stokes law presentation

56
Lecture 12 – MINE 292 - 2012 Lecture 12 – MINE 292 - 2012

Upload: minh-cao

Post on 30-Oct-2014

224 views

Category:

Documents


7 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Stokes Law Presentation

Lecture 12 – MINE 292 - 2012Lecture 12 – MINE 292 - 2012

Page 2: Stokes Law Presentation

Terminal Velocity of Settling ParticleTerminal Velocity of Settling ParticleRate at which discrete particles settle in a fluid at constant temperature is given by Newton’s equation:

vs = [(4g(s - )dp) / (3Cd )] 0.5

where

vs = terminal settling velocity (m/s)

g = gravitational constant (m/s2)

s = density of the particle (kg/m3)

= density of the fluid (kg/m3)

dp = particle diameter (m)

Cd = Drag Coefficient (dimensionless)

The terminal settling velocity is derived by balancing drag, buoyant, and gravitational forces that act on the particle.

Page 3: Stokes Law Presentation

Reynolds NumberReynolds NumberIn fluid mechanics, the Reynolds Number, Re (or NR), is a dimensionless number that is the ratio of inertial forces to viscous forces.

It quantifies the relative importance of these two types of forces for a given set of flow conditions.

where:

v = mean velocity of an object relative to a fluid (m/s) L = characteristic dimension, (length of fluid; particle diameter) (m) μ = dynamic viscosity of fluid (kg/(m·s)) ν = kinematic viscosity (ν = μ/ρ) (m²/s) ρ = fluid density (kg/m³)

Page 4: Stokes Law Presentation

Drag Coefficient and Reynolds NumberDrag Coefficient and Reynolds NumberCd is determined from Stokes Law which relates drag to Reynolds Number

Page 5: Stokes Law Presentation

Drag Coefficient and Reynolds NumberDrag Coefficient and Reynolds NumberCd is determined from Stokes Law which relates drag to Reynolds Number

Page 6: Stokes Law Presentation

Drag Coefficient and Reynolds NumberDrag Coefficient and Reynolds NumberCd is determined from Stokes Law which relates drag to Reynolds Number

Page 7: Stokes Law Presentation

Drag Coefficient and Reynolds NumberDrag Coefficient and Reynolds NumberCd is determined from Stokes Law which relates drag to Reynolds Number

Page 8: Stokes Law Presentation

Drag Coefficient and Reynolds NumberDrag Coefficient and Reynolds NumberCd is determined from Stokes Law which relates drag to Reynolds Number

Page 9: Stokes Law Presentation

Drag Coefficient and Reynolds NumberDrag Coefficient and Reynolds NumberCd is determined from Stokes Law which relates drag to Reynolds Number

Page 10: Stokes Law Presentation

Terminal Velocity of Settling ParticleTerminal Velocity of Settling ParticleTerminal velocity is affected by:

TemperatureFluid Density Particle Density Particle SizeParticle ShapeDegree of TurbulenceVolume fraction of solidsSolid surface charge and pulp chemistryMagnetic and electric field strengthVertical velocity of fluid

Page 11: Stokes Law Presentation

Drag Coefficient of Settling ParticleDrag Coefficient of Settling Particle

Page 12: Stokes Law Presentation

Terminal Velocity of Settling ParticleTerminal Velocity of Settling Particle

Page 13: Stokes Law Presentation

Type I Free-Settling VelocityType I Free-Settling Velocity

Particle Settling in a Laminar (or Quiescent Liquid)

Momentum Balance

Page 14: Stokes Law Presentation

Type I Free-Settling VelocityType I Free-Settling Velocity

Particle Settling in a Laminar (or Quiescent Liquid)

Page 15: Stokes Law Presentation

Type I Free-Settling VelocityType I Free-Settling Velocity

Integrating gives the steady state solution:

For a sphere:

Page 16: Stokes Law Presentation

Terminal Velocity of Settling ParticleTerminal Velocity of Settling ParticleType I Settling of Spheres

Page 17: Stokes Law Presentation

Terminal Velocity of Settling ParticleTerminal Velocity of Settling Particle

Page 18: Stokes Law Presentation

Terminal Velocity under Terminal Velocity under Hindered Settling ConditionsHindered Settling Conditions

McGhee’s (1991) equation estimates velocity for spherical particles under hindered settling conditions for Re < 0.3:

Vh/V = (1 - Cv)4.65

where

Vh = hindered settling velocity

V = free settling velocity

Cv = volume fraction of solid particles

For Re > 1,000, the exponent is only 2.33 McGhee, T.J., 1991. Water Resources and Environmental Engineering. Sixth Edition. McGraw-Hill,

New York.

