statement of consultation - east hampshire of... · basingstoke & deane borough council ... bnp...

Statement

of

Consultation

Proposed Main Modifications Housing and

Employment Allocations

January 2016

jwoodgate1

Typewritten Text

EHALLOC/18

1

Contents 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 2

2.0 Site Allocations Plan Proposed Main Modifications Consultation ................. 2

Who was invited to make representations? ..................................................................... 2

How were they invited to make representations? ............................................................ 2

Summary of comments and how they have been addressed ........................................... 3

Outcome ......................................................................................................................... 3

Appendix A – Consultees

Appendix B – Letter to all consultees

Appendix C – Response form

Appendix D – Deposit locations

Appendix E – Summary of representations received

Appendix F – Schedule of Proposed Main Modifications

Appendix G – Schedule of Proposed Minor Modifications

2

1.0 Introduction

1.1 This statement has been published to accompany the Council‘s Propose Main Modifications on the Submission East Hampshire District Local Plan: Housing and Employment Allocations (Site Allocations Plan).

1.2 The purpose of this statement is to provide a summary of the Councils’ consultation process and outcomes. The statement has been prepared in accordance with the Town and Country (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012.

2.0 Site Allocations Plan Proposed Main Modifications Consultation

2.1 The Site Allocations Plan Proposed Main Modifications was published for public consultation on 23 November and closed at 12 noon on 8 January 2016, lasting for a period of six weeks.

Who was invited to make representations?

2.2 All ‘specific consultation bodies’, ‘general consultation bodies’ and Councillors

were consulted. A full list of those bodies that were sent notification of the public consultation can be found within Appendix A.

2.3 Also all those people who had expressed a wish for their contact details to be

placed on the Council’s Local Plan consultation database were also invited to make representations (approximately 1,000 individuals and organisations). The consultation was open to all members of the public, District Councillors and Parish Council members.

How were they invited to make representations?

2.4 A letter was sent out by email or post to over 1,000 individuals and companies on

the council’s database inviting them to make representations and explaining how to do so by either filling out a response form or writing to us by email or by post. All District Councillors and Parish Councils were also contacted with the same information. The letter sent can be found in Appendix B. A copy of the representations form can also be found in Appendix C.

2.5 All the Plan documents including the Proposed Main Modifications, Site

Allocations Plan, the addendum Sustainability Appraisal and addendum Habitats Regulation Assessment statement were made available to view at the Council Offices as well as several deposit locations across the District (Appendix D).

2.6 All documents were available to download from the Council website

(www.easthants.gov.uk) and details of how to make representations were available.

2.7 Consultees were invited to make representations on the Proposed Main

Modifications only. A schedule of minor modifications, a plan showing the changes and a plan incorporating the changes were also made available.

http://www.easthants.gov.uk/

3

Summary of comments and how they have been addressed

2.8 In total 30 individuals, organisations and statutory consultees commented. 7 representations received did not relate to the Proposed Main Modifications and were rejected by the Council. A written response was sent to each informing them of this. In total 186 comments were accepted on the proposed main modifications, 14 were in support of the changes. Table 1 provides a breakdown of the number of the representations received for each Policy. A summary of the comments received is attached at Appendix E. Appendix E only summarises the sections of representations which relate to the proposed modifications.

Policy Number of responses

Policy EMP1 2

Policy EMP2 16

Policy HN1 31

Policy HN2 5

Policy LP1 18

Policy CF1 9

Policy CF2 2

Policy CF3 3

Policy RC1 8

Policy RC2 16

Policy RC3 4

Policy FM1 3

Policy FM2 3

Policy FM3 7

Policy VL1 2

Policy VL2 4

Policy VL3 5

Policy VL4 5

Policy VL5 4

Policy VL6 5

Policy VL7 4

Policy VL8 3

Policy VL9 2

Policy VL10 4

Policy VL11 3

Policy VL12 2

Policy VL13 4

General 5

Outcome

2.9 The outcome of the consultation has resulted in two of the proposed main

modifications being withdrawn. These are MM53 and MM56 and they have been deleted from the schedule of proposed main modifications attached at appendix F.

2.10 A number of additional Minor Modifications have also been added. A full list of

these is set out in Appendix G.

5

Appendix A – Consultees

Organisation

6a Vision

A.H. Graham & Partners

A.O Broadway

A2 Dominion Group

Adams Hendry Consulting Ltd

Adams Integra

Advoco Planning

Alice Holt Action Group

Alliance Planning

Alton Business Club

Alton Chamber of Commerce

Alton Chamber of Commerce and Industry

Alton Society

Alton Town Council

Alton Town Partnership

Alton Western Bypass Action Group

AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited

Annetts Farm

Applegarth Farm Shop

Ashill Developments

Association of Petersfield Businesses

Aviation Tool Corporation

Barratt Homes (Southampton)

Barton Willmore

Basingstoke & Deane Borough Council

Bedales School,

Bell Cornwell Partnership

Bellway Homes

Bentley Parish Council

Bentworth Parish Council

Bighton Parish Council

Blackburne & Haynes

Blackmoor Apple Shop

Blackmoor Estates Ltd

Blackmoor Game Ltd

Blue Sky Planning Ltd

BNP Paribas Real Estate

Bonnington Architects Ltd

Bordon Area Action Group

Bordon Area Action Group

Bovis Homes (SE Region)

Bowtell's Farm Shop

6

Boyer Planning

Boyes Turner Solicitors

Bradbeer Planning Ltd

Bradley Parish Meeting

Bramdean & Hinton Ampner Parish Council

Bramshott & Liphook Parish Council

Bramshott & Liphook Preservation Soc

British Telecommunications Plc

Brocks Farm Shop

Brookworth Homes Ltd

Bryan Jezeph Consultancy

Buriton Parish Council

Business East Hants

C J Butler Farms Ltd

Calleva Medical Ltd

Campaign for Real Ale (CAMRA) East Hampshire

Campaign for Real Ale Ltd

Candovers Parish Council

Carter Jonas

Catherington Village Residents' Assoc

CB Richard Ellis

Celab Limited

CGMS Consulting

Chawton Parish Council

Chawton Parish Plan Committee

Chawton Park Farm

Chichester District Council

Churt Parish Council

Civil Aviation Authority

Clarke Gammon Wellers

Cluttons LLP

Colliers CRE

Community Action Hampshire

Community First East Hampshire

Community Response

Compton Parish Council

Connell Land & Planning

Corrie & Co Ltd

Country Landowners & Business Association

Country Markets

Countrywide

CPRE (East Hants Branch)

CPRE (Hampshire)

Crest Nicholson

Crondall Parish Council

Crown Estates

7

Cyclists Touring Club Right to Ride

D & M Planning Partnership

Dalton Warner Davis LLP

David Ames Associates

David Wilson Homes Southern

DCM (Tews) Ltd

Deadwater Valley Trust

Defence Estates - South West

Denmead Parish Council

DHA Planning & Development

Dialogue Communicating Planning

Dockenfield Parish Council

Dr June Chatfield

Drivers Jonas LLP

DTZ

Durleighmarsh Farm Shop

East Hampshire Association of Parish and Town Councils

East Hampshire Cyclists Forum

East Hampshire Disability Forum

East Hampshire District Council

East Tisted Village Stores

Eastleigh Borough Council

Elstream Developments

Energy Alton

English Hampshire Lavender

English Heritage (Southern Region)

Entec UK Ltd

Environment Agency

Estate Office

F. R. Northcott

Farm Manager

Farnham Town Council

Farringdon Parish Council

Fight4FourMarks

fit2cook

Foreman Homes

Forestry Commission

Forge Farm

Format Milton Architects Ltd

Four Marks Parish Council

Frensham Parish Council

Friends, Families, Travellers and Law Reform Project

Froxfield Parish Council

G L Hearn

General Secretary Showmens Guild of Gt Britain

Genesis Town Planning

8

Gladman Developments

Goadsby & Harding (Commercial) Ltdb

Gosport Borough Council

Grange Farm Shop

Grayshott Hall Health Centre

Grayshott Pottery

Grayshott Society

GVA Grimley Ltd

Hambledon Parish Council

Hammer Trout Farm & Smokery

Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust

Hampshire Chamber of Commerce

Hampshire Constabulary

Hampshire Constabulary Property Services

Hampshire County Council

Hampshire County Youth Service

Hampshire No 2 Circuit of Jehovah's Witnesses

Hampshire Playing Fields Assc

Hampshire Police Authority

Hampshire Primary Care Trust

Hansus Cottage Produce

Hants Farming & Wildlife Advisory Group

Hart District Council

Harting Parish Council

Haslemere Town Council

Havant Borough Council

Headley Down Community Association

Headley Parish Council

Henry Adams Planning Ltd

Herriard Parish Council

Hewetts Solicitors

Highways Agency

Hollywater Society

Holybourne Residents Association

Home Builders Federation

Homes & Communities Agency

Homes and Communities Agency (HCA)

Horndean Business Group

Horndean Parish Council

Hotel Solutions

Howard Hutton & Associates

Hyden Farm Organics

Ian Judd & Partners LLP

J & K Walther

J E Boyson & Son

J G Luff

9

J Rook Manor Farm Ltd

J S Evans Farm

John R Nicholson

Johnson Designs

Kevin Scott Consultancy

Kingsbridge Homes

Kirkwells

Knight Frank LLP

Laleham Healthcare PLC

Lambert Smith Hampton (NOMS)

Leith Planning

LEVVEL

Linchmere Parish Council

Lindford Parish Council

Liss & Liphook Surgeries

Liss Forest Residents Association

Liss Parish Council

Liss Village Design Group

Long Sutton Parish Council

Lucas Land and Planning

Luken Beck Ltd

M J Tosdevine & Son

M L Wilson & Son Ltd

Maltby Engineers Limited

Martin Critchley Associates

Martin Robeson Planning Practice

Martineau

Matthew Utting

MB Planning & Prows Ltd

McKenzie Brothers

Medstead Parish Council

Mill Farm Organic

Milland Parish Council

Ministry of Defence

Mobile Operators Association (MOA)

Mono Consultants Ltd

Mr Richard Stubbs

Mr Whitehead's Cider Company

MV & VH Povey

National Farmers Union

National Federation of Gypsy Liaison Groups

National Grid PLC

National Landlord's Association

National Trust

Natural England

Neame Sutton Ltd

10

Network Rail Property

New Forest District Council

NMB Planning Ltd

North Hampshire CCG

Northern Wey Trust

Northington Parish Council

Old Alresford Parish Council

Old Thorns Golf and Country Estate

Open Spaces Society

P G Lambert & Son

Paris Smith & Randall LLP

Peacock & Smith

Peak Quality Homes

Peter Brett Associates

Petersfield & District CAB

Petersfield Area Historic Society

Petersfield Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group

Petersfield Society

Petersfield Tomorrow

Petersfield Tomorrow Town Design Statement Group

Petersfield Town Council

Phillips & Son Ltd

Planning Potential Ltd

PlanningSphere Ltd

Pollen Organics

Portsmouth City Council

Portsmouth Water plc

Preston Candover & Nutley Parish Council

ProVision Planning & Design

PRP Architects

Pub With No Name

PUSH

Queen Elizabeth Country Park

Radian

Rail Regional Policy & Deliv Dept of Transport Rail Groupart

Reed Farm Partnership

Reside Developments Ltd

Residents of Eastland Gate

Richard Ashby Associates

Robert Tutton

Rogate Parish Council

Roger Hill Architects

Ropley Society

Rother Valley Organics

Rowlands Castle Association

Rowlands Castle Parish Council

11

Rowledge Resdents' Association

Royal Mail Estates

RPS Planning

RSPB

Rushmoor Borough Council

Rydon Homes

S R Wittcomb

S. W Budden

Savills

Scott Brownrigg & Turner

Scottish & Southern Energy

Selborne Brickworks

Selborne Parish Council

Selborne Village Shop

Sheet Village Association

Sigma Planning Services

Simmons & Sons

Smiths Gore

Society of Sussex Downsmen

Somerfield

South Downs Gospel Hall Trust

South Downs Joint Committee

South Downs National Park Authority

South Downs Society

South East Hampshire CCG

South East Water

South Warnborough Parish Council

South West Trains

Southern Gas Networks (formerly Transco)

