strategy documents1a
DESCRIPTION
Informs Strategic documents mapTRANSCRIPT
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
• The pre-eminent strategy document• Encompasses all aspects of National power
PublishedClassification: UNCLASS
National Security Council(Ms. Condoleezza Rice)
OPNAV POC: N513
NSSNSS
DPG
NMSNSS
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
Defense Planning Guidance• DPG FY 04-09 provides direction for DoD components to develop their FY 04-09 program submissions and the President’s FY04 budget submission.• The DPG focuses on plans and programs that enhance joint warfighting capabilities, including the interoperability, training and experimentation needed to support those capabilities.Classification: CLASSIFIED
• DPG FY04-09 was signed out effective 3 May 02- Numerous studies, briefs and program reviews directed by DPG are in progress• DPG FY 05-09 started 1st week of Nov 02:- Purpose is to refine, not re-write, DPG 04- Goal for publication is 15 March 03
• OSD (Policy) and OSD (PA&E) share lead• OPNAV Lead: N8
DPGDPG
(to PPBS)
DPG
NSS
TPG
FP Study OA Study
QDR JPD
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
Quadrennial Defense Review• Required by Congress every 4 years after Presidential inauguration.• Used by Administration to conduct comprehensive review of defense strategy• 2 x QDRs to date: 1997 & 2001• Next QDR in 2005
Classification: UNCLASS
• QDR 2001 report released Sept 2001• Next QDR report due Sept 2005
• OSD is principal author• CJCS required by Congress to do separate assessment of risk• Services can provide input, but have limited ability to influence content• OPNAV POC: QDR Cell• QDR 2001 cell established in N8 in Sept 2000, disestablished Oct 2001• N51 (N512/513) support strategy/policy aspects of QDR
QDRQDR
DPG
QDR
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
Nuclear Posture Review• DoD report to President and Congress which provides blueprint for strategic posture.
Classification: CLASSIFIED
• Current NPR signed by SecDef Dec 2001• NPR Implementer (tasking from SecDef to Services based on NPR) is in draft. Signature expected Dec 2002.
• Lead: OSD- Implementation is closely coordinated w/JS, Services, STRATCOM and DOE.• OPNAV POC: N51 (N514)
NPRNPR
NMSNPR
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
Contingency Planning Guidance• Fulfills Title X, USC requirement for written policy guidance for CJCS and Combatant Commanders to prepare and review contingency plans.• Drafted by OSD, approved by President.Classification: CLASSIFIED
The 2002 CPG was approved by the President on 28 June 02 and signed out by SECDEF effective 1 July 02
• OSD Document• JS Lead: J5/Strategic Plans and Policy Directorate• OPNAV POC: N51 (N512)
CPGCPG
CPG
JSCP
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
Transformation Planning Guidance• Provides rationale for transformation• Provides tasks relating to transformation to the Services, JS, OSD, and JFCOM•Classification: CLASSIFIED
Draft in work• Current draft: 31 October 02• Out for Service Chief chop (due 8 Nov)
D/FT has lead for OSD• N71 has Navy lead
TPGTPG
DPG TPG
JV
JCC
JOCs
NTR
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
• Study what changes to US over-seas presence must take place toaccount for new realities & a newdefense strategy. - DPG Directed
• Briefed to OPSDEP tank (Early Oct 02)- Brief was stopped short due to time• JCS tank TBD
DASD/Strategy is lead agency-N513 is OPNAV liaison to DASD/Strategy
FP StudyFP Study
DPG
FPStudy
Navy Fwd Pres Study
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
• Provides advice of CJCS to the President and SECDEF on the strategic direction of the Armed Forces.
Classification: Unclassified
• Approved by OPSDEPS.• JCS decision Brief 6 Nov 02.• Publication Dec 02.
Lead: J-5.OPNAV POC: N51 (N513)
NMSNMS
NSS
NMSJV
JCCNOC
JOCs
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan• Provides guidance to Combatant Commanders, Service Chiefs and Defense Agencies to accomplish tasks and missions based on near-term capabilities• Apportions resources to the Combatant Commanders• Implements deliberate planning guidance reflected in the CPGClassification: CLASSIFIED
• JSCP 2002 was approved by CJCS and signed 01 Nov 02• Work has begun on JSCP 02 chng 1 to refine force apportionment as Combatant Commanders develop their Swiftly Defeat The Efforts (SDTE) plans.
