steady state performance of sssc
TRANSCRIPT
Power Flow Control with Static Synchronous Series Compensator (SSSC) Abdul Haleem Chandra babu Nayudu Ravireddy M Project Manager College of engineering pune Project Developer Krest technologies, [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Abstract- The series compensation technique of long and medium transmission lines is
extensively employed in many countries including India as it offers considerable advantages and
better use of transmission lines. It can also be a technique in improving power system stability
and power flow through the intended transmission network. However, technical problems such
as reliability of capacitors and their protective equipments do exist; and more recently the
problem of sub synchronous resonance (SSR) has surfaced. To remove these drawbacks,
recently a series compensation technique for transmission line which uses a synchronous
voltage source (SVS). The static synchronous voltage source utilizes a power electronic voltage
source (VSC) converter employing GTO or IGBT depending upon power requirements. The VSC
may employ a two level or multilevel converter. In this paper a static synchronous series
compensator (SSSC) using a 6-pulse VSC employing sinusoidal pulse width modulation is
examined. The steady state performance and P-δ characteristics are obtained for a given
transmission network embedded with SSSC. A control circuit for the operation of SSSC is
developed and the performance of the control circuit is investigated in MATLAB-SIMLINK
Platform.
Keywords— 6-pulse VSC, SSSC, FACTS, Power Flow Control, Series compensation
1. Introduction Series capacitive compensation is
widely used in long transmission
lines to maintain the overall
impedance of the transmission
line. The capacitive series
compensation increases the power
transfer capacity as well as the
transient stability. The series
dielectric capacitors have been
installed all over the world as
efficient economical way of
providing capacitive series
compensation [1]. With the new
advances in the generation of the
power electronics devices based on
voltage source converter (VSC)
known as flexible ac transmission
system (FACTS), more flexible
operation and control of the
transmission networks are possible
[2]. FACTS controllers can be
classified as shunt, series, or phase
angle compensating devices or
devices which are a combination of i
the above three types such as
unified power flow controller
(UPFC) [3]. These FACTS devices
enable fast response using the
phase locked loop (PLL) with
minimum inherent time delay
during severe disturbances,
transient power swings, thus
allowing the transmission system
operating safely and close to the
theoretical stability limit. Two
FACTS devices can provide capacitive
series compensation, they are :(1) thyristor
controlled series capacitor (TCSC) [4] and
(2) static synchronous series compensator
[5,6].
There are several TCSCS are widely
installed [7]. The TCSC is used in practice
to significantly improve the small
disturbance and transient stability of the
power system [8,9]. Although the TCSC can
provide the capacitive series compensation,
it has several disadvantages [10]. It injects
low order harmonic components (typically
third, fifth, seventh and ninth) into the
power system because of phase control of
the thyristors [2]. Transient response of the
circuit is rather slow, because of controlling
thyristor firing pulse is available only once
in each half cycle. Deriving a closed-loop
model of TCSC is complicated [11].
Furthermore, it is susceptible to parallel
resonance due to the presence of inductors
and capacitors in parallel paths.
The SSSC is one of the most important
FACTS devices for power transmission line
series compensation. It is a power
electronic-based VSC that generates a
nearly sinusoidal three phase voltage which
is in quadrature with the line current
[3,12].The SSSC converter block is
connected in series with the transmission
line by a series coupling transformer. The
SSSC can provide either capacitive or
inductive series compensation independent
of the line current. Unlike other series
compensators, an ideal SSSC is essentially a
pure sinusoidal ac voltage source at the
system fundamental frequency. Its output
impedance at other frequencies is ideally
zero. Thus, SSSC does not resonate with the
inductive line impedance to initiate sub
synchronous resonance oscillations. This
paper deals with a 6 pulse (two levels) VSC
[13].
The objective of this paper is to analyze
and investigate the steady state performance
of the SSSC for providing dynamic series
compensation, voltage regulation. A control
circuit is proposed for the operation of the
SSSC. The proposed control scheme for the
SSSC is fully validated in both capacitive
and inductive modes of operation by
simulation.
2. Priciple of Operation of SSSC
ii
The SSSC is generally connected in
series with the transmission line with the
arrangement as shown in Fig.1. The SSSC
comprises a coupling transformer, a
magnetic interface, voltage source
converters (VSC) and a DC capacitor. The
coupling transformer is connected
in series with the transmission line
and it injects the quadrature
voltage into the transmission line.
The magnetic interface is used to
provide multi-pulse voltage
configuration to eliminate low
order harmonics.
Fig.1 static synchronous series compensator
The VSCs are either two-level
converter or three level converter.
