strengthening kee management institutions to …

STRENGTHENING KEE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTIONS TO

ACHIEVE MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH A

MULTISTAKEHOLDER APPROACH AND

STRENGTHENING BASELINE DATA OF HIGH BIODIVERSITY

OUTSIDE CONSERVATION AREAS

Grant Final Report

Perkumpulan Aliansi Relawan untuk Penyelamatan Alam (ARuPA)

Date of Report: April 23, 2021

DISCLAIMER :

This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States

Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this (specify) are the sole

responsibility of Perkumpulan ARuPA and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the

United States Government

i

STRENGTHENING KEE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTIONS TO ACHIEVE

MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH A MULTISTAKEHOLDER

APPROACH AND STRENGTHENING BASELINE DATA OF HIGH

BIODIVERSITY OUTSIDE CONSERVATION AREAS

Grant Final Report

Perkumpulan Aliansi Relawan untuk Penyelamatan Alam (ARuPA)

Grant agreement No. TT1.2-GRA-C3-8

Grant Period of Performance: May 01, 2020 – April 30, 2021

Date of Report: April 23, 2021

This publication was prepared by Perkumpulan ARuPA for Chemonics International for activities

completed under Contract No. AID-497-TO-16-00002

ii

CONTENTS

ABBREVIATION ...................................................................................................................... iii

Section I – Technical .................................................................................................................. 1

A. Summary of Grant Activity Goals and Objectives .......................................................... 1

B. Summary of Grant Activity Achievements ...................................................................... 3

C. Description of Any Activities/Milestones Not Completed .......................................... 27

D. Lessons Learned and Recommendations ...................................................................... 27

E. Grant Success Stories .................................................................................................... 28

F. Product/documents resulted from grants activities ...................................................... 29

Section II - Financial ................................................................................................................. 30

A. Description of grant activity funding ............................................................................. 30

B. Summary of Grant Activity Costs and Payments .......................................................... 30

C. Explanation of higher or lower than anticipated costs ................................................. 31

iii

ABBREVIATION

Acronym Definition

APBD Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah

APBDes Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Desa

ARuPA Aliansi Relawan untuk Penyelamatan Alam

BBKSDA Balai Besar Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam

BBL Bening Bening Lobster

BIJAK Bangun Indonesia untuk Jaga Alam demi Keberlanjutan

BPBD Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah

BPEE Bina Pengelolaan Ekosistem Esensial

BTNAP Balai Taman Nasional Alas Purwo

BUMDes Badan Usaha Milik Desa

BTS Batas

CDK Cabang Dinas Kehutanan

CSO Civil Society Organization

CSR Corporate Social Responsibility

DD Dana Desa

DID Dana Insentif Daerah

DISHUT Dinas Kehutanan

F Female

FGD Focus Group Discussion

GPS Global Positioning System

KEE Kawasan Ekosistem Esensial

KEE MK Pulau Masakambing

KEE TP Teluk Pangpang

KEE TK Pantai Taman Kili Kili

KEE UP Mangrove Ujungpangkah

KSDAE Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam dan Ekosistem

M Male

MoEF Ministry of Environment and Forestry

MPA Marine Protection Area

OPD Organisasi Perangkat Daerah

Si Merak Ati Sistem Informasi Manajemen Area dan Keanekaragaman Hayati

Jawa Timur.

SKW Seksi Konservasi Wilayah

SMCA Spatial Multi Criteria Analysis

R & D Research and Development

TAHUJA Tata Hubungan Kerja

TCA Transmission Channel Analysis

ToT Training of Trainer

USAID United States Agency for International Development

1

Section I – Technical

A. Summary of Grant Activity Goals and Objectives

Since ARuPA was awarded the grant in May 2020, ARuPA has collaborated with the East Java Office

for Natural Resources Conservation (BBKSDA) and East Java Forestry Service (Dinas Kehutanan), to

implement a pilot activity to improve the effectiveness of the management of essential ecosystem

areas (KEE) at the site level. The piloting focused on strengthening the institutional design of the KEE

managers and the KEE management plans at KEE Teluk Pangpang, Banyuwangi. Teluk Pangpang is a

coastal area with mangrove forests with an area of + 1,663.71 hectares. Teluk Pangpang has been

designated as a KEE on July 27, 2020, through the East Java Governor Decree No. 188/338 / KPTS /

013/2020. The focus/objectives of the piloting activities in Banyuwangi is to:

▪ Assessing the need for strengthening the effectiveness of KEE management;

▪ Strengthen the multi-stakeholder forum for KEE management based on the results of

stakeholder mapping;

▪ Update the KEE area arrangement map

▪ Update KEE management documents.

After three months of piloting, the new approach taken by AruPA at the KEE Teluk Pangpang has

been approved by East Java BBKSDA and Forestry Service. The new approach focused on strengthen

and provide more intensive stakeholder collaboration, clarify roles and functions among forum

members on KEE management, and serve as a foundation to achieve the effectiveness on KEE

management. Based on this approach, East Java BBKSDA and East JavaForestry Service need to

replicate good practices from KEE Teluk Pangpang to three additional locations. Due to the success

of the KEE pilot in Teluk Pangpang, the project will expand the pilot activities to strengthen the

effectiveness of KEE management in three additional KEE locations, which are (l) KEE Mangrove

Ujung Pangkah in Gresik, (2) KEE Pantai Taman Kili Kili in Trenggalek, and (3) KEE Pulau

Masakambing in Sumenep.

The objective of this grant was to improve the effectiveness of KEE management at the field level by

promoting a multistakeholder management approach. The grant activity was implemented by

working with stakeholders to strengthen KEE management institutions, strengthen the KEE

management documents according to effectiveness measurements, conduct analysis of KEE

management financing options from local government agencies and stakeholders, and determine the

roles and responsibilities, and working relationship between involved stakeholders. The selected

pilot locations were in KEE Teluk Pangpang in Banyuwangi, KEE Ujung Pangkah in Gresik, KEE Pantai

Taman Kili-kili in Trenggalek and KEE Masakambing in Sumenep. The grant also worked to

strengthen the process of identification and verification (inver) of high biodiversity areas outside

conservation areas in East Java. The biodiversity inventory will strengthen the achievement of the

East Java Province target to identify and verify 225.000 hectares of high biodiversity areas.

The main objectives of this project were:

1. Assess the need for strengthening the institution of the KEE multi-stakeholder forum

2. Strengthening the institutional functions to achieve the effectiveness of KEE management.

3. Increasing the capacity of forum members and community groups in managing KEE

4. Implementing the inventory of high biodiversity areas outside the conservation area

5. Sharing knowledge on the effectiveness of KEE management

To achieve these objectives, ARuPa carried out several activities:

Phase I May-Nov 2020

Location: KEE Teluk Pangpang Banyuwangi

2

Activities:

1. Consolidation meeting with BPEE

2. Consolidation and socialization program

3. Research - Stakeholder study of KEE Teluk Pangpang

4. Multi-stakeholder workshop to present results of stakeholder mapping and KEE

management gap analysis

5. Training of KEE management through a multi-stakeholder approach and dissemination of

KEE regulations and conceptions to the stakeholders

6. Writing workshop to integrate institutional strengthening options for the KEE management

forum members into the draft KEE decree

7. Stakeholder workshop to present the proposed revised KEE decree

8. Technical meetings to develop a work plan to map and verify the KEE area

9. Mapping and field verification on KEE management area

10. Producing an updated map of the KEE management area

11. Collecting data and identify opportunities to improve ecosystem function, maximize wildlife

protection, and contribute to community livelihoods

12. Social Assessment for the community around KEE Teluk Pangpang

Phase II Dec 2020 – Apr 2021

Location:

▪ KEE Teluk Pangpang Banyuwangi

▪ KEE Mangrove Ujungpangkah Gresik

▪ KEE Pantai Taman Kili Kili Trenggalek

▪ KEE Pulau Masakambing Sumenep

Activities:

