steady-state airflow and particle trajectories inside a hard disk drive chanchal saha thesis...
TRANSCRIPT
STEADY-STATE AIRFLOW AND PARTICLE TRAJECTORIES INSIDE
A HARD DISK DRIVE
CHANCHAL SAHA
THESIS PRESENTATION
Contents
Background1
Objectives2
Model analysis3
Conclusions4
Background
Hard disk drive
• Data storage device
• Data read-write ability
• Form factor
Performance
• Disk rotational speed
• Head positioning accuracy
Degradation factor
• Contaminated particles
• Sliding born : 14 to 200 nm
• Manufacturing-born: near few microns
Current practice
OBJECTIVES
• Airflow without filter
• Airflow with filter
• Particle trajectory
• Factorial analysis
• Velocity, residence time & travel distance relationships
• Verification
How did we proceed?Reverse engineeringCAD modelMesh modelAirflow modelParticle trajectory model
Objectives
• Airflow without filter
• Airflow with filter
• Particle trajectory
• Factorial analysis
• Velocity, residence time & travel distance relationships
• Verification
Airflow model without filter medium
0 m/s
4 m/s
10 m/s
18 m/s
14 m/s
Objectives
• Airflow without filter
• Airflow with filter
• Particle trajectory
• Factorial analysis
• Velocity, residence time & travel distance relationships
• Verification
Airflow model with filter medium
Filter inlet interface
Filter
Filter outlet interface
Airflow model with filter medium
Velocity plot at filter interfaces
Filter inlet normal velocity
Filter out normal velocity
Objectives
• Airflow without filter
• Airflow with filter
• Particle trajectory
• Factorial analysis
• Velocity, residence time & travel distance relationships
• Verification
Particle injection position
Center diameter
Mid diameter
Outer diameter
Near filter cavity
Near actuator arm
Near filter medium
Particle trajectory models
• Travel in a circular pattern
• Top disk particles do not touch inlet interface
• Top disk particle trajectory behavior
• Base disk particles enter inside cavity, very rare touch interface
• Base disk particles trajectory behavior
Trajectory models•Diameter 0.1 & density 1050• Diameter 0.1 & density 2100• Diameter 0.3 & density 1050• Diameter 0.3 & density 2100
• Touch filter inlet interface: none
• Travel: mostly over rotating disks
• Settle downs: bottom of base boundary
Model-1
• Diameter: .1 to .3 μm • Density: 2100 kg/m3
• Injected particles: 4
Model-2
• Diameter: .1 to .3 μm • Density: 2100 kg/m3
• Injected particles: 6
• Touch filter inlet interface: none
• Trajectory: mostly around injection points
• Settle downs: either there or bottom of base boundary near cavity
DISCUSSIONS: TOP DISK LEVEL
Discussions: base disk level
Discussions: near actuator arm
Touch the filter inlet interface
• Impossible for top disk level injected particles• Very less possibility for base disk level injected
particles
Touch the filter inlet interface
• Impossible for top disk level injected particles• Very less possibility for base disk level injected
particles
Summary on discussions
• Particles movement follow the velocity field vector• Inside the cavity, velocity varies in different depths
Explanation of particles behavior
• Narrow cavity & airflow direction
• Low velocity magnitude
• Top disk: a loop of airflow
• Base disk: an inward-outward airflow
• High velocity flow from outlet interface
Objectives
• Airflow without filter
• Airflow with filter
• Particle trajectory
• Factorial analysis
• Velocity, residence time & travel distance relationships
• Verification
Factorial analysis
Filter medium model:• 2-level, 3-factor, and 3-replicate factorial analysis • Pressure and velocity magnitude data across filter interfaces• 24 runs
• Factorial analysis for pressure drop data• Factorial analysis for face velocity lift data
OUTCOME
High level parameters
• Porosity: 0.8• Inertial resistance: 125.81 kg/m4
• Viscous resistance: 637.82 kg/m3-s
Input parameters
Low level parameters
• Porosity: 0.4• Inertial resistance: 28.842 kg/m4
• Viscous resistance: 158.13kg/m3-s
Outcome
PorosityPorosityLow level (0.4) is suitable for pressure dropHigh level (0.8) is preferable for face velocity lift
Inertial Inertial resistanceresistance
No impact on pressure drop and face velocity lift across filter interfaces
Viscous Viscous resistanceresistance
High level (637.82 kg/m3-s) is a good choice
Objectives
• Airflow without filter
• Airflow with filter
• Particle trajectory
• Factorial analysis
• Velocity, residence time & travel distance relationships
• Verification
AIR FLOW MODELVERIFICATION
Here, f=5400/60=90 rps r=0.0325 m
= 565.488 radian/s
V = 565.488×0.0325 m/sV = 18.4 m/s
Calculation:
Airflow model without filter medium
Airflow model with filter medium
Bernoulli’s equations
• Ding, W., & Kumar, M. Bloomington: Donaldson Co. Inc.
• Song, H., Murali, D., & Ng, Q. Y. (2004). Massachusetts: DSpace@MIT.
Reference
Trajectory model verification…
Conclusions
Without filter medium airflow model
• Linearly increase of velocity
• Base disk has higher velocity
Filter medium airflow model
• Higher velocity at bottom and left
• Higher pressure at right corner of interfaces
Particle trajectory model
• Follow directions of airflow model
• Travel in a random pattern
• Scarcely touch FII
• Base disk injected particles have higher tendency to touch FII
Acknowledgements
• Special thanks• Industrial System Engineering• Centre of Excellence-Nanotechnology• Donaldson Company
•Admiration and gratitude• Dr. H.T. Luong• Prof Joydeep Dutta• Dr. Pisut Koomsap• Mr. Dan Tuma
• Sincere thanks • Faculty members, staff and students of ISE
• Deepest acknowledgement • Family and friends
Recommendations
• Use very high configuration computer
• Mesh size should be improved & mesh type can be changed
• Physics parameter level can be increased
• Geometric size & position can be changed
• Volumetric airflow and PCU time
• Varying disk speeds & removal of disk separator
• Particle sizes and diameters should be varied more
• One test run:
Particle injection position: top disk-MD, size:10μm & density:7000 kg/m3
EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
VELOCITY PLOTTop disk Base disk
PARTICLE TRAJECTORY MODEL
PARTICLE TRAJECTORY MODEL…
Two models1.Near filter medium injected particles2.Particle injection point similar to PCU test
Trajectory models•Diameter 0.1 & density 1050• Diameter 0.1 & density 2100• Diameter 0.3 & density 1050• Diameter 0.3 & density 2100
24 runs
6 runs