structural health monitoring - uta.edu talks/lewis talk shm 09.pdf · structural health monitoring...

12
Automation & Robotics Research Institute (ARRI) The University of Texas at Arlington F.L. Lewis, Fellow IEEE, Fellow IFAC, Fellow UK InstMC Moncrief-O’Donnell Endowed Chair Head, Controls & Sensors Group http://ARRI.uta.edu/acs [email protected] Structural Health Monitoring Rytter’s Levels: Worden et al. 2009 Machine Learning Methods of Learning supervised unsupervised reinforcement classification SHM defect Interrogate (active or passive) Change in property Material Sample sensors Property Changes: visual acoustic temperature, pressure thermal conductance properties magnetic props global props.- Modal- stiffness, vibration freqs local props – local vibration freqs, impedance strain, stress force causes AE stress waves wave propagation properties – scattered, reflected, freq content Model-based Data-based DSP filter, preprocess, detrend Feature extraction Decision-making Bayes NN fuzzy rule-based Diagnosis & Prognosis Detection Classification Localization Assessment Prediction Fault Types Composites Matrix (resin) crack Delamination Fibre breaks Metals Material Defects Corrosion Crack Fatigue System Defects Rivet Failure Surface Ice Detection Methods Vibration (LF- wavelength >> plate thickness) global- LF - changes in structural props- stiffness, vibr. freqs. local- HF – changes in res. freqs., impedance Sonic Ultrasound (HF- wavelength << thickness) Acoustic Emission (mid freq.- wavelength ~ thickness) Wave Propagation (single freq waves) Strain, Stress X-Ray Visual Thermal Magnetic

Upload: hadang

Post on 28-Jun-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Automation & Robotics Research Institute (ARRI)The University of Texas at Arlington

    F.L. Lewis, Fellow IEEE, Fellow IFAC, Fellow UK InstMCMoncrief-ODonnell Endowed Chair

    Head, Controls & Sensors Group

    http://ARRI.uta.edu/[email protected]

    Structural Health Monitoring

    Rytters Levels:

    Worden et al. 2009

    Machine Learning

    Methods of Learningsupervisedunsupervisedreinforcement

    classification

    SHM

    defect

    Interrogate (active or passive)

    Change in propertyMaterialSample

    sensors

    Property Changes:visualacoustictemperature, pressurethermal conductance propertiesmagnetic propsglobal props.- Modal- stiffness, vibration freqslocal props local vibration freqs, impedance

    strain, stressforce causes AE stress waves

    wave propagation properties scattered, reflected, freq content

    Model-basedData-based DSP

    filter, preprocess, detrendFeature extraction

    Decision-makingBayesNNfuzzyrule-based

    Diagnosis & PrognosisDetectionClassificationLocalizationAssessmentPrediction

    Fault Types

    CompositesMatrix (resin) crackDelaminationFibre breaks

    MetalsMaterial Defects

    CorrosionCrackFatigue

    System Defects Rivet FailureSurface Ice

    Detection Methods

    Vibration (LF- wavelength >> plate thickness)global- LF - changes in structural props- stiffness, vibr. freqs. local- HF changes in res. freqs., impedance

    SonicUltrasound (HF- wavelength

  • Electromagnetic spectrumhttp://imagers.gsfc.nasa.gov/ems/waves3.html

    Sound

    Frequency in Hz

    Wavelength (STP at sea level)

    20 200 2,000 20,000

    Infrasound Ultrasound

    Humans DogsElephants

    100,000

    Cats

    BatsDolphins

    200,0005

    50m 10m 1m 10cm 1cm 1mm

    Sound

    Frequency in Hz

    Wavelength (STP at sea level)

    20 200 2,000 20,000

    Infrasound Ultrasound

    Humans DogsElephants

    100,000

    Cats

    BatsDolphins

    200,0005

    50m 10m 1m 10cm 1cm 1mm

    Acoustic Spectrum

    Sensor Modalities

    Overlap in freqs!

    Transmission depends on the medium

    Sensors Based on Physical Transduction Principles

    Mechanical SensorsPiezoresistive Effect converts an applied strain to a change in resistance Piezoelectric Effect converts an applied stress (force) to a potential difference. PZTCapacitive Sensors convert displacement (force) into change in capacitance

    Magnetic and Electromagnetic Sensors do not require direct physical contactHall Effect. Magnetic field applied perpendicular to current flow causes induced voltageMagnetic Field Sensors detect metallic objectsEddy Current Sensors use magnetic probe coils to detect defects in metallic structures

    F.L. Lewis, Wireless Sensor Networks, in Smart Environments: Technologies, Protocols, Applications, Chapter 2, ed. D.J. Cook and S.K. Das, Wiley, New York, 2005.