Southern Planning Practice

Southern Water Services

Sovereign Kingfisher

Sport England (SE Region)

Stewart Ross Associates

Stoughton Parish Council

Strutt & Parker

Surrey County Council

Susan Organ

Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land

Telecom Securicor Cellular Radio (Cellnet)

Terence O'Rourke

Test Valley Borough Council

TFA Ltd

The Courtyard Community Village Shop

The Environment Centre

The Good Intent

12

The Petersfield School

The Planning Bureau Ltd

The Secretary Alton & District Sports Council

The Selborne Arms

The Theatres Trust

The Waterlooville Trust

Thomas Eggar LLP

Tilford Parish Council

Timms Turkeys

Tourism South East

Town and Country Planning Association

Triple FFF Brewing

Turley Associates

Upton Grey Parish Council

Urban DNA

Vail Williams LLP

W A Wood

Waggoners Wells Residents Association

Waverley Borough Council

West Meon Parish Council

West Sussex County Council

West Waddy ADP

Westella

Weston Corbett & Weston Patrick Parish Meeting

White Young Green

Whitehill & Bordon Town Partnership

Whitehill Town Council

Winchester City Council

Woolf Bond LLP

Woolmer Service Station Ltd

Worldham Parish Council

13

Appendix B – Letter to all consultees Dear Sir/Madam, The modifications on the Council’s Local Plan: Housing and Employment Allocations (Site Allocations Plan) are now out for public consultation. As part of the examination process, East Hampshire District Council has prepared a number of suggested changes to the plan, known as 'proposed modifications'. These modifications fall into two types: 'minor modifications', which if implemented would not significantly change the meaning of the Site Allocations Plan and generally cover typographical errors or factual updates. However, the second type known as 'main modifications' are more substantial in that, for example, they would change the meaning of a policy or proposal in the plan. In addition to the 'main modifications' the Council produced a separate schedule of 'minor modifications'. However, these are for information only and do not form part of the consultation. The Inspector asked that the schedule of 'main modifications' be subject to a six week period of consultation: this consultation runs from 23 November 2015 to 12 noon on 8 January 2016. The schedule of proposed main modifications can be found on the Councils website at http://www.easthants.gov.uk/planning-policy/ehdc-local-plan-housing-and-employment-allocations-examination. The Inspector will consider all comments made on these main modifications prior to issuing his final recommendations in the form of an Inspector's Report. Please note comments will only be considered that refer to a change as shown in the Schedule of Main Modifications. Representations can be made by completing a response form and emailing to [email protected] or by writing to Planning Policy, East Hampshire District Council, Penns Place, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU31 4EX. Only those representations that are made in writing and are received by the Council within the six week period ending noon on Friday 8 January 2016 will be considered. If you would like any more information on the Site Allocations Plan, its associated documents or the Local plan process then please contact the Planning Policy team on 01730 234280 or visiting the Council’s website at http://www.easthants.gov.uk/planning-policy/local-plan-housing-and-employment-allocations-examination-library. Yours Faithfully,

Victoria Potts Planning Policy Team Manager

http://www.easthants.gov.uk/planning-policy/ehdc-local-plan-housing-and-employment-allocations-examination

http://www.easthants.gov.uk/planning-policy/ehdc-local-plan-housing-and-employment-allocations-examination

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.easthants.gov.uk/planning-policy/local-plan-housing-and-employment-allocations-examination-library

http://www.easthants.gov.uk/planning-policy/local-plan-housing-and-employment-allocations-examination-library

14

Appendix C – Response form

East Hampshire District Council Housing and Employment Allocations Plan (Site Allocations Plan) Main Modifications consultation 23 November 2015 – 8 January 2016 Main Modifications Consultation Form The East Hampshire District Housing and Employment Allocations Plan Schedule of Main Modifications (SASMM) includes a series of changes to the published Plan. These suggested changes are being consulted on for a period of six weeks. For advice on how to respond to the consultation, and how to fill in this form please see the guidance notes on the Council’s Housing and Employment Allocations Plan (Site Allocations Plan) website: http://www.easthants.gov.uk/planning-policy/local-plan Submitting comments: Please fill in this form and return:

Via email to: [email protected]

By posting to: Planning Policy Team

East Hampshire District Council Penns Place Petersfield Hampshire GU31 4EX

Comments must be received by 12 noon on 8 January 2016. Comments

received after this time will not be accepted and will not be considered by

the Inspector.

Please fill a separate form for each Main Modification you are commenting on.

Please clearly identify which Main Modification your comments refer to using the

reference (i.e. MM1, MM2 etc.) in the SASMM.

For East

Hampshire use

Respondent no:

Representation

no:

http://www.easthants.gov.uk/planning-policy/local-plan


15

Please do not repeat your previous comments as these have already been

considered by the Planning Inspector. Comments will only be considered that

refer to a change as shown in the SASMM.

All comments received on the proposed changes within the time period will be

considered by the Planning Inspector as part of the examination of the Site

Allocations Plan. The Inspector may wish to contact you to discuss your

comments and concerns, prior to concluding the formal examination into the Plan.

The personal information will only be used for purposes related to the consultation

and the Site Allocations Plan examination. The Council will place all the

representations and the names of those who made them on its website, but will

not publish personal information such as telephone numbers, emails or private

addresses. However other information will be shared with the Planning Inspector.

The information relating to your comments on the Main Modification (Part B) will

be published on the Site Allocations Plan examination webpage.

A) Your details:

1) Who is making this representation?

Name:

Organisation (if applicable):

Address:

Email:

Telephone:

Client’s details (only applicable if you are acting as agent on behalf of another person or business)

Name:

Organisation (if applicable):

Address:

Email:

Telephone:

16

B) Your representations: What do you wish to object to/support?

Please use a separate form for each Main Modification you wish to comment on. Only comments relating to a proposed Main Modification will be considered.

1) Please give the Main Modification reference your comment relates to.

Main Modification reference - MM:

2) Do you consider the proposed Main Modification addresses the following

issues in relation to the policies concerned?

Yes No Legally compliant Positively prepared Justified Effective Consistent with national policy

3) If you have answered ‘no’ to any of the above please specify your reason for

objecting below. You should make clear why the Main Modification is either

not legally compliant and/or unsound having regard to whether the

modification is not: positively prepared; justified; effective; or, not

consistent with national policy. Please see guidance notes for explanation of

these terms:

Continue on a separate sheet if necessary

17

4) Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the East

Hampshire Housing and Employment Main Modification legally compliant

and/or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested

revised wording of any policy or text. Please be as precise as possible.

Continue on a separate sheet if necessary.

Please note you should cover all the information, evidence and supporting information necessary to justify the representation and the suggested change. After this stage, further submissions will only be accepted at the request of the Inspector. You must return this form by 12 noon on Friday 8 January 2016. You can e-mail it to: [email protected] Or return by post to:

Planning Policy,

East Hampshire District Council

Penns Place

Petersfield

Hampshire

GU31 4EX


18

Appendix D – Deposit locations Deposit Locations: 1. Planning Reception, Monday - Friday East Hampshire District Council, 09:00 am - 05:00 pm Penns Place, Petersfield, Hants

GU31 4EX 2. Alton Information Office, Monday - Friday 7 Cross and Pillory Lane, 09:00 am - 04:30 pm Alton, Hants GU34 1HL. (Closed 01:00 pm - 01:30 pm) Saturdays 09.30 am - 12.00pm 3. Bordon Information Office Monday - Friday Forest Community Centre, 09:00 am - 04:45 pm Pinehill Road, Bordon, Hants (Closed 01:00 pm - 01:30 pm) GU35 0BS 4. Horndean Parish Office, Monday - Friday Tyfield House, 09:00 am - 04:30 pm Blendworth Lane, Horndean, Hants. PO8 0AA 5. Bramshott and Liphook Parish Monday - Friday Office, The Haskell Centre, 10:00 am - 04:00 pm Midhurst Road, Liphook, Hants. (Closed 01:00 pm - 02:00 pm) GU30 7TN 6. Local Libraries at Alton, Bordon, During normal opening hours Horndean,

Liphook and Petersfield.

Appendix E

Response number Rep Made Agent/Organsiation Obo? Modification

number Policy Summary of response

22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 3 EMP1

HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.


Both originally included site specific clauses to improving bus stops and public transport and should be retained as it will guide applicant in preparing acceptable development proposals. Although the removal is justified by CP31, the suggested modification is not recommended and HCC does not agree with the Inspector as CP31 is a general policy and does not help developers in preparing acceptable development proposals for these two sites.

3 Ian Sowerby Bell Cornwell Lamron Estates Ltd 11 EMP2

An outline application was submitted on 27th Nov in the knowledge of the proposed modifications to policy ENP2 and make it more likley that the development will proceed in the short term. Our clients maintain their support for EMP2 as proposed to be modified.


This site has the potential to impact upon operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site needs to be considered in this regard because both proposed employment allocations lie within the MWCA for the Alton HWRC and a safeguarded minerals and waste transfer station.





Appendix E






Both originally included site specific clauses to improving bus stops and public transport and should be retained as it will guide applicant in preparing acceptable development proposals. Although the removal is justified by CP31, the suggested modification is not recommended and HCC does not agree with the Inspector as CP31 is a general policy and does not help developers in preparing acceptable development proposals for these two sites.













Appendix E







14 David Neame Neame Sutton Southcott Homes (Fareham) Ltd 18 HN1

The modifications concern fundamental components of the scheme that have not been properly assessed and as a consequence are likely to lead to the inability of the site to deliver the level of development the Council is relying on. The 820 dwellings now proposed have not been properly tested in terms of its sustainability credentials. The Council have a proved need for specialist elderly accommodation pver and above its OAN. 40 sink holes on the site will restrict the ability to deliver the projected totals and to increase the housing densities elsewhere on the site has not been tested. The Council has failed to provide confirmation as to how the later phases of the site will be delivered in terms of highway and access requirements. The above points call into question the deliverability of the entire allocation of dwellings proposed during the plan period and its current 5YHLS.

22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 18 HN1

This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.



Appendix E











Appendix E

15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife

Trust26 HN1

By removing mention of the Bechstein's bat the species will not be fully protected. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site. Specific measures for the protection of Bechstein's bat and the maintentance and management of supporting habitat/foraging corridors will be required".

21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 26 HN1

The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.



11 Clare Gibbons Southern Water 27 HN1

New/improved sewerage sewerage infrastructure will be required to serve the proposed development to ensure the risk of foul water flooding does not increase. We consider the proposed modification to remove the requisite criteria a retrograde step and not consistent with national policy. JCS CP26 is a general policy and does not accommodate this proposed development.

18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 27 HN1

Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".



Appendix E









Appendix E



12 Martin Small Historic England 30 HN1

This modification would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully managed and would weaken the protection HN1 affords to potential remains. Retain the wording "provide for the retention and careful management of....".





10 Gill Foster Horndean PC 31 HN1Council express overall agreement but wish to express disappointment with the deletion of paragraphs q + r.



10 Gill Foster Horndean PC 32 HN1Council express overall agreement but wish to express disappointment with the deletion of paragraphs q + r.



21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 36 HN2Appears to be a modification of a landscaping criterion to refelct the permission already granted in the policy.

Appendix E


Trust37 HN2

No definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision needs to be made for the on-going management and monitoring of key species. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity, Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority species and habitats on the site".

21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 37 HN2The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.





20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 41 LP1 The proposed wording is supported.

20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 42 LP1The proposed amended wording regarding mitigation against negative traffic impact is supported.

22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 42 LP1

HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for this site. The original wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed wording is unhelpful and HCC recommend that the previous wording should be retained.

20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 43 LP1The proposed amended wording regarding on-site movement is supported.

Appendix E


Trust44 LP1

No definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision needs to be made for the on-going management and monitoring of key species. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity, Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority species and habitats on the site".

20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 44 LP1The proposed amended wording regarding a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme is supported.

21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 44 LP1The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.


Trust45 LP1

Welcome the inclusion of this wording but suggest a revision to the wording to ensure that mitigation measures are robust and effective. Consider the best approach for protecting the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 SPA would be to adopt a strategic approach as per Thames Basin Heaths SPA. Suggested revision of wording "provide robust and effective measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 SPA".