1. Preparation for Pilot Activities

1.1. Internal preparation meeting for the program implementation team

2. Assess the need for strengthening the institution of the KEE multi-stakeholder

forum

2.1. Workshop on planning and drafting research designs

2.2. Stakeholders mapping studies for 3 KEE Mangrove Ujungpangkah (UP), Pulau Masakambing

(MK), Pantai Taman Kili Kili (TK) area

2.2.1. Desk research

2.2.2. Field data collecting for Stakeholders mapping studies

2.2.3. Data analysis and report writing of stakeholders mapping results

2.3. Policy and fiscal incentive opportunity studies in local government for KEE UP, MK, TK

management


2.3.2. Field data collecting in Policy and fiscal incentive opportunity studies

2.3.3. Data analysis and report writing in policy and fiscal incentive opportunity studies

2.4. Biodiversity inventory in KEE UP, MK, TK


2.4.2. Field data collection Biodiversity inventory in KEE

2.4.3. Data analysis and report writing in KEE biodiversity potential.

2.5. Data analysis and report writing in socio-economic assessment in KEE


2.5.2. Field data collection in Socio-Economic Assessment in KEE

2.5.3. Data analysis and report writing in socio-economic assessment in KEE

3. Strengthening the institutional functions to achieve the effectiveness of KEE

management

3.1. KEE management document development of KEE Teluk Pangpang (TP)

3

3.1.1. Development of KEE Telung Pangpang management document

3.1.2. Stakeholders consultation of KEE Teluk Pangpang management document

3.2. KEE area arrangement of KEE UP, MK, TK

3.2.1. Field mapping & verification of KEE UP

3.2.2. Field mapping & verification of KEE MK

3.2.3. Field mapping & verification of KEE TK

3.3. Development map of area arrangement/blocking of 3 KEE area

3.4. Consolidation meeting of KEE forum for strengthening of KEE institutional and management

document

3.4.1. Consolidation meeting of KEE TP Forum phase 1 & 2

3.4.2. Consolidation meeting of KEE UP Forum phase 1 & 2

3.4.3. Consolidation meeting of KEE MK Forum phase 1 & 2

3.4.4. Consolidation meeting of KEE TK Forum phase 1 & 2

3.4.5. Writing workshop for finalizing institutional and management document of KEE UP,

MK, TK, TP phase 1 & 2

4. Increasing the capacity of forum members and community groups in managing

4.1. Strengthening the utilization of KEE to support village potential-based KEE management

objectives

4.1.1. Silvofishery training

4.1.2. Ecotourism development training in the KEE area

4.1.3. Writing workshop and assistance for drafting the ecotourism business plans of KEE TP

4.1.4. Writing workshop and assistance for drafting the ecotourism business plans of KEE UP

4.1.5. Writing workshop and assistance for drafting the ecotourism business plans of KEE

MK

4.1.6. Writing workshop and assistance for drafting the ecotourism business plans of KEE TK

5. Implementing the inventory of high biodiversity areas outside the conservation area

5.1. Development of Biodiversity Information System in East Java Province

5.2. Development module for biodiversity inventory training

5.3. Training of trainer (ToT) for biodiversity inventory team

5.4. Spatial Multi-Criteria Analysis (SMCA) for developing the indicative map of high biodiversity

area

5.5. The collection of repository secondary data

5.6. Field data collection for high biodiversity 17 locations in the East Java

5.7. Data consolidation of ground check results and secondary spatial data

5.8. High biodiversity map finalization and writing report of high biodiversity inventory

B. Summary of Grant Activity Achievements

Overall, ARuPA has achieved all the targets that have been determined in the planning. Here is a

summary of the achievements and detail of activities during the project:

B.1 Summary of Achievements

No Indicator name Target Actual

Note

(to describe the achievements or justification of not achieved

target)

The number of studies

that were conducted on

the need to strengthen

KEE management in the

targeted area.

4 4 • Executive summary and report of stakeholders

mapping

• Executive summary and report of policy and fiscal

incentive opportunity studies

• Executive summary and report of KEE biodiversity

potential

4


Note


target)

• Executive summary and report of socio-economic

assessment in KEE

ARuPA has handed over the study reports to beneficiaries

on April 20, 2021, in Aston Hotel Surabaya. The

beneficieries are:

• KEE Teluk Pangpang Forum

• KEE Mangrove Ujungpangkah Forum

• KEE Pulau Masakambing Forum

• KEE Pantai Taman Kili Kili Forum

• The East Java BBKSDA

• The East Java Forestry Service

• BPEE

The number of

institutions that have

received data,

information, or tools

related to biodiversity

protection and/or

sustainable landscape

developed by ARuPA

through USAID BIJAK

support,

8 11 ARuPA has handed over the study reports to beneficiaries

on April 20, 2021, in Aston Hotel Surabaya. The

beneficieries are:

• BPEE, the Directorate of Management of Essential

Ecosystem, Indonesian Ministry of Environment and

Forestry;

• DISHUT Jawa Timur, East Java Provincial Forestry

Service;

• BBKSDA Jawa Timur, the East Java Agency for

Conservation of Natural Resources;

• Manager representative of KEE Pantai Taman Kili Kili

Trenggalek (KEE TK)

• Manager representative of KEE Teluk Pangpang

Banyuwangi (KEE TP)

• Manager representative of KEE Mangrove

Ujungpangkah Gresik (KEE UP)

• Manager representative of KEE Pulau Masakambing

Sumenep (KEE MK)

• District Government of Trenggalek

• District Government of Banyuwnagi

• District Government of Gresik

• District Government of Sumenep

The number of KEE

forums and action plans

established or

strengthened as the

result of USAID BIJAK

assistance.

4 4 • Forum and action plan of KEE TK

• Forum and action plan of KEE TP

• Forum and action plan of KEE UP

• Forum and action plan of KEE MK

The project developed these documents to strengthen

the management effectiveness of each four KEEs namely:

• Institutional documents include The East Java

Governor Decree of the KEE area and Forum of KEE

Manager; roles and relations procedure of members

of KEE forum.

• Action plan document 2021-2025

• Protection plan document 2021

KEE Forum on four sites, East Java BBKSDA and Forestry

Service have expressed gratitude that the existence of

these documents have helped them manage the KEE

areas.

The number of maps or

indicative maps of KEE

developed/ enhanced by

ARuPA as the result of

USAID BIJAK support.

3 & 17 3 & 17 Four maps of KEE areas as follows:

▪ Management block map of KEE TK

▪ Management block map of KEE TP

▪ Management block map of KEE UP

▪ Management block map of KEE MK

5


Note


target)

The management block map of KEEs will be used for each

forum as a guideline to implement the action plan and

protection plan documents.

17 maps of high biodiversity areas on 21 districts, which

are Tuban, Madiun-Kediri, Trenggalek, Gunung Kelud,

Malang-Kota Batu, Surabaya-Gresik, Sidoarjo, Sampang,

Pasuruan, Lumajang, Dataran Tinggi Hyang, Probolinggo,

Jember, Situbondo, Ijen Baluran, Banyuwangi Utara, and

Banyuwangi Selatan.

These 17 maps of high biodiversity areas will be used by

the East Java Forestry Service; East Java BBKSDA and the

government of each district for:

• biodiversity data center for conservation program

planning

• data-based decision making

• provision of a biodiversity profile for district

environmental services

• monitoring the circulation of protected and wild

animals

• projection of proposals and designation of new KEE,

and

• calculation of natural resources balance

The number of people

trained in sustainable

landscapes supported by

USG assistance:

a. Silvofishery

b. Tourism

development

c. Tourism business

d. ToT biodiversity

inventory

a. 36

b. 38

c. 36

d. 20

a. 38

b. 38

c. 147

d. 20

▪ 38 persons consist of 2 female and 36 male were

trained in silvofishery. Most of the participants'

knowledge level about silvofishery have increased.

Before the training, 31.25 percent did not

understand silvofishery compared to 3.13 percent

after the training. The number of participants who

became very familiar with the concept of

silvofishery/cultivation of mangrove connected ponds

increased from 37.5 percent to 71.88 percent.

▪ 38 persons consist of 7 females and 31 males have

been trained in ecotourism development. Through a

trainer, the community understood the concept and

basics of ecotourism management, specifically in the

KEE context. The achievement is indicated by the

post-test result as below:

o Low level in the pre-test was 10 persons, and

the post-test is 2 persons.

o Medium level in the pre-test was 12 persons,

and the post-test is 11 persons.

o High level in the pre-test was 4 persons, and


▪ 147 persons consist of 36 female and 111 male trained

in ecotourism business plan, with the detail:

o KEE TK: 41 persons (11F; 30M) o KEE TP: 55 persons (11F; 40M)

o KEE UP: 24 persons (8F; 16M)

o KEE MK: 27 persons (6 F; 21M)

▪ 20 persons consist of 3 females and 17 males who

were trained in the training of trainer biodiversity

inventory. Most of the participants' knowledge levels

increased. These were indicated by pre and post-test

results and discussion processes during training. Pre

and post-test result showed that:

o Low level in the pre-test was 7 persons, and


o Middle level in the pre-test was 14 persons, and


o High level in the pre-test was 6 persons, and


6


Note


target)

The number of

biodiversity information

system developed by

ARuPA through USAID

BIJAK support.

1 1 There is already a web-based information system. Please

check it: https://inver-kehati-jatim.karogis.com

The website is fully operational and has officially been

handed over to the East Java Forestry Service on 20 April

2021 at Hotel Aston Surabaya. The East Java Forestry

Service will manage this website as the East Java

biodiversity information system after the close-out of this

project. Until the date of this report, ARuPA is still in

coordination with the East Java information and

communication officer to obtain the definitive website

address before the end of May 2021.

The number of news

featuring sustainable

landscapes or

conservation messages

of BIJAK or BIJAK

partners that are

covered in the media

5 38 38 media coverage. Follow the link below to read the

individual news clippings:

Media Coverage

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1jnHcMXbh8Bko41

qYVJEY9iBUTtDhLSfu

Overall, four KEEs were covered in the news by online

media. The news were dominated by KEE Mangrove

Ujungpangkah Gresik and KEE Taman Kili Kili Trenggalek.

The district governments of these KEEs were active in

sharing with the local journalists about the sites. The

media has covered KEE Teluk Pangpang a year ago during

phase 1. The media rarely writes about KEE Masakambing

because of its remote location.

Among others, the news covered topics about the

existing KEEs, the establishment of the KEE Forums, the

uniqueness of the landscapes, flora, and fauna in each of

the KEE areas, the support from the district government

towards this project.

https://inver-kehati-jatim.karogis.com/

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1jnHcMXbh8Bko41qYVJEY9iBUTtDhLSfu

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1jnHcMXbh8Bko41qYVJEY9iBUTtDhLSfu

7

B.2 Summary of Activities

NO ACTIVITY OUTCOME BENEFICIARIES PARTICIPANTS

DATE PLACE F M Total

PHASE I (MAY – NOV 2020)

1.1 Consolidation meeting with BPEE

Advice from the director of BPEE to USAID BIJAK & ARuPA on the project plan to be implemented. The Director of BPEE advised the

project implement to capture existing conditions in the field at KEE

Teluk Pangpang Banyuwangi to get actual baseline data for the project

and maximize the involvement of the right parties during the project. In

response, USAID BIJAK and ARuPA conducted a stakeholder mapping

to capture the parties who are already and supposedly involved in the

KEE Forum in Banyuwangi. ARuPA had also maximized the involvement

of the parties in every project activity and always coordinate with BPEE,

East Java BBKSDA, and Forestry Service.

