state of maryland public school construction … bpw completed lea template … · state of...

STATE OF MARYLAND

PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 200 W. BALTIMORE STREET

BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21201 410-767-0617

ROBERT A. GORRELL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

LARRY HOGAN INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION KAREN SALMON, Ph.D. GOVERNOR CHAIRPERSON

To: Board of Public Works From: Robert A. Gorrell Date: October 12, 2017 Subject: October 18 Board of Public Works (BPW) Meeting Information

At the direction of the Board of Public Works (BPW), the Public School Construction Program invited the Local Education Agencies (LEAs) and their associated leadership to the October 18, 2017 BPW meeting. The purpose of the meeting is for the LEAs to present and discuss their FY 2019 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) needs, which will allow the BPW to better evaluate and analyze the requests prior to the Governor’s Budget submission. In response to this request, the PSCP has attached the following for your consideration:

• A summary of the FY 2019 CIP Request from each LEA. This information is reflective of current requests, which are likely to change throughout the CIP process. Throughout the month of October, the staff of the Interagency Committee on School Construction (IAC) will meet with each LEA to collect additional information on the CIP requests. Based on those meetings and advice from staff, the CIP requests may be revised.

• A summary table of data collected for each LEA. The PSCP and the MSDE Facilities staff worked with several LEAs to establish an information-gathering template in order to provide comparable information. The template was populated by 23 LEAs and the Maryland School for the Blind. The LEAs have listed each of their FY 2019 project requests and divided them into large new or renewal projects, and smaller systemic projects that are intended to extend the functional life of existing facilities.

• Supporting information from each LEA. In addition to comparable data, the completed templates provided by the LEAs contain narrative responses illustrating their unique circumstances.

Please note that the LEAs submitted the templates to the PSCP prior to the deadline for CIP submissions. Some discrepancies may exist between the LEAs’ template information and their submitted FY 2019 CIP requests.

LEA(1)

Planning(2)

Funding(3)

Allegany 0 2 4,834,000$ Anne Arundel 7 15 57,800,000$ Baltimore County 16 20 127,387,396$ Calvert 0 3 10,022,000$ Caroline 1 1 418,000$ Carroll 0 6 7,103,000$ Cecil 1 4 6,932,000$ Charles 3 9 35,772,000$ Dorchester 0 4 13,991,000$ Frederick 1 11 26,084,000$ Garrett 0 0 -$ Harford 0 4 14,016,000$ Howard 2 5 8,585,000$ Kent 0 0 -$ Montgomery 16 32 117,243,000$ Prince George's 4 22 83,510,000$ Queen Anne's 0 2 805,000$ St. Mary's 0 4 7,008,000$ Somerset 0 1 17,500,000$ Talbot 0 1 12,000,000$ Washington 1 4 14,812,000$ Wicomico 1 4 13,391,000$ Worcester 0 1 4,336,000$ Baltimore City 0 37 93,885,000$ MD School for the Blind 0 1 24,285,000$ Design Review Outsourcing 0 0 -$

Totals 53 193 701,719,396$ 246

Summary of Preliminary FY 2019 CIP Requests by LEA

FY 2019 CIP FY 2019 CIP RequestsPlanning/Funding

(6)

Preliminary FY2019 CIP Funding Requests

Page 1 of 9

LEA Prio

rity

Project Name Proj

ect C

ateg

ory

Project Type

TotalEstimated

Project CostNon-PSCP

FundsLEA Anticipated

State BudgetNet State Funding

Prior State Funding

FY 2019LP

FY 2019 Requests

(6)Allegany 1 Allegany High C Replacement $55,803,000 $15,611,000 $40,192,000 $40,192,000 $36,242,000 $3,950,000Allegany 2 Bel Air Elementary SR Roof $1,077,000 $193,000 $884,000 $0 $0 $884,000Allegany Total $56,880,000 $15,804,000 $41,076,000 $40,192,000 $36,242,000 $4,834,000

Anne Arundel 1 Jessup Elementary C Replacement $48,509,000 $34,707,000 $13,802,000 $13,802,000 $10,530,208 $3,272,000Anne Arundel 2 Arnold Elementary C Replacement $42,103,000 $32,832,000 $9,271,000 $9,271,000 $3,480,000 $5,791,000Anne Arundel 3 Marley Elementary C Addition $2,702,000 $1,814,000 $888,000 $888,000 $803,000 $85,000Anne Arundel 4 Bodkin Elementary SR HVAC $5,800,000 $3,186,000 $2,614,000 $0 $0 $2,614,000Anne Arundel 5 Solley Elementary C Addition $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LP $0Anne Arundel 6 Solley Elementary C Addition $3,848,000 $2,513,000 $1,335,000 $0 $0 $1,335,000Anne Arundel 7 Maryland City Elementary K K Addition $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LP $0Anne Arundel 8 Maryland City Elementary K K Addition $4,140,000 $2,626,000 $1,514,000 $0 $0 $1,514,000Anne Arundel 9 Broadneck Elementary SR Roof $2,000,000 $1,110,000 $890,000 $0 $0 $890,000Anne Arundel 10 Glen Burnie Park Elementary C Gym Addition $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LP $0Anne Arundel 11 Glen Burnie Park Elementary C Gym Addition $7,626,000 $4,487,000 $3,139,000 $0 $0 $3,139,000Anne Arundel 12 Arnold Middle SR Roof $3,700,000 $2,010,000 $1,690,000 $0 $0 $1,690,000Anne Arundel 13 Riviera Beach Elementary K K Addition $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LP $0Anne Arundel 14 Riviera Beach Elementary K K Addition $3,466,000 $2,185,000 $1,281,000 $0 $0 $1,281,000Anne Arundel 15 Chesapeake Bay Middle C Renovation (Open Space

Conversion)$10,187,000 $6,015,000 $4,172,000 $0 $0 $4,172,000

Anne Arundel 16 George Cromwell Elementary C Renovation/Addition $36,260,000 $30,668,000 $5,592,000 $5,592,000 $1,000,000 $4,592,000

Anne Arundel 17 Annapolis Middle SR HVAC/Windows/Sprinklers $21,275,000 $11,537,000 $9,738,000 $0 $0 $2,806,000

Anne Arundel 18 Edgewater Elementary C Renovation/Addition $45,896,000 $36,567,000 $9,329,000 $0 $0 LP $0Anne Arundel 19 Tyler Heights Elementary C Renovation/Addition $43,096,000 $38,626,000 $4,470,000 $0 $0 LP $0Anne Arundel 20 Richard Henry Lee Elementary C Renovation/Addition $39,789,000 $28,960,000 $10,829,000 $0 $0 LP $0Anne Arundel 21 Crofton Area High C New $134,835,000 $86,008,000 $48,827,000 $47,373,000 $0 $24,414,000Anne Arundel 22 Broadneck High SR Electrical $500,000 $295,000 $205,000 $0 $0 $205,000Anne Arundel Total $455,732,000 $326,146,000 $129,586,000 $76,926,000 $15,813,208 $57,800,000

Baltimore County 1 Franklin High SR Air Conditioning $17,707,000 $11,684,000 $6,023,000 $6,023,000 $2,857,000 $3,166,000Baltimore County 2 Kenwood High SR Air Conditioning $23,355,000 $14,294,000 $9,061,000 $9,061,000 $4,298,000 $4,763,000Baltimore County 3 Victory Villa Elementary C Replacement $37,180,000 $22,388,000 $14,792,000 $12,717,000 $10,477,604 $4,314,396Baltimore County 4 Lansdowne Elementary C Replacement $40,050,000 $25,058,000 $14,992,000 $14,992,000 $7,918,000 $7,074,000Baltimore County 5 Northeast Area @ Joppa Road Elementary C New $49,000,000 $32,638,000 $16,362,000 $15,369,000 $0 $16,362,000Baltimore County 6 Patapsco High & Center for the Arts C Limited Renovation $44,259,000 $23,257,000 $21,002,000 $19,502,000 $0 $21,002,000Baltimore County 7 Lansdowne High C Limited Renovation $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LP $0Baltimore County 8 Lansdowne High C Limited Renovation $60,000,000 $35,277,000 $24,723,000 $0 $0 $23,745,000Baltimore County 9 Woodlawn High C Limited Renovation $43,055,000 $22,732,000 $20,323,000 $20,676,000 $0 $15,723,000


Page 2 of 9

LEA Prio

rity

Project Name Proj

ect C

ateg

ory

Project Type

TotalEstimated




Prior State Funding

FY 2019LP

FY 2019 Requests

(6)Baltimore County 10 Dundalk Elementary C Replacement $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LP $0Baltimore County 11 Dundalk Elementary C Replacement $46,800,000 $29,658,000 $17,142,000 $0 $0 $17,142,000Baltimore County 12 Berkshire Elementary C Replacement $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LP $0Baltimore County 13 Berkshire Elementary C Replacement $40,245,000 $25,715,000 $14,530,000 $0 $0 $6,290,000Baltimore County 14 Colgate Elementary C Replacement $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LP $0Baltimore County 15 Colgate Elementary C Replacement $38,585,000 $25,689,000 $12,896,000 $0 $0 $0Baltimore County 16 Chadwick Elementary C Replacement $47,260,000 $31,200,000 $16,060,000 $0 $0 LP $0Baltimore County 17 Northeast Area @ Ridge Road Elementary C New $46,435,000 $29,701,000 $16,734,000 $0 $0 LP $0Baltimore County 18 Bedford Elementary C Replacement $47,260,000 $31,319,000 $15,941,000 $0 $0 LP $0Baltimore County 19 Summit Park Elementary C Replacement $47,260,000 $31,224,000 $16,036,000 $0 $0 LP $0Baltimore County 20 Northeast Area Middle C New $90,055,000 $48,695,000 $41,360,000 $0 $0 LP $0Baltimore County 21 Pine Grove Middle C Addition $20,475,000 $11,458,000 $9,017,000 $0 $0 LP $0Baltimore County 22 Red House Run Elementary C Addition $6,640,000 $4,000,000 $2,640,000 $0 $0 LP $0Baltimore County 23 Deer Park Elementary C Addition $7,380,000 $4,366,000 $3,014,000 $0 $0 LP $0Baltimore County 24 Fort Garrison Elementary C Addition $7,930,000 $4,629,000 $3,301,000 $0 $0 LP $0Baltimore County 25 Scotts Branch Elementary C Addition $6,640,000 $4,000,000 $2,640,000 $0 $0 LP $0Baltimore County 26 Dulaney High C Replacement $139,950,000 $79,675,000 $60,275,000 $0 $0 LP $0Baltimore County 27 Towson High C Replacement $133,250,000 $83,310,000 $49,940,000 $0 $0 LP $0Baltimore County 28 Battle Grove Elementary SR Boiler $855,000 $453,000 $402,000 $0 $0 $402,000Baltimore County 29 Featherbed Lane Elementary SR Boiler $855,000 $453,000 $402,000 $0 $0 $402,000Baltimore County 30 McCormick Elementary SR Chiller $1,095,000 $578,000 $517,000 $0 $0 $517,000Baltimore County 31 Owings Mills Elementary SR Chiller $1,035,000 $547,000 $488,000 $0 $0 $488,000Baltimore County 32 Orems Elementary SR Roof $1,505,000 $759,000 $746,000 $0 $0 $746,000Baltimore County 33 Timber Grove Elementary SR Roof $1,860,000 $942,000 $918,000 $0 $0 $918,000Baltimore County 34 Deer Park Middle SR Roof $4,500,000 $2,204,000 $2,296,000 $0 $0 $2,296,000Baltimore County 35 Johnnycake Elementary SR Roof $1,860,000 $942,000 $918,000 $0 $0 $918,000Baltimore County 36 Loch Raven High SR Roof $2,275,000 $1,156,000 $1,119,000 $0 $0 $1,119,000Baltimore County Total $1,056,611,000 $640,001,000 $416,610,000 $98,340,000 $25,550,604 $127,387,396

Calvert 1 Northern High C Replacement/Renovation $71,117,000 $36,859,000 $34,258,000 $34,258,000 $24,539,000 $9,312,000

Calvert 2 Patuxent High SR Chillers $750,000 $352,000 $398,000 $0 $0 $398,000Calvert 3 Southern Middle SR Pneumatic Controls $588,000 $276,000 $312,000 $0 $0 $312,000Calvert Total $72,455,000 $37,487,000 $34,968,000 $34,258,000 $24,539,000 $10,022,000

Caroline 1 Greensboro Elementary C Replacement $39,913,000 $14,120,000 $25,793,000 $0 $0 LP $0Caroline 2 Lockerman Middle SR Roof $538,000 $120,000 $418,000 $0 $0 $418,000

Caroline Total $40,451,000 $14,240,000 $26,211,000 $0 $0 $418,000


Page 3 of 9

LEA Prio

rity

Project Name Proj

ect C

ateg

ory

Project Type

TotalEstimated




Prior State Funding

FY 2019LP

FY 2019 Requests

(6)Carroll 1 Sandymount Elementary SR HVAC $6,256,000 $3,135,000 $3,121,000 $0 $0 $3,121,000Carroll 2 Westminster High SR Electrical $2,159,000 $1,059,000 $1,100,000 $0 $0 $1,100,000Carroll 3 Liberty High SCI Science $1,587,000 $830,000 $757,000 $0 $0 $757,000

Carroll 4 South Carroll High SCI Science $932,000 $497,000 $435,000 $0 $0 $435,000

Carroll 5 Sandymount Elementary SR Roof $1,502,000 $718,000 $784,000 $0 $0 $784,000Carroll 6 Linton Springs Elementary SR Roof $1,736,000 $830,000 $906,000 $0 $0 $906,000Carroll Total $14,172,000 $7,069,000 $7,103,000 $0 $0 $7,103,000

Cecil 1 Gilpin Manor Elementary C Replacement $29,643,000 $17,771,000 $11,872,000 $11,871,824 $8,113,530 $3,758,000Cecil 2 Bohemia Manor Middle/High SR Roof $2,635,000 $975,000 $1,660,000 $1,660,000 $830,000 $830,000Cecil 3 Cherry Hill Middle SR Windows/Doors $928,000 $316,000 $612,000 $0 $0 $612,000Cecil 4 Cecil Manor Elementary SR HVAC $2,624,000 $892,000 $1,732,000 $0 $0 $1,732,000Cecil 5 New Chesapeake City Elementary C Replacement $30,507,000 $18,741,000 $11,766,000 $0 $0 LP $0Cecil Total $66,337,000 $38,695,000 $27,642,000 $13,531,824 $8,943,530 $6,932,000

Charles 1 Dr. Samuel A. Mudd Elementary C Renovation/Addition $28,289,000 $16,147,000 $12,142,000 $12,142,000 $6,116,549 $6,025,000Charles 2 Elementary #22 C New $41,931,000 $24,201,000 $17,730,000 $17,730,000 $9,625,000 $8,105,000Charles 3 Berry Elementary K K & PreK

Addition/Renovation$3,293,000 $1,817,000 $1,476,000 $1,476,000 $750,000 $726,000

Charles 4 Dr. James Craik Elementary K K & PreK Addition/Renovation

$4,184,000 $2,047,000 $2,137,000 $2,137,000 $759,129 $1,378,000

Charles 5 Benjamin Stoddert Middle C Renovation/Addition $47,589,000 $24,662,000 $22,927,000 $21,338,000 $0 $11,463,500Charles 6 Eva Turner Elementary C Renovation $23,493,000 $13,902,000 $9,591,000 $8,997,000 $0 $4,795,500Charles 7 Dr. Gustavas Brown Elementary C Renovation (Open Space

Conversion)$2,775,000 $1,235,000 $1,540,000 $0 $0 $1,540,000

Charles 8 John Hanson Middle SR Roof $3,207,000 $1,523,000 $1,684,000 $0 $0 $1,684,000Charles 9 Dr. Samuel A. Mudd Elementary REL Relocatable (State) $90,000 $35,000 $55,000 $0 $0 $55,000

Charles 10 Maurice J. McDonough High C Renovation/Addition $11,789,000 $5,786,000 $6,003,000 $0 $0 LP $0Charles 11 J. P. Ryon Elementary K K Addition $3,995,000 $1,795,000 $2,200,000 $0 $0 LP $0Charles 12 Malcolm Elementary K K Addition $3,699,000 $1,680,000 $2,019,000 $0 $0 LP $0Charles 36 Mary H. Matula Elementary SR Boiler $900,000 $400,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $0

Charles Total $175,234,000 $95,230,000 $80,004,000 $63,820,000 $17,250,678 $35,772,000

Dorchester 1 North Dorchester High C Replacement $48,671,000 $20,211,000 $28,460,000 $28,460,000 $15,030,903 $10,021,000Dorchester 2 South Dorchester PK-8 C Limited Renovation $7,260,000 $2,647,000 $4,613,000 $0 $0 $2,363,000Dorchester 3 Vienna Elementary SR Roof $880,000 $265,000 $615,000 $0 $0 $615,000Dorchester 4 New Directions Learning Academy SR Roof $1,419,000 $427,000 $992,000 $0 $0 $992,000Dorchester Total $58,230,000 $23,550,000 $34,680,000 $28,460,000 $15,030,903 $13,991,000


Page 4 of 9

LEA Prio

rity

Project Name Proj

ect C

ateg

ory

Project Type

TotalEstimated




Prior State Funding

FY 2019LP

FY 2019 Requests

(6)Frederick 1 Sugarloaf Elementary C New $41,845,000 $26,667,000 $15,178,000 $15,178,000 $6,671,000 $8,507,000Frederick 2 Butterfly Ridge Elementary C New $48,519,000 $30,463,000 $18,056,000 $18,056,000 $7,671,000 $10,385,000Frederick 3 Urbana Elementary C Replacement $47,216,000 $28,587,000 $18,629,000 $10,661,000 $0 $2,902,000Frederick 4 Rock Creek School C Replacement $46,960,000 $33,943,000 $13,017,000 $0 $0 LP $0Frederick 5 Catoctin High SR HVAC $4,200,000 $1,576,000 $2,624,000 $0 $0 $2,624,000Frederick 6 Woodsboro Elementary SR Boiler $378,000 $161,000 $217,000 $0 $0 $217,000Frederick 7 Middletown Elementary SR HVAC $379,000 $149,000 $230,000 $0 $0 $230,000Frederick 8 Valley Elementary SR Roof $396,000 $154,000 $242,000 $0 $0 $242,000Frederick 9 Thurmont Middle SR Roof $609,000 $229,000 $380,000 $0 $0 $380,000Frederick 10 Carroll Manor Elementary SR Sewage Pump $573,000 $226,000 $347,000 $0 $0 $347,000Frederick 11 Governor Thomas Johnson High SR Roof $422,000 $172,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $250,000Frederick 14 Waverley Elementary C Renovation/Addition $55,821,000 $30,837,000 $24,984,000 $0 $0 $0Frederick Total $247,318,000 $153,164,000 $94,154,000 $43,895,000 $14,342,000 $26,084,000

Harford 1 Havre de Grace Middle/High C Replacement $105,206,000 $80,825,000 $23,781,000 $23,781,000 $10,000,000 $11,544,000Harford 2 Bel Air Elementary C Renovation (Open Space

Conversion)/HVAC$7,560,000 $3,969,000 $3,591,000 $3,591,000 $3,023,000 $568,000

Harford 3 Fallston Middle SR Chiller $1,000,000 $472,000 $528,000 $0 $0 $528,000Harford 4 Aberdeen Middle SR Building Envelope $2,664,000 $1,288,000 $1,376,000 $0 $0 $1,376,000Harford Total $116,430,000 $86,554,000 $29,276,000 $27,372,000 $13,023,000 $14,016,000

Howard 1 Harpers Choice Middle SR Roof $3,523,000 $1,694,000 $1,829,000 $0 $0 $1,829,000Howard 2 Atholton Elementary SR Roof $0 $0 $538,000Howard 3 Long Reach High SR Building Envelope $10,695,240 $6,068,240 $4,627,000 $0 $0 $4,627,000Howard 4 Fulton Elementary SR Roof $0 $0 $816,000Howard 5 Glenwood Middle SR Building Envelope $1,654,000 $879,000 $775,000 $0 $0 $775,000Howard 6 Talbott Springs Elementary C Replacement $41,624,000 $29,642,000 $11,982,000 $0 $0 LP $0Howard 7 New High School #13 C New $124,064,000 $74,464,000 $49,600,000 $0 $0 LP $0Howard Total $181,560,240 $112,747,240 $68,813,000 $0 $0 $8,585,000

