status quo des 'memorandum of understanding' zwischen apmg ... schaden-p2tag-2012.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Status quo des 'Memorandum of Understanding' zwischen APMG und IPMA
Mag. Brigitte Schaden, IPMA Chairman
pma Vorstandsvorsitzende
Köln, 26. April 2012
• IPMA
• Komplexität in Projekten - Zertifizierungslevel
• Vergleichbarkeit von Standards
• Memorandum of Understanding APMG-IPMA
• Ergebnisse und aktueller Status
• Mapping von assessment Methoden
Information: IPMA
ExBo 2011/2012
IPMA Growth 1997-2010 (members)
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
118551330516251
1835822032 23553
2678029942 30290
32769
3818740785
53338 53655
IPMA‘s WorldAfrica
•Egypt•Marocco
•South Africa•Zambia
IPMA‘s World
Asia•Azerbaijan
•China•India•Iran
•Kazakhstan•Nepal
•Taiwan
IPMA‘s World
Australia
IPMA‘s World
Europe•Austria
•BosniaHerzegovina
•Bulgaria•Croatia•Cyprus
•Czech Republic•Denmark•Finland
•France (AFITEP)•France (SMAP)
•Germany•Greece•Hungary•Iceland•Ireland
Europe•Italy
•Kosovo•Latvia
•Lithuania•Netherlands
•Norway•Poland
•Portugal•Romania•Russia•Serbia
•Slovakia•Slovenia
•Spain•Sweden
•Switzerland•Turkey
•United Kingdom•Ukraine
IPMA‘s World
North America•Canada•Mexico
•United States
IPMA‘s World
South America•Brazil•Chile
•Costa Rica•Guatemala
•Panama•Peru
IPMA 4 Level Certification
Warum brauchen wir Standards ?
ISO_PC 236 Group photo at Paris plenary at AFNOR office January 2012 - (photo courtesy Jouko Vaskimo (JV7N0178))
The ICB 3
1.01 Project management success
2.01 Leadership 3.01 Project orientation
1.02 Interested parties
2.02 Engagement & motivation 3.02 Programme orientation
1.03 Project requirements & objectives
2.03 Self-control 3.03 Portfolio orientation
1.04 Risk & opportunity 2.04 Assertiveness 3.04 Project, programme & portfolio implementation
1.05 Quality 2.05 Relaxation 3.05 Permanent organisation
1.06 Project organisation 2.06 Openness 3.06 Business
1.07 Teamwork 2.07 Creativity 3.07 Systems, products & technology
1.08 Problem resolution 2.08 Results orientation 3.08 Personnel management
1.09 Project structures 2.09 Efficiency 3.09 Health, security, safety & environment
1.10 Scope & deliverables 2.10 Consultation 3.10 Finance
1.11 Time & project phases 2.11 Negotiation 3.11 Legal
1.12 Resources 2.12 Conflict & crisis
1.13 Cost & finance 2.13 Reliability
1.14 Procurement & contract 2.14 Values appreciation
1.15 Changes 2.15 Ethics
1.16 Control & reports
1.17 Information & documentation
1.18 Communication
1.19 Start-up
1.20 Close-out
The eye of competence
The purpose of the GLOBAL ALLIANCE FOR
PROJECT PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
initiative is to develop agreed frameworks as a
basis for review, development, and recognition
of local standards that will facilitate mutual
recognition and transferability of projectmanagement qualifications.
Mappings to Other Standards
As part of our work in the GAPPS to promote
transportability & mutual recognition, we mapped
various global standards to the GAPPS standards.
Based on the GAPPS standard this mapping
exercise is done to show which core and commonset of topics the various standards have.
Diversity of Standards for Project Management
ICB 3.0
PMBOK
OPM 3
IPMA-Delta
PM-Kanon
P2M
V-Modell XTPRINCE 2
DIN 69900 / 69901
ISO 10.006
HOAI VOB/FIDIC
Scrum
project excellence
CMMI
SPICE
special Standards
Maturity-Models
De facto Standards
De jure Standards
IEC 62198
VDA 4.3
……
ISO 21.500 ……
PM3
Up until now the following standards have beenmapped to the GAPPS standards:
• AIPM
• ANC SPM
• ICB3
• P2M
• PMBOK 2008
• PRINCE2 2009
• SAQA NQF Level 5
Memorandum of Understanding
• 11th November 2009, Vienna
The International Project Management
Association (IPMA) and The APM Group are
pleased to announce they have signed a Memorandum of Understanding which
will enable the two organizations
to support and recognise each other.
Brigitte Schaden, President of IPMA
Alan Harpham, Chairman, The APM Group
MoU OBJECTIVES• To publicise the mapping between ICB.3® and PRINCE2® as
developed by GAPPS and verified by IPMA® and APM Group.
• To encourage IPMA® members and PRINCE2 qualified people to research and write articles comparing and contrasting the ICB.3 and PRINCE2.
• To recognize that PRINCE2 provides knowledge and understanding of a number of the concepts included in the ICB.3 and in due course IPMA will develop supplementary exams to enable PRINCE2 Practitioners to achieve appropriate IPMA qualifications i.e. at levels C & D.
• To raise awareness of the IPMA member association's individual membership schemes among the APM Group's examination candidates.
• To bring the IPMA® member associations´ corporate membership
schemes to the attention of the APM Group's Accredited Organizations.
• ICB3 - PRINCE 2
PRINCE2-IPMA Syllabus
• “Upgradezertifizierung” von PRINCE2 – Practitioner zu IPMA Level D
• Syllabus
PILOT Project (Poland)
Pilot Project in Poland regarding Bridging Qualification from PRINCE2® Practitioner to IPMA® Level D certification
Start: London , Sept 5th 2011
• The groups for the pilot will be organized by the APMG Accredited Training Organizations
• Training before the session should cover all competence elements taken under consideration in Level “D” assessment.
• Pilot exams to be held in English only, Polish version plannedfor post-pilot
• 4 ATOs are participating in the pilot. 3-4 exam sessions of pilot exams to be organized in 2012
Suggested format of the upgrade certificate
2 written parts: A multiple choice test and an objective test exam
1. Multiple choice9 competence elements from technical competence elements
26 competence elements from contextual and behavioural
competence elements
Duration: 30 minutes
2. Scenario type questionsOTEs - Understanding and application level
Duration : 1 hour
Mapping of Global Certifications and Qualifications
GAPPS has pubished a mapping of the different assessment methods used for the various certificationsand qualifications for project management that are issuedby professional association and governments endorsedinstitutes such as universities and vocational educationproviders. ►
Never give up