4 beneficiaries: BPEE, BBKSDA of

East Java, Forestry

Service of East Java,

and ARuPA

9 14 23 Jun 4, 2020 Virtual Meeting

1.2 Consolidation and

socialization program

Agreement on the project activity plan developed by BPEE, East Java

BBKSDA and Forestry Service, and ARuPA. The result of this meeting is

as follow:

o BPEE, USAID BIJAK ARuPA, East Java BBKSDA, Forestry Service,

and all participants agree on strengthening the effectiveness of KEE

Teluk Pangpang management.

o The parties who attended the consolidation and socialization

activities were committed to supporting this joint activity matrix.

This activity matrix consisted of activities from USAID BIJAK

ARuPA, East Java BBKSDA, and Forestry Service.

o The activity matrix was socialized in a stakeholder meeting in

Banyuwangi in September 2020, held by Bappeda Banyuwangi.

4 beneficiaries:

BPEE, BBKSDA of

East Java, Forestry

Service of East Java,

and ARuPA

11 28 39 Aug 19,

2020

Virtual

Meeting

1.3 Research - Stakeholder study

of KEE Teluk Pangpang

Draft report on the KEE Teluk Pangpang stakeholders study developed.

One important finding was that village institution has the greatest level

of interest towards the KEE compared to other actors. However, in

contrast, the level of influence of the village is very low. The

recommendation is to empower the village institution. In another

finding, there is a knowledge and perception gap from several

stakeholders related to the definition, function, and management of KEE

areas. The recommendation is the need to consolidate and coordinate

among stakeholders.

27 beneficiaries of

stakeholder in KEE

Teluk Pangpang

1 1 2 Jun 2 – Jul

30, 2021

Yogyakarta

Banyuwangi

1.4 Multi-stakeholder workshop

to present results of

stakeholder mapping and KEE

management gap analysis

Final report on the KEE Teluk Pangpang stakeholders’ study developed

based on inputs at the stakeholder workshop. The important inputs

were: the need to align work programs and budgets from various

parties to focus on the activities of the Teluk Pangpang KEE

management forum. In this sense, the Banyuwangi Bappeda office has

the authority to consolidate all of OPD (District Apparatus

27 beneficiaries of

stakeholder in KEE

Teluk Pangpang

2 28 30 Sep 9, 2020 Banyuwangi

8



Organizations) to focus on KEE management. Another input: village

institution has the potential as the implementing management of KEE

Teluk Pangpang. The Village Law provides villages as very strategic

institutions and village institutions have the authority to consolidate

various institutional community groups in the village. So, all of the

programs from several OPD should be organized by the village at the

field implementation.

2.1 Training of KEE management

through a multi-stakeholder

approach and dissemination of

KEE regulations and

conceptions to the

stakeholders

Stakeholders’ understanding and awareness in KEE Teluk Pangpang

improved related to KEE management. The results are as follow:

o Training participants have increased understanding of the KEE

regulations, multistakeholder management approach, and gender

mainstreaming. Results of the pre-post test showed increased

understanding among participants by 20 to 30 percent.

o Participants agree to arrange an action plan document of KEE Teluk

Pangpang and hold a public consultation.

27 beneficiaries of

stakeholder in KEE

Teluk Pangpang

7 18 25 Nov10 – 12,

2021

Yogyakarta

2.2 Writing workshop to

integrate institutional

strengthening options for the

KEE management forum

members into the draft KEE

decree

Draft SK Forum and the role of forum members arranged. The draft

East Java Governor decree states that the forum structure is made out

of 3 divisions: protection, utilization, planning, and research and

development. Another important point stakeholders agree on was the

village institution, as a forum member, represents all the community

groups in the KEE area.

A legal opinion needs to be developed to accompany the draft SK

Forum before it is submitted to the provincial government,

27 beneficiaries of

stakeholder in KEE

Teluk Pangpang

3 7 10 Sep10, 2020 Banyuwangi

2.3 Stakeholder workshop to

present the proposed revised

KEE decree

Proposed draft KEE Forum decree completed. At the workshop,

participants agreed to add an obligation for the Teluk Pangpang KEE

forum to develop an action plan and protection plan document. The

meeting mandated the East Java Forestry Service to submit the draft

forum decree to the East Java provincial government legal bureau.

27 beneficiaries of

stakeholder in KEE

Teluk Pangpang

5 25 30 Oct 7, 2020 Banyuwangi

3.1 Technical meetings to develop

a work plan to map and verifiy

the KEE area

Mapping team for KEE areas and work plans established. The team

members consist of:

o Chairman: Januar (Perhutani KPH Banyuwangi Selatan)

o Team members: 3 persons from Kedungringin village, 3 persons

from Kedunggebang village, 3 persons from Kedungasri village, 3

persons from Wringinputih village, Bappeda (1 persons), Balai TNAP

(3 person), Perhutani (6 person), BPEE (1 person), CDK Banyuwangi

(2 person), SKW V Banyuwangi (1 person), BBKSDA Jatim (1

person).

27 beneficiaries of

stakeholder in KEE

Teluk Pangpang

2 11 13 Oct 8, 2020 Banyuwangi

9



The team has agreed to use the SMCA map as a baseline map during

field verification and block mapping in KEE areas.

3.2 Mapping and field verification

on KEE management area

KEE area boundary field coordinates and spatial data to determine the

KEE map areas are obtained. o There are 34 KEE boundary area GPS points recorded in the field.

o The border pal or markers have been installed. They measure L 12

cm x W 12 cm x H 100 cm and marked “BTS KEE”

o In the field, the team has identified land control, land use, and land

cover of the KEE area, and identified various flora and fauna,

mostly bangau tong tong (Leptoptilos javanicus).

27 beneficiaries of

stakeholder in KEE Teluk Pangpang

1 31 32 Oct 15 – 16,

2020

Banyuwangi

3.3 Producing an updated map of the KEE management area

Map of KEE Teluk Pangpang management area. ARuPA produced blocking map of the KEE area that is used in the management of the

action plan document.

27 beneficiaries of stakeholder in KEE

Teluk Pangpang

0 1 1 Oct17 – 30, 2020

Yogyakarta

4.1 Collecting data and identify

opportunities to improve

ecosystem function, maximize

wildlife protection, and

contribute to community livelihoods

Assesment report of the KEE Biodiversity’s potential completed. We

found 10 mangrove species, with Tanjang Clengkreng (Rhizophora

apiculata) as the dominant species; 12 bird species and 1 deer (Rusa

timorensis), identified that more than 51 percent of the area are dense

vegetation. We defined 3 grades or blocks namely low (red), middle (yellow), and high (green). Each grade/block have recommendation such

rehabilitation activity in the low block need to increased.

27 beneficiaries of

stakeholder in KEE

Teluk Pangpang

1 7 8 Sep11 – 15,

2020

Banyuwangi

4.2 Social Assessment for

community around KEE Teluk

Pangpang

Assessment report of KEE Teluk Pangpang’s social aspect competed.

The social assessment used Transmission Channel Analysis (TCA)

approach to capture social problems, potentials, and arrange

transformation on them. Based on this assessment, we recommended that among OPD, Perhutani, BTNAP, Village Government, and

community, they need to build consensus to detail the KEE’s

management plan. Because the existing condition showed that there are

gaps in knowledge and perception of land use towards KEEs.

27 beneficiaries of

stakeholder in KEE

Teluk Pangpang

2 13 15 Oct9-14,

2021

Banyuwangi

PHASE II (DEC 2020 – APR 2021)

1 Preparation for Pilot Activities

1.1 Internal preparation meeting

for the program

implementation team

Seventeen ARuPA program staff have improved understanding about

the program, their duties & responsibilities; Detail of activity plan

developed. Most of ARuPA’s program staff had a 2-year experience with

stakeholder engagement, biodiversity conservation, and community

development. We had arranged scopes of works and 4-month working

plans for each staff.

17 program staff of

ARuPA

3 15 18 Dec 18,

2020

Yogyakarta

2 Assess the need for strengthening the institution of KEE multi-stakeholder forum

2.1 Workshop on planning and

drafting research designs

Four research design of stakeholder mapping, fiscal opportunities,

biodiversity and socio-economic on KEE Mangrove Ujungpangkah (UP),

Pulau Masakambing (MK), Pantai Taman Kili Kili (TK)

3 KEE, namely: UP,

MK, TK

25 13 38 Dec 26-27,

2020

Yogyakarta

10



2.2 Stakeholders mapping studies for 3 KEE Mangrove Ujungpangkah (UP), Pulau Masakambing (MK), Pantai Taman Kili Kili (TK) area

2.2.1 Desk research Three packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) stakeholders list, interest, and

authority of stakeholders were collected based on literature.

3 KEE, namely: UP,

MK, TK

4 0 4 Jan 2-5, 2021 Yogyakarta

2.2.2 Field data collecting for

Stakeholders mapping

studies

Three field finding packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) of the stakeholders’

perception of the KEE initiative were collected, based on interviews and

FGD at 3 KEE sites.

3 KEE, namely: UP,

MK, TK

4 0 4 UP: Jan9 to

Feb9, 2021.

MK:

7,8,11,13,

and 19 Jan

2021

TK: Jan5 to

9, 2021

Gresik,

Sumenep,

Trenggalek

2.2.3 Data analysis and report

writing of stakeholders

mapping results

Three packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) of the stakeholders’ mapping

reports in three KEE completed. The studies found two important

things as follows: (1). Some parties have high interest but low power. In

contrast, some parties have low interest but high power. Balance among

the parties needs to be developed; (2). There were gap perceptions

among parties related to how KEE areas should be managed.