Montgomery 1 Wayside Elementary C Replacement $24,074,000 $18,581,000 $5,493,000 $4,036,000 $3,036,000 $2,457,000Montgomery 2 Wheaton High C Replacement $116,007,000 $88,469,000 $27,538,000 $24,162,458 $7,662,369 $19,876,000Montgomery 3 Richard Montgomery Elementary #5 C New $35,381,000 $27,628,000 $7,753,000 $6,852,500 $0 $7,753,000Montgomery 4 Bethesda-Chevy Chase High C Addition/Renovation $39,647,000 $33,858,000 $5,789,000 $7,469,000 $0 $7,469,000Montgomery 5 North Bethesda Middle C Addition/Renovation $21,593,000 $16,888,000 $4,705,000 $4,145,000 $0 $4,705,000Montgomery 6 Diamond Elementary C Addition/Renovation $9,147,000 $7,206,000 $1,941,000 $1,441,500 $0 $1,941,000Montgomery 7 Kensington-Parkwood Elementary C Addition $12,679,000 $11,157,000 $1,522,000 $431,000 $0 $1,522,000Montgomery 8 Clarksburg Cluster Elementary (Clarksburg Village

Site #2)C New $36,008,000 $27,959,000 $8,049,000 $8,831,000 $0 $8,049,000


Page 5 of 9

LEA Prio

rity

Project Name Proj

ect C

ateg

ory

Project Type

TotalEstimated




Prior State Funding

FY 2019LP

FY 2019 Requests

(6)Montgomery 9 Walt Whitman High SR HVAC $2,600,000 $1,951,000 $649,000 $0 $0 $649,000Montgomery 10 Briggs Chaney Middle SR HVAC $2,500,000 $1,876,000 $624,000 $0 $0 $624,000Montgomery 11 Burtonsville Elementary SR HVAC $2,500,000 $1,876,000 $624,000 $0 $0 $624,000Montgomery 12 Oakland Terrace Elementary SR HVAC $2,400,000 $1,801,000 $599,000 $0 $0 $599,000Montgomery 13 Highland View Elementary SR HVAC $2,340,000 $1,756,000 $584,000 $0 $0 $584,000Montgomery 14 Sequoyah Elementary SR HVAC $2,250,000 $1,688,000 $562,000 $0 $0 $562,000Montgomery 15 Shady Grove Middle SR Roof $2,119,000 $1,590,000 $529,000 $0 $0 $529,000Montgomery 16 Flower Hill Elementary SR HVAC $2,106,000 $1,580,000 $526,000 $0 $0 $526,000Montgomery 17 Julius West Elementary SR Roof $1,990,000 $1,493,000 $497,000 $0 $0 $497,000Montgomery 18 Ashburton Elementary SR HVAC $1,740,000 $1,306,000 $434,000 $0 $0 $434,000Montgomery 19 Springbrook High SR Roof $1,634,000 $1,226,000 $408,000 $0 $0 $408,000Montgomery 20 Jackson Road Elementary SR Roof $1,480,000 $1,111,000 $369,000 $0 $0 $369,000Montgomery 21 Highland Elementary SR Roof $1,316,000 $988,000 $328,000 $0 $0 $328,000Montgomery 22 Dr. Sally K. Ride Elementary SR Roof $1,314,000 $986,000 $328,000 $0 $0 $328,000Montgomery 23 Damascus High SR Roof $1,091,000 $819,000 $272,000 $0 $0 $272,000Montgomery 24 Thomas Edison High School of Technology C Replacement $69,088,000 $56,475,000 $12,613,000 $12,918,000 $0 $12,613,000Montgomery 25 Lucy V. Barnsley Elementary C Addition/Renovation $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LP $0Montgomery 26 Lucy V. Barnsley Elementary C Addition/Renovation $13,224,000 $10,902,000 $2,322,000 $0 $0 $2,322,000Montgomery 27 Potomac Elementary C Replacement $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LP $0Montgomery 28 Potomac Elementary C Replacement $30,391,000 $23,550,000 $6,841,000 $0 $0 $3,421,000Montgomery 29 Luxmanor Elementary C Replacement $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LP $0Montgomery 30 Luxmanor Elementary C Replacement $29,190,000 $22,591,000 $6,599,000 $0 $0 $3,300,000Montgomery 31 S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary C Addition $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LP $0Montgomery 32 S. Christa McAuliffe Elementary C Addition $11,386,000 $8,915,000 $2,471,000 $0 $0 $2,471,000Montgomery 33 Ashburton Elementary C Addition $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LP $0Montgomery 34 Ashburton Elementary C Addition $13,944,000 $12,026,000 $1,918,000 $0 $0 $1,918,000Montgomery 35 Seneca Valley High C Replacement $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LP $0Montgomery 36 Seneca Valley High C Replacement $152,121,000 $117,451,000 $34,670,000 $0 $0 $17,335,000Montgomery 37 Maryvale Elementary/Carl Sandburg Learning

CenterC Replacement $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LP $0

Montgomery 38 Maryvale Elementary/Carl Sandburg Learning Center

C Replacement $58,997,000 $45,774,000 $13,223,000 $0 $0 $6,612,000

Montgomery 39 Tilden Middle/Rock Terrace School C Replacement $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LP $0Montgomery 40 Tilden Middle/Rock Terrace School C Replacement $54,985,000 $42,693,000 $12,292,000 $0 $0 $6,146,000Montgomery 41 Gaithersburg Elementary C Addition $26,000,000 $21,293,000 $4,707,000 $0 $0 LP $0Montgomery 42 Takoma Park Middle C Addition $25,186,000 $19,611,000 $5,575,000 $0 $0 LP $0Montgomery 43 Thomas W. Pyle Middle C Addition $18,889,000 $14,797,000 $4,092,000 $0 $0 LP $0Montgomery 44 Burtonsville Elementary C Addition $12,818,000 $10,029,000 $2,789,000 $0 $0 LP $0Montgomery 45 Judith A. Resnick Elementary C Addition $10,989,000 $8,565,000 $2,424,000 $0 $0 LP $0Montgomery 46 Pine Crest Elementary C Addition $8,623,000 $7,250,000 $1,373,000 $0 $0 LP $0


Page 6 of 9

LEA Prio

rity

Project Name Proj

ect C

ateg

ory

Project Type

TotalEstimated




Prior State Funding

FY 2019LP

FY 2019 Requests

(6)Montgomery 47 Montgomery Knolls Elementary C Addition $6,605,000 $5,160,000 $1,445,000 $0 $0 LP $0Montgomery 48 Walt Whitman High C Addition $22,073,000 $11,037,000 $11,036,000 $0 $0 LP $0Montgomery Total $888,425,000 $691,912,000 $196,513,000 $70,286,458 $10,698,369 $117,243,000

Prince George's 1 Tulip Grove Elementary C Renovation/Addition $19,093,332 $14,011,332 $5,082,000 $5,210,000 $4,885,000 $197,000Prince George's 2 Stephen Decatur Middle C Renovation/Addition (SEI) $21,793,000 $11,492,000 $10,301,000 $2,505,000 $0 $10,301,000

Prince George's 3 Bowie-Belair Annex High C Limited Renovation $28,528,000 $14,556,000 $13,972,000 $11,675,000 $5,501,000 $8,471,000Prince George's 4 William Wirt Middle C Replacement $82,913,000 $42,688,000 $40,225,000 $33,751,000 $0 $4,500,000Prince George's 5 William Schmidt Environmental Education Center C Renovation/Addition $33,094,000 $17,128,000 $15,966,000 $13,892,000 $0 $5,000,000

Prince George's 6 New Adelphi Area #1 Middle C New $91,624,000 $50,626,000 $40,998,000 $0 $0 LP $0Prince George's 7 New Glenridge Area #2 Middle C New $91,624,000 $50,626,000 $40,998,000 $0 $0 LP $0Prince George's 8 Suitland High C Replacement/Renovation $173,743,000 $88,650,000 $85,093,000 $0 $0 LP $0

Prince George's 9 International High School at Langley Park C New $37,381,000 $19,073,000 $18,308,000 $0 $0 LP $0Prince George's 10 Woodridge Elementary SR HVAC $2,161,000 $826,000 $1,335,000 $0 $0 $1,335,000Prince George's 11 Andrew Jackson Academy SR Windows $327,000 $125,000 $202,000 $0 $0 $202,000Prince George's 12 Phyllis E. Williams Elementary SR Piping $3,121,000 $1,193,000 $1,928,000 $0 $0 $1,928,000Prince George's 13 Dwight D. Eisenhower Middle SR HVAC $13,062,000 $4,992,000 $8,070,000 $0 $0 $8,070,000Prince George's 14 Walker Mill Middle SR HVAC $13,831,000 $5,286,000 $8,545,000 $0 $0 $8,545,000Prince George's 15 Glenridge Elementary SR HVAC $12,343,000 $4,717,000 $7,626,000 $0 $0 $7,626,000Prince George's 16 Lamont Elementary SR HVAC $7,587,000 $2,900,000 $4,687,000 $0 $0 $4,687,000Prince George's 17 James Madison Middle SR HVAC $10,086,000 $3,855,000 $6,231,000 $0 $0 $6,231,000Prince George's 18 Patuxent Elementary SR HVAC $5,741,000 $2,194,000 $3,547,000 $0 $0 $3,547,000Prince George's 19 Chillum Elementary C Renovation (Open Space

Conversion)$1,013,000 $387,000 $626,000 $0 $0 $626,000

Prince George's 20 North Forestville Elementary SR Roof $1,169,000 $447,000 $722,000 $0 $0 $722,000Prince George's 21 Bladensburg Elementary SR Roof $2,049,000 $783,000 $1,266,000 $0 $0 $1,266,000Prince George's 22 Greenbelt Elementary SR Roof $1,571,000 $600,000 $971,000 $0 $0 $971,000Prince George's 23 Rosa L. Parks Elementary C Replacement $9,640,000 $0 $9,640,000 $9,615,000 $7,005,986 $2,609,000Prince George's 24 Mary Harris "Mother" Jones Elementary C New $7,755,000 $0 $7,755,000 $7,755,000 $6,305,000 $1,450,000Prince George's 25 Lake Arbor Elementary C New $6,204,000 $0 $6,204,000 $6,204,000 $3,064,000 $3,140,000Prince George's 26 Suitland Elementary C Replacement/Renovation $7,816,000 $0 $7,816,000 $7,816,000 $5,730,000 $2,086,000

Prince George's Total $685,269,332 $337,155,332 $348,114,000 $98,423,000 $32,490,986 $83,510,000


Page 7 of 9

LEA Prio

rity

Project Name Proj

ect C

ateg

ory

Project Type

TotalEstimated




Prior State Funding

FY 2019LP

FY 2019 Requests

(6)Queen Anne's 1 Church Hill Elementary SR Chiller $208,000 $110,000 $98,000 $0 $0 $98,000Queen Anne's 2 Kent Island High SR Chiller $1,500,000 $793,000 $707,000 $0 $0 $707,000Queen Anne's Total $1,708,000 $903,000 $805,000 $0 $0 $805,000

St. Mary's 1 Park Hall Elementary SR Roof/HVAC $7,202,000 $3,495,000 $3,707,000 $3,707,000 $415,000 $2,378,000St. Mary's 2 Hollywood Elementary SR Roof/HVAC/Fire Safety $6,898,000 $3,343,000 $3,555,000 $3,555,000 $400,000 $2,260,000St. Mary's 3 Green Holly Elementary SR Roof $2,012,000 $1,153,000 $859,000 $0 $0 $859,000St. Mary's 4 Great Mills High SR Roof $3,294,000 $1,783,000 $1,511,000 $0 $0 $1,511,000St. Mary's Total $19,406,000 $9,774,000 $9,632,000 $7,262,000 $815,000 $7,008,000

Somerset 1 J. M. Tawes Technology & Career Center C Replacement $42,781,000 $7,400,000 $35,381,000 $35,381,000 $14,720,000 $17,500,000Somerset Total $42,781,000 $7,400,000 $35,381,000 $35,381,000 $14,720,000 $17,500,000

Talbot 1 Easton Elementary - Dobson Building C Replacement $53,226,000 $32,408,000 $20,818,000 $18,927,000 $0 $12,000,000Talbot Total $53,226,000 $32,408,000 $20,818,000 $18,927,000 $0 $12,000,000

Washington 1 Urban Educational Campus C New $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LP $0Washington 2 Sharpsburg Elementary C Replacement $26,728,000 $11,022,000 $15,706,000 $12,519,000 $0 $6,511,000Washington 3 Urban Educational Campus C New $19,248,000 $7,323,000 $11,925,000 $0 $0 $5,963,000Washington 4 Boonsboro Elementary SR Roof $1,544,000 $541,000 $1,003,000 $0 $0 $1,003,000Washington 5 South Hagerstown High SR Roof $1,994,000 $659,000 $1,335,000 $0 $0 $1,335,000Washington Total $49,514,000 $19,545,000 $29,969,000 $12,519,000 $0 $14,812,000

Wicomico 1 West Salisbury Elementary C Replacement $28,647,000 $13,128,000 $15,519,000 $15,519,000 $11,810,200 $3,709,000Wicomico 2 Delmar Elementary C Limited Renovation $10,298,000 $2,903,000 $7,395,000 $3,824,000 $0 $7,395,000Wicomico 3 Beaver Run Elementary C Replacement $47,636,000 $23,568,000 $24,068,000 $0 $0 LP $0Wicomico 4 Glen Avenue Elementary SR Roof $1,893,000 $331,000 $1,562,000 $0 $0 $1,562,000Wicomico 5 Pinehurst Elementary SR Roof $879,000 $154,000 $725,000 $0 $0 $725,000Wicomico Total $89,353,000 $40,084,000 $49,269,000 $19,343,000 $11,810,200 $13,391,000

Worcester 1 Showell Elementary C Replacement $42,406,000 $33,374,000 $8,672,000 $8,925,000 $0 $4,336,000Worcester Total $42,406,000 $33,374,000 $8,672,000 $8,925,000 $0 $4,336,000

Maryland School for the Blind 1 Newcomer, Case and Campbell Halls C Renovation/Addition $45,187,000 $13,527,000 $32,261,000 $31,660,000 $1,320,705 $24,285,000Maryland School for the Blind Total $45,187,000 $13,527,000 $32,261,000 $31,660,000 $1,320,705 $24,285,000

Baltimore City 1 Holabird PK-8 #229 C Replacement $31,506,000 $5,105,000 $26,401,000 $26,401,000 $9,810,000 $13,036,000


Page 8 of 9

LEA Prio

rity

Project Name Proj

ect C

ateg

ory

Project Type

TotalEstimated




Prior State Funding

FY 2019LP

FY 2019 Requests

(6)Baltimore City 2 Graceland Park/O'Donnell Heights PK-8 #240 C Replacement $31,277,000 $10,052,000 $21,225,000 $21,225,000 $8,258,000 $10,189,000Baltimore City 4 Roland Park Elementary/Middle #233 SR HVAC $6,500,000 $1,442,000 $5,058,000 $0 $0 $5,058,000Baltimore City 5 The Historic Samuel Coleridge-Taylor Elementary SR HVAC $8,500,000 $1,885,000 $6,615,000 $0 $0 $6,615,000

Baltimore City 6 Garrett Heights PK-8 #212 SR HVAC $5,200,000 $1,153,000 $4,047,000 $0 $0 $4,047,000Baltimore City 7 Federal Hill Prep PK-5 #045 SR Fire Safety $1,000,000 $222,000 $778,000 $0 $0 $778,000Baltimore City 8 Highlandtown PK-8 #215 SR Roof $800,000 $177,000 $623,000 $0 $0 $623,000Baltimore City 9 William S. Baer Special Education #301 SR HVAC $5,000,000 $1,109,000 $3,891,000 $0 $0 $3,891,000Baltimore City 10 Western High #407 SR Elevator $400,000 $89,000 $311,000 $0 $0 $311,000Baltimore City 11 Yorkwood Elementary #219 SR Fire Safety $875,000 $194,000 $681,000 $0 $0 $681,000Baltimore City 12 The Historic Samuel Coleridge-Taylor Elementary SR Fire Safety $1,100,000 $244,000 $856,000 $0 $0 $856,000

Baltimore City 13 Fallstaff PK-8 #241 SR Fire Safety $1,500,000 $333,000 $1,167,000 $0 $0 $1,167,000Baltimore City 14 Woodhome PK-8 #205 SR Roof $2,600,000 $577,000 $2,023,000 $0 $0 $2,023,000Baltimore City 15 Baltimore Polytechnic Institute High #403 SR Roof $6,800,000 $1,508,000 $5,292,000 $0 $0 $5,292,000Baltimore City 16 Western High #407 SR Roof $4,500,000 $998,000 $3,502,000 $0 $0 $3,502,000Baltimore City 17 Commodore John Rodgers PK-8 #027 SR Fire Safety $1,850,000 $410,000 $1,440,000 $0 $0 $1,440,000Baltimore City 18 Collington Square PK-8 #097 SR Fire Safety $1,200,000 $266,000 $934,000 $0 $0 $934,000Baltimore City 19 Curtis Bay PK-8 #207 SR HVAC/Roof $6,500,000 $1,442,000 $5,058,000 $0 $0 $5,058,000Baltimore City 20 Hazelwood PK-8 #210 SR Roof $1,200,000 $266,000 $934,000 $0 $0 $934,000Baltimore City 21 Furman L. Templeton Elementary #125 SR Roof $1,350,000 $299,000 $1,051,000 $0 $0 $1,051,000Baltimore City 22 Federal Hill Prep PK-5 #045 SR Structural/Roof $1,950,000 $433,000 $1,517,000 $0 $0 $1,517,000Baltimore City 23 Baltimore City College High #480 SR Windows/Structural $12,679,000 $2,812,000 $9,867,000 $0 $0 $9,867,000Baltimore City 24 George Washington Elementary #022 SR Roof/Windows/Doors $3,750,000 $832,000 $2,918,000 $0 $0 $2,918,000Baltimore City 25 Gilmor Elementary #107 SR Roof/HVAC/Windows/Doors $6,300,000 $1,397,000 $4,903,000 $0 $0 $4,903,000

Baltimore City 26 Highlandtown PK-8 #215 SR Structural/Windows $1,150,000 $255,000 $895,000 $0 $0 $895,000Baltimore City 27 Belmont Elementary #217 SR Vertical Packaged

Classroom Air Conditioning Units

$550,000 $122,000 $428,000 $0 $0 $428,000

Baltimore City 28 Dickey Hill PK-8 #201 SR Vertical Packaged Classroom Air Conditioning Units

$814,000 $181,000 $633,000 $0 $0 $633,000

Baltimore City 29 Edgewood PK-5 #067 SR Vertical Packaged Classroom Air Conditioning Units

$572,000 $127,000 $445,000 $0 $0 $445,000

Baltimore City 30 Hazelwood K-8 #210 SR Vertical Packaged Classroom Air Conditioning Units

$638,000 $142,000 $496,000 $0 $0 $496,000


Page 9 of 9

LEA Prio

rity

Project Name Proj

ect C

ateg

ory

Project Type

TotalEstimated




Prior State Funding

FY 2019LP

FY 2019 Requests

(6)Baltimore City 31 Hilton Elementary #021 SR Vertical Packaged

Classroom Air Conditioning Units

$594,000 $132,000 $462,000 $0 $0 $462,000

Baltimore City 32 Matthew A. Henson Elementary #029 SR Vertical Packaged Classroom Air Conditioning Units

$660,000 $146,000 $514,000 $0 $0 $514,000

Baltimore City 33 Mt. Royal Elementary/Middle #066 SR Vertical Packaged Classroom Air Conditioning Units

$924,000 $205,000 $719,000 $0 $0 $719,000

Baltimore City 34 Diggs-Johnson Building #162 SR Vertical Packaged Classroom Air Conditioning Units

$748,000 $166,000 $582,000 $0 $0 $582,000

Baltimore City 35 Thomas Jefferson PK-8 #232 SR Vertical Packaged Classroom Air Conditioning Units

$638,000 $142,000 $496,000 $0 $0 $496,000

Baltimore City 36 Windsor Hills PK-8 #087 SR Vertical Packaged Classroom Air Conditioning Units

$462,000 $102,000 $360,000 $0 $0 $360,000

Baltimore City 37 Edgecombe Circle PK-8 #062 SR Vertical Packaged Classroom Air Conditioning Units

$880,000 $195,000 $685,000 $0 $0 $685,000

Baltimore City 38 Brehms Lane Elementary #231 SR Vertical Packaged Classroom Air Conditioning Units

$616,000 $137,000 $479,000 $0 $0 $479,000

Baltimore City Total $153,583,000 $35,297,000 $118,286,000 $47,626,000 $18,068,000 $93,885,000

Grand Total $9,070,954,144 $5,508,836,144 $3,561,400,000 $1,506,668,564 $503,248,366 $701,719,396

FY 2019 Capital Improvement Program RequestPresentation to the Board of Public Works - October 18, 2017

V. Total Cost of all projects

listed in the 6 Year FY 2019

CIP

# of

St

uden

ts

Squa

re

Land

Mile

s

Stud

ents

pe

r Lan

d M

ile

# of

Fa

cilit

ies

Stud

ents

pe

r Fac

ility

Statewide Total $23,291,113,217 Per Student Statewide Total

$9,642,132,514

Talbot County

1) Unique geography2) Enrollments3) Local funding 4,645 477 9.7 11 422.3 $96,610,739 $ 20,799 36.7% $59,611,000 93.04 Good Up to $435/sf

Baltimore City1) Aging Facilities2) Increased costs3) Limited local funding

73,953 81 913.7 160 462.2 $2,400,000,000 $ 32,453 48.3% $357,835,000 82.63 Adequate $485/sf

Caroline County 1) Growth2) County tax revenue 5,630 326 17.3 12 469.2 $161,000,000 $ 28,597 19% $135,179,000 91.84 Good $395/sf

Queen Anne’s County1) Limited Local Funding2) Small internal maintenance staff

7,721 372 20.8 14 551.5 $55,685,508 $ 7,212 14.0% $92,670,000 89.62 Good $556/sf

Cecil County

1) Continued local county involvement in funding capital projects2) Ongoing deferred maintenance3) Stagnant enrollment

15,455 418 37.0 30 515.2 $50,800,000 $ 3,287 6.2% $186,109,000 94.36 Good $335/sf

VI. Average PSCP

Maintenance Score:

VII. Total Cost Per Square Foot for a New

School (inclusive of site, design etc.)

