strawman design of a long-wavelength camera for the ...golwala/talks/... · short-wavelength...

1
Optical Design Constraints: CCAT primary is 25 m and F/0.6. CCAT will provide two F/8 Nasmyth foci. Reimage to ~ F/2 to yield reasonable pixel sizes (9.2 mm at 150 GHz). Need image of the primary for cold Lyot stop. Want low optical loading and high throughput; necessitates reflective elements for large reimaging optics; transmissive optics must be cold and therefore small. Need flat focal plane to make use of focal plane arrays. Resulting design Two ellipsoids (2.5m) and a final cold lens (30cm) •~30-cm cold Lyot stop between second ellipsoid and cold lens Bend angle at each ellipsoid = 15 degrees 5.2% distortion at edge of 20’ diameter FoV Strehl ratio > 90% at 2 mm across full 20’ diameter FoV Strehl ratio > 80% at 850 μm across 14.6’ diameter FoV Further improvements to design in the works! SCUBA2 may be mounted at other Nasmyth Successor SWCam may share ellipsoids with LWCam Abstract The initial suite of instruments for the Cornell-Caltech Atacama Telescope (CCAT) will likely include a wide-field, long-wavelength continuum camera (LWCam), covering frequencies from 150 GHz to 405 GHz (740 um to 2 mm) over a field-of view (FoV) as large as 20' diameter. Such a camera would contribute to many of CCAT's science goals and make use of time when poor weather renders short-wavelength (200-620 um) observations unfeasible. A strawman design for such a camera is presented here, including an assessment of the current status of various necessary technologies. Strawman Design of a Long-Wavelength Camera for the Cornell-Caltech Atacama Telescope S. Golwala 1 and J. Glenn 4 for the CCAT Instrumentation Working Group CCAT IWG: A. W. Blain 1 , D. Campbell 2 , M. Bradford 3 , R. Brown 2 , G. Cortes 2 , D. Dowell 3 , R. Giovanelli 2 , J. Glenn 4 , S. Golwala 1 , P. Harvey 5 , C. Henderson 2 , T. Herter 2 , P. Goldsmith 3 , W. Langer 3 , J. Lloyd 3 , T. Nikola 2 , T. Phillips 1 , S. Radford 1 , A. C. S. Readhead 1 , G. Stacey 2 , D. P. Woody 1 , J. Zmuidzinas 1 1 California Institute of Technology, 2 Cornell University, 3 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4 University of Colorado, Boulder, 5 University of Texas CCAT LWCam Summary Summary of LWCam bands and sensitivities. Due to the high pixel count, we assume that only the inner 10’ of the FoV is populated with Nyquist sampled 740 μm and 850 μm pixels; the outer 5’ annulus of the FoV will use the same size pixels in these bands as at 1.1 mm, resulting in poorer angular resolution but still allowing their use for sky-noise removal. A future upgrade of the instrument would populate the entire FoV with small 740 μm and 850 μm pixels. Band Center Bandwidth [ν/ν] Beam FWHM [arcsec] Single-Pixel Sensitivity Pixel Size Pixel Count Mapping Speed Wavelength [μm] Frequency [GHz] mJy sec μK CMB sec inner 10’x10’ square outer 5’ annulus inner 10’x10’ square outer 5’ annulus deg 2 / mJy 2 / hr deg 2 / (10 μK CMB ) 2 / hr 740 405 0.07 8 7 0.8 3.2 16384 3072 6.7 865 350 0.11 9.5 4 0.7 2.8 16384 3072 29.1 1100 275 0.18 14 2.5 1000 2.1 4096 40.4 0.03 1400 215 0.19 18 2.2 530 1.6 4096 86.3 0.15 2000 150 0.20 26 2.3 310 2.3 1024 41.2 0.23 3000 100 0.30 40 2.7 270 1.5 1024 70.7 0.71 Motivation CCAT will revolutionize submm astronomy by providing unprecedented wide-field survey and wide-bandwidth spectroscopy capabilities in the 200 to 620 μm submillimeter bands. An important complement is a long-wavelength camera covering the atmos- pheric windows from 740 μm to 2 mm. Science impact: Submm galaxy observations No facility planned that will go as deep at 740 μm and 850 μm Confusion limit in these bands is 2X deeper vs. JCMT. These bands important for filling in SEDs between CCAT 200-620 μm and LMT 1-3 mm bands Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect science SZ observations of galaxy clusters require coverage from 1 mm to 2 mm and also need the higher-frequency bands for submm-galaxy confusion removal See poster 91.18 Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect Science with CCAT. Galactic protostellar regions Confusion not an issue for nearby sources. Rayleigh-Jeans tail is necessary constrain dust T and spectral index. With coverage to 2 mm, CCAT survey of galaxy would be definitive. Observatory Efficiency: ~70% of the time is optimally used for observations at 740 μm and longer ~50% at 1.1 mm and longer LWCam would make use of these periods. Recently available technologies enable a camera that covers all bands from 740 μm to 2 mm simultaneously. Design Principles Maximal use of CCAT 20’ field of view Maximize mapping speed Minimize sky-noise removal artifacts Maximal frequency coverage, simultaneous if possible Maximize source SED coverage Improve observatory efficiency Spectral sky noise subtraction Antenna-coupled optical design Feedhorn coupling not feasible at largest pixel counts (>10 4 pixels) Bare absorbers Pros: Simple Relatively easy photolithography Cons: Multi-color design difficult (beamsplitters) or inefficient (divided FoV) Filter wheels render array non-optimal in some bands Beam definition and stray light abatement challenging at lowest fre- quencies (Griffin, Bock, Gear, 2002) Antenna-coupled designs naturally eliminate above problems Highly multiplexable bolometer technology Pixel counts (>10 4 pixels) large enough that multiplexed readout critical Superconducting transition-edge sensors (TESs) and microwave kinetic inductance detectors (MKIDs) good candidates Optical train with low optical loading (at the longest wave- lengths) Atmospheric opacity in the 1-2 mm bands is 10% or lower Telescope emissivity of 5-10% needed Warm optics must be reflective and low roughness, stops and transmissive optics must be cold Critical Technologies Antenna-coupled pixels Phased array of long slot dipole antennae tapped by microstrip defines reasonable beam (Goldin 2002, 2003, Kuo et al 2006a, 2006b,Vayonakis et al. 2002) Optical bandwidth set by phased-array physical parameters Slot length, extent of array to slots: max λ size of pixel in (F/#) λ Tap spacing along a single slot, slot spacing: min λ Status: slot-dipole antennae demonstrated in lab (figure) and prototype camera (poster 101.02, Schlaerth et al. 2008,Vayonakis et al. 2008) Coupling efficiency, absorption spectra not fully understood, but good (60-70%) for narrow-bandwidth antennae w/short slots On-chip in-line bandpass filters Long-slot antenna design covers wide bandwidth; need to define bands matched to atmospheric windows Use bandpass filters in-line with microstrip to define multiple colors for a single pixel Filters use lumped element capacitors and lumped-element or microstrip inductive elements Filters can be matched to microstrip in-band and have high impedance out of band, many can be used in parallel, outputs feed to independent detectors. Status: Bandpass filters demonstrated in two varieties and for five of the six nominal bands (poster 101.02, Schlaerth et al. 2008,Vayonakis et al. 2008) Multi-Scale Pixels Want pixel size to scale with λ: too small: poor optical efficiency, too many pixels too large: poor instantaneous sampling of sky Binary nature of phased-array antenna summing tree naturally allows factor-of-2 steps in pixel size Output of a pixel of size L high-pass-filtered to define high-frequency pixel of size L Reflected low-frequency power summed with adjacent pixels to define pixels of size 2L, 4L, etc. Status:To be demonstrated. Expected difficulties are with photolithography, which may require microstrip crossovers. Low-pass and high-pass filters are similar to demonstrated bandpass filters. Highly multiplexable bolometric sensors Two good