storm water management program 1998/99 annual report and ... · board adopted a municipal npdes...

JULY 1999 LIBRARY COPY

Storm Water Management Program 1998/99 Annual Report and Program Effectiveness Evaluation Report

Prepared for:

City of Stockton Municipal Utilities District Storm Water Division

County of San Joaquin Public Works Department

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Introduction and Background ........................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Best Management Practices (BMPs) .................................................................................. 1-4 1.3 Assessment Tools ............................................................................................................... 1-6

2.0 Residential and Commercial Activities Assessment ........................................................ 2-1 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Assessment of the Program ................................................................................................ 2-2 2.3 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 2-6

3.0 Improper Discharge Activities Assessment ...................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Assessment of the Program ................................................................................................ 3-2 3.3 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 3-6

4.0 Industrial Activities Assessment ...................................................................................... .4-1 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 Assessment of the Program ................................................................................................ 4-2 4.3 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 4-4

5.0 Construction Activities Assessment .................................................................................. 5-1 5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5-1 5.2 Assessment of Program ...................................................................................................... S-2 5.3 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 5-4

6.0 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 6-1

LIST OFT ABLES

Table A-1 City of Stockton Residential and Commercial Reported Activities ..................... 2-9 Table A-2 County of San Joaquin Residential and Commercial Reported Activities ......... 2-17 Table B-1 City of Stockton Improper Discharge Reported Activities ................................... 3-7 BMP B3.1 City of Stockton Record Illicit Connections Investigated During 1997/98 ....... 3-15 BMP B3.1 City of Stockton Record Illicit Connections Investigated During 1998/99 ....... 3-19 Table B-2 County of San Joaquin Improper Discharge Reported Activities ....................... 3-25 Table C-1 City of Stockton Industrial Reported Activities ................................................... A-5 BMP Cl.3 City of Stockton Record of 1996/1997 Industrial Inspections ............................ .4-9 BMP Cl.3 City of Stockton Record of 1997/1998 Industrial Inspections .......................... A-11 Table D-1 City of Stockton Construction Reported Activities .............................................. S-5

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Storm Water Management Program Stucture ......................................................... 1-3 Figure 2. Storm Water Management Program Section 4 Detail.. ........................................... 1-5

Annual Report Program Assessment

7j r i oi-/ 1

TOC-i

1.0 SUMMARY

1.1 Introduction and Background

The 1987 amendments to the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) mandated the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate storm water runoff from industrial activities and municipal

separate storm sewer system (municipal discharges are the focus of this report) in two phases.

The amendments define storm water discharges as point sources to be permitted under the

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). EPA published the Phase I storm

water regulations in November 1990. The regulations required large municipalities (population

greater than 250,000) and medium municipalities (population greater than 100,000) to submit a

NPDES permit application in two parts. The first part was to contain information regarding

existing activities and authorities that address storm water runoff quality. The second part was to

contain a comprehensive management program describing controls to be implemented to reduce

the discharge of pollutants in urban runoff to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP).

The City of Stockton (City) was identified in the Phase I regulations as a medium municipality.

The City submitted its Part 1 application in May 1992 and Part 2 in May 1993 to the Central

Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board). In February 1995, the Regional

Board adopted a municipal NPDES storm water permit issued to the City. TQ.e permit directs the

City to implement its Storm Water Management Program (Program) submitted in its Part 2

application. The City has been implementing its Program since February 1995.

The County of San Joaquin (County) was named as a co-permittee to the City's storm water

permit. The Regional Board determined the unincorporated areas of the City should also be

covered by the storm water program subsequent to the City submitting its Part 1 application. In

February 1993, the Board notified the County of San Joaquin (County) to submit its two-part

permit application. The County submitted Part 1 application in February 1995 and its Part 2 in

February 1996. As required in the permit, the County began implementing its program in

October 1996 once approved by the Regional Board.


1-1

The NPDES permit expires on February 1, 2000, and the City and County will submit an

application to renew the permit by August 5, 1999. A revised Program will be submitted with

the application that identifies activities to be conducted during the next five-year permit term. In

accordance with the regulations, the City and County conducted an assessment of the

effectiveness of their Programs to reduce pollutants to the MEP. The findings of the assessment

is summarized in this report and will assist the City and County to develop their revised

Program.

While named as co-permittees to one permit, the City and County currently have separate

programs and submit documents and reports separately to the Regional Board. However, the

programs are essentially identical (Figure 1) and the City and County work together

cooperatively to ensure consistency in program development and implementation. The revised

program will be a joint document but with different implementation for each agency.

To conduct the assessment, tools were developed for each BMP and used to evaluate the

effectiveness of each program element. To summarize the assessment findings, the format of

this report for the discussion of each of the program elements includes:

1. A summary of the regulatory requirements and program element objectives to comply with

the regulations,

2. An assessment of each BMP in the program element that were implemented by each

permittee through the 1998/1999 reporting period,

3. Recommendations for revisions to the activity by permittee or activity based on the

assessment, and

4. Concluding statement on program effectiveness.

Assessing the effectiveness for the City and County's Programs cannot be done jointly due to the

time of implementation provided to each. At the time of this review, the City was completing its

fourth full year of implementation, while the County had completed only two years of


1-2

Section 1

Legal Authority

Figure 1. Storm Water Management Program Structure City of Stockton and the County of San Joaquin

Section 2

Source Identification

Storm Water Management Program

Section 3

Characterization Data

l

Section 4

Management Program

...

KEY PROGRAM ACTIVITIES

Residential and Commercial Activities

Improper Discharge Activities

BMPs (See Figure 2.)

Section 5

Assessment of Controls

~-

Industrial Activities

Construction Activities

Section 6

Fiscal Analysis

1-3

implementation. The assessment was completed reviewing annual reports and documents

submitted through the completion of the third year for the City, and one and a half of for the

County. Some of the discussions provided in this report are separated into City and County

sections, when necessary, to address the discrepancies in program implementation schedules.

1.2 Best Management Practices (BMPs)

The City's Program has 35 BMPs, and the County's Program has 34 BMPs that are contained in

four key program activities (Figure 2). The final BMPs in the Program were originally part of a

much larger list of potential BMPS and were selected based on a screening process that included

the following six factors:

1. Ability to meet regulatory requirements - Does the BMP facilitate compliance with the storm

water regulations?

2. Effectiveness of the BMP to remove pollutants- Is the BMP effective in removing pollutants

of concern?

3. Public Acceptance- Is the BMP acceptable to the community and defined in a manner to

gain public support?

4. Ability to implement- Does the BMP consider implementation into existing programs and

minimal inter-departmental impacts?

5. Institutional Constraints -Does the BMP provide for minimal institutional constraints, such

as utilizing existing ordinances, policies, and intergovernmental agreements?

6. Cost for implementation- What is the impact on available City funds to implement the BMP,

or will the BMP require a significant financial investment?

Using these factors, the BMPs were selected, rated and prioritized. Selecting BMPs using this

approach ensured the Program was focussed on activities that could be significant sources of

pollutants in urban runoff.


1-4

Figure 2. Storm Water Management Program Section 4 Detail

Al.l Channel and Detention Basin Maintenance A1.2 catch Basin, Pipeline, and Pump Station Maintenance A2.1 General Plan Policy Statements A2.2 Conditions of Approval A2.3 MUD/Development Review Committee

Residential and (Not in the County's Program)

Commercial A2.4 Storm Water Quality Control Criteria Plan

Activities A2.5 Development Review Procedures A2.6 Standard Specifications and Plans A3.1 Street Sweeping and Litter Removal A3.2 Street Pavement Maintenance and Reconstruction A4.1 Existing Structural Controls Evaluation A4.2 Proposed Flood Management Projects Evaluation A6.1 Pesticides, Herbicides, & Fertilizers Control Program

Bl.l Prevention of Illicit Discharges B2.1 Ongoing Field Screening

Section 4 B3.1 Investigation and Elimination of Illicit Discharges B4.1 SWPPPs for Municipal Facilities

Improper B4.2 Industrial Inspections for Spill Prevention and Response Management Discharge B4.3 Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Plan

Program Activities BS.l Public Reporting Plan B6.1 Public Education B6.2 Storm Drain Stenciling B6.3 Household Hazardous Waste Collection

, B6.4 Used Oil Recycling B7.1 Sanitary Seepage/Overflow Coordination

Cl.l Priority Industrial Facilities Identification C1.2 Industrial Condition of Acceptance

Industrial C1.3 Industrial Facilities Inspection Program Activities C1.4 Industrial Facilities Enforcement Program

Cl.S Industrial Outreach Program C2.1 Industrial Monitoring Program

Dl.l Review for Construction Activities

Construction D2.1 Grading Ordinance

Activities D3.1 Inspection and Enforcement of BMPs D4.1 Education and Training Program

--- --------·-·····- -- -----

]-;i

1.3 Assessment Tools

To evaluate the effectiveness of the storm water program, an assessment was conducted for the

35 (or 34) BMPs contained the four key program activities:

Program Activity Section Discussed in Report

Residential and Commercial Activities Section 2.0

Improper Discharge Activities Section 3.0

Industrial Activities Section 4.0

Construction Activities Section 5.0

To conduct the assessment, a number of tools were developed and used while reviewing the City

and County's annual reports. Summaries of the review are provided in tables at the end of each

section. The objective for developing and using assessment tools was to provide a measure of:

• the ability of a BMP to reduce pollutants in storm water runoff,

• the development and implementation of BMPs in accordance with the Program and

implementation schedule,

• the number of BMPs developed and implemented as proposed in the Program, or revised if

approved,

• staff's knowledge and willingness to implement the BMPs that are part of their work

functions or responsibility,

• public identity and understanding of the storm water program, BMPs and mission,

• cooperation between agency and department staff to implement and report BMP activities,

• management commitment to the Program, and

• adequate record keeping and reporting practices to adequately monitor BMP implementation

and effectiveness.

Assessing the pollutant reduction capability of a BMP cannot be measured quantitatively, but

rather qualitatively. While the City has conducted significant water quality monitoring, the


1-6

current data cannot be used to reliably measure reduction in pollutants. Therefore, assessment

tools will be used to qualitatively assess pollutant reduction. For example, implementing the

illicit discharge program has resulted in material being eliminated from the storm sewer system

that had historically been pumped to the river. While a direct measurement of the amount of

pollutants reduced cannot be made, an assumption that pollutants in the runoff were reduced as a

result of implementing the activity can be made.

Using these assumptions, and applying the results of the assessment tools to meet the above

stated objectives, an evaluation of compliance with MEP for the Program was made.


1-7

This page left blank intentionally.

2.0 REsiDENTIAL AND CoMMERCIAL AcTIVITIES AssESSMENT

2.1 Introduction

The federal regulations require the Program to control pollutants in runoff from residential and

commercial development. The program is at a minimt:m to address the following activities:

• Maintenance activities related to storm water structural controls,

• Design and construction of controls for new development and re-development

• Municipal operation and maintenance activities related to public streets, roads and highways,

• Design and construction of future storm water basins, and retrofit opportunities for existing

basins,

• Municipal facilities, i.e. landfills,

• Chemical handling, use, and disposal methods used by public agencies.

The City's Program has 13 BMPs and the County 12 in five program activities to address these

requirements through implementing both structural and nonstructural (pollution prevention)

control measures, as appropriate, depending on the source or activity causing the pollution to

occur.

Given the regulatory requirements, the BMPs contained in the Residential and Commercial

Activities element were developed to achieve the following objectives:

• Incorporate activities into existing staff functions and activities as much as reasonably

possible.

• Inspect and maintain publicly owned storm drain system to ensure operation and

maintenance activities address water quality.

• Ensure City land development policies and standards adequately implement storm water

quality measures.

• Ensure staff has proper training and tools to develop, implement and enforce storm water

quality controls.


2-1

• Implement appropriate storm water control measures to address municipal projects and

activities.

• Evaluate and implement when possible water quality features for future and existing storm .

water control facilities.

• Reduce pollutants in runoff resulting from illicit discharges, municipal operations and

activities, and new development and redevelopment.

2.2 Assessment of the Program

2.2.1 City of Stockton Program

The objectives of this activity were met through timely development and implementation of all

the BMPs in the Residential and Commercial Program. The primary focus of the Program is on

pollution prevention rather than structural controls. This required increased field inspection,

maintenance activities, document review, record keeping and reporting from City staff and was

accomplished through employee training and establishing standard practices/procedures. Some

activities required cooperation between City departments, which was accomplished through

meetings, training, establishing practices and procedures, and city management support.

The regulations require control measures implementedfor this activity to reduce the discharge of

pollutants in runoff to the MEP. Table A-1 provides a summary of the assessment of activities

reported for the program through the 199811999 reporting period. Based on this assessment, the

Residential and Commercial Activities program reduced pollutants in runoff though

implementing the following BMPs by:

Structural Controls

• Inspecting the storm drain system, basins, channels, catch basins, pipelines, laterals and

manholes prior to, during and following the wet season. Repairing erosion or other damage,

removing accumulated pollutants, and eliminating illicit connections reduces the amount of

pollutants that could have been discharged to the river.


2-2

• Implementing an enhanced sump-cleaning program to ensure sumps are cleaned annually

resulting in removal of accumulated pollutants on a more frequent and regular basis from the

storm drain pump stations.

• Televising the storm drain sewer main lines to detect and eliminate illicit connections.

• Reporting by inspectors demonstrates staff knowledge of the Program, and indicates a

proactive approach towards implementing the Program and reducing pollutants in storm

water.

Chemical Handling

• Ensuring proper handling, use, disposal and reporting of pesticides and herbicides through

establishing City directives, standard operating procedures and complying with all applicable

laws. This resulted in increased City staff awareness and reduced the discharge of chemicals

caused by mishandling, spillage, improper disposal or overuse/spray.

• Assigning resources to staff a Pest Control Manager position to track City usage and

compliance with City policy and laws and regulations, and to be responsible for records and

reporting activities relating to chemical use.

New Development and Redevelopment

• Ensuring storm water quality is addressed in the land development planning stages by

revising the General Plan. Requiring detailed watershed drainage plans before development

can occur is a key revision to the General Plan.

• Ensuring the storm water division is adequately represented at Development Review

Committee meetings to address storm water quality issues associated with proposed

development in the City that will need to be addressed before development can occur.

• Ensuring requirements for new development and redevelopment projects incorporate

appropriate storm water control measures through developing standard conditions of approval

to be included on all tentative maps brought before the planning commission and council for

approval. A development project cannot be approved until the storm water division agrees the

condition has been met


2-3

• Developing a Storm Water Quality Control Criteria Plan (SQCCP) and standard

specifications and plans in cooperation with the development community and industry. These

documents establish requirements for permanent storm water control measures for new

development and·redevelopment. Standards include requirements for the operation and

maintenance of control measures.

• Distributing copies of the SQCCP and standard specifications and plans to the building

industry and met with builders to review the storm water requirements. This ensured the

development community was aware of the storm water program and requirements to be

included in the initial site planning of a proposed development.

• Implementing a development review process to have the City's storm water division review

all plans to ensure the SQCCP requirements are addressed and BMPs incorporated and

designed in accordance with City standards. Storm water division staff reviewed 52

development plans for compliance.

• Provided training to the development review staff on the SQCCP and engineering standard

specifications and plans.

Municipal Operations, Activities and Facilities

• Implementing a program to collect garden refuse at the curbside eliminates refuse being

washed or swept down the storm drain.

• Implementing a program to manually remove trash, debris and litter from channels and

sloughs ensures these materials are not discharged to the river.

• Developing and implementing a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that

establishes control measures for street maintenance projects.

Ensuring the SWPPP is being implemented through reporting to the storm division,

Assigning a key contact in the storm water division for the SWPPP, and

Requiring an annual certification of compliance be submitted to the storm water division.

Provided training to supervisors, senior staff and staff required to manage or implement

the SWPPP

• Developing a Maintenance Staff Guide that addressed municipal employee activities

including road work and repair, street cleaning, storm drain system (ponds and conveyance

system) maintenance and operation, illicit discharges, vegetation management, bridge repair


2-4

and maintenance, structure repair and maintenance, and traffic maintenance and repair. The

Guide explains the stormwater requirements, discusses pollutants of concerns associated with

maintenance activities and discusses municipal activities addressed by the guide. The guide

was adopted by the City Manager as City Policy.

Flood Control Planning

• Incorporating storm water quality controls into three proposed major flood control detention

basins in the City.

2.2.2 County of San Joaquin Program

The County has only been implementing its Program since late 1996 and is primarily in the

development stages. Record keeping and reporting at this point in program development is not

sufficient to adequately assess program effectiveness. However, since the City and County

programs are identical, the cooperation and coordination between the agencies is such that many

of the activities being conducted by the City will also be conducted by the County. The

assumption is that when fully implemented, those portions of the permitted area being controlled

by the County will be adequately controlled to reduce the discharge of pollutants associated with

Residential and Commercial activities.

A summary of the activities by assessment tool conducted by the County through the 1998/1999

reporting period is provided in Table A-2. Key activities include:

• Implementing an enhanced sump-cleaning program to ensure sumps are cleaned annually to

remove of accumulated pollutants on a more frequent and regular basis from the storm drain

pump stations.

• Developing draft language for General Plan revisions and standard conditions of approval to

be included on tentative maps that address storm water quality issues.

• Participating in the City's SQCCP and standard specifications and plan development and

planning to adopt similar documents for the County.


2-5

• Implementing a development review process that ensures major developments are routed

through the County's storm water program for review and comment to ensure storm water

quality issues are adequately addressed.

2.3 Recommendations

The City and County's Program is in its infancy stages of implementation. It is anticipated that

changes or revisions to the various components of the Program may occur as it matures to

change the priorities or focus of the program, or to facilitate the monitoring and assessment

aspects of the Program. Issues, deficiencies or concerns identified during the extensive review

for the assessment that may need additional attention during the next permit term are

summarized below and apply to both the City and the County.

2.3.1 General- recommended for all activities

1. Maintain records of all training provided to staff by BMP. Include records on the date, time

and location of the training, subject discussed and roster of attendees.

2. Consider implementing supervisory oversight procedures to track and verify BMPs are being

adequately implemented.

2.3.2 Structural Control Maintenance activities:

1. The County should implement a record keeping and reporting procedure similar to the City's.

2. Review and revise inspection reporting to ensure items identified as concerns or possible

illicit connections are adequately tracked and reported to completion (illicit discharge

eliminated).

3. Maintain records of chemical use for pond and channel maintenance. Include type and

quantity of chemicals.

4. Consider developing a process to ensure maintenance inspection findings of possible illicit

discharges are reported, investigated and eliminated, if necessary.


2-6

2.3.3 New Development and Redevelopment

1. Improve record keeping to separate the types of activities, i.e. project review and approval

during development/planning stage, field inspections, and meetings. Maintain complete

tracking recm:ds showing project from approval at development stage to final construction.

2.3.4 Roadway Operations and Maintenance

1. Develop inspection program for periodic checks by storm water division to track and verify

BMPs being implemented.

2.3.5 Flood Management Projects

1. The County should consider expanding program to include consideration of water quality

issues in development of flood control projects.

2.3.6 Pesticides, Herbicides, Fertilizers

1. Maintain records of chemical use by department and use. Include type and quantity of

chemicals.

2. Consider implementing a program to evaluate methods to reduce chemical usage for City

operation and maintenance.

3. Consider developing an Integrative Pest Management Program.

4. Consider reviewing language in Standard Operating Procedures and directives to ensure it is

consistent with the storm water program requirements, and revise, if needed, to add language

to specifically address storm water quality concerns.

Annual Report Program. Assessment

2-7

Activity BMP Assessment Tool

A 1 Structural A 1.1 Structural Number of basins or Control Controls channels inspected and Maintenance Maintenance cleaned.

What are the City and County's waste disposal practices for material and sediment removed from the ponds? What type of weed and vegetation removal techniQues used? Types of erosion control practices or changes to practices implemented to minimize erosion of basin slopes and surrounding areas Are inspections planned to be conducted prior to the wet season or are inspections a result of complaints and flooding?

Table A-1 City of Stockton

Residential and Commercial Reported Activities

Accomplishments Reported in Annual Reports 1995/1996 1996/1997 1997/1998

Established maintenance 9/96 inspected basins - bank 8/97 inspected four basins and districts for five ponds in City (no maintenance and litter removal took pictures, described type of records or reported maintenance completed litter, identified 2 illicit activities) 4/1 0 visited basins to take discharges, found excessive

pictures for inspection log mud at inlet to one. Free standing water observed. 9/97 revisited site with mud, identified possible illicit discharge through mud removal work. Revisited pond 3 times as follow-up 1 0/97 inspected one pond to verify illicit discharge removed. 11/97 revisited site with excessive mud that was removed - found more. 12/97 revisited pond and found erosion 6/98 inspected 4 ponds at end of wet season found plastic material, litter, minor erosion, squirrel holes, weeds and mud at inlet.

transport to landfill same same

chemical use, mowing, disking same same and grading used to control weeds/vegetation. Vegetation, straw and grading same same

no data recorded Conducted inspections between Inspection conducted prior to, April and September. during and after the wet

season.

1998/1999 not reported

same

same

same

same

I

2-9


Were employees conducting inspections and maintenance trained in the stonnwater management program, its requirements and how they relate to employees' actions? How many training classes held, type of training and number of employees in attendance.

A 1.2 Catch Basin, Number of facilities Pipeline, and Pump inspected and cleaned. Station Maintenance

Estimate of quantity of material removed What are the City and County's waste disposal practices for material and sediment removed from the stonn drain system?

What is the frequency of inspections conducted? Are inspections planned to be conducted prior to the wet season or are inspections a result of complaints and flooding?




City employees were trained. Same Same

Inspected and cleaned on a 50,342 LF mainline Routine: rotational basis - planned once 2192 catch basins 647 Catch basins every 5 years. 149,036 LF mainline City Council approved cleaning 4665 LF mainline televised sumps annually 88294 LF laterals

175 manholes

not reported 596 tons removed from pump 1124 tons removed from pump stations stations

Must comply with Solid Waste Same same Board requirements and met NPDES Permit requirements for landfills.

Original goal was to inspect same once every 5 years, with current resources not able to meet this requirements. Reduced and extended inspection frequency.