17 Heather Richards RSPB 45 LP1

Proposed wording "provide adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects, through in-combination effects of additional dwellings on the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA to be set out in a strategic mitigation strategy".

20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 45 LP1The proposed amended wording regarding mitigation against adverse impact on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 is supported.

20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 46 LP1The removal of the reference to the FRA from this policy is supported.

9 Gina Spencer Bramshott & Liphook PC 46 LP1

Want to reinstate (f) provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Incorporate measures to ensure new development is avoided in low lying areas and that there is adequate provision for sewerage. JCS (CP26) gives no protection to property owners and the onus should be on the developer to ensure there is no detrimental effect on wider community. Emailed to advise no regard will be given to 'Amendments' and 'Add' sections within their response.

20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 47 LP1The removal of the reference to provide infrastructure for sewerage (on and off site) from this policy is supported.

9 Gina Spencer Bramshott & Liphook PC 47 LP1

Want to reinstate (f) provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Incorporate measures to ensure new development is avoided in low lying areas and that there is adequate provision for sewerage. JCS (CP26) gives no protection to property owners and the onus should be on the developer to ensure there is no detrimental effect on wider community. Emailed to advise no regard will be given to 'Amendments' and 'Add' sections within their response.

20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 48 LP1The proposed amended wording regarding noise mitigation is supported.

20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 49 LP1The proposed amended wording regarding land contamination is supported.

20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 50 LP1The removal of the reference to an Energy Strategy is supported as it is acknowledged that this requirement is covered in JCS Policy CP24.

Appendix E

20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 51 LP1

The removal of the reference to the provision of an Employment and Training Agreement is supported as it is acknowledged that this is required through policy CP5 of the JCS.

1 John and Anne Vincent 53 CF1

Down Farm Development site access has been changed to Green Lane only and the reference to the Chalton Lane access has been removed. Proposed wording "provide vehicular access to the site via Green Lane".

22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 54 CF1


1 John and Anne Vincent 56 CF1

The words bowling green and been replaced by tennis courts. This does not reflect the planning permission for the allocation site but for the adjacent site. Proposed wording "provide public open space to include allotments, tennis courts, sports pitches, a sports pavillion and children's play facilities".


Trust57 CF1

There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".

18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 58 CF1


11 Clare Gibbons Southern Water 59 CF1


Appendix E

18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 59 CF1


12 Martin Small Historic England 60 CF1

This modification would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully managed and would weaken the protection CF1 affords to potential remains. Retain the wording "provide for the retention and careful management.



21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 67 CF2Is the removal of a landscaping criterion because it is considered to be covered by JCS Policy CP29.


Trust68 CF2



Trust74 CF3


21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 74 CF3


Appendix E



21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 80 RC1 Seems to be a weakening of the existing policy condition.

12 Martin Small Historic England 81 RC1

This modification would remove the requirement for an applicant to demonstrate through a heritage statement the impact of development on this site. It would also remove the helpful suggestion of early consultation with Historic England and HCC. The proposal is inadequate as it only requires any adverse impact to be "mitigated". This would weaken the protection RC1 affords to heritage assets. The SA Addendum fails to to identify the full extent of the proposed changes but still concludes that this modification would have negative implications for heritage. Retain the existing wording of criterion e of Policy RC1.


Trust82 RC1


21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 82 RC1


17 Heather Richards RSPB 83 RC1

We disagree with the modifications to remove commitment to the Solent Mitigation Strategy as appropriate mitigation for recreational in-combination impacts on the Solent SPAs, SACs and Ramsar sites. These modifications raise concerns about the deliveray of these houses without the commitment to the Solent Mitigation Strategy to mitigation recreational distubance on the SPA. Maintain the current wording, do not utilise the text proposed.

Appendix E

18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 84 RC1




11 Clare Gibbons Southern Water 86 RC1


22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 89 RC2

This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.



Appendix E








Trust93 RC2

By removing mention of the Bechstein's bat the species will not be fully protected. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site. Specific measures for the protection of Bechstein's bat and the maintentance and management of supporting habitat/foraging corridors will be required".











Appendix E









11 Clare Gibbons Southern Water 98 RC2




12 Martin Small Historic England 99 RC2

The proposed modification MM30 would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully managed. This would weaken the protection that HN1 affords to potential remains. Retain the wording "provide for the retention and careful management of...".

Appendix E










Trust106 RC3

By removing mention of the Bechstein's bat the species will not be fully protected. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site. Specific measures for the protection of Bechstein's bat and the maintentance and management of supporting habitat/foraging corrifors will be required".





Appendix E



12 Martin Small Historic England 115 FM1

The proposed modification would remove the requirement for the implementation of a programme of archaeological work to establish a record of the potential significance of the site. The reason for this proposed modification is to reflect the planning permission granted for this site. Retain criterion e of Policy FM1.

19 Laura Lax Environment Agency 116 FM1

We are disappointed that many elements of the plan we supported are proposed to be removed. We recognise that policies CP25 and CP26 of the JCS provide a solid direction in policy terms for development in relation to flood risk and water issues but we feel it is important to highlight where these issues need significant consideration.




Trust123 FM2




22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 128 FM3


Appendix E

12 Martin Small Historic England 132 FM3

The proposed modification would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully managed. The reason for this proposed modification is to reflect the planning permission granted for this site. Retain criterion e of Policy FM3.

8 Roy Pullen Medstead PC 132 FM3

There is an inconsistency in the wording - on two different sites but covering the same problem. FM2 - provide improvements to Boyneswood Road bridge. FM3 - provide a segregated footway across Boyneswood Road bridge.


Trust133 FM3


21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 133 FM3






22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 139 VL1


12 Martin Small Historic England 142 VL1

The proposed modification would remove the requirement for an applicant to demonstrate through a heritage statement the impact of the development on this site. The proposed modification is inadequate as it only requires adverse impact to be mitigated and weaken the protection that policy VL1 affords to a nationally important heritage asset. Reword as "provision of a heritage statement to assess the impact of the development on the Bentworth Conservation Area and demonstrate how any impact has been taken into account and avoided or minimised within the proposals".

Appendix E


Trust143 VL1



The proposed modification would remove the requirement for an applicant to demonstrate through a heritage statement the impact of the development on this site. The proposed modification is inadequate as it only requires adverse impact to be mitigated. This would weaken the protection VL2 affords to nationally important heritage assets. Although both the existing criterion d and proposed new criterion e both refer to a Scheduled Ancient Monument, our records do not show any such monuments on or near the allcation site at Crows Lane. Retain the wording "provision of a heritage statement to assess the impact of the development on the setting of the nearby Upper Farringdon Conservation Area and demonstrate hwo any impact has been taken into account and avoided or minimised within the proposals".


Trust150 VL2


21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 150 VL2




2 Angela Jackson 156 VL3

The deletion of the sentence 'This should include measures to minimise the impact of development on existing woodland, mature trees and hedgerows within the site' has a specific significance not covered by the substituted text. It was not mentioned at the Examination that these words would be cut out, vitial to preserve the character of the local area. I request that the deleted sentence be re-instated to say "the existing woodland, mature trees and hedegrows must be protected".

Appendix E


Trust156 VL3





Trust157 VL3


17 Heather Richards RSPB 157 VL3





Trust164 VL4





Trust165 VL4


Appendix E






Trust172 VL5





The proposed modification would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully managed. This would weaken the protection Policy VL5 affords to potential archaeological remains on the site. The SA Addendum concludes that this modification would have negative implications for heritage. Retain the wording "provide for the retention and careful management of...".




Trust181 VL6


Appendix E




Trust182 VL6




6 Nick StenningMedstead and Four Marks

Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group

186 VL7

It is the view of the Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group that we do not think that this reworded criterion will address the adverse traffic impacts from development of this site.




Trust188 VL7






Appendix E


Trust196 VL8





HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original


Trust202 VL9





Trust209 VL10





The proposed modification would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully managed. This would weaken the protection Policy VL10 affords to potential archaeological remains on the site. Retain the wording " provide for the retention and careful management...".

Appendix E




Trust216 VL11







Trust222 VL12




Appendix E


Trust229 VL13





The proposed modification would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully managed. This would weaken the protection Policy VL13 affords to potential archaeological remains on the site. The SA Addendum concludes that this modification would have negative implications for heritage. Retain the wording "provide for the retention and careful management of...".

4 R Bowery Liss Parish Council Support

The proposed modifications were considered at our Planning Committee on 7th December & LPC comments that it welcomes the modifications.

7 Pat Harris Alton Town Council SupportThe Planning and Transportation Committee Members agreed they had no comment to make.

13 Dr Pauline HolmesDorset, Hampshire & IOW

Area Team for Natural EnglandSupport

We have reviewed these modifications and have no comments to make.

16 Patrick Blake Highways England Support

We have reviewed the modifications and have no comment at this time

23 Lucy Howard South Downs National Park SupportThe NPA does not have any comments to make on the Main Modifications.

Appendix F

Main Mod

no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan

Current wording Proposed wording Reason

MM1 EMP1 14

An overall site area of 9.4ha is allocated to accommodate

about 7ha of employment land. The site will be developed in

accordance with the following site specific criteria:



accordance with the following site specific criteria.

Development shall:

To make the policy development

specific.

MM2 EMP1 a a 14 provision of vehicular priority access from Waterbrook Road; provide vehicular access to the site; Provides flexibility.

MM3 EMP1 b b 14implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic

impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;

ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on

the local road network;Clarification.

MM4 EMP1 c 14 consider improving access to public transport; DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP31.

MM5 EMP1 d c 14

include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to

existing external routes including the Public Right of Way

network;

provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential

users, linked to existing external routes including the Public

Rights of Way network;

Clarification.

MM6 EMP1 e d 14

provision of appropriate landscaping and screening to

minimise the impact of development on the setting of Alton

and the surrounding area;

provide landscaping and screening to minimise the impact of

development on the setting of Alton;Consistency.

MM7 EMP1 h 14

provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should

include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. The site should

be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater

than the run-off prior to development taking place;

DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25.

MM8 EMP1 i 14

investigation of the extent and type of any contamination on

the site and identify any necessary mitigation measures

required;


MM9 EMP1 j 14

ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied

unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,

working with the District Council; and


MM10 EMP1 k 14provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior

to the implementation of development.DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP5.

MM11 EMP2 16



accordance with the following site specific criteria:



accordance with the following site specific criteria.

Development shall:


specific.

MM12 EMP2 b 16implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic




MM13 EMP2 c 16 enhance the bus facilities on Wilsom Road; DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP31.

MM14 EMP2 e 16maintain the footpath through Lynch Hill and retain the rural

entrance to it;DELETE Covered by new criteria c.

MM15 EMP2 i g 16


show that any loss of floodplain can be fully compensated.

Details should also include a Surface Water Disposal

Strategy. The site should be attenuated to ensure that the

run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development

taking place;

fully compensate any loss of floodplain; Site specific issue and remainder

covered by JCS Policy CP25.

MM16 EMP2 j 16





MM17 EMP2 k 16provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior


MM18 HN1 • extra care provision for the elderly;• a Care Village including independent living units and extra

care provision for older people

Clarification and reflecting

planning application.

Appendix F

Main Mod

no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MM19 HN1 • a new 2FE primary school. • a new primary school and land for future expansion.

MM20 HN1The site will be developed in accordance with the following

site specific criteria:

The site will be developed in accordance with the following

site specific criteria. Development shall:


specific

MM21 HN1 c c 21provision of community facilities, including a two form entry

primary school, community centre and convenience shop;

provide community facilities, including a primary school,

community centre and convenience shop;Consistency.

MM22 HN1 d d 21

provision of vehicular access to all residential and

employment areas of the site, including access from

Rowlands Castle Road to serve land north of

Rowlands Castle Road and access from the B2149 (Havant

Road) to serve land north-east and south-west of Havant

Road;

provide vehicular access from Rowlands Castle Road to

serve land north of that road only and access from the B2149

(Havant Road) to serve the remainder of the site;

Site specific requirement to

reflect planning permission.

