state expert appraisal committee, punjab of 45th meeting.pdftelefax: state expert appraisal...
TRANSCRIPT
STATE EXPERT APPRAISAL COMMITTEE, PUNJAB Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India
O/O Punjab Pollution Control Board, Vatavaran Bhawan, Nabha Road,
Patiala – 147 001 Telefax:- 0175-2216980
No. SEAC/CEE(HQ)/1150-60 Dated 6.4.2011
SPEED POST
To
1. Dr.(Smt.) Neelima Jerath, Executive Director, Punjab State Council for Science and Technology, Sector 26, Chandigarh.
Chairman (SEAC)
2. Shri Anil Kumar Sondhi, Deptt. of Soil & Water Conservation, Punjab, SCO 92-94, Sector 17-D, Chandigarh.
Member (SEAC)
3. Shri Harbax Singh, Chief Town Planner (Retd.), H.No.2917, Sector-42C, Chandigarh-160036
Member (SEAC)
4. Prof. P. Thareja, Head, Department of Mineral & Metallurgical Engineering, PEC University of Technology # 701, PEC University of Technology Campus, Chandigarh.
Member (SEAC)
5. Shri Darshan Singh Jaidka, Chief Engineer (Retd.) Department of Water Supply & Sanitation, Punjab, Chandigarh H.No.316, Urban Estate, Phase-I, Patiala.
Member (SEAC)
6. Dr.(Smt.) Jatinder Kaur Arora, Additional Director, Punjab State Council for Science & Technology, Sector 26, Chandigarh.
Member (SEAC)
7. Er. Malvinder Singh, FIE, Chief Environment Engineer (Retd.), Punjab Pollution Control Board, Patiala. # 10, Gill Enclave, Near Hira Nagar, Patiala
Member (SEAC)
8. Dr. Satwinder Singh Marwaha, Director, Punjab Biotechnology Incubator, Camp Office: Basement: PSCST, Adj. Sacred Heart School, Sector 26, Chandigarh-160 019.
Member (SEAC)
-2-
9. Dr. Vineet Kumar, Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee- 247 667.
Member (SEAC)
10. Dr. R.M. Mathur, Scientist 'F' Head Chemical Recovery, Environmental Management & Biotechnology, Post Box no.174, Paper Mill Board, Himmat Nagar, Saharanpur- 247 001 (U.P.)
Member (SEAC)
Subject: Agenda of 45th meeting of the State Expert Appraisal Committee to be held on 08.04.2011 at 2:00 p.m. at Patiala.
In continuation to this office letter no. 1060-69 dated 1.4.2011 regarding the
above cited subject.
Enclosed, please find herewith, a copy of the agenda of the 45th meeting of
the State Expert Appraisal Committee to be held on 08.04.2011 at 2:00 p.m. in the Committee
Room, Punjab Pollution Control Board, Vatavaran Bhawan, Nabha Road, Patiala.
It is requested to make it convenient to attend the meeting on the above said
date, time and venue.
Sd/-
(D.K.Dua) Secretary (SEAC)
Endst. No. 1161-66 Dated: 6.4.2011 A copy of the above is forwarded to the following for information & necessary action:-
1. The P.S. to Chairman, Punjab Pollution Control Board, Patiala for information of the Chairman.
2. The P.A. to Member Secretary, Punjab Pollution Control Board, Patiala for information of the Member Secretary.
3. Shri A.S. Dogra, IFS (Retd.), Former Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Punjab, Currently Consultant, Forestry & Natural Resource Management, Chairman, State Level Environment Impact Assessment, # 256, Sector 37-A, Chandigarh- 160 036.
4. Shri F. Lal Kansal, Chief Engineer (Retd.) and Ex-Chairman, Punjab Pollution Control Board, Patiala, Member State Level Environment Impact Assessment,
5. The Member Secretary, State Level Environment Impact Assessment O/o Punjab Pollution Control Board, Patiala.
6. The Deputy Controller (F&A), Punjab Pollution Control Board, Patiala. He is requested to make arrangements for paying T.A./D.A. to the members of the Committee.
7. The System Analyst, Punjab Pollution Control Board, Patiala. He is requested to depute a data entry operator for operating the Laptop during the meeting.
8. The Environmental Engineer (Construction), Punjab Pollution Control Board, Patiala. He is requested to depute an operator for operating the D.G. set during the meeting.
9. The Caretaker, Punjab Pollution Control Board, Head Office, Patiala for making proper arrangements to conduct the meeting.
Sd/- (D.K.Dua)
Secretary (SEAC)
INDEX
Item no.
Description Page no.
45.01 Confirmation of the minutes of 44th meeting of SEAC held on 26.3.2011.
3
45.02 Action taken on the proceedings on the 44th meeting of SEAC held on 26.3.2011.
4-8
45.03 Regarding issuance of TOR to M.C. Bathinda for establishment of Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Facility at Bathinda.
9
45.04 Application for obtaining Environmental Clearance for developing Shopping Complex namely „The Celebration Mall" at Village Paragpur, Jalandhar, M/s Francolin Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
10-12
45.05 Application for obtaining environmental clearance for residential colony namely “AKME Polis” to be developed by M/s AKME Projects Ltd. at Vill. Jandiali, Ludhiana-Chandigarh Road, Distt. Ludhiana.
13-20
45.06 Application for obtaining environmental clearance for residential colony namely "Super Mega Mixed Use Integrated Industrial Park Project –Phase-I" to be established in the revenue estate of Village Nagla, Tehsil Zirakpur, Distt. Mohali, Punjab by M/s Shipra Estates Limited.
21-24
45.07 Request for waving of Public Hearing for setting up of a CETP in the revenue estate of Tajpur Road, Ludhiana by M/s Punjab Dyers Association.
25
45.08 Application for obtaining Environmental Clearance for developing an Information Technology Park including SEZ- "Yellowstone Landmark Info city" to be developed at Sector 66 B, Mohali by M/s Sukham Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd.
26-29
45.09 Application for obtaining environmental clearance for establishment of cement grinding unit of capacity 150 TPD by M/s Surya Industries in the revenue estate of at Sadiq Road, Faridkot, Distt- Faridkot.
30-31
45.10 Application for Environmental Clearance to establish an "Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Management Facility" by Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana at village Jainpur and Jamalpur.
32-36
45.11 Application for environmental clearance under EIA Notification for expansion of its existing unit M/s Sharu Steels Pvt. Ltd. at Plot No. B-48, Focal Point, Phase-VII, Ludhiana.
37-38
45.12 Application for grant of environmental clearance for expansion of its existing unit by M/s Sharu Special Alloys Pvt. Ltd. at Village Gobindgarh, adjoining Phase-VII, Ludhiana.
39-40
45.13 Application for Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification for carrying out expansion in the existing unit by installing 2 no. induction furnaces of 8 Ton/heat capacity each by M/s Khurana Steels Ltd. at Vill. Dhandari Khurd, adjoining Phase-VII, Focal Point, Ludhiana.
41-42
45.14 Application for Environmental Clearance for the replacement of existing induction furnace of capacity 4.5 T/heat with 2 no. induction furnaces of capacity 8 T/heat each and installation of a steel rolling mills by M/s Sudershan Forge Pvt. Ltd., Industrial Area-C, Kanganwal Road, VPO Jugiana, GT Road, Ludhiana.
43-45
Item no. 45.01 Confirmation of the minutes of 44th meeting of SEAC held on 26.3.2011
The minutes of 44th meeting of State Expert Appraisal Committee
held on 26/03/2011 were circulated to all the members vide letter no. 1106-15 dated
04.04.2011.
No observation has been received from any of the members. As
such, SEAC may confirm the proceedings.
Item no. 45.02 Action taken on the proceedings on the 44th meeting of SEAC held on 26.3.2011.
Item no.
Description Decision of the meeting
Action taken
44.01 Confirmation of the minutes of 43rd meeting of SEAC held on 19.3.2011.
The minutes of 43rd meeting of State Expert Appraisal Committee held on 19/03/2011 were circulated to all the members vide letter no. 952-61 dated 25.3.2011.
The Committee confirmed the proceedings with minor amendment in item no. 43.20.
The project proponent of item No. 43.20 has been conveyed the decision of SEAC vide letter No.1103 dated 4.4.2011.
44.02 Action taken on the proceedings on the 43rd meeting of SEAC held on 19.3.2011.
The Committee desired that letters to all the project proponents be issued apprising them regarding decision taken on their project proposal by the SEAC in its 43rd meeting held on 19.3.2011.
Letters to all the project proponents have been issued.
44.03 Application for environmental clearance under EIA Notification for expansion of its existing unit M/s Sharu Steels Pvt. Ltd. at Plot No. B-48, Focal Point, Phase-VII, Ludhiana.
