global Textile and Fashion Industry
Interpret Pattern Draft and Sewing Sequence of Apparel
Interpret and Draw Production Sketches
Follow-Up Order from Design to Production for Textile and Fashion Industry
Calculate Cost of Material and Apparel for Textile and Fashion Industry
Source for Supplies and Production for Textile and Fashion Industry
Apply Lean Manufacturing Concepts
Identify Waste through Value Stream Mapping and Process Razing
Basic Industrial Engineering
Intermediate Industrial Engineering
Conduct Material and Product Testing and Evaluation
Manage Social Accountability Compliance
Supervise Quality Procedure
Supervise Work Improvement Process
Supervise WHS Practice
30
Importance of Training to Management/Company
Training is important because it sets the tone for how the employee views the company, it
helps ease the transition during the new hire process, and it builds a foundation for employees.
A newly hired employee who has poor training and orientation to the company is bad business
for an organization. Research has shown that it takes nearly ninety days to get a clear picture of
how an employee will succeed in their job. However, the first thirty days of employment are the
most important in developing the employee. Research has also shown that new hires will decide
within the first two weeks whether their new workplace is what they want or they decide to stay
on until they find a better job (Anderson, 2007). Five tips for an effective training process which
are key to training and retaining employees are:
Highly structured first day and orientation
Develop and deliver training objectives for the next thirty days-the employee should
know what to expect
Establish product and technical goals for the next 30 days
Assign a mentor – to help employee with the learning objectives
Manager should take an active role in training process-meet with the employee on a
weekly basis to answer questions and assist in the training process
Many corporations are reluctant to invest in the training process as they fear it will not be
cost effective. Companies are aware that finding and training employees can be a daunting task.
Many companies today worry about the amount of money spent on training and the time it takes
away from the workday and the cost benefit. For a training program to be truly effective,
reliable and effective training strategies and goals must be in place. A company that has a pool
of well trained and qualified employees will find that hiring from within can be a successful
process. Well trained employees are a valuable and desired human resource tool at any
corporation.
Companies which invest in training programs have found that their employees are better
workers, happier and better qualified candidates for promotions. There are many different types
31
of training which can be offered. Skills set training will deal with the skills needed to get the job
done. These skills can be technical or expertise knowledge. Soft skills can assist in customer
service development and programs that instruct people how to interact with each other in the
workplace. Training can consist of a multitude of courses from customer service, computer
basics, time management skills, and increase up to more professional levels which allow for
certification.
Training can occur on site if your corporation has a functional training department.
However, for smaller companies and those companies which choose to out-source training, there
are many other ways to deliver training. Companies often pay a training and development
company to come on-site and deliver the required training or the employees can be sent to an off-
site location. Technology advances today allow training to be delivered via computer, CD-Rom,
or disc. Many companies opt for the computer based training as this allows the learner to learn
at their own pace. There are many options available to companies who wish to incorporate
training into their office practices; however, the company must find the method that is most
effective for the corporation as well as the employees
Maintaining a Positive Attitude Training for Employees:
Most employees will respond to a positive attitude by being more positive and will
become easier to work with.
Maintaining a positive attitude increases employee job satisfaction, since employee
service representatives with a positive attitude find their work more enjoyable and
rewarding. Higher job satisfaction also translates to a lower employee turnover rate.
Employee service, employee care, and call center representatives who have a positive
attitude about their jobs are also more cooperative, get along better with their co-workers,
and are better team players.
Having a positive attitude at work can reduce stress, which can lead to an increase in
productivity and a decrease in sick days or absenteeism.
Maintaining a positive attitude is critical to success in your job.
32
Measuring Employee Attitude:
Organizations are increasingly interested in retaining right talents while targeting for new talents;
measuring employees attitude provides an indication of how successful the organization is in
fostering a conducive environment which nurtures great attitude among employee’s towards their
job and company . Because attitude is basically a psychological state, care should be taken in the
effort of quantitative measurement, although a large quantity of research in this area has recently
been developed. The usual measures of employee attitude involve an employee attitude survey
with a set of statements using a Likert technique or scale. The employee is asked to evaluate each
statement in term of their perception on the performance of the organization being measured.
Participant's willingness to invest in the program is directly proportional to the benefits of the
learning that the trainee could expect. Each participant forms their own perception towards
training. Some perceptions remain the same during the program, while some faded depending
upon the assessment of a program by the participant.
Employee Attitude Survey:
An essential component of organizational training and development, employee attitude
surveys provide a picture of the organization's needs. These surveys can be used to solicit
employee opinions on a variety of issues such as the company's success in communicating its
mission to employees, or local issues such as quality of the working environment.
Uses for Employee Attitude Surveys include:
Focusing of Employee Development Programs
Enhancing Management/Employee Relations
Training Needs Assessment
Evaluation of Training
Organizational Climate Survey
33
1.4. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY:
The study was undertaken to achieve the following objectives:
To analyze the impact of gender on attitude of employees towards the training programs
conducted in the organization.
To analyze the perceived benefits of training to the employees.
To evaluate the perceived impact of the training program on the employees.
To analyze the training activities conducted in the organization.
34
1.5. SCOPE OF THE STUDY:
The study is helpful to analyze the attitude of employees towards the training program
conducted in the organization.
The training process also assists in identifying skills in which employees are weak and
assist the management in developing a beneficial training strategy.
Implementation of quality training program in the organization goes a long way in
assisting with the development of employees.
This research explores the proposed link between the employee outcome and the training
program. Training program has emerged as one of the most important areas of
organization practice.
35
1.6. LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY:
Due to the time constraint the sample size is minimized to 100.
The research is been done in only one organization, so it cannot resemble the entire
population working in the whole industry.
36
CHAPTER – 2
37
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
CHAPTER - 2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
According to Gordon (1983), companies make training a stand-alone function, separate from
HR. He points out a twenty percent increase in training expenditure since it has not kept pace
with the twenty-four percent increase in workers in the same period. He suggests Training
Managers use Return on Investment (ROI) to demonstrate that the training function is a profit
center, not just a cost center.
According to Noe and Schmitt (1986), participants were more motivated to learn and transfer
skills to the work environment when they were highly involved in their jobs.
38
According to Baldwin and Ford (1988), empirical investigations of personality, motivational
and environmental factors impact on training effectiveness.
According to Keep (1989), at the individual level, investment in training provides a powerful
signaling mechanism to increase employee motivation and commitment to the organization.
According to Kelly (1991), ‘new industrial relations’ practices of employee involvement may
affect employee attitudes positively; there is no priori reason to assume that positive attitudes
will translate into feelings of commitment or mutual interest.
According to Wexley and Latham (1991), training is unlikely to be effective unless it is related
to high level of motivation, better ability to perform their job, and hopefully also makes them
feel positive toward their work.
According to Green (1992), training effectiveness can be mediated by social and political
process.
According to American Society for Training and Development (ASTD), less than $1500 per
employee was spent for training in 1996. The largest part of that (49 percent) was spent for
technical and professional training. Only two percent was spent for New Employee Orientation
and three percent on quality, competition and business practices training.
According to Heyes and Stuart (1996), training provision has a positive impact on employees’
attitudes such as motivation and job satisfaction where employers adopt structured, formalized
approaches to training which link skill formation to job security, future employment prospects,
recognition and rewards.
According to Bramley (1997), ‘Effective training’ indicates ‘not only finding out whether the
training was well done but also asking what it achieved and whether it was worthwhile for the
organization to be sponsoring it’.