• Joint Staff document: J5/Strategic Planning and Policy Directorate• OPNAV POC: N51 (N512)
JSCPJSCP
NMSCPGJSCP
(to COCOM plans)
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
• Provides guidance for military transformation• Joint Warfare• Joint Concepts• Joint Capabilities
Classification: Unclassified
As of 28 Oct 02• Signed by CJCS• Forwarded to SECDEFfor endorsement
DJ7 has lead• N513 has Navy lead
JVJV
NMS
JCCJV
JIMPFunc
Concepts
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
• Defines the process that translates emerging joint concepts into warfighting capabilities through experimentation and assessments.- JV describes the conduct of future joint warfare. The JIMP details the process, from concept to capability, that will support achieving the Chairman’s Vision.
Classification: Unclassified
Approved 15 Apr 01DJ7 has lead• N513 had lead• N81 supported• COG shift to N70
JIMPJIMP
JV
JIMP
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
• Amplifies a particular function or describes how to employ a system or conduct a task.• A functional concept may be specific to a particular operating concept or it may apply broadly to multiple concepts.• Provides the detail for experiments and establishes a benchmark against which to measure improvement.
Classification: TBD
• Functional Concept development TBD.• Will flow from existing JWCAs.
• Lead will be JWCA offices under J-5.- OPNAV POC: N51/N81
Functional ConceptsFunctional Concepts
JCC
JOCs
Service Concepts
Functional Concepts
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
• Conducted to assess or review specific aspects of the NMS between NMS cycles (4 years)• Supports NMS – feeds the same documents during the NMS off-years
Classification: CLASSIFIED
• No JSR during NMS publication year• DJ5 has overall lead• N513 is Navy lead
JSRJSR
NMSNOC
JSR
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
• Provides the next level of resolution below JV. Amplifies the JV key ideas to provide a more detailed foundation for follow on concept development, experimentation and assessment. • JCC focus is on the employment of joint forces in missions across the range of military operations.
Classification: Unclassified
• Outline approved by JROC 17 Oct 02• Outline due SECDEF 1 Nov. • Final Document due SECDEF 1 Feb 03.
Lead: J-7Support: J-8, JFCOMOPNAV POC: N51 (N513)
JCCJCCJV
JOCs
Service Concepts
Functional Concepts
JCC
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
Integrate joint and Service concepts in an operational level perspective forjoint concept development and experimentation.Describes how a Joint Force Commander will plan, prepare, deploy, employ and sustain a joint force along a specified range of the range of military operations.Classification: TBD
•JOC development TBD.• Will follow JCC.
Each individual JOC will be lead by a Combatant Commander or Service as directed.
JOCsJOCsJV
JOCs
Service Concepts
Functional Concepts
JCC
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
Naval Operational Concept• Operationalizes Naval Force Concepts:• Seapower-21• Marine-21• Entry point for Service concepts in JCC
Classification: UNCLASS
Draft In work• TOR/Outline approved• 1st Draft to released 22 Oct• Responses to NWDC 25 Oct• CFFC/CO MCCDC brief 7 Nov• CNO/CMC brief TBD
• NWDC and MCCDC have lead in drafting- OPNAV POC: N51 (N513)
NOCNOCNMS
JCC
Mar.InfoOPS
CONOPS
NTR
SP21
GlobalCONOPS
NOC
JSR
JOCs StrategicPlanning
Framework
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
• Vision of how Navy will organize, integrate, and transform through Sea Strike, Sea Shield, Sea Basing, FORCEnet, Sea Warrior, Sea Trial and Sea Enterprise.
Classification: Unclassified
• Series of Proceedings articles- Overview and Sea Shield published- Other articles to follow
• N00Z lead• N513 transitioning to lead for briefings/ownership
SP21SP21
NP21SP21NOC
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
• Establishes the SECNAV’s vision for the Naval forces
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
• Approved Oct 02 Deep Blue had Navy lead• N513 supported• SIG coord for USMC
NP21NP21
NP21SP21
SECNAVPosture
Stmt
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
USN CONOPS• Based on DPG guidance • Services will achieve capabilities for deterring aggression & coercion.