III. Total Cost of Repair for All SchoolsII. County Information

Local Education Agency

I. Summary of the Unique Challenges, such as

enrollment growth or decline and upkeep of PK-12 School

Facilities

IV. Facility Condition

Index (FCI)




CIP

# of

St

uden

ts

Squa

re

Land

Mile

s

Stud

ents

pe

r Lan

d M

ile

# of

Fa

cilit

ies

Stud

ents

pe

r Fac

ility


$9,642,132,514

VI. Average PSCP

Maintenance Score:







Facilities


Index (FCI)

Frederick County

1) Pace of enrollment growth2) Pace of residential growth3) Location of residential growth.4) Growing number of aging schools

42,331 664 63.8 68 622.5 $1,173,000,000 $ 27,710 21% $400,400,000 91.32 Good $457/sf

Allegany County

1) Aging School Facilities2) Limited local funds3) Declining enrollment4) Free and Reduced Priced Meals5) Budget cuts

8,443 424 19.9 22 383.8 $435,929,000 $ 51,632 60% $30,421,000 87.01 Good $417/sf w/o site$477/sf with site

Calvert County

1) Declining enrollment2) Free and Reduced Priced Meal has increased3) Decrease in level of local funding4) Capital dollars

15,969 213 75.0 25 638.8 $149,517,360 $ 9,363 18% $152,559,000 94.19 Good $353/sf

Carroll County1) Declining enrollments2) Local projection recognition has declined

25,256 456 55.4 40 631.4 $304,031,413 $ 12,038 27.5% $250,586,000 91.22 Good Unknown

Washington County

1) Need for Early Childhood Education2) Aging Schools3) Funding

22,545 468 48.2 46 490.1 $250,000,000 $ 11,089 16.6% $177,182,000 92.22 Good

$302/sf plus allowable costs. Other cost not included 24% of this

amount.




CIP

# of

St

uden

ts

Squa

re

Land

Mile

s

Stud

ents

pe

r Lan

d M

ile

# of

Fa

cilit

ies

Stud

ents

pe

r Fac

ility


$9,642,132,514

VI. Average PSCP

Maintenance Score:







Facilities


Index (FCI)

Wicomico County

1) Highest At- Risk Population (FRPM, Special Education services and EELs2) Low wealth per pupil

14,645 400 36.6 24 610.2 $193,652,678 $ 13,224 33.0% $316,555,633 91.69 Good $471/sf

Charles County1) Enrollment growth2) Transient student population3) Open space enclosures

26,390 458 57.6 38 694.5 $595,000,000 $ 22,546 20% $342,918,000 90.40 Good $413.53/sf

St. Mary’s County1) Increasing enrollment2) Bring existing facilities up to modern educational standards

17,852 359 49.7 26 686.6 $240,219,819 $ 13,456 18.72% $178,005,000 89.91 Good

State SF Cost for FY 2014 New School

Project (Captain Walter Francis Duke) $240.80

2015 LR project at Spring Ridge M $224/sf

Worcester County 1) Enrollment2) County Wealth 6,687 455 14.7 14 477.6 $67,871,000 $ 10,150 14.27% $58,803,000 89.33 Good $434.43/sf

Baltimore County

1) Air conditioning2) Enrollment growth3) Upgrading Failing Infrastructure

112,139 682 164.4 161 696.5 $2,210,000,000 $ 19,708 unknown $1,340,000,000 87.82 Good 436.34/sf




CIP

# of

St

uden

ts

Squa

re

Land

Mile

s

Stud

ents

pe

r Lan

d M

ile

# of

Fa

cilit

ies

Stud

ents

pe

r Fac

ility


$9,642,132,514

VI. Average PSCP

Maintenance Score:







Facilities


Index (FCI)

Montgomery Co. 1) Enrollment growth2) Funding CIP 159,010 506 314.2 205 775.7 $1,300,000,000 $ 8,176 95% $601,600,000 88.20 Good $312/sf

Prince George’s

1) Aging facilities2) Enrollment3) Local funding needs4) Low debt ceiling

124,045 498 249.1 195 636.1 $5,688,000,000 $ 45,854 43.72% $2,791,332,362 85.67 Good $479/sf

Dorchester County

1) Local Capital Maintenance Funding2) Open Space Enclosures3) Fiscal Constraints/Time

4,594 540 8.5 14 328.1 $326,479,000 $ 71,066 Unknown $40,924,000 89.98 Good $416.99/sf

Maryland School for the Blind

1) Enrollment growth2) Funding 205 N/A N/A 1 205.0 $59,800,000 $ 291,707 N/A $59,800,000 N/A N/A

Harford County

1) Increase programmatic needs2) Flat enrollment and rising operational costs3) Sustaining technology infrastructure requirements

37,442 527 71.0 54 693.4 $2,178,343,440 $ 58,179 12.21% $337,043,019 89.00 Good $421/sf




CIP

# of

St

uden

ts

Squa

re

Land

Mile

s

Stud

ents

pe

r Lan

d M

ile

# of

Fa

cilit

ies

Stud

ents

pe

r Fac

ility


$9,642,132,514

VI. Average PSCP

Maintenance Score:







Facilities


Index (FCI)

Somerset County1) Lowest per capita income2) Limited workforce availability2) Geographic challenges

2,960 320 9.3 10 296.0 $91,000,000 $ 30,743 30.18% $70,621,000 87.61 Good $417/sf

Howard County

1) Enrollment growth2) Funding3) Community Use / Utility and aging systems

55,638 251 221.7 76 732.1 $3,165,369,260 $ 56,892 8.22% $234,132,500 92.43 Good $360/sf

Anne Arundel County

1) Enrollment growth2) Funding levels and predicatbility of the funding stream3) Increasing regulatory and environmental compliance costs

81,397 415 196.1 119 684.0 $1,945,244,000 $ 23,898 82.54% $1,427,846,000 88.74 Good $474.06/sf

Kent County (Will not be presenting - there is no FY 2019 CIP request)

1) Enrollment decline2) Underutilized schools3) Aging facilities 2,019 278 7.3 5 403.8 $153,560,000 $ 76,057 92.3% TBD 88.42 Good Unknown

Talbot County Public Schools FY 2019 Capital Improvement Program Request

Presentation to the Board of Public Works October 18, 2017

Presenter: Dr. Kelly L. Griffith, Superintendent

I. Brief Summary of the Unique Challenges, such as enrollment growth or decline, and Upkeep ofPK-‐12 School Facilities:

• Unique geographical challenges – 600 miles of waterfront• Farms students have increased from 27% in FY07 to 44% in FY17• ELL student population has increased from 151 in FY07 to 300 in FY17• 20 languages spoken in homes of Talbot County• Replacement of Talbot County’s largest elementary school and the associated challenges

o Needs associated with the diverse student populationo Importance of community school, shifting population, and redistricting plano Local and State Funding

II. County Information:• Number of PK-‐12 students – 4,645 (Fall 2017 1st week enrollment)• Square miles with County – 477• Average number of students per square mile – 9.73• Total number of school facilities -‐11

III. Total current estimated cost of repair (replacement schools, needed schools, neededrenovations, needed correction of deferred maintenance) for all school facilities: $96,610,739Includes CIP items ($59.6 million) and the estimated cost of deferred maintenance ($37 million)

IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI): 36.7%[ FCI % = facility’s total ESTIMATED repair costs / facility’s replacement cost]$96,610,739/$263,399,760 (731,666 @ $360/sq.ft.) = 36.7%

V. Total cost of all projects listed in the 6 year CIP Request: $59,611,000• FY19 & FY20 – Easton Elementary School Replacement Project• FY21 – Easton High School -‐ Roof Replacement (SR)• FY22 – Easton High School -‐ Four (4) Rooftop HVAC Units Replacement (SR)• FY23 – Chapel District Elementary School -‐ Roof Replacement (SR)

VI. Current LEA average PSCP Maintenance Score: Overall Rating 93.04 = Good

Summary of maintenance efforts and challenges:

• Funding – Our current maintenance allocation is approximately $1.85 per Sq.Ft., exclusiveof operations funding. Our current maintenance and operations allocation isapproximately $5.94 per Sq.Ft. Although TCPS is very appreciative of the funding wecurrently receive, there are still many maintenance issues that are not addressed at ourcurrent level of funding.

• Staffing – Our maintenance department experiences extreme difficulty hiring qualifiedmaintenance personnel. With the impending retirement of veteran maintenancepersonnel, this will become a significant issue for Talbot County Public Schools in the nextfew years.

Page 1 of 82



VII. What do you currently estimate as the total cost per square foot for a new school in your areainclusive of site, design, FF&E, etc.?:

• Comment on construction costs and challenges:

i. It has been approximately 10 years since TCPS has had a significant renovationproject and many years since the last new/replacement school construction. Atthis early point in the planning process for Easton Elementary School, we cannotaccurately estimate real cost per square foot locally. The project could cost asmuch as $435 per square foot, inclusive of demolition and all other associatedcosts. At the direction of our County Council, TCPS is challenged to keep the totalcost of the project much lower. TCPS plans to meet this direction by consideringthe utilization of modular and panelized construction materials, or as a last resort,through a reduction in square footage.

ii. Contractor Participation – Because of our location, Talbot County is likely toexperience limited contractor participation in the bidding process, which couldresult in higher construction costs.

iii. Prevailing Wage Rate – The lowered prevailing wage rate State participationpercentage of 25% will significantly impact the cost of construction for the EastonElementary School replacement project.

Page 2 of 82



VIII. Listing of FY19 CIP Request (two types):

New School, Replacement School, Total Renovation that results in like-‐new condition

Project Description for Replacement School:

LEA Priority (#)

Total Estim

ated

Cost ($)

LEA Share ($)

State Share ($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest (Y

/N)

Previously Fun

ded Project (Y/N)

Coun

ty Has Forward Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments

The Easton Elementary School Replacement Project 1 $53,226,000 $32,408,000 $20,818,000 Y N N

Systemic projects, Additions, and Renovations that DO NOT result in like-‐new school

Project Description for Systemic Renovations

LEA Priority (#)

Total Estim

ated

Cost ($)

LEA Share ($)

State Share ($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest (Y

/N)

Previously Fun

ded Project (Y/N)

Coun

ty Has Forward Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments

Easton High School Replacement Roof 2 $4,400,000 $2,464,000 $1,936,000 N N N

Easton High School HVAC Replacement 3 $900,000 $500,000 $400,000 N N N

Chapel District Elementary School Replacement Roof 4 $1,085,000 $608,000 $477,000 N N N

Page 3 of 82

Presenter: Dr. Sonja B. Santelises, Superintendent

I. Brief Summary of the Unique Challenges, such as enrollment growth or decline, and Upkeep ofPK-12 School Facilities:

City Schools’ portfolio includes 159 schools and the average building age is 50 years. Buildings with systems beyond their facility life cycle, increased costs related to the maintenance and renovation of systems in these facilities, and limited funds to support construction and maintenance of facilities within the district portfolio are a few of the unique challenges the district faces to maintain and preserve facilities. Below is a summary of these highlighted challenges, and the efforts the district is taking to improve facility conditions. In addition, we have highlighted how we plan to advocate for support from the IAC and BPW to assist us to meet ongoing needs to successfully maintain our facilities.

Aging Facilities and Poor Facility Conditions o The Jacobs Report, conducted in 2011, reported that the district-wide Facility Condition

Index (FCI) is 60% for City Schools’ portfolio, a rating indicating very poor condition.Of all the buildings in our portfolio, 74% were constructed between 1946 and 1985 and23% were constructed prior to 1946. Older buildings mean older systems and withoutthe necessary funds to upgrade or improve these facilities, the district faces challengesmaintaining and preserving its facilities.

o We are addressing the districtwide FCI average by renovating and replacing existingbuildings and closing underutilized schools. Through the 21st Century Buildings Plan,we will be renovating or replacing 23-28 school buildings. As you know, this schoolyear we celebrated the grand opening of Fort Worthington and Frederick. FortWorthington exceeded enrollment projections and now is fully utilized. Dorothy I.Height (formerly John E. Howard) and Lyndhurst will open in the next school year,representing the significant accomplishments of City Schools and its partners to providegreat facilities for our children. Other areas of progress related to the 21st CenturyBuildings Plan is the closing of underutilized facilities. Per the 21st Century MOU,City Schools is required to close 26 buildings and to date we are ahead of the scheduleapproved by the Board of School Commissioners. Despite this progress, there are stillapproximately 120 remaining buildings in our portfolio with much needed maintenanceand repairs. The district will prioritize staff support, repairs and maintenance in newerfacilities as the result of CIP funding and 21st Century School program.

o The district is also updating a four phase Facility Condition Assessment beingconducted by the EMG consultant team to provide an overview of the district’s facilityneeds. We are in Phase 2 of the assessment. Due to the age of our systems, failures ofcritical building systems and equipment are a significant component of maintenancerepairs. These types of repairs typically include temporary repairs or complete upgradesto critical safety, mechanical, plumbing, electrical and security systems. Due to limitedcapital and repair funding, many systems are beyond their facility life cycles and tendto run until there is a breakdown in the systems. In many cases the replacement parts nolonger exist and have to be manufactured. This is an expensive challenge and oftenrequires us to make complete systems upgrades.

Baltimore City

Page 4 of 82

o Outside of our systemic challenges, City Schools is also being responsive to the lack ofair conditioning in our facilities. Over the past two years City Schools has drafted afive-year plan to provide AC in schools without full HVAC systems. Implementingthis plan is contingent on the availability of CIP funding and BPW approval of projects.City Schools’ AC plan includes providing stand-alone units in classrooms in all schoolswithout AC. These systems will provide both cooling and heating which will address amain cause of school closures in the winter months. This represents City Schools’continued efforts to maximize capital funds with energy efficient strategies that addressmultiple concerns. However, it is important to note that directing funding to airconditioning defers critical projects needed across the district.

o City Schools has also made shifts in operations by focusing on energy initiatives thathave impacted our facilities in recent years. The district has reduced our consumptionof energy (electric, natural gas, heating and steam) by 17% between FY14 and FY16.

Increased Costs o Based on a summary of our current contractors, construction costs in the area have

increased by 70% over the last five years. Baltimore City Schools has seen asignificant increase in costs, particularly in the projects that involve mechanical systemreplacements and roofing construction.

o An additional challenge is the inability to predict the future construction cost increasesof CIP projects. While escalation rates are used in cost estimates developed for CIPprojects, the time lag between project submission and full funding of the projects whichallows the district to bid projects for construction presents a significant challenge. Thisis a hardship exacerbated by the state’s previous partial funding of City Schools’ CIPprojects. While there have been discussions and changes in the funding methodsrelated to partial funding, the district will continue to be impacted in the next few years.In FY17, approximately 60% of our state allocation for systemic projects were partiallyfunded, a significant increase from previous years. This leads to the time lag betweenestimated project costs and increases between when the project scopes were originallydeveloped and submitted to BPW and when City Schools received the balance of fundsfor projects. This ultimately impacts whether City Schools can successfully moveprojects forward.

o External shocks such as large natural disasters or world-wide economic events alsohave a significant impact on costs, most often for materials. This has been evidenced inthe past, and the near future will likely see additional impacts on costs from recentnatural disasters.

Limited Local Funding o Continued financial assistance through the CIP is needed to support City Schools’ current

and future efforts to improve our ability to operate our schools efficiently. This isespecially important due to our limited local funding. Our capital allocation from the Cityof Baltimore has been $17 million since fiscal year 2012. This amount reflects BaltimoreCity’s financial position and does not demonstrate City Schools’ capital needs.

Page 5 of 82

o Compared to other LEAs that receive larger local allocations, this limited local fundingimpedes our ability to forward fund projects when we experience challenges such as thepartial funding of projects, as previously discussed. Our local funds are used to matchState funded projects. Therefore, we have no flexibility to forward fund capital projects.As a result, when project bids are higher than previously submitted estimates, we do nothave local resources to fund financial gaps and move the project forward and must rescindthe capital project. As an example, if the 2017 bid for a project came in well over theamount approved by the BPW in 2014, the project had to be canceled and resubmitted inthe FY19 CIP.

o We appreciate the IACs support for changes in the COMAR language to allow theinclusion of City Schools’ issued debt in the calculations that determine the state cost share.However, our ability to fund projects will be hampered by the proposed change in the statecost share from 93% to 91% for FY19-21. We ask that the IAC and BPW continue to assistCity Schools in addressing the proposed reduction in state funding.

II. County Information:• Number of PK-12 students – 73,953• Square miles with County – 80.94• Average number of students per square mile – 913.7• Total number of school facilities - 160

III. Total current estimated cost of repair (replacement schools, needed schools, neededrenovations, needed correction of deferred maintenance) for all school facilities: $2.4 billion

IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI): 48.3%[ FCI % = $2.4 billion/ $4.95 billion]

V. Total cost of all projects listed in the 6 year CIP Request: $357,835,000

VI. Current LEA average PSCP Maintenance Score: Overall Rating 82.63 (FY17)= Adequate (anincrease from 77.77 in FY2014)

• Summary of maintenance efforts and challenges:o City Schools announced the District’s $130 million budget shortfall last December and has

worked to identify cuts and savings to close the gap to balance the budget, including acontribution of $30 million from District office staff reductions, spending and hiringrestrictions, and a withdrawal from the district’s fund balance. Operations has had to makereal time economic decisions that reduced the most cost effective types of maintenance,both preventative and predicative based on actual allocations within the fiscal budget year.These decisions “to save money and work within the fiscal allocation” may result in a long-term increase to the amount and frequency of more expensive breakdowns, repairs andreplacement work.

o FM&O continues to experience a growing demand for response to service requests that arerelated to indoor air quality, environmental protection, school security, the increasedcomplexity of computer controlled HVAC and related mechanical equipment; and property

Page 6 of 82

damage caused by weather related events. It has continued to upgrade its work processes and levels of production through the implementation of various initiatives and development of the workforce.