The Committee was of the opinion that though moratorium had been lifted but the MoEF letter did not explicitly speak that Ludhiana ceased to be critical polluted area. The Committee, hence, felt that in view of the MoEF letter dated 16.3.2011, there is a need to obtain clarification / advice from the MoEF / SEIAA.
After detailed deliberations, the Committee authorized the Chairperson of the SEAC to seek clarification from MoEF regarding the above issue and further decided that the case may be placed in the meeting of SEAC as soon as the clarification is received from the
Letter has been written to MoEF vide No. SEAC/Gen/2011/1958 dated 31.3.2011 for seeking clarification, but the reply of the same is yet awaited. The case has been placed in the agenda as a separate item.
MoEF/SEIAA.
44.04 Application for environmental clearance for expansion of its existing unit by M/s Sharu Special Alloys Pvt. Ltd. at Village Gobindgarh, adjoining Phase-VII, Ludhiana.
-do-
-do-
44.05 Application for environmental clearance as required under EIA Notification for cement grinding unit of capacity 30 TPD to be developed by M/s New Tech Cement Industries, in the revenue estate of Village Gholia Kalan, Tehsil Bagha Purana, Distt. Moga.
It was decided by the SEAC to call the project proponent in the next meeting of SEAC, so as to make him aware regarding the proceedings of the public hearing and to take his view point. It was also decided that Punjab Pollution Control Board be requested to intimate the status of the construction and installation of proposed industrial plant, within one week, to enable the Committee to proceed further in the matter.
1. The project proponent will be called to make him aware regarding the proceedings of the public hearing and to take his view point in the 46th meeting of SEAC.
2. M.S., PPCB, has been requested vide letter no. 1105 dated 4.4.2011 to send the report as desired by the SEAC.
44.06 Application for environmental clearance under EIA Notification for increase in the production capacity of existing cement grinding unit from 75 TPD to 150 TPD of M/s Shri Bala Ji Cement Industries, in the revenue estate of Village Jai Singh Wala, Bagha Purana, Distt.
The Committee decided as under:-
1. Punjab Pollution Control Board be requested to intimate the status of the construction and installation of the industrial plant for which the project proposal is pending for environmental clearance including the pollution control status of the existing unit, within one week, to enable the Committee to proceed
1. M.S., PPCB, has been requested vide letter no. 1122 dated 4.4.2011 to send the report as desired by the SEAC.
2. The project proponent has been requested vide letter no. 1102 dated 4.4.2011 to intimate, within one week, the status of final EIA report and EMP.
Moga.
further in the matter.
2. The project proponent be requested to intimate, within one week, the status of final EIA report and EMP.
44.07 Application for environmental clearance under EIA Notification for carrying out expansion in the existing unit by installing 2 no. induction furnaces of 8 Ton/heat capacity each of M/s Khurana Steels Ltd. at Vill. Dhandari Khurd, adjoining Phase-VII, Focal Point, Ludhiana
The Committee was of the opinion that though moratorium had been lifted but the MoEF letter did not explicitly speak that Ludhiana ceased to be critical polluted area. The Committee, hence, felt that in view of the MoEF letter dated 16.3.2011, there is a need to obtain clarification / advice from the MoEF / SEIAA.
After detailed deliberations, the Committee authorized the Chairperson of the SEAC to seek clarification from MoEF regarding the above issue and further decided that the case may be placed in the meeting of SEAC as soon as the clarification is received from the MoEF / SEIAA.
Letter has been written to MoEF vide No. SEAC/ Gen / 2011 / 1958 dated 31.3.2011 for seeking clarification, but the reply of the same is yet awaited. The case has been placed in the agenda as a separate item.
44.08 Application for environmental clearance for the replacement of existing induction furnace of capacity 4.5 T/heat with 2 no. induction furnaces of capacity 8 T/heat each and installation of a steel rolling mills of M/s Sudershan Forge Pvt. Ltd., Industrial Area-C, Kanganwal Road,
-do-
-do-
VPO Jugiana, GT Road, Ludhiana.
44.09 Application for environmental clearance for Residential Group Housing Project namely “Rosewood Green Housing” to be developed by M/s Virat Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. at Vill. Sadhe Majra, Habitpur Road, Dera Bassi, Distt. Mohali.
The Committee decided as under: 1. The project proponent be requested not to carry out any further construction activity at site till he obtains environmental clearance as required under EIA Notification dated 14.9.2006. The project proponent be also requested to submit the latest photographs from all the four sides showing the status of construction. 2. The project proponent be requested to get information regarding classification of the area from the Department of Town & Country Planning, Punjab, in which the site of the project is located, as per Master Plan, within 7 days.
The decision of the Committee has been conveyed to the project proponent vide letter no. 1101 dated 4.4.2011.
44.10 Application for environmental clearance for construction of emerging technologies complex for Sri Guru Granth Sahib World University, Fatehgarh Sahib.
The Committee decided to request the project proponent to carry out representative ambient air sampling of the site area at 3-4 locations for atleast 7 days from the NABL accredited/MoEF approved Laboratory. Meanwhile the project proponent also submit the layout/ building plan duly approved by the Competent Authority of the State.
The decision of the Committee has been conveyed to the project proponent vide letter no. 1103 dated 4.4.2011.
44.11 Application for environmental clearance to establish an "Integrated Municipal Solid
The Committee was of the opinion that though moratorium had been lifted but the MoEF letter did not explicitly speak that Ludhiana ceased to be critical polluted
Letter has been written to MoEF vide No. SEAC/ Gen / 2011 / 1958 dated 31.3.2011 for seeking clarification, but the reply of the same is yet
Waste Management Facility" by Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana at village Jainpur and Jamalpur.
area. The Committee, hence, felt that in view of the MoEF letter dated 16.3.2011, there is a need to obtain clarification / advice from the MoEF / SEIAA.
After detailed deliberations, the Committee authorized the Chairperson of the SEAC to seek clarification from MoEF regarding the above issue and further decided that the case may be placed in the meeting of SEAC as soon as the clarification is received from the MoEF / SEIAA.
awaited. The case has been placed in the agenda as a separate item.
44.12 Application for obtaining environmental clearance for developing Urban Estate at Mullanpur, District S.A.S. Nagar, (Mohali) by the Divisional Engineer, Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA)
The Committee decided that the project proponent be reminded to submit the detailed draft EIA/EMP report to the SEIAA/SEAC at the earliest, so that further action may be taken in the matter.
The decision of the Committee has been conveyed to the project proponent vide letter no. 1104 dated 4.4.2011.
Item No. 45.03: Regarding issuance of TOR to M.C. Bathinda for establishment of Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Facility at Bathinda.
The Municipal Corporation, Bathinda has applied for obtaining
Environmental Clearance to establish an "Integrated Municipal Solid Waste
Management Facility" as required under EIA notification dated 14/9/2006. The
municipal solid waste processing facility will be installed in 20 acres at Bathinda having
capacity to handle 350 Ton /day of municipal solid waste. The sanitary landfill facility
will also be developed in an area of 36.8 acres in the revenue estate Village Mandi
Khurd, Distt. Bathinda. The project of the promoter is covered under Category 7 (I) of
the schedule appended to the said notification.
The case was considered by the SEAC in its 43rd meeting held on
19.3.2011 and approved the "Terms of Reference" (TOR), for preparation of detailed
draft EIA/EMP for further appraising the project. The said TOR was conveyed to the
M.C., Bathinda vide letter no. 14494 dated 28.3.2011 after getting approval of
Member Secretary, SEIAA. However, some amendments have been made by the
Member Secretary, SEIAA in following two SEAC conditions.
1. No Objection Certificate from pollution angle of the Punjab Pollution Control
Board.
2. NOC from the nearest Airport Authority for both sites.
The above noted conditions have been amended by the Member
Secretary, SEIAA as under:
i) No Objection Certificate from pollution angle / Authorization of the Punjab
Pollution Control Board under Municipal Solid Waste (Management &
Handling) Rules, 2000.
ii) NOC from the nearest Airport Authority for the site, which is located within
20 kms.
This is for the information of the SEAC.
Item No. 45.04 Application for obtaining Environmental Clearance for developing Shopping Complex namely „The Celebration Mall" at Village Paragpur, Jalandhar, M/s Francolin Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
M/s Francolin Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. has submitted application
for obtaining environmental clearance for developing Shopping Complex namely „The
Celebration Mall" at Village Paragpur, Jalandhar, on Form 1 & 1A alongwith basic
information and the project promoter is covered under category 8 (a) of the Schedule
appended to EIA notification dated 14/9/2006 as amended from time to time. The
detail of the project is as under:-
The case was considered in the 43rd meeting of SEAC, which was
attended by the following were present on behalf of the project promoter:
1. Col. Kuldip Sandhu, Senior General Manager
2. Dr. Koyal Kumar, Environmental Consultant, M/s EQMS India (P) Ltd., Delhi
Dr. Koyal Kumar of M/s EQMS India (P) Ltd., Delhi who is the
Environmental Consultant of the project proponent and the name of his consultancy
firm figures at Sr. no. 7 of the list uploaded by the MoEF at its official website,
presented the case before the SEAC as under:-
1. The promoter has proposal to develop Shopping Complex namely "The Celebration Mall" at Village Paragpur, Jalandhar having retail shops, restaurants, cafeteria, food court and Cinema Hall etc.