One side of the VSC is connected
to the magnetic interface while the
other side is connected to the DC
bus. The VSC generates six-pulse
voltage waveform and it is
combined into multi-pulse (12
pulses) voltage waveform by Wye-
Delta connection of the magnetic
interface. More pulses (24 or 36
pulses) can be achieved if zigzag
transformers are used as the
magnetic interface. The DC
capacitor is used to maintain DC
voltage level on the DC bus. This
DC capacitor is selected to meet
harmonic and economic criteria of
the SSSC and the power system.
Figure.2 shows a single line diagram
of a simple Transmission line with an
inductive transmission reactance, XL,
connecting a sending-end voltage source,
and a receiving end voltage source,
respectively [3].
Fig.2 an Elementary Power Transmission System
The real and reactive power (P and Q) flow
at the receiving-end voltage source are
given by eq (1) and (2)
(1)
(2)
Where Vs and Vr voltage magnitudes and
are the phase angles of the
voltage sources. The voltage magnitudes are
chosen such that Vs = Vr =V and the
iii
difference between the phase angles is
.
An SSSC, limited by its voltage and current
ratings, is capable of emulating a
compensating reactance, Xq, (both inductive
and capacitive) the expression of power
flow given in equation (1) and equation (2)
becomes
Where Xeff is the effective total
transmission line reactance between its
sending and receiving power system ends,
including the equivalent “variable
reactance” inserted by the equivalent
injected voltage (Vq) (Buck or Boost) by
the SSSC. The compensating reactance is
defined to be negative when the SSSC is
operated in inductive mode and positive
when SSSC operated in capacitive mode.
Fig.3 shows an example of a simple power
transmission system with an SSSC and the
related phasor diagrams.
Fig.3 Two machine system with SSSC
Fig.4 Phasor diagram
The SSSC injects the compensating
voltage in series with the line irrespective of
the line current. The transmitted power Pq
therefore becomes a parametric function of
the injected voltage and it can be expressed
as follows:
The normalized power Pq versus angle
plots are shown in Fig.4.6 as a function of
Vq These values are calculated for the
system whose specifications are given
earlier in A Programme in MATLAB has
been developed to obtain these
iv
characteristics for Vq= 0, 0.353, 0.707 and
these are shown in Fig.5
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
TRANSMISSION ANGLE (DEGREES)
TR
AN
SM
ITT
ED
PO
WE
R (
p.u
)
Vq=0.707
Vq=0.353
Vq=0Vq=-0.353
Vq=-0.707
Fig.5 Transmitted power versus transmission angle
as a function of the degree of series compensating
voltage Vq by the SSSC
From the plots given Fig.5 we can say that
the SSSC increases the transmitted power
by a fixed fraction of the maximum power
transmittable by the uncompensated line,
independently of transmission angle and
SSSC not only increase the transmittable
power but also decreases it.
The transmittable active power, P, and the
reactive power, Q, supplied by the receiving
end bus can be expressed for the simple
two-machine system as functions of the
(actual or effective) reactive line impedance,
XL the line resistance, R, and transmission
angle, as follows:
P= [ sin -R (1-Cos )]
Q= [Rsin + (1-Cos )]
The normalized active power P and reactive
power Q versus angle transmission
characteristics described by equations and
are plotted as a parametric function of the
XL/R ratio for 7.4, 3.7, 1.85 in Fig.6 These
values are calculated for the system whose
specifications are given earlier. A
Programme in MATLAB has been
developed to obtain these characteristics for
XL/R = ∞, 3.7, 7.4, 1.85 and these are
shown in Fig.6 and the Programme is given
in Appendix-3
Fig.6 Transmitted real and reactive power versus
transmission angle as a function of ratio of
These plots clearly show that the maximum
transmittable active power decreases, and
the ratio of active to reactive power
increases, rapidly with decreasing XL/R
ratio.
Control circuit
Introduction An advanced control scheme is
introduced by Akagi [4] used for SSSC. The
development of this control scheme is
discussed in this chapter.
Development of Control circuit for SSSC
v
Fig.7 System Configuration of SSSC
The following assumptions are made in the analysis
1) The sending-end voltage is equal to
the receiving-end voltage
2) The SSSC device is assumed to be an ideal controllable voltage source. Output
voltage vector is equal to its reference
3) The three phase voltages at sending end
are balanced
Fig.7 shows a block diagram of the
control circuit [4]. The three- to two-phase
transformation obtains and from the
three-phase currents and. The d-q
transformation yields and from
and the phase information is generated
by a phase lock-loop (PLL)
Fig.8 Control circuit for SSSC
The injected voltage is independent of the
line current and controlled by using the
pulse width modulation switching
techniques. The voltage source converter
uses PWM switching techniques to ensure
fast response and to generate a sinusoidal
wave form. The output of The PLL is angle,
θ, which is used to transform the direct axis
and quadrature axis components of the ac
three phase voltages and current. The
measured quadrature voltage is compared
with the desired reference constant
quadrature voltage to the input of the AC
voltage regulator which is a PI controller.