Classification: CLASSIFIED
• Published • N-8 Document• Currently no action for N3/N5- Would be co-opted if SPF concept is accepted
GlobalCONOPSGlobalCONOPS
GlobalCONOPS
NOC
StrategicPlanning
Framework
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
• Bridging document between strategy & programs. Describes how Navy will operate in 1-4-2-1 context:- 7-12 years out and 15-19 years out• Companion document to NSPG- Bridge from QDR, JV, SP-21 and NTR to PPBS process• Leads into Campaign AnalysisClassification: TBD (likely CLASSIFIED)
• Concept being developed in N513 • In development
Strategic PlanningFrameworkStrategic PlanningFramework
Mar.InfoOPS
CONOPS
NSPG
NTR
GlobalCONOPS
NOC
NavyOA
Study
StrategicPlanning
Framework
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
• Identify and prioritize Capability Objectives needed to support the execution of the strategy.• Bridge from QDR, NMS, JV, SP-21, and NTR to PPBS process
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
• Draft Navy version in review by OPNAV and CFFC/NWDC.• Final draft expected by 1 Nov• Naval (w/ USMC) planned for APR 03
• N513 lead- Draft on annual basis (each APR)- With N512, monitor implementation (MCPs)
NSPGNSPG
IRRMP NSPG
StrategicPlanning
Framework
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
• Integrated Resources Requirements Management Process• DNS attempt at OPNAV organizationaland process (PPBS) improvement- Results will be incorporated into NSPG & SPF framework
Classification: TBD (likely to be UNCLASSIFIED)
In work. Due Date unknown. DNS Lead• N3/N5A is N3N5 lead• N513 has had inputs•N512 has had inputs
IRRMPIRRMP
.
IRRMP NSPG(to PPBS)
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
Define document’s purpose• Brief description• 2-3 lines max
List the document’s current status• Brief description• 2-3 lines max
List Lead/Action Organization respon.• Brief description• 2-3 lines max
Maritime InfoCONOPSMaritime InfoCONOPS
Mar. InfoOPS
CONOPS
NOC
StrategicPlanning
Framework
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
• Naval Transformation Roadmap- Provides Service path to transformation- Assessed and tracked by OSDD/FT
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
• Published- Next update due 1 March 2003• N71 to reconvene NTR working group in Nov 2002
• OPNAV POC: N71 - N51 (N513) supports • Marine Corps POC: MCCDC
NTRNTR
NTR
NOC
TPG
JOCs
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
Operational Availability Study• DPG 04 directed CJCS to study concept of Operational Availability to determine the joint military capabilities and force employment timelines required to accomplish emerging missions in the 2002 CPG.• OA final report recommendations will feed DPG-05Classification: CLASSIFIED
• Interim Report (near term scenario) briefed to DepSecDef in Aug, SecDef in Sept• Final Report (including all sub-studies) due by 31 Mar 03.
• JS Lead: J8/Warfighting Analysis Division• Note: JROC oversight of study• OPNAV POC: N51 (N512)
OA StudyOA Study
DPG
NavyOA
Study
OAStudy
(+ 5 substudies)
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
Navy Operational Availability Study• Navy OA Study goal is to examine “Strategy-to-capability mismatches” and recommend courses of action to re-align resources.• The 5 OA sub-studies will conduct alternative analysis to provide recommendations addressing OA shortfalls/overages and to improve responsiveness of forcesClassification: CLASSIFIED
• Sub-studies are progressing at different rates, general goal is for each sub-study to have developed their CONOPS by 1st week of December 02 to support OA modeling.
Navy OA Leads:• Overall study lead: N51 (N512)• Strategic Reserve: N512• Executing Swiftly Defeat: N816• AC/RC Mix: N512• Worldwide PrePo assets: N421• Force generation/Rotation Ratios: N512
Navy OA StudyNavy OA Study
NavyOA
Study
OAStudy
(+ 5 substudies)
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
• Navy Forward Presence Study- Attempts to answer • What activities does presence consist of?• What do we get from presence?• Where should presence be?• What should presence look like in the future?
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
• Draft in progress- Initial outline approved by N513- Info gathering from NWC, CNA, GAO, CRS, CBO, available literature
OPNAV POC: N51 (N513)
Navy FP StudyNavy FP Study
NavyFP Study SP-21
NMSNSS
TSC Guidance
QDRReport
QDRReport
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
National Security Policy Directives• Brief description• 2-3 lines max
List the document’s current status• Brief description• 2-3 lines max
List Lead/Action Organization respon.• Brief description• 2-3 lines max
NSPDNSPD
17
4
NMSNSPDs
Purpose
Organizational ResponsibilitiesStatus
Relationships
Define document’s purpose• Brief description• 2-3 lines max
List the document’s current status• Brief description• 2-3 lines max
List Lead/Action Organization respon.• Brief description• 2-3 lines max
DOCUMENT TITLEDOCUMENT TITLE