The main recommendation from this studies is efforts are needed to

create collaborative governance that is closer to ideal without

forgetting several dimensions that characterize the capacity of this

collaboration, including bonds of trust, mutual understanding,

commitment, the common ground, and the presence of actors who

become a connector (the bridging actors).

3 KEE, namely: UP,

MK, TK

4 0 4 Feb10-25,

2021

Yogyakarta

2.3 Policy and fiscal incentive opportunity studies in local government for KEE UP, MK, TK management

2.3.1 Desk research Three packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) secondary data of national/local

fiscal incentive policy were collected.

3 KEE, namely: UP,

MK, TK


2.3.2 Field data collecting in

Policy and fiscal

incentive opportunity

studies

Three field finding packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) of the development and

budgeting documents from districts, sub-districts, and village

governments were collected.

3 KEE, namely: UP,

MK, TK

2 2 4 UP: Jan8 to

Feb9, 2021

MK: 7, 19,

26 Jan 2021

TK: Jan8 to

Feb9, 2021

Gresik,

Sumenep,

Trenggalek


writing in policy and

fiscal incentive

opportunity studies

Three packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) of the policy and fiscal incentive

opportunity studies report in three KEEs completed. Here are some

findings:

o Discussing sustainable development must always measure how the

performance of regulations, institutions, and infrastructure are

included in the context of KEE management. Therefore, regulations

3 KEE, namely: UP,

MK, TK

2 2 4 Feb10-25,

2021

Yogyakarta

11



on KEE must be clarified so that stakeholders can use the regulations

as a reference in the management and development of KEE

o The budget planning policies related to KEEs at the national,

regional, and village levels have included KEEs in them, but some

have not explicitly included KEEs as part of their planning.

o The budget opportunity for KEE management are:

- National, provincial, district level: (1). The balancing national and

regional finances/budget provides opportunities that allow KEE

to become one of the conservation areas; and also

deconcentration budget. (2). The opportunity for revenue-

sharing from the Reforestation Fund (Dana Reboisasi), based on

proposals from the community, is very possible for allocations to

KEE, especially for conservation activities. (3). The regional

incentive budget (Dana Insentif Daerah/DID) makes it possible to

include indicators related to land area. This is where KEE has an

opportunity to conserve land, allowing it to take advantage of

DID.

- Village level: opportunities for village budget (Dana Desa/DD),

especially villages in the KEE area, have a great opportunity to

allocate budgets for KEE development

- Grants from government, corporate social responsibility /

private sector, universities, and non-government organizations /

civil society, have a great opportunity to develop KEEs.

2.4 Biodiversity inventory in KEE UP, MK, TK

2.4.1 Desk research Three packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) biodiversity potential data were

collected & three SMCA maps were developed.

3 KEE, namely: UP,

MK, TK


2.4.2 Field data collection

Biodiversity inventory in

KEE

Three packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) the biodiversity data through

SMCA ground check were collected.

3 KEE, namely: UP,

MK, TK

2 5 7 UP: Jan10-

17,2021

MK: Jan17-

21,2021

TK: Jan9-16,

2021

Gresik,

Sumenep,

Trenggalek


writing in KEE

biodiversity potential.

Three packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) of the KEE biodiversity potential

reports were completed. Some key finding of the activity, as follow:

Here the main finding of fauna in each KEE:

o KEE Pantai Taman Kili Kili: The types of species that have the

highest density in the protected areas and sustainable use areas,

are Javan-pond heron (Ardeola speciose), swallow linchi (Collocalia

linchi), and brown-throated sunbird (Anthreptes malacensis).

3 KEE, namely: UP,

MK, TK

2 5 7 Feb10-25,

2021

Yogyakarta

12



Sustainable use areas, recovery areas, and protected areas have

the same diversity index category which is medium. Apart from

turtles, important animal species that can be found at KEE Pantai

Taman Kili-kili include Japanese sparrowhawk (Accipiter gularis),

gajahan pengala (Numenius phaeopus), kipasan belang (Rhipidura

javanica), Javan plover (Charadrius javanicus), Javan coucal

(Centropus nigrorufus), Javan myna (Acridotheres javanicus), and

Rubby-throated bulbul (Rubigula dispar).

o KEE Mangrove Ujungpangkah: Little egrets (Egretta garzetta) are

the species that have the highest density values in the protected,

sustainable use, and recovery areas of KEE Mangrove Ujung

Pangkah. The index of animal diversity in the protected and used

areas is in the high category. In contrast to the two areas, in the

area of recovery, the value of the animal diversity index is

moderate. Important species found in KEE Mangrove Ujung

Pangkah include: lesser adjutant (Leptoptilos javanicus), Javan coucal

(Centropus nigrorufus), Javan plover (Charadrius javanicus), eurasian

curlew (Numenius arquata), whimbrel (Numenius phaeopus), far

eastern curlew (Numenius madagascariensis), Malaysian pied fantail

(Rhipidura javanica), black-tailed godwit (Limosa limosa), bar-tailed

godwit (Limosa lapponica), Pasific golden plover (Pluvialis fulva),

greater sand plover (Charadrius leschenaultia), kentish plover

(Charadrius alexandrius), whiskered tern (Chlidonias hybrida), white-

winged ter (Chlidonias leucopterus), gull-billed tern (Sterna nilotica),

lesser crested tern (Thalasseus bengalensis), greater crested tern

(Thalasseus bergii), terek sandpiper (Xenus cinerus), common

redshank (Tringa tetanus).

o KEE Pulau Masakambing: Based on observations in the KEE area

on Masakambing Island, 22 bird species were recorded, 5 of which

were protected, one mammal species, and 3 herpetofauna species.

The results of the analysis show that KEE Masakambing has a

moderate diversity of bird species in areas of protection,

sustainable use, and recovery. In this protected area the most

individuals encountered were marine goggles with a density of

0.372 individuals/ha. In the sustainable use area, the most

individuals encountered were Cacatua sulphurea abotti with a

density of 0.673 individuals/ha. In the recovery area, the most

individuals encountered were species clogged rivers with a density of 0.309 individuals/ha. Bird species are more common in the

mangrove areas, although some are easily visible in plantation and

13



residential areas, such as Cacatua sulphurea abotti, Zosterops chloris,

Cinnyris jugularis, Todiramphus chloris.

2.5 Socio-Economic Assessment in KEE UP, MK, TK

2.5.1 Desk research Three packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) list of utilization types, potential

conflicts over the use of the KEE area.

3 KEE, namely: UP,

MK, TK


2.5.2 Field data collection in

Socio-Economic

Assessment in KEE

Three packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) of the utilization of KEE areas and

potential conflict were collected based on interviews at 3 KEEs.

3 KEE, namely: UP,

MK, TK

1 3 4 UP: Jan8-

28,2021

MK: Jan17-

20,2021

TK: Jan5-

15,2021

Gresik,

Sumenep,

Trenggalek


writing in socio-

economic assessment in

KEE

Three packages (KEE UP, MK, TK) of the socio-economic assessment

reports were completed.

A resume of the findings in the socio-economic assessment in KEE UP,

MK, and TK are as follow:

o Utilization of KEE areas.

- Economic interaction (Ujung Pangkah): The mobility of

community activities and their interactions with the Ujung

Pangkah area is more motivated as a source of livelihood land

in the form of ponds and fishermen.

- Ecologic interaction (Pantai Taman Kili-Kili): The involvement

and interest of the village government and community groups

(Pokmawas) in the coastal area of Taman Kili-Kili is more

based on motivation to carry out turtle rescue conservation.

- Ecology-economic interaction (Pulau Masakambing): This

pattern further describes the form of community subsistence

over the limited resources around it.

o Conflict potential

- Conflict of authority: In KEE Pantai Taman Kili-Kili between

Perhutani and Village Government/Community. In KEE Ujung

Pangkah related to oloran land (high/low-tide lands) between

village government and concession holder.

- Conflict of market actors: KEE Ujung Pangkah, ijon market

(bonded system) detrimental to fishermen and pond managers

- Conflict of roles: If one party does not have a strong

commitment, there will be a potential for conflict to split the

agreement that is built. This situation can happen at KEE

Masakambing. The skeptical and apathetic attitude of the

village government to initiate the designation of Masakambing

3 KEE, namely: UP,

MK, TK

1 3 4 Feb10-25,

2021

Yogyakarta

14



Island as KEEs, will result in the loss of public confidence in

accepting KEE as a conservation area.

o Potential opportunities for village institutions in managing KEE ie.

Village Owned Enterprises/BUMDes. BUMDes has the opportunity

to manage KEEs as long as it improves the conditions below:

- BUMDes do not yet have sufficient capacity to be involved in

providing added value, especially invaluable products.

- BUMDes does not have a good marketing network or build

partnerships with market players who control the marketing

chain.

- Not all village governments have provided support for the

role of BUMDes as the motor that drives the economy of the

community in the village.

3 Strengthening the institutional functions to achieve the effectiveness of KEE management

3.1 KEE management document development of KEE Teluk Pangpang (TP)

3.1.1 Development of KEE

Telung Pangpang management document

The draft KEE Teluk Pangpang management document was developed.

The activity was held on 23 December 2020. 27 people participated, including 23 males and 4 females. The activities to draft the document

of KEE Teluk Pangpang management (including the action plan, and

internal monitoring and evaluation), was completed by experts and

already discussed with the representation from the KEE forum. This

document has been consulted and discussed with the KEE Teluk

Pangpang forum for important input on institution and management

documents of KEE Teluk Pangpang later.

27 beneficiaries of

stakeholder in KEE Teluk Pangpang

4 23 27 Dec 23,

2020

Banyuwangi

3.1.2 Stakeholders

consultation of KEE

Teluk Pangpang

management document

Important stakeholder inputs integrated into the final draft of the KEE

Teluk Pangpang management document.