1998/1999 See A6.1 regarding Maintenance Staff Guide

f

Routine: 797 Catch basins 26557 LF laterals cleaned 223282 LF mainline cleaned 3770 LF mainline televised 97 manholes

1611 tons removed from I pump stations See A6.1 regarding Maintenance Staff Guide

See A6.1 regarding Maintenance Staff Guide

I

2·10


i

I Were employees conducting inspections and maintenance trained in the stormwater management program, its requirements and how they relate to employees' actions? How many training classes held, type of training and number of employees in attendance.

New Development A2..1 General Plan Did changes to the andRe- Policy Statements General Plan occur? Development What were the changes

and when did they occur?

A2..2 Conditions of Were standard conditions Approval developed and

implemented?

A2..3 Was an individual MUD/Development assigned to the Review Committee development review

committee? What position/staff member was assigned? Number of meetings attended by MUD employee?

TableA-1 City of Stockton


I Accomplishments Reported in Annual Reports

1995/1996 1996/1997 1997/1998 Not developed I Not developed 11/97 meeting with MUD and

P/W staff regarding

I

maintenance and department responsibilities 11/97 staff had a presentation

I of a litter removal device from CDS Technologies.

Council amended text of GP complete complete policy to comply with stormwater requirements. Revised language requires detailed water shed drainage plans before development can occur. Not developed 5/97 Developed and approved complete

standard note to be included on all tentative maps. Language requires compliance with state general permit and city grading and erosion control ordinance.

MUD deputy director for MUD voting member removed, complete stormwater was appointed as all stormwater issues to be voting member to DRC addressed through City

Manager's representative.

no data recorded 2 meetings Not necessary, program revised

1998/1999 See A6.1 regarding Maintenance Staff Guide

complete

I

complete i

I

complete

complete

..... -

2-11


A2.4 Storm Water Was criteria developed? Quality Control Criteria Plan

Were maintenance and operational requirements included as part of the criteria? Were employees trained

in the new criteria? When and who attended?

Were workshops held for the construction industry to learn the new criteria? When and how many attended? Anyfeedback regarding workshop?

A2.5 Development Was the development Review Procedures review process revised?

Were employees trained? When and who attended?

·-- ·--



Accomplishments Reported in Annuai.Reports 1995/1996 1996/1997 1997/1998

Not developed 8/96 Technical committee complete formed to develop and review draft criteria. Met with key interested parties, BIA and Construction Site Advocacy Group for review and comment. Received support letter from BIA. 5/97 SQCCP adopted as code amendment to the Stormwater Ordinance and an administrative guidance adopted.

Not developed Yes complete

Not developed 5/97 public work staff provided not reported training

Not developed Met with key parties, i.e. BIA, not reported during development of criteria

Not developed Technical staff developed flow complete chart of review process Stormwater Division included as a department to review plans submitted for approval Stormwater staff included in all review of development projects.

Not developed 3 management meetings Attended 13 meetings for between community specific projects to review development, public works and stormwater program stormwater division held requirements and criteria. developed and presented policy for notification of inspection

·-1998/1999 ·-

complete

complete

not reported

not reported

complete

not reported

2-12


Number of plans approved using new conditions?

A2.6 Standard Were plans and Specifications and specifications developed? Plans

Employee training conducted for new standards and plans? Were workshops conducted for the development and construction communities?

A3.1 Street What is the timing and Sweeping and Litter frequency of street Removal cleaning

Were records kept of the quantity and quality of waste collected by land use or area?

What are the waste management practices?

A3.2 Street How is routine Pavement maintenance scheduled? Maintenance and Have schedules been Reconstruction revised to conduct routine

maintenance prior to the wet season?



Accomplishments Reported In Annual Reports 1995/1996 1996/1997 1997/1998

Not developed not developed 52 projects

Not developed Standards adopted at same time complete as SQCCP

Included in training for criteria not reported

Workshops held for construction Newsletter distributed to not reported community. construction industry explaining

revised standards.

1300 miles swept 2x per week same same downtown swept 2-5x per week litter collection done by alternative work crew Sweeper: 2585.17 tons Sweeper: 3377.55 tons Sweeper-3483tons Litter manually collected: Litter manually collected: Litter manually collected: 563.16 tons 563.16 tons 28,349 tons Garden refuse collected on Garden refuse collected on Garden refuse: not reported streets: 27,440.3 tons streets: 26,166.33 tons Garden refuse used as cover at same same landfill.

not developed 7/96 developed SWPPP for Modified program to address resurfacing activities stormwater issues. Certification of compliance with Submitted NOI and developed SWPPP to be submitted to SWPPP for activities stormwater division

~-- -~······----~---

1998/1999 68 projects reviewed through the Economic Development Committee 6047 City permits applications screened to ensure stormwater compliance See Appendix A2.5 for complete listing of sites.

complete

not reported

not reported

same

Sweeper-3506tons Litter manually collected: 29,472 tons Garden refuse - not reported

I

same I


2-13


Was employee training conducted? When and who attended?

Flood A4. 1 Existing Was the evaluation Management Structural Controls completed? Projects Evaluation

A4.2 Proposed Has review process been Flood Management revised? Projects Evaluation

Number of flood control projects revised to address storm water quality?

- -- ·- _L___ ..



Accomplishments Reported in Annual Reports 1995/1996 1996/1997 199711998

Assigned MUD staff member as not reported primary contact for stormwater issues 5/97 met with supervisors for training Trained senior staff Trained staff

Feasibility to modify detention evaluation complete evaluation complete basin to improve treatment completed by COM and submitted to the Regional Board Met with homeowners association (HOA) of private ponds to advise them to stormwater concerns. HOA to incorporate stormwater issues into newsletters. Structural changes to private ponds not possible. City will assist in source control alternatives.

not developed All projects must comply with Projects must be reviewed, SQCCP (A2.4) comply with City standards,

and OK'd by the stormwater division

not developed Not developed 3 major projects: Taft Area Detention Mosher Creek Quarry Basin Airport Gateway Project Projects incorporated stormwater quality controls. Taft Area project design completed 6/98, others are under design.

1998/1999 -·-See A6.1 regarding Maintenance Staff Guide

-evaluation complete

Same

not reported

2-14

_ Activity BMP Assessment Tool

Pesticides, AS. 1 Pesticides, What are the type and Herbicides, Herbicides, and quantity of chemicals Fertilizer Fertilizers Control used?

Program

Is there a goal to reduce the use of chemical for week control? Have employee and contractors been trained in chemical use and application and in alternative techniques and chemical use?

What practices are used for disposing chemicals?

--



Accomplishments Reported in Annual Reports 1995/199S 199S/1997 1997/1998

Pesticides, herbicides, not reported Chemicals used by Parks and fungicides, insecticides, Recs, Municipal Utilities fertilizers Division (MUD) and Public City to continue current program Works to reduce use of chemicals .. Types used: fungicides and Assigned Pest Control manager herbicides (golf courses and to be responsible for record parks) , insecticides and keeping and reporting of herbicide (sewer lines, etc by chemical use. MUD) and herbicides (in public

ROW for Public Works) Total reported use of all chemicals: 1338 pounds and 774 gallons

not reported Yes BMPs developed and same procedures established to reduce chemical use

not reported S/97 Pest Control Manager met Finalized BMPs as Parks and with pesticide applicators. Recs. Directive. Used by BMPs to reduce pesticide use Public Works was distributed. Discussed Staff received directive from compliance with laws and City Council requiring applicable reporting compliance with pesticide use requirements and application laws.

MUD employees implement Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for pesticide use and application.

Minimize purchase and inventory same same of chemicals to reduce waste. Established procedures for proper disposal. Treated as a hazardous waste.

1998/1999 See Appendix AS. 1 for annual pesticide report

same

same

same

2-15


Training conducted for employees conducting

i municipal activities?

~--



Accomplishments Reported in Annual Reports 1995/1996 1996/1997 1997/1998 1998/1999

Developed Maintenance Staff Guide that addressed municipal employee activities including road work and repair, street cleaning, storm drain system (ponds and conveyance system) maintenance and operation, illicit discharges, vegetation management, bridge repair and maintenance, structure repair and maintenance, and traffic maintenance and repair. The Guide: - Explains stormwater requirements - Discusses pollutants of concerns related to municipal operations - Discusses maintenance activities to be addressed by the guide Guide adopted by City Manager as City Policy that must be adhered to by City employees

2-16

Activi!y _ BMP

Structural Control A 1.1 Structural Maintenance Controls

Maintenance A1.2 Catch Basun, Pipeline, and Pump Station Maintenance

New A2.1 General Development and Plan Policy Re-Development Statements

A2.2 Conditions of Approval

A2.4 Storm Water Quality Control Criteria Plan

A2.5 Development Review Procedures

A3.1 Street Sweeping and Litter Removal

A3.2 Street Pavement Maintenance and Reconstruction

Tablr:•A-2 County of San Joaquin

Residential and CommfHCial Reported Activities

Assessment Tool Accomplishments Reported in Annual Reports 1996/1997 1997/1998 1998/1999

Estimate of quantity of Continued existing program, cleaning same same material removed and inspection deta.ils not reported

Estimate of quantity of Enhanced sump cleaning program. same same material removed To be implementecl1997/98

Did changes to the General Developed language for General Plan Language developed for General Plan occur? What were the revisions. Plan when revised. changes and when did they occur? Were standard conditions Standard language for different types same Conditions of approval for developed and implemented? of development being developed. development applications require

construction and industrial sites to submit an NOI and comply with the State's permit.

Was criteria developed? Participated in City's process and May adopt criteria in 98/99 same may adopt criteria in 97/98

Was the development review Major developments are now routed same same process revised? through the Department of Public

Works Facilities Division, administrators of the stormwater program. They rank projects for review based on size.

What is the timing and Continued existing program. Funds same same frequency of street cleaning budgeted in FY96/97 for another

sweeper in the NPDES permitted area. Sweeper details not provided.

How is routine maintenance Evaluating Caltrans Standards and same same scheduled? Have schedules consider adopting for reducing been revised to conduct pollutants in runoff from street routine maintenance prior to construction projects. the wet season?

-- --

2-17

I

I

!

Activity BMP

Flood A4.1 Existing Management Structural Projects Controls

Evaluation

Pesticides, A6.1 Pesticides, Herbicides, Herbicides, and Fertilizer Fertilizers Control

Program

Table A-2 County of San Joaquin

. Residential and Commercial Reported Activities

Assessment Tool Accomplishments Reported in Annual Reports 1996/1997 1997/1998

Was the evaluation Review of other municipal programs complete complete completed? and meetings with Central Valley

permittee group found there are no cost effective methods to increase treatment efficiencies of ponds.

What are the type and Continue efforts to ensure proper use same same quantity of chemicals used? of chemicals

1998/1999

2-18

3.0 IMPROPER DiscHARGE AcTIVITIES AssESSMENT

3.1 Introduction

The federal regulations require the Program to detect and remove illicit discharges and illegal

dumping into the storm sewer, and, at a minimum, to include:

• An enforceable program to detect and prevent illicit discharges to the storm sewer,

• Field screening activities to detect illicit discharges over the life of the permit, including a

program to investigate illicit discharges or evidence of illicit discharges found during field

screening activities,

• Measures to prevent spills from discharging to the storm sewer,

• Promoting public reporting of illegal dumping and proper management and disposal of use

oil and toxic materials,

• A program to prevent infiltration from sanitary sewer systems into the storm sewer.

The City and County Programs each have 12 BMPs in seven program activities to address these

regulatory requirements, and were developed to achieve the following objectives:

• Reduce pollutants in runoff through ensuring illicit discharges are eliminated from the storm

sewer system through a comprehensive program of inspections, investigations, enforcement,

training and public outreach.

• Incorporate activities into existing staff functions and activities.

• Ensure new development and redevelopment do not have illicit discharges.

• Ensure agency activities and facilities eliminate illicit discharges and implement adequate

Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plans.

• Ensure other agencies or departments that respond to spills are adequately trained to prevent

spills being discharged to the storm sewer.

• Conduct appropriate public outreach to promote reporting and proper handling of hazardous

wastes.


3-1

• Maintain the sanitary sewer system to prevent infiltration into the storm sewer, and

implement spill and cleanup procedures to prohibit discharges of sewer overflows into the

storm sewer.



As summarized on Table B-1, the City met the objectives of this program activity by:

• Adopting the Storm Water Quality Management Ordinance that provides the City adequate

legal authority to develop, implement and enforce its Program.

• Ranking drainage areas to prioritize inspections and implemented a field-screening program

that eliminated illicit discharges involving chlorinated water, paint, soap, fertilizer, sediment,

oil and auto fluids, and debris.

• Implementing a program to detect and eliminate illicit discharges that includes conducting

inspections during the dry weather.

• Developing and monitoring the implementation of SWPPPs for two City landfills and the

City Municipal Service Center. The SWPPPs implement controls to prevent the discharge of

pollutants from municipal activities, and establishes inspection and monitoring activities to

verify and document SWPPP implementation and effectiveness.

• Amending the City's Hazardous Material Emergency Response Plan (HMERP) to establish a

cooperative and coordinated approach between the City storm water division, and the fire

department, County Environmental Health and the County OES agencies to incorporate

measures to protect storm sewers during emergency response activities. The standard spill

report form used by the agencies was revised to reference storm sewer protection.

• Incorporating storm water quality activities into industrial facility inspections conducted by

the fire department mercantile inspection program. Implementing a reporting process to

ensure data regarding industrial spills, chemical inventory and inspection results is shared

between the Fire Department, County OES, and City's Municipal Utilities Department

Industrial Waste Division and the City storm water division.


3-2

• Developing a self-guided inspection checklist and guidance manual for inspectors to ensure

areas of concern for storm water quality issues are inspected during industrial site

inspections.

• Providing training to the fire department, County OES, and City's Municipal Utilities

Department Industrial Waste Division regarding storm water issues.

• Ensuring public knows how to report illegal dumping through advertising on the local cable

station and in public outreach brochures included in utility bills.

• Developing a number of outreach brochures addressing a wide range of activities conducted

by the general public and businesses. The brochures suggest pollution prevention measures

that can be implemented individuals or businesses to reduce discharges of pollutants in

stormwater runoff.

• Developing a database to track illegal dumping reports to track the effectiveness of public

outreach efforts.

• Developing and widely distributing public outreach brochures, HELP and Storm Water

System - Illegal Dumping that increases public awareness of storm water quality issues,

promotes reporting of illegal dumping, and advises the public on the proper handling and

disposal practices for used oil and household hazardous wastes.

• Utilizing volunteer groups, school work programs, school environmental programs, and the

·San Joaquin Mosquito Vector Control District "paint-the-drain" campaign to implement a

storm drain stenciling program throughout the City and County. Over 4000 drains have been

stenciled "No Dumping- Drains to Delta" to deter illegal dumping to the storm sewer.

• Sponsoring Coca-Cola's pollution prevention program by providing funding for the "Only

Rain in Storm Drains" campaign. This message was printed on diet coke and diet sprite cans

that also provided an 800-storm water pollution prevention info-line.

• Creating a fictional character "Auntie Pollution" to be an environmental educational symbol

for the storm water quality program that attends public functions and school presentations to

promote pollution prevention and deter dumping into the storm sewer.

Auntie Pollution was discontinued in 1998 and replaced with Sally-Save-Water Program, an

existing fictional character that was revised to include storm water.


3-3

• Conducting workshops for industries in storm water quality issues and control measures

through the Targeted Opportunities to Prevent Pollution in Stockton (TOPPS) program. This

program is a joint effort between the Department of Toxic Substances Control, City, County

Public Health Environmental Division, County OES and the County storm water program to

promote and educate pollution prevention techniques to industry. Storm water issues are

incorporated into workshops and newsletters. One entire workshop was dedicated to the

storm water program and provided solutions to achieving compliance with City requirements,

federal regulations and state permits.

• Increasing the number of household hazardous waste events and promotion of permanent

used oil collection centers resulted in an increase in the volume of household hazardous

waste being disposed of appropriately.

• Promoting household hazardous wastes events and used oil permanent centers in the

CityScape newsletter distributed with monthly utility bills. Developing a Recycling Guide to

promote proper disposal of household hazardous wastes. Publishing articles on recycling and

proper disposal of household hazardous wastes monthly in the local newspaper.

• Implementing an environmental awareness program through two local high schools to

promote an Adopt-A-Stream Program to increase awareness of the impacts of illegal

dumping. Intending to extend program to other schools in area.

• Developing and implementing TV and radio ads to increase the awareness of storm water

quality issues, promote reporting of illegal discharges, and promote proper disposal of

household hazardous waste and used oil.

• Implementing sanitary sewer maintenance program to investigate for leaks that could

infiltrate into the storm sewer. Investigation techniques include television monitoring.

• Implementing control measures for City staff to protect storm sewer during sewage overflow

events.

3.2.2 County of San Joaquin Program

As in the Residential and Commercial Activities discussion, the County's Program has not been

implemented long enough to provide an adequate assessment of its effectiveness. However, the


3-4

County's program is similar to the City's and when implemented should provide equivalent

reduction in pollutants.

A summary of the activities conducted by the County through the 1998/1999 reporting period is

provided in Table B-2. Key activities include:

• Reviewing new development plans to prevent potential illicit connections with new

development.

• Developing and implementing SWPPPs for four county landfills, the County Corporation

Yard and the Motor Pool and Repair Shop. The SWPPPs implement control measures to

prevent pollutants from county activities being discharged in storm water runoff.

• Incorporating the Solid Waste Reporting Hotline number on all brochures developed by the

County to promote reporting of illegal dumping.

• Increasing public outreach through television and radio to promote reporting illegal dumping.

• Coordinating with the Solid Waste department to develop a multi-language campaign to

promote used oil recycling.

• Coordinating with the City to develop a multi-language outreach program for the Asian and

Latino populations.

• Developing an agricultural Recycling Program to promote proper disposal of used oil and

other hazardous materials relating to agricultural activities.

• Developing a storm water program outreach brochure entitled "Pollution Prevention on Your

Farm" to promote awareness and suggest measures to take to prevent storm water pollution

associated with farming activities.

• Supporting and participating in the TOPPS and Coca-Cola programs (see City's program . discussion)

• Increasing the number of household hazardous waste events and increasing the annual

volume of household hazardous waste collected.

• Promoting the household hazardous waste events and promoting permanent oil recycling

centers through brochures and TV announcements.

• Implementing a program to convert septic systems to sanitary sewer service. Septic systems

that fail must connect to a new sanitary sewer line if within 200 feet of the new service.


3-5

3.3 Recommendations

Issues, deficiencies or concerns that were identified during the extensive review for the

assessment that may need additional attention during the next permit term are summarized below

and apply to both the City and the County:

1. Maintain records of all training provided to staff by BMP. Include records on the date, time

and location of the training, subject discussed and roster of attendees.



3. Review and revise inspection reporting to ensure items identified as concerns are adequately

tracked and reported to completion.

4. Consider implementing a process to improve coordination of inspection, investigation, and

enforcement activities between the maintenance crew, MUD, and the storm water division.

5. Consider creating a record keeping program of key fire department spill responses that

involved storm drain protection or referrals to the storm water division.

6. Consider adding a new BMP to address public education and outreach activities not

specifically related to household hazardous waste or oil recycling; such as outreach for

educating the public about the storm water program in general.

7. Improve record keeping of actual illicit connections removed including a characterization of

the material eliminate and staff efforts taken to eliminate the discharge.

8. Create or improve record keeping of the number of sewage overflows including a description

of the measures taken to protect the sewer system.

9. Consider creating standard procedures through a cooperative approach with the utility

department for protecting the storm sewer system during sewage overflow, including

methods to prevent discharges to the storm sewer, appropriate clean-up activities to ensure

residual spillage does not become a source of coliform in the storm sewer system, and

reporting to the storm water division. Provide employee training once procedures are

established.


3-6


Illicit Discharge 81.1 Prevention of Has the ordinance been Prevention Illicit Discharges developed or revised?

Has employee training been held regarding new ordinance provisions and on illicit connections?

Field Screening 82.1 Ongoing Field Was field screening conducted for Illicit Screening in accordance with plan? Discharges

Type of field screening conducted?

Illicit Discharges 83.1 Investigation and Number of illicit discharges Investigation Elimination of Illicit investigated? Procedures Discharges

Type and quantity of material eliminated through investigation?

Number and type of enforcement action taken?

Type of follow-up action required?

Table 8-1 City of Stockton

Improper Discharge Reported Activities

Accomplishments Reported in Annual Reports 1995/1996 1996/1997 1997/1998 -

Stormwater Management and complete complete Discharge Control Ordinance adopted 6/26/95. -Stormwater staff conducts document review and inspections.

not developed Developed ranking of storm 6/98 began screening 30 drainage basin drainage areas for inspections planned as of the inspection activities. annual report, 20 had been

completed.

not developed Visual and field sampling, and if same needed laboratory analysis of samples. A standard reporting form/log developed that specifies field parameters to be tested has been developed.

not developed developing - identified illicit 24 investigations were discharge concern through industrial conducted. Six follow-up inspection program. Corn Products inspections were also conducted Corp (see C1.3) in addition to the 20.

See Attached List chlorinated water paint soap oil and auto fluids organic matter debris

Enforcement letter written to 1 Cease and Desist Stockton Flea Market for 2 Code Enforcement Action discharging restaurant wastewater 6 Verbal Instruction and Direction to storm drain.

Varies with the degree of concern - site specific: Six follow-up inspections One referral to County Environmental Health Residents mailed brochures (see 85.1)

1998/1999 --

Illicit discharges addressed in Employee Maintenance Guide see A6.1 in Table A-1

Since 7/98 43 sites were monitored. Collected additional samples at 17 sites to help identify illicit connections. See Appendix 82.1 for results of dry weather field screening activities.

same

34 investigations. 22 follow-up inspections in addition to the 34. See attached list.

trash TSS oil organic matter turbidity fertilizer conductivity

1 Cease and Desist 2 Novs letters verbal instruction

same

3-7


Spill Prevention, 84.1 SWPPPs for Type of facilities that submitted Contamination, Municipal Facilities a NOI for the state permit. and Response Procedures

When was a SWPPP developed and implemented?

Type of monitoring/assessment conducted to determine SWPPP implemented and effective?

84.2 Industrial Has a program to review Inspections for Spill industrial SWPPPs been Prevention and developed and implemented? Response

Has an agreement or coordination with the Fire Department been completed?

Employees trained to conduct inspections? When was the training conducted and who attended?