Our current construction costs (from recent bids) for full replacement buildings are the following: • New construction, including site work, excluding design, CM, FF&E = $350.00 / SF• New construction, including site work, excluding design, CM, FF&E, including photovoltaic =

$385.00 / SF• New construction, including site work, design, CM, contingency, FF&E, technology, and

photovoltaic = $485.00 / SF


Please see the summary on increased costs under section I.

VIII. Listing of FY19 CIP Request (two types): SEE ATTACHMENT

Page 7 of 82

Project Description for

New School, Replacement School, or Total Renovation that results in a LIKE-NEW CONDITION of the school

Building No.

Project Type

Holabird EM 229 Replacement 1 31,506 5,105 13,036 N Y NGraceland Park/O'Donnell Heights EM 240 Replacement 2 31,277 10,052 10,189 N Y NArmistead Gardens EM 243 Renovation/Addition 3 42,588 9,446 LP N N N In Planning Total Cost 105,371 24,603 23,225


Project Description forSystemic projects, Additions, Renovations, and for other capital work that DOES NOT result in a like-new condition of the school

Bldg No. Project Type

Roland Park EM (FY17/8) 233 HVAC_phase 3 4 6,500 1,442 5,058 Y N NThe Historic Sam. Coleridge-T. E (FY17/6) 122 HVAC_phase 3 5 8,500 1,885 6,615 Y N NGarrett Heights EM (FY17/7) 212 HVAC_phase 3 6 5,200 1,153 4,047 Y N NFederal Hill E 45 Fire Alarm 7 1,000 222 778 Y N NHighlandtown 215 Roof 8 800 177 623 Y N NWilliam Baer 301 HVAC 9 5,000 1,109 3,891 Y N NWestern H 407 Elevator 10 400 89 311 Y N NYorkwood (FY16/13) 219 Fire Alarm/Sprinkler 11 875 194 681 Y N NThe Historic Sam. Coleridge T. E (FY16/32) 122 Fire Safety 12 1,100 244 856 Y N NFallstaff (FY16/36) 241 Fire Alarm 13 1,500 333 1,167 Y N NWoodhome (FY16/50) 205 Roof 14 2,600 577 2,023 Y N NPoly H (FY17/3) 403 Roof 15 6,800 1,508 5,292 Y N NWestern H (17/4) 407 Roof 16 4,500 998 3,502 Y N NCommodore John Rodgers EM 27 Fire Safety/Sprinkler 17 1,850 410 1,440 N NCollington Square EM 97 Fire Safety/Sprinkler 18 1,200 266 934 N NCurtis Bay EM 207 HVAC/Roof 19 6,500 1,442 5,058 N NHazelwood EM 210 Roof 20 1,200 266 934 N NFurman L. Templeton E 125 Roof 21 1,350 299 1,051 N NFederal Hill E 45 Structural/Roof 22 1,950 433 1,517 N NCity College H 480 Windows/Stone, Mason 23 12,679 2,812 9,867 N NGeorge Washington E 22 HVAC(univents)/Roof/W 24 3,750 832 2,918 N NGilmor E 107 Roof /HVAC/Windows& 25 6,300 1,397 4,903 N NHighlandtown #215 215 Structural & Windows 26 1,150 255 895 N NBelmont Elementary School 217 A/C 27 550 122 428 Y N NDickey Hill Elementary/Middle School 201 A/C 28 814 181 633 Y N NEdgewood Elementary School 67 A/C 29 572 127 445 Y N NHazelwood Elementary/Middle School 210 A/C 30 638 142 496 Y N NHilton Elementary School 21 A/C 31 594 132 462 Y N NMatthew A. Henson Elementary School 29 A/C 32 660 146 514 Y N NMount Royal Elementary/Middle School 66 A/C 33 924 205 719 Y N NSouthwest Baltimore Charter School (Diggs Johnson Building) 162 A/C 34 748 166 582 Y N NThomas Jefferson Elementary/Middle School 232 A/C 35 638 142 496 Y N NWindsor Hills Elementary/Middle School 87 A/C 36 462 102 360 Y N NEdgecombe Circle Elementary School 62 A/C 37 880 195 685 Y N NBrehms Lane Elementary School 231 A/C 38 616 137 479 Y N N Total Cost 90,800 20,139 70,661

Coun

ty H

as

Forw

ard

Fund

ed

(Y/N

)

Comments

LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y

/N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed

(Y/N

)

Comments

LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed

Cost

($)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Re

ques

t (Y/

N)

Prev

ious

ly

Fund

ed P

roje

ct

(Y/N

)

Page 8 of 82

Presenter: Dr. Patricia Saelens, Superintendent


• Growth is only within the incorporated towns and not in the rural areas surrounding thetowns. With each major town having its own elementary school (5), redistrictingelementary students to help balance growth in any one area isn’t a viable solution.

• County tax revenue is flat because we lack industrial growth. Agriculture is the county’snumber one industry and property zoned agriculture is caped at a very low rate. Thismakes it much more difficult for County to fund it’s share of school construction projects.

II. County Information:• Number of PK-12 students – 5,630• Square miles with County – 326• Average number of students per square mile – 17• Total number of school facilities - 12

III. Total current estimated cost of repair (replacement schools, needed schools, neededrenovations, needed correction of deferred maintenance) for all school facilities: $ 161 M

IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI): 19%[ FCI % = facility’s total repair costs / facility’s replacement cost]


VI. Current LEA average PSCP Maintenance Score: Overall Rating 91.84 = Good• Summary of maintenance efforts and challenges:• Efforts – Added a full time staff member who’s primary responsibility is HVAC filter

replacement; highly skilled workforce with the tools needed to perform their duties thusreducing the amount of work needed to be contracted out.

• Challenges – Maintaining aging equipment and infrastructure; relatively small staff

VII. What do you currently estimate as the total cost per square foot for a new school in your areainclusive of site, design, FF&E, etc.?: $395

• Comment on construction costs and challenges:• Remote Area – small number of contractors able/willing to bid on various trade

packages• Contractors unwilling to bid on State projects; smaller contractors don’t have the in-

house staff or expertise to comply with paperwork and bonding requirements• There are no general contractors headquartered in Caroline County.

Caroline County

Page 9 of 82


New School, Replacement School, Total Renovation that results in like-new condition

Project Description for New School, Replacement School, or Total Renovation that results in a LIKE-NEW CONDITION of the school

LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments

Greensboro Elementary Replacement School 1

39,913,000 14,120,000 25,793,000 Y N N

Open space classroom building that suffers from age related deterioration of critical systems combined with enrollment well above existing capacity - 9 portable classrooms

Total Cost 39,913,000 14,120,000 25,793,000

Systemic projects, Additions, and Renovations that DO NOT result in like-new school

Project Description for Systemic projects, Additions, Renovations, and for other capital work that DOES NOT result in a like-new condition of the school

LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments

Lockerman Middle School Partial Roof Replacement 2 538,000 120,000 418,000 Y N N

Roof study prepared by Garland Roofing supports the need to replace this section of roof installed in 1993.

Total Cost 538,000 120,000 418,000

Page 10 of 82

System-Wide Accreditation by the Middle States Association of Colleges & Schools

202 Chesterfield Avenue • Centreville, MD 21617 • 410-758-2403 • www.qacps.org

FY2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REQUEST PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

OCTOBER 18, 2017

Presenter: Dr. Andrea Kane, Superintendent

I. Brief Summary of the Unique Challenges, such as enrollment growth or decline,and Upkeep of PK-12 School Facilities:

Very limited County funds are allotted for regular, routine maintenanceto school buildings.

QACPS operates a small, internal maintenance staff and there is difficultyin obtaining funding to increase the workforce.

Necessary costs for the frequent upgrades to classroom and buildingtechnology currently fall under the umbrella of “Facilities.”

II. County Information:

Number of PreK-12 students: 7,721 Square land miles within the County: 372 Average number of students per square mile: 20.8 Total number of school facilities: 14

III. Total current estimated cost of repair (replacement schools, needed schools,needed renovations, needed correction of deferred maintenance) for all schoolfacilities: $ 55,685,508

IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI): %[ FCI% = facility’s total repair costs / facility’s replacement cost]: 14%

Page 11 of 82



V. Total cost of all projects listed in the 6 year CIP Request: $ 92,670,000

VI. Current LEA average PSCP Maintenance Score: Overall Rating: 89.62 = Good


o School buildings in our County were either newly built or renovatedwithin a short duration of time. This requires more local funding thatis clustered together at irregular intervals.

o During the last audit by the Maryland Legislative Auditors, they notedthat our Maintenance Department was seven technicians short basedupon the square footage of the buildings in our school system.

o HVAC and Energy Management Systems are becoming more complexto maintain and are requiring replacement parts that are no longermade.

o As most building systems now require the use of computerintegration, we have seen a sharp increase in the amount of fundingrequired just to upgrade licensing software.

VII. What do you currently estimate as the total cost per square foot for a new schoolin your area inclusive of site, design, FF&E, etc.?: $ 556.00 per square foot

Comment on construction costs and challenges:

o QACPS has experienced difficulty in ensuring interest and in gettingmultiple bidders to respond to recent construction solicitations.

o The location of Queen Anne’s County in proximity to some of thelarger, metropolitan locations suggests a high probability of meetingthe State’s requirements for MBE contracts. However, we haveexperienced challenges in obtaining interest in our projects by MBEregistered firms and then fail to meet our percentage goals.

o The State prevailing wage rates increase the cost of each projectsignificantly.

Page 12 of 82




New School, Replacement School, Total Renovation that results in like-new condition:

Project Description for New School, Replacement

School, or Total Renovation that results in a LIKE-NEW CONDITION of the school

LEA Priority

(#)

Total Estimated Cost ($)

LEA Share ($)

State Share ($)

New Funding Request (Y/N)

Previously Funded Project (Y/N)

County Has

Forward Funded (Y/N) Comments

N/A

Total Cost

Systemic projects, Additions, and Renovations that DO NOT result in like-new school:

Project Description for Systemic projects, Additions,

Renovations, and for other capital work that DOES NOT result in a like-new condition

of the school LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Total Estimated Cost ($)

LEA Share ($)

State Share ($)

New Funding Request (Y/N)

Previously Funded Project (Y/N)

County Has

Forward Funded (Y/N) Comments

Church Hill ES Chiller Replacement

1 $ 208,000 $ 112,000 $ 96,000 N N N

Kent Island HS Chiller Replacement

2 $ 1,500,000 $ 804,000 $ 696,000 N N N

Total Cost: $ 1,708,000 $ 906,000 $ 792,000 Planning Request

N

Page 13 of 82

Presenter: Dr. D’Ette W. Devine, Superintendent

I. Brief Summary of the Unique Challenges, such as enrollment growth or decline, and Upkeep of PK-12 School Facilities:

• Continued local County involvement in funding Capital projects• Ongoing deferred maintenance on aged buildings not receiving CIP funding• Relatively stagnant enrollment

II. County Information:• Number of PK-12 students – 15,455 (as of Sept. 2017)• Square miles with County – 418• Average number of students per square mile – 36• Total number of school facilities - 30

III. Total current estimated cost of repair (replacement schools, needed schools, needed renovations,needed correction of deferred maintenance) for all school facilities: $50,800,000

IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI): % 6.2[ FCI % = facility’s total repair costs / facility’s replacement cost] 50,800,000 / 824,724,000


VI. Current LEA average PSCP Maintenance Score: Overall Rating 94.36 = Good• Ongoing County involvement to fund operations personnel and efforts• Carrying $50mm per year worth of deferred maintenance

VII. What do you currently estimate as the total cost per square foot for a new school in your areainclusive of site, design, FF&E, etc.?: $335/sqft

• Cecil County benefits from positive geographical location in regards to number of qualitybidders per project who come from Baltimore, Lancaster, PA, and Delaware

• Challenges include decrease in quality skilled trade laborers into workforce in Countyand across the State

Cecil County

Page 14 of 82




LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments Gilpin Manor E - New 1 29,643,000 17,771,000 11,872,000 N Y Chesapeake City ES - New 5 30,507,000 18,741,000 11,766,000 Y N Planning Request Total Cost 60,150,000 36,512,000 23,638,000



LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments Bohemia Manor MS/HS - Roof Replacement 2 2,635,000 975,000 1,660,000 N Y Cherry Hill E - Doors & Windows 3 928,000 344,000 584,000 Y N Cecil Manor E - HVAC 4 2,624,000 971,000 1,653,000 Y N

Total Cost 6,187,000 2,290,000 3,897,000

Page 15 of 82

Presenter: Dr. Theresa R. Alban, Superintendent

I. Brief Summary of the Unique Challenges, such as enrollment growth or decline, andupkeep of PK-12 School Facilities:

• Pace of enrollment growth – Between September 2015 and September 2016,enrollment grew by 658 total students. Based on our September 22, 2017enrollment data, the total enrollment is expected to grow by another 1000 students.

• Pace of residential growth – Between 1990 and 2015, Frederick County’spopulation grew by approximately 95,000 persons. Over the next 25 years,Frederick County’s population is expected to grow by another 89,000 persons.More than 21,000 residential dwelling units have been approved in FrederickCounty and not yet built. In total, more than 9,700 students are projected to begenerated by these new residential dwelling units. At the current pace of residentialconstruction, we are anticipating another 3,900 students over the next ten years.

• Location of residential growth – At 664 square miles, Frederick County is thelargest county, geographically, in Maryland. Residential growth is concentrated inFrederick City, and the I-70 and 1-270 corridors. However, available schoolcapacity is located in other parts of Frederick County such as Thurmont andEmmitsburg in northern Frederick County. This makes it difficult to addresscapacity issues through redistricting.

• Growing Number of Aging schools – FCPS has 45 schools that are, in whole orpart, 25 or more years old. Our ten-year EFMP identifies more than 600 systemicprojects needed across our system and prioritizes 85 of those projects over the nextsix years. The EFMP also includes the replacement of two schools andmodernization of six schools in the six year CIP.

II. County Information:• Number of PK-12 students – 42,331*• Square miles with County – 664• Average number of students per square mile – 64.20• Total number of school facilities – 68

III. Total current estimated cost of repair (replacement schools, needed schools, neededrenovations, needed correction of deferred maintenance) for all school facilities:

$1.173 billion**


V. Total cost of all projects listed in the 6 year CIP Request: $ 400.4 million


Frederick County

Page 16 of 82


Best Management Practices • Maintenance serves a critical role in the education of our students by maintaining the

optimal learning environment. The Public School Construction Program (PSCP)reported maintenance inspection results for all local education agencies (LEA) for FY2010-2014 and FCPS was one of eight LEAs ranked in their top tier and one of onlythree LEAs with over forty schools. During this time frame, 96% of the 68 FCPSschools inspected were rated “Superior” or “Good”. In 2017, the PSCP inspection ofOakdale Elementary School yielded a 96 out of 100 score, for a superior rating.

• Twenty employees obtained the Facility Management Profession credential issued bythe International Facility Management Association in FY17. With 60 total FMPs,FCPS has the largest cadre among all other school districts.

• We continue to optimize our SchoolDude implementation. FCPS uses the SchoolDudesoftware solution for work processing and asset management. The Departmentcompleted its comprehensive asset inventory, capturing over 190,000 building-systemassets. Preventive maintenance schedules are now in place, resulting in 99,150 labor-hours of scheduled maintenance work each year.

• The Department uses SchoolDude’s Capital Forecasting module to generate strategic,facility-planning information. This information allows us to accurately review andprioritize our systemic projects and provides our deferred maintenance and facilitycondition index.

• Developed a process to measure the instructional suitability of classrooms – assessingparameters of the optimal learning environment, including temperature, humidity, andlighting.

Challenges • Funding - Ideally, a comprehensive facilities funding plan includes provisions for both

maintaining school facilities, as well as upgrading the facilities to accommodatechanges in environmental, safety, and handicapped regulations, and changes in securityand instructional practices and technology. The current levels of funding are notadequate to meet the maintenance needs of FCPS.

• Staffing - Recruiting and retaining qualified staff in commercial construction tradesremains an obstacle for FCPS and many other county school systems. The departmentwill execute a gap analysis study to characterize weaknesses in the skill sets oftradesmen, so that we can target training for optimal benefit. We continue to rely oninnovative training and skill development to develop in-house staff.

VII. What do you currently estimate as the total cost per square foot for a new school inyour area inclusive of site, design, FF&E, etc.?:

• $457/ sq. ft.

Comment on construction costs and challenges: • FCPS has seen an 11-14% increase in construction costs due to prevailing wage rate

requirements.

Page 17 of 82

• As a total cost of construction, site costs have increased from 12% in the early 2000’sto approximately 20% today due in large part to increasingly restrictive storm watermanagement regulations.

• The new MEMA emergency “shelter in place” electrical power requirements requireprovisions for additional equipment (HVAC; data; coolers/freezers) to be placed onemergency generators, thereby increasing cost of construction.

• Administrative requirements of MBE regulations place a burden on contractors thatincreases the cost of construction.

• FCPS has experienced at least one major contractor going out of business on three ofthe last four new school construction projects resulting in less bidders. Additionally,the construction workforce is at an all-time low and contractors have a difficult timehiring skilled workers.

• Commodity pricing has increased at an alarming rate. As an example, from 2008-2015we have seen a 45% increase in asphalt products, a 40% increase in gypsum products, a30% increase in insulation, and a 26% increase in plastic pipe. FCPS is concerned thatwe will experience another sharp spike in commodities pricing due to recent naturaldisasters world-wide.

• A mandated pre-k program without funding to construct space to house the programwill place an undue burden on LEAs.

• The size of a 700 SRC elementary school has grown approximately 10,000 square feetdue in large part to increased number of instructional support spaces.

Page 18 of 82




LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments

New Sugarloaf ES 1 41,845,000 26,667,000 15,178,000 N Y Y $8,507,000 requested in FY19

New Butterfly Ridge ES 2 48,519,000 30,463,000 18,056,000 N Y Y $10,385,000 requested in FY19

Urbana ES Replacement 3 47,215,665 28,756,665 18,459,000 Y N N

$2,875,000 requested in FY19; Anticipate Co forward funding portion

Rock Creek Replacement 4 42,954,338 29,937,338 13,017,000 Y N N Local Planning approval requested in FY19

Total Cost 180,534,003 115,824,003 64,710,000

Page 19 of 82



LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments

Catoctin HS HVAC (PH 1) 5 4,000,000 1,440,000 2,560,000 Y N N Woodsboro ES Boiler Replacement 6 225,000 81,000 144,000 y N N Middletown ES gym HVAC 7 597,000 239,000 358,000 Y N N Valley ES Roof Replacement 8 393,000 157,000 236,000 Y N N Thurmont MS Roof Replacement 9 580,000 231,000 349,000 Y N N Carroll Manor ES sewage pump station 10 600,000 240,000 360,000 Y N N Gov TJ HS Roof Replacement 11 450,000 180,000 270,000 Y N N

Total Cost 6,845,000 2,568,000 4,277,000

Page 20 of 82

Presenter: Dr. David Cox, Superintendent


• 15 of our 22 schools are over 30 years old (68%)• 11 of those are over 40 years old (50%)• Limited local funds available for capital projects• Have balanced the number of facilities with declining enrollment through consolidation

and closings. We continue to evaluate the most efficient use of schools and are currentlysoliciting for a consultant to conduct the Facility Utilization Study of Elementary Schools

• 54.2% FARMS• Allegany County is a uniquely rural county removed from the metropolitan areas. After

decades of declining enrollment the county-wide enrollment has stabilized.• Much as other counties we have been forced to deal with budget cuts that have forced us

to reduce staff in all areas. Further reductions will affect not only the delivery ofinstruction but also our ability to maintain our buildings.