MM23 HN1 e e 21

provision of measures to reduce the traffic impacts of the

development on adjoining residential roads and improve

accessibility by non-car transport modes including the

provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to


network and provision over the A3)M) Junction 2, and the

ability to service the site by public transport;


the local and strategic road network;Clarification.

MM24 HN1 f f 21

provision of new footpaths through the site to link with

Horndean Village, Hazleton Common and the South Downs

National Park;



Right of Way network, Horndean Village, Hazleton Common

and the South Downs National Park;

Clarification and consistency.

MM25 HN1 i i 21

include appropriate green infrastructure provision creating

connections to the wider green infrastructure network,

including improving the habitat connectivity between the

adjoining SINCs (Redcroft Row, Hazelton Common, Pyle

Farm Meadow South and The Holt);

provide new green infrastructure to connect with the wider

network, and to improve the habitat connectivity between the

adjoining SINCs;

Clarification.

MM26 HN1 j j 21

implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation

Scheme. This should include measures to protect key

species and habitats including Bechstein Bats, woodland and

mature trees on the site. Where adverse impacts are

unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;

be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation

Scheme and include measures to protect key species and

habitats on site;

Clarification.

MM27 HN1 k 21


include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential

measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built

development is avoided in low lying areas where surface

water flooding is more likely to occur and the site should be

attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than

the run-off prior to development taking place. Water should

also be directed away from the most sensitive areas of the

site identified in order to protect the aquifer;

DELETECovered by JCS Policy CP25 and

by new criteria K.

MM28 HN1 l k 21

demonstrate that any development will not result in

contamination of groundwater as the site lies within

groundwater source protection zone 1;

not result in contamination of the aquifer or groundwater

(including turbidity). Site specific issue.

Appendix F

Main Mod

no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MM29 HN1 o m 21

investigation of the extent and type of contamination on the

site including any potential contamination from the adjacent

historic landfill sites, to identify any necessary mitigation

measures required;

ensure risks from land contamination are minimised, through

remediation works; andClarification.

MM30 HN1 p n 21

provide for the retention and careful management of any

important archaeological remains, within and adjacent to the

site, in a manner appropriate to their significance;

manage important archaeological remains within the site. Clarification.

MM31 HN1 q 21





MM32 HN1 r 21provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior


MM33 HN2

Land at Lovedean Lane is allocated for residential

development for about 40 dwellings on 2.5ha.



Land at Lovedean Lane is allocated for residential





specific.

MM34 HN2 b b 22implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic



the local road network;Clarification

MM35 HN2 c c 22



network including retention of and connection to the public

footpath along the northern edge of the site;



Rights of Way network and the public footpath along the

northern edge of the site;


MM36 HN2 d d 22

respond positively to the sensitive rural landscape character

to the western boundary and strengthen the green

infrastructure connections linking the wider area;

provide semi-natural open space along the western boundary

and strengthen links to the wider green infrastructure network;To reflect planning permission

MM37 HN2 e e 22


Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the

impact of development on protected trees, including veteran

tree and woodland and hedgerows. Where adverse impacts

are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;



habitats on site; and

Clarification.

MM38 HN2 f 22


include a Foul and Surface Water Disposal Strategy.

Potential measures should be incorporated to address on and

off site drainage works and measures to prevent surface

water from the site discharging onto the adjacent highway.

The site should attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no

greater than the run-off prior to development taking place.

Water should also be directed away from the most sensitive

areas of the site identified in order to protect the aquifer;

DELETECovered by JCS Policy CP25 and

by new criteria f.

MM39 HN2 g f 22



groundwater source protection zone 1; and

not result in contamination of the aquifer or groundwater

(including turbidity). Site specific issue.

MM40 HN2 h 22



working with the District Council.


Appendix F

Main Mod

no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MM41 LP1 24

Land at Lowsley Farm, south of the A3 is allocated for

residential development for about 175 dwellings on 10.8ha.


site specific criteria

Land at Lowsley Farm, south of the A3 is allocated for





specific.

MM42 LP1 b b 24

implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic

impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads

and Longmoor Road;


the local road network including Longmoor Road;Clarification

MM43 LP1 c c 24



network and retain the public right of way in an attractive semi-

natural setting;



Rights of Way network and retain its attractive semi-natural

setting;

Clarification.

MM44 LP1 d d 24



species along the southern boundary and habitats on site

including protected trees, including veteran tree and

woodland. Where adverse impacts are unavoidable,

appropriate mitigation will be required. Any biodiversity

enhancements should take account of the Biodiversity

Opportunity Area;



habitats on site;

Clarification.

MM45 LP1 e e 24

provision of a Screening Assessment as the site is within 5km

of the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA and could potentially

have a significant impact on the ecological integrity of the

SPA. The Assessment should ascertain whether the

provision of adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any

adverse effects is required;

provide adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse

effects on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 Special Protection

Area.

Clarification.

MM46 LP1 f 24







the run-off prior to development taking place;


MM47 LP1 g 24ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on

and off site);DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26.

MM48 LP1 h f 24provision of appropriate noise mitigation measures including

noise bunds and barriers, to reduce traffic noise from A3(M);

provide noise mitigation measures including noise bunds and

barriers, to reduce traffic noise from the A3(M); and Clarification.

MM49 LP1 i g 24investigation of the extent and type of contamination on the

site to identify any necessary mitigation measures required;


remediation works. Clarification.

MM50 LP1 j 24





MM51 LP1 k 24provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior


MM52 CF1 28

Land at Down Farm is allocated for residential development

for about 207 dwellings on 17.8ha.



Land at Down Farm is allocated for residential development

for about 207 dwellings on 17.8ha.




specific.

Appendix F

Main Mod

no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MM54 CF1 b b 28implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic




MM55 CF1 c c 28

include measures to improve accessibility by non-car modes,

the ability to service the site by public transport and ensuring

the connection of the site with existing cycle and pedestrian

routes including connection to the existing cycle route running

alongside the A3 and the Public Right of Way network;


users, linked to existing external routes including the existing

cycle route running alongside the A3;

Consistency.

MM57 CF1 f f 28implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation

Scheme;



habitats on site;

Clarification.

MM58 CF1 g 28







the run-off prior to development taking place. Water should

also be directed away from the most sensitive areas of the

site identified in order to protect the aquifer;

DELETECovered by JCS Policies CP25

and CP26.

MM59 CF1 h 28ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on


MM60 CF1 j h 28





MM61 CF1 k 28





MM62 CF1 l 28provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior


MM63 CF2 30

Land at Drift Road is allocated for residential development for

about 11 dwellings on 0.6ha.



Land at Drift Road is allocated for residential development for

about 11 dwellings on 0.6ha.




specific.

MM64 CF2 a a 30

provision of vehicular access to the site via a new access link

forming a priority junction with Drift Road in the location of the

existing driveway;

provide vehicular access to the site via Drift Road in the

location of the existing driveway;Consistency.

MM65 CF2 b b 30implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic




MM66 CF2 c c 30



network;


users, linked to existing external routes; andClarification.

MM67 CF2 d 30 provision of appropriate landscaping; DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP29.

MM68 CF2 e d 30implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation

Scheme;



habitats on site;

Clarification.

Appendix F

Main Mod

no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MM69 CF2 f 30


include a Foul and Surface Water Disposal Strategy. The site

should be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no

greater than the run-off prior to development taking place;

and


MM70 CF2 g 30





MM71 CF3 31

Land at Trafalgar Rise is allocated for residential




Land at Trafalgar Rise is allocated for residential





specific.

MM72 CF3 b b 31implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic




MM73 CF3 c c 31



network;




Clarification.

MM74 CF3 e e 31



species and habitats that use the site. Where adverse

impacts are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be

required;



habitats on site.

Clarification.

MM75 CF3 f 31



be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than

the run-off prior to development taking place; and


MM76 CF3 g 31





MM77 RC1 32

Land at former Rowlands Castle Brickworks, The Drift is

allocated for residential development for about 34 dwellings

on 1.8ha.



Land at former Rowlands Castle Brickworks, The Drift is


on 1.8ha.




specific.

MM78 RC1 b b 32implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic




MM79 RC1 c c 32



network and to the National Cycle Route 22;



Rights of Way network and the National Cycle Route 22;

Clarification.

MM80 RC1 d d 32

retain and screen the bridleway within a semi-natural setting.

Any residual loss of amenity is to be compensated for by

improvements to the right of way network in the local area;

retain and screen the bridleway within a semi-natural setting. Clarification.

Appendix F

Main Mod

no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MM81 RC1 e e 32

provision of a heritage statement to assess the impact of the

development on the Scheduled Ancient Monument (SAM) of

Rowland’s Castle and the setting of the Conservation Area

and demonstrate how any impact has been taken into

account and avoided or minimised within the proposals. Early

consultation with English Heritage and Hampshire County

Council’s archaeology adviser would be advised;

mitigate any adverse impact on the Scheduled Ancient

Monument of Rowlands Castle and the setting of the

Conservation Area;

Clarification.

MM82 RC1 f f 32

Implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation


species and habitats including Bechstein Bats, protected

trees, including veteran tree and woodland. Where adverse


required;



habitats;

Clarification.

MM83 RC1 g g 32

provision of appropriate mitigation to address the impacts of

recreational disturbance through in-combination effects of

additional dwellings on the Solent SPAs, SACs and Ramsar

sites as set out in the Solent Mitigation Strategy;

provide mitigation to address the impacts of recreational

disturbance, through in-combination effects of additional

dwellings, on the Solent Special Protection Areas (SPAs),

Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) and Ramsar sites; and

Clarification.

MM84 RC1 h 32

provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, including a

Surface Water Disposal Strategy, to address any measures

required to mitigate any potential impacts of groundwater and

surface water flooding including avoiding built development in

low lying areas. The site should also be attenuated to ensure

that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to

development taking place. Water should also be directed

away from the most sensitive areas of the site in order to

protect the aquifer;


and CP26.

MM85 RC1 i 32





MM86 RC1 j 32ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on


MM87 RC1 k h 32

investigation of the extent and type of contamination on the

site to identify any necessary mitigation measures required;

and


remediation works.

MM88 RC1 l 32





MM89 RC2 34

Land south of Oaklands is allocated for residential




Land south of Oaklands is allocated for residential





specific.





MM91 RC2 c c 34



network including access at both Redhill Road and the B2148

and to the existing bridleway and Cycle Route 22 located to

the east of the site;



Rights of Way network, Redhill Road, the B2148 and Cycle

Route 22;

Clarification.

Appendix F

Main Mod

no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MM92 RC2 d d 34improve the pedestrian footway and provide crossing facilities

on the B2148 Whichers Gate Road;

provide crossing facilities on the B2148 Whichers Gate Road

and improve the pedestrian footway;Clarification.

MM93 RC2 e e 34


Scheme which should include a plan to manage, maintain

and enhance the adjacent Oaklands Woodland SINC’s

ecological integrity and interest. The Scheme should also

include measures to protect key species and habitats

including Bechstein Bats, hedgerows and mature trees.

Where adverse impacts are unavoidable, appropriate

mitigation will be required;



habitats on site whilst managing, maintaining and enhancing

the adjacent Oaklands Woodland SINC's; and

Clarification.

MM94 RC2 f 34

provision of a network of green infrastructure that integrates

all existing trees (whether protected or not) with other

vegetation on the site and its boundaries;

DELETE Covered by new criteria e.

MM95 RC2 g f 34








Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) and Ramsar sites.

Clarification.

MM96 RC2 h 34




surface water including avoiding built development in low lying

areas. The site should also be attenuated to ensure that the


taking place. Water should also be directed away from the

most sensitive areas of the site identified in order to protect

the aquifer;


and CP26.

MM97 RC2 i 34





MM98 RC2 j 34ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on


MM99 RC2 k 34




DELETE To reflect planning permission.

MM100 RC2 l 34





MM101 RC2 m 34provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior


MM102 RC3 36

Land north of Bartons Road (Eastleigh House Cottages),

Havant is allocated for residential development for about 17

dwellings on 0.6ha as an extension of proposed housing

development in Havant Borough to the south.