options, both photolithographically compatible with phased-array antennae and in-line filters: Superconducting Transition Edge Sensors (TESs) (Irwin 1995, Hunt et al. 2002) Demonstrated noise-equivalent powers (NEP) sufficient for background-limited performance in all bands In use/planned for APEX-SZ, ACT, SPT, SCUBA2, CLOVER, BICEP2/SPUD, SPIDER Kpixel-scale time-division-multiplexed SQUID-based readout developed by NIST and UBC, in use by SCUBA2, ACT, CLOVER, BICEP2/SPUD, SPIDER (deKorte et al. 2003, Reintsema et al. 2003) Status: Sensitivity is sufficient. Fab of focal planes of sufficient size and yield at reasonable cost to be demonstrated (in process). Multiplexing at kpixel scale has been demonstrated, probably insufficient for 10s of kpixels. RF SQUID- muxed readout may be needed, is under development at NIST (Irwin and Lehnert 2004) Microwave Kinetic Inductance Detectors (MKIDs) (Day et al. 2003, Zmuidzinas et al. 2003, Mazin 2004) 1/4-wave notch resonators incorporating MKIDs are easily multiplexed at few GHz RF frequencies (Mazin et al 2006) Not yet demonstrated sufficient performance to be background limited at CCAT site, within a factor of a few, near-term improvements may be sufficient Demonstrated in astronomical observations in a protoype camera (see poster 101.02, Schlaerth et al. 2008,Vayonakis et al. 2008) Status: X few sensitivity improvement needed, being actively worked on. Control and reproducibility of resonator frequencies to be demonstrated. RF multiplexing demonstrated for small arrays (tens of MKIDs), simultaneous readout of 100s to 1000s of MKIDs to be demonstrated. Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 L Z 0 L L L Z c Z c Z c Z c Z i n1 Z i n3 Z i n2 Z i n4 Z 1 Z 2 Z 3 Z 4 Upper left: A portion of a 16-slot, 256-tap slot-dipole phased-array an- tenna. The slots are red. The pie-shaped objects are capacitors that ter- minate the microstrip slot taps. The binary summing tree that combines the power from the taps is visible. Figure courtesy of H. G. LeDuc (JPL). Bottom left: Empirical and theoretical beam maps of a phased-array slot-dipole antenna coupled to a SIS mixer detector, measured at 110 GHz. Figure courtesy of A.Vayonakis (CIT). Top right: Bandpasses for three in-line bandpass filters measured in the lab by Fourier Transform spectroscopy. Figure courtesy of A.Vayonakis. Middle right: Photolithographic layout of four parallel lumped-element bandpass filters. Figure courtesy of S. Kumar (CIT). Bottom right: Schematic of parallel arrangement of in-line bandpass fil- ters. Figure courtesy of S. Kumar. L L L L L H H L L H H L L L L L 20 arcmin 10 arcmin References Day et al., 2003, Nature, 425: 817. deKorte et al., 2003, Rev. Sci. Instr., 74: 3807. Goldin et al., 2002, AIP Conf. Proc., 605: 251. Goldin et al., 2003, Proc. SPIE, 4855: 163. Griffin, Bock, Gear, 2002, Appl. Opt., 41: 6543. Hunt et al., 2002, Proc. SPIE, 4855: 318. Irwin 1995, Appl. Phys. Lett., 66: 1998. Irwin and Lehnert 2004, Appl. Phys. Lett., 85: 2107. Kuo et al. 2006a, NIM A, 559: 608. Kuo et al. 2006b, Proc. SPIE, 6275: 62751M. Mazin, 2004, Ph. D Thesis, California Institute of Technology Mazin et al., 2006, NIM A, 559: 799. Reintsema et al., 2003, Rev. Sci. Instr., 74: 4500. Schlaerth et al. 2008, to appear in Proc. LTD12. Vayonakis et al. 2002, AIP Conf. Proc., 605: 539. Vayonakis et al. 2008, to appear in Proc. LTD12. Zmuidzinas et al., 2003, Proc. Far-IR, Submm, and Mm Detector Workshop, NASA/ CP-2003-211408: 326. Nasmyth (Cassegrain) Focus, F/8 M4 ellipsoid M5 ellipsoid Lyot stop F/2 focal plane CCAT top view with LWCam CCAT side view with LWCam dimensions in mm L1 cold lens 150 GHz Airy discs shown 20 arcmin across diagonal λ = 2 mm λ = 850 μm λ = 600 μm Pixel Distribution over FoV H = high pixel density in high-frequency bands L = low pixel density in high-frequency bands