The main inputs on the meeting are:

o Optimizing land utilization by agroforestry complex system and

ecotourism purposes. Agroforestry complex systems are

characterized by various tree species, like a natural forest that has

high biodiversity and multi-layer canopies. Through mangrove

landscape by applying agroforestry complex system can become

an ecotourism destination.

o Forum consolidation meetings need to be held monthly, to report

activities from each forum member and arrange plans for next

month.

o Promoting KEE area and biodiversity through social media and

another digital platform.

27 beneficiaries of

stakeholder in KEE

Teluk Pangpang

2 25 27 Jan 19, 2021 Banyuwangi

3.2 KEE area arrangement of KEE UP, MK, TK

15



3.2.1 Field mapping &

verification of KEE UP

KEE border identified and confirmed in the field and marked on 15

coordinate points with natural boundaries such as rivers, former docks,

bridge, etc. KEE spatial data collected, including KEE border

coordinates.

Based on the field mapping process, KEE Ujungpangkah has 23 percent

recovery zone, 40 percent sustainable use zone, and 37 percent

protected zone.

1 beneficiary of KEE

UP

6 29 35 Jan 19-23,

2021

Gresik


verification of KEE MK

KEE border identified and confirmed in the field and marked with

natural boundaries & wood pal inscribed with “outermost point of KEE

Masakambing”, KEE spatial data collected, including KEE border

coordinates.

During the mapping process, the team succeeded in identifying the

boundaries of the KEE area on the outer boundary (batas luar) that

leads to the sea and the inner boundary (batas dalam) that leads to the

mainland. 10 coordinates defined the boundary of the KEE area. In

addition, field verification of the SMCA map has been carried out. The

SMCA map is a map produced by overlay mapping of the ecological and

socio-economic variables to create three categories, namely high,

medium, low. The low category means recovery zone, medium category

means sustainable use zone, and high category means protected zone.

Based on the field mapping process, KEE Pulau Masakambing has 39

percent recovery zone, 15 percent sustainable use zone, and 46 percent

protected zone.

1 beneficiaries of

KEE MK

2 16 18 Jan 18-22,

2021

Sumenep


verification of KEE TK

KEE border identified and confirmed in the field and marked with

natural boundaries & wood pal inscribed “KEE TKK”, KEE spatial data

collected, including KEE border coordinates.

During the mapping process, the team succeeded to identify the

boundaries of the KEE area. It took 6 coordinates of the KEE area

boundary. In addition, field verification of the SMCA map has been

carried out. The SMCA map is a map produced by overlay mapping of

the ecological and socio-economic variables to create three categories,

namely high, medium, low. The low category means recovery zone,

medium category means sustainable use zone, and high category means

protected zone. Based on the field mapping process, KEE Pantai Taman

Kili-Kili has 27 percent recovery zone, 64 percent sustainable use zone,

and 9 percent protected zone.

1 beneficiaries of

KEE TK

5 34 39 Jan 9-15,

2021

Trenggalek

16



3.2.4 Development map of

area

arrangement/blocking of

3 KEE area

Blocking maps of KEE Ujung Pangkah, KEE Masakambing, and KEE

Taman Kili-Kili area management were developed based on field

mapping and verification.

Map of KEE Ujung Pangkah have scale 1:19.000; KEE Masakambing scale

1:5.000; KEE Taman Kili-Kili scale 1:7.000.

These maps inform KEE boundaries; recovery zone; sustainable use

zone; and protected zone. The map also informs village boundaries;

settlement; roads; river; state forest concession; turtle landing area for

KEE Kili-Kili map; important habitats for KEE Ujung Pangkah; and

important trees for cockatoos of KEE Masakambing.

3 beneficiaries of

KEE

1 3 4 Jan 24-30,

2021

Yogyakarta

3.3 Consolidation meeting of KEE forum for strengthening of KEE institutional and management document

3.3.1 TP phase 1 Important points for institutional and management document of KEE TP

(1). In general, the meeting resulted in several important things,

including the role of each division in the forum such as the secretariat,

division of planning, research and development; monitoring and

evaluation; division of community utilization and empowerment; and

division of conservation.

27 beneficiaries of

stakeholder in KEE

TP

7 26 33 Feb 10-11,

2021

Banyuwangi

3.3.1 TP phase 2 Important points for institutional and management document of KEE TP

(2).

o Important notes on the management document

- It is necessary to include the number of assistance activities as

an indicator for monitoring and evaluation assessments in the

protection action plan document 2021

- It is necessary to add procedures for implementing

monitoring and evaluation activities in the protection action

plan document 2021.

o Important notes on the institutional document

- Between management members of KEE TP are collaborative

relationships by reducing sectoral egos and prioritizing

coordination and communication.

- The commitments between KEE forums TP with other parties

i.e private sector related to KEE activities should be agreed

upon by the KEE forum leader

- Immediately KEE forum leader hearing to the Banyuwangi

Regent to present KEE forum activities. A letter requesting

the hearing will be made by BBKSDA of East Java.

27 beneficiaries of

stakeholder in KEE

TP

7 20 27 Mar 10,

2021

Banyuwangi

17



- Institutional governance documents that have been finalized

will be given to CDK Banyuwangi as a secretary of forum KEE

TP

- The secretariate of the forum expected to make the form

letterhead, vision and mission, and KEE logo.

3.3.2 UP phase 1 Important points for institutional and management document of KEE UP

(1).

Important points for developing institutional document: To

accommodate coordination between institutions, it is necessary to have

a secretariat located at the Environmental Office of Gresik Regency.

The Environmental officer of Gresik and BBKSDA Jawa Timur will be

allocated their human resource to operating the secretariat.

Important points for developing management document: Private sector

around the KEE area needs to always be involved in management

activities. The companies are: PETRONAS; PGN SAKA (PT Saka Energi

Indonesia); PT Smelting Gresik; PT Petrokimia Gresik.

36 beneficiaries of

stakeholder in KEE

UP

9 44 53 Mar16-17,

2021

Gresik

3.3.2 UP phase 2 Important points for institutional and management document of KEE UP

(2)

o Important notes on the management document

- KEE UP forum members from the Regional Apparatus

Organization (Organisasi Perangkat Daerah/OPD) already

have a budget from the 2021 APBD for the management of

KEE UP. They are expected to immediately realize their

activities. Meanwhile, members who do not have a budget

from the 2021 APBD for the management of KEE UP are

expected to immediately propose changes to the 2021 APBD.

- KEE UP forum member from the private sector, they are

expected to immediately realize their funding through a CSR

mechanism according to what has been planned by their

company.

- Final KEE UP action plan documents for 2021-2025 and action

plans for protection for 2021 immediately submitted to the

Directorate General of Conservation of Natural Resources

and Ecosystems (KSDAE) of the Ministry of Environment and

Forestry, guided by the East Java Center for Conservation of

Natural Resources and Ecosystems (KSDAE)

- In managing KEE UP, managers are expected to prioritize the

values of gender equality and social inclusion

o Important notes on the institutional document

36 beneficiaries of

stakeholder in KEE

UP

11 56 67 Apr12, 2021 Gresik

18



- The working relationship arrangement (tata hubungan

kerja/TAHUJA) is the multi-stakeholder collaborative

management principle under the coordination of the Assistant

for Economy and Development Regional Secretary of Gresik

as Chairman of the KEE Manager.

- The scope of work of the KEE UP managers are dynamic and

can undergo additions or changes following the processes that

are running in each division

- The Secretariat of KEE UP is located at the Office of the

Environment Office of Gresik Regency Jl. KH. Wahid Hasyim

No. 17. Further coordination regarding the institution will be

discussed at the secretariat. Routine meetings in 2021 will be

scheduled every two months by the Secretary to

accommodate the planned activity programs of each division.

- The Division of Planning, R & D, Monitoring and Evaluation,

and Cooperation are expected to now pay serious attention

to identifying opportunities for collaboration with third

parties i.e private sectors.

- Other divisions are Utilization, Conservation, Protection, and

Security immediately to hold a meeting for each division to

realize the activity plan at KEE UP

- KEE UP forum need to coordinate with related agencies

outside KEE, for example with the Regional Disaster

Management Agency (BPBD)

- Involving the Search and Rescue or SAR team in the activities

of the protection and security division.

3.3.3 MK phase 1 Important points for institutional and management document of KEE

MK (1). Here as follow, the important result of the meeting:

o Important points for developing institutional documents such as develop KEE secretariat at the Sumenep and Masakambing Island

proposed.

o Important points for developing management document such as

the Masakambing village government suggested developing village

regulations on mangrove protection proposed

o Follow-up on forum operational agreed, including the Forum

member of KEE Pulau Masakambing conducts field trips to the

Pulau Masakambing when the weather conditions allow

35 beneficiaries of

stakeholder in KEE

MK

5 26 31 Feb 18-19,

2021

Sumenep

3.3.3. MK phase 2 Important points for institutional and management document of KEE

MK (2).

Important notes on institutional document

35 beneficiaries of

stakeholder in KEE

MK

4 32 36 Mar 18,

2021

Sumenep

19



o The working relations between management members forum of

KEE MK are collaborative relationship by reducing sectoral egos

and prioritizing coordination and communication;

o Encourage the Head of Masakambing Village and the Masakambing

community as the main actors in various activities and

management of the KEE MK;

o Immediately KEE forum leader hearing to the Sumenep Regent to

present KEE forum activities;

o The institutional document of KEE MK serves as a guideline for

forum KEE MK work relations.