Land north of Bartons Road (Eastleigh House Cottages),

Havant is allocated for residential development for about 17

dwellings on 0.6ha, as an extension of proposed housing

development in Havant Borough.




specific.





Appendix F

Main Mod

no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MM104 RC3 c c 36



network and provide a new pedestrian footpath along Bartons

Road to connect the site to Wakefords Way West and

improvements to the pedestrian crossing on Bartons Road;


users, linked to existing external routes;Clarification.

MM105 RC3 d 36retain the existing Armco vehicle barrier which protects the

railway embankment;DELETE

Vehicle barrier located outside of

District.

MM106 RC3 e d 36


Scheme. This should include the provision of an adequate

wooded buffer to the adjoining SINC and measures to protect

key species and habitats including Bechstein Bats. Where

adverse impacts are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will

be required;


Scheme and measures to protect key species and habitats on

site, whilst providing an adequate wooded buffer to the

adjoining SINC;

Clarification.

MM107 RC3 f e 36








Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) and Ramsar sites; and

Clarification.

MM108 RC3 g 36




surface water including avoiding built development in low lying

areas. The site should also be attenuated to ensure that the


taking place;


MM109 RC3 h 36



groundwater source protection zone 1; and


MM110 RC3 j 36

developers should work with the District Council to ensure

that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied unless it

can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so.


MM111 FM1 38

Land at Lymington Farm is allocated for residential




Land at Lymington Farm is allocated for residential





specific.

MM112 FM1 b b 38implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic




MM113 FM1 c 38provide an assessment of the traffic implications at the nearby

railway bridge;DELETE

To reflect the planning

permission.

MM114 FM1 d c 38



network;



MM115 FM1 e 38

the implementation of a programme of archaeological work to

establish a record of potential archaeological significance of

the site;

DELETETo reflect the planning

permission.

Appendix F

Main Mod

no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MM116 FM1 g e 38




off site drainage works and include measures to prevent

surface water from the site discharging onto the adjacent

highway. The site should be attenuated to ensure that the run-

off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development

taking place;

provide measures to prevent surface water from the site

discharging onto the adjacent highway;


permission.

MM117 FM1 h f 38ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on


MM118 FM1 j 38





MM119 FM1 k 38provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior


MM120 FM2 40

Land at Friars Oak Farm in Medstead is allocated for




Land at Friars Oak Farm in Medstead is allocated for





specific.

MM121 FM2 bensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on

the local road network;Consistency.

MM122 FM2 c d 40



network;




Consistency.

MM123 FM2 d e 40implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation

Scheme;



habitats on site.

Consistency.

MM124 FM2 e f 40








taking place;


discharging onto the adjacent highway.


permission.

MM125 FM2 f 40

developers should work with the District Council to ensure

that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied unless it

can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so; and


MM126 FM2 g 40provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior


MM127 FM3 41

Land North of Boyneswood Lane is allocated for residential




Land North of Boyneswood Lane is allocated for residential





specific.

MM128 FM3 b b 41implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic

impacts of the development on adjoining roads;



Appendix F

Main Mod

no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MM129 FM3 c c 41

improvement works to Boyneswood Lane, Boyneswood Lane

between its junction with footway provision on site and its

junction with Stoney Lane, and to Stoney Lane between its

junction with Boyneswood Lane and its junction with Station

Approach (unless suitable alternatives can be provided);

improve the highway between Boyneswood Lane and Stoney

Lane;Clarification.

MM130 FM3 d d 41



network including the provision of a segregated pedestrian

footway across the Boyneswood Road bridge;



Rights of Way network

Clarification.

MM131 FM4 eprovide a segregated footway across Boyneswood Road

bridge;Clarification and consistency.

MM132 FM3 e 41

the implementation of a programme of archaeological work to

establish a record of potential archaeological significance of

the site; and to identify any necessary mitigation measures

required;

DELETETo reflect the planning

permission.

MM133 FM3 f 41


Scheme. This should include measures to safeguard any

protected species that use the site, minimise the impact of

development on protected trees, including veteran tree and

woodland and hedgerows. Where adverse impacts are




habitats on site;

Clarification.

MM134 FM3 h 41








taking place;


discharging onto the adjacent highway; and


permission.

MM135 FM3 i 41ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage,

water supply and electricity (on and off site);DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26.

MM136 FM3 j 41investigation of the extent and type of contamination on the

site to identify any necessary mitigation measures required;DELETE


permission.

MM137 FM3 l 41





MM138 VL1 44

Land at Ashley Road in Bentworth is allocated for residential




Land at Ashley Road in Bentworth is allocated for residential





specific.

MM139 VL1 b b 44implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic




MM140 VL1 c c 44



network;



Appendix F

Main Mod

no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MM141 VL1 d d 44have a design and layout of high quality and a character

which respects the characteristics of the village;NO CHANGE

MM142 VL1 e e 44provision of a heritage statement to assess the impact of the

development on the nearby Bentworth Conservation Area;

mitigate any adverse impact on Bentworth Conservation Area;

andClarification.

MM143 VL1 f f 44


Scheme. Any biodiversity enhancements should take

account of the Biodiversity Opportunity Area;



habitats on site.

Clarification.

MM144 VL1 g 44









MM145 VL1 h 44ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on

and off site); andDELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26.

MM146 VL1 i 44





MM147 VL2 46

Land at Crows Lane in Upper Farringdon is allocated for




Land at Crows Lane in Upper Farringdon is allocated for





specific.

MM148 VL2 b c 46



network;



MM149 VL2 d e 46

provision of a heritage statement to assess the impact of the

development on the Scheduled Ancient Monument (SAM) and

the setting of the nearby Upper Farringdon Conservation Area

and demonstrate how any impact has been taken into

account and avoided or minimised within the proposals;

mitigate any adverse impact on the Scheduled Ancient

Monument and the setting of the Upper Farringdon

Conservation Area;

Clarification.

MM150 VL2 f g 46



impact of development on existing woodland, mature trees

and hedgerows within the site. Where adverse impacts are




habitats on site.

Clarification.

MM151 VL2 g 46









MM152 VL2 h 46





Appendix F

Main Mod

no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MM153 VL3 48

Land at Headley Nurseries in Headley is allocated for




Land at Headley Nurseries in Headley is allocated for





specific.





MM155 VL3 c c 48



network;



MM156 VL3 e e 48




and hedgerows within the site. Measures to protect key

species and habitats should also be carried out. Where

adverse impacts are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will

be required;




Clarification.

MM157 VL3 f f 48

provision of a Screening Assessment as the site lies within

5km of the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA and could

potentially have a significant impact on the ecological integrity

of the SPA. The Screening Assessment should ascertain

whether the provision of adequate measures to avoid or

mitigate any adverse effects is required;



Area.

Clarification.

MM158 VL3 g 48









MM159 VL3 h 48





MM160 VL4 50

Land at Headley Fields is allocated for residential




Land at Headley Fields is allocated for residential





specific.

MM161 VL4 a a 50

provision of vehicular access to the site from The Paddock

and improvement made to the standard of Headley Fields to

ensure that the link is suitable for use by all modes;

provide vehicular access to the site from The Paddock and

include improvements to the standard of Headley Fields;


permission.





MM163 VL4 c c 50



network;




Clarification.

Appendix F

Main Mod

no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MM164 VL4 e e 50


Scheme. This should include measures to safeguard

protected species that use the site and minimise the impact of

development on the mature trees and hedgerow on the

boundary of the site. Where adverse impacts are





Clarification.

MM165 VL4 f f 50



potentially have a significant impact of the ecological integrity

of the SPA. The Screening Assessment should ascertain

whether the provision of adequate measures to avoid or

mitigate any adverse effects is required;



Area.

Clarification.

MM166 VL4 g 50


include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. This site should




MM167 VL4 h 50





MM168 VL5 52

Land adjacent to Linden, Fullers Road in Holt Pound is


on 0.74ha.



Land adjacent to Linden, Fullers Road in Holt Pound is


on 0.74ha.




specific.

MM169 VL5 a a 52

provision of a priority junction access and ensure any new

direct access does not encroach on the visibility requirements

of adjoining junctions in regular use;

provide vehicular access without direct access onto the A325; Consistency.

MM170 VL5 b b 52implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic



the local road network including the A325;Clarification

MM171 VL5 c c 52



network;


users, linked to existing external routes;Clarification

MM172 VL5 f f 52



impact of development on of existing woodland, mature trees





habitats on site;

Clarification

MM173 VL5 h 52




of the SPA. A Screening Assessment is therefore required to

ascertain whether the provision of adequate measures to

avoid or mitigate any adverse effects is required;

DELETE To correct a factual error.

Appendix F

Main Mod

no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MM174 VL5 i 52



measures should be incorporated to ensure that built





DELETE

MM175 VL5 k i 52



site, in a manner appropriate to their significance; and

manage important archaeological remains within the site. Consistency.

MM176 VL5 l 52





MM177 VL6 54

Land adjacent to Stream Cottage, Fullers Road in Holt Pound

is allocated for residential development for about 5 dwellings

on 0.2ha.



Land adjacent to Stream Cottage, Fullers Road in Holt Pound

is allocated for residential development for about 5 dwellings

on 0.2ha.




specific.

MM178 VL6 a a

provision of vehicular access to the site via Fullers Road;

implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic


Provide vehicular access to the site via Fullers Road. Consistency.

MM179 VL6 b 54ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on


MM180 VL6 b c 54



network;


users, linked to existing external routes;Consistency.

MM181 VL6 d e 54









Consistency.

MM182 VL6 e f 54




of the SPA. The Assessment should ascertain whether the

provision of adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any

adverse effects is required;



Area.

Consistency.

MM183 VL6 f g 54




development is avoided in Flood Zone 3 and low lying areas.

The site should be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is

no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place;

and

DELETE Covered by National Policy

MM184 VL6 g 54





Appendix F

Main Mod

no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MM185 VL7 56

Land to the rear of Junipers in Medstead is allocated for




Land to the rear of Junipers in Medstead is allocated for





specific.





MM187 VL7 c c 56



network;



MM188 VL7 e e 56




and hedgerows within the site. Measures to protect key

species and habitats should be carried out. Where adverse


required;




Clarification

MM189 VL7 f 56





water flooding is more likely to occur. The site should be




MM190 VL7 g 56ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on


MM191 VL7 i 56





MM192 VL8 58

Land to the east of Cedar Stables in Medstead is allocated for




Land to the east of Cedar Stables in Medstead is allocated for





specific.





MM194 VL8 c c 58



network;



MM195 VL8 e e 58the area of land to the north east of the site (west of Trinity

Hill) is to be retained as open space;

provide an area of open space to the north east of the site,

west of Trinity Hill; andClarification.

MM196 VL8 f f 58








habitats on site.

Clarification.

Appendix F

Main Mod

no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MM197 VL8 g 58









MM198 VL8 h 58





MM199 VL9 59

Land north of Towngate Farm House in Medstead is allocated

for residential development for about 4 dwellings on 0.5ha.



Land north of Towngate Farm House in Medstead is allocated

for residential development for about 4 dwellings on 0.5ha.




specific.





MM201 VL9 c c 59



network;


users, linked to existing external routes; andClarification.

MM202 VL9 e e 59


Scheme. This should include measures to retain the

hedgerows bordering the site;



habitats on site.

Clarification.

MM203 VL9 f 59




the run-off prior to development taking;


MM204 VL9 g 59ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on

and off site); andDELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26.

MM205 VL9 h 59





MM206 VL10 60

Land at adjacent to Bullfinches, Park Lane in Ropley is

allocated for residential development for about 7 dwellings on

0.8ha.



Land at adjacent to Bullfinches, Park Lane in Ropley is

allocated for residential development for about 7 dwellings on

0.8ha.




specific.





MM208 VL10 c c 60


existing external routes Including the Public Right of Way

network;



MM209 VL10 e e 60









Clarification.

Appendix F

Main Mod

no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MM210 VL10 f 60









MM211 VL10 g f 60





MM212 VL10 h 60





MM213 VL11 61

Land at the corner of Dunsells Land and Gilbert Street in

Ropley is allocated for residential development for about 15

dwellings on 0.69ha.



