student tool choice in enquiry-based learning
DESCRIPTION
A presentation given at the international Pedagogic Research into Higher Education (PRHE) conference on 25th Oct 2010. Authors: Peter Dangerfield, Tünde Varga-Atkins, Ian Ellis, Louis Vitone Title: Student tool choice in enquiry-based learning: an activity theory analysis of a pilot project using an online social bookmarking tool (Diigo)TRANSCRIPT
Student tool choice in enquiry-based learning:
an activity theory analysis of a pilot project using
an online social bookmarking tool
Mon 25th October 2010, Session 2e, 2-3.30pmPRHE 2010
Peter DangerfieldTünde Varga-Atkins
Ian EllisLouis Vitone
Acknowledgements to CEDP (CETL in Developing Professionalism)
Social bookmarking
?
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
Browse others’ searches
Snowballing Common interests
Social bookmarking
Portable ‘favourites’ Toolbar – saving
weblinks quickly
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
Social bookmarking
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
Diigo – tag cloud
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
Context: the reflective professional EBL (PBL) & social bookmarking Aims: what influences student tool choice? Methods Findings Discussion
Session outline
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
EBL - PBL
1. Clarify terms from scenario
2. Define problem
3. Identify prior knowledge
4. Review steps 2 and 3
5. Form learning objectives
6. Individual study
7. Group sharing of private study
Wood, D (2003)
Scenario
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
PBL group – which step?
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
Analysis of problem: mind map
Mr Bridge56 Married
Stomach juices etc
Reluctant to change
Bad teeth
Clinical iceberg
OTC
Primary secondary tertiary
Life style advice
Stats for men women going to doctor
OTC
Chronic
Reluctant to go to doctor
History NHS 1948
Triggers to consultation
Roles staff (primary care team)
Acid reflex
Autonomy
Smokes and overweight (bad
life style)
Wife has ulcer
GIT tract
Endoscopy Biopsy Liver Gallbladder
Normal results
Sick role Standard deviation Normal
distribution
Blames beer curry
Vomiting
Symptoms associated with indigestion
Inflammatory response
Production of saliva
PeristalsisName teeth
Self medication
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
Skills needed for developing reflective professional: Independent learning skills; Need to be adept at information skills (search, retrieve,
store, evaluate and synthesise information) (McGee and Bee 2008);
Student characteristics: Diverse ICT skills; Most students use web2 for social life but not realise
potential for education (JISC/Ipsos Mori 2008, Trinder et al 2008, Boulous et al
2006);
Context
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
Rationale: activity frameworkPeopleTechniquesResources
Research PBL objectives
Student
Tools
Refle
ctive
pr
ofes
siona
lInform
ation
skills
Lifelong learning
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
What tools (people, techniques, resources) do students use to research their PBL?
Introduce an online social bookmarking tool. How do students engage with the social
bookmarking tool? How do they value such a tool for their PBL
enquiry?
Aims: can students’ PBL learning be enhanced?
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
Small scale study, pilot with first-year medics. Focus groups & interviews. Piloted ‘walkthrough interview’.
Online engagement and statistics. Email feedback. Used activity theory to help interpret and
organise findings.
Methods
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
What tools (people, techniques, resources) do students use to research their PBL?
How do students engage with the social bookmarking tool?
How do they value such a tool for their PBL enquiry?
Findings
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
What tools: individual resourcesFirst years
books
internet
library search
VLE resources
Anatomy booklets
lectures
Anatomy hands-on
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
What tools : talking to peopleFirst years
Senior peers
Friends,ex-school friends
PBL group
Anatomy staffLecturers
Family, relatives
PBL facilitator
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
What tools: learning techniques?
mnemonics
Note-takingdiagrams
drawings
mind maps cue-cards
quizzes
copying
reflecting
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
How students used Diigo: As bookmarking weblinks for themselves; As sharing tool;
Social bookmarking tool: Diigo
“Agile learners” Initially interested fail to see benefit of tool?[IT skill issues?/avoiders?]
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
Social bookmarking
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
Diigo – a group’s bookmarks
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
Use / no use
Difficult at first but got easier with use
I felt I had to get used to so many
things
Very complicated at start; easy once sorted but not
enough comments were made
Ineffective and cumbersome
We had our own system of sharing
information
Useful at first
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
Continuance theory (e.g. Chiu and Wang 2008, Lee 2010) What factors influence students’ continuing to use
technology? And what factors influence discontinuance ...?
Value of social bookmarking tool
Viewing technologies as ‘tools’ - metaphor is useful: it places control in students’ hands (Stevenson 2007)
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
In practice weblinks were: Shared via face to face discussions
instead or via email. Share in Facebook©
Stored in favourites on PC or in their hand-written PBL notebooks.
“We had our own way of sharing information“
Sharing weblinks: Diigo vs others
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
Tool choice: continuance
“We had our own way of sharing information“
Results of study: • first satisfaction with technology, • then perceived usefulness, • attitude, • concentration, and • perceived behavioural control
(necessary skills using technology) (Lee 2010)
“Useful at first“
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
“I felt I had to get used to so many
new things “
Tool choice: continuance
Results of study: • first satisfaction with technology, • then perceived usefulness, • attitude, • concentration, and • perceived behavioural control (necessary
skills using technology) (Lee 2010)
Ineffective and cumbersome
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
“Very complicated at start; easy once
sorted but not enough comments
were made“
Tool choice: continuance
Social influence: • Have people around adopted
technology?• They have an influence on continuance
and adoption. (contradicting Chiu and Wang 2008 and confirming Lee 2010).• Medical students: see importance of
(senior and current) peers.
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
Importance of Utility (and here not much web links to share); Social influence;
Diverse ICT experiences -> large influence on uptake Majority students show more conservative pattern of
adoption/continuance of technologies; But: some agile learners!
Lack of technology use for learning (vs social); Confirms studies such as Beetham et al 2009
Findings suggest:
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
Social bookmarking seems to be the least adopted web 2 technology (versus wikis and blogs) – why? Bookmarking about how individuals manage their notes,
resources ‘at home’? More difficult to shift?
Discussion 1
Battelemedia.com
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
Bookmarking has potential to enhance learning – but potential is not valued by students (at least in this stage in which they use books more than the web)
More appropriate in later in career? And will this change as technologies converge/advance?
Discussion 2
>
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
Students do share e.g. Facebook. Sharing is an informal activity and not just the act of
posting/storing a link; Not seen as being a controlled environment.
Discussion 3
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
Acknowledgements to CEDP (CETL)
The Road to the future?
Conclusions
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
QUESTIONS
Contact: [email protected]
STUDENT TOOL CHOICE IN ENQUIRY-BASED LEARNING DANGERFIELD & VARGA-ATKINS ET AL PRHE 2010 /35
Publications – previous project
• Developing professionalism through the use of wikis: a study with first-year undergraduate medical students. Medical Teacher 32(10), October. 2010
• HEA MEDEV subject centre newsletter. Spring 2010. (Issue 21) Using wikis to promote the personal and professional development of undergraduate medical students: a report for the CETL in Developing Professionalism