39
According to Santos and Stuart’s (2003), employee will transfer skills and knowledge to the
workplace if training is associated with rewards
According to Casse and Banahan (2007), the current traditional training continuously facing
the challenges in the selection of the employees, in maintaining the uncertainty related to the
purpose and in introducing new tactics for the environment of work and by recognizing this, they
advising on all the problems, which reiterates the requirement for flexible approach.
According to Miller and Desmarais (2007), usually the managers have the choice to select the
best training and development programmed for their staff but they always have to bear in mind
that to increase their chances of achieves the target.
CHAPTER – 3
40
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
CHAPTER- 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
41
3.1. RESEARCH DESIGN
This study adopts descriptive research method. The major purpose of descriptive
research is description of the state of employee attitude towards training program as it exists at
present. The information collected is analyzed to make an evaluation of employee attitude.
3.2. POPULATION:
The population of the study comprises of 199 employees working in grade III in
Thiruvalluvar Textiles Private Limited.
Grade No of employeesIII 199
3.3. SAMPLE SIZE:
Out of 199 grade III employees working in Thiruvalluvar Textiles, 100 employees are
selected as sample for the study.
3.4. SAMPLING METHOD:
Simple random sampling method is employed for the selection of 100 respondents from
the total population of 199.
3.5. DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
Primary data collection was done through structured questionnaire. Questionnaire has
been distributed to the employees directly and explanation was provided to the required
variables. The questionnaire consists of 50 questions.
Variables used in the study:
Pre-training activities
During the training
Planning of the training
42
Post-training activities
Training atmosphere
Training methods
Evaluation of trainers response
Perceived benefits of training
Perceived impact of training
Time management
Employees suggestion towards training
Opinion of employees for the further improvement of training
A five point Likert-style rating scale (Strongly Agree = 1, Agree = 2, Neutral = 3, Disagree = 4,
strongly Disagree = 5) was used to assess employees’ attitude towards training programs.
3.6. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
The following statistical tools & techniques are used in this study to arrive specific
results.
1. Percentage method.
2. Chi-square method.
CHAPTER – 4
43
DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION
44
CHAPTER- 4
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
4.1. PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS:
4.1.1. GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS
The following table shows the gender of the respondents.
TABLE: 4.1.1.1
S.No Gender No. of the Respondents Percentage1 MALE 41 41 2 FEMALE 59 59
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that 41% of the respondents are male and 51% of the
respondents are female.
It is concluded that majority of the respondents are female.
GRAPH: 4.1.1.2
GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS
41
59
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
MALE FEMALE
GENDER
PE
RC
EN
TA
GE
45
4.1.2. AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS
The following table shows the age of the respondents used for study.
TABLE: 4.1.2.1
S.No Age No. of Respondents Percentage1 <20 yrs 18 18 2 21-30 yrs 23 23 3 31-40 yrs 27 27 4 41-50 yrs 20 20 5 > 50 yrs 12 12
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that 27% of the respondents belongs to the age group
of 31- 40 years, 23% of the respondents belong to the age group of 21-30 years, 20% of the
respondents belong to the age group of 41-50 years, 18% of the respondents belong to the age
group of less than 20 years and 12% of the respondents belong to the age group of more than 50
years.
It is concluded that majority of the respondents belong to the age group of 31- 40 years.
GRAPH-4.1.2.2
AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS
18
23
27
20
12
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
<20 yrs 21-30 yrs 31-40 yrs 41-50 yrs >50 yrs
AGE
PE
RC
EN
TA
GE
4.1.3 EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS
46
The following table shows the educational qualification of the respondents
TABLE: 4.1.3.1
S.No Educational Qualification No. of Respondents Percentage1 Degree 2 2 2 Diploma 1 15 3 ITI 1 1 4 School 81 81 5 Others 15 1
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
INFERENCE:
From the above table inferred that 81 % of the respondents have done school education,
15% of the respondents have done diploma, 2 % of the respondents have done degree, 1% of the
respondents have done ITI and 2% of the respondents have come under other category.
It is concluded that majority of the respondents have done only school education.
GRAPH: 4.1.3.2
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Degree Diploma ITI School Others
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION
PE
RC
EN
TA
GE
4.1.4. EXPERIENCE OF THE RESPONDENTS
47
The following table shows the experience of the respondents
TABLE: 4.1.4.1S.No Experience No. of Respondents Percentage1 <2 yrs 19 19 2 2-5 yrs 23 23 3 5-8 yrs 18 18 4 8-11 yrs 33 33 5 >11 yrs 7 7
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that 33% of the respondents have experience of 8-11
years, 23% of the respondents have experience of 2-5 years, 19% of the respondents have
experience of less than 2 years, 18% of the respondents have experience of 5-8 years and 7% of
the respondents have experience of more than 11 years.
It is concluded that majority of respondents have experience of 8-11 years.
GRAPH: 4.1.4.2
EXPERIENCE OF THE RESPONDENTS
19
23
18
33
7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
<2 yrs 2-5 yrs 5-8 yrs 8-11 yrs >11 yrs
EXPERIENCE
PE
RC
EN
TA
GE
4.1.5. CURRENT SALARY OF THE RESPONDENTS
The following table shows the current salary of the respondents
48
TABLE: 4.1.5.1. CURRENT SALARY OF THE RESPONDENTS
S.No Current Salary No. of Respondents Percentage1 < Rs.2000 60 60 2 Rs.2001 – Rs.5000 21 21 3 Rs.5001 – Rs.8000 15 15 4 Rs.8001 – Rs.11000 2 2 5 > Rs.11000 2 2
Total 100 100
Source: Primary Data
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that 60% of the respondents earn below Rs.2000, 21%
of the respondents earn between Rs.2001 - Rs.5000, 15% of the respondents earn between
Rs.5001 - Rs.8000, 2% of the respondents earn between Rs.8001 - 11000 and 1% of the
respondents earn above Rs.11000.
It is concluded that majority of the respondents earn below Rs.2000.
GRAPH: 4.1.5.2.CURRENT SALARY OF THE RESPONDENTS
CURRENT SALARY OF THE RESPONDENTS
60
2115
2 20
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
< Rs.2000 Rs.2001 - Rs.5000 Rs.5001 - Rs.8000 Rs.8001 -Rs.11000
>Rs.11000
SALARY
PE
RC
EN
TA
GE
4.2. CHI-SQUARE TEST
49
The chi-square test is one of the widely used non-parametric tests in statistical analysis. The chi-
square distribution has many applications in situations that involves testing of hypothesis
concerning discrete of qualitative data. The quality ² describes the magnitude of discrepancy
between theory and observation. With the help of ² test, we are in a position to know whether a
given discrepancy between theory and observation may be attributed to chance or whether it
results from the inadequacy of the theory, to fit the observed facts. If ² is zero it means that the
observed and expected frequencies are completely coincide. The greater the discrepancy between
the observed and expected frequencies the greater is the value of ².
The quantity ² is defined as:
² = ∑ (Oi - Ei) ²
Ei
Oi – Observed frequency
Ei – Expected frequency
4.2.1. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & DETERMINATION OF EMPLOYEES
TRAINING NEEDS
HYPOTHESIS:
50
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and determination of
employees training needs.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is a no significant relationship between gender and
determination of employees training needs.
TABLE: 4.2.1.1
DETERMINATION OF EMPLOYEES TRAINING NEEDSGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 16 13 19 0 1 49FEMALE 28 11 7 4 1 51Total 44 24 26 4 2 100
TABLE: 4.2.1.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei16 22 -6 36 213 12 1 1 0.119 13 6 36 30 2 -2 4 21 1 0 0 028 22 6 36 211 12 -1 1 0.17 13 -6 36 34 2 2 4 21 1 0 0 0
(Oi - Ei) ² / Ei = 14.2
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value = 14.42 Table value = 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is more than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is accepted. There is a significant relationship between gender and determination of
employee training needs. Majority (44%) of the respondents strongly agree that their superior
analyzed their strength & weakness to determine the training needs.
