student success measures...common metrics and definitions data definitions for student success...
TRANSCRIPT
Student Success MeasuresYuba Community College District
Woodland Community College
Yuba College
Yuba Community College District
Overview
Building Teams
Development of Common Metrics and Definitions
Woodland Community College Student Success Measures
Yuba College Student Success Measures
Distance Education Report
Baselines for CCCCO Vision for Success
Research Team
Siria S. Martinez, Ph.D.
Dean of Student Success &
Institutional Effectiveness
Woodland Community College
Emma Blackthorne, PhD
Dean of Institutional
Effectiveness
Yuba Community College District
Jeremy Brown, ABD
Dean of Student Success and
Institutional Effectiveness
Yuba College
Building a Research Team
Creating a culture of data informed decision making
Effectively and efficiently respond to change
Effective in identification of new opportunities to support
outcomes
Facilitates the continued development of a culture of
collaboration throughout the district at all levels
Common Metrics and Definitions
Data Definitions for Student Success Measures
Significant outcome – using common measures across the district
Developed Student Achievement Metrics and Definitions aligned
to the Board of Trustee’s 8 Measures of Success
Using common reports and queries
Developed a Crosswalk between Answers Reports, Student
Achievement Metrics and the Board’s Adopted Measures of
Student Success
Student Success Measures
Presented by:
Dr. Siria S. Martinez
Presented by:
Jeremy Brown
College Readiness
College Readiness - English
35%40%
43%38%
55
99
132
116
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Percentage and Number of First Time College Students who First Enrolled at or Above College-Level in English Each Academic Year
Percent Number
Source: Custom SQL Query
College Readiness - English
18.1% 19.5% 18.4%22.7%
121
131
106
128
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
Percentage and Number of First-Time College Students who First Enrolled at or Above College-Level in English Each Academic Year
Percentage Number
Source: Custom SQL Query
College Readiness - Mathematics
34%36%
39%35%
75
103
123
93
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Percentage and Number of First-Time College Students who First Enrolled at or Above College-Level in Math Each Academic Year
Percent Number
Source: Custom SQL Query
College Readiness - Mathematics
16.0% 15.5% 15.5% 17.4%
107 104
89
98
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
Percentage and Number of First-Time College Students who First Enrolled at or Above College-Level in Math Each Academic Year
Percentage Number
Source: Custom SQL Query
Progression through Developmental
Courses
Progression through Developmental Courses
English
15%18%
14%
51
83 81
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Percentage and Number of Unprepared Students Who Successfully Complete the Degree Requirement in English within 2 Primary Terms
Percent Number
Source: Custom SQL Query
Progression through Developmental CoursesEnglish
15.1%18.0%
23.6%
153
179
208
0
50
100
150
200
250
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2014/15 2015/16 2016/17
Percentage and Number of Unprepared Students Who Successfully Complete the Degree Requirement in English within 2 Primary Terms
Percentage Number
Source: Custom SQL Query
Source: Custom SQL Query
5% 5% 6%
18
25
37
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Percentage and Number of Unprepared Students Who Successfully Complete the Degree Requirement in Math within 2 primary terms
Percent Number
Progression through Developmental
Courses Mathematics
Progression through Developmental CoursesMathematics
5.7% 7.4% 10.2%
59
7882
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2014/15 2015/16 2016/17
Percentage and Number of Unprepared Students Who Successfully Complete the Degree Requirement in Math within 2 Primary Terms
Percentage Number
Source: Custom SQL Query
Semester Course CompletionDisaggregated by Race/Ethnicity
Semester Course Completion
* 2017/18 Data is incomplete at this time.
Source: Answers – Enrollment Term to Term Comparison
* 2017/18 Data is incomplete at this time.
