steel – 2005/2006

36
Steel – 2005/2006 Thomas A. Danjczek, President Steel Manufacturers Association March 20, 2006 National Slag Association 89 th Spring Meeting Clearwater, FL

Upload: martena-galloway

Post on 31-Dec-2015

32 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

National Slag Association 89 th Spring Meeting Clearwater, FL. Steel – 2005/2006. Thomas A. Danjczek, President Steel Manufacturers Association March 20, 2006. NSA – Spring Meeting. Steel – 2005/2006. SMA 2005 • World Steel Production/Operating Rate • China - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Steel – 2005/2006

Steel – 2005/2006

Thomas A. Danjczek, PresidentSteel Manufacturers AssociationMarch 20, 2006

National Slag Association

89th Spring MeetingClearwater, FL

Page 2: Steel – 2005/2006

Steel – 2005/2006

I. SMA

II. 2005

• World Steel Production/Operating Rate

• China

• Scrap, Ore, Steel, Gas Prices

• Consolidations

III. 2006

• China’s Challenges

• Trade

• Energy & Environment

• Other

IV. Slag Issues

V. Conclusion

NSA – Spring Meeting

Page 3: Steel – 2005/2006

NSA – Spring Meeting

•The Steel Manufacturers Association (SMA)

–39 North American Companies:

33 U.S., 3 Canadian, and 3 Mexican

–109 Associate Members:

Suppliers of goods and services to the steel industry

•SMA member companies

–Operate 120 Steel plants in North America

–Employ about 40,000 people

–Minimill Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) producers

–Produce nearly 100% of structural, wire rod, rebar, minimill plate and hot rolled, and a high percentage of SBQ products

–Also represent several integrated steel producers and rerollers

Page 4: Steel – 2005/2006

NSA – Spring Meeting

•Production capability

–SMA represents over two-thirds of U.S. steel production (app. 70%)

•Recycling

–SMA members are the largest recyclers in the U.S.

–Last year, the U.S. recycled over 70 million tons of ferrous scrap

•Growth of SMA members

–Efficiency and quality due to low cost

–Flexible organizations

–EAF growth surpassed 53% in 2004, and anticipated to be 60% by 2010

Page 5: Steel – 2005/2006

2005

Page 6: Steel – 2005/2006

WORLD CRUDE STEEL OPERATING RATE

75%

80%

85%

90%

Cap Util % 76.1% 77.2% 80.3% 84.2% 86.8% 85.3% 85.0% 84.1%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

World Crude SteelOperating Rate %World Crude SteelOperating Rate %

Operating rates recovered from 76 percent in 2000, to a peak of 87 percent in 2004, and have moved moderately downward since late 2004.

Source: Metal Strategies

Page 7: Steel – 2005/2006
Page 8: Steel – 2005/2006

NSA – Spring Meeting China’s Impact

After 4 Trips in a Year…

Key Questions:

- When will Chinese steel production significantly exceed its own domestic consumption – i.e. 50/60 MMT?

- Will the Chinese government shut down inefficient, excess capacity? (Has not done so with polluting facilities despite strong policy)

- How can North American Steel Industry compete against Chinese government - - - IT CAN’T!

Page 9: Steel – 2005/2006
Page 10: Steel – 2005/2006

Chart 2: The Exploding Trade Deficit With China

Page 11: Steel – 2005/2006

Chart 3: China’s Foreign Exchange Reserves

Page 12: Steel – 2005/2006
Page 13: Steel – 2005/2006

CONCERNS 

Steel Item Comment•North American steel industry CANNOT Currency, banks, land, environment,compete against Chinese steel companies consolidations, policiesfinanced and controlled by theirgovernment

• In 2005, compared to 2004, China steel Trend worsens in 2006 with newimports are projected to drop by 6.1 capacity on line, and China’smillion tons, while exports are projected slowdownto increase by 12.3 million tons 

• North American steel industry loss of a Government de facto subsidiessignificant increment of its customer (industrial parks, infrastructure,base to relocation to Chinese factory space, loans)production sites

Page 14: Steel – 2005/2006

Steel Making Raw Material Prices

Prices of key steel making cost inputs have more than doubled in 2004 and 2005. The outlook for 2006 is for continuing cost pressures...

Steel Making Raw Material Prices Indices 1990 = 100%

0%

50%

100%

150%

200%

250%

300%

Ind

ex

19

90

= 1

00

CoalIron OreScrap - Chicago #1 BundlesSlabs - Brazil Export

Page 15: Steel – 2005/2006
Page 16: Steel – 2005/2006

Source: Iron and Steel Statistics Bureau

Page 17: Steel – 2005/2006

Rebar Prices, 1990-2005(Midwest, $ per ton)

Source: Purchasing Magazine

June 2005 = $470

July 2005 = $450

Aug. 2005 = $435

Sept. 2005 = $485

Oct. 2005 = $494

Nov. 2005 = $486

Dec. 2005 = $481

Page 18: Steel – 2005/2006

Wire Rod Prices, 1990-2005(Midwest, $ per ton)

Source: Purchasing Magazine

June 2005 = $505

July 2005 = $472

Aug. 2005 = $469

Sept. 2005 = $523

Oct. 2005 = $492

Nov. 2005 = $503

Dec. 2005 = $503

Page 19: Steel – 2005/2006

Wide-Flange Beam Prices, 1990-2005(Midwest, 8 x 8, $ per ton)