2. The project is covered under category 8 (a) of the Schedule appended to EIA notification dated 14/9/2006.
3. The total plot area of the proposed project is 23744.37 sq. m and total built up area is 1,00,924 Sq. m.
4. The site of the project falls within M.C. limits Jalandhar.
5. The total water requirement for the project will be 744 KLD, out of which 448 KLD will be met through fresh water by using borewells and 296 KLD will be met with re-circulation of treated wastewater.
6. The total wastewater generation from the proposed project will be about 296 KLD out of which 151 KLD treated sewage will be utilized for flushing, 56 KLD for DG cooling, 44 KLD for horticulture.
7. The project proponent has proposed to install STP having capacity of 375 KLD consisting of bar screen, oil & grease trap, equalization tank, primary treatment, SAFF, secondary treatment, filtration, activated carbon filter, softener and treated water storage.
8. 6 no. of rainwater harvesting pits of capacity 43.27 m3 each will be provided for rainwater harvesting in which the run-off collected from roof top, green area and paved area will be discharged.
9. The total quantity of MSW has been estimated 1.62 MT/day which will be segregated at source. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in an mechanized compostor and recyclable waste will be sold out to the authorized vendors and the remaining solid waste will be disposed off to the common municipal solid waste landfill site.
10. The total power requirement is 3500 KW will be supplied by Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. The project has provision to provide 8 No. DG sets of capacity 1500 KVA each and 1 no. DG set of 500 KVA to supply electricity during failure of power supply of PSPCL. These DG sets will be provided with acoustic enclosures and proper foundations.
11. The total parking area will be for 1354 ECS.
12. Fly ash based products will be used as far as possible and energy efficient glass will be used for minimizing ingress of light and maximizing heat cut offs.
The committee observed that it will not be advisable to discharge the
surface run-off to be collected from green area into the rainwater harvesting system
since the water of this area may contain pollutants, which may contaminate the
ground water. The committee further observed that the project proponent is required
to submit the following documents/data for carrying out appraisal of the project
proposal.
1. Proof of ownership of land.
2. Layout and building plan duly approved by the Competent Authority
2. Permission for CLU issued by the Competent Authority of the State.
3. Status of construction if any, alongwith photographs from all the four sides.
4. A map showing various features and Red Category industries within a radius of 500 m from the project site.
5. Site plan showing location of fire fighting equipment layout, first aid room and location of tubewells.
6. Analysis reports of ambient air, ground water and noise level from NABL Accredited laboratories/MoEF authorize laboratory.
7. Permission from the competent authority for :-
a) Water & Sewerage connection.
b) Collection of solid waste.
c) Use of Ground Water.
8. Availability of adequate land for use of treated sewage and plantation.
9. Quantification of energy saved and renewable energy devices used and permission of PSPCL for power connection.
10. Drawing showing plumbing systems for use of fresh, treated and hot water.
11. Affidavits for:-
a) Constitution of Environment Monitoring Cell.
b) Use of ready mix concrete or use of fly ash during construction.
c) To provide fire Fighting System.
d) To provide wind breaking curtains and water sprinkling system to minimize dust emissions.
e) To provide adequate safety measures for the construction workers during the construction phase.
13. An undertaking to the effect that the surface run-off to be collected from green area will not be discharged into the rainwater harvesting system.
The Committee also brought out that all these observations have been
mentioned in the agenda of the 43rd meeting of SEAC uploaded on the official website
www.seiaapunjab.co.in.
Col. Sandhu informed that the said documents/data will be submitted within 15 days.
The Committee agreed to accept the request made by Col. Sandhu and
decided to defer the case till the reply of above noted observations, is received. The
decision of the Committee was conveyed to the project proponent vide letter no.
15420 dated 31.3.2011.
Now, the project proponent vide letter dated 1.4.2011 has submitted
documents/data.
The case is placed before the State Expert Appraisal Committee for consideration.
Item No. 45.05 Application for obtaining environmental clearance for residential colony namely “AKME Polis” to be developed by M/s AKME Projects Ltd. at Vill. Jandiali, Ludhiana-Chandigarh Road, Distt. Ludhiana.
The project proponent has applied for obtaining environmental
clearance as required under EIA Notification for developing a township containing
plots, group housing, commercial, EWS and convenient shopping namely „AKME Polis‟
in the revenue estate of Village Jandiali, Ludhiana-Chandigarh Road, Distt. Ludhiana.
As per the application, the plot area of the proposed site is 77.169 acres and the
expected cost of the project is Rs. 226 crore. The built-up area of the project is
2,72,962 sq. m, as such, the project of promoter is covered under category 8 (b) of
the Schedule appended to EIA notification dated 14/9/2006.
The case of the project was considered in the 12th meeting of State
Expert Appraisal Committee held on 27/9/2008. During the meeting, all construction
ingredients of the project as fixed in the criteria for Environmental Grading prescribed
by Ministry of Environment & Forests, Govt. of India, New Delhi were discussed and
evaluated. The Committee awarded „Silver Grading‟ to the project. However, it was
pointed out that the mean value of SPM level at the project site, as per the ambient
air quality data provided by the promoter is 216.57 µg/Nm3, which is higher than the
prescribed limit specified in Manual on “Norms and Standards for Environment
Clearance of Large Construction projects”, Ministry of Environment and Forest,
Government of India (Table 1.1 National ambient air quality standards for different
building typologies as per CPCB). The case file of the project was forwarded to State
Environment Impact Assessment Authority for consideration for grant of
environmental clearance.
Accordingly, the case was considered by SEIAA in its 11th meeting held on
17.10.2008, and after detailed deliberation on the matter the authority observed that:-
1. The project site is located very near to Focal Point, as such, the effect of
various type of industries located in this Focal Point need to be assessed.
2. The commercial part of the project is shown an un-determined plan in the plans
approved by the competent authority, which can not be considered for grant of
environmental clearance at this stage.
3. The project has been granted change of land use for establishment of
residential/commercial project, whereas as per the master plan of the Ludhiana
city, this area has now been earmarked for light industries.
4. The four acre land earmarked for disposal of treated effluent is not included in
CLU.
In view of the above, it was decided by the Authority that the case may
be referred back to the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee for re-consideration of
the same in light of above mentioned points and give its revised recommendations.
The case was reconsidered in 16th meeting of SEAC held on 6/12/2008.
Sh. Deepak Gupta, Environmental Consultant for the project submitted pointwise reply
to the observations of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority as under :-
1. The promoter has already planned to provide minimum buffer of 15 m green
belt of broad leaf trees towards the air polluting industries as per the
notification no. 2274 dated 25/7/2008 issued by Govt. of Punjab, Deptt. of
Science, Technology and Environment. Thus, the effect of various types of
industries located in the Focal Point or in the surrounding area will be
minimized and taken care of.
2. The promoter has not planned the layout of commercial part of the project at
this stage. Therefore, the environmental clearance may be given by the
Authority excluding commercial part of the project. The environmental
clearance for the commercial part of the project will be obtained by the
promoter as and when the layout of this part of the project is planned and
before starting construction activity of the commercial part of the project.
3. Although, as per the Master Plan of the Ludhiana City, this area has now been
earmarked for light industries, but it has been clearly specified on page 189 of
Master Plan, Ludhiana that the sites on which various projects have been
approved or whose change of land use has already been permitted by
competent authority / Govt., such sites shall be deemed to be adjusted as
sanctioned / permitted.
4. The promoter has four acre land adjoining the project area where it is proposed
to use treated effluent onto land for irrigation / plantation. As this land is
outside the project area and there will be no residential / commercial activity on
this piece of land and the land will be used only for use of treated sewage onto
land for irrigation / plantation, therefore, change of land use may not be
insisted upon for this site.
The reply given by the project proponent was discussed and it was
decided that a committee of officers from Punjab Pollution Control Board, Regional
Office, Ludhiana should visit the project site to verify the submissions made by the
promoter, check feasibility of land for disposal of treated sewage and send their
recommendations to decide the application of the promoter for grant of environmental
clearance.
Accordingly, a committee of the following officers of the Board was
constituted for inspection of the project site, as per decision taken in 16th meeting of
SEAC.