4.2.2. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & TRAINING METHOD AND CONTENT
HYPOTHESIS:
51
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and training method
and content.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and training
method and content.
TABLE: 4.2.2.1
TRAINING METHODS AND CONTENTSGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 26 19 3 0 1 49FEMALE 29 12 9 1 0 51Total 55 31 12 1 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.2.2Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei26 27 -1 1 0.0319 15 4 16 13 6 -3 9 1.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.529 28 1 1 0.0312 16 -4 16 19 6 3 9 1.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei = 7.06
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value = 7.06 Table value = 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and training method &
content. Majority (55%) of the respondents strongly agree that they had an opportunity to decide
about contents and materials of training program
4.2.3. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND PRE-COURSE BRIEFING OF
EMPLOYEES WITH THEIR SUPERIORS
52
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and pre-course briefing
of employees with their superiors.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and pre-course
briefing of employees with their superiors.
TABLE: 4.2.3.1
PRE-COURSE BRIEFING WITH SUPERIORGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 29 16 3 0 1 49FEMALE 29 21 0 1 0 51Total 58 37 3 1 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.3.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei29 28 1 1 0.0316 18 -2 4 0.23 1.5 1.5 2.25 1.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.529 30 -1 1 0.0321 19 2 4 0.20 1.5 -1.5 2.25 1.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ(Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 5.46
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value = 5.46 Table value = 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and pre-course
briefing of employees with their superiors. Majority (58%) of the respondents strongly agree that
they had pre-course briefing with their superior.
4.2.4. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND OBJECTIVE OF PERFOMANCE
IMPROVEMENT SETUP BY THE SUPERIOR
53
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and objective of
performance improvement setup by the superior.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and objective
of performance improvement setup by the superior.
TABLE: 4.2.4.1
OBJECTIVE OF PERFOMANCE IMPROVEMENT SETUP BY THE SUPERIOR
GENDER STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE
STRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 28 15 4 1 1 49FEMALE 33 16 0 2 0 51Total 61 31 4 3 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.4.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei28 30 -2 4 0.1315 15 0 0 04 2 2 4 21 1.5 -0.5 0.25 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.533 31 2 4 0.1316 16 0 0 00 2 -2 4 22 1.5 0.5 0.25 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ(Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 6.26
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value = 6.26 Table value = 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and objective of
performance improvement setup by the superior. Majority (61%) of the respondents strongly
agree that their superior setup objective for the performance improvement in advance.
4.2.5. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & OBJECTIVE OF THE
TRAINING PROGRAM
54
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and objective of the
training program.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and objective
of the training program.
TABLE: 4.2.5.1
OBJECTIVE OF THE TRAINING PROGRAM
TotalGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
MALE 29 18 1 0 1 49FEMALE 27 20 2 1 1 51Total 56 38 3 1 2 100
TABLE: 4.2.5.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei26 27 -1 1 0.0319 15 4 16 13 6 -3 9 1.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.529 28 1 1 0.0312 16 -4 16 19 6 3 9 1.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei = 7.06
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value = 7.06 Table value = 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and objective of the
training program. Majority (56%) of the respondents strongly agree that the objective of the
training program is made clear in the beginning of the training.
4.2.6. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND TRAINING IMPARTED
RELEVANT TO THE JOB REQUIREMENT
55
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and training imparted
relevant to the job requirement.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and training
imparted relevant to the job requirement.
TABLE: 4.2.6.1
TRAINING IMPARTED IS ACTUALLY RELEVANT TO THE JOBGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 29 17 1 0 2 49FEMALE 26 19 5 1 0 51Total 55 36 6 1 2 100
TABLE: 4.2.6.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei29 27 2 4 0.1517 18 -1 1 0.051 3 -2 4 1.30 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.52 1 1 1 126 28 -2 4 0.1419 18 1 1 0.065 3 2 4 1.31 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.50 1 -1 1 1
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 6
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value = 6 Table value = 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and training imparted
relevant to the job requirement. Majority (55%) of the respondents strongly agree that the
training imparted is relevant to the job requirement.
4.2.7. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND DESIGN & SCHEDULE OF THE
TRAINING PROGRAM
56
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and design and
schedule of the training program.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and design and
schedule of the training program.
TABLE: 4.2.7.1
TRIANING PROGRAM WAS PROPERLY DESIGNEDGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 31 18 0 0 0 49FEMALE 25 21 4 1 0 51Total 56 39 4 1 0 100
TABLE: 4.2.7.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei31 27 4 16 0.718 19 -1 1 0.050 2 -2 4 20 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.50 0 0 0 025 29 -4 16 0.621 20 1 1 0.054 2 2 4 21 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.50 0 0 0 0
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 6.4
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value = 6.4 Table value = 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and design and
schedule of the training program. Majority (56%) of the respondents strongly agree that the
training program was properly designed and scheduled.
4.2.8. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND EMPLOYEE SELECTION FOR
TRAINING BASED ON THEIR PERFOMANCE
57
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and employee selection
for training based on their performance.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and employee
selection for training based on their performance.
TABLE: 4.2.8.1.
EMPLOYEE SELECTION FOR TRAINING BASED ON THEIR PERFORMANCEGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 24 20 4 1 0 49FEMALE 29 19 0 1 2 51Total 53 39 4 2 2 100
TABLE: 4.2.8.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei24 26 -2 4 0.220 19 1 1 0.054 2 2 4 21 1 0 0 00 1 -1 1 129 27 2 4 0.219 20 -1 1 0.050 2 -2 4 21 1 0 0 02 1 1 1 1
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei=6.5
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value = 6.5 Table value = 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and employees
selected for training based on their performance. Majority (53%) of the respondents strongly
agree that their superior selected them for the training based on their performance.
4.2.9. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND JOB REQUIREMENT &
RESPONSIBILITIES
58
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and job requirement
and responsibilities.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and job
requirement and responsibilities.
TABLE: 4.2.9.1
JOB REQUIRMENT AND RESPONSIBILITYGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 27 16 2 2 2 49FEMALE 31 17 3 0 0 51Total 58 33 5 2 2 100
TABLE: 4.2.9.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei27 28 -1 1 0.0416 16 0 0 02 2.5 -0.5 0.25 0.12 1 1 1 12 1 1 1 131 30 1 1 0.0317 17 0 0 03 2.6 0.4 0.16 0.10 1 -1 1 10 1 -1 1 1
Σ(Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 4.27
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value = 4.27 Table value = 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and job requirement
and responsibilities. Majority (58%) of the respondents strongly agree that training program gave
adequate knowledge about the job requirement and responsibilities.
4.2.10. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND REGULATIONS IN THE
TRAINING PROGRAM
59
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and regulations in the
training.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and
regulations in the training.
TABLE: 4.2.10.1
REGULATIONS IN THE TRAINING PROGRAMGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 34 12 1 1 1 49FEMALE 32 17 2 0 0 51Total 66 29 3 1 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.10.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei34 32 2 4 0.1312 14 -2 4 0.31 1.5 -0.5 0.25 0.21 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.532 34 -2 4 0.1217 15 2 4 0.32 1.5 0.5 0.25 0.20 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ(Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 3.25
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value = 3.25 Table value = 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and regulations of the
training program. Majority (66%) of the respondents strongly agree that the rules and regulations
of the training were clearly defined.
4.2.11. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND FOLLOWUP MEETING WITH
THE SUPERIOR
60
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and follow-up meeting
with the superior.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and follow-up
meeting with the superior.
