steve mckenzie - inbound vs. account based selling

42
#INBOUND16 INBOUND VS. ACCOUNT BASED SELLING ….. Friends ….. Foes ….. or Frenemies? Steve McKenzie Head of Sales InsightSquared [email protected]

Upload: inbound

Post on 23-Jan-2018

580 views

Category:

Business


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

#INBOUND16

INBOUND VS. ACCOUNT BASED SELLING …..

Friends ….. Foes ….. or Frenemies?

Steve McKenzieHead of Sales InsightSquared [email protected]

#INBOUND16

ACCOUNT BASED SELLING?

#INBOUND16

1. Sales people might be thinking ….. – What is this Marketing Speak? – This is how we have been selling all the time

• We focus on accounts• We find the key contacts• Run then through a process• We sell to them

2. Right?

ACCOUNT BASED SELLING?

#INBOUND16

GTM MACHINE HAS EVOLVED

#INBOUND16

B2B BUYERS HAVE EVOLVED 1. Buyers are empowered

2. Buying is done by committee

#INBOUND16

B2B SELLERS HAVE EVOLVED 1. Walking catalogue

– Look what I have ….

2. Solution selling– Help me understand …..

3. Challenger Sales– Here’s what I know/how I can help …..

#INBOUND16

1. Organization = Account2. Person = Contact or Lead 3. Person who is ‘loosely engaged’ = MQL4. Person who is ‘more engaged’ = SQL5. Person who a Rep is going to try and sell to = SAL6. Organization that is engaged = Opportunity7. People in that organization = Contacts8. Organization that you have contracted with = Customer

DEFINITIONS

#INBOUND16

SPECIALIZE FOR EFFICIENCY

#INBOUND16

DIVISION OF LABOR

Marketing

BDR / SDR

Account Exec

CSM

#INBOUND16

INBOUND STRATEGY

#INBOUND16

1. Publishers of content to draw people (leads) in

2. Goal = Opt in to start a digital relationship

3. Further engagement to create ‘Hand Raisers’ / MQL

4. Marketing Optimize for the Denominator

5. Focus is on Quantity

6. Usually stop once Op created

INBOUND MARKETING

#INBOUND16

1. MQL handed off to BDR / SDR – SLA – speed to reach out– SLA - number of touches

2. BDR to book meeting / demo for AE3. AE qualifies and converts to Op4. AE sells5. Hands over account to CSM to manage

INBOUND SALES

#INBOUND16

1. Higher volume transactions

2. Faster sales cycle

3. Lower ASP

4. Very large total addressable market (TAM)

5. Inside sales predominance

6. Optimized for SPEED and VOLUME

TYPICAL INBOUND USE CASE

#INBOUND16

Pros1. When it works well it’s a machine!2. Cost effective for broad coverage3. There is always someone to call!

– Good steady lead flow Cons1. Marketing control who sales sells to 2. Could hit a MQL fiscal cliff (Quantity)3. Hit an MQL decay curve (Quality)4. MQL & Op misalignment 5. Division of labor can lead to silos and finger pointing

PROS AND CONS

#INBOUND16

ACCOUNT BASED STRATEGY

#INBOUND16

ACCOUNT BASED MARKETING Focus on Accounts, Contacts and Engagement1. Ideal Client Profile (ICP) definition – with sales2. Identification of target accounts3. Identifying / add contacts4. Specialized content for accounts and contacts 5. Focus on the Numerator - Quality6. Involved beyond op creation

– create broad account coverage / engagement

#INBOUND16

1. Build list of target accounts (with Mkt) 2. Add relevant persona’s / contacts3. Proactively reach out and try to engage4. Stay the course with the accounts / building trusted advisor relationship5. Challenger Sales methodology