1. Sh. R.K. Gupta, Environmental Engineer
2. Sh. S.P. Garg, Environmental Engineer
3. Sh. Shiv Kumar, Assistant Environmental Engineer
The said Committee has submitted its report and intimated that the site
M/s AKME Polis to be developed by AKME Projects Ltd. at Jandiali, Ludhiana-
Chandigarh Road has been visited by the team on 14/1/2009. The team observed that
on east and north side, the red category industries are situated along the boundary.
One induction furnace exists on west side which is more than 100 m from the
boundary and one poultry farm also exists which is less than 100 m from the boundary
of the project.
1. The air pollution from induction furnace may be significant and smell problem
from poultry farm is also expected. As per policy of the Board, the project
proponent has to develop 15 m wide green belt of wide leaf trees on east side /
north side and also on west side to reduce the pollution expected from
induction furnace and poultry farm. This can be allowed as per Ludhiana Master
Plan Clause “The sites on which various projects have already been approved
or whose change of land use has already been permitted by competent / Govt.,
such sites shall be deemed to be adjusted as sanctioned / permitted.” The
project proponent has already land use change of 77.1687 acres land issued by
Deptt. of Housing and Urban Development, Govt. of Punjab vide no. 6726-27
dated 24/7/2006 well before the final approval of Master Plan of Ludhiana.
2. Layout plan of commercial part of the project has not been planned by the
promoter, so it may be excluded from the environmental clearance and
promoter will get environmental clearance separately before starting any
construction of Commercial part of the project.
3. The promoter has given registered deed of four acres of land adjoining to the
project where it proposes to discharge treated sewage. The total water to be
used for various uses will be 815 Kl/day and expected sewage will be 80%
which comes out to be 652 Kl/day. Out of this 652 Kl/day, 271 Kl/day will be
used for flushing system in the houses and 381 Kl/day will be used for irrigation
of green belt developed along the boundary, lawns and for plantation of trees
planted along the internal roads. The promoter will lay the piping network for
irrigation of these areas. For excessive sewage, the colonizer will develop the 4
acres land as per Karnal Technology. The committee has observed that the
land is sufficient to take care of the excessive sewage and reported that this
four acre land is already in use for agriculture purpose. Thus the committee is
of the view that this change of land use for this land is not required.
The Committee has recommended that the case of the colony may be
considered for grant of environmental clearance.
The case was reconsidered in the 19th meeting of State Expert Appraisal
Committee held on 7/3/2009 in light of the report of the team. After detailed
deliberations on the reply submitted by officers of the Punjab Pollution Control Board,
the Committee decided to forward the project to State Environment Impact
Assessment Authority for grant of environmental clearance subject to the condition
already recommended (12th meeting of State Expert Appraisal Committee held on
27/9/2008), to Authority alongwith the following special conditions :
1. That the project proponent will provide a green belt of broadleaf trees of
minimum 15 metres width around its project site.
2. The project proponent will not get the land use of four acre land (which is
adjoining to the project and is proposed by the project proponent for discharge
of treated sewage of the colony) changed from the Town and Country Planning
Deptt., Punjab until the sewer line is laid in the area by M.C. The copy of the
proceedings be sent to CTP, Punjab with request not to change the land use of
remaining four acres of the project for any activity.
Subsequently, the case was discussed by the SEIAA in its 18th meeting
held on 15.6.2009 and it was decided that the MoEF may be requested to give
guidelines/advise to process such cases where there are red category industries within
100 metres / 500 metres from the boundary of the project. Accordingly, the MoEF
was requested vide letter no. 23414 dated 13.7.2009 to give the desired clarification,
which was received from MoEF vide letter dated 3.9.2009. The matter was considered
by the Authority in its 21st meeting held on 19.9.2009 and it was decided that the case
may be forwarded to SEAC alongwith the clarification received from MoEF vide letter
no. 19-78/2009-IA.III dated 3.9.2009 for appropriate consideration.
The case of the project proponent was placed in the 31st meeting of
State Expert Appraisal Committee held on 24/10/2009. During meeting the Committee
observed that the conc. of SPM in the ambient air varies in the range of 196 µg/m3 to
216 µg/m3 and the variation at some point of time are more than the permissible limit
of 200 µg/m3 prescribed in the National Ambient Air Quality Standards by Central
Pollution Control Board. The Committee noted with concern that as there are number
of red category industries situated along the boundary of the project, therefore,
decided that the proposed site be visited by SEAC to visualize the status of industries
falling in the radius of 100 m / 500 m from the periphery of proposed project.
Accordingly, the case was deferred.
Accordingly, the Committee members visited the site of „AKME Polis‟ to
be developed by M/s Akme Projects Ltd., Vill. Jandiali, Ludhiana-Chandigarh Road,
Distt. Ludhiana on 28/11/2009. During visit, it was observed that ;
1. The project proponent has constructed office complex only. No other
construction activities were going on at site.
2. On the front side of the project site i.e. on southern, there is a flour mill namely
M/s Jindal Agro Industries.
3. On the right side of the project site i.e. on eastern side, the following industrial
units are existing;
a. M/s General Tools adjoining the site b. M/s Super Tech Agro adjoining the site c. M/s Asian Lacto & M/s Asian Lak Health adjoining the site. d. M/s Batra Poly Fab = 67 m e. M/s Osho Tools = 80 m f. M/s Gangotri Rubber = 105 m
g. Saw Mill adjoining the site
4. On the left side of the project site i.e. on western side, the following industrial
units are existing;
a. M/s NKH Alloys = 158 m away
b. M/s Ashwani Knit Fab = 120 m away
c. Poultry farm = 82 m away
During visit, it has been observed that the project proponent is
developing green belt of 15 m width towards the eastern side of the project side and
planted more than 1000 trees. The representatives of the project proponent present
during visit were suggested to shift the location of the school area proposed on the
eastern side to another suitable location due to its proximity to the industrial units on
the eastern side. They were suggested to submit duly approved revised plan from
competent authority after incorporating above changes i.e. plan indicating green
buffer zone of 15 m width towards the eastern side and alternate location of school.
Thereafter, the project proponent vide letter dated 8/12/2009 has
submitted revised plan showing green area towards eastern side & alternate site of
school towards western side and also enclosed an affidavit to the effect that the
company has left the prescribed minimum area of 15 m on the boundary of the
project as green area and shall plant broad leave trees in the project side. The project
proponent has requested for grant of environmental clearance.
The case was reconsidered in the 35th meeting of State Expert Appraisal
Committee held on 9/1/2010. During meeting, the Committee observed that project
proponent has submitted necessary clarification and satisfactory reply to the queries
and in regard to the application of new AAQM Notification dated 16/11/2009, the
majority decision was taken by the Committee and awarded „Silver Grading‟ and
decided to forward the case to State Environment Impact Assessment Authority for
grant of environmental clearance subject to certain conditions.
The case was again considered by the SEIAA in its 28th meeting held on
21.3.2010 observed that there are some red category industries including an induction
furnace and a poultry farm within 250 m radius of the project site and the air
emissions / odour to be generated from these industries may have ill effects on the
residents of the proposed project. Therefore, the Authority decided that:-
"The project proponent may be requested to carry out Impact
Assessment Study of the effect of the red categories industries located
within 250 m radius of the project site and to submit the mitigation
measures to be taken by the proponent regarding the effects of these
industries".
The SEIAA further decided that the project proponent may be requested
to submit supplementary information as per revised Form- I, in view of amendment
notification dated 1.12.0009 and subsequent circular of MOEF dated 18.01.2010. As
decided, the project proponent was requested vide letter no. 16247 dated 1.4.2010.
But the project proponent failed to respond in connection with said letter, accordingly,
a reminder was issued vide letter no. 25963 dated 8.6.2010.
In the meanwhile, SEIAA/SEAC, Punjab became non-functioning due to
resignation of their Chairmen. The MOEF, New Delhi vide D.O No. J-11013/43/2007-
IA-II (I) dated 8.07.2010 asked the SEIAA/SEAC that the cases of „B‟ category projects
lying pending with SEIAA/SEAC be sent to MoEF for further consideration. The file was
also sent to MoEF, New Delhi. Thereafter, the project proponent vide its letter dated
22.11.2010 (received in the MoEF on 26.11.2010) has submitted revised Form-I, and
EIA report.
The SEIAA/SEAC of Punjab has been reconstituted by the MoEF, New
Delhi, vide order-dated 7.3.2011 and the case file of the project proponent has been
received back from MoEF.
The case was considered in the 29th meeting of SEIAA held on
23.3.2011 and it was observed that the project proponent has submitted
supplementary information as per revised Form-I vide letter dated 22.11.2010 and
Impact Assessment study report and the same have been taken on record.
After detailed deliberations in the matter, it was decided to return the
case to SEAC to critically evaluate the Impact Assessment study report submitted by
the project proponent and to submit the recommendations to the Authority in
accordance with provisions of the EIA Notification dated 14.9.2006.