    Thermal Sensors measure temperature or heat fluxThermo-Mechanical Transduction. Heat causes thermal expansionThermoresistive Effects. Resistance R changes with temperature TThermocouples. Junctions of two different metals at different temperatures causes current flowResonant Temperature Sensors. Temp change in some materials causes a change in resonant frequency

    Optical Transducers. Convert various properties to lightOptical fiber interferometers and gratings changes in length (strain), temp. cause changes in phaseOptical fiber accelerometers based on time of flight

    Acoustic SensorsUltrasound. High Frequency. Can penetrate structures. Reflected and scattered from defectsAcoustic Wave Sensors

    surface acoustic wave (SAW), thickness-shear mode (TSM), flexural plate wave (FPW), or acoustic plate mode (APM)

    PiezoelectricSensor- develops a voltage difference across two of its faces when compressed Actuator- physically changes shape when an external electric field is applied

    PyroelectricHeat Sensor- Develops a voltage difference across two of its faces when it experiences a temperature change.

    TEMP. COMPENSATION

    Ferroelectric-Has a spontaneous electric polarization (electric dipole) which can be reversed in the presence of an electric field.

    PZT - Lead zirconate titanate

    X-rayVisualCoherent OpticsFiber optics no EMI, lightweight, low noise, high BW

    InterferometryFiber Bragg Grating - FBG

    Thermography - IRMagnetics

    Eddy currenta coil induces eddy currents in a conductive sampledefects cause change in the impedance of the sample

    Interrogation / Interaction Modalities

    Group 1

  • Ultrasound HF (5 MHz)wavelength > thickness

    Group 4- Strain, Stress

    Force on defect causes AE stress waves

    wikipediaLamb Waves

    Elastic waves that propagate in a solid thin plate

    2-D Wave equation

    solutions split into two sets of waves-symmetric & antisymmetric

    Irradiate entire thicknessPropagate substantial distances

    S0 Extensional mode

    A0 Flexural mode

    wavelength ~ thickness

    s0 Scattered and reflected by crack

    a0 Detects delamination

    A major challenge and skill in the use of Lamb waves for ultrasonic testing is the generation of specific modes at specific frequencies that will propagate well and give clean return "echoes". This requires careful control of the excitation and identification of the correct waves.

  • Eddy-coil EM actuatordischarges capacitor through a coil, induces pulsed magnetic field in conductive sample,generates a forceneeds 1-10 J

    Passive vibration monitoring-in-flight aircraft vibration freqs are very lowsuccessful in a boat hull monitoring application

    Actuation / Interrogation

    Active vs. Passive

    PZT actuator

    Active -

    Actuator interrogation signalsBurst sinusoids

    kk-N

    has DFT

    Square window DFT swamps out the signal DFT

    time freq

    Square window

    Hamming window

    Hann window

    FFT of burst sinusoids with: time freq

  • Chaotic Interrogator Actuation Todd et al. 2009

    Actuation by Lorenz Signal

    Signals received atsensors

    Sensor 1 Sensor 2

    Actuator and Sensor Locations

    Based on Physical ModelsFEA or dynamics model

    Based on Engineering KnowledgeTodd et al. 2009FBG sensors on Boat waterjet

    Worden & Manson 2009CR = actuatorCi= PZT sensors

    3 sensor networks based onknown damage regions

    Ihn & Chang 2004Sensors along a rivet joint andBuilt into a composite skin

    c.f. human nervous system proprioceptors

    Deploy at Hot SpotsDeploy over a Large Area-

    limits the frequencies and interrogation methods

    No methodical procedures

    Aircraft wing

    Features

    Time momentsFrequency domain properties-

    Resonant freqs, sidebandsPower content in specific frequency bandsTransmissibilities

    Strain, stress

    Transmissibility from sensor j to sensor i

    ( )( )( )

    iij

    j

    PSDTPSD

    =

    Do DFT for sensor i signal

    actuatorSensor i

    Do DFT for sensor j signal

    Sensor j

    ( )ijT

    Time-Varying Frequency ContentShort Time Fourier Transform Windowed DFT

    time

    frequency

    Must select window lengthMust use good window w(n) - Hamming, Hann

    WaveletDoes not need windowMulti-resolution analysis

    Hilbert-Huang Transform (HHT)

    2 ( 1)( 1)/

    ( 1)( , ) ( ) ( )

    tj k n N

    n t NX k t x n w t n e

    =

    = STFTSpectrogram

    Wavelet xformScaleogram

    Basic or mother wavelettime

    freq

  • Fault detection & Identification

    Model-Basedmake physical model using FEA or physics-based methodsdetermine comparison metriclook for departures of real measured data from the model

    Data-Basedbased on moments, freq response, or statisticsestablish normal operating limits basedestablish abnormality thresholdsdepartures indicate faults

    Both methods look for departures from the normthis means Statistical Pattern Recognitionpreprocessing of data, filter, detrendoutlier rejection

    Variations of available empirical and deterministic fatigue crack propagation models are based on Paris formula:

    Where: = instantaneous length of dominant crack = running cyclesCo, n = material dependent constants = range of stress intensity factor over one loading cycle

    ( )no KCdNda

    =

    e.g. Deterministic Crack Propagation Modelse.g. Deterministic Crack Propagation Models

    Physical Modeling

    Dr. George Vachtsevanoshttp://icsl.gatech.edu/icsl

    Ihn and Chang 2004

    Lamb Waves

    Must focus on ONE frequency

  • Nascent freq

    Where is the right Lamb wave?

