strategic perspective
DESCRIPTION
compensatn mgmtTRANSCRIPT
2-1
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter
2
Strategic Perspectives
2-2
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Learning ObjectivesAfter studying Chapter 2, students should be able to:
1. Understand the concept of a compensation strategy, where it comes from, how it relates to the organization’s situation, and why the concept has value.
2. Illustrate the relationship between the pay system and each of the strategic issues discussed.
3. Realize there is not yet consensus on the concept of strategy.
4. Understand the difference between transactional and relational returns.
2-3
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Corporate objectivesstrategic plans,vision, and values
Strategiccompensation
decisions
Compensationsystems
Employeeattitudes and
behaviors
Competitiveadvantage
Business unitstrategies
HR strategies
Social, competitive,and regulatoryenvironment
What business should we be in?
How do we win (gain competitive advantage) in those businesses?
How should HR help us win?
How should total compensation help us win?
Strategic Choices
2-4
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Strategic Perspectives Toward Total Compensation
• Support the business objectives
• Support recruiting, motivation, and retention of MS-caliber talent
• Preserve MS core values
• Support business mission and goals
• Develop global leaders at every level
• Reinforce team-based culture
• Reduce costs, increase productivity
• Demonstrate respect for individual talent and the limitless potential of a highly motivated team
• Encourage high standards of excellence, original thinking, a passion for the process of discovery and a willingness to take risks
• Reward fresh ideas, hard work and a commitment to excellence
• Value diverse perspectives as a key to discovery
Microsoft Bristol - Myers Squibb Firepond
Ob
ject
ives
Inte
rnal
A
lign
men
t • Integral part of MS culture• Support MS performance
driven culture• Business/technology-
based organization design structure
• Flexibility for development and growth
• Reflect responsibilities, required competencies, and business impact
• Pay differences that foster a collegial atmosphere
• Reinforce high expectations
2-5
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Strategic Perspectives Toward Total Compensation (continued)
• Lead in total compensation
• Lag in base pay
• Lead with bonuses, stock options
• Compare favorably to higher-performing competitors
• Cash between the 50th and 75th percentile
• Demonstrate respect for individual talent and the limitless potential of a highly motivated team
Microsoft Bristol - Myers Squibb Firepond
Ext
ern
ally
C
om
pet
itiv
eA
dm
inis
trat
ion
• Open, transparent communications
• Centralized administration• Software supported
• Performance and leadership feedback – everyone is a leader
• Administrative ease
• Goal-focused, team-oriented, and self-managed
Em
plo
yee
Co
ntr
ibu
tio
n
• Bonuses and options based on individual performance
• Support high performance, leadership culture
• Team-based increases
• Options align employee and shareholder interest
• Tailor to business and team results
• Bonus pool based on Firepond financial performance. Individual share of pool based on individual performance.
• Push stock ownership deep into company
2-6
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Pay System Objectives
Attract and retain employees
Motivate performance
Promote skills and knowledge development
Shape corporate culture
Reinforce and define structure
Determine pay costs
2-7
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Pay-Design ProcessBefore any new compensation program is
designed, there must be a clear understanding by the organization of:its current valuesits structureits peopleits goals and vision for the future
2-8
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Generic Business-level Strategies
InnovatorCost CutterCustomer Focused
2-9
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Tailor the Compensation System to the Strategy
StrategyBusiness Response
HR Program Alignment
Compensation System
Innovator:
Increase Product Complexity and Shorten Product
Life Cycle
Cost Cutter:
Focus on Efficiency
Customer Focused:
Increase Customer
Expectations
• Product Leadership
• Shift to Mass Customization and Innovation
• Cycle Time
• Committed to Agile, Risk Taking, Innovative People
• Reward Innovation in Products and Processes
• Market-Based Pay
• Flexible – Generic Job Descriptions
• Operational Excellence
• Pursue Cost-effective Solutions
• Do More With Less
• Focus on Competitors’ Labor Costs
• Increase Variable Pay
• Emphasize Productivity
• Focus on System Control and Work Specifications
• Customer Intimacy
• Deliver Solutions to Customers
• Speed to Market
• Delight Customer, Exceed Expectations
• Customer Satisfaction Incentives
• Value of Job and Skills Based on Customer Contact
2-10
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Which Pay Decisions Are Strategic?
A strategic perspective focuses on those competitive choices that help the organization gain and sustain competitive advantage.
2-11
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Strategic Compensation Decisions
ObjectivesAlignmentCompetitivenessContributionsAdministration
2-12
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Example: The Strategic Compensation Decisions Facing Starbucks
1. Objectives: How should compensation support business strategy and be adaptive to the cultural and regulatory environment?
Starbucks objectives: Grow by making employees feel valued. Recognize that every dollar earned passes through
employees’ hands. Use pay, benefits, and opportunities for personal
development to help gain employee loyalty and become difficult to imitate.
2-13
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Example: The Strategic Compensation Decisions Facing Starbucks (continued)
2. Alignment: How differently should the various types and levels of skills be paid within the organization?
Starbucks: De-emphasize differences. Use egalitarian pay structures, cross-train employees
to handle many jobs, and call employees partners.