The case is placed before the Committee for further consideration in the
matter.
Item No. 45.06 Application for obtaining environmental clearance for residential colony namely "Super Mega Mixed Use Integrated Industrial Park Project –Phase-I" to be established in the revenue estate of Village Nagla, Tehsil Zirakpur, Distt. Mohali, Punjab by M/s Shipra Estates Limited.
It is submitted that the project proponent has applied for
obtaining environmental clearance as required under the provisions of EIA notification
dated 14.9.2006 for establishment of a Project namely "Super Mega Mixed Use
Integrated Industrial Park Project –Phase-I" in the revenue estate of Village Nagla,
Tehsil Zirakpur, Distt. Mohali, Punjab by M/s Shipra Estates Limited on Form 1 & 1A.
The details of the project are as under:-
The total area for the proposed project is 445633.616 sq.m (44.5 hectare) and
the builtup area is 5,68,150.02 sqm.
The total area of the project is to be divided into following three components:
IT/ITES Industry : 40.3 %
Residential : 28.42%
Commercial : 1.37%
The total area of the project of Phase-I is 44.5 hectares and no industry of
category A & B falling in the Schedule appended in the notification dated
14/9/2006 is to be housed in the industrial component of the project, as such,
the project is not covered under category 7 (I) of the said Schedule. However,
the builtup area of the project is 568150.02 sqm., as such, the project is
covered under Category 8 (b) of the said Schedule.
The expected cost of the project is 600 crores.
The total water requirement is about 1700 KLD out of which 909 KLD will be
met from ground water extracted through bore wells and remaining will be met
from the treated wastewater.
Total 833 KLD domestic wastewater will be generated from the proposed
project and a STP of capacity 1000 KLD based on Moving Media Reactor
technology will be installed to treat the said wastewater. The treated
wastewater from sewage treatment plant will be utilized for D.G. set cooling,
flushing and horticulture purposes.
Total 4820 Kg/day of solid waste will be generated, which will be segregated at
source. The project proponent has proposed to provide adequate number of
collection bins for segregation of bio-degradable and non-biodegradable waste
as per the MSW Rules, 2000.
The power requirement is 33 MW, which will be provided by Punjab State
Power Corporation Limited. The 8 no. D.G. sets of 1000 KVA capacity each are
proposed for Industrial use. 3 no. D.G. sets of 500 KVA capacity each and 1
no. D.G. set of 380 KVA will be installed for Residential use and for supplying
electricity for Commercial use 4 D.G. sets of 1250 KVA capacity each, 2 D.G.
sets of 1000 KVA capacity each and 1 D.G. set of 500 KVA shall be provided as
power backup during emergency period
The project proponent has applied to the MoEF and the case was placed
considered by the EAC/MoEF in its 93rd meeting held on 9th-10th November, 2010 and
approved the TOR, which was conveyed to the promoter by the MoEF vide letter dated
26/11/2010. In the said letter, the MoEF mentioned as under:
"Public hearing is to be conducted for the project as per provisions of EIA
Notification 2006 and the issues raised by the public should be addressed in the
Environmental Management Plan. A detailed draft EIA/EMP report should be prepared
as per the TOR and submitted to the Ministry in the prescribed form as per said
Notification".
Thereafter, the project proponent vide letter dated 2/12/2010 requested
the MoEF that the project is covered under category 8 (b) of the Schedule of
appended to the EIA notification dated 14/9/2006, as such, public consultation is not
required to be conducted. The said letter of the project proponent has been dealt by
the MoEF and perusal of which indicates that the case was placed in the meeting of
EAC of MoEF held on 18-20 January, 2011. But no extract pertaining to said meeting
has been placed by the Ministry in the record file received from the MoEF. Minutes
placed on the official website of the MoEF pertaining to 95th meeting of EAC held on
18-20 January, 2011 were perused and it was observed that the representation of the
project proponent for exemption from the public hearing has not been considered in
the said meeting.
Now, the project proponent vide letter dated 17/3/2011 addressed to the
Member Secretary SEIAA, again informed that the case was considered by the EAC of
MoEF in its meeting held on 18 January, 2011 for exemption of public hearing and
requested to look into the matter.
The project proponent has also submitted EIA report vide letter dated
10/1/2011 in compliance to TOR issued by the EAC of MoEF.
The case was considered in the 29th meeting of SEIAA held on
23.3.2011 and the Authority critically examined the EIA Notification dated 14.9.2006
as amended on 1.12.2009 and application of the project proponent and noticed as
under:
a) The total area of the project of Phase-I is 44.5 hectares and no industry of
category A & B falling in the Schedule appended in the notification dated
14/9/2006 is to be housed in the industrial component of the project, as such,
the project is not covered under category 7 (c) of the said Schedule. However,
the built-up area of the project is 568150.02 sqm., as such, the project is
covered under Category 8 (b) of the said Schedule.
b) Public consultation is not required for all building and construction projects or
area development projects (which do not contain any category 'A' projects and
activities) and Townships item 8 (a) & (b) in the Schedule appended to EIA
Notification.
After detailed deliberation in the matter, it was decided by the SEIAA to
amend the last two paragraphs, which are reproduced above, of the MoEF letter dated
26.11.2010 as under and to issue corrigendum in this regard.
"The project proponent shall prepare detailed draft EIA/EMP as per
Terms of Reference and shall submit to the SEIAA in the prescribed form
as per EIA Notification dated 14.9.2006".
It was also decided by SEIAA to return the case to SEAC to evaluate the
EIA report submitted by project proponent and process the application as per the
provisions of EIA Notification dated 14.9.2006.
The case is placed before the SEAC for further consideration in the
matter.
Item no. 45.07 Request for waving of Public Hearing for setting up of a CETP in the revenue estate of Tajpur Road, Ludhiana by M/s Punjab Dyers Association.
M/s Punjab Dyers Association, Ludhiana has applied to the MoEF,
New Delhi for obtaining environmental clearance as required under the provisions of
EIA notification dated 14.9.2006 for setting up of a CETP of 117 MLD capacity at
Tajpur Road, Ludhiana in an area of 32 acres since at that time SEIAA/SEAC for the
State of Punjab was not functioning due to resignation of their Chairmen.
The said proposal was considered in the 95th meeting of the EAC of
MoEF held on 18th-20th January 2011 and approved the TOR, which was conveyed to
the promoter by the MoEF vide letter dated 11.2.2011. In the said letter, the MoEF
mentioned as under:
"Public hearing is to be conducted for the project as per provisions of EIA Notification 2006 and the issues raised by the public should be addressed in the Environmental Management Plan. A detailed draft EIA/EMP report should be prepared as per the TOR and submitted to the Ministry in the prescribed form as per said Notification".
Thereafter, MoEF has constituted SEIAA / SEAC for the State vide Order
dated 7.2.2011 and returned the case to the SEIAA/SEAC for further consideration in
the matter.
Now, M/s Punjab Dyers Association vide letter dated 31.3.2011
requested the SEIAA to exempt the project proposal from public hearing as the Govt.
of Punjab, Department of Industries & Commerce, Chandigarh, vide Notification No.
4037-A dated 24th February, 2011 has declared the land belonging to Hadbast No. 177
measuring as 311 kanal 10 Marla in the revenue estate of Tajpura Road, Village
Jamalpur Awana, District Ludhiana as an industrial area for setting up a common
Effluent Treatment Plant by M/s Punjab Dyers Association, Ludhiana (copy enclosed as
Annexure-1).
The case is placed before the SEAC for further consideration in the
matter.
Item No. 45.08 Application for obtaining Environmental Clearance for developing an Information Technology Park including SEZ- "Yellowstone Landmark Info city" to be developed at Sector 66 B, Mohali by M/s Sukham Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd.
M/s Sukham Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd has submitted an application
for obtaining environmental clearance for developing an Information Technology Park
including SEZ namely "Yellowstone Landmark Info city" at Sector 66 B, Mohali on
Form 1 & 1A and the project of the promoter is covered under category 8 (b) of the
Schedule appended to EIA notification dated 14/9/2006 as amended from time to
time. The details of the project are as under:-
The total plot area of the proposed project is 100.064 acres and total built up area
is 3,33,650 Sq. m.
The site of the project falls within M.C. limits of Mohali.
The expected cost of the project is Rs. 952 Crores.
The total water requirement for the project will be 1450 KLD, out of which 950 will
be met with groundwater and balance 500 KLD will be met through recycling of
treated effluent. The project proponent has attached two water balance charts
with the application as Annexure-3 & 12, which are not matching with each other.
The total wastewater generation from the proposed project will be about 910 KLD,
out of which 500 KLD will be used for flushing and remaining 410 KLD will be used
for irrigation of green area (23402.21 sq. m).