TABLE: 4.2.11.1
FOLLOW-UP MEETING WITH THE SUPERIORGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 31 18 0 0 0 49FEMALE 24 21 5 1 0 51Total 55 39 5 1 0 100
TABLE: 4.2.11.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei31 27 4 16 0.618 19 -1 1 0.050 2.5 -2.5 6.25 2.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.50 0 0 0 024 28 -4 16 0.621 20 1 1 0.055 2.5 2.5 6.25 2.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.50 0 0 0 0
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 7.3
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value = 7.3 Table value = 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and follow-up meeting
conducted after training. Majority (55%) of the respondents strongly agree that follow-up
meeting after the training was conducted with the superior.
4.2.12. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND OPPORTUNITY PROVIDED TO
APPLY THE SKILLS LEARNT
61
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and opportunity
provided to apply the skills learnt.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and
opportunity provided to apply the skills learnt.
TABLE: 4.2.12.1
OPPORTUNITIES PROVIDED TO APPLY THE LEARNT SKILLS
TotalGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
MALE 24 20 4 1 0 49FEMALE 28 20 0 1 2 51Total 52 40 4 2 2 100
TABLE: 4.2.12.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei24 25 -1 1 0.0420 20 0 0 04 2 2 4 21 1 0 0 00 1 -1 1 128 27 1 1 0.0420 20 0 0 00 2 -2 4 21 1 0 0 02 1 1 1 1
Σ(Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 6.08
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value = 6.08 Table value = 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and opportunity
provided to apply skills learnt. Majority (52%) of the respondents strongly agree that
opportunities are provided to apply the skill/knowledge learnt from the training.
4.2.13. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND ACQUIRED SKILLS AND
KNOWLEDGE
62
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and acquired skills and
knowledge.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and acquired
skills and knowledge.
TABLE: 4.2.13.1
ACQUIRED NEW SKILLS/KNOWLEDGEGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE Total
MALEFEMALE
29 16 3 1 0 4924 23 2 1 1 51
Total 53 39 5 2 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.13.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei29 26 3 9 0.3516 19 -3 9 0.53 2.5 0.5 0.25 0.11 1 0 0 00 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.524 27 -3 9 0.323 20 3 9 0.52 2.5 -0.5 0.25 0.11 1 0 0 01 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ(Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 2.85
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value = 2.85 Table value = 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and acquired skills
and knowledge. Majority (53%) of the respondents strongly agree that they had necessary
resources to apply their acquired skills and knowledge from the training.
4.2.14. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND TRAINING FEEDBACK
63
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and training feedback.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and training
feedback.
TABLE: 4.2.14.1
SUPERIOR SUPPORTS THROUGH COACHING &FEEDBACKGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE Total
MALE 30 14 5 0 0 49FEMALE 29 18 2 1 1 51Total 59 32 7 1 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.14.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei30 29 1 1 0.0314 16 -2 4 0.255 3.4 1.6 2.56 0.80 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.529 30 -1 1 0.0318 16 2 4 0.252 3.6 -1.6 2.56 0.71 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 4.06
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value = 4.06 Table value = 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and superior’s support
through coaching and feedback. Majority (59%) of the respondents strongly agree that their
superior support them through coaching and feedback.
4.2.15. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND CONVENIENCE OF THE
TRAINING PROGRAM
64
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and convenience of the
training program.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and
convenience of the training.
TABLE: 4.2.15.1
CONVENIENCE OF THE TRAININGGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE Total
MALE 27 19 2 0 1 49FEMALE 31 18 1 1 0 51Total 58 37 3 1 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.15.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei27 28 -1 1 0.0419 18 1 1 0.052 1.5 0.5 0.25 0.20 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.531 30 1 1 0.0318 19 -1 1 0.051 1.5 -0.5 0.25 0.21 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ(Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 2.57
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value = 2.57 Table value = 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and timing & venue of
the training was convenient. Majority (58%) of the respondents strongly agree that the timing
and venue of the training session was convenient.
4.2.16. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND TRAINING ATMOSPHERE
HYPOTHESIS:
65
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and training
atmosphere.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and training
atmosphere.
TABLE: 4.2.16.1
TRAINING ATMOSPHERE
TotalGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
MALE 29 19 0 0 1 49FEMALE 35 12 2 2 0 51Total 64 31 2 2 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.16.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei29 31 -2 4 0.1319 15 4 16 10 1 -1 1 10 1 -1 1 11 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.535 33 2 4 0.1212 16 -4 16 12 1 1 1 12 1 1 1 10 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 7.25
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 7.25 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and training
atmosphere. Majority (64%) of the respondents strongly agree that the training atmosphere was
well organized and it enhanced the learning process.
4.2.17. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND METHODS USED TO LEARN
TRAINING PROGRAM
66
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and methods used to
learn training program.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and methods
used to learn training program.
TABLE: 4.2.17.1
METHODS USED TO LEARN TRAINING PROGRAMGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE Total
MALE 24 20 4 1 0 49FEMALE 29 19 0 1 2 51Total 53 39 4 2 2 100
TABLE: 4.2.17.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei24 26 -2 4 0.1520 19 1 1 0.054 2 2 4 21 1 0 0 00 1 -1 1 129 27 2 4 0.1519 20 -1 1 0.050 2 -2 4 21 1 0 0 02 1 1 1 1
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 6.4
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 6.4 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and methods used to
learn training program. Majority (53%) of the respondents strongly agree that different methods
of learning were used in the training session.
4.2.18. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND MATERIAL & MODULE OF THE
TRAINING COURSE
67
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and methods & module
of the training course.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and methods
& module of the training course.
TABLE: 4.2.18.1
MATERIAL AND MODULE OF THE TRAINING COURSEGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE Total
MALE 27 19 2 1 0 49FEMALE 28 18 4 0 1 51Total 55 37 6 1 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.18.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei27 27 0 0 019 18 1 1 0.12 3 -1 1 0.31 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.528 28 0 0 018 19 -1 1 0.14 3 1 1 0.30 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 2.8
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 2.8 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and methods &
module of the training. Majority (55%) of the respondents strongly agree that the course material
and the module covered in the training program were sufficient.
4.2.19. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND INTERACTION WITH
INDIVIDUALS
68
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and interaction with
individuals.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and interaction
with individuals.
TABLE: 4.2.19.1
INTERACTING WITH INDIVIDUALS
TotalGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
MALE 31 13 5 0 0 49FEMALE 35 14 0 2 0 51Total 66 27 5 2 0 100
TABLE: 4.2.19.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei31 32 -1 1 0.0313 13 0 0 05 2.5 2.5 6.25 2.50 1 -1 1 10 0 0 0 035 34 1 1 0.0314 14 0 0 00 2.5 -2.5 6.25 2.52 1 1 1 10 0 0 0 0
Σ(Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 7.06
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 7.06 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and successful
communication and interaction with each individual. Majority (66%) of the respondents strongly
agree that trainer was successful in communicating and interacting with each individuals.
4.2.20. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND TRAINERS SUPPORT
69
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and trainer’s support.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and trainer’s
support.
TABLE: 4.2.20.1
TRAINERS SUPPORTGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 30 18 1 0 0 49FEMALE 22 22 5 1 1 51Total 52 40 6 1 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.20.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei30 25 5 25 118 20 -2 4 0.21 3 -2 4 1.30 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.522 27 -5 25 122 20 2 4 0.25 3 2 4 1.31 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 7
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 7 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and trainer’s support
& patient when employees approached for doubts & clarification. Majority (52%) of the
respondents strongly agree that their trainer was patient and supportive when they were
approached for doubts and clarifications about the training program.