Page 19: Stokes Law Presentation

Terminal Velocity under Terminal Velocity under Hindered Settling ConditionsHindered Settling Conditions

McGhee, T.J., 1991. Water Resources and Environmental Engineering. Sixth Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Page 20: Stokes Law Presentation

Relationship between CRelationship between Cvv and Weight% and Weight%

Page 21: Stokes Law Presentation

Effect of Alum on IEPEffect of Alum on IEP

Page 22: Stokes Law Presentation

Ideal Rectangular Settling VesselIdeal Rectangular Settling VesselSide view

Page 23: Stokes Law Presentation

Ideal Rectangular Settling VesselIdeal Rectangular Settling VesselModel Assumptions

1. Homogeneous feed is distributed uniformly over tank cross-sectional area

2. Liquid in settling zone moves in plug flow at constant velocity

3. Particles settle according to Type I settling (free settling)

4. Particles are small enough to settle according to Stoke's Law

5. When particles enter sludge region, they exit the suspension

Page 24: Stokes Law Presentation

Ideal Rectangular Settling VesselIdeal Rectangular Settling VesselSide view

u = average (constant) velocity of fluid flowing across vesselvs = settling velocity of a particular particlevo = critical settling velocity of finest particle recovered at 100%

Page 25: Stokes Law Presentation

Retention TimeRetention TimeAverage time spent in the vessel by an element

of the suspension

and W, H, L are the vessel dimensions; u is the constant velocity

Page 26: Stokes Law Presentation

Critical Settling VelocityCritical Settling Velocity

If to is the residence time of liquid in the tank, then all particles with a settling velocity equal to or greater than the critical settling velocity, vo, will settle out at or prior to to, i.e.,

So all particles with a settling velocity equal to or greater than v0 will be separated in the tank from the fluid

Page 27: Stokes Law Presentation

Critical Settling VelocityCritical Settling Velocity

Note: this expression for vo has no H term. This defines the overflow rate or surface-loading rate - Key parameter to design ideal Type I settling clarifiers - Cross-sectional area A is calculated to get desired v0

Since

Page 28: Stokes Law Presentation

Ideal Circular Settling VesselIdeal Circular Settling VesselSide view

Page 29: Stokes Law Presentation

Ideal Circular Settling VesselIdeal Circular Settling VesselAt any particular time and distance

Page 30: Stokes Law Presentation

Ideal Circular Settling VesselIdeal Circular Settling Vessel

In an interval dt, a particle having a diameter below do will have moved vertically and horizontally as follows:

For particles with a diameter dx (below do), the fractional removal is given by:

Page 31: Stokes Law Presentation

Sedimentation Thickener/ClarifierSedimentation Thickener/ClarifierTop view

Side view

Page 32: Stokes Law Presentation

Plate or Lamella Thickener/ClarifierPlate or Lamella Thickener/Clarifier

Page 33: Stokes Law Presentation

Continuous Thickener (Type III)Continuous Thickener (Type III)

Page 34: Stokes Law Presentation

Thickener (Type III) Control SystemThickener (Type III) Control System

Page 35: Stokes Law Presentation

Continuous Thickener (Type III)Continuous Thickener (Type III)Solid Flux Analysis

Page 36: Stokes Law Presentation

Continuous Thickener (Type III)Continuous Thickener (Type III)Solid Movement in Thickener

Page 37: Stokes Law Presentation

Continuous Thickener (Type III)Continuous Thickener (Type III)Experimental Determination of Solids Settling Velocity

Page 38: Stokes Law Presentation

Continuous Thickener (Type III)Continuous Thickener (Type III)Solids Settling Velocity in Hindered Settling

Page 39: Stokes Law Presentation

Continuous Thickener (Type III)Continuous Thickener (Type III)Solids Gravity Flux