Land at the corner of Dunsells Land and Gilbert Street in

Ropley is allocated for residential development for about 15

dwellings on 0.69ha.




specific.





MM215 VL11 c c 61



network;



MM216 VL11 e e 61








habitats on site.

Clarification.

MM217 VL11 f 61









MM218 VL11 g 61





MM219 VL12 62

Land off Hale Close in Ropley is allocated for residential




Land off Hale Close in Ropley is allocated for residential





specific.





Appendix F

Main Mod

no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MM221 VL12 c c 62



network;



MM222 VL12 e e 62implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation

Scheme;




Clarification.

MM223 VL12 f 62









MM224 VL12 g f 62 relocation of the existing allotments; re-provide existing allotments within the village. Site specific requirement.

MM225 VL12 h 62





MM226 VL13 63

Land southwest of Dean Cottage is allocated for residential




Land southwest of Dean Cottage is allocated for residential





specific.





MM228 VL13 d d 63



network;



MM229 VL13 f f 63



impact of development on mature trees (some TPOs) forming

part of existing hedgerows bordering the site. Where adverse


required;




Clarification.

MM230 VL13 g 63





water flooding is more likely to occur. The shite should be




MM231 VL13 h g 63




manage important archaeological remains within the site. Consistency.

MM232 VL13 i 63





Appendix G

Minor

Mod no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MIN1 Sub heading Sub heading 3 What is this about? What is the Housing and Employment Allocations Plan?

Further clarification and update

to take account of status of

document and reflect matters

discussed at Examination.

MIN2 1.1 1.1 3

This is a consultation on the Proposed Submission version of

the Local Plan: Housing and Employment Allocations for East

Hampshire District (areas outside the South Downs National

Park (SDNP)).

The East Hampshire District Local Plan: Housing and

Employment Allocations is the second part in a suite of

development plan documents and follows on from the Joint

Core Strategy.





MIN3 1.2 1.2 3

Proposed Submission means that this is the version of the

Local Plan: Housing and Employment Allocations that the

Council would like to submit to the Secretary of State for

examination. The purpose of the consultation is to obtain

views on the “soundness” of the plan.

Its primary purpose is to identify specific sites to meet the

individual housing and employment targets set out in policies

CP3 and CP10 of the Joint Core Strategy (JCS), and to set

out guidance for the development of these sites.





MIN4 1.3 1.3 3

Throughout the process of preparing the Local Plan: Housing

and Employment Allocations, a significant level of public

consultation has been undertaken. In order to inform

communities of the ongoing planning situation in East

Hampshire District, the Council undertook preliminary

community engagement on the housing and employment site

options covering the whole area outside the SDNP as part of

the draft Plan. A commentary of the events has been

produced into Local Interim Planning Statements (LIPS). The

LIPS events kicked off the plan process and stimulated

significant community interest. Consultation on the draft Plan

took place between December 2014 and February 2015,

comments received during this time have also helped to

develop the Plan.

This Plan uses the same overall housing requirement,

methodology (‘Liverpool’) and buffer (5%) as the JCS. These

have been found sound both at the Examination of the JCS

and at the Examination of the Housing and Employment

Allocations Plan.





MIN5 1.4 1.4 3

This process has ensured that the community, partners and

stakeholders have had the opportunity to influence key

aspects of the Plan. This has been guided by the adopted

Statement of Community Involvement (SCI) and a summary

of the steps undertaken is set out in the Statement of

Consultation which is published alongside the Plan.


Employment Allocations only covers the area of East

Hampshire outside the South Downs National Park (SDNP)

as shown in Map 1. This is because the Park Authority is the

Local Planning Authority for the SDNP and is producing a

separate Local Plan for the whole of the SDNP. For all

information about planning in the National Park please see

the SDNP website http://www.southdowns.gov.uk/planning.





http://www.easthants.gov.uk/ehdc/planningpolicy.nsf/webpages/Site+Allocations+Plan+-+Consultations














http://www.southdowns.gov.uk/planning








Appendix G

Minor

Mod no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MIN6 1.5 1.5 3

The purpose of this stage of consultation is to provide an

opportunity for you to comment on the matters that will be

considered by an Inspector who conducts the examination,

i.e. whether the plan:

a) has been prepared in accordance with the Duty to

Cooperate, legal and procedural requirements, and

b) is “sound‟. Soundness means:

· Positively prepared – the plan should be prepared based on

a strategy which seeks to meet objectively assessed

development and infrastructure requirements, including

unmet requirements from neighbouring authorities where it is

reasonable to do so and consistent with achieving

sustainable development;

· Justified – the plan should allocate the most appropriate

sites, when considered against the reasonable alternatives,

based on proportionate evidence;

· Effective – the plan should be deliverable over its period

and based on effective joint working on cross-boundary

strategic priorities; and

• Consistent with national policy – the plan should enable the

delivery of sustainable development in accordance with the

policies in the National Planning Policy Framework

(Framework).

(Source: paragraph 182 National Planning Policy Framework,

DCLG 2012).

This means taking a disaggregated approach to the supply of

new homes and employment in each Planning Authority

Area, including the calculation of the 5 year housing land

supply.





MIN7 1.6 1.6 4

In preparing the Plan, the Council believes it has complied

with all the necessary legal requirements. In terms of the Duty

to Cooperate, the Council has worked with neighbouring

authorities and has produced a statement of compliance. The

statement provides evidence of how the council has co-

operated with neighbouring authorities and “bodies‟ on

potential cross-boundary issues. The council also believes

that the Plan meets the tests of soundness set out above.

It should be noted that Whitehill & Bordon, and areas covered

by emerging Neighbourhood Plans which allocate homes, do

not form part of this Plan. Further information is set out in

later sections.





MIN8 Sub heading Sub heading 4 What is the Housing and Employment Allocations Plan? delete





Appendix G

Minor

Mod no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MIN9 1.7 1.7 4


Employment Allocations will form part of the Statutory

Development Plan for East Hampshire District. Its primary

purpose is to identify specific sites to meet the individual

housing and employment targets set out in policies CP3 and

CP10 of the Joint Core Strategy (JCS), and to set out

guidance for the development of these sites. It should be

noted that Whitehill & Bordon and areas covered be

emerging Neighbourhood Plans do not form part of this Plan.

Further information is set out in later sections.

For the remainder of this document the East Hampshire

District Local Plan: Housing and Employment Allocations will

be called the Site Allocations Plan.





MIN10 1.8 1.8 4

Upon adoption it will form part of the Development Plan which

will comprise the following:

• Saved Policies of the East Hampshire District Local Plan:

Second Review (March 2006)

• East Hampshire District Local Plan: Joint Core Strategy

(adopted by East Hampshire District Council (May 2014) and

South Downs National Park Authority (June 2014))

• East Hampshire District Local Plan: Housing and


• Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan (October 2013)

• Adopted Neighbourhood Plans

The Site Allocations Plan forms part of the Development

Plan, which will comprise the following:

• Saved Policies of the East Hampshire District Local Plan:

Second Review (March 2006)

• East Hampshire District Local Plan: Joint Core Strategy

(adopted by East Hampshire District Council (May 2014) and

South Downs National Park Authority (June 2014))

• East Hampshire District Local Plan: Housing and


• Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan (October 2013)

• Adopted Neighbourhood Plans





MIN11 1.9 1.9 4

Housing and employment site allocations are currently the

main priority in the planning system and that is why this Plan

focuses on these issues. In the future another part of the

Local Plan that updates the Saved Policies of the East

Hampshire District Local Plan: Second Review will be created

and form part of the Statutory Development Plan. This will

consider further revisions to Settlement Policy Boundaries,

Gaps between settlements, Special Character Areas and

other Development Management Policies.

Housing and employment site allocations are currently the

main priority in the planning system and that is why this plan

focuses on these issues. In the future another part of the

Local Plan that updates the Saved Policies of the East

Hampshire District Local Plan: Second Review will be created

and form part of the Statutory Development Plan. This will

consider further revisions to Settlement Policy Boundaries,

Gaps between settlements, Special Character Areas and

other Development Management Policies.





MIN12 1.10 1.10 5

For the remainder of this document this version of the East

Hampshire District Local Plan: Housing and Employment

Allocations will be called the Proposed Submission Site

Allocations Plan.

Whilst the National Park is a separate authority, East

Hampshire District Council has regard to the statutory

purposes of the National Park under Section 62 of the

Environment Act 1995.





MIN13 1.11 5

It must be noted that the Proposed Submission Site

Allocations Plan only covers the area of East Hampshire

outside the South Downs National Park (SDNP) as shown in

Map 1. Within the SDNP the Park Authority is the Local

Planning Authority and will be producing a separate Local

Plan for the whole of the South Downs National Park. For all

information about planning in the National Park please see

their website http://www.southdowns.gov.uk/planning.

DELETE













Appendix G

Minor

Mod no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MIN14 1.12 5

East Hampshire District Council is however, to have regard to

the statutory purposes of the National Park under Section 62

of the Environment Act 1995.

DELETE





MIN15 1.13 1.11 7

Neighbourhood planning is a new element of the planning

system introduced in 2012 through the Localism Act. A

fundamental principle of neighbourhood planning is that it is

community-led, with the community establishing local

planning policies for development and use of land within its

neighbourhood. Neighbourhood Plans enable local people to

play a leading role in responding to the needs and priorities of

the local community.

NO CHANGE

MIN16 1.14 1.12 7

In East Hampshire District, the appropriate bodies for

producing Neighbourhood Plans are the Town and Parish

Councils. A Neighbourhood Plan must generally conform to

the East Hampshire District Local Plan and can promote

more but not less development than the Local Plan. Once a

Neighbourhood Plan is adopted it will become part of the

Development Plan for the district and will be used to assess

and determine planning applications within the

Neighbourhood Plan’s designated area.

NO CHANGE

MIN17 1.15 1.13 7

In East Hampshire; Alton, Bentley, and Medstead and Four

Marks are the three areas currently designated as

Neighbourhood Plan areas. Where a community is

developing a Neighbourhood Plan that includes housing and

employment allocations and has progressed to consultation

stage, the District Council is not proposing to allocate sites.

In East Hampshire: Alton, Bentley, Ropley and Medstead &

Four Marks are the four areas currently designated as

Neighbourhood Plan areas. Where a community is

developing a Neighbourhood Plan that includes housing and

employment allocations and has progressed to consultation

stage, the District Council is not proposing to allocate sites.





MIN18 1.16 1.14 7

However, if these Neighbourhood Plans do not become

adopted the Council will assess the need for it to identify sites

through a subsequent Development Plan Document (DPD).

NO CHANGE

MIN19 1.17 1.15 7

If further Neighbourhood Plans are prepared in the future and

include site allocations for housing and/or employment and/or

alterations to the Settlement Policy Boundaries, these

neighbourhood plans will supersede this Plan for their

respective designated areas.

NO CHANGE

MIN20 Sub heading What should I look at? DELETE





MIN21 1.18 7

This document includes detailed site allocations and policies

to guide and manage development, deliver infrastructure and

create sustainable communities. These also set out how the

plan will be implemented and monitored.

DELETE





Appendix G

Minor

Mod no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MIN22 1.19 7

A Policies Map accompanies the Plan which sets out on an

Ordnance Survey map base, where development is proposed

and changes to existing Settlement Policy Boundaries.

DELETE





MIN23 1.20 7

Alongside the Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan

there is a Sustainability Appraisal report which explains the

alternatives that were considered for the sites, and the

reasons for the choices made. There is also a Habitats

Regulations Assessment, which looks at the impacts of the

Plan on sites of European nature conservation importance.

DELETE





MIN24 1.21 8

The Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan also reflects

the comprehensive evidence base which has been prepared

and updated to justify the Plan. This covers issues such as

housing land, employment land, flooding, transport,

infrastructure and viability and has been compiled primarily

either by the council or on behalf of the council by specialist

consultants, in conjunction with our partners and statutory

bodies.

DELETE





MIN25 1.22 8

You can see the Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan

and all related documents on our web site at:

www.easthants.gov.uk/draftsiteallocations

DELETE





MIN26 Sub heading 8 How can I get involved? DELETE





MIN27 1.23 8

You can contact us directly as an individual, through being

part of a group such as a residents association or other

community or special interest group, or through your parish

council.