Upload: others

Post on 09-Jun-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Strawman Design of a Long-Wavelength Camera for the ...golwala/talks/... · short-wavelength (200-620 um) observations unfeasible. A strawman design for such a camera is presented

Optical Design

Constraints:• CCAT primary is ∅25 m and F/0.6.• CCAT will provide two F/8 Nasmyth foci. • Reimage to ~ F/2 to yield reasonable pixel sizes (9.2 mm at 150 GHz). • Need image of the primary for cold Lyot stop.• Want low optical loading and high throughput; necessitates reflective elements for

large reimaging optics; transmissive optics must be cold and therefore small.• Need flat focal plane to make use of focal plane arrays.

Resulting design• Two ellipsoids (∅2.5m) and a final cold lens (∅30cm)• ~∅30-cm cold Lyot stop between second ellipsoid and cold lens• Bend angle at each ellipsoid = 15 degrees• 5.2% distortion at edge of 20’ diameter FoV• Strehl ratio > 90% at 2 mm across full 20’ diameter FoV• Strehl ratio > 80% at 850 µm across 14.6’ diameter FoV• Further improvements to design in the works!

SCUBA2 may be mounted at other NasmythSuccessor SWCam may share ellipsoids with LWCam

AbstractThe initial suite of instruments for the Cornell-Caltech Atacama Telescope (CCAT) will likely include a wide-field, long-wavelength continuum camera (LWCam), covering frequencies from 150 GHz to 405 GHz (740 um to 2 mm) over a field-of view (FoV) as large as 20' diameter. Such a camera would contribute to many of CCAT's science goals and make use of time when poor weather renders short-wavelength (200-620 um) observations unfeasible. A strawman design for such a camera is presented here, including an assessment of the current status of various necessary technologies.

Strawman Design of a Long-Wavelength Camera for the Cornell-Caltech Atacama TelescopeS. Golwala1 and J. Glenn4 for the CCAT Instrumentation Working Group

CCAT IWG: A. W. Blain1, D. Campbell2, M. Bradford3, R. Brown2, G. Cortes2, D. Dowell3, R. Giovanelli2, J. Glenn4, S. Golwala1, P. Harvey5, C. Henderson2, T. Herter2, P. Goldsmith3, W. Langer3,J. Lloyd3, T. Nikola2, T. Phillips1, S. Radford1, A. C. S. Readhead1, G. Stacey2, D. P. Woody1, J. Zmuidzinas1

1California Institute of Technology, 2Cornell University, 3Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4University of Colorado, Boulder, 5University of Texas

CCAT LWCam SummarySummary of LWCam bands and sensitivities. Due to the high pixel count, we assume that only the inner 10’ of the FoV is populated with Nyquist sampled 740 µm and 850 µm pixels; the outer 5’ annulus of the FoV will use the same size pixels in these bands as at 1.1 mm, resulting in poorer angular resolution but still allowing their use for sky-noise removal. A future upgrade of the instrument would populate the entire FoV with small 740 µm and 850 µm pixels.