The project proponent shall install two identical STPs having capacity of 500 KLD
each consisting of screens, collection tank, clarifier, aeration tank, secondary
clarifier, pressure sand filter ozonation process & sludge drying beds.
The total quantity of MSW has been estimated as 3000 kg/day. The solid waste will
be collected separately as recyclable and non- recyclable at primary source. The
recyclable material will be directly sent for the respective processing industry and
the other component will be sent to composting section.
The total power requirement will be 17 MW, which will be supplied by Punjab
State Power Corporation Ltd. The project promoter has provision to provide 3
number of DG sets of capacity 1000 kVA each, as standby arrangement of power
supply.
The other details of the project have been given in the Form 1 & 1-A
submitted by the promoter and the details of the proposed project are as under:
1. Properly filled Form 1 & 1A Yes
2. Proof of ownership of land Submitted.
3. CLU status Submitted.
4. Approved Layout plan and Building plan from Competent Authority.
Submitted, but not approved.
5. Topographical map of the area showing Contour Plan.
Submitted.
6. Status of construction, if any, alongwith photographs from all the four sides.
Not submitted.
7. 500 meter radius map of the area from periphery of project site clearly indicating the various industries (specifically red category industries) and structures lying in the area.
Not Submitted.
8. Certificates from authorized departments regarding a) State Boundary not within 10 Km. b) Project not lying in eco-sensitive and
protected area including wild life sanctuaries.
c) Not lying in the critically polluted areas.
Not required as the General Condition is not applicable in this case.
9. Site plan of the project showing the following i) Location of STP ; ii) Solid waste storage area. iii) Green belt iv) Parking space v) RWH and water recharge pits vi) Fire fighting equipment layout vii) First aid room
i) Not marked on the
site plan. ii) –do- iii) –do- iv) Marked v) Not marked on the
site plan vi) Not marked on the
site plan vii) Not marked on the
site plan
ix) Location of Tubewells viii) Not marked on the site plan
10. Permission of Competent Authority for; a) Water and Sewerage connection b) Collection of Solid waste c) Use of Ground Water
a) Not required as the project
proponent has proposed to provide tubewells for water supply and treated waste water will be used for irrigation of green belt.
b) Own compost manufacturing facility to be provided.
C) Applied for obtaining permission of CGWA.
11. Water balance chart for summer, rainy and winter seasons indicating critical requirements.
The project proponent submitted two water balance charts which are at annexures-3 and 12 and both of these are not matching with each other.
12. Availability of adequate land for use of treated sewage and plantation.
Submitted.
13. Analysis reports of ambient air, ground water and noise levels from NABL Accredited laboratories.
Submitted.
14. Quantification of energy saved and renewable energy devices used and permission of PSPCL for power connection.
Quantification of energy saved and renewable energy devices used is submitted but permission of PSPCL for power connection is not submitted.
15. Drawing showing plumbing systems for use of fresh, treated and hot water
Submitted.
16. Construction schedule (PERT/CPM Chart) Not submitted.
17. Affidavits for ; a) Constitution of Environment
Monitoring Cell b) Use of ready mix concrete or use of
fly ash during construction. c) To provide Fire Fighting System
Submitted.
d) To provide wind breaking curtains and water sprinkling system to minimize dust emissions.
e) To provide adequate safety measures for the construction workers during the construction phase.
The case is placed before the SEAC for consideration.
Item No. 45.09: Application for obtaining environmental clearance for establishment of cement grinding unit of capacity 150 TPD by M/s Surya Industries in the revenue estate of at Sadiq Road, Faridkot, Distt- Faridkot.
M/s Surya Industries has applied for obtaining environmental
clearance as required under EIA Notification for establishment of a cement grinding
plant of capacity 150 TPD in the revenue estate of Sadiq Road, Faridkot, Distt.
Faridkot. The project of the promoter pertains to category 'B' and it falls under
category 3 (b) of the Schedule appended to the said Notification. As per application
submitted by the industry, the details of the project are as under :-
The proposed plant will be established in an area measuring 6212 sq. m which
is presently meant for agricultural use and the same will be got converted for
industrial purpose.
The industry will produce 150 TPD of cement by grinding process only by using
gypsum, clinker and fly ash/ slag. as raw material.
The cost of the project will be Rs.123.1 lacs.
The water 3 KLD will be for domestic use and the same will be met from
ground water by way of providing tubewell.
Only domestic effluent will be discharged after passing through septic tank.
The industry has proposed to install cyclone followed by bag filter house as
APCD to contain the concentration of particulate matter in the emissions within
the standards laid down by the Board.
Total energy requirement of the project is 700 KW and will be met from the
PSPCL.
The other details of the project have been given in the Form 1 and pre-
feasibility report submitted by the industry.
1. Properly filled Form 1 & Pre-feasibility report Submitted.
2. Proof of ownership of land Submitted.
3. CLU status Not submitted.
4. Topographical map of the area showing Contour Plan.
Not submitted.
6. Status of construction, if any, alongwith Not Submitted.
photographs from all the four sides.
7. 500 meter radius map of the area clearly indicating the various features.
Not Submitted.
8. Certificates from authorized departments regarding following General Condition is applicable for this category:
i) Protected areas notified under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972;
ii) Critically polluted areas as identified by the Central Pollution Control Board from time to time;
iii) Eco-sensitive areas as notified under section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, such as, Mahabaleshwar Panchgani, Matheran, Pachmarhi, Dahanu, Don Valley, and
iv) Inter-State boundaries and international boundaries;
i) Not Submitted.
ii) Does not fall in critically polluted area
iii) –do-
iv) Not submitted.
9. Availability of adequate land for use of treated sewage and plantation.
Submitted.
10. Analysis reports of ambient air, ground water and noise levels from NABL Accredited laboratories
Not Submitted.
11. Construction schedule (PERT/CPM Chart) Not submitted.
12. Affidavits for ;
f) Constitution of Environment Monitoring Cell
g) Use of ready mix concrete or use of fly ash during construction.
h) To provide Fire Fighting System
i) To provide adequate safety measures for the construction workers during the construction phase.
Not Submitted.
The pre-feasibility report submitted by the project proponent is not in
accordance with MoEF Circular dated 30.12.2010.
The case is placed before the SEAC for consideration.
Item No. 45.10 Application for Environmental Clearance to establish an "Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Management Facility" by Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana at Village Jainpur and Jamalpur.
The Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana has applied for
Environmental Clearance to establish an "Integrated Municipal Solid Waste
Management Facility" by Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana at Village Jainpur and
Jamalpur as required under EIA notification dated 14/9/2006. The project of the
promoter is covered under Category 7 (I) of the schedule appended to the said
notification. As per application submitted by the Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana, the
details of the proposed project are as under:
1. Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Management Facility at Jamalpur:
(i) Total area of the Jamalpur facility : 99 acres.
(ii) Available area for MSW processing: 64 acres
(iii) Tonnage handled at the facility : (a)1077TPD for initial 2 to 3 years
(b)735 TPD after rejuvenating the Jamalpur site.
2. Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Management Facility at Jainpur:
(i) Total area of the Jamalpur facility : 32 acres.
(ii) Available area for MSW processing: 32 acres
(iii) Tonnage handled at the facility : 342 TPD
3. The expected cost of the project is Rs.98.40 crores.
4. A CWP no.9148 of 2006 titled as Giani Arjun Singh V/s State of Punjab is sub-judice.
5. M/s Vitya Consultants Pvt.Ltd. has been appointed as Environment Consultant by IL & FS, the Project Development Advisor to Govt. of Punjab for the project.
6. Ludhiana – Sahnewal airport is at a distance of 9 Km from the site located in the revenue estate of Village Jamalpur and 20 Km from the site located in the revenue estate of Village Jainpur. Both these sites are located on the outskirts of Ludhiana within M.C. Limits of Ludhiana.
7. The site located at Jamalpur has already earmarked for development as per the local development plan.
8. The sewage to be generated during operation phase will be sent to STP located adjacent to the facility.
9. The leachate will be collected & recycled to maintain the required moisture contents in landfill.
10 The other details of the project have been given in the pre feasibility report and the Form 1 submitted by the promoter.
The proposed TOR for preparation of draft EIA report has been submitted by M.C. Ludhiana.
The status of documents submitted by the project proponent is as under:-
1. Properly filled Form 1 Yes
2. Proof of ownership of land Not submitted
3. CLU status Not submitted
4. Approved Layout plan and Building plan from Competent Authority.
Not applicable.
5. Topographical map of the area showing Contour Plan.
Not submitted
6. Status of construction, if any, alongwith photographs from all the four sides.
Not submitted
7. 500 meter radius map of the area from periphery of project site clearly indicating the various industries (specifically red category industries) and structures lying in the area.
Submitted.