DELETE





MIN28 1.24 8

This can be done by:

(i) using the on-line version of this document and linked

response form OR

(ii) by picking up, filling in and returning one of the response

forms, available from the Council’s website, the Council

offices and deposit locations.

DELETE





MIN29 Sub heading 8 What happens next? DELETE





Appendix G

Minor

Mod no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MIN30 1.25 8

Figure 1 sets out the stages to the Plan. This current

consultation is highlighted. Following consultation the Council

cannot make major changes to the Plan if it intends to submit

it for examination. We will therefore endeavour to resolve

objections through minor changes if necessary, but will then

submit the Plan, the schedule of changes and any

outstanding representations to the Secretary of State (SoS).

The SoS appoints an independent Inspector to conduct an

examination into the soundness of the plan and the Inspector

determines what will be discussed at the examination, and

who should attend.

Figure 1: Illustrates the formal stages the plan is taken

through to adoption in accordance with the Town and Country

Planning (England) Regulations 2012.

DELETE





MIN31 Sub heading Sub heading 9 The East Hampshire Context The East Hampshire Context





MIN32 1.26 1.16 9

The JCS sets out the Council's overall approach towards the

local application of sustainable development through its

objectives and core policies. The JCS was jointly prepared by

East Hampshire District Council (EHDC) and the South

Downs National Park Authority (SDNPA). The National Park

covers 57% of the district and splits the area managed by

East Hampshire District Council into two halves, one south of

the National Park known as the southern parishes and an

area to the north of the National Park. The splitting of the

district into two separate Local Planning Authorities creates

some added complexity for place shaping for example the

main settlements of Petersfield and Liss are both part of East

Hampshire as a place but in planning terms are dealt with

independently by the SDNPA.

NO CHANGE

MIN33 1.27 1.17 10

The JCS is the overarching planning policy document for the

district. It sets out the strategy for the future development of

the district over the period to 2028 and was prepared and

examined as complying with the requirements of the

Framework. The JCS identifies the overall spatial vision and

economic, social and environmental objectives for the district

and the amount, type and broad location of development

needed to fulfil those objectives. The Proposed Submission

Site Allocations Plan identifies and allocates specific sites

suitable for development in order to meet the JCS's

requirements for housing and employment and in so doing

makes a major contribution to delivering the objectives within

the JCS. The Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan

covers the same plan period as the JCS for the 43% of the

district outside the South Downs National Park.

The JCS is the overarching planning policy document for the

district. It sets out the strategy for the future development of

the district over the period to 2028 and was prepared and

examined as complying with the requirements of the

Framework. The JCS identifies the overall spatial vision and

economic, social and environmental objectives for the district

and the amount, type and broad location of development

needed to fulfil those objectives. The Site Allocations Plan

identifies and allocates specific sites suitable for development

in order to meet the JCS's requirements for housing and

employment, and in so doing makes a major contribution to

delivering the objectives within the JCS. The Site Allocations

Plan covers the same plan period as the JCS for the 43% of

the district outside the South Downs National Park.





Appendix G

Minor

Mod no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MIN34 1.28 1.18 10

The Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan sets out what

type and level of development will be promoted throughout

East Hampshire District Council’s planning area. The Plan

will provide more certainty for local communities, landowners,

developers and infrastructure providers about the future

pattern of development. Specific development proposals for

the sites identified in the Plan will, however, need to gain

planning permission before development can take place.

The Site Allocations Plan sets out what type and level of

development will be promoted throughout East Hampshire

District Council’s planning area. The Plan will provide more

certainty for local communities, landowners, developers and

infrastructure providers about the future pattern of

development. Specific development proposals for the sites

identified in the Plan will, however, need to gain planning

permission before development can take place.





MIN35 1.29 1.19 10

Within the area to the north of the National Park is Whitehill &

Bordon, the second largest town in the district and currently a

base for the military who are in the process of relocating. It is

identified in the JCS as a strategic allocation for 2,725

dwellings over the Plan period to 2028. The strategic

allocation does not form part of this Proposed Submission

Site Allocations Plan and is proceeding on the basis of policy

guidance provided in the JCS and through a masterplan and

a series of planning applications.

Within the area to the north of the National Park is Whitehill &

Bordon, the second largest town in the district and currently a

base for the military who are in the process of relocating. It is

identified in the JCS as a strategic allocation for 2,725

dwellings over the Plan period to 2028. The strategic

allocation does not form part of this Site Allocations Plan and

is proceeding on the basis of policy guidance provided in the

JCS, and through a masterplan and a series of planning

applications.





MIN36 1.30 1.2 10

Other significant settlements to the north of the National Park

identified in the JCS include Alton, Liphook, Four

Marks/South Medstead and Grayshott, each providing a

range of facilities for their local populations.

NO CHANGE

MIN37 1.31 1.21 10

The area to the south of the National Park has three

significant settlements, Horndean, Clanfield and Rowlands

Castle.

NO CHANGE

MIN38 1.32 1.22 10

The Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan directly takes

forward Policy CP3: New Employment Provision and Policy

CP10: Spatial Strategy for Housing in the Local Plan: Joint

Core Strategy (JCS). Policy CP10 of the JCS sets an overall

target of 10,060 new homes to be built over the plan period

(up to 2028). The majority of that target is accounted for in

completions, existing planning permissions, existing

undeveloped allocations from previous plans, the strategic

allocation at Whitehill & Bordon, and from estimates of

development on small sites (windfalls). The Proposed

Submission Site Allocations Plan is focused on identifying

specific greenfield sites to meet the residual housing

requirement and takes into consideration sites that have been

granted planning permission since the adoption of the JCS.

The Site Allocations Plan directly takes forward Policy CP3:

New Employment Provision and Policy CP10: Spatial

Strategy for Housing in the Local Plan: Joint Core Strategy

(JCS). Policy CP10 of the JCS sets an overall target of

10,060 new homes to be built over the plan period (up to

2028). The majority of that target is accounted for in

completions, existing planning permissions, existing

undeveloped allocations from previous plans, the strategic

allocation at Whitehill & Bordon, and from estimates of

development on small sites (windfalls). The Proposed

Submission Site Allocations Plan is focused on identifying

specific greenfield sites to meet the residual housing

requirement and takes into consideration sites that have been

granted planning permission since the adoption of the JCS.





Appendix G

Minor

Mod no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MIN39 1.33 1.23 11

Policy CP10 of the JCS requires allocations to be made to

meet the following levels of housing in East Hampshire

District (outside the National Park):

• a minimum of 700 dwellings at Alton

• a minimum of 700 dwellings at Horndean;

• a minimum of 200 dwellings at Clanfield;

• a minimum of 175 dwellings at both Liphook and Four

Marks/South Medstead;

• a minimum of 150 dwellings at Rowlands Castle;

• a minimum of 150 dwellings at other villages north of the

National Park.

NO CHANGE

MIN40 1.34 1.24 11

The use of ‘minimum’ targets does not mean that there is no

ceiling to the housing targets. The Inspector’s report into the

JCS was clear that, whilst the 10,060 new homes target for

the whole of the district over the plan period was the

minimum needed to meet the objectively assessed need, the

figure of 10,370 would meet all the need. Therefore a

relatively small degree of flexibility is needed around the

housing targets and is provided for within this Plan.

Housing need was established through the JCS Examination

at around 610 dwellings per annum, or 10,370 dwellings for

the whole of the plan period up to 2028. The figure of 10,060

was set by the JCS as the minimum number of new houses

that should be provided to 2028. The difference between the

two indicates the need for a modest degree of flexibility

above the minimum figure set by the JCS, and this is

provided for by this Plan.

Clarification.

MIN41 1.35 1.25 11

The housing land supply for the district as a whole is made

up of a minimum of 8,366 dwellings outside the SDNP and a

minimum of 1,694 dwellings within the SDNP making a total

of 10,060. Chapter 10 sets out more information about the

implementation and monitoring.

NO CHANGE

MIN42 1.36 1.26 11

The table below shows the number of dwellings being

provided (outside the SDNP) in relation to the targets

established in the JCS. The provision consists of planning

permissions granted outside of the Settlement Policy

Boundaries since 1st April 2013, allocated sites within this

document, as well as sites allocated through emerging

Neighbourhood Plans. Details on the complete housing land

supply position (1st October 2014) can be found within

Appendix 2.

The table below shows the number of dwellings being

provided (outside the SDNP) in relation to the targets

established in the JCS. The provision consists of planning

permissions granted outside of the Settlement Policy

Boundaries since 1st April 2013, allocated sites within this

document, as well as sites allocated through emerging

Neighbourhood Plans. Details on the complete housing land

supply position (1st April 2015) can be found within Appendix

2.





MIN43 Table 1 Table 1 11 Update figures to reflect additional commitments To reflect the latest position

MIN44 1.37 1.27 12

Employment provision and distribution in the district is set out

in Policy CP3 of the JCS which requires the provision of land

for employment use in East Hampshire district (outside the

National Park) for:

• about 7ha of employment land in Alton;

• about 2ha of land in Horndean for industrial (B2) and

business use (B1).

NO CHANGE

MIN45 1.38 1.28 12The Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan contains

specific site policies to meet these requirements.

The Site Allocations Plan contains specific site policies to

meet these requirements.





Appendix G

Minor

Mod no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MIN46 1.39 1.29 12

It should be noted that some of the site allocations have

already been granted planning permission. Further detail is

set out in appendix 1.

NO CHANGE

MIN47 1.30 12

Policy CP22 and paragraph 7.24 of the JCS requires housing

proposals capable of affecting the Wealden Heaths Phase II

Special Protection Area to consider, on a case-by-case basis,

whether a project-specific HRA is required. Housing

proposals falling within 5.6km of the coastal ‘Natura 2000’

sites will need to consider whether mitigation is required to

address the impacts of recreational disturbance, through in-

combination effects of additional dwellings, on the Solent

SPAs, SACs and Ramsar sites. Affected housing allocations

in this plan have a site specific criterion to address these

constraints.

Clarification

MIN48 1.40 1.31 12

Relevant national policies, JCS policies and the saved

policies of the Local Plan Second Review (2006) will apply

where relevant to all of the proposals set out in this Plan.

NO CHANGE

MIN49 2.1 12

The following sections set out, for each of the main towns

and villages in the Plan area, site specific proposals to meet

the requirements of the Joint Core Strategy (JCS). The

Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan focuses on

identifying specific sites to meet the individual housing and

employment targets set out in policies CP3 and CP10 of the

JCS. These specific site allocations meet the residual

development requirements for the district (outside the SDNP).

For each site there is a policy setting out the criteria that

subsequent planning applications will need to address. The

boundaries of allocated sites, which are all greenfield sites

beyond existing Settlement Policy Boundaries, will be

integrated into a revised Settlement Policy Boundary when

the Plan is adopted and are shown on the Policies Map.

The following sections set out, for each of the main towns

and villages in the Plan area, site specific proposals to meet

the requirements of the Joint Core Strategy (JCS). The Site

Allocations Plan focuses on identifying specific sites to meet

the individual housing and employment targets set out in

policies CP3 and CP10 of the JCS. These specific site

allocations meet the residual development requirements for

the district (outside the SDNP). For each site there is a policy

setting out the criteria that subsequent planning applications

will need to address. The boundaries of allocated sites, which

are all greenfield sites beyond existing Settlement Policy

Boundaries, will be integrated into a revised Settlement

Policy Boundary when the Plan is adopted and are shown on

the Policies Map.





MIN50 2.4 13

The preparation of the first Neighbourhood Plans in the

district cover Alton and Bentley. Work has been undertaken

in parallel with this Plan. In order to allow the local community

the widest opportunity to determine local policies for their

area, land allocations and policy guidance in this Plan is only

provided for those elements not covered by the respective

Neighbourhood Plans. Should further Neighbourhood Plans

be prepared in the future and include site allocations for

housing and/or employment, these neighbourhood plans will

supersede this Plan for their respective designated areas.

The preparation of the first Neighbourhood Plans in the

district cover Alton, Bentley, Ropley and Medstead & Four

Marks. Work has been undertaken in parallel with this Plan.