Table B-1 City of Stockton


Accomplishments Reported in Annual Reports 1995/1996 1996/1997 ' 1997/1998

Three: One industrial permit coverage for )complete Two industrial permits for the municipal service center. 1

Austin Road and French Camp I

landfills One construction permit for paving operations

SWPPPs developed and SWPPP developed for service complete implemented for landfills and center paving MUD stormwater division to MUD tracks compliance Samples collected and reported track compliance and provide MUD employee assigned as key for service center. Land fill data assistance. contact for site not supplied. Paving operation Employee training and spill Walk through inspections by MUD of not required to sample runoff. prevention and cleanup service center conducted to identify Service center data suggests activities is the focus of the areas and activities of concern for elevated TSS and low pH values control measures. stormwater at the south discharge point Developed under the industrial complete complete program C1.3

OES, Fire Department and same Under illicit discharge program MUD to share information on fire depart was noted as spill in production areas, waste reporting spills to the storm water and chemical areas, and division: whether site has SWPPP. Fire 10/23/97 Fire department Department is to incorporate reporting spill at Stockton Unified stormwater inspection into School District yard. mercantile inspection program. 12/1 0/97 Fire Department

reporting contaminated fire water at industrial fire to MUD.

MUD provided the Fire Department with inspection

forms and a new list of priority industrial facilities to be inspected for storm water issues.

12/96 County OES provided not reported not reported training regarding stormwater issues

~-------- -

199811999 Notice of Termination submitted for Corporation Yard. (Appendix 84.1). Not required to submit NOI for City yard. Activities adequately covered by Maintenance Staff Guide - see A6.1 complete

same

complete


3-8


Type of outreach material developed for industry?

84.3 Hazardous Has the HMERP been Materials Emergency developed and implemented? Response Plan

Have standardized reporting forms been developed?

Has employee training been conducted? When was the training conducted and who attended?

Public Reporting 85.1 Public Reporting Has the number of public of Non-Storm Program reporting incidents been Water Discharges recorded, including the type of

incident and material being dumped and the location of incident?




MUD developed Model SWPPP See 86.1 and C1.5 Same for industrial facilities. See 86.1 and C1.5

Yes, the HMERP has been complete complete amended to address protecting storm drains during emergency responses.

MUD developed a standardized Fire Department responded to report for spill reporting and 405 incidents and reports are on provided it to the Fire Department. file with the Stockton Fire

Department. Meetings were held to ensure MUD developed a self-help First response training provided coordination in implementing inspection checklist and guidance to MUD staff as well as fire HMERP between document that provides help on department employees, hazmat County Public Health what to look for and references to technicians and specialists. Environmental Health Division note on inspection forms regarding CountyOES stormwater issues during industrial CHP inspections. County Sheriff Caltrans MUD requested information of first MUD response training for staff MUD planned to create a Tracking 911 phone calls only same database to accurately track possible indirectly by fire the number and frequency of department response. Fire public reporting of incidents. department only tracks spills with

reimbursement. Sanitary overflows are reported by MUD found current system of public reporting ok and will continue general public outreach on local cable station.

---- -- . -- ------------····-----

1998/1999 same

complete

.

Fire Department responded to 150 Hazmat calls. 50 of these

I calls required cleanup activities.

I

Phase I and Phase II First I

responder awareness class held. See Appendix 84.3

same

--- ---······-----

3-9


Used Oil/Taxies 86.1 Public Education How many HELP brochures Management and have been distributed? Disposal

How many Targeted Opportunities to Prevent Pollution in Stockton (TOPPS) workshops and outreach has the program participated in or sponsored?




Developed and distributed not reported HELP brochure. HELP explains storm water quality issues and advises residents not to dispose of used oil or other chemicals into storm drains. Number distributed not provided - brochure distributed widely throughout City. Second flyer • Storm Water System - Illegal Dumping mailed to all utility customers in bills. Brochures distributed at: • Earth Day at UOP • Ag Expo - Solutions for Compliance Workshop - As needed basis

TOPPS directors meet monthly TOPPS directors meet monthly 7/96 Stormwater Deputy Director for 7/97 presented TOPPS 1996 the City was appointed outreach environmental excellence program committee chair. winners for industry in pollution 7/96 TOPPS display at Ag Expo· a prevention for air, water and 3-day event land regulatory categories. Website updated providing more Solutions for Compliance helpful data for industry in Stockton Workshop held that included a (www.stocktonet.com/community/TO session on industrial storm water PPS). program and the use of Solutions for Compliance Workshop alternative fuels - 78 individuals that focused on the stormwater attended .. Industrial Permit was held for Attended Ag Expo and handed industry and co-sponsored by the out outreach material at the stormwater program. TOPPS booth

TOPPS distributed 2000 On the Safe Side Newsletters were sent to businesses county wide.

~--


not reported

---

3-10


Auntie Pollution Program

Other Outreach material

-- . - - -- -- ---·····------




Created a fictional character Auntie Pollution stickers, posters, Auntie Pollution Program to be named • Auntie Pollution• to join coloring books have been designed retired but will continue to other environmental characters and produced for use in school distribute material until supply to provide outreach and be an presentations. exhausted. Will continue environmental education I program under an existing symbol for stormwater. fictional character know as Sally-

Save-Water. Developed the following Consultant hired to develop two Began City/County bi-monthly outreach brochures: stormwater videos, 1 30-min. video coordinating meetings. -Pollution Prevention in Your for classroom presentations and 2 9/12/97 Attend Storm Water Garage 30-sec videos for TV. Quality Task Force meeting. - Pollution Prevention Outside Design of billboards and bus panels 10/2/97 Attended Central Valley Your Home are approved and a contract for a 6 Storm Water Permits - Pollution Prevention Inside months display has been secured. coordination meeting. Your Home 1/27/98 TV and Radio Ads are being 12/11/97 City and County -Pollution Prevention on Your aired. starting an environmental Boat 5/97 Co-Sponsored the Coca-Cola awareness program with Edison - Landscaping and Pool pollution prevention program. High School that could be a Maintenance During the promotion, cans of diet model for other school programs. - Paints and Solvents coke and diet sprite will carry the The first phase will be inter-high - Concrete Applications message "Only rain in Storm Drains" school competition in the adopt a - Earth Moving Activities and provide an 800 number stream program. The program - Heavy Equipment Operations. stormwater pollution prevention info will have daily event during earth

line. week .

1998/1999 Continued Sally-Save-Water campaign with in class room presentations and in PSAs.

Attended Central Valley Stormwater Permittee Committee meetings in January, February, and April 1999 to discuss various stormwater program issues being addressed by the different municipal agencies.

3-11


r--Other Outreach material (Cont'd)

66.2 Storm Drain Number of catch basins Stenciling stenciled?

66.3 Household Number of collection events Hazardous Waste held. Collection and 66.4 Used Oil Recycling

Quantity by type of material collected? Has there been an upward trend in hazardous material waste collection?

-- --



Accomplishments Reported in Annual Reports 1995/1996 I 1996/1997 I 1997/1998

I 2/98 City and County jointly

I contracted with Montoya

I

Communications to develop a multi-ethnic public outreach strategy 6/98Sally-Save-Water 'Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program" was presented to 24 fifth grade classes at six Stockton Elementary Schools . Each school received a 'Sally-Save-Water Don't Abuse Mother Earch ... Stop Stormwater Pollution" video along with activity booklets, stickers, and posters. 6/98 397 stormwater pollution prevention commercials about oil and pesticides were aired on cable television

Created stencil 'No Dumping - 2275 basins stenciled. Received 2090 drains stenciled (70% in the Drains to Delta' used San request from a girl scout troop to City) using volunteer groups from Joaquin Mosquito Vector paint catch basin inlets. City current girl scouts, boy scouts and Control District 'paint-the-drain contracts with San Joaquin Count utilizing other resources such as campaign. Boy Scouts painted Jr. College. City obtained copy of Caltrans and students at UOP. 4 square miles within the stencils and paint to make available Lincoln Village neighborhood. for distribution to volunteer groups.

2 HHW events, 3 days per 9 HHWevents 9 HHWevents event 15 permanent used oil 15 permanent used oil Use/waste oil collected at HHW recycler/collection sites recycler/collection sites events and at 15 permanent locations. 85,424 pounds from HHW HHW not reported 164,214pounds from all HHW event (only one event 102,422 gallons of used oil from 11 events reported) collection centers 104,880 gallons of used oil from 206,207 gallons of waste oil 11 collection centers (based on report from 11 Approximately 85% of waste collection centers) collected at HHW consisted of 76% of HHW materials were oil flammable and poison chemicals based paints, motor oil and car (oil based paint and pesticides), batteries. car batteries, latex paint and

motor oil/oil products)

--1998/1999 -

not reported

2 HHW events, 3 days per event

178,277 pounds HHW collected. See report in Appendix 66.3

3-12


I--Types of outreach and promotion techniques implemented to encourage use of collection events?

Control of B7.1 Sanitary Number of sanitary sewer illicit Seepage from Seepage/overflow connections to storm sewer Sanitary Sewer Coordination found? Lines




Advertised in City Scape that same Aired Sally-Save-Water Public accompanies utility bills. Service Announcement. Developed and distributed Recycling Guide. Publish articles in newspaper monthly. # not reported not reported 42 sewer overflows occurred. Cleaned 1, 942,398 lineal feet Potential for illicit discharge of sanitary sewer line and caused by overflow. televise sanitary sewer main lines yearly. Illicit connections would be detected through this program.

---------- - -- --

1998/1999 ----not reported

not reported

3-13

BMPB3.1 City of Stockton

Record Illicit Connections Investigated During 1997/98

1. 7/16/97 Investigated heavy oil substance found at Orange and Sonora pump station. Oil found in manholes back to Washington Street. Two sites with stormwater connections in this area, McCormick and Baxter (superfund site) and Cal Cedar. Pump station disabled and cleaned, no discharges to surface water occurred during investigation.

7/17/97 (Reported under industrial inspections Cl.3) Conducted site inspection at Cal Cedar. Stormwater interceptor had not been maintained and contained. Discharge occurring out of interceptor.

7/22/97 (Reported under industrial inspections Cl.3) Conducted site inspection at a McCormick & Baxter in response to complaint of excessive dirt being tracked onto roadway, and to illicit discharge investigation.

2. 8/1/97 Fire water discharge from Cal Cedar contained organic material, saw dust, wood chips and sheen. City crew shut down pump station until water could be more closely examined.

8/21/97 (Reported under industrial inspections Cl.3) Re-inspected Cal Cedar site and collected samples of oil on site to compare to oil found in sump. Contacted OES to check database for spills and chemicals stored in the area.

3. 9/25/97 Responded to oil like substance spill at the Ryder Storm Water Pump Station. A light sheen of oil noted on water into pump station. Pump station was shutdown and pumped to the sanitary sewer.

4. 10/8/97 Responded to a complaint of laundry water being discharged to storm drain at Kiltie/Iris. Inspection did not find evidence of discharge.

10/15/97 Investigated second complaint of laundry water at Kiltie/Iris. Found flexible hose directed to gutter leading from a washing machine on the patio of an apartment. Pictures were taken and MUD notified.

10/16/97 Washing machine belongs to tenant of apartment complex. City Code Enforcement Section issued a citation to have the hose and washing machine disconnected.

5. 10/23/97 Investigated reported spill at Stockton USD maintenance yard. District had plugged storm drain and covered drain inlets with plastic and sandbags.

6. 10/30/97 Investigated complaint of steam cleaning wastewater from furniture being washed to storm drain at 7273 Murray Drive. Investigation found Community Thrift washing furniture with high power washer next to storm drain. Issued Cease and Desist for cleaning operation.

7. 11/19/97 Investigate complaint regarding discharges from Advance Milk Company that manufactures milk feed products for dairy cattle. A sample was collected from the gutter.

3-15



8. 12/10/97 Responded to a report from the Fire Department regarding a spill at GATX Company. Truck carrying batteries caught on fire and approximately 300 to 500 gallons of fire water entered the storm drain. pH of the water measured 1. Storm drain was plugged, pumped and cleaned by GATX.

9. 1/12/98 Maintenance crew reported blue colored water from the Quail Lakes Storm Water pump station from the residential lake. The maintenance crew obtained the name of the HOA representative to speak to regarding this discharge. Dye used in residential lakes to control light penetration and suppress aquatic plant growth. Product does not contain herbicides. MSDS and fact sheet to be submitted on dye.

10. 1/13/98 Responded to complaint regarding pool being discharged to gutter.

11. 3/18/98 Assisted Code Enforcement of an inspection of some property that had several drums of waste oil like substance and pallets of batteries. Referred site to County Environmental Health.

12. 3/20/98 Assisted Code Enforcement with an inspection of Center Street Body Shop. Business allowing wash waters to flow to gutter. Noted several 55 gallon drums and two fgallon buckets of waste oil open without waste labeling or secondary containment. Evidence of spilled oil on ground around containers. Notified County Health.

13. 4/13/98 Investigated complaint regarding oil leaking into gutter from parked cars. Did not find free oil but lots of evidence of previous spills. Catchbasin free of any standing oil.

14. 5/1198 Investigated a complaint of oil dumping from residence. Found personal car repair had resulted in spilled transmission fluid that was washed to the storm drain. Inspector spoke with resident regarding proper handling and disposal of car fluids.

15. 5/4/98 Investigated complaint of oil dumped into gutter. Mobil mechanic works out of the residential site. Found a full oil catch pan in driveway. Spoke with resident about oil disposal practices and had them remove the pan.

16. 5/4/98 Investigate complaint about pool water into gutter. Resident informed him it was from the gutter of the house and not the spa. His spa was connected to the sanitary sewer line.

17. 517/98 Responded to complaint about discharges at Tillie Way. Found storm water pump for parking lot at a place of business had failed and caused the loading dock's parking area to become flooded. A portable pump was used to relieve the flooding.

18. 517/98 Responded to complaint regarding blue colored waste in residential neighborhood. Found contractor had washed his paintbrushes with latex paint in storm drain. Spoke to contractor regarding proper disposal practices.

3-16



19. 5/11198 Investigated complaint regarding pool water discharged to the storm drain system. Found pool maintenance company draining pool to storm drain. Spoke with company contact regarding the City Code prohibiting such discharges, and provided them a pamphlet on pool maintenance activities.

20. 5/12/98 Investigated complaint regarding waste oil being stored next to a dumpster. Found abandoned containers and reported to the County Hazardous Waste Section.

21. 6/5/98 Responded to complaint regarding paint chips being washed into gutter. Found painting contractor high-pressure cleaning/preparing a building resulting in water and paint chips flowing into the storm drain system. Spoke with contractor about not discharging to the storm drain system, and directed them to dry clean the paint chips.

6/9/98 cleaned.

Re-inspected site with high-pressure cleaning. Found paint chips had been

22. 6/16/97 Investigated a dry-weather field screening finding of oily water in the storm drain system at 12th and Airport Way. No source could be found. Water in pump station at Airport Way was pumped to the sanitary sewer line.

23. 6/26/98 Responded to a complaint of a white powder in a gutter. Resident reported it was soap used to absorb an oil leak. Instructed resident to clean soap out of gutter and not to wash it down the storm drain.

3-17



1. 7/21/98 Investigated complaint of sludge in gutter in residential neighborhood resulting from pool cleaning activities. Instructed resident to clean gutter and to not discharge pool water to storm drain again.

2. 8/13/98 Responded to complaint of spilled grease in storm drain from brewery/restaurant. Spoke with owner about pollution prevention practices for waste grease and about washing kitchen mats.

8/21/98 Revisited restaurant secondary containment around grease bin had not been installed. Restaurant will contact City once secondary containment in place. Specifically instructed restaurant to cease washing kitchen mats outdoors and to sweep and remove cleaning material used to absorb spilled grease.

9/9/98 Revisited restaurant. Site has invested in a tub to wash floor mats. Mats washed in tub outside, when complete tub brought indoors and empty to sanitary sewer. Business increased frequency of waste grease pick-up to reduce amount of waste grease and spills at site. Secondary containment was not constructed, but was out to bid for construction.

3. 8/17/98 Investigated potential illicit discharges at Van Buren MH 4. Oily sheen and organic material floating on surface. Took samples and analyzed for metals, conductivity and turbidity.

9/9/98 Revisited site to investigate potential illicit discharge and included visiting Van Buren at the deep water channel. Took samples at MH 4 and at the deep water channel to determine if the source of pollutants was urban runoff or waters in the deep water channel that surcharge the storm sewer system due to tidal influence.

4. 8/17/98 Investigated potential illicit discharge at Airport and 12th Street manhole. Sediment noted in line, residential runoff occurring during site visit. Samples collected and tested for oil and grease.

5. 8/17/98 Investigated potential illicit discharge at Flora and Harrison. Flow observed during visit and sediment had accumulated in the line. Samples collected and analyzed for metals, conductivity and turbidity.

9/3/98 Revisited site and collected addition samples that were analyzed for phenols, metals, pH and temperature. Sampled "clean water" and "dirty water". Dirty water was a sample taken after sediment was stirred. This was done to determine if the water column or sediment was the source of the high metal concentrations. Observed discharges from residential lawn watering.

6. 8/17/98 Investigated potential illicit discharge at Harrison MH 1, observed organic material, dirt and clams in line. Samples collected and analyzed for metals, conductivity and turbidity. Observed discharges from residential neighborhood and from vehicle body shop. Visited body shop. Waters from washing vehicles. City will contact owner of shop.

7. 8/17/98 Investigate potential illicit discharge at Van Buren and Park. Flow occurs only in morning. Observed organic material floating. Samples collected and analyzed for metals, conductivity and turbidity.

9/3/98 Revisited Van Buren and Park after analytical results for metals were determined to be high. Sampled "clean water" and "dirty water". Dirty water was a sample taken after



sediment was stirred. This was done to determine if the water column or sediment was the source of the high metal concentrations.

8. 8/21/98 Investigated potential illicit discharge at Weston Ranch Pump station and observed brown, opaque water that had a petroleum sheen and trash and thin algae-like substance in one comer. It had an odor of decaying trash and sewer. Followed the water up the storm line and found the discharge was corning from a cornfield. Farm hand indicated this was common practice for this field and another field just northwest of the site. The farm hand provided a copy of the business card of the owner of the cornfield.

8/21/98 Visited cornfield to the northwest and found the site was draining to the storm drain. Water from the field was draining across a newly paved road and appeared to be washing oil or tar from the road. This explains the sheen observed at the pump station.

8/28/98 Tested water being discharged from pond just downstream of Weston Ranch Pond for free chlorine and copper. It did not contain either.

8/28/98 Sent NOV to Van Groningen & Sons for agricultural connects to the storm drain system in the Weston Ranch area.

9. 8/24/98 Investigated potential illicit discharge at Turnpike West, MH 7, observed cloudy water with floating organic matter. During the field screening activities, this site had high copper concentrations. Samples collected were analyzed for metals.

8/24/98 Investigated flow upstream of manhole and found a nasty growth. The water had and odor but was colorless and clear. Observed substantial sediment in the line. Upstream manhole was clear and did not have a nasty growth. John Taylor Fertilizer discharges to the storm drain and is the only industry between the two manholes.

8/24/98 Further investigated line downstream of manhole with nasty growth. Observed stagnant water, with excessive growth and awful odor (rancid cheese or severely decayed dairy product type odor). The water was thick and brown in color. Samples collected and analyzed for metals, conductivity and BOD. Requested City to shut pump station down on this line until further investigation.

8/25/98 Revisited downstream manhole and collected addition sample to have analyzed for fertilizers.

8/25/98 Conducted site visit of the John Taylor Fertilizer business. This business sales and distributes finished fertilizer products. Products can be delivered or pick-up at the site. Reviewing spill log and found spills occurred regularly. There were no entries in the spill log since Nov. 1997. Representative with John Taylor indicated runoff from site is not allowed into storm drain, although their system had a valve that would allow flows to the storm drain. A sample was collected from standing water in one on-site storm drain.

8/31/98 Revisited storm line near John Taylor Fertilizer and obtained samples again at manhole downstream of the business.

3-20


Record lllicit Connections Investigated During 1998/99

9/11/98 Issued NOV to John Taylor Fertilizer and order to clean the storm line for discharging fertilizer to the storm drain system.

10. 8/24/98 Investigate potential illicit discharge on the south side of Arch-Airport Rd. Found com and tomato fields draining to storm drain.

8/26/98 Further investigation of Airport Road at 12th collected samples and analyzed for MBAS, and metals. Quick drive through neighborhood showed that area was dry.

8/28/98 Sent CDO to Stockton Metropolitan Airport, owner of the land around the airport to stop discharging agriculture runoff to the City's storm drain system.

11. 8/24/98 Investigate potential illicit discharge at David and Guernsey. The water was slightly oily smelling (like vegetable oil) and had a brownish color. Conducted field analysis for chlorine.

8/26/98 Revisited David and Guernsey to collect samples for MBAS. Observed water to be cloudier than the first visit.

9/11/98 Revisited David and Guernsey to investigate illicit connections. Observed clear water with brown floating organic material. Observed fish, frogs and crayfish. Sheen observed. Drove through the drainage basin - identified residential lawn irrigation, and discharges from a water hydrant during routine domestic water system maintenance. Afternoon observation found water in storm line to be cloudier than observations made in the morning, and observed elevated chlorine levels. Followed chlorine levels upstream. Determined residential lawn water was not source of chlorine.

12. 8/26/98 Investigated paint spill to the storm drain system at Stockdale Paints. Found hose from hand washing basin connected to the storm drain system. Traced paint spill through storm line to determine extent of damage. While at site inspected items in dumpster and found paint buckets and two batteries. The representative for Stockdale Paints indicated their company did not discard these items, the dumpsters are not locked and are used by individuals after hours. Stockdale Paints was directed to clean the spilled paint and to direct the hose from the hand basin to the sanitary sewer. The discarded items in the dumpsters were referred to County Environmental Health. Pump station was shut down.

8/28/98 Revisited manholes and storm line Stockdale Paints were to clean and found site was adequately cleaned. Pump station was allowed to operate.

13. 8/26/98 Investigated potential illicit connection at CR-48. Taco Bell employee was washing down drive through area, and residential lawn watering were contributing discharges to the storm drain system.