    Use s0 for cracksUse a0 for composite delamination

    Group velocity Dispersion

    From FEA for the specific material G

    roup

    vel

    ocity

    Frequency

    s0 arrives before a0 below 600kHz

    Time

    Freq

    uenc

    y

    s0 a0

    Optimal sensor location wrt crack

    Ihn and Chang 2004Smart Suitcase

    Acellent Technol. Smart patch

    Rivet failure

    Cracks0

    Debonda0

    Composite faults

    Acellent Smart Layer

    a0

    s0

    debond

    crack

    Dam

    age

    inde

    xD

    amag

    e in

    dex

  • Tomography- imaging by sections using wave energy2D or 3D images

    x-ray CTgammaelectron

    Reconstruction algorithmsfiltered back projectioniterative reconstruction

    ART- algebraic reconstruction techniques(Kaczmarcz algorithm)

    wikipediaCardiac CT scan

    s0 energy- compute energy up to MAXIMUM PeakUse RMS value for tomographic reconstruction

    Sticky gum to hold sensors?

    Split plate into a uniform gridMount sensors at grid points400 sensors!

    Freq = 500 kHz

    Uniform angular sampling of plate with few sensors

    Improved sensor placement

    Wide band Lamb wavesExcitation rectangular impulse 10 microsec wideExcites Lamb waves covering a broad frequency spectrum

    Used Kohonen NN to classify damage

    Compensate for Propagation- amplitude A with distance x

    Hickman et al. 1991

    LF vibration 1-5 kHz

    Defects cause energy redistribution in freq. spectrogram

    FEA

    Rivet removal and cracks both lower the HF content

    Select Features?

  • 24 sq. plate, 0.08 thick

    Eddy coilActuator1-10 J

    Screwsaroundedges

    Sensor placement determined experimentally!

    Compute features for each sensor

    Best Features:Energy distribution- Power in specific freq bands

    3-4PZT sensors

    NN classification?

    Features-Energy distribution- Power in specific freq bands

    1-1.5 kHz

    1.5-3 kHz

    Rivet failuresCracksicing

    Power in freq range 1-1.5 kHz

    Pow

    er in

    freq

    rang

    e 1.

    5-3

    kHz

    Aircraft Monitoring Wing cuff

    1. Damage detection

    EDS

    EDS= Electrodynamic shakerLF EM Vibration at 1-2 kHzCompute DFT

    4 PZT sensors

    Transmissibility from sensor j to sensor i

    ( )( )( )

    iij

    j

    PSDTPSD

    =

    1 2

    3

    4

    panel

    Damaged panels

  • Features = power in specific freq bands

    Classification and departure detectionNNclustering (K-means, NN)outlier analysis using norm distance measure

    Training data Set and Validation Set

    Unsupervised learning for fault detection

    Band 1 Band 2

    No fault

    crack

    2. Damage Location

    Network of sensors

    Damage = remove panels

    CR = PZT actuatorCi = PZT sensors

    NN MLP classifier competitive learning

    Supervised learning for fault classification or fault location

    Actuator and sensor locations based onKNOWN possible fault locations

    4 networks with 1 actuator and 3 sensors

    Fiber Bragg Grating FBG

    Interrogate length scales in the mm rangeNo EMILightweightCan be directly photo written into silica fiber using UVEmbed inside composites

    2r nT =n= fiber core model index, T= grating period

    Axial compression or tension changes T can measure strain

    Boat Hull Monitoring passive wave excitationJoint Degradation active excitation - EDS

    about 0.1-0.3 nm

    A-K= 11 sensor arrays56 sensors in allRosette= 3-D sensor?

    Boat Hull Monitoring

    Passive excitation

    Sensor placementhull monitoringwaterjet monitoring

  • Discrete wavelet transformSet scale factor equal to 2j

    Feature selectionSelect specific levels only

    No defect

    Defect

    1024

    516256

    128

    1996 IEEE Ultrasonics Symp.

    Changes in time delay and freq due to physical quantity y(t)

    Interrogation freqs 434MHz = 5-10 m RFID range2.5 GHz = 1-2 m RFID range

    SAW + RFID

    Gate this part = 1-2 micro sec

    Sensitive to y(t) = temp., displacementy(t)= strain, force, accel. needs proper packaging

    Haiying Huang, ME Dept, UTA

    Passive induction coupling-remote interrogation

    Res f

    req f 01

    Res freq f10

    Strain causesRes freq shift

    Patch Antenna

    Crack Monitoring Haiying Huang, ME Dept, UTA

    Res f

    req f 01

    Res freq f10