– teaching on industry trends– Tailoring account / persona specific needs

6. Engaging for the longer haul

ACCOUNT BASED SALES

#INBOUND16

1. Smaller well known addressable market

2. Fortune 100 for example would be obvious

3. Larger ASP

4. Longer sales cycle

5. Deeper / complex engagement

6. Broader account coverage required

TYPICAL ACCOUNT USE CASE

#INBOUND16

Pros1. Clearly identified accounts and contacts to go after2. Can create a deeper engagement3. Works well when there is good Marketing and Sales alignment Cons1. If your accounts won’t engage, you are stuck2. Cost per interaction are higher3. Harder to scale4. Works badly when Marketing & Sales not tightly aligned

PROS AND CONS

#INBOUND16

MARKETING STRATEGY SUMMARY

#INBOUND16

CASE STUDY

#INBOUND16

1. Sales Goal / ASP = # of Deals

2. # Deal / Conversion Rate % = # of Ops

3. Ops needed / MQL/A to Op conversion rate = # MQL/A’s

4. MQL/A’s needed / Mkt campaign conversion rate

BOTTOM UP PLAN

#INBOUND16

BASED ON THIS

#INBOUND16

OTHERWISE WE SHOULD MAKE FRIENDS

#INBOUND16

HEY FRED ….

#INBOUND16

WE KNOW WHERE THIS IS

#INBOUND16

1. Good sense of our Ideal Client Profile (ICP)2. Could identify Target (ICP) Accounts 3. Value prop non commoditized (consultative selling) 4. Biggest loss reason doing nothing 5. Closed Lost – 2nd time round 2 x more likely to buy6. Closed Lost – 3rd time round 4 x more likely to buy7. Therefore ‘Closed Lost’ Accounts = rich vein of opportunity

WHAT WE KNEW

#INBOUND16

Total Addressable Market (TAM)

Target Accounts (ICP)

Named Accounts (A’s & B’s)

• Contact• Contact• Contact

#INBOUND16

1. Built list of Target Accounts2. Scored and ranked them (A’s, B’s, C’s & D’s)3. Reduced the number of personas we targeted (8 to 3)4. Identified key contacts and added to accounts 5. Marketing switched from MQL to MQA (engagement)6. Sales and BDR teams switched to Named Accounts7. Changed sales behavior to acknowledge the ‘Come Back Kids’

WHAT WE DID

#INBOUND16

EXAMPLE CAMPAIGN - TOFU

#INBOUND16

EXAMPLE CAMPAIGN - TOFU

#INBOUND16

EXAMPLE CAMPAIGN – MOFU

#INBOUND16

EXAMPLE CAMPAIGN - STALLED

#INBOUND16

EXAMPLE CAMPAIGN – LOST

#INBOUND16

1. Volume changed - scary

2. Re think sales activity plans and cadences

3. Plan for world of scarcity rather abundance

4. Had to deliver higher quality smarter engagement

5. Forced to raise our game on sales execution

AND?

#INBOUND16

1. Increased ACV by 2.5x in 18 months - √

2. Sales cycle stayed constant - √

3. Conversion stayed constant – X

….. but was nerve-racking for a while

………. and the game ain’t over

RESULTS

#INBOUND16

Fortune 500 Million

SO WHAT’S THE ANSWER?

INBOUND

Lower ASP

Simpler sales process

Shorter sales cycle

Large TAM

Inside sales predominance

Lower Mkt. cost per unit

ACCOUNT BASED

Higher ASP

Complex sales process

Longer sales cycle

Easily identified target accounts

Field and Inside sales

Higher Mkt. cost per unit

#INBOUND16

NOT ALWAYS SIMPLE MATH

1 + 1 = 2

#INBOUND16

AB

IB

CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE ??

#INBOUND16

1. Data points – Sales cycle– ASP– TAM

2. How do your buyers buy – By committee / individual

3. Buyer’s expectations– POC / hand holding / self serve

CONSIDERATIONS

#INBOUND16

1. Focus on customer experience 2. Account based selling is desirable

– it insures against one contact trap– it accounts for buying committee

3. Sales is tethered to Marketing4. Need to balance between quality and quantity / speed and

value

CLOSING COMMENTS

#INBOUND16

THANK YOU.

Steve McKenzieHead of Sales InsightSquared [email protected]