Thus the voltage regulator provides the
quadrature component of the converter
voltage. Also the Measured direct axis
component voltage is compared with the
reference voltage; this driven error is an
input to the voltage regulator which is a PI
controller to compute the direct component
of the converter voltage. The injection
voltage is generated by transforming these
vi
direct axis and quadrature axis components
into three phase voltage and is applied to the
VSC to produce the preferred voltage, with
the help of pulse width modulation (PWM).
Simulation results
Simulation of the SSSC is performed in
MATLAB SIMULINK using the Akagi’s
control technique.
Steady state characteristics of SSSC [4].
Fig.9 Simple system taken for simulation
Fig.9 shows the simple system taken for
simulation. The main circuit of the SSSC
device consists of three phase voltage-fed
pulse width modulation (PWM) inverters. A
PWM control circuit compares reference
voltage with a triangle carrier signal in order
to generate gate signals. The ac terminals of
the PWM inverters are connected in series
through step-up transformers because
injecting voltage is very small compare to
transmission line voltage. A three-phase
diode rectifier is employed and reactor L
and resistor R representing the impedance of
the transmission line are inserted between
sending end and receiving end. DC
capacitor used for the charging and
discharging purpose. The function of the
control system is to keep the injecting
voltage in quadrature with the transmission
line current and only control the magnitude
of injected series reactance to meet the
desired reactance compensation level.
Fig.9 shows simulation model used for the
steady state performance of the SSSC
Fig.10 Static Synchronous Series Compensator Model in MATLAB
Fig.11 injecting voltage
The fig.11 shows that the injecting
voltage of the SSSC and this injected
voltage will be in quadrature with the line
current. The SSSC can provide either
capacitive or inductive series compensation
independent of the line current. By
controlling the magnitude of injected
voltage the amount of series compensation
can be adjusted.
When an SSSC injects an altemating voltage
lagging the line current as shown in the
Fig.12, it emulates a capacitive reactance in
vii
series with the transmission line causing the
power flow as well as the line current to
increase as the level of compensation
increases and then SSSC is operating in a
capacitive mode. The emulating capacitive
reactance of 0.22 ohms.
0.62 0.63 0.64 0.65 0.66 0.67 0.68 0.69 0.7-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
Time in seconds
Capacitiv
e com
pensation
voltage (V)
current (A)
Fig.12 SSSC Operating in Capacitive Mode (Capacitive Compensation)
The emulating reactance value calculated by
using following relation is .where
Vq is the rms value of the injecting voltage
and I is the current flowing in the line (rms
value).
When an SSSC injects an alternating
voltage leading the line current as shown in
the fig.13, it emulates an inductive reactance
in series with the transmission line
causing the power flow as well as the
line current to decrease as the level of
compensation increases and the SSSC is
operating in an inductive mode. The
emulating inductive reactance of 2 ohms
2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.1-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
Time in seconds
Inductive
Com
pensation
voltage (V)
current (A)
Fig.13 SSSC Operating in Inductive Mode (Inductive Compensation)
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5x 10
4
Time in Seconds
Inje
cte
d A
ctive P
ow
er
(Watt
)
Fig.14 Performance of a SSSC Operating in Capacitive Mode (Capacitive Compensation) and Inductive Mode (Inductive Compensation) in the case of injected Active Power
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3-1500
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
Time in Seconds
Inje
cte
d R
eactive P
ow
er
(VA
R)
Fig.15 Performance of a SSSC Operating in
Capacitive Mode (Capacitive Compensation) and
Inductive Mode (Inductive Compensation) in the
case of Injected Reactive Power
Fig 14 and 15 shows the simulation
results when an SSSC emulates a reactance
in series with the transmission line. At the
time 0 seconds, the SSSC injects no voltage.
At 0.2 seconds, capacitive reactance
compensation is requested. The injecting
voltage lags the line current, by almost 900.
Due to the capacitive reactance there is an
increase in the line current and the power
flow in the transmission line increases. At
0.8 seconds coming into the no injected
state. The time interval between 0.8 to 1.6
seconds SSSC does not inject any voltage.
At 1.6 seconds, the inductive reactance is
requested. The inverter voltage leads the
line current, by almost 900. Due to the
inductive reactance there is a decrease in the
line current and the power flow in the
transmission line. At 2.5 seconds it’s again viii
coming into the no injected state so it does
not emulates any reactance.