8/26/98 Continued investigation of CR-48 at Blossom Ranch area. Observed large amounts of runoff from three residential streets. Observed lawn watering and residential car washing. Collected sample for MBAS and chlorine from pump station, and a grab sample from the Calaveras River just after pump station quit operating and analyzed for chlorine.

8/26/98 Continued investigation of CR-48 observed runoff from Home Depot. Concrete slab in garden area had been washed off into storm drain system.

3-21



14. 8/26/98 Investigated storm water basin along Fresno A venue found significant oil sheen in basin that appeared to be pure product oil. Referred finding to County Environmental Health.

15. 8/26/98 Investigate potential illicit discharge near the DANA facility. Observed irrigation water in the line, but not much water in the line adjacent to the facility.

16. 8/31/98 Responded to complaint received from the County Public Health services regarding fluids leaking from a dumpster at Pep Boys. Inspection found dumpster empty but stained with oil and grease. Storm drain inlet showed no evidence of wrongdoing. Paved area around the store was badly stained and littered with empty vehicle fluid and lubricant bottles. City requested Pep Boys to increase trash collection frequency.

17. 9/1198 Investigated Duck Creek Rd. for port-o-potty sources. Found only one that did not have evidence of spills. Water observed in storm drain system was from lawn irrigation runoff.

9/2/98 Revisited site at Stagecoach Industrial Park for sources other than lawn irrigation. Found dumpster being sprayed with sprinklers, and construction site with evidence of water being discharged from a fire hydrant. Referred construction site to the appropriate City department. A single port-o-potty was located at the site.

9/2/98 Continued investigation at Stagecoach Industrial Park. Took samples at the basin of Stagecoach and Duck Creek Drive, and two manholes. Samples were clean and odorless but sample from the basin had several worms that are associated with sewage-like water.

18. 9/3/98 Investigated potential illicit discharges at Edison and Lindsay MH-1. Sampled for phenols only.

19. 9/3/98 Responded to complaint about a taco truck dumping oil into the storm drain. Inspected catch basin and found oily stain on the inlet cover. Discussed with resident and owner of the taco truck and informed them that dumping to the storm drain is prohibited and should be discharged at a truck washing or commercial facility that takes these types of discharges.

9/4/98 Revisited site and found no additional dumping had occurred. 20. 9/4/98 Investigated potential illicit discharge with industrial waste program. Trinity

Mountain Water/ Advance Metal Products was discharging metal cleaning waste and waste from a water filtration unit into the storm ditch on Navy Drive. Industrial Waste Division will follow-up with the company to ensure flows are treated and discharged to the sanitary sewer.

21. 9/4/98 Responded to citizen report of a vehicle leaking oil into the storm drain. Found older model vehicle parked over an extensive oil stain and leaking oil into the gutter. Attempted to contact owner of vehicle.

22. 9/9/98 Investigated potential illicit connection at Madison and Sonora South manhole. Collected samples and had analyzed for surfactants, metals, conductivity, turbidity and phenols. Observed water was brownish and slightly cloudy.

9/9/98 Continued investigation at the north manhole. Collected samples and analyzed for metals, conductivity and turbidity. Observed water was "clean".

3-22



23. 9/9/98 Investigate potential illicit connection at Army Court manhole. Observed white foam and yellow water at site. Collected samples and had analyzed for metals and surfactants.

24. 9/11/98 Observed California Catering Truck Wash on California Street allowing wash waters to be discharged to the storm drain system. Individual washing truck did not speak English.

25. 9/15/98 Responded to complaint about pool waters being discharged to the storm drain system from 900 Bristol Street. Informed caregiver of home that pool discharges to the storm drain were not allowed. Obtained number of the resident to discuss matter and to obtain the name and number of the pool service company.

5/19/99 Issued letter to resident at 8821 Stonewood for discharging pool water to the storm drain system in violation of City Code.

5/25/99 Sent letter to 35 pool service and maintenance companies in the City reminding them that pool discharges to the storm drain violated City Code.

6/6/99 Issued letter to resident at 1046 W. Mariposa Avenue for discharging pool water to the storm drain system in violation of City Code.

6/15/99 Issued letter to owner of Heavenly Spa and Stove Center at 1810 W. Fremont Street for discharging pool water to the storm drain system in violation of City Code.

26. 4/7/99 Observed resident pouring motor oil into catchbasin. Oil removed from the catch basin.

27. 4/19/99 Found illegal connection to the storm drain system by private resident. Referred matter to the Public Works Department.

28. 5/11199 Observed construction vehicle leaking hydraulic fluid onto street. Contacted owner and asked to clean site.

5112/99 Resinpected site and found hydraulic fluid removed. 29. 5/27/99 Trash and oil found in gutter at 2121 Sandlewood. No responsible party

identified. Referred to Hazardous Materials for cleanup. 30. 6/23/99 Responded to complaint about a 55-gallon drum of oil outside Little Caesar's

Pizza Restaurant. Inspection found lid was not secured but no evidence of spills or leaks. Discussed matter with restaurant manager who agreed to secure lid and find a more secure location for drum.

3-23

Activity i BMP i I

Illicit Discharge B 1 .1 Prevention Prevention of Illicit

Discharges

Field Screening 82.1 Ongoing for Illicit Field Screening Discharges

Illicit Discharges 83.1 Investigation Investigation and Procedures Elimination of

Illicit Discharges

Spill Prevention, 84.1 SWPPPs Contamination, for Municipal and Response Facilities Procedures

84.3 Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Plan

Table B-2 County of San Joaquin


Assessment Tool I Accomplishments Reported in Annual Reports 1996/1997 1997/1998 1998/1999

Has the ordinance been Draft of Storm Water Quality Ordinance was adopted by complete developed or revised? Management Ordinance County Board of Supervisors

presented to various 3/10/98 interested parties. All new development plans are reviewed and construction

Was field screening Incorporates screening into same same conducted in accordance normal duties. Unusual with plan? electrical bills for storm water

pumps will also trigger a need to investigate for illicit discharQes.

Number of illicit not reported not reported Referred two calls to the connections investigated? City that were incorrectly

directed to the County.

Type of facilities that Corporation Yard complete complete submitted a NOI for the Motor Pool and Repair Shops state permit. Four landfills

Was a SWPPP developed Yes complete complete and implemented?

Has the HMERP been County OES has response New program currently under not reported developed and plan - new program changes development. implemented? to place an emphasize on

storm water. -- ··---- ---- --------- ~- - -

3-25

Activity BMP

Public Reporting B5.1 Public of Non-Storm Reporting Water Discharges Program

Used Oii/T oxics B6.1 Public Management and Education Disposal



Assessment Tool Accomplishments Reported in Annual Reports

I --

1996/1997 1997/1998 1998/1999 -

Has the number of public Existing Solid Waste Hotline Include hotline number in same reporting incidents been used for public reporting of brochures. Increase public recorded, including the dumping. All brochures outreach by ensuring number is type of incident and developed contain this hotline in television and radio spots material being dumped number. aired for the storm water and the location of program. incident? Solid Waste Public Solid Waste developed a complete complete Outreach for used oil multi-language media recycling. campaign to promote used oil

recycling. The County also has developed an Ag Recycling Program.

How many Targeted County financially supports Solutions for Compliance Participated in the Solution Opportunities to Prevent TOPPS Workshop - one topic included for Compliance Workshop Pollution in Stockton Solutions for Compliance stormwater Helped staff the Stockton (TOPPS) workshops and Workshop - main topic Participated in industrial AG Expo Information Booth outreach has the program stormwater awards for Environmental Co-Sponsored the Annual participated in or Assisted in upgrade of Excellence. Pollution Prevention Awards sponsored? TOPPS website Participated in the Good

Business Partner Program Promoted Pollution Prevention and TOPPS program to the Manufacturers Industrial Roundtable.

--

3-26


Other Outreach material

---------------------------




Participated with the City as a Participated in the Sally-Save- Participated in the Sally-co-sponsor in the Coca-cola Water environmental Save-Water Storm Water pollution prevention awareness program with city. Pollution Prevention promotion. Participated in Edison High Program

Adopt a Stream program with Participated in the Adopt a. Delta Keeper and the City. Stream Program with Bear Students cleaned trash from Creek High School and the Walker Slough and Five follow-uped with the Edison Mile Slough. High School Program Developing multi-ethnic implmented in 1997/98 outreach program to promote Participated in the Chamber stormwater program to the of Commerce Industrial Asian and Latino populations. Permitting Workshops Currently developing brochure Particiapted in the that will be translated into 4 development of a multi-different languages. lingual stormwater brochure

1

Investigating developing a Participated in a 1

grant program to provide presentation to the

I funding to ethnic groups to Association of Health conduct own pollution Educators prevention programs. Coordinated with County Implemented using same Office of Education to brochures as City (seven develop Pollution different brochures) plus one Prevention curriculum additional developed for farms Participated in the Earth entitled: "Pollution Prevention Day lnformatnion and on Your Farm". Demonstration Booth

Promoted Pollution Prevention at the stockton All American City Award competition. County staff gave

3-27

Activity BMP

86.2 Storm Drain Stenciling

86.3 Household Hazardous Waste Collection and 86.4 Used Oil Recycling



Assessment Tool Accomplishments Reported in Annual Reports

I ---

1996/1997 1997/1998 1998/1999 Number of catch basins Conducted through the City - same same stenciled? included in number reported

;by the City -

Number of collection Eight HHW events. 15 HHW events Implemented Ag Pesticide events held. Used oil collected at HHW same for oil Container Recycling

. events, at landfills and Program transfer stations. County currently selecting ; County also has an Ag used site for permanent oil program collection center in the Promotes used oil recycling metropolitan area of the centers City.

11 events held Quantity by type of ! 1519 customers and collected 5136 people attended and 522,631 poinds of HHW material collected? Has ;196,000 pounds of HHW. collected 448,000 pounds of there been an upward I Used oil quantities not HHW. trend in hazardous 1 reported. material waste collection? I

Types of outreach and Use brochures and TV same same promotion techniques announcements to promote implemented to encourage program use of collection events?

·-·-

3-28

Activity BMP

Control of B7 .1 Sanitary Seepage from Seepage/overflo Sanitary Sewer w Coordination Lines

Table B-2 County.of San Joaquin


Assessment Tool Accomplishments Reported in Annual Reports 1996/1997 1997/1998 : 1998/1999

Number of sanitary sewer Implementing program to completed construction of i not reported illicit connections to storm convert septic systems to College Park Sanitary. i sewer found? sanitary sewer service. i

Completed second phase of I

West Lane Heights Sanitary I Sewer Collection System. !

New construction ensures I connection to sanitary service. No seepage into storm drain system noted during field work. Listing of industries in the same same NPDESpermit area was developed. Will compare list against San Joaquin County Hazardous Material database to rank facilities.

!

3-29

4.0 INDUSTRIAL AcTIVITIES AssESSMENT

4.1 Introduction

The federal regulations require the Program to monitor and control pollutants in storm water

runoff from industrial facilities that are contributing a substantial pollutant loading to the storm

sewer. Facilities mandated to be addressed in the program are municipal landfills, hazardous

waste treatment, disposal and recovery facilities, and facilities subject to SARA requirements.

At a minimum the program is to:

• Establish priorities and procedures for conducting industrial site inspections,

• Establish control measures for discharges from industrial facilities, and

• Implement a monitoring program for industrial facilities.

The City and County each have six BMPs in two program activities to address these

requirements. The objectives of the BMPs to meet the regulatory requirements are:

• Reduce pollutants in runoff from industrial facilities.

• Identify all industrial facilities in the City and screen the facilities to prioritize and rank the

facilities based on its potential to contribute pollutants to the storm sewer.

• Establish appropriate inspection and monitoring activities for industrial facilities based on the

rank and priority.

• Implement an enforcement program to ensure control measures are implemented as required

in conditions of approval, City Code or SWPPPs.

• Provide outreach to industry to ensure they understand storm water quality issues and to

provide assistance for compliance with the City and State storm water programs.

• Implement an investigative and compliance monitoring program to evaluate effectiveness of

industrial control measures.


4-1



Developing and implementing the industrial activities program required a significant amount of

the City's storm water progra~ resources. BMPs were developed through a cooperative

approach with an advisory committee of industrial representatives.

Evaluation of the activities conducted by the City with the assessment tools used in Table C-1

found the City met the previously noted objectives. By implementing the Industrial Activities

Program, pollutants were reduced in discharges from industrial facilities by:

• Prioritizing industrial facilities to be inspected and monitored to ensure the facilities with the

greatest potential to be significant contributors of pollutants in runoff are adequately

controlled. Reviewing and updating the list occurs on a regular basis.

• Creating a database to maintain industrial information, including chemical inventories and

practices, and to track inspection activities and findings, monitoring results and enforcement

activities. This will provide the City with a mechanism to identify industries that may

require additional controls or monitoring.

• Integrating high priority industrial facilities into the City's GIS system to show location of

the facility, and provide pertinent information to the storm water program, such as chemical

inventory. This will assist the City investigate illicit discharges and identify potential sources

of pollutants of concerns based on the City's discharge monitoring program.

• Implementing a Condition of Acceptance program. Level 1 industrial facilities must apply

for a COA from the City. The COA program is similar to a permitting program that provides

the City with appropriate authorities to require industries to implement controls and

monitoring and provides the City with appropriate enforcement authorities necessary to cause

the industry to come into compliance with City requirements. This will ensure pollutants

from high priority industries are adequately controlled and reduced in runoff into the City's

storm sewer.

• Implementing an industrial inspection program that included verifying compliance with state

permit requirements. Conducted follow-up inspections when needed to ensure a site was


4-2

implementing appropriate controls. Identified facilities that are candidates for the City's

monitoring program based on site conditions noted during inspections. Noted potential for,

or evidence of, illicit discharges during site inspections. Referred sites with severe

compliance problems to the MUD industrial waste section or the County Department of

Public Health, Environmental Programs.

• Developing a standardized Inspection And Industrial Monitoring Plan that provides self

guided procedures to assist staff conducting inspections and monitoring and includes a

standardized inspection form.

• Providing employee training on the industrial program and the Inspection And Industrial

Monitoring Plan.

• Implementing a cooperative agreement between the storm water division and other agencies

that conduct industrial inspections (see discussion under Illicit Discharge Activities) to

ensure inspections include investigating storm water issues and inspection findings are

shared.

• Conducting outreach to industry through workshops to present City and State storm water

requirements and to present control measures available to industry to comply with

requirements.

• Developing a model "SWPPP for Industrial Facilities" to assist industries in developing an

adequate control program to reduce or eliminate pollutants in runoff from the facility.

• Distributing quarterly storm water newsletters to industry to provide guidance and assistance

to comply with the storm water program requirements.

• Implementing an industrial monitoring program for Level 1 industrial facilities to monitor

through investigative techniques or sampling the effectiveness of the industrial control

program to reduce pollutants its runoff.

• Developing a Good Business Partner Program through TOPPS to recognize environmentally

conscious businesses. Emphasis of the Program is on education of the industry and its

customers and to promote businesses through advertising. The pilot program begins with the

carpet/upholstery/drapery cleaning business.

• Providing an incentive for businesses to promote sound environmental solutions through

presenting Environmental Excellence Awards annually through TOPPS for air and water

regulatory programs.


4-3

4.2.2 County of San Joaquin

The County has not begun developing or implementing the key components of its Industrial

Activities Program. To date, the County has developed a "cook book" guide for industry to use

to comply with the State's general permit. The County has also purchased commercially

prepared BMP education videos for industrial applications that may be used by industry.

4.3 Recommendations

Issues, deficiencies or concerns identified during the extensive review for the assessment that

may need additional attention during the next permit term are summarized below and apply to

both the City and the County:

1. Consider maintaining records of all training provided to staff by BMP. Include records on

the date, time and location of the training, subject discussed and roster of attendees.




4-4


Identification of C1.1 Priority Has the listing of Inspection Industrial Facilities industrial facilities been Priorities and Identification completed? Procedures

Has the list been reviewed and updated? How and when?

Has a database been created to track activities conducted with industry?

C1.2 Industrial Has the Condition of Condition of Acceptance been Acceptance (COA) completed?

How many industries have applied for the

. COA? How many industries have received a GOA?

Table C-1 City of Stockton

Industrial Reported Activities

__ Accomplishments Reported in Annual Reports . _ ____ _ ___ 1995/1996 --. 1996/1997 . -- 1997/1998 1998/1999

Yes, involving a scoring Began investigating sewage, 7/98 issued a letter to all technique of five factors, ranked grey water and paint from boat level 1 and 2 industries with a industrial discharges to and marina operations. copy of the City's guidelines. establish priorities for inspecting Developed questions to be 9/98 issued letter to all level and monitoring. Industrial included in an oil recycling 1 industries explaining City's facilities broken out into levels boater survey to be conducted program and providing a list with Level 1 and 2 the high by San Francisco University. of all level 1 industries. priority facilities. See Appendix C1.1 for copy

of letters.

----N/A Yes, 4/97 revised using data Yes, updated using RB data same

from regional board on NOI and incorporated SARA data permittees. on releases of reportable

/quantities. MUD has developed a database Modified database to split Requested level 1 and 2 not reported for scoring, ranking, inspection, industry information from facilities be included in GIS and other pertinent data needed drainage basin info (databases system for the storm drain for industrial facilities. linked). system, and to include

Efforts to incorporate City's chemical inventory data. business licensing process into stormwater program have not worked. Business licensing assignment and use of SIC codes not effective.

not developed Started Industrial Advisory Continued monthly meeting Developed COA program Committee with the help of the with Advisory Committee. and incorporated into the Chamber of Commerce to help Focus on prioritizing of Industrial Facilities develop the Industrial COA industrial facilities. Began Monitoring Plan. It's a program. Held first meeting developing monitoring program available to Level 1 5/27/97 and held monthly program exemption program industries and establishes meetings since to review and and Condition of Acceptance self monitoring, smapling, develop program. Program. reporting notification, and

record keeping requirements. Allows the City to require an !ndustry develop a SWPPP and establish additional requirements, if needed. A COA is issued for five years.

not developed not developed Program under development 34 industries are in level 1, all level 1 industries must haveaCOA

not developed not developed Program under development 15 industries have receivied COA todate

4-5


C1.3 Industrial What is the frequency Facilities Inspection and type of inspections Program being conducted?

Has record keeping and reporting practices been maintained.

Has employee training been conducted, when was it conducted and who attended?

Has interagency coordination, response, and reporting process been developed and implemented?



Accomplishments Reported in Annual Reports 1995/1996 1996/1997 1997/1998 1998/1999

not developed 16 inspections conducted to 17 inspections conducted all All priority one facilities verify NOI and SWPPP - if not investigate NOI and SWPPP inspected - 34 inpsections available requested documents on site. conducted. be obtained and developed. At lease 5 without NOI and See Appendix C1.2 6 possible monitoring candidates SWPPP 1 complaint response 3 complaint responses 1 significant source of non- 4 enforcement actions stormwater potential See Attached List At least 4 without NOI or SWPPP. See Attached List

not developed Yes, MUD developed a standard complete complete inspection form and industrial monitoring plan to be used by em_j)loyees.

Industrial facilities monitoring Use of Facility Monitoring plan developed to provide self- Plan continues to provide on-help to employees. the-job training to employees. 7/98 Council adopted plan 2/98 Attended class by DTSC for revisions to California Hazardous Waste Codes. 2/98 Attended class by City for testifying and presenting evidence in court. 4/98 Attended CWEA Annual Conference and attended workshop on Phase II compliance.

Yes- see illicit discharge Yes, Code enforcement and same program Health Department work

cooperatively with one

-~~--- ___ _j another.

- -~--

4-6


C1.4 Industrial Has an enforcement Facilities program been developed Enforcement and implemented? Program

Number of enforcement procedures taken and response or follow-up activities taken?

C1.5 industrial Number of workshops See 86.1 Outreach Program held and number of

people in attendance? Type of feedback or input into the workshop content and usefulness.




Industrial Facilities Monitoring Plan completed in April1998 with assistance of an industrial advisory group. Describes escalating enforcement activities and provides enforcement response guiedelines. Plan describes: - How to investigate noncompliance - Which staff members are involved in each step of enforcement - The type of enforcement actions that can be taken The Plan also outlines the City's legal authority to take such actions.

4 enforcement actions taken during year: 1 - Cease and Desist 1 Notice to Clean 2 verbal directives to comply.

See 86.1

- --- ······---- '--- ---- ---------

1998/1999 Implemented the Industrial Facilities Monitoring Plan.

none reported

Developed outreach program through Industrial Facilities Monitoring Plan. Focus of Plan on assisting industry to reduce non-stormwater and polluted stormwater discharges from site. As part of this outreach, the City held four SWPPP classes for industry See Appendix C1.5

4-7


1-Type and number of outreach material developed and distributed?

Monitoring C2.1 Industrial Number of sites Program Monitoring Program monitored?

Number of sampling exemptions issued?




See 86~1 Distributed 2000 flyers 7/97 City newsletter requesting participation in "Stormwater Alert" mailed to TOPPS all level 1 and 2 industries Distributed flyers produced by reminding them of new general Advisory Committee to all permit requirements. industrial facilities in City 1 0/97 Second Storm water See 86.1 Alert distributed discussing

permit sampling requirements.

See 86.1

A formal City monitoring program Identified 2 facilities as has not been developed. possible monitoring sites. However, through inspection activities the City has identified at least 6 possible monitoring sites when the monitoring program is finally developed and implemented.

Currently the City requires a SWPPP for industries, and compliance with the State's permit monitoring requirements.

-- ---

1998/1999 Developed outreach brochure for Carpet Cleaners TOPPS begain Good Partner Program for industries See Appendix C1.5

Monitoring program was developed and implemented through the Industrial Facilities Monitoring Plan. Industrial facilities designated into three levels as defined in the Plan. Level 1 facilities are inspected and monitored. Levels 2 and 3 are not. Level 1 facilities are separated into major and minor facilities. Major facilities are monitored once per year and minor facilities monitored once every five years.

Sampling exemption program developed as part of the Industrial Facilities Monitoring Plan. To receive an exemption an industry must apply to the City, and comply with City and State Permit requirements. An exemption is issued for a period of five-years and City approval is required for it to be renewed.