In order to allow the local community the widest opportunity to

determine local policies for their area, land allocations and

policy guidance in this Plan is only provided for those

elements not covered by the respective Neighbourhood

Plans. Should further Neighbourhood Plans be prepared in

the future and include site allocations for housing and/or

employment, these neighbourhood plans will supersede this

Plan for their respective designated areas.





Appendix G

Minor

Mod no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MIN51 3.1 13

The Joint Core Strategy (CP10) states that new sites will be

identified for a minimum of 700 dwellings at Alton. The site

identification and allocation process will be addressed as part

of the emerging Alton Neighbourhood Plan.

The Joint Core Strategy (CP10) states that new sites will be

identified for a minimum of 700 dwellings at Alton. The site

identification and allocation process will be addressed as part

of the emerging Alton Neighbourhood Plan. It should be

noted that the Alton Neighbourhood Plan Area covers the

village of Holybourne and therefore any housing allocations

for this village will be considered through the preparation of

the Alton Neighbourhood Plan.





MIN52 EMP1 f e 14

provision of a buffer zone along the river to protect and

enhance the biodiversity value and prevent further erosion of

the river and its corridor;

provide a buffer zone along the River Wey to protect and

enhance the biodiversity value and prevent further erosion of

the river and its corridor; and

Consistency.

MIN53 EMP1 g f 14



species and habitats. Where adverse impacts are


to be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and

Mitigation Scheme and include measures to protect key

species and habitats on site.

Clarification.

MIN54 EMP2 a 16 provision of vehicular access from Wilsom Road; provide vehicular access from Wilsom Road; Consistency.

MIN55 EMP2 d c 16



network and retain the Public Right of Way in attractive semi-

natural setting;



Rights of Way network and retain its attractive semi-natural

setting;

Clarification.

MIN56 EMP2 f d 16


minimise the impact of development on the setting of Alton

and the neighbouring residential area;


development on the setting of Alton;Consistency.

MIN57 EMP2 g e 16

provision of a buffer zone between the bank of the river and

any buildings to protect and enhance the biodiversity value of

the river corridor and to ensure that access is available for

any future maintenance;

provide a buffer zone between the bank of the River Wey and

any buildings, to protect and enhance the biodiversity value of

the river corridor and to ensure that access is available for

any future maintenance;

Clarification and locally specific.

MIN58 EMP2 h f 16


Scheme. Any biodiversity enhancements should take

account of the Biodiversity Opportunity Area and protected

key species and habitats;




Clarification.

MIN59 4.4 4.4 19

HN1 - Provision 700 new dwellings

2ha industrial (B2) and business use (B1)

New school

HN1 - Provision 700 new dwellings

Care Village including independent living units

2ha industrial (B2) and business use (B1)

New school


MIN60 HN1A site of 62ha of land to the east of Horndean is allocated for

a mixed use form of development to include: NO CHANGE

MIN61 HN1 • about 700 dwellings; NO CHANGE

MIN62 HN1• land for about 2ha industrial (B2) and business use (B1);

andNO CHANGE

MIN63 HN1 a a 21provision of accommodation for the elderly, including extra

care;

provide accommodation for older people, including extra

care;Clarification.

MIN64 HN1 b b 21

provision of about 2ha of land for industrial (B2) and business

uses (B1) and provision of an Enterprise Centre, close to

Junction 2 of the A3(M) with immediate access off the B2149;

provide about 2ha of land for industrial (B2) and business

uses (B1) and provide an Enterprise Centre, close to Junction

2 of the A3(M) with immediate access off the B2149;

Consistency.

Appendix G

Minor

Mod no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MIN65 HN1 g g 21

provision of a new pedestrian crossing on Dell Piece East to

connect to the existing footway and provide a safe and

accessible link to existing facilities on the western side of

Junction 2 of the A3(M);

provide a new pedestrian crossing on Dell Piece East to

connect to the existing footway, and provide a safe and

accessible link to existing facilities on the western side of

Junction 2 of the A3(M);

Consistency.

MIN66 HN1 h h 21


minimise the impact of development on the setting of the

South Downs National Park and of the Grade II Listed

Buildings at Pyle Farm;


development on the setting of the South Downs National Park

and on the setting of the Grade II Listed Buildings at Pyle

Farm;

Consistency.

MIN67 HN1 m 21ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on


MIN68 HN1 n l 21

provision of appropriate noise mitigation measures including

noise bunds and barriers, to reduce traffic noise from Havant

Road and A3(M);

provide noise mitigation measures including noise bunds and

barriers, to reduce traffic noise from Havant Road and the

A3(M);

Consistency

MIN69 HN2 a a 22 provide a vehicular access to the site from Lovedean Lane; NO CHANGE

MIN70 LP1 a a 24

provision of vehicular access to the site from Longmoor Road

via Lowsley Farm reserve housing site listed in the saved

East Hampshire District Local Plan: Second Review Policy

H2;

provide vehicular access to the site from Longmoor Road via

Lowsley Farm Phase 1;

Site specific and to future proof

the document.

MIN71 CF1 e e 28

retention of hedgerows along with appropriate landscaping

and landscape enhancement to take account of the impact of

development and its proximity to the South Downs National

Park;

retain hedgerows and provide landscape enhancements to

take account of its proximity to the South Downs National

Park;

Clarification.

MIN72 CF1 i g 28

implement a scheme for protecting future occupiers from

traffic noise from the A3(M) and Chalton Lane to mitigate the

impacts of traffic noise from surrounding roads;

provide noise mitigation to reduce traffic noise from Chalton

Lane and the A3(M); andClarification.

MIN73 CF3 a a 31 provision of vehicular access to the site via Trafalgar Rise; provide vehicular access to the site via Trafalgar Rise; Consistency.

MIN74 CF3 d d 31

provision of any mitigation measures required to protect,

retain and enhance the western and northern landscape

boundaries;

provide mitigation measures to retain, protect and enhance

the western and northern landscape boundaries; andClarification.

MIN75 RC1 a a 32provision of vehicular access to the site via the access road

to the north of the site from Redhill Road;

provide vehicular access to the site via the access road to the

north of the site from Redhill Road;Consistency.

MIN76 RC2 a a 34provision of vehicular access to the site via Redhill Road or

Whichers Gate Road;

provide vehicular access to the site via Redhill Road or

Whichers Gate Road;Consistency.

MIN77 RC3 a a 36provision of vehicular access to the site via a single access

on to Bartons Road (in Havant Borough);

provide vehicular access to the site via a single access on to

Bartons Road (in Havant Borough);Consistency.

MIN78 RC3 i f 36provision of appropriate noise mitigation measures to protect

the occupants of dwellings located close to the railway line;

provide noise mitigation measures to protect the occupants of

dwellings located close to the railway line.Consistency.

MIN79 FM1 a a 38

provision of vehicular access from Lymington Bottom Road

designed to minimise the impact on the adjacent Doctors

surgery;

provide vehicular access from Lymington Bottom Road

designed to minimise the impact of the adjacent Doctors

surgery;

Consistency.

MIN80 FM1 f d 38


Scheme. This should include measures to safeguard

protected species that use the site. Where adverse impacts

are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;




Clarification.

MIN81 FM1 i f 38provision of appropriate noise mitigation measures to protect

the occupants of dwellings located close to the railway line;

provide noise mitigation measures to protect the occupants of

dwellings located close to the railway line.Clarification.

Appendix G

Minor

Mod no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MIN82 FM2 a a 40provision of vehicular access to the site from Boyneswood

Road as well as the closure of access via Friars Oak;

provide vehicular access to the site from Boyneswood Road

as well as the closure of access via Friars Oak;Consistency.

MIN83 FM2 b c 40 improvements to Boyneswood Road bridge; provide improvements to Boyneswood Road bridge; Consistency.

MIN84 FM3 a a 41provision of vehicular access from the corner of Boyneswood

Lane/Beechlands Road;

provide vehicular access from the corner of Boyneswood

Lane/Beechlands Road;Consistency.

MIN85 FM3 g h 41provision of public open space on site and retention of the

existing boundary vegetation;

provide on-site open space and retain the existing boundary

vegetation;Consistency

MIN86 FM3 k i 41

provision of increased capacity at the Four Marks CofE

Primary School to accommodate the likely number of primary

school children arising from the development; and

provide increased capacity at the Four Marks CofE Primary

School to accommodate the likely number of primary school

children arising from the development.


permission.

MIN87 VL1 a a 44provision of vehicular access from Church Street or Ashley

Road and incorporate junction radii;provide vehicular access from Church Street or Ashley Road; Consistency.

MIN88 VL2 a a 46

provision of vehicular access to the site via Crows Lane;

implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic


provide vehicular access to the site via Crows Lane; Consistency.

MIN89 bensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on

the local road network;Consistency.

MIN90 VL2 c d 46have a design and layout of high quality and a character


MIN91 VL2 e f 46

appropriate landscaping and landscape enhancement to take

account of the impact of development and its proximity to the

South Downs National Park;

provide landscaping and landscape enhancement to take

account of its proximity to the South Downs National Park;

and

Consistency.

MIN92 VL3 a a 48 provision of vehicular access to the site via Glayshers Hill; provide vehicular access to the site via Glayshers Hill; Consistency.

MIN93 VL3 d d 48have a design and layout of high quality and a character




MIN95 VL5 d d 52provide a pedestrian crossing on the A325 on the desire line

between the site and the northbound bus stop;NO CHANGE

MIN96 VL5 e e 52have a design and layout of high quality and a character


MIN97 VL5 g g 52

provision of appropriate landscaping and landscape

enhancement to take account of the impact of development

and its proximity to the South Downs National Park;

provide landscaping and landscape enhancement to take

account of the impact of development and its proximity to the

South Downs National Park;

Consistency.

MIN98 VL5 j h 52provision of a noise assessment due to close proximity to

A325;

provide noise mitigation measures to reduce traffic noise from

the A325; andConsistency.

MIN99 VL6 c d 54have a design and layout of high quality and a character


MIN100 VL7 a a 56provision of vehicular access to the site via Junipers on South

Town Road;

provide vehicular access to the site via Junipers on South

Town Road;Consistency.



MIN102 VL7 h f 56safeguarding of an element of the site to provide an

extension to the cemetery; and

safeguard an element of the site to provide an extension to

the cemetery.Consistency.

Appendix G

Minor

Mod no.Policy

Existing

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

New

paragraph/

Policy

Criterion

Page number

of Proposed

Submission

Plan


MIN103 VL8 a a 58 provision of vehicular access to the site via Trinity Hill; provide vehicular access to the site via Trinity Hill; Consistency.



MIN105 VL9 a a 59provision of vehicular access to the site from one access on

to Wield Road leading to a service road;

provide vehicular access to the site from one access on to

Wield Road leading to a service road;Consistency.


which respects the characteristics of the village;

have a design and layout of high quality and a character

which respects the characteristics of the village; andConsistency.

MIN107 VL10 a a 60 provision of vehicular access to the site via Park Lane; provide vehicular access to the site via Park Lane; Consistency.



MIN109 VL11 a a 61 provision of vehicular access to the site via Dunsells Lane; provide vehicular access to the site via Dunsells Lane; Consistency.


which respects the characteristics of the village;

have a design and layout of high quality and a character

which respects the characteristics of the village; andConsistency.

MIN111 VL12 a a 62 provision of vehicular access to the site via Hale Close; provide vehicular access to the site via Hale Close; Consistency.



MIN113 VL13 a a 63 provision of vehicular access to the site from Bighton Hill; provide vehicular access to the site from Bighton Hill; Consistency.

MIN114 VL13 c c 63 provision of passing places and footpath on Bighton Hill; provide passing places and a footpath on Bighton Hill; Consistency.

MIN115 VL13 e e 63have a design and layout of high quality and a character


MIN116 Appendix 1 Update to reflect latest position

MIN117 Appendix 2Update to reflect the Housing Land supply position as of 1

April 2015

MIN118 Appendix 3Update to reflect the most recent housing trajectory and

correct key and explanation.

MIN119 Map 1 Update title to reflect status of document

statement of consultation - east hampshire of... · basingstoke & deane borough council ... bnp...

Documents