Important notes on management document

o BBKSDA Jawa Timur (the East Java Agency for Conservation of

Natural Resources) suggested to the forum to use data from the

Indonesian Cockatoo Conservation (KKI) and the BBKSDA Jawa

Timur on the types of flora and fauna biodiversity on

Masakambing Island.

o In 2021, the Sumenep Fisheries Service will focus on forming

groups for both fishermen and fish farming in Masakambing.

o The Masakambing village community proposed to Sumenep

Government to provide telecommunication facilities for cellular

and internet networks, provide electricity and transportation

access to Masakambing.

o The Sumenep Tourism Office proposed KEE MK branding as "the

Heart of the Archipelago" because of the island’s position in the

middle of the Indonesian archipelago.

o Suggestion from BBKSDA: KEE MK forum periodically updates

data on demographics, flora, and fauna.

o For the 2021 Action Plan, the Sumenep environmental officer

proposes several activities, including Purchasing Kapook trees

(Ceiba pentandra) and coconut (Cocos nucifera); Installation of

information boards related to KEE on Masakambing Island;

Protection of cockatoo nest trees; and Mangrove conservation

area development.

3.3.4 TK phase 1 Important points for institutional and management document of KEE TK

(1). Here as follow, the important result of the meeting:

o Important points for developing institutional documents such as

the Secretariat of KEE Pantai Taman Kili Kili Forum at the Panggul

Trenggalek sub-district office proposed.

39 beneficiaries of

stakeholder in KEE

TK

10 50 60 Feb 15-16,

2021

Trenggalek

20



o Important points for developing management documents such as

the head of the field, namely the Trenggalek Residential Area and

Environment Agency, coordinate conservation activities proposed

o Follow-up on forum operational agreed including the development

of a logo, letterhead, and the KEE Pantai Taman Kili Kili tagline by

the secretariat and ARuPA

3.3.4. TK phase 2 Important points for institutional and management document of KEE TK

(2).

Important notes on the institutional document

o The working relations between management members forum of

KEE TK are collaborative relationship by reducing sectoral egos

and prioritizing coordination and communication;

o There is a proposal to add the position of Deputy Regent of

Trenggalek as the Steering Committee for the KK TK forum;

o Immediately KEE forum leader hearing to the Trenggalek Regent

to present KEE forum activities. To note, this agenda has been

carried out on April 7, 2021.

o The institutional document of KEE MK is a guideline for forum

KEE MK work relations.

Important notes on management document

o There are proposals to re-emphasize the importance of

establishing a core protection zone covering land and water areas

through the designation of a marine protected area (MPA). This is

because the determination of the turtle conservation area cannot

only be on the mainland but must also include marine areas. The

determination of the MPA area is proposed to be the KEE core

zone.

o The area of the core zone is at least 10% of the total area

proposed to be free from activities other than conservation. In

this case, at KEE Pantai Taman Kili Kili, there is still a catching

area for lobster seeds (BBL) in the waters of KEE Kili Kili Beach

39 beneficiaries of

stakeholder in KEE

TK

10 36 46 Mar 15,

2021

Trenggalek

3.3.5 Writing workshop for

finalizing institutional and

management document

of KEE UP, MK, TK, TP

phase 1

Draft 1 of institutional and management document of KEE UP, MK, TK,

TP developed. The target to finalize the draft 1 institutional document

of four KEEs arranged. The target to finalize the draft 1 management

document of four KEEs arranged.

4 KEE: UP, MK, TK,

TP

0 4 4 20 Days

within

Feb10-

Mar28, 2021

Yogyakarta

Gresik

Sumenep

Trenggalek

Banyuwangi

3.3.5. Writing workshop for

finalizing institutional and

management document

Final institutional and management document of KEE UP, MK, TK, TP

developed.

4 KEE: UP, MK, TK,

TP

0 4 4 12 days

within

Yogyakarta

21



of KEE UP, MK, TK, TP

phase 2

During approximately 33 working days, the writing team has

successfully written 12 documents with details of 4 Institutional

documents for 4 KEE locations and 8 Management documents for 4

KEE locations. The final institutional document is a document entitled

"Pedoman Tata Hubungan Kerja dan Pola Koordinasi Pengelola Kawasan

Ekosistem Esensial " and a final Management document in the form of a

5-year management document entitled "Rencana Aksi Pengelolaan

Kawasan Ekosistem Esensial Tahun 2021 – 2025" and an annual

management document entitled " Rencana Kegiatan Pelindungan Kawasan

Ekosistem Esensial Tahun 2021” for each of the 4 KEE locations.

Feb10-

Mar28, 2021

4 Increasing the capacity of forum members and community groups in managing KEE

4.2 Strengthening the utilization of KEE to support village potential-based KEE management objectives

4.2.1 Silvofishery training Four communities group of KEE had improved understanding of the

sustainable utilization of marine resources and how to cultivate fish in

mangrove areas and maintains the sustainability of KEE.

These were indicated by pre and post-test results and discussion processes during training. Pre and post-test result showed that

o Low level in the pre-test was 7 persons, and the post-test was 2

persons.

o Middle level in the pre-test was 14 persons, and the post-test was 9

persons.

o High level in the pre-test was 6 persons, and the post-test was 16

persons.

38 beneficiaries

from the community

group of KEE UP,

MK, TK, & TP

2 36 38 Jan 27-29,

2021

Banyuwangi

4.2.2 Ecotourism

development training in

the KEE area

Eight community tourism groups had improved on the capability to

identify the opportunity and to develop the ecotourism development

plan.

o Through the material training delivered by trainers, the community

understands the concept and basics of ecotourism management,

specifically in the KEE context. The achievement is indicated by the

post-test result as below:

- Low level in the pre-test was 10 persons, and the post-test was 2

persons.

- Medium level in the pre-test was 12 persons, and the post-test

was 11 persons.

- High level in the pre-test was 4 persons, and the post-test was 13

persons.

o The community, through forums and were assisted by a trainer, were

able to identify the opportunity to develop ecotourism, such as the

8 beneficiaries from

the community

tourism group and 4

beneficiaries from

KEE forum

representative of

KEE UP, MK, TK, &

TP.

7 31 38 Feb 24-26,

2021

Trenggalek

22



community of KEE Pantai Taman Kili Kili who realized that turtle

habitat in KEE can be as magnitude for the visitor to learn more

about turtle conservation.

o The community through the forum and assisted by a trainer, were

able to develop the ecotourism development plan. For example, the

community around KEE Ujungpangkah plan to develop integrated

track of mangrove tour in 3 village.

4.2.3 Writing workshop and

assistance for drafting

the ecotourism business

plans of KEE TP

Draft of Business plan for developing ecotourism inside and around KEE

TP area developed.

Here as follow, the attraction recommended for each village are:

o Kedungasri: Mangrove tour and education, and Canoeing; Dragon

Fruit Agro-tourism for agro-tourism and resto; Darungan Hamlet

village tour and cycling; Candi Purwo for Pilgrim Tour.

o Kedunggebang: Mangrove tour and education, and Canoeing;

Dragon Fruit Agro-tourism; Krajan Hamlet village tour and photos.

o Wringinputih: Pine conservation– Mangrove Kawang for education

mangrove and fun games; Panoramic view of Kili Kili for Bird

watching; Teluk Pangpang mangrove tour; Cooking Class Produk

Mangrove and homestay in Krajan hamlet.

9 community groups

ecotourism

beneficiaries

11 40 51 14 days

within

Mar11-Apr8,

2021

Banyuwangi




plans of KEE UP


UP area developed.

1. Ujungpangkah Exploration Tour Package

The preparation of the Ujungpangkah Exploration tour package is

urgent to connect tourism attractions in the three villages in the KEE

UP. The main objective is to "extend" the length of stay of tourists by:

o Establish regular and measurable visiting patterns in a package;

o Providing Regional Interpretation Services;

o Changing the visiting model to be in groups;

o Providing a tourist-friendly mode of transportation (environment.

Tourists, community) and attractive;

o Connecting various attractions (in the form of activities) in a series

of visits.

2. Ujungpangkah Bengawan Solo Mangrove Conservation.

The Mangroove and Muara Bengawan Solo ecosystems are important

attributes possessed by KEE UP. As branding, both are only suitable to

be placed in the perspective of Ujung Pangkah as an area/landscape not

a village per village. In an ecotourism perspective, the form of

presenting attractions Around Mangrove is absolutely in the form of

9 community groups

ecotourism

beneficiaries

8 16 24 14 days

within

Mar11-

Apr12, 2021

Gresik

23



education and tourist involvement in conservation efforts

(Volunteerism).


assistance for drafting the ecotourism business

plans of KEE MK


MK area developed. Based on the analysis of the current conditions in Masakambing Island,

ecotourism products have been designed, namely:

o Bekka’ Experience

o Village Journey

o Beautiful Karang Putih (white coral)

o Bukit Keramat (sacred hill)

o Homestay

In addition, two tourism products are also interesting, namely:

o Voluntary program: Programs offered to institutions (eg Planette

urgence, GVI, ASSA, International Schools, Universities) following

the needs of Masakambing Village. Examples of programs: Coral Reef

Restoration, Ecological Farming, Quality Education at the basic level,

Mangrove Conservation.

o Research locations: With the rich biodiversity that exists in the

village of Masakambing, it opens up opportunities for research by

research institutes, universities, and groups

9 community groups

ecotourism beneficiaries

6 21 27 14 days

within Mar17-

Apr15, 2021

Sumenep




plans of KEE TK


TK area developed.

