study on hybridization of existing thermal power stations...

35
Study on Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Stations with Solar Collection Fields and Local Manufacturing of CSP Components at Cairo University Faculty of Engineering April 1 st 2014 12-Sep-13

Upload: dinhmien

Post on 20-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Study on Hybridization of Existing

Thermal Power Stations with Solar

Collection Fields

and

Local Manufacturing of CSP

Components

at

Cairo University

Faculty of Engineering

April 1st 2014 12-Sep-13

Study on Hybridization of Existing

Thermal Power Stations with Solar

Collection Fields

12-Sep-13

Main Objective

Investigating the development of electricity generation with less fuel by integrating solar fields into existing conventional thermal power plants.

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

3

Basic Concept

Steam Power Plant

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

4

Fuel2 < Fuel1

Air2 < Air1

Fuel1

Air1

Fuel2

Air2 B

T

Water

Steam

P

B: Boiler T: Turbine P: Pump

Condenser

Combined Cycle Power Plant

Basic Concept

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

5

Fuel1

Air1

Fuel2

Air2

Exhaust

T

HRSG

B

P

Condenser

Steam

Water

Fuel2 < Fuel1

Air2 < Air1

B: Boiler T: Turbine P: Pump C: Compressor HRSG: Heat Recovery Steam Generator C.C: Combustion Chamber

Air

Fuel

C.C

C T

Basic Concept

Gas Power Plants

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

6

Air

Fuel C.C

C T

Exhaust

T: Turbine C: Compressor C.C: Combustion Chamber

• Inefficient

• Needs large

heat exchanger

surface area

Existing Plants (EEHC 2011/2012)

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

7

Steam, 13,002, 19, 43%

C.C, 10,103, 12, 34%

Gas, 3,642,

12, 12%

Hydro, 2,800, 5,

9%

Solar , 20, 1, 0%

Wind, 505, 1,

2%

Capacity (MW, #, %)

Steam, 74,527, 44%

C.C, 59,916,

35%

Gas, 15,771,

9%

Hydro, 19,622,

11%

Solar , 19, 0%

Wind, 1,504, 1%

Energy (GWh, %)

Steam, 17,252, 54%

C.C, 10,345,

33%

Gas, 4,263, 13%

Fuel Use (ktoe, %)

Plant types under consideration

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

8

Steam, 13,002,

19, 43%

C.C, 10,103,

12, 34%

Capacity (MW, #, %)

Steam, 74,527, 44%

C.C, 59,916,

35%

Energy (GWh, %)

Steam, 17,252, 54%

C.C, 10,345,

33%

Fuel Use (ktoe, %)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Capacity Factor

2. Plants Age

3. Topography of the Land

4. Direct Normal Irradiance DNI at the plants locations

5. Available Land Area

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

9

Exclusion Criteria

1- Capacity Factor

• Plants that have capacity factor less than 15% are excluded.

• No plants are excluded based on this criteria.

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

10

The ratio of the plant’s annual actual electrical output, to its

annual potential if it operated at full capacity.

Exclusion Criteria

2- Plants Age

• Plants that are older than 25 years are excluded.

• 7 plants are excluded:

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

11

Plant Type Age in 2013 (years)

Shoubra El-Kheima ST 26

Cairo West ST 34

Ataka ST 26

Abu Sultan ST 27

Kafr El-Dawar ST 27

Damanhour Steam ST 27

Assiut ST 46

Exclusion Criteria

3- Topography of the land

• Any plant with surrounding land that has a slope greater than 5% is excluded.

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

12

The slope of the power plant’s land.

• No plants are excluded based on this criteria.

Exclusion Criteria

4- Direct Normal Irradiance DNI at the plants locations

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

13

The amount of solar radiation received per unit area by a surface that is always held perpendicular to the rays that

come in a straight line from the direction of the sun.

Plants that have DNI less than 4 kWh/m2/day are excluded.

No plants are excluded based on this criteria.

Exclusion Criteria

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

14

5- Available Land Area

• Plants that do not have excess land area inside or outside their borders are excluded.

• 10 plants are excluded:

Plant Type Comment

Cairo West Ext. ST Surrounded by residential and agricultural area

Cairo North C.C Surrounded by residential area

Tebbin ST Surrounded by industrial and residential area

Talkha C.C Surrounded by residential and agricultural area

Talkha steam (210) ST Surrounded by residential and agricultural area

Talkha (750) C.C Surrounded by residential and agricultural area

Mahmoudia C.C Surrounded by agricultural area

El-Atf C.C Surrounded by agricultural area

Damanhour C.C C.C Surrounded by agricultural area

Abu Kir 150 ST Surrounded by agricultural area

Excluded Plants

# Criteria Number of excluded plants

1 Capacity Factor 0

2 Plants Age 7

3 Topography of the Land 0

4 Direct Normal Irradiance DNI at the plants locations

0

5 Available Land Area 10

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

15

Selected Plants

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

16

Steam,

3,584, 7, 12%

C.C, 6,065, 7,

20%

Capacity (MW, #, %)