4.2.21. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND IMPARTIALITY OF TRAINERS
70
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and impartiality of
trainers.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and
impartiality of trainers.
TABLE: 4.2.21.1
IMPARTIALITY OF TRAINERSGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 27 19 1 1 1 49FEMALE 29 18 3 1 0 51Total 56 37 4 2 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.21.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei27 27 0 0 019 18 1 1 0.051 2 -1 1 0.51 1 0 0 01 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.529 29 0 0 018 19 -1 1 0.053 2 1 1 0.51 1 0 0 00 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 2.1
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 2.1 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and trainer’s
impartiality in giving feedback to the respondents. Majority (56%) of the respondents strongly
agree that trainer was impartial in giving feedback to them.
4.2.22. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER & EMPLOYEES MOTIVATION LEVEL
71
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and employees
motivation level.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and employees
motivation level.
TABLE: 4.2.22.1
EMPLOYEES MOTIVATION LEVEL
TotalGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
MALE 25 23 0 0 1 49FEMALE 32 15 4 0 0 51Total 57 38 4 0 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.22.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei25 28 -3 9 0.3223 19 4 16 10 2 -2 4 20 0 0 0 01 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.532 29 3 9 0.3115 19 -4 16 14 2 2 4 20 0 0 0 00 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 7.63
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 7.63 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and employees
motivation level. Majority (57%) of the respondents strongly agree that they are motivated at
their work after training.
4.2.23. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND JOB BETTERMENT
72
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and training help
employees to do their job better.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and training
help employees to do their job better.
TABLE: 4.2.23.1
TRAINING HELPS EMPLOYEES TO DO THEIR JOB BETTER
TotalGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
MALE 24 24 0 1 0 49FEMALE 16 31 2 1 1 51Total 40 55 2 2 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.23.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei24 20 4 16 0.824 27 -3 9 0.330 1 -1 1 11 1 0 0 00 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.516 20 -4 16 0.831 28 3 9 0.322 1 1 1 11 1 0 0 01 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 5.25
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 5.25 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and training help
employees to do their job better. Majority (55%) of the respondents agree that training helps
them to do their job better after training.
4.2.24. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND TRAINING ENABLES
EMPLOYEES TO BE FELT VALUED BY THE COMPANY
73
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and training enables
employees to be felt valued by the company.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and after
training employees felt valued by the company.
TABLE: 4.2.24.1
TRAINING ENABLES EMPLOYEES TO BE FELT VALUED BY THE COMPANYGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 25 15 7 1 1 49FEMALE 23 18 9 1 0 51Total 48 33 16 2 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.24.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei25 24 1 1 0.0415 16 -1 1 0.067 8 -1 1 0.121 1 0 0 01 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.523 24 -1 1 0.0418 17 1 1 0.069 8 1 1 0.121 1 0 0 00 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 1.44
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 1.44 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and after training
employees felt valued by the company. Majority (48%) of the respondents strongly agree that
they are valued by the company.
4.2.25. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND TRAINING ENABLES CAREER
PROGRESS
74
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and training enables
career progress.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and training
enables career progress.
TABLE: 4.2.25.1
TRAINING ENABLES CAREER PROGRESSGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 22 25 1 0 1 49FEMALE 23 27 0 1 0 51Total 45 52 1 1 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.25.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei22 22 0 0 025 25 0 0 01 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.523 23 0 0 027 27 0 0 00 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 3
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 3 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and training enables
career progress. Majority (45%) of the respondents strongly agree that the training enables career
progress for them.
4.2.26. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND TRAINING HELPS EMPLOYEES
GROW
75
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and training helps
employees grow.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and training
helps employees grow.
TABLE: 4.2.26.1
TRAINING HELPS EMPLOYEE TO GROW AS A PERSON
TotalGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
MALE 22 24 1 1 1 49FEMALE 31 18 1 1 0 51Total 53 42 2 2 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.26.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei22 26 -4 16 0.6224 21 3 9 0.431 1 0 0 01 1 0 0 01 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.531 27 4 16 0.618 21 -3 9 0.431 1 0 0 01 1 0 0 00 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 3.08
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 3.08 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and training helps
employees to grow. Majority (53%) of the respondents strongly agree that the training helps
them to grow.
4.2.27. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND TRAINING IMPROVED SKILLS,
KNOWLEDGE AND PERFOMANCE
76
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and training improved
skills, knowledge and performance.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and training
improved skills, knowledge and performance.
TABLE: 4.2.27.1
TRAINING IMPROVED SKILLS, KNOWLEDGE AND PERFORMANCEGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 25 22 2 0 0 49FEMALE 20 25 2 3 1 51Total 45 47 4 3 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.27.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei25 22 3 9 0.422 23 -1 1 0.042 2 0 0 00 1.5 -1.5 2.25 1.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.520 23 -3 9 0.425 24 1 1 0.042 2 0 0 03 1.5 1.5 2.25 1.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 4.88
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 4.88 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and training improved
skills, knowledge and performance. Majority (47%) of the respondents agree that the training
program improved their skills, knowledge and performance.
4.2.28. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND TRAINING FOSTERED
TEAMWORK, PARTICIPATION & CO-OPERATION
77
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and training fostered
teamwork, participation & co-operation.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and training
fostered teamwork, participation & co-operation.
TABLE: 4.2.28.1
TRAINING FOSTERED TEAMWORK, PARTICIPATION AND CO-OPERATIONGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE Total
MALE 18 29 1 0 1 49FEMALE 21 27 1 2 0 51Total 39 56 2 2 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.28.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei18 19 -1 1 0.0529 27 2 4 0.151 1 0 0 00 1 -1 1 11 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.521 20 1 1 0.0527 29 -2 4 0.141 1 0 0 02 1 1 1 10 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ(Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 3.39
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 3.39 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and training fostered
teamwork, participation and co-operation. Majority (56%) of the respondents agree that training
fostered team work, participation, and co-operation amongst them.
4.2.29. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND ATTAINMENT OF OBJECTIVE
OF THE TRAINING
78
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and employees able to
attainment of objective of the training.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and attainment
of objective of the training.
TABLE: 4.2.29.1
ATTAIN OF OBJECTIVES OF THE TRAININGGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 28 18 1 1 1 49FEMALE 37 10 4 0 0 51Total 65 28 5 1 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.29.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei28 32 -4 16 0.518 14 4 16 11 2.5 -1.5 2.25 11 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.537 33 4 16 0.510 14 -4 16 14 2.5 1.5 2.25 10 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 7
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 7 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and employees able to
attain objective of the training. Majority (65%) of the respondents strongly agree that they are
able to attain the objectives of the training.
4.2.30. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND RECOGNITION OF EMPLOYEES
IMPROVEMENT
79
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and recognition of
employee’s improvement
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and
recognition of employee’s improvement.
TABLE: 4.2.30.1
RECOGNITION OF EMPLOYEES IMPROVEMENT GENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE Total
MALE 21 27 0 1 0 49FEMALE 26 24 1 0 0 51Total 47 51 1 1 0 100
TABLE: 4.2.30.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei21 23 -2 4 0.227 25 2 4 0.20 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.50 0 0 0 026 24 2 4 0.224 26 -2 4 0.21 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.50 0 0 0 0
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 2.8
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 2.8 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and employee’s
improvement was considered and recognized in the training. Majority (51%) of the respondents
agree that their improvement after the training was considered and recognized by the company.
4.2.31. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND PERCIEVED IMPACT OF
TRAINING ON PAY
80
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and perceived impact of
training on pay.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and perceived
impact of training on pay.