II. County Information:• Number of PK-12 students – 8,443• Square miles with County – 424• Average number of students per square mile – 20• Total number of school facilities - 22


Cost of renovation of existing facilities based on 2% FCI per year of school life. $435,929,000


V. Total cost of all projects listed in the 6 year CIP Request: $30,421,000 Excluding prior yearfunding

VI. Current LEA average PSCP Maintenance Score: Overall Rating 87.01 = Good• Summary of maintenance efforts and challenges:The major challenge is the availability of local funds for major capital and systemic projects

VII. What do you currently estimate as the total cost per square foot for a new school in your areainclusive of site, design, FF&E, etc.?: $417.00 w/o site; $477.00 with site



Allegany County

Page 21 of 82



LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y

/N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed

(Y/N

)

Comments

Allegany HS. 1 55,803,000 15,611,000 40,192,000 N Y N Total Cost 55,803,000 15,611,000 40,192,000



LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments

Bel Air Roof 2 1,077,000 193,000 884,000 Y N N Career Center Roof Ph1 3 1,251,000 219,000 1,032,000 Y N N Washington Boiler 4 909,000 168,000 741,000 Y N N Career Center Roof Ph2 5 440,000 98,000 342,000 Y N N Braddock Boiler 6 909,000 168,000 741,000 Y N N Fort Hill Boiler 7 1,626,000 275,000 1,351,000 Y N N Westernport Roof 8 440,000 98,000 342,000 Y N N Northeast Roof 9 610,000 123,000 487,000 Y N N Beall Windows and Doors 10 268,000 94,000 174,000 Y N N West Side Windows and Doors

11 317,000 115,000 202,000 Y N N Northeast Gym Addition 12 3,013,000 869,000 2,144,000 Y N N

Total Cost 10,860,000 2,420,000 8,440,000

Page 22 of 82

Presenter: Dr. Daniel D. Curry, Superintendent


1. Calvert County Public Schools K-12 student enrollment has declined from 17,014.5FTE in 2006/07 to 15,511.75 FTE in 2016/17. This represents an almost 9% declineover a 10 year period. The housing boom in Calvert County ended in 2008 and acombination of slow economic growth, relatively high median home prices, andslow housing starts, have all been contributing factors.

2. Conversely, the percentage of students eligible for FARMS has increased from 14%to 22% during that same period.

3. Calvert County Public Schools successfully operates and maintains over 2.3 Millionsquare feet of school facilities. Over the last 10 years we have built 1 newelementary school, replaced 2 schools, and have a 3rd replacement schoolcurrently under construction. The level of funding from our local county does notallow us to build new or replacement schools with any more frequency and limitsthe number of systemic type projects we can undertake simultaneously. As aresult, we are beginning to see our facility inventory age and building systemicissues arise.

4. Unless we infuse the required capital dollars towards systemic renovations, we willbegin seeing critical failures within our facilities. Therefore, 84% of Calvert CountyPublic Schools CIP project requests for FY 2019 – FY 2024 are systemicrenovations.

II. County Information:1. Number of PK-12 students – 15,969 (Based on 9/30/2016 Enrollment Count)2. Square miles with County – 213 Square Land Miles3. Average number of students per square mile – 75 students per Square Land Mile4. Total number of school facilities - 25


$149,517,360

IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI): 18% (estimate only)[ FCI % = facility’s total repair costs / facility’s replacement cost]

Calvert County

Page 23 of 82

In 2016, Calvert County Public Schools contracted with a consulting firm to perform Facility Condition Assessments of our schools to assist with long range planning. Assessments for over 50% of our buildings are currently complete. The remaining 50% have not yet been surveyed. Therefore, the calculated average FCI for our schools is only an estimated value.

It is worth noting that although our current estimated FCI is only 18%, much of this is attributable to our efforts in successfully maintaining our facilities and addressing systemic issues as they arise, in house, through our maintenance staff. Additionally, we have identified and completed multiple projects that qualify through the Aging Schools Program and QZAB. Based on the average FCI multiplier of 2% per year for every year of a building’s age, the average FCI for Calvert County Public Schools facilities should be 42%.

V. Total cost of all projects listed in the 6 year CIP Request:

$152,559,000 with State Participation of $45,596,000

VI. Current LEA average PSCP Maintenance Score: Overall Rating 94.19 = Good 1. Summary of maintenance efforts and challenges:

Efforts: i. Calvert County school buildings continue to perform extremely well on

maintenance inspections. Currently, 50% of CCPS schools have a superior score and 50% of our schools score in the good category.

ii. CCPS maintenance and building service staff take immense pride in caring for their schools. This is evident from the 2017 maintenance score of 89.33 received by Northern Middle School. The 1976 building is currently in the CIP for replacement in 2024.

iii. As good stewards of the County citizens’ tax dollars, we have learned to maximize our maintenance operations budget. Over the last 10 years, the operations cost per square foot of facility has decreased by 10%.

iv. Through a comprehensive Energy Conservation Plan, CCPS has realized a 16% decrease in energy consumption over the last 10 years.

Challenges: v. Maintenance of newer facilities with more complex systems requires

expertise, continuing education of staff, and technical knowledge that can be challenging for our maintenance personnel.

vi. Ever increasingly, systemic components, especially within building lighting controls and HVAC systems require more frequent inspections, calibration

Page 24 of 82

and replacement. This requires significantly more manpower than CCPS currently has.

vii. Attracting new talent as our maintenance staff retires is an ongoing issue. Due to an apparent shortage of trained and experienced technicians in almost all trades, we have experienced difficulty in filling vacated skilled trades positions. The limited pool of viable candidates tends to drive labor costs upward, making employment with CCPS less attractive, even with a good benefits package.

viii. Keeping up with new standards, codes, and regulations and having the manpower to do so, also puts a strain on resources and the operations budget.

VII. What do you currently estimate as the total cost per square foot for a new school in your area inclusive of site, design, FF&E, etc.?:

$353/SF (This does not include site acquisition. Our last 3 schools have been replacement schools that were built on the same site as the existing facility) Comment on construction costs and challenges:

i. Calvert County Public Schools construction costs appear to be in line with metro DC and Baltimore regional costs especially if projects fall above the $500,000 prevailing wage threshold.

ii. Attracting local contractors for specific trades such as structural steel and

masonry is very problematic. Lack of local specialty contractors for such trades has resulted in lack of competition and inflated pricing on projects.

iii. Designing facilities to be LEED certified has resulted in increased A/E fees.

Additionally, commissioning firms which were not required for projects 10 years ago, are now the norm and required for LEED certification. We have also seen an increase in costs from contractors for the additional testing and documentation required for LEED and commissioning.

iv. Site design and construction costs have seen a sharp increase due to new

storm water management regulations from Maryland Department of the Environment.

v. Attracting MBEs towards meeting MBE goals can be difficult depending on the geographic region of Calvert the project resides in.

Page 25 of 82

VIII. Listing of FY19 CIP Request (two types): IX. New School, Replacement School, Total Renovation that results in like-new condition


LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments

Northern High School Replacement 1 20,800,000 11,488,000 9,312,000 N Y N

This is a request for funding for the 3rd year of construction

Total Cost 20,800,000 11,488,000 9,312,000

X. Systemic projects, Additions, and Renovations that DO NOT result in like-new school


LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments

Patuxent High School Chillers & Cooling Tower 2 750,000 352,500 397,500 N N N

Southern Middle School Controls 3 588,000 276,360 311,640 N N N

Building Automation System Controls

Total Cost 1,338,000 628,860 709,140

Page 26 of 82

Carroll County Public SchoolsFY 2019 Capital Improvement Program Request


Presenter: Stephen H. Guthrie, Superintendent


Declining enrollments and subsequent loss of revenue has put a strain on both theoperating and capital budgets.

Local project recognition has declined, leading to state funding requests that fall belowhistorical averages and an increase in deferred projects.

II. County Information: Number of PK-12 students – 25,256 Square miles with County – 456 Average number of students per square mile – 55 Total number of school facilities - 40

III. Total current estimated cost of repair (replacement schools, needed schools, neededrenovations, needed correction of deferred maintenance) for all school facilities: $304,031,413

IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI): %27.5[ FCI % = facility’s total repair costs / facility’s replacement cost]


VI. Current LEA average PSCP Maintenance Score: Overall Rating 91.22 = Good Summary of maintenance efforts and challenges:


Comment on construction costs and challenges: The only projects we have bid recentlyhave been roof replacement projects, so we are still utilizing the PSCP cost per squarefoot to budget.

Page 27 of 82





Project Description forNew School, Replacement School, or Total Renovation that results in a LIKE-NEW CONDITION of the school

LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments

Total Cost 0 0 0

Page 28 of 82




Project Description forSystemic projects, Additions, Renovations, and for other capital work that DOES NOT result in a like-new condition of the school

LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments

Sandymount ES - HVAC Replacement

1 $6,231,000

$2,882,000

$3,349,000

Y N N

Westminster HS - Electrical Equipment Replacement

2 $1,060,000

$529,000 $531,000 Y N N

Liberty HS - Science Room Renovation

3 $882,000 $466,000 $466,000 Y N N

South Carroll HS - Science Room Renovation

4 $882,000 $466,000 $466,00 Y N N

Sandymount ES - Roof Replacement

5 $1,502,000

$661,000 $841,000 Y N N

Linton Springs ES - Roof Replacement

6 $1,736,000

$763,000 $973,000 Y N N

Total Cost12,293,000 5,767,000 6,626,000

Page 29 of 82

Presenter: Dr. Boyd Michael, Superintendent

I. Brief Summary of the Unique Challenges, such as enrollment growth or decline, and Upkeep ofPK-12 School Facilities: Early Childhood Education

• Increased emphasis on the importance of early childhood learning is a goal forWCPS, where almost 50% of our students receive free or reduced cost meals.Additions or renovations to house increased pre-kindergarten and all-daykindergarten may be needed at some of our elementary schools.

Aging Schools• Currently, over 40% of our school buildings exceed 40 years of age. In 10 years,

even with the completion of the projects within Washington County PublicSchools’ Master Plan, the percentage of schools over 40 years old will rise to 50%,with 40% of WCPS schools being over 50 years old.

• All but one of WCPS’s middle schools were built in the 1970’s or earlier, the loneexception being opened in 1980. Most of these schools were built using the“open school” concept, and have undergone a hodge-podge of uncoordinatedmodifications over the years to try to achieve the best learning environment forour students. These schools need to be modernized or replaced to meet today’seducational and environmental standards.

Funding to Optimize Replacement Cycle• The current replacement cycle that can be locally supported for WCPS school

buildings results in the replacement or modernization of a school once every 3 to4 years. With 46 school facilities, this means that a school built today would notbe replaced for 160 years – a pace that does not sustain WCPS schools.

II. County Information:• Number of PK-12 students – 22,545• Square miles with County – 468• Average number of students per square mile – 48• Total number of school facilities – 46

III. Total current estimated cost of repair (replacement schools, needed schools, neededrenovations, needed correction of deferred maintenance) for all school facilities: WashingtonCounty Public Schools’ FY2019 Comprehensive Maintenance Plan and 2017 10 Year EducationalFacility Master Plan currently identify a total estimated cost of repair at $250,000,000 usingtoday’s dollars, and including an estimated 2%/year of accumulated deferred maintenance forfacilities under 10 years old.

IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI): 16.6% [ FCI % = facility’stotal repair costs / facility’s replacement cost]

V. Total cost of all projects listed in the 6 year CIP Request:Total Cost: $177,182,000

Washington County

Page 30 of 82

Total State Funds: $105,740,000 Total Local Funds: $ 71,442,000

VI. Current LEA average PSCP Maintenance Score: Overall Rating 92.22 = Good• Summary of maintenance efforts and challenges:

With the continuous advance of building technologies, ensuring adequatetraining of maintenance staff is challenging.

Maintaining sufficient budgets to fund a robust preventive maintenanceprogram that extends the life of equipment and major systems.

VII. What do you currently estimate as the total cost per square foot for a new school in your areainclusive of site, design, FF&E, etc.?: Washington County constructs schools within both themaximum gross area allowances established in COMAR and the cost-per-square-foot allowancedetermined by the state each year based upon a statewide average of construction costs:$302/sq. ft. plus allowable site development costs. Design, furniture and equipment, utility, andoffsite costs that are not funded by the state generally add about 24% to this amount.

• Comment on construction costs and challenges: Volatile cost changes for systemic renovations, where yearly market conditions

can make or break whether projects can proceed based on funding and budgetscreated in prior years.

State regulations add tremendous cost and complexity to all projects:• High Performance Act (LEED)• Prevailing Wage• Emergency Shelter Requirements• Stormwater Management• Maryland Historic Trust• Minority Business Enterprise• State Drawing Review Process

Page 31 of 82




LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments

Urban Educational Campus - Board of Education Component 1,3 $19,248,000 $7,323,000 $11,925,000 Y N

Y-20%

WCPS is submitting both a Request for Planning Approval and a Request for Funding

Sharpsburg Elementary 2 $26,728,000 $11,022,000 $15,706,000 Y N N

Total Cost $45,976,000 $18,355,000 $27,631,000



LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments

Boonsboro ES - Roof Replacement 4 $1,544,000 $541,000 $1,003,000 Y N N South Hagerstown HS - Roof Replacement (Ph.II) 5 $1,994,000 $659,000 $1,335,000 Y N N

Total Cost $3,538,000 $1,200,000 $2,438,000 Page 32 of 82

Presenter: Dr. Donna C. Hanlin, Superintendent

I. Brief Summary of the Unique Challenges, such as enrollment growth or decline, and Upkeep ofPK-12 School Facilities:Wicomico County has one of the highest at-risk populations in the State, considering thepercentage of students who qualify for free and reduced meals, those who receive specialeducation services and those who are English Language Learners. Wicomico is at the bottom ofthe state in terms of wealth per pupil, in FY2017 we were last, in FY2018 next to last. Two majorpriorities for Superintendent Hanlin and the Wicomico Community are Universal Pre-Kindergartenand increasing the graduation rate. Currently, only 33% of our students who enter Kindergartenare ready to learn. In turn, only 82% of our students who enter 9th grade graduate in four years. Itis imperative that we have adequate school facilities to help us address these two significanteducational adequacy issues.

• From 2008 to 2010 WCPS completed 3rd party Facility Conditions Assessments* whichrevealed the following:o Most of the systemic needs fall within the categories of (1) beyond useful life, (2)

accessibility and (3) building codeo Over 50% of the portfolio was over 30 years old and over 58% of the portfolio fell

into the “Fair to Poor” category for FCI (Facility Condition Index)o Total backlog of renewal and repair needs was $159.2 Milliono Projected funding to maintain FCI over 10 years ranged from $6.2 Million to $34.3

Million annually, with an average of $13.5 Million• Historically (FY2013-FY2017) WCPS has received on average 69% of total funding

requested from the State and 55% of total funding requested from Local Government.o Although WCPS’s current cost share is 97%, it only covers items determined and

calculated as eligible by the State. The latest proposal to the IAC decreases ourcost share to 95%. Although that still appears to be a high cost share, on average,within the last 5 years, overall project costs for WCPS are a 50% split betweenState and Local Government due to items needed for a project, but not eligible forstate funding.

• Between 2012-2016 WCPS executed an average of $20 Million of construction annually.o $33 Million was requested in FY2018, of which $19 Million was recommended for

funding (State + Local Government)• Wicomico’s enrollments have been growing since 2014. Projected enrollments indicate

that overall enrollments will continue to grow and will eventually outpace current staterated capacity (SRC) around 2023.o 2nd highest student enrollment among the Eastern Shore Counties and 15th largest

student enrollment in the state.o Current enrollment bubble is making its way through the entire system. It started

in 2013 at the elementary level, hit the middle school this school year and willreach high school in 2021.

o At-risk population (ELL, Spec Ed. & FARM) has grown from 59% of totalenrollments in 2005 to 76% in 2017.

Wicomico County

Page 33 of 82

We take great pride in collaborating with both local and state government regarding our public-school construction and associated funding needs. We are facing many facility challenges, aging building infrastructure, increased enrollments and expanding educational initiatives. We cannot operate in isolation and accomplish our goals, we recognize the unique needs across our State and provide this information to ensure that adequate and equitable funding is provided for Wicomico so that our students have the same access to high quality instructional programming being delivered in adequate facilities.

*included 22 of 24 school buildings (the remaining two were being replaced)

II. County Information:• Number of PK-12 students – 14,644.5• Square miles with County – 400• Average number of students per square mile – 37• Total number of school facilities -24


IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI): 33%[ FCI % = facility’s total repair costs / facility’s replacement cost]$193,652,678/$595,509,480 = .33

(Data excludes the recently replaced James M Bennett High, Bennett Middle and currently under construction West Salisbury)



Wicomico is working towards increased preventative maintenance (PM) instead of reactivemaintenance (RM). RM is more expensive than PM. Increasing PM requires additional staff. Wehave been successful in increasing the levels of PM and will need additional full time staffpositions. Within the last year we reorganized how PM is prioritized which resulted in lessemergency call and less down time of equipment which contributes to more efficient andaffordable operations. Any cost deferred due to PM is being invested into new equipment andmaterials.


$28,647,000 (Total Project Costs) / 60,833 SF = $471 / SF• Comment on construction costs and challenges:

i. The cost listed above includes recent life cycle cost sacrifices that were necessaryto meet reduced budgets on the most recent major construction project.

ii. The Eastern Shore has been struggling with maintaining a stable sub-contractorworkforce.

1. Bidding is often limited to 3 or less bids per trade package due to limitedavailability of qualified local and regional contractors.

Page 34 of 82

2. The trades that have survived the economic downturn are very busy andare spread thin across the entire Eastern Shore.

3. We are outside the target area for several key trade contractors to remaincompetitive and therefore if they bid it is often at a higher cost withlimited staffing.

Page 35 of 82




LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments

West Salisbury Elem 1 28,647 13,128 15,519 N Y Y Replacement Beaver Run Elem 3 47,636 23,568 24,068 Y N N Replacement

Total Cost 76,238 36,696 39,587



LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments

Delmar Elem 2 10,298 2,903 7,395 N N N Limited Reno Glen Ave Elem 4 1,893 331 1,562 Y N N Systemic Roof Pinehurst Elm 5 897 154 725 Y N N Systemic Roof

Total Cost 13,088 3,388 9,682

Page 36 of 82

Presenter: Dr. Kimberly Hill, Superintendent


• Enrollment growth – 20% increase over the last 20 years• 2016 Graduation rates – CCPS 92.17 percent and State 87.61 percent• Fourth fastest population growth of Special Education & highest population growth of

English Language Learner (ELL) in the state• Highly transient student population due to adjacency to four military bases and DC• State inspection scores – average 90+ scores on inspected buildings over the last three

years• Ten schools with open-space floorplans

II. County Information:• Number of PK-12 students – 26,390• Square land miles with County – 458• Average number of students per square land mile – 57.62• Total number of school facilities - 38

III. Total current estimated cost of repair (replacement schools, needed schools, neededrenovations, needed correction of deferred maintenance) for all school facilities:$595,000,000.00 - [estimate derived from the System-Wide Capital Improvement Plan (SWCIP)developed in 2014 by GWWO Architects for Charles County Public Schools]

IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI): 19.99% **[ FCI % = facility’s total repair costs / facility’s replacement cost] **(estimate derived from theSWCIP developed in 2014 by GWWO Architects for Charles County Public Schools)



i. Standardization of materials/suppliesii. Partnership between Planning & Construction/Maintenance/Operations

iii. Enhanced training required for new systems


• Billingsley ES/ES #22 - Construction contract $35,165,000.00

• Land purchase $1.5 Million/A&E $2.1 Million/FF&E $2.1 Million

• Total project costs $42,898,000 (103,737 sf bldg.) = $413.53 per sf• Comment on construction costs and challenges:

Charles County

Page 37 of 82

i. Reduced available lands due to downzoning & reduction in the PFAii. Sewer availability on the edges of the development boundaries

iii. Contractor/subcontractor pool limited due to travel distance from DC/Baltimore &available work

iv. Increased complexities of projects due to LEED requirementsv. Increased site costs due to Stormwater Management (SWM) practices

vi. Increased costs due to Prevailing Wages requirements

Page 38 of 82




LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments Dr. Samuel A. Mudd E. - Modernization/Addition

1 28,289,000 15,920,000 12,369,000

N Y Y-

47% County has forward funded $5,755,000.00

New Elementary School #22 - Construction

2 37,183,000 19,453,000 17,730,000

N Y Y-

23% County has forward funded $3,996,000.00

Benjamin Stoddert M. - Modernization/Addition

5 45,014,000 23,676,000 21,338,000

N N RECEIVED PLANNING APPROVAL

Eva Turner E. - Modernization/Addition

6 22,541,000 13,544,000 8,997,000

N N RECEIVED PLANNING APPROVAL

T.C. Martin E.. -Modernization/Addition

13 28,383,000 14,231,000 14,152,000

Y N

Total Cost 161,410,000 86,824,000 74,586,000

Page 39 of 82



LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments Full-Day Kindergarten Addition - Berry ES

3 3,293,000 1,817,000 1,476,000

N Y Full-Day Kindergarten Addition - Craik ES

4 4,184,000 2,047,000 2,137,000

N Y Maurice J. McDonough H. - Security Enhancements & Preforming Arts

7 11,789,000 5,786,000 6,003,000

Y N

Improves school security by creating a secure front entrance and relocates the office while adding preforming arts spaces

Open Space Enclosure - Dr. Gustavus Brown ES

8 2,775,000 1,235,000 1,540,000

Y N

Addresses open space layout which is not conducive to learning

Roof Replacement - John Hanson MS

9 4,330,000 1,963,000 2,367,000

Y N

Systemic replacement based on age & need from CCPS work order system - incorporating future solar opportunity

Roof Replacement - Westlake H.