Steam, 21,230 ,

12% C.C,

37,060 , 22%

Energy (GWh, %)

Steam, 4,664 , 15%

C.C, 6,521 , 20%

Fuel Use (ktoe, %)

Selected Plants

# Power Plant Plant Type Plant Capacity

(MW)

1 Cairo South I C.C 450

2 Cairo South II C.C 165

3 Damietta C.C 1,200

4 Arish ST 66

5 Oyoun Mousa ST 640

6 Nubaria (1,2,3) C.C 2,250

7 Damanhour Ext. ST 300

8 Sidi Krir 1,2 ST 640

9 Sidi Krir (C.C) C.C 750

10 Matrouh ST 60

11 Walidia ST 624

12 Kuraymat steam ST 1,254

13 Kuraymat 1 (C.C) C.C 750

14 Kuraymat 2 (C.C) C.C 500

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

17

Technology Assessment

Parabolic Trough

Advantages:

1. the most cost effective concentrating solar power technology.

2. Hybrid operation is already a commercially proven concept.

Power Tower

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

18

Advantages:

1. It utilizes the cheapest flat mirrors.

2. It is suitable for operation with all power cycles.

3. Higher temperatures lead to better efficiency of turbines at a conventional Rankine cycle.

Technology Assessment

Parabolic Trough

Disadvantages:

1. The temperature limits of 400-5000C leads to the production of steam suitable only for conventional Rankine cycles.

2. Lower temperatures obtained from these systems leads to efficiencies less than power tower and dish systems.

Power Tower

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

19

Disadvantages:

1. The technology is less mature than trough ones.

2. Land use efficiency is less than that of linear systems.

Technology Assessment

Parabolic Trough Power Tower

Land Use Factor 40% 25%

Optical Efficiency 70% 63%

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

20

Parabolic Trough Power Tower

Energy (GWh) 189 107

Capacity (MW) 51.9 29.2

Input

Output

Implementation Scenarios

• Scenario A: Only available land within the plants borders are used.

• Scenario B: Available land within and outside the plants borders are used.

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

21

B

A

Governing Equations

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

22

Governing Equations

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

23

Technical Assessment

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

24

58,290

189

810

1

10

100

1,000

10,000

100,000

Existing

Plants

Scenario A Scenario B

Energy (GWh) 9,649

52

222

1

10

100

1,000

10,000

Existing

Plants

Scenario A Scenario B

Capacity (MW)

11,185

35

161

1

10

100

1,000

10,000

100,000

Existing

Plants

Scenario A Scenario B

Fuel Use/Savings (ktoe)

Economic Assessment (Subsidized Fuel)

Scenario Investment ($) Annual

Savings ($)

Payback period (Years)

A 100,221,457 2,426,796 41.3

B 469,289,894 11,227,313 41.8

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

25

Economic Assessment (Fuel’s Market

Price)

Scenario Investment ($) Annual

Savings ($)

Payback period (Years)

A 100,221,457 14,819,977 6.8

B 469,289,894 68,563,034 6.8

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

26

Economic Assessment (Subsidized Fuel)

Scenario Investment ($) Annual

Savings ($)

Payback period (Years)

A 80,177,165 2,426,796 33

B 375,431879 11,227,313 33.4

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

27

Investments decrease by 20%

Economic Assessment (Fuel’s Market

Price)

Scenario Investment ($) Annual

Savings ($)

Payback period (Years)

A 80,177,165 14,819,977 5.4

B 375,431915 68,563,034 5.4

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

28

Investments decrease by 20%

Public Private Partnership (PPP)

• 1% contribution

• 5% contribution

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

29

Regulatory framework

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

30

Transmission and

distribution

networks

Loads

Generation

Co.

IPP

expansion

Bilateral

agreement

Exports

& Imports

MV & LV

Customers

Gov. PP

BOOT(s)

Generation

Co.(s)

Target Market

Phase one

HV

Customers

MV

Customers UHV

Customers

Dis

Co(s)

Private

Distributor

LV customers

ISP

ISP MOEE/EEHC

IPP expansion

Trans Co(s)

Exports

& Imports

MV & LV

Customers

Gov. PP

BOOT(s)

Generation

Co.(s)

IPP expansion

Trans Co(s)

HV

Customers

MV

Customers UHV

Customers

Dis

Co(s)

Private

Distributor

ISP

LV customers

ISP

Target Market

Proposed phase two

MOEE/EEHC

MOEE/EEHC

Exports

& Imports

Dis

Co(s) MV & LV

Customers RE: Gov PP

& IPP

…..

BOOT(s)

Generation

Co.(s)

IPP expansion

Trans. co.

Target market

proposed

phase

three

HV

Customers MV

Customers UHV

Customers

EEUCPRA

Ministry of Electricity and Energy

Independent Merchant Transmission & Distribution

ISP(s)

TSO

Possible demo implementations

• At current power plants in the industrial sector

1-Apr-14 Hybridization of Existing Thermal Power Plants with Solar Collection Fields

34