TABLE: 4.2.31.1
TRAINING HAS AN IMPACT ON PAY GENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 28 19 1 0 1 49FEMALE 32 17 1 1 0 51Total 60 36 2 1 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.31.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei28 29 -1 1 0.0319 18 1 1 0.11 1 0 0 00 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.532 31 1 1 0.0317 18 -1 1 0.11 1 0 0 01 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ(Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 2.26
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 2.26 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and perceived impact
of training on pay. Majority (60%) of the respondents strongly agree that there is an impact of
training on the pay structure.
4.2.32. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND PERCEIVED IMPACT OF
TRAINING ON PROMOTION
81
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and perceived impact of
training on promotion.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and perceived
impact of training on promotion.
TABLE: 4.2.32.1
TRAINING HAS AN IMPACT ON PROMOTIONGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 22 25 2 0 0 49FEMALE 30 18 1 1 1 51Total 52 43 3 1 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.32.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei22 25 -3 9 0.425 21 4 16 0.82 1.5 0.5 0.25 0.20 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.530 27 3 9 0.318 22 -4 16 0.71 1.5 -0.5 0.25 0.21 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 4.6
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 4.6 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and perceived impact
of training on promotion. Majority (52%) of the respondents strongly agree that there is an
impact of training on their promotion.
4.2.33. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND PERCEIVED IMPACT OF
TRAINING ON JOB ABILITY
82
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and perceived impact of
training on job ability.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and perceived
impact of training on job ability.
TABLE: 4.2.33.1
TRAINING HAS AN IMPACT ON EMPLOYEES JOB ABILITYGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE Total
MALE 32 14 2 1 0 49FEMALE 24 26 1 0 0 51Total 56 40 3 1 0 100
TABLE: 4.2.33.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei32 27 5 25 114 20 -6 36 1.82 1.5 0.5 0.25 0.21 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.50 0 0 0 024 29 -5 25 126 20 6 36 1.81 1.5 -0.5 0.25 0.20 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.50 0 0 0 0
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 7
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 7 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and perceived impact
of training on job ability. Majority (56%) of the respondents strongly agree that there is an
impact of training on their job ability.
4.2.34. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND PERCEIVED IMPACT OF
TRAINING ON JOB SECURITY
83
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and perceived impact of
training on job security.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and perceived
impact of training on job security.
TABLE: 4.2.34.1
TRAINING HAS AN IMPACT ON MY JOB SECURITY
TotalGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
MALE 21 25 2 0 1 49FEMALE 28 21 2 0 0 51Total 49 46 4 0 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.34.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei21 24 -3 9 0.425 23 2 4 0.22 2 0 0 00 0 0 0 01 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.528 25 3 9 0.421 23 -2 4 0.22 2 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 2.2
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 2.2 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and perceived impact
of training on job security. Majority (49%) of the respondents strongly agree that there is an
impact of training on their job security.
84
4.2.35. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND PERCEIVED IMPACT OF
TRAINING ON FUTURE EMPLOYMENT PROSPECTS
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and perceived impact of
training on future employment prospects.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and perceived
impact of training on future employment prospects.
TABLE: 4.2.35.1
TRAINING HAS AN IMPACT ON FUTURE EMPLOYMENT PROSPECTSGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 24 24 0 1 0 49FEMALE 16 31 2 1 1 51Total 40 55 2 2 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.35.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei24 20 4 16 0.824 27 -3 9 0.30 1 -1 1 11 1 0 0 00 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.516 20 -4 16 0.831 28 3 9 0.32 1 1 1 11 1 0 0 01 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 5.2
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 5.2 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and perceived impact
of training on future employment prospects. Majority (55%) of the respondents agree that there
is an impact of training on future employment prospects.
85
4.2.36. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND PERCEIVED IMPACT OF
TRAINING ON JOB SATISFACTION
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and perceived impact of
training on job satisfaction.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and perceived
impact of training on job satisfaction.
TABLE: 4.2.36.1
TRAINING HAS AN IMPACT ON JOB SATISFCATIONGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 31 15 1 2 0 49FEMALE 37 12 1 0 1 51Total 68 27 2 2 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.36.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei31 33 -2 4 0.115 13 2 4 0.31 1 0 0 02 1 1 1 10 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.537 35 2 4 0.112 14 -2 4 0.31 1 0 0 00 1 -1 1 11 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ(Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 3.8
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 3.8 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and perceived impact
of training on job satisfaction. Majority (68%) of the respondents strongly agree that there is an
impact of training on job satisfaction.
86
4.2.37. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND PERCEIVED IMPACT OF
TRAINING ON MOTIVATION
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and perceived impact of
training on motivation.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and perceived
impact of training on motivation.
TABLE: 4.2.37.1
TRAINING HAS AN IMPACT ON MOTIVATIONGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 27 18 3 0 1 49FEMALE 31 17 1 1 1 51Total 58 35 4 1 2 100
TABLE: 4.2.37.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei27 28 -1 1 0.0418 17 1 1 0.063 2 1 1 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.51 1 0 0 031 30 1 1 0.0317 18 -1 1 0.061 2 -1 1 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.51 1 0 0 0
Σ(Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 2.19
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 2.19 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and perceived impact
of training on motivation. Majority (58%) of the respondents strongly agree that there is an
impact of training on motivation.
87
4.2.38. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND OVERALL DURATION OF THE
TRAINING
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and overall duration of
the training.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and overall
duration of the training.
TABLE: 4.2.38.1
OVERALL DURATION OF THE TRAINING WAS SUFFICIENTGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 34 12 2 0 1 49FEMALE 35 14 1 1 0 51Total 69 26 3 1 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.38.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei34 34 0 0 012 13 -1 1 0.12 1.5 0.5 0.25 0.20 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.535 35 0 0 014 13 1 1 0.11 1.5 -0.5 0.25 0.21 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 2.6
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 2.6 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and overall duration of
the training. Majority (69%) of the respondents strongly agree that the duration of the training
was sufficient.
88
4.2.39. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND TIME GIVEN TO GET
FEEDBACK FROM THE PATICIPANTS
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and time given to get
feedback from the participants.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and time given
to get feedback from the participants.
TABLE: 4.2.39.1
ENOUGH TIME WAS GIVEN FOR THE FEEDBACK FROM THE PARTICIPANTSGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 33 14 1 1 0 49FEMALE 37 11 2 0 1 51Total 70 25 3 1 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.39.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei33 34 -1 1 0.0314 12 2 4 0.31 1.5 -0.5 0.25 0.21 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.537 36 1 1 0.0311 13 -2 4 0.32 1.5 0.5 0.25 0.20 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 3.06
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 3.06 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and time given to get
feedback from the participants. Majority (70%) of the respondents strongly agree that enough
time has given to give feedback.
89
4.2.40. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE
TRAINING PROGRAM FOR OTHERS
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and recommendation of
the training program for others.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and
recommendation of the training program for others.
TABLE: 4.2.40.1
EMPLOYEE RECOMMEND THE EXISTING TRAINING FOR OTHERSGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 30 17 2 0 0 49FEMALE 27 20 2 0 2 51Total 57 37 4 0 2 100
TABLE: 4.2.40.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei30 28 2 4 0.1417 18 -1 1 0.052 2 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 1 -1 1 127 29 -2 4 0.1420 19 1 1 0.052 2 0 0 00 0 0 0 02 1 1 1 1
Σ(Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 2.38
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 2.38 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and recommending
the training program for others. Majority (57%) of the respondents strongly agree that they will
recommend the training program for their co-employees.
90
4.2.41. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND PERFOMANCE OF THE
TRAINING
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and performance of the
training.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and
performance of the training.