10 3,343,000 1,595,000 1,748,000

Y N Boiler Replacement - Indian Head E.

11 1,326,000 618,000 708,000

Y N La Plata H. - Renovation 12 6,501,000 3,645,000 2,856,000

Y N Full-Day Kindergarten Addition - J.P. Ryon ES

14 3,995,000 1,795,000 2,200,000

Y N Full-Day Kindergarten Addition - Malcolm ESN

15 3,699,000 1,680,000 2,019,000

Y N

Total Cost 45,235,000 22,181,000 23,054,000

Page 40 of 82

Presenter: Mr. James Scott Smith, Superintendent


• During the 1990’s SMCPS focused on a program to bring our existing facilities up tomodern educational standards through modernization and additions. These schools arenow coming due for life cycle replacement of roof and HVAC systems.

• The recent focus has been to meet the needs of our growing community with newconstruction based on our expansion of our existing schools in the 1990’s.

• SMCPS has added 535,394 s.f. over the past 10 years while the per s.f. maintenancebudget has decreased by $0.31. Most importantly, staffing during this time has notincreased, based on the number of positions available and the ability to find skilledapplicants.

• SMCPS is the 4th fastest growing county in the state and has the fastest growingmunicipality in the state (Leonardtown).

II. County Information:• Number of PK-12 students – 17,852 (includes PK3 and PK4 – half and full day)• Square land miles with County – 359• Average number of students per square land mile – 50

Total number of school facilities – 26* *This number does not include: Chesapeake Public Charter School, Fairlead Academy, which is housed in a county owned facility, and Fairlead Academy 2, which is housed in a relocatable complex.


Based on current six-year capital plan for FY 2019 – FY 2024:Replacement schools: $0Needed schools: $133,070,000Note: (includes relocatables needed to house students during construction)Needed renovations: $45,422,000Needed correction of deferred maintenance: $61,727,819.00

Deferred maintenance: $17,999,120.46 Deferred renovations: $43,728,699.29

St. Mary's County

Page 41 of 82

IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI): 18.72%

[ FCI % = facility’s total repair costs / facility’s replacement cost]

St. Mary’s County Public Schools does not currently have a consultant preparing an FCI review. In completing the FCI for this presentation, SMCPS utilized the following information:

• FY 2017 actual maintenance cost per school• FY 2019 deferred maintenance from the most current Comprehensive Maintenance Plan• FY 2019 – FY 2024 scheduled work from the most current Comprehensive Maintenance Plan• FY 2019 – FY 2024 scheduled work from the most current State Capital Improvements Program

This FCI does not take into account changes that are needed to meet educational program requirements and is based on the codes and standards that were in place at the time of construction.

SMCPS Note: In order to accurately complete this section, the definition of “facility’s total repair costs” and the “facility’s replacement cost” must first be established on a state-wide basis, using actual field

investigation of each school based on a set of established guidelines.

SchoolFCI

6 YearGreen Holly E.S. - Building B 79.77%Town Creek E.S. 69.32%White Marsh E.S. 69.29%Green Holly E.S. - Building A 64.29%Dynard E.S. 56.65%Mechanicsville E.S. 45.66%Park Hall E.S. 29.15%Lettie Marshall Dent E.S. 28.88%Hollywood E.S. 27.80%Benjamin Banneker E.S. - Early Childhood Ctr 21.37%Great Mills H.S. 20.24%Lexington Park E.S. 5.52%Ridge E.S. 4.91%Piney Point E.S. 4.34%Fairlead Academy 3.11%Chopticon H.S. 2.47%Greenview Knolls E.S. 1.74%George Washington Carver E.S. 1.22%Benjamin Banneker E.S. 1.19%Esperanza M.S. 1.10%Leonardtown H.S. 1.04%James A Forrest Career & Technology Ctr 0.99%Oakville E.S. 0.67%Evergreen E.S. 0.61%Leonardtown E.S. 0.59%Margaret Brent M.S. 0.57%Leonardtown M.S. 0.17%Captain Walter Francis Duke E.S. 0.11%Spring Ridge M.S. 0.09%SMCPS System Average 18.72%

Page 42 of 82

V. Total cost of all projects listed in the 6 year CIP Request:• Local Funds $101,764,000 • State Funds $76,241,000• Total $178,005,000


• Adequate funding for maintenance through the operating budget, including staffingo Funding has decreased from a high of $1.68 in FY 2009 to a low of $1.24 in

FY 2016 per square foot during a period of rapid growth and new facilities.• The ability to hire qualified staff to address the needs of ever-changing technology.• Through the automated work order system and a concentrated effort, planned versus

unplanned work orders have decreased from a high of 77.90% unplanned work inFY 2008 to a low of 42.80% in FY 2017.

Systemic ProjectsProject Title State Funding Local Funding Total Project Park Hall E.S. Roof & HVAC Systemic Renovation & Sewer Lift Station $3,707,000 $3,495,000 $7,202,000Hollywood E.S. Roof & HVAC Systemic Renovation & Emergency Power $3,555,000 $3,343,000 $6,898,000Green Holly E.S. Partial Roof Replacement $859,000 $1,153,000 $2,012,000Great Mills H.S. Partial Roof Replacement $1,511,000 $1,783,000 $3,294,000Green Holly E.S. Switch Gear & HVAC Systemic Renovation $1,466,000 $2,316,000 $3,782,000Dynard E.S. Roof & HVAC Systemic Renovation & Emergency Power $2,404,000 $3,536,000 $5,940,000Mechanicsville E.S. Modernization $3,248,000 $6,087,000 $9,335,000Great Mills H.S. Roof Replacement - Study $3,103,000 $3,866,000 $6,969,000

New Capacity ProjectsProject Title State Funding Local Funding Total Project New Elementary School - Central County $16,586,000 $20,726,000 $37,312,000Lettie Marshall Dent E.S. Addition, HVAC Systemic Renovation, Electrical Upgrade, & Tank Replacement $2,703,000 $4,226,000 $6,929,000Middle & High School Facility $37,099,000 $51,233,000 $88,332,000

Total $76,241,000 $101,764,000 $178,005,000

Page 43 of 82


• Comment on construction costs and challenges:• There have historically been increased construction costs for SMCPS compared to other

school systems in the state based on location and availability of constructioncompanies.

• Multi-year funding of projects beyond the actual construction timeframe can be achallenge on an LEA to ensure adequate funding is in place to complete the project.




LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments N/A

Total Cost

Page 44 of 82



LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments Park Hall E.S. - Roof & HVAC Systemic Renovation & Sewer Lift Station

1

7,202,000 3,495,000 3,707,000

N Y Hollywood E.S. - Roof & HVAC Systemic Renovation & Emergency Power

2

6,898,000 3,343,000 3,555,000

N Y Green Holly E.S. - Partial Roof Replacement

3

2,012,000 1,153,000 859,000

Y N Great Mills H.S. - Partial Roof Replacement

5

3,294,000 1,783,000 1,511,000

Y N

Total Cost 19,267,000 9,681,000 9,586,000

Page 45 of 82

Presenter: Mr. Louis H. Taylor, Superintendent


• Recent School Construction History: From 1980 through 2000, Worcester Countyexperienced a 50% increase in total population which resulted in a 28% increase inschool enrollment.In 1997, the Worcester County Board of Education and the Worcester CountyCommissioners developed and began to execute an aggressive and ambitious schoolconstruction program. The goal of the program was to address facility and instructionaldeficiencies in 1950’s vintage schools and to address overcrowding due to ongoingpopulation growth in Worcester County.WCPS completed renovation/addition projects at five schools between 2002 and 2016.The total construction cost for these five projects was $145,000,000. Total State fundingfor these projects totaled $36,000,000. Total project costs for these projects, includingA/E fee, CM fee, technology and FFE was $179,000,000.

• Enrollment: Student enrollment has remained stable over the past ten years atapproximately 6,700 students. Projected enrollments identify an enrollment of nearly7,000 students by 2026. Future school construction in Worcester County will be drivenmore by aging facilities than by enrollment growth.

• County Wealth: 42% of all Worcester County students were eligible for the Free andReduced Meal Program during the 2016-2017 school year. This includes 67% of thestudents served by our three Pocomoke area schools, 49% of the students served by ourthree Snow Hill area schools and 51% of the Berlin area elementary school students.Wealth formulas limit the amounts of State and Federal funding available to WorcesterCounty Public Schools and increase the responsibility placed upon our local governmentofficials to fund major school construction projects while simultaneously funding nearly80% of the school system operating budget each year.

II. County Information:• Number of PK-12 students – 6,687 (As of 9/22/17)• Square LAND miles with County – 455• Average number of students per LAND square mile – 14.70• Total number of school facilities – 14

III. Total current estimated cost of repair (replacement schools, needed schools, needed renovations,needed correction of deferred maintenance) for all school facilities: $67,871,000

Worcester County

Page 46 of 82

(Note: This amount includes the estimated $42,406,000 project cost for the Showell Elementary Replacement School.)

IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI): 14.27%[ FCI % = facility’s total repair costs / facility’s replacement cost]14.27 % = $67,871,000 / $475,629,280 [Estimate only – we do not have a complete/currentfacilities condition assessment]

Note: Using the ‘2% for each year of a school’s life’ Facility Condition Index estimating techniqueprovided by the PSCP staff results in an overall FCI of 56.29% for Worcester County PublicSchools. The ongoing maintenance effort at each of our schools is reflected in the differencebetween the 56.29% age-impact FCI and the 14.27% estimated current repair cost FCI.


VI. Current LEA average PSCP Maintenance Score: Overall Rating 89.33 = Good• Summary of maintenance efforts and challenges:• The Worcester County Public Schools 13-person Maintenance Department is responsible

for the maintenance and repair of 1.3 million square feet of facilities (14 school facilities,35 portable classrooms and the Central Office) and 430 acres of school grounds.

• Seven of our schools were constructed between 38 and 47 years ago and have had nocomprehensive renovations since original construction. These aging facilities presentmaintenance, upkeep and repair challenges for both our Maintenance Department andthe school custodial staffs.

• The overall PSCP Maintenance Score for inspections conducted at 12 of our schools since2011 is 89.33. The average age of the schools at the time of inspection was 24.92 years.7 of the 12 schools inspected received a rating of ‘Superior’ or ‘Good’. The 5 schoolsrated “Adequate” were an average of 2.75 points short of achieving a ‘Good’ rating andthe average age of those schools rated ‘Adequate’ was 40-years-old at the time ofinspection.

• We believe that these inspection results illustrate the efforts and commitment of ourteam to meet those challenges and to provide our students functional, well maintainedand quality school facilities, even in those facilities approaching 50 years of service.


• Comment on construction costs and challenges:• Our current project cost estimate for the Showell Elementary Replacement School,

scheduled to bid in June 2018 is:i. Building cost/s.f.: $ 305.09

ii. Sitework: $ 3,000,000 iii. Building + Site cost/sf: $ 335.82

Page 47 of 82

iv. Contingency: $ 721,000 v. Other project costs: $ 8,900,000 (A/E, CM, FFE, Technology, Commissioning)

vi. Project Cost/S.F.: $ 42,406,000 / 97,613 s.f. = $434.43/sf • As has been the case on each project we have executed over the past 10-15 years, our

greatest challenge is attaining a sufficient number of contractors to respond to our bidsrelated to major school construction projects. The limited number of bidders,particularly site contractors, headquartered on the Eastern Shore combined with thereluctance of some bidders to travel to and commit to a 24-36 month constructionproject in Worcester County provides a challenge to our Facilities Department.

VIII. Listing of FY19 CIP Request (two types):• The Showell Elementary Replacement School project is the next phase of the school

construction program envisioned 20 years ago and discussed in Section I. To date, localgovernment has provided $1.24 million for design services related to this project.

• Our FY19 CIP includes a partial State funding request of $4,336,000 for the Showellproject.

• Pending all State and local approvals of construction documents and construction bids,we plan to begin construction of the replacement school in October 2018.

• Following construction of the Showell Replacement School, we are planning an additionto Stephen Decatur Middle School and then a sustained program of systemic renovationprojects including roof replacements at two middle and one elementary schools.


Page 48 of 82


LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments Showell Elementary - Replacement 1 42,406 33,734 8,672 Y N N FY19 CIP request: $4,336,000

Total Cost 42,406 33,734 8,672



LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments N/A

Page 49 of 82

Presenter: Ms. Verletta White, Superintendent


• Installation of air conditioning;• Providing seats for a continuously growing enrollment;• Modernizing our aging infrastructure, and;• Continuing our systemic improvement program.

II. County Information:• Number of PK-12 students – 112,139• Square miles with County – 682• Average number of students per square mile – 164.4• Total number of school facilities - 161

III. Total current estimated cost of repair (replacement schools, needed schools, neededrenovations, needed correction of deferred maintenance) for all school facilities: $2.21 Billion(This is based on a comprehensive county-wide facilities assessment study that was completed byan independent third-party consultant in March 2014).

IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI): %

BCPS developed individual Building Condition Scores for each of our schools during the 2014comprehensive county-wide facilities assessment study. However, these scores are not a standardFCI and cannot be compared to any developed by other counties. We are attempting to use thedata to develop a comprehensive, overall building score for the entire system. That ‘number shouldbe available in the next couple of days and we will forward it to you once completed. The standardFCI, as described here, was never developed for our facilities.

[ FCI % = facility’s total repair costs / facility’s replacement cost]

V. Total cost of all projects listed in the 6 year CIP Request: $1.34 B

VI. Current LEA average PSCP Maintenance Score: Overall Rating 87.82 = Good• Summary of maintenance efforts and challenges: Continue to provide additional

positions and resources in the operating budget to continue to maintain/improve ourrecord as the buildings are aging.

VII. What do you currently estimate as the total cost per square foot for a new school in your areainclusive of site, design, FF&E, etc.?: $436.34/sf

• Comment on construction costs and challenges:1) Providing air conditioning in all schools.2) Keeping up with enrollment growth, and3) Upgrading and modernizing continuously aging infrastructure.

Baltimore County

Page 50 of 82

Project Description for New School,

Replacement School, or Total

Renovation that results in a LIKE-NEW

CONDITION of the school

LE

A P

rio

rity

#

To

tal

Esti

mate

d C

ost(

s)

LE

A S

hare

(S

)

Sta

te S

hare

(S

)

New

Fu

nd

ing

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Pre

vio

usly

Fu

nd

ed

Pro

ject

(Y/N

)

Co

un

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fu

nd

ed

(Y

/N)

Co

mm

en

ts

Victory Villa ES - Replacement 3 $37,180,000 $22,388,000 $14,792,000 N Y Y

Lansdowne ES - Replacement 4 $40,050,000 $25,058,000 $14,992,000 N Y Y

Northeast Area ES - New School 5 $49,000,000 $31,941,000 $17,059,000 N N Y

Patapsco HS - Limited Renovation 6 $44,259,000 $23,257,000 $21,002,000 N N Y

Lansdowne HS - Limited Renovation 7/8 $60,000,000 $35,277,000 $24,723,000 N N Y

Woodlawn HS - Limited Renovation 9 $43,055,000 $22,732,000 $20,323,000 N N Y

Dundalk ES - Replacement 10/11 $46,800,000 $29,658,000 $17,142,000 N N N

Berkshire ES - Replacement 12/13 $40,245,000 $23,606,000 $16,639,000 Y N N

Colgate ES - Replacement 14/15 $38,585,000 $25,445,000 $13,140,000 Y N N

Chadwick ES - Replacement 16 $47,260,000 $30,421,000 $16,839,000 Y N N

Northeast Area II ES - New School 17 $46,435,000 $28,922,000 $17,513,000 Y N N

Bedford ES - Replacement 18 $47,260,000 $30,540,000 $16,720,000 Y N N

Summit Park ES - Replacement 19 $47,260,000 $30,445,000 $16,815,000 Y N N

Northeast Area MS - New School 20 $90,055,000 $48,695,000 $41,360,000 Y N N

Dulaney HS - New School 26 $139,950,000 $79,675,000 $60,275,000 Y N N

Towson HS - New School 27 $133,250,000 $83,310,000 $49,940,000 Y N N

$950,644,000 $571,370,000 $379,274,000

Baltmore County Public Schools

FY2019 Capital Improvement Program RequestPresentation to the Board of Public Works

October 18, 2017

Page 51 of 82

Project Description for New School,

Replacement School, or Total

Renovation that results in a LIKE-NEW

CONDITION of the school

LE

A P

rio

rity

#

To

tal E

sti

ma

ted

Co

st(

s)

LE

A S

ha

re (

S)

Sta

te S

ha

re (

S)

Ne

w F

un

din

g R

eq

ue

st

(Y/N

)

Pre

vio

us

ly F

un

de

d P

roje

ct

(Y/N

)

Co

un

ty H

as

Fo

rwa

rd F

un

de

d (

Y/N

)

Co

mm

en

ts

Franklin HS - Air Conditioning 1 $13,610,000 $7,587,000 $6,023,000 N Y Y

Kenwood HS - Air Conditioning 2 $20,455,000 $11,394,000 $9,061,000 N Y Y

Pine Grove MS - Addition 21 $20,475,000 $11,458,000 $9,017,000 N N N

Red House Run ES - Addition 22 $6,640,000 $4,000,000 $2,640,000 N N N

Deer Park ES - Addition 23 $7,380,000 $4,366,000 $3,014,000 N N N

Fort Garrison ES - Addition 24 $7,930,000 $4,629,000 $3,301,000 N N N

Scotts Branch ES - Addition 25 $6,640,000 $4,000,000 $2,640,000 N N N

Battle Gove ES - Boiler Replacement 28 $855,000 $453,000 $402,000 N N N

Featherbed Lane ES - Boiler Replacement 29 $855,000 $453,000 $402,000 N N N

McCormick ES - Chiller Replacement 30 $1,095,000 $578,000 $517,000 N N N

Owings Mills ES - Chiller Replacement 31 $1,035,000 $547,000 $488,000 N N N

Orems ES - Roof Replacement 32 $1,505,000 $759,000 $746,000 N N N

Timber Grove ES - Roof Replacement 33 $1,860,000 $942,000 $918,000 N N N

Deer Park MS - Roof Replacement 34 $4,500,000 $2,204,000 $2,296,000 N N N

Johnnycake ES - Roof Replacement 35 $1,860,000 $942,000 $918,000 N N N

Loch Raven HS - Roof Replacement 36 $2,275,000 $1,156,000 $1,119,000 N N N

$98,970,000 $55,468,000 $43,502,000

Baltmore County Public Schools

FY2019 Capital Improvement Program RequestPresentation to the Board of Public Works

October 18, 2017

Page 52 of 82

Montgomery County Public Schools FY 2019 Capital Improvement Program Request


Presenter: Dr. Jack R. Smith, Superintendent

I. Brief Summary of the Unique Challenges, such as enrollment growth or decline, and

Upkeep of PK‐12 School Facilities: (2016–2017 school year)

For the 2016–2017 school year, MCPS experienced its ninth straight year of

enrollment growth.

Official September 30, 2016, enrollment was 159,010 students, for a one‐year

increase of 2,563 students.

Since the 2007–2008 school year, enrollment has increased by 21,265 students.

By the 2022–2023 school year, enrollment is projected to increase by 9,470 students

to reach 168,480 students.

Adding the projected student increase to the student increase since 2007 results in

a total increase of 30,735 students during the 15‐year period from 2007 to 2022.

As a result of this remarkable enrollment growth, funding the Capital Improvements

Program is challenging—capacity projects needed to provide seats for students

compete with projects to address our aging infrastructure and building systems

including HVAC and Roof Replacement projects.

