stigma and discrimination in healthcare settings: key issues and priorities for action improving...
TRANSCRIPT
Stigma and Discrimination in
Healthcare Settings:
Key issues and priorities for action
Improving Physical Health Outcomes of those with Severe and Enduring Mental
Health Problems
Wednesday 4th
March 2015
Workshop Aims• To explore stigma and
discrimination as reported by people with lived experience when accessing healthcare settings
• To provide an overview of what we already know in this context
• To discuss potential solutions and actions
See Me 2013-16 Scotland Mental Health Anti-Stigma and
Discrimination Programme
People who experience mental
health problems are more able
to participate in society and live
more fulfilled lives
People who experience mental health
problems will not limit their own lives
and help-seeking behaviour as a
result of self-stigma
Recovery from mental health
problems will be more widely
understood and more people will
believe recovery is possible
Stigma and discrimination will be
reduced in communities and
organisations with a positive impact
on people’s lives
See Me 2013-16 – social movement for change focus for action
National Programme
Media volunteers
Re-focussed social marketing
Media strategy
SMHAFF
Communities Programme
Lived experience participation & leadership
Community champions
Local & thematic change networks
Grants programme site testing
Themes
Human Rights
Health & Social Care
Work & employment
Young people
Health and social care –
Research tells us there is a problem
• It is a significant issue identified by service users.
• There is no consistent difference in attitudes or behaviour described in general health versus mental health settings, although there are some differences in the nature and patterns of stigma
Stigma is prevalent in health settings
Source: Quinn & Gray, 2009
Stigma is prevalent in health settings (cont.)
• Positive and negative attitudes can co-exist in the same individual
• Even where staff express negative attitudes, there is often a willingness or desire for training and education
Source: Quinn & Gray, 2009
Health inequalities and diagnostic overshadowing are present in the NHS• On average, people with mental illness die 5-10
years younger than the general population• People with bipolar disorder have higher levels of
physical morbidity and mortality than the general population
• People with schizophrenia are 3-4 times more likely than general population to develop bowel cancer and have a 52% increased risk of developing breast cancer.
• The risk of depressed patients with coronary heart disease dying in the 2 years after initial assessment is twice as high as it is for non-depressed patients.
(Source: No Health Without Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists
and Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, 2009)
Diagnostic overshadowingHighlighted as a significant problem in A&E in recent qualitative study (16 yes, 5 unsure, 4 no)
“She was discharged and then returned in less than 24 hours… she actually didn’t survive ….the decision was that her behaviour seemed compatible with the pre-existing mental health problem and therefore there was no need to investigate” (Senior A&E Dr)
“I think its sometimes a bit of a shame because …. you automatically put them in a box, Ok, the mental illness, um, without sort of like focussing on the physical pain and what they’re actually going in” (A&E nurse)
Source: van Nieuwenhuizen et al, 2013
Diagnostic overshadowing in A&E – why?Problems obtaining a historyProblems with examination due to agitationEnvironment not appropriate and distressing to patientsClinicians lack of knowledge about mental illnessLabelling and stigma (distracted by diagnosis, frequent attenders, drug and alcohol use)Fear of violence, avoidanceTime pressureLack of parallel working with psychiatry “in one case the involvement of a psychiatrist led to the discovery of a physical illness” Source: van Nieuwenhuizen et al, 2013
% people identifying as having a mental health problem who experienced a positive response about their recovery from health professionals
66%
2006
65%
2013
73%
2008
(Scottish Social Attitudes Survey, 2014)
“The lowest income group were less likely than those in higher income groups to
have received a positive message from professionals about their
recovery”
“No significant reduction in reported discrimination from mental health professionals was found”
34.3% of MH service users surveyed reported discrimination by health care workers in 2008
30.4% of MH service users surveyed reported(not statistically significant) reported discrimination by health care workers in 2011
Time to Change Evaluation
Source: Corker et al, 2013
Mental healthcare professionals’ behaviour might be more resistant to change because:• professional contact selects for people with
the most severe course and outcome (the ‘physician’s bias’);
• contact occurs in the context of an unequal power relationship;
• prejudice against the client group is one aspect of burnout, which is not uncommon among mental health professionals
Why?
Implications?
“The danger of this trend is that people with mental health problems might be deterred from seeking professional help”
“It would be a terrible irony if people were encouraged by T2C to ask for help – only to find that those providing it held prejudicial views”
Dr Claire Henderson, IOP
What can we do?
“We need to find out why we are not seeing such a level of change among health staff. We want to bring people together to discuss that”
Sue Baker, Director, Time to Change
Research suggests that we can do
something about it…
…and also helps us conceptualise what
might make a difference
Mixed methods• The strongest evidence for anti-stigma
interventions in health care settings is for workshops, which have an education and positive contact element
• It is likely that some combination of contact with service users, professional education, “social marketing” to influence attitudes and reform of structural barriers to non-discriminatory practice would be effective
Source: Quinn & Gray, 2009
Social contactBased on evidence informed assumptions that:• where people know someone with
mental health problems they will be less stigmatising
• social contact disconfirms negative attitudes
• needs to be credible • positive and continuous
….so why doesn’t it happen in the mental health service users and professional relationship?
Social contact • Stigma is a deeply embedded
emotional reaction (education not so useful)
• The nature of contact in health and social care settings may be negative, acute and complex
• There is a real power imbalance in the relationship (reinforced by a traditionally disempowering system)
Formalised peer support (hits all the buttons)
Formalised peer support
Challenges and level
the power imbalance
Challenges self-stigma
Enhances
recovery
Challenges direct stigmaChallenges
structural stigma
Changes attitudes
and behaviour
Sustained and
authentic contact
Source: Scottish Government, Evaluation of the
Delivery for Mental Health Peer Support Pilot, 2009
Who is actively challenging stigma?
72% female and 27% male91% white British or Scottish
89% between 26 and 6580% employed (8% retired) (50% public,
13% private, 16% voluntary)
68% have had a mental health problem at some point in their life
88% of these had accessed help from services
(Source: See Me social movement survey, unpublished 2014)
What is their experience of stigma and discrimination?
33% have experienced discrimination as a result of their mh problems
86% have someone close to them who has experienced mh problems
83% have witnessed discrimination towards other people with mh problems
79% have made efforts to improve their own attitudes and/or behaviour
(Source: See Me social movement survey, unpublished 2014)
What motivates them?
• Indignant and appalled at behaviour of healthcare staff, those in workplace and those in authority
• To prevent others experiencing what they have
• People they know have died or suffered because they couldn’t talk about mental health
For discussion…….
Do we know enough about stigma and discrimination in health and social care settings in Scotland to act?
Whose responsibility is it to make change happen?
What are you doing already?
What more could be done?