4-8

4/3/97

4/9/97

4/11/97

4/14/97

4/22/97

517/97

5/15/97

5/20/97

6/4/97

6/10/97

6/13/97

. 6/23/97

7/1197

BMP Cl.3 City of Stockton

Record of 1996/1997 Industrial Inspections

Viktron manufactures PC Boards. Had NOI and SWPPP. Good candidate or monitoring,

Newark Sierra Paperboard manufactures pulp paper from waste paper. Large outside storage area. Has a NOI and SWPPP. Good candidate for monitoring.

Newark Recycled Fibers waste paper-recycling center. Has a NOI and SWPPP.

DANA, a SARA facility has a NOI and SWPPP.

Sumiden Wire Products, a SARA facility with large outside storage area. Has a NOI and SWPPP. Good candidate for monitoring

ASCO/Delta, a SARA facility. Has a NOI and SWPPP.

Responded to a complaint from County Health, Auto Toys.

Applied Aerospace Structures. Has a NOI and SWPPP. Good site for monitoring.

Stockton Scavenger Ass. Site has basin and sand/oil separator for storm water runoff. Not maintained.

East Stockton Transfer facility- has NOI but not a completed SWPPP. Has a series of underground interceptors to treat runoff, not maintained. Good candidate for monitoring.

Silgan Container Corporation. Has a NOI and SWPPP. Part of a monitoring group and has not collected samples at this site.

Sunrise Sanitation Services.

Waste Management that collects portable toilet wastes and processes waste for disposal to sanitary sewer.

Cargill Inc., a SARA facility, manufactures flour by milling wheat. Could not locate NOI or SWPPP during inspection.

Com Products Corporation. Installed a stormwater pond to receive runoff. A lot of potential for non-stormwater runoff (steep water and animal feed areas).

Sierra Chemical Company, a SARA facility that manufactures bleaches and repacks acid and chlorine. Stormwater can be used as makeup water in product. Review site as possible monitoring candidate.

4-9

7/23/97

8/11/97

9/3/97

9/18/97

10/21/97

10/24/97

11/3/97

1117/97

11/18/97

12/16/97

BMP Cl.3 City of Stockton

Record of 1997/1998 Industrial Inspections

Lipton canning. Has a NOI and SWPPP. Most work conducted during dry weather season.

Valley Tomato Products. Installed new sump to ensure wastewater is not discharged to the storm sewer.

PDM who fabricates steel plates and beams for construction projects. Large outside storage areas and conducts welding outside. Has a NOI and SWPPP. Needs to improve housekeeping.

Diamond Truck Body Company fabricates utility truck bodies from steel components. Does not have NOI or SWPPP. Information given to the facility.

Universal Services Recycling engages in sorting, assembling and breaking up scrap and waste material for ferrous and non-ferrous metal recycling. Determined facility should have a NOI and SWPPP.

Advanced Recycling Technologies recycles plastic materials such as bags, crates, and bottles, and paper and cardboard. The site is very messy and lots of loose trash and plastic. Determined should have a NOI and SWPPP.

QB Rebuilders manufactures brakes from oil brake parts. Several manufacturing activities are done outdoors and there are large part storage areas. Evidence of past spills from parts washer and brake oven noted. Good candidate for stormwater monitoring and likely to produce nonstormwater. Could not supply copy of NOI or SWPPP during visit.

Sampling report from QB Rebuilders inspection indicates high levels of asbestos in storm water runoff. Soil samples collected from Charter Way basin to evaluate if asbestos is in sediment. Also evaluate samples for metals due to past practices at site. QB did not have a storm water permit and were directed to do so.

Berberian Nut Factory. Has outdoor storage, loading and unloading and manufacturing areas for nut fumigation with methyl bromide. Could not produce NOI or SWPPP during visit. Follow-up with State information indicates NOI never filed.

Alegre Trucking in response to a complaint of tracking mud into roadway. Spoke with Algre about the complaint.

Delta Blue Grass in response to complaint of excessive mud into roadway. During inspection noted steam-cleaning unit used for cleaning trucks.

4-11

3/16/98

3/24/98

3/26/98

3/27/98

4/20/98

6/1198

BMPC1.3 City of Stockton

Record of 1997/1998 Industrial Inspections Informed company wash rack must be equipped with treatment and connected to sanitary sewer, not storm sewer. Discussed issue of tracking mud to facility.

Vanco Truck Stop in response to complaint of excessive mud being tracked into street. Spoke with firm about complaint.

Advance Recycling Technology, joint inspection with Code Enforcement. Very messy and variety of non-stormwater sources.

Ultimate Container, plastic recycling facility. Found numerous spills and residual material in drums including pesticide containers and plating products. Issued a notice to clean.

Ultimate Container- follow-up inspection with MUD industrial representative. Collected samples from sump and storm drains. MUD issued Cease and Desist order to stop receiving drums with residual material. Site has significant sources of non-stormwater.

Ultimate Container - follow-up inspection with County Health. County sampled containers for hazardous waste determination. Some of the drums had been removed.

Ultimate Container- follow-up inspection to Notice to Clean. Good candidate for storm water monitoring.

Advance Recycling's new location- proposes to eliminate outside storage with new facility.

4-12

5.0 CoNSTRUCTION AcTIVITIEs AssEssMENT

5.1 Introduction

The federal regulations require the Program to implement and maintain structural and non

structural BMPs to reduce pollutants in runoff from construction sites. At a minimum a

construction program is to include:

• Procedures for incorporating potential water quality impacts from construction activities into

the site planning,

• Requirements for BMPs,

• Process to prioritize site inspections and enforcement activities,

• Educational and training program for construction site operators.

The City and County each have four BMPs in four program activities to address these

requirements that have the following objectives to meet the regulatory requirements:

• Reduce pollutants in runoff from construction sites,

• Ensure sites obtain coverage and comply with the State General Permit, when applicable,

• Establish legal authorities and program to allow the City to require submittal of documents

for review and approval and establish minimum requirements for control land disturbance

activities, and establish minimum control requirements for construction activities and post

construction controls.

• Establish inspection and enforcement procedures for staff to ensure compliance with City and

State programs.

• Provide education and training for construction site operators and City employees.


5-1

5.2 Assessment of Program


The City met the objectives of the construction program through timely implementation of all the

BMPs contained in the Construction Activities Program, that were developed with the

participation of the development community, and industry, and city departments. Participation

by these parties was essential for an effective program to be established because many of the

activities involved establishing ordinances, procedures and policy that would impact the City,

development community, and industry. A summary of the assessment tools applied to the

construction program activities conducted through the 1998/1999 reporting period are included

in Table D-1.

Given the results of the assessment, implementing the construction program element reduced the

discharge of pollutants in runoff from construction sites by:

• Screening all building, grading and construction permit applications to ensure stormwater

issues are adequately addressed.

• Reviewing development plans and SWPPPs during site planning activities to ensure control

measures addressing construction activities and post-construction are included and adequate.

Development plans cannot be approved without the storm water division's review and

approval.

• Developing and implementing a Grading Ordinance that provides the City the authority to

require SWPPPs, grading plans, erosion and sediment control plans, and other documents as

needed to be submitted and approved prior to project approval. The Ordinance allows the

City to establish control measures and standards for construction site and post-construction

activities.

• Enforcing requirements of the Grading Ordinance and other City policy, standards and

requirements pertaining to the storm water program through conducting site inspections.

• Developing a database for construction sites that includes pertinent information about the

sites, such as size, location, etc. to be used to prioritize construction site inspections.


S-2

• Creating and implementing an Enforcement and Inspection Handbook that contains a

standardized inspection reporting form for City inspectors. This is a self-guided document to

assist site inspectors ensure storm water control measures are implemented, operating and

maintained at construction sites.

• Enlisting the Building Department site inspectors to incorporate stormwater issues into

normal code compliance inspections. This significantly increases the number of inspections

conducted for stormwater and ensures all phases of construction activities are inspected.

• Providing training to all City staff involved in construction site inspections. Training for

inspectors was mandated by the City Manager. This clearly demonstrates the level of

importance of the storm water construction program to city staff.

• Providing refresher training for authorized enforcement officers in the City. The need for

permit holders to properly implement their SWPPPs was stressed by the City Manager. This

clearly demonstrates the level of importance of the storm water construction program to city

staff.

• Conducting a extensive outreach and educational program for the development and

construction industry to ensure awareness and knowledge of the construction program

requirements and providing assistance to comply with the requirements by:

Distributing copies of the Grading Ordinance and Enforcement and Inspection Manual to

the Building Industry Association members,

Developing a Model Construction Activity SWPPP to be assist developers develop an

adequate SWPPP,

Conducting meetings with developers/construction site operators at the planning stage,

during construction, or as requested by the City or developer,

Conducting workshops for building industry to review City and State construction

requirements and review appropriate construction site control measures,

Developing and distributing brochures for specific construction activities:

+ Paints and Solvents

+ Concrete Applications

+ Earth Moving Activities

+ Heavy Equipment Operations


5-3

Distributing newsletters to the development community and industry covering storm

water requirements and highlighting specific storm water topics/issues.

• Continuing to identify sources of pollutants associated with construction activities by

meeting with the various utility companies to discuss and review applicability of storm water

requirements for utility construction activities. Deciding to develop a model SWPPP for

Utility Construction Activities.

• Implementing a goal of 75% level of acceptance program for the construction inspection

program. This program ensures that a construction site obtains an acceptable inspection

report 75% of the time based on the building inspectors' report. Sites that achieve the level of

acceptance receive a thank you letter from the City. Those that do not receive a letter

directing them to improve their efforts to achieve the level of acceptance.

5.2.2.County of San Joaquin Program

The County has not developed or implemented the key components of its Construction Activities

program. To date the County has participated with the City in the development of the City's

grading ordinance, and in the City's workshops and training activities for construction site

operators. Program elements are scheduled to be developed and implemented beginning in the

1998/1999 reporting period.

5.3 Recommendations

Issues, deficiencies or concerns identified during the extensive review for the assessment that

may need additional attention during the next permit term are summarized below and apply to

both the City and the County:

1. Consider maintaining records of all training provided to staff by BMP. Include records on

the date, time and location of the training, subject discussed and roster of attendees.




5-4


Site Planning 01.1 Site Planning Number of plans reviewed. Procedures Procedures

Number of plans needing revisions to better address storm water program requirements. Was employee training conducted. When was it conducted and who attended? What other outreach efforts have been taken to implement program?

BMP 02.1 Grading Has a grading ordinance Requirements Ordinance been developed or

modified and adopted?

What are the requirements relating to storm water quality?

Table D-1 City of Stockton

Construction Reported Activities


SWPPPs are reviewed and if approved issued a SWPPP number by the City. 89 SWPPPs reviewed and

approved. I 7 pre-construction meetings held 23 meetings with developers/contractors to explain stormwater requirements.

Met with a number of different contractors at their or the City's request prior to approving SWPPP. Attended Utility Coordination Meetings to speak about stormwater issues.

Developed Stormwater Coordination Meetings with County to ensure consistent program implementation. Attended 5 coordination meetings for establishing policy I procedures.

Draft ordinance developed by Ordinance adopted 2/97. Copy complete City together with sent to Regional Board. representatives of development community. Procedures to ensure BMPs are implemented to be developed. Requires submittal of NOI same same and SWPPP with grading permit application. Sites not subject to grading permit need E&S for building permit. City issues a number for all approved SWPPPs, permits not issued until city number assigned.

1998/1999 See Appendix 01.1 for SWPPPs reviewed and approved.

same

not reported

not reported

complete

same

I

5-5


Inspection and D3.1 Inspection and Number of inspections Enforcement Enforcement conducted? Procedures Procedures

Were standardized reporting forms created and implemented?



I Accomplishments Reported in Annual Reports I 1995/1996 1996/1997 1997/1998 I

I Being developed to utilize 1 0 inspections conducted - 6 Total sites inspected by all City I current construction did not have SWPPP, staff 1100. 16 inspections !procedures. Inspection remaining were not reported in annual report relating !frequency dependant upon implementing SWPPPs. to stormwater. !site size. 5 of the sites were first time

! inspections and had

i implemented SWPPPs

J 5 of the sites were follow-up inspections that continued to note problems with compliance. 1 site was issued a notice to clean 1 site given time limit to obtain NOI and prepare a SWPPP.

Developed an Enforcement and Developed database to track Inspection Handbook that construction sites, information helped staff to: and data about the sites will be - Review and approve SWPPPs used to prioritize the sites to - Monitor construction sites to inspect. see if a contractor is implemented its SWPPP or when amendments to the SWPPP are necessary - Ensure permanent BMPs are constructed properly

The handbook contains standardized reporting forms to assist staff when reviewing SWPPPs or conducting site inspections.

---1998/1999

See Appendix D3.1 Enlisted help of building inspection department to include monitoring for stormwater during building code inspections. Building department conducted 13,895 inspections during the 1998/99 season. Stormwater division has a construction site inspector that conducted 1000 inspections. City's goal is to achieve 75% compliance for inspections conducted. As of 7/99 the City had achieved 90% compliance.

same

5-6


Number and type of enforcement action taken? Follow-up action required? How was issue resolved?

Educational and D4.1 Education and Were employee trained? Training Training Measures Type of training given, Measures when was it conducted and

who attended?

'--- -·-




Enforcement powers will be Currently inspections provide 1 Notice to Clean accomplished through using outreach and assistance for 1 Verbal deadline for SWPPP building permit sign-off compliance. Common activities 5 follow-up inspections to verify powers, occupancy permit include providing verbal work complete. powers, and improvement instructions for compliance and acceptance powers. conducting follow-up Enforcement activities have inspections. been expanded through new Stormwater Management Discharge Ordinance. Training program Enforcement and Inspection 7/21/97 REM presented implemented. MUD field Handbook provides a self-help demonstration of catch basin personnel associated with and can be used by employees. insert for construction sites. construction activities 2/14/97 training on the State 1/98 Met with MUD, Public attended a 6-hour hazardous General Permit Works and design consultant to materials awareness (HMA 4/7/97 Training on the City present stormwater division Training) that has grading ordinance and storm water treatment capability incorporated storm water enforcement and inspection requirements for the Taft Area issues. program for construction Detention Basin

industry. 4/20/98 Conducted refresher 4/21/97 City Manager mandated training for authorized make-up training for inspectors. enforcement officers (Public 4/23/97 held make-up training Works and Building Inspectors.) for inspection and enforcement 4/20/98 Provided refresher class policy and procedures manual. for authoriz~d enforcement 5/8/97 Completed training officers at city council chambers. certification for inspectors for City Manager stressed the need City program. City manager for permit holders to properly signed all certificates, an copies implement their SWPPPs. were placed in the personnel files of each recipient. 6/19/97 held special training class for public works and building inspectors on erosion control practices. Used commercially developed video tapes.

--

1998/1999 ---verbal notices letters follow-up inspections

Continue to use Enforcement and Inspection Handbook as a on-the-job training tools.

I '

5-7


Number and type of outreach material developed and distributed to the development and construction community.

Were workshops conducted for development and construction community? When was conducted, what subject was addressed and who attended?

---




MUD Developed model Distributed copies of grading 7/97 distributed second SWPPP for Construction ordinance and enforcement and Stormwater Alert newsletter to Activities inspection manual to BIA building community and industry .

members. . 9/97 distributed Stormwater Alert 6/24/97 Attended meeting with Public Works, AT&T, Sprint, Cal. Water and PG7E to discuss utility companies complying with City and State requirements. Decided to write Utility SWPPP common to all utilities that do work in the City.

2/97 free workshop for building 7/97 presentation to custom industry, only 16 people arrived home builders on stormwater out of 428 invitation sent. requirements. 5/98 provided training at BIA 7/97 attended meeting at Grupe offices for developers and HQ, major development firm engineers. 9/97 met with Port of Stockton to

discuss SQCPP, SWPPPs and trainino.


not reported

I

5-8

6.0 CoNCLUSION

The City and County conducted an assessment of their programs to evaluate the effectiveness of

the BMPs to achieve the goal of the storm water regulations to reduce the discharge of pollutants

in runoff from urbanized municipal areas. Since 1995, the City has developed and implemented

all the BMPs in their Program. The County has its program approved by the Regional Board in

October 1996, and its program is currently under development. However, the City and County

programs are identical and should result in similar results once the County has fully implemented

its program.

The assessment evaluation involved an extensive review and consolidation of the activities

reported in the annual reports, and theri evaluating these activities against tools or measures to

assess the effectiveness of the programs to adequately address the program requirements of the

federal regulations and reduce the discharge of pollutants in runoff.

Based on the assessment review the following conclusions regarding the Programs are made:

1. The City has fully implemented their program.

2. The County's program is identical to the City's and has only been in effect for 1.5 years and

is continuing to be developed and implemented.

3. The City and County intend to prepare a joint Program for the next permit term. This will

result in two different implementation schedules to account for the County entering the

Program later than the City. Annual reporting activities will remain separate.

4. Implementing the Programs resulted in the reduction of pollutants in urban runoff by:

a. Implementing control measures for municipal activities and operations,

b. Requiring controls for construction and new development and redevelopment

c. Eliminating lllicit Discharges

d. Inspecting construction sites and industrial facilities.

e. Enforcing City requirements

f. Training public employees and private industry


6-1

g. Conducting public outreach through brochures, TV and Radio ads, etc., to promote public

awareness of storm water quality issues and concerns and to provide solutions to

preventing storm water pollution.

5. The City and County will continue to implement their current program with some revisions

to:

a. Improve reporting and record keeping

b. Improve coordination between program elements

6. Provide supervisory or administrative oversight and verification of implementation.


6-2

1:.!1:.!•...)( l'tU. 0'-+J

City Manager's Office- Economic Development Division

ERC Meetings- Jul.y 1, 1998 to June 30, 1999

-- --·· .. nate ERCID Company SiteAddr~~

~--.- . . ...

Jul1998

07/08/1998 199 Quick Stop Mini-man & Gas St..1.tion Fremont & nE" Streets

07/08/1998 20R Retail & Office Building (01inchiolo) 7303 Pacific Avenue (at Wilora)

07/15/199& 209 PDM Strocal, l11c. 2324 Navy Drive

07124/l998 218 R V Storage Facility Mariposa Road (west side across from

07/31/1':198 112 California Homes 3202 W. March Lane

07/3l!l998 227 United Way 401 E. Main Street

6

Aug 1998

08/04/1998 211 Advanced lndust.rial Coating. SJP #9807.603 950 Industrial Drive

08/05/1998 214 Sidewalk Cafe (Sidewalk Adventures) 230 E. Main Street

1}8112/1998 217 Center for Employm&\t Tr;Uning (CEI') 1029 N. El ~1."~0 Street

08/)4/1998 216 J & R Warehouse Properties (Catellus) 4201 & 4238 Gibrnltar Court

08/25/1998 215 Federnl Express- SJP #9703.4 71 Performance Drive

08/26/1998 233 Multi-Plex Movie TI1earre

08/26/1998 219 Squeeky Clean Car Wash 5121 Holiday Drive

7

Se~ 1998

09/02/1998 221 Gospel Centcr Rescue Mission Comer of Church St. & S. San Joaquin

09/03/1998 223 Vega (Weston Ranch-Gus Station, Mini-marl, Manthey Rond (West on Ranch)

09/09/1998 220 Righetti Enterprises 1649 E. Channd Slrcct

09/ll/1998 222 Present.at!on Church 6715 Leesburg Place

09/18/1998 235 S icrra Chemical lO 10 Industrial Way

0'}121/1998 234 Associated Tractor

6

Oct 1998

10/01/1998 226 Auto Repair Facility (smog & lwlt!-up) West Lane@ Klinger (2213, 1240 & 2

10/02/1998 225 Retail & Office Building (Chlnchiolo) 7303 Pacific Avenue (at Wilora)

I

t:J'!J•...JO .......... ,_,_.....,

·- -. --·-~

Dnte ERClD Cumpany Site Address

10113/1 9~8 237 Applied Aerospace Structures 3437 S. Airport Way

10/15/1998 236 Applied Aerospace Structures 3437 S. Airport Way

10/15/1998 22~ Kleinfelder 2825 Myrtle

5

Nov 199M

11/04/1998 230 Pallcu Pallet, Inc. - SJP 1405 S. Fresno

11/05/1998 231 Marina Towers 300 N Hamson Street

11/10/1998 229 Antonini Enterprises Trucking 4001 S. Odell Avenue

11/10/1998 238 Sidewalk Cafe (Sidewalk Adventures) 230 E. Main Street

11/19/1998 241 98 Cent Clearance Dis!. Ctr- SJP #9809.629 Airport Gateway Business Center

11123/1998 239 Hollywood VIdeo (Weston Ranch) Weston Ranch

1112311998 243 Stockton Recycling

lln5/l998 242 EMS Heating & Air l2SS N. Union Street (former PamecQ ---·-- ··-

8

Dtt1998

12103/199H 213 Indoor Mer~o Newberry Building

12/16/1998 245 Ewing Irrigation 1023 S. Pershing (off of Navy Drive) .-. ·--

2

J!Ull999

01106/1999 246 Cal Sheets Airport Gateway (north of Noll & sout

01/0711999 249 Shopping Center (Fremont) 2630·2648 E. Fremont Street

01111/1999 247 Hendcr.;on Construction 2050 E. Fremont Street (fonncrly Apse

01/11/1999 244 University of the Pacl..lic (UOP) Pacific Avenue (Arts/Geology Project)

01113/1999 :268 Tyrestonc 1244 West Lane

01/19/1999 267 Retail Expansion Group (Staples facility) 4510 Alitalia, Building·"B"