II. County Information: (2016–2017 school year)

Number of PK‐12 students – 159,010

Square miles within County – 506.1

Average number of students per square mile – 314

Total number of school facilities (2017–2018 school year) — 205 facilities — 133

elementary schools, 40 middle schools, 25 high schools, one career technology high

school, one alternative program, and five special program centers.

III. Total current estimated cost of repair (replacement schools, needed schools, needed

renovations, needed correction of deferred maintenance) for all school facilities:

Total estimated cost is approximately $1.3 billion. This cost figure is based on a

general assessment of our aging facility inventory.

IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI): [ FCI % = facility’s

(total repair costs / facility’s replacement cost)

The current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index is 95 percent. This

figure is based on a general assessment of our aging facility inventory.

V. Total cost of all projects listed in the 6 year CIP Request:

The preliminary FY 2019 state aid request totals $115.6 million. The remaining five

years of the state CIP request is estimated at $486 million; however, this figure is an

estimate based on current enrollment projections and cost estimates.

Page 53 of 82

Montgomery County Public Schools FY 2019 Capital Improvement Program Request



The Montgomery County Infrastructure Maintenance Task Force provides a report

to the county describing the funding necessary to adequately maintain the county

agencies’ infrastructure.

Items in the report include: Fire Safety, PLAR, HVAC, and Roof Replacement.

The 2016 report found that MCPS has a backlog of approximately $790 million for

these critical building system maintenance projects.

VII. What do you currently estimate as the total cost per square foot for a new school in your

area inclusive of site, design, FF&E, etc.?:

Current estimates for the total cost per square foot for a new school is $312.

Comment on construction costs and challenges:

The construction market challenges anticipated within Montgomery County will

predominately be related to cost containment and quality control. These two areas

will be impacted by supply and demand challenges associated with the growing

federal and private sectors within our region and compounded by the skilled labor

shortage found within the construction market. Material increases are anticipated

to be a significant driver of costs as well as the impacts associated with

environmental regulations related to site development. Material increases were

anticipated prior to recent natural disasters and it is now anticipated these costs will

grow at an exponential rate.

Page 54 of 82


New School, Replacement School, Total Renovation that results in like‐new conditionProject Description for

New School, Replacement School, or Total Renovation that results in a LIKE‐NEW CONDITION of the school

Wayside ES Revitalization/Expansion 1 $24,074,000 $18,581,000 $2,457,000 N Y Y

Wheaton HS Revitalization/Expansion 2 $116,007,000 $88,469,000 $19,876,000 N Y Y

Richard Montgomery ES #5 (New) 3 $35,381,000 $27,628,000 $7,753,000 N N Y

Clarksburg Cluster ES New (Clarksburg Village Site #2) 8 $36,008,000 $27,959,000 $8,049,000 Y N y

Thomas Edison HS of Technology Revitalization/Expansion 24 $69,088,000 $56,475,000 $12,613,000 N N Y

Potomac ES Revitalization/Expansion* 27/28 $30,391,000 $23,550,000 $3,421,000 Y N Y

Luxmanor ES Revitalization/Expansion* 29/30 $29,190,000 $22,591,000 $3,300,000 Y N Y

Seneca Valley HS Revitalization/Expansion* 35/36 $152,121,000 $117,451,000 $17,335,000 Y N Y

Maryvale ES/Carl Sandburg School Revitalization/Expansion* (CSR) 37/38 $58,997,000 $45,774,000 $6,612,000 Y N Y

Tilden MS/Rock Terrace School Revitalization/Expansion* 39/40 $54,985,000 $42,693,000 $6,146,000 Y N Y

Total Cost $606,242,000 $471,171,000 $87,562,000

Systemic projects, Additions, and Renovations that DO NOT result in like‐new school


Systemic projects, Additions, Renovations, and for other capital work that DOES NOT result in a like‐new condition of the schoolBethesda/Chevy Chase HS Addition 4 $39,647,000 $33,858,000 $5,789,000 N N Y

North Bethesda MS Addition 5 $21,593,000 $16,888,000 $4,705,000 N N Y

Diamond ES Addition 6 $9,147,000 $7,206,000 $1,941,000 N N Y

Kensington‐Parkwood ES Addition 7 $12,679,000 $11,157,000 $1,522,000 N N Y

Walt Whitman HS HVAC 9 $2,600,000 $1,951,000 $649,000 Y N N

Briggs Chaney MS HVAC, Phase II 10 $2,500,000 $1,876,000 $624,000 Y N N

Burtonsville ES HVAC 11 $2,500,000 $1,876,000 $624,000 Y N N

Oakland Terrace ES HVAC 12 $2,400,000 $1,801,000 $599,000 Y N N

Previously Funded

Project (Y/N)

County Has Forw

ard Funded

(Y/N

)

Comments

LEA Priority (#)

Total Estim

ated

Cost ($)

LEA Share ($)

FY 2019 Req

uest Only

State Share ($)

New

Funding Req

uest (Y/N

)

Montgomery County Public Schools

Preliminary FY 2019 Capital Improvement Program Request


LEA Priority (#)

Total Estim

ated

Cost ($)

LEA Share ($)

FY 2019 Req

uest Only

State Share ($)

New

Funding Req

uest (Y/N

)

Previously Funded

Project (Y/N)

County Has Forw

ard Funded

(Y/N)

Comments

Page 55 of 82


Systemic projects, Additions, Renovations, and for other capital work that DOES NOT result in a like‐new condition of the school P

reviously Funded

Project (Y/N)

County Has Forw

ard Funded

(Y/N

)

Comments

LEA Priority (#)

Total Estim

ated

Cost ($)

LEA Share ($)

FY 2019 Req

uest Only

State Share ($)

New

Funding Req

uest (Y/N

)

Highland View ES HVAC 13 $2,340,000 $1,756,000 $584,000 Y N N

Sequoyah ES HVAC 14 $2,250,000 $1,688,000 $562,000 Y N N

Shady Grove MS Roof 15 $2,119,000 $1,590,000 $529,000 Y N N

Flower Hill ES HVAC 16 $2,106,000 $1,580,000 $526,000 Y N N

Julius West MS Roof 17 $1,990,000 $1,493,000 $497,000 Y N N

Ashburton ES HVAC 18 $1,740,000 $1,306,000 $434,000 Y N N

Springbrook HS Roof 19 $1,634,000 $1,226,000 $408,000 Y N N

Jackson Road ES Roof 20 $1,480,000 $1,111,000 $369,000 Y N N

Highland ES Roof 21 $1,316,000 $988,000 $328,000 Y N N

Dr. Sally K. Ride ES Roof 22 $1,314,000 $986,000 $328,000 Y N N

Damascus HS Roof 23 $1,091,000 $819,000 $272,000 Y N N

Lucy V. Barnsley ES Addition (CSR) 25/26 $13,224,000 $10,902,000 $2,322,000 N N Y

S. Christa McAuliffe ES Addition 31/32 $11,386,000 $8,915,000 $2,471,000 Y N Y

Ashburton ES Addition 33/34 $13,944,000 $12,026,000 $1,918,000 Y N Y

Gaithersburg ES Addition 41 LP only

Takoma Park MS Addition* 42 LP only

Thomas W. Pyle MS Addition 43 LP only

Burtonsville ES Addition 44 LP only

Judith Resnik ES Addition 45 LP only

Pine Crest ES Addition 46 LP only

Montgomery Knolls ES Addition 47 LP only

Walt Whitman HS Addition 48 LP only

Total Cost $151,000,000 $122,999,000 $28,001,000

*Split-FY Funding RequestDouble priority numbers indicate Planning and Funding requests … ##/##

Page 56 of 82

Presenter: Dr. Kevin M. Maxwell, Superintendent


• Prince George’s County Public Schools has over 200 facilities spread around 500 squaremiles of land that house instruction for our approximately 124,000 students.

• More than 50% of these 200 facilities are over 40 years of age and in need ofmodernization to meet our goals of providing safe and supportive learning environmentsto all of our students.

• Significant enrollment growth in the northern area of the County has createdovercrowding in over 90 of our facilities that further reduces their educational adequacyand exacerbates condition deficiencies.

• In a proactive response to these points, PGCPS commissioned the development of a 20-year master plan that strategically addresses both over-utilization and facility condition.The implementation cost of this plan is around $425M/year or $5.68B (in 2017 dollars).

• Currently, our annual capital funding is at just one third of this need; at this rate it willtake over 60 years to modernize 133 of the 200 schools.

• Our County government is supportive of this master plan but faces challenges inincreasing and even maintaining capital funding for public school construction. TheCounty is close to exceeding the established limit for debt service costs and likewisecannot increase tax revenues above the statutory limit.

II. County Information:• Number of PK-12 students – 124,045• Square miles with County – 498• Average number of students per square mile – 249• Total number of school facilities -195


$5.68B in 2017 dollars based on the commissioned study of our entire inventory.

IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI): %[ FCI % = facility’s total repair costs / facility’s replacement cost]

The average FCI was 43.72% according to an independent desktop audit in 2012.

V. Total cost of all projects listed in the 6 year CIP Request: $2,791,332,362


Implementation of School Dude work order management system has provided real time data.Enhanced training for all employees to improve quality of service to our schools. Included budgetplanning and decision making to middle management. Funding is needed to expand preventive

Prince George's County

Page 57 of 82

maintenance efforts. Overcrowding in some facilities is causing accelerated life expectancy of already aged equipment.

VII. What do you currently estimate as the total cost per square foot for a new school in your areainclusive of site, design, FF&E, etc.?: $479/SF in FY19

• Comment on construction costs and challenges:i. MBE participation requirements, particularly local requirements

ii. Prevailing Wagesiii. Competing for contractors in the limited metro area labor pooliv. Local permitting review times and requirementsv. Lack of swing space and need to phase construction and/or use temporary

classroomsVIII. Listing of FY19 CIP Request (two types):



LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments Tulip Grove ES Major Renovation, and Addition

1 $19,093,332 $14,011,332 $5,082,000

N Y Stephen Decatur MS Major Renovation and Addition with SEI

2 $21,792,960 $12,594,960 $9,198,000

Y N William Wirt MS Renovation/Replacement

4 $82,912,548 $46,709,548 $36,203,000

Y N William Schmidt Center Major Renovation and Addition (Funding)

5 $33,094,260 $18,763,260 $14,331,000

Y N New Adelphi Area Middle School No.1

6 $91,624,168 $54,725,168 $36,899,000

Y N New Glenridge Area Middle School No.2

7 $91,624,168 $54,725,168 $36,899,000

Y N Suitland HS Complex Renovation/Replacement

8 $173,742,595 $97,159,595 $76,583,000

Y N New International High School at Langley Park

9 $37,381,277 $20,903,277 $16,478,000

Y N

Total Cost $551,265,308.00 $319,592,308.00 $231,673,000.00 Page 58 of 82



LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed

(Y/N

)

Comments Bowie Belair Annex Limited Renovation

3 $28,527,663 $15,952,663 $12,575,000

Woodridge ES Limited HVAC Upgrade

$2,160,000 $959,000 $1,201,000

Andrew Jackson MS Exterior Windows Replacement

$327,000 $145,000 $182,000

Phyllis E Williams ES HVAC Piping and VAV Box Replacement

$3,120,000 $1,385,000 $1,735,000

Dwight D Eisenhower MS HVAC & Building Envelope Modernization

$13,062,000 $5,799,000 $7,263,000

Walker Mill MS HVAC & Building Envelope Modernization

$13,831,000 $6,141,000 $7,690,000

Glenridge ES HVAC & Building Envelope Modernization

$11,730,000 $5,208,000 $6,522,000

Lamont ES HVAC & Building Envelope Modernization

$7,586,000 $3,368,000 $4,218,000

James Madison MS HVAC & Building Envelope Modernization

$10,086,000 $4,478,000 $5,608,000

Patuxent ES HVAC & Building Envelope Modernization

$5,742,000 $2,549,000 $3,193,000

Chillum ES Open Space POD Conversion (2 PODs)

$1,013,000 $450,000 $563,000

North Forestville ES Roof Replacement

$1,169,000 $519,000 $650,000

Page 59 of 82

Bladensburg ES Roof Replacement

$2,050,000 $910,000 $1,140,000

Greenbelt ES Roof Replacement

$1,570,000 $697,000 $873,000

Rosa L. Parks ES (Forward Funding)

$9,640,000 $0 $9,640,000

Mary Harris "Mother" Jones ES (Forward Funding)

$7,755,000 $0 $7,755,000

Lake Arbor ES (Forward Funding)

$6,204,000 $0 $6,204,000

Suitland ES (Forward Funding) $7,816,000 $0 $7,816,000

Total Cost $133,388,663 $48,560,663 $84,828,000

Page 60 of 82

Presenter: Dr. Diana Mitchell, Superintendent


• Dorchester County Public Schools has two distinct challenges that effect the ability of ourfacilities to perform as needed.

i. Local Capital Maintenance Funding-The first challenge is maintaining; and ideally,improving Facility Maintenance funding to include regular Capital Maintenancefunding for items like: furniture and equipment replacements (schoolfurniture/instructional equipment/technology upgrades/playscape upgrades andreplacements/minor HVAC equipment replacements), minor window/wall/floorprojects, environmental projects (HAZMAT’s, UST’s, IAQ challenges, energymanagement controls upgrades, etc.), hardscape repairs (paving and concreterepairs/replacements), school security improvements (security vestibules, camerasystems, access control, lockdown door hardware, etc.) and accessibilityimprovements (ADA improvements as needed).

ii. Open Space Elementary Schools-The second, and largest instructional challengefrom a facilities/educational adequacy perspective is the elimination of “openspace” instruction at five out of seven of our elementary schools. Open spacedesign is outdated and proven to have significant deleterious effect upon theability of our elementary students and teachers (our students with the greatestpotential for high achievement) to succeed at all levels of their education. Openspace facilities also present significant security and threat response challenges. Byhaving compromised instructional platforms at the elementary level, it alsocreates a liability for those students at every level as they progress through theiracademic careers.

iii. Fiscal Constraints/Time-Part and parcel of both challenges is the ability of ourlocal funding authority to provide the funding needed to make these essentialimprovements. This has led to compromises in the critical path of delivery ofthese improvements. The delivery of improvements is being delayed due to thefunding constraints to provide for responsible local fiscal policy management andexecution. Inversely, every year another class of elementary students enrolls atopen space elementary schools throughout the county that will only hobble theirpotential throughout their academic lives. Ultimately this presents long termliabilities for these students, while more well-funded counties accelerate thequality of their facilities by eliminating open space schools. The result is that theneediest counties students; like Dorchester, continue to fall farther behind. This isneither equal nor equitable.

II. County Information:• Number of PK-12 students – 4,594• Square miles with County – 540• Average number of students per square mile – 8.5

Dorchester County

Page 61 of 82

• Total number of school facilities – 13 14 (Did not include New Directions LearningAcademy (NDLA)


FY2019 10 Year CIP Full Funding of all Requests $152,659,000

C-SD HS Replacement $93,266,489 (Based on per pupil cost of NDHS at $78,375.20 by 1,190student capacity). This project is not shown in the current CIP as it is outside of the 10 yearwindow.

Annual Recommended Maintenance Funding ($7.50/sf at 1,074,503 sf) $8,055,398. Currently funded at $5.12/sf.

Total projected Capital Cost of Ownership over next 10 years $245,925,000 (not including Maintenance).

10 Year Maintenance Cost $80,553,980 (at $7.50/sf).

10 Year Total Capital and Maintenance Cost of Ownership $326,479,000

IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI): % This is currently unknownby each facility and will require a funding source to conduct a Comprehensive FacilitiesAssessment (CSA) study. Per R. Gorrell at 8/21/17 Eastern Shore LEA meeting, State funding isbeing solicited in upcoming fiscal conversations at the State level.[ FCI % = facility’s total repair costs / facility’s replacement cost]

V. Total cost of all projects listed in the 6 year CIP Request: $40,924,000 (FY2019-2024)


Tradition of Responsibility and Performance-Dorchester has been consistently rated asbeing very effective, efficient and creative at facility maintenance. Per Legislative Auditfindings DCPS costs are the second lowest in the state for similar peer groups. This is alsoreflected in inspection scores from our insurer’s risk management inspection serviceprovider, as well as, the ongoing State School Inspection Maintenance Program scores andresults.

• Agility/Adaptability/Accountability-DCPS maintains a blended approach to maintainingschool facilities (See Comprehensive Maintenance Plan).

i. Invest in Our People: Wherever possible/practical DCPS facilities staff(Journeyman or Masters Licensed Craftsmen, Certified Groundskeepers, Licensedin-house IPM first responders) provide “in house” maintenance.

ii. Invest in Our Relationships with the Private Sector: When not possible/practical(large, complex equipment/systems) DCPS regularly solicits long term

Page 62 of 82

preventative maintenance contracts with preferred rates for emergency service, parts, etc. that support these strategic partnerships.

iii. Shrewd Investment Yields Return-On-Investment (ROI)-By having a consistent,blended and reasonably funded program approach over the course of years,systems/facilities design life can be expanded and maximized to minimize andreserve exposure to Capital Renewal cost for only critical needs tosupport/enhance instruction and keep existing facilities viable if possible.

iv. Respect and Leadership-We are very fortunate to have Executive and Politicalleadership at the School District and Local Government levels that respect andsupport sound maintenance practices. If it is not broken, we want to keep itrunning. If it is broken (and we need it), fix it or replace it. This support andexpectation provides clear guidance and confidence to Facilities Departmentleadership to “do the right thing”.

• Significant challenges exist (and will continue to exist into the future) for:i. Increasing Complexities-Maintaining newer, complex, high performing

buildings/systems that are (unfunded) mandated by state law and adopted energycodes. These are significant cost drivers in first cost and often result in systemsthat are not practically maintained “in house”. Regrettably this can result inexpensive/complex systems not being properly maintained.

ii. Attracting and Maintaining a Quality Work Force-Securing qualified facilitiesemployees. It is a challenge to find competent, skilled employees that have theability and aptitude to maintain systems/facilities per design/code requirements.This is a combination of limited employee pool regionally and competition forhighly skilled employees with the private sector.

iii. Fiscal Constraints-Local Capital Maintenance Funding is inconsistent or completelylacking due to larger funding constraints locally. This is not a criticism, more astatement of reality.This has a considerable deleterious effect in both the short and long term. Iteffects systems/facility performance and efficiencies on a daily basis andultimately creates a probability that “design life” over the long term may be lessthan required, leading to an increasing frequency in capital funding need. In anenvironment of shrinking resources, we cannot afford this. We have been veryfortunate to be able to compensate for this reality by shrewd maintenance andfinancial practices and aggressive pursuit of grant funds.

iv. Leadership-It is imperative that Leadership at all levels recognize the importanceof consistently investing in facility maintenance. If this importance is notrecognized, facilities maintenance funding is at risk for reduction that will havesignificant long-term consequence(s) effecting our ability to nominally support ourmission.

v. Agility/Willingness to Change-Because of the challenges noted above, it hascreated the opportunity and imperative to look for creative solutions, fundingopportunities and solution selections. Performance contracts, shared savingscontracts, self-performance, “internal” general contracting, grant programs,

Page 63 of 82

private/public partnerships, utility rebates as income streams, etc. are all now becoming standard strategies in the “asymmetric” challenge we find ourselves in.


• Comment on construction costs and challenges: The North Dorchester High SchoolProject is funded at $48,671,000 for all-inclusive program delivery (planning, building,permitting, quality control, project management, FFE, etc.) for a facility of 116,720 sf. Thisyields a cost of $416.99 per square foot. Contributing factors to this significant unit costare:

i. Dorchester is in a geographically isolated area with a very limited supply ofConstruction Managers, General Contractors and subcontractors to perform theselarge and complex projects.

ii. Prevailing Wage/Davis Bacon Wage Rates drive additional cost for no added valueto the projects.

iii. Unfunded mandates of LEEDs certification, International Energy Codes, etc.,iv. Does not include HAZMAT abatement costs,v. This is an existing, previously developed site with existing incoming utility

infrastructure. Undeveloped sites could cost more.vi. This funding level is not adequate to support all preferred alternates.

vii. This pricing is now about 18 months old. Costs have and will continue to escalate.viii. $320/sf to build this project is inadequate.

All of these factors add cost premiums to projects that typically only add to the local cost share of the project.