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5x 10
4
Time in Seconds
Lin
e A
ctive P
ow
er
(Watt
)
]
Fig.16 Performance of a SSSC Operating in
Capacitive Mode (Capacitive Compensation) and
Inductive Mode (Inductive Compensation) in the
case of Line Active Power
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
Time in seconds
Voltage (
V)
Curr
ent
(A)
voltage
current
Fig.17 injected voltage and line current
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30
500
1000
1500
2000
Time in Seconds
Lin
e R
eactive P
ow
er
(VA
R)
Fig.18 Performance of a SSSC Operating in
Capacitive Mode (Capacitive Compensation) and
Inductive Mode (Inductive Compensation) in the
case of Line Reactive Power
In the fig.16 at the time 0 seconds, the
SSSC did not emulate any reactance
compensation. At 0.2 seconds, capacitive
reactance compensation is requested. Due to
the capacitive reactance there is an increase
in the line current and the power flow in the
transmission line increases from 12 kW to
22 kW. At 0.8 seconds coming into the no
injected state. The time interval between 0.8
to 1.6 seconds SSSC does not injecting any
voltage. At 1.6 seconds, the inductive
reactance is requested. Due to the inductive
reactance there is a decrease in t the power
flow in the transmission line from 12 kW to
2 kW. At 2.5 seconds it’s again coming into
the no injected state so it does not emulates
any reactance.
Therefore, from the figures 16 and 18
when an SSSC emulates a reactance in
series with the transmission line, the power
flow in the transmission line always
decreases if the emulated reactance is
inductive. Also, the power flow always
increases if the emulated reactance is
capacitive.
The parameters of the test system
Controllable Power rating (P) =10 kW
Utility line to line Voltage=200V
Line inductance (L) = 1.0 mH
Line resistance (R) = 0.04 ohm
Frequency = 60 Hz
Phase difference=100
Rms voltage of Vc =12V
PI controller gains areKp =0.5Ki = 100 2 Level inverter employing IGBTCapacitor = 200 µF IGBT Snubber resistance = 1 x105 ohm
Snubber capacitance = ∞
On resistance of IGBT = 1 x10-4 ohm
Conclusion
The static synchronous series
compensator offers an alternative to
conventional series capacitive line
ix
compensation. Whereas the series capacitor
is an impedance that produces the required
compensating voltage as the line current
flows through it, the SSSC is a solid-state
voltage source that internally generates the
desired compensating voltage. However the
voltage is in quadrature to line current
(Leading or lagging as per requirement)
independent of the line current. The voltage
source nature of the SSSC provides the
basis for its superior operating and
performance characteristics not achievable
by series capacitor type compensators.
References
1. N.G Hingroni and L Gyugyi.
“Understanding FACTS: Concepts and
Technology of flexible AC Transmission
System”, IEEE Press, New York, 2000.
2. L.Gyugyi, C. D. Schauder, K. K. Sen.
“Static synchronous series compensator: a
solid-state approach to the series
compensation of transmission lines,” IEEE
Trans. on Power Delivery, vol. 12,no. 1,
1997,pp. 406-417.
3. K.K.Sen, “SSSC-static synchronous series
compensator: theory, modeling and
applications”, IEEE Trans. On Power
Delivery, v.13, no.1, 1998, pp.241-246.
4. Hideaki Fujita, Yasuhiro Watanabe
Hirofumi Akagi “Control and Analysis of a
Unified Power Flow Controller” IEEE
Trans.On Power Electronics vol.14, no.6,
November 1999, pp. 1021-1027.
5. Hideaki Fujita, Yasuhiro Watanabe
Hirofumi Akagi “Dynamic Performance of
a Unified Power Flow Controller for
Stabilizing AC Transmission Systems”IEEE
Trans.On Power Electronics
Vol.14,No.6,November 1999,pp.81-87.
6. B.Geetalakshmi, A.Saraswathi,
P.Dananjayan “Comparing and evaluating
the performance of SSSC with Fuzzy Logic
controller and PI controller for Transient
Stability Enhancement” Proceeding of India
International Conference on Power
Electronics 2006.
7. M.S. El-Moursi, A.M. Sharaf, “Novel
reactive power controllers for the
STATCOM and SSSC”, Electric Power
Systems Research 76 (2006) 228-241.
8. Mohammed El Mours A.M.Sharaf
KhalilEl-Arroud “Optimal control schemes
for SSSC for dynamic series compensation”
Electric Power Systems Research 78 (2008)
646–656.
9. Bruce S. Rigby and Ronald G. Harley ‘An
Improved Control Scheme for a Series-
Capacitive Reactance Compensator Based
on a Voltage-Source Inverter” IEEE
Transactions on industry
applications,vol.34,no.2, march/april1998.
10. C.J. Hatziadoniu, Member, A.T. Funk,
Student Member, “Development of a control
scheme for a Series-Connected Solid-State
Synchronous Voltage Source” IEEE
Transactions on Power Delivery. Vol. 11,
No. 2, April 1996.
x