Band Center

Bandwidth[∆ν/ν]

Beam FWHM[arcsec]

Single-Pixel Sensitivity Pixel Size Pixel Count Mapping Speed

Wavelength [µm]

Frequency [GHz]

mJy √sec µKCMB √secinner

10’x10’ square

outer 5’annulus

inner 10’x10’ square

outer 5’annulus

deg2 / mJy2 /

hr

deg2 / (10 µKCMB)2 /

hr

740 405 0.07 8 7 − 0.8 3.2 16384 3072 6.7

865 350 0.11 9.5 4 − 0.7 2.8 16384 3072 29.1

1100 275 0.18 14 2.5 1000 2.1 4096 40.4 0.03

1400 215 0.19 18 2.2 530 1.6 4096 86.3 0.15

2000 150 0.20 26 2.3 310 2.3 1024 41.2 0.23

3000 100 0.30 40 2.7 270 1.5 1024 70.7 0.71

Motivation

CCAT will revolutionize submm astronomy by providing unprecedented wide-field survey and wide-bandwidth spectroscopy capabilities in the 200 to 620 µm submillimeter bands.

An important complement is a long-wavelength camera covering the atmos-pheric windows from 740 µm to 2 mm.

Science impact:• Submm galaxy observations

• No facility planned that will go as deep at 740 µm and 850 µm• Confusion limit in these bands is 2X deeper vs. JCMT. • These bands important for filling in SEDs between CCAT 200-620 µm

and LMT 1-3 mm bands• Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect science

• SZ observations of galaxy clusters require coverage from 1 mm to 2 mm and also need the higher-frequency bands for submm-galaxy confusion removal

• See poster 91.18 Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect Science with CCAT.• Galactic protostellar regions

• Confusion not an issue for nearby sources. • Rayleigh-Jeans tail is necessary constrain dust T and spectral index.• With coverage to 2 mm, CCAT survey of galaxy would be definitive.

Observatory Efficiency:• ~70% of the time is optimally used for observations at 740 µm and longer

~50% at 1.1 mm and longerLWCam would make use of these periods.

• Recently available technologies enable a camera that covers all bands from 740 µm to 2 mm simultaneously.

Design Principles

Maximal use of CCAT 20’ field of view• Maximize mapping speed• Minimize sky-noise removal artifacts

Maximal frequency coverage, simultaneous if possible• Maximize source SED coverage• Improve observatory efficiency• Spectral sky noise subtraction

Antenna-coupled optical design• Feedhorn coupling not feasible at largest pixel counts (>104 pixels)• Bare absorbers

• Pros:• Simple• Relatively easy photolithography

• Cons:• Multi-color design difficult (beamsplitters) or inefficient (divided FoV)• Filter wheels render array non-optimal in some bands• Beam definition and stray light abatement challenging at lowest fre-

quencies (Griffin, Bock, Gear, 2002)• Antenna-coupled designs naturally eliminate above problems

Highly multiplexable bolometer technology• Pixel counts (>104 pixels) large enough that multiplexed readout critical• Superconducting transition-edge sensors (TESs) and microwave kinetic

inductance detectors (MKIDs) good candidates

Optical train with low optical loading (at the longest wave-lengths)• Atmospheric opacity in the 1-2 mm bands is 10% or lower• Telescope emissivity of 5-10% needed⇒ Warm optics must be reflective and low roughness,

stops and transmissive optics must be cold

Critical Technologies

Antenna-coupled pixels• Phased array of long slot dipole antennae tapped by microstrip defines reasonable beam

(Goldin 2002, 2003, Kuo et al 2006a, 2006b, Vayonakis et al. 2002)• Optical bandwidth set by phased-array physical parameters

• Slot length, extent of array ⊥ to slots: ⇒ max λ⇒ size of pixel in (F/#) λ

• Tap spacing along a single slot, slot spacing: ⇒ min λStatus: • slot-dipole antennae demonstrated in lab (figure) and prototype camera (poster 101.02, Schlaerth et al. 2008, Vayonakis et al. 2008)• Coupling efficiency, absorption spectra not fully understood, but good (60-70%) for narrow-bandwidth antennae w/short slots

On-chip in-line bandpass filters• Long-slot antenna design covers wide bandwidth; need to define bands matched to atmospheric windows• Use bandpass filters in-line with microstrip to define multiple colors for a single pixel