Source: Answers – Enrollment Term to Term Comparison
Semester Course Completion
70.6% 71.2% 72.7%
74.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18*
Annual Course Success Rate by Race/Ethnicity with Overall Comparison
American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Black or African American
Hispanic/Latinx Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander White
Two or more races Other/Unknown Overall
Successful Completion of Gateway
Courses
Successful Completion of Gateway Courses
English
78% 77% 78% 78%
133
217
251258
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Percentage and Number of Students Who Successfully Complete their First Attempt in the Degree Requirement for English
Percentage Number
Source: Custom SQL Query
Successful Completion of Gateway Courses English
Source: Custom SQL Query
70.7% 70.3% 69.3%71.7%
787
865
745 761
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
Percentage and Number of Students Who Successfully Complete their First Attempt in the Degree Requirement for English
Percentage Number
Successful Completion of Gateway Courses
Mathematics
Source: Custom SQL Query
69%
61%
67% 69%196 191
268
285
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Percentage and Number of Students Who Successfully Complete their First Attempt in the Degree Requirement for Math
Percentage Number
Successful Completion of Gateway Courses Mathematics
Source: Custom SQL Query
52.7% 51.5%56.0%
50.4%
497524
541
412
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
Percentage and Number of Students Who Successfully Complete their First Attempt in the Degree Requirement for Math
Percentage Number
Semester to Semester Persistence Fall to Spring
Semester to Semester Persistence
Source: Answers-Persistence Cohort Report by Term
71.6% 71.7% 71.1% 72.8%
270
327
392
420
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Percentage and Number of Entering Students Persisting from Fall to Spring within an Academic Year
Percent Number
Source: Answers – Persistence Cohort Report by Term
70.4% 70.9% 71.1%75.0%
743
680
621
569
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
Percentage and Number of Entering Students Persisting from Fall to Spring within an Academic Year
Percentage Number
Semester to Semester Persistence
Year to Year Persistence
Year to Year Persistence – Fall Entry
Source: Answers-Persistence Cohort Report
58.6%
53.3% 52.7%221
243
290
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Fall 2014 to 15 Fall 2015 to 16 Fall 2016 to 17
Percentage and Number of Entering Students Persisting from Fall in One Academic Year to Fall in the Next Academic Year
Percentage Number
Source: Answers – Persistence Cohort Report by Term
51.5% 51.2% 49.5%
544
491
433
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Fall 14 to 15 Fall 15 to 16 Fall 16 to 17
Percentage and Number of Entering Students Persisting from Fall in One Academic Year to Fall in the Next Academic Year
Percentage Number
Year to Year Persistence – Fall Entry
Year to Year Persistence – Spring Entry
33.7%
27.8%
39.6%35.2%
6549
80101
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Spring 2014 to 15 Spring 2015 to 16 Spring 2016 to 17 Spring 2017 to 18
Percentage and Number of Entering Students Persisting from Spring in One Academic Year to Spring in the Next Academic Year
Percentage Number
Source: Answers-Persistence Cohort Report
Source: Answers – Persistence Cohort Report by Term
32.7%36.7% 35.3%
39.3%
166
182
158
140
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Spring 14 to 15 Spring 15 to 16 Spring 16 to 17 Spring 17 to 18
Percentage and Number of Entering Students Persisting from Spring in One Academic Year to Spring in the Next Academic Year
Percentage Number
Year to Year Persistence – Spring Entry
Degree/Certificate Completion
Degree/Certificate Completion
Source: Answers – Academic Program - Graduates in a Date Range
324
401419
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017
Number of Students Earning a Degree or Certificate Each Year
757
710
813
2014/15 2015/16 2016/17
Number of Students Earning a Degree or Certificate Each Year
Source: Answers – Academic Program - Graduates in a Date Range
Aligns with CCCCO Vision for Success Goal #1 (Direct)
Degree/Certificate Completion
Transfer Readiness
Transfer Readiness
Source: Answers - Momentum Report
Aligns with CCCCO Vision for Success Goal #2 (Indirect)
178
205
236
0
50
100
150
200
250
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Number of Students who Achieve Transfer Ready Status Each Year
315
379
404
2014/15 2015/16 2016/17
Number of Students who Achieve Transfer Ready Status Each Year
Source: Answers - Momentum Report
Aligns with CCCCO Vision for Success Goal #2 (Indirect)
Transfer Readiness
Employment
Employment
5%
53%
17%22%
54%
9%
60%
11%
18%
69%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Self-Employed Employed at one job Employed at morethan one job
Unemployed Employed in a JobClosely Related tothe Field of Study*
Percentage of CTEOS Respondents Who Ended their Study at WoodlandCommunity College in 2014-15 within each Employment Category
Woodland Community College Statewide
Source: Cal-PASS Plus – Career & Technical Education Outcomes Survey (CTEOS)
* Aligns with CCCCO Vision for Success Goal #4 (Direct)
Source: Cal-PASS Plus – Career & Technical Education Outcomes Survey (CTEOS)
* Aligns with CCCCO Vision for Success Goal #4 (Direct)
7%
62%
15% 16%
63%
9%
60%
11%
18%
69%
Self-Employed Employed(one job)
Employed(multiple jobs)