Source: Purchasing Magazine

June 2005 = $516

July 2005 = $506

Aug. 2005 = $496

Sept. 2005 = $545

Oct. 2005 = $560

Nov. 2005 = $574

Dec. 2005 = $587

Page 20: Steel – 2005/2006

U.S. Oil and Natural Gas Prices…oil prices are the major uncertainty in the outlook for 2006, with

forecasts ranging from thirty-five to seventy-five US$ per bbl…

Page 21: Steel – 2005/2006

Natural Gas Cost Impact

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Aug-05

$ p

er t

on

Integrated Mills

Flat Rolled Mini-Mills

Long Product Mini-Mills

…sharp gains in natural gas prices have more than doubled steel mill gas costs per ton since 2000. Costs for integrated mills have risen over $30 per ton…

Page 22: Steel – 2005/2006

U.S. STEEL INDUSTRY CONSOLIDATION(Percent Change, 2000 compared to 2005)

-50%

-25%

0%

25%

50%

75%

No. ofCompanies

No. of Plants

Capacity Capacity /Company

No. Plants /Company

Flat Rolled Long, Other

Mittal Steel weighted average share of all markets served = ~33% (major product range-15-40%+)

-FRP acquisition price ($/ton, going-concern basis) 2002= $110……..2003-’04=$170……2005=$225

Source: Metal Strategies

Page 23: Steel – 2005/2006

2006

Page 24: Steel – 2005/2006

CHINA’S CHALLENGES Area Comment

•Environment Trade policy and laws are not enforced regardingemissions and effluents; Province versusBeijing; employment rules, not environment 

•Consolidations State-owned facilities; only non-controlling foreignownership allowed; antiquated facilities; policy is20 large producers, push small producers out 

•Technology/Quality Quality in flat rolled will affect export capabilities.Switch from long to flat not easy 

•Inventories Run full out. Not always market-oriented 

•Capital Will not always be free; could lose state credit 

•Personnel Some “unrest” expressed toward elite class.Internet is politically uncontrollable

NSA – Spring Meeting 2006 China

Page 25: Steel – 2005/2006

China’s Steel Trade Balance

 

Year 2004 2005 2006 

Imports 33.1 27.0 22.0 

Exports 20.2 32.5 36.0 (Semi’s) 6.2 9.0 5.0

Steel Trade Balance -12.9 +5.5 +14  

2006 China

Page 26: Steel – 2005/2006

 

The National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) recently reviewed China’s compliance with its WTO commitments in the accession protocol. While progress has been made in certain areas, there are serious concerns and problems with effective compliance relating to: 

1. Huge U.S. trade imbalance2. Continued currency manipulation3. Arbitrary VAT taxes and rebates4. Massive counterfeiting and piracy5. Discriminatory standards6. Inadequate regulatory transparency

COMPLIANCE WITH THE WTO

2006 China

Page 27: Steel – 2005/2006

Chinese steel industry expansion continues in a region that is deficient in resources (supply

and quality) and environmental compliance…

2006 China

Page 28: Steel – 2005/2006

2006 Prices

Page 29: Steel – 2005/2006

• Section 421 Disappointment – No Relief

• Wire Rod Case – No Import Injury

• Solicit Congressional Assistance & Action

- Ryan/Hunter

- Graham/Schumer

- Other???

• Doha Agenda “only lose?”

2006 Trade

Page 30: Steel – 2005/2006

• No National Energy Policy

• For EAFs, Demand Response is “Perfect Peaker”

• Need for Nuclear

• After Metallic Exports, Number One Threat for Competitiveness

2006 Energy

Page 31: Steel – 2005/2006

• Mercury “End of Pipeline” Regulation Risk (Area Source Rule vs. Negotiated Settlement)

• TOSCA – Not Recognizing Benefits of Recycling i.e. Automotive Scrap, Fluff, & Slag

• Trend Toward “Measure – Monitor – Control”, vs. “Under the Bar” Compliance

• Continued Risk With Lost Radioactive Sources, TRI Reporting, and GGG

2006 Environment

Page 32: Steel – 2005/2006

• Metallics Exports Concerns

• Transportation Challenges

• Congressional “Gridlock”

• TEA 21 $$$ - Finally

• U.S. Government Financial Policies (Trade & Budget Deficit)

• Need for Border Adjustable Tax

2006 Other

Page 33: Steel – 2005/2006

NSA – Spring Meeting

SLAG ISSUES

Two Primary Issues:

1. Revision of the Slag Risk Assessment

2. Regulatory Status of Slag as a Product

Page 34: Steel – 2005/2006

NSA – Spring Meeting

SLAG RISK ASSESSMENT PROJECT

• Conducted by Steel Slag Coalition

• Anticipate completion, Spring 2006

• Updated to reflect current toxicological data, standards, and risk methodology

• Work completed, now doing human health portion

• Ecological report will be valuable in responding to potential impact on the environment

Page 35: Steel – 2005/2006

NSA – Spring Meeting

REGULATORY STATUS OF SLAG

• SMA is engaged with EPA and various state agencies that EAF SLAG IS NOT A WASTE MATERIAL, BUT IS A USEFUL PRODUCT

• Regulations in Iowa are attempting to classify EAF slag as a waste under “beneficial reuse” regulations

• SMA is coordinating a federal effort to prompt the EPA to clarify the status of EAF slag under federal solid waste regulations

Page 36: Steel – 2005/2006

NSA – Spring Meeting

Conclusions

• Hell, it’s still a cyclical business

• We need to continue to work together on slag issues

• Fundamental shift in both demand and supply due to China & its appetite for raw materials – China is still the “wild card”. Risk near term is auto’s; long term is China

• Consolidations and discipline have had an impact to reduce volatility

• Role of inventories affecting pricing and production

• Demand still healthy, construction solid

• Unknowns (Oil, interest rates, auto sector, energy, freight rates, federal spending, China, China, China)

• Still reasons for meaningful optimism