Page 64 of 82




LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments North Dorchester HS Replacement 1 $48,671,000 20,211,000 28,460,000 N Y Y

Total Cost $48,671,000 $20,211,000 $28,460,000



LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments

SDK8 HVAC/Ceiling and Above Systemic Renovation 2 $7,260,000 $2,647,000 $4,613,000 N N N

VES Roof Replacement 3 $880,000 $265,000 $615,000 N N N NDLA Roof Replacement 4 $1,419,000 $427,000 $992,000 N N N

Total Cost $9,559,000 $3,339,000 $6,220,000

Page 65 of 82

Presenter: Ms. Barbara P. Canavan, Superintendent


o Increasing programmatic needso Flat enrollment relative to rising operational cost (salary, materials, contract services,

employee benefits)o Sustaining technology infrastructure requirements (instructional, support, and

operational)

II. County Information:• Number of PK-12 students – 37,442• Square miles with County – 527• Average number of students per square mile – 70.46• Total number of school facilities -54


o Total Replacement Value for ALL Schools $2,178,343,440o Current Deficiency plus 5-year life cycle cost $354,806,274o 10 Year deficiency plus life cycle cost $731,373,687

IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI): 12.21%[ FCI % = facility’s total repair costs / facility’s replacement cost]


VI. Current LEA average PSCP Maintenance Score: Overall Rating 89.00 = Good• Summary of maintenance efforts and challenges:o Aging facilities – in ability to meet programmatic requirements, maintenance, and upkeepo Staffing – recruiting and retaining experienced facilities management professionals and

trades due to lack of funding and our inability to compete in a current market placeo Increasing regulatory requirements, building square footage, and complexity of systemso Limited fiscal and human resources

VII. What do you currently estimate as the total cost per square foot for a new school in your areainclusive of site, design, FF&E, etc.?: $421

• Comment on construction costs and challenges:o Regulations driving construction cost and site costo Increase in the number of projects

− As projects become less competitive, cost increase− Decrease in the availability of skilled workforce

Harford County

Page 68 of 82

VIII. New School, Replacement School, Total Renovation that results in like-new condition


LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments Havre de Grace Middle/ High School Replacement Project 1 105,206,000 81,425,000 23,781,000 N Y N

$600,000 of LEA share is from Harford County Parks & Recreation

Total Cost 105,206,000 81,425,000 23,781,000

Page 69 of 82

IX. Systemic projects, Additions, and Renovations that DO NOT result in like-new school


LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments

Bel Air Elementary School HVAC/ Open Space Enclosure 2 7,560,000 3,969,000 3,591,000 N Y N

First year of funding received in FY 2018. State-Local cost share calculations of 63% State and 37% Local.

Fallston Middle School Comprehensive HVAC Systemic 3 1,000,000 472,000 528,000 Y N N

Based on State – Local cost share calculations of 60% State and 40% local.

Aberdeen Middle School Building Envelope - Roof Replacement and Exterior Walls 4 2,664,000 1,288,000 1,376,000 Y N N

Based on State – Local cost share calculations of 60% State and 40% local.

Total Cost 11,224,000 5,729,000 5,495,000

Page 70 of 82

Presenter: Dr. John B. Gaddis, Superintendent


• Somerset County is uniquely challenged; both economically and geographically. Rankedlowest in the State for per capita income and highest for unemployment rates, SomersetCounty remains committed to providing State-of-the-Art facilities that can offer a safe andwelcoming learning environment for all students. Geographically, workforce availability islimited as well as access to competitive pricing for today’s building technologies. Also dueto the geographic constraints of the County, we have two small island schools with lowerutilizations that are uniquely challenging to maintain. On the contrary, on the mainland,we have high concentrations of students in the North end of the County causingovercrowding in some of our elementary schools. Seven of the ten school buildings inSomerset County are more than thirty-five years old. We believe that this is evidence of aconcerted effort by both Somerset County and the State to maintain and prolong the lifeof these community facilities. However, as curriculum, technology, and student learningevolves, some of these outdated buildings can no longer efficiently and effectivelyaccommodate the needs of current and future programs.

II. County Information:• Number of PK-12 students – 2,960• Square LAND miles with County – 320• Average number of students per square mile – 9• Total number of school facilities -10


IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI): 30.18%[ FCI % = facility’s total repair costs / facility’s replacement cost]

Note: The JM Tawes Technology & Career Center and the Princess Anne Elementary School bothhave an FCI over 100% (i.e. Cost of repairs exceeds replacement value.)


VI. Current LEA average PSCP Maintenance Score: Overall Rating 87.61 = Good• The ratio of maintenance technician to gross square footage of facilities maintained by

Somerset County Schools is approximately 1 to 150,000. The dollar per square footbudgeted for maintenance (not including salaries) is under $1 per GSF. Even withsignificant staffing and budgetary challenges, the Somerset County Public Schoolsmaintenance team has been able to prolong the life of our facilities as we wait for StateCapital funding to replace or renovate them. We were very proud to receive theComptroller’s Silver Hammer Award for Deal Island Elementary School in 2016.

Somerset County

Page 71 of 82

VII. What do you currently estimate as the total cost per square foot for a new school in your areainclusive of site, design, FF&E, etc.?: $417 / SQ. FT.

• This number was derived from the current budget divided by gross square footage of thenew JM Tawes Technology & Career Center. Due to the remote geographic location ofSomerset County, we find that it is extremely difficult to attract competition for smaller(and often even large) projects. We end up paying a premium on ALL bids because of thelack of availability of quality local contractors. While many contractors simply do not wantto travel over 3 hours (across the bay bridge or through the Chesapeake bay bridgetunnel); some will build in significant premiums for temporary housing and transportationfor their workforce. In addition to the transportation issues, we believe that the dollar persquare foot is significantly higher due to the requirements of Prevailing Wage andMinority Business Enterprise. Again, there is a lack of availability of workforce in our areaso limiting the pool of allowable contractors increases the cost of construction.



Replacement of the J.M. Tawes Technology& Career Center

LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

The FY19 request is for the second year of partial funding in the amount of $17,500,000 for the new 103,846 sq. ft. Career &

Technology Center.

Total Cost 1 42,781,000 7,400,000 35,381,000 N Y N

Page 72 of 82

Presenter: Dr. Michael J. Martirano, Superintendent


• HCPSS is among, if not, the fastest growing county in the State and enrollment projectionsindicate this trend will continue with significant enrollment growth over the next decade.

• Since school year 2012/13, enrollment grew by 4,669 or 9.6%.• By 2026, the 2017 enrollment projections show an anticipated increase of 4,000 ES

students; 2,200 MS students and 2,800 HS students.• It is challenging for the school system to budget within the funding levels currently

available from the County to address rising project estimates and enrollment and maintainour current facilities to high standards, which is a priority.

• Each school year, in addition to the educational use, there are over 10 million communitymembers that use the HCPSS facilities after hours and on the weekends. This requiresextended use of the utilities and additional maintenance to address the wear and tear onboth the facilities and the aging systems.

II. County Information:• Number of PK-12 students – 55,638 (9/30/16 FTE)• Square land miles with County – 251• Average number of students per square land mile – 222• Total number of school facilities - 76 (includes specialty schools)


• Cost to Repair - $213,628,100 (deferred maintenance)• Cost to Replace – $2,951,741,160• TOTAL Cost to Repair & Replace: $3,165,369,260

IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI):[ FCI % = facility’s total repair costs / facility’s replacement cost]

• 8.22%

V. Total cost of all projects listed in the 6 year CIP Request:• $234,132,500

VI. Current LEA average PSCP Maintenance Score:• Overall Rating - 92.43 = Good• Summary of maintenance efforts and challenges:

The Howard County Public School System, Department of School Facilities is responsiblefor the Facilities Management of 80 locations, housing approximately 56,000 students and8,000 staff. School Facilities plans and schedules work to maximize efficiency, minimizeexcessive labor, and prolong the useful service life of equipment, systems and thefacilities. We have been experiencing many challenges over the years that include:

• Enrollment growth of approximately 950 (PreK – 12) students per year, since FY2013

• Increasing square footage• Cost saving measures

Howard County

Page 73 of 82

• Getting more done with fewer dollars and staff• Finding ways to extend the life of existing assets• Finding highly qualified applicants• Increased workload• Aging work force• Schools being used 24/7• Maintaining great customer service

The last six years, the Department of School Facilities has performed well in the Public School Construction Program annual inspections. Good, over-all maintenance defers the need for repairs and major renovation, and reduces the cost of large capital projects. Maintenance helps to protect the health of students and staff, and establishes an environment that focuses on education. In the future years, aging buildings and equipment will eventually lead to breakdowns and issues with structural integrity. Preventative and proactive maintenance go a long way to prolong this from happening; this requires proper funding.

We have partnered with School Dude to assist in real-time data, which closely monitors work order numbers, identifies and separates life safety, IEQ and other associated needs from schools. This accumulating repair data allows us to implement better accountability and KPI’s; basically, sharing a common platform with staff and vendors to process work requests electronically.

Last year, the Office of Maintenance received approximately 35,000 work orders that included: • Carpentry (3,763)• General (4,477)• Electrical (4,242)• Electronics (2,638)• Flooring/painting (617)• HVAC (6,564)• IEQ (455)• Plumbing (4,473)• Other miscellaneous requests.


• Project cost estimates are based on the State’s current year’s cost per square foot. Inaddition, the total budget estimate includes 8 percent each for architect and constructionmanager fees and 5 percent each for related costs, project contingency andequipment/technology.

• Comment on construction costs and challenges:o Compliance with the prevailing wage law, LEED requirements, and construction cost

escalation, which adds more than 18 percent to project costs, continue to drive costsup.

o We have begun to perform value engineering on each project at the planning stagewith a focus on changes that reduce cost while meeting building requirements andinstructional needs.

o We have been exploring alternative approaches to providing educational space forprograms to free up existing school capacity and defer the need for new construction.

Page 74 of 82

o We continue to balance the need for classroom seats with maintaining the conditionof our existing buildings and make capital investments that reduce our life cycleoperating costs.

VIII. Listing of FY19 CIP Request (two types):New School, Replacement School, Total Renovation that results in like-new condition


LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments Talbott Springs ES - Replc 6 41,624,000 29,642,000 11,982,000 N N N LP Request Only New High School #13 - New 7 124,064,000 74,464,000 49,600,000 N N N LP Request Only

Total Cost 165,688,000 104,106,0000 61,582,000 Systemic projects, Additions, and Renovations that DO NOT result in like-new school


LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tota

l Est

imat

ed C

ost (

$)

LEA

Shar

e ($

)

Stat

e Sh

are

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comments

Harpers Choice MS - Roof 1 3,523,000 1,694,000 1,829,000 Y N N Atholton ES - Roof 2 1,150,000 612,000 538,000 Y N N Long Reach HS - Bldg Env 3 10,695,240 6,068,240 4,627,000 Y N N Fulton ES - Roof 4 2,112,000 1,296,000 816,000 Y N N Glenwood MS - Bldg Env 5 1,654,000 879,000 775,000 Y N N

Total Cost 19,134,240 10,549,240, 8,585,000

Page 75 of 82

cviscarra

Highlight

Presenter: Dr. George Arlotto, Superintendent


• Ongoing enrollment growth• Overall funding levels and predictability of the funding stream• Increasing regulatory and environmental compliance costs

II. County Information:• Number of PK-12 students – 81,397• Square miles with County – 415 land sq. miles and 173 water sq. miles• Average number of students per land square mile – 196• Total number of school facilities – 119

III. Total current estimated cost of repair (replacement schools, needed schools, neededrenovations, needed correction of deferred maintenance) for all school facilities: $1,945,244,000to bring all schools up to “like new” condition (FCI = minimum 90%) and address identified overcapacity concerns.

IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI): 82.54%

V. 7.46% = $517,398,000/$6,935,629,000 (required to bring existing facilities up to a “like new” condition with a minimum FCI of 90%) [ FCI % = facility’s total repair costs / facility’s replacement cost]

VI. Total cost of all projects listed in the 6 year CIP Request: $1,427,846,000

VII. Current LEA average PSCP Maintenance Score: Overall Rating 88.74 = Good• Summary of maintenance efforts and challenges:

VIII. What do you currently estimate as the total cost per square foot for a new school in your areainclusive of site, design, FF&E, etc.?: $474.06/sf

• Comment on construction costs and challenges:i. Availability of qualified contractor, subcontractor, and supplier poolii. High Performance (LEED) school facilities

iii. Prevailing wage requirementsiv. Emergency Shelter Compliance

Page 76 of 82

Anne Arundel County

IX. Listing of FY19 CIP Request (two types):



LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tot

al E

stim

ated

Cos

t ($

LEA

Sha

re ($

)

Sta

te S

hare

($)

New

Fun

ding

Req

uest

(Y/N

)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comment

Jessup ES - Construction

1 48,509 34,707 13,802 N Y Y

Arnold ES - Construction

2 42,103 32,832 9,271 N Y Y

George Cromwell ES - Construction

16 36,260 30,668 5,592 N Y Y

Edgewater ES - Planning

18 45,896 36,567 9329 Y N

Tyler Heights ES - Planning

19 43,096 38,626 4,470 Y N

Richard Henry Lee ES - Planning

20 39,789 28,960 10,829 Y N

Crofton Area HS - Construction

21 134,835 86,008 48,827 Y N Y

Total Cost 390,488 M 288,368 M 102,120 M

Page 77 of 82



LEA

Prio

rity

(#)

Tot

al E

stim

ated

Cos

t ($

LEA

Sha

re ($

)

Sta

te S

hare

($)

Amou

nt N

ew F

undi

ng R

eque

st (Y

/N)

Prev

ious

ly F

unde

d Pr

ojec

t (Y/

N)

Coun

ty H

as F

orw

ard

Fund

ed (Y

/N)

Comment

Marley ES - Classroom Addition - Construction

3 2,702 1,814 888 N Y

Bodkin ES - HVAC - Systemic 4 5,800 3,186 2,614 Y N

Solley ES - Classroom Addition - Planning

5

Planning Approval

Solley ES - Classroom Addition - Construction

6 3,848 2,513 1,335 Y N

Maryland City ES - Kindergarten Addition - Planning

7

Planning Approval

Maryland City ES - Kindergarten Addition - Construction

8 4,140 2,626 1,514 Y

N

Broadneck ES - Roof Replacement - Systemic

9 2,000 1,110 890 Y

N

Glen Burnie Park ES - Gym & Pgrm. Addition - Planning

10

Planning Approval

Glen Burnie Park ES - Gym & Prgm. Add. - Construction

11 7,626 4,487 3,139 Y

N

Arundel MS - Roof Replacement - Systemic

12 3,700 2,010 1,690 Y

N

Riviera Beach ES - Kindergarten Addition - Planning

13

Planning Approval

Riviera Beach ES - Kindergarten Addition - Construction

14 3,466 2,185 1,281 Y

N

Chesapeake Bay MS - Open Space Enclosure

15 10,187 6,015 4,172 N

N

Annapolis MS - HVAC/Controls/Windows/Sprinklers

17 21,275 11,537 9,738 Y

N

Page 78 of 82

Broadneck HS - Electrical (TIMS) - Systemic

22 500 295 205 Y N

65,244 M 37,778 M 27,466 M

Page 79 of 82

Kent County Public SchoolsFY 2019 Capital Improvement Program Request


Presenter: Dr. Karen M. Couch, Superintendent


Four factors currently influence the future of school facilities in Kent County: Enrollments are projected to decline modestly to 2026, from 1,899 (K-12) in

September 2017 to 1,832 in the 2026-2027 school year. Demographic information provided by the Maryland Department of Planning indicates

that these enrollment trends are likely to continue, because the age groups thatsupport school enrollment (0-4, 5-19, and 20-44) will decline by a total of 9% whileolder age groups (45-64, 65+) will increase by 41% between now and 2040. However,demographic, housing, transportation and economic development changes may leadto enrollment growth in certain parts of the jurisdictions.

The schools in Kent County are significantly underutilized as a whole. The elementaryschools have reasonable utilization rates following the closure of two elementaryschools beginning in the 2017-2018 school year; however, the middle school and thehigh school are and will remain significantly underutilized at least through 2026.

Among the school systems, KCPS has the 2nd oldest average square footage in thestate. The facilities have been well maintained and have received a number ofsystemic renovations, ASP, QZAB, and local projects, but only the high school hasreceived extensive partial renovations in recent decades.

Two elementary schools were closed beginning with the 2017-2018 school year. The fourfactors above indicate that “right-sizing” the school facility plant should continue. To thatend, a Six-Year Strategic Facilities Plan is now underway.

The roof and rooftop mechanical units at Galena Elementary School are in urgent need ofreplacement. A feasibility study is underway to determine the appropriate scope ofcapital projects needed.

In combination with solutions for Galena Elementary, recommendations will be brought tothe Board of Education in December 2017 and will be reflected in the 2018 EFMP and inthe FY 2020 CIP.

II. County Information: Number of PK-12 students – 2,019 (1st week head-count) * Square LAND miles with County – 278.34** Average number of students per square LAND mile – 7.25 Total number of school facilities – 5

* KCPS has full day prekindergarten. Head count and FTE are therefore the same.** Source: http://msa.maryland.gov/msa/mdmanual/01glance/html/area.html#county


Page 80 of 82



This figure is based on bringing all five schools to “like-new” condition through renovation. The calculation utilizes:

The IAC’s published cost for renovation of square footage that is older than 40 years($302.00/sf). Even though limited areas of two of the schools have been more recentlyrenovated, the assumption is that these areas will need to be substantially renovated inorder to make them educationally appropriate and to integrate them into the newlyrenovated areas.

Sitework calculated at 10% of the cost of construction. This percentage is higher than thefigure that is used by the IAC to calculate State participation for renovation work. Thefigure reflects that fact that, with the single exception of the high school football field, theparking lots at the elementary schools, and a limited number of other outdoor facilities, allexterior areas of the five schools are in need of renovation. Moreover, it is very likely thatthe cost percentage for sitework in Kent County will be higher than the statewide averagebecause of the limited number of sitework contractors in the area. Therefore 10%appears to be a reasonable number for broad estimating purposes.

Contingency has been calculated at 5% of combined building and site costs. This figure isappropriate for renovation work.

The figure above is not based on a current facility assessment; the most recent assessment was completed in 2013 and is understood to be both incomplete and not reflective of current conditions. In reality, it would not be necessary or fiscally possible to bring all facilities to “like-new” condition, since some areas have already been renovated, and there has been continuous investment in building systems and finishes through the CIP, ASP, QZAB, and local programs. A facility assessment to determine the full cost of all renovation and replacement needs of the five school buildings is beyond the current means of the LEA.

Completion of the Six-Year Strategic Facilities Plan and adoption of recommendations by the Board of Education will provide a far more accurate picture of the total funding that will be needed to bring all schools to like-new condition. If an outcome of the Plan is that the total facility plant of KCPS is reduced, possibly in combination with some new construction, the total required to achieve the “like-new” status will change.

IV. Current estimated average of schools Facility Condition Index (FCI): 92.3% per instructions.[ FCI % = facility’s total repair costs / facility’s replacement cost]

This FCI is based on the assumptions outlined in Item III above.

V. Total cost of all projects listed in the 6 year CIP Request: $TBD.

As noted for Item III above, this figure will be calculated when the recommendations of the Six-Year Strategic Facilities Plan are adopted.

Page 81 of 82



VI. Current LEA average PSCP Maintenance Score: Overall Rating 88.42 = Good Summary of maintenance efforts and challenges:

VII. What do you currently estimate as the total cost per square foot for a new school in your areainclusive of site, design, FF&E, etc.?: Unknown. For estimating purposes, the LEA will use theconstruction cost promulgated by the IAC in the FY 2019 CIP Instructions. A typical industry figureof 15% of total project cost will be used to estimate the site investigation, design, FF&E and other“soft costs.

Comment on construction costs and challenges: The cost of new school construction inKent County is unknown, since no new school has been built in this jurisdiction since 1971.It is believed that this LEA would face unique challenges with respect to its location, whichlimit the number of available contractors and subcontractors. To overcome thesebarriers, project delivery methods will be examined that have proven successful in otherjurisdictions on the Eastern Shore, particularly Construction Management At-Risk (CMR).

Page 82 of 82

state of maryland public school construction … bpw completed lea template … · state of...

Documents