Recommendations for the development of tourism products in KEE

Pantai Taman Kili Kili:

o Kili-Kili Beach Turtle Conservation: Turtle Conservation Education

Tour & Turtle Nest Adoption

o Jekelan Hill: Jekelan EcoCamp Site (JECS)

o Wonocoyo Village: Village explore & Voluntourism Coastal conserve

9 community groups

ecotourism

beneficiaries

11 30 41 14 days

within

Mar10-Apr9,

2021

Trenggalek

5 Implementing the inventory of high biodiversity areas outside the conservation area

5.1 Development of Biodiversity

Information System in East

Java Province

The prototype of web GIS and mobile apps based biodiversity

information system developed. Then followed up with activities 5.1

Development of Biodiversity Information System in East Java Province,

conducted by ARuPA Experts. The biodiversity information system has

been produced which is still under trial and in advanced development.

Prototype of the system can access through the link as follows:

o Link webGIS https://inver-kehati-jatim.karogis.com/

2 beneficiaries,

namely: BBKSDA;

Forestry Service of

East Java

0 7 7 Jan 2021 Yogyakarta


24



o Link APK Android https://inver-kehati-

jatim.karogis.com/auth/login?next=%2F%3Faction%3DdownloadApp

login: operator; password: operator.

5.2 Development module for biodiversity inventory training

A biodiversity inventory module to guide the biodiversity inventory activity in 17 locations.

3 beneficiaries, namely BPEE;

BBKSDA of East

Java; and Forestry

Service of East Java.

1 4 5 Jan 6-8, 2021 & Jan 14-15,

2021

Yogyakarta

5.3 Training of trainer (ToT) for

biodiversity inventory team

Twenty persons from East Java Forestry Service, East Java BBKSDA,

and others had improved understanding the method and techniques for

biodiversity inventory and the operation of biodiversity information system. These were indicated by pre and post-test results and

discussion processes during training. Pre and post-test result showed

that:

o Low level in the pre-test was 7 persons, and the post-test was 2

persons.

o Middle level in the pre-test was 14 persons, and the post-test was

9 persons.

o High level in the pre-test was 6 persons, and the post-test was 16

persons.

20 persons from

East Java Forestry

Service, East Java BBKSDA, and other

3 17 20 Jan 4-6, 2021 Batu

5.4 Spatial Multi-Criteria Analysis

(SMCA) for developing the

indicative map of high

biodiversity area

17 Indicative maps of high biodiversity areas for East Java Province

developed which has been overlaid with village administration area and

forest in Perum Perhutani area are developed.

2 beneficiaries,

namely: BBKSDA;

Forestry Service of

East Java

2 7 9 Jan 7-20,

2021

Yogyakarta

5.5 The collection of repository

secondary data

17 repository secondary data of biodiversity collected. 2 beneficiaries,

namely: BBKSDA;

Forestry Service of

East Java

0 5 5 Jan 6-20,

2021

Yogyakarta

5.6 Field data collection for high

biodiversity 17 locations in the

East Java

17 row material of high biodiversity area in 17 locations in the East Java

province and the Improvement of biodiversity information system based

on field data collection activity.

Field data collection batch 1 is still ongoing from 8 February to 3 March

2021 to accomplish 9 locations from 17 locations, and batch II will be

held on 8-22 March 2021 to complete the remaining 8 locations out of

17 total locations. When this activity is completed, it will produce:

o Row material of High biodiversity area in 9 locations in the East

Java province

o The Improvement of biodiversity information system based on field

data collection activity.

2 beneficiaries,

namely: BBKSDA;

Forestry Service of East Java

15 88 103 Phase 1:

Feb15-Mar1,

2021 Phase 2:

Mar8-22,

2021

Tuban

Trenggalek

Situbondo Sidoharjo

Sampang

Probolinggo

Pasuruan

Malang-Batu

Madiun-

Kediri

Lumajang

Surabaya

25



Field data collection of biodiversity for 17 location was completed, and

produce:

o High biodiversity data for 17 locations of 23 district in the East Java

province collected

o The Improvement of the biodiversity information system was

completed, by updating the data analysis system and revising the

placement of menus on the website.

Jember

Ijen Baluran

Gn. Kelud

DT Hyang

Banyuwangi

AlasPurwo-

Merubetiri

5.7 Data consolidation of ground

check results and secondary

spatial data

Report of analysis and consolidation of ground check data and

secondary data developed; Final draft of the information system was

developed. There are three steps to doing the inventory, namely: spatial

study; field inventory, and data analysis. In the spacial study, we have

done sequentially modeling of fauna priority species distribution;

analysis of biodiversity hotspots & least cost path; determination of

biodiversity inventory area; and finally class analysis of the Spatial Multi-

Criteria Analysis (SMCA). The spacial study resulted in 17 areas to be

inventory in the field. Secondly, we have done field inventories of high

biodiversity on 17 areas in East Java. The inventory team came from

ARuPA, East Java BBKSDA and Forestry Service. The final step is data

analysis. In sum, the finding from this activity are:

There are 17 locations of high biodiversity inventory. Determination of

locations based on biodiversity hotspot which is defined by fauna

distribution data combine by an environmental variable such as

elevation, proximity from rivers, and degree of slope.

To capture the variety of locations, we defined 4 categories of

biodiversity areas, namely corridor, buffer, protected, and isolate.

Corridor for areas as a connector between conservation areas. Buffer

for areas around the conservation area. Protection area for coastal,

mangrove, and certain geological uniqueness

The 17 locations are at 21 districts in East Java Province. From the total

location of 342.102,67 hectares, 205 species of birds, 10 species of

mammals, and 31 species of herpetofauna were recorded. Then for the

types of flora in the entire location has been identified there are 154

types of flora.

Each location of 17 areas has the status of high-medium-low of

biodiversity. From SMCA, we get information especially The

composition of biodiversity that has status high, medium, and low are in

2 beneficiaries,

namely: BBKSDA;

Forestry Service of

East Java

1 8 9 Mar24-31,

2021

Yogyakarta

26



each location. The locations which have high status more than 20% are

Tuban, Sampang, Sidoharjo, Malang-Batu, and Banyuwangi.

5.8 High biodiversity map

finalization and writing report

of high biodiversity inventory

Biodiversity identification and verification report in East Java province

and high biodiversity map developed.

The recommendation from this biodiversity inventory are: First, the

East Java Provincial Government could enact the 17 locations of

biodiversity inventory become KEEs. Second, on the KEEs, the

government needs to establish management forums for KEEs and

involve various stakeholders. Third, the need to develop action plan

documents for the effectiveness of the KEE management.

Furthermore, the results of these activities obtained a regional network

that can support biodiversity conservation in East Java and

accommodate public participation in its management. To accommodate

the public’s participation, we conducted the training of trainers for

various parties so that they can pass on their knowledge to other

parties. Such as the East Java BBKSDA and Forestry Service, and

involved Perhutani staff, CSO, and higher-education students in the field

of biodiversity inventory.

The result of biodiversity inventory on 17 locations in East Java can see

on this temporary website https://inver-kehati-jatim.karogis.com. in the

future, this website will be embedded as part of the official East Java

Government’s website. Until now, the process to embed the site is still

being negotiated until the end of May 2021. This website, which is called

“Si Merak Ati”, is also designed to provide biodiversity maps and data

for all districts in East Java. On 21 May 2021, USAID BIJAK has handed

over the biodiversity information system to the East Java Forestry

Service. The website will be used to analyze biodiversity inventory data,

develop plans to protect high biodiversity areas, and identify areas to

establish new KEEs. The East Java Forestry Service become the host to

manage the biodiversity data system in the “Si Merak Ati” website. We

have discussed with the East Java Forestry Service to arrange the

protocols to manage the website.

2 beneficiaries,

namely: BBKSDA;

Forestry Service of

East Java

1 10 11 Apr12-16,

2021

Yogyakarta


27

C. Description of Any Activities/Milestones Not Completed

There is no activities/milestones not completed.

D. Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Lessons learned and recommendations from this project are as follows:

NO LEVEL LESSONS LEARNED RECOMMENDATION

1 Supra KEE By considering Law No.

23/2014 on regional

government, and looking at

the situation in the field, it is

better if the role of the

provincial and district

governments needs to be

increased on the KEE issues.

So that the role of the central

government needs to be

reduced.

Enhancing the role of regional

government and reducing the

role of the national government

in KEE affairs. In addition, we

recommend that the Minister

of Environment and Forestry

(MoEF) Decree of on KEE be

issued soon.

In addition, need to purpose

and re-enforce the role of the

provincial government on KEE

development due to MoEF

Decree Number P.66 of 2015

about the De-centralization of

the environmental sector.

2 Forum of KEE KEE Forum members who

majority government officer in

the district and provincial level

are still concerned with the

role of each government

officers. In addition, the

legality of the forum is very

important as a basis for forum

members to prepare activity

plans and budgets in each

agency.

To overcome sectoral egos, it

is necessary to hold

consolidation meetings for

forum members periodically

and continuously. In addition,

the role of the Bupati (head of

district) or Sekda (District

secretary) is very important to

mobilize each district agency to

focus on KEE.

To have the OPD prioritize

KEEs in their work plan, they

need to be proposed to

Bappeda at the provincial and

district level to add the KEE

program in their planning

arrangement.

3 Community Since there are KEE programs

in four locations, communities

have started to realize how to

use natural resources

sustainably. However,

awareness among the public is

uneven because of the lack of

socialization on KEEs.

The need for KEE socialization

at the community level by the

village government and other

parties who are members of

the KEE forum. So, it needs to

be included in the KEE program

in the village’s official work

plan.

4 ARuPA The short duration of the

project implementation has

accelerated the work team

To achieve the effectiveness of

KEE management, need more

time and approaches to these

28

NO LEVEL LESSONS LEARNED RECOMMENDATION

and strategies. Even in a

COVID-19 pandemic situation,

ARuPA could still carry out

activities and achieve all

activities by optimizing the

technology and roles of site

officers and staff.

stakeholders to ensure all of

the recommendations can be

integrated into related

documents.

