stigma and discrimination: hindering effective hiv responses ngo 2010 report
TRANSCRIPT
STIGMA AND DISCRIMINATION: HINDERING EFFECTIVE HIV
RESPONSES
NGO 2010 Report
2010 Report based on aCivil Society Consultation
Online survey in ten languages
1500 respondents started survey and 1021 completed it
57 key informants interviewed by Delegates and Communications Facility
8 focus groups conducted by NGO Delegates and Communications Facility
Consultation respondents
Gender: 60% male, 36% female; 4% transgender
65% identified as being or serving PLHIV
No answer3%
Asia and the Pacific
16%
Europe17%
North America
19%
Africa21%
Latin America and the
Caribbean24%
Regional distribution
Key Findings: Impacts of Stigma & Discrimination on
Access
21%
61%
28%
13%17%
5%
22%
58%
25%
10%14%
8%
27%
59%
24%
11% 13%6%
22%
56%
26%
15% 15%
7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Little or no stigma and/or
discrimination (S&/D)
Experienced S&/D when accessing
services
Afraid to access services
Denied access to services
Difficult or impossible for another reason
Don't know
Prevention SRH Treatment Care&Support
Key Findings:Reasons for Not Accessing
58%
36%
58%
47%
13%
3%
56%
37%
62%57%
9%2%
53%
41%
66%
55%
6% 4%
51%
37%
63%
51%
34%
8%4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Identify with a group that is
discriminated against
Gender identification or
sexual orientation
Confidentiality reasons
Health care workers are not helpful or they refuse to treat
Family does not know or
acceptstatus (option only
given with care & support)
Other No answer
Prevention SRH Services Treatment Care&Support
Key Findings:Lack of confidentiality; lack of care
Respondents who were afraid to, or denied, access cited lack of confidentiality as the top reason
Half of these respondents cited health care workers as unhelpful or even refusing to treat
We need comprehensive training within health and community care systems, with specific attention to working with key populations
“Unfortunately, although the healthcare
workers have information, they do still have prejudice and are judgemental with regard to us, as ..... HIV positive patients.”
Key Findings:Negative associations
More than half of respondents who were afraid to, or denied, access said it was because they associate with a group that is discriminated against
We need to be able to recognize, collect data, involve and support key populations, especially the most marginalized
We need to be able to more effectively measure stigma
Key Findings:Criminalization
Perpetuates stigma and discrimination which further marginalizes populations affected by HIV and AIDS
Undermines the public health and evidence-based response to HIV and AIDS
Incompatible with a public health approach
We need to remove punitive laws and practices that inhibit the response to HIV and to reaching the MDGs
What exists to help?
Majority aware of protective laws but responded that laws not enforced or followed
UNAIDS work on stigma and/or discrimination: Two-thirds knew of UNAIDS work on this Half found UNAIDS to be somewhat effective, effective or
very effective on this work
We need to implement and expand a comprehensive package of programs to reduce stigma and discrimination
We need tools to measure progress in tackling stigma
Global Priorities Identified by Respondents
1. Raising awareness and knowledge about HIV
2. Changing harmful policies and laws
3. Funding civil society organizations as a key tool to fight stigma and discrimination
Maintaining previous commitments to protect quality of life
Universal Access enshrines this commitment on paper but we have fallen short on action
2011 : review and renew our commitment
Focus on tackling stigma and ending discriminatory practices
Zero discrimination. Zero new HIV infections. Zero AIDS-related deaths.
Thank you!
www.unaidspcbngo.org