• Filters use lumped element capacitors and lumped-element or microstrip inductive elements • Filters can be matched to microstrip in-band and have high impedance out of band, many can be used in parallel, outputs feed to

independent detectors.Status: Bandpass filters demonstrated in two varieties and for five of the six nominal bands (poster 101.02, Schlaerth et al. 2008, Vayonakis et al. 2008)

Multi-Scale Pixels• Want pixel size to scale with λ:

• too small: poor optical efficiency, too many pixels• too large: poor instantaneous sampling of sky

• Binary nature of phased-array antenna summing tree naturally allows factor-of-2 steps in pixel size• Output of a pixel of size L high-pass-filtered to define high-frequency pixel of size L• Reflected low-frequency power summed with adjacent pixels to define pixels of size 2L, 4L, etc.

Status: To be demonstrated. Expected difficulties are with photolithography, which may require microstrip crossovers. Low-pass and high-pass filters are similar to demonstrated bandpass filters.

Highly multiplexable bolometric sensorsTwo good options, both photolithographically compatible with phased-array antennae and in-line filters:• Superconducting Transition Edge Sensors (TESs) (Irwin 1995, Hunt et al. 2002)

• Demonstrated noise-equivalent powers (NEP) sufficient for background-limited performance in all bands• In use/planned for APEX-SZ, ACT, SPT, SCUBA2, CLOVER, BICEP2/SPUD, SPIDER• Kpixel-scale time-division-multiplexed SQUID-based readout developed by NIST and UBC, in use by SCUBA2, ACT, CLOVER, BICEP2/SPUD, SPIDER (deKorte et al. 2003, Reintsema et al. 2003)

Status: Sensitivity is sufficient. Fab of focal planes of sufficient size and yield at reasonable cost to be demonstrated (in process). Multiplexing at kpixel scale has been demonstrated, probably insufficient for 10s of kpixels. RF SQUID-muxed readout may be needed, is under development at NIST (Irwin and Lehnert 2004)• Microwave Kinetic Inductance Detectors (MKIDs) (Day et al. 2003, Zmuidzinas et al. 2003, Mazin 2004)

• 1/4-wave notch resonators incorporating MKIDs are easily multiplexed at few GHz RF frequencies (Mazin et al 2006)• Not yet demonstrated sufficient performance to be background limited at CCAT site, within a factor of a few, near-term improvements may be sufficient• Demonstrated in astronomical observations in a protoype camera (see poster 101.02, Schlaerth et al. 2008, Vayonakis et al. 2008)

Status: X few sensitivity improvement needed, being actively worked on. Control and reproducibility of resonator frequencies to be demonstrated. RF multiplexing demonstrated for small arrays (tens of MKIDs), simultaneous readout of 100s to 1000s of MKIDs to be demonstrated.

8

Finally, optical power is coupled from the microstrip transmission line to the MKID by routing the microstrip over the MKID CPW center conductor; with aluminum MKIDs, radiation above 90 GHz breaks Cooper pairs and is thus sensed. With a thermal source, we have demonstrated that approximately 50% of the power incident on the antenna is transferred to the MKID, in line with expectations. (We have chosen a single-polarization antenna design because it is the only geometry that has a large enough optical bandwidth – set by the tap spacing at high frequency and the slot length at low frequency – to afford multicolor operation. The loss of !2 in background-limited sensitivity is more than compensated by the simultaneous observation in four colors.) 3.4 Multiplexing Factor

The number of detectors that may be read out with a single feedline and cryogenic amplifier is limited by the quality factor Q of the resonators, the accuracy with which the resonance frequencies may be lithographically determined, and the bandwidth of the amplifier. Qs of greater than 10

6 have been

demonstrated with resonator FWHMs of a few kHz. A 54-element test array of uncoupled detectors was used to demonstrate that the resonator frequencies can be predicted to within 3 MHz, much larger than the achievable FWHM. Q for optically loaded devices degrades to roughly 10