TABLE: 4.2.41.1
OVERALL PERFOMANCE OF THE TRAINING WAS EXCELLENTGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 28 18 2 1 0 49FEMALE 30 16 4 0 1 51Total 58 34 6 1 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.41.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei28 28 0 0 018 17 1 1 0.062 3 -1 1 0.331 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.530 30 0 0 016 17 -1 1 0.064 3 1 1 0.330 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 2.78
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 2.78 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and performance of
the training. Majority (58%) of the respondents strongly agree that performance of the training
was excellent.
91
4.2.42. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND REQUIREMENT OF CROSS
TRAINING
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and employee likes to
be cross-trained.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and employee
likes to be cross-trained.
TABLE: 4.2.42.1
REQUIREMENT OF CROSS TRAINED
TotalGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
MALE 33 12 2 1 1 49FEMALE 38 9 4 0 0 51Total 71 21 6 1 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.42.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei33 35 -2 4 0.112 10 2 4 0.42 3 -1 1 0.331 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.538 36 2 4 0.19 11 -2 4 0.44 3 1 1 0.330 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ(Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 3.66
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 3.66 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and employee likes to
be cross-trained. Majority (71%) of the respondents strongly agree that they would like to be
cross trained.
92
4.2.43. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND COMPANY STRATEGIES
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and company strategies.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and company
strategies.
TABLE: 4.2.43.1
COMPANY STRATEGIESGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 30 13 4 1 1 49FEMALE 31 16 4 0 0 51Total 61 29 8 1 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.43.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei30 30 0 0 013 14 -1 1 0.14 4 0 0 01 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.531 31 0 0 016 15 1 1 0.14 4 0 0 00 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ(Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 2.2
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 2.2 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and need to emphasize
company strategy. Majority (61%) of the respondents strongly agree that the company strategies
need to be emphasized.
93
4.2.44. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND CONSISTENCY OF TRAINING
FORMAT AND PROCESS
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and consistency of
training format and process.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and
consistency of training format and process.
TABLE: 4.2.44.1
THERE SHOULD BE MORE CONSISTENCY WITH THE TRAINING FORMAT AND PROCESSGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE Total
MALE 28 15 3 3 0 49FEMALE 35 12 3 0 1 51Total 63 27 6 3 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.44.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei28 31 -3 9 0.315 13 2 4 0.33 3 0 0 03 1.5 1.5 2.25 1.50 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.535 32 3 9 0.312 14 -2 4 0.33 3 0 0 00 1.5 -1.5 2.25 1.51 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Σ (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 5.2
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 5.2 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and consistency of
training format and process. Majority (63%) of the respondents strongly agree that there should
be more consistency in the training format and process.
94
4.2.45. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND HIRE TRAINING PERIOD
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis, Ho: There is a significant relationship between gender and hire training
period.
Alternative Hypothesis, H1: There is no significant relationship between gender and hire
training period.
TABLE: 4.2.45.1.
NEW HIRE TRAINING PERIODGENDER STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREESTRONGLY DISAGREE
Total
MALE 29 18 1 0 1 49FEMALE 31 16 2 2 0 51Total 60 34 3 2 1 100
TABLE: 4.2.45.2
Oi Ei (Oi - Ei) (Oi - Ei) ² (Oi - Ei) ² / Ei29 29 0 0 018 17 1 1 0.061 1.5 -0.5 0.25 0.20 1 -1 1 11 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.531 31 0 0 016 17 -1 1 0.062 1.5 0.5 0.25 0.22 1 1 1 10 0.5 -0.5 0.25 0.5
Σ(Oi - Ei) ² / Ei= 3.52
Degrees of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (2-1) (5-1)= (1 x 4) = 4
Level of significance = 5% Calculated value= 3.52 Table value= 9.49
INFERENCE:
The calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance, so the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is no significant relationship between gender and mandatory new
hire training period. Majority (60%) of the respondents strongly agree that mandatory there
should be training period for employees joining the organization.
95
CHAPTER – 5
96
FINDINGSCHAPTER - 5
FINDINGS
The following are the major findings observed in the study:
I. ANALYSIS OF PERSONAL PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS:
Majority (51%) of the respondents are female.
Majority (27%) of the respondents belong to the age group of 31- 40 years.
Majority (81%) of the respondents have done only school education.
Majority (33%) of respondents have work experience of 9-11 years.
Majority (60%) of the respondents earn below Rs.2000 per month.
II. ANALYSIS OF PRE-TRAINING ACTIVITIES:
Majority (44%) of the respondents strongly agree that their superior analyzed their
strength & weakness to determine the training needs.
Majority (55%) of the respondents strongly agree that they had an opportunity to decide
about contents and materials of training program.
Majority (58%) of the respondents strongly agree that they had pre-course briefing with
their superior.
Majority (61%) of the respondents strongly agree that their superior setup objective for
the performance improvement in advance.
III. ANALYSIS OF DURING THE TRAINING:
Majority (56%) of the respondents strongly agree that the objective of the training
program was made clear in the beginning of the training.
Majority (55%) of the respondents strongly agree that the training imparted is actually
relevant to the job requirement.
IV. ANALYSIS OF PLANNING THE TRAINING:
Majority (56%) of the respondents strongly agree that the training program was properly
designed and scheduled.
97
Majority (53%) of the respondents strongly agree that their superior has selected them
based on their performance.
Majority (58%) of the respondents strongly agree that training program gave adequate
knowledge about the job requirement and responsibilities.
Majority (66%) of the respondents strongly agree rules and regulations of the training
were clearly defined.
V. ANALYSIS OF POST-TRAINING ACTIVITIES:
Majority (55%) of the respondents strongly agree that follow-up meeting after the
training conducted with the superior.
Majority (52%) of the respondents strongly agree that opportunities are provided to apply
the skill/knowledge learnt from the training.
Majority (53%) of the respondents strongly agree that they had necessary resources to
apply their acquired skills and knowledge from the training.
Majority (59%) of the respondents strongly agree that their superior support them through
coaching and feedback.
VI. ANALYSIS OF TRAINING ATMOSPHERE:
Majority (58%) of the respondents strongly agree that the timing and venue of the raining
session was convenient.
Majority (64%) of the respondents strongly agree that the training atmosphere was well
organized and it enhanced the learning process.
VII. ANALYSIS OF TRAINING METHODS:
Majority (53%) of the respondents strongly agree that different methods of learning were
used in the training session.
Majority (55%) of the respondents strongly agree that the course material and the module
covered were sufficient.
VIII. ANALYSIS OF EVALUATION OF TRAINERS RESPONSE:
Majority (66%) of the respondents strongly agree that trainer was successful in
communicating and interacting with each individual.
Majority (52%) of the respondents strongly agree that their trainer was patient and
supportive when they were approached for doubts and clarifications.
98
Majority (56%) of the respondents strongly agree that trainer was impartial in giving
feedback to them.
IX. ANALYSIS OF PERCEIVED BENEFITS OF TRAINING:
Majority (57%) of the respondents strongly agree that they are motivated at their work
after training.
Majority (55%) of the respondents agree that training helps them to do their job better
after training.
Majority (48%) of the respondents strongly agree that they are valued by the company.
Majority (45%) of the respondents strongly agree that the training enables career
progress.
Majority (53%) of the respondents strongly agree that the training helps them to grow.
Majority (47%) of the respondents agree that the training program improved their skills,
knowledge and performance.
Majority (56%) of the respondents agree that training fostered team work, participation,
and co-operation among them.
Majority (65%) of the respondents strongly agree that they are able to attain the
objectives of the training.
Majority (51%) of the respondents agree that their improvement after the training was
considered and recognized by the company.