8. Certificates from authorized departments regarding
a) State Boundary not within 10 Km.
b) Project not lying in eco-sensitive and protected area including wild life sanctuaries.
c) Not lying in the critically polluted areas.
Not submitted.
9. Site plan of the project showing the following
i) Location of STP ;
ii) Solid waste storage area.
iii) Green belt
iv) Parking space
v) RWH and water recharge pits
Not marked
vi) Fire fighting equipment layout
vii) First aid room
viii) Location of Tubewells
10. Permission of Competent Authority for ;
a) Water and Sewerage connection
b) Collection of Solid waste
c) Use of Ground Water
Not required
11. Water balance chart for summer, rainy and winter seasons indicating critical requirements.
Not Submitted
12. Availability of adequate land for use of treated sewage and plantation.
Not submitted
13. Analysis reports of ambient air, ground water and noise levels from NABL Accredited laboratories.
Not submitted.
14. Quantification of energy saved and renewable energy devices used and permission of PSEB for power connection.
Not submitted
15. Drawing showing plumbing systems for use of fresh, treated and hot water
Not submitted
16. Construction schedule (PERT/CPM Chart) Not submitted
17. Affidavits for ;
a) Constitution of Environment Monitoring Cell
b) Use of ready mix concrete or use of fly ash during construction.
c) To provide Fire Fighting System
d) To provide wind breaking curtains and water sprinkling system to minimize dust emissions.
e) To provide adequate safety measures for the construction workers during the construction phase.
Not submitted
The Municipal Corporation Ludhiana applied for obtaining Environmental
Clearance in the month of December, 2010 to SEIAA/SEAC, Punjab, but the same was
sent to MoEF vide letter no.876 dated 6/1/2011 since the SEAC/SEIAA for the State of
Punjab became non-functional in the State of Punjab.
Thereafter, the MoEF, vide letter no. F.No. 19-5/2008-IA-III dated
16.3.2011 returned the case to the Secretary to Govt. of Punjab, Deptt. Of Science,
Technology & Environment stating that:
“In continuation to the Ministry‟s letter of even number dated 14.3.2011, I am
directed to return the following Category „B‟ projects for appraisal at State Level
under EIA Notification, 2006 as amended in 2009 since the SEIAA/SEAC for Punjab
have been reconstituted and Moratorium on CEPI for the Ludhiana, Punjab has
been lifted vide OM No. J-11013/5/2010-IA-II(I) dated 15.2.2011.
1. CMSWMF at Jainpur and Jamalpur, Ludhiana
2. CETP at Tajpur Road, Ludhiana
It may kindly be noted that out of six number of CETP/CMSWMF projects
of Punjab, only CMSWMF at Samgouli, Mohali is Category „A‟ project due to the
location of the site within 10 km radius of inter-State boundary and ToR was issued
on 7.3.2011”.
The case was considered by the SEAC in its 44th meeting held on
26.3.2011 and after detailed deliberations, the Committee was of the opinion that
though moratorium had been lifted but the MoEF letter did not explicitly speak that
Ludhiana ceased to be critical polluted area. The Committee, hence, felt that in
view of the MoEF letter dated 16.3.2011, there is a need to obtain clarification /
advice from the MoEF / SEIAA. The Committee authorized the Chairperson of the
SEAC to seek clarification from MoEF regarding the above issue and further
decided that the case may be placed in the meeting of SEAC as soon as the
clarification is received from the MoEF/SEIAA.
Accordingly, a letter has been written to MoEF by the Chairperson of the
SEAC vide no. SEAC/Gen/2011/1958 dated 31.3.2011 for seeking the aforesaid
clarification.The reply is awaited from the MoEF.
It is mentioned here that the Govt. of Punjab, Deptt. of Science,
Technology & Environment vide Memo no. 3/10/2010-STE (4)/709 dated 25.3.2011
has sent a copy of letter no. F.No.19-5/2008-IA-III dated 14.3.2011 of the MoEF
regarding the case in question, which was received by SEAC on 29.3.2011.The MoEF
letter no. F.No. 19-5/2008-IA-III dated 16.3.2011 sent to the Secretary to Govt. of
Punjab, Deptt. Of Science, Technology & Environment , which is discussed above, is in
continuation of MoEF letter dated 14.3.2011.The members may peruse both the
letters of MOEF jointly for appropriate decision.
The case is placed before the SEAC for consideration.
Item No.45.11 Application for environmental clearance under EIA Notification for expansion of its existing unit M/s Sharu Steels Pvt. Ltd. at Plot No. B-48, Focal Point, Phase-VII, Ludhiana.
The industry has applied for obtaining environmental clearance for
carrying out expansion of its existing unit located at Plot No. B-48, Focal Point, Phase-
VII, Ludhiana, as per details given below.
Product Existing Proposed Total
Steel Ingots 21600 TPA 25000 TPA 46600 TPA
TMT Bars 21600 TPA 25000 TPA 46600 TPA
The case of the project proponent was placed in the 31st meeting of
State Expert Appraisal Committee held on 24/10/2009. The Committee observed that
as the proposed site falls in industrial Focal Point, therefore, public consultation is not
required in this case and decided to categorize the project into Category B-1, with
certain Terms of Reference for Rapid Environmental Impact Assessment Study of the
proposed project. Accordingly, the TOR were issued vide letter no. 37335 dated
16.11.2009 to the industry for its project proposal.
Thereafter, Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi vide Office
Memorandum dated 13th January, 2010 declared Ludhiana City as critically polluted
area. Furthermore, as per amendment made by the MoEF in its notification dated
14.9.2006 on 1/12/2009, such type of project are now covered under category 3(a)
and General Condition is applicable for this category. Accordingly, Punjab Pollution
Control Board was requested by the committee vide letter no.19406 dated 22/4/2010
to intimate as to whether the project site falls within the critically polluted area or not
in light of the boundaries defined by the MoEF vide office memorandum dated
15/3/2010, within 7 days positively, so that the guidelines issued by the MoEF may be
complied with.
Subsequently, SEIAA/SEAC for the State of Punjab became non-
functional due to resignation of their Chairmen in July 2010. Accordingly, the case file
was sent to MoEF for further consideration in the matter.
Now, SEIAA / SEAC for the State has been constituted vide order dated
7.2.2011 and the file has been returned by the MoEF to the SEAC/SEIAA.
The project proponent has not yet submitted the draft EIA report and
EMP. No communication has been received from the Punjab Pollution Control Board in
connection with letter dated 22/4/2010.
The case of the industry was considered by the SEAC in its 44th meeting
held on 26.3.2011 and was of the opinion that though moratorium had been lifted by
the MoEF vide Office Memorandum dated 15.2.2011, but it did not explicitly speak that
Ludhiana ceased to be critical polluted area.The Committee authorized the
Chairperson of the SEAC to seek clarification from MoEF regarding the above issue and
further decided that the case may be placed in the meeting of SEAC as soon as the
clarification is received from the MoEF/SEIAA.
Accordingly, a letter has been written to MoEF by the Chairperson of the
SEAC vide no. SEAC/Gen/2011/1958 dated 31.3.2011 for seeking the aforesaid
clarification. The reply is awaited from the MoEF.
The matter regarding critically polluted area of Ludhiana is similar to
item no 45.10 ,as such, uniform appropriate decision may be taken in addition to
industry specific observations.
The case is placed before the SEAC for consideration.
Item no. 45.12 Application for grant of environmental clearance for expansion of its existing unit by M/s Sharu Special Alloys Pvt. Ltd. at Village Gobindgarh, adjoining Phase-VII, Ludhiana.
The industry has applied for obtaining Environmental Clearance
for expansion of its existing unit by installing a steel rolling mill of capacity 10 MT/hr.
and 2 no. induction furnaces of capacity 8 T/heat each.
The application of the project proponent was placed in the 30th meeting
of State Expert Appraisal Committee held on 10/10/2009. The Committee observed
that the proposed site of the industry is located in the industrial zone as per proposals
of Master Plan (2007-2021) of Ludhiana, as such, public consultation is not required in
this case and decided to categorize the project into Category B-1, with certain Terms
of Reference for Rapid Environmental Impact Assessment Study of the proposed
project. The Committee decided to recommend the case to SEIAA for approval of
TORs, fixed by SEAC with exemption from public hearing/public consultation.
Accordingly, the TOR were issued vide letter no. 353732 dated
4.11.2009 to the industry for its project proposal, after approval of Member Secretary
of SEIAA.
Thereafter, Ministry of Environment and Forests vide Office
Memorandum dated 13th January, 2010 declared Ludhiana City as critically polluted
area. Furthermore, as per amendment made by the MoEF in its notification dated
14.9.2006 on 1/12/2009, such type of project are now covered under category 3(a)
and General Condition is applicable for this category. Accordingly, Punjab Pollution
Control Board was requested by the committee vide letter no.19406 dated 22/4/2010
to intimate as to whether the project site falls within the critically polluted area or not
in light of the boundaries defined by the MoEF vide office memorandum dated
15/3/2010, within 7 days positively, so that the guidelines issued by the MoEF may be
complied with.