01/25/1999 250 Warehouse (Buu Oates project) "B" Street and Boeing

otn9tl999 251 Pool Hi!.ll Renovation 720 N. ElDorado Slreet

8

feb 1999

02/09/191}9 252 Home Depot March L<me & I-5, along Feather River

2

____ .._ __ -

Site Addrc~~ ERC ID Cu~pany ~~=========~====~~

02/17/1999

02117/1999

3

Mar1999

03/02/ll)\}9

03/03/1999

03/05/1999

03/12/1999

03/15/191)9

03/18/1999

03/19/1999

03/22/1999

03/23/1999

03/29/1999

10

Apr 1999

04/06/1999

04/14/1999

04/15/1999

04/22/1999

4

May 1999

05/13/1999

05/20/1999

05/24/1999

Jun 1999

06/04/1999

06/07/l999

06/10/1999

254 Amerlcarible lnlcmational (formerly RV Clrc 9!6 Center Street

253 Eureka Fabrications, lnc. 4113 Gold River Lune

255 Head Start Preschool

261 Togo's and Baskin Robbins

256 Mercado

259 LSW Manufacturing

263 Westwood Chemical Corp.· SJP #9812.65l

260 Bwk Store and Coffee Shop

258 EMS Heating & Air

262 Diamond Pallet of California (SJP Client)

265 lntersttte Truck Ccmer

264 Teichert Aggregates

425 N. California Slrcct

4965 S. Highway 99, Frontage Road E

500 E. Main Street

745 S. Lincoln Street

Ccnt.ral Valley or Port of Stockton

27 N. Hunter Sireet

1258 N. Union Street (fonncr Pameco

1838 Vicki Lane

641 S. Harrison Street

Van Dervin Parkway & Frank West Cir

269 First Step Nursery (Child Ab~ Prevention C 540 N. California Street

270 Hickory Springs (SJP Client #9903.667)

271 Alpine Construction

272 Coyote Dry Dock Marina

275 New York Deli

27o CompuVista Business ltttilute

273 Brown Strauss

279 G & G T\.-cluto!ogies

2244 West Lane or 2200 blod of E. M

1728 & 1736 E. Market Street

19 and 17 S. San Joaq$1 Street

Marketplace basement

former Alan Meat fac!l)ty on Mariposa

820 S. atlifomia Strc\.'1.

274 Stockton Scavenger 1240 NUYY Drive

278 England/Corsair, Inc. (La-Z-Boy subsidiary) ( 555 Zephyr

1.11:::14

3

Date ERC lD Com puny ···--=====::.:..;__...:..._

06/ll/1999

06/1711999

06/22/1999

6

277 Daycare- Private School

280 Mercy Charities Housing (Gleason Park)

281 Ramada Inn

CIH Total ERC Meetin~:s

U11J .5!1999 IH•'<'lnpu Ac«33 Databa:sw R~pon:ja

Site Addrc!ls

~00 E. Main Street

Gleason Park Area - 2 blcks south of cr

Ill E. March Lane

4

STORMWATER- NO FLOW BASINS

Location ID Date Time

Airport/Duck Cr S. Inlet pipe A DC-66 35961 , 1005 B 1345

Wilshire & Deep Water Chan A DW-108 35965 1155 B na

Diamond & Mormon Slough A MM-154 35969 805 B 1255

Bieghle Alley & Mormon Sl A MM-152 35969 825 , B 1305

7th & UPRR/Duck Cr. A DC-165 35969 845 B 845

12th & UPRR Ditch Outlet A DC-165 35972 1038 B 1450

Duck Cr. North Inlet B DC-65 35975 1255

Caran & Willora B 5M-129 35991 1351

Madison North MH 1 A MM-144 35991 926

Church & Commerce MH 3 A MM-150 35991 757 B 1241

Madison & E. Sonora N MH1 B MM-144 35996 1207

1-5 & 14 Mile Slough B 14-36 36010 1411

Madison & Dp Wtr Channel A DW-117 36012 928 B 1305

Caran & Clarane B 5M-129 36052 1355

10

STORMWATER ·DRY WEATHER SAMPLING Lob ID Cu Cd 0" Nl Pb Zn TSS EC Tlrl>ldltv MBAS otaJ Ptoeno TPH' Tot.! Oil & Gceost ' Pe.t Field pH ' Aeld TOIT"4> Aeld a

LoceU011 10 Dote Time (Cu priYl FnJ!1L mg'L mgt. !11!J1L mQJ!. fTl!liL mgt UIT'I\os/cm NTU mg:'l rng/l FnJ!1L mg/1. fn9ll std C "¢

Weston f'lnl> !riel

GIP-PMH1 GIP-WW-

AJRP-12MH1

Hoi'na!>-MH 1

[).Jd( Creek Bosln- N0f111 ~riot

[).Jd( O"oelc Basin- South !riel

Arch Rd. Basin- MH1

1Dih/Urlon

Airport Retention Bosln lrlet Pipe

TlJ'T'jlil<e Eastlne- MH1

SJ-62 06/15198 820 8165-14 1230 8166-25

FC-72 06/15198 930 8165-17 1320 8165-28

OC-65 06/15198 1020 816&-19 1355 816&-31

CR-18 06/17198 835 816t-22 1345 816t-23

OC-65 06120198 815 818(}.41

OC-65 06120198 830 8180-42 1310 818(}.45

A LJ-81 06/29f.l8 925 818(}.43 B 1350 8180-46

AOC-16! 06129198 101~ 8180-44 B 1425 818(}.47

A LJ-80 07Jil1198 1115 8182-18 B 1432 8182-17

A WK-64 07Jil1198 835 8182-19 B 1328 8182-20

stooocoach & [).Jd( Cre&k f'lnl> St•ti• A DC-69 07Jil1198 1027 8182-21

TlJ'T'jlike West lne • MH4

Lindsay & VO$eml1e East- MHI Un<lsay & Yosen-118 W&~t • MH1

Han1son • MH4

Ven Btren- MH4

Edson& Lindsay- MH1

13510ak- MH

Oe'.1d & Guernsey Outfal

Garan & Clarano MH 2

Madson & E. Sonora N- MH1

Madson & E. Sonora S- MH1

Centor St ~ StoUon

W. Scotto Ave· MH1

B 1458 8182-22

A WK-64 07 Jll1/98 930 8182-23 B 1407 8182-24

AD'N-11: 07Jil6/98 7150 8187-40 BDW-11; 07/06/98 1139 8187-41

ADW-11! 0Ul6/98 810 8187-42 B 1211 8187-43

AO'.'J-11! 07106198 839 8187-44 B 1234 8187-15

ADW-11< 07/06/98 902 8187-48 B 1156 8187-47

ADW-10! 07/06/98 924 8187-18 B 1254 8187-49

AMM-15! 07115198 937 8196-27 B 1311 8196-28

A5M-129 07/15198 1124 8195-29

AMM-14' 07/20198 829 8201-49

AMM-14~ 07/20/98 844 8201-&l B 1228 8201-51

AMM-15C 07120198 915 8201-52 B 1247 8201-53

AMM-145 07120198 935 8201-54 B 1305 8201-55

Airport Retent1011 Basin & Poci<-MH A LJ-80 07120/98 1014 8201-56

legonPerk

BuenaVIs1a

stlm.Jzu & Ryde Wet Wol

1D IF Sutler & Cel Rive

B 1335 8201-57

A SC-57 07122198 802 8203-15 B 1247 8203-16

A SC-56 07122198 824 8203-17 B 1322 8203-18

A SC-55 07122198 842 8203-19 B 1342 8203-20

A CR-45 07129f.l8 758 821(}.23

0.02 0.02

0.02 0.02

0.20 0.03

0.02 0.02

0.01

0.01 0.01

0.01 0.01

0.09 0.05

0.02 0.01

0.01 0.01

0.01 O.ot

0.28 0.05

0,01 0.01

0.01 2.~0 0.05 1.40 2.02 7.12 9,32

1.98 0.10 0.63 1.13 4.53 16.5 0.98 0.08 0.29 0.67 2.56 7.60

0.01 0.04

0.01 0.01

0.02 0.07

12.2 0.02 0.29 0.37

0.11

0.02 0,12

0.01 0.01

O.ot 0.01

0.05 0.06

0.01 0.04

0.04

1.22 3.42

0.01 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.02

0.01 0.01

0.01

167.00 62.00

418

758

0.3 0.05 0.17 0.05

0.19 0.05 0.18 0.0275

0.69 1.3

0.05 0.05

0.46 0.001 1.3 0.001

0.18 0.001

0.24 0.001 0.23 0.001

0.26 0.001 0.32 0.001

1.9 0.003 1.8 0.001

0.14 0.001 0,25 0.001

0.3 0.001 0.32 0.001

0.32 0.001 0.29 0.01

0.23 0.001 0.27 0.001

0.14 0.001 0.17 0.001

0.16 0.001 0.22 0.001

6.5 0.04 4 0.001

0.2 0.001 0.27 0.02

0.17 0.001 0.2 0.003

0.43 0.001 0.37 0.001

0.27 BROKEN

0.42 0.001

0.21 0.001 2.2 0.03

0.24 0.001 0.28 0.001

0.3 0.001 0.24 0.001

0.69 0.001 0.82 0.001

0.26 0.001 0.32 0.001

0.21 0.001 0.67 0.001

0.33 0.001 0.4 0.001

0.5 0.01

380

1000 1400

7.56 7.62

7.2 7.28

6.97 7.15

7.53 7.62

7.16

7,65 7.39

8.26 7.77

7.02 6.72

7.5 7.4

7.21 7.43

7.75 7.54

6.7 6.87

8,73 6.36

8.45 6.47

6.55 8.45

8.24 H

6.57 6.47

6.73 7.25

6.72

7.19

7.31 7.35

8.75 6.99

6.74 6.82

8.67 8.55

8.43 7.34

8.26 7.57

6.93 6.~2

7.33

20.1 0.04 20 0.16

24 0.2 31 0.09

23 0.31 25 0.43

18 0.28 23 0.19

16.2 0.24

17.9 0.09 22.6 0.17

18.7 0.07 21.9 0.03

17.4 0 19.1 0.05

20.3 26.6 0

17.1 0.05 22.8 0.03

18.5 0.01 22.4 0

21.5 24.9

0

23 0.02 24.6 0.01

23.8 0 24.7 0.36

24.3 0.02 25.6 0

25.6 0.02 25.3 0.02

25.7 0 25.3 0

22 0.55 25.3

28.4 0.16

26.4 0.1

28.9 0.02 29.4 0.05

28.5 0.06 28.1 0.05

23.2 0 23.8 0

18.3 0.04 23.6 0.06

26.6 0.24 23.2 0.02

24.6 0.01 24.7 0

23.7 0.02 24.8 0.02

21.3 0.08

STORMWATER ·DRY WEATHER SAMPLING Lob ID CU Cd Cr N1 Pb Zn TSS EC Tllbldty MBAS otal Pheno TPH Total 011 & GroSSI Pest Field pH Field TetTl> Aeld Cl

Loao~on ID Dale llme (Cuonly) mgA.. m.l!1:__!!1~___!!1!!!\.~~~trnhos/cm NTU ITI!)Il~ _n>gi\. __ l!lgll __ mJjlt. _____ rngll ___ ~td _____ C __ 11\¢.~

SanQ..lne~ & Col. River

West ln & Col RiverS

West ln & Cal River N

Hwy4 &S J River

8111 & S J River

Ft. Donel$on & 14 Mile SloU!tl

1-5 & 14 Mile Slou~

C1>ert>o<.rg & Mosher

COrrmerce & Deep Wtt Charnel

Web« & Mormon Slou!tl

San Jose & Deep Wlr Charnel

Lafayette & Mormon Slough

IWey & Mosher Slc>t.9l

Thornlon & Mosher SloU!tl

Don & Mosher Slou(ll

CenW&OWC

Mlr>er&DWC

Co<rmerce & owe

Conn & Oanone

C.ll!I1MH2

20 2F

B 1310 821~24 0.02 826 22 0.6 0.011 7.88 24.4 0.02

A DV-50 07/29198 820 821~25 B 1339 821~26

CR-46 07/29198 850 821 ~27 1400 821~28

A CR-43 07/2919ll 912 821~29 B 1418 821~30

A SJ-60 0Ml3198 810 8215-41 B 1255 8215-42

A SJ-61 OMJ3198 835 8215-43 B 1320 8215-44

A 1+35 08/03/98 903 8215-45 B 1352 8215-46

A 14-36 OMJ3/98 935 8215-47

A MS-20 08/03198 1015 8215-48 B 1436 8215-49

ADW-12( 08110198 928 8222-43 B 1305 8222-44

AMM-141 08110/!l8 955 8222-45 B 1327 8222-46

ADW-11' 08/10198 1020 8222-47 B 1252 8222-48

AMM-14~ 08/10198 1040 8222-49 B 1340 8222-50

A MS-14 08/12198 ~5 8224-35 B 1300 8224-36

A MS-18 08112198 1017 8224-39 B 1340 8224-40

A MS-17 08112198 1046 8224-37 B 1320 8224-38

ADW-12! 08119/98 704 8231-09 B 1106 8231-10

ADW-12: 08119198 736 8231-11 B 1155 8231-12

ADW-12' 08119/98 805 8231-13 B 1133 8231-14

P.5M-12S

5M-12S

35052 826 8257-18

30052 1355 8257-19

k!Mn S1andard E Median Mode Slnndard 0 Von once Kurto~ls

Ske'W'f"lflSS Ronge Mlnlrrun Mal<imm1 Sum Colnt conn&nco HI!11Ac~or Low Acllon

0.01 0.01

0.02 0.02

0.01 0.01

0.01 0.02

0.01 0.01

0.01 0.01

0.03

0.03 0.01

0.01 0.01

0.01 0.01

0.01 0.01

0.01 0.01

0.01 0.01

0.03 0.02

0.01 0.01

0.02 0.02

0.01 0.01

0.01 0.01

<0.02 <0.10 0.04 <0.10 0.15

<0.01 <0,05 0.11 <0.05 0.06

0.22 0.12 0.01 0,00 1.32 1.74

121.15 10.75 12.20 0.00

12.20 19.67 90.00 0.27 0.49

-0.05

0.03 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.04 0.00

40.73 6.17 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.24 7.00 0.03 0.06 0.01

0.40 0.05 0.29 0.00 0.49 0.24

61.42 7.49 1.40 0.04 1.40 2.81 7.00 0.36 0.76 0.04

0.61 0.08 0.67 0.00 0.76 0.56

50.78 6.85 2.02 0.00 2.02 4.24 7.00 0.56 1.16 0.05

2.24 0.29 1.22 0.00 2.72 7.38

45.94 6.57 7.12 0.02 7.12

15.66 7.00 2.01 4.25 0.23

0.21

0.15

6.20 0.67 5.51 0.00 6.29

39.60 43.91

6.38 16.50 0.15

16.50 37.20

6.00 5.04

11.24 1.16

114.50 6.98

114.50 0.00

74.25 5,512.~0

97.45 9.65

167.00 62.00

167.00 229.00

200 102.90 217.40

11.60

510 522 4.4

0.3 0.012 0.4 0.013

524 551

389 411

1574 1571

1290 1174

854 882

897

408 408

310 306

314 360

306 308

295 331

737 758

352 334

318 342

138 154

357 548

348 278

236

213

540.25 48.55

398.50 0.00

356.79 127,299.99

2.25 1.50

1,574.00 138.00

1,574.00 21,610.00

40.00 110.57 650.82 429.68

6.5

5.7

6.6 16

3.5 4.5

34 20

28

29 9.3

13 7.2

18 26

14 11

24 16

1 1.5

168 7.1

4.7 4.4

0.6 0.011 0.7 0.014

0.5 0.018 0.3 0.015

0.6 0.01 0.6 0.01

0.5 0.01 0.4 0.01

0.3 0.01 0.3 0.01

0.4 0.065

0.4 0.016 0.4 0.016

0.18 0.19

0.18 0.21

0.33 0.36

0.21 0.23

0.34 0.35

0.01 0.01

0.01 0.01

0.01 0.01

0.01 0.01

0.01 0.01

0.42 0.017 48 0.66 0.011

0.33 0.01 150 0.33 0.01 33

20 0.45 0.011 0.014 12 0.42

6.9 0.15 7.3 0.2

7.5 0.16 5.7 0.19

135

56

2U9 4.99

11.00 0.00

34.57 1,195.30

20.42 4.33

168.00 1.00

168.00 755.80

35.00 11.45 33.05 10.14

0.52 0.08 0.31 0.00 0.83 0.69

47.26 6.22 6.60 0.14 6.50

45.82 88.00 0.17 0.69 0.35

'0.01 0.01

0.01 0.01

0.065

0.01

0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 8.24 2.82 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.98

90.00 0.00 0.01 0.01

58 5.521

40.5 0

64.39 4146 106.2 9.964

150 1

150 232

4 63.1

##II## (5.10)

926.67 44.56

1,000.00 0.00

513.94 264,133.33

61.13 8.09

1,400.00 380.00

1,400.00 2,780.00

3.00 581.57

1,508.23 345.10

0.001

0 0

0.017 0.0048

0.00052 0.00042

7.01 7.4

7.33 7.77

7.35 7.74

7.44 8.48

7.74 7.62

7.08 6.9

7.32

7.93 7.83

9.23 8.56

9.16 7.83

8.97 8.85

7.63 7.81

7.55 7.51

7.32 7.87

7.17 7.03

7.45 7.34

9.25 9.2

9 7.7

7.3

7.1'8

7.54 0.06 7.40 0.00 0.70 0.48

(1.63) (0.53) 9.25 6.36 9.2!1

17.5 18.2

18.9 19.2

0.04 0.01

0 0

20.9 0.11 21.2 0.02

21.3 0.36 22.2 0.19

23.2 0.04 22.5 0.04

21.4 0 22.4 0.01

21.3 0

22.1 22.4

27 28.2

26 26.2

26.7 27

26.2 26.5

23 23.2

22.9 23.2

22.8 23.4

0.03 0.03

0.06 0.06

0.12 0.09

0.08 0.07

0.07 0.12

0.05 0.22

0 0.08

0.25 0.08

25.7 0.12 28.2 0.03

25.3 0.29 26.3 0.16 '•

24.9 0.08 25.3 0.11

24.1

26.6

23.45 0.28

23.50 0.00 3.10 9.62

(1.63) (0.46) 31.00 16.20 31.00

0.13

0

678.47 90.00 0.14 7.68 7.39

2,110.50 90.00 0.64

24.09 22.81

0.09 0.01 0.05 0.00 0.11 0.01 7.54 2.57 0.55 0.00 0.55 7.54

87.00 0.02 0.11 0.06

~·~California Regional Water Quality Control Board -~ _ · . . · Central Valley Region

. Steven T. Butler, Chair Winston H. Hickox Secretary for

Environmental Protection

Sacramento Main Office Interne:t Address:: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/--rwqcb5

3443 Routier Road, Suite A, Sacramento, California 95827-3003

Phone (916) 255-3000 • FAX (916) 255-301~~:, ::. C :::·:· {?:;, ~·;

Gray Davis OJJJk ~~.,

7 July, 1999

JunMasuoka City of Stockton 1465 S. Lincoln Street Stockton, CA 95206

,J ... ~

... · .. , ~ . -

Mi..:fH\.>!0~ ,.,.: i iUTlES

NOTICE OF TERMINATION- STATE OF CALIFORNIA GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES-WDID NO. : 5S39S305620 Site: Stockton, San-Joaquin County

Your request to terminate coverage under the State of California General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated yvith Construction Activities has been approved. This approval is based on information provided to us in the Notice ofT ermination (NOT) form, signed and certified by you, indicating that this project is not required to be regulated by a construction activities storm water NPDES permit.

Attached is a copy of your approved NOT request form. A copy of this form has been forwarded to the· State Water Resources Control Board. It will be the agency responsible for ensuring that your company's name and other permit information have been removed from the Storm Water Program permittee's database. We suggest that you maintain a copy of this letter, along with your NOT, in your files for possible future reference. ·

Please note that the above staff findings are based solely on the accuracy of the information which has been provided. If the information is inaccurate or incomplete, or if the activities at the site have changed, thes~ findings may no longer· apply. Further, the--findings shall in no way release the owner, developer or contractor of the site from any liability which may result from noncompliance with the requirements of the General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activities should it apply. The ongoing accuracy of the information provided may be subject to verification by inspection by Regional Board staff.

Ifyou have any questions or comments you may contact me at (916) 255-3027, or the State Board Storm Water Unit at (916) 657-0757.

'--fr(~lft/d! MELISSA R. HALL

·Storm Water Program Assistant

cc: State Water Resources Control Board, Division ofWater Quality, NOT Processing Unit (Enclosures only)

~Recycled Paper . Our mission is to preserve and enhance the quality of California's water resources, and ensure their proper allocation and efficient use for the benefit ofpre~ent and future ?,enerations.

State of California, State Water Resources Control Board·

NOTlCE OF TERMINATION.

OF COVI3=RAGE UNDER. THE NPDES. GENERAL PERMIT NO. CAS000002 FOR DISCHARGES. OF STOR~ WATER

ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY

Submission of this Notice of Termination constitutes notice that the owner (and his/her agent) of the site · identified on this fonn is no longer authorized to discharge storm water associated with construction

activity by NPDES ~eneral Permit No. CAS000002: ·

I. WDID NO. 5B39S305620

II. OWNER \

COMPANY NAME City of Stockton CONTACT P!:RSON ' Jun Masuoka

STRE:;T ADDRESS 14 6 5 S • Lincoln· S t • TITLE Deputy Public Works Director

CITY Stockton STATE CA ZIP 95206 PHONE (209)937-8341

Ill. CONSTRUCTION SITE INFORMATION ' '

A. DEVELOPER NAME Same as above CONTACT PERSON Same as above

STRE:;T ADDRESS TITLE

CITY CA ZIP PHONE

B. SITE ADDRESS City Streets: various loc COUNTY San Joaquin

CITY Stockton CA CA ZIP05206 PHONE (209)937-S~a]

IV. BASIS OF TERMINATION

_;:S_ 1. The construction project is complete and the following conditions have been met.

-All elements of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan have been completed. - Construction materials and waste have been disposed of proper!{ - The site is in compliance with all local storm water management requirements. - A post-construction storm water .gperation and management plan is in place. . . .

Date of project completion ~-l_t3.J_

2. Construction activities have been suspended, either temporarily _· _ .. or indefinitely _ and the following ·conditions have been met. ·'

- All elements of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan have been completed. - Construc'Jon materials and waste have been disposed.of properly. ·, - All denuded areas and other areas of potential erosion are stabilized. - An operation and maintenance plan for erosion and sediment control is in place. - The site is in compliance with all local storin water management requirements.