Based on the experiences in

this project, a stage that should

not be missed is the

stakeholder mapping to identify

the important stakeholders and

also in coordination and

consolidation forum KEE. In

addition, need to

synchronization the project

plan with the work plan of

government institutions such as

BBKSDA and Forestry Service

in provincial level.

E. Grant Success Stories

1. KEE Teluk Pangpang and KEE Ujungpangkah succeeded in emphasizing the importance of

mangroves and the protection of migratory birds to the community.

2. KEE Taman Kili Kili Beach, which is the landing site for Olive ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys

olivacea) and Leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) has succeeded in conserving turtles

and stopping poaching and illegal trade of turtles by the community.

3. KEE Pulau Masakambing has succeeded in protecting the population of abotti yellow-crested

cockatoo (Cacatua sulphurea) which currently number only 25 individuals in the wild.

4. With various stakeholders’ characteristics and KEE typology, ARuPA can define the right

strategies and approaches to gain commitment and support from related stakeholders. It

significantly accelerated the achievement of all targeted milestones in place.

5. Stakeholder mapping and local policy analysis is considered as the most important baseline data

to improve the participation of OPD in arranging their program and budget to support the

implementation of KEE action plan. Furthermore, the stakeholder analysis can provide clear

recommendations for determining the structure, role, and function of the members of the KEE

forums.

6. Lessons learned from KEE Teluk Pangpang on drafting the KEE forum decree have provided a

reference for the East Java BBKSDA and Forestry Service to replicate the decree for the other 3

KEEs.

7. The SMCA method provided strong recommendations on the different important values of KEE

areas to determine blocking maps for area management. The recommendation has been

integrated into the KEE action plan and KEE protection plan by determining the different

approaches for managing block based on the block characteristic (protection, sustainable

utilization, and rehabilitation)

8. The socio-economic studies provided alternative options to manage and utilize KEE areas in

certain blocks by considering the tenure and social relation.

9. Strong demand for high biodiversity data provided by Si Merak Ati as a platform for biodiversity

data center for conservation program planning, data-based decision-making, provision of a

biodiversity profile for district environmental services, monitoring the circulation of protected

and wild animals, projection of proposals, and designation of new KEE, and calculation of natural

resources balance. So, Si Merak Ati will become a hub for the distribution of data used in

29

achieving the performance indicators of both the East Java forestry service, East Java BBKSDA,

and district environmental services in East Java.

10. Acceptance of the project by BPEE at the national level and the East Java BBKSDA and Forestry

Service at the provincial level because we build agreement and synchronizing the project plan

with government work plan in national, provincial, and district level.

F. Product/documents resulted from grants activities

Please follow the link below:

https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=1YQGWV0Bx62lXhLUJh39AhpSF5utsH-ov

1. Report of stakeholder mapping studies

2. Report of fiscal incentive studies

3. Report of biodiversity studies

4. Report of socio-economic studies

5. Institutional documents of 4 KEE (include several records of agreements)

6. Action plan documents of 4 KEE

7. Protection plan documents of 4 KEE

8. Biodiversity inventory report on 17 location in East Java

9. Module of biodiversity inventory manual

10. apps Si Merak Ati manual

11. webGIS Si Merak Ati manual

https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=1YQGWV0Bx62lXhLUJh39AhpSF5utsH-ov

30

Section II - Financial

A. Description of grant activity funding

During the project implementation in phase I and phase II, USAID BIJAK grant funding contributed

greatly in helping ARuPA implement activities and achieve its objectives. USAID BIJAK funded all the

implemented activities. The only activity with third-party contribution was activity 5.3 - Training of

trainer (ToT) for biodiversity inventory team. Because the East Java Forestry Services wanted to add

more participants, they contributed to the budget, mostly for accommodation and transportation of

additional participants who came from the province and district level in East Java.

The management of the budget became challenging, especially in phase II because we had to

implement several activities almost simultaneously in 4 different locations. To avoid any funding

delays from USAID BIJAK, the financial department made intensive communications with ARuPA

program manager and executive director of the financial situation, and activities that are planned and

implemented so that they can be executed on time which also implies in the report submission as

the requirements of the fund transfer of each milestone.

B. Summary of Grant Activity Costs and Payments

Fixed amount award

Chemonics Grant

Budget Commitment

Total Milestone

Payments Variation Action Taken

Milestone 1 IDR 15,900,000 - -



Milestone 4 IDR 101,800,000 - -


Milestone 6 IDR 176,080,000 - -

Milestone 7 IDR 120,920,000 - -


Milestone 9 IDR 356,150,000 - -

Milestone 10 IDR 759,850,000 - -

Milestone 11 IDR 687,310,000 - -

Milestone 12 IDR 1,116,100,000 - -

Milestone 13 IDR 514,200,000 - -

Milestone 14 IDR 993,400,000 - -

31

Chemonics Grant

Budget Commitment

Total Milestone

Payments Variation Action Taken

Milestone 15 IDR 316,500,000 - -

Milestone 16 IDR 322,250,000 - -

Milestone 17 IDR 171,150,000 - -

TOTAL IDR 5,920,350,000

C. Explanation of higher or lower than anticipated costs

In activities implemented by ARuPA, all milestones and activities are completed. All the budget has

been used for each of the activities. Most of the activities’ costs fell close to the budget. Only two

activities were overbudget: activity 3.3.2 - Consolidation meeting for developing KEE institutional

and management document of KEE Ujung Pangkah (I) and activity 3.3.2 - Consolidation meeting for

developing KEE institutional and management document of KEE Ujung Pangkah (II). The over-budget

was caused by the doubling of participants because all KEE Forum members are suggested to attend.

Consequently, we had to provide a meeting package twice the original budget. We asked the hotel

to reduce the selection of food/snack items in each pax to reduce the price and avoid excessive

over-budget.

Regarding the milestone payments, at the beginning of phase II, some milestone payments were late

because of the lateness of the signing of the modification of the agreement while we have to keep

submitting the report of each milestone according to the schedule in the milestone. This situation

forces some activities keep being implemented while the milestone funds were late to be disbursed.

This situation also forces us to make more prefinance than predicted. But, in the middle of the

implementation of phase II, the funding has been going well.

During the grant receipt process, several modifications were made:

• Modification I

Based on information from the Government of Indonesia Task Force for the Acceleration of

Handling COVID-19, on June 28, 2020, the daily increases of positive cases of COVID in

Indonesia averaged more than 1,000/day for the past week. Currently, the East Java Province is

a Covid-19 red zone, with a cumulative number of 11,482 cases

(http://infocovid19.jatimprov.go.id/index.php/data).

According to a notice issued by the Minister of Administrative Reform and Bureaucratic Reform

No. 58 of 2020 on the work system of government employees in the new normal order,

employees of central and regional agencies are encouraged to carry out meetings and

communications activities through electronic media. In addition, official travel should be carried

out selectively and only for priority and urgent reasons.

To comply with the government’s notice, ARuPA shifted its implementation methodology from

conducting in-person events to using an online meeting platform. We conducted the

Consolidation and Socialization program (activity #1.2) and Stakeholder mapping and KEE

management gap analysis (activity #1.3) using the online meeting platform. This shift had two

results: (1) a change in the deliverables produced; and (2) underspending of funds that were

originally budgeted for the in-person events. Under this amendment, ARUPA allocated the

http://infocovid19.jatimprov.go.id/index.php/data

32

underspent funds to carry out a new activity, the social assessment of communities around KEE

Teluk Pangpang (see activity #4.2).

• Modification II

The second modification was made because the four new locations were added into the

project. Since the award in May 2020, ARuPA has collaborated with the East Java BBKSDA and

Forestry Service to implement a pilot activity to improve the effectiveness of KEE management

at the site level. This piloting focused on strengthening the institutional design of the KEE

manager and the KEE management plan at the KEE Teluk Pangpang, Banyuwangi. After three

months of piloting, The new approach taken by AruPA has been approved by the East Java

BBKSDA and Forestry Service , where the new approach focused to strengthen and provide

more intensive stakeholder collaboration, clarify roles and functions among KEE management

forum members, and serve as the foundation to achieve effectiveness on KEE management. As a

result, East Java BBKSDA and Forestry Agency has requested ARuPA to strengthen this process

and replicate the good practices in KEE Teluk Pangpang to three additional locations.

Due to the success of the KEE pilot in Teluk Pangpang, modification no. 02 will expand the pilot

activities to strengthen the effectiveness of KEE management in three additional locations,

which are (1) KEE Ujung Pangkah in Gresik, (2) KEE Pantai Taman Kili-Kili in Trenggalek, and (3)

KEE Masakambing in Sumenep. The expanded scope of work is summarized in Table 1 below.

With additional activities in 3 KEEs, modification 02 was made to extend the agreement period

to April 30, 2021, and increase the budget for the implementation of the activities to Rp.

6,437,850,000, -

• Modification III

The third modification was made because the impact of Covid-19 was still in motion at that

time. On February 10, 2021, BIJAK met with ARuPA to discuss the status of the activities, the

impact of Covid-19, and the completion timeline for the remaining activities. Given the ongoing

uncertainty with Covid-19, ARuPA agreed to reduce some activities that may delay the

implementation of activities in the remaining weeks of the grant. As a result, ARuPA proposed

these revisions to the activities:

1. Changes to the number of days of activity implementation and number of LOE of

honorarium for experts on activities:

• All Activities under #3.3 and Activities #4.2.3 through #4.2.6, #5.7, and #5.8

2. Cancellation of the following activities:

• All Activities under #3.4 and Activity #4.1

With these changes, the overall impact on reducing the budget by Rp. 517,500,000 from the

previous total budget of Rp. 6,437,850,000, -

strengthening kee management institutions to …

Documents