Thereafter, SEIAA/SEAC for the State of Punjab became non-functional
due to resignation of their Chairmen in July 2010. Accordingly, the case file was sent
to MoEF for further consideration in the matter. Now, SEIAA / SEAC for the State has
been constituted vide order dated 7.2.2011 and the file has been returned by the
MoEF to the SEAC/SEIAA.
The project proponent has not yet submitted the draft EIA report and
EMP. No communication has been received from the Punjab Pollution Control Board in
connection with letter dated 22/4/2010.
The case of the industry was considered by the SEAC in its 44th meeting held on
26.3.2011 and was of the opinion that though moratorium had been lifted by the
MoEF vide Office Memorandum dated 15.2.2011, but it did not explicitly speak that
Ludhiana ceased to be critical polluted area.The Committee authorized the
Chairperson of the SEAC to seek clarification from MoEF regarding the above issue and
further decided that the case may be placed in the meeting of SEAC as soon as the
clarification is received from the MoEF/SEIAA.
Accordingly, a letter has been written to MoEF by the Chairperson of the
SEAC vide no. SEAC/Gen/2011/1958 dated 31.3.2011 for seeking the aforesaid
clarification. The reply is awaited from the MoEF.
The matter regarding critically polluted area of Ludhiana is similar to
item no 45.10 ,as such, uniform appropriate decision may be taken in addition to
industry specific observations.
The case is placed before the SEAC for consideration.
Item no.45.13 Application for Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification for carrying out expansion in the existing unit by installing 2 no. induction furnaces of 8 Ton/heat capacity each by M/s Khurana Steels Ltd. at Vill. Dhandari Khurd, adjoining Phase-VII, Focal Point, Ludhiana.
The industry has applied for obtaining environmental clearance for
obtaining environmental clearance as required under EIA Notification dated 14/9/2006
for carrying out expansion of its existing unit by installing 2 no. induction furnaces of 8
Ton/heat capacity each located in the revenue estate of Village Dhandari Khurd,
adjoining Phase-VII, Focal Point, Ludhiana.
The application of the project proponent was placed in the 35th meeting of
State Expert Appraisal Committee held on 9/1/2010. The Committee was satisfied with
the clarification given during the discussion and decided to categorize the project into
Category B-1, with certain Terms of Reference for Rapid Environmental Impact
Assessment Study of the proposed project and for conducting public consultation as
per the provisions of EIA Notification dated 14.9.2006. Accordingly, the TOR were
issued vide letter no. 2838 dated 25.1.2010 to the industry for its project proposal and
approved of Member Secretary, SEIAA.
Thereafter, Ministry of Environment and Forests vide Office
Memorandum dated 13th January, 2010 declared Ludhiana City as critically polluted
area. Furthermore, as per amendment made by the MoEF in its notification dated
14.9.2006 on 1/12/2009, such type of project are now covered under category 3(a)
and General Condition is applicable for this category. Accordingly, Punjab Pollution
Control Board was requested by the committee vide letter no.19404 dated 22/4/2010
to intimate as to whether the project site falls within the critically polluted area or not
in light of the boundaries defined by the MoEF vide office memorandum dated
15/3/2010, within 7 days positively, so that the guidelines issued by the MoEF may be
complied with.
Thereafter, SEIAA/SEAC for the State of Punjab became non-functional
due to resignation of their Chairmen in July 2010. Accordingly, the case file was sent
to MoEF for further consideration in the matter.
Now, SEIAA / SEAC for the State has been constituted vide order dated
7.2.2011 and the file has been returned by the MoEF to the SEAC/SEIAA.
The project proponent has not yet submitted the draft EIA report and
EMP. No communication has been received from the Punjab Pollution Control Board in
connection with letter dated 22/4/2010.
The case of the industry was considered by the SEAC in its 44th meeting
held on 26.3.2011 and was of the opinion that though moratorium had been lifted by
the MoEF vide Office Memorandum dated 15.2.2011, but it did not explicitly speak that
Ludhiana ceased to be critical polluted area.The Committee authorized the
Chairperson of the SEAC to seek clarification from MoEF regarding the above issue and
further decided that the case may be placed in the meeting of SEAC as soon as the
clarification is received from the MoEF/SEIAA.
Accordingly, a letter has been written to MoEF by the Chairperson of the
SEAC vide no. SEAC/Gen/2011/1958 dated 31.3.2011 for seeking the aforesaid
clarification. The reply is awaited from the MoEF.
The matter regarding critically polluted area of Ludhiana is similar to
item no 45.10 ,as such, uniform appropriate decision may be taken in addition to
industry specific observations.
The case is placed before the SEAC for consideration.
Item no. 45.14 Application for Environmental Clearance for the replacement of existing induction furnace of capacity 4.5 T/heat with 2 no. induction furnaces of capacity 8 T/heat each and installation of a steel rolling mills of M/s Sudershan Forge Pvt. Ltd., Industrial Area-C, Kanganwal Road, VPO Jugiana, GT Road, Ludhiana.
The industry has applied for environmental clearance for the
replacement of existing induction furnace of capacity 4.5 T/heat with 2 no. induction
furnaces of capacity 8 T/heat each for the manufacture of steel ingots @ 60,000 TPA
(total) including existing capacity. The industry has also proposed to manufacture TMT
bars, angles, round etc. @ 60,000 TPA.
The application of the project proponent was placed in the 30th meeting
of State Expert Appraisal Committee held on 10/10/2009. The Committee observed
that in view of the present scenario of Ludhiana city the project should not be
exempted from the public hearing. The committee decided that the industry should
get the public hearing conducted through Punjab Pollution Control Board and decided
to categorize the project into Category B-1, with certain Terms of Reference for Rapid
Environmental Impact Assessment Study of the proposed project.
Accordingly, the TOR were issued vide letter no. 35738 dated 4.11.2009
to the industry for its project proposal. Subsequently, the industry vide its letter dated
28/12/2009 represented to the committee that the site of the industrial plant is
located in the declared industrial area, as such, the industry is not required to conduct
public consultation. The industry has submitted a copy of the notification dated
17/12/1994 issued by department of Industries, Punjab vide which the land area
measuring as 370.17 acres falling in the jurisdiction of village Kanganwal has been
declared as Industrial Area "C".
Thereafter, the industry was requested vide letter no.3431 dated
29/1/2010 to get the ambient air quality monitoring for one month period (twice a
week 24 hourly at uniform intervals) from the NABL/MoEF accredited lab for all
pollutants mentioned in the notification no. GSR 826(E) dated 16/11/2009.
Further, Ministry of Environment and Forests vide Office Memorandum
dated 13th January, 2010 declared Ludhiana City as critically polluted area.
Furthermore, as per amendment made by the MoEF in its notification dated 14.9.2006
had made amendments on 1/12/2009, such type of project are now covered under
category 3(a) and General Condition is applicable for this category. Accordingly,
Punjab Pollution Control Board was requested by the committee vide letter no.19408
dated 22/4/2010 to intimate as to whether the project site falls within the critically
polluted area or not in light of the boundaries defined by the MoEF vide office
memorandum dated 15/3/2010, within 7 days positively, so that the guidelines issued
by the MoEF may be complied with.
Thereafter, SEIAA/SEAC for the State of Punjab became non-functional
due to resignation of their Chairmen in July 2010. Accordingly, the case file was sent
to MoEF for further consideration in the matter.
Now, SEIAA / SEAC for the State has been constituted vide order dated
7.2.2011 and the file has been returned by the MoEF to the SEAC/SEIAA.
The project proponent has not yet submitted the draft EIA report and
EMP. No communication has been received from the Punjab Pollution Control Board in
connection with letter dated 22/4/2010.
The case of the industry was considered by the SEAC in its 44th meeting
held on 26.3.2011 and was of the opinion that though moratorium had been lifted by
the MoEF vide Office Memorandum dated 15.2.2011, but it did not explicitly speak that
Ludhiana ceased to be critical polluted area. The Committee authorized the
Chairperson of the SEAC to seek clarification from MoEF regarding the above issue and
further decided that the case may be placed in the meeting of SEAC as soon as the
clarification is received from the MoEF/SEIAA.
Accordingly, a letter has been written to MoEF by the Chairperson of the
SEAC vide no. SEAC/Gen/2011/1958 dated 31.3.2011 for seeking the aforesaid
clarification. The reply is awaited from the MoEF.
The matter regarding critically polluted area of Ludhiana is similar to
item no 45.10 ,as such, uniform appropriate decision may be taken in all such cases in
addition to industry specific observations.
The case is placed before the SEAC for consideration.