2-14
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Example: The Strategic Compensation Decisions Facing Starbucks (continued)
3. Competitiveness: How should total compensation be positioned against our competitors? What forms of compensation should we use?
Starbucks: Pay just slightly above other fast-food employers. Provide health insurance and stock options for all
employees (including part-timers). Give everyone a free pound of coffee every week.
2-15
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Example: The Strategic Compensation Decisions Facing Starbucks (continued)
4. Contributions: Should pay increases be based on individual and/or team performance, on experience and/or continuous learning, on improved skills, on changes in cost of living, on personal needs, and/or on each business unit’s performance?
Starbucks: Emphasize team performance and shareholder
returns. For new managers in Beijing and Prague, provide
training opportunities in the U.S.
2-16
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Example: The Strategic Compensation Decisions Facing Starbucks (continued)
5. Administration: How open and transparent should pay decisions be to all employees? Who should be involved in designing and managing the system?
Starbucks: As members of the Starbuck’s “family,” our
employees realize what is best for them. Partners can and do get involved.
2-17
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
1. Assess Total Compensation Implications• Competitive Dynamics• Core Culture / Values• Social and Political Context• Employee / Union Needs• Other HR Systems
1. Assess Total Compensation Implications• Competitive Dynamics• Core Culture / Values• Social and Political Context• Employee / Union Needs• Other HR Systems
2. Fit Policy Decisions to Strategy• Objectives • Contributions• Alignment • Administration• Competitiveness
2. Fit Policy Decisions to Strategy• Objectives • Contributions• Alignment • Administration• Competitiveness
3. Implement Strategy• Design System to Translate Strategy into Action• Choose Techniques to Fit Strategy
3. Implement Strategy• Design System to Translate Strategy into Action• Choose Techniques to Fit Strategy
4. Reassess the Fit• Realign as Conditions Change• Realign as Strategy Changes
4. Reassess the Fit• Realign as Conditions Change• Realign as Strategy Changes
Key Steps to Formulate a Compensation Strategy
2-18
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Basic Issue: Does “Best Fit” Pay Off?
Socioeconomic / Political Environment
Socioeconomic / Political Environment
HR / Compensation Policies
HR / Compensation Policies
Organization Strategy
Organization Strategy
Competitive Advantage
Competitive Advantage
Socioeconomic / Political Environment
Organization Strategy
Organization Strategy
HR / Compensation Policies
HR / Compensation Policies
Competitive Advantage
Competitive Advantage
2-19
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Best Practices Options
THE NEW PAY External market-sensitive-based pay,
not internal alignment Variable performance-based pay, not
annual increases Risk-sharing partnership, not
entitlement Flexible opportunities to contribute, not
jobs Lateral promotions, not career path Employability, not job security Teams, not individual contributors
HIGH COMMITMENT High wages: You get what you pay for Guarantee employment security Apply incentives; share gains, not risks Employee ownership Participation and empowerment Teams, not individuals are base units Smaller pay differences Promotion from within Selective recruiting Enterprise-wide information sharing Training, cross-training, and skill
development are crucial Symbolic egalitarianism adds value Long-term perspective matters Measurement matters
2-20
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Virtuous and Vicious Circles
Organization Performance INCREASES
Decreased Performance- Based Pay
Decreased Employee Performance
Risk/Return IMBALANCE
Organization Performance DECREASES
Increased Performance- Based Pay
Increased Employee Performance
Risk/Return BALANCE
Virtuous Circle
Vicious Circle
2-21
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
An implicit contract is an unwritten understanding between employers and employees over their reciprocal obligations and returns; employees contribute toward achieving the goals of the employer in exchange for returns given by the employer and valued by the employee.
2-22
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Framework for AnalyzingDifferent Deals
HIGH PAY – LOW COMMITMENT
Hired Guns (Stockbrokers)
HIGH PAY – HIGH COMMITMENT
Cult - like (Microsoft)
LOW PAY – LOW COMMITMENT
Workers as Commodity (Employers of Migrant
Farm Workers)
LOW PAY – HIGH COMMITMENT
Family (Starbucks)
Low High
RELATIONAL
Lo
wH
igh
TR
AN
SA
CT
ION
AL
2-23
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Summary
A strategic perspective on compensation takes the position that how employees are compensated can be a source of sustainable competitive advantage.
Two alternative approaches are highlighted:A “best fit” / contingent business strategy / environmental
context approach; andA “best practices” approach.
The “best fit” approach presumes that one size does not fit all. The art of managing compensation strategically involves fitting the compensation system to the different business and environmental conditions.
2-24
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Summary (continued)
The best practices approach assumes that there exists a universal, best way.The focus is not on the question of what the best strategy is,
but how best to implement the system.Agreement on what are the best practices does not exist.
The four-step process for forming and implementing a compensation strategy includes:Assessing conditionsDeciding on the best strategic choices following the pay modelImplementing the strategy through design of the pay systemReassessing the fit
2-25
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
© 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Summary (continued)
Recent studies have begun to research what aspect of the compensation system really does matter, but the answer is still fuzzy.
An essential point is that the deal (the employment relationship) includes both transactional and relational forms of compensation.
It is the total deal, the relationship with people, that makes an organization successful.