X. ANALYSIS OF PERCEIVED IMPACT OF THE TRAINING:
Majority (60%) of the respondents strongly agree that there is an impact of training on
pay.
Majority (52%) of the respondents strongly agree that there is an impact of training on
promotion.
Majority (56%) of the respondents strongly agree that there is an impact of training on
job ability.
Majority (49%) of the respondents strongly agree that there is an impact of training on
job security.
Majority (55%) of the respondents agree that there is an impact of training on future
employment prospects.
99
Majority (68%) of the respondents strongly agree that there is an impact on job
satisfaction.
Majority (58%) of the respondents strongly agree that there is an impact on training on
motivation.
XI. ANALYSIS OF TIME MANAGEMENT:
Majority (69%) of the respondents strongly agree that the duration of the training was
sufficient.
Majority (70%) of the respondents strongly agree that enough time has given to give
feedback.
XII. ANALYSIS OF EMPLOYEE SUGGESTION TOWARDS TRAINING:
Majority (57%) of the respondents strongly agree that they will recommend this training
program for others.
Majority (58%) of the respondents strongly agree that performance of the training was
excellent.
XIII. ANALYSIS OF OPINION OF EMPLOYEES FOR FURTHER IMPROVEMENT
OF TRAINING PROGRAM:
Majority (71%) of the respondents strongly agree that they would like to be cross trained
Majority (61%) of the respondents strongly agree that the company strategies need to be
emphasized.
Majority (63%) of the respondents strongly agree that there should be more consistency
in the training format and process.
Majority (60%) of the respondents strongly agree that there should be mandatory new
hire training period.
Chi-square analysis results reveal that gender has a significant impact on determining the
training needs of the employees and there is no significant impact of gender on the attitude of the
employees towards training activities.
100
CHAPTER – 6
101
SUGGESTIONSCHAPTER - 6
SUGGESTIONS
In today‘s competitive world, attitude is the factor which divides the line between failure and
success. Thus productivity of the employees improved not only by their skills and knowledge but
also by attitude of the employee. If an employee has a positive attitude then training for him can be
more effective, he has a positive effect on the climate.
The training records must be maintained, preserved properly and updated timely.
Proper care should be taken while selecting the trainers.
Trainers must be given continuous feedback and the training should be performed as a
continuous planned activity.
New and different trainers should be invited so that the maximum impact can be got from the
training programmes.
Coordination and interaction of the employees of all levels must be encouraged to locate new
talents among employees.
102
CHAPTER - 7
103
CONCLUSIONCHAPTER – 7
CONCLUSION
It is concluded that with the analysis of all the facts & figures, the observations during the training
period gives a very positive attitude regarding the training to the employees. The Thiruvalluvar
textile is performing its role up to the mark in the training activities and the trainees enjoy their work
and felt valued after the imparted training.
The training imparted meets the objectives like:
Effectiveness of training.
Assist the employees to acquire skills, knowledge and attitude and also enhance the same.
Helps to motivate employees and helps in avoiding mistakes.
104
It becomes quite clear that there is no other alternative or short cut to the development of human
resources. If we have to meet the challenges of technology, social and economic we have to train the
employees to their category at which they work in the organization.
105
APPENDIXQUESTIONNAIRE: APPENDIX – I
I. PERSONAL DETAILS:
1) Gender
1) Male
2) Female
2) Age:
106
1) below 20 yrs 2) 21-30 yrs
3) 31- 40 yrs 4) 41-50 yrs
5) >50 yrs
3) Educational Qualification
1) Degree 2) ITI
3) Diploma 4) School
5) Others
4) Experience:
1) below 2 yrs 2) 2-5 yrs
3) 5-8 yrs 4) 8-11 yrs
5) >11yrs
5) Current Salary:
1) below Rs.2000 2) Rs.2001- Rs.5000
3) Rs.5001- Rs.8000 4) Rs.8001- Rs.11000
5) > Rs.11000
Tick [✓] to state your level of agreeability towards your attitude about training program
on the likert scale rating from 1 to 5:
1 = "Strongly agree”
2 = “Agree”
3 = "Neither agree nor disagree”
4 = “Disagree”
5 = "Strongly disagree”
107
II. Pre-Training Activities: 1 2 3 4 5
6. My superior analyzed my strength and weakness to
determine the training needs.
7. I had an opportunity to decide about the training
methods & contents.
8. I had pre-course briefing with my superior.
9. My superior setup the objectives for the
performance improvement in advance.
III. During the training: 1 2 3 4 5
10. The objective of the training program is made
clear in the beginning of the training.
11. The training imparted is actually relevant to the
job requirement.
IV. Planning of the training 1 2 3 4 5
12. The training program was properly designed and
scheduled.
13. The superior has selected the employees for
training based on their performance.
14. The training program gave adequate knowledge
about job requirement and job responsibilities.
15. The dos and don’ts, rules and regulations were
clearly explained in the training session.
V. Post-Training Activities 1 2 3 4 5
16. Follow-up meeting after the training program is
conducted with the superior.
17. Opportunities are provided to apply the new
knowledge/skills that were learnt from the training.
108
18. I had necessary resources to apply the acquired
new skills/knowledge.
19. Superior supports through coaching & feedback.
VI. Training atmosphere 1 2 3 4 5
20. The timing of the session and venue of the
training was convenient.
21. The training atmosphere was well organized and
it enhanced the learning process.
VII. Training methods 1 2 3 4 5
22. Different methods of learning like lecture, exercise, group discussions and learning through games were used in the training sessions.23. The course material and the module covered were sufficient.
VIII. Evaluation of Trainers response: 1 2 3 4 5
24. The trainer was successful in communicating and
interacting with each individual.
25. The trainer was patient and supportive when
approached for doubts and clarification.
26. The trainer was impartial in giving feedbacks for
the participants.
IX. Perceived benefits of Training: 1 2 3 4 5
27. After training, I felt more motivated at work
28. Training helps me to do my job better
29. After training, I felt valued by the company
30. Training enables career progress
31. Training helps me to grow as a person
32. The training improved my skill, knowledge and
performance.
109
33. The training fostered teamwork, participation and
co-operation among the participants.
34. I was able to attain the objectives of the training.
35. On account of the training, my improvement was
considered and recognized in the organization.
X. Perceived Impact of Training: 1 2 3 4 5
36. Training has an impact on pay
37. Training has an impact on promotion
38. Training has an impact on job ability
39. Training has an impact on job security
40. Training has an impact on future employment
prospects
41. Training has an impact on job satisfaction
42. Training has an impact on motivation
XI. Time management 1 2 3 4 5
43. The overall duration of the training was
sufficient.
44. Enough time was given for the feedback from the
participants.
XII. Employees suggestion towards Training: 1 2 3 4 5
45. I will recommend this training for others.
46. The overall performance of the training was
excellent.
110
XIII. Opinion of Employees for the further
Improvement of Training:
1 2 3 4 5
47. I would like to be cross trained
48. Company strategy/goals need to emphasized
49. There should be more consistency with the
training format and process
50. There should be a mandatory new hire training
period
111
112
BIBLIOGRAPHYBIBLIOGRAPHY
Kothari.C.R., ‘Research Methodology’, New Age International Publishers, Second
Edition, ISBN (13): 978-81-224-2488-1
Robinson and Robinson, ‘Training for Impact’, ISBN 1-55542-1539.
Raymond A.Neo, ‘Employee Training and Development’, New Edition, ISBN-13:
9780073530345
John, ‘Hand Book of Training and Development’, Jaico publishing House (1993).
Ramasamy.N, ‘Training and Development’, T.R.Publications (1992).
WWW.GOOGLE.COM
WWW.AMAZON.COM
113