4, but this is sufficiently

smaller than the 3 MHz spacing to ensure separation. The predictability has been somewhat degraded in the more complicated optically coupled design tested so far, but any overlapping resonances can be decoupled via linear decomposition as long as they are separated by at least 1 FWHM. HEMT amplifiers that operate over 4-12 GHz are available, enabling the simultaneous readout using a single HEMT of 2400 detectors spaced by 3 MHz. For completeness, we note that saturation of the HEMT puts a less restrictive limit on the multiplexing factor: the power for each excitation frequency is at most hundreds

Figure 5. Left: The 16-pixel array for the demonstration camera. The phased array of 16 slot antennae comprising each pixel is visible. Right: A photograph of a

slot antenna, showing the microstrip taps that extract the power absorbed by the slot dipoles. A 3-stage, in-line bandpass filter is on the right.

Figure 6. Left: Angular response of an antenna coupled to a SIS mixer to a coherent 100 GHz source. Right: Responses of three in-line band-defining filters. The high-frequency fringing is the result of resonances between blocking filters used in these early tests, which will be improved upon for the MKIDCam.

Z0

Z0

Z0

Z0

L

Z0

L

L

L

Zc

Zc

Zc

Zc

Zin1

Zin3

Zin2

Zin4

Z1

Z2

Z3

Z4

Upper left: A portion of a 16-slot, 256-tap slot-dipole phased-array an-tenna. The slots are red. The pie-shaped objects are capacitors that ter-minate the microstrip slot taps. The binary summing tree that combines the power from the taps is visible. Figure courtesy of H. G. LeDuc (JPL). Bottom left: Empirical and theoretical beam maps of a phased-array slot-dipole antenna coupled to a SIS mixer detector, measured at 110 GHz. Figure courtesy of A. Vayonakis (CIT). Top right: Bandpasses for three in-line bandpass filters measured in the lab by Fourier Transform spectroscopy. Figure courtesy of A. Vayonakis. Middle right: Photolithographic layout of four parallel lumped-element bandpass filters. Figure courtesy of S. Kumar (CIT).Bottom right: Schematic of parallel arrangement of in-line bandpass fil-ters. Figure courtesy of S. Kumar.

L L L L

L H H L

L H H L

L L L L

20 arcmin10 arcmin

References

Day et al., 2003, Nature, 425: 817.deKorte et al., 2003, Rev. Sci. Instr., 74: 3807.Goldin et al., 2002, AIP Conf. Proc., 605: 251.Goldin et al., 2003, Proc. SPIE, 4855: 163.Griffin, Bock, Gear, 2002, Appl. Opt., 41: 6543.Hunt et al., 2002, Proc. SPIE, 4855: 318.Irwin 1995, Appl. Phys. Lett., 66: 1998.Irwin and Lehnert 2004, Appl. Phys. Lett., 85: 2107.Kuo et al. 2006a, NIM A, 559: 608.Kuo et al. 2006b, Proc. SPIE, 6275: 62751M.Mazin, 2004, Ph. D Thesis, California Institute of TechnologyMazin et al., 2006, NIM A, 559: 799.Reintsema et al., 2003, Rev. Sci. Instr., 74: 4500.Schlaerth et al. 2008, to appear in Proc. LTD12.Vayonakis et al. 2002, AIP Conf. Proc., 605: 539.Vayonakis et al. 2008, to appear in Proc. LTD12.Zmuidzinas et al., 2003, Proc. Far-IR, Submm, and Mm Detector Workshop, NASA/

CP-2003-211408: 326.

Nasmyth (Cassegrain) Focus, F/8

M4ellipsoid

M5ellipsoid

Lyot stop F/2

focal plane

CCAT top view with LWCam CCAT side view with LWCam

dimensions in mm

L1 cold lens 150 GHz Airy discs

shown

20 arcmin across diagonal

λ = 2 mmλ = 850 µmλ = 600 µm

Pixel Distribution over FoVH = high pixel density in high-frequency bandsL = low pixel density in high-frequency bands