Unemployed Employed in a JobClosely Related tothe Field of Study*
Percentage of CTEOS Respondents Who Ended their Study at Yuba College in 2014/15 within each Employment Category
Yuba College Statewide
Employment
Employment
Source: Cal-PASS Plus – Strong Workforce Program (SWP)
34%
41%
47%44%
50% 50% 52% 54%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016
Percentage of Skills-Builders and Completers who Earned a LivingWage within One Year of Exiting the College with a Statewide
Comparison
Woodland Community College Statewide
Source: Cal-PASS Plus – Strong Workforce Program (SWP)
42% 43%46%
51%
44%46%
50%52%
2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16
Percentage of Skills-Builders and Completers who Earned a Living Wage within One Year of Exiting the College with a Statewide Comparison
Yuba College State Median
Employment
DISTANCE EDUCATION
3-Year Trends
Board of Trustees Retreat
July 11, 2018
Presented by: Emma Blackthorne
YCCD Distance Education
3-Year FTES Trend
Source: Custom SQL Query
979 9551,008
350 347 380
0.00
200.00
400.00
600.00
800.00
1000.00
1200.00
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
FTES And Sections
DE FTES DE Sections
YCCD Distance Education
3-Year Course Success Rate
Source: Custom SQL Query
68.8%72.3% 71.6%71.20% 72.70% 74%72% 70% 70%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
2015_16 2016_17 2017_18
Course Success RatesSuccess Rate Yuba Average Success Rate Woodland Average Success Rate
2020 Vision for Success Baseline Looking forward
Vision for Success: CCCCO Six Measures
1. Increase by at least 20% annually students acquiring Associate degrees, certificates,
or specific skills sets that prepare them for an in-demand job
2. Increase by 35% the number of students transferring annually to a UC or CSU
3. Decrease the average number of units to complete
4. Increase the percent of exiting CTE students who report being employed in their field
of study
5. Reduce equity gaps across all measures among traditionally underrepresented student
groups
6. Reduce regional achievement gaps across all measures among colleges located in
regions with educational attainment of adults
CCCCO Vision -- CompletersMIS Data Mart District Completion
Goal: Increase by at least 20% annually students acquiring Associate degrees, certificates, or specific skills sets that prepare them for an in-demand job
District
Completers
Increase by at least 20% annually
students acquiring Associate
degrees, certificates, or specific
skills sets that prepare them for
an in-demand job
Source: CCCCO CalPassPlus
CCCCO Vision – Transfer Data Source: University of California InfoCenter &
The California State University Institutional Research Dashboard
Goal: Increase by 35% the number of students transferring annually to a UC or CSU
District: New Enrollments at UC 2017
Source: UC InfoCenter
APPROXIMATE
DISTRICT UC
TRANFER
RATE:
11%
Increase by 35% the number of students transferring
annually to a UC or CSU
District:
New Enrollments at CSU 2016
Source: CSU Institutional Research Dashboard
APPROXIMATE
DISTRICT CSU
TRANFER
RATE:
39%
Increase by 35% the number of students transferring
annually to a UC or CSU
District Transfer Approximation
CSU and UC
49%
CCCCO Vision – Decrease Units Goal: Decrease the average number of units to complete
District: Decrease Units to Complete
Completion by Design & Guided Pathways,
Enrollment management, and
Degree audit projects will be paramount to achieve
the overall goal.
CCCCO Vision – CTE Employed In
Field of StudyData Source: CalPassPlus Launch Board
Goal: Increase the percent of exiting CTE students who report being
employed in their field of study statewide to 69%
District: Employed
in Field of Study
Increase the percent of exiting CTE
students who report being employed in
their field of study statewide to 69%
CCCCO Vision – CTE EmploymentForecasts 2014-2024
Middle-Skills and Entry-Level
Goal: Increase the percent of exiting CTE students who report being
employed in their field of study.
Regional Entry-
Level Employment
Sutter/Yuba
This is the job market for prospective
employees who are nonskilled
workers.
Living Wage for Sutter/Yuba Counties:
1 Adult: $11.40/hr $23,712
+Child: $24.91/hr $51,813
Regional Entry-Level
Employment
Yolo
This is the job market for prospective
employees who are nonskilled
workers.
Living Wage for Yolo County:
1 Adult: $12.77/hr $26,561
+Child: $26.81/hr $55,765
Regional Entry-Level
Employment
Lake
This is the job market for prospective
employees who are nonskilled
workers.
Living Wage for Lake County:
1 Adult: $11.04/hr $22,963
+Child: $25.10/hr $52,208
Regional Middle-
Skill Employment
Capital Region
This is the job market for prospective
employees after participating in YCCD
programs.
Living Wage for Yolo County:
1 Adult: $12.77/hr $26,561
+Child: $26.81/hr $55,765
Living Wage for Sutter/Yuba Counties:
1 Adult: $11.40/hr $23,712
+Child: $24.91/hr $51,813
Regional Middle-
Skill Employment
Lake
This is the job market for prospective
employees after participating in YCCD
programs.
Living Wage for Lake County:
1 Adult: $11.04/hr $22,963
+Child: $25.10/hr $52,208
CCCCO Vision – Equity GapsMIS Data Mart Equity Gaps
Goal: Reduce achievement equity gaps across all measures among
traditionally underrepresented student groups
Completer Equity Gaps
Source: CCCCO CalPassPlus
CCCCO Vision – Regional Equity Gaps
Goal: Reduce regional achievement gaps across all measures among
colleges located in regions with educational attainment of adults
Any Questions?