Date of suspension __ / __ / ____ Expected start up date __ ! __ ! __

MEMORANDUM

October 7, 1998

TO: Tim Anderson, Senior Plant Operations Supervisor Jim Butler, Senior Plant Maintenance Supervisor Robert Castelli, Technical Services Supervisor Doug Jones, Senior Water/Collection Systems Supervisor Robert Granberg, Senior Civil Engineer Mark Madison, Senior Civil Engineer Mark Von Aspern, Plant Operations Supervisor, Tertiary Dick Teczon, Plant Operations Supervisor, Main Plant Michael McDonald, Plant Maintenance Supervisor Larry Huber, Laboratory Supervisor Verlin Brown, Stores Supervisor Joseph Bulawit, Collection Systems Supervisor Yitzhak Gilon, Water Operations Supervisor Purita Billedo, Executive Assistant

FROM: Diane M. Hinson Regulatory Compliance Officer

SUBJECT: FIRST RESPONDER AWARENESS TRAINING- PHASE I & II

The remaining classes scheduled for the Phase II portion of the training have been scheduled for Friday, October 9; Monday, October 19; and Friday, October 30, commencing at 8:00a.m. in the Administrative Training Room. The scheduling of class sessions has attempted to minimize impact to work loads. Please schedule your remaining staff for one of the 3 scheduled classes. Names not appearing on this list indicates completion of Phase II and the competency test.

The RWCF's senior management, clerical, and engineering staff will undergo First Responder Awareness training tailored toward the hazards encountered in the workplace, and this session will be scheduled at the conclusion of our current curriculum.

SECTION NAME EMPLOYEE NAME TRAINING SESSION HOURS 1. Call Sys Barnes, David FRA-Phase I-8/17/98 4 2. Call Sys Bulawit, Joseph FRA-Phase I -8/21/98 4 3. Call Sys Gillet II, Michael FRA-Phase I-8/3/98 4 4. Call Sys Howe, Larry FRA-Phase I-8/3/98 4 5. Call Sys Jones, Anthony FRA-Phase I-8/21/98 4 6. Call Sys Jones, Doug FRA-Phase I-8/17/98 4 7. Call Sys Knight, Dennis FRA-Phase I-8/17/98 4 8. Call Sys DeCicco, Louis FRA-Phase I-8/17/98 4

SECTION NAME EMPLOYEE NAME TRAINING SESSION 9. Coil Sys Newell, Bill FRA-Phase I-8/3/98 10. Coil Sys Pedro, Jerry FRA-Phase I-8/4/98 11. Coil Sys Pina, Armando FRA-Phase I-8/4/98 4 12: Coil Sys Sterni, Roger FRA-Phase I-6/23/98

SECTION NAME EMPLOYEE NAME TRAINING SESSION 1. Eng Barajas, Bill FRA-Phase 1-8/3/98 4

SECTION NAME 1. Env Ctrl 2. Env Ctrl 3. Env Ctrl

SECTION NAME 1. Lab 2.Lab 3.Lab 4.Lab 5.Lab 6.Lab

SECTION NAf"vffi 1. Maint 2. Maint 3. Maint 4. Maint 5. Maint 6. Maint 7. Maint 8. Maint 9. Maint 10. Maint 11. Maint 12. Maint 13. Maint 14. Maint 15. Maint 16. Maint 17. Maint SECTION NAf"vffi

EMPLOYEE NAME Castelli, Robert Tucker, Frank Williams, Larry

EMPLOYEE NAME Bowles, Dennis Guardado, Victor Horn, Tim Huber, Larry Ng, Linda Richards, David

EMPLOYEE NAME Anderson, William Antonio, Rolando Butler, Jim Campoy, Steve Conley, Stanley Cree, Bill Daclan, Felix Dimas, Gerald Gallego, Bruce Gallegos, Max Gillet, Michael Glass, Michael Hanlon, Ron Hensley, Debra Kenney, Brian Kopas, Leo Lobosco, Lonnie EMPLOYEE NAME

TRAINING SESSION FRA-Phase 1-8/21/98 FRA-Phase 1-6/23/98

TRAINING SESSION FRA-Phase 1-8/4/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/3/98

FRA-Phase 1-8/4/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/4/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/4/98

TRAINING SESSION FRA-Phase 1-8/21/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/17/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/21/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/17/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/21/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/21/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/17/98 FRA-Phase 1-6/23/98 FRA-Phase 1-6/23/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/17/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/21/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/17/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/17/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/21/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/17/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/21/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/21/98 TRAINING SESSION

HOURS 4 4

4

HOURS

HOURS 4 4 0

HOURS 4 4 0 4 4 4

HOURS 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 HOURS

18. Maint McDonald, Michael FRA-Phase 1-8/21/98 19. Maint Miller, Delbert FRA-Phase 1- 8/21/98 20. Maint Palacio, Abel FRA-Phase 1-8/17/98 21. Maint Perry, Dwayne FRA-Phase 1-6/23/98 22. Maint Rivas, Richard FRA-Phase 1-8/17/98 23. Maint Saha, Richard FRA-Phase 1-8/21/98

· 24. Maint Tener, Jon FRA-Phase 1-8/21/98 25. Maint Valentine, Kenneth FRA-Phase 1-8/21/98 26. Maint Walker, Mark FRA-Phase 1-8/17/98 4

SECTION NAME EMPLOYEE NAME TRAINING SESSION 1. Ops Anderson, Tim FRA-Phase 1-6/23/98 4 2. Ops Chow, Curran FRA-Phase 1-8/17/98 4 3. Ops Field, John FRA-Phase 1-8/17/98 4 4. Ops Pubill, Gian FRA-Phase 1-8/21/98 4 5. Ops T eczon, Dick FRA-Phase 1-6/23/98 4 6. Ops Wise, Don FRA-Phase 1-8/21/98 4

SECTION NAME 1. Ops-T 2. Ops-T 3. Ops-T 4. Ops-T 5. Ops-T

EMPLOYEE NAME Almazan, Earl Bole, Bob Christian, Doug Perez, Julian Von Aspern, Mark

TRAINING SESSION FRA-Phase 1-8/4/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/17/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/3/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/3/98 FRA-Phase 1-8/4/98

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

HOURS

HOURS 4 4 4 4 4

SECTION NAME EMPLOYEE NAME Brown, Verlin Swofford, Jim Wong, Steve

. TRAINING SESSION HOURS 1. Warehouse FRA-Phase 1-8/4/98 4 2. Warehouse FRA-Phase 1-8/4/98 4 3. Warehouse FRA-Phase 1-8/3/98 4

SECTION NAME EMPLOYEE NAME TRAINING SESSION HOURS 1. Water Field Alejo, Paul - FRA-Phase 1-8/3/98 4 2. Water Field Bauman, Richard 0 3. Water Field Bensen, Michael 0 4. Water Field Campoy, Kenneth 0 5. Water Field Castro, Richard FRA-Phase 1-8/3/98 4 6. Water Field Gilon, Yitzhak 0 7. Water Field Gomez, Raymond 0 8. Water Field Harrison, Randy 0 SECTION NAME EMPLOYEE NAME TRAINING SESSION HOURS 9. Water Field Heisinger, Wanda FRA-Phase 1-8/4/98 4

10. Water Field 11. Water Field 12. Water Field 13. Water Field 14. Water Field 15. Water Field 16. Water Field 17. Water Field 18. Water Field 19. Water Field 20. Water Field

SECTION NAME 1. Stormwater 2. Stormwater

King, Michael Lucas, Ray McKibben, Carol Newell, Debra Quinones, Rudy Retzius, Thomas Temme, Loren Traverso, AI Whetstone, Jerry Williford, Willie Woodall, David

EMPLOYEE NAME Baillie, Alex King, Don

erne: Morris Allen, Director Donald Dodge, Assistant Director

FRA-Phase 1-8/4/98

FRA-Phase 1-8/3/98

FRA-Phase 1-8/4/98

TRAINING SESSION

Ed Formosa, Deputy Director/Water & Collection Systems Robert Simmons, Deputy Director/Wastewater Glen Birdzell, Deputy Director/Stormwater

0 4 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0

HOURS 0 0

WASTE lYIANAGEIVIENT SUIVIMARY STOCKTON HH\V COLLECTION EVENT

JUNE 3-5, 1999

RECYCLABLES (70.4%) Gross Wei~ht ~~t W~izht HHW

Paint Related Materials 13,835 lbs. 12,950 lbs. Latex Paint 20,500 lbs. 20,140 lbs. Motor Oil 12,750 lbs. 12,750 lbs. Antifreeze 1,400 lbs. 1,400 lbs. Paint Related Materials(Bulk) 7,500 lbs. 6,825 lbs. Lead Acid Batteries 2,685 lbs. 2,685 lbs. Household Batteries 215 lbs. 207 lbs. Propane Cylinders (BBQ type) 240 lbs. 240 lbs. Mercury 5 lbs. 2 lbs.

Totals 59,130 lbs. 57,199 lbs.

INCINERATION (27.1 %)

Flammable Liquids 5,255 lbs. 4,490 lbs. Flammable Solids 7,520 lbs. 6,930 lbs. Pesticide Liquids 2,790 lbs. 2,350 lbs. Pesticide Solids 1,785 lbs. 1,609 lbs. Corrosive Liquids 690 lbs. 584 lbs. Alkaline Liquids 870 lbs. 770 lbs. Oxidizers 540 lbs. 357 lbs. Organic Peroxides 15 lbs. 12 lbs. Aerosols 1,940 lbs. 1,555 lbs. Compressed Gases 65 lbs. 57 lbs. Ammonium Nitrate Fertilizers 950 lbs. 858 lbs. Medical Sharps 70 lbs. 50 lbs. Fusees 25 Ibs. 22 lbs. PCBs 280 lbs. 265 lbs.

Totals 22,795 lbs. 19,909 Lbs.

LANDFILL (2.5%)

Asbestos 940 lbs. 776 lbs. Railroad Ties I, 180 lbs. 1,062 lbs. .

Totals 2,120 lbs. 1,838 lbs.

~TOTAL \VASTE MANAGED 4-. [!4,045 lbs] 78,946 lbs. Pr.n-.J on :yer..ct P•per

P.02

CESQ(i

0 lbs.

210 lbs.

114lbs.

10 lbs.

334 lbs.

0 lbs.

334 lbs.

J•J0:-16-99 12:30P

WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY STOCKTON· San Joaquin County Fairgrounds

March 12-13, 1999

1-"'.U..:S

RECYCLABLES (73.1 %) Gross Weieht ~~t W~i2ht llHJf. Latex Paint

Motor Oil Oil Filters Antifreeze Paint Related Materials Paint Related Materials (bulked) Household Batteries Automotive Batteries Propane Cylinders (BBQ type) Mercury

INCINERATION (24.0%)

Flammable Liquids Flammable Solids Pesticide Liquids Pesticide Solids . Corrosive Liquids Alkaline Liquids Oxidizers

Aerosols

Compressed Gases

Ammonium Nitrate Fertilizers Medical Sharps Isocyanates Zinc Powder PCBs

Acid, Oxidizing Cyanides Fusees

LANDFILL

Asbestos (2.9%)

~ TOTAL\VASTEMANAGED PMt..:lon L.cyc~otdP~

Totals

Totals

Totals

10,000 lbs. 14,050 lbs.

100 lbs. 3,000 lbs. Y,270 lbs. 7,l:!OO lbs.

100 lbs. 4,glo lbs.

110 lbs. 30 lbs.

49,270 lbs.

3,005 lbs. 5,755 lbs. 1,835 lbs. 3,145 lbs.

310 lbs . 250 lbs. 150 lbs.

1,270 lbs. 100 lbs. 170 lbs.

45 lbs. 30 lbs. 3 lbs.

125 lbs.


16,212 lbs.

1,950 lbs.

1,950 lbs.

9,100 lbs. 14,050 lbs.

55 lbs. 3,000 lbs. ~.6go lbs. 6,gg3 lbs.

Y2 lbs. 4,g07 lbs.

110 lbs. 22 lbs.

46,799 lbs.

2,580 Ibs. 5,342 lbs. 1,505 lbs. 2,909 lbs.

271 lbs. 214 lbs. 133 lbs.

865 lbs. 81 lbs.

148 lbs. 31 lbs.

27 lbs.

1 lbs. 114 lbs.


14,232 lbs.

1,762 lbs.

1,762 lbs.

62,793 lbs.

CESQG

514 lbs.

40 lbs.

14 lbs.

568 lbs.

153 lbs.

153 lbs.

0 lbs.

721 lbs.

------

... CITY OF STOCKTON ;:; DEPAI=ITMENT OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES 25CO NAVY DRIVE STOCKTON. CA 85206-1181 (209) 837-8750 FAX (208) 937-8702

July 9, 1998

Advanced Metal Plating 4421 Giannecchini Ln. Stockton, CA 95206

INFORMATION FOR NEW STORMWATER PROGRAM

Federal regulations require the City to identify priority industrial facilities discharging into the City storm dniin system for the purpose of establishing control measures for such discharges. To comply with the Federal regulations, the City has adopted the Guidelines for Stormwater Industrial Facilities Monitoring Plan. Since your facility may be included in this new program I have enclosed a copy of this Plan for your review and information.

The City will start implementation of the Guidelines for Stormwater Industrial Facilities Monitoring Plan later this summer. Should you have any questions regarding the new program, please contact either myself at 937-8734 or Alex Baillie at 937-8706.

MORRlS L. ALLEN DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES

GLEN D. BIRDZELL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, STORMWATER DIVISION

GDB:AB:sa

Enclosure

"STOCKTON ... CALIFOI=INIA'S SUNI=IISE SEAPOI=IT"

,------ ,5, W CITY-OF STOCKTON

DEPAJ:lTMENT OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES 25CXJ NAVY DRIVE STOCKTON. CA 95206-11 51 [209) 937-E750

. FAx [209) S37-~706 . • J Y.

· September 1, 1998

NOTICE TO ALL AFFECTED INDUSTRIES:

IMPLEIV1ENTATION OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON STORIVI\V A TER INDUSTRIAL CONDITIONS OF ACCEPTANCE PROGRAL\1

The City of Stockton was issued a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES 1

Permit for its storm water discharges on March 1, 1995. by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. In anticipation of receiving the City's NPDES Permit. City_ staff. in conjunction with a citizen's advisory group. developed a Stormwater Management Plan which was subsequently incorporated into the Permit. The Management Plan contains a section describing the Best Management Practices (BMPs) appropriate to regulate industrial activities. The B:..·fPs which were incorporated into the City's NPDES permit are as follows:

+ Identification of Priority Industrial Facilities (PIFs). + An Industrial Conditions of Acceptance Program + An industrial inspection program. + An industrial enforcement program. + An educational industrial outreach program. + An industrial monitoring program.

On July 9, 1998 the Stormwater Division mailed a copy of the "Guidelines for Stormwater Industrial Facilities Monitoring Plan" to all known PIFs. This plan was adopted by the City Council and defines the policies and procedures for the implementation of the six BMPs mentioned above. All Level one PIFs are subject to the City's Stormwater Management Plan.

Your facility has tentatively been identified as a Level One Industrial Facility. To continue discharging stormwater to the City's storm water system you are required to make application for a Condition of Acceptance (COA). Your application for a COA must contain the following information:

1. Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID number) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board.

"STOCKTON ... CAL!FORNIA'S SUNRISE SEAPORT"

NOTICE TO ALL AFFECTED INDUSTRIES: September 1, 1998 Page 2

J.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON STORMW ATER INDUSTRIAL CONDITIONS OF ACCEPTANCE PROGRAM

2. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (with applicable amendments) that . complies with the terms of the General Permit to discharge storm water associated

with industrial activity (WQ Order Nos. 91-13 DWQ & 92-12 DWQ (excluding construction activities).

3. All Storm water monitoring data collected smce the date of issuance of your facilities WDID number.

· 4. Copies of the two latest annual stormwater reports sent to the State Water Resources Control Board or to the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board since the date of issuance of your facilities WDID number.

5. Copies of annual recertification documents since date of issuance of your facilities WDID number.

You are urged to provide the above information prior to October 16, 1998. If you cannot meet this compliance deadline you should request an extension from the Stormwater Division prior to October 16, 1998. Failure to provide this information by the due date will lead to administrative action by the City of Stockton. The Stormwater Division will verify if your facility is a Level One ~IF and if it should be classified as a Major or Minor Level One Facility. Please contact Alex Baillie, Environmental Control Officer, at (209) 937-8706 if you have questions about this program or need a time extension to file the required information.

~ :t..~ MORRIS L. ALLEN DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES

MLA:GDB:gb

LEVEL-l REPORT

18-Aug-98

LEVEL COM I' ANY STREET MAILING ADDimSS SIC Code BASIN NOI

Quinteros Auto Dismantling Turnpike Rd. 2966 Turnpike Rd. ((J \/f;(,. 5015 WK-64 Yes

SIMS-LMC Recyclers Aurora St. 1000 S. Aurora St. · /~ ... .'f 1 (, 5093 MM-150 Yes

Charter Way Auto Recyclers Charter Way 930 E. Charter Way · /·,,·'(.'(',. 5015 WK-64 Yes

Jaguar I leaven Tillie Lewis Dr. 1433 Tillie Lewis Dr. /.' 5015 S.l-60 Yes

Reynold's Alum. Recycling Co. Frcm onl St. IIJ03 E. Fremont St. · /·; )' /.> <~- 5093 DW-123 Yes

131oom's Auto Parts, Inc. Turnpike Rd. 2546 Turnpike Rd. · 1 ... ,:, ,! , 5015 WK-64 Yes

M&M Auto Dismantling .leiTerson St. I I I I E. Jellerson St. ·":', .:· (> ( .. 5015 MM-150 Yes

Acme Truck Parts & Equipment, I Wilson Way 10 I G S. Wilson Way II 5015 MM-150 Yes

Mel's Auto Dismantlers Navy Dr. 2219 Navy Dr. _r .. ,.:,r·:./:t: .• 5015 SJ-60 Yes

Evergreen Glass, Inc. Tillie Lewis Dr. 1444 Tillie Lewis Dr. / ... ;.,,.., C:. 5093 SJ-60 No

rilter Recovery Systems Navy Dr. 1625 Navy Dr. 5093 MM-142 No

Acme Lift Trucks, Inc. Wilson Way 1049 S. Wilson Way .: •• •; .,!( ..... ( ' ~-...

5015 MM-150 No

Debco Auto Wrecking, Inc. Navy Dr. 2345 Navy Dr. -- , l< """'J (. .. 5015 SJ-60 No

Pat X-Ray Co., Inc. San Juan Ave. 711 San Juan Ave. "7';·;:o3 5093 SC-56 No

Associated Tractor Service, Inc. Charter Way 1323 W. Charter Way··,'·:. ·t: ( .. · 5015 WK-64 No

· Stockton Metal Recycling Waterloo Rd. 1533 Waterloo Rd. ·:::;, •• ") l) ~--) .... .,. 5093 SC-57 No

1

LEVEL COMPANY STREET MAILING AnDRESS SIC Code BASIN NOI

Cal-West Periodicals Pony Express Ct. 2136 Pony Express Ct. c-7(?t ~:- 5093 DC-69 No

Delta Paper Stock Co. Lincoln St. 40 I S. Lincoln St. (,i t)• ?l;-:--_: 5093 MM-147 No

Ben's Auto Dismanller Navy Dr. 2041 Navy Dr. ·(, 5015 SJ-60 No

1-MWIIF

Stockton Scavenger Association, I Navy Dr. P.O. Box 1747 'i': /i ·I 4953 SJ-60 Yes

Waste Management, Inc. Premont St. P.O. Box 9180-· 'f' -· ( '/. .) / ) ,) 4953 DW-123 Yes

East Stockton Transrer Station Weber Ave. 2435 E. Weber Ave.'-}\,!.:·,__,-..,_·-' 4953 DW-123 Yes

Sunrise Sanitation Service, Inc. Charter Way P.O. Box 201061 I • / l .. ·,. I <1953 WK-64 No

1-SAUA

Silgan Containers Manuf:1cturing Navy Dr. P.O. Box 270 / ; ~ I I ! .~ 3411 SJ-60 Yes

Sierra Nevada Chemical Co. Industrial Dr. I 0 10 Industria I Dr. •' / ,l ,..· c '(. 2812 DC-65 Yes

PDM Strocal, Inc. Navy Dr. 2324 Navy Dr. I{

3441 SJ-60 Yes

Sigma Circuits, Inc. Fremont St. 1950 w. Fremont St. cr.~ ?! 1 ::~ 3672 SC-56 Yes

Van Den Bergh Foods Co. Waterloo Rd. P.O. Box 9200 't·' ~·'.~. ~~:·~ 2033 SC-57 Yes

Corn Products Corp. Industrial Dr. P.O. Box 6129 -· '(\? vC· 2046 DC-65 Yes

Applied Aerospace Structures Cor Airport Way P.O. Box 6189 '/', ('i' ,(_,. 3728 DC-65 Yes

Sumiden Wire Products Corp. El Pinal Dr. P.O. Box 8719 _.: ?,·,zc.)(f 3315 DV-50 Yes

Automatic Switch Co., Inc. Carlton Ave. P.O. Box 1995 / ·, /t··'! 3613 SC-56 Yes

Dana Corp. Industrial Dr. 1550 Industrial Dr. . ('~ ;·~'0 3714 LJ-80 Yes ..

Cargill, Inc. Producers Dr. 3939 Producers Dr. L/)z L)(:-, 2041 DC-65 No

2

Nathan Davidson Vice President Acme Truck Parts & Equipment Inc. 1016 S Wilson Way Stockton, CA 95205

Mr. Kurt Gibson Automatic Switch Company 705 N. Carlton Ave. Stockton, CA 95203

Jerry Shuman General Manager Ben's Auto Dismantlers 2041 Navy Drive Stockton, CA 95206

Doug Olsen Cargill Foods 3939 Producers Drive Stockton, CA 95206 ·

Eldon Kuntz Charter Way Auto Recyclers 930 Charter Way Stockton, CA 95206

· Ron Brawley Regulatory Affairs Manager Corn Products International 1021 Industrial Drive P.O. Box 6129 Stockton CA 95206-0129

Troy Todd Safety Coordinator DANA Corporation 1550 Industrial Drive Stockton CA 95206

Anthony Cardiano, Owner Jaguar Heaven Auto Dismantlers 1433 Tillie Lewis Drive Stockton, CA 9 5 206

Larry Matthews, Owner M&M Auto Dismantling 1111 E. Jefferson Street Stockton, CA 95205

Mike Davis, Manager Mel's Auto Dismantlers 2219 Navy Drive Stockton, CA 95206

Gordon McCord Plant Purchasing/Safety Coordinator PDM Strocal, Inc. 2324 Navy Drive Stockton, CA 95206

Yolanda M. Gaytan Environmental Director Quintero's Auto Dismantling 2966 Turnpike Road Stockton, CA 95206

February 3, 1999

Frank J. Ferral, Business Development Director Greater Stockton Chamber of Commerce 445 W. Weber Ave., Ste.220 Stockton, CA 95203

STORMW ATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) TRAINING

As we discussed yesterday, the following is a list of dates and times for the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan introductory training sessions (8) and the follow-up, hands-on practical sessions ( 14 ). As agreed upon, the final sessions at the end of the schedule may be eliminated if necessary. Please review the schedule and let me know if there are any conflicts.