Page 40: Stokes Law Presentation

Continuous Thickener (Type III)Continuous Thickener (Type III)Bulk Velocity

where

ub = bulk velocity of slurry

Qu = volumetric flow rate of thickener underflow

A = Surface area of thickener

Page 41: Stokes Law Presentation

Mass Balance in a ThickenerMass Balance in a Thickener

Page 42: Stokes Law Presentation

Thickener Cross-Sectional AreaThickener Cross-Sectional Area

Page 43: Stokes Law Presentation

Thickener Cross-Sectional AreaThickener Cross-Sectional Area

Talmadge – Fitch Method

Page 44: Stokes Law Presentation

Thickener Cross-Sectional AreaThickener Cross-Sectional Area

Talmadge – Fitch Method

- Obtain settling rate data from experiment (determine interface height of settling solids (H) vs. time (t)

- Construct curve of H vs. t

- Determine point where hindered settling changes to compression settling

- intersection of tangents - construct a bisecting line through this point - draw tangent to curve where bisecting line intersects the curve

Page 45: Stokes Law Presentation

Thickener Cross-Sectional AreaThickener Cross-Sectional Area

Talmadge – Fitch Method

- Draw horizontal line for H = Hu that corresponds to the underflow concentration Xu, where

- Determine tu by drawing vertical line at point where horizontal line at Hu intersects the bisecting tangent line

Page 46: Stokes Law Presentation

Thickener Cross-Sectional AreaThickener Cross-Sectional Area

Talmadge – Fitch Method

- Obtain cross-sectional area required from:

- Compute the minimum area of the clarifying section using a particle settling velocity of the settling velocity at t = 0 in the column test.

- Choose the largest of these two values

Page 47: Stokes Law Presentation

Thickener Cross-Sectional AreaThickener Cross-Sectional AreaCoe – Clevenger Method

- Developed in 1916 and still in use today:

where A = cross-sectional area (m2) F = feed pulp liquid/solids ratio

L = underflow pulp liquid/solid ratio ρs = solids density (g/cm3)

Vm = settling velocity (m/hr) dw/dt = dry solids production rate (g/hr)

Page 48: Stokes Law Presentation

Thickener Depth and Residece TimeThickener Depth and Residece Time

- Equations describing solids settling do not include tank depth. So it is determined arbitrarily by the designer

- Specifying depth is equivalent to specifying residence time for a given flow rate and cross-sectional area

- In practice, residence time is of the order of 1-2 hours to reduce impact of non-ideal behaviour

Page 49: Stokes Law Presentation

Typical Settling TestTypical Settling Test

Page 50: Stokes Law Presentation

Type II Settling (flocculant)Type II Settling (flocculant)- Coalescence of particles occurs during settling (large

particles with high velocities overtake small particles with low velocities)

- Collision frequency proportional to solids concentration

- Collision frequency proportional to level of turbulence (but too high an intensity will promote break-up)

- Cumulative number of collisions increases with time

Page 51: Stokes Law Presentation

Type II Settling (flocculant)Type II Settling (flocculant)- Particle agglomerates have higher settling velocities

- Rate of particle settling increases with time

- Longer residence times and deeper tanks promote coalescence

- Fractional removal is function of overflow rate and residence time.

- With Type I settling, only overflow rate is significant

Page 52: Stokes Law Presentation

Primary Thickener DesignPrimary Thickener Design- Typical design is for Type II characteristics

- Underflow densities are typically 50-65% solids

- Safety factors are applied to reduce effect of uncertainties regarding flocculant settling velocities

• 1.5 to 2.0 x calculated retention time• 0.6 to 0.8 x surface loading (overflow rate)

Page 53: Stokes Law Presentation

Primary Thickener DesignPrimary Thickener Design

Non-ideal conditions

• Turbulence• Hydraulic short-circuiting• Bottom scouring velocity (re-suspension)

All cause shorter residence time of fluid and/or particles

Page 54: Stokes Law Presentation

Primary Thickener Design ParametersPrimary Thickener Design Parameters

Depth (m) 3 - 5 m

Diameter (m) 3 - 170 m

Bottom Slope 0.06 to 0.16 (3.5° to 10°)

Rotation Speedof rake arm 0.02 - 0.05 rpm

Page 55: Stokes Law Presentation

Hindered (or Zone) Settling (Type III)Hindered (or Zone) Settling (Type III)

- solids concentration is high such that particle interactions are significant

- cohesive forces are so strong that movement of particles is restricted

- particles settle together establishing a distinct interface between clarified fluid and settling particles

Page 56: Stokes Law Presentation

Compression Settling (Type IV)Compression Settling (Type IV)- When solids density is very high, particles provide partial

mechanical support for those above

- particles undergo mechanical compression as they settle

- Type IV settling is extremely slow (measured in days)