INTRODUCTORY CLASSES Tues., March 2 9 a.m.- noon Thurs., March 4 2-5 p.m.

· Tues., March 9 2-5 p.m. · Thurs., March 11 9 a.m.- noon

PRACTICAL SESSIONS Wed., March 10

. Tues., March 16 Thurs., March 18 Tues., March 23 Thurs., March 25 Thurs., April 1 Tues., April 6

MORRIS L. ALLEN

9 a.m.- noon 2-5 p.m. 9 a.m.-noon 9 a.m.-noon 2-5 p.m. 9 a.m.- noon 9 a.m.- noon

Wed., March 17 9 a.m.- noon Wed., March 24 6-9 p.m.

Tues., March 30 2-5 p.m. Wed., March 31 9 a.m.- noon

Thurs., April 8 2-5 p.m. Tues., Aprill3 2-5 p.m . Wed., April 14 6-9 p.m. Tues., April 20 9 a.m.- noon Wed., April 21 2-5 p.m. Tues., April27 2-5 p.m. Wed., April 28 2-5 p.m

DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES

SUSAN MORA LOYKO COMMUNITY OUTREACH COORDINATOR

MLA:SML:sa

cc: Bob Murdoch, Senior Civil Engineer

T:\STORMWAT\OUTREACH\CHAMBERLTR

SWPPP Approved Date Query

16-Ju/-99

SWPPP SWPPP# WOlD Owner Address Lot Numbers Description Approved Responsible Person

7/14198 -CP001-0 Allied Aerospace

8/1198 -WR011-0 5S39S309549 McGinnity Company

John McGinnity

10/14198 -BE018-1 US Home 4418 St Andrews 1415 Residence

Sally Sanderson

10/19198 -SP011-1 FORTHCOMING Gary Stone Co. Joshua Tree Cir 13, 12, 16, 17 Single Family

Gary Stone

10128198 -CP004-0 Raley's

4113199 -MR001-0 5S39S31 0328 Arnaiz-Watanabe II, Ltd Holman Rd and Hammer Lane

MattAmaiz

4126199 -BE017-2 FORTHCOMING Earl Wadlow 4942 St Andrews Dr. 1901 Single Family

Earl Wadlow

5117199 -BE004-1 DELL'ARINGA HOMES 4977 St Andrews Drive 1906 Single Family

Robert Deii'Aringa

5118199 -CP006-0 F & H Construction 233 Center Street Weber Pt South Bank Seawall

Marl< George

5120199 -CP007-0 CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CO 4201 Gibralter Ct, Stockton Paxis-

Randy Simmering 5f2SJI99 -CPOOS-0 5S39S310856 UNITED CHRISTIAN SCHOOL 3293 Morada Lane Private School Facility

Dennis Gibson

5120199 -MI001-1 5S39S310031 MASSIE& CO. 4114 South Airport Way Lot 1 Massie Industrial Park

Ron VanNoy

5124199 -CP010-0 5S39S310861 Clancy & Theys Aviation Dr. & Runway Dr. Dollar Tree Stores Distribution Center

Pat O'Neill

612199 -BE019-0 Marchbrook Building Co. 5322 St Andrews Dr 38 Single Family Res.

Ron Rugani

614199 -BE004-2 5S39S310771 Cleon Thompson Bldg 4916 St. Andrews Dr. 1898 Single Family

Marty Thompson

617199 -CP011-0 Christian Life Center 4303 Christian Life Way

Richard Kline

6/10199 -CP012-0 Brookside Dental Bldg 3427 Deer Park Drive Commercial

Janice Norene

6120199 -CPClCB-0 5S39S310016 CAL SHEETS PROPERTIES 1212 Performance Drive Manufacturing Facility

JOE ESCOBAR

1

SWPPP Approved

~

SWPPP#

-BE01Q.8

WOlD Owner

Responsible Person

Gabbert Construction Inc. Carl Gabbert

Address Lot Numbers Description

3575 Blue Lake Circle Lot#23 Single Family Residence

2

SWPPP Inspection Count 07101/98- 06/30/99

• ~···· ···ur~~ ....... , Owner Address Lot Numbers

97-LB001-0

97-LJ001-0

97-LM001-0

16

38

33

Bright Development 2175 Volpi Drive

Kaufman & Broad California Greens II

Florsheim Homes Golf Course Terrace Units #4 and# 10

Buzz Oates Enterprises Gold River Lane

Lewis Hames/Grupe Unit 25- Phases 1 & 2 4129/98 add Unit 15, 34, and extend Riverbrook to Unit 18.

R.E. Development dba Cali Units 16 & 28.

Caresco Development Pebble Beach Drive

John C. Saccone & Sons Pebble Beach Drive

Miller- Klein Development, Pebble Beach Drive

Lenzi Construction & Mana Pebble Beach Drive

Grupe Communities Unit 7- Phases 1 & 2.

Grupe Communities St. Andrew Drive

CoyN. Elvis St. Andrews Drive

Arnaiz Development Co., I Wild Grape Drive Area

LeBaron Ranches L.P. LeBaron Estates

Verner Group Ill Little John Creek Subdivision

Morada Development Grou Pioneer Circle

~.:..;::.:::.u...,~.;,..:.;;...-.: .. >r.::•:....,_,...,;.,.,.;._,...,.,_.;-.,~,-··-...:.:--"".;, .......... '•'-' ,_,.-' · .... -~ -- -·--~·-·-·~...:.....< .... ;: • ....::..:::..:.:.:....·J:<.- - ,J _. ___ ;,_,_._,__;_;~._-;,_.

Page 1 of 3 Tuesday, July 20, 1999

Various

Lots 1-40, 30 & 17 first

Unit 4- Lots 8-12, 27, 62, & 69; Unit 10-Lots 24-28

33,34, 35 & 36

Various - Including Riverbrook Drive

Various

Lot#1559

Lot1545

Lot1550

Lot 1579

Various

Lot#1430

Lot 1421 4-30-98 added Unit 2 Lot 109

Unit 2- Lots 2-103, lots 76, 75, 74 first 4123!98 add Unit 3 and Holman Road

Lots 1 to 219

Little John Creek Unit #1; 4; 5; Unit 2, lots 2-4, 51-60, and 65-68; and

Lots 1-80.

SWPPPID Tofrll Inspections Owner. Address Lot Numbers

97-SP001-1

97-SP006-0

97-SP007-0

97-SP008-5

97-SP014-0

97-SP015-0

97-SP016-0

97-WR001-0

97-WR002-0

97-WR004-0

97-WR005-0

97-WR006-0

97-WR007-0

'!;;...,..;-..-...,;.-,,,h-.,_·_-·...:~·i·~-..:.

31

42

9

33

25

18

44

37

10

37

41

38

37

R.E. Development dba Cali Bravo

Beck Properties Country Side Village Unit 2

Spanos Park Development Oak Grove

Victorian Development Waterfront

R.E. Development dba Cali Masterpiece

Greenbriar Homes Chanteane

Greenbriar Homes Unit #2 - Unit #4

Bright Development Coral Ridge West

Florsheim Homes Belle terra

Kaufman & Broad California Marquis I Prarie Meadows

Kimball Hill Homes Sierra Meadows

R.E. Development dba Cali Mirage

R.E. Development dba Cali Paradise

.. -.............. _ .. _; .. ~·······-·:,.·:..c.::. ~·. ~:.;:· ..,.,_:.,.,.: • .,: ..•• :.:~:;;·.~·· ...•.. ·-,······ •' ~ ... ~.~--·· ,- ,; .. .._..;.,,


Spanos Park -Whistler Meadows Unit 1, Lots 1-34, 36-42, 45-64, and 66-104.

NOT filed Jots 47- 49

Various

Lot #15, Amended 6124/ots 1, 7, 15, 18 & 26. (Index Map Area H)

A. G. Spanos Parkpart of units 3, 6, 7, 8, & 10- Various lots

Lots 457-459, 477-483, and 500-504 -Unit #12, lots 505-508 and 562.

Various

Lots 1-7, 46, 57, 61-68, 73-110, and 158-186.

Lots 1-10, 15, 73-91, and 106-136.

Units 21 & 22, Various, Lots 10 & 63 first.

Lots 1-14 and 26-62. 316 add 55, 63-67, 72, and 105-111. 4!20 add 70, 71, 75, 80, 83, 87, 89, 90, 94, 105, 112-114.

Units 16 & 17, Lots 1-44 (16) & 1-48 (17)

Units 10 & 27, Lots 1-48 (10), 12-26 (27), and 37-52 (27)

SWPPPID Total Inspections Owner Address Lot Numbers

97-WR009-0 32 Forecast Group Carolyn Weston & William Moss to Dominque & Units 11 & 14- Unit Nisperos 11, Lots 1-55 & Unit

14, Lots 1- 61

98-8S004-0 36 Trimark Homes Bridgeport Trails Unit 3-5 Various

98-8S005-0 1 Nylen Homes for A.C.L.C. Bridgeport Trails Unit 2 Lots 28 and 29

98-AG002-0 1 Gate/Ius Development Airport Gateway Industrial Complex GATX Site Improvements

98-BE012-9 32 Caresco Development Pebble Beach Drive Lot #1561 amended 3/27 for Lot #1571

98-CP001-0 2 Allied Aerospace

98-CP004-0 2 Raley's

98-CP005-0 2 Boeing Wy

98-LB001-1 g Frontier Builders Davis Road & Bear Creek various

98-SC001-0 2 Village Properties 7920- 8014 Lower Sacramento Road Various

98-SP006-1 43 Chapman Co., Inc. Country Side Village #1 and Spanish Bay Unit 1

98-WS001-0 2 City of Stockton West Side Sewer Various

CP007-0 1 CATELLUS DEVELOPME 4201 Gibralter Ct, Stockton

CP008-0 2 UNITED CHRISTIAN SCH 3293 Morada Lane

CP009-0 1 CAL SHEETS PROPERTI 1212 Performance Drive

CP010-0 2 Clancy & Theys Aviation Dr. & Runway Dr.

Total FY Inspections 1000

•... """-"'"'"';.;.·--=-· .. ~ .......... ~...--.... -"~-- ,_,_ .. ..;..._ ~· '-·~·'"'' "" ·. ~-- ·-. .;, ,. ···-~-~- :-.,.L •.••• :·.~(..·::..:..-.. ..:...:o:.; ··.;: ·.:;..~·:t·.;,: • 'l..i.- ;;,.. "•


STORMWATER INSPECTION APPROVAL

BUILDER NAME BUILDER# 9/1/98 - 2/19/99 % 3/1/99 - 3/31/99 % 4/1/99-4/30/99% 5/1/99 - 5/31/99 % 6/1/99-6/30/99 %

Frontier Builders 1 31.58 14.3 90.48 -- 94.1

Trimark-Crosswinds 2 19.44 77.8 100 30 93

Lewis Homes 3 26.85 62.9 75 Completed ---Caresco Dev. 4 50.82 90.5 90 78.26 90.9

Bright Dev. 5 64.29 96.3 93.02 100 100

Beck ProQerty 6 58.21 54.5 Project Completed --- ---Beck Dev. 7 52.63 55.4 51.35 66.67 91.7

Buzz Oates 8 82.61 Project Completed -- ----Chapman Co. 9 47.97 87.1 100 70.27 91.4

Florsheim 10 45.32 61.7 79.8 85.84 87.8

Gary Stone Inc. 11 100 100 N/A 88.9

Grupe Const. 12 45.45 Project Completed ---- ----Grupe Dev. 13 45.95 Project Completed ---- ---I Amaiz Dev. 14 44.81 60 81.19 87.6 85.a!

H. D. Arnaiz 15 51.91 52.5 81.97 97.73 941

Jerry Schmidt 16 68.18 66.7 60 100 78.6

Kaufman & Broad Ctl. 17 69.52 93.5 Profect Completed -- ---!Kauman & Broad Inc. 18 73.67 91.9 95.83 98.71 99.4

Kimball Hill 19 56.03 88.7 93.22 92.11 96.2

R E Dev - Greenbriar 20 62.22 Project Completed --- ----R E Dev. 21 75.17 82.75 77.2 68.84 63.62

Verner Canst. 22 88.42 97.5 92.11 100 100

Forecast Grp. 23 82.95 97.14 100 Complete --McGinnity_ Co. 24 --- 77.8 100 85.71 100

Deii'Aringa Homes 25 Grace Period - No prior inspections. 66.67 33.33 100

Schingler Development 26 Grace Period - No prior insgections. 83.33 87.5

Miller-Klein Development 27 Grace Period - No prior inspections. 33.33 100 80

Pro-Build West Dev. 28 Grace Period - No prior inspections. 44.44 100 83.3

Average 58 ~ 75 80 82 90 - ---- - -----···-- ·- ·-·- -- - --~--------. ··------ ------------ ------~ -

----s CITY OF STOCKTON

DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES 25CXJ NAVY DRIVE STOCKTON. CA 95206-1 ~51 (209) 937-6750 FAX (209) 937-5706

March 15, 1999

Bud Chambers Beck Properties 3114 W. Hammer Lane Stockton, CA 95209

CERTIFIED 'MAIL RETURl~ RECEIPT

p 008 364 194

CONSTRUCTION SITE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS

The City is responsible for administration of a stormwater management program for construction site activities as mandated by the State and Federal governments. This program is now in its second year, and City staff and the development community have been asking questions regarding the effectiveness of the program, and how to measure the level of compliance with the individual construction site Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's).

The City has in place a job site monitoring program, however, neither the job site superintendents nor the City's building inspection staff have been given a goal for consistent compliance with SWPPPs, which makes it very difficult to verify whether or not compliance with the City's Stormwater Management Program at construction sites is satisfactory. A compliance goal would assist in' defining when sufficient effort has been made to comply with the site SWPPP.

To make the task as easy as possible for you, the State of California developed a selfcertifying compliance program. This program requires Builders/developers to employ the Best Available Technology on your site at all times to avoid pollution of stormwater. It is the responsibility of every builder/developer to implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent pollution before, during and after the actual construction activity. Additionally, you are required to evaluate the BMPs contained in individual SWPPPs for effectiveness and to amend those BMPs if they are not working properly. Environmental groups want to see very clean construction sites at all times!.

The department's Stormwater Division has evaluated five and one half months (9/1/98 to 2/19/99) of construction site inspection data collected by the City Building Division (each developer/owner will receive the raw data used that concerns his particular project). This data is public information and can be requested according to the public information act by any individual. Attached is a tabular and graphical representation of the percentage of approved (acceptable) stormwater inspections of the total inspections made at twenty three developer-owned projects. Compliance with the site SWPPP is measured by satisfactory inspections. These inspections are made at random times of the day by various trained inspectors and represent momentary snapshots of conditions. It should be noted that job site superintendents are immediately notified verbally and/or in writing of the inspection

11STOCKTDN ... CALIFDRNIA'S SUNRISE SEAPORT"

Bud Chambers March 4, 1999 Page 8

CONSTRUCTION SITE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS

results. The percentage of satisfactory rated inspections ranges from 19.4% to average approval rating was 58.4 %, which means that the inspector, on the ave a site a satisfactory rating a little more than half the time.

Based on the evaluation of this data, a compliance goal of 75% satisfactory in: proposed for a trial period. This goal essentially means that three out of four must receive a satisfactory rating. This would also require a developer or his 1

amend the site SWPPP immediately if the inspections for a thirty day period fell b satisfactory rating.

The data supports the fact that some developers are at or above the proposed are just below the goal, and that three are seriously below the goal. It is appar goal is attainable and compliance with the goal will provide a level economic pia; all developers regulated by the City's Stormwater Management Program. Add are proposing that the month of March, 1999, be used to amend and or i consistency in site SWPPP compliance required to attain the 75% goal, and tt· compliance and non-compliance with the goal be sent on a monthly basis to eac starting with April, 1999.

If you have any comments on this letter, please give me a call at 937-8734.

MORRIS L. ALLEN DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES

GLEN D. BIRDZELL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES/STORMWATER

GDB:gb

<I> C) a:s ...... c: cu. 0 s.. Cl)

a.. -C\1 > 0 s... c. c. <(

100

75

50

25

0

0

Storm Water Inspection Approval Percentage

5 10 15 20

Builder#

----

S' CITY OF STOCKTON

CEPA~TMENT OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES 25CO NAVY DRIVE STOCKTON, CA 95206-11 81 [209) 944-8750 FAX [208) S44-a7DB

April 9, 1999

LauraKass Lewis Homes P. 0. Box 276125 Sacramento, CA 95827

CERTIFIED l\lAIL RETURN RECEIPT

p 008 364 213

CONSTRUCTION SITE STORMW ATER l\IA_l~AGEMENT PROGRAM

In a letter dated March 15, 1999 the City of Stockton began the implementation of a trial rating system for construction sites. The stated intent the rating system was to have all regulated construction sites attain a 75% inspection approval rating. The month of March was to be a trial period for individual developers to amend their Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans to met or exceed the 75% goal.

The Stormwater Division has evaluated the March inspection date and is pleased to report an overall improvement. The average approval rating for all construction sites went from 58.4% to 75.4%. The number of developers that met or exceeded the goal during the first review period was 5, and that number went up to 12 in the month of March.

On the down side of this report there are seven developments that are below the 75% goal. It is strongly recommend that the responsible parties for these seven construction sites take a very aggressive look at amending their SWPPP to insure compliance during the month of April.

Once again: the attachments to this letter include a ranking sheet, inspection approval graph, and the raw data for your particular site.

I would like to thank each of you for a positive response to this pilot program, and if you have questions concerning this program please contact me at 937-8734.

GLEN D. BIRDZELL DEPUTY DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL UTILITES/STORMWATER

MLA:GDB:sa Enclosures rrservice tvith Pride"

"STDCKTDN ... CALIFDI=lNIA'S SUNI=liSE SEAPDI=lT"

-res > 0 I.. Q. Q. <( c 0 ·- 0') +' 0'> 0 en <U-r O...c tn 0 c '-

~ .... ~ 5

I- .::;;;;;

(1) +' res ~ E '-0 +' en

I • I

I

0 0 ~

0 l[)

l[) N

~ Q

~ .

0

co ~

=It '-

N C1)

"'0 ~ ·-::l

OJ

0

-----

s CITY OF STOCKTON

DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES 25CXJ NAVY DRIVE

CERTIFIED lYLI\JL RETUR.i'{ RECEIPT

p 106 984 222 STOCKTON, CA 9520&11 91 (209) 937-8750 FAX (209) 937-6708

May 18, 1999

Anita Duran R E Development dba California Homes 3031 W. March Ln., Ste 133-S Stockton, CA 95219

STORM \VATER POLLUTION PREVENTION COMPLIANCE

In accordance with Federal and State requirements, the City of Stockton has been implementing a storm water pollution prevention program for several years. Part of this program requires that some construction projects include pollution controls. Inspections are conducted in order to insure that these controls are in place and functioning.

Over the past few months, staff has been reviewing inspection reports to determine if the City's goal of an inspection approval rate of75% is being met. The results for September 1998 through February 1999, and for March 1999 were transmitted to all the affected contractors previously. Attached are the results for April1999.

As can be seen from the graph, the vast majority of contractors now meet or exceed the City's goal. We are pleased to note that your firm is in compliance. We would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your efforts and to encourage you to continue them.

If you have any questions, please contact Bob Murdoch at (209) 937-8757.

MORRIS L. ALLEN

/42~ OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES

GLEN D. BIRDZELL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES/STORMW ATER

MLA:GDB:RM:sa

Enclosures

G:\!vfUD\priv\_Staff_ \STORJv!W A T\CONSTRUC\S\VPPP Compliance.ltr.doc

"STOCKTON ..• CALIFOI=lNIA'S SUNI=liSE SEAPOI=lT"

-ns > 0 '-c. c. <( c 0 ·- 0) +""e» ~C) c.~

"" -VI •-c I-- 0. a..<( (1) ~

cu 3: E ... 0 ...... en

0 0 ~

0 L()

1.() N

0

CX) N

0 N

0

·-

----

s CITY OF STOCKTON

DEPA~TMENT OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES 25CXJ NAVY DRIVE

CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT

p 106 984 145 STOCKTON. CA 9520&11 91 (209) 937-6750 FAX (209) 937-6708

June 24, 1999

Phil Miller Trimark- Crosswinds 7100 E. Lincoln Dr., Ste A-106 Scottsdale, AZ 85253

CONSTRUCTION SITE STORM WATER MA~l\lAGEMENT PROGRt\M

The City of Stockton began implementing a rating system for construction sites in March 1999 for compliance with storm water management requirements. The stated intent of the rating system was to have all regulated. construction sites attain a 75% inspection approval rating.

Since that time, the average approval rating for all contractors has improved from 58% to 82%. There were twelve developers that met or exceeded the goal for the month of May 1999. Your firm along with four others did not meet the goal. It is recommended that you review your operations and the requirements of your Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and make revisions as needed to meet the goal as soon as possible.

Attached for you information is a ranking sheet, raw data, and an inspection approval graph. If you have any questions, please contact me at 937-8734.

ROBERT MURDOCH STORM WATER PROGRAM MANAGER

Enclosures

G:\MUD\priv\_Staff_\STORM\V A T\CONSTRUC\failed inspection letter for may 99.doc

"STOCKTON ... CALIFOI=lNIA'S SUNI=liSE SEAPOI=lT"

Cl)

Storm Water Inspection Approval May 1999

100 • • - • --·

C) 75 , ...... , .. ,. ... ,.., .. , .. _ .. ··· .. ·.-,., ........................ ,,.,, ns .., c Q) (.) 1-&. 50 . . .., ,· , ... -ns > 0 I-C. c. <(

0 I; .:;c .

1 3 5 7 9

-., .. _.

:.<_,:.

11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27

Builder#

storm water management program 1998/99 annual report and ... · board adopted a municipal npdes...

Documents